Super Search

Travel

Lamp shades

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I found some glass lamps that I like but wonder how safe the lamp shades are…the website states that the lamp shades are made of “a natural linen” but can I trust this? Are lamp shades usually made with a plastic/synthetic base also? And, do I have to worry about any flame retardants on the shade?

Thanks so much!

Debra’s Answer

I have one lamp with a fabrics lamp shade in my house, all the others are task lamps with metal shades.

I looked at the shade. Mine is basicallly two pieces of fabric stretched over a wire frame.

If I remember correctly, I seem to recall some paper lining (here is a how to make a shade that shows attaching a styrene plastic “shade paper”).

So I would just check and see. If the shade is 100% fabric, it’s probably OK. If it has a paper liner, I wouldn’t use it because the heat of the lamp would make the plastic outgas.

The other possible toxic exposure would be a fabric finish that would still be on the fabric because it probably isn’t prewashed.

As for fire retardants, you should ask as some may have it and others not. It may say “fire retardant fabric” in the description, but absence of these words does not necessarily mean there is no fire retardant.

To be really safe, you can choose your own fabric and have a lampshade custom made. Be sure to provide prewashed fabric and give exact instructions about what you want and don’t want. There are many custom lampshade makers online and probably available in your local community as well. If you are handy, you might be able to do it yourself.

The one lamp shade I have I bought when I moved here to Florida 14 years ago. It’s a synthetic fabric, I’m sure, but it had no toxic outgassing and is very pretty. But this is very much an exception to my general rules.

You just have to evaluate each lamp shade individually.

Add Comment

The Safest Seafood

Randy HartnellMy guest today is Randy Hartnell, President of Vital Choice Wild Seafood & Organics, which he founded in 2001 with his wife Carla. He is responsible for guiding the company on its mission of providing consumers with high quality sustainable seafood, while educating them about the impact of their food choices on the environment, their health, and the commercial fishing community. We’ll be talking about toxic chemicals found in seafood, the health benefits of seafood, how you can choose and purchase the safest seafood. Prior to founding Vital Choice, Randy spent 24 years as a commercial salmon and herring fisherman in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. He is a Washington state native and currently resides there with his wife in Bellingham. www.vitalchoice.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Safest Seafood

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Randy Hartnell

Date of Broadcast: January 15, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, January 15th 2015, 01-15-15. We’re having a winter day in Florida. It’s 67°, but it’s all gray and overcast and it feels like winter.

Today, we’re going to talk about seafood, which is something we haven’t really talked about before. I’ll just admit right up front that I don’t eat seafood at all at any time, so it’s not something that I’ve researched a lot. But I know a little bit about it, enough to know what the toxic exposures are and where to find the safest seafoods.

I just never have been able to eat seafoods since I was born. The first time my parents gave it to me, I was gagged. There’s just something about it that my body doesn’t tolerate. But that said, seafood is very healthy if you get good seafood. It’s a source of many nutrients that we’ll talk about. We’ll talk about how to prepare it and all of those things. I’m just saying that I’m a novice at this subject because I had no personal experience with it.

My guest today is Randy Hartnell. He’s the president of Vital Choice Wild Seafood and Organics, which he founded in 2001 with his wife, Carla. This is one of the best websites that sell seafood that I found. So we’re going to find out all about his very high quality seafood.

Hi, Randy.

RANDY HARTNELL: Hi, Debra. It’s a pleasure to be with you today.

DEBRA: Thank you. It’s a pleasure to have you. And you’re in Washington?

RANDY HARTNELL: I’m in Washington State up here in the northwest.

DEBRA: And what’s the weather like there?

RANDY HARTNELL: It’s a little overcast, kind of gray and probably a lot chillier than there, than where you’re at.

DEBRA: Yeah, is it raining?

RANDY HARTNELL: No, it’s not actually. We’ve been having a very mild winter.

DEBRA: Good!

RANDY HARTNELL: I haven’t touched my windshield yet.

DEBRA: Yeah, we’ve been having a mild winter too. So tell us, you used to be a fisherman. How did you get from being a fisherman to selling seafood?

RANDY HARTNELL: That’s right! I was a commercial fisherman for over 20 years. I loved it. I started going up there when I was in college to work my way through school and just fell in love with working out in nature and on the water. I did that until the late 2000’s, right around 2001.

We had a disruptive event happen in our industry over a period of time. The industrialization of salmon came on to the world scene in a big way. Whereas wild salmon from Alaska had previously constituted most of the wild salmon in the world, farm salmon basically came along and displaced it.

It was a lot cheaper. It was available year round. And so from a retailer’s standpoint, that was just a lot more profitable, a lot less hassle. And in spite of the fact that wild salmon was superior nutritionally, superior from an environmental standpoint, it tasted a lot better, basically consumers, all they knew was that farmed salmon was cheaper.

So in a period of couple of years, our prices collapsed and we couldn’t really make a living. It was a pretty devastating time in our industry. And so it’s really similar to what a lot of ranchers and farmers have experienced with the industrialization of these industry and basically every produce.

So I had to find something else to do. That something else ended up being Vital Choice.

DEBRA: Well, can you tell us something about what the fishing experience is like? I know that I’ve seen movies where they have scenes where the big boats go out and then they put the fish on ice and things, but is there anything that you can tell us that would give us more of an idea of what that experience is like between the fish in the water and it ending up in the store someplace?

RANDY HARTNELL: Sure! It varies quite a bit with the type of fish, the type of fishing methods used. I was involved with several different kinds of fisheries, but my primary fishery was a wild salmon fishery in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Fish come in seasonally. We even go up there every summer, in June. The fish would come in, we’d spend about six weeks and catch the fish.

Some of the boats take better care of them than others. My boat is refrigerated, so the fish were chilled. The openings are usually six or eight hours. And so after you’re done fishing, you’d deliver those to another boat that basically tenders them to either a processing ship or a processing client.

The industry has changed quite a bit, but basically probably 24 hours before those particular fish are chilled and cleaned. At that time, most of it was being canned for sale around the world. This is really one of the best foods on the planet really. Nothing goes into that can except that fresh salmon and maybe a little salt.

Increasingly, the demand for frozen product has occurred. In Europe, Asia, the rising middle classes around the world, they all want our Alaska salmon because it’s some of the best seafood on the planet – cleanest, best quality.

Ironically, a lot of Americans, still, they’re prone to buy the cheapest thing they can find and so they’ll buy a lot of the farm fish. The ironic thing is the best seafood that we’re raising or we’re harvesting is going offshore and we’re importing farmed shrimp, farm catfish, farm tilapia and all these stuff. They can’t come close to fetching an Alaska wild seafood nutritionally.

But anyway, as far as the quality goes and time to market, it really depends. A lot of people get hung up on the fresh versus frozen and all ‘fresh’ means is it’s never been frozen even though it may take a week to get from the fishing rounds to the store in Florida or Orlando actually. We spent a lot of time trying to educate people about this. If you take a really good quality fish out of the water, you clean it and freeze it right away. It stays that way until we thaw it. When the customer thaw it out, it’s going to taste the way it tasted out of the water. In many cases, frozen fish is going to be a better culinary experience than so-called fresh.

If you catch it yourself, if you’re down there in Florida, you have a lot of seafood and you catch it yourself, that’s one thing. But I travel around a lot, I always check out seafood in various restaurants. And a lot of times, it’s not very good. And I heard your introduction about how you had a really bad experience at an early age. Unfortunately, that’s the case for a lot of people. They get bad quality product and they just assume that all seafood tastes bad.

DEBRA: I may have. I mean, this was back in the fifties and so I may have gotten a piece of fish that had been sitting in a Styrofoam container wrapped in plastic full of mercury…

RANDY HARTNELL: You know, I doubt that that was it, it’s more the fats. The thing that makes seafood so incredibly healthy are those polyunsaturated fats, those omega 3’s. The thing about them is they’re incredibly unstable. That’s why we take it out of our food supply because they’re the enemy to shelf life.

And in fish, what that means is if they’re exposed to air, if fish is exposed to air for even a day or two, they start to oxidize. That’s what we know as its rancidity or fishiness and it just always amazes me how many people out there think that seafood tastes fishy because when you get good quality seafood and you take care of it and package it well, it doesn’t taste fishy at all.

I’m here in Seattle and last night, I went with some friends out to a local restaurant. We had a couple of different types of seafood. It was the most delicious meal. I would challenge anybody that thinks they don’t like seafood to let me set them up with a seafood meal. You wouldn’t believe a number of people I’ve converted over the years. I’m always just amazed. What I commonly hear is, “That doesn’t taste like fish.”

DEBRA: Well, maybe I should try your fish.

RANDY HARTNELL: I’d be happy to give you an option to help you do that.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. Well, we need to go to break. But when we come back, we’ll talk more with Randy Hartnell about this safest seafood. He’s the president of Vital Choice Wild Seafood and Organics. Their website is VitalChoice.com. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randy Hartnell. He’s the president of Vital Choice Wild Seafoods and Organics. That’s VitalChoice.com. We’re talking about seafoods, the safest seafood and the most delicious seafood, I’m told.

Randy, tell us about some of the toxic chemicals that are found in seafood that people might want to watch out for and why is it important to have seafood from pristine waters?

RANDY HARTNELL: Well, that’s an interesting question. There’s been methyl mercury in the ocean for thousands of years. They looked at specimens of hair from Eskimos that lived thousands of years ago and they had methyl mercury in them. A lot of people realized that life evolved in the ocean with a background presence of methyl mercury.

So to a certain extent, it’s there and we can handle fishes that have lower amounts. And if you look at the science, you look at the study, generally, around the world, the people that eat the most seafood are the healthiest.

DEBRA: Yes.

RANDY HARTNELL: They are the longest lived, they had some of the best infant mortality. I’m talking about major scientific studies where they looked at thousands of people and really you only have to look at Japan. The population of Japan including pregnant and nursing women are eating fish every day and they’re some of the healthiest people on the planet, not the sickest.

What happens is a lot of people focus on these trace levels of methyl mercury and other contaminants. We’re talking parts per billion or less. They totally forget about the good nutrients from seafood that aren’t in most of the land-based foods. Seafood, it just has the whole micronutrient spectrum. It’s got these incredible long chain omega 3 fats. And when you just focus the methyl mercury and you forget about all the benefit, you’re really doing yourself a disservice.

Now, to your question, you do want to focus on fish that’s obviously from clean waters. We knew that a lot of people were concerned about this and rightfully. And so we started our fish from the very beginning. We would submit samples to labs.

What we saw over the years, what we learned is that toxicity or methyl mercury in seafood is really a function of the species, the life cycle of the fish. And so generally, what you want to do is avoid longer lived fish because it tends to bio-accumulate over time in a larger fish.

So for instance, we source albacore tuna from one fisherman. But when he comes in and unloads his boat, he’s got albacore tuna that ranged from 4 or 5 pounds up to 50 or 60 lbs. and he buy only the smallest, two or three years old. They had the lowest contaminant levels and also the highest levels of these healthy fats.

DEBRA: Well, let me ask you about that because if you’re just going to the store or the fish market and you want to buy some tuna, how would you know what sized fish that piece of tuna came from?

RANDY HARTNELL: You would not know. It’s impossible to know. In fact, you could be pretty sure that what you’re getting is just the opposite, you’re getting the largest. The commercial path is we don’t like the little fish because they’re relatively low yield, they’re more expensive to process. In contrary, they like the bigger fish, which tend to have the highest contaminant levels and the lowest methyl mercury levels.

So for instance, if you buy a can of the albacore tuna that we’re sourcing, it’s got maybe 1 ½ to 3 grams of omega 3 fatty acids per serving. If you go into a grocery store and you buy albacore tuna off the shelf, it’s almost negligible. We’ve tested this numerous times.

And so not only is it that higher contaminant level. It’s got much lower levels of the good fats. And that’s just a function of the type of fish that they source. They’re both albacore tuna, but the bigger fish that are down deep have a higher contaminant levels than the lower levels, compared to the smaller fish that are caught by hook and line.

A couple of studies that came out a few years ago upon which the FDA based their advice to pregnant and nursing women to restrict seafood consumption. This is in 2004. They were based on two studies. One was in the Faroe islands of Denmark and one was in New Zealand. And they saw the higher the fish consumption along these pregnant women, they really begin to see problems with their children over the course of the years.

But when we went back and looked at it, when the scientists went back, we realized that in the Faroe Islands, people were eating pilot whales, which is at the top of the food chain, highly contaminated marine mammal. In New Zealand, they were eating shark, which again is a top of the food chain fish that lives a long time, has a relatively high contaminant levels.

On the contrary, when you look at populations that are eating normal seafood that you would get in the grocery store, most grocery stores, the contaminant level is much lower. What we’ve done is we’re very selective. We don’t have to produce large volumes to go into grocery stores. We just sell over our website and so we can go to the fishermen and say, “We only want your smaller fish. We only want your halibut.” We only buy halibut 25 lbs. and under. Halibut can get up to hundreds of pounds.

And so to answer your question. When you go to the store, you don’t really know what you’re getting.

DEBRA: But if somebody buys from you, then they do know what they’re getting because you have very specific criteria.

RANDY HARTNELL: Yes, because we buy what we want to eat. Our family eats far more fish than anybody and so we just kind of practice – we just buy what we know is healthiest for ourselves and then source the same thing for our customers.

But I have to say that while we do that – and I’ve been doing this for a dozen years now, I go to scientific conferences around the world and I’ve developed friendships with some of the leading scientists in this realm, just some really wonderful people not connected to industry. They appreciate meeting our company because we’re providing food that they recognize being the healthiest out there. But what they will tell you is that there is no evidence, really no evidence…

DEBRA: Hold on, Randy. We’ll come back after the break because the music is kind of taking over. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Randy Hartnell, president of Vital Choice Seafood and Organics. We’ll be right back after the break.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randy Hartnell from Vital Choice Wild Seafood and Organics. I’m at the website now and we’re going to talk about all these great products. I’m just looking and there’s so many things. There’s basically – well, I’ll let you explain. Go ahead. Tell us about your products.

RANDY HARTNELL: Well, when we started out a few years ago, we mainly had salmon and halibut. And over the years, people have requested other products and we do have access. Both my partner and I had spent many, many years in the industry. We had a lot of contacts with our suppliers and with fishermen. And so we had access to really great products over the years. We just keep adding, adding things.

In fact, this last year, we even branched out from seafood and added some organic, grass-fed beef.

DEBRA: I saw that.

RANDY HARTNELL: We had customers that were asking for that and we had a great supplier real close to us here in Washington and so we put some of that out.

DEBRA: But basically, it looks like that your choices are really centered around salmon, cod, tuna, halibut and particularly, there’s a lot of salmon, wild salmon, wild Alaskan salmon in a lot of different forms from canned to – you’ve got a whole section here that has salmon burgers and salmon sausage and salmon bacon and all these things that are made out of salmon.

RANDY HARTNELL: [Inaudible 00:28:18]

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. But there’s also different kinds of salmon here. So tell us what the difference is. You’ve got sockeye and king and silver and smoked salmon.

RANDY HARTNELL: You know, the salmon is just an amazing, amazing animal. There are five different species. The biggest one is the king salmon. It’s the fattiest, richest, the least common so it’s going to be the most expensive. There’s the silver salmon. There’s the sockeye salmon. Sockeye salmon is our signature product. It’s a really abundant fish from Alaska and British Columbian primarily. There’s some coho salmon or silver salmon or pink salmon.

The main difference between the different species is when they’re going through their life cycle, they occupy different niches in the river system. That translates into – and when the fish comes back from the ocean (I don’t know how much you know about the life cycle of salmon), basically…

DEBRA: Well, actually, let me tell you, I know a lot about it because I used to live in Northern California right near Point Reyes National Seashore. And so the salmon would come up our creek in the [inaudible 00:29:41] valley. And in our community, we would celebrate the return of the salmon. We would all go stand down at the bridge and watch the salmon jump.

Anso I actually have a big affinity for salmon from doing that. It’s an amazing thing to see the salmon coming up…

RANDY HARTNELL: It really is. It’s just an amazing animal. The more you know about it, the more fascinating it is. But what a lot of people don’t realize is that when the salmon – they’re boarding the river, some fresh water. They migrate out as a little tiny smolt into the ocean. There’s a lot more food out in the ocean, so they grow rapidly out there. And then, roughly, on average, three to four years later, they will migrate back to the very same river, the very same spawning beds that they were born.

I forget where we were going with this. Oh, I remember. So a lot of times, the salmon (especially the king salmon and the sockeye), their spawning beds maybe hundreds of miles up that river. And once they get back in that river and they’re heading to those spawning beds, there really isn’t any food in the river, very little. So they’re not eating. And so they have to be carrying all the calories, all the energy that they’re going to need to get to those spawning grounds.

And so the species like the sockeye and the king salmon, they’d have to migrate the farthest. They’ll have the highest fat level. That translates into rich, just a really wonderful eating experience. You can get Alaska sockeye salmon from one river, but maybe it has to only migrate for a day and that will have like maybe half the fat as a sockeye and some of the larger ones that might have to migrate for two weeks. So you can have a dramatically different culinary experience depending on where that fish is from.

And so what we do to make sure that our customers are only eating the best is we tend to target fish that are from river systems where they have these higher fat levels.

DEBRA: That’s so wonderful. And I just want to comment because of my experience living in Northern California. Actually, I was born there. I spent 12 years living in the [Inaudible 00:31:58] valley in Marin County, which is right across the Columbia Bridge from San Francisco and I lived out in that rural area.

Because I was able to live so close to nature and we had organic farms and we had the salmon and all these things, I became really aware of the whole idea of local food. It’s much more difficult to eat local here in Florida than it was for me to eat local when I lived in California. I just loved the stories behind the food that is completely missing in supermarket food. I loved the story that you’re telling about how much fat is in the fish depends on how far their spawning grounds are from the ocean.

I just think that if people knew these stories about their food more, then we would have much more appreciation for the food, that we’d have much more connection of the food coming from nature and our connection with nature.

So many people think that food comes from the supermarket and they have no idea that this fish is like going up river against the current of the river. It’s just like this big, whole journey to get back to the spawning grounds. And it affects your culinary experience. I just think these stories are so wonderful.

RANDY HARTNELL: Yes. And beyond that, the fisheries in Alaska, really, the management of those fishers is such that – well, you know, around the world, most wild salmon have disappeared and a lot of that has to do with the loss of their habitat. The east coast, they dammed most of there, so there really are no commercially available wild salmon from the north east. All the Atlantic salmon that’s out there, that’s pretty much 100% farmed salmon.

But in Alaska, the habitat is still pristine. We’re fighting to keep it that way. Consequently, we still have these magnificent salmon [inaudible 00:34:01]. Two years ago, over 200 million pink salmon returned to Alaska. That was the biggest on record. A lot of people are getting the impression that we’re wiping out all the wild salmon. We hear all the bad news about wild salmon. But really, it’s a different story in Alaska because we’ve protected the habitat.

This year, 15 million sockeye salmon are predicted to return to Crystal Bay alone. That’s just one region out of 34,000 miles of [inaudible 00:34:29] up here. The best part of that story is it only takes about 15% to 20% of those fish to replenish the spawning ground. So the rest is harvestable surplus.

DEBRA: Good! We need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randy Hartnell. He’s the founder of Vital Choice Wild Seafood and Organics and we’re learning about salmon and other seafood. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randy Hartnell. He’s the founder of Vital Choice Wild Seafoods and Organics where they sell wild seafood. A lot of it, all different kinds, I’m looking here. They’ve got wild shrimp and shell fish, calamari, prawns, crabs, oysters. And listen to this. I’m looking at this description and it says, “Our pure sweetly delicious Pacific spot prawns are hand-harvested off British Columbia, packed in seawater upon harvest and fresh frozen onboard.”

And so it’s just like that whe you thought out these prawns, it’s just like you were just right there on the boat, yes?

RANDY HARTNELL: That’s right. It wasn’t easy for us to find a fisherman that was willing to do that. But fortunately, we did find a couple of them. And what’s happening there again, this is some of the highest quality seafood you can find and we’re just increasing the man for it around the world.

Maybe you’re familiar with this. The Fukushima radiation disaster in Japan, it just has made Alaska seafood in that much more demand. So you can see from the prices there that it’s not cheap, but we never let price dictate what we source. We go out and we find the very best quality of all the different types of seafoods and we pay the fisherman – well, we need to pay them to get it and add a margin so that we can survive and that’s what it is.

We’ve become so accustomed to cheap food in this country and it’s reflected in our health. We’re one of the sickest populations on the planet because we’re eating all these industrial pollutants. I’m sure I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know.

DEBRA: No, but I would just like to interject that people complain about the cost of food, but they forget that medical bills cost so much more. I would rather spend the money on the food and be well than spend money on medical bills and be sick.

RANDY HARTNELL: You know, my dad used to say as far back as I can remember, “If you don’t have your health, you don’t have anything.” I’m getting older and I’m watching just so many people around me, their poor lifestyle and their diet are catching up to them.

He also used to say, “Don’t be too soon old and too late smart.” What we find is a lot of people, until they get a wake-up call, they really don’t hear it.

DEBRA: Yes, that’s exactly right.

RANDY HARTNELL: We spend a lot of time trying to educate people about that and provide them with that. That’s why we’re called Vital Choice because there’s nothing more important than your health and nothing impacts your health more than what you choose to eat.

DEBRA: I do want to mention – because this is the last segment and we only have a few minutes left. I want to make sure that I mention that you have a lot of information on your website about how pure your products are. You do testing. It talks about it on your website. You’re testing and also, that your cans are not the type that have BPA in it. Some of your products come in cans, some in pouches. So you’ve looked at the packaging as well as the purity of the fish.

RANDY HARTNELL: Yeah. We basically run our business. We started out as a family-ran business. We’ve got non-family people now. We basically just run our business based on the golden rule. We source products and package it in maybe what we want to consume. We’re as aware of this as anybody. We have thousands of customers and they tend to be customers that are highly conscientious and they’re concerned about this. And so we do our best to source things that we all want to eat and pack it in ways that are known to the safest.

Life is a terminal disease. There’s no way we can get rid of all the potential contaminants. It’s all out there. But I think what people fail to recognize is if you’re eating good quality food, it supports your immune system, it supports your cell health, your cellular health and you’re better able to combat these threats from our environment.

One of the best examples if I could just take a second is seafood is one of the richest sources of selenium and selenium is a natural antidote to methyl mercury. We have a lot more on our website about that if you want to just type in ‘selenium’ and ‘methyl mercury’. You can read all kinds of things. That’s just one example.

You know, I’ve seen over the years, people that are so focused on the toxic aspect of it that they forget about just how important it is to invest more in good food and protect yourself from these threats.

DEBRA: Just to back up to what you just said about the selenium, one of the things that I learned was that in nature – I learned this from an herbalist on an herb blog – is that in nature, the antidote to the poison grows right next to it. And so if you have something like a toxic mushroom or something, the antidote, you just look around and the antidote is there. I thought that that was a fascinating thing.

But of course, nature would do that. Nature would have that kind of balance. If there’s methyl mercury there and it’s a naturally occurring thing, that there would also be in the fish the antidote. It would be right in it.

In the industrial world, things are not created that way. It’s just industrial chemicals are industrial chemicals and the antidote is not right there.

RANDY HARTNELL: Great point, great point. That’s a perfect example, seafood because what makes methyl mercury toxic is that it binds the selenium in our cells. And every cell in our body requires selenium to function properly. And so if you’re getting methyl mercury and no selenium, then you run a selenium deficit and you have problems.

Seafood is one of the richest sources of selenium, so you’re replenishing any that gets locked up by the methyl mercury. There’s quite a bit of science about this. We’ve known it since the sixties. It doesn’t get much exposure in the press.

DEBRA: That’s so good to hear. Well, I’ll make sure that people know about it because they will hear this interview.

And also, before we go, I want to make sure that people know about your ‘In the Kitchen’ section on your website. We’ve got all these videos telling people how to prepare – you want to tell us about some of the videos?

RANDY HARTNELL: Yes, a lot of people are sort of intimidated about seafood. A lot of people are worried about it smelling up their house. And again, that goes back to quality. If you get good quality seafood, it’s not fishy. We travel around the country and we set up our grill and our booth, I cooked our salmon in hotels and conference centers and I’ve never, ever had anybody ask me to leave. So first of all, if you have good seafood, it doesn’t smell up your house.

Second of all, it’s just so simple. You can take one of these frozen pieces of salmon out of your freezer, thaw out in 15 or 20 minutes, put it in the oven or a pan and in 10 minutes, you have a gourmet meal with some of the healthiest food on earth. We wanted to share that. So we created a series of just short 1-minute videos that are on our website.

If I could, Debra, I also want to mention that we have our fantastic science-based newsletter that we send out every week. It’s called Vital Choice newsletter that you can sign up for on our website.

DEBRA: Yes, I’m glad you mentioned that because I have been subscribing to your newsletter for years and you always have interesting things to read, always.

RANDY HARTNELL: Yeah. It’s been great, yes. We’ve got over a hundred thousand people read it. I feel more like we’re just as committed to education as we are to providing good food. It’s kind of our passion, to help people understand just how important this is.

DEBRA: That’s great, that’s great. So what’s your favorite seafood dish, your favorite way to eat seafood?

RANDY HARTNELL: You may be surprised to learn that I eat probably more canned salmon than just about anything because it’s so easy, it’s so portable, it’s nutritious. You could put it over and it’s ready to eat. So you can pour it over a salad or stir it into a pasta or rice. It’s just very easy.

As far as our frozen products, I probably eat more of our sockeye and king salmon. Last night, we were at dinner at this great restaurant, a seafood restaurant in Seattle and I was just so torn because the sablefish or black cod is just – I’m not sure if you’ve had. Well, I know you haven’t.

DEBRA: I haven’t had that, but some of my listeners might.

RANDY HARTNELL: It is one of the most incredibly, wonderful, delicious fish. But they also have some winter king salmon that were just coming fresh from Alaska. So we were all torn as to which one to have. Sablefish comes from – it’s caught at about 2000 ft. to 3000 ft. down in icy cold waters and it’s just the richest, the most delicious thing.

It’s kind of like asking the person which is their favorite [inaudible 00:49:01]. It’s apples and oranges. They’re all good. We encourage people to experiment and try them all.

DEBRA: Yes. I mean, you even have wild salmon caviar. I think you have salmon in every form there is, it looks like to me.

RANDY HARTNELL: I will admit that that’s what I had for breakfast. It’s like rocket fuel for the brain. It’s pure, healthy, omega 3 fats. We try to please as many people as we can. We get the demand or requests for all kinds of seafoods.

DEBRA: Good. Well, we’ve come to the end of our time. Thank you so much for being here with me. I’ve learned a lot. I think my listeners have learned a lot. Again, you can go to their website, VitalChoice.com and sign up for their newsletter and try their food. We’re at the end of our time. Thank you so much! You’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Cali Bamboo Flooring

Question from 3kids

Cali Bamboo Flooring claims the following for their floors. Do you have any experience with this company? Floor would be floated as this product would be used in a basement. Home is located in the Northeast so tile is not optimal. Thanks for your help.

Low VOC Flooring

ASTM Laboratory Test Results Show Cali Bamboo Flooring

100% Formaldehyde Free

A recent extensive testing performed by the world’s preeminent emissions detection laboratory Benchmark International, shows several floors registering standardized concentration levels as “Not Detectable” with less than 0.000 PPM (parts per million). The floors with detectable levels were still 50 times lower than the strictest California Air Resources Board (CARB) Phase 2 standards 0.05 PPM. In fact, Cali Bamboo floors scored even lower than the typical air we breathe 0.02 PPM.

Due to Cali Bamboo’s proprietary quality control process, which includes the use of superior materials, adhesives and manufacturing techniques, we are able to manufacture a product that is beautiful, durable, eco-friendly and safe for even the most sensitive homeowners.

Debra’s Answer

I don’t have any experience with this flooring, but it looks pretty good on paper.

Anyone have any experience with this?

Add Comment

Nut milk bag made of nylon

Question from TA

Debra, do you think that nylon bags known as “nut milk bags” are safe to use? They are commonly used for making almond milk, but I would like to use it for making coconut milk from shredded dried coconut and boiling water, which sits for an hour or so before being strained through the bag. So the water wouldn’t be boiling at the time it contacts the nylon, but it would still be a bit warm. I know that there are cotton/hemp bags also, but I get the impression that those might be more likely to become gross (for lack of a better word!) after a while. It seems that most of the bags are nylon, and they get great reviews, and of course they are made for and used by health enthusiasts, but I’d like to be sure they aren’t going to leach anything into the milk.

Debra’s Answer

Nylon is one of the safest plastics. I doubt the nylon bags would leach.

That said, I used an nylon bag to make almond milk and immediate bought a cotton bag and a hemp bag. I liked both, but liked the hemp bag better.

I don’t see any reason they would get gross if you wash the bags after each use and dry them thoroughly.

Add Comment

How Natural Remedies Could Have Saved A Life

Pamela Seefeld,R.PhMy guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. The week before Christmas, my brother died suddenly. The death certificate says the cause of death was pneumonia, but this was only the result of a lifetime of cigarettes, alcohol and prescription drugs (read more about my brother’s death at Life and Death: A Tale of Two Children.) We’ll talk about how prescription drugs can undermine your health in general, the side effects of the specific prescription drugs Bradley was taking at the time of his death, and what he could have done naturally instead of taking these prescription drugs. I can’t help but think my brother could be alive today if he had made better choices. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

pamela-seefeld-at-desk

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Natural Remedies Could Have Saved a Life

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph

Date of Broadcast: January 14, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

But actually, we’re actually – I can’t talk this morning. Actually, this show is going to be about a sad subject, which is that the week before Christmas, my brother died, my little brother. He’s younger than me and the death certificate says that he died of pneumonia, but my opinion is that he died from a lifetime of taking prescription drugs.

I have on the show today as my guest, Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist. She’s been on the show many times. She’s on every other Wednesday. You can listen to the back shows if you go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com.

She dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs, but she knows all about prescription drugs and what they can do to your body. I just want to do this show today in honor of my brother and of other choices, so that if you have loved ones that are on prescription drugs, that you can know what the possible outcomes might be and offer them another solution.

I know that sometimes, that’s hard to do because obviously, I’ve known and my brother all his life and he knows all about my work and I have tried to help him many times to do things a more natural way. The last time I talked to him – he lived clear on the other side of the country, so we didn’t see each other all the time. The last time I talked to him before I got the phone call (the week before Christmas), that he was on maximum life support.

The last time I talked to him, he was telling me about all the drugs that he was taking and how despondent he was about being addicted to them, but that he couldn’t get off of them. I offered to help him get off of them and he said, “I can’t go through that.”

I want to do this show today because if you have loved ones that are in this situations, loved ones who are taking these kinds of drugs (and we’re going to be talking about them today), please, please, please do whatever you can to help them because this is the end result. And Pamela, registered pharmacist is going to talk to us about that today.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey, Debra. I’m really sorry for your loss. This is really important that we do this show and that people know about some of the dangers of the medications that he was taking, which are commonly prescribed medicine.

DEBRA: Yes, I’m going to let you do a lot of talking because I find myself sitting here being quite emotional since it’s only been a month. It’s only been a month.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, it’s not too long, but we need to just kind of look at some of the medicines. We’ve discussed this. I have a list in front of me, the things that he was on. He was taking dextroampethamine, which everyone knows as Ritalin. He was on oxycodone, which is a very strong narcotic. He was on Ketorolac, which is an anti-inflammatory; Methadone, which is another narcotic; Valium, which is an anxiolytic; and he was on Lasix, which is a diuretic. He was also on Synthroid and some stool softeners.

So this, I can tell you just working as a pharmacist that this is pretty typical. A lot of people are prescribed these medications. And some of the things that people maybe weren’t aware of, but I’m going to explain a little bit about the scheduling of medication because three of the medicines he’s taking are schedule II.

Schedule II is the most highly addicting besides schedule I. Schedule II is what’s recognize in the prescription realm as being the most addictive and the most problematic. So the FDA assigned this scheduling system quite a long time ago to try and categorize different medicines, so people knew what their – and the categories are one through five based on potential for addiction and dependence and abuse.

So schedule I (and I think this is important for people to know about these schedules because it shows you how dangerous the medicines are), schedule I, there are no schedule I drugs available in pharmacies here in the United States. Schedule I is heroine and LSD, marijuana – which of course, different states are legalizing it above and beyond what the federal government has mandated – ecstasy and [inaudible 00:06:05]. People, they’re smoking these kinds of things.

These medicines are not considered – schedule I’s, there are no schedule I’s available in regular pharmacy practice in the United States. In Europe and in England, there are some schedule I’s that are available through research. They do have heroine and so forth. That’s different over here. In the United States, schedule I is not available.

Schedule II – and I want to really focus on this, schedule II. This is from the FDA site itself describing schedule II, “…substances or chemicals are defined as drugs with high potential for abuse, less abuse potential than the schedule I drug, with use potentially leading to severe psychological and physical dependence. These drugs are also considered dangerous. Some examples of schedule II drugs are…” – there’s the methadone, there’s the oxycodone and there is the Adderall and the Ritalin.

So the three of the drugs that he was taking are considered schedule II. I was reading right from the FDA website the definition of a schedule II drug.

So this should make people pause and concerned that schedule II drugs, the FDA is saying they’re potentially leading to severe psychological and physical dependence. “These drugs are also considered dangerous.” That is a sentence, period.

We know that these three medicines that he was taking have high tolerance, high dependence and the fact that most of these people that are put on these – especially the narcotics, in particular, the oxycodone, maybe even more so than the methadone. But we know that taking schedule II narcotics, patients have a higher risk of what’s called morbidity and mortality. They have a higher chance of dying at a younger age from complications from the narcotic usage.

DEBRA: Now, I want to ask you a question. So Ritalin, when I put together this list, a friend of mine who went to get my brother’s effects (because I wasn’t living close by in order to do that), he was reading to me over the phone what was written on the bottles. And so I didn’t realize that he was taking Ritalin and Valium because I was just looking at the medical names for these.

But Ritalin, I mean, school children are given Ritalin?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, this is the problem, yes. It’s highly addictive and has psychological dependence and problems. We know that kids have ADD, ADHD, these sort of diagnoses where they have inattentiveness. I have different theories about that. I mean, that’s probably a whole other show in itself. I really am against using medications for small children. I think it’s really dangerous. We have a high percentage of children – I think I was reading in New York City like one in four kids is on a psycho-stimulant. It’s a lot.

DEBRA: It’s a lot.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s a lot of children. I don’t agree with it, but I understand why society is leaning towards using these medicines in small kids and in people because people are demanding it. Most parents are not going to take the time to spend a lot on parenting skills and get the kids to be attentive to school. Most people are just basically surviving, running around trying to get everything done. I think it’s just an easy solution to maybe a complex problem that requires lots of lifestyle changes that they’re not willing to do. I mean, that’s a personal opinion.

DEBRA: Well, I think my brother has been taking these drugs for a very long time because I remember like 40 years ago – that’s a long time – 40 years ago, when we were young adults, I sent him a Christmas present. He called me up and he just screamed at me over the phone about, “Why are you sending me a Christmas present? Don’t you know that I have to go down to the post office and pick it up and I just can’t do that? Why are you bothering me?”

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh, no!

DEBRA: He just totally flipped out because I sent him a Christmas present. I recognized that’s not him, that’s not my brother. It was the drugs. That was going on like 40 years ago.

We need to go to break, but when we come back, we’ll talk more about prescription drugs and safer alternatives with my guest, Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist. She actually practices – say the words of what you practice because I’ve got it right here. Pharmacognosy! That’s the word. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. And there is a term for that. It’s actually a field in itself called ‘pharmacognosy’, which is the study of medicinal plants. And I’ve said before on other shows with her that I love this word because it’s pharma, which is drugs and cognosy is intelligence. And plants are healing substances with intelligence coming from a live thing instead of being synthesized in the lab.

Any time we’ve talked many times before about how taking plant-based substances for healing will actually heal your body, whereas drugs might alleviate your symptoms, but they don’t have healing factors. You just keep taking them and taking them and get addicted to some of them. That’s what we’re talking about today, addiction to some prescription drugs and how they can lead to not living as long as you might. As I’ve said at the top of the show that my brother died the week before Christmas and he was taking quite a number of drugs which we’re discussing today.

Okay, Pamela, let’s talk about the first drug on the list, Ritalin.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. So the Ritalin, we know that most of the time, people are given Ritalin because of inattentiveness, ADD, ADHD, that type of thing. Ritalin is a psycho-stimulant. And of course, especially in younger people, when they start on this medicine, there is some data that shows that it’s a gateway to other drugs. It opens the potential for alcohol abuse, marijuana, cocaine, things that are illegal drugs.

So we have to look and think that when the body gets conditioned – and you have to understand that these receptors in the brain, that’s how these drugs work – there are receptors in the brain that are stimulated and when they get stimulated, the body likes this. That’s why they’re considered addictive. Using psycho-stimulants to get attentiveness instead of looking at behavioral issues themselves really needs to be addressed.

I know for a fact that I’ve used these with adolescents before and adults that people that have ADD, instead of using Ritalin, they can get away with using pro-DHA, which are the common focus in fish oil, the DHA, the EPA of 4.5 to 1. And a lot of people really respond to low dose zinc, 15-30 mg. a day because zinc is a co-factor for over 200 enzymatic reactions in the brain and a lot of people with inattentiveness, children and adults alike, they can benefit from having more of the zinc.

Actually, zinc is depleted when people eat lots of preservatives, refined food, high fructose corn syrup, a lot of things that are just hidden in our diet. If they’re not eating a really clean diet, which most people aren’t, the zinc depletion as far as these co-factors in the brain is pretty significant. Just doing those two things there, many times, people notice a big difference in their attentiveness and they can possibly avoid being on this drug.

DEBRA: Well, I think that we’ve talked about it so many times, but it bears repeating here. The two things that are probably the biggest things that are contributing to health problems today are number one, exposure to toxic chemicals and number two, lack of nutrition.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct!

DEBRA: Most people are so malnourished that if they would just take the right vitamins before they ever consider taking a drug, a lot of their symptoms will go away.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, that’s exactly right. So what I’m telling people is that these drugs, not even looking at them as gateway drug, but when you’re drug naïve, you haven’t been on these medicine and you’re kind of standing in front of opportunities (because life is full of opportunities and knowledge is power), instead of putting these things into your body, you can stand there and say, “Okay, I see that I have a problem. I need something for pain or I need something for attentiveness” and look for tools that can help you instead of doing to the medicines first because the medicines, it’s kind of like you open the door and you can’t close it. You’re on them forever. Very few people will take – especially pain medicines, we’ll take patients off of these things.

So it’s kind of like all-or-nothing. It’s like you’ve got the gambling table, all or nothing. I don’t really think that that’s the best way to approach people’s issues. The best way is to try some other things first. Natural products do work very well. Maybe they won’t work for 100% of people, but I see this from personal experience that because I actually transitioned people off medicines many times, I tell people, “Before you actually take that initial step, you really need to look at what we can use.” A homeopathic detox takes the chemical out of the body. Use a calming, focusing fish oil to try and focus the brain.

Also, Huperzine, which is an herb has very, very good data that it works as an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. I’ll explain what that is. When the brain and the synapse, when people have Alzheimer’s or memory issues, they use a drug called Aricept. Aricept is very expensive and Aricept has very limited use especially in Europe because it’s so expensive and they find that it just really kind of staves of the memory problems for maybe six months. But it’s used quite widely in the United States.

What this does is it allows more acetylcholines to make memories in the brain and it kind of stops the enzyme that breaks it down in the synapse. So generally, what it does is acetylcholine is a memory and when you make a memory, acetylcholine goes and it puts it in a certain place in the brain and then that’s your memory. You can retrieve it or put it away.

So Rx-Brain or Huperzine (Huperzia serrata) is a plant that shows the exact same activity as Aricept with none of the side effects. I even use it for people that come and say, “I need more attentiveness. I’m going back to school, I’m reading.” Instead of reaching for the Ritalin, these supplements run like $10 to $15 for a month, very inexpensive and very, very effective.

There’s tons of data on the Library of Medicine. If somebody wanted to say, “I need memory improvement, I need attentiveness improvement,” for $10 or $12 or something like that, you are really looking at enhanced memory. And there are studies that show that this works just like the drug.

DEBRA: Wow! I think that it’s just – we talk about this show after show. I think we’ve done ten shows or something like that now, but we keep talking about this show after show, about how it seems like any drug that you would be taking that’s a prescription drug or even an over-the-counter drug, that there’s a natural substance that can be used instead, which doesn’t have side effects, which is less expensive. We just should be reaching for those first.

We should be reaching for those first because you could stop taking them whenever you don’t want to take them anymore and you’re not addicted to them for life and they cost so much less. So in this country, we just need to have a reorientation to know that there are safer things that we can choose.

We needto go to break, but when we come back, we’ll talk more. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is registered pharmacist, Pamela Seefeld. We’re talking about some prescription drugs that my brother was taking the week before Christmas when he died and what you can do instead that is far safer for yourself and for your loved ones. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

Pamela, we haven’t mentioned yet today that people can call you and how you can help them. So why don’t you tell everybody about that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. I’ve been 20 years in business here in Clearwater, Florida. My store is Botanical Resource Pharmacy. It’s all homeopathic and natural products. Consultations are free. I also do consultations on adults, adolescents and children and pets as well. You can reach me here at the pharmacy at 717-442-4955. I would be very honored to help you or your family member with anything related to medication, avoiding medicines. If you want to know medical homeopathic products that we have here, they’re not typically available in health food stores, they’re medical grade that I can prescribe for you if you have any issues with blood pressure, cholesterol or whatever and of course, pain, which is what we’re focusing on today.

DEBRA: And the way I met Pamela was actually a friend of mine went to her. She’s here in Clearwater, Florida where I live. A friend of mine went to her because his mother was on a number of prescription drugs and Pamela not only got her off the prescription drugs, but his mother is doing much better now. Even his other’s doctor commented on how well she was doing.

So Pamela really knows her stuff. She’s very well-regarded here in Clearwater, Florida. So if you have any health problems that need some help, if you’re on any prescription drugs, if you have loved ones on prescription drugs, I highly recommend that you call Pamela and let her help you with this because she really has things that work.

Alright! So let’s talk now about Valium.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. So Valium is a schedule IV. They consider it low-risk for dependence, but actually, I don’t really believe that’s the case because most people that start on Valium, there is a lot of tolerance and dependence and people do become addicted to it.

And so when you look at people taking anxiolytics especially this particular class called benzodiazepines, benzodiazepines work in the brain and they work on the benzodiazepine receptor. When a drug binds into the receptor, it has this calming effect on the person.

The problem with this is that there’s psychological and physical dependence when you take benzodiazepines. People typically need more medicine. They stay at it for a long period of time. And when you start taking benzodiazepines, Xanax, Ativan, Valium, these different drugs that are very, very, very commonly prescribed, it takes probably less than 10 days and after that period of time, you start to develop intolerance.

So these medicines, it’s one of those things that I was talking about that when you start them, you’re going to be on it for a long time. You’re going to have a hard time getting off of it. It’s really a bad road to go down.

If you’re looking at natural alternatives, Passion Flower, medical grade Passion Flower is a partial agonist or has activity in a partial manner towards the receptor. So what’s interesting about this is that if your brother had been taking Passion Flower instead of Valium, he would be in a much better situation because the Passion Flower binds to the receptor – and I use this sometimes when I’m trying to take people off these medicines because the body can’t tell if it’s the drug on there or the herb. Passion Flower has this affinity for it and Passion Flower, it has anti-depressant activity and it has some anti-pain activity as well.

So it’s maybe more all-encompassing than the Valium and it’s very safe and you can’t overdose on it. So I really would suggest that if people are contemplating going on a benzo or looking at getting off of benzo, Passion Flower is a very helpful tool.

DEBRA: And I’ve taken Passion Flower. Pamela gave it to me to help me sleep. It did help me sleep. And then after a couple of weeks of taking it, I just decided not to take it one night and I’ve just been sleeping just fine ever since. So it certainly is something that can be used safely. She told me I could just take as many of them as I needed to in order to sleep. I did and it worked just fine. It worked very well.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah. These medicines, benzos are highly addicting and like I said, the problem with tolerance and dependence is that a lot of times, you have a physical dependence where you’re craving the drug, but you also have psychological dependence because you start thinking that you need the drugs and you can’t live without them.

That’s the problem. You really want to start embracing and looking at are there things we can do other than that because anxiety is a pretty universal problems and it affects people in different ways especially stress. So we need to embrace other things that can be used in a safer manner and more effective manner and also safer for the long-term.

The medicines that he had here, the narcotics, the Ritalin, the psycho-stimulants and then also the anxiolytics or the Valium, these things all have higher risk associated when the people are taking them versus the person that are taking natural products and using some other alternative therapies in place of these medicines.

DEBRA: One thing that I want to mention is that my brother wasn’t taking like recreational street drugs. He was just – I’m going to say “normal” person. I remember my brother when we were younger before he started taking these drugs, as a child even, he was interested in cooking. He used to watch the Galloping Gourmet on TV and he got my mom to buy all the cookbook. He couldn’t wait to make chicken with 40 cloves of garlic. He wanted to.

He had loved airplanes. He was always bugging my father to take him to the airport. He just wanted to watch the planes take off and land. I remember, his happiest moment was when – I think he was about 10 or 12. He so wanted to fly that my parents bought two plane tickets, one for me and one for him. I had never been on an airplane either. They put us on the airplane in San Francisco and we got to fly down to Monterey, which is a very short flight, 30 minutes or something. We flew and they drove…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Ah!

DEBRA: They met us down in Monterey.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s really sweet.

DEBRA: It was so sweet. Bradley was just so jazzed. This was like the highlight of his life so far, to fly. And as soon as he became old enough and started working and started making money, the first thing he started doing was flying around the country. And then he flew to Europe. He just loved to travel and he was very sophisticated and he liked to eat in nice restaurants and go to nice places and do nice things. And he got on these drugs because he went to the doctor and he believed the doctor.

The same thing with my father. My father died at age 77, but as he was having greater health problems, I was going in and saying, “Here’s a natural remedy. Here, drink this juice. Do this natural thing, do this natural thing” and he wouldn’t do any of it. He just said, “I’m going to do what the doctor tells me to do.” I would like people to see that there are other choices. There are other choices.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist. She’s here helping us all understand about some prescription drugs that my brother was taking most of his life and at the time of his death at age 56, the week before Christmas. His death certificate says ‘pneumonia’, but I know that these prescription drugs and maybe others he was taking were taking a toll on his health.

Pamela, before we talk about another drug, you mentioned about how prescription drugs can reduce your life span.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. A lot of the data is really with elderly people because there’s a lot of controversy about giving elderly people these medicines. The whole idea is that your brother was on these medicines for a long period of time. And then eventually, if he wouldn’t have passed away, he would be an elderly person on these medicines.

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So we looked at these, especially the narcotics. The narcotics, to oxycodone and the methadone are statistically significantly correlated with higher morbidity and mortality in elderly people – and even in middle aged people. We know that when a person’s drug are narcotics, the actual problem, what they had, the pain problem, the initial reason why they were prescribed the medicine, it’s not solved.

And this is important for people to know. The pain medicines that we use, there’s really two ways to approach it. One is the narcotics, we call them ‘centrally-acting’, which means they act in the brain. And when they act in the brain, they block the signal down to where the pain took place.

I’ll just give you an example. Say your brother had a back injury. He picked up something wrong, a car accident or something like that. This is very typical. He has a back problem, he goes to the doctor, they hand him the narcotics. They don’t tell him, “You’re going to be on this forever. You’re going to become addicted to it.” Really questions aren’t really brought up in the initial conversations.

So what it does is it blocks the signal from the brain.

DEBRA: Wait, wait. Wait, wait. I just want to interrupt you for a second because…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Please…

DEBRA: …I think this is an important point. You said the doctor hands them the bottle or the prescription and they don’t say that they’re going to be addicted to this for the rest of their life.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No! It really does not enter the conversation, correct.

DEBRA: And then it’s going to cost you hundreds of dollars a month. I think that my brother told me that he was spending $500 a month on his prescriptions.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s insane!

DEBRA: $500 a month, it is insane. And I will tell you that – and I don’t like to say this about my brother, but at the time that he died, he was just staying at somebody’s house and all of his possessions where in his car. He wasn’t homeless because he was staying with somebody. Fortunately, he had people that he could stay with, but he couldn’t afford to have his own place to live.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, because he’s spending it all on drugs.

DEBRA: Because he’s spending it all on drugs, I know! He got to a point where he couldn’t work anymore. It wasn’t that he was a bum. He worked all of his life. But it got to the point where his physical condition was that he couldn’t work anymore.

And so he was staying with friends. He had his things in his car. He was eating in diners. I mean, this is not my brother. This is not what he would’ve chosen. But that was the end of his life. I’m just stunned by this whole thing.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, we know that he made the choice of going to the physician. The physician is not the bad guy here. I don’t want people to think that.

DEBRA: No, I don’t want them to think that too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m not against that. I’m a regular pharmacist too. What I’m saying is that I think it’s empowering and important to individuals to realize that at any one time in our life, we probably are going to have an injury that we’ll need to see the doctor and we’ll need some kind of pain control. That is an absolute fact. That’s an absolute fact. He had an initial injury of some sort and he went to the doctor.

What we see that the data shows that when we look at an injury and if we treat this injury with a steroid burst, which is like maybe a Medrol Dosepak or some amount of steroids, steroids bring the inflammation down quickly in the body and allow things to start getting back into normal. A steroid burst and taking a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent like Advil or Naprosyn, something like that (there’s tons of them in the market), Ibuprofen and taking it in a scheduled manner, not like when you think you have pain, these peripherally acting or the ones that don’t work in the brain are much safer. They don’t have the addiction and the tolerance. S

So when a person has an injury (especially for back injuries), the data shows give some steroids and give them some anti-inflammatory on a scheduled basis, maybe one pill with each meal for a weak so you get the inflammation down and start healing the body. In those cases, it locks pain signals in the periphery called eicosanoids. It will just let that area start healing, maybe some physical therapy and things like that.

Those are the real ways to have positive outcomes. It’s negatively correlated when people get narcotics on the first forefront, they give them narcotics because basically, they’re going to be on it forever. And then the bad part about it is when you are on a centrally-acting narcotics, you’re on the oxycodone and he’s on the methadone, when you’re on these medicines, it blocks your perception of the pain, but the injury is still there. So what this means to you and I and to your listeners is that your injury actually can continue to get worse because you start exerting yourself and you’re moving around and you’re not cognizant of the pain.

DEBRA: Right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So that’s the problem.

DEBRA: The thing I wanted to say and failed to say just recently here is that when a doctor gives you – I don’t want it to sound like I’m against doctors because I’m not.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, I’m not either.

DEBRA: I think that a lot of doctors do a lot of good in the world. But the thing is, any one of us, when a doctor gives us a prescription can go online and look up the prescription and find out what it is. And instead of just taking it blindly, we can find out if it’s addictive, what schedule it’s on. All these things, all the information is there.

And then we can see for ourselves – like when I used to take Synthroid, I was having side effects and everything (a lot of people do). I went and I looked up Synthroid and I said, “Well, you know what? Let’s look for something else. I looked for something else. I went to a different doctor and I found a natural form of thyroid supplement. It opened the door for me to say, “Well, I don’t have to always take this prescription drug.”

And so I’m just encouraging people to find out what your choices are and then make a choice. We don’t have to just do what the doctor says. You can decide for yourself if that’s the road that you want to take. And if you want to do what the doctor says, okay, but just know that there’s other choices.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, that’s exactly right. And also too, I mean, I have thousands of clients, but I have a lot of clients right here locally. If they have a prescription, they’ll come bring it to me first before they’ll go fill and say, “Do I need this? Is there something I can take?” And there’s a lot of times, I’ll say, “No, this is what you really need. This is what you have. Go fill it. But these are the side effects and this is what you need to look out for. Don’t combine it with food/combine it with food” or whatever. I’ll give them all that information.

Or I’ll say, “Look, I have something here. You can try this first. I think this is going to work and it’s comparable to what they wrote for you” and most of these people will embrace the natural products first especially the medical homeopathy, which is designed and developed by physicians, not herbalist.

So it’s really important that people know that there are really high-functioning products that can take the place of medications. And you have to look, two-thirds of all medicines were found in plants. This isn’t new information.

DEBRA: Yeah! Right, right. Yeah.

Pamela; The medicines that you’re using were found in the dirt or in plants or some place in the natural realm.

DEBRA: It all started with that. And then now, they isolate the active ingredients and duplicate them. In many cases, they duplicate them in the laboratory synthetically made from coal tar and things like that. So what you’re offering is the plant version, the plant version.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct.

DEBRA: Anyway, we’re getting to the end of our time together. It’s gone by so fast, it always does. But I want you to give your phone number and tell people again how you can help because it’s so valuable, what you’re doing.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay. So I do homeopathic and alternative medicine in pharmacy. I would be very happy to help with any of your concerns. Today was just kind of a microcosm of what we’re doing as far as looking at narcotics and medications, but we do have natural alternatives, homeopathic and alternative medicines that are plants and supplements that I can write out for you free of charge and mail it to you.

I’d say two-thirds of my business is really mail-outs, so you can call me from any place in the country. It’s a 10-minute conversation. I can go over what you’re doing and help you, guide you as far as what choices you want to make if you want to get off of prescription. If you don’t want to be on certain medicines, if you’re having some life issues that you need to deal with stress –

And I do a lot of mental health. So if you have anxiety or depression issues, severe stress, I’m very, very good at that and I would be most honored and would be glad to help you and your family. You can reach me at my pharmacy at 727-442-4955, I would be so very glad to help you see what alternatives you might have as far as for you and the future. I think choices are very important and knowledge is power. So I want to empower you, to let you know that there are things you can do other than medicines if you chose.

DEBRA: That’s right. And you do such a good job. I know I keep saying that, but I mean, Pamela has helped me so much in terms of helping me with some physical conditions that I’ve had for years. Even though I’ve detoxed and changed my diet and get nutrition and stuff, there’s still things that you want to do. Sometimes, your body just needs a little help. She knew exactly what to give me and my body has been so much better since she’s been helping me.

And so anyway, we’ve only got a few seconds left, so I just want to thank you again and thank all of my listeners. Just having somebody so close as a brother not be here anymore, I appreciate you all. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

How Cell Phones Harm Your Health and How to Stay Safe

Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D, is recognized internationally for her work on environmental health and disease prevention. A Presidential appointee that received bi-partisan Senate confirmation, Dr. Davis was the Founding Director of the world’s first Center for Environmental Oncology and currently serves as President of Environmental Health Trust, a nonprofit devoted to researching and controlling avoidable environmental health threats. A national book award finalist, Dr. Davis lectures at universities in the U.S. and Europe and was the recent winner of the Carnegie Science Medal in 2010 and the Lifetime Achievement Award from Green America in 2012. Her 2007 book, The Secret History of the War on Cancer, details the ways that public relations strategies have undermined public health, and is being used at major schools of public health, including Harvard, Emory, and Tulane University. Her recent book, Disconnect: The Truth about Cell Phone Radiation and Your Health, what the Industry has Done to Hide it, and What You Can Do to Protect your Family was published in the U.S. and U.K. by Dutton, 2010, and has been released in Australia, India, Turkey, Taiwan, Finland, Estonia, China, and as a book on tape. Her research has appeared in major scientific journals. Her research has been featured on CNN, CSPAN, CBC, BBC, and public radio. ehtrust.org | http://showthefineprint.org/ | www.babysafeproject.org

read-transcript

 

 

pong600-1

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Cellphones Harm Your Health and How to Stay Safe

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D

Date of Broadcast: January 13, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Tuesday, January 13th 2015 and it’s a beautiful sunny day here in Clearwater, Florida. And today, we’re going to be talking about cellphones. We’ve talked about cellphones, but we can’t talk about cellphones too much because there’s so much to know about them and they can be so dangerous. Most people don’t know what the dangers are or how we can protect ourselves from them.

So today, my guest is Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D and she is the author of a book called Disconnect: The Truth About Cellphone Radiation and Your Health, What the Industry Has Done to Hide It and What You Can Do to Protect Your Family. It was published in the United States and in the United Kingdom and has been released in Australia, India, Turkey, Taiwan, Finland, Estonia, China and there’s a book on tap.

She, in addition, serves as the president of the Environmental Health Trust, which is a non-profit devoted to researching and controlling avoidable environmental health threats through education and policy changes. She has been on CNN, CSPAN, CBC, the BBC Public Radio. She’s just been around doing a lot for a very long time. Her research has appeared in major scientific journals so she knows what she’s talking about on this subject and I’m very happy to have her on the show.

Hi, Dr. Davis.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Well, hi, Debra. Nice to talk to you.

DEBRA: Thank you. You know so much. I don’t even know where to begin to ask you questions on this subject. Why don’t you just go ahead and start telling us about what you think are the most important things that the public needs to know about cellphones.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Well, picking up on your own work, I would say that, as you know, you spent a career identifying toxic hazards in consumer products in the world in general and I think one of the most important things for people to realize who are concerned about toxics is this — cellphone radiation weakens cell membranes.

This means that any toxic material that is already in your body can be more deeply absorbed into your cell with exposure to cellphone regulation. Now, this fact is being used now in medicine to enhance the uptake of drugs for the treatment of cancer as well as for other syndrome. So to me, it is absolutely puzzling that there is this disconnect of our understanding of the basic science of what is going on and the way that we treat other toxic hazards.

I’ve been disappointed at the failure of this issue to take off, but I think I understand it now better. Five years ago, when I wrote the book Disconnect, the world was simply not ready to think about the fact that there might be a dark side to this technology. Nowadays, we all know families who sit at the dinner table without talking, everyone glued to their devices.

DEBRA: Yes. Yes.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: We all know young people with whom you cannot have full conversation because they will interrupt themselves by looking at their screen for something that suddenly occurs to me as more important than finishing their own sentence.

DEBRA: Yes.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: And there’s been a growing recognition that these devices while very valuable also need to be reigned in in the way that we use them and rely on them.

So the Environmental Health Trust, the non-profit that I started when I was at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute is now my full-time gig. What we are doing is taking the latest scientific information and making it available to the public, so they can make some sense of this very confusing situation where we simply are lacking information about the basics of cellphones.

So let me take a second and tell you something. A cellphone is a two-way microwave radio. It sends and receives microwave radiation. Now, microwave ovens use a thousand watts power. A cellphone uses less than one watt of power. And when it was first approved by the FDA in the early 1990s, it was assumed that because cellphone radiation was so weak, it would have no biological effect.

Research today tells us that that’s not true. Cellphones are weak, but they use the same frequency as the microwave oven, about two billion cycles a second, between 900 million to 2 billion cycles per second. That frequency can have biological effects because it is not a steady frequency from a phone, but a pulsed one – kind of like this, tap, tap-tap-tap, tap, tap, tap-tap, tap-tap-tap. That erratic, irregular, pulsed digital signal is what we believe causes biological consequences.

It weakens membranes as I’ve said, but it can also cause damage to DNA not by directly breaking the ionic bonds like x-rays, which is ionizing radiation. But as a non-ionizing form of radiation, it can disrupt cells and their ability to communicate, it can cause heat shock proteins and increase the formation of free radicals, which we know are damaging to living material.

DEBRA: There’s so much! Wow! There’s so much to know and so few people know things.

I was actually talking to somebody the other day, somebody that I just met, he was surprised that I wasn’t carrying my cellphone. Of so many people that I meet, they don’t even have a landline anymore. Their cellphone is the only phone that they have.

And so this was a fairly intelligent guy. He has a law degree in fact. He had no idea that there was any health consequences of using a cellphone. And before I started explaining to hi the health effects of this, he was kind of teasing me like, “You mean, you’re not somebody that things, they have to be reachable any minute of the day?” I reminded him that when I was a child, we didn’t have answering machines on our telephones.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

DEBRA: I can remember the day that if you wanted to get a phone call, you had to actually be there in the house and answer the phone and that was the only way that somebody could reach you. No message machines, no cellphones, nothing. People communicated just fine. I don’t see that it’s a good trade-off for us to risk our life and our health and our well-being so that we can be instantly available at every moment.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: I certainly agree. Let’s just talk about what we know about health right now. We know that the World Health Organization in 2011 released a report that at that time reviewed all the experimental and human studies on cellphones and other wireless radiation. They concluded in 2011 that cellphone radiation was a “possible human carcinogen”< the same category as DDT, lead and some forms of the engine exhaust.

Now, you do not let children play with DDT, lead or engine exhaust and yet, our schools now are moving ahead to install wireless throughout with no recognition of the fact that there are long-term consequences of this.

Now, the WHO made that determination with the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2011. This past year, a group of colleagues and I reviewed new evidence including new studies of humans using cellphones for 20 years or more. We have concluded (working with some of the world’s top epidemiologists who are advisors to the World Health Organization) that cellphone and other wireless radiation is a “probably human carcinogen” using the criteria of the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

I think that’s really important for your listeners to understand.

DEBRA: I do too.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: The evidence on the biological effects of cellphone radiation has become stronger since my book was first written. And one of the things I would appreciate getting feedback from you on and from your listeners is whether I should provide a new edition of the book that provides the new evidence because at this time, what I wrote in 2010 was somewhat speculative. What I have written now is less so because we’ve got the bodies of evidence, we’ve got the proof, we’ve got unfortunately growing numbers of people with brain cancer as well as people with hearing loss and serious problems with sleep, which we can associate with their long-term of cellphones.

DEBRA: We need to go to break, but we’re going to talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D. She’s the president of Environmental Health Trust and their website is EHTrust.org. We’re talking about how cellphones can harm your health. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D., president of Environmental Health Trust. Their website is EHTrust.org where there is a lot of information about what we’re talking about here today.

Before we talk about anything else, I just want to repeat what you said right at the beginning of the show about how cellphones are damaging to cells in your body and therefore, it allows the toxic chemicals to – say what you said again.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Cellphones weaken membranes. They may interfere with something as essential as calcium. And of course, calcium governs the ways that membranes open and close, gated communication within and between cells and membranes.

That capacity of cellphone radiation to affect membranes is being used in medicine today to develop new treatments for cancer. It makes no sense to then assume that the only impact of such radiation is beneficial. It is beneficial in the treatment of Cancer. It is being used in approved medical devices that have been developed in a number of countries. So I find it amazing that we fail to take this into account in the ways that we have been testing, evaluating and using cellphones and tablets and other wireless devices.

A tablet today has many different antennas on it and it’s tested at 20 cm. away from the body at standard test protocol. You don’t hold a tablet right next to your head. But increasingly, tablets are being used as phones and communication devices. They are being held directly on the bodies of young children. They are called ‘tablets’ because they belong on tables. They do not belong on the lap and they certainly don’t belong on the body of a small child.

Now, the good news as you know very well (and you’ve written about this) is that if you eat your vegetables, you repair DNA damage. I don’t mean to oversimplify it, but studies have been done with cellphone radiation where you first expose cells to melatonin or polyphenol or other [00:16:27] from green tea and you can reduce the damage by these exposures. This suggests to us that there are ways that you can repair damage that may have happened, which is why no matter how you’ve been using your cellphone until this moment, take it out of your pocket, get it off your body and eat your vegetables and of course, sleep in the dark because when you sleep in the dark, your body produces melatonin and melatonin is what we need to repair damage. T

That is why, in your bedroom, you should unplug. There should be no blinking blue lights or any other lights at night. You need to sleep in total darkness. And if your environment doesn’t allow that, then get a sleep mask because when you are in darkness, the body naturally produces melatonin and melatonin is a natural antioxidant, it affects almost every cell of the body and it helps us to repair whatever damage may have taken place.

Now, if your listeners are surprised to hear my concern, I’d like to let you know that we have a website we’ve recently launched called http://showthefineprint.org/. That site combines all of the advise that manufacturers currently provide about how to use their devices.

Those of your listeners who have a cellphone right now, an iPhone, you’ll find that iPhone has made it easy for you. If you go to your iPhone settings and open that up…

DEBRA: Actually, I could go there right now.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: You can do it right now. Go to your iPhone settings, go to ‘Settings’ and then go to ‘General’, which is just about midway down the screen. Click on ‘General’ and then click on ‘About’, which is at the top of the screen.

DEBRA: ‘Settings’, I’m on ‘Settings’ now. So now, I’m going to ‘General’.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Then go to ‘General’ and then go to ‘About’, which is at the top.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Now, scroll all the way down to something you would not normally even notice called ‘Legal’.

DEBRA: I got it!

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: And then click on ‘Legal’ and then you will get ‘RF Exposure’ and there you have it in the paragraph above the hypertext link. It tells you to reduce exposure to RF. Perhaps you can read it.

DEBRA: No, actually, I can’t read it and I have my magnifying glasses on. You know how on cellphone devices, you can make the type bigger, you can just open the window and it makes it bigger? This page will not do that.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Right! That’s right. You cannot make it larger.

DEBRA: So I can’t make it bigger.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: You cannot make it larger and you cannot copy it. Here’s what it tells you. It says, “To reduce exposure to RF radiation, use a hands-free device or the headset that came with the device and keep the phone at least 10 mm. away from the body to avoid exceeding the as tested exposure guideline.”

DEBRA: Okay, so how far is 10 millimeters?

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Well, it means you can’t keep the phone in your pocket.

DEBRA: Right!

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Ten millimeters is perhaps smaller than your thumb joint, but the fact of the matter is you can’t keep phones in the pocket of your pants or your shirt without exceeding the as tested exposure guidelines.

And this advice is buried in the phone. That’s why our group, Environmental Health Trust is working with others to make this information more broadly known. I hope you’ll be able to provide links from your site as well to ours.

DEBRA: I certainly will. I will.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: We have http://showthefineprint.org/, which puts together one place all of the advice on many of the smart phones today. We’ve also got the BabySafeProject.org, which is started by over a hundred physicians, obstetricians, gynecologists, pediatric neurologists, all of them share the concern about protecting the young, developing brain.

We are well aware that in the first year of life, the brain more than doubles in a child. And throughout pregnancy, the brain of course grows rapidly. It starts with just a few cells concentrated at the top of a neural tube and ended up becoming this amazing thing, the brain of the baby.

DEBRA: I need to interrupt you because we need to go to break and I want to hear everything that you want to say. I want to give you plenty of time and I don’t want to interrupt you. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D. She is the president of the Environmental Health Trust, which is EHTrust.org. And we’ve also been going to http://showthefineprint.org/, BabySafeProject.org. And when we come back, she’s going to tell us about babies and cell phones.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Devra Lee Davis. We’re talking about cellphones and all kinds of ways they are harmful to our health.

Just before the break, we were talking about how they affect the development of baby’s brain in pregnant women. So tell us more about that.

DEBRA: Yes. The head of obstetrics and gynecology at Yale University is Hugh Taylor, an M.D., Ph.D. Two years ago, he produced a study where he had exposed prenatally to cell phone radiation. He used a silenced and muted phone that was simply at the cage of the animal, so the exposure was rather weak, but it was throughout the entire period of pregnancy of mice.

He found that when the mice were born, the mice that had been exposed prenatally had hyperactivity syndrome as measured by a standard test that they use for measuring behavior in mice. Other studies from Turkey have shown damage to the brain of rodents that are exposed prenatally to cellphone radiation.

Based on these different studies, Dr. Taylor and a group of over a hundred other experts in pregnancy and reproductive health formed the Baby Safe Project. That’s BabySafeProject.org. On that project, on that site, you can find materials that are being handed out clinicians around the world today.

I spent a month in India. The Indian Academy of Pediatrics and the Indian Obstetricians and Gynecologists are also handing out these materials because we want pregnant women to know they must protect the abdomen especially toward the end of pregnancy when the baby’s head is close to the surface. Cellphone radiation doesn’t get very far into the body, but it does get in at least an inch or more. And the more fluid, the more it can absorb, which is why children has to be especially protected. Their skulls are thinner, their brains contain more fluid, they will absorb more radiation.

The Baby Safe Project has information for clinicians as well as for patients. And every one of the 4500 women who goes into Yale University Center to have a baby gets this information now. It’s available at BabySafeProject.org as well as under our free download at Environmental Health Trust, EHTrust.org.

Our website is loaded with information that you can download and share with others under the section right on our home page called ‘Download’. Our doctor’s pamphlet is a two-sided thing that can be printed out and given away and we certainly want to encourage your listeners to go to our site, to sign up to our newsletter, to follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

DEBRA: Yes, all those things.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: All those things, but more importantly, to share this information with young parents, with people who have young children, so that they will understand that the American Academy of Pediatrics is advising no screen time for children under the age of two, so that they will be aware that there’s simple things they can do now to practice safe technology and that we have the right to reclaim our lives back. There is nowhere written that you’ve all got to be on emergency standby 24/7.

DEBRA: No. No. I mean, no. We’re human beings, we’re not machines and we’re not electronic devices and there are other ways to communicate besides phones.

I remember many years ago when I used to live in California, I lived out in a rural community and I belonged to an environmental group. And so this was back in the days when I remember at the same time, I was trying to figure out how to send via modem a magazine article to a magazine publisher and he was trying to talk me through it on the phone. The point was that we could’ve communicated electronically. I think that we had email at that time, but one of the women said, “But there wouldn’t be any chocolate cake.” After that, we all refer to this as a chocolate cake factory, which was meeting face-to-face and having human connection.

And I think that that’s so important. I was thinking the other day about how many people I know because of my professional activities and people who have become my friends from the work that I do that I have never met face-to-face. I know them because I email them or talk to them on the phone or Skype them or whatever. That’s good in one sense that you have exposure to many more people, but it’s a different quality of relationship when you’re actually sitting down together.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: That’s certainly true. That’s certainly true.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. It’s not the same, it’s not the same.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: And I think in a way, the anonymity of the Internet friends that we all have can also contribute to an increase in violence because it’s not a real person that you’re acting out against. It’s just this abstract entity.

Imagine all of these kids sitting there playing video games for hours at a time who can easily make the transition to becoming jihadist. And it seems to me that there must be a relationship. This Internet is being used to recruit these poor, insulated and disaffected, young people. Whereas in the past, they might have gone out, gotten into trouble in the local neighborhood, now they can get themselves on a plane and end up participating in horrendous activities of violence. I think that in a way, the digital world has allowed for anonymity and a disconnect from basic human feelings and exchanges.

Now, that is why, by the way, in South Korea, there are psychiatrist that has come up with a new syndrome that they have confirmed in MRIs in middle school children. They call it ‘digital dementia’. What they refer to is a lack of development in the right hemisphere, a lack of the ability to develop empathy, to look one in the eye, to understand the consequences of another.

It’s so severe that they have actually come up with treatments for this, which involves a kind of digital detox. And as you may be aware, digital detox is not just a phrase you can find. There are actually programs around the world now to allow people to disconnect and reconnect. People become so accustom to the 24/7 world that they forget to take time to play music, listen to music, go outside, all the things in the world we know we need to do to stay healthy – exercise and things of that sort. People are chained to their screen.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. I feel so unfortunate that I’m old enough that I knew what the world was like before we had all of these. We need to go to break, but we’ll be back and talk about this more when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D. She is the president of the Environmental Health Trust. The website is EHTrust.org. And from there, I’m sure you can get to all the other activities that she’s doing. She’s really, really taking a stand on cellphones and digital devices that I think is very much needed. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D. of Environmental Health Trust. The website is EHTrust.org. Dr. Davis, we’re in our last ten minutes here of the show. I want to make sure that you tell us about some things that we can do to use these devices more safely or do you think that we should just eliminate the whole system entirely?

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Oh, no, no. We’ve got to be smarter than our phones and our tablets.

DEBRA: I like that, ‘smarter than our phones’, yeah.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Right! This means that we’ve got to control the technology and not let the technology control us. Our website has lots of information. On Facebook, we have an ongoing discussion about things that can be done. We’re specifically concerned about young women keeping cellphones in their bras because as we just saw in the earlier segment, manufacturers advise that you not keep a phone directly next to the body, but people are not aware of this. That’s why we set up http://showthefineprint.org/. That site puts together all of the advice now found buried inside phones.

We have YouTube materials that people can look at and we have a campaign underway right now to model exposures so that people understand that a laptop (they no longer call them ‘laptop’) doesn’t belong on the lap, but on a table. The reason they call them ‘tablets’ nowadays is because that’s where they belong. We want to encourage people to understand that if you must carry a phone on your body, put it on airplane mode or turn it off. That way, you will not be getting exposed to the microwave radiation.

Men should be aware that those who keep phones in their pockets are exceeding the as tested exposure guidelines and reducing their sperm count. This is not a good idea for lots of reasons. It’s not a good form or birth control, but it also has other adverse effects that we need to be aware of.

We have a good program for the schools now that you can find on our website. We’re working ceaselessly on this around the country to promote awareness that schools should be wired, not wireless. The reason for this have to do with expense, but also have to do with safety. The long-term effects of children growing up in a sea of radio frequency, radiation that did not even exist five years ago is not something anyone can tell us about. We simply are not flying blind when it comes to this technology.

And as I indicated in an earlier segment, we want the 21st century classroom to go beyond the digital divide, that all children have access to technology, but there’s no reason that this should be wireless. We want to encourage awareness that there are solutions, that there are low tech best practices that allow schools to use wired Internet connections.

We are developing materials on our website on schools, wireless and health where there’s preliminary information that you can share with your teachers and students and a longer document that also tells you best practices that can be implemented of what parents need to know about safe technology.

The American Academy of Pediatrics as I indicated earlier recommends no screen time at all for children under the age of two. We are seeking support now to expand this message nationally and internationally. And so I would certainly appreciate your listeners making a donation to Environmental Health Trust, so that we can expand our ability to provide this information to teachers and parents around the world.

In general, the tips for the schools are to hardwire all devices that are connected to the Internet, these computers and tablets. And if you must use a wireless device, download to it and then put it on airplane mode when children are using, so that this becomes a routine policy in school.

And of course, we can provide briefing materials. We have resources for families and staff on safe technology and tips for how to practice safe tech including a little card that can be handed out. They involve keeping it on airplane mode as much as possible with WiFi off. And of course, practice safe phone. That means using a speaker phone or a handset (preferably an air tube headset) and not letting children use mobile phones except in an emergency.

Of course, driving is a huge risk factor. Mobile devices distract drivers even if they’re hands-free. Please limit your calls to circumstances where you are not in a high traffic situation.

Remember that distance is your friend and that if you can keep these devices out of your bedroom and away from young children, you’ll be better off and so will they. And as we know, we need to sleep in the dark in order to make melatonin, in order to repair damage that may have occurred as a result of living.

Promoting awareness of these things is what the Environmental Health Trust is doing. I’m delighted to be able to talk with you after all these year. I’ve followed your work for quite some time. I think it’s wonderful to see you moving into this area as well. I look forward to working with you to see that we all do a better job of getting the information out.

These devices have revolutionized our world. Business and our abilities to respond to emergencies is totally transformed. And you’re right, there’s a whole generation growing up that will never know what it was like previously.

At the same time, we’ve got to claim back our private time. We’ve got to give our children more opportunities to get their feet wet and dirty with the grass and sand…

DEBRA: I totally agree!

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: …and not spend their lives in front of screens. And families have the right to demand no devices at the dinner table and parents should absolutely take devices away from children at night. It disrupts their sleep no matter what they’re telling you. It’s not a good idea to have any bright lights, any blue lights in the bedroom.

DEBRA: I so agree with you about this. I know that even without all of these devices, it’s difficult enough to get people out of the house out into nature so that people can experience the whole of life that we’re all interconnected with. With all these devices on top of it, people are so absorbed in all these electronics and it’s like the reality of life becomes what they see on the screen instead of the actual reality of life that’s right in front of you.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Yes.

DEBRA: And I have a big concern about that. It’s just that we have to know that we’re connected to the natural world. That’s part of our basic survival and so many people don’t know that.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: I was in one of those beautiful places in the world in South India in Carola, taking a boat ride. There were other tourists with me from Asia, a family with young children. They were holding their device up to themselves and the experience photographing it, videoing it rather than experiencing it.

DEBRA: Yes, I see this all the time

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: On Jenny Lake in Jackson Hole, you’ll see people videoing the boat ride, but not experiencing it. It’s a strange thing. I’m wondering when are people going to – they’re going to spend their time watching the video rather than being where they are at the moment?

DEBRA: Yeah.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: And it’s happening all over the world!

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Well, we only have just a couple of minutes left. I just want to thank you so much for coming on the show. And I, too, I’ve been following your work for many years too. I’m so happy that we’ve finally met even though we were meeting over a digital device. I very much look forward to working with you in the future to make this more known.

People have talked to me in the past about the connection between electromagnetic fields and toxic exposures and how the electromagnetic fields can increase the toxicity of the toxic chemicals that we’re being exposed to, but I never quite understood how it fit together, so I’m so glad that you explained that. I will probably have more questions for you about that because I think it’s an integral part of people protecting themselves from the toxics, to also protect themselves from the electromagnetic fields.

Well, I appreciate that very much. Hopefully, we’re thinking about doing another edition of Disconnect because it’s five years now and so much more science has come out. I will certainly be in touch with you when we reach that decision. I would welcome any of your listeners who have an opinion to let us know what they think we should do.

It’s a tough sell because we are all so attracted and have become so dependent on these devices. I’m not anti-technology, I’m just pro-health.

DEBRA: Yeah, exactly. Me too.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: We need to understand technology better so that we can be more responsible in the way we use it for ourselves and our children.

DEBRA: Just like we need to understand toxics better for exactly the same reason. I don’t think that we’re going to end up with a world that’s 100% no toxic chemicals, but we need to understand how to use them and understand how to use this technology. I love that you talked about doing it smartly, us being smart over our phones…

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Correct!

DEBRA: …because that’s the thing, to use these tools as a tool for life rather than letting them make us sick and not being able to think clearly, et cetera.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Right!

DEBRA: Anyway, we have to go because the music is going to come on in just a few seconds. But again, thank you so much.

DR. DEVRA LEE DAVIS: Thank you and please have your listeners look at our website, EHTrust.org and sign up for our newsletter and let us know what we can do to get the word out more with you.

DEBRA: Great! This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Clear coat for craft projects

Question from TA

Hi Debra, I ‘ve seen a variety of ornament craft ideas, in which an ornament is made of clay, salt dough, etc, and then covered with a clear coat. I’d like to try something like this with my child, and the clay and salt dough seem quite safe, but I’m wondering if you can recommend a safe product for the clear coat. I think the ones most people are using are probably an aerosol, toxic product. I’m not sure where to find a safe one for this type of crafts. Even though it’s now past Christmas, this applies to other crafts throughout the year as well.

Debra’s Answer

I don’t know of a spray clearcoat that’s not toxic.

Readers, any ideas for this?

Add Comment

Clear coat and paint for wood furniture

Question from TA

Debra, I’m looking for products to finish some wood furniture. Given that the items will be used by my child, I’m looking for things that are safe, durable, and possibly even safe to eat off of (in the case of clear-coating a wood table, for instance). And I’m sensitive to strong odors, so it needs to be low-odor as well. I know that AFM make Polyureseal, and we have actually used that previously for a couple of smaller things, but I haven’t yet looked into whether it’s safe for food contact.

I know that you recommend Old Fashioned Milk Paint, but I believe you used that for painting walls rather than wood furniture, correct? I see on their website that it does need a clear acrylic finish, and they recommend AFM Safecoat Acriglaze for that. For children’s products, which will inevitably come in contact with water, we’d need to use that finish, apparently. Are there any other paints that are safe to use “as is” without applying a clear finish on top?

Debra’s Answer

This is a difficult question to answer off the top of my head.

I searched for “food safe paint” and got a variety of answers, including one that said all paints and finishes are safe once they are cured! I wouldn’t agree with that!

Some toys say that the are painted with safe paints. If I remember correctly, these are usually paints that don’t contain heavy metals.

I would contact Ecos Paints and see if their paints and finishes meet your needs. I searched for “food safe” on their site and nothing came up, but they have a pet paint. The page says “For animals, this problem is doubled, because they are in the habit of actively sniffing their environment and even licking, biting and chewing things that we would never put in our mouths. As a result, pets actively ingest the harmful chemicals that normally remain on walls, floors and doors.”

And their pet paint is designed to be safe for pets and their behaviors.

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Wool as flame retardant

Question from TA

Debra, I’ve read some claims that wool burns at a lower temperature (600 degrees F, as I recall) than the extremely hot temperatures involved in the open flame test that mattresses must pass. So the claim is that the wool isn’t an adequate flame retardant and thus other things are being mixed in with the wool.

I think the idea that was being put forth was that things are being added to the wool itself; in other words, the mattress manufacturer isn’t intentionally adding any flame retardant to the mattress, but rather the wool itself is being produced in a way that it includes something for fire retardant purposes, since the wool alone can’t withstand higher than 600-degree temperatures.

Have you heard anything like this? The concern was that we could be buying something for it’s non-toxic attributes, while it might actually contain something as bad or worse than what we are trying to avoid.

Debra’s Answer

Wool typically is considerable to be non-flammable in it’s natural state.

A fabric made entirely of wool is difficult to ignite, burns slowly, and has limited ability to sustain a flame.

I came across a website that was showing how wool ignites. They were burning a piece of yarn hanging down, surrounded by air.

This is not the way wool is used in a mattress or furniture as a flame retardant. There it is a layer of fabric with very little air around it.

If someone is claiming that wool must be treated to pass the new open flame test, the proof should be showing a mattress or sofa in flames with a wool fire retardant barrier in place on the mattress or sofa.

Last year I actually spoke with a flammability research test engineer from the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation in Calfiornia, who was working on the new flammability regulations there. He told me that all manufacturers need to do to make cotten, linen and hemp pass the new smolder test was to add a layer of wool beneath.

The liternature overwhelmingly agrees that the flammability of wool in it’s natural state it low. There is no need to add chemical flame retardants.

Add Comment

pitcher water filter for vacation

Question from PT

I am in search of a portable filtering device to take on vacation. I found this Clearly Filtered pitcher and it looks like it has some of the important certifications. What do you think?

www.clearlyfiltered.com/test-data

Thanks

Debra’s Answer

I can’t really evaluate this because the site doesn’t give enough information. It claims to remove everything you would want to remove, but it says nothing about the filter media, so I can’t confirm their claim.

Also keep in mind the pitcher is good for only 200 gallons, which is probably enough for your vacation.

It’s probably fine for a temporary filter, but again, the site doesn’t give enough information for me to give it a proper evaluation.

Add Comment

Formaldehyde-free plywood, other woodworking materials

Question from TA

Debra, are you familiar with PureBond formaldehyde-free plywood? It is apparently available at Home Depot, and it is soy-based rather than using the urea formaldehyde. I typically avoid soy (have a bit of a food sensitivity to it and don’t think it’s great for us overall), but in this instance, we won’t be eating it, and it seems much better than typical plywood. But I’m wondering if you are familiar with it and recommend it, or if there are any other concerns I should be aware of with this product.
purebondplywood.com

Along the same lines, I’d like to know what type of materials you would recommend we use as the backing for a bookshelf. We’d like to construct a wood bookshelf to contain children’s building blocks, and this question will come up for us as we attempt to make DIY versions of other types of furniture for our child and our home. These types of bookcases typically have a particle board or fiberboard backing. Wanting to avoid the formaldehyde in those, I’m wondering if the PureBond plywood would work, or if there is a thinner (lightweight) option that is safe. We thought maybe a lower grade of pine would be one option, since the aesthetics aren’t important for the backing which will hardly be seen anyway. Other ideas?

Final question – is Baltic Birch plywood safe? I see alot of children’s items are made with that. They’re typically items that are sold by higher-quality brands and websites that sell natural-fiber items, but I’m always wondering if that type of wood is safe.

Debra’s Answer

PureBond formaldehyde-free plywood is fine. I haven’t used it, but I don’t see a problem with it.

You can use masonite as a backing for a bookcase. It’s just wood particles pressed together with steam. No resins.

Baltic Birch plywood is made from solid birch veneer, cross-banded, and laminated with exterior grade adhesive. Exterior grade adhesive is less toxic than interior grade. I’ve never used or inspected this plywood, so I have no first hand experience, and I also couldn’t find a MSDS to check for toxic ingredients. I would contact the manufacturer of those toy products and see if you can get more information about the material. It looks to be safer and higher quality than other plywoods, but I’m lacking information.

Add Comment

How Toxic Chemicals Can Make You Fat, and How Detoxing Can Make You Skinny

genita-masonMy guest today is Genita M. Mason, HHP, NC, MH, Founder and Medical Director of The Biosanctuary Health Clinic & Retreat.  We’ll be talking about all the toxic “obesogens” and how these toxic chemicals make people gain weight, plus the plan to lose weight by removing them from your body.  “So refreshing to get into this area,” she told me, “I didn’t realize what I had going on until a woman who had gone through over 30 weight loss programs in the last 12 years came into the clinic for something else and begin melting it off.” Patients come to Genita’s retreat for her advanced detox program based on orthomolecular and naturpathic models. In 2014 she was given the American Naturopathic Medical Association’s High Achievement’ Award. I met her in 2010 after she won a human rights award for the High Impact Biological Medicine “Green Body & Mind Medical Model” she developed which practices the best of Functional Medicine for a long list of today’s epidemic physical and mental diseases and metabolic disorders such as addiction. www.biosanctuary.com

the science of weightlossPurchase Genita’s new book The Science of Weight Loss from amazon.com. Read more about the book and Genita’s detox program at http://thescienceoflosingweight.com/

read-transcript

 

 

 

 

bio-genita-dog

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Toxic Chemicals Can Make You Fat and How Detoxing Can Make You Skinny

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Genita M. Mason, HHP, NC, MH

Date of Broadcast: January 08, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, January 8th 2014. And it’s cold! It’s cold even here in Florida. It’s 55° today. I know that doesn’t sound very cold to some of you, but that’s very cold for us. And did you hear in the news up in the northern part of the United States, it’s 40° and 50° below 0. Very cold today!

But we’re going to talk about warm things. We’re going to talk about how toxic chemicals can make you fat and how detoxing toxic chemicals, removing them from your body can make you skinny.

My guest today really knows what she’s talking about on this subject. Her name is Genita M. Mason, HHP, NC, MH. She’s the founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat. I met her a few years ago when I learned about her work, helping people with mental health issues by removing toxic chemicals from their bodies.

You just go to her retreat, she puts you in a non-toxic environment, she feeds you the right organic foods, she makes special programs for you to take the right supplements and everything and people get better. She found that as a side effect of this, people losing weight. So she started looking at what’s happening with weight.

We’re going to hear all about this today, all about what toxic chemicals make you fat, where they’re found, what to do instead, so keep listening.

Hi, Genita.

GENITA MASON: Hi, Debra! Thank you for having me. I couldn’t be more happier than to be on your show taking this off for the new book.

DEBRA: Thank you. I couldn’t be more happier than having you here and having you kick off your book on my show.

GENITA MASON: Yeah, it is so refreshing to be talking on this subject because I know that this is going to touch so many people and help so many people out of the mystery of why they’re not losing weight when they should be as well.

DEBRA: Yeah. You mentioned that one of your clients had gone through over 30 listed weight loss programs.

GENITA MASON: She listed over 30. You name any of those popular ones and she’s done it.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah. I know because I’ve done a lot of them too and I think a lot of my listeners have. So just before we start talking about the book and the program, I want to ask you just a couple of questions so that the listeners understand who you are and what you do.

First of all, could you tell us what all those letters after your name mean, HHP, NC, MH?

GENITA MASON: I’m licensed by the Board of Naturopathic Medicine as a holistic health care provider. It means that I don’t have the emergency room and I don’t have a prescription pad, which I don’t need because when people follow my programs, they’ll never need one of those.

DEBRA: Right!

GENITA MASON: So I’m happy with that. And then the other acronym is ‘nutritional consultant’. But beyond that, I’m a nutrition biochemist. Just remember that all doctors before the 1930s who were biological medical doctors – now, I practice biological medicine. They had biochemistry degrees. To be a doctor, you had to understand how the body works because you were using natural substances before big pharma got a hold of the standards of care.

So really, I lean more on science than I do anything that I learned in school. I’m also having the blessing of being mentored by famous doctors, biological medical doctors who trained early on in the early 1900s, 1930s and 1940s such as Dr. Abram Hoffer, Dr. Alighieri and Dr. Thomas who I work with here in Costa Rica.

DEBRA: So tell us how you became interested in approaching medical problems from your viewpoint? How did you veer off the path of becoming just a standard medical doctor?

GENITA MASON: Well, at least to me, because I’ve trying to have been involved in this for decades, it’s only common sense that the body has – call it a ‘divine design’ or call it ‘[inaudible 00:05:26] biochemistry’ if you want to approach it scientifically. There is a way that the body is designed to function and that design has evolved over three million years with the human cells surviving and developing into what it has over three million years now.

Call it your spirit or anything you want, but our bodies are a product of the earth. We need that relationship with good whole foods and homeostasis, a supportive and enriching environment in order to thrive.

And then when you inject a toxic chemical, what it does is it robs – not only is it toxic, but it robs the body of nutrients that the cell needs, that every cell needs to function in the way that it was designed to function. And when that design is thwarted, when it can’t do that, it’s a cascade event.

And this is chronic. I mean, if it’s once in a while, of course, you’re not going to suffer probably. But when it’s chronic such as it is today because of the environment that we live in and if we don’t know how to protect ourselves, when it’s chronic, things start going bad. And when they go bad, first, we’ll have a series of symptoms and then of course, they’ll develop into disease if we don’t intervene.

So toxins don’t belong in the body. That’s the bottomline. They steal, they rob nutrients from the body and they destroy tissue as a result. They destroy the cells as a result.

And it’s not only that. It’s what they do to our bacteria. We’re actually 10:1 bacterial over cells. Don’t get a little bit too much in the limelight. What’s happening today is with GMO foods and the toxins in our food, the chemicals in our food, it’s wiping out our good stuff.

There’s the American Gut Project. Everybody should look up the American Gut Project, the group of rockstar scientists that are taking samples from people all over the world and putting a lot of data together. These chemicals, our gut flora, we have lots of bacteria, healthy bacteria, microbes that were there a hundred years ago that are no longer there because they’ve been chemically destroyed. So that gives the bad bacteria, the gram negative mostly, more opportunity. You just give it a little bit. You give it an inch and it’ll take a mile.

And I’ll tell you being a practitioner that’s been testing my patients, because though I only use supplements that don’t kill people, I’m more careful than psychiatrists. I test everybody. I test every functional aspect of the human body, what’s going on under the hood, the gut health, the endocrinology before I write up targeted nutritional therapies and strategies for them, treatment strategies.

Fifteen years ago or twenty years ago when I started my private practice, I rarely saw bacterial dysbiosis, rarely. And today, I rarely don’t see it.

DEBRA: Wow!

GENITA MASON: Yeah, that’s a wow! And I can tell you from the GMOs, the chem trails, the radiation now that we have, it’s an epidemic problem. We need to learn if we’re going to survive while the government wise up (give them time to wise up) to strategize how to survive. That is identifying your routes of exposure in your home and workplace and diet and protecting yourself, getting rid of it, making wiser choices.

DEBRA: Well, we’re about to go to break, but before we do, because I know if I ask you another question, you’re going to talk for another few minutes, let’s take this short period of time to say that you have a new book, The Science of Losing Weight, which we’re about to talk about when we come back and I have an advanced copy here, a PDF, I’m looking at it and it’s incredible! It’s not available yet, but if you go to her website, you can get an advanced copy and she will send you a password so that you can read it right now even though it’s not available. I mean, she can’t send you the actual book. You can read it online with a password just as soon as you buy it.

GENITA MASON: And I actually think it started right away on the program because the Solution section is pretty much done and as well get a free copy of A Gut Feeling, the small intestinal bacterial overgrowth recipe book that collaborates with it.

DEBRA: Right! And you only get the free ebook of A Gut Feeling if you order it within an hour of the end of the show. So you can go order it right now if you want during the break or you can wait until the end, but order it right away. Go to Biosanctuary.com. It’s right there on the front page. You have to kind of scroll down a little bit, but you’ll see it. It’s really easy to find.

So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason. She’s the founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat and we’re going to be talking about the The Science of Losing Weight. Stay tuned.

bio-team

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason, founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat. I’m going to keep giving her website over and over, Biosanctuary.com, so that you can make sure that you can go there and order her new book and get immediate access by special password. Nobody else in the world has this yet except you, listeners. She’s giving us this, very special.

So Genita, I’m just going to let you start talking because I know you have so much to say.

GENITA MASON: I have a battery of words.

DEBRA: Go ahead!

GENITA MASON: And by the way, I would love to share some of the warmth and the heat here in Costa Rica, the clinic with you there in Florida.

DEBRA: Oh, thank you. What’s the temperature there?

GENITA MASON: Pardon me?

DEBRA: What’s the temperature there?

GENITA MASON: It’s humid. It’s 85°, 90° or so. It’s warm. It’s warm, but it’s great. It’s great for losing weight.

DEBRA: That’s right! You don’t have to go in the sun. All you have to do is sit outside.

GENITA MASON: Right, right. Well, yeah, or both.

DEBRA: Or both.

GENITA MASON: So the first thing that I want to – and I want to lay the foundation, the perspective.

DEBRA: Okay.

GENITA MASON: Everyone is trained in all diets (most or all diets generally speaking), the approach is everyone is concerned about calories, reducing calories and burning them. That’s the traditional view of how to lose weight and we need to stay exact because the core value now is that if you have –

You know, everybody fluctuates by over 10 lbs. We have holidays, we get sedentary sometimes and we’re usually, “Argh! I’m just a mess.” But if you have 20, 30, 40 and anything above to lose, you have likely – and I say that, because I’m a scientific, I can’t do 100%, but there’s a strong indication, very strong (I’d say 90% strong indication) that you have an actual underlying medical condition or metabolic disorder.

That disease or metabolic disorder needs to be exposed through testing and then in evidence-based way, strategize a solution and a targeted nutritional therapy to correct it.

How many people do we know that diet, that reduce their caloric intake by 500, 1000 and a long-term, they are dedicated, they’re doing the work, they’re exercising and they’re not losing?

DEBRA: A lot of people.

GENITA MASON: Yes. Yes! My daughter included when she got hit by the mold infection. And it broke my heart. She’s a young woman, 23 years old, had the world at her fingertips, never had to think about what she was eating and here, she was locked in a prison – I called it ‘prison’ and depravation. You can’t have things that you want without paying dearly for it.

DEBRA: I know that story.

GENITA MASON: I think everybody that has the weight to lose knows it today. And that’s because it’s not about – these diet books, if you look, we have more diet books, we have more gyms, we have more personal trainers, we have more theories, we have more different – it’s like rearranging furniture on the Titanic. None of it is working! If it works, it works a little while and then you’re just seeing it right back, right?

DEBRA: Right.

GENITA MASON: So we need to look at why, ask the question why because we didn’t have this problem a hundred years ago, we didn’t have this problem 50 years ago. It’s an epidemic now. And the reason is – me being a toxicologist, being an orthomolecular and epigenetic practitioner, I’m a toxicologist, I have to look at people’s environments and how it’s affecting them to heal them, any condition – schizophrenia, addiction, cancer, you name it. You have to look at the organism’s environment. I’ve been doing that for 20 years to develop strategies to help people heal.

So when I started looking at the weight issues of today, how people are gaining weight, can’t lose it or lose it and gain it right back – and I did this with my whole heart because my daughter was affected. We have to remember that. That’s what woke me up to all of these, to help my daughter. So I used everything I know about the environment and how it affects humans. I was asking the question in my research, “What has caused this?”

My daughter never had an extra pound. She was an athlete, a second degree black belt. She trained almost every day for 12 years. She was a cheerleader. She had solid muscles. And bam! On 5”3 ½ frame, she gained 50 lbs.

DEBRA: Wow! That’s a lot for that size.

GENITA MASON: Yeah, mold infections, mold infections. So through that, the truth started surfacing. And then I started treating people specifically to losing weight. I would never treat when people would come to me for losing weight, they’d say, “You know it’s not about losing weight. It’s all about soul, body, mind wellness.” Well, you tell that to a person that’s been trying to lose weight for 10, 20, 5 years, they’re like, “No, it’s about losing weight.”

So anyway, I’ll tell you a list for your listeners so that they can start ingesting this and changing their perspective about what they have to address to get well and lose the weight if they want to lose. The toxic environment, both voluntary and involuntary, in the food with GMO’s, the chemicals, in tap water – even in showering in tap water, [inaudible 00:19:11] exposure.

GMOs are really bad because of what they do to the bacteria flora of the gut. All these toxic chemicals being ingested, being delivered breathing them – even your saliva, when you breathe, if you’re in a toxic environment like Los Angeles, New York, swallowing your saliva is actually toxic. And we can’t avoid that, but we can do things to protect ourselves and get rid of those toxins efficiently before they accumulate into our tissues.

But all these toxins, collectively, they’re called ‘body burden’. It seems there’s actually a name now for the bio accumulation of the toxic chemicals in your environment and diet.

So this bio accumulation, which by the way, the gut is the first one to solve and the first one taken out, which is very unfortunate because gut health just feeds into the health of the entire body. It says in Chinese medicine, “All health starts in the gut.”

So here’s a list of the things that these toxic chemicals are causing, the conditions and diseases that they’re causing that are preventing people from being able to lose weight and causing them to gain weight when they shouldn’t be.

And what I mean by that, I know many people at eat healthy, that are exercising, that have active lifestyle and they’re paying [inaudible 00:20:34] trying not to gain weight and they are anyway.

DEBRA: Yes.

GENITA MASON: So here’s a list. Intestinal inflammation. These toxins cause these things – intestinal inflammation, leaky gut syndrome, digestive malabsorption, insulin resistance, sluggish liver and pancreatic function. When you can’t release enough enzymes to break down the fats, proteins and carbs that you eat, what’s going to happen? You’re going to deposit, right? And also, they’re going to sit around in the gut and cause bacterial dysbiosis, which gives you another cascade of problems.

DEBRA: And I have to interrupt you. Wait, wait, wait. Before you go on with the list, we have to go to break and then you can continue.

GENITA MASON: Okay, thank you.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason. She’s the founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat and author of her new book, Science of Losing Weight. During this break, you can go to her website, Biosanctuary.com, order the book. And if you order it within the next hour, you’ll get a free ebook of recipes that go along with her way of losing weight. You can also get immediate access through a special website with a special password because the book isn’t in print yet. But you can, as a listener, get it today. We’ll be right back.

bio-food

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason. She’s the founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat and author of her new book, Science of Losing Weight, which is available to you, my listeners, today by a special password if you go to her website, Biosanctuary.com and order it. You don’t have to wait until it’s out in a couple of months or whatever it is. You can get that information today and start using it to lose weight.

So tell us more, Genita. You were telling us about the list of body conditions that are produced by toxic chemicals that affect your ability to…

GENITA MASON: Exactly, disorders actually.

DEBRA: Yeah, disorders, yes. So go on with that list.

GENITA MASON: So we ended with adrenal fatigue when you are actually low cortisol. Cortisol helps to convert food fuel to energy as well. So that could be a product of weight gain. Blood sugar disregulation, which of course, is another metabolic disorder.

So there’s a cascade of events that happen especially when you hit on the neuroendocrine system because the neuroendoctrine system, your glands that produce the hormones in your body, which are also affected by your ability to digest that is impaired with this toxic chemicals and what they do to your gut, they cannot help the body convert food to fuel.

So the next one here on the list is bacterial dysbiosis, which is huge. It’s the big one today. And you can look this stuff up. There’s plenty of information on the Internet now these days. You can look this stuff up. These little polysaccharides have been in a clinical trial, injected into rats and literally, in weeks, it made them obese. And that is actually the most popular gram negative bacteria that people express when they develop bacterial dysbiosis. So it’s a great theory. You’ve got an evidence-based direct link.

And then we create toxic gut syndrome. This is something I’m very familiar with because I’ve worked with mental health patients for many years and I was clearing the gut. That’s the foundational ethic in my program – first gut health and neuroendocrine health. And through clearing the gut, I have actually cleared schizophrenia through clearing the gut toxicity syndrome.

That’s how these toxic chemicals, the bad bacteria (usually gram negative) output goes through the intestines, through to the bloodstream straight to the brain and completely disrupt brain chemistry. So that’s another one. And they also will cause you to gain weight or make it very hard because collectively, these toxins, not only do they hurt the gut, but they also impair or completely disable the mitochondria, which is the energy processing center of every cell. It’s like the nuclear power plant. It impairs the bio accumulation of toxins. It impairs or many times, it disables that mitochondria from being able to burn fats, carbohydrates and proteins. And that’s actually evidenced in the lab test that I’ve done.

Let’s see here, yeast and molds and fungal infections. Of course, my family was hit by the mold infection once. Let’s see. So all of these combined will cause multiple chemical sensitivity, which will also cause people to gain weight. The list is endless, but those are the highlights that I’ve been working with.

DEBRA: I used to work in a doctor’s office with people who had multiple chemical sensitivities. Well, that happened after I knew about my own chemical sensitivities. But in my own body, I gained a lot of weight after I started being chemically sensitive. I didn’t used to weight as much as I ended up weighting. I weight a lot less now, but at one point, I weight 299 lbs.

