Question from Bonnie Johnson

Hi Debra,

Does anyone have any experience using one of these? They are supposed to purify the air in your home.

Especially did it help a sinus condition?

Debra’s Answer

I had a Himalayan Salt Lamp in my bedroom for a while, but I had to remove it because I couldn’t sleep. I finally just gave it away.

As beautiful as they are, I wouldn’t use one as an air filter.

Salt lamps are natural source of negative ions.

At any given time, there are both positive and negative ions in the air. Negative ions are often found in nature, often created by lightening storms, sunlight, waterfalls, ocean waves and other natural processes. A salt lamp produces negative ions during the evaporation of water attracted to the lamp by the salt.

Positive ions are often created by electronic devices like computers, TVs, microwaves, and vacuum cleaners. They are known to contribute to problems like allergies, stress and sleep trouble.

Negative ions can neutralize positive ions by bonding with them.

Since air pollutants such as airborne mold, bacteria, and allergens often carry a positive charge, they can be neutralized by negative ions.

But that’s the limitation of a salt lamp as an air purifier.

For air purifiers that work to remove a broad spectrum of particles and chemical pollutants, visit the Air Filters page of Debra’s List.

Add Comment

Question from Michelle W

Hi Debra,

I recently contacted a small furniture company to ask about the toxicity of the materials they use. Here’s part of their reply:

“The inner liner is made of a Polyester (92%) / Spandex (8%) blend. Likewise, they contain no known latex content. However, they are treated with a flame retardant called Pyrovatex SVC. This material is not known to cause allergic reactions or contain latex derivatives and is non toxic.”

I tried to look up the MSDS for the Pyrovatex flame retardant, but the website seems to be down (and has been for at least a week.) Do you know anything about this flame retardant or how they can claim it is nontoxic?

Thanks!

Debra’s Answer

Pyrovatex is a trade name for Phosphonic acid, (2-((hydroxymethyl)carbamoyl)ethyl)-, dimethyl ester

Phosphonic acid is an organophosphorus compound. There are many types of phosphorates, including Gyphosate (“Roundup”).

Here is an MSDS for Phosphoric Acid

It says it’s 98% phosphorous acid.

There is no toxicity information given, however, it is hazardous by burning the skin and is harmful if swallowed. Inhalation can cause chemical burns to the respiratory tract.

That’s how they can say it’s nontoxic.

It doesn’t appear to be volatile, so if you are not inhaling it as a powder, it would be not toxic.

Add Comment

Question from Dawn Magstadt

Hi Debra,

Thank you for all you do. Hey, I was wondering, I’ve come upon yet another seemingly simple thing with huge implications, lighting.

I’ve been avoiding the light bulb situation and I won’t buy the curly ones (mercury is mercury–bad enough. I have some in my mouth and the fish I eat, and like who’s gonna really toss the bulbs not in the trash can? please.

Then the Dollar Store, my refuge from Walmart confusion, let me down in that
they burned out within a month this time. So I resigned myself to go to Menards (like Home Depot etc) and saw LED.

Then there’s some kinds (can’t recall–from another excursion) that say they can get hot(I’m thinkin’ that’s Halogen). I had 3 Halogen tall pole lamps in the 90s and I never bought a replacement bulb in 10 years! I take that back, maybe once for one. Then I divorced and who knows, they probably still burned after that. So a few years ago I merely bought a desk Halogen and it burned out in a week! I’m like what gives in a decade? Now they burn out? Made no sense.

I don’t want any bulbs to start a fire in my cheapy Goodwill lamps, my god. Might as well burn beeswax candles; at least it would be healthy and cost about the same as those expensive bulbs. I don’t mind expensive if it lasts, but then I read LED is directional and may keep melatonine from happening. I love the light they give but not on people’s cars (which seems like I’ve seen–too bright, albeit clear, must be hunting snipes, lol). I thought those for melatonine were the UV watcha ma call it clear bulbs. It’s nice they all are in light bulb form now but it was easier to know what was what when their shapes were different. I mean Halogen were little bity, not a bulb.

And then they (the god makers of light) claim regular florescent works for plants when in fact, I read before you’d have to have them no further away than 4″, now they act like any old bulb will do. How can that have changed in only 7 yrs?

Would they just organize it, make up their minds so I can just grab a pack of bulbs and feel comfortable that I won’t burn my apt building down and lose everything and that I won’t get depressed
or end up with a sleep disorder. I mean come on people.

So I’m saying…have you done any research?

It just seems odd, does it not, that when it’s all about light, it’s in the dark. And of course it’s complicated and of course it’s polluted.

Debra’s Answer

I’ve done a lot of research about this over the years and could organize it, and will, but can’t in this blog post today. Lighting is changing so quickly it’s hard to keep up with it.

I’ll just give you a quick answer by telling you what I use.

First, I’ve done things to have more natural light in my home, like install skylights. I have a big skylight over my shower, so I rarely turn on a light when I go in the bathroom. Even at night I have a little nightlight, so there’s no need to turn on the overhead light.

Then, I’ve purchased light fixtures that take incandescent type bulbs. And I use Philips EcoVantage bulbs, which are halogens inside of a bulb that is the same size and shape as an incandescent. I’ve never had a problem with overheating.

I also have a fixture over my kitchen sink that takes small halogens. It’s all metal and glass, so no problem with overheating. The fixture is designed for halogens.

As a rule, I don’t use overhead lights, except in the hallway. I much prefer task lighting, which also saves energy.

Simple.

Hope this helps your dilemma!

Add Comment

This week there has been a an article going around with the sensational headline:
 

There Are ‘Fracking’ Chemicals In Your Toothpaste,
Detergents and Ice cream.”

Well, I wanted to know what horribly toxic fracking chemicals were in toothpaste, so I started reading the article. But it just didn’t make sense.

So I searched for a different article on the subject and found the original press release about the study, which said no such thing.

In fact, the study tested samples of fracking fluid collected in five states, and found that the chemicals contained in fracking fluid were “no more toxic than substances commonly found in homes.”

The pollutants were various forms of ethylene oxide.

According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , ethylene glycol can have a variety of health effects.

In addition to eye pain and sore throat, exposure to EtO can cause difficult breathing and blurred vision. Exposure can also cause dizziness, nausea, headache, convulsions, blisters and can result in vomiting and coughing. Both human and animal studies show that EtO is a carcinogen that may cause leukemia and other cancers. EtO is also linked to spontaneous abortion, genetic damage, nerve damage, peripheral paralysis, muscle weakness, as well as impaired thinking and memory. In liquid form, EtO can cause severe skin irritation upon prolonged or confined contact.

It is used in the production of many consumer products, and may not appear on the label.

My point here is that information on toxics in consumer products should be presented in a factual way and not in a way that is misleading. Fracking chemicals were NOT found in toothpaste, detergents and ice cream. They were found in fracking fluid.

I take issue with both the article and the press release. One made it sound more toxic than it is, the other lessened the concern by comparing it to innocent household products.

I prefer facts.

Add Comment