GENITA MASON: Hmmm… you’re thinking, “Before I’m going to go to 300,” right? Everybody’s got their limit.

DEBRA: No, it actually said on the scale 299 lbs. But I could see people, a lot of the patients that came into this office that I was working in (this is many, many, many years ago), a lot of them would either come in overweight or I would just watch their bodies just balloon up. And it wasn’t because they were eating a lot of junk food. We had these people on elimination allergy diets and stuff and they would just get fatter and fatter and fatter. And so I know it’s the chemicals. I know it’s the chemicals.

GENITA MASON: And you know, we don’t not only now have the chemicals, but that sets the stage for insulin resistance because insulin resistance alone, it causes false hunger because by the nature of this metabolic disorder, if the insulin cannot get the fuel into the cell to set off the brain’s hunger alarms, you’ll just continue to eat far more than you need to be satiated. So you have to shut off the brain’s alarm system that made you hungry in the first place, right?

But also, if the fuel cannot get into the cell, guess what? It’s going to get deposited.

DEBRA: Yeah.

GENITA MASON: And also, the visceral fat issue, the [inaudible 00:32:23] belly – I love how these things are so common now, they have their own name. The liver will convert all carbo – well, not all, but carbohydrates that are not used, it will convert those to fat. And that’s usually where you get the start of your visceral fat, that fat around the gut.

That’s just one of them. But if you have insulin resistance, that means you’ve been eating a lot of processed food, which also means that you have a chemical toxicity issues as well – inflammation, leaky gut, et cetera, et cetera. There’s a list of possibility, which is why really you want to test. You never want to go into any kind of health program without finding out what is going on underneath, so you can really get the best reward, the best kickback from your effort.

My heart goes out to people. Honestly, my heart goes out to people. I have friends that I know how they eat, I know how they take care of themselves, I know how it hurts. It hurts their self image, it hurts how they view the world, how people sees them change. It’s just sad, it’s a superficial world. But I’m not approaching it from that, I’m approaching it from truly a health issue. It impairs your quality of life. It impairs them what they can do. And also, going into older age with the issue really sets you back.

So we want to look at the solution, the truth, the real solution to this. We can’t just be dancing in the dark. The calorie burning is not going to happen while you have these metabolic disorders. You’re just going to have to work hard and people give up. They’ll do exactly what they’re told to do on a diet and it barely works. So the sacrifices that they have to make, they’re huge and you can only do that for so long until you’re going to give up. Come on, we’re humans.

DEBRA: We need to eat.

GENITA MASON: We’re not [inaudible 00:34:21] to do something regardless of what the input is.

DEBRA: Right. We need to go to break again. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason, founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat. You can go to her website, Biosanctuary.com and get her new book, Science of Losing Weight. It’s not in print yet, but if you buy it today, you’ll get a password so that you can get access to it online.

I’m looking at right now. it’s full of information. All the things that she’s talking about, she gives the solution, so you get all the understanding on how the toxic chemicals make your body not able to lose weight and to gain weight. All the solutions are there. So it’s Biosanctuary.com. We’ll be right back.

bio-massage

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Genita M. Mason. She’s the founder and medical director of the Biosanctuary Health Clinic and Retreat. Currently, she’s in Costa Rica. Is your clinic now in Costa Rica or do you have other locations?

GENITA MASON: Yes, it is. That’s Dr. Thomas who I mentored with for five years now. He’s 74 years old. He’s been in service to others for 44 years and wishes to retire and made me his successor here. So I’m actually taking over the clinic here – the clinic, retreat and ecospa, a gorgeous place in Sta. Theresa to help him retire and there’s going to be changing of the guards.

I do practiced still in the States, but that is on a very specific timeline. I come in to do the 10-day retreat for people who simply cannot make it to Costa Rica. But it’s more fun and much more beautiful and enchanting here.

DEBRA: Yes!

GENITA MASON: You know, Debra, I know we don’t have much more time. I really want the solutions out there. I want to help people engage and tell them what they need to do and start looking at to start getting well.

DEBRA: That was exactly what I was going to say. I want to make sure that you tell people what they can find in your book with that regard and also about the 10-day intensive treatment cycle for the Science of Losing Weight. It’s beginning on February 10th. Go!

GENITA MASON: Sure, absolutely! Here’s what I’m giving away. What I want to see is just change the entire ground, folks losing weight globally, how people look at how to do this. I’m actually giving away in the book the entire solution. Well, I practice here at the clinic if people are handed here in the clinic. The only thing that ican’t do in the book is provide the individual part of the nutritional therapies and strategies, but there is foundational program here because a lot of people can’t even get their tests done before the come in. So we use a foundational protocol while we wait for the test, something to get more specific to their individual biochemistry.

But everything that I know that is causing weight gain and making it hard to lose is in the foundational protocol, which I share and process. It’s a 60-day strategy that I share in the book in the solution section. All the instructions are there, everything from your diet through your targeted nutritional therapies, what vitamins and minerals that you need to be taking, your smoothie in the morning, the juicing in the evening, the bug pillars, how to get rid of bacterial dysbiosis. That actually leads in to some of the solutions, what they need to start addressing.

And of course, it’s always best and I encourage even when they’re working on their own to get your lab work, which I tell in the solution section which labs to get.

So you want to eliminate small intestinal bacterial overgrowth – if it’s present, any fungus and mold. This, you want to look at, intestinal inflammation as well as inflammation elsewhere because that can be disrupting your neuroendocrine system and making it hard to lose weight.

DEBRA: Right.

GENITA MASON: You want to look at toxic gut syndrome. If you have a lot of mental fatigue, physical fatigue, you’re really depressed a lot, anxious a lot, you want to look at toxic gut syndrome because that also causes weight gain, but it’s an indicator that you’ve got some serious mitochondria issues going on.

You want to replace the helpful microbial gut flora and that’s with the use of probiotics and organic colostrum. You want to feed your mitochondria. The B vitamins, by the way, are consumed – many of them are consumed by gut bacteria. Do you know because gut bacteria is a living being, it has a diet? And its diet is actually get access to the nutrients before you do because it sit on the wall of the intestines. They consume these nutrients, so they never get a chance to get into your blood system.

DEBRA: Oh, I suddenly understood that just now when you said that. The mitochondria, which are not – I mean, not the mitochondria, but all these microorganisms, which are co-existing in our bodies with their separate organisms (they’re not our cells), they’re robbing our cells of the nutrition because they’re right there to eat it up right where we’re eating it, right where the food is coming down. They’re the first ones to get it and grab it and then there’s no nutrition for us.

GENITA MASON: And specifically for the mitochondria. The B vitamins, they love the B vitamins.

DEBRA: Oh, geez! I just never understood that before.

GENITA MASON: I love it when people get the aha especially someone like you, the queen of green who’s been asked this for how many years. I love it when I get to share an aha, something so cool!

DEBRA: Oh, my God! No wonder my body is not getting nutrition. We could be taking all these supplements and everything and…

GENITA MASON: You know what? You go get a Myer’s – here at the clinic, I provide Myer’s cocktails, which are intravenous IV’s in the 10-day program because I have to bypass the gut. To get the show going, I have to bypass the gut. While we heal the gut and get that working well, you just go in and get some Myer’s cocktail. We also do the intramusculars. I just say drench people with the B vitamins to wake up that mitochondria.

DEBRA: Wow!

GENITA MASON: You want to do liver, kidney, skin and lymph detox. It’s just general detox that we’re using – infrared sauna, a lot of ozone. I have my patients drinking ozone. That kills the anaerobic bad bacteria. It’s very specific. It’s beautiful. Ozone does not touch at all the healthy cells. It is very specific to anything that’s not supposed to be there.

DEBRA: Great!

GENITA MASON: I love the intelligence of the human body. I love it!

DEBRA: Yeah, I do too.

GENITA MASON: You want robust antioxidant support because of oxidative stress. It’s of course married to toxic assault. The antioxidant support will protect you from lots of exposures while you study yours and eliminate them. And of course, there’s radiation, chem. trails, fluorides, pesticides, VPA and particularly GMO detox and protection that you want to look at.

I give instructions in the book for all of this. It’s a 60-day program that is detailed in the book with the SIBO food phases (small intestinal bacterial overgrowth phases) because you want to eat foods that are easily digested in the small intestine, so they don’t drift down into the larger and sit around and make more bacteria for you.

Now, real quick before we sign off here because I know we’re getting close, I want to share with people that…

DEBRA: Four minutes, we have four minutes.

GENITA MASON: Okay. There’s a documentary that’s being done on this. I’m even trying to get the Environmental Working Group to get involved. There’s a documentary being done on this because this is a groundbreaking approach. The evidence-based, scientifically evidence-based approach to losing weight is groundbreaking. And also, it’s comprehensive as it is here in the way we practice the solution here in the clinic. We have phenomenal results here in ten days. I have a patient, I have a doctorate patient here right now. She’s only five days in. She came up to me yesterday. She’s British and she says, “Genita, I’ve lost an inch off of my waist!”

Anyway, it is groundbreaking. So what I’m offering because I want to get a big group in here. I want to get 10 people, which we’ve already got three sign-ups, but I want to get 10 people here to go through the 10-day program.

Now, this 10-day program that I provided, usually, it’s $5400. It’s accommodation, lab testing, it’s all included. Everything is included. The supplements for 30 days, the detox diet, the SIBO diet, the education, all the infrared sauna, the ozone therapy, the IV’s, it’s all included. You could see it on my website. But I’m actually offering this you have to sign releases that we can do all the interviews and show your before and after’s and everything. It’s just ten days. And then there’ll be a follow-up at 30 days. We’ll reach out to you at home.

So I’m offering this program for $3600 and that’s everything. That’s accommodations, everything for ten days to be in the weight loss program, The Science of Weight Loss for the documentary. So that’s a real big opportunity.

DEBRA: That is a big opportunity.

GENITA MASON: That will probably never happen again.

DEBRA: Yeah.

GENITA MASON: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, when you look at the therapies, I’m pulling a rabbit out of my hat, but that’s all I’ve been doing for 20 years.

DEBRA: What a great opportunity!

GENITA MASON: Pardon me?

DEBRA: It’s such a great opportunity.

GENITA MASON: Yeah, yeah. It absolutely is. And it sets the stage, it really locks you in. I had people call it the ‘5-star human carwash’ and that’s exactly what it is. You come in feeling however you feel, loaded down, fatigued, et cetera, et cetera and you leave literally with the consciousness of the ‘cosmic 3-year old’, I call it.

DEBRA: Yeah.

GENITA MASON: Life in its infancy again. When you’re in solution mode, when you find a solution and you see it actually working finally, it’s like a world that’s flat. This bowling ball just lifts off people’s soldiers and their whole consciousness and perspective shifts. There’s hope again. There’s joy again. You’re not loaded down with this monkey on your back. We don’t want to be there.

DEBRA: And it’s something…

GENITA MASON: Well, there’s one thing here that I do want you in my back, but…

DEBRA: You’re doing it all at once when you go do a program like that. You do it all at once and you see the big change, then it’s much easier to then come home and continue to do it than doing it in little bits and pieces over time.

GENITA MASON: Exactly! And because it is new information and a new approach for people, there’s a learning curve especially when you do it at home. It has to be your hobby base, that’s what I tell people. It’s a whole new hobby, learning the mechanics of this, following the program, making time for the mechanics of the program.

So when you come here and we engage you and you get into the rhythm and you get into the flow, the daily flows here…

DEBRA: I have to interrupt you just because we only have ten seconds left and I want to make sure that I give your website again. It’s Biosanctuary.com. Thank you so much for being with us. You can go to her website and find out more about the book, find out more about the program. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well!

bio-campfire

help needed-neighbors fumigation

Question from Jenny

Help-our neighbors just fumigated their home today. The house is behind us about 50 feet. But never the less on the side of babies room. Their home is entirely tented. I am hoping if we close our windows it will be enough. Do we need to relocate until this is done?? Thank you so much!!

Debra’s Answer

The whole point of tenting is to enclose the toxic fumigation gas so it doesn’t escape.

I wasn’t able to find anything on the internet about people being harmed outside of the tent.

But I did find an article that explains the safety measures used in fumigation: Are Termite Tenting & Fumigation Safe?

This article also says that once the home has been aired and cleaned properly, there is no residue of the fumigant left. They warn that tenting and fumigating does not offer protection against future termite infestations.

Add Comment

A Unique Handmade Body Soap

cynthia-jenningsMy guest today is Cynthia A. Young Jennings, owner of Sweet Harvest Farms in Tampa, Florida. She runs a thriving cottage industry that makes soaps for women, men, and dogs. C.J. has formulated a soap recipe all her own that consists of natural, soothing and luxurious organic ingredients to make a soap that “not only leaves you squeaky clean but also give s you soft, supple and silky skin.” I can vouch for this. I bought a big bar of her soap at a holiday crafts fair and had to have her on the show. C.J. has been an artist longer than she can remember. Painting on anything that “didn’t move”, including old cupboard doors, chairs and even her father’s old Army boots, made her offerings a bit eclectic. Even during her 20 years in the medical field CJ always had her hand in creating. Years later, opening her store in Destin, Fl. , she decided to offer a little bit of everything from antiques to handmade primitive dolls. Included in this eclectic mix was Potpourri and Handmade Soap. Always being a perfectionist and wanting to give her customers only the best, she found the Soap and Potpourri not up to her standards. Many Soaps that are sold as “homemade” are actually produced in huge warehouses? These “soap blocks” are shipped in large quantities which others re-melt, mix with scent, color, blend them with synthetic Glycerin, and call them “Glycerin Soaps”. Many contain chemicals, preservatives, Parabens and Petroleum by-products that are eventually absorbed into your bloodstream through your skin not to mention the damage they create to the environment when washed down the drain or thrown out into the garbage. True Soaps don’t melt, become slimy, or leave a greasy residue on your skin or shower—AND true soaps must have a cure date on their label. Sweet Harvest Farms products do not contain Parabens, Sodium Lauryl Sulfates, Phosphates, Harsh Chemicals, Mineral Oils or Petroleum products of any kind. C.J.’s experience in the medical field has given her the ability to formulate her own patented recipes for her handmade soap, lip balm, she butter bars, roll on perfume, tooth powder and more. There are very few true Soap makers left that stay true to the old fashion method of Soap making used hundreds of years ago. Vitamins A-E, Organic and All Natural Shea Butter, Flaxseed Oil, Olive Oil, Castor Oil, Jojoba Oil, Palm Oil (sustainable), Coconut Oil and others. are what customers say make this Soap nurturing and hydrating. www.sweetharvestfarms.com

read-transcript

 

 

cj-closeup

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
A Unique Handmade Body Soap

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Cynthia A. Young Jennings

Date of Broadcast: January 07, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Wednesday, January 7th 2015. I got that right. Do you find that it’s difficult the first few days of the year that it’s not 2014 anymore and that you have to remember this new number, 2015? I seem to actually be getting better doing that as the years go by. It’s lovely to be starting a new year.

Today, we’re going to be talking about soap. Soap is a lovely thing. I love buying handmade soap. And I’ve been using handmade soap for years. There’s a big difference between soap and detergent and how it interacts with your skin and gets it clean. But even amongst handmade soaps, there is a huge difference in how soap is made.

I trust my guest that I have today because one of the things that I love to do is go around to farmer’s markets and fresh markets and crop fairs and any place where people are making things by hand. As I’ve been doing that, I keep seeing this same woman over and over. I see her and her soaps over and over and I keep thinking what great soaps these look like over and over. I have even taken her card and listed her on my website, given her a link on Debra’s List at DebrasList.com and then finally, I bought a bar of soap.

Just over Christmas time, I went to a holiday fair and I saw her soap and I learned some new things. She had a beautiful display. And from her display, I learned some things about her soap that I never knew about soap. And so I bought the soap and it’s very different from any other soap that I’ve purchased before or used on my skin.

She says that it’s – I’m going to tell you the quote – she says that her soap “not only leaves you squeaky clean, but also gives you soft, supple and silky skin.” And that’s exactly right. I can vouch for that. It’s a heavy bar of soap. It doesn’t just melt away.

So we’re going to learn about the differences between soaps, what’s toxic. You might have that’s toxic in your soap and what truly old-fashioned soap is. We’re going to learn all about that today.

My guest is Cynthia A. Young Jennings. She’s the owner of Sweet Harvest Farms in Tampa, Florida.

Hi, Cynthia. We’re going to call you CJ because you like to be called CJ.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: That’s fine. If you say, “Hey, you,” that’ll work.

DEBRA: Okay!

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: And let me apologize. First of all, I leave close to an air base and they’re doing training. So every once in a while, you might hear jets in the background.

DEBRA: Totally fine! Thanks for telling us what that sound is in case we hear it. So Cynthia, how did you get to be a soap maker?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, gosh! I had owned a store before. And it was wholesaling what I thought was ‘true soap’, but it was leaving me itchy and dry like most products that you buy in the market commercially. Since I have a medical background and I did work in a dermatology office for the doctors therein, I’m a sponge. I learn and read everything. I wanted to be a surgeon at one time, but that’s another story. That’s why I stayed in the medical field so long.

So I decided to start doing research. And I wanted everything I do, I do with passion and with a vengeance. So I actually researched soap making for actually two years before I actually took the plunge because I wanted to make sure that what I created was going to be the best thing on the market.

Of course, my family and I are the guinea pigs. So after a couple of trials, because I was developing my own recipes (so these recipes aren’t found anywhere, but on my head), I tried a couple of recipes and gave them to my family and friends and they’re like, “Well, yeah, this is great, but this or whatever.” And finally, the third try, I came with what I think is a totally different bar of soap than you will find anywhere else.

DEBRA: It’s totally a different bar of soap than I have ever seen.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, it’s my own recipe. I put in there what I think your skin needs or actually know what your skin needs to thrive. I have always put 100% of my ingredients on my back label, which my mother is like, “Why? People will know what you’re using” and I said, “Yes, but they won’t know my recipe.” There’s a big difference.

DEBRA: That’s right, there is.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: it is a big difference. I mean, you could lay out everything for someone to make pancakes, but if they don’t know the recipe, they don’t know how much of everything to put in.

And actually, starting this year, the FDA is actually starting to clamp down on people and fine them if they don’t have 100% of their ingredients on the back of the bar and they are also finding people that claim to have soap when it’s truly not soap and only a beauty bar.

Dove, last year, actually knew this was coming and jumped on the bandwagon to avoid the fine. And so when you go on the store now and look at the Dove packaging, it now says ‘beauty bar’.

DEBRA: Well, before we hear more about your soap that is so fabulous, I’d like you to tell us more about what you’ve learned about soap and additives that are in it and things like that, so that people can understand what the issues are about why they should use your soap and not another soap. So just tell us more about this whole thing of soap versus beauty bar, so that people can understand more about the labeling of soap. What is soap?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, what it turns out, there are several manufacturers all over the country and overseas that do make soap. But what happens is they replace all the good stuff with synthetic lathering agents and harsh chemicals. That is what makes the bar of soap lather.

Now, if you have a good recipe and have the right combination of oils in a bar of soap, you don’t need lathering agents because the combination of oils can make a beautiful lather on its own.

And then what they do is they also siphon out the glycerine, which is a very hot commodity. This is what your skin need. But they siphon it out to sell it to high-end cosmetic companies. And then they’ll replace it because now the softening agent has been removed.

So then they’ll replace it with mineral oil, which comes from biodiesel fuel. They’ll also put in lanolin, which comes from the sheet wool. And by the way, we have been led to believe for many, many years that lanolin is actually good for you. It is not. Your skin wants moisture constantly. And what lanolin does is it actually puts a film over your skin so that moisture cannot penetrate it. If you stop and think about it, lanolin comes from sheet wool. When you see it rain on a sheet, what does the water do?

DEBRA: It runs off.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: it rolls off, exactly. And that is because it puts that film. It’s a natural protective film for the sheet obviously, but we, as humans, we need the moisture.

Then they put it lauryl sulfate for preservatives and chemicals. Your skin is the largest organ in your body and it absorbs everything you put on it, whether it’s make-up, deodorant or whatever. So of course, all these that you’re putting not only into your body, but you’re washing down the brain – not your brain, the drain – which actually, I shouldn’t laugh because all these chemicals are actually stored in body fat and in your brain.

DEBRA: Yes, they are stored in your brain.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes, everything. I mean, I could really go off on that one, but that’s for another interview. So everything that goes down the drain, it’s also not good for the environment.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. You’re exactly right.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: It’s really scary. We’re so used to just believing what’s told to us. We really need to become a nation of label-readers. I know when I started really concentrating on labels, my husband and I went to a grocery store and we spent probably four hours – we didn’t buy a thing, but spent four hours going up and down the aisle just reading labels and what is in the products that we use for our skin, our hair, what we eat. It’s really scary.

DEBRA: We need to go to break, but when we come back, I want to hear more about labels. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is CJ – well, I guess I’ll say Cynthia A. Young Jennings also known as CJ, owner of Sweet Harvest Farms in Tampa, Florida. Her website is SweetHarvestFarms.com. She makes incredible soap, which we’re going to continue to talk about after the break.

cj-tableatmarket

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Cynthia A. Young Jennings, owner of Sweet Harvest Farms, that’s at SweetHarvestFarms.com and she makes incredible soap, which we’re going to hear about very soon in the show.

But first, I want to ask Cynthia. You had mentioned before about the FDA and labeling and beauty bars versus soap. So what is the difference between if somebody sees the word ‘beauty bar’ on a bar of what they think is soap and real soap.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Beauty bars have usually had all the good ingredients siphoned out of it. That’s what we were just talking about.

DEBRA: So is there a legal definition of what the word ‘soap’ is? I know that in the government, in foods, there is standardization of like mayonnaise, for example. It can’t be called mayonnaise unless it has certain ingredients in it. So is it the same thing with soap?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes, almost, yes. The FDA has books that are probably about five inches thick that are a very dry read.

DEBRA: Yes, I’ve read some of them.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Unfortunately. They’re quite specific as to what is termed as soap or a beauty bar. There are very few true soap makers left, by the way, in the United States. Out of all the millions of people, there’s only about 65 true soap makers left.

DEBRA: Wow!

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: So a lot of the things that you see at shows, markets, et ceter is either a beauty bar or a melt n’ pour product. The melt n’ pour is actually what I consider in my opinion one of the worst. That is the product you can actually go into Michael’s craft store and in children’s crafts and see a big block of white that you can take home that you melt, put a little color, a little glycerin in and pour it back out in a mold, cut it up and call it homemade soap, which a lot of people do.

Unfortunately, the glycerin that most people use comes from biodiesel fuel. That is a different type of glycerin. That is not the soap glycerin that you need for your skin. And there is no scent, there’s no color, there’s no [inaudible 00:16:14]. It’s really scary.

And I’m not sure how the FDA thinks that they’re going to crack down on everybody because to be quite honest, they can’t even get a handle on our food supply. So I think it’s a scare tactic I think because back in the ‘90s, melt and pour became very popular. It’s the clear stuff that you can see little bits and pieces in. It melts very quickly and it leaves slime all over your skin in the shower.

So everyone started jumping on the bandwagon and started doing melt n’ pour beauty bars and calling it handmade soap. I think since it’s become inundated, everywhere you go, to see someone set up with homemade soap. I think that’s why the FDA finally is clamping down or trying to clamp down.

DEBRA: Yeah. One of the things that has been such a difficult thing, but not just in soap, but in all kinds of products is that there’s a term like ‘soap’ and yet that can mean so many different things.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: I’m not sure if you realize this, but the FDA does not even recognize the word ‘natural’ when you’re talking about…

DEBRA: I know that. We’ve talked about that before, yeah.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: It’s like people use the word ‘vintage’ to describe clothing and furniture when ‘vintage’ is really a term used for wine. So it’s all relative I guess.

DEBRA: It would be nice if there were some standardized words that we could just say this word and know what it means and not have there be so much…

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Exactly! Oh, totally. I agree.

DEBRA: And even within the naming of chemicals, that’s where it gets really confusing because you can call something like glycerin (you just said glycerin) and glycerin can either be the natural glycerin that is the result of soap making or it can be, as you said, glycerin made from petrochemicals, from diesel fuel and it’s completely synthetic and has nothing to do with soap at all, yet all it says on the label is glycerin. And that’s something I’ve been writing about for years and years and years.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Exactly! Yeah, it’s really – [sigh], I guess people are going to use what they want to use to their benefit or not their benefit. And that’s what’s scary because you really can’t – you’re right, there’s no standardized wording that can really describe what you’re using.

DEBRA: And I think that people look at soap and say, “Oh, this looks so pretty with all that little stuff in it or it’s all these colors that are swirled together or it has a pretty fragrance or whatever. But then there’s this whole other issue of, “Is this soap actually functioning well to help your skin? Are there any toxic chemicals in it?” And it’s not just about how pretty it is.

That’s what we’re going to talk about when we come back from the break, which is coming up in about a minute or so. So let’s see what can we talk about in a minute.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, let me tell you what happened. When I finally started making soap, my daughter knew that I was starting to make soap. She called me one day and said, “Mom, you got to do something for Charlie. She’s scratching until she bleeds.” So my No More Eczema soap is actually the first soap that I ever made. And to this day, it’s probably one of my bestsellers.

DEBRA: So what about it makes people not have eczema?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Just my recipe. It’s just my recipe. I don’t claim it cures eczema. That would put me in a whole different category with the FDA. I don’t claim anything, but I can say that it does help. It contains no scent, it contains no color. I crush up and grade organic field cut oatmeal or oats – that’s not oatmeal, but the oats – and that is placed aside for a little bit of exfoliation, a little bit of a calming effect. Everything I put in my soap, there’s a reason for it.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. And I’ve been looking at your ingredients list and these soaps don’t contain any parabens, sodium, lauryl sulfate, phosphates, harsh chemicals, mineral oils or petroleum products of any kind. I think you really bend over backwards to use this many organic ingredients as possible.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Oh! Oh, certainly. And even the palm that I use is sustainable. It’s expensive to buy organic and sustainable, but I wouldn’t use anything else.

DEBRA: Okay, we need to go to break now. When we come back, we’ll talk more about CJ’s soap and how real soap gets made. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Cynthia Young Jennings of Sweet Harvest Farms. She’s in Tampa, Florida and I found her at multiple craft stores and farmer’s markets and things. You can go to her website at SweetHarvestFarms.com to learn more about her soaps and makes a purchase and enjoy her creativeness in putting together her website. It’s got a lot of lovely things on it. We’ll be right back.

cj-facebook2

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Cynthia A. Young Jennings. She’s the owner of Sweet Harvest Farms in Tampa, Florida. Her website is SweetHarvestFarms.com.

So Cynthia, CJ, you’ve got this great page on your website that I’ve read about five times now. When you go to her website, the first on the left side, it says ‘Shop’ and right away, the first thing you see is Handmade Soap 101. I’m looking at the Handmade Soap 101 page.

So the first thing – and this is the thing that actually, what I’m about to say is the thing that made me finally buy a bar of soap. It was because it says right on this page, “You cannot wrap true soap in cellophane or put them in a box. True soap needs air to continue to cure and every soap needs to be marked with a cure date on the back label.” That is the first time I have ever seen that.

And then when I was at Cynthia’s booth at the fair, I looked on the labels and they all had dates. Some of them were very fresh and you had to wait in order to use them until they got to their cure date. Tell us about curing soap. I just got this whole idea of it being like this thing that needs to breathe. It just changed my whole idea of soap. So tell us about this.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, the cold process method of soap, that process is called saponification. The saponification is the combination of the lye water, which sounds scary, but it’s not because once it’s mixed with the oil, it’s already eradicated.

That’s another thing that’s very important. You cannot have true soap without lye. You have to use lye in order to make soap. I actually use food-grade lye, the same type of lye that’s made to make pretzels. So it’s extra safe.

Well, that saponification process is very much like fermentation with wine. You wouldn’t drink the grape juice and the sugar as wine until it was completely fermented. And it’s the same thing with soap. It takes about 45 weeks from the day I make it for it to be totally soap. The lye and the oils are still doing their thing. And as it cures, it actually gets harder and harder because the moisture that’s in the soap starts to evaporate.

Let’s say that it says the cure date is the 22nd of January, so that is the day that you can start using it. If you let that bar set for about another month, instead of lasting six to eight weeks, which my soap do, it might last you about 12 and that’s because it becomes harder.

DEBRA: Wow! I will tell you this is a really hard – you know this, but listeners, this is a really hard bar of soap. It is not soft. It is hard and it is heavy every time I pick it up. It is not a frothy bar, it’s dense.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Right!

DEBRA: It’s like eating gelato instead of ice cream.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: That’s a good description. Although if you’ve been to my bar, it wouldn’t hurt you. It would just foam with the mouth a little bit.

DEBRA: I love that!

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes. And a lot of people, it’s really funny because I explain to the parents if the children are with them, let your children use this soap and they’re like, “Oh, it will melt” and I’m like, “No. You could have this in the shower in the water and heat it directly, it’s not going to melt like your beauty bars. It’s not going to melt like your melt n’ pour products. This is a true bar of soap that will last and last.”

I mean, I had people come up and say, “I have a little bitty piece” and they’re showing me their fingers really close. “I have a little bitty piece of soap and it still works.” So that’s the true difference. If it doesn’t leave a slim on the tub, it’s certainly not going to leave it on your skin.

DEBRA: No, it doesn’t leave any slime. And I think I paid $7 for this big bar. Isn’t that how much it costs, $7 or something.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes. And believe me, in all the years (I’ve been doing this now for 12 years), in all those years, I’ve only had one other true soap maker come up to me and introduce themselves and they said, “How are you making any money? You’re giving this away?”

DEBRA: Yeah, I was really surprised because I had bought a lot of handmade soap over the years, probably some of the stuff that really isn’t soap. It melts within like a month. If I can get it to last for a month, I’m lucky. And they charge $4 or $5 or $6 for that. I’m looking at this bar of soap and I think it’s going to last me – I mean, I’m just one person taking one shower a day. I think it’s going to last me three or four or five months anyway.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes, I have a lot of people that – unfortunately, my husband and I use the same soap. So it will last probably about six to eight weeks. But it’s really funny because we’ll be using a bar of soap and I’m like, “Okay, I want to go on to the next scent” and it’s like it’s still lasting and lasting and lasting.

DEBRA: Yeah, it does.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: But also, a lot of people have misconception because you want to use this soap on your face. People look at me like I’m nuts because of course, they would use this stuff that they get commercially because it does nothing but draw your skin. But you want to use this.

I have a lot of customers that tell me they see reduced fine lines around their eyes just using my soap. I can’t claim that because I would get in trouble. But I can tell you what my customers say. I do have a press and a testimonial page on my website that you can read and actually see the videos of my customers, a testing.

I am 60. That was a really hard age for me, by the way. I cried for days. But a lot of people – in fact, everyone I meet, when I tell them I’m 60, they actually ask for my license because I truly look probably about 45. That is because I use this soap on my face.

DEBRA: I’ve been using it on my face. Actually, I’ve never been one for going through all those beauty products that you’re supposed to use on your face. I’ve just never done that. I’ve always used soap. And I have very few wrinkles for my age. It actually feels really good to use your soap on my face because it does get clean, but it doesn’t feel dried out at all.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Right!

DEBRA: And I’m just very happy with it. I’m very happy with it.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: And every bar of soap, like I was saying, there’s a reason behind it. So I had all these people ask me, “Well, do you have soap for this? Do you do a soap for that?” And so I actually now have a dog soap for Phyto and people swear by it. I have a soap that I make for acne.

And one thing about that is there is what’s called salicylic acid that is what is used in a lot of acne remedies and prescriptions. I use all-natural – now, here we go with that word ‘natural’ because that’s what people want to hear. But it is! Salicylic acid actually comes from the willow tree. And what I do is I brew a tea of willow bark and put it into the soap to combat the acne and blemishes while still leaving your skin soft.

DEBRA: Well, of course, that’s the natural way to do it. We need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. My guest today is Cynthia A. Jennings – I think I left out one of your names here, Cynthia A. Young Jennings, owner of Sweet Harvest Farms. I was looking at your website instead of looking at my page about you. Cynthia A. Young Jennings, owner of Sweet Harvest Farms. Her website is SweetHarvestFarms.com. And we’ll be right back.

cj-shavingsoap3

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Cynthia A. Young Jennings of Sweet Harvest Farms in Tampa, Florida. Her website is SweetHarvestFarms.com.

There’s a couple of things I want to make sure that we get in here before the end of the show, which is coming up very soon. You have here on this page ‘Homemade Soap 101’, it says “there are very few true soap makers left that stay true to the old-fashion method of soap making that is used literally thousands of years ago.” Tell us about the excavations in ancient Babylon.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, they have found, they’ve uncovered cylinders with inscriptions for soap making around 2800 B.C. and later records from Egypt as well and describing how the oils were combined with alkaline salts to make soap. A lot of the way that they found this was after they slaughtered a sheep or whatever to eat, of course, the oils from the body would then leech across the fire, which of course produces ash, then it hardened. I’m like, “How did people figure out that they can use them to wash themselves?” I don’t know.

DEBRA: I don’t know! Maybe somebody just picked up the hardened fat out of the fire.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: I think someone probably did. It may be have rained or got wet and then it lathered up and they’re like, “Hmmm…” I have that question about a lot of things, how people figure out things.

So it’s the combination of oils. Lye actually comes from ash. And so it’s the combination of that that makes true soap. Like I said earlier, you cannot have true soap without lye.

DEBRA: And before they started manufacturing lye that you could buy in a package, people made their soap by combining fat particularly from animals because it’s so easy to get…

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Right, and the ash.

DEBRA: …and the ash from their fires, their fireplaces.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Exactly!

DEBRA: That’s how like colonial times, for example, people made soap.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Right! And it was back then it was called ‘lye soap’.

DEBRA: Yeah, it’s quite an ancient and natural thing and just something that our bodies have evolved with over time.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: It is.

DEBRA: So I love soap. I just love soap. Anyway, the other thing I wanted to make sure we mention is that about people with allergies because I know that a lot of my listeners are sensitive to certain things. So would you tell us about allergies?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, let me explain something. A lot of people that come up to me and say, “Oh, you know, I can’t use because it smells or whatever and I’m allergic to scent.” I’m like, “No.” More than likely, you’re not allergic to the scent. You’re allergic to the chemicals that are put into the scent.

DEBRA: Right!

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: And so a lot of people will use my soap and they’re shocked because they’ve never been able to use anything like this on their skin before because they were allergic or they would break out or they would itch or whatever. And they don’t find that with my soap.

Now, I will tell you, I did give a bar of my soap to one of the vendors that sold flowers across from me one day. The next week, I saw him and I said, “So how did it work?” and he goes, “It was amazing!” He said, “But I broke out.” I was like, “What?” It’s like, “No way it was my soap.” He goes, “Yeah, it was your soap.”

Well, I come to find out, you can be allergic to nuts. There is a rare condition where you can be so ultra-sensitive that a lot of these people don’t live past the age of 30. That’s how sensitive they are because almost everything has some kind of nut oil in it. It turned out that because I use shea butter in my soap and shea butter comes from the shea nut.

So he was one of the few. So now, on my bar on the back, it says, ‘Shea butter’ and in parenthesis, it says ‘shea nut’ because a lot of people don’t realize that the ‘shea butter’ comes from the ‘shea nut’. But I have people like my son-in-law who is extremely allergic to peanuts and such and he can use my soap no problem. So I have a lot of people that use allergies to nuts that use my soap without a problem in the world because of the shea butter, but it’s just that one in all the thousands of people that I sold to that had that ultra, ultra sensitivity.

And to this day, I’m still not really sure that it was my soap. He could’ve eaten something at dinner that had traces because you can have my new traces of nut oil and other oil, but you have to be really, really careful.

So there really isn’t an allergy or sensitivity to the scent that is in the soap. Like I said, I had people that had been using my soap for years and they can’t even use the soap the doctor prescribe them from the pharmacy, but they can use my soap. That makes me feel really good.

Whenever I get really tired (because it is a very laborious process and I’ve been doing this every day for 12 years), when I get tired, my husband sits me down at my computer and he pulls up the testimonial page. He goes, “If you want to know why you do this, read what your customers have to say.” When a simple bar of soap can make such a difference in someone’s life, I can’t describe to you the feeling that gives me and the joy.

DEBRA: Hmmm… I can imagine. So the point I wanted to make here is that it says here (I want to get the right one), “If you find that any of the ingredients used in our products may cause you irritation due to allergies, it’s always possible for us to produce a soap that does not contain any specific oil. Just email your request and we can make you a soap that is just as moisturizing and luxurious to suit your needs.”

And so I just want to make sure that people who are having difficulty finding a soap that they can use because of allergies that they can come to you and you’ll work with them to get them a wonderful bar of soap, something that they can use. I think that’s really important.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: And what I do too, because like I said, 99.9999% of the time, people that feel that they are sensitive a bath and body product, most of the time, it’s the chemicals and preservatives in the product that they’re having a reaction to and not any of the really good stuff that you’ll find in my soap. So what I’ll do is I’ll actually send a sample if they do have allergies of any sort. I have yet to have anyone come back.

I mean, usually, when I send a sample to someone that says, “Well, I want to try it.” Within probably two weeks, they’re ordering seven bars. That tells me that it worked just fine.

DEBRA: Well, I would order seven bars, but I think it would last me seven years.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: And just to put a bug in your ears too, I had finally – now, I’ve been doing this, my family and I had been using this for years. But finally, after the FDA did come out a couple of months back and say that yes, toothpaste is actually dangerous for you, I am now going to be offering my all-natural tooth powder.

DEBRA: I saw that on your card, but I don’t see it on your website because I want some.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes. Finally, I did the first – well, I call it ‘test marketing’ at High Park Market on Sunday and it was a hit, which I was very pleased to see because a lot of people, they really don’t pay attention to the news and stuff like that. It was out there for a very short time. It was out for maybe two or three days and then it was gone. A lot of people did hear about it and they’re like, “Yeah, we heard. We can’t believe it! Flouride is awful for you. There’s no benefit whatsoever.”

All you have to do is turn your toothpaste over, look at the ingredients, google each ingredient and read what it says about the ingredients.

DEBRA: Yeah. We’ve talked about toothpaste before on this show and I’ve been writing about it for years.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Oh, good.

DEBRA: So I’m very excited to see what you’ve come up with since I love your stuff so much.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Well, it should be on the website by next week.

DEBRA: Okay, good because I just ran out of my tooth powders.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Oh, no!

DEBRA: I was wondering what to try next. So we only have about a minute left. Is there anything you’d like to say that you haven’t said?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: I would just encourage people to read, read, read. Don’t just go to one source, go to many. I would not put anything, ingest anything or put anything on my skin if I did not know what the ingredients were. What I tell everybody is if you can’t pronounce it, don’t use it because a lot of the…

DEBRA: Totally!

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: I mean, it just makes sense. You were granted this amazing, beautiful life and this amazing functioning body that’s a miracle in itself, take care of it. And take care of the earth that we live in. We keep taking and we keep forgetting to put back and that’s important.

DEBRA: Yes, it is. I totally agree with that too. So let me give your website again. It’s SweetHarvestFarms.com. When you go there, listeners, she’s got so many different kinds of soaps – handmade soaps, specialty soaps, seasonal soap, shea butter bars, African black soap, pine tar soap, cedar soap dishes that are beautiful made out of untreated white cedar and she’s got men’s shaving soap. Do you also sell all the little brushes and everything that goes with it?

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Yes, I do. they’re actual badger brushes that I sold that you can buy either with the men’s shaving kit or without.

DEBRA: And we’ve got to go. Thank you so much for being with us.

CYNTHIA A. YOUNG JENNINGS: Thank you.

DEBRA: I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com to find out more. Have a great day. Be well!

cj-soapespresso

Ecos Paints

Question from Parn

Hi Debra,

Do you have any experience with Ecos Paints?

I narrow down to two paints that I may get, Natura and Ecos. Do you like one better than the other?

I know that Natura had some problem in the past.

Is there any other paint that you like beside this two?

I tried Mythic years ago. I liked it fine. I read that some people had problem with linger smell recently.

Thank you.

Parn

Debra’s Answer

I haven’t used Ecos Paint to paint an entire room, but I have some samples and I was very impressed with them.

I did an interview with Julian Crawford, CEO of the US distributor of Ecos Paints and like what he had to say. You can listen to the interview and decide for yourself. Next time I paint, I’m going to try Ecos.

The other paint I would recommend to you is Old Fashioned Milk Paint. It’s made from only natural ingredients and simply smells like a glass of warm milk. I have painted a whole room with this paint and it’s beautiful.

Add Comment

The Best Diet for Perfect Health

Paul-Jaminetperfect-health-dietMy guest today is Paul Jaminet, Ph.D., author of Perfect Health Diet: Regain Health and Lose Weight be Eating the Way You Were Meant to Eat (Scribner, 2012), editor-in-chief of the Journal of Evolution and Health, and blogger. He is also the creator of the Perfect Health Retreat, an opportunity to repair health and obtain a comprehensive education in the Perfect Health diet and lifestyle at a luxurious beachfront setting. These retreats are establishing the Perfect Health Diet as a spectacularly successful – and delicious – approach to health improvement. Paul became convinced of the importance of an ancestral approach to health when he overcame a chronic disease through diet and lifestyle. Prior to his discovery of ancestral health, Paul had been an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and a software entrepreneur. Paul continues to pursue research in economics and business strategy. www.perfecthealthdiet.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Best Diet for Perfect Health

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Paul Jaminet Ph.D.

Date of Broadcast: January 06, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Happy New Year! This is our first show of 2015. I’ve been off for a few weeks. I always take a little break over the winter. The quiet season of the year to rest and rejuvenate and make new plans for the following years. I have lots of plans for this year and I think you’ll be very happy with them.

[Coughing] Excuse me. I was just eating while I was listening to the news.

So my guest today is Paul – I’m hoping I’m saying this right and I’m sure he’ll tell us after he comes on – Paul Jaminet, Ph.D. He’s the author of the The Perfect Health Diet: Regain Health and Lose Weight by Eating the Way You Were Meant to Eat. Well, on the cover of his book at the very top, it says, “Paleo perfected!” It’s the quote from Vogue Magazine.

And as I’m looking through his diet, I haven’t tried it yet, but it’s very interesting to me because as some of you know if you’ve been listening or reading my website, I did the Paleo diet about a year ago, but it wasn’t quite right for me. And so I’m hoping today – well, I’m sure today that Paul will tell us about more scientific evidence of what we should be eating and why.

And this is very scientific in fact. This is not just a fad, what he’s talking about. He’s done the scientific research and has put together a whole program. He calls it an ancestral approach and this goes back to eating the foods that our bodies are really designed to eat.

So without further adieu, let’s just bring on Paul and he’ll tell us all about it. Hi, Paul!

PAUL JAMINET: Hi, Debra. It’s great to be with you.

DEBRA: Thank you. And how do you say your name?

PAUL JAMINET: Oh, you pronounced it perfectly, Paul Jaminet.

DEBRA: Thank you. Okay, I was guessing. Anyway, tell us how did you become interested in this diet? What prompted you to do this research and put this together?

PAUL JAMINET: Well, like a lot of people in middle age, I started having some health problems. And in my case, I have had some health problems actually since birth. I was in and out of the hospital with chronic ear infection as a young child. Those infections actually kind of persisted, but they became very severe after I had a long course of antibiotics for acne and [inaudible 00:03:38]. And after that, I just started going downhill every year. I started really getting worried for my health. I felt like I was getting Alzheimer’s in my thirties and forties.

So at one point, about ten years ago, I found the Paleo diet and that was the first thing I tried that made a difference in my symptoms. It’s like, “Oh, this proves diet is really important and I should investigate this and figure out how to become healthy.”

So that started a long course of research. I had some problems on Paleo. You mentioned in the introduction that you might have had some problems too. I knew it was an imperfect diet (at least the way I was implementing it), but it’s been promising enough that it could be a starting point for figuring out how to make it better.

DEBRA: That was my conclusion too, yeah. So I’m really interested in what you have to say. I’ve been kind of tweaking my Paleo diet without having done the research that you’ve done, so I’m really interested in what you’re going to tell us.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah. Well, what I found was after I adopted the Paleo diet, some symptoms improved, but then I started developing clear signs of nutritional deficiencies. I found I needed more carbohydrates than I’d originally implemented the diet with. I also found I developed a vitamin C deficiency and I had symptoms of scurvy. I would have little scratch wounds that wouldn’t heal for six months. When I took vitamin C’s, they finally healed.

So I realized that the diet as I was eating it was missing some nutrition. That gave me the idea, “I’ll just research all the nutrients, all the known nutrients and figure out how much we need, find the foods that deliver those nutrients and then I’ll construct a natural whole foods diet.” That’s why we call it ‘ancestral’. We eat the kinds of foods that our ancestors could’ve eaten before they had a lot of modern technology and chemistry and food science.

So it’s like a hunter/gatherer diet, natural plants and animal, but we’re tweaking the proportions so that we optimize nutrition. We’re including some very nutrient-dense food like egg yolks or liver or bones fat or soup. It took us seven years of research to really get our diet right. But then we found, my wife and I both cured our chronic health problems. When we started a blog and published our book, we’ve had several thousand readers report that their health problems cleared up on our diet.

And so, that really proved to us that it really works. And in fact, when we wrote the book, we knew that it would work for others because it just made so much sense that if you nourish your body properly, then that will greatly improve your body’s ability to deal with almost any health challenge.

DEBRA: I completely agree with that statement. And as I’ve said many times, a large part of our health problems is because we – well, first of all, because we’re exposed to toxic chemicals. But also, because we’re exposed to toxic chemicals, we need more nutrition for our bodies to deal with that. And instead of getting more nutrition, we’re getting less nutrition by eating processed foods.

I’ve done a lot of research on Paleo because I was eating a Paleo diet and I thought that it made sense to go back to our original foods. And for a long time – oh, I can’t even tell you how many years – years ago, I had this idea – I know! In 1987, I got to a point where I said, “Well, I just need to look at nature and what does nature do. Let’s just use nature as the model.” And the first thing was that instead of eating industrial processed foods, to just eat foods that would be in my natural environment locally and seasonally. So that doesn’t take us back in time, but at least it takes us back to nature.

And so I illuminated a lot of these things a long time ago. But the thing that’s missing when I look at a lot of Paleo websites is that they give you lists of foods, but they don’t tell you as you are talking about the proportions. And so people, they look and they say, “Well, I can have chocolate on the Paleo diet” and so they eat a lot of chocolate instead of a lot of nutritious foods or they eat bacon for every meal or they just pick something and they eat their favorite foods off the list instead of considering what the nutritional aspects, so I’m really interested in hearing this.

So we have just a couple of minutes before break and I want to make sure that you have plenty of time to start explaining this. So let me just introduce. If you go to Paul’s website (because this is what we’re going to start talking about after the break), if you go to Paul’s website, which is PerfectHealthDiet.com, there’s a link there in the menu, it’s called ‘The Diet’ (it’s the second link), it has a wonderful diagram that you could just print out and put on your refrigerator door – oh, there’s chocolate right at the top!

PAUL JAMINET: We’re actually one of those that approve of chocolate – at least 85%, not too sugary chocolate.

DEBRA: Yeah. Well, anyway, there’s a beautiful drawing that shows the proportions of how to eat different groups of food and a very nice list of what to eat and what not to eat. We’re going to be discussing that when we come back after the break.

Let me just prepare you how I prepare my chocolate because I don’t eat chocolate bars with any kind of sugar in it. I started a number of years ago trying to figure out the perfect way to eat chocolate and I’ve gone through many evolutions. What I do now is I have organic cocoa powder and I mix it with date sugar. And then I put in coconut butter. For those of you who don’t know, that’s the whole coconut meat ground up like peanut butter or a nut butter, so it includes the fiber and oil. And then I mix it with grass-fed cream. It’s very delicious and very nutritious.

We do need to go to break now. And when we come back, Paul is going to tell us about his Perfect Health Diet. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Paul Jaminet, Ph.D., author of the Perfect Health Diet. And now, we’re going to hear all about the diet. I actually love the way this diet looks.

So why don’t you tell us about the diet first and then I’ll ask my questions?

PAUL JAMINET: Okay! Well, like I said, we’re an ancestral diet, a natural whole food diet. And probably the best way to understand our diet in a moment is we sometimes call it an example of ‘ancestral gourmet cuisine’ because it very closely resembles the proportions and the flavors that you would find in the very highest end restaurant like classic French restaurant or a very high-end Chinese or Thai restaurant. Those are pretty much the proportions of the food. It’s very delicious. It’s very satisfying.

We really didn’t expect that when we were developing the diet. We developed them just to be as nutritious and as optimal for health as we could. But then we realize after we were done and it resembled gourmet cuisine that that really makes sense because our brains must have evolved a liking for healthful food to try to encourage us to get the nutrition that we need. So it’s a very delicious diet. It resembles food from expensive restaurants, but it’s actually very easy to prepare at home.

The graphic design that you mentioned on our website on ‘The Diet’ page is in the shape of a yin-yang apple. So the apple represents health…

DEBRA: Yes, I noticed that, yeah.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah. And the yin-yang symbol represents balance. So that’s partly a balance between plant and animal foods. The Paleo community tended to deprecate plant foods and discouraged eating carbohydrate and we want to emphasize you need both, plant and animal foods for best health.

It also represents balance between east and west. My wife is of Chinese descent. There are elements of Chinese and American, European cuisine. There are many different ways to implement the Perfect Health Diet. You can do it both ways, but it’s actually good to implement some of each.

So for instance, we recommend flavoring foods with fats and oil, with some of the classic cooking accents like lyme juice, vinegar and with Umami flavors like grated eggs cheese, like tamari sauce, like fish sauce. You can sample from a lot of the world’s cuisine and Umami flavors are much more popular in Asia than in America, but they’re good for you.

So when you put everything together, our diet ends up being about three-quarters plant food, one quarter animal food. But most of the calories come from the animals. So a lot of plant foods are very low in calories. It’s a very fiber-rich diet.

For instance, we recommend eating about a pound of starches a day, things like potatoes or white rice. We recommend cooking them and then refrigerating them for a day, which increase the amount of fiber and makes them more healthful.

DEBRA: Ah! I didn’t know that. Wow! Say that again, say that again. The starches, you cook them in advance and then refrigerate?

PAUL JAMINET: Right! So we’ll cook enough starches for maybe three days, the next three days. We’ll cook them in the evening after we’re done eating usually. And then put them in the refrigerator. We usually cook them in a pressure cooker and then refrigerate them. And then we’ll just pull them out as we need them for meals for the next several days.

As you cook the starches and then refrigerate them, the cooking largely eliminates the fiber, but then when you refrigerate them, the starch re-gelatinizes into a form that’s difficult for us to digest, but is very beneficial to gut bacteria.

There’s a lot of evidence that eating starches that you cooked and then refrigerated that way is very beneficial to the health or the gut microbiom.

Our diet is also rich in fruits and vegetables, which are good for the gut microbiom. The standard cooking assets like lemon juice, lime juice and vinegar, those are good for the gut microbiom. A lot of the classic spices that are used for cooking are good for the gut microbiom. Even drinks like coffee, tea and cocoa like you mentioned are good for the gut. They have polyphenols and other compounds that are beneficial for our gut microbiom.

So there’s a lot of – you know, one thing that distinguishes us from the Paleo diet or other forms of ancestral diet is that there are many, many factors in food which informs our health. We try to optimize everything. That’s why we chose the name ‘Perfect Health Diet’. We’re really looking at hundreds of factors that influence health like all the known nutrients and like the nutrients not only for us, but for our gut microbes and trying to get the proportions exactly right.

We also emphasize lifestyle elements like [inaudible 00:19:56]. That also, in turns out, influences health.

We work hard to make everything practical to live. So my wife and I are working on a cookbook right now with practical advice. We’ve learned how to implement this ourselves in 30 minutes a day (or less) work.

DEBRA: Great!

PAUL JAMINET: We can cook very efficiently. We cook once a day for thirty minutes and we make enough food for three meals.

One nice thing is on our diet, you can very easily repackage leftovers to make a nutritious meals that taste quite different from the meal you originally cooked, but is still very satisfying and healthful.

So there’s a lot of good science to our diet. Now, when we go out to restaurants, it’s very difficult to find a restaurant that can serve a meal as good as our own meal, the home cooked meals we have every night.

DEBRA: I find that true for me too, yeah. We need to go to break again, but we’ll talk about the diet when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Paul Jaminet. He’s the author of the Perfect Health Diet. Go on over to his website, PerfectHealthDiet.com. At the top, on the menu, there’s a tab that says ‘The Diet’ and there you’ll find this diagram that we’ve been talking about and it lists all the proportions and everything you can eat on this diet. We’ll be talking about it more when we come back. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Paul Jaminet who’s the author of the book, Perfect Health Diet: How to Regain Health and Lose Weight by Eating the Way You Were Meant to Eat. We’ve been talking about the diet as outlined on his website at PerfectHealthDiet.com. He’s got a great picture. If you just go to the page that says ‘The Diet’, he’s got a diagram in the form of a yin-yang apple that shows the balance of the foods. It’s a great reminder. You can just print it out and put it on your refrigerator and it will remind you what to eat.

Okay! So now, I’m going to ask you my questions. I know that for me, the problem I had with the Paleo Diet was that it was too much protein and vegetables, that actually, if I eat too much protein, I end up having gout attacks. I ended up after a few months on the Paleo diet having two months of gout. I had three gout attacks back to back. I thought, “This is not going to work for me.”

But I also found that for me, I wanted to eat more carbohydrates, yes and I need a little bit of fruit. And what I added back in was legumes, which is on your ‘do not eat’ list. And the reason that I added them – but what I want to eat is sweet potatoes. I want to eat sweet potatoes and I want to eat potatoes. I don’t because of blood sugar.

And so how could somebody who is – like I’ve been on a low carb diet for years because of blood sugar. And so I have all this big, “Don’t eat these starches.” So what would you say to somebody like me?

PAUL JAMINET: Okay! Well, yeah, all of those are very common issues. And so the reason you got gout on a high protein diet is that when you’re burning proteins for energy (which isn’t really a good thing to do), you’re releasing all these nitrogen. That gets processed in the liver, the urea, which makes your urine smell – you know that classic urine smell. But if the liver can’t make enough urea, then it makes uric acid, which gives you gout or kidney stones or gallstones or things like that.

And so you definitely don’t want to overeat protein. We recommend getting about 15% of calories from protein and that’s about what most people normally do. So for most people, they want to increase their meat consumption relative to their normal diet.

And then the other issues, the blood sugar, well, there are two aspects to that. One is the post-meal blood sugar and the other one is the fasting blood glucose. If you’re prediabtic or diabetic, then you’ll get elevated fasting glucose. And for both of those, it can actually be beneficial to eat some starches.

That helps in several ways. One is the resistance starch really helps your gut microbiom and the things that the gut microbes make for you help improve your metabolic function and help you to handle or control your blood glucose better. So being [inaudible 00:30:31] in resistant starch fiber.

Now, they also have some compounds that are toxic for your digestive tract function. And if you soak them and then cook them for a long time, then you’ll destroy those and there will be a healthful food.

DEBRA: Yeah, that’s what I thought.

PAUL JAMINET: So that’s fine. If you’re willing to take the time to prepare them properly, then you can include beans in your diet. But it’s not really necessary for health and if you have less time, then it’s perfectly fine to do what potatoes, white rice, sweet potatoes. The key is (like I said before the break) just cook them in advance and then refrigerate them. And then you’ll get a similar amount of fiber as what the beans have. So you’ll get the same benefits that the beans do.

DEBRA: So let me ask you a question before I forget. So then after you refrigerate the rice or the potatoes, can you then warm them back up again.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah, warm them say on a microwave.

DEBRA: I don’t use a microwave.

PAUL JAMINET: So long as we cook them, don’t put them in boiling water, you can make them comfortable to eat.

DEBRA: Okay! So I don’t use a microwave, but I could just like steam them a little bit or sautee them or something?

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah, something to warm them up a little and make them at an enjoyable temperature to eat.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. But you could eat something like one of my favorite things, potato salad. That would be a cold potato. That would be really good. That would have a lot of fiber in it.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah! So then I also wanted to ask you why white rice instead of brown rice?

PAUL JAMINET: Well, the general problem with the cereal grains and legumes is that they’re all grassland, above ground seeds. They were always getting eaten by herbivores, so things like cows and horses and so on. And so they evolve these poisons that suppress mammalian digestion. And in cereal grains, those are mostly on the bran. We don’t want to eat too many of those. That’s why we eat the [inaudible 00:33:00], the cereal grains and the beans unless you can prepare them in a way that eliminates the toxin.

In white rice, it turns out, first of all, most of those toxins are in the bran. So when they melt the brown off the white rice, they’re eliminating most of them. And then the rest are destroyed in cooking. So white rice is basically a toxin-free choice of starch. It’s similar to potatoes and the other in-ground starches, which are helpful with normal cooking. They don’t need any special operation.

So that’s the reason we recommend white rice. There is a little bit of nutrition on the bran, but actually, there are many other sources you can get those nutrients form. So there really isn’t much benefit to eating the bran. The bran in other cereal grains is the major source of gluten, which gives some people health problems.

Yeah, so different people would react with different intensity to some of the compounds in the bran of the cereal grains. But it can be really hard to tell if you’re sensitive. You can have low level inflammation and not really notice. But it could be taking the uric [inaudible 00:34:37] or giving you a higher chance of developing cancer. So we sort of take the safe approach. It’s better to not eat those things in quantity.

DEBRA: Right, right. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Paul Jaminet. You can go to his website, PerfectHealthDiet.com where he has all outlined for you very nicely and even some recipes, which we’re going to talk about when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Paul Jaminet. He’s the author of the The Perfect Health Diet: Regain Health and Lose Weight by Eating the Way You Were Meant to Eat.

Let’s see, what did I want to ask you about – recipes, recipes. Oh, I know what I want to ask you first. What are you eating today, breakfast and dinner?

PAUL JAMINET: Well, I do intermittent fasting. So I generally just don’t eat until maybe 1 p.m. or so. So I haven’t eaten yet apart from…

DEBRA: Ooh, what did you eat yesterday? What did you eat yesterday?

PAUL JAMINET: I had black coffee in the morning. And then for lunch I have leftovers. I basically re-arrange whatever leftovers we have in the refrigerator and I make [inaudible 00:39:50].

DEBRA: And what is that?

PAUL JAMINET: Well, that’s a classic Korean dish that means ‘leftover’. And also, what I do is I put a starch, usually potatoes or white rice. I put in some vegetable. I put in a sweet blend. Sometimes, it’s fruit. Yesterday, it was beet. I put in three egg yolks, which is one of our recommended nutrient-dense foods that we eat regularly. I put in a little bit of leftover beef stew that we had. So that included some tendons as well as meat and a bunch of vegetables like carrots and so on.

I put in a little bit of fish sauce, a little bit of rice vinegar. Those are the Umami and asset flavoring that we recommend. Just a touch of coconut meal. I warmed it up in the microwave.

DEBRA: It sounds delicious, but what did you have for dinner?

PAUL JAMINET: For dinner, I think we made Pad Thai last night. We also have some leftovers. We’ll actually snack on some cheese and rice crackers when my wife gets home from work and while we’re preparing dinner.

So it’s good to try to do most of your eating in the afternoon. So we do a lot of our cooking in the evening when she gets home, but we actually only kind of sample it and have a light dinner. Most of what we make, we eat as leftovers the next day or the next several days.

DEBRA: Yeah, I do that too. When I make things – I have more time to cook on the weekends than I do during the week. And one of the tricks that I found is very helpful to me staying on eating healthful food is to have enough food already prepared that I can just take out of the refrigerator and eat or warm up quickly. I have a little toaster oven that warms it up in three minutes.

And then I don’t have to think about, “Well, now what am I going to eat?” and go get even takeout from te natural food store (it has things in it that I don’t want to eat.” Having the food on-hand, knowing what it is that you’re going to eat, preparing it in advance and then having it there at a meal time, so no matter how busy you are, if you have time for a snack in the afternoon, that you have food there. It’s the no. 1 thing that I think helps people stay on an eating plan, whatever it is. And so I’m a big fan of leftovers.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah. It’s no fun to cook if you’re really hungry and you tend to not make cheese in time and not make as good food as you should. It’s much better if you can enjoy some cheese and crackers and wine while you’re cooking.

My wife takes two lunches to work. She has her first lunch at about noon and her second lunch at about four. So she’s had most of her food, she’s not that hungry when she gets home. We can have a little extra cheese and crackers and just snack and sample on the first we cook dinner when it’s fun. And then, put it away for leftovers for tomorrow.

DEBRA: You know, one of the things that’s been really a challenge for me is not having starches, to not eat rice for so many years because I was on a low carb diet. It has just been extremely difficult to be able to do a lot of things like crackers, for example. I would love to have cheese and cracker. And so to add rice back into my diet and see how that goes, that would give me rice crackers, rice flour, rice noodles, just all these things that you can make with rice.

So I’m going to try this and see what happens.

PAUL JAMINET: Great! That’s good.

DEBRA: Yeah, because it seems to me that it overall makes sense and that instead of looking at individual symptoms, that if I would just try the diet as an overall good diet, that some of the symptoms might just handle on their own.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah. Yeah.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. So is there a particular reason to use egg yolks only and not eat the egg whites or you’re just trying to get it dense?

PAUL JAMINET: Well, all the nutrition is in the yolk. The whites are basically pure protein. If you get your protein from meat or fish, which is what we recommend, then you’ll get a lot of micronutrients with the protein. You don’t really want to eat protein powders or pure protein, things like egg white. You want to get your protein with lots of other nutritious food compound.

And the other aspect with eggs is that it’s possible to develop a sensitivity to egg. We don’t want that to happen because egg yolks are so nutritious and so good for you. It turns out, the allergenic and immunogenic protein, most of them, 80% to 90% are in the white, not the yolks. So if you discard the white, you get rid of the 80% to 90% of the potential immunogens right there.

And then if you mix the egg yolks with food and cook them a little, then the proteins that are in the yolk becomes much more indigestible. So even if you have a sensitivity, you can reduce your reaction by about 99% just by simply discarding the white, mixing the yolk with food and cooking them. You’ll also greatly decreases the risk that you’ll ever develop egg sensitivity.

So that’s basically the reason you discard the white. You don’t need to. If you like whole eggs, you can eat whole eggs. But your risk of developing a sensitivity goes up.

DEBRA: Interesting. I look at what is commonly promoted as being healthy. And so somebody who were eating egg white omelets and bran, according to your viewpoint, that would exactly the wrong thing to eat.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah, that’s right. I think there has been a lot of misinformation and a lot of randomness in how people eat and what they think is good. It’s kind of remarkable because if you went back a hundred years, there wasn’t the same confusion about how to eat. But now, we have many more choices and it’s much easier to go astray.

DEBRA: The other night, I was eating crackers made from rice flour and almonds with butter on top. And it was just like exactly the thing that I wanted to eat, but I was thinking, “Oh, rice! I shouldn’t be eating it, but this is what my body wants to eat” and I was doing exactly the right thing.

PAUL JAMINET: Yeah. Well, you should trust your body, trust its desire. It has your best interest at heart.

DEBRA: Yeah, as long as you are trusting…

PAUL JAMINET: As long as you’re eating natural whole food.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. I was going to say as long as you’re really trusting your body and not you’re having cravings of what you think you want to eat. You’re probably not craving – I was going to say chocolate cake, but chocolate’s okay. It’s just the cake part. You don’t want to eat wheat and things like that.

But I think there’s such a thing called instinctive nutrition where your body wants certain things and then you’ll want them just because you’re missing out on those nutrients or whatever. So it is good to do that.

We only have about a minute and a half left. So I just want to make sure that if there’s anything that you haven’t said, that I give you a little time to just kind of wrap up.

PAUL JAMINET: Okay. You know, I’d love to tell your listeners a little bit about our health retreat. My wife and I, I mentioned we’ve had several thousand reader success stories, people who cured their health problems on our diet. We wanted to figure out a way to prove scientifically.

No one in the same Perfect community gives much credence to anecdotes because you hear about the good stories, but you don’t certainly hear about people who had a bad time on the diet and gave it up. So you really want to have something that’s more like you see everything that happens, both the good and the bad if there’s any bad.

We were convinced that our diet would really help a lot of people and cure a lot of diseases and we decided to start a health retreat business where people could come for a week and we provide all the food, we provide the environment, we provide the exercise program. We teach every aspect of how to be healthy.

DEBRA: I need to interrupt just because we’re coming up very close to the end of the show. So people can find out more if they go to your website, PerfectHealthDiet.com. Thank you so much for being with me. It’s very interesting and I’m going to give your diet a try. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and I’ll be back tomorrow. Be well.

MosoNatural Air Purifying Bag

Air purifying pouches that contain all-natural bamboo charcoal, long used in Asia for air and water purification, and taken internally to detox the body. “We conducted research and testing and found that bamboo charcoal works incredibly well to remove odors, bacteria, harmful pollutants and allergens from the air. On top of that, it is a natural dehumidifier, helping to prevent mold, mildew and excess moisture… A Moso Bag typically lasts for two years as an air purifier, just place it in the sun once a month to rejuvenate. After the charcoal is exhausted as an air purifier, it is a wonderful addition to the garden. Cut open the bag and put the charcoal into your soil, where it promotes plant growth due to its mineral-rich nature and ability to retain moisture.” Bags come in three sizes: small for gym bags and lockers, medium for cars and closets, and large for spaces up to 250 square feet, such as kitchens, bedrooms, and offices.

Visit Website

Toxic Free Superstar: Pia Zadora

Today my guest is the iconic Pia Zadora—Golden Globe winner, Grammy nominee, ShowWest winner, accomplished singer, film star, and a mom who has been living toxic free for years. I first met Pia in…I think it was 2000…when she called and asked me to fly down to her Beverly Hills home and inspect it for toxic exposures. We’ll be talking about how Pia got interested in toxics, why eliminating toxics from her home is important to her, and how she lives toxic free at home. piazadora.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Toxic Free Superstar: Pia Zadora

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pia Zadora

Date of Broadcast: December 11, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It is – what is the date today? It is Thursday, December 11th 2014 and it’s a nice, chilly day here in Florida, 69°. I know it’s much colder every place else.

But it’s winter time. It’s coming to be the holidays and I’m actually going to take a vacation for three weeks. But there are many, many, many shows that you can listen to. It’s in the archives. Just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, see what you might be interested in and I’m hoping that you’ll listen to lots of archives while I’m taking a little vacation.

But I’ll be back with live shows in January. In fact, I already have many guests booked for the month of January and we’ll just continue after the holiday.

My guest today is Pia Zadora, actress, singer. She’s had a long career – well, she’s been a Golden Globe winner, a Grammy nominee, an accomplished singer, film star, broadway baby. She was a child star. She has been in broadway shows.

But she’s also a mom and she’s very interested in toxics. I’ve known PIa for many years. I was trying to figure out when I met her. I think it was in the year 2000 when she called me and asked me to come down to her home in Beverly Hills and check it out for toxic exposures. So we’re going to let Pia talk about how she lives toxic-free.

Hi, Pia!

PIA ZADORA: Hi, Debra. How are you?

DEBRA: I’m great. How are you?

PIA ZADORA: I’m good. I think you’re right with the year 2000 because my youngest son had just been born. He’s 17 now. He’s about two or three at the time when I started detecting toxins in my environment for some weird reason – maybe hormonal me. I was like, “Uh-oh, something’s going on here.”

But I think the interesting thing is as time goes on, it seems more evident or more prevalent. When I started using paint for Jordan when he was born, painting the nursery and doing all that stuff and redoing the bathrooms and then trying to keep everything clean with the wrong solution like Lysol and all that other stuff, it’ll kill you before it kills the germs and I started smelling and sensing and protecting thinking, “Well, this is just not right.”

And that’s when I called you because I’ve seen some of your stuff and I said, “Wow! It’s probably a big issue and I need my guru…”—because you were my guru at that time.

DEBRA: Thank you.

PIA ZADORA: And you still are. I mean, I’m in constant touch with you to explore every new direction I go in terms of solutions and paints and pools with chlorine and all that kind of stuff.

DEBRA: That’s right. I actually get a lot of emails from Pia.

PIA ZADORA: Yes!

DEBRA: Over the years, over all these years, I continue to get emails from Pia. When she wants to do something new, she contacts me and finds out how to do something non-toxic.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah, yeah. And it’s very important. The good thing is that place are much more aware of it. I mean, when I used to – for instance, I had a house in Malibu. I think it was the time that you were with me. It was brand new and it just reeked of all these toxins and the plaster and all that, the bad baths, the coverings. I was like, “Oh, my God!” When I went into this house, I feel like I’m going to faint or something. It was overwhelming.

And so we checked it out and I was told to bake it. You bake a house!

DEBRA: That’s right. That’s exactly right.

PIA ZADORA: I know! But people thought I was nuts. I’m like, “No, we can’t go to Malibu this weekend because I’m baking the house.” “Really? Well…”

And then I had my meter, my electromagnetic meter when I would go to buy cars. I come in with the meters. I have to sit on this seat with the car on when you look at the meter how high it registers. People really thought I was nuts at the time.

But now, people are accepting and understanding in a much different, more progressive way because I think that a lot of people are getting sick and they’re realizing that they’re getting sick because of the stuff in their environment.

DEBRA: Yes, that definitely is happening that I really see in the last few years that major television shows are talking about this. Whereas when I started back in 1982, I self-published my first book. And then in 1984, my first book was published. At that time, they didn’t know where to put it on the shelf on the bookstores. Nobody had ever heard about any of these things before.

But now, there’s all these organizations. They’re working on toxics. There’s legislation, there’s all these businesses. I have more than 500 websites on Debra’s list at DebrasList.com that are selling toxic-free products and it’s just all changed from where it was even it’s changed since the year 2000 when you and I first met. There’s so much more awareness than there ever was before. And I think that’s great.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah, true. Yeah, it’s a relief.

DEBRA: It is a relief. It is a relief.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah.

DEBRA: So why is this important to you? Why is it important to you to live toxic-free.

PIA ZADORA: I think it’s important because it’s healthy and it keeps you feeling confident and upbeat and the whole vibe of it, you just feel difference. When you stop eating organic and you’ve stopped using VSD paint and you use all-natural vitamins and all these, you just feel the difference.

And it’s important on many levels. It’s important spiritually, it’s important physically and you know that you’re doing what’s best for yourself and for your kid (as you’ve said, I’m a mother). So it’s really important for me to be there as long as I can and to be as healthy as I can.

And my daughter, which is amazing, she’s 27 or 28 now. She is more, almost more aware. She sends me new stuff every time, “Oh, Mom, try this. Put butter in your coffee in the morning. And it has to be pasteurized butter. Go on this website and get all these cheese.” She cooks organic food for her little Pomeranian with vegetables in it and all kinds of stuff. I’m very proud of her, that she’s so aware. She’s completely gluten-free and all that.

So I think I brought that awareness to her and she kind of ran with it. She’s the next generation, which is great because that means her kid will be healthier and she will take better care of them in so many ways.

And then there’s medication and all that other stuff that we do now to keep ourselves the way we want to keep ourselves – peaceful, tranquil, healthy, happy, more positive, all those things that we do.

DEBRA: Well, are there specific chemicals that you’re concerned about more than others?

PIA ZADORA: Well, I’m concerned obviously with the dust bed. The thing that’s hardest for me because I’m performing now is make-up. It’s really hard to find a make-up that will be – you know, you’ll go on a set or you’ll go on stage and will look right and is not going to bleed if you know what it mean.

There’s so many preservatives and parabens and [inaudible 00:09:16], all that crap that you know is not good for you. I’m concerned about those.

And I’m also concerned about eating out because my lifestyle is eating out a lot especially since I’ve had my accident, I can’t really get around and cook that much. And I enjoy going out and relaxing. It’s hard to know – well, obviously, you know that not everything is healthy and organic, that you’re eating in a restaurant. You don’t know what they’re cleaning the dishes with. You don’t know all the other stuff that you’re ingesting and the pesticides that they’re using in the kitchen.

It’s kind of scary. But I guess you just have to protect your own environment and not be overly conscious because then you’ll be a recluse, you become a hermit.

DEBRA: Well, I found over the years that if I can do it more than fifty percent – I think I probably am more conscious and take more actions than most people, but if you can do something more than 50%, then you actually can make some progress.

So we need to go to break, but we’ll be right back and talk more with Pia Zadora about living toxic-free.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: Okay, this is Debra Lynn Dadd. I think you can hear me. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Sorry, I have a little microphone thing going on there. So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Pia Zadora, accomplished singer/actress. She’s been in the entertainment business since she was in a child. She was on Broadway. And now, she’s still an entertainer, but also a mom and she’s been living toxic-free as I’ve said, as we’ve both said since the year 2000. So she has a lot of experience with this subject that we cover on this radio show.

So Pia, before the break, you were talking about eating out. One of the things that I find is that there are certain restaurants that you just can’t find out any information, but if you go to better restaurants, then a lot of restaurants are now serving organic ingredients. At least they’ll tell you what’s in it and that they have some knowledge about the ingredients. Other restaurants, they’re just taking some frozen thing that was prepared at some other place and putting it in a microwave and it’s not fresh food at all.

But what do you find when you go to a restaurant? Do you find that it’s easier or difficult to get organic and to find things out?

PIA ZADORA: Well, there’s just a few restaurants that I go to because I know that they will disclose and I know that their standards are higher than your average restaurant. If they’ll have wild fish, they’ll tell you what’s wild, what isn’t. They’ll have some organic vegetables or salad or green. They’ll have free range if not organic, but usually like in [inaudible 00:17:09] Ranch, they cook something like that.

You just have to trust and know that you’re going to go to is going to be honest and then you’re okay! If I’m traveling, driving from Vegas to L.A. or something and get hungry and you have to go into one of the chain restaurants…

DEBRA: I know!

PIA ZADORA: Oh, my gosh! Oh, my gosh! You can just taste the difference and the sugar that they put in and everything. It’s just mind-boggling. And if you’re hungry, you’re hungry. Either take something in the car or have something that you know is not okay.

DEBRA: I know that that really is – I’ve done a fair amount of driving myself especially on highways like that. It’s just the food is so few and far between.

I remember when I was moving from California to Florida, my husband and I, we would decide that we would stop along the way and have breakfast. When we left in the morning, we didn’t eat at the hotel or some place just so that we’d have like a goal for, “Let’s have a rest and have breakfast.”

And when we got to Florida, we stayed in [inaudible 00:18:33]. I can’t even remember how to say that. And then we have to drive down to the Tampa area where I live in Clearwater. We drove and drove and drove and drove through the Florida jungle and drove and drove and drove. The only food that there was for miles and miles was boiled peanuts and I was never so happy in my life to say Denny’s.

PIA ZADORA: Oh, I know, I know.

DEBRA: But I don’t want this to sound like I eat at Denny’s all the time because I don’t. But if you are in a situation like that and that’s all the food there is, really, your choice is are you going to eat it or you’re just not going to eat.

PIA ZADORA: Exactly!

DEBRA: And so I know that for myself, as much as I love to enjoy some small, locally-owned restaurant, they’re not always there.

PIA ZADORA: Right!

DEBRA: I know for myself if I go on a trip, I’ve always got snacks on the car, so that I can choose if I’m going to eat at Denny’s or not, that I have a choice. That I think is an important thing to do.

I used to eat in places like that and now, it’s just like I don’t want to even eat them, eat those things. I’ll tell you that one thing that I read about on my food blog recently was that I started being able to get just pork belly, which is what bacon is made out of. I love bacon. I think everybody loves bacon. Even a lot of diets like the Paleo diet, they recommend eating bacon – and low carbs diet. Everybody is eating bacon.

But the thing about bacon is that in addition to the fact that virtually all bacon has sugar on it of one sort or another, it’s also smoked. And so all those chemicals, those combustion byproduct chemicals from the smoke actually get into the meat. And so that’s a reason that I stopped eating bacon a long time ago because of that.
But recently now, I’ve been getting pork bellies and they don’t have any of that stuff on it. It’s just the meat. It’s just the meat and it’s really good quality pork too. It tastes so delicious.

And then the other day, there was some bacon and I thought, “Well, you know, I’ll just eat this little bit of bacon” and it actually didn’t taste good to me anymore because I’m so accustomed to not eating smoked and sugar and all those things and just have the raw meat. It was a really interesting experience.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah. But to get back to the Denny’s thing and traveling on the road, the scary part is that 90% of America just eats that stuff and thinks it’s okay on a regular basis.

DEBRA: Yeah, we’re on the next break already. That went quick. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, my guest today is Pia Zadora and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pia Zadora, Golden Globe winner, Grammy nominee, film star, singer. She’s been around a long time, since she was a child. She was a child star and has been around as long as I can remember.

So Pia, did you find that your children, being raised in a toxic-free way, did you find that they had less health problems than other children?

PIA ZADORA: Yes, my first two were not really raised in a toxic-free world because I wasn’t aware of it. I first became aware of it 15 years ago when you and I hooked up. But I still think that each year increases.

Everything, it worsens in terms of chemicals and additives and foods and paints and everything.

So I think it’s more important to do it now more than ever. But I do think my younger, my baby is better. He’s clearer, he’s calmer, his skin is better. You know, they go out once they turn teenagers. You can’t stop them from having soda or eating Dorito’s with the other kids when they go out, but I think the important time is when you’re younger and they’re eating, when they’re babies, when they’re three, four, five years old. There’s more neuroplasticity and they’re more vulnerable. And I think at that time, if you feed them organically and you surround them with healthy things –

And toys, these pleasant toys! When he was a baby, there were all kinds of Lego stuff going on and people were being that plastic and Legos and from China. It’s horrible when you really think that kids, small kids, innocent, vulnerable kids are being poisoned by their toys.

DEBRA: I just think that that’s unbelievable. We should be able to live in a pure world where the environment isn’t attacking us all the time. Fortunately, we can create our own homes to be that way. But still, when we go out on the world, we’re still being exposed to those toxic chemicals in places like pesticides on public lawns and when kids go to school.

Even schools now, there’s some movement towards removing most toxic chemicals from schools. But most schools still are toxic and children go into toxic schools and they’re fed non-organic lunches.

There’s been so much progress over the last 30 years since I’ve been doing this, but there’s still much more to be done. Still so much more.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah, there’s not enough. There’s not enough progress.
DEBRA: Yeah. It needs to go faster and there needs to be more. I think about this every day, how can I get more information faster and change more lives because we really now need to be considering about everybody in the world and be looking at the regulations and why isn’t everybody aware of this and why isn’t everybody making the choices that you and I are making because it just is common sense, wouldn’t you think?
PIA ZADORA: Yeah, absolutely. But the awareness is just not enough right now – it’s better, but it’s not enough.
DEBRA: I agree. Well, we’re contributing to that today. We’re bringing more awareness to more people. We’ll just keep pushing it forward because we need to have a toxic-free world for everyone.

So what is the most difficult thing you found in order to change?

PIA ZADORA: Well, the more and more you get into it, the more you look at under microscope, you realize that – first, thing it’s just like a food, it’s just a cleaning solution, then you realize it’s the varnishes on the furniture. I’m like, “Oh, my God! What am I going to do? I’m just decorating a new house?” “Oh, no. You can’t use any of that.” At first, it’s scary.

And then I got all organic furniture. And at that time, there weren’t that many choices in terms of colors, so I have to use the all-natural fabric. Now, there are more choices and prints and all that good stuff coming that you can find through certain websites. But who would’ve thought that your furniture is poisoning you or your rug? I mean, you think, “Okay, maybe the carpet painter,” but you don’t think that. That was very hard for me in the beginning.

DEBRA: Especially at that time. I remember in 2000 when we were working on your house, I remember working with your interior decorator to get your furniture to be non-toxic.

PIA ZADORA: Yes, Michael Smith. And he actually decorated the White House after that.

DEBRA: Really?

PIA ZADORA: Yeah, he’s an amazing decorator. There’s wonderful stuff that he didn’t understand, I mean what we were talking about. He thought I was off the wall.

DEBRA: Yeah, but we did end up with some pretty nice pieces for you, but it was very limiting what we had to choose from at the time. Whereas now today, there’s many more places to get furniture. But still, I would say that one of the things that’s so different now is that we have more awareness than we’ve ever had before in terms of I can produce more studies about what’s toxic than I could years ago.

When I first started, there were no studies that said that carpet was toxic. I could just smell it and I knew that people were getting sick. But now, they’ve measured it and studied the chemicals in it. And you can get studies that show all the list of chemicals in carpets. It’s in the Chicago Tribute about fire retardants in sofas. There’s all these people with fire retardant sofas that now understand that they’re being exposed to fire retardants every time they sit on their sofa.

PIA ZADORA: And how about fire retardants in babies’ pajamas.

DEBRA: I know! I mean, that’s just ridiculous. I’m sorry, it’s just not a good thing. Fire retardants, babies? I mean, there’s all these attention on fire retardants so that there’s not a fire, but babies are not smoking cigarettes. Maybe they have to be protected from their parents or visitors who are smoking cigarettes that might draw the ashes on their bed. It’s so toxic and babies are so vulnerable.

It just boggles my mind that the people who are making these decisions don’t understand this and that we as consumers need to be watching for it.

So we need to go to break again. We’ll listen more of Pia singing. We’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pia Zadora. We’re talking about her toxic-free life. Pia, I know that one of the things that I noticed about living in a toxic-free way is that the products themselves are so much more enjoyable to use.

One of the first things I noticed was that it was so much more comfortable to wear cotton than polyester and there was one Christmas when I ate an organic orange for the first time and I was stunned that it didn’t taste like what I thought an orange tested like (like fungicide) and that it actually tasted like an orange. I gave everybody oranges for Christmas because I was so excited that I wanted them to taste a real orange.
So my question is what are some of your favorite products that are toxic-free?

PIA ZADORA: I’m very much into aromatherapy. I love home sprayed with lavender and I love creams, body lotions with essential oils. It just feels so good and it’s such a difference. When I was traveling and I ran out of my cream and I had used something that was in the hotel, I mean it smelled awful and it felt awful. I just couldn’t use it. You get used to this stuff and it becomes a part of you. It just feels so pure. You feel happy, your body feels happy. it really, really sound silly, but it’s true.

DEBRA: Well, I think our bodies feel happy when we use something like aromatherapy – and these are real, honest to goodness natural essential oils from plants. The difference is because the natural plant essences are actually alive and healing and compatible with our bodies whereas those other fragrances that aren’t are made from petrochemicals and they’re just artificial and there’s nothing there that actually heals your body.

And so many times, when we’re not using these natural produces and are instead using these synthetic ones, our bodies aren’t being nourished. It’s like taking a drug for symptoms. A prescription drug for symptoms might alleviate your symptom, but taking something like a natural, homeopathic remedy will actually heal your body. And so when we’re using these products, there’s actual healing nature to them.

PIA ZADORA: Right, right. And you don’t feel invaded. I mean, with toxic stuff, you feel like there’s an invasive element going on. It doesn’t feel, smell and taste right.

DEBRA: That’s exactly right. And yeah, there is like a right-ness to it. Yeah, I feel that too. So what other natural products do you like?

PIA ZADORA: I like everything! The interesting this is we had a leak in the house and I had these sustainable, beautiful wooden floors put in, all-natural and all that, it just came with a little vinegar and a little warm water and it just – I love baking soda and I like to clean vegetables, wash my vegetables with vinegars. You can just see all the grind and the dirt coming out from them. It’s like the really natural things are fun.

Tea tree oil as a cleanser. I’m a little bit of a germophobe, so I carry my wipes and my tea tree and everything. Because I live in Vegas and I work in Vegas, I’m always opening a door or doing gas and all that. That’s a great way to just carry germs and get sick and get cold and all kinds of stuff.

So I actually have these little plastic food handling gloves that I keep in my purse. I dispose of them when I open a door or something. A gazillion people in every hotel I go to opens those doors and they have colds, they sneeze or whatever, so I use my tea tree wipes when I sit down to eat and after eating or touching something or on a plane. I’m wiping the arm rest or the tray table with the tea tree wipes. So that’s a fun thing for me too.

DEBRA: That’s a really good idea. A lot of people use – I forgot what that’s called, those products that you wipe your hands on to kill the germs. There’s a word for this, I’m just not thinking of it.

PIA ZADORA: You mean Purell?

DEBRA: Stuff like that. And those are alcohol-based. That alcohol is just made from crude oil. There’s nothing natural about it. It’s just alcohol-based. So to use something like tea tree oil actually has natural anti-bacterial properties to it, so you’re using exactly the right thing. And I think that for somebody like you who’s out there in public spaces all the time, that’s a really wise thing to do to protect yourself from germs. Somebody like me who’s in my house all the time, that’s probably not as necessary.

PIA ZADORA: Yeah, because you’re not vulnerable.

DEBRA: But you, you’re doing exactly the right thing. You’re doing exactly the right thing, yeah.

PIA ZADORA: And I’mshaking hands with people all the time. You just have to keep yourself clean.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. Good idea, good idea. So let’s see, things like clothing. Do you wear natural fiber clothing?

PIA ZADORA: I have all my pajamas made from organic cotton. I buy them from different websites like[inaudible 00:45:10] or I have them made from stuff that I order from Genesis and all that stuff. But you know, my every day stuff, I can’t because I just need it to be – or the sweats, I do organic and natural. But my show clothing and all that other stuff, I can’t. But I do send them to organic cleaners, to non-toxic cleaners. I use non-toxic cleaning. I switched to them and all that. And I always wash or clean them after I buy them to get that initial chemical stuff. You can just smell it off of them.

DEBRA: Yes, yes.

PIA ZADORA: But it’s important to use non-toxic cleaners. My God, I mean that’s very…

DEBRA: So how do you clean your house? What kind of cleaners would you use to clean your house?

PIA ZADORA: Well, I use Planet Solution from Whole Food for different things. I use natural, organic vodka and I use vinegar as I told you and the organic Dr. Bronner’s soaps and all that stuff and just all-natural products. You can smell them. Some of the natural products aren’t that natural. You smell them right away and it’s like, “Uh-uh, this is not the best,” so you switch to the next.

It’s pretty much at Whole Foods and those places because that’s really the only resource that we have for that kind of stuff. I’m not as evolved as you, which is why I call you and email you and ask you about all the different products and things like about the – what was it about the glass that they said that there was – what was it in the glass?

DEBRA: Oh, lead in the glass?

PIA ZADORA: Lead in the glass – I mean, at the craziest places. They’re like, “Well, these glasses have lead” but crystal glasses actually have some lead. You’re, “How do you get lead-free glass?” It’s like, “Oh, God! I got to call Debra or email Debra.”

DEBRA: Well, that’s why I’m here. That’s why I’m here. But I think you’re doing a pretty good job from what I know, from the questions that you’re asking, that you’re looking to see at every turn, that you’re wanting to make sure that if there’s a toxic exposure that you’re aware of it. And as you become aware of it, you try to find out the answer and try to do the best you can. I think that that’s a really, really good thing to do.

Over time, all these different things come up and we all just make changes and we become less and less toxic.

PIA ZADORA: Yup,yup.

DEBRA: Well, thank you so much for being on, Pia. It was a pleasure. We’re at the end of the show. I wish you very well in continuing to have a toxic-free home. I know you have a question to me about swimming pools that I need to answer. I will do that and I’ll also put it on my website so everybody can see what the answer is.

Swimming pools, there’s a lot of new things out and I want to take time to explain what the differences are because I went through all that with my pool as well.

So thank you so much. Have a wonderful holiday!

PIA ZADORA: Thank you, Debra. You too. Have fun! And I’ll talk to you soon.

DEBRA: Okay, thanks. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. I’m going to be taking a break for the next three weeks and I’ll be on Tuesday, January 6th. And so during the interim, please go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to as many of the past archive shows as you’d like. There are so many interesting shows.

And I’m also now working on transcribing all the shows, which is really important to me because there’s so much information in these shows. I know that it’s a lot easier to just scan through a transcript and find that nugget that you’re looking for especially if you’re listening to something and you hear something that you’re really interested in. You can go to the transcript and look. I’m trying to get all the links to different websites that we’ve mentioned in the transcripts so they’re really ending up being a valuable resource on into the future.

There’s so much to learn and what I’m working on is getting as many knowledgeable experts on as I can and people who are making toxic-free products. We’ll just continue on 2015 after the holiday.

Thank you so much for listening. Again, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to the archives during the holiday. We’ll be back in 2015. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

How to Restore Your “Virgin Hair”

Diana-and-JimToday my guest is Diana Kaye. She and husband James Hahn are co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. They’ve been on this show together many times, but today Diana is here to talk about their highly recommended Hair Wash, and how most hair care products damage your hair with toxic chemicals. I’ve been using this product for several months and what a difference! We’ll talk about your “virgin hair” and how to get your hair back to it’s natural state. Diana and Jim own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. Terressentials Organic Hair Care | Terressentials Pure Earth Hair Wash: Instructions and FAQs | Terressentials Hair Help Resource Guide

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How to Restore Your “Virgin Hair”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Diana Kaye

Date of Broadcast: December 10, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Wednesday, December 10th 2014 and I have a little tickly in my throat today, but the show must go one. You’ll excuse me please if I cough or sneeze, but I’m here and I’m going to be talking to my guest.

Today, it’s Diana Kaye. She’s been on before. She’s one of the co-founders along with her husband, James Hahn of their USDA certified organic business – yes, this is a certified organic business, which is Terressentials. We’ve had her on in the past talking about different aspects of what it means to be organic.

But today, we’re going to do a different kind of show with her. We’re going to talk about their award-winning – well, I think it’s an award-winning. Anyway, it’s highly recommended hair products. It’s been featured on television and written up in the Washington Post and all kinds of other places. I’ve actually been using it on my hair for the last three months.

But the thing about it is that not only is it completely natural and I think mostly organic (Diana will tell us this), but it also is completely different than most hair products in that it actually restores your hair to what she calls “virgin hair”, your virgin state of hair before the hair is damaged by all the toxic hair care products that we used.
So we’re going to hear about that today and hear about her product. And let me tell you, my hair looks very different and very much more soft and lovely and beautiful.

Hello, Diana.

DIANA KAYE: Well, hi there.

DEBRA: How are you doing?

DIANA KAYE: I’m sorry to hear you’re not feeling well.

DEBRA: Well, I’m sorry too. But you know what? I’m not really sick. I did a lot of singing in my Dickens costume this weekend for Christmas and parties and just not quite enough rest. I’m not really sick. I’m just kind of on the edge of having a tickle in my throat.

DIANA KAYE: Ah! Oh, I see.

DEBRA: So I might [coughing], but I’ll try to not cough in the microphone.

DIANA KAYE: You wore your voice out.

DEBRA: I’m otherwise in good spirits and otherwise feeling well. It’s just my throat.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, that’s good. That’s better news.

DEBRA: Yeah, I’m sitting here sipping herbal tea.

DIANA KAYE: Me too!

DEBRA: Good! So let’s talk about hair.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, that’s a very interesting topic.

DEBRA: And a very big topic.

DIANA KAYE: It is.

DEBRA: So first I want to say let’s just start out and give your website. It’s Terressentials.com. It’s probably easier to just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and scroll down the page and look for today’s show because I’ve put links to pages on Diana’s website that gives you in writing the things that we’re going to be talking about today. So if you are scribbling madly and would just like to see the webpage, it’s right there at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. I included a link there for you.

So why don’t we start with talking about what’s wrong with hair care products.

DIANA KAYE: Okay, that’s a whole other giant can of worms.

DEBRA: I know.

DIANA KAYE: The problem is we live in a very plastic world today and people, they actually wrap their bodies in plastic. For example, people today wear clothing that is polyester, nylon, acetate, any acrylics, the many members of different types of synthetic petroleum-based fibers.

People also live in environments and work in environment where they’re walking on synthetic petroleum-based fiber carpets. They sit in an office chair that has a plastic upholstery material covering it. They often use purses made of plastic, hair brushes made of plastic.

What happens as a result of living with all of these plastic is that there is a lot of friction that’s generated due to constant walking on plastics, wearing shoes with plastic soles, rubbing your plastic-wrapped bum on your plastic-covered upholstery. And so how this affects people in regards to hair is that it generates a lot of static electricity.

What a lot of people are unaware of is that many of the new or newer surfactants that has been engineered by industrial chemical engineers, they actually have inherent anti-static properties built into this chemical product in order to accommodate this world of synthetic static electricity that we live in.

DEBRA: Before you go on, I’d just like to say something about static electricity and synthetics and that is when I started doing research, this is why you have fabric softener, to reduce the static electricity. And so I was looking into what would be a natural fabric softener. And what I discovered was that if you wear natural fibers, you don’t need fabric softener at all period because there’s no static electricity. I thought that was very interesting.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, it’s absolutely…

DEBRA: So it’s only the synthetics that require having some kind of anti-static. I remember the days when I used to wear synthetic clothing, you take it out of the dryer and it all sticks together because of the static electricity.

DIANA KAYE: Correct.

DEBRA: And with natural fibers, it doesn’t do that at all. So there’s just no need for hair conditioners and fabric softeners and all those things that are in our products today to counteract the static electricity from these synthetics.

DIANA KAYE: And that’s exactly what we try to educate people. When you look at the big picture – and Debra, you know by this time I believe that we are about the big picture. We try to encourage people to understand what we’re talking about and start replacing these chemical fibers that they are literally enrobing themselves with on a daily basis even if it’s one thing at a time because over a year, two years or three years, you can replace most of the synthetics in your life.

And one of the things that we want people to start with is the things that are closest to your body. And thus, our hairwash, which as you mentioned is completely different from conventional, bubbly, surfactant shampoo product. It’s not a surfactant. It doesn’t have any inherent anti-static properties. It’s not something that when it gets into our water supply or gets into a septic field can disrupt the microflora and fauna of our soil ecosystem or of our water ways. It’s a completely different approach to cleansing the hair.

And so we want to tell people that when you look at our hair wash and want to try it, you can’t think of it as a shampoo because it doesn’t work like that.

DEBRA: No, it’s not. It’s not a shampoo, but it is a hairwash.

DIANA KAYE: Yeah.

DEBRA: I remember I first tried this many years ago like 20 years ago – you’ve been making this for a long time.

DIANA KAYE: A long time.

DEBRA: A long time. I remember that I was very accustomed to shampoo and I liked it to bubble up and wanted it to bubble up and – ooh, we’ve been talking instead of watching the clock. So we’re coming up on the break, but I’ll finish my sentence.

I remember writing in one of my books about washing your hair with baking soda to get rid of dandruff and that was totally different. And so when I got to your hair wash (I’m not even going to call it ‘shampoo’), it isn’t bubbly, it doesn’t leave your hair squeaky clean, but it removes the things that needs to be removed.

It was such a different experience that I just couldn’t even fathom using this or figure out or anything and so I ended up not using it. I went back at least a natural shampoo.

We’ll pick up this thread of thought when we get back from the break because there’s so much more to say. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kay from Terressentials. We’re talking about how to restore your virgin hair, how to get your hair back to it was when you were born. Isn’t that an amazing thing to think of? But I’m well on my way to doing that. We’ll talk more about that when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. I just noticed that there’s a broken link one of your – I was just going to all the pages that we’ve put up here and there’s a broken link on one of those that I’ll fix in the next commercial. So if you’ve already gone to Toxic Free Talk Radio and you’re checking out the links to Diana’s site, never fear, I will fix this in the next break.

And again, the website is Terressentials.com. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look for this show and there is a number of links that you can just go there – once I fixed the link, haha. Okay, it’s been a busy few days.

DIANA KAYE: You poor woman.

DEBRA: So we were talking about how different the shampoo is. It was like I just gave up on it, but I came back to it because it all started making sense to me 20 years later as I continued to research and research shampoo. Even organic shampoos, they have organic versions of still the same types of things that are damaging to your hair. They’re designed in the wrong way.

So Diana, would you tell us more about what are the kinds of ingredients that are damaging your hair and why we should be using hair washes instead?

DIANA KAYE: Well, the number one thing that damages the hair – and I’ve said this over and over again to women – is the perming, the relaxing, the highlighting, bleaching and dying. Those are the primary degraders of your hair and they’re very toxic for the environment.

And so the number one thing that we try to do is get women to understand what exactly they’re doing to themselves when they use these kinds of products and hopefully, switch folks over to lemon juice and sunlight or henna for darker colors so that we can preemptively stop this major degradation and attack to the hair.

The second big, big issue for everyone are these surfactants, the foamy, bubbly substances that most folks alive today has been using on their hair nearly every day (if not, every other day) to supposedly clean their hair. The actual surfactant, a.k.a. detergent attack the hair.

If you can envision a cleaner for your garage floor, which is going to attack oil and grease, the surfactants works in the same way. They not only break the surface tension of the water as a castile, a traditional castile soap can do, they go a step further where they actually attack the hair shaft, which is a similar version of a substance called keratin, which also makes up our nails, but the hair is a much finer, more delicate version of what our nails are.

So when you wash your hair every day with a substance that is literally attacking your hair, what happens over time is that the hair shaft becomes pitted, it can look like – and I’ll use this to contrast, a point of reference.

When you look at a baby’s hair, an infant under a high powered microscope, what you’re going to see is something that looks like a smooth rod of glass. It’s shiny because it’s smooth. And because it’s smooth and hard, it reflects light. So can look lighter than it actually is because of the refraction with the natural light and it feels softer because the hair hasn’t been attacked and it’s not rough.

Now if you contrast take a piece of hair from someone who has been – and let’s just take the worst case scenario – someone who has been chemically altering their hair with one of the substances we talked about (dying, coloring, perming, relaxing) and also on a daily basis using a conventional and yes, even a so-called ‘natural’ shampoo product and you look at that hair, what you’re going to see is something that looks like a piece of hickory twig or hickory wood.

The surface is pitted, the exterior layers are actually peeling and curling up. What happens ultimately with the worst types of attacking for people who do very regular chemical treatments, the hair starts to look like swiss cheese. It breaks easily, it’s difficult to grow past a particular length because of all the damage.

What many companies do is they create products for, let’s say – and everyone has heard of this – colored treated hair or special hair conditioning treatment for people who perm or relax their hair. These products have a high percentage of glue, of polymers, acrylate, PVP copolymers, which stands for polyvinylpyrrolidone.
There are various silicones, dimethicones in these products including so-called natural biopolymers, which would be seen on the label as wheat protein, p-protein, o-protein, et cetera. Not only do these polymers thickens thin products, but they are designed to actually glue the hair and hold it together.

DEBRA: Oh, my God!

DIANA KAYE: It glues down those curling, rough edges in an attempt to make the hair look like it is not so damaged.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. We’ll continue after the break and talk about what your hair wash does to heal this instead of continuing to damage the hair. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is Diana Kay. Her website is Terressentials.com. But I suggest that you go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, look for this show and see the links to specific hair pages on her site. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kay. She and her husband, James Hahn are co-founders of their USDA certified organic business, Terressentials. They’ve been making organic, personal care products for almost as long as I’ve been writing about them. So they have much experience. They’re very organic. It’s worth going and checking out their website, Terressentials.com.
Today, we’re talking about their hair wash product. Diana has been telling us all the reasons why all the commercial kind of hair products are bad for our hair and how it damages our hair. So Diana, tell us now about your hair wash and what it’s made from and why it’s so wonderful?

DIANA KAYE: Yes, we’re going to move away from the gloomy aspect.

DEBRA: Yes.

DIANA KAYE: So our hair wash is very, very different. It doesn’t contain any soap, surfactants or coating agent like any of the plastics or silicones that we had talked about and it cleans in a very different way.

Our hair wash is a clay-based product that we have blended with organic herbal extract that we make all ourselves or a blend of organic essential oils if it’s one of the aromatic versions of our hairwash and that’s it.

Many, many years ago, we first tried to offer this product in its raw state, which was literally rocks. People were not very receptive to the idea they have to grind a rock with a mortar and pestle.

DEBRA: Maybe that’s the one I used.

DIANA KAYE: So that didn’t slide. The second way we tried to offer it after that wasn’t very successful was as a ground-up version that you would mix yourself at home and people weren’t very receptive to that either because it was time-consuming and you could only make enough that you could use that day or the next day.
So we went back to the drawing board and we said, “Okay, we’re going go to do a pre-mixed version that at least is going to resemble a liquid or a semi-liquid kind of a product that hopefully people might be more receptive to. And as it turned out, people were more receptive a version that was in a bottle that they could squeeze out, so we were able to reach more people.

So the product works very simply. Instead of attacking your hair to try to eat away or dissolve oils and grease and then by surface tension reactions remove other kinds of articles from your hair, our hair wash, which is a clay-based product works by absorbing.

It grabs a hold of excess oils, dirt particles, hydrocarbon particulate matter that’s both in the air or any other kind of petrochemical particulate. And this is what’s so fantastic about this amazing of Mother Earth, it grabs all of these particles to its limit of absorption, pulls it into the clay itself and holds it there forever.

So when you apply it to your hair, there’s no foaming action, no bubbles. And admittedly, Debra, I think as you’ve found out, it’s very different because we had been – even me, I was conditioned from the time I was a baby that the day you wash your hair is to expect lots of foams and bubbles. And so we don’t have that with this product. So psychologically, it’s a pretty dramatic feel on your hair.

DEBRA: It is, it is.

DIANA KAYE: And for a lot of people, they find it hard to accept, but if someone is really committed to moving away from chemical treatments, chemical detergents and all the plastics and chemical preservatives, chemical fragrances that are associated with conventional, so-called natural and even the so-called organic types of shampoos, this is the product where you can move away from all of that once you’ve made a personal decision that that’s something that you’re committed to doing.

When you use the hair wash, there’s a transition period. It does take some time because the hair washes is very gently to try to remove all of these plastics and other residues that has been deposited and actually impregnated into your hair from all your previous washing and conditioning. We advice people straight up that you need to approach using this product in a different fashion.

And we actually have an entire blog, very detailed, that explains how to use it, how to answer questions, what to expect, how you can speed it what we call the ‘detox transition period’. But once you read that and understand how to use it over a period of a week to two or three weeks (which really depends on how think your hair is, how long your hair is and its state of damage or health), once folks understand that and go through the transition, over time, as the old damaged hair is replaced with new virgin hair, people can experience essentially a rebirth of their hair in their head because they can feel as the new hair grows in what does real hair feels like.

And depending upon how quickly someone’s hair grows and how frequently they wash their hair, the time period varies. But generally, within six months, most people who don’t have really long hair are going to have this enlightening experience where they finally get to see what their real hair is like. Most people find their hair become softer, more manageable. It has a natural, healthier shine to it.

I think personally that one of the best things is you have this peace of mind knowing that you’re engaging actively with Mother Earth and you’re not contributing to water waste, pollution and air pollution by supporting industrial chemical factories that manufacture all of the conventional shampoo ingredients.

DEBRA: We’re going to talk more about this when we come back. I have a comment I want to make. I always want to make comments I guess.

DIANA KAYE: Yes! That’s good.

DEBRA: But I could wait until after the break so that I won’t have to cut myself off. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And today, my guest is Diana Kay. She’s from Terressentials.com. But also, you can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, scroll down, find today’s show and see all the links that I’ve posted (which are now there and live and correct) to her pages about hair care. We’ll talk more about this when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dian Kay. We’re talking about how to restore your virgin hair both by allowing your hair to grow out and damage it, but also to detox and heal the damaged hair that you have.

And I just want to make this statement because this is one of those big picture statements. In our industrial society, we’re so accustomed to using industrial products and so we think in terms of there’s the toxic industrial product and then there’s the natural products, which actually aren’t natural.

The ingredients originally came from renewable resources, but they’ve all gone through industrial processes in order for those ingredients to go into the shampoo. And then you have the organic ones, which are the same thing. Even though they tend to be more whole ingredients, there’s a lot of these ingredients that started out as something organic, but again, went through an industrial process in order to turn into that we know of and love.
And then what Diana is doing is she’s making something that is more of ingredients in their natural state. That’s the point that I wanted to make and that is what we call natural or organic isn’t in its natural state when you’re looking at an industrial product.

And then that the hair that she’s talking about when she’s talking about “virgin hair”, it’s getting our hair, allowing our own natural hair to grow out and not be damaged. And so what we have is actually natural hair, which most people never experienced if what you’re using is typical hair care products.

DIANA KAYE: Excellent point really.

DEBRA: Thank you. And I’ve been using your hair wash for a few months. At first, it took quite a while for me to – I mean, my hair didn’t look good. But I was at a place where it didn’t matter to me. I wasn’t being on television or something like that and I just decided I was just going to have my hair look the way it looks.

And so then, finally, I talked to Diana, she said, “Well, use apple cider vinegar rinse” and that helped tremendously. And then she suggested that I wash with her body wash. And that. I liked that even more.

And so now I’m using a combination of the hair wash and the body wash because I still want to have the detox effect of the clay and the healing effect of it on my hair, but I also want my hair to look better. Since I’ve been using those two products and using the apple cider vinegar mixed with water after using each one, my hair looks better than it’s ever looked in my life.

It’s soft and it’s thicker and it has more body to it, so I can brush it and it stays in place without hair spray or anything. I look in the mirror and I think, “I look beautiful. My hair looks beautiful.”

DIANA KAYE: Yehey!

DEBRA: It’s not flying up in the air from the static electricity and it’s not all flat. I tend to have oil hair, but it doesn’t look oil or greasy or anything. I just am so happy with my hair. I’m really looking forward to having all my old, damaged hair grow out and really just having my natural hair and using Diana’s natural, totally natural (in their natural state) products in order to keep mine in its natural state heart.

And that’s a totally, totally different thing. it’s like going into a different realm of nature as it is instead of industrial natural.

DIANA KAYE: Yeah, we’re going back to our roots.

DEBRA: Literally.

DIANA KAYE: We existed or co-existed with the planet that we walk on every day and how humans evolved over thousands and millions of years. People, before the invention of all these industrial chemicals, they only had plant extracts and oils from plants and animals and natural clays and minerals and salt to take care of their bodies. And here’s the amazing part. Somehow, humans managed to evolve and flourish without industrial chemicals.

DEBRA: Yes! And they were a lot healthier and they didn’t have health care systems and they survived.
DIANA KAYE: Yes!

DEBRA: So I see over and over again that in our culture, we have this industrial system where products are being made that are damaging to hair or body or skin or whatever, internal organs. And then we have to do things to counteract the effects.

We can just skip all that and just maintain our bodies in a natural way, in a natural state as close to nature as possible. And that’s an entirely different experience. This product and this way of thinking is part of that being in our natural state.

It’s funny that there’s even an English word that I’ve been able to find that means being in one’s natural state. But I guess when language developed, I think that probably people didn’t think, “Oh, there’s going to be a time in the future when everybody is damaged by industrial products…”

DIANA KAYE: We need these chemicals every day.

DEBRA: “…and we’re going to have to distinguish.”

DIANA KAYE: It is bizarre.

DEBRA: It is, but that’s what’s happening. That’s what’s happening and we just need to be aware of it and make decisions to find these products and find these ways of being and have this be our standard to say, “We want to be in our natural state.” I mean, I think that’s the best way I can think of to say it.

DIANA KAYE: Yes. What we’ve always espoused is living as close to the earth as possible.

DEBRA: Yes, I totally agree.

DIANA KAYE: One of the best images that I have in mind that I absolutely love is on our baby line of products where we found this beautiful photograph of a toddler totally bare bum, naked to the world and totally filled with innocence. This toddler is bending over right in the surf, the ocean surf with his feet in the water and his hands touching the earth.

DEBRA: Oh, I’m going to have to look for that.

DIANA KAYE: That image just really to me espouses everything that we are trying to communicate to the world, to our friends and customers about how we feel about how we need to care for our bodies and be respectful of the earth because let’s face it, this is it. In our lifetimes, it’s doubtful that we’re going to find another beautiful planet that we could live on. So we have to take better care of the planet that we have.

And what I wanted to mention before we close for today is some folks also have very curly hair, very thick, coarse hair. Sometimes, during your transition period, a little oil helps them to soften their very rough pores and damaged hair.

Our hair help resource guide that we have online talks about the different oils and butters that we have that folks unlike me (I have very fine, thin and straight hair) who might need a little extra help, we have completely organic, USDA certified products that they can feel completely comfortable using to help condition their dry or irritated scalps or their coarse, wiry, very thick or curly or kinky or damaged hair during their transition period to the natural hair, truly natural hair.

DEBRA: Yeah, I’m so looking forward to that. I really am. It’s something that I haven’t even thought about because you grow up with things being the way they are. Most people alive today, most people listening to this show probably grew up in the industrial age – well, of course, in the industrial age because that started way back in the 1800s. But even especially since the fifties (like I was born in 11955 and yes, I’m that old)…

DIANA KAYE: You survived!

DEBRA: I did! I survived all those chemicals. Better living through chemistry.

DIANA KAYE: Exactly!

DEBRA: But it was really in the mid-fifties after World War II that there were so many chemicals and so many new technology came out, that’s when plastic was developed and all those things and we’re really – like my generation was the first generation that has lived with that many toxic chemicals. And we find that children being born today have illnesses that previous generations didn’t see it, very early ages. And so we’re really seeing that the toxic chemicals are having an effect even in very few generations.

Anyway, we’re coming right up on the end of the show. We’ve only got 30 seconds left.

DIANA KAYE: Once again, we talked to the end.

DEBRA: So I just want to mention that if you order from Terressentials during the Christmas season, if you order more than $50, you get chocolates – very delicious, organic chocolates.

DIANA KAYE: And fair trade.

DEBRA: And fair trade.

DIANA KAYE: Yes.

DEBRA: Delicious, organic, fair-trade chocolates, so it’s a great time to order. Go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look for all these links that I’ve put there to Terressentials. Thank you for listening. Be well. We’ll be back tomorrow.

DIANA KAYE: Thanks, Debra.

DEBRA: Thank you, Diana.

All Organic Lubricant for Women

My guest today is Rinaldo S. Brutoco, Founder and Chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch. We’ll be talking about all-organic Aloe Cadabra®, the USA’s first FDA-cleared organic vaginal lubricant and daily moisturizer, and toxic chemicals found in lubricants that can easily be absorbed through the skin. Rinaldo is a successful entrepreneur, executive, author, and futurist and the Founding President of the World Business Academy. His work includes clean energy; climate change analysis and mitigation; sustainable business strategy; values-driven leadership; global reconstruction; organic products; and financial products for Sustainable Responsible Impact Investment. Certified organic for more than fifteen years, Seven Oaks Ranch grows and distributes organic produce such as tomatoes, Aloe vera, Meyer lemons, Hass avocados, and garlic. More than seven years ago SOR opened its certified organic kitchen and production facility, where great care is taken to handcraft each of its products. What began as an eleventh-grade economics-class project for young Orion Brutoco and his classmates at Oak Grove School, the project quickly grew into something more: a real business manufacturing a variety of organic and natural products with nationwide distribution. The first product was Garlic Gold®. In 2011 SOR created an organic cosmetics division and proudly announced the nationwide release of its first all-organic cosmetic product Aloe Cadabra. Rinaldo and his wife of 34 years reside in Santa Barbara, where he is also a very active father of four grown children and three grandchildren. www.aloecadabra.comwww.garlicgold.com

read-transcript

 

 

ac---Rinaldo-brutaco

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
All Organic Lubricant for Women

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Rinaldo Brutoco

Date of Broadcast: December 11, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. And if I sound a little different today, it’s because I don’t have much voice.

Actually, I do other things besides talk about toxics. One of the things that I do is at Christmas time, I sing with a group. We get all dressed up in Dickens costumes and sing Christmas songs at various places. We had our first performance over the weekend and I think too many parties. Too much singing, too many parties, so I have a little bit of laryngitis this morning, but the show must go on and we’re going to have a really good show today.

We have good shows every day. And if you haven’t listened to all the shoes (I think there’s more than 200 of them now), you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and you can listen to all the shows we’ve ever done except number one. We didn’t get number one recorded.

But also, I’m working on the shows transcribed. And so we’re transcribing all the current shows, but also, as quickly as I can get them done, the past shows too. So I can read about them. You can listen to these shows. There’s so much great information and we’re going to have more great information today.

It’s Tuesday, December 9th 2014 and we’re going to talk about something that I think a lot of women (and men too) would be interested in and that is a lubrication for women over a certain age who needs such a thing. We’re going to talk about that because it’s something that people need and want, but many of the commercial products are full of toxic chemicals (which we’re going to find out). But there are natural and organic products available to use instead.

My guest today is Rinaldo Brutoco. He’s the founder and chairman of Seven Oaks Ranch and we’ll be talking about one of the many products that they produce called Aloe Cadabra. It’s the USA’s first FDA-cleared organic vaginal lubricant and daily moisturizer and there are no toxic chemicals.

This is so important because toxic chemicals in lubricants such as this can easily be absorbed through the skin and especially mucous membranes in those sensitive parts of the body.

So let’s get right to it! Hi, Rinaldo.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Hello, Debra Lynn. Thanks for having me on the show.

DEBRA: Thank you so much for being on. I originally wanted you to be on because of Aloe Cadabra, but I see from your bio that you do so many different things. Tell us how you became interested in making natural products.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Sure! I’ve been an organic customer for over 35 years. It’s always been something to keep toxics out of my diet and in a constant [inaudible 00:03:55] that way. And when I moved to Ojai, California (about almost 20 years ago now), I decided to take a chemical ranch and prove that you can turn it into a vibrant, organic property. It was only about 12 ½ acre, which is fairly small for a ranch, but there was enough for me to do. We opened up Seven Oaks Ranch as an organic facility with three years of transition of course. And then I got it certified. It remains certified to this day. I sold it almost five years ago now.

And when I was there, I had started growing products. My first product was garlic. And then I started adding all kinds of other organic products. Every week, were at a farmer’s market. The garlic became an indicator for me of how to improve my yield as a farmer, move further up the food chain so to speak and become a producer, a manufacturer. That’s where I thought the profits were.

I wanted to make this something permanent, so we launched a product line called Garlic Gold, which is 100% organic. All of our products are 100% organic including the lubricant. And so what we did is we launched Garlic Gold. There are only two ingredients in Garlic Gold, extra virgin organic olive oil and organic garlic. It says in the label that’s all. There are no monosyllabic words on my label.

DEBRA: That’s good.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: So we started making that product. That’s now become a line of 15 different SKU’s. And then about three or four years ago, we decided to launch an organic cosmetics division because I became increasingly aware of the toxicity in cosmetics. It troubled me greatly because I’ve been very much in love with my wife for 35 years and I did not want her to continue to be subjected to what I thought as a toxic stew when we were both being so careful of what we ate.

And so we created that division called Live Well Brands, by the way, which is the division that sells Aloe Cadabra and we launched the Aloe Cadabra product. It went nation-wide almost immediately. It’s in every CVS in America. It’s in a whole ton of Walgreens. It’s in Whole Foods and most places. It’s in a variety of other outlets, plus of course, it’s always available on our website, which is always the best price you’ll get, from our website with typically free shipping and stuff like that.

So we’re happy to support retail chains to put an alternative on the shelf, which is non-toxic and which is extraordinarily pleasurable and so we launched the product.

And by the way, you mentioned in the opening, it’s true, vaginal dryness affects about 85% of all women in peri- and post-menopause. But it also turns out that we’ve got a customer market in young women who had just given birth. I could show you testimonials from young women who really found their marriages on the rocks because they just could not return to their normal, naturally lubricated state after giving birth. It was terribly challenging for them and their significant others.

We also discovered that it’s phenomenally well-regarded in the LGBT community (although we never thought of that at the time). I now know that about 40% to 45% of our customers are men and I’m really proud of that because men who care enough about the women or the other men in their life to use something non-toxic is a mark of a good man.

DEBRA: I totally agree with you. I do have your product and I’ve tried it and I do think that it is remarkably pleasurable. It really makes a big difference. I mean, it feels really nice. It really feels nice and it doesn’t feel like you’re using something artificial at all…

RINALDO BRUTOCO: …which we’re not.

DEBRA: No, you’re not! It’s just as natural. I think it says on your website something like, “It’s as natural as nature. It’s as natural as you are.” It feels natural.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah, and the reason is we actually went into some trouble to create it, so it mimics natural feminine muscosity, so it actually feels like the normal, real thing that your body used to produce.

DEBRA: It does, it does.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: And it also totally matches vaginal pH, which is really important because drying or osmolality has now been identified by the Whole Health Organization as one of the leading contributing factors of the transmission of sexually-transmitted disease or STD. So if you don’t want to increase your vulnerability, you don’t want to have a high osmolality rating and things like K-Y and Astroglide are off the blooming charts. I mean, the Whole Health Organization could never distribute them. They’ve asked for us for samples of our product because our osmolality is the lowest known to any lubricant.

DEBRA: What is osmolality?

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Osmolality is drying factor. So when you use something – and particularly, we sell our product both as a vaginal moisturizer. Most women tend to moisturize their skin, faces and what-not at least once or twice a day and they forget that the part of their body which becomes most adversely affected by their hormonal changes is their female organ. They become very, very dry.

And not to get too graphic for your audience, but if you look at the skin in that area under a microscope, you could literally see the cells have cracks between them very similar to a dry lake bed. It’s through those little cracks that infection and vaginal yeast infections, urinary tract infections, that’s where they enter. That’s why they’re so common today.

Well, osmolality rating is how much more drying a product is that you use. And in that category, the only product that is dramatically below the maximum that the UN recommends is Aloe Cadabra.

I’ll just give you an example. You’ll find this fascinating. If you look at the osmolality rating of K-Y – and I can refer you to a website that has all these. I’m trying to see if I can find it for you quickly. Sexual Wellness News will tell you all about osmolality. The reality is that the amount of drying that occurs from almost every conceivable lubricant is way off the charts or is actually below its maximum [inaudible 00:10:43] by World Health Organization.

DEBRA: We can talk about this more after the break. We need to go to break for the commercial. Otherwise, the commercial will start playing right over you. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Rinaldo Brutoco. He is the founder and chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch that makes and sells Aloe Cadabra, a wonderful organic lubricant for women. You could go to his website AloeCadabra.com and you can enter coupon code DEBRA20 – check it out – to get a 20% discount on this product through the month of December, so try it. We’ll be right back.

ac-tube-natural-side1

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Rinaldo Brutoco. He’s the founder and chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch and we’re talking about his product, Aloe Cadabra. That’s the U.S.A.’s first FDA-cleared organic vaginal lubricant and daily moisturizer.

Rinaldo, you did a great job on your website. I’m going to actually go there right now. You did a great job on your website. You have a page called ‘Why?’

RINALDO BRUTOCO: ‘Why?’ Everybody loves that page.

DEBRA: I love that page. Let’s talk about the ‘Why?’ page. Go ahead and tell us about it.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Well, first of all, you were asking, “Who needs this?” And of course, the reason to have it, not just the menopause or age, stress, childbirth, allergies, chemotherapy, vaginal dryness is a major cause –

And our product is natural plant-based, which is really key because it means it’s safe with condoms and toys and all that sort of things as it should be. But it’s also a very powerful way to moisturize.

What we decided to do under the ‘Why?’ page is we showed people what the other products contain. So for example, if you look at K-Y, which is the most popular – the two most popular in the country are K-Y and Astroglide, they both contain propylene glycol. We have a chart that you can see that. We, of course, don’t. Proplylene glycol is the thickening agent used in Anti-freeze. It’s literally used in Anti-freeze.

DEBRA: Yeah, it is.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Talk about a drying agent!

Then petroleum or synthetic-based products. Both K-Y and Astroglide use petroleum-based products that are used traditionally in industrial application. Benzoic acid is a food preservative. We don’t use it.

By the way, all of our products, although we’re not saying that people should use them orally, all of our products are made to food-grade organic standards. So everything we make is 100% edible and toxic-free organic and FDA-cleared.

But then, things I found out like K-Y has hydroxyethylene cellulose, which is using in cleaning solvent, that’s in the product. And then, polyquaternium-15 is used to create body in shampoo and Astroglide uses that as their thickening agent. These are things you would not want to do to a friend, let alone to yourself.

DEBRA: Or to your loved one.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah, particularly where it’s the most sensitive, absorbent part of your female anatomy. And for the LGBT community, they have a similar issue. If they use it in other parts of the anatomy, which are extremely sensitive to absorption.

So the point is if you’re going to watch what you put in your mouth, that’s not only the orifice in your body, please be careful and don’t put highly toxic chemicals that are extraordinarily drying, which will cause you, by the way, to get an undue number of urinary tract infection, et cetera, et cetera.

In fact, I invented the product originally because that’s what my wife was going through. She was like on this yo-yo of going constantly back and forth to the store and having to buy the next cure for what happened. We didn’t know why until –

I’m a bit of a frustrated inventor/scientist and so I started looking into it and oh, my goodness, what’s the oldest healing plant known to human? Well, aloe vera. I looked at 440 strains of aloe vera and only one of them is known to be the healing agent. That’s Barbadensis.

So I started studying Barbadensis, I find it antibacterial and antifungal by nature. I go this is the building block for a great product. About 95.7% of our product is basically organic aloe vera, which has never been heated.

DEBRA: I mean, there’s nothing more healing than that.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Nothing, no.

DEBRA: And so what better product to use in that area of the body. You just got it exactly right.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah. And because it’s natural in every way, there is no clean-up. It will, over time, absorb into your body. You won’t experience any staining of sheets or any of the normal things that can happen because it’s totally natural. Your human body just loves it.

In fact, I tell people, if they haven’t used it before, they should put it on at least once just to get their skin more moisturized before they use it for any intimacy because it will be that much more pleasurable and soothing. We have people write us and say it was sort of like putting water at dry sand at first because it was so absorptive. They loved it. There’s all kinds of wonderful letters.

I just heard Joy Behar on the radio the other with Howard Stern and she was telling the whole audience – this is like last week that she has basically given up sex with her husband because of vaginal dryness and there’s nothing that she can do because she didn’t a single product. So if anybody listening knows Joy Behar, tell her an emergency care package is on its way to her agent for her.

DEBRA: Well, I really can’t say enough about how nice it feels. I mean, even if you just rub it on your hand, it feels nice. And so there are other things that you have besides the aloe. So tell us what else is mixed with it, with the aloe to make it be the texture that it is?

After using it, I thought, “Well, let’s just try…” – I also have just plain aloe vera. I thought, “Let’s just try some aloe vera and see if it’s the same” and it’s not. You’ve definitely made something made its own thing based on the aloe base.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah, it took a while because this product is shelf stable for two years. We don’t use any non-organic ingredient that are not, as I’ve said earlier, food-grade. So it’s not even that I used organic ingredients that you could use in a skin cosmetic preparation. I require everything to be made – we’re the first organic kitchen in Ventura County. We used our organic kitchen as a place where we make our organic products like aloe vera because I want it made literally to that standard.

DEBRA: Right.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: This is for my wife and my friends and as she says to the “sisterhood”, she wants it to be pure. We put things in it like natural vitamin E oil, which we find helps add some lubricity. We like the nourishing quality of vitamin E also as a soothing agent. We do use a little Xanthan, which thickens it up a little bit. It stands up a little stronger than it would if it was just the gel itself.

We do use a very small amount of citric acid from fruits and vegetables. It sounds like that may be stingy, but it’s not. We use a so small amount. That’s how I balance the pH identical to vaginal pH as normally found. In other words, we want vaginal pH to be absolutely identical, so that nothing we’re doing throws the woman’s body off its rhythm.

DEBRA: We need to go to break again, but we’ll be right back and we’ll continue on talking on this subject. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Rinaldo Brutoco. He’s the founder and chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch. We’re talking about his product, all organic Aloe Cadabra. Now, again, you can go to AloeCadabra.com like “Abra Cadabra,” like the magic of oil, the magic you’ll feel when you use it and you can get 20% off by entering DEBRA20 at checkout. We’ll be right back.

ac--aloecadabra-scents

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Rinaldo Brutoco. He’s the founder and chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch. They make all-organic Aloe Cadabra, organic lubricant for women. You can go to their website, AloeCadabra.com and for the month of December, you can get 20% discount if you enter the coupon code, DEBRA20.

Rinaldo, let’s just talk about how Aloe Cadabra is different from other lubricants. You have a very good FAQ page on your website. Let’s start by talking about how is Aloe Cadabra different from other organic and natural lubricants because you’re not the only one in the market, but you were the first and you are unique.

Hello? Are you there?

RINALDO BRUTOCO: I’m right here, Debra. Thank you. I was going to say – I would like to just finish up. I’m going to make an offer also to your listeners. There’s this great doctor. Her name is Dr. Laurie Steelsmith. You may have heard of her. She’s a naturopathic position. She’s literally an MD as well. She’s an acupuncturist. And she’s a huge fan of our product and recommends it in her practice.

She did an article. It’s called ‘Could Certain Lubricants Increase YOUR Risk of Sexually-Transmitted Infections’. We will send a copy – it’s two pages long. We’ll send it electronically to anybody who writes us at info@aloecadabra.com.

And on this second page, I want people to refer to the personal lubricant osmolality chart I was referring to a moment ago. We looked at 15 other products in the marketplace. Now, an osmolality rating for a woman should be close to 260/kg. That’s natural. We come in at 172, which means we are a moisturizer, not a drying agent. We come it 172. Two hundred sixty is the maximum you should hit according to the World Health Organization. K-Y warming jelly is over 10,000.

DEBRA: Whoa!

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Astroglide is over 8000. So what this is telling you – and there’s 15 of them here. Wet Original Gel is over 4000. Even Liquid Silk is over 3000. So I want you to look at that chart because when I say it’s bad for you – I’m literally quoting Dr. Steelsmith. I’d be happy to send you that two-page article. That’s a very extremely well-regarded practitioner. It’s not me writing. It’s her. I urge people to look at it.

The other thing I was going to complete before the commercial came on, you asked us about our ingredients and I wanted to just let people know we do make flavored ingredients. We make Tahitian Vanilla, which is the flavor. It’s delicious. It’s very creamy. It’s delicious. And we flavor it with, for example, organic Stevia just to keep with our organic theme and we only use organic vanilla.

We have French Lavender, which is a scent. The scent is quite delightful. Again, essential oil made from organic lavender. We also make – we started last holiday, we’ve kept it around all year now – Peppermint Tingle, which as you can imagine has a peppermint flavor and adds a certain tingle.

So we have these different flavors. We have Piña Colada, which people really seem to love. We have these flavors as well. All of them including the natural aloe are 100% food grade.

But to go to the FAQ page you asked about –

DEBRA: Wait! Before we go there, I wanted to ask you. You have one that’s unscented, unflavored?

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yes. Yeah, that’s the original, Natural Aloe Cadabra.

DEBRA: Good, good because I know some people who are listening just want things to be very plain and even if it’s essential oils. The lavender is lovely and the French Vanilla. I haven’t tried all the different flavors, but they certainly are enjoyable. You’ve done a really good job.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Thank you. And I’m the chief formulator, so it’s kind of fun. I have to eat my mistakes as well as the staff. If I ended up liking it, that’s what I put on the market. But the point is that the things you’ll find that’s really delightful is our commitment to 100% non-toxicity. That’s what makes us unusual. We were the first organic lubricant in the market. We’re the only one that was cleared by the FDA as well until I think recently (there might be a second one now). But we are very committed to 100% organic.

And many of the good products out there refuse to go to the point of being organic. So for example I like the company Good Clean Living. I think it’s a shame that they don’t get an organic certification. I think I know why they don’t. They don’t apply for it. So they put on their product, on their advertising “uses organic ingredient.” I’m sorry, that’s not good enough. Anybody could use inorganic ingredients. We only use organic ingredient.

DEBRA: And that’s a big difference.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: So the point is we are organically certified.

DEBRA: That is a big difference. We’ve talked about this on other shows, talking about different personal care products, other shampoos and lotions and things like this. There really is a lot of people who put ‘organic’ on the label, but it’s not totally organic and it’s also often not certified.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah. And they’re using the word because they know it attracts people. But let me tell you one of the reasons people do that just so you’ll know. In order to get that, you have to meet a standard, which most people just won’t meet including in my kitchen – I make it in the kitchen, not a factory. I want people to know that. I’m an organically-certified kitchen. That’s the quality level I commit because this was something I wanted to make for my wife. I didn’t care what it took to get it perfect. Not everybody comes to that level of dedication and they tend to go what’s it going to cost before they figure out how they’re going to make it.

But in our kitchen, we are audited on what cleaning solutions we use so there are no toxic residuals on any of our cleaned utensils. You got to go a long way to get that certificate.

DEBRA: I understand. Yeah, we’ve talked about this too about how people, sometimes when you go to a natural food store, for example, the store itself will not be certified organic, but they’re making things like salad bars and deli items and things. They’re making them using organic ingredients, but theoretically, they could be cleaning their kitchen with something toxic. And so you’re not always getting the whole picture of being organic.

So this is one of the reasons, listeners why this is so important, what he’s done because everything is certified throughout. It’s certified ingredients. He’s making it in a certified facility. It’s just organic, organic, organic and not all the products are that way.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: And I think we should demand that of everybody.

Debra; I do too.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: You know why? Because it costs money. I hate to say it because I’m a businessperson. But I think we make decisions. We sort of short shift our customers because we think, “Gee, we can’t afford to do it exactly right, so we’ll do a close to right.” And I’m really impressed by what the great retailers – Neiman Marcus was founded by a guy named Stanley Marcus. He had this quote, “No one ever went broke giving the customer a good deal.”

I think if you’re willing to spend the extra money, yes, you’ll get less money for margin and you’ve got less for advertising. But at the end of the day, people will talk about it and they’ll go, “Wait a second. I don’t want to settle for second best or almost okay. I want toxic-free.”

Plant-based is huge! Everybody should be plant-based. What are we doing in an oil drum making up lubricant?

DEBRA: They shouldn’t even be there. They just should not even be on the planet. We need to go to break again. When we come back, we’ll continue with my guest, Rinaldo Brutoco. I think that we can talk about some other things besides what we’re talking about. I want to talk about your Garlic Gold because I really like it.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Oh, sure.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

AC-Couple-In-Bed

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Rinaldo Butoco. He’s the founder and chairman for Seven Oaks Ranch. We’re talking about his all-organic Aloe Cadabra organic lubricant for women. Would you give your email address again and tell people what they can get from you, the article?

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Sure, it’s info@aloecadabra.com. We’ll be glad to send you the Dr. Laurie Steelsmith article on the risk of sexually-transmitted infections from using other lubricant.

DEBRA: Good. Thank you. I’m interested in seeing that. I’m going to send you my email address, so you can send one to me. I wanted you to particularly mention, on your FAQ page, you’re talking about how a plant-based lubricant like Aloe Cadabra differs from a water-based or an oil-based lubricant. And specifically, you made a point about oil-based lubricants running the risk of damaging condoms.

I think that that’s really important. If people are using condoms to – you know, what they use them for. I can’t think of a word today.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Prophylactic.

DEBRA: Prophylactic! Thank you. If they’re using condoms so they don’t get pregnant, if they then use a lubricant, that interferes with the effectiveness of the condom, that’s a big deal.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah, I know. And many, many times, it’s like 200% more likely to break if it’s oil-based. In fact, it says on the box. I’m very proud of something I want to share with you. We made a contribution at the request of the local Planned Parenthood of Ventura County and they asked us for $50,000 worth of our products, so they could give some to each young woman coming in who receives condoms to avoid pregnancy. The reason they asked for it was no. 1, they wanted something non-toxic and no. 2, they wanted to use something that wouldn’t break the condom.

So we’ve done that. we’ve actually delivered right now close to $30,000 of that already. I think we’ve still got over $20,000 in the pipeline because we have it in our warehouse and they pull it out as they need it. It’s all brand new product. None of that is dated. None of that is stuff we were going to throw. And we did that because we want these young women to be able to avoid pregnancy. That’s why they went to Planned Parenthood. We were grateful that they were smart enough to ask us for the product. We’re happy to supply it.

So yes, it’s a very big problem. And you know, silicon itself, which is not good for your body, it stain sheets and everything else, it can also be damaging or less desirable for use with condom. So a plant-based natural product is always the best whether you’re LGBT, female, whether you’re just a nice guy and cares about the other man/woman in your life that you’re interacting with. Let’s be kind to each other and let’s not in pursuit of something, which is normal and healthy like either sexual relationships or self-pleasuring, let’s not introduce toxicity into our lives when we don’t need to. Let’s not do that.

DEBRA: I totally agree, totally, totally agree. Well, I do want to make sure that we talk about Garlic Gold because we only have a few minutes left of the show.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Darn! I enjoyed it. Let’s do it again. I love sharing the good news.

DEBRA: Thank you. And this has been a great show.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah, good.

DEBRA: This has been a great show. You sent me some samples of your Garlic Golden and what I got was these little nuggets of organic garlic that are crunchy (and I sprinkle them all over my salad and they’re gone now because they’re so good and the come in different flavors), you said you had 15 different products? So tell us a little bit about your products.

I also want to mention that his whole business here started because you were doing a class project with your son. Tell us about that too.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yeah. Well, my son was in the 11th grade. He and some buddies of his used to come to me for kind of just advanced economics like how do you apply theoretical economics that you learn in high school to the real world of business. And so I was challenged one day. And my son yelled at me while I was in the kitchen, he said, “Dad, why don’t you make a product out of that garlic thing?”

Now, what he was referring to is I used to do what you now know as Garlic Gold Nuggets. I used to put them on broccoli or string beans or extra virgin olive oil and people would invite themselves to dinner. When we invited them, they’d say, “By the way, would you mind doing that garlic thing when we come.” It got to be a little thing around town.

And so my son and three of his friends decided they wanted to learn how you would create a product out of thin air, so to speak.

We started. They each had a lab notebook. I said, “Well, if I’m going to do this not for five or six or eight people, if I’m going to do it ten gallons or a hundred gallons at a time, we’re going to have to figure out a whole lot of chemistry, we’re going to have to figure out what we’re going to call it, we have to figure out what people would be willing to pay for it.” I mean, this is an entrepreneurial exercise.

And these young men stayed with me all the way through the product launch at the farmer’s market. The reception was so overwhelming, we were kind of like flabbergasted. We decided to keep going and we developed a permanent label and we ramped up the whole situation. At that point, we already had an organic kitchen, so we just made more of it.

Long story short, my son who went through college and did several other things, just about two months ago returned to the company and is now the brand manager for Garlic Gold.

The Garlic Gold, the original product are those crunchy nuggets which stay crunch indefinitely in a bottle, that’s in the bottle we sell you with extra virgin olive oil. They have no after bite or bitterness. Many of our customers would…

DEBRA: That’s right, they don’t.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: None whatsoever. Everything I do is organic of course. So it’s delicious. And what I like it for is because I was looking for a product also that would have no salt in it, but still be full of flavor. So we do have the sea salt nuggets blend that we do, which you’re more than welcome to buy, it’s very popular. But for those people who are like myself, in their late sixties, we make it also with imported parmesan cheese.

DEBRA: Oh, that sounds delicious.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: I was asked years ago, “Why don’t you get domestic parmesan cheese?” and I said, “Because it isn’t as good.” And so I just like to do that to my customers. You sprinkle it on and it’s just phenomenal. And then we make Sea Salt Nuggets, Parmesan Nuggest.

We make a tremendous blend called Italian Herb Nuggets with organic herbs. And if you use that while you’re cooking, it’s just phenomenal. You put it into some tomato sauce, all of a sudden, you’ve got an Italian pizza sauce or you’ve got a great lasagna or whatever, spaghetti.

And we also have Southwest Nuggets, which have that southwest, Hispanic flavor. And then we have Nuggets de Provence, we call it – French nugget. We have several others in the waiting line that we’ll introduce eventually. Please go to our site. It’s called GarlicGold.com. The reason for the name is it looks like little flakes of garlic when it’s floating in the oil. It looks like miner’s gold.

DEBRA: Yes, it does look like that. It does. It’s so delicious. I mean, do you just dehydrate them. How do you get them crunchy like that?

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Well, first of all, I should point out. We’re the only company allowed in the world to sell that product in California. Many states have real strict standards. California is the strictest. You cannot use garlic and olive oil together because normally, they create a bacillus. Many people die here actually. It’s a very strict standard.

DEBRA: Hmmm… I didn’t know that.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: It took us over a year to clear multiple hurdles with state government including we had to submit everything we do in – I think it was 10-second increments of the manufacturing process before we got approved. We are 100% legal in every state, in every country in the world because to your point, we toast the garlic to a point where it has no moisture left. We do it with a flash toasting process. So when you do that, because it has no moisture, the bacillus can’t live. It requires moisture.

So once you’ve done that, you’ve got a crunchy little nugget. Once you’ve got the crunchy nugget, you could put them in the olive oil and it’ll float around, but it’s not going to absorb the olive oil because there’s no water in olive oil. And so we get the benefit of this extra virgin olive oil case.

I really recommend the original product, which is the olive oil and the nuggets together. If you just spoon a couple of tablespoons over any vegetable, particularly broccoli, green beans, you name it, people will go, “Wow! That’s amazing!”

In fact, what I often tell people, “Cook the most expensive dinner you can for your best friend,” like really expensive steaks or lobsters or whatever it is you like (and hopefully, you’re getting sustainable seafood and grass-fed beef), “cook the most expensive dinner you can and then serve that either on your garlic smashed potatoes or your vegetable bowl” and the thing they will talk about after you just spent $10 or $15 a person on raw ingredients, what they’ll talk about is the ¢25 to ¢35 of garlic you put on their vegetable or the potato. They’ll go, “Wow! That was amazing.”

DEBRA: That sounds really delicious.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Yes, they’re crunchy.

DEBRA: They sound so delicious. Anyway, we’re at the end of our time together. I just want to make sure that everybody knows that they can go to either of your websites and get 20% off their purchase whatever people buy for the month of December. And so the websites are AloeCadabra.com and GarlicGold.com. You just enter the coupon code, DEBRA20 to checkout. And if you forget the names, you can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look at the description of the show and those websites are right there linked. You just click on the websites and the information about the 20% discount is there well.

And this show will be transcribed and available next Tuesday. Thank you so much for being on the show. I think you’re doing wonderful things. I really admire how organic you’re being.

RINALDO BRUTOCO: Thank you very much for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

ac---Garlic-Gold-10-Products - Copy

100% wool baby mattress

Question from Terry

Hi Debra, congratulations on the work that you do to make our environment a safer place.

I’m hoping you can give me your opinion. I’ve researched a lot about baby mattresses as we have twins due in 2 weeks.

I am leaning towards a 100% organic wool mattress in an organic cotton cover. I’m worried it will be too soft for newborns as we are continually told the most important thing is firmness. Australian SIDSANDKIDS here still recommend a firm foam mattress and advise against natural fibres like cotton and wool cores as they believe they are too soft.

I spoke with them about this today. They have no belief in the toxic gas theory. So it’s really frustrating.

I have been tossing up between an organic cotton futon and the organic wool futon. I have read that cotton futons can hold too much moisture and will harbour more bacteria and dust mites. Do you think this is likely? The only thing that worries me about wool is it may be too soft, baby could possibly be allergic to wool, and also Dr Sprott from cotlife2000 in NZ has a bedding analysis on his website which shows wool containing high phosphorous levels. He seems to recommend mattress wrapping for all mattresses whether organic or not.

Do you have any concerns about a 100% cotton futon or 100% wool futon, and which would you recommend the most? Thanks for taking the time to read my email, as I’m sure you get hundreds.

I really appreciate your advice as I really need to decide to ease my wifes pregnant mind:). Thanks Debra.

regards,

Terry (from australia)

Debra’s Answer

My best recommendation is a Naturepedic baby mattress. It is just the right firmness and organic cotton. They do not use wool because babies may have allergies to wool.

If you can’t have a Naturepedic mattress shipped to Australia, and your only choices are organic cotton or organic wool…firmness IS very important for babies. I would probably follow Dr. Sprott’s recommendation and get the firm mattress that is available and wrap it to reduce toxic gases.

Add Comment

PEVA vs EVA and more!

Question from Wendi

Debra, just a note from a newbie in your peanut gallery:

I am more-often-than-not challenged in comprehending facts that help me make decisions, yet found your explanation of PEVA vs EVA (in shower curtain liners…) EZ to understand. Thanks for that!

NOW I wanna know – where can I find a heavy weight PEVA (8g or more), or even EVA, that measures at least 72″ X 72″???…(a few inches wider is even better). So far, everything heavy AND large AND PEVA/EVA is not quite wide enough for the tub/shower in the condo I’ve rented for a year…

Care to help??…w.

Debra’s Answer

Try a local TAP Plastics store. They do sell plastic sheeting cut to size. Don’t see PEVA on their website, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have it in the store and they may be able to order it for you.

Add Comment

Celebrating Winter Solstice

My guest today is Teresa Villegas, author of How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. I’ve been celebrating Winter Solstice since 1987, when my discovery of toxic chemicals in consumer products lead me to search for a celebration beyond toxic consumer gift exchange. I did learn that I could give gifts made from toxic free materials, but in the process found in Winter Solstice a celebration of reconnection with Nature and intention for the coming year. Teresa shares my viewpoint that Winter Solstice can be a celebration for everyone—of every religion and viewpoint—because it’s a celebration of the return of the light of the Sun that supports all life on Earth. Join us as we talk about what Winter Solstice means to each of us, why and ways we celebrate, and how you can celebrate Winter Solstice too. www.heartandmindpress.com

Another book Teresa likes, and I like too, is How To Celebrate The WInter Solstice: A Rational Approach to Celebrating the Season Without Religion by Thomas Harrop.

read-transcript

 

 


Solstice Cake

I have two girlfriends with whom I celebrate the solstices and equinoxes. We usually get together and eat seasonal foods, some from our gardens depending on time of year, and we do various things appropriate to celebrating the season.

This year we had our gathering on Solstice eve, the night before Solstice. Linda read something about having a birthday party for the Sun, to bake a cake with an image of a Sun on it, and sing Happy Birthday to welcome the rebirth of the Sun in the new year. She asked me to bake and decorate a cake for the occasion.

I thought about this cake for days in advance and considered many different options. What cake to bake? How do I get an image of the sun on top? I considered using yellow icing to pipe or paint a sun, and creating a sun with careful placement of golden raisins. But everything I thought of didn’t seem quite right.

Then on the very day that the cake was needed, the perfect cake just came to me. I knew exactly what to do, what elements to bring together that would be exactly right in every way. I made a gluten-free almond cake, topped it with mascarpone cheese* instead of sugary frosting, then “painted” a sun on top with ginger-orange marmalade fruit spread (sweetened with grape juice concentrate). The translucent marmalade caught the light and made the Sun “shine”. For a final festive garnish, I sprinkled the top with curls of lemon zest, from a lemon I picked off the tree in my backyard. I gave the Sun eight points with a beeswax candle at each point to represent infinity and the infinite continuation of the return of the Sun year after year.

It was a truly stunningly beautiful cake, and amazingly delicious too. With the fresh lemon zest, the cake just smelled like winter in Florida, where citrus trees are everywhere, in almost every backyard.

I was happy that this cake captured the spirit of the Solstice, in the place where I live. Everyone loved it.

Here’s the recipe for my cake.

SOLSTICE CAKE

makes one 9-inch layer,  8 servings

  • 6 tablespoons butter, at room temperature
  • 3/4 cup sifted powdered unrefined cane sugar (sold as “organic” powdered sugar)
  • 4 large eggs
  • 1 teaspoon almond extract
  • 1 1/2 cups almond flour (or almonds processed to a fine powder)
  • 1/4 teaspoon salt
  • 8 ounces mascarpone cheese, at room temperature
  • 1/2 jar ginger-orange marmalade fruit spread (or plain orange marmalade)

the zest of one lemon

  1. Preheat the oven to 325 degrees F.
  2. Line a 9-inch round cake pan with a piece of parchment paper.
  3. Whip butter in a large bowl with an electric mixer until smooth and creamy, then add powdered sugar and continue to beat until well incorporated.
  4. Add the eggs, one at a time, beating and scraping the sides of the bowl after each addition.
  5. Add the almond extract.
  6. Stir the almond flour into the batter along with the salt.
  7. Pour batter into the pan and bake 35 to 40 minutes, or until the cake is lightly browned on top and a toothpick inserted into the center comes out clean.
  8. Let the cake cool in the pan for 10 minutes.
  9. Invert cake onto a cooling rack and allow it to cool completely.
  10. Spread the soft mascarpone cheese onto the cooled cake. Then put the cake in the refrigerator for about an hour to allow the mascarpone to firm up.
  11. To make the sun, put a heaping tablespoon of marmalade in the center of the cake. Then fill a teaspoon with marmalade. Starting from the center circle, place the marmalage in the teaspoon on the cake, and pull the marmalage out towards the edge, making the sunbeam narrower and narrower as you go. I starting pulling with the back of a teaspoon and then tipped the spoon as I want to make the line narrower.
  12. Top with lemon zest curls and a candle at each point.

* Mascaropone is a soft Italian cheese similar to our cream cheese but more delicate. It is usually sold in gourmet supermarkets and natural food stores, or in the speciality cheese section of supermarkets. If you can’t find it where you live, you can use whipped cream cheese or buttercream frosting.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunshine Through the Year

I “accidentally” found this very cool website a couple of years ago and it’s one of my favorites.

Gaisma.com has very comprehensive data about the amount of sunshine for every place in the world. “Gaisma” is a Latvian word, meaning “light”.

Why would you want to know this? For gardening, for calculating potential solar energy, but for me, it very clearly shows the increase and decrease of day length (making it easy to find the longest days and longest nights), in beautiful graphs.

Here is my graph for Clearwater, Florida, for today, 5 January 2013.

Today is the day after the Summer Solstice, the so-called “longest day”. See, the day length is 13 hours 55 minutes. But tomorrow is 13 hours 55 minutes also, and if you could scroll this back, you would see that the prior three days were 13 hours 55 minutes. It takes a week here for the daylight to be one minute less.

Then this information is placed on a beautiful graph that shows the hours of sunlight over the course of the year. There’s a grey line near the middle that is today.

Then there is the sun path diagram. The sun path is the seasonal-and-hourly positional changes of the sun as the Earth rotates and orbits around the sun, so you can see where the sun will be at different times of year. This is useful to orient a house or garden to the sun. You can print your sun path diagram on an overhead transparency or tracing paper and overlay it on your house or garden plans.

In addition there is all kinds of meteoroligical information for your place like temperature, wind speed, and precipitation. And if you don’t know where you are in the world, it tells your longitude and latitude, too, local time zone and even your altitude.

It’s a great tool to play with. I had fun looking at the sunshine hours graph for different places in the world. Compare the graph for your location with my Clearwater graph. Quite a difference in the sun patterns!

Even if you have no other use for this, go find your location and see what your local sun patterns are. And next time a solstice nears, here’s where you can find your own “longest day” and “longest night.”


transcript

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Celebrating Winter Solstice

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Teresa Villegas

Date of Broadcast: December 4, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It is Thursday, December 4th 2014. Today, we’re going to talk about celebrating winter solstice.

Now, what does this have to do with toxic chemicals? It has to do with toxics because many, many years ago when I first became aware of toxic chemicals and how they were making me sick and I started my recovery from that, one of the things that happened was that I got to Christmas and saw that Christmas was basically a big exchange of toxic products.

It doesn’t have to be that, but at the time, 30 years plus ago when I was first becoming aware of toxic chemicals, that’s exactly what it was (and it still is today for many families) and I couldn’t give or receive toxic Christmas presents.

This started me thinking about the whole idea of commercial consumer-oriented Christmas and looking for something that had more meaning and I found winter solstice.

Now, if you think that winter solstice is like some strange thing that strange people do, actually, for me (and my guest who’s coming up), it’s something that I think that everyone can celebrate regardless of what your religion is or your personal beliefs. It really goes back to having it be a time of reconnecting with nature, making intentions for what is going to happen in the coming year. There’s a whole tradition behind this that is very human and natural. And that’s what we’re going to be talking about today.

And also, a part of it is that eventually, I did end up giving holiday presents again, but I gave presents for winter solstice. They were natural and toxic-free and in alignment with the whole idea of celebrating nature and are part of it at this time of year.

So I’d like to welcome my guest. Her name is Teresa Villegas. She’s the author of a very charming little book called How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. Hi, Teresa.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Hi, thank you for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So first tell us a little bit about yourself. I actually realized that I didn’t put a bio here and a description on ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Tell us just a little bit about yourself and then how you came to be interested in celebrating winter solstice.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Okay. Well, in my history, I’m an artist and an illustrator and a designer. And over the last ten years I was in [inaudible 00:03:58], I’ve taken that role on at pretty much [inaudible 00:04:02] and then illustrating and designing and then painting while I have my children. Of course, anybody who has a family, their career changes. And so mine changed quite a bit.

So now, my career has been influenced of course and inspired by my children. And part of that is getting back to more illustrating for these books. I used to draw a long time ago. So now I’m doing it more now after I’ve had children. I know what they liked and what they looked for and then realizing there’s a need for different types of book.

Anyway, one of the books, this recent book that I’ve illustrated…

DEBRA: Teresa, I need to interrupt you for a second.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yes.

DEBRA: Could you speak louder or closer because we’re not hearing you very well.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Sure! Oh, I’m sorry. And also, we have a bad connection. We had rains for the first time in a long time. So forgive me for that. I will speak up, yes.

DEBRA: Isn’t that wonderful? But you sound better now, you sound better now, so thank you.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Basically, my kids, we celebrate winter solstice. My kids came home one day from school and they said, “Mom, we’re the only family that celebrates winter solstice. Our teachers would like you to come and talk to our class about it.” And so I said sure.

So for the last few years since I’ve been talking about it to my children’s class, I said, “I should just illustrate this book because they keep asking again and again.” And for the last couple of years, I finally illustrated the book and had it published this year.

Winter solstice has played a part in our family for years. Having this book, other families that we’ve talked with said, “How do you do that? We’d like to take part of that.” And so we just basically told everybody about it and then I illustrated [inaudible 00:05:45].

DEBRA: I’m so happy you did.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Everybody has a little guidebook now.

DEBRA: Yes. I’m so happy you did because I have been celebrating it since 1987, a long time. And when I first started, there was very little information. I mean, there was a lot of information that was more of a religious nature for religions that practice winter solstice, but I didn’t want to practice that religion.

What I wanted to do was find what the essence of winter solstice was. It was like going back in time and saying, “Well, if I didn’t live in this culture, if I lived in a culture where my life was all about living in an ecosystem and living in nature, why would I be celebrating winter solstice and how would I be celebrating winter solstice?” So I was trying to go back to the essence of it, not the way it has come forward.

And I really found when you sent me your book, I said, “Oh, yeah. She’s got it.” We agreed because you’ve stripped away all the other stuff that’s been attached to it over time and really got back to the same essence that I found in it. I think the way that you’ve put together your little book in such an artistic way and such a simple way to understand it really captures the spirit of celebrating the season.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Oh, thank you.

DEBRA: Yeah, you’ve done a really great job. So let’s explain what is a solstice?

TERESA VILLEGAS: Well, the solstice is an actual astronomical event that happens. The sun has reached its furthest point along the elliptical path of the earth. And so that’s why our days are the shortest and our nights are longer.

So as everybody knows in the winter time in the northern hemisphere, our winter times, our nights are darker. That’s why we have so much more light as far as decorations and all that as part of the celebration.

And so in our family, we celebrate that because it is an actual astronomical event. This is something that I’ve celebrated as you did in the eighties when I was in college because of the fact that my friends and I, we wanted to look for something to celebrate as well that wasn’t religious, but yet we made it to the earth and we appreciate that.

I was celebrating that alone. And now, my husband and I celebrated that too. But now that we have the children and our family, we wanted it to be something to celebrate the actual event.

My husband as atheist and I’m Buddhist, we both come from a Christian culture, but we wanted to do something different for our family. And so therefore, my husband was onboard because he said, “Well, that’s an actual event, so that’s something that would be really…” – and it’s really a matter of awe and inspiration from our planet earth and how we celebrate and how we relate to that.

And so that’s where it all started, when our kids were young and we’re forming our own family tradition.

Ever since then, it’s about the sun, about the return of the light and about our connection with earth and about our connection inside of ourselves and what do we want. This is the winter and the earth that is in the winter months, the season of winter and the animals are hibernating and going into a stage of quiet and silence and recollection and thinking about what’s happened in the past year. And at the same time, connecting and thinking about what we want coming in the New Year, in the coming year, the sense of renewal that we talked about in this season.

DEBRA: I think for people in the past, one of the things that struck me as I was doing my research on winter solstice is that virtually every culture around the world, if you go back far enough, has a winter celebration that is about the returning of the light. And the reason that this was so important to people that they had this big celebration about it is because there were no supermarkets then, there were no stores, there was nothing. And so everything that people had then came from their ability to go in their surrounding natural environment, into their ecosystem and gather materials and food.

During the winter season, lots of places were very barren and so the winter solstice, they’ve watched for this moment when the days started becoming longer, when it got to that point where this is the last darkness and now, the days are going to start getting longer. That meant that food supply was going to come back and that was a very, very, very important thing.

We need to go to break. We were going to talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Teresa Villegas. She’s the author of How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. Her website is HeartandMindPress.com. where you can go see her book and buy a copy if you’d like. We’d be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

transcript

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re talking about celebrating winter solstice today with my guest, Teresa – Teresa, would you say your last name so we get it right.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Villegas, Villegas. The double L’s are Y. It sounds like a Y, Villegas.

DEBRA: Villegas, yes. She’s the author of – I have the page right here. I want to get the title right too –How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. I guess I wasn’t on the right page because during the break, I was looking up when exactly is winter solstice.

This is a very important thing because if you’re going to celebrate an astronomical event, then you need to have the right moment when it’s occurring. It happens at a moment and our calendar doesn’t line up with what’s happening in the sky.

This was one of the first thing that I had to understand when I started understanding nature, was that things that happen in our industrial world are very standardized, but what’s happening in our nature happens according to nature. And so we celebrate what’s called the first day of winter on December 21st, but winter solstice is neither the first day nor December 21st. Winter solstice marks the middle. In old culture, it’s called mid-Winter and that’s the point where the sun turns around. And this year, it happens to fall on December 21st.

I’m looking at a chart here in my timezone. It happens at 19:03. So that’s in 24-hour timezone. What is it? So if 12 noon is 12, then how many – let’s see. It’s 7:03 p.m. But it will happen at a different time in your time zone because the sun is doing what it’s doing – is this making any sense at all?

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yes, so it’ll be five o’clock in my time, in the Mountain time district.

DEBRA: Right, right. And so you can figure it out there from there. But here’s the thing that I find out and that is – well, I was wondering which one is the longest night? Is it the night before like if it happens at 7:03? Which one’s the longest night?

In trying to answer that question, what I found out was that the word solstice, ‘sun stands still’. And so it’s standing still on the horizon. Stonehenge, if you’re familiar with Stonehenge, it’s built around, so that the sun will line up to shine between two stones when it rises on a winter solstice. That’s part of how they oriented themselves to the year at that time.

But the sun actually rises at that point on the horizon more than one day. I found out that depending where you are on the planet, the longest night can happen – it can be two nights, it could be 16 nights depending on where you are.

And there’s a wonderful website (SEE BELOW). I have to look it up. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look for this show. I’ll up the link to this website there because I’ve forgotten the name of it, but I’ll find it. It will show you the length of days on any day of the year at any point in the planet. And so you can look up wherever it is that you lived and it will tell you the number of days of the solstice.

One year, my husband made me a candle holder, like a menorah where people in the Jewish culture light a candle for every night of Hannukah. We made a menorah, like a menorah and lit a candle for every longest night of winter solstice. I really liked doing that that year.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Oh, that’s beautiful.

DEBRA: Yeah, because it really – one of the things, one of my favorite parts of winter solstice traditional celebrations is the Yule log, which actually is about carrying the light through the darkest night. And that’s why they stay up all night and that’s why they burn the log and that’s why they have a big log and they decorate it and everything because there’s this point where this is like the darkest, darkest, darkest point in the year and the celebration is for then the people to carry the light of the sun through this darkest point until the sun rises the next morning.

And so for us to then say, “Well, our darkest night is…” – I think it was nine days at that time or something. We lit a candle every night to say, “Okay, this is the darkest time. We’re going to carry the light.” I just think that’s such a beautiful thing to do.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yes, that’s a really beautiful part. That’s the part in the book that we have. We basically just wrote about how we celebrate it and part of our celebration is candle lighting. Some years, we’ll make homemade candles for the celebration.

DEBRA: Ooh…

TERESA VILLEGAS: I know.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah, I love doing that. Well, we’re coming up to break again in a couple of minutes, but start to tell us about some of the things that your family does to celebrate (and we’ll talk more when we come back from the break) because I think that people who aren’t familiar with winter solstice think that the celebrations might be very different from Christmas, but in fact, a lot of our Christmas traditions come from winter solstice.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right, right. In fact, it was the winter solstice. So we do have all of the same things. So when we celebrate, I think it’s more of an attitude that you want to take and more of a metaphorical way that people can look at it who have actually been looking at it before religions had actually taken it and used the symbols and the imagery and all the intentions from the winter solstice from the pagans.

This is not in our book. We’re not any kind of pagan celebration. We’re just using a kind of relationship to our natural earth, honoring the earth and the changes.
So the light do come in with it, with the candles and the light and then using that as a representation of our light within. And our kids, of course, when we light the candles – we have one candle that everybody has [inaudible 00:20:24] and around the table we go.

And this lasts a really short period of time because we have little kids. So they take a little light from their candle, a wick. Actually, it’s like a long match that we have that they light from the big candle and you put on their candle [inaudible 00:20:44].

DEBRA: Oh, how beautiful.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Then they pass it to the next one. Of course, kids, they like anything with fire. So that was one thing that they enjoyed. I mean, they enjoy everything. I asked this morning.

And the other thing is we decorate the tree. We have a tree and so we decorate a tree. We have lights to light up the night and to remind us of our inner light. We also have decorations and we make food, we make special food. Every family has a different food that they like to cook.

DEBRA: And I want to hear all about this after the break.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Okay.

DEBRA: …and I have some things to share too.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Okay.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And today, we’re talking about celebrating the winter solstice as an alternative to consumer Christmas that doesn’t conflict with anything. It’s just something that everybody can celebrate and still have your normal traditions that you do. So we’ll be right back and give you some more ideas about that.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

transcript

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Teresa Villegas. She’s the author of How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. I cannot tell you how charming this book is. It’s just a delight. The illustrations are just stunningly beautiful.

And I just wanted to share a couple of pages with you here. I’m going to go back to the previous page, hold on. So here’s one of the pages that gives you some suggestions on what you can do on winter solstice. It has awesome snowflakes on it and feet, different feet of family members and their different kinds of shoes in different parts of the world – some very interesting shoes.

Anyway, so it says, “Step outside or take a walk. Experience the longest, darkest night of the year. Feel the crisp air. Hear the quiet sounds of the night. See the light of the moon and the stars. Smell the fragrance of the trees. Taste the falling snow on your tongue. Inhale and breathe the whole experience.” Wow! I think that’s just beautiful.

And then the next page has a beautiful picture of different family members showing the breath – you know how you’d see your breath when it gets so cold. They all have breath coming out and the stars spell out ‘silent night’.

And then there’s a little tag on the side that says, “Do you know that the word ‘silent’ has the same letters as ‘listen’.” The whole book is like this. It just is so peaceful. It’s a peaceful book. It’s like it just feels like you feel on winter solstice. I just think that you just captured that so well.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Thank you. Well, what I wanted to mention is placing the emphasis on winter solstice as an emphasis on nature and science and personal growth.

DEBRA: Yes.

TERESA VILLEGAS: …and the light and the connection that between the earth and us and what’s happening at the same time simultaneously, looking to our outer world and looking to our inner world.

DEBRA: Yes, exactly. It’s like at that time, all of life on the planet is down under ground, that seed. It’s about seeds and that we can also go within and be looking at what’s going on with ourselves and planting our own seeds of what we want to be creating in the coming year. It just all fits together. That’s exactly the celebration. And it’s a celebration that people had been doing around the world in many cultures since – I don’t even know how long. It’s just an ancient, ancient thing to do.

One thing I wanted to talk about was the Christmas tree or the solstice tree. I call mine the solstice tree and about the fact that it’s an evergreen. There’s a significance of decking the halls – actually, that song, “deck the halls with bells and holly, tra-la-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la,” that solstice song, all the things about decorating your house with greens, anything that has to do with decorating your house with evergreens, the significance behind that is that the whole celebration is about carrying light through the barren winter.

And so as opposed to a deciduous tree where it just has bare branches, the evergreens carry life through their eternal. And so just like burning the Yule log through the night, decorating your house with evergreens says, “I’m agreeing with carrying life through until the sun comes back again.” I just think that’s such a wonderful…

TERESA VILLEGAS: I think that’s wonderful.

DEBRA: Yeah…

TERESA VILLEGAS: That’s so beautiful. I didn’t know that that song was particularly for winter solstice though.

DEBRA: It is! It is! It’s totally about that. The celebrations really are that at winter solstice, people come together and they have a festival and they burn fires and they have a feast and they wish each other well. The Wassail Song like, “Here we come a-wassailing among the leaves so green.” A-waissal is a bowl of punch. And the word ‘wassail’ is the toast. It means “have health.”

And then after the winter solstice party, they would take whatever was left of the punch and they would take it outside the following day and dump it on the apple trees. It’s actually called ‘wassailing the tree’. They have songs that people used to sing. These are some of my favorite songs of all times. They’re songs that people would sing to the trees to tell them to bear.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Wow!

DEBRA: Yes! So there’s this huge thing – and this is just in cultures I saw all over the world. There’s this huge thing about at this time of year, people praying or intending (or whatever it is that they did), participating in the growth of nature, that they felt it was their responsibility.

The aborigines in Australia, they do this thing where they walk around the borders of their land. I forgot, there’s a name for this. They walk around the borders of their land on New Year’s Day I think. So it’s the same kind of thing and they sing their land into existence. They sing it together.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Ah, that’s beautiful.

DEBRA: The tribes sings their land into existence. And these are the traditions that we’re not doing anymore.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right! In fact, I was speaking with a woman a couple of weeks ago and she was from the Middle Eastern countries. She said, “Oh, the pomegranate tree is what we really honor and celebrate quite a bit during this time of year.” The pomegranate, of course, is a fruit that has many implications of life because of all the seeds within, life and the metaphor of this pomegranate and all of that.

DEBRA: Right! And it’s about abundance.

TERESA VILLEGAS: So that was really nice to hear. I love hearing these stories and how everybody celebrates it differently. And that’s what’s so wonderful about it because every family can adapt it to what they need.

DEBRA: That’s exactly it.

TERESA VILLEGAS: I mean, Bernard and I, my husband and I, we celebrated before we had kids. We didn’t need to have so much of the gifts or the tree. Because we just had each other, we celebrate. But with the kids, we want to place the emphasis on the tree and nature and getting back in touch with nature. That’s why we’d go for a hike. We’d go for a night walk. We experience the nature in this time of the season and the light and the stars.

And something I just heard the other day was that when the earth is on the axle that gives us the seasons, the 23.5° axle tilt that gives us the season of our earth, actually the top of it points to the star Polaris. So the axial tilt is always pointing to the star Polaris. I didn’t even know that. Have you heard that before?

DEBRA: Yes, I did. That’s the northern star. That’s the northern star.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yeah. Well, thank you very much.

DEBRA: That’s the line. And so that star, that one star is always on the same place. And if I’m understanding this correctly (an astronomer can write in and correct me if I’m not), if I’m understanding it correctly, it’s all the stars in the sky revolve around that point.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right! I heard that, but I made the connection. And so I was actually working on this book about the tilt and this and that and winter solstice. I’m like, “Oh, my gosh! Now it all comes together for me.”

DEBRA: It all makes sense, yeah. Yeah! We need to go to break again. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. I’m here with Teresa Villegas, author of How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. We’re talking about how to celebrate winter solstice. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

transcript

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Teresa Villegas. She’s the author of How to Celebrate Winter Solstice. You can go to her website, which is HeartandMindPress.com. and get the book. It’s so charming. I’m looking at another page here where she’s talking about staying up late and being together and playing and having fun. I know I have with my friends stayed up all night. We sing winter solstice songs, which I’ve written the words to and play games and talk about the work we’ll be doing next year and read winter solstice stories and eat food.

Teresa, in her book, she says, “At the first sign of the morning’s light as the new sun rises in the east, it’s time to give and receive gifts.” She’s got this wonderful drawing of a family, each one snuggled in their sleeping bag all sleeping in a circle around the solstice tree with the presents underneath and snowflake lights on the tree. When I look at this picture, I just thought about the camaraderie and the closeness and the togetherness of a family and how that same togetherness exists between us and nature if we would just participate in it.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right, right. And we actually do that. We get our sleeping bags. We all put it around the tree. And that’s one of the things I ask my kids as I was going to do this interview. Every year, we’re always asking, we say, “What’s your favorite part? What’s your favorite part?” and they said, “Staying up all night.”
And when I go to the schools and talk to the schools about this, that’s when all of the kids say, “Oh, I wish we could stay up all night long.” But of course, you know, the kids crash pretty early.

DEBRA: Yeah, they do. But it’s just this idea that they don’t have to go to bed.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right! I think you’re right, you’re right, you’re right. It is fun. And it’s really fun to talk about the things that happened in the past and what we want to change in the year. We try to turn off all of the electronics. And then we play games and just play more games and hang out and converse and talk.

DEBRA: Right! And it’s a good time to do that. It’s a really good time to reconnect with each other on a human level.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right!

DEBRA: Another point I wanted to make was that for me, it was really important that I create my own celebration. Part of that was not to just repeat what somebody has created, but to use my own creativity.

When I thought about that, I thought, well, there was a point in time when people were developing the idea of celebrating winter solstice and they created a celebration that was about their place and time. And so I wanted to create a celebration that was about me and my relationship to nature in this place and time. I think that that’s part of it, to really be free to take whatever traditions you want to take and not use any traditions you don’t want to take. It’s really about you and your relationship with nature and marking that time when life is starting again and be able to say, “How do I want my life to start again?”

Can you tell I love this holiday?

TERESA VILLEGAS: I do too. We do too. You told me that you would write things down?

DEBRA: Yes. Yes, I do. I do. I write things down all the time, but especially on winter solstice. It’s a really good time to have that quiet time that night when you’re staying up all night to have some quiet time and take stock of your life and envision how you want your life to be different and if there’s something that you’re wishing for like if you’re wanting a new boyfriend or something. This is really the time to say, “Okay, this is what I want” because what we think about, what we say we want are the things that we get. And if your life isn’t going the way you want it to go, this is a time, a really good time to just focus on that and draw pictures or write it down or whatever it is that you do.

I’m interesting in what you all eat. Tell us more about what are your winter solstice foods.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Well, we like to cook a lot in our family. My husband likes to cook. For the sweets, he likes to make the cinnamon rolls for the morning. The kids get involved in that. And then also, in the evening, we like to have – I guess he spent a lot of time in Europe. He said that they had a lot of seafood. I guess it was in Italy he’s had a lot of seafood.

DEBRA: Oh, yeah. They have a thing where it’s like the seven seafoods or something.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Oh, right.

DEBRA: Yeah.

TERESA VILLEGAS: So we kind of did our little southwestern pozole, seafood pozole. So that’s a big thing where we have green chili and then we have shrimp and we have scallops. So we make a green seafood pozole. Typically, pozole is made from red chillis and pork. But we use green chillis and seafood.

DEBRA: Yeah!

TERESA VILLEGAS: So that was how we adapted it for our family. What about you?

DEBRA: Well, I’m always looking at what other foods of the season. So one thing that I really like to make is fruitcake. People are going to roll their eyes and say, “Oh, that tough, sugary thing?” Well, no. My fruitcake is not like that because I actually make cake with natural sweeteners and almond flour and things like that. So it’s gluten-free and it’s sugar free.

And then I take dried fruits, organic dried fruits instead of those sugary candy fruits. So it’s like a fruit in that cake. It’s really delicious.

I’ll make it in November. I put a little brandy and stuff on it. The alcohol evaporates, but you still have that whole – it’s like this whole ritual of making the cake and the approach to winter solstice. And then you eat it.

And then I make cookies. I always make some kind of gluten-free cookies in star shapes and I go a lot of star cookies. And then we just kind of have whatever wintery foods we want to eat that particular night.

And over the years, I’ve just developed a lot of naturally sweet recipes of things that are close to the kinds of things that you might eat at Christmas time like fudge and cookies and stuff like that. So we have those, but we have them in their natural, healthy state.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Oh, that sounds delicious. I mean, I’ve never said that about one of those fruitcakes, “Oh, that sounds delicious,” but it does sound delicious. I mean, you’re right!

DEBRA: Well, neither did I.

TERESA VILLEGAS: That icky stuff is just disgusting, that sticky fake fruit. I guess it’s not fake.

DEBRA: It is. It’s candied fruit, it’s sugared fruit. [inaudible 00:46:22]

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yeah, yeah, [inaudible 00:46:22].

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. But mine is very good. It’s very, very good. So it’s just I loved hearing about your family cooking together. And so again, a thing about winter solstice is that there’s an ancient tradition called ‘A Day Out of Time’ I think it’s called where the year actually, they only had 364 days. The 365th day was out of time because that was the winter solstice. It was out of time.

And so it’s a good day to just say, “Well, I’m going to take this day off from my normal life and do something like cook a wonderful dinner and spend time with my family and take time for myself.” And so for me, that’s what winter solstice is about. It’s just like, “I’m not doing my normal life. It’s different. It’s a day out of time.”

TERESA VILLEGAS: Right! And that’s what makes it nice. You can do something exceptionally different than the way everybody else is doing. That’s another reason why winter solstice is just so particular to your family.

We do like to go for a hike. And there’s one particular hike that we do only on winter solstice, so that’s kind of nice too, out of the ordinary.

DEBRA: That’s nice. Wow! I like that. I love everything you said. So we only have less than two minutes left, is there anything quick you want to say that we haven’t talked about?

TERESA VILLEGAS: Just happy winter solstice however you celebrate the holidays. We send you love. Have a wonderful holidays!

DEBRA: Thank you. You too. I will. I’m going to put more information. Each one of the shows has its own post on the archive blog. I’ll put more information about winter solstice on the page for this show.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Maybe one of your recipes.

DEBRA: Oh, I could probably put a recipe, yes.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Yes! Your fruitcake.

DEBRA: You know, we have transcripts. So there’s going to be a transcript within the beginning of next week. I’ll put a recipe. Yeah, I’ll put a link to the website where you can find out how many days of winter solstice there is. I’ll just kind of fill up that page with some interesting stuff.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Oh, thank you.

DEBRA: Yeah. We’ll just have a virtual celebration like that. Again, Teresa’s website is HeartandMindPress.com. You can go there. She has a blog. She’s got pictures of her family celebrating winter solstice. You can order your books there.

And she also has winter solstice cards that you can send to your friends. They’re very charming. Whether you’re new to winter solstice or you’ve been celebrating winter solstice for a long time, it’s just a place where you can go and just find out more about winter solstice, being inspire and introduce your friends and family to winter solstice with a very lovely book that is not religion-oriented. It’s only nature-oriented.

So, thank you so much, Teresa.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Thank you.

DEBRA: You have a happy winter solstice. I’m sure you will.

TERESA VILLEGAS: Thank you very much.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can find out more by going to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Have a great holiday season and be well.


Solstice Cake

I have two girlfriends with whom I celebrate the solstices and equinoxes. We usually get together and eat seasonal foods, some from our gardens depending on time of year, and we do various things appropriate to celebrating the season.

This year we had our gathering on Solstice eve, the night before Solstice. Linda read something about having a birthday party for the Sun, to bake a cake with an image of a Sun on it, and sing Happy Birthday to welcome the rebirth of the Sun in the new year. She asked me to bake and decorate a cake for the occasion.

I thought about this cake for days in advance and considered many different options. What cake to bake? How do I get an image of the sun on top? I considered using yellow icing to pipe or paint a sun, and creating a sun with careful placement of golden raisins. But everything I thought of didn’t seem quite right.

Then on the very day that the cake was needed, the perfect cake just came to me. I knew exactly what to do, what elements to bring together that would be exactly right in every way. I made a gluten-free almond cake, topped it with mascarpone cheese* instead of sugary frosting, then “painted” a sun on top with ginger-orange marmalade fruit spread (sweetened with grape juice concentrate). The translucent marmalade caught the light and made the Sun “shine”. For a final festive garnish, I sprinkled the top with curls of lemon zest, from a lemon I picked off the tree in my backyard. I gave the Sun eight points with a beeswax candle at each point to represent infinity and the infinite continuation of the return of the Sun year after year.

It was a truly stunningly beautiful cake, and amazingly delicious too. With the fresh lemon zest, the cake just smelled like winter in Florida, where citrus trees are everywhere, in almost every backyard.

I was happy that this cake captured the spirit of the Solstice, in the place where I live. Everyone loved it.

Here’s the recipe for my cake.

SOLSTICE CAKE

makes one 9-inch layer,  8 servings

  • 6 tablespoons butter, at room temperature
  • 3/4 cup sifted powdered unrefined cane sugar (sold as “organic” powdered sugar)
  • 4 large eggs
  • 1 teaspoon almond extract
  • 1 1/2 cups almond flour (or almonds processed to a fine powder)
  • 1/4 teaspoon salt
  • 8 ounces mascarpone cheese, at room temperature
  • 1/2 jar ginger-orange marmalade fruit spread (or plain orange marmalade)

the zest of one lemon

  1. Preheat the oven to 325 degrees F.
  2. Line a 9-inch round cake pan with a piece of parchment paper.
  3. Whip butter in a large bowl with an electric mixer until smooth and creamy, then add powdered sugar and continue to beat until well incorporated.
  4. Add the eggs, one at a time, beating and scraping the sides of the bowl after each addition.
  5. Add the almond extract.
  6. Stir the almond flour into the batter along with the salt.
  7. Pour batter into the pan and bake 35 to 40 minutes, or until the cake is lightly browned on top and a toothpick inserted into the center comes out clean.
  8. Let the cake cool in the pan for 10 minutes.
  9. Invert cake onto a cooling rack and allow it to cool completely.
  10. Spread the soft mascarpone cheese onto the cooled cake. Then put the cake in the refrigerator for about an hour to allow the mascarpone to firm up.
  11. To make the sun, put a heaping tablespoon of marmalade in the center of the cake. Then fill a teaspoon with marmalade. Starting from the center circle, place the marmalage in the teaspoon on the cake, and pull the marmalage out towards the edge, making the sunbeam narrower and narrower as you go. I starting pulling with the back of a teaspoon and then tipped the spoon as I want to make the line narrower.
  12. Top with lemon zest curls and a candle at each point.

* Mascaropone is a soft Italian cheese similar to our cream cheese but more delicate. It is usually sold in gourmet supermarkets and natural food stores, or in the speciality cheese section of supermarkets. If you can’t find it where you live, you can use whipped cream cheese or buttercream frosting.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunshine Through the Year

I “accidentally” found this very cool website a couple of years ago and it’s one of my favorites.

Gaisma.com has very comprehensive data about the amount of sunshine for every place in the world. “Gaisma” is a Latvian word, meaning “light”.

Why would you want to know this? For gardening, for calculating potential solar energy, but for me, it very clearly shows the increase and decrease of day length (making it easy to find the longest days and longest nights), in beautiful graphs.

Here is my graph for Clearwater, Florida, for today, 5 January 2013.

Today is the day after the Summer Solstice, the so-called “longest day”. See, the day length is 13 hours 55 minutes. But tomorrow is 13 hours 55 minutes also, and if you could scroll this back, you would see that the prior three days were 13 hours 55 minutes. It takes a week here for the daylight to be one minute less.

Then this information is placed on a beautiful graph that shows the hours of sunlight over the course of the year. There’s a grey line near the middle that is today.

Then there is the sun path diagram. The sun path is the seasonal-and-hourly positional changes of the sun as the Earth rotates and orbits around the sun, so you can see where the sun will be at different times of year. This is useful to orient a house or garden to the sun. You can print your sun path diagram on an overhead transparency or tracing paper and overlay it on your house or garden plans.

In addition there is all kinds of meteoroligical information for your place like temperature, wind speed, and precipitation. And if you don’t know where you are in the world, it tells your longitude and latitude, too, local time zone and even your altitude.

It’s a great tool to play with. I had fun looking at the sunshine hours graph for different places in the world. Compare the graph for your location with my Clearwater graph. Quite a difference in the sun patterns!

Even if you have no other use for this, go find your location and see what your local sun patterns are. And next time a solstice nears, here’s where you can find your own “longest day” and “longest night.”

Natural Alternatives to Sleeping Pills

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Today we’ll be talking about insomnia and natural things you can do at home to get enough sleep. According to National Geographic, less than one-third of our population in the USA get enough sleep. Since sleep affects our mental state, the aging process, our immune system, and our body’s ability do detox toxic chemicals, it’s very important to get enough sleep. Pamela will tell us about phases of sleep, sleep hygiene, dangers of using prescription hypnotic drugs and how they lead to psychiatric problems, plus natural substances to help you sleep that target similar areas of the brain without the side effects. . Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

pamela-seefeld-at-desk

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Natural Alternatives to Sleeping Pills

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld PhD

Date of Broadcast: December 3, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free. It’s Wednesday, December 3rd 2014. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. And in fact, she helps people get off prescription drugs.

I have her on every other Wednesday because she has so much information about the negative health effects of taking prescription drugs and over-the-counter drugs and so much information about simple, natural things that we can do to help our health that I just want her to tell you everything that she knows. I learn from her every time I talk to her.

So today, we are going to be talking about insomnia. Are you having trouble sleeping? Well, it’s winter time, there’s hibernates, so I thought we should talk about sleep since this is a natural time for us to be getting more sleep and rejuvenating our bodies and that you absolutely need to sleep in order for your body to detox toxic chemicals. This is an extremely important subject today and so let’s just get started.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey, it’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. It’s always great to have you. So what did you tell me about National Geographic said one-third, less than one-third of our population in the United States get enough sleep?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct! And they just had a special on that just this last Sunday talking about the dangers of sleep deprivation and how the majority of the people are really driving around with insufficient sleep and as a result of it, are basically impaired.

And we see this quite a bit. If you look at the rate of car accidents and the rate of just accidents in general, it’s highly associated with lack of sleep. Most adults are going to need between seven and nine hours of sleep at night. The majority of the people in this country are probably getting six or less.
DEBRA: I think that that’s probably true. So what would sleep deprivation look like?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it can go in different phases. Chronic sleep deprivation will definitely age the person for one thing. Inattentiveness, these people tend to compensate by trying to drink lots of caffeine and coffee. And also, if you look at the very severe side effects of it, if someone goes several days without sleep, psychosis can set in and can really make this person end up in a hospital.

Sleep deprivation tend to really cause hallucinations. A lot of different things that are psychiatric symptoms that maybe if they’re people that see a psychiatrist as a result of sleep deprivation that’s been severe enough for a long enough period of time, these people might be misdiagnosed with depression and then placed on medication as a result of it.

So it’s really important to say that the brain needs this time to basically mop up and clean out the remnants of the day and get started fresh for the next day.
And what we also find is that people who have had chronic sleep deprivation – it doesn’t really have to be like you haven’t slept two days in a row. It can be six hours of sleep and that’s not what your body needs.

What we see is that it’s kind of like the brain is on fire and putting this in terminology, ‘inflammation markers’ in the circulation go up. And that’s why we know that weight gain is associated with not sufficient sleep. We find that this actually can have effects in memory and cognition and a lot of it is related to circulating cytokines that come in and out of the brain.

So it has some very, very serious health effects by not having decent sleep.

DEBRA: Great! Well, tell us about what are the different phases of sleep.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right! So most people know a little bit about some of this. I’ll kind of go over some basic things. There are two types of sleep. There’s non-rapid eye movement and there’s rapid eye movement, which is REM sleep. REM sleep is known as ‘active sleep’ or ‘paradoxical sleep’. So this is the time when your eyes are actually moving underneath your eyelids.

So at the beginning of sleep, you’re kind of relatively awake and alert. The brain produces beta waves. But as the brain slows down, slower waves called alpha waves are produced. You’re not quite asleep at this time, but this is when you can have vivid hallucinations and ‘myclonic jerks’ where all of a sudden, you feel like your muscles move or your legs move suddenly. That’s what’s happening during that phase. That’s to be expected. We actually have a lot of that going on at night, but we only remember it maybe once in a while.

So stage one sleep is the beginning of the theta wave. And then stage two lasts about 20 minutes and then the brain activity called ‘sleep spindles’ and body temperature and heart rate slows. So this is asleep. Stage there is delta waves and deep sleep. And stage four is dreaming or REM sleeping brain activity.
What I thought was very interesting is that you actually go through this pattern where you start in stage one, you go to stage two and three, then you go back to two and then you go to REM and this gets repeated four to five cycles per night – and then the average REM time is 90 minutes.

So this is pretty interesting. When you have to go through these different phases, setting an alarm – I know a lot of people have to wake up by an alarm, but if you think about it, you’re kind of jolting yourself out of sleep, right?

DEBRA: Yeah, right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So depending on where you were at that time, what I see in most people is they can try and get themselves to a point where the alarm isn’t suddenly waking them, where they’re actually getting to bed at a reasonable time so that if they need to have an alarm to get up for work, that it goes off and they’re really through most of their sleep cycle, that makes a huge difference.

But if you think about most people, they go to bed late, they procrastinate, then they set their alarm and they get up really early, they’re not going through all these phases of sleep. And then they get in the car and drive. And also, a lot of these people end up taking prescription hypnotics. We’ll talk a little bit about that, how this really changes the chemistry of the brain in an unfavorable way.

DEBRA: I know for myself when I used to go to school when I was a child, my mother would set the alarm and I’d have to be forced to be awakened every morning so that I could get to school by 7:30. I hated that. I just didn’t like that all.

And so now, it’s really important to me that I allow myself to fall asleep when I want to fall asleep. And then I wake up when I want to wake up. I think that that makes a huge amount of difference in terms of just allowing your body to do what it needs to do.

Sometimes, I think I should get up and work and then I think, “No. You know what? I’m just going to let myself sleep” and having that extra hour of sleep or whatever, just going back to sleep in the morning. It just makes a huge difference in how well I’m able to function for the rest of the day. You think, “Oh, I’m going to get an extra hour of work done if I get up early,” but I actually get more done if I sleep.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, yeah, correct because what happens is the consolidation of memory – well, we want to just use simplistic terms, the mopping up of the brain. But basically, what the brain is doing during this sleep process – and you think about the rest of your body too. In the beginning, you were introducing about cleaning up toxic chemicals. The body during sleep basically gets ready for the next day. This is preparatory work that takes place in our sleep cycles. It’s cleaning up the brains. It’s getting rid of remnants of things from the day time that really are non-consequential.

And basically, what the brain is doing during this time is categorizing whether they need to save something or not. So all these little memories and things that we had – that’s why I think when people are studying for a test, studying just before you go to bed and really making an imprint on that will enhance your studying capacity when you take your exam in the morning.

So there’s a reason for studying just before you go to sleep because the consolidation, the memories, it’s going to start putting these memories, which are made of acetylcholine, it’s going to start compartmentalizing them in the brain. And the things that are non-consequential and not important is going to clear that out.
Also, if we’re talking about this from a detoxification point, the kidney start removing all of these excess remnants of metabolism from the day time. And that’s why when you go to sleep at night, you keep going to the bathroom. People get up and go to the bathroom when their bladder is full. The reason why is your center of gravity when you’re lying down changes. So during the day, your center of gravity is at a different location. It’s more central. But when you sleep at night, the center of gravity changes to the back of the kidneys.And this was designed intentionally so that the fluids of the body that are containing waste products will go to the kidneys during that time and leave.

So actually, when you think about it, your first void in the morning really contains all these things that have accumulated during the day that really were not processed at the time that you actually were drinking water and going to the restroom then.

So it’s really amazing the way the body decides that this is a time to restore, re-nourish and clean up things that can lead to diabetes, intellectual problems or cognitive delays. All these kinds of things are basically mopped up during this process.

DEBRA: Wow! I haven’t thought about it quite that way, but I think that you described it really well, that it really is not about being lazy or anything like that. It just really is that time for us to rejuvenate, for our bodies to rejuvenate and to have that rest.

We need to go to break, but when we come back, we’ll talk more about sleep and natural ways to sleep better. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

She has very successfully gotten people off drugs. She helps people replace drugs that they’ve been taking with natural substances that can do the same thing. But the thing that really seems most important to me (having been somebody who has taken prescription drugs and also natural things) is that when you take prescription drugs, it might alleviate your symptoms, but they’re not healing your body. Pamela can replace those drugs with substances, natural substances that actually are repairing and healing your body. To me, that’s a huge, huge, huge difference. It costs less too and you end up with a better result.

So Pamela, I know that you are happy to talk to anybody on the phone about what they’re taking and what they could take instead. So what’s your phone number?
PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. I would be very happy to help any of you, even your children if they have any issues as far as medications or any behavioral issues. You can call me here at my pharmacy. It’s 727-442-4955. That’s Botanical Resource.

And I really do everything all-encompassing. So cholesterol, blood pressure, mental health. I do a lot of mental health. So if you want to get off these prescription medications or you want to know some alternatives for depression or anxiety, for sleeping, I would be most honored to help you and your family.

DEBRA: And she’s really wonderful. She’s here in Clearwater, Florida where I am and I found out about her and invited her to be a guest on my show because she has such a great reputation here. Everybody loves here. Medical doctors recommend her. My medical doctor, when I told him that I was taking some things that she had given me said, “Oh, just take whatever Pamela tells you to take.”And that was the end of the conversation.

So I completely trust her. I have had wonderful results from what she’s advised me to do. If you’re having any kind of health concerns, I hope that you will call her and get some help too.

Alright! So as long as we’re talking about prescription drugs and getting off of them, why don’t you tell us next about the dangers of using prescription hypnotic drugs for sleeping pills?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Great, great. Great subject. So what happens is that someone will go to the doctor, they’re having some sleep disturbance and insomnia, maybe some stress going on in their lives and the doctors, the first thing that they’re going to normally prescribe for a lot of people is then benzodiazepines. That’s a class of drugs that includes Xanas, Ativan, Valium.

These medications have two problems with them. They have addiction; they have tolerance and dependence basically.

Tolerance means you need more medication to get the same effect. And dependence means, of course, that you’re dependent on it. And the dependence with these medicines is physical and it’s psychological, which is bad. It’s both aspects.

So when people go on these medicines, they need more medicine over time to get the same effect. And then when they try and take it away, they can have panic attacks, severe anxiety. And people are on long term benzos, it’s really very problematic. And most of these people, I’m sure given the opportunity, would have chosen not to be placed on them.

A good example of a hypnotic that’s been used forever really (probably, I don’t know, 34 years) is Restoril, which is Temazepam. It’s an old benzo drug. And if you look at these drugs – and I still see people coming in on those – the studies show after about threeweeks, it doesn’t work anymore. So say somebody that’s on 15 mg…

DEBRA: Only three weeks?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah! It doesn’t work. So they need more medicine and it’s that quick. In fact, they’d tell somebody that’s even using a benzo on a part-time basis or short period of time for an anxiety disorder, you’ve got a window of maybe nine to twelve days of taking it consistently, then after that, you can’t really be without it. It’s pretty quick.

So I don’t think people realize that tolerance and dependence show up rather fast. I don’t know if they’re necessarily warned about that.
And you have to be careful too because when you take these prescriptions, there’s cognitiveproblem associated with this – and memory. Remember we were talking about memory consolidation, this kind of messes with your head.

So people that have these and take these prescription hypnotics, there can be some hang over sedation. And especially with Ambien, which is a very common prescription hypnotic, when someone is given Ambien, there are lots of cases where people are sleep walking, they get up in the morning and they don’t remember the commute to work. There’s a lot of problems with memory and cognitive impairment as a result of taking Ambien.

And what scares more than anything is that you have a large of population in this country that are taking these every night and then they get up and drive a car to work. This is really frightening if you think about.

Now, the benzos are kind of going out of favor because of the tolerance and dependence, but I still see quite a lot of people that are on Ativan and Xanax for sleep especially older people where they’ve been put on that a long time ago and basically, now,they don’t have a choice, but to be on that.

So really, just kind of to regroup, there’s different drug classes of these anxiolytics, but they can be use for insomnia, for hypnotics. Taking these drugs definitely has some other aspects as well especially even looking at elderly people.

And we should really focus on that because we have a lot of elderly people that have sleep disturbances. Our sleep changes as we get older. It’s a more lighter sleep. And not only that, when you think about you and I, we run around all day, so when we go to bed, we’re tired. But the older people, they’re more sedentary.

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right? So when I go to sleep, I fall into bed. They probably because they’re doing activities of daily living, they’re doing some shopping, they’re watching TV. I mean, they’re not really doing a whole lot.

So I think, my theory really, I think most people need to be tired to sleep.

DEBRA: Well, I think so too. I mean, I had noticed that recently (like maybe in the last month or so) that I had been a lot more physically active, that I’ve been doing things where I’m walking more, I’m not sitting at my desk so much, I’m not thinking so much, as much as I am out doing things. I noticed that. And I’m also working longer hours. So I have activities in the evening as well as during the day.

And by the time it gets to be 10 o’clock, I am just physically tired whereas I know before, there had been time in my life where if I wasn’t working long hours or I wasn’t intensely getting a lot of things done in the time period that I have, that I wasn’t as physically tired and it was harder to sleep. But now, it’s just like, “Oh, thank you. It’s bed time!”

I mean, we live here in Florida. Wesee a lot of older people and…

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: They just sit around all day. I don’t want to say all older people sit around all day because we certainly have active seniors, but a lot of old people just sit or watch TV all day or they talk to each other or they play checkers or whatever it is that they’re doing. They’re not physically engaged in life to the degree that younger people are.

We need to go to break. But when we come back, we’ll talk more about sleep, sleeping pills and what we can do naturally to sleep better. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

So Pamela, let’s talk about some things that people can do to sleep better. First, I wanted to say that many, many years ago when I started researching toxic chemicals, one of my first, most exciting discoveries was that formaldehyde causes insomnia.

At the time, I really had insomnia. It was excruciating for me to go to bed at night because I would not sleep and I would just toss and turn for hours. It turns out that formaldehyde is the major chemical in permanent press finish and that if you have permanent press sheets on your bed as you’re lying there at night, you’re going to be sleeping in a cloud of formaldehyde, particularly if you just take the sheets out of the package and put it on the bed.

But even after you’ve been washing and sleeping, there still is formaldehyde. It’s lessening amounts, but still, for a very long time, the sheets are still emitting formaldehyde.

I had to put that together. Nobody had put it in a book yet that I had see. I had to find out in one book that formaldehyde caused insomnia and find out in another book that formaldehyde is in permanent press resin on bed sheets. And when I put those two things together, I said, “Oh, my God!” I went right down and found the only – at that time, there was only one brand of untreated cotton sheets. I managed to find it, put those sheets in my bed and I slept. I slept.

It was just like so wonderful to sleep after all those nights, months, years of not sleeping well because of the formaldehyde on the bed sheets. And now, for the past 30 years, I have only slept on cotton flannel sheets every night – not that there aren’t other types of cotton sheets, but I just love cotton flannel sheets. And even though I live in Florida, I would think it’s too hot for flannel sheets, but it’s not. It’s very comfortable to sleep on them year around.

So that’s my two cents worth on how we can sleep better, change your sheets.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, you’re right. Chemicals affect a lot of what is going on in our lives. Let’s face it, people have those artificial candles burning in their houses. It reaches your eyes, your eyes water. Formaldehyde coming offof the mattress, coming off of the sheets, coming off of the carpeting, you are exposed to these things continuously. And that’s why when people, you go into a store to buy, that new mattress, no that’s formaldehyde offgassing.

So it’s pretty prevalent. A lot of people are very sensitive to it. And this can explain a lot of people’s sleep disturbances. Environmentally, their room is just not equipped for them to get a restful sleep. So that can even be part of sleephygiene.

Sleep hygiene, really, the study show a dark, cold room. You don’t have a lot of ambient light coming in from outside. You want to have comfortable clothes, comfortable sheets. Sometimes, they believe that protein or a carbohydrate snack. Make sure you have some food in your stomach. I’m not talking about a meal, but if you go to bed with your stomach hungry and it’s growling all night, you’re not going to really have some decent sleep. So you shouldn’t be hungry when you go to bed, you shouldn’t be full either. And then limiting alcohol consumption just before you fall asleep.

And screen time. A lot of people know that looking at the screen – and I tell a lot of people too, get your cell phone out of the bedroom because there’s constantly little emails and dings and those noises wake you up.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So really, it’s important to look at that. And the formaldehyde issue, I think that most people aren’t really cognizant of it. You and I know about this sort of thing. But remember, we weretalking about the kidneys and the mopping up of the body, what happens during that process is if you’re exposing yourself to these chemicals while you’re sleeping, you’re not really realizing why it’s interfering with the way you feel and function.

DEBRA: Well, you know, it’s – I forgot what I was going to say.Okay, go ahead.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Even the mattress, I know for myself, the mattress that I have at my house – I mean, I bought this quite a while ago. It’s an organic mattress and it’s made with wool or organic latex…

DEBRA: I have a wool mattress too, Pamela. Another common…

PAMELA SEEFELD: I know! The whole frame is not made with any varnishes. I love it! It’s green sleep. I’ve had it for – I don’t know, probably ten years. That’s the best thing I ever bought. And it’s just completely chemical free.

DEBRA: Yeah, I have a wool mattress and it’s the best thingI ever bought. I just love it. I just love my wool mattress.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Look at us. Look at this, the two ofus. People who are probably listening to this thing, “Oh, they planned this.” I mean, I didn’t know she does what she has done.

DEBRA: No, we didn’t.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And here I am, I had to order from Canada. It came down from Canada. It came down from Canada. I had to custom order and it came from Canada.

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s really a great investment in your sleep and your comfort.

But I kind of want to talk a little bit more about the medication and the fact that when people are having sleep disturbances, they need to realize that perhaps stress an anxiety during the day are affecting your sleep too.

So let’s look at it from a mental health perspective. We address the chemicals and the comfort and the dangers of some of the prescription (and we can talk about the dangers of the prescriptions for hours), but I want people to realize that when you go to sleep and you’ve done all the sleep hygiene things, but if you have a lot of stress in your life and a lot of people really, you have overwhelming stress –

This is what I find in my business, that the people come and the first thing if I say, “Are you stressed?”, they just lose it. They’re like, “Yeah.” It’s just that a lot of people work full-time and they have to take care of their home, they have children, maybe they have elderly parents. The stresses of life perhaps have gotten more extreme I think in recent years for a lot of people especially with the economy in some places.

So I’m a big advocate of using calming fish oil to calm the brain and some of the racing thinking that’s associated with not being able to turn the brain off. So there’s a product by Nordic Naturals, it’s called ProDHA. They have two of them, their professional line, ProDHA and ProDHA 1000, which is the higher octave of that and is much stronger.

ProDHA, I take that myself, has a calming effect on the brain, but it’s not making you sleepy. So what it does is it turns off a lot of that subconscious worry that people have. “I need to add something to the list of things to do,” you know what I’m talking about, these constant thinking in the back of your head.

I also noticed with the higher docosahexaenoic acid that are in those products, you have a lot more vivid dreams. You can remember your dreams. And I really put this together because DHA is very active in the brain. Customers, I remember, were coming back to me after they’ve taken it and saying, “Does this make you dream vivid dreams?” and I said, “Well, DHA has a lot of activity in the brain and it would make sense that that would be the case” and then I started noticing myself when I switched to that product as well.

So if people has sleep disturbances and they’ve done all these other things or cause from stress, you would want to be on omega 3’s anyway, customizing your product that would be specifically towards more restful and relaxing sleep, but also that you’re not kind of being spontaneously upset about things during your daily life, during the day. I’ve noticed that this has really taken the edge of being stuck on traffic, things don’t go your way. Things that normally could be aggravating for most people, I think that this would be highly helpful.

DEBRA: Yes, it’s so interesting about how you can take natural substances and have them affect how you think and how you feel and your ability to do those two things. When I see that from taking a supplement, I start thinking about how – oh, I hear the music, so we have to go to break. I’ll finish my sentence. Sometimes, I get so interested in what we’re saying, I don’t even look at the clock.

Anyway, let’s go to break. We’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. We’ll be back in a moment.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

I mentioned before, Pamela that you talk to people on the phone and can help people get off their prescription drugs and also recommend natural substances to people for virtually any conditions, so why don’t you give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. So you can reach me at my pharmacy here. I’ll be glad to help you with any particular need you have about a supplement or a question about the drugs you’re taking or to remove those medicines from your life.

The number here at Botanical Resource is 727-442-4955. I would be very happy to help you or any loved one in your family or even a friend, anybody you know. My business is really word-of-mouth. I’ve been doing this for 20 years probably. It’s really very positive and I think you’ll find your results to be very good.

DEBRA: Very good. And just give your number just one more time.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. So it’s 727-442-4955. And as I’ve said previously, I would really be honored and happy to help you or your loved one.

DEBRA: Great! So tell us about natural substances that people can take that will help them sleep better.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Alright, good. So there’s lots of different products in the market and I’m going to talk about some of the ones that actually can work.
So a lot of people use theonine. There is limited data on that as a hypnotic and sleep. I personally don’t use it. So I’m going to go through the pros and cons of the products I like. I don’t really think that that works as well. It does work for some people, but not for the vast majority.

Now Valerian is very popular. Valerian does have components that put you into deep sleep, but it has a really nasty smell. And if you’ve ever smelled it, it smells like dirty, old socks.

DEBRA: I’ve never smelled it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, it does, it does. It smells like dirty, old socks and I’m not kidding you. If you buy a bottle and you open it up, you’ll know exactly what I mean. So some people can’t get past the olfactory problems associated with that product.

My personal favorite is passion flower. The reason why I like passion flower is that it works like the benzodiazepines receptor products – the Xanax, the Ativan, the Valium – but it’s a partial agonist to the receptors. So when you take these benzodiazepines, the agonist has an affinity towards the receptor. The receptors are proteins and cells and that’s how drugs work.

So when you take Xanax, which a prescription that has addiction and tolerance, it binds to the receptor and it changes the chemistry and the cell and that’s how you get calm or that’s how you sleep. What the passion flower does is it has partial activity. So it goes on the receptor, it goes off the receptor. It goes on the receptor, it comes off the receptor. And when you’re doing this, you have some pharmacological advantages because you don’t have tolerance and dependence, but you have a highly effective product because it really binds right to the receptor pretty reproducibly.

I use that to get people off the medicine. By using that and few other little supplements, we can kick the drug off and the body is kind of faked off. It doesn’t know if the drugs are on or the supplements are on. So if someone really has pretty bad insomnia, passion flower is going to be the strongest product that you’ll probably be using in the natural realm.

DEBRA: I was taking passion flower. You gave me some passion flower and it worked very, very well. And then there was a day – I took it for about a month or so. I still have a bottle of passion flower in my nightstand.

After about a month, I thought, “Well, let me just see what happens without it.” And since then, I just haven’t even needed to take it because I still get my seven to eight hours of sleep every night. It got me through a period of time when I wasn’t sleeping very well. And then I know that I have it right there in my nightstand. If I’m not sleeping, I can just take some.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, yeah. That’s the best way to use that. I mean, somebody that has chronic insomnia and they’re not responding – and you’re on a few supplements too that we were just balancing the chemistry of the body. So the sleep disturbance would eventually go away. That’s what we would expect. But the good part is that we’re looking at trying to use the chemistry of the body and what we know about pharmacology to use these products in a responsible manner so that you’re not having these tolerance and dependence and these addiction properties.

And so passion flower is really a liberating product because you can use it for a certain period of time and like in your situation, sleep eventually started to come on a normal cycle and was much more reproducible and much more serene so to speak. You got better sleep, so you didn’t need it anymore, whereas if you had gone to the doctor and he had given you a benzodiazepine, you wouldn’t be able to stop it.

And that’s the beauty of using herbal products that work in a pharmacological basis. When you decide to target things based on the receptor on the brain and you’re trying to get a therapeutic outcome using the drugs, you might get an outcome, but you’re also going to have a negative outcome in the fact that you’re eventually going to need it to sleep every single night. And that’s not what we want for people. We want people to be able to make a choice.

DEBRA: Right, right. Absolutely.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So also too, there’s a product called Perfect Sleep that I like a lot. It’s a liquid tincture. So sometimes, people don’t want to swallow a capsule, they want to hold it underneath their tongue. That’s by DesBio. That works really, really well.

And that has some things that also help our hormones as well especially if someone has menopausal issues or so forth or depression, it has some other serotonergic activity as well. It might help for the person that maybe has sleep disturbances as a result of depression. So that product works really well.

There’s a homeopathic product (especially for children and for adults too). It’s called Neurexan. It’s from Heel. It’s a German company. Neurexan has a lot of data behind it. And what’s nice about Neurexan, it says clearly in the label it’s for overactive minds.

It really probably can be used in tandem with the Pro DHA for people that are having this obsessive thinking, worrying about the day, all these pressures that are on people today. The idea that we have to just fall into bed and turn everything off is very difficult for most people. They really can’t do it. So that’s a really good tool.
I want to mention one more thing and we’re going to talk a little bit more some of the natural stuff quickly. But there’s a higher incidence with elderly people using prescription for sleeping, hypnotics that they have a higher co-morbidity and mortality. They have a higher chance for a severe fall or fracture. And when we know when elderly people have fall and fractures, there’s a lot of co-morbidities that is caused, problems that all of a sudden, they end up with an infection, they’re in rehab, they’re not doing well and then they die.

So if you’re young or even if you’re older, if you want to try and preserve your health and your quality of life, reaching for the prescription hypnotics first before you tried some of the natural products and used the correct dose – because sometimes people, I’ll say, “Try this passion flower” and they’ll say, “Well, I’ve tried that, it didn’t work.” Well, it depends what product you’re using, what dose you’re using. And Debra, that’s really what it’s about. I select that for you for free. I tell you what to take. You’re not just going to randomly grab something.

DEBRA: No. I really want to really emphasize this point because you can go to a natural food store and look on the shelf and buy passion flower or whatever, but the difference is Pamela understands about dose because she’s a trained pharmacist and she has all these decades of experience. And so she can tell you exactly how much to take. She understands exactly how dosing works in a way that we who are not trained don’t understand this at all.

You can’t just look on the back of a bottle and say, “Take one pill.” She knows exactly how much you should take, she compare you with exactly the right product. And the products that she carries in her pharmacy are products that she personally has been using with her clients for years and she knows what works and what doesn’t work. She can help you make that decision instead of spending hundreds of dollars on products that you won’t know whether they work or not just because you’re trying them because you read them on a magazine article.

She really will give you a very precise recommendation based on her knowledge and experience. That’s one of the reasons why she’s just so incredible.
PAMELA SEEFELD: I really appreciate that. And that’s important to realize. I really respect people’s time and money…

DEBRA: And she really does.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I really want the best for everybody. It’s not about, “Okay, I want to mail you something.” It’s not about that. The things that I suggest like the passion flower product that I ended up deciding on ultimately, I probably used five different ones with different people and I just kind of decided to looking at what is actually in there, how it’s standardized, how many milligrams, what’s actually working as far as feedback.

I’ve been doing this long enough. I know if people are coming back and saying, “It’s not working,” a particular product, “I just don’t want to use it anymore,” I move on to something else. There’s a lot of products that are very popular, that there’s a lot of advertising around, but I found that they just don’t work very well for people and they’re expensive and I just don’t carry them here.

So it’s really about selecting something that’s appropriate for the person. Especially if they’re drug naïve or not drug naïve and they haven’t had anxiolytic prescriptions, but especially the person that’s tittering on the edge and needing to have prescription therapy and the doctor or the practitioner is pushing for it, you really need to look and see if there’s some other things you can do instead.

And this encompasses not just the sleep that we’re talking today, but your blood pressure, your cholesterol, all these different things. Depression, anxiety, ADD, ADDHD, OCD, all these things can be helped very effectively with the right supplements, the right dose and just a few simple things.

DEBRA: Yes, they can. Now, we only have less than a minute actually, so I just want to slip one more thing in here and that is to say that being a registered pharmacist, Pamela can order and sell natural supplements at professional prescription grade that they cannot sell in the natural food store.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct.

DEBRA: And so you’re getting a completely different kind of supplement when you go to her than if you’ve been in a natural food store.
Okay, so we’ve got 15 seconds left, so give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, yes. It’s 727-442-4955 and as I’ve said previously, let me help you with any of your questions. I would be glad to answer those. I’m here full service for you.

DEBRA: Okay, great. And Pamela will be onagain in two weeks and every two weeks after that for an undetermined period of time. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

CozyPure Latex and Wool Products

Question from SARA

Debra,

As you well know, I have a great amount of respect for your expertise and opinion.

I am on the hunt for new bedding, including a latex mattress, organic cotton sheets, and wool topper & comforter.

I have perused your list of recommended vendors, but I happened across a local company that manufactures latex mattresses, organic cotton sheets, and wool toppers, comforters, and pillows. It just so happens that the company, CozyPure, based in Norfolk, VA is not on your list.

Have you heard of this company and do what is your opinion about the quality?

Their list of certifications include GOTS.

www.cozypure.com/certificates-and-memberships

www.cozypure.com/why-choose-cozypure

www.cozypure.com/natural-components

Debra’s Answer

The description looks good, but I can’t speak to the quality as I have no experience with this company.

Readers, anyone know about CozyPure?

Add Comment

Lead in Bathtub

Question from Hannah

Question about my bathtub…

I had my house spot-tested for lead today in preparation for a possible remodel next year.

The thing that tested highest for lead was the bathtub.

I knew this was a possibility but had not had it really on my radar until recently.

The lead inspector said that it was not an issue at all – that the lead from bathtubs does not leach and poses no danger to my kids.

But I was a bit skeptical as I have a 5.5 year old and a 1.5 year old who bathe in the tub nightly. so far their blood lead levels have always been

Do you consider the lead from a tub to be a hazard?

If so my options are to avoid that bathtub entirely and just have them shower in the newer bathroom upstairs that only has a shower stall.

Or I could refinish the bathtub.

My understanding is that the refinishing would be highly toxic and we would have to leave the house for it. But for how long would it be toxic? More than a week? Do you know how long the porcelain glaze takes to fully outgas?

Would love your thoughts as always. Thanks 🙂

Hannah

Debra’s Answer

I wrote about lead in bathtubs in Home Safe Home in 2004. It was first reported in 1995 on the television show Good Morning America.

Tests showed that hands ribbed along the side of the tub, bath water allowed to sit in the tub, and washcloths soaked in bath water and rubbed on the bottom of the rub all tested positive for lead.

But here’s the interesting thing. I recently learned that lead is not absorbed through the skin. What happens is that lead gets on hands and then children put their hands in their mouths, or children and adults pick up food and it gets on the food and that’s how lead gets in the body.

That said, keep in mind there is no safe level for lead.It’s something to be very careful with. Personally I wouldn’t allow my children to soak their bodies in a tub leaching any amount of lead.

Lead is a heavy metal, so if you are concerned about lead exposure, PureBody Liquid Zeolite detox drops will remove any lead that is accumulated in your body or your children’s.

If you want to refinish your bathtub, you would probably need to leave the house for it. If I remember correctly, they use lamps to cure the porcelain glaze. Call a company and find out the details. Once cured, porcelain glaze is totally nontoxic.

Add Comment

Lead Free Dishes

Question from R SWANSON

Can you tell me if Mikasa Bone China is lead-free or safe to us, our daughter has cancer and wants to stay away from dishes containing lead?

Thank you for any help you can give.

Lisa’s Answer (updated September, 2020)

I will be updating Debra’s List with safe brands.  As a guide you can read “Is Ceramic Dishware Safe?”

Living Toxic Free With Nine Children

You might have read a post on my Toxic Free Q&A about immersion blenders, which had a comment with a link to a post on another blog about toxic chemicals being released by immersion blenders. Well, I went to check out that post and found a whole website created by a woman who is very much in agreement with me. My guest today is Andrea Fabry. She blogs at It Takes Time and is the owner of Just So Natural Products. We’ll be talking about how and why she lives and works toxic free. Andrea is a former journalist and the mother of nine children ranging in age from 29 to 13. Following a health crisis in 2008, Andrea and her family discovered the wonders of natural living. Andrea is also the founder and president of momsAWARE, an educational organization designed to empower others to live healthy in a toxic world. www.it-takes-time.com | www.justso.co

read-transcript

 

 

Andrea-outside

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO Living Toxic Free with Nine Children

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd Guest: Andrea Fabry

Date of Broadcast: November 20, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, November 20th. It’s getting to be winter. I just heard on the news while I was waiting for the show to start (and maybe you did too) that more, more snow in Buffalo, New York area.

And it’s cold here in Florida, but I got my heater. I was talking the other day about my old heater broke and I had ordered a new one. I’ll just say it again because I know that a lot of people are buying the space heaters nowadays or you have one because it’s getting cold, you want to make sure that you don’t use a plastic space heater because the heat will cause the plastic to up gas.

What you want to get is something called a ‘utility heater’ and they have metal housings, metal with a powder coat, baked-on finish sometimes. If it smells, if the powder coat finish smells, just put it somewhere where you can just run it and it’ll bake off. That’s just some residual thing.

But I just took mine out of the box and there was no odor at all. It’s heating my feet up nicely under the desk. I got it at Home Depot for $19. You might have to order one because they’re just lying off the shelves. But just go into Home Depot or Lowe’s or whatever your local hardware store is and ask them for a ‘utility heater’, which just went on. I don’t know if you can hear it.

Anyway, that’s how you can get a heater, a small heater that will heat you personally, not your whole, entire house. It will heat you personally sitting at a desk or lying in bed inexpensively and non-toxically. It’s the most important thing, that it’s toxic-free.

Actually, it sits toxic-free in your home. The electricity, of course, is putting toxic pollutants out into the environment, but that’s another thing.

Alright! It’s Thursday, November 20th 2014. And today, my guest is Andrea Fabry. She has a very interesting blog at It-Takes-Time.com. She also has a business selling hand-made natural personal care products. She’s got an organization called Mom’s Aware to educate moms to live healthy in a toxic world.

And it’s just every interesting for me to read her blog because she has things on it that I didn’t know. In fact, that’s how I found her. One of my readers sent a comment to one of my posts with a link to Andrea’s website about immersion blenders. Maybe we’ll talk about that a little bit.

But as I looked around her blog, her viewpoint is very much in common with mine. She does things slightly differently in an interesting way and I learned a lot by looking at her website (and I’m still looking at her website) because she’s very creative and has her own way of doing things.

Hi, Andrea!

ANDREA FABRY: Hi, Debra. So great to be here. I’m so excited.

DEBRA: Thank you. Oh, so the thing that I forgot to say is you have nine children.

ANDREA FABRY: Well, yes.

DEBRA: So nobody can tell me, nobody can say to me now that they’re too busy to be toxic-free.

ANDREA FABRY: Ah! Well, that’s a story and I’m sure we’ll get into it.

DEBRA: So I gave a little summary about what you do, but why don’t you in your own words just give us an overview of what you do.

ANDREA FABRY: Well, I just have a passion like you do, Debra just to return to nature, really explore what it means to live as naturally as possible. I haven’t always been that way unlike you who’s been on this journey – you’re way ahead of your time.

DEBRA: Thank you.

ANDREA FABRY: I was not on this journey until the year 2008. So it’s very recent for me, in the last six years. But I know that if I can make some of these changes, anyone can.

DEBRA: Exactly, I totally agree with you. So first, tell us how you got interested in this in 2008. What happened in your life? What was your life like before you changed?

ANDREA FABRY: Right! Well, before, we were a drivethrough family. I was raising nine children, busy, activities, living the good life, buying the cheapest products I could find. Even my next door neighbor, I remember, got pregnant with her first child and she wanted to go to natural products and I said, “Don’t throw your old ones away. I’ll take them all.” I just had no concept.

We were managing okay. My oldest at the time in 2007 was in her twenties and then our youngest was six years old. Up until that point, I didn’t cook. I bought as cheaply as I could and thought nothing about the world in which we lived.

So in the year 2000, we had moved into a home that we didn’t make any connection with. For the first time in our parenting, we found ourselves in emergency rooms. We began to get medical diagnosis. This was in the year 2000. And again, I still thought nothing of it except that we made a move from Illinois to Colorado, maybe the elevation, I don’t know. We had a lot of mysterious illnesses that lasted up until the year 2007.

Well, in that year, we found some mold in the house and uncovered some carpets – and not just a little, but a lot. We called someone to come fix this and unfortunately, we called the cheapest company possible, which was our mindset at the time. Very unfortunately, they remediated it improperly and blew fans all over to it and into the heating system, the ventilation in the home.

So shortly after, about six weeks later, we began to see serious illnesses come up – autoimmune disease, vertigo, migraines, digestive problems, vision problems, respiratory problems, fatigue problems to the point where we had surgeries. My 11-year old was in a wheelchair. And these were kids that were active and thriving. Before I knew it, our youngest, four couldn’t even read because the [inaudible 00:07:49] was so intense.

So something severe was happening, but to be honest, Debra, I was just hoping a doctor would figure it out for us. And so we want to 60 of them that year. It was only thanks to the internet and a friend who suggested that there’s such a thing as big building syndrome, environment matters, that kind of thing who just mentioned it to me. I didn’t want to think about environment or even taking ownership of our house in any way. That was a new concept.

But desperation will take you a lot of places and I became desperate to find an answer. And when I connected the dots, that this mold exposure was so intense and the remediation was so improperly done, that we were living in a very toxic situation.

That led me to speak with one of the leading toxicologists in the field who helped me understand what had happened to our family and encouraged to leave everything, treat the home as if it were on fire. And October 4th 2008, we did that.

At the time, we had seven children living with us. The others were out. We left everything and started completely over. I had a great hope that some of these health issues would be behind us. And unfortunately, what I didn’t understand about our immune system and rebuilding it is we couldn’t keep the lifestyle we had.

And as one who was completely clueless – and now, I’m 51 years old. I was an older parent, I’ve lived a certain way. My house had declined so severely that not only did I have nine sick children, but I was having a hard time functioning, a lot of memory loss and fatigue and joint problems, liver problems and so on. So it was a very steep learning curve suddenly.

And out of desperation, I made a lot of changes including just we moved to Arizona to kind of figure out how we were going to survive and thrive again or if that was even possible. We were just kind of limping along. And I’ve discovered that it’s more than – there’s clean air, there’s clean water, there’s clean food.

Well, our diet was pretty typical American. So to change and alter – and our products was full of chemicals, something I’ve never thought about. I had to make all of those changes. This is why I know that if I can do this, limping along, I know that anyone can. They key is understanding the process and it took time. That’s why I had such a passion to call my blog that.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. But I do want to say that I just can’t even imagine what you went through having gone through that whole process myself (I know a lot of people listening have gone through that same process), but I only had to do it with one person. I just can’t even imagine multiplying that by nine especially children who you have to help as well.

We need to go to break now. We’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Daddy and my guest today is Andrea Fabry. When we come back, we’ll hear more about her adventure and how she became toxic-free and nature-oriented.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

favorite-family2

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Andrea Fabry. She’s got nine children and she went through a whole ordeal of having to change their whole lifestyle – hers and her whole family when they all got sick of toxic mold.

So Andrea, when you got to the point where you decided that you needed to change everything, reading your blog, you have picked up on some things. I’ve been looking at toxic chemicals for 30 years, more than 30 years. I’ve been writing about them for 30 years.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes, you have.

DEBRA: And I actually started, I went through my own ordeal in 1978. That was a long, long time ago. And so I looked at a lot of products. But you write about things I’ve never heard of. Let’s talk about toxic chemicals and immersion blenders. That came up on my blog because somebody sent it in, but it sparked a lot of interest. So how did it ever occur to you to look at toxic chemical in immersion blenders?

ANDREA FABRY: Well, here’s the thing. I went from complete disinterest in the whole subject and thought people like myself and probably at the time, I would’ve thought you were kind of – you know, nuts!

DEBRA: Thank you.

ANDREA FABRY: I mean, I really just was not interesting and I just couldn’t understand asking questions about our lifestyle honestly. So to go from that to reading the science journals – that’s what I do. I’m sure, just like you, I’m on notifications on a lot of keywords.

And so this study came up and it’s very recent, it was in Sweden I believe of finding chlorinated paraffin in immersion blenders. We live by our big blenders because when you fix food from scratch, there’s a lot to do and this really helps speed the whole process up.

DEBRA: Right, it does, it does.

ANDREA FABRY: I make mayonnaise with my immersion blenders. So it really caught my eye. I just wrote about it. The next day, I wrote the author of the study because I knew it had really just come out and what’s so interesting – and it was just interesting more than, “Oh, I’ve got to quickly take action” because Debra, you and I both know, you do the best you can. You do the best you can and then you make choices and you learn and you grow. And next time I need an immersion blender, I’m going to get this brand.

But I thought a little more urgent about that. But more than that, it was such a new – I use it all the time and I never thought to look. And of course, I buy stainless steel. I never thought to look under that hood where there is this plastic. And that what type of plastic? To find that chlorinated paraffin – and I know enough to know. I don’t want that in my food. I don’t know want it. And we’re heating it up? It’s electrically applied. There are heating bulbs.

And the author of the study, he just came on it by accident where this cat food had been contaminated. And so they tried to figure out why and how. So all that to say, I know you and I are just very like-minded and like-hearted, I just couldn’t wait to share that information.

DEBRA: Yeah, whenever I see things like that, I always want to tell people. When I finally figured out in my own life that I could feel better by not being exposed to toxic chemicals, it was like, “Oh, my God! I have to tell everybody.”

ANDREA FABRY: Yes, yes.

DEBRA: …because nobody had told me. If somebody had told me early in life or if my parents had known early in life that they could’ve raised a healthy child by not exposing them to toxic chemicals and they have done that, how different my life would’ve been and how different my life would’ve been if I had felt better and not gone through the illnesses that I went through.

I just said, “I have to talk about this because I don’t want anybody to be exposed to toxic chemicals because they don’t know.”

ANDREA FABRY: Right, exactly!

DEBRA: …if you don’t know.

ANDREA FABRY: You don’t.

DEBRA: Yeah, if you don’t know, you can’t make a choice.

ANDREA FABRY: I feel that way so much about a house, an indoor environment of any sort – a school, an office, a house. To understand that our air matters, that’s a new way of thinking.

DEBRA: It is a new way of thinking. When I started 30 years ago, there was no such field as indoor air pollution. I was writing about people getting sick from carpets and stuff, but there were no studies then. I was just saying, “You know, well, I know this person who got sick… we took out the carpet and they were fine.”

And then the studies started coming out. And so now, we think of things, toxic chemical exposures very differently than we did.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes, you’ve seen it all. Boy! You’ve really seen it.

DEBRA: Yeah, yup. I really have been here through the whole history.

ANDREA FABRY: Yeah.

DEBRA: But I want to back up for a minute. What should somebody be looking for in an immersion blender to try to figure out if they’re being exposed?

ANDREA FABRY: Well, I’ll be honest. If you have a stainless steel one, look under the hood, the part that contacts the food and see if you don’t see a rim of plastic there. That’s the problem. And convenience is a problem, isn’t it? I like it because it saves me some steps and it works. Otherwise, I’d get my big blender out with the stainless steel whisk and use that or do it by hand and so forth.

But you know, it looked to me from the study like it’s enough to cause an issue. And if we’re going to invest our time in this high-quality nutritional food, I want it from the farm to the table. I want to keep it as non-toxic as I can.

It’s up to every individual as to where that lies on your priority list. For me, I’m on the hunt for one that doesn’t have. And there are a couple. There were four brands in this study that came out clean. I don’t think – well, most of them were not made in China. And in fact, eight of them that had this chlorinated paraffin were from China (or maybe it’s not eight, I can’t recall the exact number).

But that’s the clue sometimes even if you buy it in America where it’s been made. So I have bought two now since I’m really on this and I really want to write about it. I do want to replace mine because I use it so often. I bought two and they’re from Europe.

And so I’m currently waiting on the voltage adaptor/transformer before I can use either one.

DEBRA: I understand. It’s an adventure. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Andrea Fabry. She has a blog called It-Takes-Time.com It Takes Time. She’s also the owner of Just So Natural Products. We’ll talk about these when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Striped-Cookie-Feature-ITT

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Andrea Fabry and we’re talking about how to live toxic-free with nine children.

Now, I have to say I was looking at your blog again (I keep looking at your blog), I was looking at your blog again during the break and I have to say that you can go to my website and you can find all kinds of – probably anything you want or know how to buy, any toxic-free products in and I have recipes and things. But Andrea has this unique viewpoint because she’s a mom and because she has a family. There are things that I would never even think to write about.

For example, there’s a whole section about food cold By Kids, For Kids were her kids are coming up with the recipes and pictures. They’ve written a blog post and there’s pictures of them making them. One of them is cacao stripes cookies, gluten-free cacao stripes cookies. She says, “Looking for a healthier alternative to the ever popular Keebler Fudge Stripes?”

Well, see, I don’t even know what a Keebler Fudge Stripe is because I gave up eating packaged cookies 30 years ago. So it would never occur to me to make an alternative to a Keebler Fudge Stripes?

ANDREA FABRY: Well, it turned out that way when I looked at the pictures. It’s exactly what it looked like. And Debra, I’m sorry, but eight years ago, that’s all what we’re eating. It’s pretty fresh in my mind.

DEBRA: I understand! No, I understand because I will admit that prior to – it was hard for me to change my food.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes.

DEBRA: I removed the toxic chemicals a lot sooner. The food took years. And even after I was living in a totally toxic-free home and eating additive-free food, that additive-free food still could be a bag of cookies. I used to have this European cookies that I really loved and they didn’t have any preservatives or artificial colors or flavors in them. And so that was fine. I could eat wheat and sugar and all the other garbage. The only thing I was not eating was preservatives and artificial colors and flavors. That was as far as I had gotten at that point.

And so I would just take a bag of these cookies and a carton of pasteurized milk (non-organic because there was no organic milk then), and I’d sit and that’s what I’d have for dinner. Very well balanced.

So that’s what I’m coming from. I mean, I grew up on TV dinners.

ANDREA FABRY: Yeah, me too.

DEBRA: And Jack in a Box and A&W root beer.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes!

DEBRA: Yeah, that’s what I – shake and pizza.

ANDREA FABRY: We are kindred spirits.

DEBRA: Yeah, that’s what I grew up on. I mean, I didn’t know any different. And so the whole thing to stop eating those cookies and make my own cookies or make my own ice cream instead of – there used to be this flavor of ice cream. I don’t know if it’s still available. It’s called Cherry Cherie, which is full of these candied maraschino cherries and chocolate chips. I could eat half a gallon of that. I’d just sit there and watch TV and eat half a gallon.

So I want people to know, I am totally normal. This is where I’m coming from. I haven’t always been this way, but I learned…

ANDREA FABRY: Yeah, over the years.

DEBRA: Over the years, you learn, you learn.

ANDREA FABRY: You do. And you know what propelled us in our family [inaudible 00:30:10] one of them right after we blew fans on the toxic mold, my son, six weeks later, developed type I diabetes. Well, that obviously is a life-changing diagnosis. And as a mom, well, I choke up thinking about this. He already lost so much and now, he’s got to change his diet.

Fortunately, at the time, I knew nothing about diet and we were told just to cover his carb. He could eat whatever he wanted. And this is why. It’s mainly because Collin is now 14, watching him take ownership and learn to love real food and learn to cook real food and find things that he just loves about the sugar has been so encouraging. If he can do it, then all of us can. All the other kids kind of followed his lead. It’s like you don’t need sugar the way you think you do.

DEBRA: That’s exactly right.

ANDREA FABRY: Food tastes wonderful in its natural state. So that’s really why we started By Kids, For Kids. They were just whizzes in the kitchen and I thought that’s going to help somebody. We’ll inspire another child with type I or their mom.

DEBRA: Yeah, it really is. I see that after all these years of research, I see that there’s basic information that we need to have like what’s toxic and what’s not toxic. But how you apply it is very individual. It’s so encouraging and gratifying for me to see a blog like yours where you’re applying the same concerns that I have and the same information that I have in your own unique way with your family.

On the one hand, we could say that this is a big, horrible, tragic thing, that everything is so toxic, but on the other hand, seeing now that there’s a whole alternate universe of things that are not toxic and things that are good for you.

But they aren’t so commonly available or commonly known. And so it’s about finding out about them and then using your own creativity. It’s just amazing opportunity to create your life the way you want it to be out of your own creativity.

ANDREA FABRY: Exactly! I think of it now as like a treasure hunt as opposed to when this first happened. You know, a part of our story, Debra, a big part of it is that after we left the house and after we started to recover, we developed multiple chemical sensitivity where one whiff of the laundry aisle in the store, I would have to go lay down for three hours or my children, one little, tiny ant trap that’s so innocent would create this huge nosebleed.

That hasn’t been the case. So to become chemically sensitive on top of everything else, my initial reaction was I resented it. Why can’t we just go back to our old life? Because we simply had to alter our life.

Some people make these decisions for a healthier lifestyle simply because they’re smart, they’re wise, they get it, they want to avoid things. I applaud that so much. That wasn’t me. That’s not my story. I had to. If my kids were going to survive and thrive again, we couldn’t have the chemicals in the house. We couldn’t have the chemicals in the food. We had to do it all so fast.

DEBRA: I understand, so did I.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes! And there was a sort of resentment about it initially. Well, that, thankfully, the journey, I’m six years out. I really do see it as a treasure hunt now. It’s the best part of what came out, it’s discovering this whole world of natural and realizing how much better we’re going to do over the long run despite our crises that we know what we know and then to enjoy it.

That’s what I love to help people. Get people over that hurdle of, “I don’t want it! I just resent the whole thing. Why can’t we just make the way it was or why do we have to think about immersion blenders or heaters?” like you opened the program, I wrote that down because I didn’t know and I’m in Arizona and my feet are cold. So I’m like, “Oh! Utility heaters. Thank you, Debra” and I just wrote that down.

You know, I like thinking about that now, whereas before, it was a burden.

DEBRA: I totally understand what you’re saying. It is a treasure hunt for me too. It’s just so much delight when I find things.

We need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Andrea Fabry and we’re talking about the delights of living toxic-free. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

ryan1

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Andrea Fabry. She is the mother of nine children who all went through toxic mold exposure and multiple chemical sensitivity and came out the other end smiling and creating a new life with much better products in their homes.

So Andrea, I wanted to ask you a question that I know a lot of people have on their mind. And that is at the beginning of the show, you were talking about how you used to buy everything because it was cheap. And so it sounds like budget was a consideration for you.

So does it not matter to you anymore? How are you? Tell us, is it more expensive to live this way and how do you do that?

ANDREA FABRY: Well, it depends. I’m an economics major. I graduated 1978 with economics. I didn’t go into that field. However, something stuck with me over the years. And that is short run and long run. When it comes to health and the world in which we live, there’s a short run and there’s a long run. I now understand that I’m going for the long run. When I spend more on food –

And honestly, when you start making your own cleaning products and beauty care products, that part, I think that expense can go down. I don’t know any way around spending more for grass-fed pastured meats. It’s more expensive. But I see it as an investment. And I know in the long run, I know what I know what I know is that it pays off.

DEBRA: It does.

ANDREA FABRY: It may cost more now, but you will be spending less. And if you look at a hundred years ago, what we spent on food, it was a substantial part of our income, but what we spent on medical care was much smaller with that split. Now, we’re spending a great deal of income on medical care and less on field.

And that’s a mindset. Really changing that mindset to, “Yes, I may be spending more now, but…” – and we’ve seen it, the medical bill. Because we had that horrific – especially 2007, 2008, our medical bills, it took us a long time to dig out of that hole, plus we lost our house and started over. So financially, it was quite devastating, to say the least. We really did start from ground zero again. But we knew we had no choice, that if we were going to help our kids recover and thrive again, we had to get away from that mentality of, “Well, that’s the cheapest?”

And I didn’t even realize that I said that in the beginning, Debra, but that truly was a big part of my mindset, how buying in bulk, buying the cheapest. Now, I belong to an organic buying club. We do group buys. It’s just like that treasure hunt. There’s nothing like finding other like-minded people and getting together and sharing some of these costs. We ended up buying a quarter of cow. That’s a lot cheaper than the special cut of grass-fed beef.

And that’s the other part. I do understand. I understand the financial concerns and you can’t do it all right away, but in the end, you will be saving in terms of quality of life.

DEBRA: I found that too and that there are certain things that are more expensive and there’s other things – like when you start cleaning your house with baking soda and vinegar instead of expensive cleaning products, you start saving money.

And I found that my medical expenses did go down. I mean, there had been studies, which show – I don’t remember the numbers off the top of my head, but it’s on my website – about how many billions of dollars are being spent on illnesses related to toxic chemical exposure.

And so when you remove the toxic chemicals from your life, you’re cutting all of that out, so that your body actually has a chance to thrive and have its own natural health and that things like the extra expense of food is much, much less than the cost of medical bills. I mean, the cost of having cancer, for example, is astronomical.

ANDREA FABRY: Right. You know, we were on so many prescriptions. We had seizure disorder on one of our children and that was huge amounts of drugs and visits and tests and so forth. These are free now. Thanks to clean air, clean food, clean water, her body has just really appreciated the change and so we’re saving.

But honestly, you have to remember that. You’re giving up that lifestyle of walking in and seeing – food is incredibly cheap this way when it’s industrialized. It’s almost like just a giving up and a letting go of that.

DEBRA: Well, it’s a letting go, but also, I think you’ll agree that this other world that we found is actually much more enjoyable like I’d much prefer the taste of food organic to cheap, processed food.

ANDREA FABRY: Everything is better, everything is better.

DEBRA: Yeah!

ANDREA FABRY: And that is the long run view, the risks. And again, I did it kicking and screaming. And now, I’m beyond grateful. So my heart and my passion is for the kickers and screamers, but if they’re probably listening to your program, they’re probably not kicking and screaming, but maybe part of them. They’re obviously smart, they’re listening to this.

But my heart is for someone who is having a hard time believing, “Is it really going to pay off?” and I just want to say that the quality of life – well, you can hear it both in you and me.

DEBRA: Yes.

ANDREA FABRY: It gets pretty obvious.

DEBRA: We’re almost to the end of the show, but I want to make sure I ask you this question because I see in your writing that you have a close to nature viewpoint. This is something that’s really important to me. I wish we had a whole hour to talk about that. But maybe we’ll have you back and we can talk more about that because there’s so much we haven’t covered that we could talk about.

ANDREA FABRY: Well, it’s like driving, Debra (and I’m teaching one of our younger ones to drive again, it never gets easy). If you focus on ahead, way what your goal is rather than get caught – when you look too close to the road, you can veer off. Nature really offers just a beautiful picture of thriving health-wise. And so you keep your eyes and your focus on, “Well, what is the closest to nature?”

And I’m very active in the field of building biology and that’s basically it. What kind of shelter does nature provide? What are the materials rather than getting caught up in this and that. You can get tripped I think very easily.

DEBRA: Well, that, in 1978, it had been about 10 years, I was actually starting to feel better (because I had no guidance or anything then), in 1987 – or 1985 actually, I moved out into a forest instead of living in the city. In 1987, I just kind of looked around and I said, “Well, wait a minute! There’s the industrial world and there’s this.” Nature is thriving. Why aren’t we, humans thriving? And I had just a big aha moment about if I wanted to know how to live in a way that was thriving, I should look at nature because nature is doing it.

ANDREA FABRY: Yes! Yes. And you know, I just want to thank you honestly really for pioneering this. That took a lot of courage. And for you to just write about it so quickly and have this passion, I really appreciate it.

DEBRA: Thank you so much. Thank you so much. Well, I think it takes all of us. It takes all of us doing this. My goal is now to have the whole world be toxic-free. I just started out just trying to make my home, my home and then quickly, we have other people’s homes.

Then I’ve learned so much about how everything that we do has these long tails and they go out into the environment and they affect other people and what other people do affects us and that we really need to do – like in the beginning, I was talking about my heater. Well, it’s an electric heater, so it’s producing pollution. But where I am right now, unless I put solar panels on my house (which I’m considering, but not affording yet), that’s the only choice I have.

ANDREA FABRY: Right, exactly. Yes.

DEBRA: So we need to be looking at what is the electric company doing and what are the government regulations and what are they selling at the big buck stores and you know you know.

ANDREA FABRY: I do! That’s right.

DEBRA: And so everything that I do and everything that you do is all contributing to this—and everything that all our readers are doing. I think that all together, we are changing the world.

ANDREA FABRY: I do too.

DEBRA: And even though it looks weak sometimes, but we are changing the world and we’re changing the way people think and we’re changing what’s happening. So Andrea, I’m so happy that you are on the show. Let’s have you on again.

ANDREA FABRY: I’d love it! I’d love to come back, Debra.

DEBRA: Okay, good. So again, her website is It-Takes-Time.com. Make sure you look at her recipes. I know that I am going to make these little cacao stripe cookies.

ANDREA FABRY: You’ll love them. You’ll love them.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah… and so many other things. She’s got a pizza recipe. Her son makes pizza. Her son makes pizza for the family.

ANDREA FABRY: He’s 13, I know. It’s really amazing.

DEBRA: Yeah, isn’t that amazing? She’s got a great recipe for coconut ice cream, coconut coffee ice cream. And one thing I like about your instructions – I obviously read a lot of raw food blogs and experiment with things myself and write myself, but yours are very simple. Your recipes are very simple and it’s a good place to start. I just go, “Oh, yeah! That would work, that would work.”

ANDREA FABRY: Good! Oh, I love hearing that. Thank you for that feedback.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. And we have to go because the music is going to come on in about five seconds. So thank you so much, Andrea. Go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, you can listen to this show again, you can listen to past shows. You can read the transcripts. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

natural-soap-for-sidebar

Natural Back Pain Treatment Options That Work

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Today we’ll be talking about back pain and how you can help alleviate it using natural things you can do at home. There are more than 200,000 back surgeries in the USA every year and a lot of these are due to chronic pain. We’re going to talk about chronic pain, some of the causes beyond the injury itself and how to control pain instead of surgery. Doctors offer only surgery and drugs, but there are other natural solutions, some surprisingly simple. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

pamela-seefeld-at-desk

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Natural Back Pain Treatment Options That Work

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph

Date of Broadcast: November 19, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Wednesday, November 19th 2014 and it’s still cold here in Florida. I’m still cold. I’m still waiting for my heater that I ordered to arrive that I have finally turned out the central heat for the house. So it’s warming up slowly, but boy! It’s cold here.

Anyway, my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s on every other Wednesday. She was on two Wednesdays ago and she’ll be on two Wednesdays from now again and every other Wednesday thereafter because she’s got so much to tell us about how we can not take prescription drugs, but instead handle things that are going on with our bodies by using natural means.

She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. And today, we’ll be talking about back pain and what you can do to alleviate it using natural things that you can do at home.

There’s more than 200,000 back surgeries in the U.S.A. every year and a lot of these are due to chronic pain, so she’s going to tell us what to do, some of the things that cause pain beyond the entry itself and how you can control pain instead of surgery.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey, it’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. You know, I have to tell you that yesterday, I got an email that said, “Debra, I love your show and especially Pamela.”

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh, that’s wonderful. Thanks for the great feedback.

DEBRA: You’re welcome! So anyway, let’s talk about backs.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So what happens is, like you said, there’s 200,000 back surgeries in the U.S. every year and that’s probably even a low estimate. What we find is if we go to an allopathic doctor and we have a chronic back problem – and a lot of people do have chronic back problems either because of an injury or dehydration (and we’ll go to that in a minute), what does the doctor offer you? They offer you surgery, they offer you opiates (pain relievers) and they offer you muscle relaxants.

So a lot of times, I tell people that especially surgery, the outcome sometimes is not so good. I’ve seen quite a few of my clients that things just did not turn out the way they perceived they would be. So it’s really a dicey situation.

And what we want to look at is that back pains (especially lower back pain, which is probably the most common type of back pain), there’s two components to back pain. So when you look at natural substances and what we want to do in place of surgery, in place of being addicted to narcotics (because that’s typically what they offer), lower back pain, the component you look at are muscle spasm. That’s 80% of the cause of back pain. So the muscle around the area are contracting in a way that’s very, very painful.

And secondly, there’s disc degeneration. So it puts strain on the tendons and the ligaments that are on the spinal column.

These two processes are really what’s causing the pain. Both of these are caused by chronic dehydration. I mean, I have met people that treat back problems pushing fluids. Water will take these areas. And if you think about the vertebrae, they have these cushiony areas between the vertebrae and what happens is chronic dehydration sets in and sets in motion all of these types of back problems.

DEBRA: So let’s talk about dehydration for a minute because I think that most people don’t understand what dehydration really is. I think that people understand that it’s not enough water, but what is the definition of how you would be dehydrated besides having back pain? How would you know that you’re starting to be dehydrated and how much water to drink?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay. Well, that’s a very good question. It’s going to vary for different people. I use the sauna a lot, I do 30 miles on a stationary bike every day. I need to drink a lot more water than somebody perhaps isn’t doing all the exercise because I sweat a lot. So these things are components that need to be looked at – the daily exercise and how much you sweat.

But most definitely, you can tell a person is dehydrated, I always tell people to look at your skin. Your skin gives away a lot of what your dehydration says. And of course, when you use the restroom, if your urine is really dark and concentrated – outside of taking vitamins because when people take B vitamins, riboflavin gives you that kind of fluorescent, yellow urine color. That’s a metabolite. It doesn’t mean that you have expensive urine.

I always hear people say, “Well, you know, you’re peeing out all these vitamins.” That’s not what it is. It’s the metabolite, the riboflavin. So people can correct them that that’s what it is. It shows that it’s actually being metabolized and utilized by your body, so actually, it’s a good thing.

So you need to look at those things, people’s skin. But really, it depends on activity level more than anything especially here in Florida, we’re going to be needing more fluids when it’s hot out than a person perhaps maybe up in Canada where it’s cold and they’re not sweating so much.

So I always say that it’s a broad question, but it would be inter-individual on the person. You’ll know when you’re dehydrated.

A lot of times, people with dehydration, the symptoms that show up most frequently are headaches. That’s what I find for most people. A lot of headaches are from chronic dehydration because a lot of people drink a lot of coffee and they drink a lot of alcohol. Those tend to be dehydrating by themselves.

DEBRA: People who are drinking coffee all day long (like sitting at work, drinking coffee all day long), they’re not actually hydrating their body. They’re dehydrating their body.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. That’s a big culprit.

DEBRA: What we really need to be doing is drinking water. I actually drink water all day long. I’m drinking – let’s see, how much water am I drinking now. I’m drinking at least a half a gallon of water a day. It’s got all of these things that I got from Pamela. So I’m like sipping all these nice nutrients all day long in homeopathic.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s great!

DEBRA: But I read a book many years ago – it’s an excellent book and I highly recommend it – called Your Body’s Many Cries for Water

PAMELA SEEFELD: My favorite!

DEBRA: Good! Yeah, I really love that book. When I read that book, I went, “Oh, my God! Everything that could be wrong with your body could be dehydration” and I think that that’s really true. I just started drinking more water and it explains in the book about how your body needs water and that people are drinking soda or they’re drinking juice or iced tea or whatever and what you really need is water – water, water, water.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, you’re right. I’m telling you, water is the no. 1 healing property that you can bring into your body. We look at the things that cause epigenetics, what turns on genes, what helps the body heals – water, sleep, plants, consuming plants. All these things matter, but water is one of the most important things because our bodies are mostly made of water.

And we know that the joint surfaces, the cartilage, it’s the padding that separate the bone structures and the joints. The cartilage contains a lot of water.
So when we get the stability that we’re having all these dehydration, the cartilage starts to dry out and the sliding surfaces between the cartilage and the joints, all of a sudden, there’s friction there because there’s not enough lubricant. And as a result of it, you start getting knee problems, hip problems, back problems. They’re all interrelated.

DEBRA: And it’s all dehydration.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s right. I’m saying, it’s so simple. Water is free!

DEBRA: Yeah, it is. It’s something that everybody can take and I would just say that you want to make sure that you drink filtered water, so that you’re not getting all those chemicals that are in tap water.

But aside from that, you’re not going to drown by drinking too much water. Your body needs more water than you probably think that it needs. I feel just a lot better. When you drink a lot of water, your skin looks really good too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Almost definitely. I’m telling you, people are always coming to me, “I want anti-aging skin secrets. I use medical skin care and vitamins here,” I’m like, “Look, you need to start pushing fluids.” When people are dehydrated – especially here in Florida, a lot of people have boats. They’re out in the sun. They’re doing house work outside, yard work, you get dehydration set in very easily even for active people.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. So how much water do you drink? How much water do you drink?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I mean, I drink probably a gallon or a gallon and a half.

DEBRA: Yeah, but you’re execising so much and you’re sweating.

PAMELA SEEFELD: The exercise, yeah, exactly. You know what? I’ll tell you. If you drink alcohol in a daily basis and you’re drinking coffee, you need to probably double up what you’re normally drinking now. That’s what I tell most people. Those things are naturally going to dehydrate the individual quite severely.
And also, too, don’t forget, you need to have salt. A lot of people are on these low salt diets. Salt needs to be with water.

DEBRA: That’s a very important point.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. Personally, I like rock salt. That’s one of my favorite. People have their personal favorite, but rock salt on the Himalayan especially has all the minerals and it has iron in it.

DEBRA: I only have two kinds of salt. I use real salt and Himalayan salt.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Me too!

DEBRA: Me too!

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly all I have in my house.

DEBRA: Yup, that’s all I have in my house too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Real salt and Himalayan, yes, those two things. But it’s really interesting because we know that especially the Himalayan, when it’s pink, it has a lot of iron and it’s really great for the body especially for heme and for oxygen-carrying capacity. You’re getting quite a lot of it. It’s very bioavailable when it’s located in the salt itself.

DEBRA: That’s great. We need to go to break. We’ll talk more about back pain and dehydration and other things that we can do to handle these pain in our bodies when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

Pamela, before we go on about back pain, tell people what you do and give your phone number so that they can reach you.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh! Okay, great. Yes, so my background is clinical pharmacy, but I’m also a pharmacognosy consultant (and that is an expert in plant medicine). I have a homeopathic and natural pharmacy here in Clearwater, Florida called Botanical Resource. It’s been in business for 15 years, but I’ve been a pharmacist for almost 25.

I would be most glad to help or your family with any condition, not just back problem, but any sort of condition that you might be interested as far as natural remedies and alternatives to prescription.

My consultations are free and the number here at Botanical Resource is 727-442-4955. I would be very honored and pleased to help you or any other individuals in your family with any need you may have.

DEBRA: And please call her if you have any need. Really, she does want to talk to you and she’s happy to talk to you for free. I know she has a very good reputation here in Clearwater, which is how I found out about her in the first place. It’s because of so many people who are saying so many good things about her including medical doctor, including my own medical doctor.

She is just every day taking people off of prescription drugs and putting them on plant-based natural kinds of remedies and their conditions improve. So she knows what she’s talking about in terms of viewing it from a pharmacist’s viewpoint and dose and how the body works and all these kinds of things. She’s really made a difference in my health, really helping me with the things that I’ve been trying to work on for years and not getting through. I’m now such a difference. She can tell you. Pamela, tell them how much better I am.

PAMELA SEEFELD: You’re doing great. You’re doing wonderful. Really, it’s a tremendous turnout for you and I think I’m just really pleased that I could help you so much. I really have done this a long time. I’d be the first to say that if someone needs a prescription, they need to stay on what they’re doing, but I do have alternatives, homeopathic medical alternatives that are not available at the health food store that I can sell with counseling that will take the place of prescription. I can even order things out of Europe as well.

So it’s truly all-encompassing. I teach this. Your health is just paramount. You’re doing phenomenal and you’re off a lot of your stuff. And really, we were going over that, for eight years, you were going to all these doctors and nothing really was changing. But in a short period of time, we got you on the right track and everything is great. I’m very, very happy I could help you.

DEBRA: Thank you. Thank you so much.

Okay, tell us more about back pain.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, great. So this is interesting. During the break, I pulled out The Body’s Many Cries for Water, the book that we both love so much. It’s talking about the importance of the 5th lumbar disc and this is the part in the book that they were talking about why people end up with so much lower back pain with dehydration setting in.

What he’s saying (and this is something I tell my clients a lot of times), 75% of the weight of the upper body is supported by the water volume that is stored in the disc core on the 5th lumbar disc.

So that dehydration in that 5th lumbar disc – and if you look, a lot of times, people, L5 and L4 is where they’re having a lot of problems as their lower back. And sure enough, it’s because of the dehydration.

If you think about it, your upper body, the core, it has to be held, the weight of this upper body has to be held by these small disc in this very concentrated area. So dehydration setting in is really a big problem.

Also, I want to bring up about alkalinity. When you have dehydration, you become more acidic. And so as a result of that, that changes the pH of the fluid around the cartilage. And as a result of it, it ends up in more denegeration. And of course, then it leads to more pain.

I’m a big fan of using alkaline boosters. That’s really an easy way to get the alkalinity of your water up. You can do it by becoming a vegan too, but a lot of people do not want to do an extreme diet change and I don’t necessarily recommend that. But pH boosters are great because they’re drops you put in the water.

I like AlkaLife. Personally, I’ve tried several of them. That’s the one I consistently have stayed with. I test the water.

And typically, most water, from a filtered water or from bottled water, it’s going to be probably between let’s say pH 2 or 3 to 7.5, something like that. I’ll tell you, the worst bottled water as far as pH is Dasani. That tested out to be like a 1.

DEBRA: Because I think that’s tap water.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s the same pH of Coke.

DEBRA: Isn’t Dasani tap water?

PAMELA SEEFELD: It is, yeah.

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s very acidic. So when I see people, they go to Costco or someplace and buy bottled water, I say, “Don’t get the Dasani if you’re going to do anything. That’s really extremely acidic.” I mean, you can change the pH of that water with it. But basically it’s just water from the tap that they put in a bottle. It’s really a poor choice.

So I use my regular filtered water. But when you do Ph drops, a lot of times, it’ll boost it up to 13. That’s a great, easy way, inexpensive. You can use baking soda. But sometimes, that has too much sodium. For some people, if they have blood pressure problems, I’m not going to recommend doing that. But just in a pinch, you can take baking soda and put that into just sodium bicarbonate and put that into your water and it will change the pH pretty effectively.

DEBRA: Yeah, alkaline booster is something that Pamela gave me. And so I take it as part of my – what she does frequently is she gave me some tablets and capsules and things, but not very many. Mostly, what she gave me is in liquid form. And then she tells her clients to just have a bottle of water and put all the things in the water and sip it over the course of the day, which is exactly what I do. It works beautifully, it just works beautifully.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s great. Because you know what it is? It’s like getting an IV. When you take sips of the medication all through the day, every time you take a sip, you’re getting a little hit of the medicine into the tissue. So that’s going to be more reparative and more restorative than taking single relief pill. When you take a pill or a capsule, depending if there’s food in your stomach, but most of the time, it’s going to take about 20 minutes to dissolve. You’re going to get a peak in the bloodstream and then about five minutes later, it’s gone. So it’s inconsistent dosing. Putting it in the water, you’re going to get a much better outcome.

DEBRA: Well, I really see that for myself. I mean, the change has been remarkable. It was fast. This week too, I just felt like something kicked in. You start feeling better. But then there’s a point where you just go, “Wow! Things are different. I’m in a whole new level.”

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m so excited.

DEBRA: That happened for me this week. Really, it’s like I’ve been sleeping better so much, but it was just like my energy level and the way my body is shrinking in terms of losing weight, but also just in terms of losing puffiness. I’m just more trimmed and energetic and all those things that I always wanted to be.
Anyway, we need to go to break again. When we come back, we’ll talk more with Pamela about back pain. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a registered pharmacist who dispenses natural things instead of prescription drugs. She has a business, Botanical Resource. She has a lovely spa here in Clearwater, Florida. You can call her, she’ll talk to you on the phone. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. We’re talking about back pain. So tell us more about some of the natural remedies that you can use for back pain.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Perfect! So we’re going to do this little comparison like what will the doctor give you, what am I going to give you.
DEBRA: Good, I love that.

PAMELA SEEFELD: We’re going to play that little game here because most of these people, let’s face it, a lot of people that are listening maybe have had back pain or have back pain and they know it, what normally are being prescribed.

So when you have muscle spasms, you go to the doctor and he’s going to give you a muscle relaxant like Flexeril or Zanaflex. There’s a bunch of different ones. These muscle relaxants, they relax the muscles, but they also make you loopy and tired and these are highly sedating. There’s a lot of cognitive impairment with these. You’re very sleepy.

So what can we use in the natural realm that I think personally is just as effective as these. And this is what I normally use when someone comes to me and say, “I really don’t want to take these. I’m scared driving. I have to go to work.” There’s a product called Spascupreel, which is made from Heel. It’s a homeopathic product and it’s very strongly effective. It was Rx for a long time, a while ago. The FDA has made it OTC now.

Spascupreel is excellent! And it works for any muscle spasm anywhere in the body and it’s non-sedating and it’s non-addicting and it’s very well-tolerated. So I would say figuratively, 90% of the time, someone comes to me and says ‘chronic back problem’, is on this prescription anti-spasmodics and really wants to try something different, Spascupreel does the job.

And it also can work for leg cramps like Charley horses in the middle of the night. It can work if your eyelid is twitching. It can work for any kind of cramps any place in the body. Basically, it’s kind of all-encompassing.

And these products tend to have a long shelf life. So it’s one of those things that you could use periodically or if you could use it every day if you need it to.

DEBRA: And that’s a homeophatic remedy, right?

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s a homeopathic product and it’s developed by MDs. It’s inexpensive. It works really well. They’re little sublingual pills. And like I said, you get away from the sedating properties that are very common with the prescription that a lot of people, if they have to go back to work and they have to go along with their day, these things really knock you out and make you extremely tired. So Spascupreel is an easy choice for that.

Remember we talked about the two components of the back pain. We have the fact that we have the disc degeneration and then we have the muscle spasm. This can take care of the muscle spasm.

Now, the disc degeneration, when you have stenosis or the spine is narrowing and it’s pressing on the nerve, we want to look to what’s happening in the area of the body. I usually recommend instead of going right away to surgery and doing all these very invasive procedures, costly procedures, but also high chance of disability, maybe more so than the person already is experiencing, there’s a product from DesBio called SpinalMax.

Now, there used to be a product I use from Heel that was very, very good, but they’re only making it in Germany now, so that one’s not available here so much. But SpinalMax has had excellent results. SpinalMax actually repairs the nerves coming off of the spine. I cannot explain how homeopathically this works because I was trained as a pharmacist…

DEBRA: Please do, please do.

PAMELA SEEFELD: …because it moves the spine back into place.

DEBRA: Wow! Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, it’s pretty amazing.

DEBRA: The thing that’s very interesting to me about homeophatic – I mean, I’ve known about homeopathy for many, many years. When I used to live in California, I went to a homeopath, but there’s homeopathy and there’s homeopathy. It didn’t do much for me at the time. But what you’re giving me – like I was on insulin and Pamela gave me a homeopathic remedy. The difference is that insulin is just making your blood sugar go down and is not healing your body and the homeopathic remedy is actually healing my pancreas.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct!

DEBRA: And so the long-term effects of these two things, the outcome is very, very different. And so now, it’s been what? A couple of months I think…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: …since I haven’t been taking the insuling and my blood sugar is still the same today as it was the day I stopped taking insulin. So, my blood sugar has not increased over time. I feel like more sugar is getting into my cells and I have more energy and everything. And so I’m just getting stronger and stronger. That was not happening on the insulin.

So it’s pretty amazing. It’s pretty amazing, these homeopathic remedies, these particular ones that I’m taking in and some that Pamela is talking about. They are developed by doctors to be healing. And there are things that you can’t just get it without – I mean, Pamela can give it to you because she’s a pharmacist. You can’t just go to the natural food store and buy these.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s very important to know, right because they want these products. In fact, I was looking at the disclaimers in a lot of the things that I sell, they can basically go ask you legally if you’re putting it on the Internet and people do click and ship. We don’t want that. We want these to be sold with directions and counseling and I personally select for you.

And I think what’s interesting with SpinalMax and any of these kind of products, when you go to a traditional homeopath, they do the constitutional make-up, they do all that kind of stuff. Personally, I use homeopathy in a pharmacological realm. I look at the ingredients that are in there and I decide how I’m going to use it for the individual based on how I know the dynamics of these properties of these different plants are in there.

That’s why sometimes I’ll even give somebody a product for a particular ailment and it doesn’t say that’s what it’s for. I say, “Look, I know what I’m doing. Just use it for this.” It’s really important to kind of sometimes think outside of the box. Well, this SpinalMax was actually designed in place of surgery, this particular product is.

But it’s important to use your God-given talents and your intellect, all these reading and all these learning. If, for some reason, you view a particular product that has ingredients and a make-up that might be particularly good for another ailment, it’s important to realize that. You’re able to challenge that and say, “Yeah, I think I’m going to use it for that” and it does work. That’s why we go to school, right?

DEBRA: Right, right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: …to learn all these things.

DEBRA: Healing, you know, it’s not a static thing. It’s not something that you can just write a book on and say that applies to everybody, everywhere at every time. And so your experience and your intelligence and ability to put all these pieces together for an individual really comes into play here. I just think that you’re doing an excellent job. I can’t say that enough because I’ve known a lot of people over the year who do various kinds of healing things and I just see you helping people over and over and over. It’s really pretty wonderful.

We only have a few seconds left until we need to go to break, so why don’t you give your phone number again?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, yes. If you’d like to call me at my pharmacy, it’s Botanical Resource, it’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Okay, good. We’re going to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld.

She’s a registered pharmacist. And as you know from listening, she prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. And in fact, she gets a lot of people off prescription drugs. She just does remarkable work.

So we’ll be right back and hear more about what you can do about back pain.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist. She prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. And Pamela, give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, you can call me here at my pharmacy. It’s 727-442-4955. And like I said, I would be really, really happy to help you or your family member with any issue you might have regarding prescriptions or avoiding them. We handle all cases.

DEBRA: Yes, she does. And she can even tell you what is going on in your body now that will lead you to need to take a prescription drug in the future and how you can handle that, so that you don’t have to get sick in the first place. She does so much, it’s amazing!

Anyway, let’s go back to backs.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah.

DEBRA: So where were we? What would you like to talk about next?

PAMELA SEEFELD: We were talking about alternatives, the basis of what you would normally get from the doctor. You would get narcotics and you would get muscle relaxants. So we could treat all those things. So let’s talk about the pain.

For the pain itself, remember we’re talking about using hydrating, water to increase the fluidity of the joint.
[dial tone]

DEBRA: Uh-oh, did we lose you, Pamela? Uh-oh… I’m sure that – I have a message here. Okay! So my producer is calling Pamela back. So she’ll be back just right in a minute. Let’s see, what can I tell you about backs. I know a lot about back pain because my ex-husband had a lot of back pain, a lot of injuries.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m back.

DEBRA: Oh, good!

PAMELA SEEFELD: I lost our connection. I’m sorry, I don’t know what happened.

DEBRA: It’s okay.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So, we’re regrouped. We were talking about water, lessening the friction and lubricating the joint. Now, let’s talk about the pain.

So if you go to the doctor, what he’s going to give you when you’re complaining of chronic back pain is he’s going to give you some anti-inflammatories, okay? He’s going to give you Mobic or Celebrex. They’re very common drugs – especially Celebrex.

Celebrex is a COX-2 inhibitor. It works on that particular pathway, that cascade of eicosanoids in the body. Those are pain signals. It blocks it. But of course, by blocking it, life is not like all or nothing. So when you block that, it has other problems. That’s why Vioxx had to be taken off the market because there’s people with heart problems and heart attacks. So it’s not a good idea to just completely block out a particular pathway.

I’m a big fan of using curcumin, which is turmeric. It works as a COX-2 inhibitor. It’s a natural COX-2 inhibitor. And that’s pretty easy to use and it’s pretty inexpensive. I also am a big fan of Traumeel. Traumeel is an excellent anti-inflammatory. And what Traumeel does – and it’s from Heel. It’s homeopathic. They come in drops, they come in tablets, sublingual tablets. It also comes in injections and cream. But I use the liquid quite a bit for people because you can put it in water like we were describing. When you drink it through the day, very specific.

But why Traumeel is different than using an anti-inflammatory, if you take an anti-inflammatory, that’s all you’re getting. Like a prescription anti-inflammatory, it blocks a certain cell signal, a pathway and there’s no solving.

So if we want to start solving the problem, if you’re doing this Spascupreel for the muscle spasm, you’re drinking more water, you’re doing maybe some exercises, some physical therapy to try and help the area with mobility and the SpinalMax to try and realign the spine, the Traumeel actually goes to where the injury is taking present and repairs small tears and damage in tendons, ligaments and the areas surrounding the tissue itself that’s injured.

So I like it because I think of it more as a reparative than just blocking out a cell signal. It’s more of a solving of an injury. And that’s what they really developed it originally for, for athletes. It solves where the injury takes place.

DEBRA: Yeah. Traumeel was one of the first things that Pamela gave me because I was having a problem with my foot at the time. When I went into her office, I was in so much pain I could hardly walk. She gave me Traumeel.

Later on, I had to go do other things and I was in pain. I was taking it, I was drinking it throughout the afternoon while I was sitting down. And then I had to drive myself home and I thought, “How am I going to drive home with all those pain in my foot?” But when I stood up, there was no pain in my foot after I had been drinking this bottle of water with Traumeel in it for several hours. That really shocked me. It works so well.

Pamela, are you there?

DEBRA: Yes, yes. I don’t know why I keep cutting out. I apologize. No, that’s what it is. When you’re drinking it in the water, specifically, what it’s going to do is it’s going to start releasing it gradually over a time period. And what you’re going to do is you’re saying to yourself is, “Okay, I’m actually looking for a complete solving of the issue instead of just blocking out a signal.”

All of these different prescrpitoin things that we use only block out a certain pathway and we really want to try and heal the area. So we say to ourselves, “Okay, in place of surgery, push fluids, SpinalMax, using some Spascupreel for the spasm, using some anti-inflammatory be it Traumeel or turmeric.”

And also, too, probably to some degree, eliminating nightshades in your diet because tomatoes, eggplants, some of the different vegetables that are nightshades, they do cause inflammation in some people. And sometimes, people have to try and eliminate those foods to see if the inflammation goes down a little bit.

But the hallmark of this whole talk today is to say all these people having all these back surgeries, if they did a few, inexpensive supplements (we’re not talking a lot of stuff here really) and water – like I said, the water costs nothing. It’s right there, it’s your filtered tap. If you start doing those simple things there, I’m sure that most of these people could avoid surgeries.

And I can tell you from experience and also just from listening to a lot of different lecturers, I’ve heard people, different doctors even profess that dehydration is causing a lot of the back problems. This is not new science. I can’t understand why when someone shows up with the initial, the beginning of some back problems, that water is not suggested first and foremost. I just really cannot understand that.

DEBRA: Because they don’t make money selling water. You know what? I think that back doctors, all the back doctors should all sell water filters in their offices and that way, they would make money.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I concur.

DEBRA: Yeah. I think all doctors should sell water filters. I just think that the first thing that anybody should do if they have anything going on with their body is drink more water, drink good water that is healing water and that will just hydrate your body. And then you should call Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, that’s true because we were talking about dehydration. When dehydration sets in in these discs in the spine, that’s the first place it’s going to show up because like I said, we have L5 holding a huge amount of our upper body weight. So if the dehydration alter the rest of the body, then it’s also going to start especially affecting that joint.

I’m telling you that most people could’ve reversed a lot of their back problems specifically with that SpinalMax bringing the spine back into alignment and repairing those nerves. And don’t forget to mention too that really, folic acid and omega 3 fish oil form the actual nerve themselves. Those can be excellent adjuncts to therapy to these things. I usually use those with it too because if you give the building blocks of the nerve, you’re going to have much better nerve repair off of the spine.

DEBRA: You know, Pamela, with my ex-husband, we went through years and years and years of disc problems. They wanted to give him surgery and he didn’t want to have surgery and all these stuff. And then there were chiropractor’s massage, we did something called VAX-D. There were exercises. Not one single person ever said to him these things that you’re saying now. Just having been through all that years of pain with him, I wish we knew you then.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s just really sad. These are like very elementary concepts too. Anybody that has any kind of – even a minor understanding of the human physiology would realize that the fluid and the water and how it is allowed to take waste products away from the area, how it’s needed in the subluxation station or the area where the cartilage is moving back and forth to protect the joint and lubricate the joint, these are rational concepts. They’re not like out there kind of concepts.

We know what the body is made of. We need to start remembering that we’re kind of like a chemical soup and the water is where all these ions and everything is moving around in. And if we don’t have that basis where things can be eliminated and the body can basically lubricate all these different joints and different areas, it’s going to be an uphill body for a lot of individuals – especially elderly people because their sense of thirst is altered as they age. And that’s why you see a lot of these older people with so many back problems. A lot of it is dehydration.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. Alright! So we’ve only got about a minute left. We’ll just say drink your water…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Drink your water…

DEBRA: Call Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Call me for homeopathic anti-spasmodics. And also, the SpinalMax, I cannot say enough how many wonderful things I’ve seen. I’ve had people that were on Fentanyl patches and oxycodone and they’re completely off of it doing the homeopathy for the spinal repair. I told them, “Look, pain medicines aren’t going to solve the spine. We need to solve the problem so that you don’t need the narcotics.”

They’re very liberated and very, very happy that we were able to accomplish that. It can be done. I want to tell people that there’s lots of encouragement. If you’re on all of these medicines, I can help you, give you some kind of path away from these things. I think you’ll be very satisfied.

DEBRA: Yeah, I think that you will be too. So it will not be an intrusion for Pamela for you to call her.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, I do this all day long.

DEBRA: She does, she does. And she loves to hear from you. And so just if you’ve got something going on with your health or somebody in your family, even with your pets – she can help pets too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes!

DEBRA: …and so just give her a call. Give the number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, you can reach me at 727-442-4955. As I’ve said previously, I would really be most honored to help you or your family member or your dogs or cats with any issues they may have. I’ve been doing this a long time and I’ve very successful at it and I really want to help people. So really, please call me if there’s anything I can help you with.

DEBRA: Thank you! And that’s it, we’re at the end of the show. Thank you so much, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Thank you.

DEBRA: Pamela will be back in another two weeks. You can listen to this show again or her back shows at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. You’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

The Best Water Filter Now Disinfects & Breaks Down Even Hard-to-Remove Pollutants

Today my guest is Igor Milevskiy, founder of Pure Effect Advanced Water Filters, a small, family-owned company that makes exceptional water filters which remove fluoride, radiation, and pharmaceuticals as well as chlorine, chloramine, lead, and other common pollutants…at an affordable price. Well, I have to say that Igor has really outdone himself now. He’s taken the model I’ve been using for almost two years now and make some additions that really amp up the removal of chemicals and disinfects the water completely. I just replaced my filter with the upgrade and love it. We’ll be talking about the new upgrades and why his filters are just head and shoulders above others. Also find out how you can pay for your filter by selling these exceptional filters to others (and there’s no fee to join). www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/pureeffect-filters

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH IGOR MILEVSKIY

 

 

ultra-uc-disinfect_1_1_2-1

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Best Water Filter Now Disinfects & Breaks Down Even Hard-to-Remove Pollutants

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Igor Milevskiy

Date of Broadcast: November 18, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today, I’m sitting here very cold. I think if I’m cold here in Florida, probably everybody listening is cold. We just got a cold front came down and we had this huge storm yesterday. We had thunder and lightning and tornadoes – not tornadoes here, but in Florida, we do get tornadoes with big storms.

Anyway, I want to give you a winter tip because this is what I’m going through right now. I do have heat in my house although in Florida, we usually have the air-conditioning on. I can heat my house with my central air-conditioning, but I don’t like to spend all that energy to heat the whole house when I’m really only in one room. So I usually have a little heater, just a small heater under my desk so that I’m warm sitting at my desk. And my heater broke.

But this is the perfect time of year. If you need to buy a heater, if you get those little heaters – I can’t give you a whole discussion about heaters today because we’re going to talk about something else, but what I want to tell you is that if you want to get the least toxic little heater, what you want to do is buy what’s called a ‘utility heater’ because it’s made out of metal.
Everybody is sold out of them now, but I do have my order in at Home Depot. I just went to the Home Depot website, I typed in ‘utility heater’, I ordered mine in advance and I hope I’m going to go pick it up soon because it’s cold! It’s cold, it’s cold. But I’m all bundled up and we’re going to have a nice, warm show.

So today is Tuesday, November 18th 2014. My guest today is Igor Milevskiy. He is the founder of Pure Effect Advanced Water Filters, my favorite water filter company. He’s been on before, but he’s on today because he’s introducing a brand new water filter that I just had installed in my house last week.

Now, remember I’ve been looking at water filters and evaluating them for more than 30 years. I have said before that his filter, the one that I’ve had for the past two years is the best that I’ve seen in 30 years. Well, this one is even better. He just continues to make his filters better and better and better. We are going to talk today about this new filter and the amazing and wonderful things it does.

Hi, Igor.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Debra, it’s so nice to be back with you.

DEBRA: Thank you. Well, well, well, what can I say? You just are a brilliant water filter designer.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: I appreciate that.

DEBRA: I know that you’ve been working on this for five years. Tell us a little bit about your new filter.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Well, it’s everything our bestselling units have, the ones you’ve been using for three years already and it’s more. We’ve added on a disinfection power to that system. So now, your water is protected from a very wide range of microorganisms, viruses, bacteria, allergies and so on. With the water treatment centers degrading, aging and a lot of negligence and sometimes, human error, it’s always good to have disinfection protection right at your tap and not rely on others for you for water treatment.

DEBRA: Well, let’s talk about disinfection for a minute because when you first told this to me, I have been very focused on toxic chemicals for so many years. So when I look at a water filter in the past, I would look and see how does it remove the toxic chemicals that are in water because all tap water has toxic chemicals for disinfection.

So when you brought up that this one had disinfection as a new thing, my first question was, Whoa! When chlorine and chloramines or whatever is put in the water, doesn’t that take care of killing everything?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: That’s what most people assume, that it does. But a lot of scientists have done research and there’s an article I sent you recently as well, which shows that ten to a hundred million different organisms can survive in one quart of tap water and a lot of them are becoming chlorine-resistant kind of like if you’ve heard of bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotic. That’s a similar thing happening in tap water.

The microbes are becoming resistant, they’re evolving because chlorine for such a long time. So now, what the treatment centers have to do is they have to use a stronger disinfectant, which are worse for drinking water for us as humans.

DEBRA: Right. And chloramines is a lot – if you have chloramines instead of chlorine, it’s a lot stronger and more toxic. We’re going to talk about that in a minute, but I just want to say I have this article that Igor sent me from the New York Times. It says in there that to call the process of putting in chlorine-based disinfectants, purification is a misnomer. To call the process ‘purification’ is a misnomer because really, what it does is it destroys organisms that cause illness, infection diseases like typhoid, cholera and dysentery, but it’s not really designed to do much else. And so there’s all these other things that are in the water that we don’t even know are there.

This article was talking about one called mycobacteria that are very common. They cause 20,000 infections a year. Whether you ingest it or inhale as bacteria, it affects the lungs of the elderly or immune-compromised individuals. It’s called ‘lifeguard lung disease’ because it’s such an occupational hazard in indoor pools.

We just never know what is going to be in the water because our water treatment plants are not really designed to give us the quality of water that we would like to have, plus once it leaves the plant, we can’t even estimate how many miles of pipe before it comes out of your tap and all those types could have bacteria and viruses and all kinds of things, living microorganisms that could be getting in your water.

So this new ability of the filter to disinfect I think is a really, really important thing.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Absolutely! And it’s a safe way to disinfect because we’re not using any chemicals, we’re not using any additive, it’s just the power of the sun. We’re using a UV light that the water passes through and it then gets disinfected very safely and effectively.

DEBRA: Tell us about the different sizes of microorganisms. Now, I know the unit that I’ve been using (and a lot of my listeners and readers have been using) – by the way, if you don’t have one of Igor’s filters yet, I have never had a complaint. I’ve been recommending it for the last two years and all I get is, I love my filter, I love my filter. Not one person has said to me, This is a horrible filter. Not one, not one.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Beautiful.

DEBRA: Yeah, they are really just high quality filters in every way. So the difference I know, I know that if you have one of the previous filters (which are still available and still an excellent filter), it also removes some microorganisms. But explain the difference about the size of the different microorganisms.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Sure. Well, our previous Ultra model, it had a half a micron sediment carbon block. We call it a super block. It removes some bacteria because a lot of bacteria are larger than 0.5 micron. And it removes over 99% of microbial cysts like giardia and cryptosporidium, which have a hard shell. They survive disinfection. So it removes a whole host of those.

But there’s microorganisms out there that are smaller in size. Bacteria can be as small as 0.1 micron. Viruses can be as small as 0.001 micron.

DEBRA: Igor, I have to interrupt you because we have to go to break. I want to make sure that we get through our little minute here until the commercial starts that I tell our listeners that they can win a free filter, this filter that we’re talking about, this free filter. Igor is giving one away. If you go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comduring the break, you can send me an email and enter into the contest to get a free filter.

You’re listening to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Igor Milevskiy. He’s the founder of Pure Effect Advance Water Filters. Today, we’re talking about his new model, the Ultra UC Disinfect, which removes – well, it disinfects water and also, we’re going to be talking soon about ways that it also removes more toxic pollutants than other filters as well.

But I wanted to just say again that he’s giving one away free to my readers and listeners. One of you lucky people are going to get to have your own free filter. Just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comfor the instructions. Scroll down the page and you’ll see the instructions for how you can enter the giveaway contest.

So before the break – and I interrupted you, Igor – you were explaining about the different sizes of microorganisms.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yes. They vary from 10, 20, 30 microns. Some cysts are as large as 50 microns down to 0.01 microns and a little smaller even for some virus. So sometimes, you can’t physically capture all of those on a membrane without removing minerals that are beneficial. So the ultraviolet light is what shines here – no pun intended. The light burns through them all, viruses being more susceptible because they don’t have such a protective shell like cysts, but they’re smaller. So the UV light takes care of those and a very wide range of all these different microorganisms.

And in the new system, we also have a backup. We have the ultra filtration membrane, which is 0.05 microns, several times smaller than the smallest bacteria.

And in case the power goes out, let’s say there’s an emergency, there’s no power, but you still have water pressure, the system will still work. And the membrane doesn’t require – the membrane is going to be the back-up that helps take out those bad guys. It’s small enough to take out most of these microorganisms and large enough to allow the mineral ion to pass through so you’re still going to have minerals in.

DEBRA: So I just want to summarize the difference between the unit that I’ve been recommending for the past couple of years and this new one in terms of disinfecting and removing microorganisms. The old ones, it removed those by having them be filtered down to 0.5 microns.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: 0.5 microns, that’s correct.

DEBRA: Now, in the old one, wasn’t I 0.5?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yeah, the old one was half a micron, yup.

DEBRA: So the old one was down to 0.5. Now, in the new system, it goes down to 0.05, which is much, much smaller, plus you have the UV light, which just will kill all of them no matter what size they are.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yeah, it zaps them. So it’s not a physical membrane. It’s the light using the power of the ultraviolet wavelength, which is 254 nanometers. It’s the specific wavelength that destroy the DNA and the replication mechanism of these microorganisms and it zaps right through them.

DEBRA: You know, I don’t know if I ever told you this, Igor. I actually have a long history with UV because my father was very interested in UV.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yes, you mentioned that, yeah.

DEBRA: And so I had a lot of years of having lots of UV lamps around the house while he did all these testing and tinkering and developing UV systems for swimming pools to purify the water in swimming pools. And also, he developed a unit for purifying water – just not tap water, but just like what’s being sold in third world countries. I don’t even know what the company is, but I know that at some point along the way, it got sold to somebody and that’s where it is right now.

But it’s just UV. It’s just the very best thing if you are concerned about water needing to be disinfected the way they do it with UV. Nothing comes close to it.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yeah, and UV has other advantages too, not just disinfect. It also helps spray down chemicals as well via photocatalysis. It speeds up the decomposition of the chemical. It burns it out.

DEBRA: Yeah, so what happens is that it breaks down the chemicals. Usually, chemicals are removed using water filters by absorbing the chemical molecule in some kind of filtration media. But what UV does is it actually breaks down the molecules, the compounds into just their original elements like hydrogen and oxygen and things like that, which are completely harmless.

I think that’s a pretty amazing thing for it to do. We’re coming up on the break. We just got about – no, let’s keep talking about it because this is such an important thing. I actually did some research on this. Tell us more about how this works.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: As far as the ultraviolet disinfection or…?

DEBRA: About ultraviolet. Actually, tell us about NDMA and about how you came to address this.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Okay. Well, here’s the thing. Because the water treatment centers are so careful – not careful, but they’re very curious about protecting us, they’re adding a lot of chemicals like chlorine. That causes, as I’ve mentioned earlier the microorganisms to evolve and become resistant. So now, they’re adding chloramines, which is a more potent disinfectant to kill these guys.

But the problem is chloramines creates a byproduct, a chemical byproduct called NDMA. That’s a very persistent chemical and it’s highly toxic in very small doses.

And so one of the best methods to remove that is to decompose it with ultraviolet light. So this light often serves to break down the byproduct of chloramine disinfection.

DEBRA: I think that that’s so interesting because I looked up NDMA. The first thing it says is talking about, Well, does it persist in the environment? It says yes, but it just breaks down almost instantly by sunlight and so it doesn’t end up being a problem in the environment. But if it’s not being exposed to sunlight, then it is very persistent. And UV is just like having a sunbeam on your water, which is really good.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yup.

DEBRA: We need to go to break now, but we’ll come back and we’ll talk more about all the wonderful things about this new filter. Remember, go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand enter to win this very filter in the contest. ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand then scroll down the page.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Igor Milevskiy. Just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand there’s a link there to his website and you can find out more.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Igor Milevskiy. He’s the founder of Pure Effect Advance Water Filters. We’re talking about his new – what’s it called? Let’s see, the Ultra-UC Disinfect.

Now, I want to tell you before we go any further that people are writing in, entering the contest and I want to give you some messages, Igor.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Okay, sure! Great.

DEBRA: Here’s one from Monica. She says, Great show, Debra! Igor, keep cleaning up our waters.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: I will!

DEBRA: And here, get this. Now, listen to this carefully. This woman wrote in and she says, Oh, dear. I live in San Francisco and they recycle sewer water here. She’s 65 years old and she’s from a ranch in Oklahoma where they had artesian well water and she says that she has sewer drinking water and that it makes her ill all the time.

And she’s sending me a number of articles here. Here’s one from the Texas Tribute that says ‘No Joke: Most Drinking Supplies Flush with Potty Water’ and from ‘Toilet to Taps’, city officials say, Get used to drinking recycled toilet water.

Now, do we really think that if that’s what the water is that it doesn’t have some microorganisms in it?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Oh, I highly doubt that it doesn’t. Disinfection isn’t enough. We need to do more. In New York, they installed the ultraviolet system for the main water treatment because of this concern, huge high powered UV reactors. I guess a lot of places in New York also use the recycle ‘potty water’ as you call it. It’s pretty disgusting, but imagine how many chemicals have to go in there to disinfect the water and make it clear again.

DEBRA: Yeah. Argh! Argh! Anyway, when I think about drinking pristine water from – I’m originally from California. You may have heard of Mount Shasta, California, which is one of the highest mountain. The residents of the town of Mount Shasta can go to a public park and collect water from a spring, a natural spring where the water comes down off the mountain and [inaudible 00:29:14] comes up from the spring. I’ve drunk that water and it’s so incredibly delicious and invigorating and clean. To compare that with water that’s been recycled through the sewer system, it’s not quite the same thing, not quite.

So this is one of the reasons. I mean, this is really what’s going on in the world today. And so this is one of the reasons why we need to have filters like this. We need to be taking care things right out of our own taps at home.

So let’s talk more about how UV helps break down toxic chemicals. After you told me about NDMA, I went and looked up about what other chemicals the UV lamp can break down. I have a link – let’s see. If you go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand scroll down to the box where I’m talking about the contest, there’s a link there that says ‘read more about the new filter here’. If you click on that, it’ll take you to another whole page about things that we’re talking about and that there’s a link to an article about what UV lamps do in terms of breaking down toxic chemicals.

And so here’s a list of some other things that might be in your water that UV will break down – pharmaceuticals (those don’t get removed at the water treatment plant), chemicals that are in personal care products (which also don’t get removed at the water treatment plant), pesticides, herbicides, 1-4 dioxane, fuels and fuel additives, VOCs of all kinds and endocrine disruptor chemicals like BPA. These are chemicals that UV will break down into their safe elemental components.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yeah, and a lot of those chemicals are already removed by our system’s media even without the UV like with the advanced catalytic carbons and the zeolite, activated zeolite. But there’s over 80,000 man-made chemicals in the environment, so it never hurts to have yet another layer of protection. The UV light serves that purpose very well.

DEBRA: I think that that’s a good way to put it because I have felt for the last two years extremely confident using the original Ultra-UC system. It’s certainly is one that I continue to recommend. And if somebody is on a budget particularly, this is one of the most effective, most affordable units that I’ve ever seen.

If you want more protection, then this new unit is – I mean, I’m trying to figure out how to describe this because I don’t want to make it sound like that the old filter isn’t worth having because it totally is.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Absolutely.

DEBRA: So how would you recommend people decide between these two?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Well, it really depends. If you are on a water that has chloramines, certainly, it would be a good idea to get the UV light because chloramine because creates that toxic byproduct that UV light destroys. Carbon can’t remove it, reverse osmosis can’t remove it. Ultraviolet light is the way to go on that one.

Debra; Now, let me just jump in and say that this NMDA, it damages the liver and it’s suspected to be a human carcinogen. And so if you’ve got chloramines in your water, then you’re drinking this if it’s not being destroyed.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yes, there’s a possibility that there is NDMA in the water if it has chloramines. Chlorine creates byproduct, but our other system remove that very well. So the regular Ultra system will address the byproducts to chlorine very well.

DEBRA: Yes, I would agree.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: For chloramines, you need to consider the UV light if you’d like to break down that byproduct, NDMA.

Also, if you are well water and you’ve tested the water and you found high levels of bacteria or you’re just concerned, maybe the water is cleaned now. But water is dynamic so it can change. A month from now, there can be a change in the environment or in the soil and then you can have some issue. So for peace of mind, for well water, you can have that as well. The UV light will serve you well.

DEBRA: Good. I think that that’s a good description. So now, I also want to mention that you also have a whole house filter. So why would somebody want to get a whole house filter?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Well, I mean, if you want for your bath water, your clothes’ washing water clean – your clothes will come out cleaner because there’s less chemicals in the water. Your dishes, when you wash your dishes, you’re not breathing the fume from rising into your face or coming out of your dishwasher.

Debra; I have to interrupt you. I was so interested in talking to you that I forgot to look at the time. The music is telling me we have to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And after the break, we’ll be back with my guest, Igor Milevskiy from Pure Effect Advanced Water Filters. So during the break, go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand sign up for the free filter. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Igor Milevskiy. He’s the founder of Pure Effect Advanced Water Filters. That’s a small family-owned company that makes exceptional water filters that remove fluoride, radiation, pharmaceuticals as well as chlorine, chloramines, lead and other common pollutants. And now, with the addition of the UV light, we have additional disinfectant qualities and also, additional ability to remove toxic chemical that wouldn’t otherwise be removed prior.
During the break, I got another email from the woman who’s drinking recycled toilet water. She said the point here for her is not that it’s sewage water, but that so many chemicals are added to the water in order to process the sewage water.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Of course, yes.4

DEBRA: And that’s her concerned. So she would be very happy to win the free filter to say the least.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Well, I would be happy to give one away. It’s a great product. I’d like to introduce that to your audience and hear some great feedback hopefully.

DEBRA: I’m sure you will get some great feedback. I will give you great feedback. I love mine, I love mine. And one of the things that I can say from experience now is that when I had somebody come in to – I had a handyman come to install the new filter. When he came in, he commented about how well-built the filter was – not only the new one, but the old one that he was taking out. He said that it was so easy to install and that he was just really pleased with it.

I could tell that he’s somebody who does very careful work himself. And so he really appreciated the quality.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: That’s great. Yeah, we designed them to be easy to install (or at least as easy as possible) with less hassle, better connection, higher quality connection. We don’t cut corners on quality. We put our heart and soul into this. I’m glad that it showed.

DEBRA: It does show. And none of the parts come from China.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Correct.

DEBRA: Tell us more about how you manufacture them, the things that are unique to yours.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: It’s a painstaking process, let me tell you because we don’t manufacture it all in one place. We have different components at different factories. This is because we try to source the best suppliers of the different parts even down to the little connection elbows that connect the water to the filter – the bulb, the stainless steel reactor for the UV. A lot of this is a calibration of different factories across the country that produces this. So it’s not easy, but the end result is worth it.

DEBRA: It really is. And so, even though some of the parts are plastic, they’re BPA-free, they’re folate-free, the metal components are lead-free. Just everything, I can really tell, you’ve really paid attention to everything.

And also, tell the listeners about the UV lamp and how many [inaudible 00:42:24].

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Well, yeah. We even went into giving it that extra power, that extra potency because it takes a little more power to decompose NDMA. Our system has a flow rate of half a gallon a minute. It takes about 8 seconds for a cup, which is designed that way so it’s filtered better, more thoroughly, so it doesn’t pass through too quickly.

And the light, it’s rated for a flow rate of two gallons a minute. So it’s rated several times more than what the water is actually flowing at for the system. It gets to treat the water three or four times longer. It exposes it to the UV light longer for more potency.

DEBRA: Yes. So see, Igor has thought of everything. Now, in addition to all of these, your filters also have other benefits. All of your filters have all of these benefits. So tell us about the pH of the water.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: For the drinking water filter, the pH is gently, naturally increased. But please keep in mind, this mainly is a water filter and disinfection system. The alkalizing effect is a natural effect of the calcium that we use in the system. So it’s gentle. It’s not like the artificial ionizers that use the metal plates and artificially shoots the plates up, which may not be very healthy according to some research.

This system has the calcium the water passes over and it picks up those calcium ion, which is what causes the pH to rise. Now, if you have a really low pH to begin with in your tap water, it may not rise as much as somebody let’s say like with a seven. You may see about an eight or eight and a half. Somebody with a five may see a seven. You see what I’m saying? So it depends on what the starting pH is of the tap water, but it is gently alkalizing, which makes the water more pleasant to drink and almost with a sweeter taste to it and it hydrates better. there’s a lot of research that shows water with a higher pH and more minerals give cells more hydration and the penetration to the cell is better.

DEBRA: And it makes your body a little more alkaline, which makes you healthier. Some illnesses cannot happen within an alkaline body and most people’s body’s are too acidic from toxic chemical exposure, things that you eat and things like that. And so having a little alkalinity in your water is I think a good thing and more like it is in nature.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Everything in moderation.

DEBRA: Everything in moderation.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Too high a pH is also not good.

DEBRA: Yes. No, no, you don’t want it to be too high.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: So properly balance.

DEBRA: Balance, that’s good. That’s a good way to put it.

And so, Igor, we’re coming to the end of the show. It goes by so fast, doesn’t it? We only just have about three or four minutes left. Is there anything that you want to talk about that we haven’t covered?

IGOR MILEVSKIY: I also wanted to mention if there’s anybody who is listening now that has one of our previous model systems, you can email us or Debra, provide your order number from the previous order along with your email and phone number and I will contact you with a special discount if you want to upgrade your older version to this new disinfection system. I will give you a reasonable discount to help you upgrade your unit. So we don’t want to leave anybody out.

DEBRA: And also, when you’re looking at the cost of upgrading, I had no problem selling my old filter. I mean, I had it sold before mine even arrived, my new one even arrived. The woman was going out of town and she’s going to pick it up tomorrow. I just announced it on a little, local email list I’m on that I had this filter available and it snapped right out. I mean, it is like an hour after I posted it.

Some people on this list also already have one and they started chiming in about, Oh! This is a great filter.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Beautiful! I appreciate all those comments and all of your listeners who bought water filtration from our company. I really appreciate that. So thank you to everybody and of course, to you, Debra as well.

DEBRA: Thank you. And I also want to mention that you could actually conceivably get your water filter for free by joining Igor’s affiliate program, which is absolutely free. It doesn’t cost anything to do this. You could just sell one filter or five filters and you could just earn – just sell enough, you don’t have to make a business out of it. Just sell enough to your friends that will cover the cost of your filter.

So he’s really got everything all set up so that anybody can get one of these, that it can be affordable, but you can also earn the money that you need by selling the filters.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Yeah, if you have a list of people or if you’re active in the community and you’re passionate about water filtration, then I think it’s a great potential.

DEBRA: I think it’s a great potential too. And I’ll tell you that I always give people who come to my house a glass of water and they always say, What is this?! They’re always interested. Are you filtering this? Is this bottled water? It’s because it tastes so good. It just tastes so much better than what they’re drinking. And when I tell them – I’ve sold a number of filters to my friends just because they tasted the water. Yeah, these are not hard to sell.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: And that’s the best, when you actually taste it and you can see the difference. When you compare the way the water out of the tap or even out of the battle, that plastic case and out of the filter, freshly filtered, it’s night and day difference.

DEBRA: It is a night and day difference, yeah. Well, thank you so much for being with us today.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: My pleasure.

DEBRA: Thank you so much.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Thank you.

DEBRA: And thank you for your filters and your excellent work. I want to tell our listeners again to go ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. If you scroll down the page, you can enter the contest to win a free Pure Effect Ultra-UC Disinfectant Water Filter Revitalizer. You can also get more information about the filter. All the links are there on the page. You can just be drinking pure water instead of whatever unknown things are coming out of your tap.

I can’t say enough about how wonderful those filters are and how pleased I am that you’re making them, Igor. It’s just – thank you.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Oh, it’s so worth it, hearing this type of feedback and seeing the results and how many people are drinking clean water and enjoying it. It’s really a pleasure to do. That’s what keeps me going and evolving this product further and further.

Wendy: Thank you.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: I appreciate everybody’s interest and you having me on the show again, Debra. So thank you very much.

Wendy: You’re welcome, you’re welcome. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

I think it’s:

IGOR MILEVSKIY: Oh, it’s so worth it, hearing this type of feedback and seeing the results and how many people are drinking clean water and enjoying it. It’s really a pleasure to do. That’s what keeps me going and evolving this product further and further.

DEBRA: Thank you.

IGOR MILEVSKIY: I appreciate everybody’s interest and you having me on the show again, Debra. So thank you very much.

DEBRA: You’re welcome, you’re welcome. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Spain incorporates Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) in its International Classification of Diseases

From Debra Lynn Dadd

Spain has recognized Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
AC / MADRID
Day 09/26/2014 – 3:56 a.m.

Incorporating the health system has been made in accordance with guidelines approved by WHO and other countries had already adopted

Spain has officially recognized multiple chemical sensitivity ( MCS ) to incorporate its International Classification of Diseases or ICD (the system that classifies the Health and encodes their diagnoses). With this decision, Spain joins the list of countries that recognize MCS as a disease: Germany (2000), Austria (2001), Japan (2009), Switzerland (2010) and Denmark (2012).

The process was carried out through a non-legislative proposal (PNL) presented by Deputy María del Carmen Quintanilla’s Party;following a request made to it by the Fund for the Protection of Environmental Health ( Fodesam ), in collaboration with theInformation Service Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and Environmental Health ( SISS ).

The SQM radically changes the lives of those who suffer. The recognition was a longstanding demand of those affected by a disease that turns many common chemicals in everyday life a torment for those affected by MCS. Detergents, soaps, colognes, or air fresheners become aggressive to them products they produce palpitations, vomiting, skin irritation or recurrent headaches. “MCS changes the lives of those who suffer and forces, in many cases, to live with many preventive measures to not contact or in the air, with these products,” says Carmen Quintanilla. Go outside or into a store can be, for these people, impossible to perform tasks.

This condition was further added the inappropriate treatment that many of these patients receive from the health system. Because it does not appear in the ICD as a disease is in an administrative “limbo” that involves “a state of complete helplessness. Something that should end with the recognition of MCS as a disease.

“The situation of these people is very difficult,” says Carlos Prada,Chairman of Fodesam. His intolerance synthetic substances frequently used in society often forces them to live homebound, almost like “bubble people”; wear a mask and the few times they go out.

MCS affects the central nervous system, but may also cause malfunctions in other systems such as respiratory, gastrointestinal or heart. This is an “emerging disease” of chronic nature and “environmental toxic ‘causing a’ physiological response to many agents and chemical compounds” that can be found in air fresheners, colognes, personal care products, cleaning supplies, food, water Griffin, clothing, cosmetics, snuff … Therefore, although as in other diseases MCS have degrees and symptoms vary according to the parameters of health and “chemical” environment of the patient, it is a problem difficult to handle, further “limited remarkable quality of life “form, noting the non-legislative proposal.

See article at BBC: Mundo: La difícil vida de las “personas burbuja”

International Classification of Diseases (ICD)

Add Comment

Dry-cleaned clothes and Evaporation Rates of Solvents

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I have some dry-cleaned clothes still in the plastic that have been in my closet for about 6 years. Would these be safe by now to wear, or would you dispose of them?

Thank you!

Debra’s Answer

The dry cleaning solvent perchorethylene is very volatile and will evaporate completely. I can’t tell you exactly the evaporation rate because it depends on the conditions. (Just so you get how complex this is, take a look at this paper on how to calculate evaporation rate).

So if you brought you dry-cleaned clothes home from the cleaners 6 years ago and had removed the plastic and hung them outdoors so the perc could freely evaporate, I would say in a day or so. Certainly 3 days or 7 days there would be nothing left. The plastic, however, slows evaporation. At 6 years I don’t know what it would be. But you could simply take the clothing out of the closet, remove the plastic, put them outdoors, and within several days the perc would evaporate completely.

As long as we are talking about evaporation, there is a toxicological factor of solvents called the “evaporation rate.” Each solvent has it’s own evaporation rate. These rates are established by supposing the evaporation rate of ether (or some other substance) = 1 and by indicating other slower drying solvents as multiples of the evaporation rate of substance it is being related to.

As an example, here is a chart of the evaporation rates of solvents used in printing inks, using ether=1.

evaporation-rate-of-solvents

But this still doesn’t tell us how long it would take for your perc to evaporate.

The MSDS definition of evaporation rate is “the rate at which a material will vaporize (evaporate, change from liquid to vapor) compared to the rate of vaporization of a specific known material. This quantity is a ratio, therefore it is unitless.” (MSDS HyperGlossary: Evaporation Rate)

In general usage we think of it as the amount of material that evaporates from a surface per unit of time. So there are three variables
* amount of evaporated material
* per space
* per time

Here is a chart where butyl acetate=1.

evaporation-rate-butyl-acetate

The problem is that you need to start with the evaporation rate of butyl acetate, which is unknown because the number would depend on a number of variables, such as temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, air flow, viscosity, and, as in the case of your dry cleaning, whether or not it was covered.

But here’s something you can glean from this chart. The evaporation rate of water is classified at 0.3. Heat the water and it will evaporate faster as we can observe as steam. Freeze it and it won’t evaporate at all. That’s true for solvents too—heat speeds evaporation. But if you know water is classified as 0.3 on the butyl alcohol scale, and you know that is slow evaporation, then you can tell that acetone (nail polish) at 5.6 is five times faster.

There is a line on the MSDS for “volatility” in Section 9: Physical and Chemical Properties, but there is no data on the MSDS for perc.

Well, there’s the science lesson for today. I wish it were simpler. I just try to think in terms of is it going to evaporate fast or slower. Formaldehyde, for example, evaportates pretty quickly from an open bottle, and very slowly when bound up in a resin in particleboard.

Why Organic Fish is a Terrible Idea

From Debra Lynn Dadd

I’m forwarding this to you from Max Goldberg…

The USDA is very close to finalizing standards for organic
fish and what it has come up with is absolutely horrible.

If organic is important to you (even if you don’t eat fish), I
strongly urge you to read what is going on and take action.

Why Organic Fish is a Bad, Bad Idea

As always, thank you so much for supporting organic food!
Max
—-
Max Goldberg
livingmaxwell.com/
www.facebook.com/livingmaxwell

Add Comment

Electric Tea Kettle

Question from Mira

Does anyone know of a chemically safe electric tea kettle? I drink tea all day long and would like something that heats up quickly and turns off automatically. Thanks.

Debra’s Answer

Readers?

Add Comment

Need To Choose An Insulation

Question from Gayle

Hi,

I’m needing to add more insulation to my home which was built in the 1960’s. There are SO many choices. Since it’s an established home, it seems easiest to have insulation “blown in”. Foam types scare me. Has anyone used “Green Fiber” from Lowe’s? They say it’s formaldehyde free and made of 85% recycled materials . . . I’m open to suggestions!

Thanks,

Gayle

Debra’s Answer

Readers, can you offer your experience?

Add Comment

Neem Oil May Be Toxic

Question from SARA

Hello Debra,

My name is Ines and the story I am about to tell you is truly horrible.

I am a victim of the false advertising of piggy paint, which was what lead me to your article. My 4 year old daughter almost died because she accidentally ingested piggy paint. But it wasn’t the chemicals that affected her…it was the NEEM OIL!!!!!

I originally bought the product because the founder advertised that her kids put their hands in their mouths all the time and that’s why she created the product.

I desperately need more help because the research in this is so limited. I am worried that something can happen to another child.
The symptoms include drowsiness, lethargy, seizures, respiratory arrest which can lead to death and coma. I do not understand why neem oil would be in a product advertised for children since it is known to be hazardous even for pregnant women. If you can help me in any way I would be very grateful. Thank you for you article as well.

Debra’s Answer

I agree with you that neem oil should not be in a product where it is expected that children would put it in their mouths.

Here is the neem oil side effects list from WebMD:

neem-oil-side-effects

What kind of help do you need? Is your daughter OK now?

Add Comment

Organic and Healthy

A well-chosen collection for a healthy bedroom, including Pacific Rim natural maple bedroom furniture; Pure-Rest latex and innerspring mattresses (made with natural latex, eco wool and organic cotton); Soaring Heart latex mattresses (made with organic latex, organic wool and organic cotton); Soaring Heart organic futons (various combinations of cotton, wool and latex); wood foundations and wood slat bed frames; and a full assortment of organic bedding including mattress toppers, cotton and wool mattress pads, pillows with half a dozen different natural fills, sheets, cotton and wool blankets, wool comforters, and barrier covers that protect mattresses, pillows and duvet covers from dust mites. “We bring you non-toxic, eco-friendly products that we have researched for use in our own home to protect our family, in hopes of helping you create a cleaner indoor environment for you and your loved ones.”

Visit Website

Organic and Healthy

The most non-toxic carpeting and area rugs on the market, made from 100% natural materials: Earth Weave’s Bio-Floor Collection and Nature’s Carpet “Dark Green” line. Also 100% natural wool carpet padding and 100% natural rubber rug grippers. “Wool carpeting is wonderful because the scales on wool fibers hold onto dirt until it is vacuumed away, which helps the carpet and your home stay cleaner. And these fibers absorb airborne pollutants, so wool carpeting can actually help clean the air in your home!” Plus wool carpet typically lasts 2 to 3 times as long as synthetics. “We bring you non-toxic products that we have researched for use in our own home to protect our family, in hopes of helping you create a cleaner indoor environment for you and your loved ones.”

Visit Website

Organic and Healthy

Family-tested solid wood bedroom furniture, organic futons, and affordable chemical-free sofas made from sustainably harvested wood with a low VOC finish or unfinished. Selections include maple beds and casegoods (dressers, night stands, wardrobes, bookshelves, desks, etc.) from Pacific Rim; ash beds and casegoods from Bedworks of Maine; futon sofas combining Bedworks of Maine ash/maple frames with Soaring Heart all-organic futons; and wood-frame modular sofas and tables from Carolina Morning. Cover fabrics are organic cotton; futons and cushions are filled with kapok, organic cotton, wool and/or latex. No fire retardant or stain-proofing chemicals applied. Also organic mattresses, a full assortment of organic bedding, chemical-free wool carpet and area rugs, air and water purifiers, and more. “We bring you non-toxic, eco-friendly products that we have researched for use in our own home to help you create a cleaner indoor environment for you and your loved ones.”

Visit Website

Good Night Naturals

“Just about everything natural and organic you could want to transform your bed and bath into an oasis of health, vitality and beauty.” Chemical-free organic mattresses, eco-friendly adjustable bed frames, organic wool comforters, pillows, latex mattresses, latex toppers, organic cotton sheets and luxury linens. Beautiful, high quality pieces made of natural-color and dyed organic cotton, PureGrow™ Wool, bamboo, lyocell (wood-pulp fiber and cotton blend) and other specialty natural fibers (check out their supersoft microcotton).

Visit Website

White Lotus Home

This is the site I recommend most for inexpensive natural fiber mattresses. “Handcrafted natural fiber mattresses, pillows, and accessories without toxic chemicals” since 1981. They make all-cotton mattresses without springs because “the use of steel in mattresses is responsible for enormous amounts of air and water pollution every year, not to mention the devastation that strip mining has on the land where coal and iron ore are extracted.” In addition, each and every mattress has been made entirely by hand. “I can put a mattress-crafter in a room with a natural fabric mattress case, a bale of cotton, a needle, some thread, and just her two hands, and she will come out with a 100% handmade mattress that is more comfortable, more supportive, will not poison the earth or the sleeper and costs less than $300.” Made from “green” cotton scrap fibers (they are too short to spin for textiles) which have had had no chemical processing after harvesting–no bleaching, fungicides or dyes. They also make pillows filled with kapok, buckwheat, wool, buckwheat/wool, or organic cotton, wool toppers, and “The Stowaway”–a smaller version of their mattress that can be rolled up, tied, and carried for an exercise mat or traveling. Also organic cotton sheets, 100% cotton mattress pads, and bedroom furniture. ”The environmental stewards at White Lotus believe that if the cost of saving the earth and protecting one’s health was out of reach for most people’s budgets, true progress would never be made. For that reason, in part, White Lotus is very efficient with resources and keeps its prices where almost everyone can take part in making the world a better place.” 100% of their energy is supplied by wind power. When you call to place an order, tell them I sent you.

Listen to my interview with White Lotus Home President Marlon Pando.

Visit Website

Berkeley’s Proposed Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance

Today I have three guests. We’ll be talking about a Cell Phone “Right ot Know” Ordinance being proposed in Berkeley California—about the ordinance, what it requires, and why it is needed. We’ll be discussing use recommendations from cell phone manufacturers and some surprising health effects of cell phone use (did you know storing your cell phone in your bra can cause breast cancer?).

Ellen Marks is founder and director of the California Brain Tumor Association which focuses on prevention and on the wireless radiation issue being a possible cause of deadly brain tumors. Ellen entered into the cell phone/brain tumor world when her husband was diagnosed with brain cancer in 2008. After examining her husband’s cell phone and medical records worldwide experts confirmed that her husband’s glioma was “more likely than not” attributable to his long term ipsilateral cell phone use. Ellen has testified before Congress on the health effects of cell phone radiation and has appeared on the Dr. Oz Show, Larry King Live, The View and many national newscasts. www.cabta.org

Dr. John West, M.D. is general surgeon. In the mid 1980’s, he became fascinated with the multidisciplinary team approach to breast cancer care. His previous experience as a pioneer in the development of regional trauma systems set the stage for his interest in developing a team approach to breast care. He opened Orange County’s first breast care center in 1988, and over the past 20 yrs has been on the cutting edge of developing a team approach to the care of patients with breast problems. Dr. West has been named a Best Doctor in America and has been recognized as one of the “Best Doctors in Orange County”. He has been the lead author in 20 peer review articles and has written two books. Dr. West continues to be at the forefront of cutting edge breast care issues. He was co-founder and chairman of the board of the Breast Health Awareness Foundation, which is a community outreach program dedicated to the early detection of breast cancer. Dr. West’s interests include physical fitness, gardening, and scuba diving. He is a workaholic who often jokes that his favorite saying is “Thank God it’s Monday.” Beawarefoundation.org | www.hindawi.com/journals/crim/2013/354682/

Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., Ph.D, is recognized internationally for her work on environmental health and disease prevention. A Presidential appointee that received bi-partisan Senate confirmation, Dr. Davis was the Founding Director of the world’s first Center for Environmental Oncology and currently serves as President of Environmental Health Trust, a nonprofit devoted to researching and controlling avoidable environmental health threats. A national book award finalist, Dr. Davis lectures at universities in the U.S. and Europe and was the recent winner of the Carnegie Science Medal in 2010 and the Lifetime Achievement Award from Green America in 2012. Her 2007 book, The Secret History of the War on Cancer, details the ways that public relations strategies have undermined public health, and is being used at major schools of public health, including Harvard, Emory, and Tulane University. Her recent book, Disconnect: The Truth about Cell Phone Radiation and Your Health, what the Industry has Done to Hide it, and What You Can Do to Protect your Family was published in the U.S. and U.K. by Dutton, 2010, and has been released in Australia, India, Turkey, Taiwan, Finland, Estonia, China, and as a book on tape. Her research has appeared in major scientific journals. Her research has been featured on CNN, CSPAN, CBC, BBC, and public radio. ehtrust.org

 

read-transcript

 

 

pong600-1

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Berkeley’s Proposed Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Ellen Marks, Dr. John West M.D., Dr. Devra Lee Davis, M.P.H., PhD

Date of Broadcast: November 13, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, November 13th 2014.

And if you hear banging or whirring or any kind of noises in the background, it’s because I’m having a new water filter installed. There’s nothing wrong with my old water filter, it’s just that it’s being upgraded because the company who made my water filter, Pure Effect is coming out with a new filter next week.

And in fact, we’re going to learn all about it next Tuesday, on next Tuesday show. So I got one in advance and so I’m trying it out. It’s getting installed today and it’s an interesting filter. We’re going to hear about it on Tuesday, so I won’t get into it today.

Today, we’re going to be talking about the city of Berkeley, California and their proposed cellphone “Right to Know” ordinance. My guest today – I actually have three guests, but my first guest is Ellen Marks. She’s the founder and director of the California Brain Tumor Association, which focuses on prevention and on the wireless radiation issue as a possible cause of deadly brain tumors.

Now, you may have heard Ellen back on April 28th when she was on. I invited her on because she and others had just done a protest in San Francisco store by placing warning labels on the cellphones.

And now what we’re talking about today is a proposed ordinance in Berkeley, California where it will require stores that sells cellphone to give a fact sheet that talks about what is the safest way to use a cellphone.

Hi, Ellen!

ELLEN MARKS: Hi, Debra. Thank you for having me on again.

DEBRA: Thank you so much. You’re welcome. Thank you so much for being here. And I’ll just say before you and I start talking that the other guests will be appearing later in the show. In the second segment, we’ll be having Dr. John West who works with cellphones and breast cancer.

And in the third second will be Dr. Devra Lee Davis who is a well-known research in the field of EMS and author of the book, Disconnect: The Truth About Cellphone Radiation and Your Health, What the Industry Has Done to Hide It and What You Can Do to Protect Your Family – long title. Anyway, she’ll be on in the third segment, so we’re going to be learning lots today about how cellphones can protect your health if they’re worn near your body.

So Ellen, tell us what the issue is and why an ordinance?

ELLEN MARKS: Well, the issue is in a nutshell, the FTC mandates that the manufacturers put in disclosures. What the manufacturers are doing right now is hiding this information in the manual or in the phone. So what they’re requiring to be there is that the phone should not be held to the body.

When it’s held to the body, one may be exposed to radiation that exceeds the federal exposure guideline. So every manual has this information in it. It could be on page 296 and size four font and people just don’t know that they’re there.

DEBRA: Well, the other thing that I noticed is that it doesn’t even tell you in words that we understand what the distance is. I was just looking at one on the Apple iPhone 5. I have an iPhone and it says, “Carry the iPhone at least 10 mm. away from your body.” Well, who in America knows what a 10 mm. is. How far is that?

ELLEN MARKS: Exactly! That’s about a half an inch. But the bigger problem (and that is a huge problem) that people are not seeing this. The FTC says that the end user must see this and they must understand it. And that is not happening.

And the other issue with the iPhone is – I don’t know how you found it because one has to go through many steps to get there. You have to hit ‘settings’, then you have to hit ‘general’, then you have to hit ‘about’ – I’m doing this right now.

And then you have to go down the ‘legal’, then you have to go to ‘RF exposure’ and then in print that you can’t make bigger, it does tell you, “Carry the iPhone at least 10 mm. away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.”

So it’s a combination of understanding what they’re telling you and being able to find what they’re telling you.

DEBRA: Well, I’ll tell you…

ELLEN MARKS: And that’s the issue in Berkeley.

DEBRA: Yeah. Honestly, I’ll tell you that I didn’t find it on my phone. I found it on the email that you sent me while you were giving examples.
ELLEN MARKS: Okay, okay. So people don’t know this.

DEBRA: …examples of fine print, separation advisories. And when I bought my iPhone, I didn’t even think twice about this. They didn’t tell me anything at the store, I didn’t read the manual. I just started holding it up to my head.

ELLEN MARKS: Exactly!

DEBRA: And I don’t do that anymore. I don’t do that anymore.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, that’s good.

DEBRA: Since you were on the show and you told us about this, I now use the speaker feature and I hold it away like a foot away and talk into the speaker.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, that’s wonderful because what we’re trying to do is raise awareness and educate people that this information is there and there’s reasons for this information being there.

So what Berkeley has proposed – and first of all, I want to thank Max Anderson and Chris Worthington, the two city council members who are introducing this legislation and they’ve been steadfast in their efforts. What it says, the proposed wording of the ordinance, what it would say would be a handout given to anyone when they buy a cellphone. So it would be at the point of sale instead of hiding it the way it is now. What it would say is:

“The federal government requires that cellphones meet radio frequency (RF) exposure guidelines. Don’t carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is turned on and connected to a wireless network. This will prevent exposure to RF levels that may exceed the federal guidelines. Refer to the instructions in your phone or user manual for the recommended separation distance.”

DEBRA: That, I think is excellent.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, it’s good. It’s fairly minimal, but we have to do that because this industry has already threatened a lawsuit. They’ve done this in other places across the nation who have tried similar legislation. But this is more minimal. This is not violating the industry’s first amendment rights because it’s not compelling speech and it’s not controversial.

It’s merely taking the information that already exist in the phone and in the FTC compliance document and putting it in the consumer’s hand at the point of sale so that individuals and parents can make informed choices as to how they and their children will use these devices. These should not be held to the body when they’re on.

DEBRA: Here’s just a practical question. If you need to leave your phone on, don’t you, in order to receive a call?

ELLEN MARKS: Mm-hmmm…

DEBRA: So one would have to just make sure that they carry it. I now have a little case, a Pong case for mine. I don’t carry it in my pocket or put it in my bra. I put it in my purse or it’s sitting on my desk about two feet away and it’s in my little Pong case.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, you’re absolutely right. That is a huge issue because we all love our phones. I still use one, but I never carry it to my head or to my body. It’s a valuable technology. Many of us are probably addicted to this device. So where do we keep it?

For women, they can keep it in their purse. Men should keep it in a briefcase or a backpack. We probably need a new man bag of some sort. But we need an alternative to keeping it in a pocket because as Dr. Devra Davis will tell you later, there’s a lot of science about sperm damage, damage to fetuses. Dr. West will tell you that there’s some information now about young women with unusual breast tumors who keep their cellphones in their bra. So we need an alternative.

And we also need this industry to eventually make safer equipment. They already have the patents on safer equipment, but they’re not releasing it because they would be admitting that there’s a problem and they don’t want to admit that there’s a problem.

DEBRA: Alright! So we need to go to break soon. When we come back, we’re going to be talking with Dr. John West. You can stay on the line, Ellen in case you want to jump in and talk with him because there is two lines. We’ll just keep you on all through the entire show. And then come back in segment four. We’ll talk with you again more about the ordinance.

ELLEN MARKS: Okay, thank you. I look forward to it.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And today we’re talking about the proposed Berkeley legislation to have a fact sheet given that tells you about the distances that you should have for your phone and the health effects that people have already found from having your found on next to your body. And when we come back from the break, we’ll be talking with Dr. John West.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. And we’re going to apply the music again – I’m Debra Lynn Dadd – because we just had a little telephone mix-up and we’re going to get Dr. West on the line. So just hold and listen to the music and we’ll be right back.

And the producer is not playing the music because he thinks I’m talking. Okay! Brett, I just skyped you the phone number, so try this new number. And I’ll just talk. Ellie, are you still there? No, nobody is there. Okay, I hope you can hear me. So I will talk because we don’t want to have dead air time here.

I’m going to introduce Dr. West while we’re waiting to get him on the phone. My producer says that he’s calling him and so it should just be momentarily.

So Dr. West is a general surgeon. He’s been interested in breast cancer since the mid-1980s. He has been named one of the best doctors in America and is recognized as one of the best doctors in Orange County. He’s been the lead author in 20 peer review articles, written two books and he’s on the forefront of cutting-edge breast cancer issues.

He’s the co-founder and chairman of the board of the Breast Health Awareness Foundation, a community outreach program dedicated to early detection – and I just got that he’s online. He loves physical fitness, gardening and scuba diving.

Hello, Dr. West.

DR. JOHN WEST: How are you?

DEBRA: I’m fine. How are you?

DR. JOHN WEST: Oh, just fine. Nice day in Southern California.

DEBRA: And it’s a nice day here in Florida.

DR. JOHN WEST: Oh, how about that?

DEBRA: So tell us about your work with breast cancer and cellphones.

DR. JOHN WEST: Well, of course, I’ve dedicated the last 30 years of my life to breast cancer early detection, risk reduction, et cetera. A couple of years ago, a patient, she showed up at our center with a cancer in the upper, inner left breast. She was about 38 years old. She had no family history or any known risk factors, but she said the cancer had occurred directly under where she had been storing her cellphone in her bra.

We were a bit skeptical when we presented her case to our conference and looked at the pathology. It had kind of an unusual appearance. I remember the pathologist commenting on the fact that there was a widespread area of little areas of micro-invasion and this was distinctly unusual.

So it kind of got me thinking, “Well, maybe this lady did have a story to tell.” I presented her case at a big county-wide conference of breast surgeons and basically got laughed off the stage and was told in no uncertain terms that there’s no data whatsoever to support this concept, that cellphones have microwave energy and that microwave energy is safe. And so I kind of, “Okay, guys, I’ll keep my mouth shut.”

So shortly there afterwards, I got contacted by a 21-year old who was diagnosed with what she felt to be a cellphone-related breast cancer. And then over the years, I’ve collected more cases and finally published this series.

But the most dramatic event that really changed my thinking and convinced me that this could be a major problem, it’s in fact the tip of the iceberg, I was sitting in my desk as I usually do during office hours and the radiology technician, two or three of them came running out of the room and said, “Hey, we got another one.”

It turned out to be a 21-year old girl that had what she felt to be a cellphone-related breast cancer, but the appearance of her mammogram was absolutely mind-boggling. She had unusual distribution of calcifications that were occurring in relation to her cancer.

I asked the radiologist, I said, “Just how long is that area of calcification?” She measured it with her ruler and she said, “9.5 sonometers.” I said, “Well, how wide is the distribution?” She measured 3.5 sonometers. So I pulled a cellphone out of my pocket and I said, “Measure this.”And it was 9.5 x 3.5.

I about fainted. This is the most dramatic example I can think of.

Now, I’ve had other dramatic examples; one that occurs to me as a young woman. Again, none of these women had a family history, worked at a cellphone manufacturing company and the cellphones were on a conveyor belt below the level of her waist, just the lower breast. At age 38, she developed breast cancers in the lower aspect of both breasts. I’ve never seen that pattern before.

And all these women that I’ve been dealing with, that I’ve been collecting have no family history – at least the ones that I’m reporting on. I do get [inaudible 00:18:31] on the Oz Show. I got a tremendous response from women who thought they might have a cellphone-related breast cancer.

But once we reach at a certain age, cancer becomes common and using cellphones becomes common. And to my great surprise, storing the cellphone in the bras is remarkably common. So I can’t really make much out of those case. But when I get a woman under 30 and started collecting a series of them, it starts making me really nervous.

And we published this series of four of the women a couple of years ago and it got a lot of attention. It showed a detailed analysis of the mammograms and the pathology, et cetera and they all seem to have a very consistent pattern. And so this consistency of the pattern has convinced me that there is a problem.

And so what are the solutions? Well, I’m not going to stand up in my soap box anymore and say, “Cellphones can cause breast cancer,” but I said, “Read the safety information that comes along with the cellphone” – that is if you can find it on the Internet. And virtually every cellphone manufacturer now says, “Keep your cellphone at least a half an inch from the skin.”

Now, I’ concerned that the breast is a particularly sensitive organ in its early stages of development. So teenage women who have chest x-rays we know are increased with for early onset breast cancer. And I think the same vulnerability may be for microwave irradiation. I think that maybe older women might get by with this behavior, but I think particularly for these young women –

What worries me, these highschool girls and college girls, it’s routine behavior.

DEBRA: It is.

DR. JOHN WEST: We did one study of college girls that show that 40% of them stored their cellphone in their bra at least once during the day and 3% stored it in their bra for more than 10 hours.

So these are the women just like with the cell-phone related brain cancers where we know that early onset and long duration are associated with this increased risk of – or at least proposed to be an increased risk of brain cancers. The same will apply even more so to breast because the breast being a vulnerable organ and very young women – you know, women starting at a very young age and with prolonged storage, maybe exposing some of these particularly sensitive women to early onset breast cancer.

And in fact, if this proves to be the case, just think of what it implies. Over the next decade, we’re going to have hundreds of thousands of women who have been exposed that don’t know what to do. What do you tell a 19-year or girl or tell the mother of a 19-year old girl who has noted that their daughter has been storing their cellphone in their bra for years and then doesn’t know what to do next now that she knows that it is a risk.

DEBRA: I’m sorry ot interrupt. I’m sorry, Dr. West, but our time is up. It’s time to go to commercial. I so appreciate you being here for this segment. If you’d like to go to Dr. West website and find out more about breast cancer and how cellphones affect it, just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and I have the websites for all the guests that are on today there in the show description.

And so ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. This has been Dr. John West and he has lots more information on his website. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Today, we’re talking about cellphones and the Berkeley “Right to Know” ordinance that will require retailers to pass out a fact sheet telling about what is the safest distance to store and hold a cellphone.

We have several guests scheduled today and our scheduled guest for this segment, Dr. Devra Lee Davis didn’t answer the phone and I think I know why. She told me when we scheduled her that she thought this time would be fine, but that her daughter is expecting a baby. So I’m thinking that she might have rushed to the hospital with her daughter while she gives birth.

So we’ll reschedule her because Dr. Davis has a lot to say about cellphones. She’s just returned from India where she has some new research. And so we’ll just reschedule her and give her a whole hour.

So Ellie, do you want to tell us a little bit about what Dr. Davis was going to talk about?

ELLEN MARKS: Well, I think Devra was going to talk about some research that has been done recently on reproductive health with cellphone radiation. I don’t know all of it, I’m not a scientist, but I can tell you that there has been considerable science over the years – there’s been studies out of Cleveland Clinic and Harvard and Yale about damage to sperm and damage to fetuses.

Now, as far as sperm goes, what the science has found is that when cellphones are carried in the pocket on and connected to a wireless network, that sperm is not only being damaged, but sperm count is down.

So this is a serious concern. I don’t believe there’s been any studies as to what this is doing to a woman’s reproductive organs and to eggs, but I can only imagine. So there’s considerable concern about when a man keeps a phone in a pocket.

And also, we are definitely concerned about women keeping them near their abdomen when their pregnant. Dr. Dee-Kun Li at Oakland Kaiser has done some research on this and found that cellphone radiation does affect fetuses.

There’s talk about it increasing behavior. There’s a study out of Yale. There’s been talks about cellphone radiation. This was a study done on rats where it showed symptoms such as ADHD where the rats who were exposed to the radiation while in utero, young rats, they exhibited signs of ADHD and unusual behaviors where the rats who were not exposed to the radiation did not do this.

So there’s concerns about that. There’s been some studies about damage to fetuses. Actually, there’s a woman who lives up in [inaudible 00:30:01] who was a realtor. She kept cellphones in both pockets while she was pregnant. Unfortunately, her 4-year old died from glioma. And that is the type of brain tumor attributed to cellphone use.

So we’re obviously very concerned. I’m not exactly sure what else Devra was going to go into today, but she’s definitely a leading expert on this issue.

DEBRA: And we’ll have her. We’ll have her on again. I’ll reschedule her first, so that she can…

ELLEN MARKS: Yes, and I apologize for that. I’d like to say a couple of things if we have the time. Berkeley is doing the right thing. Other cities and states have tried to do similar things in the past and they’ve been met with campaign contributions from industry to legislators. They’ve been met with litigation by this industry who claims that anything that a city or state does in regard to this is a violation of their first amendment rights. Well, what about our rights to know about these ubiquitous devices that even children are using.

So we’re really proud of Berkeley. And Harvard law professor, constitution law professor, Larry Lessig has helped us draft this legislation and he will defend this pro bono for the city of Berkeley and the industry. He feels that the way in which this is written will stand up in court because like I said before, it’s not compelling speech and it is not controversial.

So Berkeley is a city that is progressive and they stand up for their constituents’ right and we’re really proud of them. And I think you might know they recently passed a soda tax.

DEBRA: Yes! I just heard that on the news.

ELLEN MARKS: Yes! And we’re very proud of them for this. And it’s similar. They’re standing up to big industries who are profiting at the expense of our children and grandchildren. They’re not alone. I mean, the president’s cancer panel has warned – I think it was in 2010 – the president that cellphone radiation is a potential public health risk and a great one for the 21st century.

The World Health Organization has classified cellphone radiation a possible carcinogen. The American Academy of Pediatrics had spoken out about this. They wrote a letter to the FCC in 2013 and they said “children are not little adult and they’re not disproportionately impacted by environmental exposures including cellphone radiation.”

They went on to say “current FCC standards do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children. It is essential that any new standard for cellphones or other devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable population.”

They also asked for the FCC to provide “meaningful consumer disclosures.” And that’s exactly what we’re doing.

And also, the government accountability office in 2012 issued a report on this called ‘Exposure & Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should be Re-assessed.” And this is an important point.

What they said is, “The FCC has not re-assessed its test requirements to ensure that they identified the maximum RF exposure a user could experience. Some consumers may use mobile phones against the body, which the FCC does not currently test and could result in RF energy exposure higher than the FCC limit.”

So the FCC and the manufacturers are not currently testing these phones as used and that’s where these disclosures are coming from. So the public needs to know this.

DEBRA: Absolutely.

ELLEN MARKS: And yes, what Dr. West said is so important. Many women, young women, young mothers who are busy with their kids and need their hands are putting their cellphones in their bra.

If this is true (and it sounds like there is a correlation), people need to know. We can’t wait until it’s too late like we did with [inaudible 00:34:18], like we did with smoking.

So it’s very important information that Dr. West shared with you. But also, he did this case series with Dr. Lisa Bailey…

Wendy: And before you tell us about that, we need to go to break and we’ll have more time when we come back.

ELLEN MARKS: Okay. Okay, great. Thank you.

Wendy: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And today, we’re talking about cellphones and breast cancer and other types of cancer, other dangers and my guest is Ellen Marks. She’ll be back with us. We also have on Dr. West. She’ll be back after the break and we’ll talk more about this.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Ellen Marks and we’re talking about the new Berkeley “Right to Know” ordinance for customers to know what is – I don’t want to say ‘a safe distance’ because I’m not sure that – I mean, there’s a warning, but I’m not sure that it’s actually safe. It’s probably safer to use it at this distance.

But you know, I was thinking, I’m still hearing Dr. West’s words at the end of his segment when he was saying, “Once you find out about that it causes cancer and that you’ve been using this phone, what are you supposed to do?” My only solution that I know – I only know two things. One is to use some kind of device like a Pong case to reduce the amount of radiation and number two is to just not use a cellphone.

I mean, I don’t know how old you are, but I can remember when we didn’t have cellphones. I can remember when we didn’t have answering machines. You had to be there. Yeah, I’m a hundred years old.

ELLEN MARKS: That’s true. I was just telling my 28-year old daughter that the other day, how when I was a young teenager, we actually call our friends and if they weren’t home, it just rang and rang. We didn’t even have an answering machine.

DEBRA: That’s right.

ELLEN MARKS: But this technology is not going to go away and we need to be realistic about that. I do agree with you that I don’t think that they’re safe. The FCC limits do not protect us from the reality of them. They only protect us from the thermal damage that’s possibly being done and not from the non-thermal damage.

The science, thousands of studies have shown that damage is being done to us by this radiation, by this non-ionizing radiation at non-thermal levels, levels far below the FCC standard. So the reality is even keeping it at a small distance, while it’s better, is it safe? No, it’s not safe.
So people, I don’t think we need to abandon the technology. As I’ve said before, it’d be great if the industry would step up to the problem and release the patents they have on safer equipments. In the interim, I think we just need to learn unfortunately and have government warn us or advice us of the fact that the phones are not being tested to our bodies and that this language is in the manuals and we need to find an alternative. We need to keep them off, we shouldn’t be sleeping with them on. I think it’s 87% of teenagers sleep with them underneath their pillow at night. They want to get their text messages. They use it as their alarm clock. They need to know that this shouldn’t be happening.

DEBRA: Yeah, I think that there’s a false sense that people think that cellphones are safe and they just use them for everything. I know a number of people who don’t even have a landline. And so if they’re going to talk on the phone, they’re always talking on their cellphone.

I don’t do that. I have a landline and I give people my cellphone number, but I say, “Do not call me on my cellphone because I do not spend time talking on my cellphone. I just use it for emergencies or if I’m traveling. When I’m out, I carry out with me in my purse or I leave it in my car when I’m driving around or something like that in case – because sometimes, I do need to have – in the States, you need to have a phone when you’re out because there’s no such thing as a payphone anymore. Remember pay phones? Remember phone booths?

ELLEN MARKS: Yeah. Now, they’re turning them into wireless hotspots.

DEBRA: Yeah.

ELLEN MARKS: So I agree with you and unfortunately, there’s many people though who use this for business reasons. I will tell you a personal story. My husband is unfortunately someone who has been affected by this. He has a brain tumor that has been attributed more likely than not to his cellphone use. Thankfully, he’s doing well and he’s still working and he’s in the real estate industry. If he didn’t have a cellphone, he’d be out of business. He wouldn’t be able to earn a living. They’d be on to the next person.

So what he does is he never holds it to his head. He never keeps it on in a pocket or anywhere on his body. He doesn’t sleep with it at night. We keep them in another room at night. We don’t have wi-fi in our house. So he’s learned the hard way that he needed to make changes.

Until the industry does something to stop war gaming this and to fess up to the fact that there is a problem, then we need to make the changes ourselves. And that’s why with what Berkeley is doing, we are trying to raise awareness that there is an issue, that cellphones are not safe as they are used. They’re not meant to be held in the bra, not meant to be held in a pants pocket in the front or back.

There was just a scientific study that came out the other day that colon cancers are in the rise in 20- to 34-year olds, which is very unusual. They did not find the reason. They didn’t correlate cellphone use, but my colleagues are wondering about this and hope that there will be more research.

So we need to find alternatives. And it’s funny what you said because some of the manuals even go as far as to say, “Limit your use.”

DEBRA: Wow!

ELLEN MARKS: People don’t know that. A lot of people in Berkeley do not have landlines. You’re absolutely right. They’re quite expensive and they’ve given it up. They figured if they have a cellphone, they don’t need a landline.

And by the way, I don’t know if you’re familiar with this, but cordless home phones are probably as injurious as cellphones. The base station emit the same radiations.

So we try to tell people to use a corded landline. That’s what I’m on right now and it’s probably what you’re on.

DEBRA: That is what I’m on. And I’ll tell you, I had an EMF expert. Actually, I had a whole class of consultants who are being trained in this ‘come to my house’ and all of them measured the EMFs all over my house and the number place where the EMFs were most strongly emitting was in my cordless phone sitting maybe two feet away from where I sit all day long.

And when they showed me the levels, I went straight into the outside garbage and I went and bought a corded landline and that was it. I have never used one since.

ELLEN MARKS: You and I think a lot because I also have an RF device that measures RF. And I had cordless home phones. And when I realized what they were doing, what they measured (they were very high), I threw them away.

DEBRA: Very high.

ELLEN MARKS: My husband said, “You’re selling those. You’re giving them away, right?” I said, “No, they’re going in the garbage.”

DEBRA: No. Mine went in the garbage and you know, people sleep with them right next to their bed all night. It goes right through the wall. The wall doesn’t keep the radiation from going through into another room.

ELLEN MARKS: Exactly!

DEBRA: And so I agree with you that it would be unrealistic to think that we’re never going to use this technology. I mean, I know that sometimes – like especially when I travel, I have to have a cellphone because if I’m traveling to a media event, the television show has to be able to reach me on the celphone.

ELLEN MARKS: Exactly!

DEBRA: And so people expect that you’re going to have that, but that doesn’t mean that you have to be using it in the least, responsible way – or the most irresponsible way, I want to say. And we certainly can reduce our exposure. And everything that we do, it’s like with toxic chemicals we’ve talked about on this show, the more you can do to reduce your exposure, the better off you’re going to be. And the more that you can reduce the amount that you use your cellphone, the better off you’re going to be. The more you can do to protect yourself, the more you do to reduce your exposure.

And that’s why this ordinance is so important. I think this ordinance should be in every city around the world.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, that is our goal.

DEBRA: Yeah.

ELLEN MARKS: And the way that the Professor Lessig wrote this, it’s so minimal that we hope that it will stand up in court because this industry is despicable, they probably will sue. He wrote in a manner which will stand up in court and we will take this across the nation.
DEBRA: Yes.

ELLEN MARKS: And it’s a start. Berkeley was the first study in California to enact second-hand smoking legislation years ago and look where we are now. So we’ve come a long way with that and hopefully, this is the beginning and we’ll take off across the nation and eventually, it will be more.

DEBRA: Well, even if it doesn’t pass and there is no ordinance, the fact that you’re talking about it, the fact that we’re having this show today (and I know you’ll continue to get as much media attention as you can on this), people are hearing this and they’re getting educated.

ELLEN MARKS: Absolutely!

DEBRA: And that’s the whole point, for people to know.

ELLEN MARKS: Many of my colleagues, they say even if it does not pass (which we hope it does), it’s not a loss because we are getting media attention – and thank you for this. And we are getting the word out there.

And people want to be educated. We recently released the movie called Mobilize about this and we’ve shown it on some college campuses and it won an award for best documentary at the recent film festival. People really want this information. This is the ubiquitous device their children are using and sleeping with. It’s 24/7.

So they really want this information. The public wants it and needs it.

DEBRA: Well, I’m so glad that you’re doing this.

ELLEN MARKS: Well, thank you.

DEBRA: And as I said at the beginning of the show, the way I found out about you was that you and others did a protest for including warning labels on phones in San Francisco, in southern San Francisco. I think that that’s brilliant and brave and we need more, more people standing out to say what are the dangers of cellphones and other toxic products and things that are affecting our health in a negative way.
How can we see the movie, Mobilize? Is it on the website someplace?

ELLEN MARKS: It is available on Vimeo. We also have the DVDs and people can contact me. Can I give you an email?

DEBRA: Sure!

ELLEN MARKS: Okay, it’s CABTA@EllenKMarks.com. I can tell them how to get the video and we are also interested in showing it across the nation. If groups wants this shown, we can do that and we can have just speakers there.

DEBRA: Good! So that’s all the time we have for today. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and get all the information on all the speakers, all the guests that are on today.

This show will be transcribed. It will be available next Tuesday. So if you just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, look up the show and you’ll be able to read the transcripts and share it with your friends and let everybody know about this issue.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well!

Carolina Morning

Go beyond organic with a bed system that uses a unique combination of natural materials to optimize the body’s regenerative energy during rest and sleep. Pieces include a futon made of supportive (yet resilient) organic kapok/wool, modular platform bedframe, buckwheat pillows, organic kapok pillows, supportive pillows for reading in bed, eye pillows, and body pillows. They also make a quantum calming mat that enhances deep rejuvenative sleep, protects from EMFs and cell phone radiation, increases body circulation, protects from pests (bedbugs, mold, dust mites, fleas), provides ‘grounding’ similar to walking barefoot on the earth, and much more (recommended for home use and travel). All are manufactured in their small factory in the mountains of North Carolina.

Visit Website

Fewer Chemicals Make Healthier Babies

 steven-gilbert-2Toxicologist Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, a regular guest who is helping us understand the toxicity of common chemicals we may be frequently exposed to. Dr. Gilbert is Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and author of A Small Dose of Toxicology- The Health Effects of Common Chemicals.He received his Ph.D. in Toxicology in 1986 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, is a Diplomat of American Board of Toxicology, and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington. His research has focused on neurobehavioral effects of low-level exposure to lead and mercury on the developing nervous system. Dr. Gilbert has an extensive website about toxicology called Toxipedia, which includes a suite of sites that put scientific information in the context of history, society, and culture. www.toxipedia.org

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH STEVEN G. GILBERT, PhD, DABT

 

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Fewer Chemicals Make Healthier Babies

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Dr. Steven G. Gilbert PhD

Date of Broadcast: November 12, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today is Wednesday, November 12th. This year is going by so fast. It’s almost Thanksgiving and almost Christmas, I can’t believe it.
Anyway, today, we’re going to be talking about babies and children and conception and toxic chemicals, how toxic chemicals affect life from the very beginning.

My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is ToxiPedia.org. I have him on every month because he just has so much information. He’s the author of a book called A Small Dose of Toxicology, which you can download for free at his website or you can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click on the cover of his book you’ll see there and it’ll take you right to the page where you can download it.
So hello, Dr. Gilbert.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Hi. How are you doing, Debra?

DEBRA: I’m doing well. How are you doing?

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Very good. We’re having a beautiful day in Seattle. It’s fairly sunny out and my solar power system is churning almost 4000 watts of power, which I’m hoping is reducing the need for coal-fired utility plants in the Washington state.

DEBRA: I’m hoping so too. Bravo for you for doing that.

So, all life depends on reproduction and development. I mean, if I get sick as an adult, then maybe toxic exposures are affecting me for the rest of my life. But when toxic chemicals affect the life at the beginning, at reproduction and development, then the child is affected for their entire life from the beginning.

I think that we’re seeing in our world today that children have illnesses and health problems that children never had before and that they’re having them in greater numbers and we know that they’re being exposed to toxic chemicals. So that’s what we’re going to talk about today.
So where would you like to begin with this?

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: I’d actually like to start off with a little bit of ethics because I think we have an ethical responsibility to ensure that our children grow and develop at an environment where they can reach and maintain their full potential.

DEBRA: I agree.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: And we are exposed to thousands of chemicals. Reports vary, but the report from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology says that a pregnant woman is exposed to like 43 chemicals and the child is exposed to that.

So I think we have a real obligation to be very deliberate about bringing children into the world and to think pre-conception. So plan pregnancies very carefully from pre-conception through pregnancy and development and post-natally.

There are a lot of things that go on during that period of time and we’re exposed to a lot of chemicals. So it’s really important to try to reduce our chemical exposure to ensure that children can reach and maintain their full potential.

There are many places we can start. We can start with a little bit of history or we can…

DEBRA: Let’s start with a little bit of history.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: The history is really important because initially, fetal development is concerned with growth malformations. For example, there’s a conjoined twin figurine discovered in Turkey at 6500 B.S. So there was a concern about malformation a long time ago. Drawings of twins were discovered in Australia 4000 B.C. In 2000 B.C., the Tablet of Nineveh described 62 malformations that might predict the future.

And unfortunately, the 15th and 16th century were very tumultuous times. Malformations were considered to be caused by the devil and both mother and child were killed. Thank goodness we’ve moved beyond that.

DEBRA: Yes.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: But they’re really looking at and just trying to understand what environmental agents cause developmental difficulties, development malformations. It was not until the 1940s where Josef Warkany worked on these issues.

And I think that there’s another really good examples that we understood this. These gross malformations they were concerned about gradually evolved so that presently, we’re much more concerned about the effects on target organs or effects on developing nervous system or potential for agent exposure early in life that cause cancer later in life.

One example of malformations that really opened up changes in regulation and our understanding of chemical exposures in the 1960s (actually, in 1956) was thalidomide. Some of your listeners would be familiar with thalidomide because it was always consumed in pregnancy. During organogenesis, when the limbs are developing, it causes phocomelia, foreshortening of the arms – a very tragic consequence.

Fortunately, in the United States, the FDA did not release this drug into wide circulation because of a woman named Frances Kelsey. It was a really important move on her part, very good. She looked at the data. That was unfortunately released in Europe and Australia.

But this is really an eye-opening, really startling development because it changed the rules and regulations. There was a lot more testing of chemicals consumed with these drugs for this period of time.

In 1950s, we had mercury. We learned that from [inaudible 00:06:21], that the placenta is not a barrier to these chemicals and the fetus is exposed to many chemicals during pregnancy, that the mercury caused many malformations as well as total changes in neural development.

That was really the major development. That placenta was not a barrier to many chemicals as it was once thought to be to protect the fetus.

And mercury is a great example. Actually, the fetus has a higher concentration of mercury than the mom does. So the fetus actually [inaudible 00:06:52] for mercury. And this is so true and we need to be very conscious even now of the fish we consume because of mercury put out in the environment.

DEBRA: I didn’t know that.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Alcohol was really [inaudible 00:07:03] until the ‘70s. We really looked at fetal alcohol syndrome in the 1970s. It really showed that alcohol had dramatic effects on development.

DEBRA: So there’s I think different time period and different ways that the fetus can be affected going back to the changes in DNA from mutagenic chemicals. And then there are chemicals that the mother would be exposed to during pregnancy. Would you explain those differences?

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: So if you look at the developmental timeline, the different organ systems develop at different times. The central nervous system is really developing pretty much throughout gestation. But during different periods, there are different peaks in system development where the gonads develop at different times from the auditory system to the visual system, from the organs that develop.

So you look at these different things, you can make some guesses of what might be affected given exposure to chemicals. Thalidomide was very vulnerable as to a child’s organ system or limb systems were developing. This was a really critical window of development.

A lot of testing of drugs and for example some pesticides really took advantage of that so that during animal tests, they do have certain windows of development to look at potential for malformation. So this is a very critical period.

But really, you want to make sure you start thinking about pre-conception because you want to reduce the amount of chemicals in your body prior to conceiving a child so that those chemicals will not affect the child during those windows of development.

DEBRA: I completely agree with that. And so I think it’s a good idea, not only young women, but also young men who are about to be in child-bearing age to really pay attention to this issue.

I think that so many people in that age group are not focused on their health so much because they’re young and they’re feeling good and yet, this is exactly the time when they should be concerned, so that they don’t get a build-up of the toxic chemicals or they should be doing things to detox their bodies like remove heavy metals and things like that well before it’s time for them to conceive.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Absolutely! You’re absolutely right, Debra. You want to make sure both males and females are looking at it. It’s not just women’s responsibility. Men should be there helping having good nutrition, the household. They need to be thinking about nutrition and then thinking about development prior to thinking about getting pregnant. So pregnancy should be well-planned.

And this is just a sign of the times. We have 80,000 chemicals in commerce. We have over 3000 chemicals produced, over a million pounds a year. We’re exposed to a wide range of chemicals from methylmercury to lead to pesticides to endocrine-disruptors like bisphenol a and other chemicals.

We really have to be more thoughtful and deliberate about making sure that we are consuming good, nutritious food or wash our hands, take our shoes of when we come to the home and really be thoughtful about trying to reduce exposures to developing organisms.

DEBRA: Good! We need to go to break. But when we come back, we’ll talk more about the kinds of chemicals that can be affecting our future children at different times in their development.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert PhD. I think this is so important because this is the future of human Homo Sapiens. It’s the future of Homo Sapiens. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. He’s been on many times on the show because he has so much to tell us. His website is ToxiPedia.org. There’s so much information on the website. He really looks at toxic chemicals not only from a toxicity viewpoint, but historically, what’s going on, social implications. He’s just got them from every angle.
You should download his book called A Small Dose of Toxicology, which is just I think the best introduction to toxicology written in a very easy to assimilate way.

Dr. Gilbert, before we go on about how the babies are affected, let’s just talk about infertility for a minute because that’s maybe at the beginning, the first thing that toxic chemicals do, prevent conception at all.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, that’s a good point. There has been a decrease of fertility in general. And this is both due to changes in males and females. Some data say that impaired fertility have increased between 1982 and 2002 from 8.4% to 11.8% in women – so a huge change in that. In men, the sperm motility has changed. [inaudible 00:15:09] has increased and the number of sperm available for conception has also decreased in males.

So this is a very serious issue. Some of these can be laid on endocrine-disrupting chemicals that affect reproductive organ systems. This is a really important aspect of fertility and making sure we can’t conceive. It really drives couples into infertility clinics and much more anxiety and stress about conceiving a child.

So it’s very serious and I think we need to look at prevention. I think prevention is the keyword here. You want to prevent exposure to chemicals that are unnecessary. I just wanted to say that you really got to be thinking about planning your pregnancy ahead of time to reduce chemical exposure with these pesticides and metals or endocrine-disrupters such as phthalates or flame retardants.

We’ve just inundated our environment with chemicals that are not conducive to ensure that a child can reach and maintain their full potential.
I’ll just give you a little more statistics there.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Autism has increased from 6.4/1000 to 11.4/thousand between 2002 and 2008. Hypospadia, which is a malformation of the penis, this is really an important one. It increased from 20/10,000 to 37/10,000 between 1970 and 1993 and this will continue to go up.

So we’ve got lots of data to show that we have our reproductive/environmental issues. This is one of the potential causes, because we are exposed to a lot more chemicals than we were before.

DEBRA: Wow! These numbers are just – you know, while you were talking about how we need to reduce our exposure, what flashed in my mind was a science fiction movie – I mean, just an imaginary one, not one that I’ve ever seen, but a science fiction movie where the storyline would be that there’s a clinic where the parents have to go and undergo extreme detox before the government allows them to reproduce.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah.

DEBRA: That’s what’s going on now.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: It is!

DEBRA: I mean, not that the government is limiting reproduction, but the thing is that we are in that situation where seriously, people do need to remove the toxic chemicals from their bodies before they conceive because the chances of having problems, whether they’re extreme problems or more subtle problems, the chances of having problems if you get pregnant today is very, very high. It’s very high.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, it surely has increased. And you know, there are some conditions during pregnancy that cause these problems too. I just want to mention caffeine for a minute.

DEBRA: Sure.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: We’ve talked about caffeine before. Caffeine is a wildly consumed drug. And during pregnancy, actually, your metabolism caffeine actually decreases. So [inaudible 00:18:07] caffeine, it’s usually around three to four hours. It usually metabolize very quickly. But during the second and third trimester of pregnancy, its metabolism slows down, so the [inaudible 00:18:18] of caffeine increase to seven to eight hours. So you’re increasing the amount of exposure to caffeine and the length of time for exposure.

So we metabolize caffeine, which is 1-3-7 trimethylxanthine metabolized to a dimethylxanthine and this distributes to our total body water. So the fetus is actually swimming in caffeine that’s metabolized during development.

I think that one thing to remember is that there’s a lot of change during pregnancy – respiration increases, blood volume increases, urine output increases. There are a lot of very subtle changes that can increase exposure and increase potential toxicity compounds.

The gut changes, so a woman that’s pregnant will absorb more lead than when they’re not pregnant. So when they’re not pregnant, they absorb about 10% of lead because lead substitutes for calcium. During pregnancy, they’ll absorb about 50% of that lead.

So there’s some really important change that occur that you have to be aware of, which just argues again for trying to reduce exposure to chemicals.

DEBRA: I remember a few years ago (I’m sure you know this study that was done by Environmental Working Group) where they measured the chemicals in – I think it was the umbilical cord blood of babies never born…

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Right.

DEBRA: They found all these chemicals that the baby had gotten from the mother. At the time when that study came out, I remember thinking, “Oh! Well, this is now a new occurrence” until I read Silent Spring (which I didn’t read in 1964, I was only nine years old or something, but I read three or four years ago). And when I read that book, there was something in there about how they knew in 1944 that toxic chemicals, particularly pesticides, DDT and things like that were already ubiquitous in the environment, that they were already in the blood of penguins in the North Pole and things like that.

And so I kind of put two and two together and realized that when I was born after 1944, I was already one of those babies who had a mother who had toxic chemicals in her blood and I was already one of those babies that was – I mean, who knows? She was probably drinking coffee too. I know she wasn’t drinking alcoholic beverages, but I know she drank coffee.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah.

DEBRA: And who knows what else she was being exposed too. While she was pregnant, she was working in a little shop in downtown Oakland, California right there on a busy street with lots of car exhaust and all that car exhaust was coming in her shop all day long while she was pregnant with me.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, that car exhaust during that period of time would have lead in it as well as other things. And you bring up car exhausts, that’s particulate matter. There had been numerous studies that show that inhalation of particulate matter, particularly lower income people that lived along highways are more vulnerable to exposure to these chemicals.

Pumping gasoline, for example, during pregnancy or if you’re thinking about getting pregnancy, you just stop pumping gasoline. Just ask somebody else to do that because that gasoline has polyurethane or hexanes in it and other benzene, other solvents that are hazardous to developing organisms…

DEBRA: We need to go to break.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: You always need to be thinking about what you might be exposed to…

DEBRA: Wait, wait, wait. Wait, wait, wait, wait. We have to go to break. We have to go to break. Otherwise, the commercial is going to start playing right over you. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. When we come back, we’ll have more from Dr. Steven Gilbert who has so much to tell us about this subject. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is ToxiPedia.org. If you go there, you can sign up for his newsletter, which I just received during the break and the very first story is about Dr. Gilbert being on Toxic Free Talk Radio and it lists all his past shows too. Thank you very much for that.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: You’re welcome. I think you’re doing a great service with what you’re providing, Debra.

DEBRA: Thank you. Thank you very much. My cellphone is ringing. Anyway, I have to turn this off, so it doesn’t ring. That was such a surprise because my cellphone never rings. Okay, so my cellphone is off now. It’s a fair distance away from me.

So, let’s go on with what you were saying before the break.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: We were talking a little about DDT and other similar chemicals like that, some of the older pesticides. I think the important thing about DDT is it’s stored in the fat in the body. And during pregnancy, you mobilize that fat because a kid is really a giant source of need for energy.

And post-natally, if you’re breastfeeding the child, you’re mobilizing more fat. When you mobilize that fat, you mobilize compounds that are dissolved in the fat especially like DDT, PCDs. And those are in very small amount in the breast milk, but the kid is very small, so it’s a big dose. So if it’s a small exposure, but big dose based on their body weight.

And there’s another example if we were thinking about pre-conception is reduced intake of any source of these chemicals. This also goes phthalate, these endocrine-disrupters, bromate, flame retardants, which are also storing fat. So it’s just a wide range of chemicals that unfortunately, we have to be conscious of because we spread them around the environment and not done a good job of regulating potentially harmful exposures.

DEBRA: Would you just give an overview? I’m looking on – there’s a page on ToxicPedia.org where you talk about pregnancy and development and you list the chemicals. What I want you to do is give some more details about some of the major ones, but let’s just go over the list so that people have an overview and then we’ll get more details about some of them. So do you want to go over and tell people what they are?

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, there’s a wide range of chemicals. For example, we touched a little bit on methylmercury. You got to worry about methylmercury because it shows up in fish. Some fish has higher concentrates of methylmercury – some tuna fish, sharks, swordfish. The high-end food eaters in the ocean that has more methylmercury in their body than other fish.

You really want to consume fish. Fish is really important because it’s a really important source of protein, but it’s also potentially a hazard to developing organs.

So you want to consume fish that are low in mercury such as scallops. You can get a list of these things on a variety of websites about what fish should be consumed.

And mercury is really a compound that we added in coal and coal-fired utility plants. It produce mercury into the environment, then mercury turns into methylmercury, absorbed and moved up the food chain. So it’s bioconcentrate and biomagnified in fish in particular when we consume that.

So mercury is one of them. Solvents are a big deal. For example, gasoline. But there’s also solvents in cosmetic products and cleaners. So it’s very important to be conscious of what cleaning agents and cosmetics are being used.

And I think this also speaks to what we don’t know that is in lot of our products. I very strongly feel that we have the right to know what chemicals we’re being exposed to off of the ingredients. They’re not listed in these products. For example, a lot of fragrances will have phthalates as carriers to the fragrance in the product. So you have to be very careful of exposure to things like that.

DEBRA: One of the products that I think people are not aware as an exposure of solvents is permanent ink markers. They’re just sold all over the place and they’re advertised. If you can smell the marker, it’s got a solvent in it. It used to be that just professional artist markers were that way, but now, just most of the markers that are sold – you really have to look to find one that isn’t a solvent-based marker.

And so that’s just something that probably everybody has in their house except for me because I know this. Most people just buy those markers and they don’t think twice about it. And especially if you’re pregnant or if you want to get pregnant, don’t buy those markers.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, that’s a great example of simple, little products that you want to avoid. And by and large, you want to avoid things with fragrances in them because they have carriers like phthalates in them.

So it really is a matter of trying to reduce overall. I think it’s good for general health to just reduce the chemicals that we’re exposed to and try to choose products with the fewest chemicals in them.

I think there’s more availability on websites for that. The Environmental Working Group has got a lot of information, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACON). They have that great report, ACOG. My website has got materials. You can download the chapter on pregnancy and development as a PDF file as well as a Powerpoint presentation that summarizes a lot of these information.

So there’s a lot of good information out there and we got to just continue to be aware to try to eat organic food. Pesticides, there’s 1.2 billion – I just read on a site now – 1.2 billion pounds of ingredients and pesticides that are used in the United States in 2001. I’m sure that’s gone up. And this does not address the inert ingredients, the carriers.

So it’s important to try to reduce the use of pesticides. Some of the [inaudible 00:32:37] have actually banned the cosmetic use of pesticides. I would go along with that. I don’t think pesticides should be used in home environment. There are alternatives to that [inaudible 00:32:47] pest management.

So we need to pick past and reduce exposure and to reduce the use of coal, for example and shipping of coal. We’ve talked about that with mercury.

But how do we, in general, reduce our immediate use of chemicals in our daily lives?

DEBRA: Well that, there’s a lot of information on my website and in these Toxic Free Talk Radio interviews about just that thing. I know that sometimes, we can start thinking that, “Well, what are the specific chemicals that cause harm that we need to be watching out for?” I actually gave up that thinking a long time ago because as I started researching the health effects of these chemicals, these chemicals are affecting every body system. And so you just need to be reducing them, every chemical that you can overall.

And of course, there are some that are very specific. I think that pregnant women and women who want to become pregnant should watch out for those specifically like the heavy metals and the pesticides. I mean, even if all you did was eat organic food, that would reduce it a lot. Even if all you did was do something to remove the heavy metals from your body, that would help a lot.

But these things, everybody should be doing them. I would say across the board, if you want to get pregnant, if you are pregnant, mother or father, you need to do this. You just need to do this. Of all the segments of the population where it’s important, I think this is the one.

We need to go to break now, but we’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert from ToxiPedia.org and we’re talking about how toxic chemicals affect children before they’re even born, before they’re even conceived. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert. He’s the author of A Small Does of Toxicology. You can get that at his website, ToxiPedia.org. You can download it for free and also see all the other incredible information. He’s got so much information on his website that really put toxics in perspective.

Dr. Gilbert, what about x-rays for women who are pregnant or want to become pregnant?

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Well, x-rays are important to be used. But also, if you’re thinking about getting pregnant, you definitely do not want to expose you to x-rays or the energy from x-rays. There’s lots of data that show that they’re potentially harmful.

So that’s another reason to be deliberate. You go to the dentist’s office and get an x-ray, you really want to be careful with that to make sure you have your protection or to make sure your dental visits are preconception and post-delivery of the child.

So I think it’s very important to be thinking about that. It’s another good reason to be conscious and make your pregnancy deliberate.

I also want to mention, we went through a lot of [inaudible 00:39:55] on the individual, but I think also, we need to have better chemical policy reform. We need a better overview of this information, so we have transparency.

We have laws that are broken like TSCA, Toxic Substance Control Lab. I urge your listeners to engage their politicians and encourage them to enact legislation that guarantees we have access to information and guarantees and look into the safety of these chemicals we’re exposed to and make sure we’re not exposed to the wide range of chemicals we are, that we are exposed to only chemicals that we need and are the least toxic chemicals possible.

I think it’is very important to address this problem from a regulatory standpoint, from broad government perspective like banning bisphenol a in other products, from baby toys and things that could be used for babies like water bottles and things like that. So we need to look at this broadly as well as individually.

DEBRA: I completely agree. Did you see the article that was just in this week about how the European Union is wanting to ban this phenol a and they’re getting all this opposition from…

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah.

DEBRA: Talk about that because I think that this is – I mean, it’s all well and good to say that the government should do this. And I agree. But it’s so difficult for the government to do it if all the sectors aren’t aligned around this. And I really don’t understand why people just across the board can’t understand, “This is a toxic chemical, we shouldn’t be using it.”

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, it’s a very frustrating problem. It’s very frustrating for the United States. They’re not taking more leadership in this. Europe has a program called REACH and they’ve been more aggressive about trying to ban chemicals, they’ve done more work on endocrine-disrupters; bisphenol a is one of them.

There’s many use of bisphenol a. It’s produced in billions of pounds per year. It’s used in all kinds of products and plastics. That’s a primary use of them.

It’s also in cash registry receipts. And if you’re in pregnancy, don’t touch the cash registry receipts. Just stay away from them. I try to keep my granddaughters away from cash registry receipts. I go that far. We’re trying to reduce exposure to them. One of my grandchildren like to put things in her mouth. I’m constantly, “Do not put plastics in your mouth.”

So little things like that that are really important. Bisphenol a, we just don’t need to use it in the volumes that we use it. There are certainly some good uses for it. But I really commend what’s going on in Europe where they take a more precautionary approach. The precautionary approach is the industry needs to demonstrate safety.

Now, in the United States, the burden is on the government (which is us) to demonstrate harm instead of industry demonstrating safety because of these industrial chemicals that we’re being exposed to.

So we need to turn it around. We have a very precautionary approach putting new drugs on the market where they go through live testing. We use a consumer approach to industrial chemicals that are widely used and we’re exposed to.

DEBRA: I think that would be wonderful. I just would like to see – you know, I’ll pat myself on the back and say I’ve done a pretty good job over the years of reducing my own chemical exposure and being able to identify toxic chemicals that are in consumer products, but it’s so difficult because companies are not required to put on the label what they’re actual ingredients are. And so how are we supposed to know?

And when I first started doing this work 30 years ago, I had to go to industrial publications to find out what they were using because you can’t get it on the label. And then you can’t even know from product to product to product. So the best we can do is to find out — if we can find out if there’s toxic chemicals in it, then we can say, “Yes, there’s a toxic chemical, so let’s not use this one even if we don’t know everything that’s in it” or we can go to the other extreme and say, “It’s certified organic” or something like that where we’re being told that there are no toxic chemicals in it.

But what we need is this across-the-board, we need the information about what is in the product, so that as consumers, we get to make a choice and we don’t have that. Even if none of the chemicals were banned, if we had the information, I think it would change the marketplace because I think that if people really knew what was in a product and they could go look it up and find out what are the toxic effects, that they would not buy these products.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, I agree, Debra. I think that would be a huge step in the right direction. It would make a lot more transparency over what chemicals are in what products and how much of those chemicals and more deliberate use of these chemicals.

I think this also comes back to the environmental justice issue. It’s really discouraging to me that people with low income have a tough time buying food that’s organic, that is more expensive. We really got to subsidize the right products. So we’re not subsidizing the corn syrup and large soda drinks and things like that. We need to be subsidizing the right kinds of food and ensuring that people have a healthy start to life.

DEBRA: Right! I so agree, I so agree. Well, we only have about five minutes left out of the show so I want to make sure that you get to say anything else that you’d like to say that you haven’t yet said.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Well, I just want to emphasize again being deliberate about pregnancy. For example, alcohol consumption. You really want to be deliberate because if you don’t know you’re pregnant, you might consume alcohol (in a lot of states now, marijuana is legal). So what are the effects of alcohol or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana?

So you really want to be conscious of bringing a child into the world so it can reach and maintain their full potential. That means creating an environment that has the fewest chemical exposure possible and being really thoughtful about all that.

As I remember, alcohol is one of the most highly consumed drugs and it produces fetal alcohol effect and fetal alcohol syndrome, which is a more dramatic effect. But fetal alcohol effect is low level exposure and it causes neurodevelopmental disorders.

But I think the other thing I just want to emphasize is that it is about timing and dose response. We’ve studied more chemicals as we’ve developed. We learned that very small doses like bisphenol a, there are subtle effects to small doses exposure to these chemicals. So it’s not just consuming a large amount, it’s very low level exposure to these chemicals.

And be conscious of the fish you eat. Try to eat fish that are lower in mercury and look for the labels on that, look for advice from the government and other agencies, some of the non-governmental agencies that provide advice on fish consumption.

And I just want to touch too on workplace exposures. A lot of people working, for example, at nail salons – very important. Cosmetics that are used in those, nail polish and nail removers, they have solvents in them.

So it’s very important to be thinking about your occupational exposure, what chemicals you might bring home from working in an industrial environment. You’ve got lead on your clothing and track at home – so your lead exposure to workplace, solvent exposure in the workplace. So it’s very important to be thinking about workplace exposures.

DEBRA: You know, when I go to the mall, you could smell those nail polish solvents all the way 50 feet away. And so even if you’re walking by the nail salon, you’re going to be breathing those chemicals.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: You could imagine what those people that are working in those nail salons are breathing. And that’s on an 8-hour work shift. They’re inhaling a lot of solvents from those.

Again, we need to know what’s in those solvents, what kind of solvents should be used, what chemicals are in the nail polishes and what we should be thinking about as far as exposure goes.

DEBRA: So if you’re pregnant or thinking of becoming pregnant, you shouldn’t go to a nail salon and get your nails done. In fact, you shouldn’t do your nails at home either because that’s a big source of…

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, I would say that too. And no alcohol consumption, no marijuana use and no cigarette smoking, really being thoughtful about that.

And we know a lot more about potential low level effects from epigenetics. Epigenetics is the study of those changes in the expression of DNA. We have a good mechanism of action for subtle changes that are detrimental to the child’s development.

Wendy: Good! Well, as always, this has been a very informative show. There’s just so much information to know and so much – I really think that people, to be alive today and to stay healthy, we all need to be toxicologists. We all need to understand where the chemicals are and how they can affect our bodies, so that we can make those proper choices. And that’s why…

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Go to your representatives. We need chemical policy reform.

Wendy: We do, we do. I totally agree. Okay! So, thank you so much for being with us.

DR. STEVEN GILBERT: Thank you, Debra.

Wendy: You’re welcome. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and all these shows are now being transcribed. It takes a few days to get them. But usually by Monday or Tuesday of the following week, I have the transcript up for the show. I already have a number of them already done. I’ve been doing it for a few weeks.

But also, if you have shows that you would like to get a transcript for, you can request – I have so many back ones to do, but you can request that back shows be transcribed sooner or later if you go to the website and see what they are.

Again, go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dad. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

Blue Indicator on Toothbrushes

Question from Annette Tweedel

Hi Debra,

I use the Oral B blue indicator toothbrush. Well I just did some research and found out that the blue indicator is a blue dye, Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Wouldn’t that be considered not healthy? Should I be looking for another toothbrush?

Debra’s Answer

Well, I looked up Coomassie Brilliant Blue dye and found out that it is not soluable in water, so it would pretty much stick to the material of the brush, which is probably nylon.

I prefer using natural bristle toothbrushes myself. That way there is no question about dyes.

galvanized steel

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I found some “rustproof galvanized steel” containers to use as storage/recycle bins. Do you think these are safe to use as storage containers (toys, clothes, or even dog food)?

Thank you!

Debra’s Answer

Galvanizing is the process of coating iron or steel with a thin layer of zinc to prevent the metal from rusting. There are two methods: “hot-dipped”, which consists of passing the continuous length of metal through a molten bath, followed by an air stream “wipe” that controls the thickness of the zinc finish; and “electro-galvanizing”, which fuses the zinc to the metal electrolytically.

I don’t see anything toxic about this. When I had a cat, I dumped the big bag of cat food into a small galvanized garbage can with a handle and a lid. It was perfect to keep it fresh.

Add Comment

Why Toxic Chemicals Continue to Be in Consumer Products

From Debra Lynn Dadd

An interesting article was released in Newsweek magazine this past week, about endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as bisphenol A (BPA).

“For the first time anywhere in the world, the Europe Union (EU) is attempting to regulate endocrine disrupting chemicals, setting down criteria to define, identify and, where necessary, ban EDCs. Already, this is sending shockwaves through boardrooms across the world because companies selling their goods in Europe will be forced by law to comply. Everyday goods may be taken off the market; industry could lose ­billions. The emphasis is on the word “could” because the fightback has already begun. Already a year over deadline, the procedure has finally gone to public consultation, where it has met with uproar.”

It very clearly describes what we consumers are up against. Over and over we ask, if there is scientific evidence that a chemical is toxic, why is it still allowed to be on the market? Isn’t the government protecting us?

Well, it seems that even when a government tries to protect us, there are other forces at work.

So we need to have a consumer voice that is even stronger.

Read more at Newsweek: Calls to Ban Toxic Chemicals Fall on Deaf Ears Around the World

Add Comment

Toxic Tuna

From Debra Lynn Dadd

We’ve known for a long time that tuna contains mercury.

This video from a CNN report shows the government now advises that pregnant women eat no more than 6 ounces of albacore tuna per week. The video also explains how mercury gets into tuna.

Mercury is a heavy metal. It gets stored in the body. Because it is difficult for the body to process mercury, it’s likely that mercury you ate in a tuna sandwich as a kid is still in your body. And every day mercury is added to your body from other sources as well.

This is one of the reasons why I continue to recommend PureBody Liquid Zeolite. It’s an easy and affordable way to remove mercury from your body.

Add Comment

Plywood

Question from Allison

Hi Debra,

Could you tell me which of these plywoods would be the safest to use inside my home?

Thanks so much!

www.homedepot.com/p/Unbranded-Sheathing-Plywood-Common-23-32-in-x-4-ft-x-8-ft-Actual-0-688-in-x-48-in-x-96-in-439614/100034683#customer_reviews

www.homedepot.com/p/Unbranded-Sanded-Plywood-Common-3-4-in-x-4-ft-x-8-ft-Actual-0-703-in-x-48-in-x-96-in-690053/100478798

Here’s the MSDS for the second kind: www.araucoply.com/_file/file_3982_msds%20araucoply.pdf

Debra’s Answer

I explained the difference in plywoods some years ago in Plywood Resins.

Both are made with exterior glue, which is less toxic than interior glue.

The second one looks to be of better quality and is made with sustainably harvested wood.

I would choose the second one myself.

Add Comment

EMR protection

    Question from SARA

    Hi Debra,

    Would you or your readers know of reputable companies that offer EMR protection products? Am specifically seeking EMR protection/mitigation while sleeping.

    Thank you for your help!

    Sara.

    Debra’s Answer

    Readers, what companies have you used and recommend?

    Add Comment

Detox As A Daily Routine

My guest today is Meghan Root, a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan. I like her site because she has good solid information about food, fitness, and detox, presented in a way that shows how she incorporates these principles in her daily life. She helps people create unique and customized routines that fit into busy schedules. “I prioritize creating healthy routines in my life that keep me organized and on track with my long term health goals. Having a plan and sticking to it the best way to remain in control of your health and wellness,” says Meghan. Her free ebook DIY Wellness outlines five fitness routines that you can customize for your own needs. www.BeMightyLikeMeghan.com.

read-transcript

 

 

meghan-transcript-1

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO Detox as a Daily Routine

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd Guest: Meghan Root

Date of Broadcast: November 6, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, November 6th and it’s a nice autumn day here in Clearwater, Florida. Not too cold, not too hot.

And of course, winter time is the most beautiful time in Florida. That is why people come down here from the north. We even have blossoming flowers in the middle of winter. This is actually when we start planting our vegetable gardens so that we have homegrown food over the winter and into the spring because in the summer time, it’s too hot to grow most. It just have exactly the opposite kind of weather from other parts of the country.

Anyway, today we’re going to talk about detox, which is one of my favorite subjects and we talk a lot about it on the show. But we’re going to talk about it from a little different perspective. We’re going to talk about it as a daily routine.

I got this idea from a young woman named Meghan Root who is our guest today. She’s a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan. I like her site because she’s got good, solid information about food, fitness and detox. What she does is she helps her readers, her clients create routines, wellness routines.

DIY-Wellness-transcriptShe has an ebook. You can go to her website and download it for free. Her ebook is called DIY Wellness. Her whole philosophy is that there are so many things that we can do to help ourselves be healthy. Just in our daily lives, we can be healthy and maintain our health and restore our health and an easy way to incorporate this and make sure that we get them in is by creating routines.

Her DIY Wellness book shows some of her routines and it really inspired me to take a look at what are my routines. I think we kind of fall into routines without being aware of them like what do you do every morning when you get up out of bed, what’s your morning routine or your morning ritual and did you choose that or did it just kind of happened?

We have control over what we do in our lives. By setting up routines, we can make the most healthful choices. So that’s what we’re going to be talking about today.

Hi, Meghan!

MEGHAN ROOT: Hi, how are you?

DEBRA: I’m good. How are you?

MEGHAN ROOT: I’m good. I’m so jealous of your lovely weather. It’s raining and windy and stormy in North Carolina right now. But I think it should clear up this afternoon, so we’re definitely looking forward to that.

DEBRA: Yes. Well, you’re having a North Carolina autumn and we’re having a Florida autumn.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yes, we are. Yes, we are.

DEBRA: Yes. So tell us how did you become so interested in fitness?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, I say this often when I started talking about it. I feel very lucky because it’s always been a part of my life. When I was younger, I was competitive in a variety of sports – gymnastics, swimming, triathlon, pole walking.

And so, it’s second nature for me to be active and it’s something that I have always prioritized. That became challenging as I got older. Of course, the days tend to go by faster and there’s little time for many of the things that we need to do.

But I’ve always been passionate about it. I love helping people. I love helping them make lasting changes in their health and wellness. And at the end of the day, that’s what gets me out of bed in the morning.

DEBRA: Well, I can really see that in your new website because everything that you’re talking about are things that people can actually do. They’re things that you do in your daily life. You show us how we can incorporate those things in our daily lives as well, which I think is a really important point.

I know that you mentioned that you’re fortunate that this was part of your life since you were a child. I know in my life that it wasn’t. I didn’t have a family that was fitness-oriented. I had P.E. class in school, but I was just really bored with it and didn’t like it. I think that as a child, nobody ever instilled that love of sports or playing games or running or walking or any of those things. It was never something that I was taught either by my family or in school. And so consequently, it’s really taken until late in my life recently that I’m understanding the importance of movement especially in relation to detox.

So how did you get interested then in the detox aspect of this?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, I had to stop and think about this because detox wasn’t something that – when I was in college, I could get away with murder when I was younger, a teenager with what I put in my body and how I treated it. I think that’s just part of being young. You can rebound that way.

And then when I got into college, I started to notice some things changing – how what I was eating and drinking were impacting my ability to perform as an athlete. And so I wasn’t willing to sacrifice my fitness level to the extent of what I was doing on a daily basis. I started focusing on my diet and the foods that I was eating and the quality of the foods that I was eating became very important.

But it wasn’t until after I graduated from college that I began to think about what does detox mean. There was a book that I read – and I don’t know why it resonated with me the way that it did. It was a book by Jillian Michaels called Master Your Metabolism. I wouldn’t classify her as a great resource on detox necessarily, but she has a 3-phase approach to getting a handle on your metabolism and really functioning in an efficient way. It’s the three R’s. It’s remove, restore and rebalance. It’s all about taking out the bad, so that you can put in the good and kind of rebalance your life with regards to the way you’re eating and your metabolismd on the importance of eliminating chemical exposure in terms of cleaners and detergents and beauty products.

DEBRA: Oh, good.

MEGHAN ROOT: She relates all of those things to the impact that toxic exposure can have specifically in your body’s metabolism. And at the time, it was so terrifying to me and then it just got even more terrifying when I realized how much an impact that those toxic products have on every single function of our bodies. And so that’s when I first started really learning about what it meant to remove these things and to detox as a part of my daily routine.

DEBRA: So have you done anything to remove your toxic chemical exposures in your daily life, the things you have done?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, yeah. So I do not use and traditional household cleaners. I’m a big fan of Ms. Myers products. But even before I grab a bottle of that, I’ll reach for lemon and vinegar and baking soda and things that you can find in your pantry. You don’t have to bleach everything and Lysol everything. You’re just exposing yourself to so much bad when you do that and it’s not necessary.

I’ve gone through and cleaned out my beauty products, my hair products. I’m really careful about what I use and put on my skin. I mean, your skin is the biggest organ in your body and to think that you’re smearing this toxic lotion on it every morning, it’s just absolutely terrifying that I’ve been doing that for years. And so I think you’ve got to look really carefully. It’s not just the food that you’re eating and the chemicals you’re using at home. It is your beauty products. You just have to look with an open mind everything that you’re doing.

DEBRA: It really is. I think that a lot of women your age – and I actually don’t know what your age is, but I think it’s younger than me.

MEGHAN ROOT: Just a couple of years.

DEBRA: How kind. But anyway, you’re at an age where I would call you a young woman. I think that you’re in your twenties or early thirties at the latest, but you’re not at a stage in life like I am and many other women and men too where you’re now getting to the age where your body is starting to have problems and you’re thinking about, “Well, how am I going to stay younger?” and things like that.

You’re doing things at an age where – I mean, you talked about the difference between your teen years and your college years, that you could already see that difference, but what I’m so impressed with is how well you’re thinking about these things at this point in your life, so that you could have an easier time of it and be more healthy when you get to be my age. And that’s such an important message for people. It’s such, such an important message.

We need to go to break, but we will be right back and talk more with Meghan Root. Her website is BeMightyLikeMeghan.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

meghan-transcript-2

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Meghan Root. She’s a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan. So Meghan, what is being mighty?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, I think it’s so many things. I think for me, it’s taking personal responsibility for your health and your wellness and your vitality because at the end of the day, nobody else is going to do it for you. It’s so easy to look away and to prioritize other parts of your life, but being mighty is owning your health and owning your wellness and doing it in a way that is positive and in a way that can impact others where other people look at you and they’re like, “Wow! You’re glowing. You look great. How do you do it?”

That, for me, is that. It’s owning my health and my wellness in a really positive way.

DEBRA: But that is such a different viewpoint than 99.999% of people in the world today have. I was just looking since I’ve been reading your website and talking to you and knowing you, I took a look the other day in my own life about how I do a lot of things to increase my health. In particularly, I have lived with toxic chemicals for more than 30 years. I got rid of them a long, long time ago and that impacts my health so much in a positive way.

But when it comes to other things, we have this idea (and I think we’re all kind of conditioned to this) of going to a doctor. And so I transitioned many years ago from going to a medical doctor to doing alternative kinds of health things that even now, even now, I have my own favorite alternative health doctor that I kind of give this health professional responsibility for my health.

You see what I’m saying? Even though I do individual things, I’m not saying – I mean, you really made a difference for me in terms of me having to look at myself and saying, “Where am I not taking responsibility for my health?”

And actually, just last week, I went through this whole thing where I said, “Wait a minute! I need to take more responsibility for my health even than I am” and I would say that I take so much more responsibility than people typically do. I just saw how little healthcare I would actually need and how little healthcare – we’re in a healthcare crisis in the world today.

But if one really took responsibility, all the things that we can do that if I really did them, then I would be even healthier than I am now. If I didn’t say, “Well, it’s okay if I don’t do this because then I can just go to my doctor and he can help fix it,” I just think that the full degree of responsibility that you take for your health is extraordinary and I highly admired it and you really inspired me with that.

MEGHAN ROOT: Thank you.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. I hope that you inspire a lot of other people in that regard. How did you come to have that viewpoint because it’s sort of visual?

MEGHAN ROOT: I think a lot of it as I have an aversion to – I think that there’s certainly a place in this world for doctors and there are times when you’ve got to go.

DEBRA: Like if you break your leg, you want to go to the doctor.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yes, yes. If I’ve broken something, yes, I would go. But I do think that the more reading that I’ve done over the years about the power of whole foods and the impact that they can have on your well-being, in your health, I mean it’s incredible to me!

I’ve made a lot of mistakes when I was in college with regards to what I was eating because I didn’t know any better.

DEBRA: Oh, yes.

MEGHAN ROOT: But I would go through a period where I didn’t feel so good and I would go to the doctor. It took me until about my junior year to really kind of stop and look very objectively at, “Okay, what am I doing differently because it wasn’t like this when I was little. I didn’t use to feel this way. I know that I have the power to fix this.”

And so I remove all processed foods. I used to eat lean cuisines like it was my job. I mean, those things are so bad for you. They are.

DEBRA: I know. I know. I know. I grew up on TV dinners. I grew up on TV dinners.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yeah. Oh, my gosh! And to think – I mean, not only is it processed, but it’s in plastic. It’s just all – it’s so bad.

DEBRA: And it’s promoted as being healthy.

MEGHAN ROOT: And it’s so bad. But when I removed processed foods and I would look at something if I were about to eat it, I would say, “Okay, where did this come from?” If I couldn’t tell myself where it came from, the ground or an animal, I wouldn’t eat it because the reality is your body has a hard time figuring out what to do with processed foods.

And so it was about six months after I made that change that I stopped and I said, “Wait a minute! Wait, I haven’t been to the doctor. I feel great. My energy levels are through the roof. This is the answer for me.”

And so that’s when I found out – and for me, that was just the tip of the iceberg. I’ve done a lot of personal research on my own diet with my foods that I’m sensitive too. But I think there’s so much power in just eating real food. So that’s what has kind of set my course with regard to that.

DEBRA: That’s so good for you to have learned that, again, at an early age. I went through a similar thing where, as I’ve just said, I grew up on TV dinners and going to [inaudible 00:20:26] and fastfood, all that fastfood. It wasn’t until I got out on my own away from my family and started living on my own in San Francisco in the big city that I started finding out that people ate differently than that and that I could go to a natural food store or my friends were eating differently and I just started trying all those different foods and went through a very similar process to you where I found out that most of what I was eating was just making me sick. When I stopped eating it, I had a dramatic improvement. But also, by removing toxic chemicals too. It was a combination of those things.

Over Christmas once, I went on a fast. And after five days of not eating all that junk food, I was like a new person. I was like, “Well, I had to pay attention to this.” Anyway, we have to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Meghan Root. She’s a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan and that’s supposed to be at BeMightyLikeMeghan.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

meghan-transcript-2

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Meghan Root. She’s a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan at BeMightyLikeMeghan.com.

So Meghan, let’s talk about routines because that’s something that your whole website is kind of organized around routines. You’ve written this great ebook. It’s not very long, but very impactful in terms of showing us a picture of how you use the concept of routines to organize all your different wellness steps in your life. Tell us more about that.

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, when I first came up with the idea for this website, it had nothing to do with routines. I wanted it to be all about fitness. But what I found was it was hard for me to talk about fitness without incorporating all of these other steps that I take in order to keep me on track. So it organically evolved to a conversation about routine because that’s what keeps me on track and I think it’s what keeps most people in track and moving in a direction that is in line with my long-term vision and goals.

So when I sat down to write DIY Wellness, like I said, it wasn’t with routines in mind, but that’s how it happened because it’s second nature for me. They’re not extremely abstract ideas. They’re very simple. It was very easy for me to notice these patterns in my life and I think it will be easy to notice patterns and routine for most people, because they do exist.

Our lives, for the most part, are a series of patterns. So I got shoveled that I go through in this ebook – I have a morning routine that’s very basic. I think that most people do also. But I always try and wake up at the same time every day. I always make my morning detox tea (which are the recipes on my website), then I’ll make my coffee and then I always go for a walk or stretch. After about 30 minutes, I’ll have breakfast and check email.

I always do it in that order. That’s something that I didn’t even realize and so I stopped and looked at it. It sets the tone for the day and it just is a nice, productive, organized way to start my day.

DEBRA: You know, after I read your DIY Wellness ebook, I started looking at my own routines because I never have sat down and said, “Okay, I’m going to make a routine.” But it was kind of second nature for me to say, “If I want to get something done, if I want to make sure that it happens, then I’m going to make sure that I do it in a certain order.”

I think that doing things in order makes a really big difference. I really wasn’t even really aware. If you would’ve said, “Write down your morning routine,” I’d have to stop and think about it. But when I did write down my morning routine after doing DIY Wellness, what I saw was I got up in the morning and the first thing I do is read actually because I’m reading different kinds of inspirational books and I’ll just read a little inspiration to start my day.

And then I get up and I take my shower and I brush my teeth. And then I take my vitamins. It all kind of happens in that order.

I noticed in my life (not on a larger scale) that I have routines of things that I do every day. I do my newsletter every Monday, my main newsletter every Monday and I send out another newsletter on Thursday and another one on Friday. And if I don’t do these, if I don’t have a time set and a decision made to do these activities, they don’t happen. I think that that’s the value of having a routine.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yes, definitely, yes.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

MEGHAN ROOT: And I think another big one – and this is where I feel a lot of people struggle, having a routine that you can commit to with regard with your fitness because for a lot of folks especially when we get busy or when it’s the holidays and you have a lot on your plate, it gets bumped for something else whether it’s your kids, your work or your husband. It always gets put away for another day. The reality is that at the end of the day, you’ve only got one body. You’ve got to take care of it and you’ve got to prioritize that.

And it’s so easy. You just find a time of the day that you can commit to. And whether it’s going to the gym or working out at home, I think you’ve got to be diligent about making that one a habit because your body will start to crave it and it knows when it’s time.

I’m an afternoon person. I like to go to the gym in the afternoon, after lunch when my body is nice and awake. I’ll notice when it’s time for me to go, my body knows that and so I’m ready and I want to. That’s something that, again, I didn’t realize until I sat down to write this. It was like, “Wow! Yeah.”

And not to say I can’t work out in the mornings, but I always want to work out in the afternoon because that’s what I’m used to doing.

DEBRA: Yeah. Well, I noticed for myself, one of the things that I want to do at this stage in my life is to incorporate more exercise in my life because it’s not something that I’ve ever – it’s not that I’ve never exercised, but I’ve never had an exercise routine that would really stick.

I think that’s part of making a routine. Intentionally making a routine is saying, “Alright, this is what I’m going to do. This is what I’m going to accomplish. How do I get that goal in? What are the steps towards reaching that goal and that you just keep the routine in.

And so there had been times in my life when I decided, “Okay, I’m going to get up and walk every morning” and then something happened that made me stop like I hurt my foot or something and then I didn’t go back to it.

But I think that for me, as I’m learning about routines from you, it’s about that these are the basic, fundamental things that we need to have in our lives in order for our bodies to be healthy. These are just things that we need to incorporate every day of our lives.

And sure, if you hit your foot and you can’t walk for a week or two weeks, okay. But then when that time is up, then it’s back to walking because your body actually wants that exercise, it wants to be healthy and that once we know what these essential things are, these are things that we can do.

There was some place I was going with this and now I’ve forgotten what I was.

MEGHAN ROOT: But I do think that a lot of people struggle because they lack direction and accountability. And so for that, right now, I’m teaching group fitness classes. And what I love about group fitness is it has that layer of accountability and when someone is not there (because each class time, there are regulars that you’ll see), when John is not there, everyone wonders where John is, then everybody reaches out to John. They’re like, “Hey, John, are you okay?”

And so it just a layers. It’s community, it’s social, but it has a layer of accountability that a lot of people, they lack in. And then you’ll find that it’s fun and these are your friends.

DEBRA: It’s fun to go see your friends if you go to exercise class, yeah, yeah.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yes, exactly.

DEBRA: I’ve had that experience. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Meghan Root. She’s a certified fitness instructor and she just launched a new website and that’s at BeMightyLikeMeghan.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

meghan-transcript-2

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Meghan Root. She’s a certified fitness instructor who just launched a new website called Be Mighty Like Meghan. She’s got a great ebook that you can get for free called DIY Wellness. You can get it at her website, BeMightyLikeMeghan.com. So Meghan, I know in DIY Wellness, you talked about a detox routine. So tell us what you do to detox. One thing I want to say is that I know that a lot of times if you look up ‘detox’ on the Internet, if you get past all the detox drugs and detox alcohol and you get to people who are talking about detox programs for your body, that they’re talking about things like “in the spring” or “one day a year, drink a week of green smoothies” like detox doesn’t exist the rest of the time.

One thing that my favorite alternative doctor keeps telling me is that – but he doesn’t have to tell me. I mean, he’s preaching to the choir when he says this. He keeps saying that people think you only have to detox once a year, but your body is detoxing 24 hours a day every day because you’re constantly producing wastes and they need to be taken out and there’s constantly things coming in even if you have a pristine, toxic-free house like I do.

You walk out the door and you’re being exposed to the toxic chemicals and they’re coming in your body and your body needs to do something with them.

So if you’re living on planet Earth and you’re not just staying in a building that have no toxic chemicals and purified air, you’re going to be exposed to toxic chemicals. Your body needs to do something with them.

So when you talk about detox, your detox routine, you’re talking about detoxing your body every single day. So tell us what you do.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yeah! That’s right. Well, because we can do our part with removing as many chemicals. And fortunately, we do have control over a lot of what we eat and drink and put on our body, but the reality is if you go outside or to a restaurant and have water, you’re exposed to pollutants in the air, the pharmaceuticals in the water and you can’t control these things. But you can combat it.

And so I have a daily detox routine because you’re right, your body is constantly detoxing. We are constantly exposed to chemicals and to toxics. And so we have to detox daily.

And I mentioned in my morning routine that I – and this is the first thing I do every day, have a detox tea. It’s easy and I’m certainly not a pioneer with this, but I do like to talk about it and mention it. I do it every day. My detox tea is warm water, lemon juice and cayenne pepper and that’s it.

DEBRA: And tell us what that does. Why is that important?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, it stimulates your liver. Your liver is your body’s primary organ, your main organ responsible for removing toxins from your body. So it just helps to jump start that process first thing in the morning. It’s like I wake up and then I go wake up my liver and we’re awake together. And so yeah, that’s how I take on the day.

But it also helps to increase the alkalinity in your body because we have a tendency as Americans to be very acidic and that can be detrimental in a number of ways also.

But honestly, it’s the easiest thing. And then during the day, I’ll drink lemon water, lemon juice and water. So that’s an easy, easy way to approach detoxing on a very surface level. But I love it! I can’t go a day without it.

When I travel and go to customs, I’ll take lemons with me and cayenne paper because I really can’t go without it.

DEBRA: That’s a very good routine to do. So what else do you do?

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, like I said earlier, I’m very conscious of the quality of the food that I eat. And so I eat everything organically. I source sustainably and responsibly farmed protein. And that’s just to prevent pesticides and chemicals and anything that’s been genetically modified from entering my body.

I also dry brush. I used to think that people who did this were nutty. I was like, “There’s no way that there’s anything…” And then I started reading about it and then reality is your skin is your largest organ, it’s extremely exposed to toxins and dry brushing is an easy way to remove dead skin cells and toxins and increase your circulation as well as stimulate your lymphatic system.

So you can take five minutes and do it. You can take 20 minutes and do it. I certainly do it at least three times a week. Sometimes, if I’ve got more time, I’ll do it every day. It’s nice and it’s relaxing. It’s a good way to kind of unwind and it’s you time. So that’s something that I’ve just recently incorporated in the past year. But the cornerstone of my detox routine, because in order to do it daily, you’ve got to keep it fairly simple. I know this is something that you use as well. It’s Touchstone Essentials Pure Body Extra Strength, their Zeolite product. It’s a naturally occurring mineral. It’s negatively charged. And so it binds to environmental toxins and heavy metal, which generally carry a positive charge and it flushes them out of your body. It’s the easiest way to remove toxins. It’s four sprays three times a day. It’s a piece of cake.

DEBRA: It is.

MEGHAN ROOT: It has had a huge impact on my life.

DEBRA: Well, tell us about the impact. I know that you have written about what happened when you first started taking it. I know I like to say that when I first started taking it (it’s been a few years now), within the first ten days, I had what I now call Zeolite euphoria because I felt so good. It’s like if you’re doing something (or you’re not doing something) and you don’t even know how bad you feel until you do something else and you feel good.

MEGHAN ROOT: Yes.

DEBRA: I thought I was doing pretty well until I took Zeolite. By day five or ten, I just woke up and I went, “Wow! I don’t remember ever feeling like that.” I realized that what it was was that was toxic chemicals were no longer in my body – not completely, but that enough had left my body from taking Zeolite that I can feel the difference.

Your body will remove heavy metals first. And with heavy metals, our body doesn’t remove them on its own. And so if you’re not doing something like taking Pure Body, your body is just accumulating and accumulating and accumulating heavy metals.

One of the things that I’ve learned when I started researching detox is that you have to do the right detox for the thing that you want to remove. You can drink green smoothies all day long and it’s not going to remove heavy metals. It will remove other things from your body, but not heavy metals.

And so heavy metals are some of the most toxic things that you can be having in your body and cause some of the worst health effects. You could go to all the doctors in the world, but if you still have heavy metals in your body, you’re not going to get well. That’s just a plain fact.

So this is why I’m constantly saying over and over and over, “Take Pure Body, take Pure Body, take Pure Body” because the first thing people should do is just get the heavy metals out.

So tell us what happened to you when you started taking it.

MEGHAN ROOT: Well, it’s similar to how you described your initial experience. I don’t want to say I was skeptical because I was already a proponent of detoxing, so I was not nervous to introduce this. I just didn’t know how much of an impact it was going to have on me because at the time, I would’ve considered myself as well as I could’ve been.

DEBRA: Me too.

MEGHAN ROOT: And I’ve been taking this for about two years now and I felt great. I mean, I did. I thought I felt great. I was occasionally tired and occasionally, I didn’t sleep well, but I just that was normal.

And then I started taking Pure Body and it worked. It was like a week after I started taking it. It was like this cloud had been lifted off of me. I mean, the first two things that I’ve noticed where my mental clarity. I just felt like – you know, you have days where you’re really on and then days where you’re maybe off. I just felt like I was on. I could think clearer, faster. I was making connections better. It was effortless. And I also was sleeping better at night. Those are the first two things that I notice.

But again, that’s one of those things that I cannot go without because it is. Once you realize what you’re capable of feeling like with a product like the Zeolite, like Pure Body, you don’t want to go back to where you were because it’s like being a whole other person. You’re in another gear. And so I’ve so enjoyed my experience with it. I recommend it to everybody. And it has such a profound impact on my life. It’s almost hard to talk about because I get so excited about…

DEBRA: I understand. I feel the same way, I feel the same way. It’s just in this world that we’re living in today, there’s so many toxic exposures and so many exposures to heavy metals. And radiation, it removes radiation. I just put something on my blog this week about how Pure Body helps our body with radiation exposures we’re having now and radiation exposures from the past and how those radiation exposures can affect our health and what your body does.

So with all these things that it removes, I think everybody should have it.

We’ve only got about 30 seconds left, so I want to tell people that I’m actually doing a giveaway. If you want to get a free bottle of Pure Body, then just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, scroll down the page and you’ll see Meghan and her beautiful face, smiling face. Right below that, you can center the contest to win a bottle of Pure Body. We’re going to have two winners.

I’ve got two seconds left, so thank you so much, Meghan.

MEGHAN ROOT: Thank you.

DEBRA: You’re listening to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

meghan-transcript-2

How Toxics Age Your Body & What You Can Do to Stay Young

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Today we’ll be talking about how toxic chemicals cause free radical damage that ages your body, and which specific antioxidants to take to heal free radical damage in various parts of your body. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

pamela-seefeld-at-desk

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Toxics Age Your Body & What You Can Do to Stay Young

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph

Date of Broadcast: November 5, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. We have an autumn day today, Wednesday, November 5th 2014. Today, we’re going to talk about how toxic chemicals aid your body and what you can do to stay young.

I don’t know if you’ve seen my pictures, I don’t know how old you think I am, but everybody tells me that I look younger than I actually am. I’m not going to tell you how old I am today, but I could guarantee to you, I am much older than my picture looks. People are just guessing all the time how old I am and I’m actually pretty old. I mean, you can figure this out because last Saturday, November 1st, I celebrated 30 years of having my books continuously I print. If I’ve been writing books and having them published for 30 years, then – I didn’t start when I was six years old.

But I think that I look so young because I’ve been away from so many toxic chemicals so much. Obviously, it’s impossible to stay away from 100% of them in today’s world. There’s so many things that you can do to remove them from your home and your workplace and your body. And when you do that, then you’re not suffering from the damaging effects that we’re going to be talking about.

So my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s on every other Wednesday, so she was on two weeks ago and she’ll be on again two weeks from now. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. In fact, she helps people get off prescription drugs and uses medicinal plants and other natural substances in place of drugs in order to handle physical problems.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey! It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. I’m so glad you’re here too. So, we’re kind of in this pattern of starting off your shows with me telling how well I’m doing from working with you and having you give me various supplements to do various things.

So last week, I think we were talking about weight loss and I was talking about my weight loss of 14 lbs. since I’ve been working with you. But the thing that’s happened in the last two weeks that has been really astounding to me is that I actually have so much energy that I want to exercise. I want to exercise.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is just so great!

DEBRA: It is because I’ve spent most of my life not exercising because it’ll just be, “Oh, I have to drag my body out of the chair?” or I get short of breath or something like that. And so I have this little rebounder. I’ve had it for a couple of years and I know that jumping on a rebounder is really good for you. But knowing that something is good for you and actually doing it are two different things.

When I started out, I could maybe ten bounces. I mean, that’s how out of shape I was. And so then, I got up to a hundred. And then a couple of weeks ago, I got up to 150. And this week, I’ve been doing sets of 200 bounces and I’ve been doing that two or three times a day.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is great!

DEBRA: Yes, yes. This is huge progress.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m just so very, very happy for you. You deserve it. Your health is just of the utmost important.

DEBRA: It is because really, if you don’t have health, you’re not going to be able to do anything else in the world. So actually, we’re talking about aging. As my body is getting older, I am getting stronger and healthier and more able. And so aging doesn’t have to be deteriorating. It could be restoring.

Anyway, let’s start out just by talking about toxic chemicals and how they damage your body.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay! So there’s different categories of things that can be damaging to the body. We know heavy metals, lead, mercury and nickel, these things can accumulate in the body because they really don’t leave the body. It doesn’t have a really good process for eliminating it. What actually helps eliminate heavy metals pretty effectively are saunas.

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Because saunas, most of these heavy metals are stored under the skin and they can come out in the sweat. So we know that’s a very good way to remove that kind of body burden so to speak.

But we also know that the chemicals, the pesticides has to be fat soluble to stay in the body. So I’ll explain what that means. From a chemistry standpoint, something that’s water soluble, if you’re in contact with this chemical and it’s water soluble, it is going to go into the urine and leave the body. But they’re more your really aren’t water soluble chemical that accumulate in the body, so those aren’t the ones we really concern ourselves with.

When you think about a pesticide, the reason why it’s fat soluble is because think about it, when they spread a field, how do these bugs die? You don’t see bugs that are burst apart, right? That doesn’t happen. They find them dead. And how they die is in the central nervous system. So these bugs are neurological toxins to these different insects and they have affinity to do that. That’s why they’re also neurological toxins for us. So someone that maybe sprays pesticide for a living will be at a higher risk for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, any of these neurological disorders.

So people need to kind of phrase these things in their mind, going like, “What are we trying to get rid of?” Metals are easily removed from the Body Anew, which is the homeopathic detox that I use. That’s going to work its way into the central nervous system in the brain too so that if someone ate a lot of fish at one time, that can remove mercury. But it’s important to say, “We want to remove fat soluble chemicals” and to do that, the body has to undergo moving the pesticides out of the fat, into the blood stream and changing them in the liver to make them more water soluble.

So it’s important to note that that’s how these things kill bugs and they also accumulate in us.

DEBRA: Yes! So then what do you do…?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I think it’s interesting. I don’t know if people really think of it that way.

DEBRA: Well actually, I think of it that way because I wrote several pages exactly on that process in my book, Toxic-Free. But I had to research that and I had to have a friend of mine who’s a doctor explain it to me. You explained it really, really well. But I only know this because I’ve been studying toxicology for 30 years.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct! You’re an expert in the field and so you would know that, but the person listening, they might not have had it presented to them in that matter to understand how it works. I hope that that clarifies the different levels and the things we’re trying to remove out of the body.

DEBRA: Yes, and you explained that very well because the heavy metals have to be removed in a different way than how the pesticides need to be removed. Even fluoride needs to be removed in a different way.

This is what I’m finding out as I’m researching the whole subject of detox. You have to know what it is that you’re wanting to remove from the body in order to remove it. To just drink a green smoothie doesn’t necessarily remove what you want to remove. That’s why we need to be so careful about this one when we’re actually doing it.

Tell us about free radicals and how the toxic chemicals, that damage that occurs with toxic chemicals.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay. Yes, absolutely. Great question. So free radicals, basically what is – and we’re going to talk a little bit about antioxidants coming up. Free radicals are basically an unpaired electron. It’s an unpaired electron and it’s allowing damage to take place.

So what can free radicals do in the body? If you don’t have anti-oxidants whether you’re getting them from food or from supplements (sometimes, I like to say you can get it from both), what they do is it can damage blood vessels and vasculature and allow for plaque and hardening of the arteries and atherosclerotic disease.
They can work specifically on the arteries, but also on the internal organs (the liver, the kidneys).

And a good example of free radicals that are damaging is macular degeneration. When these free radicals are damaging the eye and people start having issues where they start losing their sight as they get to be elderly.

DEBRA: Right! So I also wrote about free radicals in Toxic-Free. Actually, anybody who’s interested in how toxic chemicals affects your body and what the detox process is, there’s a real clear explanation in my book if you just get my book, Toxic-Free. But I’m going to explain something about free radicals because this is how I thought of it really easily.

What free radicals are is that they’re a natural byproduct of energy production. So our body is producing free radicals. What they are is they’re molecules, but they’re unpaired on their outer shells. And so it’s like if you were a single person, you would be like an unpaired electron and you’re looking to mate up with another electron.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly! That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: But what happens is instead of mating with another single electron, they go steal husbands and wives from other marriages and they destroy those marriages.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Aah, I like your analogy.

DEBRA: Isn’t that great?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I like that. No, I really like that. That’s simplistic because I mean, really, I’m sure most people in their mind don’t know how to picture an electron.

DEBRA: Right, right. But that’s exactly the function that’s happening. We need to go to break. When we come back, more about antioxidants and free radicals and unpaired electrons.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s funny.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld and we’re talking about how toxic chemicals age your body and what you can do to stay young. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. There’s actually a word for it, it’s ‘pharmacognicist’.

I always like to mention this ‘pharmacognocy’ because it means the study of medicinal plants, but the word root itself is pharma-, which is drugs and -cogno, which is intelligence. So plants are drugs with intelligence and I really like that because nature has its own intelligence and it gets transferred to the plants into our bodies and then that intelligence helps heal us. Yes, is that correct? Hello?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is correct.

DEBRA: Okay, good. So let’s go back to anti-oxidants and free radicals. Alright! So then the free radicals, when they mate up with husbands and wives instead of another single electron, then there’s damage. It just destroys that. And so then what happens with the antioxidants?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay! So the antioxidants go and they stop this process. They’re basically donating electrons. So what’s important is there’s different levels. We think of vitamin E and vitamin C, those are very strong antioxidants. Vitamin C is the water soluble antioxidant, so that goes into the blood and the tissues that have water affinity and vitamin E is the fat-soluble antioxidants. So that goes to the brain, to the cellular membranes, things like that.

The problem with free radicals is they are not taken care of and ‘neutralized’ so to speak, you end up with damage to tissues. So antioxidants are really an important way to circumvent that. The vitamin C and E are really good. I did some searches in the Library of Medicine because I have some particular favorite antioxidants that I like.

I like Resveratrol quite a bit. Resveratrol has anti-cancer activity. It decreases your lipid, your circulating lipid (so your cholesterol, your triglycerides) and its anti-aging effects are really great because it encompasses anti-aging properties in the inside of the body, but it also stops hyperpigmentation and aging in the skin, which I thought was really interesting.

So it works inside and outside. And really, that’s what we’re all kind of concerned about, right? We want to look young, but we also want to feel young too.
So this has high affinity for the plasma membrane.

DEBRA: What is Resveratrol? What plant does that come from? How does that get made?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Resveratrol, it was originally located in red wine. It’s kind of like the going joke you need to drink lots of red wine for getting your Resveratrol. But you’d have to be drinking quite a bit, which probably wouldn’t be good either intoxicated people walking around all day. And we do find these components in wine, but it’s to a very small extent.

So the capsule, they’re relatively inexpensive. They work really, really well and they’re well-tolerated. There’s also some data, I think this is quite interesting, that this has really high penetration to the brain. And they have some studies that they’ve shown with mice that they make them both alcoholic mice. That’s the particular mouse that they breed. And then they made sure that these mice had cognitive impairment as a result of it. They couldn’t find their way around the maze.

And then they gave the one group a placebo and the other group, they gave Resveratrol. And within a month, the Resveratrol group actually overcame their cognitive decline and could run the maze like mighty mouse. So we know that it really does help to change tissue in the brain too in a favorable sense.

So there’s tons of different antioxidants. I can go to a lot of the different ones, but Resveratrol might be the one you really want to try because it does prevent the aging of the skin, which that’s been shown to be statistically significant especially the hyperpigmentation and the sun spots that you get. And then also, the internal organs and the circulating lipids and the anti-cancer and anti heart attack capacity that it entails as well is really important.

DEBRA: That’s really good.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I would tell you too green tea.

DEBRA: Yeah?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s good. Green tea is excellent as well. Green tea contains epigallocatechins, over 300 of them. I would tell people not just drinking the green tea because when you do a green tea teabag, you’re only doing the water soluble components of the plant, right?

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So drinking green tea is great for you, but I prefer to tell people to actually consume the capsules because when you consume the capsules, you’re getting all the tea. You’re not just getting the water soluble components, but you’re getting the fat soluble components.

So remember, fat soluble is where all the problems are. You want something that’s going to target into these membranes, into these tissues and the anti-cancer – like especially for breast cancer with green tea, it’s highly efficacious.

So I would tell people that green tea capsules. And not only that too, you get the added benefit that green tea capsules are great for weight – weight loss, I should be more specific.

So I know I do that. When I exercise in the morning, I take four small green tea capsules just before I start working out with my detox bottle. That way, it really helps to burn a lot more fun. There are studies that have shown that the increase in fat-burning is quite significant. So those two supplements are something that most people should really be taking.

DEBRA: That sounds good to me. I actually take a green tea extract. So would the fat soluble be in the extract or should I switch to capsules?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a very good question. So yeah, if it’s an extract that’s in glycerin or in alcohol, yes, it would because glycerin and alcohol (especially alcohol, maybe more so) extracts those components out. When you do a water soluble extract (with basically, the hot water over the tea bag), you are still getting components, but you’re not getting all the epigallocatechins that are in there because you really want the 300 different components that are in there.

An extract would have that. I like just taking the capsules, which is pretty easy because they’re tiny, little capsules. The good part about it is that I don’t do real well with caffeine and the capsules – and I think you should notice it for your extract, they don’t make you jittery.

DEBRA: Yeah. No, it doesn’t make me jittery at all.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right! Whereas if you can get it from coffee, I don’t tolerate it very well.

DEBRA: I don’t tolerate coffee well either even just a cup of coffee in the morning. I only drink it like if I’m in a different timezone and I have to be awake.
PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s the way I approach it. I don’t have coffee in my house.

DEBRA: I don’t either.
PAMELA SEEFELD: But if I’m working as a pharmacist and I’m filling prescriptions and it’s late in the afternoon, I take maybe a few sips. I’m probably getting 2 mg., just something just to make sure that I’m not getting tired.

This is really good too because we’re like parallel lives.

DEBRA: We are, we are.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, exactly. And green tea is a great way to get those components – so Resveratrol and green tea. I want to mention too just eating vegetables in your salad. If you have vegetables that have all these different colors, if you put olive oil on them, you’re going to absorb all of these flavinoids and polyphenols directly out of the vegetables. That’s why you’re eating food in the first place, to nourish the body.

DEBRA: Let’s talk more about that after the break.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: Yes, we need to go break. So we’ll talk more about that when we come back.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, very good.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. We’re talking about how to stay young even in a toxic world that cause the damage and aging to your body. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

And Pamela, we haven’t given your phone number yet. Pamela will talk to you on the phone for free about whatever your physical condition is that you’re concerned about and make some recommendations. So tell us more about what you do and what your phone number is.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, very good. So my background is clinical pharmacy, but also, of course, pharmacognocy, which we discussed. I have a pharmacy in Clearwater, Florida. I do natural products. I’m a natural product pharmacist technically. We do homeopathic medicine, full service of vitamins.

And basically, I can even look at your blood work. I can tell you what’s going on in your body, not necessarily what’s normal range and out of range. And we can customize a program for you if you want to get off of particular medications. I do specialize even in mental health. So it’s all encompassing.

I also veterinary homeopathy for dogs and cats. So if there’s a particular ailment that your favorite friend in the house is suffering from, I’d be happy to help you with that.

So my number for the pharmacy is 727-442-4955. I would be really honored to help any of you that might have some issues about the medications you’re on or avoiding medicine. Everything we do here is all-encompassing. We keep a chart for you and all services are complimentary. So that’s basically the gist of it.

DEBRA: Yes. And she’s extremely effective. She’s here in Clearwater, Florida where I live. I found out about here and started having her on the show and started working with her myself because I was hearing from so many people how well they were doing after visiting Pamela.

And even my medical doctor, when I told him that Pamela was giving me some things to help some of the things that had been long-term conditions for me, he said, “Just do what she tells you to do.” And so she’s very, very, very highly regarded.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh, that’s great.

DEBRA: Yeah, she’s very highly regarded here.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I teach this. I’ve done this a long time. I’ll be very glad to answer any questions that you might have about the supplements you’re taking, the medicines they’re taking. I know both very well. This is something that I can help you with tremendously.

DEBRA: Yeah, she really can. And another thing I just want to add about what she does is that she’s looking at supplements from the viewpoint of a pharmacist. The dose that you’re taking and what you’re taking it with. All are intertwined with how effective it is instead of just going and saying, looking at the shelf in the natural food store and saying, “Well, what should I take?” or reading an article.

Have someone who really knows what they’re doing help you choose what your supplements are. It really makes a difference, it really does because then you’ll be spending your money on something that’s really working.

When I first went to Pamela, one of the first things that she said was, she looked at my blood work and she said, “You know, whatever it is you’ve been doing, you haven’t been making progress for the past eight years.” And then she gave me some things and I made progress in two weeks.

So that’s the difference. And so if you have something that you’ve been struggling with, please, please, please call her because she’s helped so many people.
Anyway, give your phone number and we’ll go back to talking about antioxidants.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, thank you. So the number here at my pharmacy is 727-442-4955. I’d be very honored to help with any of you with any issues you might have.

DEBRA: Yes, call her. Anyway, so antioxidants. We were talking about food before the break and you were telling us that we should eat salad and put olive oil on it. Explain about why the olive oil.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right! So fat on these vegetables. And it doesn’t have to be a lot. It can be half a teaspoon even. When you have fat on the vegetables, what it does is it allows to carry these components, which are fat soluble and that’s what you want, these antioxidants because we were saying that the areas that are most susceptible in your body are the ones that have cellular membranes and that is made of fat, so the fatty acids.

So what we want to do is we want to have this peak in the blood stream be very high. So a lot of these people that are dieting and eating lots of salad, but they’re not having olive oil with it, they’re getting the peaks in the blood stream. That explains why people, when they go on extreme diets, so they’re switching up just eating lots of salads in trying to lose weight, if they’re just putting vinegar on their salad…

DEBRA: The lemon juice.

PAMELA SEEFELD: …they start losing hair. The reason why, it’s not just the idea with the little calories, they’re not absorbing anything. That’s the real problem. So by not absorbing things, it’s causing these particular types of problems.

So the vegetables are really important. But also too, the supplements. I was talking about the Resveratrol and the green tea.

I want to mention, kind of an honorable mention of curcumin, which is turmeric. Turmeric is really interesting. Before the show, I did a Medline search in the Library of Medicine to see some of the different studies and turmeric, actually, we know it protects heart disease and cancer, it reduces incidence of type II diabetes, but its antioxidant effects are extremely effective for protecting neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s.

It has a high affinity for the brain. And as a result of that, if you’re really concerned about cognitive decline, this would probably be something that you would really want to take.

DEBRA: So how…

PAMELA SEEFELD: But studies also show that it really…

DEBRA: Go ahead.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Go ahead.

DEBRA: Well, I was going to ask…

PAMELA SEEFELD: …macular degeneration, which I thought was interesting.

DEBRA: That is interesting. I think I should take that. I’d been considering taking that just recently. And I want to ask you, so you just probably give it to people in capsules?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct, correct. You can cook with it, but it just doesn’t quite give us the peak in the blood stream because you’re not getting the same amount.

And I would also tell you that this one is particularly sensitive to needing fat present at the meal to have it absorbed. So if you’re having an apple for breakfast, this is not going to be absorbed. I tell my clients when I put them in curcumin (which is also extremely effective for arthritis and for pain), you can use curcumin many times even in place of narcotics for people who have severe back pain or rheumatism because it works like a COX-2 inhibitor, which is like Celebrex. It works exactly the same. It blocks chemical signals. You’re also getting the effects to the brain.

DEBRA: So what you need if you’re going to take turmeric, you need to take it with fat. So if you were eating Indian food…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct! You have to have that. Otherwise, it won’t absorb.

DEBRA: Yeah, if you were eating Indian food, it has a lot of turmeric in it, you would also be having the fat from the food. But you need to make sure if you’re going to take a capsule that you’re taking it with some fat.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s very important because I see people that have tried turmeric for pain – usually, most people take it for rheumatism. And they’re like, “Well, that didn’t work.” And then I bring it to the fact that that’s why it’s important that people call me and I tell them, “If you eat this particular food with this particular supplement, you’re going to get the full 99% of the dose into the bloodstream.”

And we can target different supplement and different foods to deliver these things in a more effective manner. That’s what’s really important, understanding the physiology of your body and the chemistry of your food and making these things all work together in harmony, right?

DEBRA: Right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: …because a lot of people, they’re not thinking of it in that sense.

DEBRA: Well, not only are they not thinking of it…

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is very, very important. So why spend the money if it’s not going to work?

DEBRA: You’re the first person in 30 years of study on this subject that I’ve ever heard say this, but it makes so much sense. And you’re trained. You’re bringing a different viewpoint to it. I think that you have your whole pharmacy background and that you’re looking at all these interactions and it makes a big difference. It makes a huge difference. I’m so interested in this.

We need to go to break, but when we come back, we’ll talk more about antioxidants and other things that you can do to help stay youthful in a toxic world that is constantly aging your body. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. We’re talking about aging, antioxidants, toxic chemicals and what we can do to have more antioxidants in our body.

So what do you think about chocolate as an antioxidant?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I think chocolate is just showing very convincingly the data that chocolate has strong antioxidant activity. But what I would say is that unfortunately, the majority of the chocolate we see is combined with a lot of sugar and fat.

I personally like regular chocolate like everybody does, but you know what I’ve tried to do (and I can do this a great deal of the time) is have you ever tried Cocoa Nibs?

DEBRA: Yes, I have. And you know what?

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s raw chocolate pieces.

DEBRA: One of the thing that I found about it is it actually does taste like chocolate, but it has a real kick to it in terms of – it seems to have more of a caffeine kind of kick. It’s more like caffeine than eating regular chocolate. Somehow, eating a chocolate bar maybe doesn’t have as much chocolate in it because it’s got all the other stuff in it. But the Cocoa Nibs, they’re really good. I like Cocoa Nibs.

What I like to do is I like to take cocoa powder and then mix it with whatever I want to mix it with. And one of the things that I like to mix it with is I just mix it with grass-fed cream and put whatever natural sweetener I want to put in it…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Great ideas!

DEBRA: I’ll make a little fudge.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a great idea!

DEBRA: Yeah, one serving at a time like I’ll take a teaspoon, a heaping teaspoon of cocoa and then I’ll just put a little bit of, say, coconut sugar or honey or whatever and then put in the cream and just make a little paste and it’s delicious. It’s delicious and you can mix it with nuts or put mint extract or orange extract or whatever you want. That’s what I do when I want chocolate.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s very smart. I mean, a lot of times if I want to make a little fudge, I’ll mix cocoa powder with a little bit of agave and almond butter.

DEBRA: Hmmm… that sounds good.

PAMELA SEEFELD: You can roll them into little balls and put them in the refrigerator.

DEBRA: Yeah!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah. I mean, you can be creative. There’s lots of different ways you can do it. So I think that the antioxidant activity in cocoa is hard to deny. It’s there and it’s really – life’s but enjoyment. The cocoa is good for you. We’re not saying, “Sit there and eat the whole bag of fun-sized sneakers” even though I was handing out candy on Halloween. I’ve had to bring it to the hospital to get it all out of my house because I’m like, “I don’t want to have that stuff sitting around.”

DEBRA: I know.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s so funny. Antioxidants some place else thinking that other people will eat it. But yeah, the antioxidant activity in chocolate is definitely there. We know that has high affinity for fat and water soluble areas of the body. That’s very important.

I was going to mention too, we’re talking about anti-aging exercise. What does the data show about exercise?

DEBRA: Oh, good. Tell us.

PAMELA SEEFELD: We know that the study show – and this is very interesting. This just recently came out. They took people that never exercised. These people were an average of 65, they never worked out before and they took a punch biopsy of the skin on their derriere. So that’s an area that normally doesn’t see the sun and so will have the least aging effects underneath the microscope as the rest of the body.

And then they put these people on exercise routine and they had them exercising for 45 minutes for four times a week.

After three weeks of this particular study, they went and resampled their skin and their skin in that time period from the exercise (and they don’t know if it’s the sweating or the exercise) actually look like a younger person’s skin.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: So the anti-aging effects of exercise are really important especially on the skin. The sweating process and also the capillary dilation during exercise allows more – this is my theory – allows more of the nutrients and the antioxidants that are present in your body to go to the cellular membranes and be much more effective. So it’s kind of up-regulating the area.

DEBRA: My theory is… go ahead.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: Well, I was going to say too…

PAMELA SEEFELD: I was going to say too white blood cell demargination. The white blood cells have a transient increase during exercise. So these cells were normally kind of hanging on to the side of the blood vessels. Because your heart rate goes up, they’re kicked off.

And so if you take someone’s sample of their CBC and looked at their white blood cells prior to exercise and then right after exercise, you get this transient increase. That’s why people that work out quite a bit don’t get sick.

DEBRA: Hmmm… well, I was going to say that my theory about why your skin looks better when you exercise is because when you sweat, you’re removing toxic chemicals from your body and so there’s less free radicals damage.

And I’ve also noticed that at times when I drink a lot more water (like if you go on vacation and you’re hot and sweating in some other climate where you aren’t usually), I notice that my skin just looks clearer and softer.

And so I really drink. I drink about three quarts of water a day, which I think is more than most people drink. I’m just sitting at my desk and I just drink and drink and drink pure water. I think that makes a huge difference.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it does. You have to realize your body is mostly water. So basically, when it comes down to it, your carbon and all these electrolytes (sodium, potassium and your hydrogen) – I mean, basically, your body is a chemistry stew and what’s holding it all together is water. So your skin, of course, when it’s hydrated, it’s going to make a huge difference as far as the way it looks.

And believe it or not, even from people going out in the sun and sun tanning, just being hydrated makes a huge difference in the texture of the skin regardless of whether the person had sunscreen or not because dehydrate steps in and it’s really common that this can happen.

So I would tell people that you’d want to really push fluids and also try and find room for exercise during the week, whatever you can do. Personally, I think that the best time to work out is in the morning because it kind of sets the tone for the day and gets your metabolism up. But some people do much better in the evening. It just depends if it affects your sleep or not.

I would also say too there’s another supplement that I’m interested in, collagen. If you take collagen or hyaluronic acid, that can work for the joints if you have arthritis.

Collagen also, of course, builds up the collagen under the skin. You can take oil collagen. It’s pretty inexpensive. I use a drink here at the pharmacy that I take myself and it kind of tastes like orange. You put it in the water and it brings you into a peak in the blood stream really fast (but you can take it in capsules too).

And collagen, what it’s going to do is it’s going to help the skin look much more youthful because collagen is kind of like the – I want to say the scaffolding under the skin that holds it up, makes you look useful. You can take it in a supplement.

And what you can find too is that collagen has high affinity for the joints. So a lot of people, as you get older, you start having mild arthritis in your joints, it reverses that. So that’s an easy, inexpensive way to get the anti-aging effects. But at the same time, also, be working on the joints because rheumatism tends to set in as people get older. So those are some really good things too.

I’m not sure, but what are you using on your skin right now?

DEBRA: What am I using on my skin. I don’t use a particular skin product. I’ve tried a number of different ones. I mean, people are always sending me skin products because that’s a big thing in the natural products industry, natural skin products. And so I’ve tried a lot of them, but I just basically wash my face with filtered water from my shower and just various kinds of soap, just soap. I know that I probably shouldn’t do that.

PAMELA SEEFELD: You probably shouldn’t say that because your skin looks really good. Your face looks great.

DEBRA: Thank you. Okay! So Pamela, wait, I want to ask you a question. How old do you think I am? I think you don’t know my age. I think you don’t know my age, right?

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, I have no idea how old you are.

DEBRA: How old do you think I look? How old do you think I look?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Late forties? I have no idea.

DEBRA: Okay, that’s what people think. I’m older than that, I’m older than that. But see…

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, you look really good. And you know what too? And all kidding aside because people can’t see you (we’re talking on the radio), the difference since you’ve been doing the Body Anew and the few things that I’ve put you on, your skin and your body has transformed quite a bit. I mean, you looked pretty before, but now, you really glow when I see your face.

DEBRA: Thank you. I agree.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I can tell that things are just starting to fall into place.

DEBRA: I agree. Yeah, yeah. And you guys, you should see Pamela. You could go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.comand see Pamela’s picture. I want to look like Pamela because she just radiates health more than anybody I’ve ever met. I mean, you cannot look at her and not say that she’s not the healthiest person in the room. She looks healthy in a way that I’ve never seen anybody look health and I’m going to look that way too. So there!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Absolutely! That’s the only way to be. I get stopped in the grocery store and they’re like, “You look really healthy” and I’m like, “I do because I am. Please call me. I’d love to help you too.” So it’s all-encompassing.

Let me tell you, your health is your wealth and you really want to take care of your body. You only have one body. Taking some of these simple supplements we were talking about – the Resveratrol, green tea, salad with olive oil, maybe some turmeric, some curcumin, vitamin C and E, of course, getting enough sleep (we’ve talked about this before, sleep and exercise are very important), all these things that you do, these body habits affect aging in subtle ways, but very significant as well.

And these are things that we can easily do. This isn’t really too difficult. Even if you have to take the stairs when you’re at work, little bits of exercise here and there make a huge difference in the heart disease, cancer and also the way the skin appears. Study is showing that with people exercising, it can change their skin to a younger person just from a few weeks. It’s really a testament that exercise is not just for the physical health, but the skin health and the mental health as well.

DEBRA: Well, I want to say that I have this rebounder I mentioned. It only cost me $40. I just have it in the corner of the room.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Good for you!

DEBRA: And it takes me what? A minute or two to do 200 bounces. And so I can just take a little break from my desk and do the 200 bounces and come back. It’s not even time-consuming anybody can do this.

We’ve got only 20 seconds less, so give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. So if you can call me here at my pharmacy, the number here is 727-442-4955, I would be very glad to help you and your family with any questions you might have.

DEBRA: Great! This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well!

PureBody Liquid Zeolite for X-ray and CT Scan Exposures

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I have had a good deal of radiation exposure from past medical examinations – many different x-rays, and the one that scares me most is the abdominal/pelvic CT scan I had 10 years ago. Of course back then I did not realize how dangerous/high the radiation exposure was (since I was following doctors’ recommendations), but now I really worry. Is there anything I can do now to remove/reverse harmful radiation exposure? Can the zeolite drops help now from exposure 10 years ago? My 4 year old daughter also had a chest x-ray at 18 months. Would you recommend giving her zeolite drops for a certain period?
Thanks so much!

Debra’s Answer

YES, taking PureBody Liquid Zeolite CAN help your body detox from X-ray and CT scan exposure.

I contacted Touchstone Essentials for confirmation, and here is their reply…

When a person is exposed to radiation, the source is important to understand the inherent risk to exposure. The three types of radiation are:

  • Alpha Particles – An alpha particle can be considered as a helium nucleus. Helium has 2 protons and 2 neutrons in its nucleus. If both of its electrons were removed, the result would be an alpha particle. Since there are two protons and no electrons, alpha particles are positively charged. Alpha particles are not very penetrating. Paper, clothing or a few centimeters of air can effectively shield against alpha particles. However, if ingested or inhaled, alpha particles can be hazardous.
  • Beta Particles – Beta particles are high-speed electrons emitted from the nuclei of decaying radioisotopes. Since these are electrons, they have a negative charge and a small mass, approximated as 0 amu. Beta particles may travel 2 or 3 meters through air. Heavy clothing, thick cardboard or one-inch thick wood will provide protection from beta radiation.
  • Gamma Radiation – Gamma radiation is very much like x rays. It has no charge, a very short wavelength and high energy. Gamma radiation is the most penetrating form of radiation considered in this discussion. It travels great distances through air (500 meters). To be protected from a gamma emitter, thick sheets of lead or concrete are required.

Sunlight gives off the following types of radiation.

  • electromagnetic radiation
  • beta radiation – consisting of electrons
  • charged atomic nucleii – of which alpha radiation (charged helium atoms) is an example (alpha particles)
  • Neutrino radiation.

The electromagnetic radiation is also of four types which can all be considered Gamma radiation.

  • X rays
  • Ultra violet
  • visible light
  • infrared

Cells in the body are damaged through the process of ionization when exposed to radiation. Radiation-induced ionizations may act directly on the cellular component molecules or indirectly on water molecules, causing water-derived radicals. Radicals react with nearby molecules in a very short time, resulting in breakage of chemical bonds or oxidation (addition of oxygen atoms) of the affected molecules. The major effect in cells is DNA breaks.

What the Pure Body and Pure Body Extra Strength can do is help in the repair of the cells by removing the positively charged byproducts caused by the exposure to the radiation. While Pure Body and Pure Body Extra Strength will remove radioactive particles—think uranium ore dust or radioactive dust from White Sands Proving Grounds—that type of exposure is going to be much less likely than simple exposure to a radiation source like an x-ray or exposure to the sun. The exposure damage happens in milliseconds or thousandths of a second. The sooner you can start the repair/healing process the less likely there will be long term effects from the exposure, based on amount of course.

Add Comment

Toxics Then and Now: Debra Celebrates Thirty Years in Print

Debra Lynn DaddAnnie BondToday my guest and I are switching seats—I am the guest and my long-time friend Annie B. Bond will be the host. I’m celebrating 30 years in print (it was November 1 to be exact) so we’re going to talk about where the current interest in toxics in consumer products started (with my first book) and the progress made over the last 30 years. We’ve come a long way identifying toxics in consumer products and their health effects, and many more toxic free products are available today than ever before.

Debra Lynn Dadd is the author of seven books on toxics in consumer products and safe alternatives, including Toxic Free (Tarcher/Penguin, 2011). She has compiled the largest website on toxic free living, which is the only website 100% devoted to toxic chemicals, their health effects, where they are found in consumer products, and how to live toxic free. She was named “The Queen of Green” by the New York Times (mid-1990s). Debra is the host of Toxic Free Talk Radio. www.debralynndadd.com

Annie B. Bond is the author of five books, including Better Basics for the Home (Three Rivers Press, 1999), Home Enlightenment (Rodale Books, 2008), and most recently True Food (National Geographic, 2010). She was named “the foremost expert on green living” by “Body & Soul” magazine (February, 2009). www.anniebbond.com

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH ANNIE B. BOND

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Toxics Then and Now: Debra Celebrates Thirty Years in Print

Host: Annie Bond
Guest: Debra Lynn Dadd

Date of Broadcast: November 4, 2014

ANNIE BOND: Hi, I’m Annie Bond and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we discuss how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. And if you’re wondering whether you’re listening to the right show, Debra Lynn Dadd is the host, but today, she’s going to be the guest because we’re celebrating the fact that her books have now been continuously in print for 30 years.

Last Saturday, November 1st was the anniversary of the publication of Non-Toxic & Natural, the very first book about toxic chemicals and consumer products.

Hi, Debra!

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Hi, Annie. Thanks for being here today to be the host, so I can sit on the other seat.

ANNIE BOND: Oh, my gosh! Well, I’m so excited to be on this show and really honored to be the host today as you have been a huge mentor of mine as well as just a life-saving and incredibly valuable resource as the first person who actually came out with the first how-to book of non-toxic living. I just could never – I’m always forever grateful.

So please do tell us your story. How did you ever come with the idea of the first book?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, I didn’t set out to write a book. My story actually began in 1978. At the time, I was a classical musician. I played the piano. I lived in San Francisco and I accompanied a lot of classical musicians and opera singers.

And then what happened was my mother became ill with cancer. Later on, I found out that we actually were living – I grew up in an area where we were downwind from a factory. It turned out to be a cancer causer. My mother actually died of cancer when she was only 51.

And approximately the same time, I became very ill. I moved home from San Francisco. I lived in Concord, California, which is about an hour away from San Francisco. I moved home to take care of my mother because I knew she was dying.

At that particular time, my father was trying to give her some kind of alternative cancer treatment. It was very difficult to find anyone. He wanted to give her intravenous vitamin C. So he took her to a doctor who was willing to do that who was also treating people for what is now called ‘multiple chemical sensitivities’ (at the time, it was called ‘environmental illness’.

He found out that these people who this doctor was treating were being exposed to toxic chemicals and having reactions to the toxic chemicals. He kind of put two and two together and said, “This is what’s wrong with my daughter.”

He came home and he said, “Well, you know how you’re depressed all the time and you can’t think straight and all these things,” all these things that were going on with me at the time. He said, “I’m going to this doctor and there’s a whole office full of people who are experiencing exactly what you’re experiencing.
ANNIE BOND: Wow! Wow! That’s amazing.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: That’s how I found out about it in the first place. Of course, nobody was talking about toxics then. There were no books like mine. It wasn’t on the evening news like it is now.

ANNIE BOND: Yeah, sure, absolutely.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: No organizations, nothing. It was just completely like this fluke that my father went to this doctor because my mother was dying of cancer.

ANNIE BOND: And he was such a thoughtful man, your father. I mean, that was very…

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Oh, yes.

ANNIE BOND: Yeah.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah, yeah, yeah. But I wouldn’t go. I wouldn’t go. I wouldn’t go to the doctor. This just sounded outrageous to me. It’s like these products would not be on the shelves if they were that toxic. I mean, isn’t the government doing something?

ANNIE BOND: The government protects us, right?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah. And so I just couldn’t believe it. I couldn’t believe it. And then there was a night where after my mother died, I was sitting, playing the piano and I was playing this very beautiful slow movement from Abram Sonata and I just started crying. I couldn’t stop crying and I couldn’t stop crying and I couldn’t stop crying.

Now, my mother had just died, so somebody could look at this and say, “This is grief,” but my father looked at it and said, “She’s having a reaction.” And one of the things that he learned going to this doctor’s office was that if you’re having a chemical reaction, you can take Alka-Seltzer in the gold package and it will stop it.
And so he had bought some Alka-Seltzer. He put an Alka-Seltzer tablet in a glass of water. He gave it to me, put it on my hand and said, “Here, drink this.” I screamed and I said, “I will not drink this” and I threw it across the room and…

ANNIE BOND: Wow!

DEBRA LYNN DADD: One of the things that I learned later that one of my reactions, one of my physical, chemical exposure was that I would not help myself.

ANNIE BOND: Oh, that’s really interesting. Yeah, really interesting.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah, yeah. It was like this big resistance, “No, I’m not going to do this.”

ANNIE BOND: It is completely largely temper too, yeah, right.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: And so my father, actually, he went and got another glass, put another Alka-Seltzer tablet in it, wrestled me to the floor, held my nose and poured this down on my throat.

ANNIE BOND: What? That’s unbelievable. What an incredible man! I did not this part of your story.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: He poured it down my throat. And within a minute, it was like I woke up and I said, “What just happened?”

The next day, I went down to the doctor. And of course, they tested me because at the time, they were testing (I think some doctors still do that), they tested me and found out that I was reacting to every chemical they possibly could test for.

And then they wanted to put me on the protocol of giving what are called antigens, which are small amounts of the chemicals, which are supposed to stop your symptoms. Now, it stops symptoms, but it doesn’t cure what’s going on in your body. It doesn’t reverse the poisoning.

It was that experience of trying to figure out how I could get well from this toxic chemical poisoning. That led me to start researching.

And nobody had done this research before. I had to drag myself out of bed, go down to the medical libraries, go down to the poison control centers and try to find out what are the toxic chemicals that make me sick. Where are they?

ANNIE BOND: Well, when we go back to that time, the pioneers like you almost invariably came in because of a family issue. In your case, the tragedy of your mother and your father learning. And then you had to completely start from scratch. And for those of us that came later, we didn’t have to start from scratch so much thanks to you because you really were a trailblazer in this.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Thank you.

ANNIE BOND: So tell me more about the library part.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, we go down to the library. Remember, there’s no Internet.

ANNIE BOND: Yeah. This was like 1982 or something like that?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: That was 1978.

ANNIE BOND: Oh, 1978. Oh, my gosh.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: So it was really even earlier than that. It was 1978 and I would go down to the library and there were two books that saved my life. One was – my father, again, my father thought because I had never taken chemistry in school, he thought I needed a chemistry book. So he bought the Condensed Chemical Dictionary.

And so I started with that. I would look up a chemical like formaldehyde (there were a few chemicals that I could identify). And of course, the patients in the office that are patients with me, they’re all taking about this. But we have no books, we had no guidance. All we know is these toxic chemicals are making us sick.

ANNIE BOND: Right, right.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: And so I’m starting to pick up names of chemicals like formaldehyde and phenol and I looked them up in the Condensed Chemical Dictionary and fortunately, it tells you, “This is how this chemicals are made” and it gives you a very brief, little description of health effects – very, very brief.
And so you could then go look up and say, “Well, this chemical is made from this… “and then you look up the other chemical. That’s really how I started.

And then I went to another book called The Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, which was in the reference section.

ANNIE BOND: And it’s about 17” thick. I have that one too. And that was an incredible weight.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: But I think it’s probably in every – anybody can go down to any library and it’s in the reference section. I started looking and seeing that this particular product (any product I chose) had this chemical in it. And then I would start researching the health effects and I would say, “Well, my symptoms are headache, depression, fainting in the shower, not able to sleep, blah-blah-blah…”

The one I really remember, the one that is just like the pivotal moment for me was when in one book I found that formaldehyde causes insomnia. And in another book I found, that the chemical that makes permanent press sheets is formaldehyde.

Nobody had ever put that together. Nobody had ever put that together.

And so here I was looking at health effects in one book and matching them up with what chemicals are in the products in other books. I had to go to lots of different books because I had to go to textbooks and things like that to find out what the chemicals were that were used to make consumer products and various things.

ANNIE BOND: We’re going to have to go to break now, but it sounds like at that moment, the jigsaw puzzle was starting to get put together for you.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Right, right.

ANNIE BOND: I’m Annie Bond and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is the author, Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re celebrating her 30 years of being continuously in print. We’ll be back in a minute. I’m curious to know when you started writing your first book? When did you feel like you were beginning to get it together?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, I’ll talk about that when we come back from the break.

ANNIE BOND: Sounds good. Great! Wonderful!

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

ANNIE BOND: Hi, you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Annie Bond. Debra and I have switched seats today. She’s the guest and I’m the host and I am just so delighted to be here to help her celebrate.
And right before the break, we were pushing towards how she started putting it all together enough where she felt she could actually help herself to the point where she got well enough to even write a book. I’d love to hear that piece, Debra.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, once I start finding out, when I found out that formaldehyde was in my bedsheets and it was making me not sleep, I immediately went and looked for any sheet I could find that didn’t have permanent press finish and there was only one brand of sheet available at the time.
And so as I started identifying things like that (the perfume I was wearing was giving me headaches and things like that), I would just eliminate that toxic exposure and very quickly, my symptoms would just go away. The first night I slept on the formaldehyde-free sheets, I actually slept. I went, “Wow! There’s something to this.”

ANNIE BOND: You know, that is such an important piece, which I want to talk a little bit if you don’t mind..

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Sure. Sure, please.

ANNIE BOND: …just about how radically and quickly someone’s body changes. I’ll tell my story later, but it took me six months. I was as toxic as you and so sick. It was unbelievable. Six months in a completely healthy home and I bounced back. My doctor said I was old enough to have a baby. I was like a plant that didn’t have water that suddenly was given water and I just bounced back. It’s awesome. I just wanted to interject the magic of this.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah, that is what happens. That is what happens. People don’t realize how much exposure to toxic chemicals is affecting our health and well-being that when you start removing the toxic chemicals from your home and you start removing it from your body (which is a whole different thing), it’s so important that you’ll just bounce back.

ANNIE BOND: And I love that step-by-step thing.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah!

ANNIE BOND: The headache goes and then this…

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah, it does. It just starts peeling away and you start feeling ecstatic. Really, your body can feel good even living in a toxic world if you just remove the toxic chemicals from your home and remove the toxic chemicals from your body. It makes a huge, huge difference. But anyway…

ANNIE BOND: And then you want to share it, that’s the thing.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: That’s exactly it.

ANNIE BOND: I guess that’s where the natural evolution there, right?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, that was the natural evolution because once I got well, I knew a lot of people who we were on the same situation. And so in 1982, I wrote and self-publish just a little book that was a pile of Xeroxes. It was called A Consumer Guide for the Chemically Sensitive. It was just for my friends so that people would know what the toxic chemicals are.

ANNIE BOND: I have a copy of that somewhere.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Do you have that book? I still have a copy too!

ANNIE BOND: My gosh! That was way back. I remember that now, yeah.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: And one of my patients because I was now working for the doctor advising the patients – a different doctor actually – how to clean up their homes. One of my patients was a newspaper journalist and she had a connection with a publisher, Jeremy Tarcher. She introduced me to her publisher and we did the first book, Non-Toxic & Natural, which was published in 1984. No book had come out like that.

The thing that really got them to do it was that my boyfriend at the time had written a letter to Bon Ami. Bon Ami was doing this whole campaign about, “Tell us how you use Bon Ami.” He wrote to Bon Ami, “My girlfriend this little book” and they were so impressed that they sent me on two 10-city tours.”

I got so much media exposure that that’s why the publisher picked me up. It was just a little book that – it was Xerox. They were Xeroxes. It wasn’t even published. It had a little tape binding that was covering at the staples and that’s how it started.

ANNIE BOND: Unbelievable! It’s so exciting! And so how many books have you written since then?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: I think seven.

ANNIE BOND: It’s really quite a library. I would love to hear.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Seven.

ANNIE BOND: Seven! Oh, my gosh!

DEBRA LYNN DADD: I can’t even remember them all. Let’s see, Non-Toxic & Natural, The Non-Toxic Home, The Non-Toxic, Natural & Earthwise, The Non-Toxic Home & Office, two editions of Home, Safe Home and the most recent one is Toxic-Free.

ANNIE BOND: Unbelievable! That’s just incredible. And I just remember the joy I had – so just to quickly give you a little bit of an update about myself for everybody, I had two catastrophic chemical exposures, which is different than what you had. You had a creeping up experience, right?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Right, right.

ANNIE BOND: And so I became sort of a classic case of chemical sensitivity because I worked at a restaurant that had a gas leak and it sent 80 people to the hospital. And then I had a pesticide exposure that completely contaminated my house and sent me to the hospital for three months.

And so I was lucky enough to – also because of an unbelievable family member, I got to one of the first environmental medicine doctors in the world that happened to be in New Haven , Connecticut at the time.
And so I just can’t tell you what it meant to me when I found your work because I was just as desperate as I could possibly be. I could not lead a normal life.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: I understand.

ANNIE BOND: Yeah, it was a great joy for me. I remember going to listen to as if the goddess herself was emerging in Vermont. There were a number of us just hanging on every single word of yours. So thank you. It’s been really great.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: You’re welcome. You’re welcome. And I remember when you first wrote your first book, Clean & Green and I was very happy to write the foreword to that because…

ANNIE BOND: Oh, I was so honored, yeah.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Such a breakthrough that you did that. I had a few non-toxic cleaning products listed in my book and a few recipes, but you really were the one who did the breakthrough research for coming up with all these do-it-yourself formulas that so many people are using now.

ANNIE BOND: Well, thank you. It’s just an interest of mine. I was sort of steep to northern New England practical lifestyle and I was a hippie. I had that hippie life. It was a wonderful jumping off point for me. I almost didn’t do it because you had done such a glorious job on your own…

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Thank you.

ANNIE BOND: It was just one of those great things, one of these great synergies really. We need to go to break again. My name is Annie Bond and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is author, Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re celebrating her 30 years of being continuously in print. And that’s just wonderful. You’ve got a great website too. Could you give that?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Oh, yes. It’s Toxic Free – I’m so accustomed to say ‘ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com’. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and enter to the whole rest of the website where I have Debra’s list where it has more than 500 – it links to more than 500 websites that sell toxic-free products. And I’ve got thousands of questions on my Q&A. There’s just so much information there. There’s really no reason to live a toxic life.
ANNIE BOND: Wonderful! We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

ANNIE BOND: Hi, you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Annie Bond. I’m here with Debra Lynn Dadd. She and I have switched seats together today. She is the guest and I’m the host. I’m delighted to be here to help her celebrate her 30th anniversary of being in print as an expert in toxic-free living.

So Debra, I’m curious. As one of the trailblazers or thetrailblazer actually in the home particularly on non-toxic living, I wonder what do you think, do you think we’ve made any progress regarding toxic for the past 30 years?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, the answer to that is yes and no. I want to give two examples. One is that – I just looked up this morning some statistics about how the organic market, the market for organic products, organic food actually has grown. And so I’m looking at this little chart here that I got off the Internet this morning and it starts in 1990.

Now, remember, my first book was published in 1984. There are no statistics for the sales of organic food when I started. So then in 1990, they had the first. It’s zero. It’s just above zero, zero billions of dollars. Anyway, it’s grown 20% per year since 1990. So this graph goes straight up from 1990…

ANNIE BOND: Hockey stick, yeah.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah. But here’s another interesting thing. In 1990, it was just under $1 billion and it’s now $24.6 billion. Well, that as in 2008. So now, it’s 20% and 20% and 20%. But it’s only less than 3.5% of the food sales in 2008. So there’s a long way to go, but look how far it’s come. Not only do we have organic food, but we have organic cotton and we have organic personal care products. There’s just organic this and organic that. And so we have so many choices that are organic (without those toxic pesticides) that it’s really amazing!

But here’s the other side of it. There’s a website called – well, first, I should say that every chemical, every industrial chemical has a number called the – what’s it called? It’s the CAS number, but I’m trying to remember what it stands for. It’s the ‘chemical abstract service’, that’s what it is.

So if you go to their website, which is CAS.org, there’s a little counter on there. It says, “a global team of scientists is continually adding substance information to the world’s disclosed chemistry to the CAS registry.” So it has all these information. Okay! So then there’s a counter and it says ‘organic and inorganic substances’ to date.

Now, I’m reading my book, Toxic-Free, which I was writing in 2010 and I wrote, “As I’m sitting here watching this counter today, November 15, 2010, the number is 57,110,200 and counting…”

ANNIE BOND: Oh, my gosh!

DEBRA LYNN DADD: “And the time it took me to type 57,110,200, it switched to 57,110,201.” Now, what do you think the number is today, I’m looking at it right now?

ANNIE BOND: Oh, my gosh! I’m terrified. My stomach is in a knot.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Ninety million!

ANNIE BOND: Oh, gosh!

DEBRA LYNN DADD: 90,304,587 and it’s about to turn to 88 right now, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93 as we’re sitting here.

ANNIE BOND: Oh, my gosh! That’s unbelievable. And that’s really interesting what we’re discovering.
So tell me what you think. Is there any progress though in making the connection, people making the connection between the environment and health because that’s the thing I found was just like a blank wall back in the early eighties. Everyone thought I was just nuts because…

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah, there’s a huge, a huge difference. There’s a huge difference. In fact, you and I got interested because there was a connection between our immune systems and the toxic chemicals. At the time, that was the big breakthrough just to talk about the one thing.

There were poison control centers, there has always been poison control centers where – well, since they started. But those are for what are called ‘acute toxics’ like if you were to drink gasoline. It’s an immediate toxic effect where you get sick or die from ingesting a toxic chemical. That’s what a poison control center is for.

But at the time, when you and I started, there was no talk of what’s called ‘accumulative effect’ and that is this slow day in, day out, year in, year out exposure that builds up in your body. When I started, they didn’t even have the term ‘body burden’, which now is the word used to describe the amount of chemicals that are stored in our bodies, but it was going on. It was going on.

The first book that I could find, it was written on Toxics for the General Public was Rachel Carson’s Silence Spring, which was in 1964. I didn’t read it in 1864. I was only what? Seven, eight years old, nine years old. But I finally read it a couple of years ago. It says in there that even in 1944, they already knew that our bodies were accumulating DDT, another toxic poison. They already knew it in 1944.

And so if you’ve seen that study from Environmental Working Group where it talks about the chemicals in the babies’ umbilical cords, that isn’t recent. That didn’t just happen. That’s been going on since 1944. They could’ve done that testing in 1944 and found the same thing.

And that means that…

ANNIE BOND: Well, one of the things that’s interesting that’s happening now I think is that – I agree, that there has been a very big increase in awareness of toxic chemicals and health, but there’s also an increase in fear. And the press is picking up on things like BPA in babies’ bottles and that’s something to be concerned about because of the endocrine disrupters. This is a whole other story.

But I think that that’s one of the values that I have found so much in your work. People can be terrified of this. I know many pregnant woman has just got into complete terror their whole pregnancy, “What if I got…?” and all that kind of thing. The wonderful think about your work is then they’re solutions that you don’t have to go under overwhelm and terror…

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yes, that’s exactly right.

ANNIE BOND: …that instead, you’ve got ideas of things you can do. And you and I both did it. We both learned how to live completely normal lives without toxic chemicals.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: We did.

ANNIE BOND: And so the solution section is just key. And really, thanks to you, you also have your Debra’s List on your website. So tell us a little bit about that because that really speaks to the solution-focus here.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, I want to say that a number of years ago, I was on Geraldo. Remember that show, Geraldo?

ANNIE BOND: Yeah, yeah.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: He would get people on the show and then he’d kind of rip them apart. I thought, “Oh, no! What’s he going to do to me?” But he kept to me to the very end. He did a show on toxics and he had all these other guests and then he kept me up to the end. He presented me like I was the saving grace angel.
ANNIE BOND: Oh, wow! Very nice.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: He didn’t say a bad thing about me at all. He just said, “This woman is coming up with all the solutions.”

ANNIE BOND: You know, we’re going to need to go to break now. I’m Annie Bond and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is author, Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re celebrating her 30 years of being continuously in print. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

ANNIE BOND: Hi, you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Annie Bond. I’m here with Debra Lynn Dadd. She and I switched seats today. She’s the guest and I’m the host because today, November 1st was her 30th anniversary of writing her first book, Non-Toxic & Natural. She’s since gone on to write a total of seven books and has an incredible website full of all sorts of resources. It’s nice to be back again, Debra.

Where do you think we’re going with toxics in the future? I mean, I think you’ve got a bird’s eye view that very, very few people on the planet about this entire situation. It’ll be really fascinating to hear that from you.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Well, I think that – hmmm… where am I going? Where are we going?

ANNIE BOND: Do you think we’ll ever have a toxic-free world, for example. Is there a silver lining here? I’ve given talks and people just wanted to blow their brains out after. I mean, not literally of course.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: No, I understand, I understand.

ANNIE BOND: They’re like, “Oh, it’s so depressing.” And so what do you think about the situation?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: I think we’re moving in the direction of having a toxic-free world. I’m certainly pushing it and I’m a big believer in that if we have a goal and we can take step-by-step increments towards that goal, then we can achieve that goal.

And so I know in my home, I live in a toxic-free world in my home, you live in a toxic-free world in your home, Annie and I know many of our listeners do as well. And so then it’s a matter of saying, “Well, if we could achieve that, how can we achieve having a toxic-free community? How could we look around and say, ‘Where’s the toxic pollution here?’ How can we help our neighbors be toxic-free? How can we help businesses be toxic-free?” And then it just kind of moves on and moves on.

I see things that now, countries (governments, for example) have lists of toxic chemicals that they’re reviewing and banning in different parts of the world, different chemicals, different lists. There’s like a hundred different lists of governments that are banning certain toxic chemicals.

We didn’t have that in 1984 at all, nothing. Nothing, nothing like that. We had things like green chemistry nowadays where businesses are being encouraged to eliminate their toxic chemicals and replace them with chemicals that are less toxic. We have organizations that are helping businesses and consumers do these things.

And so there’s a lot more people that are in agreement now that their toxics are a problem and that we should do something about it.

I think that it’s not that widespread where people are looking for solutions. There’s a lot more people who are promoting the problem. And then there are people who are promoting solutions. And so I just continue to promote my solutions. I just keep saying, “There’s an answer. There’s a solution. Come over here.”
But the first thing we need to do is just acknowledge that there’s a problem at all. There are still many, many people who just think that toxics are not a problem, that products wouldn’t be on the shelf because the government wouldn’t allow that. That really I think is the fallacy. That’s the myth.

ANNIE BOND: So I have a question about that then. If the – sorry, I just lost my thought about that.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: It’s okay.

ANNIE BOND: So keep jumping and I’ll come back.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Okay, so there’s so much going on in the world right now in this direction that I can hardly keep up with it. I remember when I wrote my first book, my very, very first self-published book, The Consumer Guide for the Chemically Sensitive, everything I knew on the subject fit on 3 x 5 cards and a shoebox. And now, I have a website that is so big.

I have almost 6000 posts on my website. And new things are coming in all the time, new guests for me to interview, new businesses, new products that it seems like the whole world is geared towards, “Let’s be not toxic,” but there still is so far, so much to do, so far to go, so much to understand. But at last, we’re moving in a direction. It’s not a fringe thing anymore.

ANNIE BOND: I did remember what I was saying. My question was, most of my readers, all through the nineties, I would say 90% of my readers were pregnant women actually or young mothers and so that’s a definite vertical – or people that are extremely chemically sensitive or something like that. What about the broader population? How do you feel this is filtering out to people that don’t have such an urgent need to be concerned about it in the sense that they’re worried about a baby or something like that?

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Yeah. Well, I think that more and more people are starting to make the connection as there’s more and more general mass market kind of information out there. Another thing is when I was researching toxic-free, for a long time, I was going out on my old research that I had done back in the early eighties about what was toxic. And before Toxic-Free, I just researched everything a new in terms of what are the toxic chemicals because there’s so many new ones like in 1984.

In 1984, when I wrote Non-Toxic & Natural, I picked 40 chemicals. My whole goal of that book was just to eliminate 40 chemicals – and we didn’t even know about things like bisphenol a and triclosan and there was no such thing as indoor air pollution. All these things that we talk about today did not exist in 1984.

And so when I did this research, what I found was – and I’m going to say this slowly because it’s so important – every single body condition, every illness and every symptom has now been associated with toxic chemical exposure. You can look up anything that’s wrong with your body (headaches, stomachaches, impotence, infertility, anything, diabetes, overweight), everything is associated with toxic chemical exposure.

So there’s no question. Anything that’s wrong with your body, just start eliminating toxic chemicals from your home and your body and you’re going to get better. I can say that with confidence.

ANNIE BOND: Yeah, it’s really true. I first started giving talks about this kind of thing. I would talk about something called the ‘barrel analogy’, which was commonly used where if you spray your rose bushes, you’re going to feel the barrel a little bit. If you spray perfume and then go have cheese wrapped in plastic, put it in the microwave, you get a lot of plastic, you’re going to be continually adding to the barrel until you hit the overflow point. And that’s certainly what happened to you and I. We both hit the overflow point.
But I was giving a talk once and somebody said, “You know…” – and this is an expert in the field of endocrinology, of endocrine disruptors, these hormone disrupting chemicals and he said, “You know what, Annie though? It takes one hit. When someone’s pregnant, make it one hit of the plastic on the wrong day for that fetus, it could have incredible ramifications.”

And so, the seriousness of actually – you know what? Maybe one thing to talk about is the steps. You and I both put it together as a puzzle piece and everybody has to do things one step at a time. I mean, you can’t just overhaul your life overnight even though some people want to and try. But when it comes to certain kinds of chemicals, that’s where we’re getting into a bit of a tricky thing these days, with the plastics and endocrine disrupters. I think you have to be especially carefully.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: You do have to be especially careful. Part of that is simply information and understanding about what are the chemicals and what are their health effects and the different ways that chemicals can get in your body and all these things.

And so on the one hand, I feel like that I ought to be doing a lot of toxics education. And on the other hand, one could simply say, “If you just do all the non-toxic things, just do those and you’re going to eliminate.”

ANNIE BOND: I agree. And that’s a really nice way of doing it, absolutely.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: You don’t need to know all the lists of pesticides that are in food in order to buy organic because you’re just going to eliminate that list of pesticides.

ANNIE BOND: That’s right, that’s right. And people, to become a label reader. So that’s where you’ll start finding, “Oh, well, gosh! That is yellow dye no. 5. I think I won’t buy it,” that kind of thing.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Right, right, right. You can find out as much as you want to about toxics. You can also just say – you asked me about Debra’s List earlier at DebrasList.com or you can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click on ‘Shop’ at the top. You could just go to Debra’s List and just buy everything off the websites that I have listed there and you would just have a pretty toxic-free life and you wouldn’t have to know anything about these phenol or anything else.

ANNIE BOND: …which just really comes to this sort of how much you – I mean, we need to start wrapping this up. I think from my experience of seeing the body of your work over 30 years, you’ve pollinated our lives with wonderful alternatives. I think it’s just an incredible legacy of yours that you’ve been able to do that and an incredible gift to the world. I, for one, thank you so much. I know there are so many hundreds of thousands of people out there that feels the same way.

So I just want to ask you if you have any closing thoughts? I can’t thank you so much for this incredible legacy.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: You’re welcome. I want to say that it’s really been my pleasure to do it because I know that a lot of people are scared about toxic chemicals particularly if you’re just reading the newspaper or watching TV. But what this whole journey has been about for me is finding the things that aren’t toxic, finding the things…

ANNIE BOND: Yeah, that’s nice. And there’s rejuvenation there.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Right. And I see that happening. I see that life basically wants to be healthy, wants to regenerate and that all we need to do is just eliminate the toxic chemicals that are working against us and then our health will be restored. I see that happen over and over again.

So actually, if you look at me and you say, “How can she study about toxic chemicals all day long every day?” That’s not what I’m studying. What I’m doing is finding the good in the world and it’s my pleasure to bring it to everyone else.

ANNIE BOND: Well, that is just a lovely way to stop here. Really, that’s just a great sentiment.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Thank you.

ANNIE BOND: So this is Annie Bond and you’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio with Debra Lynn Dadd. She’ll be back hosting the show tomorrow. Remember, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to the archive shows. And Debra’s also starting transcripts now, so you can read those too. There will be a transcript of the show by tomorrow. So thank you so much for being with us. Please listen again tomorrow. Be well.

DEBRA LYNN DADD: Bye!

ANNIE BOND: Bye bye, Debra. Thank you so much.

Wool as fire retardant and other mattress concerns

Question from TA

Debra, do you know if wool alone is sufficient to pass the flame test required by law for mattresses? I see natural mattress companies that claim they use no fire retardant because wool is naturally flame resistant, and that’s how they pass the flame test. But then I see other natural mattress companies claiming that wool alone won’t pass the test and therefore some type of fire retardant must be used (and they sometimes directly state that companies who claim to use only wool aren’t telling the full story, because they must be using something else to pass the test). Shopping around for natural mattresses gets very confusing and frustrating.

On a similar note, how can one be sure of ANY of the claims made by mattress companies? They say their mattresses are incredibly pure, free from any toxic chemicals, and so forth. But then I find something on another site stating that the mattresses from the super-pure-and-natural company have been tested by a lab and found to contain toluene and formaldehyde. Is it possible those are false accusations, perhaps from a competitor who wants to hurt their business? Yes. Is it possible that those things are true and we’d be breathing in those chemicals if we bought said mattress? Yes.

When spending thousands of dollars on a natural mattress, how can one be sure that the product truly is as wonderful as it appears to be? If I were to spend the money on a Savvy Rest mattress, for instance, can I trust that wool really is the only fire retardant being used and that we won’t be breathing in toluene and formaldehyde and other harmful chemicals if we sleep on it for the next 20 years?

Debra’s Answer

Yes, wool alone is sufficient to pass the flame test required by law for mattresses.

As for your other question, it’s difficult. By law companies are supposed to tell the truth. But they don’t always. Over the years I have gotten to know some of the companies and trust them because of our long-standing relationship. Some companies aren’t interested in talking with me, and I also hear things. But you can also just look at their website and see what they are promoting. For example, if a company promotes that they are “certified” by a certification they created and they are the only product certified, well, what does that sound like to you?

Also, look at their certification certificates. Are they up-to-date? If you go to the website of the certifier, can you confirm the product is certified?

The companies I trust are the ones who have current third party certifications and are forthcoming about their materials, particularly describing them on their website. They welcome my phone calls. Some, I’ve even visited their manufacturing facilities. I even SLEPT in the workrooms where they make Shepherd’s Dream mattresses.

I don’t like companies mudslinging each other. For me, the best presentation a company can make is to clearly present their materials and let the customer decide.

Add Comment

Fireplace Soot and Ash in My Home

Question from Nina

I went to clean our fireplace with a wet/dry vac to try and rid the home from the smell of the fireplace since we use it very seldom. As I was vacuuming up the soot and ashes I didn’t realize the vac was blowing everything back into my home!! I opened all the doors and windows and vacuumed and dusted everything, however I have small children in the home (who weren’t home at the time) but I want to make sure the air in the home is safe. Any recommendations? Thanks

Debra’s Answer

My inclination is to say that if you dusted and vacuumed then it’s probably fine. I might run your HVAC to pick up particles. Hard to tell what might still be there, not picked up, if anything.

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Amazing Pumpkin Pancakes

pumpkin-pancakes

These pancakes are amazing because you only need TWO ingredients to make a real pancake! Just eggs and pureed pumpkin, plus pumpkin pie spices of your choice. But just the eggs and pumpkin themselves make a real pancake that looks like a pancake, tastes like a pancake, and has the texture of a pancake. Totally gluten-free. And you can make them in a minute. And this little recipe gives you a whole tall stack of pancakes!

If you add freshly grated nutmeg you don’t even need any sweetener, because the nutmeg is sweet. I just made these for breakfast and the aroma of nutmeg is wafting into my office still.

I described these pancakes the other morning on Toxic Free Talk Radio when I interviewed chef Danny Boome, host of the new season of Good Food America. He raved about the nutrition benefits and called them “autumn in a plate.” I agree.

A friend of mine made a batch and loved them.

Now you can use canned pumpkin if you must, but remember the can linings contain BPA, which is an endocrine disruptor. It’s so easy to roast your own pumpkin, please give it a try. Roasted pureed pumpkin keeps well in the refrigerator, and then you have it on hand for pancakes any morning, or to use in other pumpkin recipes (see below).

OK. Here’s the recipe!

 

Amazing Pumpkin Pancakes
Author: Debra Lynn Dadd
Ingredients
  • 2 eggs
  • 1/4 cup pumpkin puree
  • ground cinnamon
  • freshly grated nutmeg
  • butter or coconut oil for the pan
Instructions
  1. Beat the eggs with a whisk in a medium-sized bowl until the yolks are well mixed with the whites.
  2. Add the pumpkin puree and blend it in thoroughly.
  3. Add spices to taste.
  4. Heat your pan on medium high heat. Add a small amount of butter or coconut oil. Actually, best results come from using a “ceramic” nonstick pan such as Cusisinart Green Gourmet. The pancakes don’t stick at all.
  5. Use about 2 tablespoons of batter per pancake. The pancakes will “set up” like a regular pancake, but you won’t get the bubbles. When they set up after a few minutes, it’s time to flip them over using a spatula.
  6. Cook for another minute or two and transfer pancakes to a plate.

You can top with butter, maple syrup, fruit, or anything you would usually put on pancakes. But they are yummy just plain, too.

You might also like these other pumpkin recipes on this blog:
* Pumpkin Hummus
* Pumpkin Muffins
* Pumpkin Pie for Everyone (my personal favorite – sweet without sweetener!)

What You Need to Know About Your HVAC and Indoor Air Quality

Today my guest is Judy Rachel, a Home Performance Professional specializing in third party, independent home energy audits, best green building practices specifications and HVAC system design. We’ll be talking about the basics of how your HVAC works, choosing correct filters, why we have indoor air quality problems and how to solve them, and how to get to know your HVAC system so you can use it properly. Judy writes and teaches building science / energy efficiency curricula for various community and city colleges, as well as for workforce training programs. She provides both classroom and hands-on trainings. She is a senior lead trainer for Efficiency First California, training contractors in the Home Performance with Energy Star curriculum. She is a lead trainer for Energy Conservation Institute’s Building Performance Institute (BPI) Certification trainings. Judy is President of the Eco-Home Network, a non-profit devoted to greening as many homes as possible. She is the field mentor for contractors participating in the Southern California Home Upgrade program. Along with being certified as a Building Analyst, Envelope Specialist, Heating Specialist and A/C and Heat Pump Professional through BPI, she is a field proctor for these certifications. As a HERS rater (Home Energy Rater) she does diagnostic testing, verifications and inspections for residential and small commercial buildings to ensure compliance with California’s Energy Code. Certified by Build It Green, she is a GreenPoint rater for new construction and a Certified Green Building Professional. Through National Comfort Institute she holds their Air Balancing and Carbon Monoxide & Combustion Certifications. Judy thinks the most amazing part of what she does is that by creating energy efficient homes she is actually able to improve the comfort, durability, indoor air quality, as well as, occupant safety within homes. www.greenachers.com

read-transcript

 

 

O2-banner2


TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
What You Need to Know About Your HVAC and Indoor Air Quality

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Judy Rachel

Date of Broadcast: October 30, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. The first thing I want to tell you today – oh, besides the fact that it’s October 30 and it’s Halloween tomorrow – I should have on my website (and I doubt it), but if you had subscribed to my newsletter, I’ve been sending out different bits and pieces on the newsletter about how to have a less toxic Halloween.

There had been a few things that had come out, different organizations with things. But you might want to take a look at – there’s a website called HealthyStuff.org. They’ve just done a study of toxic chemicals in Halloween costumes and accessories and all those things for Halloween. So just go to HealthyStuff.org and take a look at what they had to say about the toxic chemicals in Halloween.

And you can also go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and type in “healthy halloween” into the search box and you can listen to an interview I did with Annie Bond. We talked about different ways that we have had toxic-free Halloweens in the past and different things that you can do.
So I just encourage you to type in “halloween” or “green halloween”, “non-toxic halloween” in your favorite search engine and see what comes up because there’s a lot of things to know about how toxic Halloween can be and making it a less toxic occasion for your children.

So all that said, today, what we’re going to talk about is your HVAC system, which is ‘heating, ventilation and airconditioning’. I think that’s right, but my guest will correct me. We’re going to talk about indoor air quality.

And I decided to have this guest on because I was talking with her and she gave me so much information about my HVAC system that I didn’t know. I live here in Clearwater, Florida where we are in air-conditioning. My HVAC is on seven or eight months of the year. The things that I didn’t know, I thought all of you should know because if you have HVAC (as most people do), you need to know how it’s affecting your indoor air quality, what you can do. We’re going to talk about all these things.

My guest today is Judy Rachel. She’s a home performance professional specializing in third-party, independent home energy audits, best green building practices specifications and HVAC systems design. And so today, we’re going to be talking about the basics of how your HVAC system works, choosing correct filters, why we have indoor air quality problems and how to solve them and how you can get to know your HVAC system so that you can use it properly. So we’ve got a lot to talk about.

Hi, Judy.

JUDY RACHEL: Hi, Debra!

DEBRA: How are you today?

JUDY RACHEL: I’m doing great. How about you?

DEBRA: Good. And you’re in Los Angeles, right?

JUDY RACHEL: Yeah.

DEBRA: How’s the air quality there today?

JUDY RACHEL: Well, the air quality is just what it is in L.A. We’re a great, big city. I am in a valley where we have inversion layer. So it’s definitely got its good days and its bad days. Fall is definitely kind of a better season for us with the air quality. But all that being said, indoor air quality, studies are showing, is much worse than outdoor air quality even in cities like L.A.

DEBRA: Yes. And those studies have been going on for many, many years and we’ll talk about that.
I just wanted to say that I have a friend who lives in L.A. who is also a building scientist like you are. She does consultations about fixing your HVAC for indoor air quality purposes. But also, what was so interesting to me when I went to her house what a difference it made that I always thought I could just never live in L.A. But being in her house, the difference between the outdoor air quality and the indoor air quality was just amazing.

And of course, she lives in a completely non-toxic house. So she’s reducing her indoor [inaudible 00:05:43] source as she should. It made so much difference to not just have any old HVAC, but to be able to do the right thing and understand how it is. So I know it can make a huge, huge difference.

But before we get into the details, tell us how you got interested in this subject.

JUDY RACHEL: Well, I was actually searching very specifically for a job that I could be doing every single day of my life that I could feel good about, that was going to match up with my values of wanting to live a green, sustainable, non-toxic life. And in that search, I happened to kind of fall into building science.

I heard about home energy audits. I talked my way into a class on home performance and building science and I was lost. It’s absolutely fascinating. It’s amazing, the things that we don’t know or understand about the way our homes perform and the fact that in making a home energy efficient, we have all these wonderful byproducts. We get increased comfort, we get better indoor quality, we create more durable homes, we create healthier and safer homes.

So it just was this incredible revelation, “This is awesome! It’s fascinating. I could do this every day and wake up happy to be doing this.”

DEBRA: That’s really good. I’m so glad that you’re doing it because it is a field that people need to understand. It’s kind of technical. You explained it so clearly to me that I’m sure that the listeners are going to understand everything you say today.
So first, let’s start with explain the basics of an HVAC system.

JUDY RACHEL: Well, so basically, there’s actually two components to what we call an HVAC system. We have the component that we are actually conditioning the air in our home. And so that’s really the heating and air-conditioning component of it.

Typically, it’s best that it’s a completely separate system from the v portion, which is ventilation. The heating and cooling portion is conditioning our air. It’s supposed to be about comfort. And part of comfort is actually moisture removal in air-conditioning.

The v portion, ventilation is really about the contaminant and pollutants in our air and getting proper air changes through our house. It has its own two components. We have a source point ventilation where we’re actually removing the contaminants at a particular source.
So say in a bathroom where we have high moisture issues (showers, baths, that type of thing as well as odors), we want that sources removed. In the kitchen, we’re cooking. There’s combustion byproducts. We want those sources of contaminants removed.

And then we have the second component of ventilation, which is the whole house ventilation where we actually need to create air changes from the indoors to the outdoors, so that we get this body of air that moves through the house, so we actually can remove pollutants that might be building up in the home.

DEBRA: And that would include even things like if you think that you don’t have pollution (like I think I don’t have pollution in my house because I don’t have toxic chemicals), that would include things like the pollution that’s created when we breathe, when we exhale, things like dust mites that might be coming off your bad or…

JUDY RACHEL: Exactly!

DEBRA: Tell us about some of those pollutants that w might not be thinking of.

JUDY RACHEL: Right! And so the thing is is that dusts are very living. So even when we are making tremendous effort to not bring contaminants into our homes, the very fact of our existence in an enclosed space is creating – basically, we can call them contaminants. We are creating stale air. We’re breathing in the O2, we’re breathing out the CO2. We need to make sure that we have the right balance and mix of those things.

And then, our various cleaning supplies are releasing things. So, of course, if we’re trying to clean much more non-toxically, then there’s going to be less of that. But these things do build up. Just every effort we make – our skins are still shedding cells and if we have any pets, there’s dander. So there are just all kinds of things that are building up and basically just making the air stale when we have an enclosed environments, which is what our homes are. And in order for us to keep…

DEBRA: And we… go ahead.

JUDY RACHEL: Oh, I was going to say just so in order for us to keep our conditioned air conditioned in our houses, we do need to have an enclosed environment, so we need to make sure that we’re also getting the air changes.

DEBRA: Yeah, we need to go to the break, but I want to ask you a question about that when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Judy Rachel. She’s a home performance professional specializing in energy and indoor air quality. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Judy Rachel

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Judy Rachel. She’s a home performance professional specializing in both indoor air quality and also energy efficiency. These two things go together and I’m so interested in that balance.

So Judy, would you just tell us more about – I really want us, all the listeners and myself, to understand that the HVAC system, there’s this balance going on in our homes where we need to have the air heated and cooled in an energy efficient way, which means seal up the house.
That’s one of the reasons why we have indoor air quality problems now. This whole thing about indoor air quality, when I started writing it, it wasn’t even a phrase. It didn’t exist 30 years ago when I started writing.

I remember that then, there was the energy crisis. And after the energy crisis, they said, “We need to seal up all the houses to retain the heat and cooling and reduce the amount of energy we used.” And that’s when we started having indoor air quality problems because prior to that, houses leaked around little cracks and windows and all these things. And now, there was no longer the air exchange.

So tell us more about these opposites of needing to seal the house for energy efficiency, yet needing to have ventilation for indoor air quality.

JUDY RACHEL: So first, I want to say that there’s a little bit of a fallacy that we didn’t have the indoor air quality problems when our houses were leakier.

What’s happening in a leaky building is that the air exchanges are completely random and they’re from random sources. And because of the way physics work, hot moves to cold, wet moves to dry, the natural forces that go on particularly in a leaky house are that we get cold air coming in down low and we get warm air trying to exit up high. It creates this whole invective loop and pressure differentials that are happening from inside to outside.

And so if I’m bringing air in from down low in my climate air, that’s from raised foundation. So I’m sitting on top of a bunch of dirty, disgusting earth that very often has all kinds of rodents and raccoons and possums, skunks and everything else that get underneath my houses and…

DEBRA: Me too, me too.

JUDY RACHEL: …and/or even moist basements and things like that and in other parts of the country. So we’re bringing in air from those really horrible places into our home. And then it’s also trying to exit out the top of our home.

And then in the summer, it actually reverses. And so now, I’m bringing in air from my attic, which is another place where there’s all kinds of stuff going on up there that I really don’t care to be breathing that air.

So in our leaky houses, the air exchanges were much quicker, but they were still coming from sources that I really didn’t want to be breathing that air.

Then there’s also the portion of I basically built a home to shelter myself from outside conditions because I’m just not as hardy as, say, my predecessors in human history. So I want some comfort, I want an enclosure to keep me safe and to keep me comfortable.
So now, I’ve put in a forced air system. So I’m heating and cooling my air, but if the house is leaky, then my conditioned air is coming and going. The outside air is coming in and it’s messing up this air that I’m paying to condition.

So that’s where a lot of the energy efficiency comes in. If I have a leaky building and I’m trying to heat or cool it, I’m spending much more money heating and cooling that air because it is randomly coming and going and I don’t have any control over that.

Then the way that I deliver the air into the house is through this air distribution system, the air ducts. If those air ducts are leaky, then I’m bringing in this unconditioned air that’s also very typically from the crawl spaces that my ducts are running in or the attic if that’s where my ducts are running through or the walls if that’s where my ducts are running through.

So I’m losing my conditioned air, I’m bringing in unconditioned air and I’m also bringing pollutants in if I don’t make sure that my air distribution system, that those ducts are actually tight.

DEBRA: Yeah.

JUDY RACHEL: So they have both an effect on the energy efficiency of the equipment, of my home, of my energy bill, as well as my indoor air quality.

DEBRA: So one of the things that I didn’t understand several years ago was that I always assumed that air was coming in and out of the house. But I understand that in most, if not all HVA system, what it’s doing is recycling air.

And so the key thing of interest for me about that aside from the fact that we’re probably depleting oxygen is that when you’re recycling the air, then the pollutants that people who aren’t living in toxic-free houses like you and I, just the average American person or the average person in the world, they’ve got all these toxic chemicals going on.

They’re cleaning with toxic chemicals and spraying pesticides and fire retardants on the sofa and all these things and there’s no place for those pollutants to go and they just build up and build up and build up and build up over time to very toxic levels in the home.

So it’s not just what are the toxic chemicals, it’s toxic chemicals plus no ventilation.

So could you just explain about the recycled air and how then does the v part of HVAC work to be making these air exchanges?

JUDY RACHEL: Right! So yes, our forced air system really should just be moving inside air through the house. They shouldn’t be exchanging outside air at all. That’s part of what I was just saying in terms of leaky duct system, is that the force air system in our house and the ducts that are bringing that air to the various rooms is really like the circulatory system of our body. There shouldn’t be an exchange from inside to outside through that system.

So the heating and cooling portion is to make us comfortable, it’s to condition our air and it’s also to remove moisture in climate where moisture is an issue.

DEBRA: Before you go on, let’s go to break and then we’ll put it all together when we come back so you don’t get interrupted by the commercial.

JUDY RACHEL: Okay, great!

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is and Judy Rachel from Performance Professional. Her website is GreenAchers.com”>GreenAchers.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Judy Rachel. She’s a home performance professional specializing in indoor air quality and HVA systems.

So Judy, tell us a little more about – we were discussing about how the system recycles the air.

JUDY RACHEL: Great! And so, to recap, the heating and air-conditioning portion of our heating and cooling system, for most of us, was designed and installed to actually be a closed loop within our home. They were not installed to even clean our air. They purely are installed to circulate the air and to condition the air in the house and to remove moisture.

So then that leads us to the ventilation portion of HVAC. And that ventilation portion is very specifically about exchanging indoor and outdoor air and removing contaminants and pollutants in a controlled way (so not random like in a leaky house), in a controlled amount and is absolutely meant to increase the comfort and health of the occupants within the home.
So they’re two very separate systems and…

DEBRA: But they’re all together in one thing. I mean, somebody buys the HVAC and they’re going to get both, right?

JUDY RACHEL: Well, no. So the contractor…

DEBRA: This is a very important point. This is so important.

JUDY RACHEL: Yes.

DEBRA: Okay, go ahead.

JUDY RACHEL: Yeah, so the contractors are called HVAC because we’re still dealing with the movement of air and the principles of how air moves and the pressures that make air move. It moves in the temperature differences that work within air movement and the fact that we typically are distributing – well, we’re distributing air movement through duct systems. They’re motorized, there are fans and blowers.

And so the systems are absolutely within the realm of the same brain. The contractor that’s been trained to do the heating and cooling would very naturally be able to understand how a ventilation system would need to be designed and installed. So the two things are similar in the way that we’re using air, they’re different systems.

So if we want to use your heating and cooling system as a ventilation system, then it needs to be designed that way and we need to now start having some air exchanges from inside to outside happening with it.

None of our systems actually clean the air per se. So that’s not what’s going on with this system. Basically, to remove pollutants is not about scrubbing the air or cleaning it. It’s exchanging it with enough ambient air that is not going to have the parts per million of the pollutants in it.
So to some extent, we’re diluting. We want to truly dilute as in getting rid of it and having a much better body of air available for us.

DEBRA: But then, so this now leads us into two different areas. I just want to mention them both and then go in a certain direction.

So the first thing that I want to say is that if you’re ventilating in, say, Los Angeles, you’re bringing in the outdoor air, which is polluted. But as we said in the beginning that many studies have shown that indoor air pollution is worse than outdoor air pollution because you’ve got the outdoor air pollution and you’ve also got the pollution being produced by all the toxic things and breathing and all those things that are indoor.

And so, the second area then is about filters. I know that we think that if we have HVA systems, we’re putting in the filters in order to filter the air, so that it’s less toxic. But you told me something different. So tell us about filters.

JUDY RACHEL: Right. So the filter in the heating and cooling portion of our system is actually to protect the mechanical components of the system itself. It’s to protect the fan that’s blowing the air and it’s to protect the coil that is creating our [inaudible 00:31:34] air-conditioning, the coil that’s creating the cooling air, that’s taking the heat out of the air. So we need to keep those components clean so that they continue to function well and that whole system is able to function well and efficiently.

So that is truly why there are filters in the heating and cooling portion of our forced air system. It’s for the protection of the systems themselves is not actually to say scrub our air or filter the air for our respiratory health.

DEBRA: Okay! So then, there’s things that consumers need to know about when they go buy the filter because I know that I just go down to Lowe’s or Home Depot or someplace like that and I just was buying the filters that had the highest rating for removing particulates. But there’s reason why we shouldn’t do that. So tell us about that.

JUDY RACHEL: The filters in our system create a resistance to air movement and our systems are based on air moving. And there’s basically a certain budget. Like we have a budget for buying our groceries or for anything else, there is a budget for actually the motor and the system as to how much air it can move and how much air it can move consistently and effectively.

And since we’re trying to deliver the energy, the conditioned energy into the various rooms with the air, we know very specifically how much air we need to be delivering through the whole system and how much needs to go to these particular rooms.

And so every time I put something in the air stream (such as a filter), I am creating some resistance to air flow. And there is not a very big budget for what any of these fans can use. And I’ve got this entire duct system that I have to [inaudible 00:33:36], as well as the coil that I need to put on and so my budget gets used up by all of these things. The filter needs to be only a very small portion of that budget or I basically completely short circuit the entire very expensive system that I have installed and that’s supposed to be keeping me comfortable in my home.

DEBRA: So we need to go to break in just a few seconds. So tell us what is the guideline for what a consumer needs to do to choose the right filter?

JUDY RACHEL: Well, you need to know what the pressure drop is, how much resistance to air flow the particular filter is that you’re putting in a system and if your system can handle that amount of resistance to the air flow.

DEBRA: So that would be that you should use the filters that your contractor recommends. But if you don’t have a contractor (like for me, I just moved into a house and I have no idea which was it), so we’re going to talk about what to do in that case when we come back. And also, we’re going to talk about indoor air quality.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Judy Rachel from Performance Professional in the field of energy efficiency and indoor air quality with HVAC. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Judy Rachel. She’s a home performance professional specializing in balancing energy efficiency and indoor air quality. Her website is GreenAchers.com like ‘ache’, ache like your arm aches or your head aches or your lungs ache.

JUDY RACHEL: Exactly! Yeah, I think of it as “aching to be green”.

DEBRA: “Aching to be green,” good. That’s a good way to remember it. Okay! So if I don’t have any information from the contractor who installed my HVAC system, what is the quick answer about what I should do in order to find out what is the right filter for me?

JUDY RACHEL: Well, the quick answer is that it’s important to have a filter in your system to keep any dust and debris out of your system. So the least expensive filter that’s out there that will fit in the slot is going to be your best bet just to make sure you have a filter in your system.

But then really, the only way that you can possibly find out is a contractor that can specifically leave you with filters so that you can replace those. You would need a contractor to come in and actually measure what’s called the ‘static pressure’, the pressures on the system and to let you know what exact filter you actually can use for your system.

So even [inaudible 00:40:20] filters out there and they might fit into the slot, they absolutely can short circuit your system if they’re creating so much resistance to air flow. And it’s not something that you’re necessarily going to feel at the grill, so you really need to have somebody who can come in and take the measurement across the filter.

DEBRA: Yeah, I actually just had a new air-conditioner installed a few months ago. My contractor did not leave any filters with me or say anything about it. He just installed the filter that I bought from Home Depot. So I’m going to go back to my contractor and ask him specifically about this. He did a really good job installing it, but he just didn’t say anything about this.

And actually, listeners, the first time I’ve even heard about this was from Judy. It makes total sense to me that you want to have the best air movement that you can and protect your system and not have it all fall apart.

So tell us about indoor air quality problems. What are the source of indoor air quality problems and what’s the appropriate way to handle them if we can’t just put a filter on our HVAC and say, “Oh, we’re handling our indoor air quality problems.” People should not assume that they’re handled just because they have a filter in the HVAC.

JUDY RACHEL: Yeah, the indoor air quality issues are myriad and they definitely can come from indoors, outdoors and from things that we bring into our home. So kind of a short, quick, dirty list is you radon issues, there’s just environmental tobacco smoke, biological contaminants such as molds or animal dander or dust mites, bacteria and viruses.

Stoves, heaters, fireplaces and chimneys bring contaminants into our homes. The various household products that we have, formaldehydes in so many of the materials that are used to build our cabinetry and furnishings in our homes, pesticides, asbestos, lead and all the various VOC’s, adhesives, carpets, paint, upholstery, dry cleaning, bringing in dry cleaning to your home. Just washing outside, you track things in from the bottom of your shoes. Synthetic lawn and garden fertilizers as well as pesticides.

So unfortunately, the pollutants and contaminants comes from so many sources. And then, of course, when we do things like take showers or just breathe or cook, we’re also creating moisture. And then all those things that the moisture can actually – those molecules that moisture can attract. And so we want to make sure that we get those things out of our homes as well. And so that’s absolutely where ventilation comes into play.

And so some of the ventilation that we really need to do needs to be straight exhaust. There’s just certain areas of our homes where we need to be exhausting air out of our homes (particularly bathrooms and kitchens). They’re incredibly important.

DEBRA: And every house comes with exhaust fans unless it’s a really old house before they were required by law. But isn’t it like [inaudible 00:43:44] to not have those exhaust fans? So the thing is people have to use them. You need to use your exhaust fans.

JUDY RACHEL: Yeah, it’s so important.

DEBRA: You have to turn them on.

JUDY RACHEL: Turn them on. We need to use them. And so another thing is that there’s new ones that are so wonderfully quiet. So if you don’t turn it on because it’s just too noisy, look into getting one of the ones that has – it’s called the ‘sone rating’, that’s the noise rating, so a lower sone rating so that you don’t mind having it on. But they are essential to use.

And really opening doors and windows as pleasant as it seems and can feel, there’s definitely certain times of the year when most of us can’t open our doors and windows. And the other thing about opening doors and windows is that it’s one thing and it’s not controlled. We don’t know for sure that it’s actually working. If there isn’t a temperature difference from outside to inside, if there’s no wind, if it’s a still day, then there’s actually no movement happening across a door or window.

DEBRA: Wow.

JUDY RACHEL: I love opening my doors and windows, but I also know that that’s more a connection of myself to the outdoors than it is about truly getting ventilation in my household.

DEBRA: I haven’t thought about that.

JUDY RACHEL: Yeah. And so mechanical ventilation systems are just so important to know that I’m actually getting the controlled movement of air into and out of the house that I need to have happen. And in those systems, I absolutely want to design in a filter for those systems, so that I’m not bringing in excessive dust or particulates and other things from outdoors.

But once again, it is about air movement and it’s about air movement with a fan and through a duct system, so I still need to be concerned about is that filter restricting too much air flow. That’s the other part of it. Any of our systems that have filters, it’s really important to change them regularly.

DEBRA: So we’re talking about these two different systems and I’m guessing that if you had a properly designed HVAC system that there would be these two systems operating independently, but together. So that would mean two different kinds of filters, one to keep the conditioning part system clean and the other one, in the ventilation that might be removing pollutants. Is that right?

JUDY RACHEL: Yes. So in the ventilation system, I’m still definitely concerned about whatever fan it is and blower motor that I have in that piece of equipment. So I want to keep it clean. But in the fact that I am exchanging outdoor air with indoor air, I do want it to fit better as a filter that’s going to be stopping any pollutants that I know for sure might be coming in from outdoors (basically, kind of dusty type things in particular). I definitely want to make sure that the filter is good enough that insects aren’t going to be able to bypass it or [inaudible 00:47:09] it and things like that.

DEBRA: Of course! Of course, yes.

JUDY RACHEL: So that filter, I’m going to look at and design so that I’m doing better filtration with that filter rather than just trying to protect my motor with that filter for that system by…

DEBRA: So when you…

JUDY RACHEL: Go ahead.

DEBRA: We only have a couple of minutes left, so I want to make sure I ask this question.

JUDY RACHEL: Yes.

DEBRA: So again, when you’re going down to Home Depot or Lowe’s or whatever store you buy your filter and there’s all these filters on the shelf, most of those filters, if not all are going to be the filters that are keeping your system clean and you’re just going to put them on the slot. Where does this other filter go and how do you replace it?

JUDY RACHEL: So there actually should be a little bit of a filter over your exhaust fan (in your kitchen in particular). So you should make sure that that stays clear of grease and that it’s just right there and accessible.

DEBRA: Right.

JUDY RACHEL: If you actually have a whole house ventilation system put in to your house, then that’s one of the things that our ventilation contractors need to help us with. They need to help those filters to be accessible for us.

And that’s the same thing actually with the heating and cooling portion as well. They still do need to be accessible for us. And that’s why a lot of times, we put them where the return air (where the air goes back into the system) and so there’s a little pop open so we can just pop a filter back in and have that accessible to us.

So that really is something that our contractors need to help us with, to have to call them in every three months or something to change the filters. If that’s unfeasible, we need to be able to take care of that ourselves. Otherwise…

DEBRA: So if I don’t know that there’s a ventilation system like my conditioning system, but that I have fans in the kitchen and in the bathroom, I might not even have a ventilation system?

JUDY RACHEL: Yes. In most of our buildings (unless you’ve had some kind of energy retrofit done), you probably don’t have a whole house ventilation system. You’ve got your exhaust fans.

DEBRA: Okay, good. I’m sorry, I have to interrupt you because we’re coming to the end of the show. We only have a few seconds left.

JUDY RACHEL: Okay.

DEBRA: This has been so interesting and I want everybody to remember that I’m now making transcripts of all the shows. And so in a few days, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look at the transcript of the show, read it.

You can go to Judy’s website, GreenAchers.com. And that’s like “aching to be green.” This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

New TV Show Features Organic, Sustainable, and Healthy Restaurants

My guest today is Danny Boome, internationally-acclaimed TV personality and Chef, known to audiences for his culinary work and dynamic personality. Today we’ll be talking about his new gig as host of Good Food America season two, and what he’s learned from visiting organic, sustainable, and healthy restaurants across America. Following the success of hosting two of 2013’s hit shows: ABC Daytime’s Recipe Rehab and Food Network/The Cooking Channel’s Donut Showdown – Danny has taken to the streets to take viewers on a culinary adventure across America (think: Diners, Drive-ins and Dives, but with far less calories and a super charming English accent) in search of the nation’s best organic, sustainable and healthy restaurants. Viewers will join Danny on his gastronomic journey each Sunday night as he discovers regional gems, native ingredients and the homegrown talent that keeps locals coming back for more. This season, the series will make stops at restaurants from Maine to California, and you can come along too. In addition to hosting television shows, Danny brings his passion for food and culinary exploration to homes, schools and lecture halls across America. He shares his fresh perspective and practical, no-fuss recipes and techniques through cooking workshops, courses and private lessons. As a former European professional ice hockey player, Danny is an active sportsman. Danny’s experiences on the ice, in the kitchen and traveling the country as a self-proclaimed “gastronaut,” enabled him to further promote the benefits of healthy eating and exercise by creating the non-profit organization, Better Fed. Danny started his culinary training in 1999 as a cook in Switzerland – doubling up as an au pair for a local family. He later trained at the acclaimed West Wind Inn in Canada and attended the Grange Cookery School in England. Good Food America can be seen on select satellite and cable networks as well as online at ZLiving, which allows you to watch on your computer or on any mobile device. Watch at go.zliving.com/tvshows/good-food-america

read-transcript

 

 

GFA_Danny_Outside

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
New TV Show Features Organic, Sustainable, and Healthy Restaurants

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Danny Boome

Date of Broadcast: October 29, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Wednesday, October 29th 2014. The sun is shining here in Clearwater, Florida in a beautiful autumn day. We’re talking about one of my favorite subjects today, food and eating in restaurants.

I love to eat in restaurants, but the problem with most restaurants is that they serve not very good food and it’s prepared in some not very good ways. And so it’s sometimes difficult to find restaurants that are actually serving organic and healthy food, but there is more and more and more of them.

That’s what we’re going to be talking about today because my guest is Danny Boome. He’s an internationally-acclaimed TV personality and chef and he’s the host of a new show called Good Food America, which just started a couple of weeks ago.

If you don’t have that on your TV channels where you live, you can go online and watch it. It’s a great show. I’ve just been watching. There’s two episodes online right now. I’ve just been watching it and it’s great. It’s just that kind of show like if you’ve ever watched Diners, Drive-Ins & Dives where you go backstage in the restaurant and you get back into the kitchen and you watch the chefs. They explain what they’re doing and they’re creating all these luscious organic foods, sustainable and local. And it just looks gorgeous. You’ll find out exactly what were they doing. And Danny is the host.

Hi, Danny.

DANNY BOOME: Hi! How are you doing today?

DEBRA: I’m doing great. I’m so happy to talk to you because as I’ve said, going to restaurants is one of my favorite things. I have to admit, I do watch Diners, Drive-ins & Dives not because I love Diners, Drive-Ins & Dives, but because I like to go back in the kitchen and see what the chefs are doing.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah, yeah. I mean, that was the whole sort of idea of our show because we wanted to do the health food version of Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives basically.

DEBRA: And you did.

DANNY BOOME: But also, we wanted [inaudible 00:03:00] as well because we wanted to open the door, the pantry and the story a little bit more to the viewer because as you just said right now, when you’re looking – I mean, this show actually turned me into a home vegan and a vegetarian. I was actually a big carnivore before I started this. So when you’re going out and you’re looking for good, healthy food or even good, sustainable, organic food, it’s very, very hard to find. I actually find it really hard to find the people that know what to do with it. You know what I mean?

DEBRA: Right! Right, that is the thing.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah!

DEBRA: You can go to just a regular restaurant. Say if you’re a vegetarian, you can go to a regular restaurant and say, “Well, could you give me the vegetable plate,” but it tastes like nothing.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah.

DEBRA: I mean, I’m not a vegetarian. I eat meat, but I eat like grass-fed meat and things like that. But I remember, a few years ago, I was living in San Francisco for three months and I ate all my meals in restaurants and I could not find a sweet potato. I mean, San Francisco even has a lot of good, organic restaurants, but I couldn’t even find a sweet potato.

DANNY BOOME: Well, I’ll tell you what this is and this is what I found on the journey. Basically, what we did was (just to let your listeners know), we went to 25 states, 76 restaurants and around 18 different cities.

DEBRA: Wow!

DANNY BOOME: It was rather an amazing journey because what it was about was when I think of all of us that do the show, it was a case of, “Well, what is…” – and my fingers are right now in open air quotes – “What do we call healthy? Basically, what’s your interpretation of healthy food?” That was the first thing. And the second thing was, “Well then, what’s our interpretation of organic and sustainable?”

And some people are sort of like in the gray area. You’re edging on what is and what’s not.

And basically, I have to give the credit to our research. I really found people that actually understood what people wanted from the foo, but also really nice parameters of, “Okay, well, most of the restaurants we came across that would have a sweet potato or would have something would actually only…” – they would change their menu as seasonally possible. And then they also would procure their ingredients from a maximum of 100 miles. So your carbon footprint was low. There’s a relationship with the farmer or the fisherman or the butcher or the candlestick maker even to know where the food came from.

A lot of the chefs and the owners of these restaurants really put a lot of pride into it, but they also gave a lot of ownership to, say, the waiting staff or the servers. I mean, seriously, we went to a couple of places and everything was from around the corner like a potter would make all the plate and the artist…

DEBRA: Yes, I love that.

DANNY BOOME: …decorated the restaurant. And then the community would buy into that.

And I think when you say you’re going to places and you’re looking for these little restaurants, our show tells you where they are, but also, it also gives you some sort of ownership for yourself to say, “Oh, these guys have got the ethic balance that we want, but also there’s a really cool story like I know this plate came from Fred around the corner and each plate is individual or the trout was…”

I think one of the best places that we found was they got their trout or their fish from Detroit. And ironically, you don’t think of fresh water fish from Detroit, but it was from an urban garden. And these guys, it was the Detroit Christian Urban Botanic or something like that. I can’t remember what they call it. They ship the fish down and they would grow –there would be a fish pond in their warehouse. So it was sustainable.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DANNY BOOME: They’re just really cool, little stories that when I’m going and trying to find a really cool restaurant to eat, I want to know that. I want to know that there’s been a bit of care and attention put into the dish that’s in front of me.

And seasonality especially is where it all really does lie. It’s really becoming the heartbeat I think. It all regress back to understanding where our food comes from, but it also regress back to knowing well seasonally your pantry. We know that, “Let’s use what we’ve got and let’s not push the boat out any further in any other way.”

DEBRA: Well, that’s the way everybody used to eat before – I mean, if you go back, it used to be they grow their food in their gardens, they had a cow out back, they lived in village, they had their cottage gardens and people traded with each other. It wasn’t about food being shipped in from all these different places, the plates they ate off really were made by the local potter.

And so we’re just kind of going back to what’s natural. I think that it’s really incredible that these restaurants are doing that and setting these kinds of examples.

I wanted to ask you, first of all, where are you from.

DANNY BOOME: Well, my canny accent is from England. I’m from the U.K. originally.

DEBRA: I love England.

DANNY BOOME: But I’ve been out in the States for 10 years now. My beautiful wife and my beautiful son, we’ve actually just moved back for the winter. We were living in New York for eight years and we moved to Washington D.C. for the last two years. And then this winter, we moved back to Europe because we’re just opening our own culinary academy here.

DEBRA: Oh, great!

DANNY BOOME: Yeah, which is a really cool project itself.

DEBRA: Good, good. And how did…

DANNY BOOME: …because we’re doing a…

DEBRA: Go ahead, go ahead.

DANNY BOOME: Oh, sorry. Yeah, what we’re trying to do here in Europe is – well, I class myself as what they call a ‘gastronaut’. The idea is that I’ve developed what they call the ‘gastronaut academy’. It’s basically foodie adventures. And that’s what we’re going to be doing through Europe from January through to March. I’m basically taking people on a food tour, but with an extreme element.

I always say it’s like James Bond and Audrey Hepburn when they’re on vacation. That’s the vacation I’d like to go on – with a little bit of sophistication and a little bit of excitement. And then mixed up with food, we’re going sight-seeing, we’re doing these great, big detours around Italy, we’re going to great vineyards, like 16th and 14th century vineyards and wineries and then going to a couple of great [inaudible 00:10:11] restaurant.

So it’s going to be like Good Food Europe. You could think of it like that as well as Good Food America.

DEBRA: Wow! That’s really great. Well, we need to go to break in just a few seconds, but when we come back, what I’d like to talk about is I’d like you to tell us more about organic and sustainable and how those things are different and how they play out in the restaurants and maybe a little bit about what’s wrong with restaurants.

DANNY BOOME: Okay.

Debra: What should we be watching out for if we go to a restaurant?

DANNY BOOME: Okay.

DEBRA: So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Danny Boome. He is the host of the new show, Good Food America. He also was on ABC Daytime’s Recipe Rehab. He was the host. He was the host of Donut Showdown on the Food Network’s The Cooking Channel. And so you’ve probably seen him if you watch cooking channels like I do. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Fore Street - 4

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Danny Boome. He is the host of the new show, Good Food America where he goes and visits back in the kitchens with organic, sustainable and healthy restaurants across America.

So I want to tell you how you can watch it. It might be on your local channel line-up, but the show is produced by ZLiving. If you go to their website, you can watch the show.

It’s got kind of a long URL. So just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look for Danny’s description of it in today’s show and you’ll see there’s a picture of the Good Food America logo and right next to it is the URL. You can just click on the link and it goes straight to the page on the ZLiving website where you can watch the shows.

There’s a little trailer you can watch. You can watch a little bit of the videos. And then they’ll ask you to sign in for free. Just log in and you can watch the whole video. It’s just delightful. I am so happy that you’re doing this.

Although I have to say this is the show I wanted to do, but that doesn’t mean I can’t do this show too.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah!

DEBRA: I mean, if you were to say to me, “What would be your dream vacation?”, I would say, “Oh, I’d like to go travel around the country and eat at all the organic restaurants.”

DANNY BOOME: And the funny thing is you don’t really have to travel anymore to do it because there’s so many around you.

DEBRA: There are, there are.

DANNY BOOME: I’m going to say I am the luckiest guy for all the shows that I’ve done from The Food Network to ABC to ZLiving. I’m very lucky. I get to travel and eat and link.

The thing is, obviously, if it’s your passion and what you wanted to do [inaudible 00:15:38]. The movement is that I also think that it’s actually becoming second nature now. I’m really encouraged that if people want to see this type of show, they want to hear about the who, the what, the why’s and where to find the purveyors, the restaurateurs, the – It’s really nice. It’s not a fad. I think everybody is just very ‘word for the wise’ of where we’re going with food and everybody is actually marching to the same beat and that’s a really positive step.

And this show, I really do this – I mean, season one, we got Emmy-nominated. For season two, I hope we go for it again because people are very aware that this type of information is needed. It’s also entertaining.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. It is. And it’s luscious. Well, I’m not going to talk about what I’ve already seen until we get later in the show. Let’s just talk about – there are some very yummy-looking things. And I’ll also tell you what I had for breakfast later.

But tell us about what you saw in terms of what’s the difference between organic and sustainable. Let’s just start there.

DANNY BOOME: Okay! The broad explanation of organic is that when you look at, say, organic, if arable or animal, organic is that we’ve let the – say if it’s on an arable side, on the agricultural side, basically, the land has been left to run free for five years to become toxic-free. And then obviously, the product that’s been developed is grown or raised in a non-toxic environment. That’s what organic means.

Sustainable is more about the sustainability of life and the environment. And what we’re trying to do is we’re trying to obviously lower the carbon footprint and we’re also trying to be more – like renew energy, renew products, repurpose. But then also, time and sustainability, it’s trying to farm responsibility.

It’s very interesting [inaudible 00:18:00] about the trout farming in Detroit. These guys, they grow lettuce on the top of their fish tank and the fish eat the roots. They’re in these massive tanks. If you can imagine this massive tank with a bed of salad, a bed of lettuce on the top, the fish eat the root of the lettuce. Then basically, the fish poop and the methane of the poop run the filtration system and the energy. And then the water sprinkles back on top and feeds the lettuce.

So it’s this kind of like really, really cool…

DEBRA: It is a really cool system.

DANNY BOOME: …and that’s sustainability.

DEBRA: It’s a system, yeah.

DANNY BOOME: I’m a bit of a science geek as well. So that was like I walked in and I went, “Oh, my God! This is the coolest thing I’ve ever seen.” But also, it’s very interesting how many restaurants serves this where they’re, “I’m going to go buy my product from this guy” because there’s not then a strain on the fisheries.”

I mean, fresh water fish, it’s not possibly one of the most common things that we look at when we buy fish, but there’s not a strain on the – and also then, you’re not talking like – I call it ‘[inaudible 00:19:17] farmers’ when you’re talking about [inaudible 00:19:18] farming because a lot of the fish these days, they can be farmed so they can be any color that you want because they put a food dye or a feeding coloring.

So you have to look out for real organic. So that’s where the organic comes from. What is this fish or what is this cow fed? And basically, that’s what we’re looking for.

So organic and sustainable lives in harmony in my respect, it’s what I generally think of. And when we are going to meet some of these restaurants, what you find is that a lot of the guys, they go and meet a farmer.

Basically, they go to a farmer’s market, I meet a guy and I go, “Hey!” There’s actually more of a personal connection, more of a personal rapport between the farmer and the chef than actually the chef needs.

And then it’s sort of like, “I like this guy. I like his vision. I like how he’s growing it. He respects the earth. He respects the animal. He respects that I need – you know, I’m going to put an order in for 20 [inaudible 00:20:20] pounds of potatoes a year. But I also know that that guy is really crafting the land.” I mean, it’s such a responsible thing.

DEBRA: It is.

DANNY BOOME: And that’s the strange thing with organic. I don’t think people understand the cost element. If you go to Whole Foods today and you look in conventional and you look in the organic, there’s always a price difference. But the price difference is actually that there’s a little bit more sweat that goes into that and because the chemical that they’re using, the feeds they’re using or the time it’s taken the land, sort of the hit ratio of gaining a good product is a lot lower than actually [inaudible 00:21:05] because they’re more of a cosmetic product.

So you’re looking at oranges. I mean, you’re there in Clearwater, Florida so you’re not too far away from some orange groves. You’re looking at a taste of the ownership of that. You’re trying to split [inaudible 00:21:24].

What they’re doing in Europe is this…

DEBRA: Well, wait. I have to interrupt you. I have to interrupt you because we have to go to break.

DANNY BOOME: Alright, alright. Sorry, sorry, [inaudible 00:21:31].

DEBRA: Well, the commercial’s going to come and start talking right on top of you if I don’t. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Danny Boome and he obviously has a lot to say, so we’ll bring him back after the break. Stay tuned.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Earth - 1

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Danny Boome. He’s an internationally acclaimed TV personality and chef and the host of the new show, Good Food America.

It’s actually season two of Good Food America. He’s travelled through the country to find restaurants that are organic, sustainable and healthy and taking us behind-the-scenes in the kitchens.

You can go watch him, watch the show. If it’s not on your local line-up, you can watch it on the ZLiving website. Go to my website, ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and I’ve got the link right there. So all you have to do is just click through. Well, it’s kind of a long URL.

DANNY BOOME: It kind of is, right? We got to get a bit.ly on that.

DEBRA: Yes, something that’s easy to remember like ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. It’s very easy to remember.

DANNY BOOME: But I thought ZLiving.com was actually quite a catchy URL.

DEBRA: It is. But this one, it’s ZLiving.com/tvshows/good-food-america. Now, I bet you, nobody’s going to remember what I just said.

DANNY BOOME: Or they can just go…

DEBRA: So that’s why you can just go to Toxic Free Talk Radio and get it.

DANNY BOOME: Or you can just go to ZLiving.com and go search Danny Boome and I’ll pop up. So there we go, Good Food America.

DEBRA: Oh, that’s true. That’s true, yeah.

DANNY BOOME: Sundays at 9, right? Are we finished?

DEBRA: Yeah. Okay! So now, everybody knows how to get it. So did you want to finish your sentence or shall we talk about something else?

DANNY BOOME: No! Sorry, my train of thought was as we were talking about – sorry, I get a little bit (if you can tell) passionate when we start talking about organic, sustainability and everything.

DEBRA: Yes, you do.

DANNY BOOME: And what the interesting thing that I was just about to get into was that we pay a little bit too much attention to the cosmetics of how our products look.

DEBRA: Yes, talk about that.

DANNY BOOME: And so we sometimes go, “Well, that’s an ugly fruit. I’d rather have a pretty apple in front of an ugly apple.” They’re still an apple, but we’re tasting with our eyes. It’s the same thing. There’s nothing wrong with it. It’s just ugly.

What happens is that across the country – people don’t probably understand this, but say we go to an apple orchard and the apples are picked, those apples are graded from A to D. A obviously is then taken off to premiere supermarkets, B is then taken off to lower level supermarkets, then C is then put into things like pies and things like that and then D’s, they’re made into baby food.

And what it is, there’s nothing wrong actually with the apple itself. It’s just the “would people buy? Is it attractive enough?” And that’s [inaudible 00:29:36]. They basically put the cold medic and the organic. But actually, devalues the organic. The organic was ugly. It was ugly and oversized and not uniform-looking.

So if you can imagine a carrot, as we know, the carrot, well, sometimes the carrot will come out looking turnips or basically dog legs and things like that. So what it’s worth, they said, “Look, it’s still the same thing. But we’ll give you the ugly version for ¢5 cheaper on the pound.” And people just went, “Oh, okay.” That’s how they got organic in France.

So it was a case of, “Look, you can either have the conventional that is” – they actually make the conventional product more expensive just to say, “Look, this still is a carrot. Let’s start taking those off. Let’s start get moving ourselves away from the cosmetics because that costs us money. We’ll give you an uglier product, but it’s still the same thing and it’s a little bit cheaper.”

And that literally went off the shelves. The education process is, “Okay! It tastes the same. We can cook it the same. It just looks a little bit different.” It was kind of an amazing experiment. That’s what I’m trying to get to.

DEBRA: I love hearing that, yeah. I think that organic food tastes outstandingly better and I enjoy having it all look different. I like to go to the farmer’s market and I used to get my food from community-supported agricultural farm or organic farm that was actually down the street from where I live. I could go work in the farm and help put the baskets together and all those kinds of things and I love that.

I don’t care about how it looks. It looks its own unique way. Now, each vegetable is its own unique thing. Every carrot doesn’t have to look the same.

DANNY BOOME: Think of children. Children don’t realize. I mean, when you put something in front of a child these days, they don’t actually realize what is what because they’re losing that. We’re already three steps away from the next generation not understanding what is a leek or what is phenol or what is broccoli. They don’t know the difference, they just know it’s green.

DEBRA: Right!

DANNY BOOME: So that’s one step. The other step is as adults, we always think, “Well, it looks good and so that’s what we must buy because it looks the best.” But actually, it’s the color, it’s the dirt. That’s what you want. You want something that’s vibrant in color and a little bit of dirt on it because you know where it comes from. It shouldn’t be pristine and cropped and packaged. It should be loose and wild like my women.

DEBRA: Yes, yes!

DANNY BOOME: So that’s the way it goes. My publicist, if she’s just heard that, I’d be falling flat on the ground, but yeah.

DEBRA: She’s listening, Danny.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah. But no, that’s how we got to look at things. We go to remember that we used to run the land. We used to grow our own things in our back garden. It might sound like we’re beating the drum and I know I’m in Toxic Free Talk Radio, so everyones is on the same mindscape of what we should do with products. We just have to know that we can find it and that’s why we’re going to these restaurants. We can find it. These guys are doing the research for it.

They are introducing their customers to the CSA. They are introducing their customers to the farmers. So it’s not just, “Come and eat in our restaurant.” It’s also, “This is a Bob. He’s a great farmer. Why don’t you go down the road on a Sunday and buy your groceries from him or go join his CSA and pick up your weekly groceries or fruit and vegetables on a Wednesdays and get your share.” That’s the beautiful thing about this.

DEBRA: Well, one of the things that I think is great about restaurants, I mean I think if you look back in history, restaurants probably started because people were traveling and they couldn’t make their own food and so some enterprising housewife set up – I don’t know what the history of restaurants are, but that’s what it looks like to me.

But anyway, today, most people can make their food or buy take-out or whatever. But I think one of the great roles that restaurants are playing now (especially the restaurants that you visited) is that they are showing us a new way of eating – ”new” at least for our culture here.

By going to a restaurant and being able to see it and taste it and smell it, it’s not just like some strange, “What do I do with this food?”, that you see it in the store, that you’re actually seeing it in a dish, you’re tasting it and you’re saying, “This is delicious. Where does this come from?” and that having chefs set these new examples is really important.

We need to go to break again, but when we come back, I want us to talk about and give us some examples of some of the places that you visited and what you ate there and I want to tell you what I had for breakfast.

DANNY BOOME: Okay!

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I know I’ve said that twice. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. I’m here with chef and TV host, Danny Boome. We’re talking about his new show, Good Food America. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Earth - 6

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Danny Boome, internationally acclaimed TV personality and chef and host of the new show, Good Food America on ZLiving.com.

You can just go to ZLiving.com and search on Danny Boome, search on Good Food America and find the show or you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click right on the link directly.

DANNY BOOME: And if you’re on ZLiving and you want to know what Danny Boome looks like, I’m the chef who hosts Good Food America with hair. Season one, I have no hair. Season two, chef has hair. That’s me. So that helps.

DEBRA: I know! And there’s also a very cute picture of him at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com.

DANNY BOOME: There is, yes! Yes.

DEBRA: Yes! Okay, so what I want to ask you – first, I’m going to tell you what I had for breakfast because I think that this actually belongs on the menu at some restaurant.

DANNY BOOME: Okay. I was going to say should I have been warned about this because I didn’t know you were going to do this?

DEBRA: No, no. But would you just listen? Yeah. I just want to share it with you.

DANNY BOOME: Okay, good.

DEBRA: So I had pumpkin pancakes…

DANNY BOOME: Ooh…

DEBRA: But they’re gluten-free pumpkin pancakes. They’re so easy to make and they’re so delicious. I want to tell everybody that they can make them. It’s very easy.

You can just take one egg or two eggs (however many eggs you want). For every egg, you just beat it up like you’re making scrambled eggs. For every egg, you’d put in two tablespoons of pumpkin puree and a little cinnamon and you could put it in nutmeg or any of those nice pumpkin pie spices with it. And that’s it.

So then you just take about two tablespoons of this battery, mix it all up. Take two tablespoons and make this little, tiny pancake. And it is so delicious. You would think that it would just be flat like eggs, but it pops up and it looks like a pancake and it tastes like a pancake. It actually has texture like a pancake. I was just so amazed because it was so easy and so healthy. I just think it’s the perfect autumn breakfast.

DANNY BOOME: Awesome!

DEBRA: Doesn’t that sound good?

DANNY BOOME: It sounds like you’ve got autumn in a pancake.

DEBRA: Yes.

DANNY BOOME: I’m just thinking fall is here and all those beautiful smells through the kitchen in the morning. I mean, you don’t need a famous Starbucks coffee during the week to start the morning off when you have that going on.

And also, as it’s gluten-free and as it’s pumpkin, it’s full of vitamins, it’s full of energy, antioxidants. And then, because it’s not glutened and heavy, it’s going to be really, really light and empower you through the day. And that’s the gorgeous thing about that. That’s amazing.

DEBRA: Yes, and I’m so…

DANNY BOOME: I went through a couple of places that served very similar things. I’ll tell you one place that you got to try on our journey. It’s a place called Green in San Antoni, Texas.

DEBRA: I’ve been to Green. In San Francisco?

DANNY BOOME: Yeah. Oh, no, no. These guys are in San Antonio.

DEBRA: Oh okay, different Green, go ahead.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah, yeah. Well, these guys are purely vegan/vegetarian. The funny thing is their claim to fame was their family – and you may have seen this on like [inaudible 00:42:23] Food or anything like that. Their family, the family in San Antonio that owned the café or the diner or deli, they have the world’s biggest cannabin. They went from serving basically coffee and donuts and Cinnibon to – they said they had a whole conscious point in their life where they wanted to live healthier. So they sold the business and they started this – basically, what I call it is a vegetarian/vegan diner.

All the food is organic and sustainably bought, but it’s diner food. So they still had [inaudible 00:43:01] and they still had pancakes, but they source everything and created alternatives. And some of the dishes, you won’t even know they were different. It’s just amazing!

But [inaudible 00:43:14] there’s a place like that at every corner you’ve heard. That’s the gorgeous thing when you’re on this food discovery.

DEBRA: If you’re really looking around – I mean, I know that when I go to a new city, I’m looking for – no, I’m not eating in the chain restaurants. I’m looking for these little kind of restaurants like you’re going to. I’m always looking for them. I look for them online before I go to a new city. And I’m sure going to be looking at your list. And so when I go to a city, I’ll look up those restaurants.

But it’s just so interesting. I get ideas about things to eat and things that I can make at home by going to restaurants.

DANNY BOOME: Absolutely, yeah.

DEBRA: That’s why I like to go to restaurants, I get inspired. And when you go to a restaurant, you eat things that you wouldn’t make at home.

So tell us about – well, I want to tell people about the kale burger. Tell people about the kale burger because they can watch eating-prepared on ZLiving.com.

DANNY BOOME: So that was a restaurant, Cedar Point in Philadelphia. And also, the one thing that you’ve just hit upon is actually just the simplicity of some of these dishes. It’s so quick and it’s so easy. You just throw it in a blender and make it there and then. It’s just the compliment that you have to basically build around.

But the kale burger was just really easy. If I remember, it was just cannellini beans, kale and egg and that was it.

DEBRA: Sage, sage.

DANNY BOOME: It was thrown together. Sorry?

DEBRA: Sage. I just watched it this morning, sage.

DANNY BOOME: And that. Well, can you imagine, I went to 76 different restaurants and each restaurant, we had three dishes? So you’re going to have to bear with me because sometimes, I’m going to miss an ingredient.

DEBRA: Totally fine, I would too.

DANNY BOOME: Actually, the hash was the amazing thing that they had there. They called it slame or hash because it was in a hipster area. I think it was really, really clever because it was beet root squash and sweet potatoes all sautéed together on a pan. It looked absolutely fantastic with a [inaudible 00:45:36] thing on the top. Ah, it was amazing.

DEBRA: Mm-hmmm, it looked really good. It looked really good.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah, but the kale burger was something that I’d never thought of either because it was like, “Wow! Kale is so versatile.” We all use it in salads and what-not, but actually, you then starting putting it into a burger and using it in that sense, now that is kind of cool.

DEBRA: I thought so too. I’m going to try that.

DANNY BOOME: Yeah, you got to. It really, really –
I mean, the interesting thing was Philadelphia, to say, as a city was one of the most [inaudible 00:46:10] cities I went to. My wife and I actually went the week after we had shot there. We were in D.C. We went to a concern. And the major thing was, we spent a couple of days, we spent a weekend there and the amount of organic, sustainable restaurants that were there, it was just so much easier to find.

DEBRA: Yes.

DANNY BOOME: It was so easy to find some of the really “clean” food as I like to call it. And that was just one place. That was in a [inaudible 00:46:44] neighborhood. When you went further into town in the Gayborhood, say that area in the gay quarter, there was veg.
That was like doing high-end – I mean, literally, high-end white tablecloth vegetarian/vegan food. Not one piece of meat was on the menu. And they were doing carrots six ways. I didn’t even know you can do carrots six ways. Obviously, my imagination has been stretched now since I’ve been to that restaurant.

But these guys, people are pushing the envelope. They’re playing with spices, they’re playing with their ingredients and it’s amazing what we’re coming up with.

DEBRA: Yes, so much so.

DANNY BOOME: Increasingly, I didn’t expect to find that – I mean, for that one weekend that Megan and I went to, we basically found 12 different restaurants that we haven’t even researched. We just stumbled across them. We weren’t even looking for them.

And that’s in Philadelphia, which is kind of a blue-collared town. But then we went to Colorado, we went to Denver and boy! We turn every corner and there’s an organic restaurant.

So the finger is on the pulse. It’s nice to know that you don’t have to look sometimes. That I think is my message on that one.

DEBRA: Well, I’m sorry to say that there are not many organic restaurants in Clearwater, Florida. [inaudible 00:48:06] to come down here. I mean, I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay area, so I started eating in Chez Panisse 30 years ago and Green in San Francisco.

And so when I first started becoming – I mean, I grew up on [inaudible 00:48:23]. But when I started becoming an adult and living on my own, I just started exploring food. And while the world was learning about all the things that were going on in Brookline, California with the food scene, I was right in the middle of that. I was eating in all those restaurants.

And when I came here to Florida where that hasn’t been going on and I started cooking the way I learned from eating in restaurants in the San Francisco Bay Area, people, they just fell over and then people introduced me as the best cook in Clearwater, Florida because just the difference the way people still think here in this part of the country is very different than in those cities.

I’m going to have to say that we have less than a minute left.

DANNY BOOME: No, that was the quickest hour ever.

DEBRA: I know we could talk for hours and hours about this subject and I know that you have plenty to say, but thank you so much for being here. I know you’re calling from England, yes?

DANNY BOOME: Yes, right. Yeah, yeah. I’ll send you the bill…

DEBRA: So is it the middle of the night?

DANNY BOOME: No, no, no. It’s like six o’clock in the evening, don’t worry.

DEBRA: Okay, good, good. Well, thank you so much. Do you have any – I can give you ten seconds, any final words?

DANNY BOOME: The gastronaut wants you to watch Good Food America on ZLiving, 9 PM every Sunday for an amazing food journey across America. Keep it organic and keep it sustainable.

DEBRA: Excellent! Thanks so much for being with me. And I’m going to be watching, so I think all of you should watch because it’s excellent, just an excellent, excellent show.

DANNY BOOME: Good.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well!

DANNY BOOME: Thank you. Bye bye.

DEBRA: Bye!

DANNY BOOME: Bye.

Scarlett Begonias - 4

Living Fresh Collection

Beautiful all-natural bed linens that enhance your sleep experience, made from sustainable fabric. FRESH in the name stands for “Fabric Redefining Environmental Standard in our Home.” The fabric is Tencel-Plus, made from cotton and cellulose from eucalyptus trees, which makes the fabric resist dust mites naturally (I’ve slept on these sheets and they don’t smell like eucalyptus). All natural substances are used in processing raw materials into fibers.

Listen to my interview with Living Fresh Collection National Sales Director Randi Farina.

[button link=”https://livingfresh.com/” color=”silver” newwindow=”yes”]Visit Website [/button]

Improve Your Sleep Experience With Sustainable Bed Linens

Randi FarinaMy guest today is Randi Farina, the National Sales Director of Living Fresh Collection, a new direct selling organization that focuses on sustainable bed linens. We’ll be talking about how natural bed linens enhance your sleep experience and how the Living Fresh Collection fabrics are made in a sustainable way. In 2013, Randi joined Living Fresh Collection to launch a company that would not only provide linens made with Tencel+Plus™ Lyocell (fibers from the eucalyptus tree) to enhance one’s sleep, but an opportunity to empower women by giving them the tools to own and operate their own business. After receiving her Bachelor of Art at the State University of New York, Randi started her career in 1994 with The Pampered Chef. As her business grew, the importance of providing support and mentorship to women became apparent in the success of her own organization. Her values of teamwork, personal development and achievement followed her throughout her career as her work continued with the United States Olympic Committee. Working as a licensee of the USOC, she created the first national fundraiser for the Vancouver Games. The US Olympic Team Rings Wristbands wore worn by Olympic athletes as well as fans all over the country. In 2010 Randi returned her focus to working with women as an Associate Producer for Lifetime Television’s morning show. She thrived on creating direct brand messaging to consumers, while being able to motivate women to find the very delicate balancing act between work and home life. In 2011 and 2012, Randi traveled with the Show on 10 City tours throughout the country meeting thousands of women and providing brands products & support so they could achieve their work/life balance. Returning to the direct sales industry, Randi feels as if her career has come full circle. By being able to provide support to entrepreneurial women as they grow their own businesses. Randi has found her work/life balance. Randi resides in Boca Raton, Florida with her husband and four children. www.LivingFreshCollection.com

read-transcript

 

 

Duvet Cover and Sham set

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO Improve Your Sleep Experience with Sustainable Bed Linens

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd Guest: Randi Farina

Date of Broadcast: October 28, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Tuesday, October 29th 2014. It’s a beautiful day here in Clearwater, Florida. I slept really well last night. How well did you sleep? Maybe you don’t know this, but bed sheets, most bed sheets (unless you are buying special bed sheets that don’t have this), most bed sheets have permanent press finishes on them, which are releasing formaldehyde. And even if you’ve washed your sheets many, many times, this resin, this permanent press resin stays on your sheets and continues to release formaldehyde for many years and formaldehyde causes insomnia.

So if you’re not sleeping well, you might consider changing your sheets. This is the subject that we’re going to be talking about today with my guest, bed linens. She has some very interesting bed linens that are made in a very sustainable way. And the whole idea of the company is about helping you sleep better.

I just want to say that I slept on these sheets last night and I slept really well, really, really well. They aren’t toxic at all.

But before we talk to the guest, I want to tell you that since the beginning of this show when I started in April of last year, of 2013, I wanted to transcribe the shows because each and every show has so much valuable information in it. I wanted you to be able to read it and save it in writing. It was difficult for me to find somebody who was reliable and accurate and affordable in order to make the transcriptions.

But I finally found somebody and I now have started transcribing all the live shows. Today, for the first time, I’ve posted the ones that I have. I have I think about 12 transcriptions now. You can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. And on the sub-menu, it says ‘transcripts’. You can go to that page and you can read the transcripts of – I think last week, there’s all, but one. I have it. I just need to post it. A week before, there’s all of them. And there’s also some from the past.

And so today’s show will be transcribed, tomorrow’s, Thursday’s. All the live shows are being transcribed the week that they occur. So they can go every weekend to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and find the transcripts for the week.

But I’m also working on transcribing all the back shows. So this is a great, big project. So go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, click on ‘transcripts’ and take a look because I’m really excited about them.

Okay! So now, we’re going to get to our guest. My guest today is Randi Farina. She’s the national sales director of The Living FRESH Collection, which is a new direct selling organization that focuses on sustainable bed linens.

Hi, Randi.

RANDI FARINA: Hi, Debra. How are you?

DEBRA: I’m good. I like your sheets.

RANDI FARINA: I’m so happy to hear that.

DEBRA: They aren’t toxic at all. When I spoke to you before, you told me I should wash them several times. I actually washed them many times before I slept on them. You told me that the more you wash them, the softer they get. And they did get softer and softer and softer. And I just went right to sleep and I slept all night. I have no problem with them at all.

RANDI FARINA: We’ve heard that from a lot of people. And we tell to wash the sheets prior not because there’s anything on them that we want off, but in the handling of all the packaging, we just want you to have the freshest experience. So right out of your washer is the freshest experience you can have.

DEBRA: Yes! And I use the laundry soap that you provide. It was just great! The whole experience was just great.

RANDI FARINA: I’m so happy to hear that. And you slept well?

DEBRA: I slept well. I slept very well. I woke up a couple of time (that’s typical for me), but I went right back to sleep. I was very comfortable and the sheets felt soft against my skin. I was just very happy, very happy.

RANDI FARINA: Great! Well, that’s what we’ve been hearing for many, many years, which made us want to bring them out to the residential arena because we’ve heard that story.

DEBRA: Well, tell us the story behind The Living FRESH Collection, how it came to be.

RANDI FARINA: Sure! Living FRESH Collection started – and let me just say that FRESH stands for ‘fabric redefining environmental standard in our home’. So Living FRESH sheets were actually sold to the hotels for the past eight years.

Our sister company, Valley Forge Fabrics started working with the hotels about eights years ago when the hotels really started getting into the sustainable aspect of not washing sheets unless the guest wanted them to, not washing towels unless the guest wanted to. The hotels were looking for a fiber that was more sustainable than cotton, yet still was able to hold up to the rigors of washing that hotels do, which is a lot more strenuous than the average person’s washing.

DEBRA: So tell us for a minute what’s not sustainable about cotton.

RANDI FARINA: Cotton is a fabulous fiber. We absolutely love it.Hopefully, people are growing it and farming it sustainably and environmentally friendly. Tencel+Plus, the fibers from Eucalyptus are above and beyond organic and they’re better than cotton in the respect that when cotton gets wet, it remains wet longer than Tencel+Plus.

So when you’re sleeping and you sweat at night (and everybody does sweat at night), cotton can remain wet. If you’re lying on it and it’s warm and it’s moist, bacteria can start to grow.

Tencel+Plus, we have studies that show us that it does dries faster than any other fiber out there. So it will dry faster than 100% cotton. Therefore, bacteria cannot grow on sheet.

DEBRA: Okay, good. Let’s go back to the story and then we’ll talk about the sheets.

RANDI FARINA: Okay, great! So the hotels wanted more of a sustainable fiber and something that was cleaner. So they started looking at bamboo and tencel and beechwood. They came to Valley Forge Fabrics who does a lot of their fabrics for upholstery and drapery and they said, “Do you do top of the bed?” We decided that we were going to start to create a sustainable fiber for hotels.

But in order for it to be used in hospitality, it has to withstand 160° of washing every single day. That’s difficult on the best of cotton.

So we went to the company and we said, “We love tencel. We love the fiber from eucalyptus. We just need something stronger that will last longer than 100% tencel or 100% cotton.”

So we created a proprietary fiber called Tencel+Plus. It is 52% cotton and 48% Tencel+Plus. It withstands the washing of everyday hospitality use and the drying. And the hotels absolutely loved it. It creates a cleaner sleep environment if these bacteria cannot grow on it. And then what a lot of the listeners don’t know yet is that eucalyptus is actually resistant to dust mites.

DEBRA: Oh, I didn’t know that.

RANDI FARINA: Yup, naturally. We do not have to put any chemicals in our sheets whatsoever to keep away the dust mites. And the dust mites are so important to be kept out of your bedroom because that’s what causes most allergens. If anybody is waking up with congestion or a cough or itchy nose or throat or red eyes, it very well could be because they are allergic or even sensitive to dust mite.

Cotton will not repel dust mites. Eucalyptus+, Tencel+Plus, eucalyptus fibers will repel up to 95% of dust mite survival. So it’s naturally resistant.

DEBRA: You know, I did notice sleeping on the sheets that they – because I sleep on cotton flannel every day of the year because they’re so soft and they are absorb perspiration better than – and moving here in Florida, even on very sweaty nights, it’s more comfortable to sleep on flannel than it is to sleep on a cotton percale sheet.

But I did notice that it just seemed like sleeping on these sheets was less dusty. Not that I’m even aware of my sheets being dusty, but I do know with my cotton sheets that as I wash them, the fabric just kind of starts thinning out until it just rips and it doesn’t stay.

So I know that there is something coming off the cotton sheets, but there was just like nothing. It was just soft and clean.

RANDI FARINA: Yup!

DEBRA: Soft and clean.

RANDI FARINA: Yup, that’s exactly right. And another great point – and we’re also based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, eucalyptus, if you’ve ever smelt it – Debra, have you ever smelled eucalyptus?

DEBRA: Oh, yeah. I used to live in California where we had eucalyptus trees all over the place.

RANDI FARINA: Fabulous! It actually draws the moisture away from your skin and it has that menthol smell to it, that menthol, which actually will draw the moisture away from the skin. Our sheets do the exact same thing.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. But when we come back, we’ll continue. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Randi Farina. She’s the national sales director of The Living FRESH Collection. You can go to her website at LivingFRESHCollection.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Duvet Cover Color options

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randi Farina. She’s the national sales director of the Living FRESH Collection, which is a new direct selling organization that focuses on sustainable bed linens. Their website is LivingFRESHCollection.com.

Okay, Randi, so I want to interject that even though these sheets are made out of eucalyptus, for anybody who smelled the eucalyptus tree who thinks, “Oh, no! My bed is going to smell like eucalyptus,” the sheets don’t actually smell like eucalyptus.

RANDI FARINA: No.

DEBRA: I can’t say that they’re completely without any kind of – I don’t know which word to use here, not ‘scent’, not ‘odor’, not ‘fragrance’. I don’t want to use any word that might sound derogatory. I can smell something, but it’s not a overpoweringly eucalyptus. It just smells more like just kind of a neutral wood-ishness. But I have an extremely sensitive nose and it didn’t bother me at all. I just went, “Oh, there’s just a little something there.”

But I had no problem with it at all. There’s nothing toxic about it. It’s not like something that’s scented or something that has a formaldehyde finish, not like that at all. It was just very pleasant. It doesn’t smell overpoweringly of eucalyptus. It didn’t even remotely remind me of eucalyptus.

Well, we’re going to talk about how these sheets are made later, but I just wanted to mention that since she said it was made from eucalyptus. I didn’t want anyone to get the wrong idea and stop listening because they think that the sheets smell like eucalyptus.

RANDI FARINA: They don’t. They smell clean.

DEBRA: They smell clean. They smell very clean. Yes, they do.

Okay! So tell us more about the sheets. Let’s just start talking about what the sheets are made from, how they’re made because I know that tencel, Lyocell, that you have a particular way of making these, so that they don’t contain the toxic chemicals that some other similar types of fabrics use toxic chemicals like some of the bamboos.

We should probably say that Lyocell, tencel is similar to what people know as Rayon where – I’ll just give a little background here. And then you can tell the details. Rayon and tencel are made from cellulose, bits of cellulose that are then processed in a certain way to turn it into a fiber.

Now, the difference here, if you have cotton, for example, is that cotton has a cellulose, but cotton, it’s like a cotton ball. It really is like a cotton ball in the plant. And so it’s pulled apart, the cotton ball is pulled apart and then it’s spun into a thread, but there’s actually a fiber there.

The difference here with Rayon and tencel is they take wood cellulose to make these. In most cases, it’s a wood. And then, they break it down into little bits of cellulose, which then gets mixed into array and extruded into a thread instead of there being a fiber.

And so what’s unique and sustainable about this particular one is that they have a very non-toxic process.

So Randi, I want you to just explain, give us a really good picture of what this fiber is from the beginning, from the three to the sheets.

RANDI FARINA: Sure. Well, we only take our eucalyptus fibers from FSA-protected forest. We don’t have a farm. We go straight to FSA-protected forest. They can tell us exactly how much we can cut down. And the only thing that is used to help grow the eucalyptus trees is water and sunshine. So there’s no chemicals used in the production or the growing of the trees.

We cut the tree down about ten inches from their root, which allow them to grow back to full maturity in five to eight years.

DEBRA: I’ll add that eucalyptus is a very fast-growing tree.

RANDI FARINA: Yes, yeah, absolutely.

DEBRA: I grew up with eucalyptus trees.

RANDI FARINA: There you go! We use the pulp of the tree. So there are also people out there that have asked us, “I’m allergic to eucalyptus oil. Can I still sleep on your sheet?” and the answer is yes.

So we use the pulp of the tree and we boil it down with water. We actually push it through a strainer. I’m going to give you a very vivid picture. I tell everybody to picture a very large sourhead and we push the wood pulp through a strainer in order to get the pulp, which actually is a paper pulp. When it comes out on the other side, it’s just like a paper pulp.

We take that paper pulp and we mix it with one organic solvent. The name of the solvent is NNMO. It’s organic. It looks like honey. It can actually be drunk. We mix it together to create our fibers.

At our Sleep Wellness Shows (and we do presentations introducing people to Living FRESH collection), we have a small box. It’s called our ‘create a textile box’. We actually passed it around so you can see and feel and touch the pulp of the eucalyptus wood chip, we show you the next process, which is the paper pulp. And then we show you the finished result, which is our Tencel+Plus fibers derived from the eucalyptus. We pass it around and it looks like cotton. It has more of a sheen to it and it also is much softer. So I tell people, “It looks like cotton, but it feels like cashmere.” From those fibers, we are able to get our thread, which we mix 52% cotton and 48% Tencel+Plus to weave our actual linen.

You had said earlier that this goes around another process. People ask this question all the time, Debra and I would like to bring it to everyone’s attention because everyone knows bamboo is a very sustainable fiber because it grows fast as well. And we love bamboo tables, bamboo vases. But when you take bamboo and you break it down into a fiber, they use 13 toxic chemicals to do so in their process to create the Viscose Rayon as opposed to our one organic solvent that we use, which makes Tencel+Plus sheets much more sustainable. And also, because our Tencel+Plus sheets are made for the hospitality industry, much more durable.

A lot of times, even sometimes with cotton, when you take their sheets out of the dryer, you’ll notice that the dryer fills with lint. Nobody really wonders where that came from, but you had said like you didn’t feel any dust in the bedroom. All that lint and all that dust is actually your fibers breaking down.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. I know! Even now, every time I wash my cotton flannel sheets, I get a lot of lint in the dryer. And there was no lint from these sheets. I will tell you, there was no lint from these sheets. It was really quite amazing.

RANDI FARINA: Great!

DEBRA: We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Randi Farina, the national sales director of the Living FRESH Collection. You can visit their website at LivingFRESHCollection.com. They have more information there about all the things we were just talking about, about how the product is made. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

Mediterranean towel

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randi Farina. She’s the national sales director of the Living FRESH Collection, a new direct selling organization that focuses on sustainable bed linens. Their website is LivingFRESHCollection.com.

So Randi, I know that one of the things about your bed linens in addition to the way they’re produced is that they create a healthier sleep environment. I’m really interested in that because sleep is so important to health for so many reasons. But my particular interest is that your body needs to sleep in order for it to detox toxic chemicals. If people are having difficulties sleeping, that means that their detox function is not working to the optimum.

And also, if anybody is trying to lose weight, you need to sleep in order for your body to lose weight. That’s just a known thing about weight loss. And there’s so many other things. I mean, you just can’t concentrate or work well or all these things if you don’t sleep well. And so tell us how these particular bed linens contribute to creating a healthy sleep environment.

RANDI FARINA: Sure, absolutely. I did not know that about detoxing, but we always say if you’re not resting and your body’s not rejuvenating during the night, then you’re not the best you can be the very next day.

DEBRA: Absolutely.

RANDI FARINA: And it’s interesting because in today’s world. Everybody’s doing everything correctly. They’re eating right, they’re working out. But how many of us are really considering our sleep environment? And that’s what the education that we’re trying to bring to everybody. For eight hours a day, you’re wrapping yourself in products that you probably aren’t giving much thought to. And for eight hours, if you give the thought and wrapped yourself in the best products, your body will be able to rest and rejuvenate.

So Tencel+Plus sheet as you’ve said at the very beginning are probably the softest, most luxurious sheet you can sleep on. Because of the eucalyptus fibers, they draw the moisture out of your body.

Most people wake up during the night from a tactile imbalance or a temperature imbalance. Most of us are either hot or cold and that may wake us up. The Tencel+Plus sheet will help you regulate the body temperature, they will draw the heat out of your body, when you do sweat (and like I said, everybody does, just some people sweat more than others when they sleep, which is probably a good thing if you’re detoxing), the sweat is absorbed by your sheet.

Tencel+Plus will draw the moisture to the center of the sheet, it’ll absorb it quicker, but it will also release faster than any other fiber. One hundred percent cotton or cotton poly or Rayon or silk will remain wet. And that’s a lot of reason why people wake up. If you just set a poll and say, “Are you cold or are you hot at night?”, most people say they’re both. That’s because the sweat makes them hot, but then the cooling off of the sweat lying on their bodies makes them cold again.

DEBRA: Yes, I’ve experienced that. It’s always I’m either putting the covers on or taking the covers off.

RANDI FARINA: …which wakes people up at night. Absolutely, absolutely. And that’s exactly what the Tencel+Plus sheet will allow you, to regulate your body temperature. You will still sweat at night, but not as much because you’re going to be able to breathe better. And then if you do sweat, it’ll absorb the moisture and wick away from your body and then release it quicker.

When we first came out, we had a great amount of testimonials. They’re all on our website and I invite everybody to come read them. But a lot of times, we were hearing from menopausal women who swore they no longer were sweating at night after sleeping on our sheet. And when I asked them to write the testimonial, they said, “Well, let me just double-check and make sure,” they put their old sheets back on and the next day, they would call and say, “Okay, it’s definitely your sheet. I will write you a testimonial.”

DEBRA: Oh, wow!

RANDI FARINA: We have a young mom up in the Seattle, Washington area who was done with wake-up crying every night. His pajamas were soaking wet because he would sweat so much. So again, it’s not just menopausal women who were sweating a lot.

She changed his bedding. We do have everything from the encasement for a crib all the way up to [inaudible 00:30:46]. He was no longer waking up. And because of that, he wasn’t waking crying in the middle of the night from being wet, he was sleeping through the night and so was his mother was sleeping through the night. So it was helping everybody to get that rest that they so desperately need.

DEBRA: That’s great. That’s great. I just know how good it feels for me to have a good night’s sleep. I know many, many years ago when I first started (like 30 years ago when I started discovering about toxic chemicals), I remember I used to have insomnia. All night, I would not be able to sleep and then I’d be exhausted in the morning. This just went on week after week after week. It was very hard for me to sleep. And then when I started doing research into toxic chemicals and I found that formaldehyde on the bedsheets causes insomnia, I said, “Oh, my God! I’m going to get rid of these polyester cotton sheets.” And at that time, it was very difficult to find a 100% cotton sheet. But I found the one brand that was available and I changed my sheets. That very night, I slept. It just really made a difference.

And so I’ve been telling people for 30 years that if you can’t sleep, switch away from the polyester cotton with the formaldehyde finish and go to a cotton sheet with no finish on it.

RANDI FARINA: Yeah, it makes a world of difference.

DEBRA: It does, it does. And it sounds like this is really a whole new type of bed linen that hasn’t existed before. It has even more benefits.

RANDI FARINA: It has a lot of health benefits. Just sleeping well has a lot of health benefits. We’ve heard study after study of high blood pressure, diabetes, you had mentioned obesity, people not sleeping well, their hormones are not regulating if they are not sleeping well. There’s one study that we’ve heard out of Stanford, California about people who were doing a study on what causes depression. They were able to keep people up at night, sleep deprive them and they were able to basically get them to have every symptom that a depressed person to have. The conclusion was how many of us are depressed and overwhelmed in life and how many of us really just need a good night sleep?

DEBRA: I think probably everybody is not sleeping well. I know that’s a really broad statement. But between sleeping on formaldehyde sheets and drinking coffee and toxic things in your body and stress and worry, how many people really sleep well?

I know that it’s made a big difference for me to make sure that I sleep well, a big difference in my health. And yet I think that most people just think the way they sleep is average or normal and don’t really know what a really good night sleep is.

RANDI FARINA: Right! That’s the message that we’re trying to give around the country when we give our Sleep Wellness Shows. It’s to try to really educate people on creating a cleaner, healthier, more luxurious sleep environment and opening up their eyes to understanding, number one, how important sleep is and number two, how important it is to consider what you’re already sleeping in. So you make that cleaner and healthier, it’s just going to allow everyone to sleep better and then obviously, if we’re sleeping better, we’re going to be performing much better the very next day.

DEBRA: Yes, and happier. It just feels wonderful. It just feels wonderful when you’ve had a good night’s sleep and you wake up in the morning. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randi Farina. She is the national sales director Living FRESH Collection. You can find out more at the LivingFRESHCollection.com and when we come back after the break.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Randi Farina. She’s the national sales director of Living FRESH Collection. Their website is LivingFRESHCollection.com.

Randi, I feel like I should play a lullaby for the music today.

DEBRA: To get everybody to sleep better.

RANDI FARINA: Get everybody to sleep better, yeah. So I have your catalog here and also, you have a printed catalog and you also have a website. I’m looking at your catalog. You have all kinds of different types of products made with tencel. And one of the things that I really like about the sheets that I have is that they’re just your basic, beautiful, clean, white sheets. But you also have them in colors and patterns. Just give us an idea the different kinds of products that you sell.

RANDI FARINA: Sure, everything that we make is made with Tencel+Plus. We start off at the very first layer of what you should be covering your mattress with and that’s a 100% Tencel+Plus, 100% bed bug resistant and dust mite resistant encasement.

People don’t really understand, but mattresses do double their weight in eight years if not protected. And just imagine if your body is sweating and your mattress is soaking in that sweat, it could act like a sponge. Bacteria could grow inside. So the most important thing…

DEBRA: Especially if you have a natural fiber mattress. I just want to interject that because a lot of people, they’ll switch from a polyurethane mattress, the synthetic mattress and then they’ll go to natural mattress and that’s one of the things, one of the drawbacks of a natural mattress. It’s natural, it’s biodegradable. It absorbs water. It can grow bacteria. They do need to protect their mattress.

RANDI FARINA: Yeah.

DEBRA: I just want to clarify that a mattress encasement, that goes all the way around the mattress and then zippered.

RANDI FARINA: Correct.

DEBRA: And so if you’re concerned about bed bugs or those things, then you should have a mattress encasement and that’s different from a mattress pad, which you also have.

RANDI FARINA: Correct. Our encasement actually has a [inaudible 00:41:06] lock on it, which is patented so it’s very easy for a human to open, but it can’t be opened. The bed bugs will stay out of it and bacteria will stay in or out depending on where it is.

After that, we do have a fabulous mattress pad, again, made with the Tencel+Plus. Our mattress pad has a full covering, so it looks like a sheet, but the top is very well padded to give you that extra layer of comfort.

We have our sheet set. And like you said, Debra, we started off with white and ivory. And just this past month, we released two wonderful colors, silver and denim. So those are our first two colors of the collection.

We have pillow protectors because the same thing that happens to your mattresses can happen with your pillows probably even more so from sweating and drooling. It’s important to cover your pillows. We make our own pillows and they are filled with Tencel+Plus as well. At least 30% Tencel+Plus will make them dust mite resistant, so our products are also hypoallergenic.

We also just launched two great towels. We have a spa collection, which is wonderful, white, soft and cozy, which is 70% cotton and 30% Tencel+Plus so it drives faster. It also uses less water and less drying time to clean the towel. My favorite product is our Mediterranean towel, which is original Turkish towel much thinner than a spa towel, but super absorbent. So if you can imagine that the eucalyptus draws the moisture away from your skin, imagine how absorbent it would make a towel. So that’s my one favorite.

DEBRA: And I’m looking at the picture of the Mediterranean towels. It’s very pretty. It’s got little tiny stripes, a little border of stripes and it’s got fringe, knotted fringe.

RANDI FARINA: And the fringe is not an ornament. The fringe is actually the thread that runs from the entire length of the towel and then knotted. So a lot of times, towel companies will just put on a pretty ornament and then they don’t actually wash well, but these fringes are the part of the towel. So in two years, three years, the towel will look just as beautiful as the very first day you got it.

We created a sleepwear collection, classic pajamas for women and boxers for men because people said how much they loved to wrap themselves in our sheets. We thought how fabulous to wrap yourself in our sheeting materials, so we created pajamas. We use the exact, same material, so they also get softer with each wash.

And then like you mentioned at the very beginning of this show, we did a laundry detergent for no reason other than since our linens are natural and clean, we didn’t want any residues left. You probably know a lot about what would go into a detergent. So we used an all-natural, no synthetic fragrances or dyes to create it.

There is a scent made from the eucalyptus oil. It’s a eucalyptus aloe scent going into the washing machine, but no scent at all left on the sheet.

DEBRA: And I will vouch for that. I will vouch for that. And the thing about scent is that natural fragrances like essential oils, they will tend to wash out and disappear.

In fact, here’s a little non-historic fact. The first synthetic fragrance perfume was made by Coco Chanel, the famous designer. The reason that she wanted a synthetic fragrance was because the fragrances women used then were all natural essential oils and they wouldn’t last throughout the evening.

And so Coco Chanel just happened to be there when they were making synthetic fragrances. Chanel no. 5 was the first synthetic fragrance. Those synthetic fragrances last and last and last and last. And so if you wash in detergent that has a synthetic fragrance, you’re not going to be able to get that out. I mean, really, you have to use other things to get the detergent out.

RANDI FARINA: Right! And we didn’t want any residue left on our linens.

DEBRA: So there’s none. There’s none. Your laundry detergent was totally fine.

RANDI FARINA: We also make wonderful duvet covers. Our duvet covers and our pillows are also machine washable and dryable, which you can’t say for a lot of other people or duvet covers out there, so they can create a cleaner, healthier, more luxurious sleep environment. To complete our entire collections, our shams that would go on top of the duvet cover that are beautiful and classic with a baratta stitch that complements the entire collection.

DEBRA: So people can order this on your website. But you also do parties. So tell us about those.

RANDI FARINA: We do, we do. We’re a direct sales company and we chose to go that route, so you won’t find our linens on any store shelves. You have to buy them exclusively through sleep consultants, Living FRESH Collection sleep consultants. We launched last July and we are now in 18 states.

So we go around the country and we do our Sleep Wellness parties. Some people call them Wine & Sheet Parties and serve some wonderful appetizers with it as well. But we’re not just about selling sheets. We are really about teaching people to create a cleaner, healthier sleep environment. And because we are a direct sales company, we are really able to keep the cost of the end user much lower than if we had to put it on shelves. And more importantly, we just want to be able to tell the story of why our sheets are different and why they really, really help you sleep better. We do that through our sleep consultants.

DEBRA: These really are sheets – I’ve said this before, but I’ll just say it again. These really are sheets unlike anything else that I’ve ever seen. They’re specifically designed, I would say just from looking at them, to have qualities that would help you sleep better rather than sheets of yesterday I guess.

I mean, I have nothing against a beautiful cotton sheet, but most sheets that you’re going to find on the store shelves are polyester cotton sheets with formaldehyde finishes on them and it certainly isn’t anything like this. Those sheets were designed around existing fibers and these sheets are designed with a particular purpose of how are we going to get a good sleep environment, how are we going to make a sheet that’s durable and purposes like that.

So that’s not something that you’re going to be able to put on a label and get people to understand by putting it in a store. It certainly is a new and interesting product and I’m glad that you did it.

Here’s another thing that I just wanted to mention. You have a USDA approval that it’s bio-based. Tell us about that.

RANDI FARINA: Yes, we are the only sheet company out there that is USDA certified bio based for both residential and hospitality use. We’re also the only sheet fabric out there that is fiber verified. Because our process is so soft, if you took our sheets and put them under a microscope, they can tell that they are eucalyptus. So they are fiber verified and USDA bio-based. Other sheets (for instance, bamboo sheets) cannot be fiber verified because they’ve gone through so many processes.

DEBRA: Oh, I see what you’re saying.

RANDI FARINA: So we are very proud of that certification.

DEBRA: I see what you’re saying. The eucalyptus quality, that actually, eucalyptus is still there and it can be seen through the microscope.

RANDI FARINA: That’s correct.

DEBRA: Well, thank you so much for being with us and explaining all of these, Randi. It’s very interesting. Again, the website is LivingFRESHCollection.com. We’ve got about 30 seconds. Any last thing you’d like to say?

RANDI FARINA: Yeah, I just want everybody to really understand how important it is to create a cleaner, healthier sleep environment so they can be the best possible person they can be.

DEBRA: Okay, good. Thank you.

RANDI FARINA: Thanks, Debra.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So again, I want to mention as I did at the beginning of the show that all of the shows are now being transcribed so you can read this show as well as listen to it at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Just go there and look on the sub-menu for the transcripts page and click on ‘transcripts’. I already have about a dozen transcripts up from past shows I think and we’ll keep making the transcriptions so that you can have a written record of the valuable information that’s on each of these shows.

Again, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Whole Foods Launches “Responsibly Grown,” a New Rating System for Produce

From Debra Lynn Dadd

I always love it when there are clear-cut standards for labeling. On October 15, Whole Foods introduced a whole new system to help their customers identify fruits, vegetables, and flowers as GOOD, BETTER, or BEST.

Known as “Responsibly Grown,” the rating system assesses growing practices that impact human health and the environment.

Growing practices are reviewed for

– Pest management, including prohibited and restricted pesticides
– Farm worker welfare
– Pollinator protection
– Water conservation and protection
– Soil health
– Ecosystems
– Biodiversity
– Waste reduction and recycling and packaging
– Air, energy, and climate

Having such a standard makes an impact in the field, well, literally in the field. Already farmers are working to move up to get a higher rating.

There are a lot of details, so I’m just going to send you straight to the website, so you can read all about it: Whole Foods: Get to Know Responsibly Grown

responsibly-grown-ratings1

 

Add Comment

New Food Guides

From Debra Lynn Dadd

I don’t know if this was intentional or not, but today, two new food guides were released.

The first to come into my email inbox is the 2014 Good Food Org Guide, produced by The Food Think Tank in partnership with the James Beard Foundation. It highlights more than 400 organizations across the United States leading the way toward building a better food system. Good to see so many groups working to improve our food supply!

The second announcement was from Environmental Working Group, announcing their new food database Rate Your Plate. With information on more than 80,000 foods and 5,000 ingredients from 1,500 brands, EWG’s unique scoring system rates foods based on nutrition, food additives, contaminants and degree of processing.

I have to say, I think Rate Your Plate will be more useful as an educational tool to find out what is in your favorite processed foods, rather than a tool to find something safe to eat. I’m not sure how useful the ratings are going to be here. I looked up “pickles” and only 7 brands were rated “1” (best). I clicked on one and they weren’t organic. This is what happens when you combine concerns. You get a weighted score instead of a clear score in one area. So it’s not a tool for finding organic pickles, but it will show you the 282 brands of pickles rated 5 (not so good).

The benefit I see is that you can type in virtually any processed food on the market that you might be eating and find out how bad it is.

I’m going to stick with my homemade fermented garlic dill pickles. Organic ingredients, no processing, no additives. Beneficial probiotics.

Add Comment

dot ORGANIC

From Debra Lynn Dadd

dot-organic-domain-name

Well, this is pretty cool. Now you can get a domain name that ends in .organic! Like debra.organic. But there’s a catch and a benefit.

You have to qualify. The names are reserved for members of the organic community. Any organization that wants to purchase a .ORGANIC domain must be engaged in the organic sector and meet the criteria established by .ORGANIC.

Here’s who may be eligible to register a .ORGANIC domain

  • Certified organic producers, farmers, distributors and the like
  • Certified organic textile and skincare providers
  • Organic restaurants and venues
  • Certifiers in the organic community
  • Publications, journalists and bloggers catering to the organic community and industry
  • Non-profit, not-for-profit and trade associations that primarily serve and represent the organic community
  • As this rolls out, it will be interesting to see how this can help consumers identify organic products.

Like how can consumers find these .ORGANIC businesses? They are not listed on the .ORGANIC website that I can find. Nor could I find the standards by which they are reviewed. I just typed “.organic” into google and got nothing.

Great idea. Let’s see what happens.

get.organic

Fluorescent Lights May Cause Eye Disease

From Debra Lynn Dadd

Here’s another reason to not use fluorescent lights.

According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health, increased us of fluorescent lighting my increase UV-related eye diseases by up to 12%.

“The safe range of light to avoid exposing the eye to potentially damaging ultraviolet (UV) radiation is 2000 to 3500K and greater than 500 nanometers. Some fluorescent lights fall outside this safe range.”

The light that comes from fluorescent lighting is similar to that of sunlight, bringing UV exposure indoors to homes.

The paper gives many details about fluorescent lighting and it’s dangers.

SOURCE: Eye Disease Resulting From Increased Use of Fluorescent Lighting as a Climate Change Mitigation Strategy

Compact Fluorescent Lights May Save Energy but Can Harm Your Health

Add Comment

Organic Grace

Everything for your natural bed, including innerspring and latex mattresses, wood bed frames, mattress pads and toppers, sheets, duvet covers, pillows, blankets, comforters, dust mite barrier covers, and a knowledgeable staff to help you choose the bed that is “just right” for you. Buy six or more pieces at the same time and get 10% off everything.

Visit Website

sleep number bed odor

Question from Bonnie

I have owned a sleep number bed for about 4 years. The volcanized rubber air chamber still puts off a very strong odor. I can not even turn my pillow over because it will smell to strong. My bed sheets have the odor. In the past you recommended a aluminum camping sheet to block odor from a chair. I tried this and it did not work. I have a medical problem and it is the only bed I can tolerate, traditionbal innerspring is bad for me.

I heard about charcoal absorbing bed blankets. I talked to MDE and they said they are unsafe. Do you have a suggestion. I want to try the charcoal.

Also due to an ankle problem the only shoe that helps me is New Balance. The odor is horrible and takes many months to leave. Can anything speed up the process?

Lastly, what do you use for handwashing dishes? Thank You

Debra’s Answer

It is very difficult to remove the odor from rubber whether in a bed or a shoe. Readers, any suggestions?

I see no reason why a carbon blanket would be unsafe. Many people with MCS use them successfully.

I wash my dishes with a variety of different products, as I am always trying new things. Currently I’m using BioKleen Natural Dish Liquid. It has a nice citrus smell that I like.

How Biological Dentistry Can Help More Than Your Teeth

My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep, a Registered Dental Hygienist, Orofacial Myofunctional Therapist, and author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. We’ll be talking about toxic exposures in conventional dentistry and now biological dentistry can improve both your teeth and the health of your entire body. Carol has served as a board member of the Academy of Minimally Invasive Biomimetic Dentistry (AMIBD) and is a founding member of the American Academy of Oral Systemic Health (AAOSH), and the Academy of Applied Myofunctional Sciences (AAMS). She is also a member of the American Academy of Physiological Medicine and Dentistry (AAPMD. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in dental hygiene from Baylor University and has taken courses in orofacial myology from two of the top experts in the United States. Carol is an advocate for change in dentistry. Given the current reality of healthcare costs and delivery in this country and the central role of oral conditions in general health, she works to bring together the philosophies of those who practice biological dentistry, minimally invasive/biomimetic dentistry, neurological dentistry, and those who understand the role the mouth plays in the web of inflammatory diseases, so dentistry can offer people a chance at higher levels of health. www.mouthmattersbook.com

read-transcript

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“How Biological Dentistry Can Help More Than Your Teeth”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Carol Vander Stoep

DATE OF BROADCAST: October 23, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, October 23rd 2014. The sun is shining here in Clearwater, Florida. We’re going to be talking about your teeth and your mouth and biological dentistry and a whole lot of things about how what’s going on in your mouth can affect your whole, entire body.

My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s a registered dental hygienist, orofacial myofunctional therapist and author of the book Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. She’s got a lot to tell us. I think you’re going to be surprised with some of these.

Hi Carol, thanks for being here.

Carol Vander Stoep: Good morning, Debra.

DEBRA: Good morning! So there’s so much we could talk about. Could you just give us an overview to start with about some of the different ways that what’s going on with our teeth and gums and everything in our mouth can be affecting other parts of our bodies because I think that most people, first of all, think of dentistry as only teeth-oriented, maybe gums-oriented and not all the other things that you’re talking about?

Carol Vander Stoep: Yes, and I think I kind of started off with that premise when I first wrote the first edition of Mouth Matters. I was talking about how the microbes in your mouth particularly those that live slightly under the gums – a lot of people still don’t recognize that’s there a little collar of tissue that surrounds these two and that’s an imperfect casket, if you will, to keep microbes out because the lining of that tissue, of that collar is fairly permeable to the microbes that live in your body.

So whatever you allow to flourish there easily enters your bloodstream and could go to your heart and your joints and your brain and cause all kinds of problems depending upon on what kinds of microbes you have living in that pocket.

I think there’s becoming much more awareness of course now that gum disease and heart disease, they’re linked. Perhaps maybe one of the most viable germs in there or the most common is p. gingivalis. That one can have a hundred percent of the lining of all your arteries and so on and that could be as large as a tennis court.
That can really ramp up inflammation throughout your whole body. So in that way, what is living in your mouth definitely changes the inflammatory profile of what’s going on in your body.

But if you turn that around, you have to say, “Well, if you have a really good diet and a really good lifestyle and so on, you’re not going to be host to those microbes.” I’m sure most of your listeners are pretty aware of keeping a pretty healthy body.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. So before we go on, could you explain what an ‘orofacial myofunctional therapist’ is?

Carol Vander Stoep: That is a mouthful, isn’t it?

DEBRA: It certainly is. I had to practice saying that.

Carol Vander Stoep: I’m sorry?

DEBRA: I had to practice saying that, ‘orofacial myofunctional therapist’.

Carol Vander Stoep: I just say ‘myofunctional therapist’. Basically, I think that’s almost one of the most important things that I’ve covered in the last several years. I actually have a blog on it for people who want more detail. And actually, I think everybody needs to be up on it. It’s kind of dense, but every single sentence is important I think.

For instance, probably most of your listeners by now are alkalizing their diets by eating kale and spinach and raw and everything else. But the most overlooked part is breathing and developing an airway.

You can’t really stay in an appropriate neutral to slightly alkaline state without breathing correctly. That gets to be a little bit complicated, but what I think is the most important thing is that parents of children who are developing make sure that they are not mouth breathing.

A lot of times, they mouth breath due to allergies and so on in the nose and those have to be corrected because if you’re breathing through your mouth, you’re blowing off too much carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide (on page four of the blog), there’s probably 15-20 functions in your body. We’re taught that it’s a waste gas, but it’s anything but waste gas.

So what I like to do is encourage mothers who are breastfeeding as soon as the baby comes off the breast to just take their index finger and thumb and just lightly press the lips together just to give them a subtle clue that they should be nasal breathing and any time they see them with their lips open to do that.
But to go further than that, there are three main oral postures that we should all have. Our lips should be sealed. We should have our tongues completely glued front to the back to the roof of our mouth. And if that is happening, then we’re going to have a correct swallow.

I have links in my blog that’ll take you to what a correct swallow looks like and of course, explain that in more detail.

DEBRA: And is that blog at MouthMattersBook.com.

Carol Vander Stoep: It is, MouthMattersBook.com. A lot of people forget to put ‘book’ in there and then that’s not good. But yeah, it’s called ‘Facial Meltdown: Birth to Death’.

It’s really important for everyone to have these three correct oral facial postures. But for children through aged 12 whose faces are developing, it’s critical because crowded teeth are often a result of having incorrect oral posture, but even more, you’re not developing your face forward, giving yourself enough room for your tongue so that you have an airwave. There’s nothing more important than breathing.

In the United States, it looks fairly common to have a weak jaw [inaudible 00:07:23] mouth breathing and a lower tongue posture. Everyone in your audience is perhaps going, “Ha, I never thought about where my tongue is right now.”

DEBRA: Well, that’s exactly what I’m saying. I’m also thinking I go to a biological dentist and nobody ever said anything about this to me. They talk about straightening teeth, but they don’t talk about – and I’ve even been to chiropractors and massage therapists and all these kinds of people. This is the first time I’m ever hearing this. Of course, I saw it on your website and it’s in your book in Mouth Matters.

But particularly, I was looking at your Amazon page where people can order your book and you talk about children being able to grow up with a different facial structure, a proper facial structure by doing the right things. This is not something that we think about as even possible.

I know you’re probably familiar with Weston Price’s foundation. What Dr. Price talked about is how the food that you eat affects your bone structure. I’ve even seen pictures of different things that I’ve read where it shows pictures of people at different times in history where they ate differently than we eat now or people that live in a more less industrial way and that their facial structure is totally different.

Dr. Price who was a dentist found that they had dental problems because of the bone structure in their face. And yet this is something that I think most people, if they’re not familiar with what I’ve just said, it’s like, “I never thought of that until I saw these pictures, until I read Dr. Price’s work.”

There is a natural facial structure that comes from eating a proper diet. If you don’t do that, then everything starts being out of whack. And then all these things that you’re talking about affecting the other parts of the body because of the things that are going on in our mouth and in our head, it just is all like dominoes falling over.

Carol Vander Stoep: It is completely that. And I guess that’s why I like to talk about it because the one thing – you’re exactly right – nobody is talking about it.

DEBRA: Nobody is talking about this.

Carol Vander Stoep: We’re all looking too far down stream.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

Carol Vander Stoep: And I will say something about Weston Price. Now, he’s tried about all of that with the exception of vitamin A. There doesn’t seem to be as much correlation he thought. I’m not downgrading vitamin A, but I just want to say that that’s not really part of this equation.

However, if you think about it too, his studies were showing that once they started trading and getting the sugar and the grain products, that that deteriorates it. And that’s true, but if you also think about it, what are those products, but [inaudible 00:10:30]? You have to use your teeth. There’s almost everything in our culture where we don’t really have to chew and use our teeth that well.

DEBRA: Those muscles, yeah. We need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s the author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. You can go to her website at MouthMattersBook.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s a registered dental hygienist and the author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. Her website is MouthMattersBook.com.

Carol, it seems like you’ve put together a lot of very interesting information, but it’s not what people are generally talking about. How did you get interested in this?

Carol Vander Stoep: Well, you can’t be a hygienist I think paying attention and not see that all the inflammatory diseases are tied together. So I think after about ten years of taking care of people, you notice that heart disease, diabetes and gum disease all go together.

I also noticed people eating more and more and more at restaurants. Not to be crude, but everybody was bleeding like crazy in their gum. That is just largely a diet thing with sugar being the main culprit.

And I have to say it’s really nice being in biological offices where the people who come to you understand a little bit more about how to eat.

But it just grew. Like I said, I started off my book from a very traditional viewpoint, but the more research you do, the more your world just widens. Actually, that was a tool for me to meet some of the top dentists in the world doing crazy, good stuff.

So I just want to point people to my ‘Avoiding the Death Spiral’ movie on my website. That’s the other passion that I have. It’s all well and good to be a biological dentist, but a really important keystone to dentistry is diagnosing early and correctly.

I think most dentists are still depending on x-rays [inaudible 00:15:35] to diagnose. It’s just 50% accurate. There’s no other way to say it. You need a little bit more of an imaging device that can tell you. Particularly with fluoride (it’s so big on the scene), it changes the way x-rays scatter through the tooth.

We’re very late in catching up on decay. So people at with a great lifestyle, but who have teeth breaking down, it’s basically the same problem as having gum disease if you have a tooth that they need to root canal or an abscess.

Any of those things are incredibly damaging to your health. And so you really have to start in the beginning by correct, early diagnosis. And that ‘Avoiding the Death Spiral’ explains that in detail and with a lot of images that people can relate to. So that’s the other set of dentists that I’ve really started resonating with.

And then for those who have already suffered from traditional dentistry (and I have an interview with Mercola on that a couple of years ago that a lot of people have tuned in on), you can’t do minimally invasive dentistry on a tooth that’s already had traditional dental care. You need to look then for a biological dentist to know how the adhesive in dentistry really work. A lot of dentists are woefully behind on learning that.

So I kind of explain what’s important about that. So I would just like to point people to that because it’s pretty complicated to explain.

DEBRA: Yeah, there’s so much that we could be talking about. It’s impossible to go into each thing in great detail.

But I want to make sure that we cover just a few key items. We’re going to talk about biological dentistry in the next segment, but before we get there, I just want you to explain something about just regular dentistry and some of the toxic exposures that people may be exposed to and even the general philosophy behind it so that they can see when we talk about ‘biological dentistry’ what the difference is.

Carol Vander Stoep: Sure! Traditional dentistry is still kind of stuck in the 1850s. They’re using old materials, they’re using old techniques like drills. Drills fracture tooth apart, which is not really good. It sets it up for future failure. Fifty percent of dentists are still using mercury to fill teeth with (so the fill, drill and fill routine).
Dentistry is still based on amputation dentistry. It’s like repairing teeth after the fact when we could be doing it so much earlier or diagnosing so much earlier. I’m a big proponent of air abrasion and ozone.

I’m sorry, what was the other part of your question?

DEBRA: Well, I just wanted you just to give a picture of what traditional dentistry is like including toxic substances that are used within that industry (we’ll call it an industry), so that when you talk about biological dentistry later, people can see the difference.

Carol Vander Stoep: Okay! Well, there’s probably nothing that’s as biological as we would like in the dental industry, I want to say that. There seems to be an idea with people that there are some totally non-toxic things in dentistry that can be used. It’s really always about trade-off
But of course, crowns are an important part of traditional dentistry. Root canals are a part of traditional dentistry if a tooth has died. There’s not a lot of testing for what each person might have a sensitivity to as far as dental material. Fluoride is the big thing for remineralization. I think fluoride and mercury are two of the big things that traditional dentistry is using.

But then also, most of the resins also have BPAs in them. You can’t totally get away from toxicity. Most of the crowns are porcelain. They use a lot of metal and they don’t pay attention to the differing metals that are in the mouth, which create – it sets your mouth up as the battery so you have all kinds of little electronic impulses running through your mouth all the time that you may or may not be able to detect, but your brain sure understands it and your body sure understands it. Traditional dentists aren’t really clued in to the electrical part of the body so much.

DEBRA: Yes.

Carol Vander Stoep: So there’s not too much natural that’s going on in dentistry to be honest. The best dentistry is no dentistry.

DEBRA: Yeah, I totally agree with that. I mean, when we think about going back to Dr. Price, he went to these pre-industrial cultures and he found that their teeth were in really good shape, that they had broad bones so that their teeth was not all jammed together and everything fit well. It was just in a very natural environment with very natural food.

We’ll talk more about this when we come back from the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Our guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s the author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. I have a copy of this book sitting in front of me here and it’s like 450 pages and every page has interesting information on it about dentistry and health. Well be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s a registered dental hygienist, orofacial myofunctional therapist and author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. Her website is MouthMattersBook.com.

Carol, I’m looking through. Every time we have a break, I’m continuing to look through your book. We were talking about pictures earlier of people who had good diet versus people that didn’t have good diet and how their facial structure is different.

And on page 207 of your book, you’re talking about the work that you do as a myofunctional therapist. It’s amazing the difference between you have a picture of a sister that had improper oral posture and developed whole facial balance and another sister had proper oral posture and developed good facial balance. The difference in the way they look and in our sense of beauty is amazing! It just is amazing.

I feel kind of the same way as when I looked at the Weston Price pictures. We really are designed by nature to be beautiful. And yet even in our faces, there are distortions that come from our lifestyle choices and just kind of living this skewed life that we live in the industrial world.

Carol Vander Stoep: We should have quite even facial thirds – you know, forehead, nose and then nose to chin. Mouth breathers develop a very long, narrow face. So absolutely! Aesthetically, it is not attractive. A weak jaw is never attractive.

We get used to it here. And when we see someone properly develop, I mean, those are our models. They’re beautiful, they have high cheek bones, they have sinuses, they have eyeball orbits that don’t need glasses because they’re not all squinched up. So yes, absolutely.

DEBRA: Ah, yes! Now hearing about this, I wish that my parents had known about this when I was a child. I don’t think that I have as much of a malformed face as a lot of people that I see, but I see the point. If the bones in your face are not in the proper place, then your breathing is going to be affected, your eating is going to be affected, your eyes, your vision’s going to be affected. It’s a huge thing.

Carol Vander Stoep: And apnea. I mean, it’s so rampant here. I think most people are not diagnosed because they have no idea they’re having issues – they’re choking on their tongues at night because there’s no space. And no, most doctors are not yet looking at that.

One of this might be a good point. The next thing I’m going to do is because so many people need a little help in this, I am actually going to make some myofunctional therapy companion tape, so people can kind of walk themselves through the therapy. Of course, they should see a myofunctional therapist for help, but these will be back-up tapes so people can see what these facial exercises are about.

We’re all very flaccid in our faces. Can you believe that in Brazil, actually they have 31 PhD programs in myofunctional therapy. They can even use it, women use it aesthetically for a facelift. Instead of pulling the skin up, they learn to use their muscles and it does amazing things. They get hollow cheeks. They get thicker lips. We just never think in terms of that.

DEBRA: So even adults who – this doesn’t need to be done correct when somebody is a child. Even an adult could reshape their face.

Carol Vander Stoep: They can’t totally. Your facial development is nearly completed by age 12. You really need to start on it early in order to have it forward. You can’t avoid the double jaw surgery if you want to develop airway space and so on, which has its own set of problems. But if you continue to mouth breath, at any point in time, your jaw continues to develop more vertically and your face does change.

Those who signed up for my newsletter, which is a pretty rare event, but at any rate can get some better pictures of what exactly happens there. I recommend anybody who wants to download those pictures and see what happens to a face over time if they continue to do that.

Many actors, it’s kind of painful now to watch movies and see who does and doesn’t have correct oral posture.

DEBRA: Interesting!

Carol Vander Stoep: Yes. I mean, everyone can benefit.

DEBRA: Interesting, very interesting. Yeah, yeah.

Carol Vander Stoep: People in yoga learn – oh, sorry.

DEBRA: Oh, go ahead. I was just saying how interesting it was. “People in yoga… people in yoga,” you started saying.

Carol Vander Stoep: Yeah, in yoga, they teach you to put your tongue up. Why is that? They don’t mean just the tip of the tongue, they mean all the way up. When you swallow correctly, you push up on this whole string of bones that leads to the pituitary gland and milks the hormones from that such as – well, sex hormones, growth hormones.

So it doesn’t want all the hormones that come from the pituitary. It’s a natural, little milking process that happens if you swallow correctly.

For children, you’ve got a lot of stem cells that run right along the midline of the roof of the mouth. When you rub on those, it tells your mouth to widen so you don’t have a narrow face, so you can develop tongue space and so on. I mean, that’s just a couple of interesting points.

DEBRA: Wow. Wow! Wow, wow! That was very interesting. Okay, I want to make sure that before we get to the end of the show, let’s talk about biological dentistry as a field. Can you give us a general definition of what that is and what kind of services biological dentists offer that you wouldn’t find in a regular dentist office?

Carol Vander Stoep: Well, it’s a very broad term. It’s kind of like cosmetic dentistry. Everybody has got their own interpretation. I think the two main things that they understand is that mercury is very bad for us (as we all should know), but they know how to remove mercury safely and they also will help you with the protocol as to how to also eliminate it from your body.

They often call on other people to help them with that. I have a biological movie that I’ll post soon that also kind of gives you some guidelines. A lot of people do the DMPS and DMSA and so on, chelation to pull the heavy metal out of their body, but they don’t really understand that doesn’t really pull mercury from within a cell.
So it’s very difficult to get that mercury out of your body, but they’re very, very attuned to the whole mercury removal process, which is critical. So that’s one of the big things that the biological dentists would agree on.

The same thing for fluoride. Fluoride is damaging to our bodies in so many ways and I don’t think that that’s going to surprise any of your listeners.

Some other things that they don’t think about that, methylation. Autism is looking to be having a lot to do with methylation reactions in the body. Both mercury and fluoride are terrible with depressing that particular reaction. They’re aware of that. And it’s time for a break, isn’t it?

DEBRA: It’s time for a break, yes. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s a registered dental hygienist, orofacial myofunctional therapist and author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. You can go to her website at MouthMattersBook.com where she’s got a lot more information about the things we’re talking about. We’ll be right back..

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is Carol Vander Stoep. She’s the author of Mouth Matters: Healthy Mouth, Healthy Body. Her website is MouthMattersBook.com. So if one went to a biological dentist – first of all, how would one find a biological dentist?

Carol Vander Stoep: Well, that’s what I’m saying. There’s a broad range of understanding. But most biological dentists, the mercury, the fluoride, they don’t believe much. I think more and more of them are understanding root canal toxicity, cavitation problem. They understand that our bodies are electrical entities, some of them will use cold plasma lasers, they’ll have negative ion generators in the office. They know what kind of estrogenizers and toxic chemicals are in most of the – actually, the products that we even buy from the store like Triclosan, these little polyethylene plastic bulbs and toothpaste and things like that.

Also, most f them offer dental material compatibility testing. They’ll test for DNA. If they take out a root canal tooth and find that if the person has been suffering from ill health, quite often, they’ll facilitate a DNA test to see what was actually in that, so a patient can kind of understand maybe what the ties to the general health were.

I have an article called I think ‘Root Canal Awareness Week with a Twist’ on my blog, but it’s basically a rerun of an article I did for Dr. Mercola on May 3rd called ‘Safer & Healthier Alternative to Root Canals’ where I talk about not only how to tell if a root canal that you have – it’s very hard to get out a tooth. It’s very hard to allow one to go. It’ll help you decide whether you really need to take it out or not (I would always say yes, but anyway), how it should be properly removed so that you don’t get these serious infection in the jaw bone called a cavitaiton. I go into some detail about those things.

It’s just kind of a conglomeration of what a lot of biological dentists are thinking. I even talk about implants.

DEBRA: The biological dentist would have more of an orientation towards fewer toxic chemicals, more about preventive things that you could do to keep your teeth in good shape and things like that, yes?

Carol Vander Stoep: For the most part, [inaudible 00:41:31].

DEBRA: But they would need to be different. I’m assuming they would need to be different because I don’t think that there’s probably a standard for biological dentists?

Carol Vander Stoep: There aren’t. There aren’t. That’s what I’m trying to say. There are no standards. It’s just that everybody kind of goes off on their own direction. Some are really wild and do wonderful things, wonderful, crazy things, but others are more traditional.

I tend to like the dentists with the IBDM because they seem to understand electrical, the body electric a little bit better. But I see that some of the other dental organizations that are biological are moving in that direction. So yes, the more we learn, the more we can change our practices for the better.

I don’t think it’s out of line for people to do a lot of study and bring stuff to their biological dentists and say, “But…” For instance, a lot of them are still using a lot of nitrous oxide because patients like that. Well, nitrous oxide has got a lot of problems with it. I try to explain to my patients that it’s not healthy for them.

But yes, in general, it’s all about using the least toxic and then being as careful with mercury amalgam removal as possible and then building up your immune system. Some are really good with nutrition, so yeah. So yeah, it’s just nothing like traditional dentistry.

DEBRA: Nothing like it. Yes, a biological dentist would be what you would look for if you were going to other alternative healing kind of people instead of a medical doctor. And then a biological dentist would have more of that kind of viewpoint. And again, that is a very wide spectrum of what that might be.
And even though there’s no standard (and I’m assuming there would be no certification for a biological dentist), but there are associations.

Carol Vander Stoep: They have their own certifications, yes, if you join them.

DEBRA: Oh, good. Oh, good.

Carol Vander Stoep: And what I’m trying to say too though (what I say all the time) is really wonderful where people come in and you can see the sigh of relief like, “Oh, I can talk about this stuff to someone.” You don’t have to hide what you’re thinking just in the hopes that you’ll get some kind of dental care.

DEBRA: Yes, I understand. I understand exactly what you’re saying. I have a very good doctor that I’ve been seeing for the past four years who understands exactly what I’m saying. I’m just so grateful to have him because it’s so often you go to the doctor and you have to stop being yourself and just talk to the doctor, do what the doctor talks and be willing to do what the doctor wants you to do.

I’ve had so many arguments with medical doctors who want to put me in all kinds of drugs and I say no. I had one doctor just kick me out after the first ten minutes.

Carol Vander Stoep: Yeah, they don’t have time for you. These guys really love what they do. They understand the reasoning behind it. There’s nothing like having that relationship where you can talk about things. They may not agree with you, but you can have that discussion and hey! That’s worth everything as far as I’m concerned.

DEBRA: Yeah. It is. So I want to ask you the last question I want to ask you because we’re getting almost to the end. Going to the dentist (whether it’s a biological dentist or a regular dentist), I se two reasons to go to the dentists. One is that you’re having a problem with a tooth and the other is to be preventive like going to get your teeth cleaned and things like that.

What would be your basic advice to people about how they should care for their teeth so that they don’t have to go to the dentists, they wouldn’t end up with a problem, they wouldn’t need a root canal? What’s your basic toxic-free advice on how to care for your teeth?

DEBRA: Well, beyond diet and breathing right, which is huge (that’s the big piece of the puzzle), but brushing with baking soda particularly in the evening is a good thing because it’s got a pH of 9. And so if you want to work topically in the mouth, that’s a great thing. I love ozonated oil with picks. I’ve talked about that quite a bit in the past. And of course, flossing if you’re going to.

But basically, all things are good if you take care of your body. I think that’s what I’d want to say. I would encourage those people out there because a lot of biological dentists are not yet using the advanced imaging to detect decay. That’s really, really, really critical. I hope some of you share what you learn from ‘Avoiding the Death Spiral’ with your biological dentist because I think that’s one area where we could really grow that segment.

Doesn’t no drills sound wonderful? I mean air abrasion is just using particles to blow away the decay selectively, not a drill. I think that’s a really important part that biological dentistry should begin to embrace more. Those are the thing.

DEBRA: Do you think that people need to go to the dentist in order to have their teeth cleaned on a regular basis or can they clean them in home?

Carol Vander Stoep: Well, for my patients who are really, really leading a good, clean lifestyle, yes, I think they should go in once a year just to get everything checked over. I mean, I don’t like to call my visits a cleaning. They are preventive appointments. We talk about nutrition. We talk about their airway. I give them exercises.

DEBRA: Oh, good, yeah.

Carol Vander Stoep: I’m also kind of unusual, so…

DEBRA: Well, you are kind of unusual. I mean, my dental hygienist, I go to a biological hygienist and I don’t get any of that, all these things that you’re talking about. I don’t get any of that.

Carol Vander Stoep: Yeah, so it’s like with dentists, they embrace whatever they’re going to embrace and sometimes they can’t talk about what they want to talk about because we’re working for someone else, so we’re very limited sometimes on what we can do. A lot of it really is self-study or self-advocacy for what you’ve learned and then say, “Well, I like this.”

But I have a lot of people who are in the healthcare field who are really walking the walk and they might come in after eight years and have a pristine mouth. And then I have some people who – oh, there’s a little something like, I don’t know, maybe their mouth breathing or maybe they’re mouth breathing at night. Who knows? It’s a multitude of things that could be going on. It does take a really knowledgeable hygienist/dentist, whoever to help them piece together what might be going on.

And also, you have to monitor the cracks in teeth and things like that. So it’s good to just be monitored even if you’re pristine clean by someone. It’s just unfortunate that it’s set up as a cleaning appointment, these preventive appointments because that’s what insurance pays for. In our heads, that’s what we’re looking for. We come to get them cleaned when really, for the most part, my clients, they do come in clean now. They’ve been listening to me for years on end and they’re good. But we do find other things to refine what’s good for their health. That’s the model I’d like to see, but…

DEBRA: Yeah, I’d like to see that too because one of the things that I recognize is the more education you have about your body and how it works and what you can do to keep it healthy, the more we can do those things and the less health care/illness care we need because if we actually get real healthcare, we don’t need so much illness care.

We’re getting to the end of the show. Thank you so much for being here. Carol, I learned a lot and I’m sure my listeners learned a lot too. There’s so much more in her book that you can learn Mouth Matters. You can go to her website, MouthMattersBook.com and take a look.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

Carol Vander Stoep: Thank you, Debra.

DEBRA: Thank you.

hair dye

Question from mskleimo

Do you have any sources for non-toxic hair dyes or highlighters especially ones that can be used in foils which keeps it out of direct contact with my scalp? I have become sensitive to the ones I have used for years. I have tried Palette by Nature but it cant be used in foils. I just tried Naturtint but it still has peroxide and PPD which I would like to avoid. The Palette by Nature says its free of those 2 but is too runny to use in a foil. thanks!

Debra’s Answer

First, the least toxic hair dye is henna. It comes in many colors now. But I don’t think it can be used with foils.

Maybe it’s time to consider not using foils. Maybe try henna, or no hair dye at all.

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

You CAN Lose Weight—Even if You’ve Had Difficulty Losing Weight Before

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Today we’ll be talking about what you can do to help your body lose weight. Pamela has been helping me with weight loss and I’ll talk about my story and success. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

pamela-seefeld-at-desk

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“You CAN Lose Weight—Even if You’ve Had Difficulty Losing Weight Before”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph

DATE OF BROADCAST: October 22, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today is Wednesday, October 22nd 2014. The weather is beautiful here in Clearwater, Florida where I’m looking out my window.

Actually, as I’m sitting here doing the radio show every weekday at 12 Eastern, I’m sitting here looking out 17 ft. of windows into my backyard where there’s all these oak trees and birds. Sometimes I see cardinals and red-headed woodpeckers and all kinds of things. It’s just really lovely. It’s lovely to sit here and chat with you every day and to be with my guests in this beautiful, natural atmosphere. Anyway, that’s what I’m looking at when I’m talking to you.

Today, my guest is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Pamela knows so much. She’s just incredible in terms of what she knows and her ability to help people to get well. She’s been working with me personally (we’re going to talk about that a little bit today) and also other people that I know here in Clearwater, Florida. She’s based here in Clearwater.

She’s a registered pharmacist and she educates physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She also studied a field called ‘pharmacognosy’. That’s the study of medicinal plants (in addition to studying drugs).

And so what she likes to do really is take people off prescription drugs instead of give them to them. She likes to help people with medicinal plants and other natural substances to handle whatever is going on with their bodies instead of going on drugs in the first place because the difference between drugs and medicinal plants is that drugs may control your symptoms, but medicinal plants and natural substances will actually heal your body.

She knows so much about this that I have her on every other Wednesday because we’re just going through all kinds of different physical problems and talking about what are the alternatives so that you don’t have to take drugs. I’m just thrilled to be bringing you this information.

Hi, Pamela!

Pamela Seefeld: Hey! It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. So today, we’re going to talk about how you can lose weight even if you’ve been having difficulties losing weight like me. And especially, I know that a lot of people who have had chemicals damage their body (which is virtually everyone in the world today) that if you have endocrine problems or other kinds of problems like with your liver and you can’t detox or whatever, that a lot of times, you’re overweight not because you’re eating too much or that you’re a bad person, but that your body just isn’t functioning the way it’s supposed to function.

I know that you’ve been working with me for a couple of months on just all the things, all my unhandled physical conditions, which are all improving, but specifically…

Pamela Seefeld: That’s great!

DEBRA: Yes, they are. But specifically, since I’ve been working with you, I’ve lost 14 lbs. really kind of effortlessly.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s excellent!

DEBRA: Yes, yes. And part of it has been because something that you’ve done has changed the way my body interacts with food. And so I don’t have cravings for anything, I don’t have to use any willpower to eat the right foods because I have no desire to eat sugar or any of those things that I use to have to struggle with, that I knew what was the wrong thing to do, but my body was saying, “Give me that sugar!”
And so now, it’s just like I just eat my three meals a day. I even forget to eat my snack in the afternoon. I eat my three meals. I eat something before I go to bed and I’m never hungry in between. I have no cravings and my body is just getting smaller and smaller and smaller and my clothes are hanging on me. I’m just very happy.

Pamela Seefeld: I’m so happy for you.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. I’m so happy for me too! I got to a point the other day where I realized with a bang! kind of actually that I could put my attention on other things in my life instead of having to deal with my body problems. That was kind of funny because…
Pamela Seefeld: Good for you! You know what? I’m really, really touched. I’m really so happy and honored that I can help you and that you’re doing so well. I mean, I knew that this was just really what you needed.

DEBRA: Yes, you did. You gave me exactly the right thing. I was telling somebody about this yesterday and he said, “Well, what is she giving you?” and I said, “Well, it’s not about having just like a box of things that she gives to every person who has a weight problem. It’s very individual.” By you giving me the right things for my body, my body is saying, “Okay, I can release this weight.”

Pamela Seefeld: Correct.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. So it’s about the individuality. But we’re going to talk today about different things, different ways that you can help people lose weight if they’re having trouble losing weight. I’m hoping that we’re going to talk a little bit about some of the drugs that people take to lose weight and why people shouldn’t take them and what they can do instead?

Pamela Seefeld: Correct.

DEBRA: So why don’t you start wherever you’d like to start?

Pamela Seefeld: Okay! So the end game, we’re blaming people that they’re not eating the right food or that it’s somehow a moral dilemma that they’re not just able to control their hunger. That’s not really what it’s all about. It’s not necessarily calories in and calories out because we know the person that sticks thin and they eat all day long. So it’s not necessarily even though circumstances.

Okay, so there’s different things in the body that affect metabolism. The good way to look to see if you’re having insulin resistance and storing a lot of the calories as sugar is to look at your fasting glucose like if you go to the doctor and they do a blood panel on you. It’s called a CMP and it’s called ‘complete metabolic profile’. You can see all your electrolytes and your sugar.

And when people meet with me, there’s a free consultation. If you bring me your blood work or fax or email it to me, I’ll go over the numbers with you because it’s not about the range. The problem is looking at blood work and deciding whether somebody has metabolic syndrome or has some problems or some propensities to store excess sugar as fat.

It’s not about the range because that’s for the general population. One person, a fasting blood sugar at 95, they might be stick thin and another person, they’re already gaining a lot of weight. So it’s not necessarily about the range. But I tell people that if your fasting blood sugar should really reside between 75 and 85. That’s where most normal people are going to be.

So when you start getting up to the 90s (95 or 96 or close to 100), what I typically see when somebody comes in here – maybe they’re middle age, so they’re blaming it on menopause. That’s not necessarily always what’s happening. They’re starting to gain weight. They’re not eating very much. I look and their fasting blood sugar is in the 90s and they’re triglycerides are sky high, their cholesterol is sky high and they’re like, “Well, I don’t eat these kinds of foods.”

And so what’s happening is that they’re being blamed for this, but really, it’s insulin resistance. Sugar is turning it to fat.
So a good way to start is to say, “Okay, am I putting on weight and what’s my fasting blood sugar?” That’s something that the doctor can easily determine.

There’s some new studies too. And I know with fructose, when we think about high fructose corn syrup (and of course, we’re trying to avoid all that in general), if you look at what the study show, the amount of sugar that’s added to food if you’re in the United States between 1970 and 2000, the amount of added sugar in the food supply rose 25%.

DEBRA: Wow! That’s amazing. A friend of mine just went to see a film (I haven’t seen it yet), it’s called Fed Up. He said that it was about sugar in our foods and that on the back of the label, a food label, it has the nutrition facts and it has all these different things and it gives the percentage of the daily requirement or the daily allowance. Sugar is listed, the amount of sugar is listed, but it doesn’t give the percentage.
And he told me on the film, they said that the daily allowance for sugar is something like 6-9 teaspoons, 6-9 teaspoons a day.

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, it’s insane!

DEBRA: It is! And he said even at that being the allowance that if they were to put the percentage of the daily allowance that is the sugar in the product, it would be like 400% or something and that’s why they don’t put it on there because there’s just so much sugar in tehse processed foods and people just don’t understand.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s what’s happening. And not only that, even in healthy foods, you look at a lot of these soy milks and so forth, they’ll put rice bran syrup. It’s sugar.

DEBRA: It’s sugar, it’s sugar.

Pamela Seefeld: They re-label it as something else. ‘Organic cane juice’, it’s still sugar. So you have to look at that and what we see now is there’s a new study that was published in molecular metabolism and they were talking about how…

DEBRA: Before you tell us about that, wait, wait. Before you tell us, we have to go to break.

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah.

DEBRA: I don’t want to interrupt you in the middle of you telling us about the study.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s okay. Sounds good.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. We’re talking about losing weight and well be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is a Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist. You can go to her website at BotanicalResource.com.

Okay, Pamela, tell us about the study.

Pamela Seefeld: Okay! So what they’re finding is there’s a vulnerability and a variability to fructose. This is a brand new study that was published on the Journal of Molecular Metabolism. The New York Times’ was citing this on October 14th of this month. It was looking at what is exactly happening with fructose.

What we’re finding is that fructose, when you take it, say you have a piece of fruit and you don’t have any protein or fat with it like yoghurt or a piece of cheese or something, if you just have fructose by itself, what it does is instead of doing into the bloodstream, it goes immediately to the liver and it stimulates the production of triglycerides. So it increases cholesterol.

So this is a good example. When I see some of these women that come in, they’re very athletic and they work out a lot and they’re thin and they’re in great shape and they eat a lot of fruit, all of a sudden, they come back and they’re having cholesterol at sky high. This is what can happen.

Fructose, the sugar fructose is handled differently than glucose (which is like in regular table sugar). So if they’re going to have fruit and what they’re seeing is berries, they’re finding that there’s a growth factor. It’s called fibroblast growth factor 21. That’s not really important. But what they’re finding is that obese subjects have higher levels of this and it makes you store fat.

So it’s not that the person that’s heavy is eating improperly. It’s that there’s this other things going on with the hormones. And apparently, this hormone is much more effective with fructose than any sugar.

So what does this mean to you and I? I always tell this to my patient. You don’t want to be eating fruit that’s high in sugar by itself because you’re going to store it as fat. For example, watermelon and all these lemons because it’s kind of liquidy…

DEBRA: That was the first thing that came to mind, watermelon.

Pamela Seefeld: Yup! I mean, it’s not that these things are bad. It’s not like you can’t eat them, but you have to combine them with fat or protein to delay the gastric emptying. But if you’re eating lots of fruit that are basically water and sugar, you’re going to end up with these problems. You might be thin in the beginning, but eventually, you’re going to end up gaining a lot of weight.

DEBRA: Well, you know, I watch people eat or drink smoothies with a lot of fruit in them, just straight fruit and protein powder or something (although protein is probably good, that protein or fat). But that’s just a lot of fruit and a lot of sugar that’s going on.

I know that Whole Foods are good, but vegetables, most vegetables don’t have the same degree of sugar.

Pamela Seefeld: Exactly.

DEBRA: And I also know from my own research that different fruits have different amounts of sugar. I eat mostly berries and cherries because they’re on the low end of how much sugar they have in them. I eat them by themselves (I mean, separate from a meal) and I put cream on them, grass-fed cream.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s smart. That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: Yeah. Every night, I have my lovely bowl of mixed berries or cherries with grass-fed cream and I’m very happy.

Pamela Seefeld: Look at you! So you understand the physiology of it, that the sugar is really going and it’s creating all these lipid.

You have to know too that fructose is pro-inflammatory. It can cause inflammation. So somebody who has any kind of rheumatism or arthritis, they have no business eating tons of high sugar fruits. The same thing, it also alters body weight by altering the leptin sensitivity. Leptin is al about whether you’re storing fat and also, whether you’re feeling hungry or not.

So I’m not saying fruit is bad. But when they say “eat your fruits and vegetables,” I really would rather say, “Eat your vegetables.”

DEBRA: I totally agree with you.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s where I’m coming from.

DEBRA: And that’s my experience in my own body. The other thing that I can say is that I used to – now, I’ll say something that’s very embarrassing, but it’s true, it’s true. I think there are other people in this boat and so I want to say this so that people can see how far you can come.

I used to do things like eat a whole bag of cookies for dinner or I once ate a whole coconut cream pie.

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, I’m sure a lot of people have done that of course.

DEBRA: I used to eat a half a gallon of ice cream.

Pamela Seefeld: I’ve done that!

DEBRA: It’s interesting because I love to travel, but when I travel, it’s interesting just for me to see what different places consider to be food. When I went to San Francisco (I lived in San Francisco a few years ago for three months), I couldn’t find a sweet potato to save my life in a restaurant. I had to eat three meals a day in restaurants and to try to find something…

Pamela Seefeld: That’s funny.

DEBRA: And you know, you go to a restaurant for breakfast and everything is sugar and wheat. They even put flour in scrambled eggs in some places. You have to ask, “Is this 100% eggs?” It’s just kind of amazing to go out to eat and see what you’re being fed and how much sugar is anything.

I’ve said this before, but I’m going to say it again. Just go to the Food Channel and watch Diners, Drive-ins and Dives and you’ll see how much sugar is in restaurant food. It’s in everything!

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, because you see them cooking the food, right?

DEBRA: You see them cooking the food!

Pamela Seefeld: Exactly!

DEBRA: It’s in everything. They just toss it in. It doesn’t matter if it’s a dessert or not.

People don’t understand what sugar actually does to weight. I can tell you for a fact, I don’t eat white sugar. I mean, I eat white sugar maybe once a year if I’m out some place and I just have to eat that Godive chocolate cheesecake, you know? Gluten-free Godiva Chocolate Bars, I think not. I was like, “I don’t need them.”

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, I don’t even have it in my house. It is a problem. If I have people over for coffee, like the family, I don’t have any of that there. I mean, look, we have coffee here, but I don’t have sugar in the house. I’m really sorry if that’s what you want.

DEBRA: Yeah, I have things like honey and coconut sugar, which are not so refined and stuff. But I’ll tell you that if I eat even coconut sugar, I stop losing weight. That’s the thing. And if I cut out the coconut sugar, I’ll lose weight again. It’s as simple as that.

But if I’m eating whole foods, if I’m eating my fruit with cream, if I’m not eating any kind of sweetener at all, refined or unrefined, just nothing, then I will lose weight.

Pamela Seefeld: Well, yeah. It’s because it’s altering the leptin sensitivity.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

Pamela Seefeld: Let me talk a little bit about green tea too. Let’s talk about some of the different supplements.

DEBRA: Okay, so you have 40 seconds.

Pamela Seefeld: Forty seconds? Okay. Green tea is great because it contains epigallocatechin and it can protect against cancer as well. It revs up your metabolism and it’s not going to make you jittery. I use this every day before I work out. I think it’s great.

DEBRA: I take it every day too. I take green tea extract and I also drink green tea that I grew. I love green tea.

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, I’m a big fan of the capsules themselves because if you do the tea itself, you’re doing water-soluble extract. You’re not going to get all the epigallocatechin. The best combination would be some of both.

DEBRA: Oh, good! Well, that’s good to know. So we need to go to break and then we’ll come back and talk more about how to lose weight even if you’ve had difficulty losing weight before. There are things that you can do and I’m living proof of that because after years of not being able to lose weight, I’ve lost actually 25 lbs. since January. I’m very proud of that.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dad and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK=

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs.

Pamela, you mentioned that you do free consultations on the phone. Why don’t you give people your phone number so after the show, they can call you?

Pamela Seefeld: Yes, that’s great. So you can reach me here at my pharmacy. It’s 727-442-4955. That’s 72-442-4955.

DEBRA: Okay, great! So I think you were going to tell us some things that people can take that will help their bodies.

Pamela Seefeld: Right! So the different supplements you can take, the green tea was the first one that I was just kind of talking about that works really good. There’s one also (and I’m not sure if your listeners have heard of this before), it’s called Nopal cactus.

DEBRA: I’ve never heard of that before.

Pamela Seefeld: Nopal cactus, I was looking up the studies – yes, it’s really interesting. It’s a cactus extract and what it does is it lowers postprandial glucose, which is the glucose after an hour (so after you eat, you take a blood measurement) by 25%. So this can be for people that are pre-diabetic or worried about diabetes or even if they’re eating sugar or sweets or fruits. It lowers the amount of sugar that reaches the blood stream. As a result, it stops the spiking of the sugar.

It’s pretty interesting. They use this a lot for people that are diabetics to keep blood sugar low. But it also has polyphenols, which have really strong antioxidant activity as well.

So this is a new supplement that’s up and coming. People might be interested in trying some of that. It’s not that expensive and it works really well.

DEBRA: Wow!

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, it’s pretty cool, Nopal cactus. So green tea and Nopal cactus are really good. There’s another supplement that I really like a lot. It’s made by Nature’s Plus and it’s called Synaptalean. Let me explain what Synaptalean is. This is why I like this.

DEBRA: Can you spell it first? Can you spell it first?

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, it’s S-Y-N-A-P-T-A-L-E-A-N.

DEBRA: Okay.

Pamela Seefeld: So this product is called Synaptalean. It’s at the health food store. I use it quite a lot. What Synaptalean does is it has what’s called a neuro-synapse complex in it.

So this particular product originally, they were doing the testing to see if it had activity and they were going to use it as a happy pill. It has antidepressant activity because it works on dopamine in the brain. Dopamine is the neurotransmitters that’s released when we’re eating something fattening, intoxication and that kind of thing. So dopamine is really important.

So sometimes when I have people that have some depression and I’m using maybe 5-HTP or omega-3 and I’m not sure if I’m getting the full result, I’m like, “Look, let’s try a neurotransmitter. Let’s try and work on dopamine.”

So I use this a lot for mental health, but what’s interesting is that they decided to market it as a weight loss product because they found that when people were taking it, this happy effect actually makes you not want to eat.

DEBRA: That’s interesting because I think that…

Pamela Seefeld: Isn’t that cool?

DEBRA: It is cool. I think that a lot of wanting to overeat gets triggered by wanting food for emotional comfort. And when you’re not eating emotionally – I would probably say the single, biggest change for me since I’ve been working with you or you’ve been working with me (we’ve been working together) is that this big shift from feeling like I need to eat or that I have to eat. It’s just my body is just calm all the time and I just go, “Okay, it’s breakfast time. It’s time to feed my body.” It’s not like, “I have to eat or I’m going to die” or “I’m upset, so I have to have a pizza.” All of that is just gone and I just feed myself healthy foods.

Pamela Seefeld: Well, that’s wonderful. That’s what it’s all about. It’s hard to detach yourself from that because a lot of times, we associate food with comfort.

DEBRA: Right!

Pamela Seefeld: So this is interesting because you can use this for depression especially if someone has refractory depression where the medicines really weren’t working for them and I’m using some supplements for them and I’m getting half results and I want to just kind of boost it up a little bit. But then the nice part about it is that weight loss tends to result from it as well.

So that’s a really good supplement. It has a lot of data on it that works really well. And just like I said, it’s available at the health food store. I use it a lot for mental health too, so that’s very good.

I don’t want to forget to talk about coconut oil because coconut oil is very important. We know that coconut oil lowers viruses in the body. It’s like a 75% reduction, so it has a lot of effects as far as for someone who has chronic fatigue, they worry about the cold and flu season.

But coconut oil, what the studies found is that when you’re using coconut oil and replacing that from other oils in your diet, oil makes you feel filled up. You’re not as hungry. This does not promote fat storage because coconut oil is made of medium chain triglycerides and MCT oils are burned up immediately in the blood stream. So when you take coconut oil, it’s actually used as energy right then. It cannot be stored as fat.

DEBRA: Wow. Wow! I didn’t know that. Hello?

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, you didn’t know that, yes! It can’t be stored.

DEBRA: I love coconut oil.

Pamela Seefeld: Yes, it’s MCT oil. MCT oil is what we use in people with liver failure because people with liver failure can’t process fat. So they get special nutrition in cans that are MCT oils.

So what we’re finding is we’ll give this primarily as MCT oil and as a result of that, you get lots of energy. So people that are doing athletics, they want to just up their game as far as their energy levels during the day. They don’t want to be necessarily consuming lots of high caloric foods, coconut oil is a good, little trick.

DEBRA: Wow! We talked about coconut oil on the show that we did about colds and flu and helping your immune system because it boosts that as well.

Pamela Seefeld: Correct.

DEBRA: But I just want to say again that coconut oil is great for any kind of cooking. It hardens at a cold temperature, so you can’t make salad dressing and then store the salad dressing in the refrigerator, but you could use it for salad dressing if you make it up fresh and you’re oil is at the right temperature.

But also, there’s something called coconut manna or coconut butter (differentiate brands have different names). It’s coconut oil mixed with coconut meat. So it’s more of the whole coconut. I can just eat that stuff right out of the jar with a spoon. It is so delicious.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s very good for you.

DEBRA: Oh, delicious! So delicious, yes. So if coconut oil doesn’t seem appetizing to you, look for coconut manna. My favorite one is I think it’s Artisana, Artisan something is the brand. It’s just so good, coconut manna. That’s a really great way to get those.

Pamela Seefeld: So the MCT oils are important. That’s another way to lose weight. Studies show too that taking fish oil also helps to keep weight down. We’re talking more about natural supplements. I’ll talk a little bit about the drugs at the end. But taking Omega 3’s every day also helps a lot.

I’m a big fan of doing the detox. I know you’re on the Body Anew and I’ve been on it for 15 years. That pulls out the pesticides and the chemicals that are stored in the fat soluble tissues. So that’s the best way too because it actually starts dumping the fat. That can work with or without exercise.

DEBRA: I really feel that happening. It’s just like you go along days, days, days. And then all of a sudden, there’s a day that I wake up and I was like, “What happened to my body?” It just went whoosh and got smaller.

We have to go to break. So, we’ll talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist that dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. She’s at BotanicalResource.com. We’ll talk more about losing weight when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants and other natural substances instead of prescription drugs. Her website is BotanicalResource.com. Pamela, give us your phone number again.

Pamela Seefeld: Yes, it’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Good! And you can call her after the show. She’ll be happy to talk to you. She gives free consultation. I can vouch for the fact that she knows what she’s doing, not only with me, but I know other people who see her in Clearwater. My doctor, my medical doctor recommends her. She’s unlike anybody you’ve ever talked to, I’m sure.

Okay, so go on. This is the last segment. So you want to tell us about some of the drugs that people shouldn’t take.

Pamela Seefeld: Correct. So going back really quickly, the detox is really important because it starts taking all these stuff out of the body and that helps with the weight loss in itself. What they’re normally going to give you if you go to the doctor and you’re asking for weight loss, the most popular product that they’re using Phendimetrazine. It’s basically an amphetamine derivative and there’s a million of doctors around here in Clearwater (I’m sure all around the country) that you go there, you get a B12 shot every week, they give you these appetite suppressant and they put you on 600 calories a day.

Well, if you go 600 calories a day, you’re going to lose weight anyways. This is just so you don’t feel like you’re hungry. The problem with this medicine is that they can raise your blood pressure, they can cause heart problems. Remember when people were doing the Fen-Phen and they were ending up with all these heart problems? Those are pretty serious risks.

I can also tell you for a fact, some of my clients have done this kind of stuff where they want to drop a lot of weight before a reunion or something, they’ll come in and the one client was telling me that her blood work got completely messed up as a result of taking these medicines. And then when she brought it up to the doctor, he says, “That’s not my problem.” That’s for your regular doctor. I’m just your weight loss doctor.

I’m not saying you’re all going to be that way, but I was just shocked. I’m like, “No, he put you on these medicines and the blood work looks really bad now as a result. He’s responsible.” But they think to themselves, “Okay, you’re going to pay me cash, we’re just going to go ahead and give you the weight loss pills and we’ll move on from there.” That’s not how things work.

DEBRA: Wow!

Pamela Seefeld: Yeah, I can’t make this up. I told him, I said, “No, you go back to him and tell him, ‘You’re the one that messed it up. You fix it.’” But they don’t want to manage anything with chronic management. You have to really take that into consideration when you decide to go and have to say, “Okay, I want to lose all these weight really fast and I’m going to go for these pills.”

And I can also tell you that I see this quite frequently of the clients that do decide to go do this against my wishes. I’m like, “Alright, you go do whatever you want.” They gain the weight back and more after they stop the program because it’s an artificial situation for your body. No one is going to stay on that low a calorie. And also too, you lose a lot of hair as a result of this.

So what happens is you’re eating such a low calorie diet. And if you completely cut fat out of your diet, what the study show is you’re eating these big salads, but if you’re just putting vinegar on it and you don’t have olive oil, you’re not absorbing any of the nutrients. So actually, the hair loss that these people are experiencing during these extreme diets is not necessarily because they’re not eating enough protein or enough calories. It’s because literally, the food they’re eating (especially the antioxidants), they’re not absorbing any of it.

DEBRA: That’s so important. There’s all these people who have been on low fat diets for so long and their bodies just don’t have that ability to absorb the nutrients because they’re not eating fat. It’s just been going on for so long.

Pamela Seefeld: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: Please eat fat. Eat fat, eat fat, eat fat.

Pamela Seefeld: Yes! Because if you’re thinking yourself healthy, you’re eating all these vegetables and you make this huge, colorful salad (which I do every single night), if you don’t have some fat – I’m not saying douse the whole thing in tons of oil, but if you don’t have a few tablespoons of olive oil on the salad, you’re not absorbing any of the nutrients.

The whole idea behind eating healthy foods is that your body needs to have these things being bioavailable. And to make them bioavailable, there’s ways that you can stir it into the blood stream. Otherwise, it’s just providing fiber.

That’s where a lot of these people miss the point. It’s not about extreme calorie reduction. It’s about eating every three hours, using detox. Maybe you want to throw in some green tea or some Nopal cactus.

A lot of it is looking at your blood work and saying, “Is there something here that the doctor is not seeing that’s telling me why I’m putting on weight and I should be losing weight.” That’s a lot of it. Your numbers tell a lot about what’s going on inside your body. And I think that they’re commonly not looked at.

DEBRA: Well, I think if we look at – correct me if I’m wrong, but I think if we look at fat as a symptom, as an indicator that there’s something going on in your body instead of something that “you’re eating too much” – I mean certainly people in the world as a whole are eating incorrectly in ways that put on more weight. Like for me, I’ve been eating organic, natural, unprocessed food for years and I am still not losing weight. I couldn’t figure this out. It turned out that there was something wrong with my body, not something wrong with me.

Pamela Seefeld: Correct.

DEBRA: And I think that that’s where people need to look at this and say, “It’s not about the latest fad diet. If I’m gaining weight, if I can’t lose weight, that’s my body saying, ‘there’s something wrong here.’” Normal, healthy bodies are not overweight. And so it’s a symptom like having a headache or blowing your nose, runny nose and what-not.

Pamela Seefeld: Well, it is. It is a symptom and like in your case and in the case of a lot of other of my clients, if you have pre-diabetes or diabetes or if your fasting blood sugar is in the 90s, I tell people that we want to use some homeopathy, some medical homeopathy like Pericardium Triple Warmer to start bringing the sugar down.

Most of the time, these hints are coming in your blood work and they’re telling you that you’re going to be at risk for a certain thing especially diabetes and metabolic syndrome and I think that they’re often ignored. Most of the time, people do not hear any kind of word of caution out of their physician until they’re up in the 100.

DEBRA: Yes, yes.

Pamela Seefeld: …by the time you already need medicine. So it’s really wrong. We don’t want people to be on a bunch of medicine. We want people to be healthy and happy and prevent these ongoing problems.

I always tell people it’s kind of like you’re in front of a misty bridge. These things are all showing that something is coming. I would just tell you to approach it head-on and stop it at the pass. Going to the other side means medicine, getting sick and not being 100%. That’s what people really deserve.

DEBRA: They do! And you know, I really hear you talking about health and happiness and you’re not talking about how can the industry make more money. We’re talking about how can we be healthy?

Pamela! Right!

DEBRA: I mean, if you really look at – I mean, I know that doctors help people in various ways and I don’t want to be against the whole, entire medical profession, but really, if you take a look at it, their job is to sell drugs.

Pamela Seefeld: Right! And that’s what pharmacies does. I understand it because I still work as a pharmacist. I like pharmacy. I embrace both. But I see this in a lot of patients and I see this even as a clinical pharmacist that people, if they were given an opportunity a few years before to do a few, simple, inexpensive things, they wouldn’t need any of the medicine and they wouldn’t end up in the hospital where I have to dose their medicine.

And that’s what it’s all about. It’s preventing some of these things. And look at the healthcare costs! They’re out of control in the country. Some of these could really be prevented. But also, quality of life.

DEBRA: Right, right.

Pamela Seefeld: These people deserve to not be on all these diabetic medications. A lot of these weight gain is just a symbol that the sugar is not balanced. Using some homeopathy in your water every day pretty much reverse it and it’s inexpensive and it’s safe.

So I really encourage people if they think that there’s some kind of an imbalance with glucose metabolism especially in the way they handle fructose and fruit to give me a call and I can tell you some simple things that you can do.

DEBRA: Yes, please do that because it has made a huge difference in my life. And tell us some of the conditions that you end up with, other conditions besides overweight? If you’re overweight, what else happens in your body?

Pamela Seefeld: Well, you have excessive inflammation because it stimulates circulating cytokines. So people end up having pain and arthritis and maybe even leading to chronic fatigue. But also, it impairs memory. And this is what they know, that people that have excessive amounts of circulating sugar, it impairs hippocampal memory formation.

So that’s why you’re talking about people that you kind of get foggy when you’re eating too much sugar. Well, this is what happens. The sugar can overwhelm the body. And as a result of that, you’re not only gaining weight and your lipids are really high and you don’t feel good, but it can create an element where your cognitive function is impaired to some degree.

And this is really important because let’s face it, we all want to be on top of our game with our memory. This is something that excessive amounts of sugar can cause problems – don’t even mention the fact that kidney problems, eye problems and all those especially with diabetics.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. So this is really…

Pamela Seefeld: So those are all very, very important.

DEBRA: This is something that people can do. I mean, isn’t overweight one of the major health problems in America today?

Pamela Seefeld: Most definitely. Let’s face it, a lot of people’s problems are because they’re storing the sugar and they’re storing the calories that they consume in an excessive manner. And then a lot of times, they’ll chalk it up to, “Okay, it’s hormones… she’s big-boned.” I mean, I understand a lot of stuff, but really, it’s about why is your body storing it and is it really storing it because there’s this imbalance with the way that the insulin is taking sugar into the cell.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. And there’s something we can do about it.

Pamela Seefeld: Well, definitely.

DEBRA: Well, this has been so interesting. We only have a minute left. So anything you want to say for a minute that we haven’t said?

Pamela Seefeld: Also, I would tell you, sleep is very important. I mean, this sounds like really ordinary talk, but people getting eight hours of sleep or seven and a half hours of sleep, they know that sleep affects weight and it also affects your hunger levels. So people that do not sleep the appropriate amount of time, they’re definitely going to be more at risk for storing all their calories as fat.

Debra; I have found that too. And one other things that you gave me (we talked about this on the sleep show) is passion flower. That really helps me sleep. I wake up in the morning and my body has had the opportunity to do its fat-burning thing overnight and I feel better!
Anyway, we’ve got only about ten seconds. So thank you so much. Give your phone number again.

Pamela Seefeld: Okay, yes. Please call me. I would be very gratefully happy to help you at any circumstance. It’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Thank you so much.

Pamela Seefeld: Thank you.

DEBRA: Pamela is on every other Wednesday. So two weeks from today, she’ll be on again with more great information about how you can live healthy without drugs. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

How to Read a Label on Organic Personal Care Products

Diana-and-JimToday my guests Diana Kaye and James Hahn This husband-and-wife are co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. We’ll be talking today about how organic personal care products are mislabeled in various ways and what to look for on a label to make sure you have a truly organic product. Diana and Jim own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/terressentials

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“How to Read a Label on Organic Personal Care Products”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Diana Kaye and James Hahn

DATE OF BROADCAST: October 21, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today, my guests are Diana Kaye and James Hahn. Oh, I should say it’s Tuesday, October 21st 2014. It’s a beautiful in Clearwater, Florida. I love autumn. We can open the windows now instead of living in air conditioning.

But anyway, we’re going to talk with Diana Kaye and James Hahn who have been on the show before. They have a business called Terressentials where they make – I think they call it ‘gourmet personal care products’. I’m looking at the description for the show today. It’s ‘organic gourmet personal care products’.

They’re a USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products and they really are gourmet personal care products. They’re just really high quality. Their natural scents are just luscious. I use their products and I just enjoy them every day.

So what we’re talking about today is how to read a label on organic personal care products. There are some products that say they’re organic, but are they really certified? There are some companies that would like to mislead you. Other products are really good. How do you tell the difference? This is the main thing we’re going to talk about today.

I know from past experience that Diana and James have a lot to tell us, which is why I have them on the show every month. They have just a lot of information and experience. They were one of the first companies to make organic personal care products many, many years ago. They’ve been doing this just about as long as I’ve been doing what I do, a long time.

So we might hear anything today. That’s what I’m wanting to say. We might hear anything from them today that has to do with the organic products, organic personal care products in addition to how to read the label.

Hi, Diana and James.

DIANA KAYE: Hi, Debra. How is it going?

DEBRA: Good! Busy. I know you guys are busy too.

DIANA KAYE: It’s life!

DEBRA: Yeah, it is! I was just working on my newsletter this week, this morning, yesterday. There is so much going on in the world about toxics and not toxic products that I couldn’t even keep up with it. I’m already piling up information to put in next week’s newsletter because I just didn’t have the time to put it all in the newsletter.

I actually work a whole day. I work all day on Monday just doing the newsletter. There’s just so much going on.

DIANA KAYE: I know. Oh, I’m not surprised. I often find myself at three or four in the morning doing the same thing, keeping up with and trying to digest all the information. I may have perhaps a stronger constitution than most people and I can absorb this information without feeling totally overwhelmed. But I know so many other people, they have a really hard time with being bombarded with so much information and trying to protect themselves and their family.

DEBRA: There is so much information. And so that’s why I think it’s important that I do what I do because I’m getting all these newsletters and notices and stuff from all these different places and I can kind of digest it and put it in a little summary about what’s going on in the world of toxics.

And so if you’re interested in getting my newsletter, it comes out every Tuesday. I just sent one out. It announces all the radio shows for the week, but it also tells about other things that will be on my website.

And today, I also take things that I think that you really need to know from other websites. Like today, I was announcing about a new toxics act that is now being considered, how you can write to your senator. There’s tips on how to – in today’s episode, there’s tips on how you can have less toxic Halloween and things like that.

So just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. You’ll see there’s a place to sign up on the right column of the page.

So Diana, is James not with us today?

DIANA KAYE: He is running behind. I’m not sure if he’s going to be able to jump in. I’m sorry. I just learned myself this morning, so I apologize for that.

DEBRA: Totally fine! I know you have a busy, busy business and especially now, there’s so much going on.

So let’s just start talking about organic personal care products and how they’re labeled. I’m just going to let you start wherever you want to start.

DIANA KAYE: Okay. Well, as I was preparing for the show today – I’m still laughing at myself. You know there’s some people who collect salt & pepper shakers or they collect figurines, lots of stamps, et cetera. I collect bottles of body care products that are labeled. I have got boxes and boxes of these products because I collected them over the past 20 years. It’s overwhelming to me sometimes when I look at all these products. Many of them are being sold right now, today over the Internet. Some are still being sold in health food stores – yes, health food stores – all across the country. It just boggles the mind because…

DEBRA: Well, why don’t you just pick one? Okay, go ahead and finish your sentence, but I was going to suggest that you just pick one. Start picking them out and tell us what’s wrong with them. You don’t have to tell us the brand.

DIANA KAYE: No, I will not talk about company names. The only way that we can really distinguish what we’re doing (and this has been an issue for us since we started our business) is we have to talk about ingredients because that’s what distinguishes something that’s really natural and oh, my gosh! The word ‘natural’, if you see that word, run in the other direction.

We are talking about, for instance if you can bear with me for a second here, not just products that are labeled as ‘organic’ in the body care world, but we do have (and this is something that consumers would be pleased to hear about) a federal legislation called the National Organic Program, which assures people that if they buy a food product whether it was made in the U.S. or it was made in Europe that when it comes here to the United States and it has the word ‘organic’ on it, that that product has gone through a process of certification.

We now have what’s called a reciprocity agreement with the EU, so that if products are certified to the European Union standard, then those products are also considered to be organic here in the United States. They do have to go through an oversight procedure to make sure that they’re legitimately certified, but there is som assurance with that.

The problem is we don’t have that assurance (although we should) with personal care products and – hello, surprise, this is a whole other conversation – cotton products, anything made from cotton and/or hemp and linen, any truly natural fibers.

The original tent of Congress when they were composing what they called the Organic Food Production Act of 1990 [inaudible 00:09:07] discussion to rounding the creation of that act was that Congress wanted the word ‘organic’ – they wanted organics to grow and they wanted many different types of product.

In their discussions (I have copies of these early discussions), they wanted to encourage personal care products and clothing products to follow the rule so that we could create more demand for true agricultural ingredient.

So the reason I’m ‘mentioning all that is that we don’t have enforcement in the United States in the personal care department and we don’t have enforcement in the world of textiles.

DEBRA: Okay. So wait, I just want to ask you a question right there.

DIANA KAYE: Sure!

DEBRA: Because I think that people think organic is organic is organic and because of the National Organic Program and organic foods, if they see ‘organic’, they think that it’s all organic.

Now, so we have the USDA Program and the organic seal for food and that’s organic. In the textile realm, we have the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS), which is its own program and that’s different from the National Organic Program, but is there not – oh, I see that we need to go to break. So I’ll ask the question and you can answer when we get back.

DIANA KAYE: Okay.

DEBRA: Is there not some program that covers personal care products? We’ll go to break and we’ll find out when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials. Her website is Terressentials.com. They make USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products and she’s going to tell us what that means (among other things) when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials. We’re talking about how to read the label on organic personal care products.

What I asked her before the break was we have the USDA organic standard for food and we have the Global Organic Textile Standards for textiles, but do we have any such organization with our standards and regulation and certification and all of that specifically for personal care products?

DIANA KAYE: Well, it’s interesting that you mentioned this GOTS standard. That is a standard that was created in Europe and is used for products that are – for instance, cotton. A lot of cotton is now grown in India. However, most people aren’t aware of this, but the USDA has made a policy scope statement and their statement said that if a product or textile product (and I’m just going to digress here a little bit) is labeled organic, it is supposed to be certified to the USDA organic standard not to an international standard.

This is another area though where they haven’t been enforcing their own guidance policy. And it’s strange because what a lot of manufacturers have claimed is that, “Well, personal care products aren’t food” and I beg to differ, but I’ll get back to that.

So if that’s their claim about why they think they can call products organic, but not be organic, well, let’s talk about cotton. It’s not a food product and contrary to what other people may think, cotton seed oil is not really something that humans should be eating. It has no history of human use for food.

DEBRA: And let’s just add right there that when you see cotton seed oil on a label, a food label that it comes from cotton, conventionally grown cotton (unless it saysorganic cotton seed oil), it comes from conventionally grown cotton and conventionally grown cotton I think uses more pesticides on crops than any other crop in the world I think. And so it has much more pesticide in it than food crops, ordinary food crops that have pesticides on it.

And so if you are eating cotton seed oil, you’re getting so much pesticides. It doesn’t say that on the label of course.

DIANA KAYE: No, it doesn’t. And the thing about oils (any kind of oil, I don’t care if it’s olive oil, sunflower oil, cotton seed oil, pick your favorite oil), when these crops are grown conventionally – and these goes back to our label and why some of these labels, we’re going to be talking about shouldn’t even be called ‘natural’, let alone having the product labeled as organic.

Many of the petrochemicals that are used in commercial, industrial, conventional agriculture are lipophilic, which means they are attracted to fat. So if a pesticide is applied at the base of the plant or the soil or even if it’s sprayed on the plant, it’s washed off into the soil, taken up by the roots and then it concentrates always in any oil portion of that plant.

And seed oils, this is a concern because you’re going to get all the concentrated pesticides or any other kind of petrochemically based growth regulators, fertilizers, herbicides and et cetera. So it’s really not a good idea to use any kind of oil product. I don’t care if it’s food or personal care that are not organic. ‘Natural’, as I’ve said, if you see the word, run the other direction.

DEBRA: Yes, because natural does not mean organic.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, my gosh!

DEBRA: You know, I’m looking at products all the time as you are. One of the questions that came up this week on my Q&A blog was somebody was looking for unscented aftershave. And so I started looking for an unscented aftershave [inaudible 00:18:10]. And so a product came up and it said that it was ‘natural’. It was a natural, unscented aftershave.

And so I looked at the ingredients list. To me, that’s something that’s natural. When I look at your ingredients listed house things on there like lavender essential oil where you can recognize there’s something lavender, there’s clay, there’s…

DIANA KAYE: Coco butter.

DEBRA: …unrecognizable – coco butter, yeah! Coconut oil or something like that. There were so many ingredients on this ingredients list that were just industrial chemical words and things that you= could not recognize and even I would need to go and look them up (and I know a lot of cosmetic ingredients). These are things that I have to go and look up.

To me, that’s not a natural ingredient if something is processed. If it goes through an industrial process, I don’t care if it starts as coconut oil or any other [inaudible 00:19:18] resource, it’s not natural anymore. It’s not.

And this is the problem. For me, most so-called ‘natural’ personal care products is that they take some renewable resource and they put through an industrial process, combining it with who knows what kind of industrial chemicals to make some ingredient and that’s not in its natural state in addition to the fact that it’s not organic.

DIANA KAYE: Absolutely, absolutely. And that is why we have tried to make the distinction about ‘organic’ versus non-organic products and talk about ingredients just exactly for that specific reason.

Again, I have these boxes and boxes of products. It overwhelms me because we are really a small family business. We try, Debra like you, but we aren’t as nationally based in terms of our education as you are to try to teach people, “Really what is in this stuff?”

It makes it so challenging when our voice is so small. You can go on the Internet at any time and use any search engine and if you plug in ‘organic body care’, you’re going to come up with hundreds of thousands ahead.

And what we’re seeing more and more (because the Internet has made commerce so equal or equalized it) that you will have products, something from another country and just compound the problem that are called organic, that don’t even have any kind of a certification to one of the industry standards over in Europe or wherever else, whatever country it is.

So in addition to the problem of having so many industry types of standards (not governmental standards) – uh-oh, I heard some music.

DEBRA: Yes, it’s time to go to break, but you can finish your sentence.

DIANA KAYE: Okay. For example, in the EU, they do have an organic governmental standard, but that standard was not ever written to include personal care products.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DIANA KAYE: So it’s another glitch that we have that we have the food coming over that says ‘EU certified’ and it says it’s organic and the USDA accept it, but if it’s personal care, they’re not accepting it.

DEBRA: Okay! So now, I need to cut you off. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials. We’re talking about the labeling of organic personal care products. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye. She has a business, Terressentials, which she and her husband created and they make USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products.

So we’re talking about how personal care products are labeled and their lack of enforcement structure, et cetera. Go on, Diana.

DIANA KAYE: Well, you had asked me to take out one of the products from my collection and to just dive in with a little bit about some of the examples to why these products aren’t organic (and I’m going to add, not even natural).

We have over the years compiled some educational articles. We’d invite anyone to check those out. Many of them are published on our websites. For people who have events or groups, we also have printed versions of many of those articles in kind of a brochure format so that people could help to educate their family, their friends, the groups that they participate with, et cetera.

I have products, a variety of products here – shampoos, products advertised as sunscreen, conditioners, body washes, you name it, cosmetics, colored cosmetics, et cetera that are boldly labeled as organic that are not certified organic to the USDA National Organic Program. Many of them have zero certification of any kind.

And when I say an industry standard, I’ve mentioned that previously that many of these products can’t even certify to industry standard.

Industry standards, if I can give you a brief definition of…

DEBRA: Sure!

DIANA KAYE: Here’s a group of manufacturers and maybe the suppliers of their chemical ingredients and maybe even some of the distributors of their product to distribute to – like, for example, a retail chain. These people get together and they decide they’re going to come up with what their definition of organic is.

And when they come up with these standards, everyone that I have seen is in conflict with what the USDA standard is for organic products. There are allowances for chemical processes, allowances for chemical ingredients used as catalyst and reactive agent to create these synthetic materials that they’re calling ‘natural’, which aren’t.

The problem here that’s adding to the confusion in this day of our Internet global marketplace is that we have several industry groups that got together in various countries just to thicken their soup. And so now we have industry standards created by manufacturers (not government, not the people, without consumer input) that come from different countries.

For example, if it comes from Europe, you might see the word BIO. That’s the phrase that they have used for many years over there to designate products that are organic. But again, it doesn’t mean that they’re certified to the EU standard, the government standard. It could be something that was certified to standards created by the manufacturers themselves to include all the different chemical ingredients that they use in their product.

And so we have a huge mess on our hands in the world of personal care right now with this labeling situation. I know, Debra, we were going to talk about categories of ingredients at a later date, but would you like for me to just give you a couple of examples of ingredients that are listed or maybe just read the ingredients from one product?

DEBRA: Well, here’s what I’d like you to do. Why don’t you just start with one product, tell us if it’s shampoo or whatever it is and tell us what is on the label like any claims.

DIANA KAYE: Sure.

DEBRA: You don’t have to read the whole ingredients list right at the start, but then explain to us what you’re seeing through your eyes why this is misleading or is not giving right information or is not organic or whatever because remember, we’re looking for truly organic products, so why is this one something we should watch out for?

DIANA KAYE: Okay. This product that I have, the company name includes the word ‘organic’. And in fact, the word ‘organic’, the company name is two words and the first word is ‘organic’.

So right at the top of the product, this particular one that I have is a conditioner, a hair conditioner. The first word at the top of that package is ‘organic’. It has a round circle on the front that says, “No SLS, parabens, synthetic fragrants or colorants’ and it makes the claim that it has two botanical extracts all on the front to smooth and rehydrate hair. That’s the claim.

What I’m seeing is that the main ingredient in this product is cetearyl alcohol, which is an oleochemical fatty acid. It’s a white fractionated, waxy substance. In some cases, it is not even derived from – we were talking about how some things are derived from coconut oil. We use the word “derive from”. We use that phrase in quote. But in this case, we don’t really even have any way of knowing what that cetearyl alcohol comes from because they’re not even –

A lot of companies do this. They’ll put in parenthesis ‘derived from coconut oil’, which technically, you’re not even supposed to do, but this company doesn’t even do that at all.

So the primary ingredient in this product is – well, first of all, water. That’s common. It’s just water. It doesn’t say spring water, distilled water or anything. It just says ‘water’. And then the second ingredient would be this cetearyl alcohol, which is commonly used.

DEBRA: I want to jump in for a second and say that when it says ‘water’ on the label, unless it says otherwise, it’s just tap water.

DIANA KAYE: Sure, it can be.

DEBRA: It could have all kinds of pollutants and fluorides and all those kinds of things in it, which are still there now in the product (it’s the main ingredient) and you have no idea. This is one of the reasons why we have to be paying attention to what the ingredients are and not just the claims on the front.

I also wanted to say that the word ‘organic’, if you look it up in the dictionary, it means – I can’t quote it exactly, but it means that it comes from organic matter, like from plants. But we have this other definition of ‘organic agriculture’, which means that there’s a certain way that those plants are grown without pesticides, et cetera. You can use the word ‘organic’ to say something is ‘organically’. “It happens organically” means that it happens like it would happen in nature.

And so I’m getting back to the name of this product, Organic whatever-it-is. If it’s made with plants – I’m asking you a question now and you can answer when we come back – if it’s made from plants, I think that they can get away from saying ‘organic’ because it’s got some plants in it. It doesn’t even have to be 100% plants, but it’s got plants in it. That doesn’t necessarily mean organically grown. This is very confusing.

So let’s talk about that when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials. We were talking about the labeling of organic personal care products. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials and we’re talking about personal care products and how they’re labeled.

What were we talking about before the break?

DIANA KAYE: We were talking about the idea that – you know, that’s a really good question.

DEBRA: [laughing] I was talking about…

DIANA KAYE: I had been [inaudible 00:39:09]

DEBRA: You know, during the break, all these things happen, the phone rings…

DIANA KAYE: Oh, my goodness.

DEBRA: Okay! So I was talking about how the word ‘organic’ can be misused on a label. That was the question I wanted you to address, how it can be misused and not even mean organically grown.

DIANA KAYE: Actually, yes, that is the question. Gosh! You’re good at this. Say if a product claim to be organic, they are making a claim that that is an agriculture product because the word ‘organic’ in the widely accepted definition means that it is a product — and we’re setting organic chemistry aside, but…

DEBRA: And that is another definition of organic.

DIANA KAYE: Yes! That is the one that people misuse all the time. Take a look on the Internet for ‘organic dry cleaners’. That’s infuriating to me.

But the point here is that this is the USDA. This is their position. If your product is an agricultural product and you are using the word ‘organic’, then you are subject to following the organic rules and to enforcement.

However, what these manufacturers are trying to do by using the word ‘organic’ in their company names and on the labels is to give you the impression that that is an agricultural product because they talk about all the botanical ingredients. When they make those kinds of claims, that should trigger some kind of enforcement because they are clearly infringing on the organic certification name and the value that is inherent when a product actually is certified.

So that’s why I’m really troubled by this because again, when they make their claim, what they’re trying to convince consumers of is that these are botanical products, that they are products that are agricultural botanical products.

DEBRA: Yes. Now, this is false – I want to ask you a question, then I want to say something. Is thereany organic ingredients in it at all?

DIANA KAYE: Well, here’s the problem. Without a third party verification, we have no way of verifying that. They could claim…

DEBRA: Right! But if you looked on the ingredients list on the back, does it say like organic blah-blah-blah.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, they are making that claim, but there is no certification.

DEBRA: But there’s no certification.

DIANA KAYE: Third-party verification. So our company can simply lie. They can!

DEBRA: They can.

DIANA KAYE: They can just put the word ‘organic’ on there because nobody is policing this and that is a huge problem.

DEBRA: Well, not only is it a problem. Here’s what I want to say. It’s illegal.

DIANA KAYE: It should be.

DEBRA: It’s illegal.

DIANA KAYE: It should be.

DEBRA: It is illegal. The Federal Trade Commission, there’s something called the ‘Truth in Advertising’. It’s a law in America that you cannot claim something that is not true. You cannot do that.

All of these products, if somebody wanted to actually enforce this, all of these products could be sued and be demanded that they be taken off the market, relabeled, et cetera, et cetera because the law in America says that you cannot put something on a label that is not true.

Now, is that actually true? No, as we see right here and many, many, many other examples. There are manufacturers making claims unverified, unsubstantiated claims all the time. But there is a law. It’s illegal to do this.

DEBRA: Yes, Debra. That’s such an excellent point. I would say this. In my personal experience, what I have observed is the majority, the majority of the product being sold in the personal care marketplace that claim to be organic are absolutely not. That’s the scary thing.

And regarding the Federal Trade Commission, absolutely! We have made complaints to them and it’s very sad to me because the Federal Trade Commission has declined to oversee and do any enforcement in this particular area.

There was just a new article that just came out today that was an interview through PBS about the organic personal care situation and they mentioned in their article (and this is a quote), “The Federal Trade Commission normally investigates deceptive claims, but the agency demured in its Green Guides published in 2012.”

And then I’m going to add in quotes, “to investigate personal care organic claims because” they said, “enforcement of organic claims on non-food products could duplicate USDA duties.” So they’re not doing anything.

DEBRA: What?!

DIANA KAYE: I know!

DEBRA: The point is not that they need to enforce organic claims. The point is they need to enforce truth in advertising.

DIANA KAYE: Yes!

DEBRA: That is a different thing. We’re not asking the FTC to be an organic certification organization. We’re asking them to simply enforce truth in advertising.

DIANA KAYE: Exactly! And we have not been able to get them to do that. I mean, there are countless – you know about my collection. You’ve heard about it. I can’t even keep up with it because I have different searches that come in. They come in to my mailbox every single day, new product coming out, new companies because wow! They see that “If I can get away with it and nothing is going to happen, why not?”

I wouldn’t do that, Debra, you wouldn’t do that, but we’re not like all these other people.

DEBRA: Right. No, I know, I know.

DIANA KAYE: …who are looking to cash in. This is why I’m saying it’s such a scary thing for the consumer who isn’t even aware of this because they’re trusting that there are government laws and agencies in place to protect them and really, the reality is we don’t have that.

So that’s why the work you’re doing, Debra, it’s so important to try to get this message out there to folks that you cannot trust. This is so sad, but you cannot trust what is printed on 10,000 bottles.

DEBRA: I totally agree with you. I totally agree. And I mentioned earlier during research to find an unscented aftershave this week. Half of the products (like I just searched for ‘unscented aftershave’) and I got on forums where people were discussion shaving, shaving aficionados and people who are interested in that kind of thing.

Anyway, there actually were a post where people are talking about different brands of unscented aftershave. And so I made a list of them. There were probably a handful. They were being recommended over and over. There was only one that I could find an ingredients list for.

Now, I want to say that I commend that a lot of manufacturers now are putting their ingredients list on their website. So if you hear about a product, you can go check out what are the ingredients. But on these unscented aftershaves, I couldn’t find the ingredients. I would have to go buy the product some place, but they’re being sold with no ingredients list.

And so I would say if you’re buying something online, you look for the ingredients list. In fact, on Terressentials – I’m assuming you still have this. I haven’t looked for it in a while. But you have a whole glossary of cosmetic ingredients, right? You still have that? Yes, you’ve had that for a long time.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, we do.

DEBRA: Yes, you’ve had that for a long time.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, we do. And it needs to be expanded dramatically. So you mentioned the shaving product and you’re mentioning the unscented one. This is so interesting because this product that I was talking about earlier that makes the claim on the front “no SLS, parabens, synthetic fragrances or colorants” and yet on the back of the label, there’s an ingredient called phenoxyethanol. Phenoxyethanol is a preservative, but it also has a rose fragrance and has been known as ‘Rose Ether’.

DEBRA: Wow!

DIANA KAYE: It’s typically used in personal care products to give a rose-like effect because rose is so expensive. It’s so difficult to get a rose essential oil and extremely difficult to get one as organic.

We’re talking that if the public wanted to buy 16 ounces of rose oil, they would be paying probably $14,000 for 16 ounces.

So let me tell you, you can bet, you are not going to be getting real rose oil and a body care product that you’re washing down the train. I don’t care if you paid $10 a bottle or if you pay $30 a bottle, they’re not going to be giving you that in any kind of a shampoo, conditioner or body wash product because it’s too expensive.

So in this particular case, they’ve not only made their bold, organic claim as part of their company name, but they’re also saying “no fragrances, no synthetic fragrances” and yet there is one.

Actually, part of the other ingredient list, one of the other words on this ingredient list is ‘parfum’ and parfum is clearly…

DEBRA: Well, excuse me, that’s fragrance.

DIANA KAYE: Yes! Yes, exactly. So this label is a mess, the ingredients listing on this product and yet the word ‘organic’ is huge on the front. And then it makes these other claims.

So people today, there’s been a lot of hype surrounding sodium lauryl sulfate, which is only just one of 3500 different detergents that are out there. So here’s my thing, big deal! You got rid of sodium lauryl sulfate, what other thing did you put in there. And oh, yes, so you’re not using parabens? Well, what other even less tested, more toxic kinds of preservatives are you using in your product.

DEBRA: I need to interrupt you because we only have less than 30 seconds left.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, no!

DEBRA: So I want to have time to say thank you for being on the show. We’re going to have you on again. We’re going to keep talking about this because you just have so much experience and there’s so much to learn.

I’ll give you one second to say goodbye.

DIANA KAYE: Thank you! It’s been great and I appreciate the opportunity to help educate the public and teach people about what organic means.

DEBRA: That’s it! Thanks! This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Bath Tub Mat

Question from Calico

I am still searching for a tolerable bathtub mat. You have an old discussion thread, and nothing new. Is there anything out there? Food grade silicone would be great but can’t find one. I just finished airing out a Heavea pure rubber bathtub mat. Once inside the bathroom I can smell it. Also in process of airing out the Vermont Country Store square/ perferated bathmat… After 2 months it is now the light scent of the rubber swim caps from the 1960’s. Have not brought it inside yet. Both of these had possiblities as they were not overwhelming straight out of the package. I even tried a silicone dot yoga towel but it would not stick to the tub. Anything new out there.

Debra’s Answer

Readers? Any suggestions?

Add Comment

Make Your Own Fermented Foods for Nature’s Probiotics

My guest today is fermentation revivalist Sandor Ellix Katz. I became aware of him when I read his first book Wild Fermentation, which I consider to be the basic book on the subject that everyone should have. His books and the hundreds of fermentation workshops he has taught have helped to catalyze a broad revival of the fermentation arts. A self-taught experimentalist who lives in rural Tennessee, the New York Times calls him “one of the unlikely rock stars of the American food scene.” His latest book, The Art of Fermentation (2012), received a James Beard award. Sandor teaches fermentation workshops around the world. www.wildfermentation.com.

read-transcript

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“Make Your Own Fermented Foods for Nature’s Probiotics”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Sandor Ellix Katz

DATE OF BROADCAST: October 16, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about – oh, you know what? I actually read this every time I get to the show and this morning, I forgot to put it out. There’s so much stuff going on this morning. Here we go. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. There!

Okay, lots going on. But you know, there’s lots going on my life, there’s lots going on in the world. The first thing I’d like to say is that I’d like you to go to my website. Go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and you’ll see that you can sign up for my newsletter.

I have this newsletter that goes out every Tuesday. And if you sign up for the newsletter, it will tell you all the shows that are coming up that week and it also tells you different things that I’ve been posting, new things that I post on my website.

I have a Q&A blog where people ask questions and I answer them. And also, I’m always posting new websites where you can buy toxic-free products. I’m particular saying this today because this morning, I have four or five really incredible things that I’m going to be posting next Tuesday in the newsletter about electromagnetic fields, about cellphones, about toxic chemical exposures.

There’s so much going on in the world. There’s new ways that people are labeling organic foods. And by subscribing to my newsletter – well, you hear about a lot of it from my guests. But if you subscribe to my newsletter, you can hear about a lot more things that I’m posting on different areas of my website and just keep up with all of these.

You can also sign up for my Facebook and Twitter and all those things. Just go to my website and find out what the other resources are in addition because I’m just so excited to be giving you all these new information. I’m really excited about what’s happening in the world and what other people are doing.

Anyway, we’ve got a great guest today. All the guests are great, but I just have to say that because every time we have a guest, I think that they’re a great guest. That’s why I chose them to be on the show.
It’s Thursday, October 16th 2014. We’re going to be talking today about making your own fermented foods. This is something that I do at home sometimes.

One of the reasons why I wanted my guest on today is because I want to find out more about how I can do this on a regular basis because I think it’s such a good idea and there’s so many benefits. I just get tripped up sometimes, so hopefully we’ll have some troubleshooting here as well as find out why you should make fermented foods and all their benefits and some fermented foods that you can make pretty easily.

My guest today is fermentation revivalist, Sandor Katz. I became aware of him a few years ago when I read his first book, Wild Fermentation. I consider this to be the basic book on the subject that everyone should have.

And if you’re listening to this show and you’re not fermenting foods, I highly recommend that you just go by Wild Fermentation and get going because you’re going to find out why you should be eating fermented foods today.

He also has another book called The Art of Fermentation, which received a James Beard Award. That looks at different types of fermentation throughout the world. I haven’t read that book yet, but it sounds very interesting and is the kind of thing that I would like to read.

So hello, Sandor. Thanks for being here.

SANDOR KATZ: Hi there, Debra. Thanks so much for having me on your show.

DEBRA: Well, tell us first, how did you get interested in fermentation? I mean, I consider you to be like the leader of fermented foods in the world.

SANDOR KATZ: Well, thank you.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So I know being one of the leaders – well, I can actually call myself the leader of toxic-free products in the world because when I first started 30 years ago, nobody was writing about this or talking about it or thinking about it. I think that maybe you were in that position too of how did you, in a world where people aren’t talking about fermented foods, get to be interested in it?

SANDOR KATZ: Well, there were few stages of the development of my interest in it. I would say that really this isn’t a world where nobody was talking about fermented foods because probably everybody listening to this eats and drinks products of fermentation every day and they’re so thoroughly integrated into our food practices that we’ve just all eaten fermented foods for our whole lives whether we’ve been talking about it or not.

DEBRA: Oh, whether we’re aware of it or not.

SANDOR KATZ: Cheese is fermented, cured meats are fermented, condiments involve fermentation, coffee is fermented, chocolate is fermented, beer and wine are fermented. I mean, nobody really goes through their life (or really, not even their day) without encountering products of fermentation. But the question is one of awareness and practicing it.

DEBRA: Yes.

SANDOR KATZ: All aspects of food production, fermentation largely started disappearing from people’s home kitchens and communities increasingly over the course of the 20th century and it just got concentrated to basically factories and centralized production.

And at the same time as this was happening, we developed this amazing fear of bacteria.

DEBRA: Yes!

SANDOR KATZ: And so people began to project all of these fear on the process of fermentation. So not only was it not being done around them, but then they began to imagine that it’s something that’s really dangerous than technically demanding.
I got interested in there phases. First of all, in my youth, growing up in New York City, I loved sour pickles. It was just a favorite food of mine. Those are basically cucumbers fermented with garlic, dill and salt and nothing else. The acid is not acidic acid, the vinegar acid, but rather lactic acid that develops through fermentation. I’ve just always had been drawn to that flavor.

Nobody in my family was making it. We were able to buy in local delicatessens. We could buy beautiful pickles, but nobody in my family was making it.

Then in my twenties, I started just following a macrobiotic diet for a few years. And macrobiotic places a great emphasis on the digestive benefits of eating pickles and other kinds of live, cultured food.

And it was through macrobiotics that I first started thinking about the idea that there might be health benefits from the pickles that I grew up with and other kinds of live ferment and I started noticing that when I eat these foods (or really even if I just smell them), I could feel the salivary glands under my tongues squirting out saliva. And so I just started noticing in a really tangible way how these foods got my digestive juices flowing.

But what really got me making my own ferment was 21 years ago, I moved from New York City to rural Tennessee and I started keeping a garden. And that first season of gardening, I realized for the first time that in a garden, all of the cabbages are ready at the same time, all of the radishes are ready at the same time.

And so, just as a practical matter, what do I do with these cabbage, what do I do with these radishes? I learned how to ferment vegetables. I learned from the joy of cooking. It’s really a very, very straightforward and simple process.

And then from sauerkraut, I moved into yoghurt, making country wines out of blackberries and elderberries and such. And then, at some point, I just became sort of obsessed with all things fermented. That led me into teaching. That led me into writing books. And then that led me to more teaching. And that’s pretty much what I’ve been doing since then.

It’s not only in the western diet. I mean, really, people in every part of the world incorporate fermentation into their food traditions. There’s a certain inevitability to microbial change to our food. And so our ancestors, without specifically knowing about bacteria or fungi, learned to work with these invisible life forces that are part of our food.

Basically, we all see microorganisms spoil our food and the beginnings of decomposition. So just as a practical matter to avoid that, people had to learn under what kind of storage condition would the food become more stable, more digestible, more delicious rather than just decomposing into an ugly mess that nobody will ever want to put into their mouth.

DEBRA: And you did that perfectly. We’re going right to the break. We’ll be right back to talk more about fermentation. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Sandor Katz. He’s the author of Wild Fermentation and The Art of Fermentation. His website is wildfermentation.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is fermentation revivalist, Sandor Katz, author of Wild Fermentation and The Art of Fermentation. His website is wildfermentation.com.
So Sandor, I have to tell you that I really do love, love, love Wild Fermentation, the book. People who have been listening to me for a while and reading me a while know that I have certain ways of looking at the world and you agree with me so much.
So I want to just read a little portion that I’ve put a big – I’ve circled this and put stars around it in the book. So you say:

“By fermenting foods and drinks with wild microorganisms present in your home environment, you become more interconnected with the life forces of the world around you. Your environment becomes you as you invite the microbial populations you share the earth with to enter your diet and your intestinal ecology.”

We’ve been talking about a book called Missing Microbes I think it’s called. I had that author of that book on. He was talking about how because of toxic chemical exposures like antimicrobials and antibiotics that we’re losing our microorganisms, particularly in our gut. Fermentation, wild fermentation specifically is restoring those microorganisms that are in your own natural environment that you live in as opposed to buying a probiotic that is made in a laboratory and put in a capsule.

SANDOR KATZ: Well, from my persective, the limiting factor with most probiotics is that they are billions of copies of one, single kind of bacteria or maybe two or three. But really, what I think of as our objective in probiotics therapy, eating bacterially rich foods is restoring biodiversity, rebuilding biodiversity.

DEBRA: Yes!

SANDOR KATZ: And so, traditional fermented foods, which are the embodiments of these broad communities of these bacteria simply have greater biodiversity than capsules with a billion copies of the same cell.

DEBRA: Right, right. It’s like probiotics in a capsule. I’m not trying to say that they’re a bad thing. They’re better than not having probiotics.

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah, I agree with that.

DEBRA: But probiotics in a capsule is like the industrial version of the natural world where industrial products tend to be all exactly the same and the natural world tends to be diverse.

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah, yeah. It’s a monoculture.

DEBRA: Right! It’s a monoculture. That’s exactly right. So probiotics is a good step away from just eating processed foods with no biotics at all. But the next step then is to be making your own fermented foods at home.

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah, or honestly, you can also buy foods that has been fermented. I think that the best thing to do is ferment your own, but there really are some very quality, local brands of fermented vegetables, fermented dairy products. It’s possible to get good quality, naturally fermented foods without making them yourself. But they’ll always be better if you make them yourself.

DEBRA: Well, I have to tell you that after reading your book, the first thing I made was pickles.

SANDOR KATZ: And were you happy with how they turned out?

DEBRA: I was ecstatic with how they turned out.

SANDOR KATZ: Oh, good.

DEBRA: I can’t hardly wait for summer to arrive, so that I can make the pickles. Let me just say that these are so easy to make. Anybody can make pickles. And if you can still get those little cucumbers at your farmer’s market or the store or wherever that are like pickle-sized cucumbers instead of huge cucumbers, then all you need to do is – well, you can correct me. I’m sure I’m not giving all the steps, but it’s pretty much as simple as putting the pickles in a jar with dill and garlic and water and salt. They sit there in the jar and three or four days later, you’ve got the most beautiful pickles you’ve ever eaten.

What did I leave out?

SANDOR KATZ: No, no. You got it perfectly. Yeah, in cooler weather (depending on where you live), it might take longer than that. In hot summer weather, it would probably really just be three, four, five days. But in cooler weather or in a cellar or something like that, it will take longer. The amount of time fermentation takes always depends upon the temperature. The metabolism of all these organisms goes faster when it’s warmer.

And you can really use the same method with other kinds of vegetables. I love to do it with string beans, with okra, with baby eggplants, with peppers. So if you want to leave vegetables whole or in big chunks, then you put them in a salt water medium. If you want to cut up the vegetables and expose surface area, then you don’t need to add any water and then you just dry salt the vegetables and let the salt pour water out.

DEBRA: Oh!

SANDOR KATZ: So that’s what I would call the sauerkraut method. You don’t add any water. You’re just using salt and a little bit of pounding or squeezing to get the juice out of the vegetables.

And the advantage of the dry salting method is you’re not diluting the flavor at all with water. You’re just getting the concentrated, full flavor of the vegetables themselves enhanced by the flavor of lactic acid, which develops over the course of the process.
Some people like it fermented for a long time, so they get a really strong, acidic flavor. Some people prefer a milder flavor and let it just ferment for a few days.

One of the things about fermentation is that there really are no right or wrong answers. It’s just figuring out how you like it.

And when people make these things for the first time at home, I definitely recommend that they start tasting it after a few days. Just taste it at intervals of every two days and just get a sense of the spectrum of flavors and figure out where they fit along that spectrum. And of course, that’s one of the great advantages of making anything yourself. You can figure out how you like it.

DEBRA: Absolutely! I remember when I was a kid, I’d come from a family where my mother was completely 100% Armenian. And so my grandparents on that side still cooked Armenian food and spoke Armenian and everything. And so, once we made Armenian pickles right out of the Armenian cookbook. We had to cut them all up and buy a crock to put them in and store them in the darkness and all the stuff. We had to wait a long time for these pickles.

But it was fun! It was fun. I should take that up. Of course, I don’t have a crock anymore, but I could get a crock and pick up that recipe and try those pickles too.

We need to go to break. But when we come back, we’ll continue to talk about fermented foods. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest is Sandor Katz, author of the book, Wild Fermentation. His website is wildfermentation.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is fermentation revivalist, Sandor Katz. I love that ‘fermentation revivalist’ because he is reviving fermentation.
My field is really about going beyond industrialism and getting away from those toxic chemicals. The way we get away from toxic chemical is to do these old things, these old life-affirming things that people have been doing forever. This is just like a toxic-free thing to do.

So it’s great that you’re reviving it. They’re everything from the past that works like those and is part of connecting humans to nature and utilizing the natural processing, bringing is back to that connection. It deserves to be revived. I’m just 100% with you.
So there’s so much information in this book. I just, again, really encourage everybody to read it. One of the things that you talk about is cultural homogenization, how everything becomes standardized and uniform and how fermentation is just the opposite of that. Could you just tell us a little bit more about that?

SANDOR KATZ: Well, sure. I mean, certainly, fermentation takes place in giant factories also. Anheuser-Busch is a fermentation corporation. Kraft does all kinds of fermentation.

So it’s not that fermentation cannot be industrialized because it certainly has. The nature of fermentation historically has just always been like every batch is a little different. And if you ever talk to a baker, they’ll tell you all about the reality – the humidity that change every day, the temperature. All these things affect the process of baking bread, so they have to be very adaptable.

You talk to cheese makers and they’ll tell you, “Sure. Every batch is a little bit different. And sometimes we understand exactly why and sometimes we don’t.” Making sauerkraut, making kombucha, all of these things, there’s so many variables.

Ultimately, it gets down to microbial communities. Microbial communities can be different in different places. There are generally broad patterns of similarity. It’s not a question of Russian roulette, what kind of bacteria are going to be on these vegetables.
As a matter of fact, lactic acid bacteria as a group are universally found on plants. The starter for vegetable ferment is always there, but yet the specifics of the community organisms that are going to be present is always a little bit different.

The environmental factors, which have so much influence over which of those organisms can grow and at what rate can they grow, those are always a little bit different.

So we’re really just entering into the realm of fermentation. Is departing from the world of things being very, very controlled and accepting a little bit of variability? It requires you to observe and sometimes shift your expectations as things proceed. You can’t necessarily predict what the temperature is going to be and the way these things will proceed at.

For me, I think that the practice of fermentation is almost like a meditation in like, “Okay, you can’t control everything.” You want to set things up as best you can for success, try to understand the conditions that you’re trying to create and then accept that you can’t control everything and see how it goes and keep on looking and thinking and adapting as necessary.

DEBRA: And being delighted with the surprising results!

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah! Yeah, yeah. Absolutely.

DEBRA: So tell us, there’s so many things that you have in the book about that can be fermented vegetables [inaudible 00:31:18]. Just give us a little overview so that people can get an idea of the vast scope of fermentation.

SANDOR KATZ: Well, there’s nothing that you could eat that you couldn’t ferment. We shouldn’t say that every single food has a tradition of fermentation. For instance, I’ve never seen any information about a historical fermentation of avocados. It doesn’t mean that you couldn’t put avocados into your sauerkraut or your kimchi or that you couldn’t make a fermented guacamole because I’ve done all of those things with really pleasing results. But anything you can eat can be fermented.

So I always recommend that people start with the fermentation of vegetables mostly because you don’t need any special starter cultures. You could make kefir or you could make yoghurt. There’s lots of things you could make that you would need to find a starter culture. But with fermenting vegetables, everything you need is on the vegetables already.

It’s also just absolutely intrinsically safe. According to the USDA, there has never been a single documented case of food poisoning or any kind of illness arising from fermenting vegetables. So I think that’s another great reason to recommend it to beginners.
You don’t need any special equipments. I mean, you certainly might decide that you would like an elegant crock to work with, but you can just work with a jar that’s already sitting in your pantry. And you can enjoy your results relatively quickly. Certain ferments like if you want to make a miso, most varieties of miso will age for a year or longer. Certain ferments just take a long time. But fermenting vegetables, you can really enjoy your results within days.

So fermenting vegetables is where I generally recommend that people start. Obviously, milk products are something that people ferment. You can make yoghurt, kefir, other styles of fermented milk, cheese if you really got into it. Many of those recipes actually are quite straightforward as well. The only tricky part is you need to obtain your starter cultures.

You also can ferment grains.

DEBRA: Sourdough.

SANDOR KATZ: In many parts of the world, it’s just the tradition of using grains is you always soak them in water first. Now, grains and legumes are interesting because nobody is fermenting them to preserve them. In their dried form (the way they are when they’re mature), a dried grain of wheat or of rice just preserves beautifully; same with a dried bean.

It’s not that they don’t have microorganisms on them. It’s just that they’re so dry that the microorganisms are forced into dormancy because they like the water that they need to function. So as soon as you start to soak grains or legumes, you’re kind of initiating a fermentation process.

There really begins a process that I would describe as predigestion and can make the grains and the legumes much more digestible, remove some compounds that can be potentially toxic if they remain part of them. And that can be just as simple as soaking the grain overnight before you cook them or longer if you want a more pronounced flavor.

DEBRA: I have to interrupt you because we have to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Sandor Katz, author of Wild Fermentation and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is fermentation revivalist, Sandor Katz. He’s the author of Wild Fermentation and The Art of Fermentation. His website is wildfermentation.com.

So Sandor, this is the last segment of the show so I have to ask you this now before we’re done and we don’t have time to talk about it. I have some limited experience with fermentation. While I think it is an incredible thing to do and every fermented food I’ve ever eaten, I love, it’s something that I haven’t quite gotten the hang of to be able to incorporate it into my life. I’m still learning it.

And so the kinds of things that I’m running into – first, let me tell you what I’ve made and the problems that I’ve had. I have no problems making pickles. Pickles, all I have to do is make sure I have the ingredients, put them in a jar and that’s it. They’re always perfect.

And I should add that once you get it, as Sandor said earlier, that you should taste. And once you get it to the point where it tastes right, you just put it on the refrigerator and it lasts and lasts and lasts and lasts. A lot of other food in your refrigerator may go bad, but the fermented ones, I’ve never kept a fermented one long enough for it to go bad.

I’ve also fermented beets by pretty much the same way. I’m just putting it in with some water…

SANDOR KATZ: Okay, so were you making a beet kvass?

DEBRA: I wasn’t trying to make kvass. I was making just pickled beets.

SANDOR KATZ: Okay, great.

DEBRA: So I cut up the beets. I put in some water and salt (same as the pickles) and they were delicious.

SANDOR KATZ: Great.

DEBRA: Absolutely delicious! I’ve also done kombucha. The problem that I have with kombucha is that it’s just kind of keeping track of the schedule of time because as you’ve said before, you never know what’s going to happen.
And so I have my kombucha starter. And so then I knew – I forgot how many days it is now, five days or something. And then it starts getting really vinegary, like you can’t even drink it.

The whole thing about kombucha, listeners (if you don’t know what this is) is that it makes a very wonderful drink that tastes delicious if you catch it right at the right time and it gets bubbly. It’s almost like drinking champagne or something, but it’s very good. It’s very good.

And yet if you let it go too long, then you just might as well put on your salad as vinegar. It’s not something that’s drinkable.

SANDOR KATZ: Yes.

DEBRA: It’s just that discipline you were talking about, fermenting being like a meditation. To me, it’s like getting the discipline in to be able to interact with your fermentation and get to know it and be able to give it attention because if you take that attention away, that’s when you have a problem.

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah. Well, it sounds like you know the answer, which is just that you have to begin tasting it sooner. I would give it a few days and then just start tasting it every day. Just a tiny taste, a spoonful will tell you whether it’s reached that point.
The acids that accumulate over time (same in pickles or sauerkraut as in kombucha), if you let sauerkraut go for months – I mean, that’s really the traditional way of eating it. It’s very, very sour. Some people prefer it more mild. But with kombucha, nobody really likes it when it goes to its logical conclusion. If you let it ferment for weeks and weeks, it starts to taste like vinegar. So people like it partially fermented.

And so how many days will depend a little bit on temperature because it’ll happen faster if it’s warmer, slower if it’s cooler. But ultimately, it just depends on how sharp a flavor you like, how sweet you like. And so the only way to determine that is to taste it frequently.

And you know, your consolation prize is not so bad. If you end up with some kombucha vinegar, then you can use that in salad dressings and other kinds of cooking project.

DEBRA: I find that it was – I’m just one person living by myself. I was making it faster than I could consume it.

SANDOR KATZ: Right. Well, you can make anything in any sized batch. I don’t know if you were doing a gallon-sized batch, but maybe you just need to do a quart-sized batch. But yeah, you can do it really small.

Let me talk a little bit SCOBY and the mother of kombucha. So the mother of kombucha as an example is a SCOBY, which is an acronym that stands for ‘symbiotic community of bacteria and yeast’. This is like a macro thing that we can see and hold. It looks something like a rubbery pancake. The residents of a community of bacteria and fungi that are what are fermenting the sweet tea into kombucha and it just floats at the top of your vessel.

Kombucha requires oxygen. Some of those organisms are aerobic organisms that require oxygen so a certain amount of the activity is right on the surface. That’s where the mother of kombucha floats.

But you could just peel layers off of it each batch. It gets thicker and thicker. You could peel layers off of it. You can cut pieces off of it. It’s very, very resilient. Some people have the idea that if you cut a kombucha mother in half or in quarters, you’ll kill it. That has not been my experience at all. They seem like they’re extremely resilient.

And they’re also easy to find. Everybody who makes kombucha ends up with more mothers than they know what to do with and people are very, very generous with their kombucha mothers. They’re also widely available for sale if you’re more comfortable buying them.

Kombucha can be really delicious. And generally, after the first fermentation, people will add a little bit more sugar or fruit juice or vegetable juice or herbal tea with a little bit of sugar, something and then fill it in a bottle and let that added sugar ferment for another day or so. That’s how you get that really nice carbonation. That’s also a way to just incorporate different kinds of interesting flavors.
A friend of mine swears by pineapple juice. He just likes to add a little bit of pineapple juice to the kombucha for the secondary fermentation. He consistently has beautiful, fizzy kombucha.

DEBRA: Well, I have had really good success with kombucha. For me, it’s just that as a regular, I’m working on having more control over my own production of food instead of – and I buy practically no prepared food. I’m always starting with original ingredients. But it’s a skill and it’s also not just about learning the skill of producing one more time at a time or one dish at a time, but also the management of time of all of these production.

SANDOR KATZ: I’m a big advocate of labeling using masking tape and a marker, labeling the date that you started things, the date that you think that they’ll be ready especially if you’re wont to have multiple projects going just having the information at hand to keep track of how old it is. You think when you make it that you’ll always remember which day you made it on, but as the days pass…
DEBRA: Oh no, you don’t. You don’t. I use post-it notes actually.

SANDOR KATZ: Great!

DEBRA: I have one of those beverage serving containers that’s got the little spigot on it.

SANDOR KATZ: Oh yeah, yeah. Those are great for kombucha.

DEBRA: Yeah! And I haven’t made kombucha in probably six months, but I have my SCOBY…

SANDOR KATZ: But with those, it won’t get very fizzy. It really gets fizzier if you seal it in a bottle and add a little bit more something sugary, fruit juice, sweetened herbal tea, sugar, honey, anything. Just adding a little bit of something sugary in the bottle and then sealing the bottle is how you trap carbon dioxide. Although you also have to be careful that the bottles don’t explode, which is another possibility that I address more at length in my second book, The Art of Fermentation.

DEBRA: Well, we’re almost at the end of the show. We only just have a couple of minutes left. Is there anything that you’d like to say that we haven’t covered?

SANDOR KATZ: Well, I would love to just mention my website, which is wildfermentation.com. Not only are my books available to my website, but we have a support form, links to all kinds of fermentation-related resources.

I guess I’d love to spend 30 seconds and just talk about the idea that even though we’ve all been indoctrinated to think of bacteria as bad and dangerous, right now, it’s a very exciting time in microbiology because we’re learning so much about bacteria and how important they are…

DEBRA: Yes, yes.

SANDOR KATZ: …and how the bacteria of our bodies outnumber our bodily cells 10 to 1 and they just give us so much of our functionality. Our immune system is mostly the work of bacteria. We’re learning a lot about how serotonin and other chemical compounds that determine how we think and how we feel are regulated by bacteria in our gut.

Just so many aspects of our physiology and functionality turns out relate to the health of microbial communities in our gut. So we really have to reject this war on bacteria thinking, the antibacterial soaps, the overuse of antibiotics, all the other chemical compounds that can kill bacteria and really embrace bacteria as just an important part of the matrix of all life, ourselves included.

DEBRA: I completely agree with that. I was just talking to a friend of mine last night about the yuck factor, that there are so many things that people just go, “Eww, that’s gross.” I think that bacteria is one of those things. We kind of have this cultural training about this. But yet, if you actually look at the role that microorganisms play in life, they’re fascinating and wonderful and amazing and something that we should all be admiring and encouraging. We should have more bacteria in our life, not less.

SANDOR KATZ: Yes.

DEBRA: And yet we live in a culture where just the constant messages, “Destroy that bacteria. It makes you sick. You have to spray toxic chemicals on it” and all those things. No, no, no. Prior to industrialization, people were exposed to bacteria in the world all the time.

And yes, there are contagious diseases, but contagious diseases, you get contagious diseases because your body fails to be able to handle those harmful bacteria.

SANDOR KATZ: Yeah, it’s a lot about communities out of balance, microbial communities out of balance.

DEBRA: Right! You know what? We have to go because we’re like way past the time. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ve been talking to Sandor Katz. Thanks for being with us. Be well.

Eyeglass Lenses, Coatings and Frames

Question from Cindy

Hi Debra,

My husband and I both need to get glasses and are having a hard time finding the frames and lenses we believe would be non or least toxic. Please help!

Lenses

Regarding eyeglass lenses, in a 2008 post you said, “The thing to remember about polycarbonate is that the concern is not outgassing, but leaching into food and water from contact. Since our skin does not contact the eyeglass lens, I don’t believe there is a problem with toxicity during use.”

Wikipedia states that “CR-39 should not be confused with polycarbonate, a tough homopolymer usually made from bisphenol A.[3]” BPA? Wouldn’t wearing BPA be a concern even if there’s no skin contact?

Do you still believe that all of the following lens materials are relatively nontoxic: high Index plastic, Tribrid, Trivex and CR-39 plastic?

And or true of all eyeglass lenses since they’re not touching the skin? Do any outgass or pose other toxicity hazards?

I’ve listed below what I could find on the above materials in case you’re unfamiliar with them.

Tribrid. All about vision’s site says, “Tribrid lenses were created by merging elements of PPG’s lightweight, impact-resistant Trivex lens material with those of established high-index plastic lenses.”

Trivex. I’ve read that “Trivex lenses are composed of a newer plastic that has the same characteristics as polycarbonate lenses.” all about vision’s site says, “Trivex lenses, however, are composed of a urethane-based monomer and are made from a cast molding process similar to how regular plastic lenses are made…”

CR-39 Wikipedia says, “The abbreviation stands for “Columbia Resin #39… CR-39 is made by polymerization of diethyleneglycol bis allylcarbonate (ADC) in presence of diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate (IPP) initiator. The presence of the allyl groups allows the polymer to form cross-links; thus, it is a thermoset resin…

The polymerization schedule of ADC monomers using IPP is generally 20 hours long with a maximum temperature of 95°C. The elevated temperatures can be supplied using a water bath or a forced air oven.
Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) is an alternative organic peroxide that may be used to polymerize ADC. Pure benzoyl peroxide is crystalline and less volatile than diisopropyl peroxydicarbonate. Using BPO results in a polymer that has a higher yellowness index, and the peroxide takes longer to dissolve into ADC at room temperature than IPP.”

Coatings

Regarding RX eyeglass coatings UV protection, anti-glare and anti-scratch are widely recommended and seem sensible. Do you know if they are generally safe or which are more or less toxic?

Frames

Debra, after reading your 2008 post about eyeglass frames and looking further into them, I agree that zyl (zylonite, or cellulose acetate) or frames made from propionate, a nylon-based plastic seem like good choices.

But in terms of finding the styles we like and hopefully frames covered by our insurance plan, we’d like some additional options. What do you think of aluminum, titanium, nickel or stainless steel frames? Many are blends of these– any thoughts on blends?

Also, you said you wear metal frames, do you think they’re a less toxic choice than plastic? Any long term health concerns with EMFs from metal frames? We would be wearing our RX glasses most of the day.

Thank you. Anything you can do to allay our anxiety on picking out the least toxic glasses would be greatly appreciated!

Debra’s Answer

Lenses

OK. To start, I haven’t been able to find anything which states that BPA is a hazard from outgassing, only ingestion. Recommendations are to not eat canned food or beverages, or drinking water from polycarbonate bottles. Also don’t allow your dentists to apply dental sealants made from BPA (BADGE). But there are no warnings about not wearing polycarbonate glasses.

Polycarbonate is a very hard plastic, and these don’t outgas the way soft plastics do. So I have no reason to believe that you would have any exposure to BPA from wearing the glasses. That said, you would probably get some exposure to BPA from touching the glasses, so when cleaning them, touch them only with the cleaning cloth and not your bare fingers.

All of the plastics you mention are hard plastics, so they would not outgas much, if at all. I couldn’t get any more information that you got on the exact materials, but I would say they probably don’t contain BPA as polycarbonate does, so any one of them would be better in that regard.

Coatings

Like lenses, it’s difficult to find information on the materials used to make coatings.

I was abole to find that Teflon is use to make coatings that are scratch-resistant, anti-static, and reduced-glare.

Anti-reflective coatings may contain magnesium fluoride or fluoropolymers.

But whether or not the presence of these chemicals would result in an actual exposure, I don’t know. Teflon needs to be heated to cooking temperature to release it’s toxic gas. Fluoride is a particle that is likely bound up in the coating and would not offgas.

Regardless, these exposures would be extremely small, if any.

Frames

Metal vs plastic frames?

In 2008, when I wrote my last post on this subject, I preferred metal frames over plastic. But after researching the plastic used to make frames, and finding that it is usually plant based, I’ve been wearing plastic frames. As stated before, metal frames were giving my skin a rash at the points where they touched my face.

At the moment I am wearing my favorite glasses of all time, a pair of readers with bamboo temples that I got from Peepers. A number of companies are making them now. There’s quite a selection online.

GOTS Certification for Organic Fabrics

Today my guest is Karlin Warner, the Textile Certification Specialist for OneCert, Inc., an organic certification company in Lincoln, Nebraska. We’ll be talking about the GOTS certification program for organic textiles, so we can all understand what the standard is and how it is certified when we see the certification seal on a label. Karlin received her B.S. in 2007 and M.S. in 2009 from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in Textile Science, with a minor in Chemistry. While working on her thesis project, testing an eco-friendly wrinkle resistant finish for silk, she found she had a fascination with the more sustainable side of the textile industry. Starting at OneCert while finishing her degree, Karlin has now worked to certify organic textiles for nearly six years. Her work at OneCert includes reviewing and inspecting applicants to the increasingly popular Global Organic Textile Standards (GOTS), as well as Textile Exchange’s Organic Content Standards (OCS). She likes to travel to work by bike, but also enjoys running, reading, travelling and spending time with her husband and two dogs. www.onecert.com.

read-transcript

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“How Your Body Tells You it has Toxic Overload”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Karlin Warner

DATE OF BROADCAST: October 15, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free. It’s Wednesday, October 15th 2014. The sun is shining in beautiful Clearwater, Florida, beautiful autumn day. My guest today is a textile certification specialist who certifies textiles and textile products. She’ll tell us.

What she does is she works with the Global Organic Textile Standard as a certifier. You may have seen the seal on some products or textiles and she’s the one that makes sure it’s organic. So we’re going to learn today about what a certifier does, what makes it organic and anything else she wants to tell us about the certification program.

Her name Karlin Warner and she’s the textile certification specialist for One Cert Incorporated, an organic certification company in Lincoln, Nebraska. Hi, Karlin.

KARLIN WARNER: Hi! Thanks for having me.

DEBRA: Thank you for being on. And I do want to say that I think that your photo – and listeners, if you haven’t seen her photo, if you haven’t been ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, her photo is lovely. I had to make it small so you can’t see all of it. She’s got a beautiful textile wrapped around her neck. Her photo just really embodies what she does. Good job, Karlin.

KARLIN WARNER: It was actually a gift from a friend. It was blessed I think because of my love for organic cotton. And so it’s an organic cotton scarf and it’s like all natural colors. I love it!

DEBRA: I love it too! I love it too! I just looked at it and went, “That’s beautiful.” Anyway, first of all, tell us all about the Global Organic Textile Standard. Listeners, it’s called GOTS for short. So if you ever hear anybody say GOTS or if you see that in print, it’s the Global Organic Textile Standard. Tell us about that.

KARLIN WARNER: Sure. I guess in a nutshell, the Global Organic Textile Standard – again, GOTS. That’s probably what I’ll call it the rest of the segment is an organic standard that include some other criteria.

It’s not only facing the organic content of a product from these stuff in the supply chain, but it also includes some criteria regarding the toxicity of chemicals that are used. It also includes social criteria. So it’s almost a little bit of a fair trade type of standard that’s included into that. It includes environmental and waste products [inaudible 00:03:53] as well.

It’s interesting that it’s called a ‘global standard’ because it’s used globally, but it’s also all-encompassing. It includes a lot of different pieces to make a really good quality product.

DEBRA: There’s other questions I want to ask you, but I just want to jump in with this one and ask isn’t it difficult to be evaluating all those different things?

I know for myself, I understand the different things that you’ve just described, the environmental effects and fair trade and everything. And as a consumer advocate, there’s a point in my life where I said, “Well, I need to consider all these things, but it’s just too difficult for me to evaluate products and have” – at least at that time, I think things have changed. It was just too difficult to say, “Well, something has to be non-toxic and fair trade and environment and recycled” and whatever it happened to be. I ended up with nothing to qualify for all those things.

I think the situation has changed now because this is about 15 years ago I was trying to do this. But I finally decided I’m just going to take one thing. I’m just going to look at toxics and make sure that people can identify what’s toxic and then if they want to look at those other aspects or I should say, what’s toxic free. And if they wanted then to look at those other aspects, they can. But for me, I think that toxicity is the important thing.

Do you really find in your work that you can evaluate all those things and find products obviously that meet all those standards?

KARLIN WARNER: I do think it’s possible. It definitely has been a learning curve me. I came to this with a textile background, so I had to learn a lot about how to evaluate the social criteria and other aspects.

I think if you didn’t have a standard that you’re evaluating something to, it would be really difficult to, like you’ve mentioned, know that it’s not toxic and that it’s fair trade and that it’s organic. It gets complicated to keep track of all of those pieces. But having one standard that has all the criteria does make it a little bit easier.

DEBRA: Yes, I think that people knew that about the GOTS standard, that it encompass all those things, then they could say, “Oh! Well, now this is covered. If I see that seal, I know that it’s non-toxic, that it has environmental benefits, it’s fair trade. That’s encompassed in the standard.

So how did you get interested personally in being a certifier?

KARLIN WARNER: Well, like I mentioned, I went to school for textile. My degree is in textile science so it was a lot more on the chemistry and textile testing side of the textile industries.

And while I was finishing my master’s degree, I was working on a thesis project for a more eco-friendly and less toxic wrinkle-free finish for silk. So it was a finish that was primarily using the citric acid the active ingredient rather than formaldehyde.
And so doing the research for that project really got me thinking about what other things could we be doing differently if you want less toxic and if you want to make less of an impact to the environment.

And so through like an email list or something, I got asked if I was interested in helping OneCert get their organic textiles program started and rolling because they were just starting to grow it out of that point.

So I started part-time while I was working on my degree. And then it’s pretty much history from there. I just found that I really liked it. I kind of just went with it.

DEBRA: Well, sometimes those things just appear in life, those right things. While you were talking, I was thinking that consumers, that your job in a way, you’re a certifier, your job is to say, “This product, it meets this standard.”

But as consumers, we kind of go through the same process in terms of saying, “Well, we want something that’s, say, toxic-free.” Then we have to be able to have our own standard and say this product doesn’t have this and this and this in it.” And so in a sense, we’re all certifiers. We’re certifying to ourselves and that for everybody, there needs to be a standard.

So tell us something about the Global Organic Textile Standard specifically about toxics. What are they looking for?

KARLIN WARNER: Sure! I guess the most specific part about toxic in the Global Organic Textile Standard is the prohibited and restricted input. So within the standard, there is a list of chemical ingredients that cannot be used in processing of these organic textiles.

So, for example, I already mentioned formaldehyde and that’s one of them, and genetically-modified organisms should not be used and heavy metals, plasticizers like phthalate (that’s been in the news a lot lately). There’s a whole list of these things that cannot be used.

So that’s one part of it. GOTS prohibits these chemicals specifically. And then those that aren’t explicitly listed also have to be evaluated according to some additional studies. [Inaudible 00:09:56] additional criteria mostly relating to aquatic toxicity and oral toxicity and biodegradability.

DEBRA: So what you’re doing is that you’re looking to make sure that a product does not contain the prohibited list. But then there might be some other chemicals. And so if other chemicals are being used, you need to evaluate their toxicity?

KARLIN WARNER: Yes, yes. So even if it’s something that’s not on the prohibited list, it still has to meet these other criteria.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah, you know that’s very similar to what I do as a consumer advocate, but I’m not a certifier like you are. We need to go to break, but we’ll talk more about this when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Karlin Warner, textile certification specialist for OneCert in Lincoln, Nebraska. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Karlin Warner. She’s a textile certification specialist for OneCert, an organic certification company in Lincoln, Nebraska.

So Karlin, actually, we’re having some static on the line. Can you say something just as a little test? Can you speak up a little louder than you’ve been speaking and we can get rid of that static?

KARLIN WARNER: Sure, I can speak up a little bit more.

DEBRA: Oh, great! That’s perfect. Okay. So now, when you are going through the process of certifying, tell us what do you get to do as a certifier because I know that as a consumer advocate, I’m pretty much limited to what the advertising is about a product and what are the listed ingredients. What are the selling points and things like that?

I’ll go to a website and it has information, but it’s not necessarily the whole story. And a lot of times, when I ask questions, manufacturers are reluctant to give me information.

But as a certifier, you need to be able to see everything that’s going on I’m assuming so that you can make your evaluation. Is that right?

KARLIN WARNER: Yes, that’s correct. Actually, anybody that’s applying for certification with us has to agree to share any information with us. So they submit to us a plan of how they are going to meet the organic standard. And then we evaluate that plan through the criteria to see how well it meets it and see if there’s anything that they need to change.

We also do an on-site inspection and I think that’s where a lot of the important things really happen because then we get to see really behind the scenes how things are actually being done and if it matches what they say is doing, we can see what inputs are actually being used and we can see their record-keeping and see how well things are documented as far as traceability. We want to know that the organic material they say they’re using is actually being used in that product. And same thing with the chemicals and the [inaudible 00:16:09].

DEBRA: This is so interesting. Can you just give us more details like a walk through in those descriptions? You don’t have to tell us what the product is you’re describing, but just so that listeners can get a real idea?

KARLIN WARNER: You mean a walkthrough of the inspection process?

DEBRA: Just give us more details of what you’d do if somebody came to you and said, “I want to get a certification.” The first thing that you will do is…

KARLIN WARNER: Oh, okay.

DEBRA: Just part of what you’ve just said, but more detail. So what it’s like? When you go through the inspection process, what are the kinds of things you’re looking for? What do you see? I just want us to all have more reality on when somebody sees that it says it’s ‘certified organic’, what does that actually mean?

KARLIN WARNER: Okay, absolutely. So if it’s certified organic, that means that it has been evaluated by a third party. So it’s one thing if the manufacturer says, “This is organic,” but they don’t have anything extra to back up that claim. So that’s what we do.

So we’re an external third-party. We don’t have any other relationship with the client. They will submit an application to us. And as I’ve mentioned before, that’s their plan for complying with the organic standards. They submit details about where they’re getting their organic fiber. They submit details about what chemicals are going to be used and if they’ve been pre-evaluated for GOTS to use.

They submit maps and layouts of where things are stored and how organic products are separated from non-organic product, maybe their record-keeping practices. And then again, all of the social criteria so they will have to provide policy other than that they meet the social criteria, which is again, the more so fair trade item.

So we review that entire application in detail. That’s when we might some little things that, a crack or sometimes, we’ll find some big things that are really big, red flags and would mean that they can’t be a client.

That’s the main review. And then after that, we go do the physical inspection. So we’ll go through their warehouse or their mills depending on what type of processing they are doing. We take a checklist, then we walk through the entire process.
Basically, what I do is have them walk me through every step that they take from the raw, organic product coming in to their finished product. And so we can really see what is being done every step.
And we might collect samples for testing. We might collect copy of the records and things like that as well.

And then after the inspection, we perform another review. We determine if they’re compliant. And if they are, then that’s when the certificate is issued.

So all in all, the certification process will typically take two months, maybe three. It really depends on how complete the application is to begin with. That’s the certification process in a nutshell.

I find that a lot of my work is at a desk reviewing inputs and working at maths and reviewing test reports and a lot of those tendered documentations. I really enjoy when I get to go out into the field and do the inspection. That’s kind of fun.

DEBRA: Yeah, I imagine it would be. I know I like to go to organic farms and visit and go to factories and see what they are doing. It can be a lot of fun to do that.
So we’re coming up on the break pretty soon, so I don’t want to ask you another one question. But I think that when people see that something has been certified, that they don’t really understand everything that has really gone into it.
It just is amazing to me how when somebody has to make a plan, it’s like – I know that if I were to make a plan of everything that I was going to do, say, to take a trip to go someplace and that I would have to list every single detail, that would be very difficult.
Just the action of making a plan and saying, “This is how we’re going to do everything” and then doing it exactly according to plan. That’s a pretty amazing thing right there. Just right there, that’s an amazing thing.
So we’re going to go to break and we’ll be right back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Karlin Warner. She’s the textile certification specialist for OneCert, an organic certification company in Lincoln, Nebraska. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Karlin Warner. She’s the textile certification specialist for OneCert, an organic certification company and she certifies textiles to the Global Organic Textile Standard.
Karlin, I wanted to ask you to explain about the difference between a GOTS certified fabric or a fabric that says that it’s organic. Is there a difference? And then what if a product says that it’s GOTS certified. What do all of those things mean? How does a consumer know what to look for in a textile?

KARLIN WARNER: Well, the best way to know if something is GOTS certified is to look for the logo. If you aren’t familiar with the GOTS logo, it’s kind of a green circle with a white colored cert kind of tape in the middle underneath. So it’s Global Organic Textile Standard around the outside.

DEBRA: And ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com in the description of today’s show, I put the logo so that everybody can see it and recognize it.

KARLIN WARNER: Oh, perfect. Perfect! Well, you can take a look at it there. That’s the best way to identify a fabric or a finished product that’s GOTS certified.
And sometimes, you might find that there are some false claims out there. So if you’re worried that a product is labeled as GOTS certified, but it might not actually be, the best thing that you can do is you go to the GOTS website, which is Global-Standard.org and they actually have a public database of all of the certified operations online. So you can search for the company or the manufacturer identified along with that label.

DEBRA: So if somebody were to see a GOTS certification on a fabric, then that means that the fabric itself – here’s what I want to clear up. If you see USDA on a label, then what the USDA organic certification is for is they’re certifying the agricultural product, the agricultural material. They’re not actually certifying the product, right, in textiles?

KARLIN WARNER: In textiles, actually, I do not think that he USDA allows their logo to be used on textiles unless the entire processing of the textile product has been done according to their standards, which as you know, have been written for food. So it’s very difficult. It supposedly can be done, but it is very difficult.

DEBRA: Well, isn’t that why GOTS was invented?

KARLIN WARNER: Right!

DEBRA: So that there would be a standard specific for the manufacturer of textile products.

KARLIN WARNER: Right, because there’s a lot of differences between food and dying fabric. There are things that we will wear that we wouldn’t put in our mouth and probably vice versa, so it makes sense to have different standards.
So the raw fibers for that is used in the GOTS products could’ve come from USDA certified field or other equivalent organic standards. But that’s basically the extent of certification of textiles under the standards.

DEBRA: So I guess the point I’m trying to make is that somebody could say, “This is organic fabric” and then they might produce a certification that says that this cotton is certified organic as an agricultural product, but it doesn’t say anything about how the fabric was produced.

KARLIN WARNER: Right. It’s the ingredient basically.

DEBRA: Right. And so where GOTS is important is because it has as standard for the entire production of that fabric.

KARLIN WARNER: Yes, everything from getting to the finished product and even through importing and distribution. Those are all parts that are certified. So really, the only ones that don’t have to be certified are the retailers. And that’s only apparent doing any processing.

DEBRA: Right, this came up actually on another show where we’re talking about organic personal care products. The person I was interviewing was talking about the importance of certifying the retailers. In a food setting – and you can tell me if this applies or not in a textile setting, but in a food setting, you could do something in a store, you could take a natural food store, you could take an organic lettuce out of the bin and bring it over the deli section or their little restaurant and that they could say, “This is organic salad now,” but they aren’t certified to prepare that salad in an organic way.

KARLIN WARNER: Right, right. They could do something in the preparation step that would make it not organic if they’ve actually been certified.

We run into that a lot with t-shirt products, for example. We have a GOTS certified t-shirt, someone picks it and prints on it. And then they want to control it as GOTS certified, but technically, they can’t.

DEBRA: Right, that’s a very good example. That’s a very good example. And particularly with toxics, that’s a very good example because here, you have this GOTS certified organic t-shirt and then they put a toxic ink that is emitting toxic fumes. That’s not a GOTS certified product.
Are you there?

KARLIN WARNER: Yes, I am here.

DEBRA: Oh, okay. I thought maybe we might have dropped the line. I didn’t hear you.

Okay, so something like if it was a GOTS certified organic t-shirt unprinted and then they print it with a toxic ink that’s now out gassing toxic fumes, that is not a GOTS certified t-shirt.

KARLIN WARNER: Correct. Right, that would make it not GOTS certified.

DEBRA: Right. That’s a really good example.

And so then, when we get to the level of a product, you can also certify a product. I know on my website, I list NaturePedic, which is GOTS certified to make mattresses and the whole entire mattress is certified.
KARLIN WARNER: You can have GOTS certified mattresses. That’s something that’s been popping up a little more often lately. GOTS does allow certain other ingredients to be used other than the organic fiber, so that can allow, for instance, the frame and support and different parts of the mattress.

DEBRA: And so would you have other kinds of products that are being certified like clothing or something where they would have to use buttons or zippers or things.

KARLIN WARNER: Yeah, there are a lot of clothing items that use buttons and zippers, even if it has an embroidery thread and other fiber materials have to be kind of evaluated.

DEBRA: Well, we’ll talk more about this after the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Karlin Warner. She’s the textile certification specialist at OneCert and she certifies textiles and textile products to the Global Organic Textile Standard. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Karlin Warner, textile certification specialist for OneCert. It’s an organic certification company in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Karlin, what are some of the things that might come up when you’re reviewing the plan? What are some of the things that you might see that need to be corrected?

KARLIN WARNER: Well, it can really vary depending on what the operation is involved in. One of the biggest things I would say is they have listed input, chemical inputs whether it’s dyes or other textile axillaries that are not GOTS approved.
The way that that is done is that the manufacturers of these textiles input actually submit information to certifiers like myself and we review them and they get put on a positive list for that company. So they’re essentially pre-approved or prescreened.

DEBRA: So these are chemical ingredients I should say where there is a positive approved list, so that as a certifier, all you need to do is go down the list and say, “Oh, this is already approved, so therefore it’s approved in the product.”

KARLIN WARNER: Yes.

I think that that’s a really important point to make for consumers because I’m always looking at, “Well, how do professionals like you, how are you evaluating products because I’m having to evaluate products as a consumer advocate, but then the consumer down the line, every single consumer is evaluating products.”

And so this whole idea of the preapproved positive list is just as important if not more important than the preapproved negative list that’s approved to be negative – how would you say that? Approve a list of positive things? It’s the prohibited list. So there’s the prohibited list and then there’s the positive, okay list.

I think that I know for myself whether I write that list down or not, that I have that list in my mind of chemicals I’m absolutely not going to use and things that I know are okay. I think that if every consumer would think in those terms, I think it would be easier to organize our thoughts about it.

KARLIN WARNER: Yeah, I do think it’s a helpful way to think about it. And definitely, I appreciate having the positive list and the not-allowed list as a certifier because it makes things a lot more black and white. We know that it’s already been evaluated. It either is or isn’t allowed.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. Very good. Okay, so sometimes you see things as you’re evaluating the plan, you see something that isn’t on the approved list, but isn’t on the restricted list either?

KARLIN WARNER: Yeah. So sometimes we’ll come across some inputs that the company has been using for a really long time and they like and they’ve been told that it’s eco-friendly or they’ve been told that it’s fine or it’s compliant, sometimes they’ve even has been told that it meets the GOTS criteria, that’s not sufficient. We need to know that it has been evaluated in detail by a certifier in order for it to be used.

DEBRA: Oh, so your positive, approved list, each of those things have been evaluated by a certifier and that’s why it’s on the positive approved list. So there could be something that meets the qualifications for the positive approved list, it just hasn’t been certified.

KARLIN WARNER: Right. And so in that case, then I always encourage our clients to talk to their suppliers, have their chemical suppliers submit it for approval to a certification body.

It’s a fairly simple process. We just have to take a look at the formulae and we need to see all of the ingredients and [inaudible 00:42:52] with some important pieces of data about the toxicity and biodegradability and stuff like that.
But yeah, I would say that that is the biggest roadblock that we come to with people that are doing processing, like the dying and printing.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. Well, tell us what are the different aspects of the process of making a textile that you’re looking at? You start with the raw material and you end up with a piece of fabric, but what are the different steps that it goes through where you might be encountering toxic chemicals?

KARLIN WARNER: Sure! Okay, so the first step is usually for cotton is spinning. It is mechanical and there’s usually no input at that stage.

But if you’re working with organic wool, the first stage is scouring. So right away, the first next processing step, you will encounter input. So right there, there’s usually a lot of detergent-type of chemicals that are used and so that’s something that we have to look at.

Typically, the next stage would be spinning the wool, cotton, silk or whatever fiber we’re working with. Sometimes, a wax or some similar lubricant type of thing might be used in the spinning process. The same thing for knitting and weaving. Sometimes, there are some [inaudible 00:44:29] that are used.

And for weaving, sometimes the yarns are [inaudible 00:44:33] so they’re actually coated in something to make them stronger during the weaving process. That’s something we have to look at.

And then we start to get into more of the wet processing stage. Just like I mentioned, the dying and the printing and the finishes that is a wet ingredient. There’s obviously a lot of chemicals.
And one other one that I would…

DEBRA: And… sorry, go ahead, yes.

KARLIN WARNER: It’s important for the organic consultants because a lot of times, if you do the sizing for weaving, then a lot of times, they use organisms to remove the sizing materials. So we have to make sure that they’re using GMO-free organism for that.

DEBRA: Hmmm… so if the organisms are not GMO-free (like they probably would be for anything that isn’t certified by you), then those GMO’s affect the end user in a way? Are they still there on the clothing?

KARLIN WARNER: I don’t know if I can answer that it’s 100% preserved, but it’s usually enzymes that are used. It’s because they can break down the starches that are used for sizing. I’m not sure if it leaves any residue, there’s always a possibility. But I think in the main, we just doesn’t like to use GMO at any stage. That’s something that is definitely prohibited. It’s more of the classic, old template.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. I mean, this is like GMO-free textiles and I think that that’s a good thing. I just think that we shouldn’t be using GMO’s at all for anything. They’re unnatural.

KARLIN WARNER: Yes, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. There’s no need really to use them. So once something goes through this whole process, then you issue the certification.What about marketing of this? Is there anything besides labels or anything that GOTS is doing to help consumers understand it better or look for the label?
KARLIN WARNER: I think it’s an ongoing process and they’ve been trying to do a little bit more consumer awareness. But it’s something that I hope grows a lot more in the next coming year.
I know in the Europe the GOTS label is actually fairly recognizable. But here in the U.S., it’s kind of rare to see. It hasn’t really caught on enough to get a whole lot of consumer awareness.
But aside from using the logo and encouraging certifiers use the logo. There are some other campaigns out there about using organic cotton. I don’t know if you’ve seen that Cottoned On campaign. I think it was [inaudible 00:47:50]. It’s kind of related to the GOTS standard-based [inaudible 00:47:56].

DEBRA: Could you say that again because you kind of broke up and I didn’t get it. What is the other standard?

KARLIN WARNER: Oh, it’s not a standard. It’s like a campaign. It’s like a marketing campaign for organic cotton. They just call it Cottoned On.

DEBRA: Oh, I haven’t seen that.

KARLIN WARNER: So they say, “Have you cottoned on?” It’s kind of an interesting website. I encourage you to check it out.

DEBRA: And it’s just CottonedOn.com.

KARLIN WARNER: I believe so.

DEBRA: Oh, is that it?

KARLIN WARNER: I looked at it yesterday,but I can’t remember.

DEBRA: Okay. Okay, good. Yeah. Alright! Well, we’ve reached the end of the show. Is there any final words that you’d like to say about anything we haven’t covered?

KARLIN WARNER: I don’t think so. I think we’ve pretty much covered it all. I don’t really have anything to add at this point unless there’s something that you have to ask?

DEBRA: Well, no. We actually have less than a minute left anyway. But thank you so much for being here. I think that we’ve learned a lot today about what the certification process is about.

That’s Karlin Warner. She’s with OneCert. Their website is OneCert.com. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and find out more about the different shows that are on. You can listen to those shows, the previous shows. You can find out who’s going to be on tomorrow. You can also go across the top. There’s a menu that shows different parts of my website. One of them, you just click on Shop and you’ll see that as you go through it that there are different websites that sells GOTS certified textile products of various types and all kinds of toxic-free products. I have more than 500 websites listed there where you can buy toxic-free products and live without exposure to toxic chemicals that we’re talking about every day on the show.

So please join me again tomorrow. Listen to the shows whenever you’d like 24 hours a day. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Good bye.

Removing Odor From Car Interior

Question from edward

I have a Honda accord 2010, seats are fine as they are leather, but the plastic/vinyl dashboard and carpet although 2010 is still, strong.

I’m looking for something non toxic odorless to neutralize and give fresh air. Have tried ozone/ultra violet treatments and it works for a week only, fresh air and sun.

Debra’s Answer

I contacted OdorKlenz to see if any of their products would work for this. Here is their reply:

We have had Customers use our OdorKenz Skunk or OdorKLenz-S to remove fragrances and odors from their cars. If they are able to use a carpet extractor then I would go with the OdorKlenz-S to get the rugs and upholstery done but if it is a simple wipe down and cleaning then the OdorKLenz Skunk would be fine. Both will work in this case just a matter of personal preference. Your readers can use code Savings1 at checkout to receive 30% off .

Add Comment

Microbial Shield

Question from Donna

Hi Debra,

We recently found mold in our basement and used a company to clean and remove it with a hydrogen peroxide formula. We have used this company before, as they do excellent work, and have had no problems with their products (my son has chemical sensitivities).

However, there was a coffee table in the basement which I was planning to use upstairs in the family room, and it got coated with their microbial shield. They say the main ingredient in the shield is a food preservative, but I am concerned as the table will be touch a lot and probably eaten off of.

Attached is a link to their MSDS. Do you think this is safe? Would coating the table with AFM Safecoat help? Thank you as always! Donna

Debra’s Answer

According to their MSDS, the microbial shield contains 2-butoxy ethanol.

It’s in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards

Symptoms irritation eyes, skin, nose, throat; hemolysis, hematuria (blood in the urine); central nervous system depression, headache; vomiting

Target Organs Eyes, skin, respiratory system, central nervous system, hematopoietic system, blood, kidneys, liver, lymphoid system

Remember this is for workers who are having direct contact with this chemical.

This is a volatile organic chemical (VOC), so it may be that it has already evaporated. If so, and all that’s left is the food preservative, it should be fine.

If you feel safer coating it with AFM Safecoat, go ahead. That would give you a finish that you know is safe.

Add Comment

Pillows

Question from Cindy

I’ve read so many conflicting things on the Internet about pillows. Some say pillows cause neck pain, while others say you must have a pillow to support your neck & that it’s the size of the pillow that makes the difference. What are your thoughts on this, & what kind of pillows would you recommend, if you do? Thank you so much for all you do.

Debra’s Answer

This isn’t really a toxics question, and I’m not a chiropractor, but I can tell you my experience.

For years I have been sleeping on a regular pillow with a neck roll. I love this neck roll so much I take it with me when I travel. I put it under my neck and then my head is on the regular pillow. No neck pain with this.

I have pillows from Shepherd’s Dream and USAlpaca. My neck roll is from Shepherd’s Dream.

I recommend any pillows made with natural fibers that you are comfortable with. You can find natural fiber pillows on the Beds & Bedding page of Debra’s List and the Bedding Only page of Debra’s List.

Add Comment

Crypton Super Fabrics

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I am trying to find a less toxic carseat/booster seat for my children. I did check Healthy Child but the list is outdated and I question the testing and results since the same brand can have the safest and worst car seat listed…

I did find some seats made by Clek Olli that are made of “Greenguard Crypton Super Fabrics” which “provide permanent protection against stains, moisture and odor-causing bacteria and are free of brominated and chlorinated flame retardants.” Of course I like that it is supposedly free of these flame retardants, but I wonder about the safety of other chemicals used to make it stain, odor, and microbial resistant. Have you heard of Crypton Superfabrics or have any recommendation about it’s safety? All car seats and boosters seem pretty toxic, so I feel it’s just a guessing game choosing a safer car seat, if that’s possible. Thanks so much, Debra, for all the great advice!

Debra’s Answer

It took me a while to find the information on this product, but I found it at www.hytex.com/pdf/Crypton.pdf.

This is considered a “green” product.

There are four requirements for creating
new collections:
01. Select fiber content that is either:
(a) 50-100% recycled
(b) 100% heavy-metal-free polyester
(c) 100% wool with heavy-metal-free dyes
(d) 100% polypropylene

We don’t know which fabric is on your carseat, but any one of these is better than most other carseats.

Read more at the link about how these fabrics must meet emissions standards.

It is GREENGUARD Indoor Air Quality Certified and GREENGUARD Children & Schools Certified. It’s also has the SCS Indoor Advantage Gold certification and the “Cradle to “Cradle” certification, which disallows a whole list of toxic chemicals.

What I can say is given the type of product you are considering, this choice is very probably a lot less toxic than most others on the market.

Here’s the thing for me. Would I sleep on this fabric? No. I just don’t go near synthetic fabrics of any kind, toxic or not toxic. Synthetics just make my skin creep. I’d use the wool version.

But absolutely it’s a better choice than most other carseats.

Add Comment

Lead-Free Cloth Extension Cords

Question from STAR

Hi,

I was wondering where I could purchase lead free etc. extension chords.

Thanks!

Debra’s Answer

I’m so glad you asked this question! I just struck a gold mine of possibilities for you.

I searched on “lead-free extension cord” and got zero results.

Then I tried “cloth extension cord” and bingo!

Vintage Cloth Braided Extension Cord Vintage Cloth Braided Extension Cord by FosterWeld
Extension Cord 6′ Extension Cord – Cloth Cord Vintage Replica in Red
 shopping  BLACK and WHITE zig zag cloth covered CORD for electric lamps, lighting, fans, radio
 USTARD - Vintage Style  Cloth Extension Cord – MUSTARD – Vintage Style – Cloth Covered Cord – Electrical Cord – 10-foot
 lack Cloth Covered Wire  Cloth Extension Cord – Black Cloth Covered Wire – 10-ft Cordset – Vintage Style – Edison Lamp
 cloth LAMP EXTENSION CORD  cloth LAMP EXTENSION CORD wire CABLE ELECTRIC light STEAMPUNK neon colors
 NTIQUE COPPER - Vintage Style  Cloth Extension Cord – ANTIQUE COPPER – Vintage Style – Cloth Covered Cord – Vintage – Antique – Steampunk – Electrical Cord – 10-foot
 eppermint Twist - Cloth Covered Wire  Cloth Extension Cord – Peppermint Twist – Cloth Covered Wire – 10-ft Cordset – Vintage Style – Edison Lamp
 SILVER - Vintage Style Cloth Extension Cord – SILVER – Vintage Style – Cloth Covered Exy Cord – Vintage – Antique – Steampunk – Electrical Cord – 10-foot
 Cloth Cord Vintage Replica in Red 8′ Extension Cord – Cloth Cord Vintage Replica in Red
 ntique Bronze Cloth Covered Wire Cloth Extension Cord – Antique Bronze Cloth Covered Wire – 10-ft Cordset – Vintage Style – Edison Lamp
 Red and White Twist - Cloth Covered Wire Cloth Extension Cord – Red and White Twist – Cloth Covered Wire – 10-ft Cordset – Vintage Style – Dont hide under Christmas Tree Skirt
 Sterling Silver Gray Cloth Covered Wire Cloth Extension Cord – Sterling Silver Gray Cloth Covered Wire – 10-ft Cordset – Vintage Style – Edison Lamp
 ANTIQUE BRONZE - Vintage Style Cloth Extension Cord – ANTIQUE BRONZE – Vintage Style – Cloth Covered Cord – Vintage – Antique – Steampunk – Electrical Cord – 10-foot
Extension Cord w/ Cloth Covered ZigZag Wire – Matches our Pendant Lights – Red, White, Black – Plug In Cord for Outlets
 Vintage Style - Brown Cloth Covered Extension Cord – Vintage Style – Brown- Twisted Fabric Electrical Cord – Great for Antiques, Lamps, Steampunk, Fans, etc.
 10 Black Brown Red Vintage Style Lamp Wire Cloth Covered Extension Cord – 10′ Black Brown Red Vintage Style Lamp Wire

Why are we concerned about lead on extension cords? Because virtually all extension cords and cords of any kind contain lead, known to the state of California to cause cancer. Many products now carry this warning:

WARNING: Handling the power cord on this product will expose you to lead, a chemical known to the State of California to cause [cancer and] birth defects or other reproductive harm. WASH HANDS AFTER HANDLING

All power cords for all products. All extension cords, All surge protectors.

It takes only seconds for your skin to absorb lead from touching cords, lead paint, or anything else containing lead.

The European Union has ban[ned] the placing new electrical and electronic equipment on the EU market containing more than agreed levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyl (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) flame retardants.” Their cords are RoHS (Restricion of Hazardous Materials) compliant.

But I couldn’t find any internet source of RoHS compliant cables available for consumer purchase. There’s a business someone should start.

So cloth-covered cord is the solution for the moment. You can even find some products now with cloth-covered cord, like this lamp I bought from Crate & Barrel.

rex grey task lamp

Why We Shouldn’t Have Nuclear Power Plants

My guest today is toxicologist Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, a regular guest who is helping us understand the toxicity of common chemicals we may be frequently exposed to. Today we’ll be talking about nuclear power plants and how they affect our health and the environment. Dr. Gilbert is Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and author of A Small Dose of Toxicology- The Health Effects of Common Chemicals. A Small Dose of ToxicologyDr. Gilbert received a Ph.D. in Toxicology in 1986 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, is a Diplomat of American Board of Toxicology, and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington. His research has focused on neurobehavioral effects of low-level exposure to lead and mercury on the developing nervous system. Dr. Gilbert has an extensive website about toxicology called Toxipedia, which includes a suite of sites that put scientific information in the context of history, society, and culture. www.toxipedia.org

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH STEVEN G. GILBERT, PhD, DABT

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Why We Shouldn’t Have Nuclear Power Plants

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Steven Gilbert, PhD, DABT

Date of Broadcast: October 09, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Thursday, October 9th 2014. And it’s a beautiful early autumn day in Clearwater, Florida. And we are going to be talking about why we shouldn’t have nuclear power plants.

Actually, here, where we live, there’s a strange thing going on and I probably don’t have all the details, but we are now paying on our bill to build a nuclear power plant. And that’s not something that I think most of us want in this community. There are some problems with it, and maybe it’s not going to happen. But I just would not like to see another nuclear power plant.

So, my guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. He’s been on before. And in fact, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and look for today’s show. And at the end of the description of today’s show, you can see all the shows that he’s already done.

We’ve talked about the basic principles of toxicology, how to determine your risk of harm from an exposure, toxics through history, the effects of toxics and then all kinds of chemicals. We have talked about endocrine disruptors, persistent bio-accumulative toxicants, how mercury affects your health, nano particles. Dr. Gilbert is just so knowledgeable about the whole field of toxics that I just have him on every month so that he can tell us more.

Also, he has a wonderful website called Toxipedia.org and there’s so much information there. I just found out today that they now have information about the toxic effects of various molds that you might find in your environment in addition to toxic chemicals.

He has a wonderful book called A Small Dose of Toxicology, which is free. You can go to Toxipedia.org and get that book for free. I do want to say that the easiest way to get is to just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click on the book cover. It will take you right to the page.

So, Dr. Gilbert, hello.

STEVEN GILBERT: Hi Debra. How are you doing?

DEBRA: I’m doing very well. How are you?

STEVEN GILBERT: Good. It’s a little foggy here in Seattle, Washington.

DEBRA: Foggy in Seattle, Washington. Well, isn’t that typical of autumn?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, it is. We are moving into a rainy season here.

DEBRA: Yes. We are moving out of our rainy season. I think it’s going across the country over to you.

So, tell us about nuclear power plants. Where do you want to start?

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, there are about a hundred nuclear power plants operating across United States. They generate about 20% of our total electric bills, power that we are generating. But I think you really have to ask how this came about and to look at the history of nuclear power and to understand its impact.

And the other thing I remember is a lot of the nuclear power plants are aging. There hasn’t been a new one built since the ’70s although there’s a couple under construction. I think Florida has got five nuclear plants. Those power plants are concentrated on the east coast.

So I think we have to ask. Are they safe to operate? What are we doing with the waste from them? Are they economically feasible to operate? And what are we doing for the future? How are we using this to combat climate change and to produce more and safer power?

DEBRA: Let’s start with the history. There’s a lot to talk about it. So let’s start with the history. How did the first nuclear power plant get to be built?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, it started off in World War II actually. It was the beginning of this when the atomic bomb was developed. And then the nuclear power plants mostly reduced plutonium.

Hanford, Washington was one of the major sites as well as Savannah River. And they built nuclear plants. The sole purpose was to generate plutonium and extract plutonium.

So they used uranium. They mined uranium, uranium-235 and the tremendous amount of heat is generated from these power plants. What would you do with all that heat? So they thought immediately to capitalize on the investment that the military making a nuclear plant to reduce plutonium could generate electricity. It could just turn into Atoms For Peace Program, which Eisenhower promoted.

In 1951, the first power plant—actually it was in Idaho—produced a little bit of electricity and turned on four light bulbs. So it wasn’t until 1951 that nuclear power actually turned on light bulbs. It actually generated some usable electric power.

And from there, they tried to commercialize that. There were bills passed. And nuclear power has a long history of being subsidized by the government, first through the military and then through loans of power plant construction people and developing new designs and trying to make nuclear power feasible.

One of the most important was the Price-Aniston Act in 1957 that reduced the liability. So it made the companies not have the single liability in any accident that occurs. And this is huge. It’s the only industry in the United States where the government assumes the liability of commercial operation of power plants.

DEBRA: Wow. So the responsibility is separate from the person or the organization who’s actually taking the action.

STEVEN GILBERT: Correct. At one time, there are 253 power plants ordered. We are down to 100 operating power plants.

And remember all these are again power plants. In 2013, four plants were shut down across the United States and there are efforts to shut down more of them.

DEBRA: Are they being shut down because they are unsafe or just because they’re old?

STEVEN GILBERT: I don’t think the industry would say they’re unsafe, but they have problems with the operation. They have just become uneconomical to operate. They have problems with the condensers that generate the steams.

Just remember these power plants are really just how to boil water. All you do with nuclear power is boiling water.

DEBRA: Tell us how a power plant works, a nuclear power plant works.

STEVEN GILBERT: Nuclear power plants has a nuclear reactor. And that reactor uses uranium-235 as its fuel. And they produce neutrons. Those neutrons bounce off to uranium-235 and split it into other elements and those elements are radioactive.

For example, cesium and strontium are some of isotopes that are developed when uranium is split. And splitting those atoms, the fission creates enormous amounts of heat. So they turn the heat in the steam and there are various steams to do that. That steam is used to turn the generators and produce electricity.

So nuclear power plants are just one big boiling water reactor. It boils water to make steam to produce electricity.

And one of the problems that I just alluded to was that it produces a lot of waste. So power plants produce fuel rods and those fuel rods are very hot. They produce […] what to do with them.

One of the biggest problems is we do not have a way to deal with the waste produced by nuclear power plants. There was this one time going to Yucca Mountain, that was shut down and now the nuclear power plants, most of the waste products from this power plant is stored on site. And the question is how safe is that?

DEBRA: I understand what you are saying about the environmental effects and the long term effects and all those things about the waste. But how are nuclear plants affecting us as individuals as we go about our daily life?

STEVEN GILBERT: I think that if you are nearby one, you have the direct effects of that. You have the potential to be exposed to accidental […] plant like three mile […] if you’re around that plant in Fukushima or Chernobyl where they contaminated large spots of land. Hundreds of thousands of people even evacuated from the area. So there’s the risk of that.

There’s also, in all nuclear power plants, a little bit of radiation. So there’s some potential exposure to that. And there have been some studies showing that there’s increase in, for example, leukemia from being nearby a power plant. So that’s the direct effect.

I think we also have to look at the long term consequence of nuclear power, how these plants, what happens when they age.

They have to be disposed of. They have to be […] That’s the problem […] of energy.

And one thing that nuclear power proponents say is it’s green power, it’s carbon-neutral and carbon-free actually. It’s really not the case. It takes enormous quantity of energy to build the power plants. It takes enormous energy to use the uranium-235 and decommissioning these power plants takes another huge amount of energy. There’s actually more energy it took to build the plant, to decommission it because you have to cut it out half way and let it sit around for a while.

So nuclear power plants are not carbon-free and you have to be thinking about that as far as climate change goes and other ways to produce energy and electricity.

DEBRA: We need to take a break, but when we come back, we’ll talk a lot more about nuclear power plants and how they affect our health and the environment.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist Steven Gilbert, PhD and his website is Toxipedia.org. He’s the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology, which I have many times said that everybody should read because it will give you some really just great basics about the field of toxicology. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist Steven Gilbert, PhD and he’s the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology and has incredible website about toxics called Toxipedia.org, which you should go to and explore in great detail. Anyway, I always find something interesting when I go there.

STEVEN GILBERT: And I have a chapter on radiation if you want to learn more a little bit about nuclear issues and understand the health effects of radiation. There’s a chapter of that as well as a PowerPoint presentation about radiation.

DEBRA: I’m opening your book right now. Anyway, I will open your book while you talk. So tell us about the economics of nuclear power plants.

STEVEN GILBERT: The economics is really interesting. And this is where one of the biggest failures of the nuclear power industry is. In my view, it is around economics.

I’ll just read a little quote from 1985 from Forbes Magazine and Forbes Magazine was a big economic proponent magazine.

Remember that the US government subsidized these plants in the form of loan guarantees. I mentioned earlier the Price-

Anderson Act that provides liability insurance to these power plants.

But here’s a quote from Forbes Magazine in 1985 […] in 1979. It says:

“The failure of the US nuclear power program ranks, as the largest managerial disaster in business history, a disaster on a monumental scale. Only the blind or the biased can now think that the money has been well spent. It’s a defeat of the US consumer and the competitiveness of US industry, the utility that took the program and the private enterprise system that made it possible.”

And I would say the government’s involvement really is a [gambling] statement about the economic viability of nuclear power.

I’ll just give you one more example of this. Washington State, they had a […] program. They plan to build five nuclear power plants. They had a big bond issued with billions of dollars. And they shut down two of them. Two of them, they started to build and abandoned.

One of the nuclear power plants, the Columbia Generating Station was actually completed. The […] in Washington State are still paying for this. It was the largest municipal bond failure in US history, as well as in nuclear power history.

And now in west coast here, we have a new […] situation, small modular nuclear reactor. I encourage the listeners to pay attention to small modular thing. Again, they’re looking for government subsidies to keep this thing going. And building smaller nuclear power plants, they say, would be economically viable.

Very few other plants or the majority of plants that were built went over budget. So the many plants they built cost up to 200% more than they planned to build. So they planned to build the plant for a billion or it cost $2 billion. And then they are delayed in opening. This is what happened to a couple that are under construction in the United States right now. They are all delayed in opening operations.

So economically, the bottom line is it always surprises me […] people that promote capitalism and promote physical responsibility are tolerating an industry that cannot exist without government subsidies.

DEBRA: Yes. Government subsidies, that’s a whole big subject in itself, all the things that the government is subsidizing.

So you had said earlier that the last one was built in 1973 and there were just now some under construction like they are talking about building one nearby where I live, not in my backyard, but would be serving. It would change my power source to nuclear power.

I just like to interject here that even if you are on the grid that you can do—what are they called?—green power certificates or something like that where you can actually buy green power like solar or wind, different kinds, you can choose power. And it offsets your usage. So even though you are still using the grid power, somewhere in the world, you are paying for green power to be used. And that’s way that you can offset your use.

If you can’t go to solar or do something on your own property, then at least that’s something that you can do. So there are things that we can do to promote use of energy, technologies that are not nuclear. I just think that it’s a bad thing all around.

Anyway…

STEVEN GILBERT: I think Florida has got some great advantage. You got tremendous solar capabilities. And I think in Florida, they really needed to have better incentives putting solar power on homes.

I just put solar power on my house here in Seattle, Washington […] I generated over 3 megawatts of power and it sold over 1.75 megawatts back to our […] light.

DEBRA: I just love that.

STEVEN GILBERT: It can be very exciting to do that and be engaged in producing power. So you really do not need nuclear power. We can focus on conservation and alternative sources of energy generation. There’s a lot to dig on that.

DEBRA: Yeah, there are lots of things.

STEVEN GILBERT: Particularly if you look at the Fukushima, what happened to Fukushima, the three power plants melted down there, as well as dealing with the [wait].

DEBRA: Especially with Fukushima because that’s something that we are living with now. Earlier in my lifetime, we went through Chernobyl. Earlier than that, we went Three Mile Island. I can think of three off the top of my head just in my lifetime where there’s been massive amount of radioactive material going into the environment because of nuclear power plants.

And they are just not necessary, they are not necessary because we have other ways, other less toxic ways of producing energy. And it’s just an option that doesn’t need to be there.

STEVEN GILBERT: Right. And you got to remember the power plants, their accident rates are on a U-shape curve. The most vulnerable […] for nuclear power plants when they’re starting up is the first couple of years of operations. And then it goes through a quiet period where everything is working well. And then they age, so they increase probability of accidents.

Like the Fukushima power plants where old style GE Mark 1 reactor that have known problems with them. They locked the […]

They needed to shut them down. They’re very hot and they just continued to produce heat, which created the meltdown of the three reactors of Fukushima. And there’s also…

DEBRA: We need to go to break and when we come back, we are going to talk more about that because I want to hear about what’s going to happen as these reactors start aging.

So this is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is Toxipedia.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist Dr. Steven Gilbert, PhD. And he’s the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology and his website is Toxipedia.org.

So before the break, we were talking about what’s happening with the aging nuclear power plant. So let’s talk more about that, as they are starting to crumble.

What do you think is the future of nuclear power? Do you think that they will repair these plants? Do you think that they will continue to build more? Or do you think that everybody is going to decide it’s a bad idea and stop?

STEVEN GILBERT: I would like to think that people are going to come to the conclusion that this is a really bad idea. But I think more and more people are reaching that conclusion.

You’ve seen those nuclear power plants, the owners want to extend the license of these plants for another 20 years and can operate them beyond their designed capabilities. So hence when you expose a material to radiation, it becomes more brittle.

So the plants become more vulnerable to failure.

And failure can occur in a number of ways. For example, an earthquake, which also damaged the nuclear reactor in Fukushima. We just did an earthquake study of the Washington State reactor, the Columbia Generating Station and found that seismically it’s not fit to be operating because of danger of earthquake in that area.

And this has been well documented. We have a big cleanup operation for the Hanford nuclear site because the […] plant was replicated for earthquake potential and they never did that with the plants there. And the plants do get more vulnerable as they age.

Another vulnerability is also flooding […] the Mississippi, they knew the water is going to rise on there. There are some great pictures on the web where this plant just surrounded by water. Remember that Fukushima, that’s what really damaged that plant , the tsunami quake. That flooded the back of generators and shut the plant down.

So I think we got multiple vulnerabilities here. Aging is one of them. The plant in Vermont, the Yankee Plant in Vermont was leaking tritium into the groundwater and that’s from leaking pipes and they spent a lot of time trying to figure out where that is.

Vermont is trying to shut that plant down and the industry keeps it open.

Remember there are major capital investments in these old aging nuclear plants. So they are looking at the possibility of electricity they’re generating. But even that, you look at Columbia Generating Station in Washington State, when you look at the economics of that, it’s not economically viable given the cost of uranium, which fuels reactors.

And remember these reactors have been shut down for about two months, 40 days or so […] some time, every year and a half to be refueled and it has to deal with sourcing that uranium and then packaging the fuel rods. So that’s very expensive to do.

We determined in the Columbia Generating Station that we could save billions of dollars by abandoning this plant and moving to a different source of energy.

So I think in the long run, nuclear power is not viable and you can see that with the very few that are on order and just a couple being built in the United States. And these, like I mentioned, are over budget and behind times. So I don’t think they are viable.

The last data is trying to make them economically viable. They’re dealing with the waste with these small modular nuclear reactors.

DEBRA: And do you think that those small modular nuclear reactors will be the future?

STEVEN GILBERT: I don’t. I think they stem from the same problems. The industry proponents say that because they can manufacture, they create about 300 megawatts of power, they can be sited in different places where it’s cheaper to build.

But it is really not the case. They have the same vulnerabilities. They still need uranium to run them. They still have to deal with the waste. And waste is a huge problem.

So the waste that comes out of this plants, when you burn these fuel rod, it becomes very hot and contaminated with nuclear wastes. Cesium and strontium has been two of them and you have to put them some place.

So you pull them out of the nuclear reactor and they cycle […] fuel cycle and put new fuel rods with uranium-235. And they store them in a large pool, like a big swimming pool. The water dissipates the heat from the fuel rods and it keeps the neutrons from [creating] more reaction.

So, where do this stuff go? Because these are older plants, they continue to produce fuel […]. It’s like 55,000 tons of […] fuel.

And then, the problem is where to put it. So they store it in these ponds, in these swimming pools. And the old […] reactors, there are several [pools] up in the air.

And this is the big problem with Fukushima because the reactor number four had all their fuel rods out of the reactor. At the time, it seemed like a good idea to know that it is way up in the air. And that earthquake has damaged that fuel and leaked the water out of the big swimming pools, those fuel rods can burn. They can start burning the fused hydrogen and they can get an exposure from that and it actually could distribute more radiation from the fuel rods than in the reactor core.

So it’s a huge problem. So they take the fuel rods. They put them in dry cask storage. That’s one of their solutions, but they have no place to move these dry casks, no place to dispose of.

So I think that’s one of the vulnerabilities of the nuclear power. We do not know what to do with the waste and we are generating wastes that would be around for many generations. And I just think that’s irresponsible. You should not be burdening future generations with […] nuclear fuel that we do not know what to do with. And it creates hazard wherever it is.

DEBRA: One of the things that we have talked about a little bit on this show is that my basic foundation of thinking has to do with looking at nature and seeing how life works and how close we can come to that. And that’s really my standard. Can something be in the cycle of life?

And so when you have something like nuclear waste, which is extremely toxic, it’s extremely harmful to everything and it cannot go back into the cycle of life. It just piles up and piles up and piles up just like probably most people are more familiar with landfill problems where you have things like plastic that doesn’t biodegrade. I mean they put them in the landfill, but that doesn’t mean it’s going back into the cycle of life.

And the way that cycle of life works is if you imagine a tree and it produces leaves and the leaves then the leaves do what they do. They do photosynthesis and help the tree live and they provide shade and food and all kinds of things for their little local environment. And then the leaves fall off the tree and they go back on the ground and they build soil.

And so at every point, what’s going on is that elements of nutrients of life are exchanging forms with each other. And nuclear elements can’t do that. They don’t do that. And so what they do is that they harm life around them instead of going back into that cycle of life.

That’s what I’m most concerned about. I just think that anything that can’t participate in that renewable cycle of life is the things that we shouldn’t do.

We need to go to break. But when we come back, we will hear more from Dr. Gilbert about nuclear power plants. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist Dr. Steven Gilbert. And his website is Toxipedia.org and he’s the author of the book A Small Dose of Toxicology, which you can get for free on his website. Again, that’s Toxipedia.org.

And doctor, we are talking about nuclear power plants. During the break, I looked up what was going on with my nuclear power plant. And in fact, I thought I heard this as I was walking through the room and there was a television on, the other day. I actually don’t read the newspaper and all of those kinds of things, so I don’t always know what’s going on in the world.

But what happened is very recently this proposed nuclear power plant, the whole project was canned. So they are not putting it up. This one is done. And what I found was an article saying that one of our legislators or a representative has proposed that all the $54 million that have been collected from us for this nuclear power plant should be refunded to the public. And I’m very happy for that.

STEVEN GILBERT: I bet that never happens because the power companies already invested a lot of money in design and working on that thing. So they incurred a whole bunch of expenses that the […] often end up paying for.

The nuclear plants have also got this great thing where they can pay forward. So for years, before the plant is built, they actually start paying for it in the electric rates.

DEBRA: Yes, yes.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s a very nice deal for the power companies. I want to mention one more thing, one more hazard about these power plants. It’s proliferation of the knowledge.

For example, Ukraine—and I think everybody is aware of the political problems in Ukraine […]—has 15 nuclear power plants.

And who do you want owning these power plants? They can produce radioactive wastes that could make bombs. You do not want terrorists or other people that have other issues controlling these plants. And you look around the world, you see North Korea, Iran.

Physicians for Social Responsibility produced a great report about nuclear famine with the example that India and Pakistan got into an exchange of nuclear weapons. Billions of people could die due to [agricultural] failure around the world.

So, I think just from that perspective, that’s another reason why nuclear powers not a good thing to do around the world.

DEBRA: I completely agree with you. Just on every level, it’s not a good thing.

Tell us more reasons why people should use solar or wind or other alternatives because they do exist. And why do you think—besides economically, is there some reason why everybody is going to these other types of energy that are obviously so renewable and less polluting and a much better idea.

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, one reason in my view is that the power companies control the grid. And maybe they want to make the investment to allow energy to put back in the grid. We are very fortunate here in Seattle that our power company is pretty progressive. It allows us to sell power back to them.

Many places—I believe Florida is an example—put a lot of barriers up to putting solar power back on to electric grid. Grid companies would focus on conservation and investing in the grid so that they could take power from individuals. But that’s decentralizing the power generation. And these power companies make money from selling electricity from large investments in coal-powered plants, coal-fired plants and nuclear plants in a large generating capacity.

So I think one thing that listeners can do is to contact your representative. Say you want better incentives for solar or wind power and move to renewables and get away from coal and nuclear power as a source of generating electricity.

We need entirely new model for generating power, which is individually. Look at what Germany has done in that regard. They shut most of their nuclear reactors, moving towards a more decentralized power production model. And that results to all of us getting involved.

Another thing we can do individually is conservation to move toward LED light fixtures. They really reduce the amount of watts.

And the solar power I have on the house, I actually have a new technology called eGate that lets me monitor power use and the power I generate from my solar panels. And I can literally watch when I turn on the light in the room how much power that light is consuming. It’s really opened my eyes.

DEBRA: That’s very cool. I love that.

STEVEN GILBERT: I’ll send it to you, Debra. So you have to take a look at that.

DEBRA: I like that.

STEVEN GILBERT: You really need to see that. And it really drives home the fact that these old incandescent lights are very energy-hogging and we can switch to a much reduction in power we use individually as well if we are making an investment to move towards solar.

DEBRA: I have a little gadget that I’ll admit that I’ve never used, but I just came across it the other day because it’s a technical thing and I am not a technical person. But I don’t even know if they are still sold. It’s called Kill-A-Watt.

And it’s a thing that you can put in. You unplug your cord and then you plug in this device and then you plug your cord into it and it will tell you how much energy you are using. But I like…

STEVEN GILBERT: Cool.

DEBRA: Yeah, it is. And so my idea was that I was going to go around and I was going to test the energy and everything in my house. I actually do save a lot of energy. I don’t use a lot of lights. I don’t even have overhead lights in most of my rooms. I just use little task lights.

STEVEN GILBERT: Very good.

DEBRA: I just got a new air conditioner that’s much more energy efficient and I’m about to get a water heater next week that is going from electric to gas. And so one by one, I’m replacing all these things and not looking at what the individual energy use is.

But I love the idea of what you just described, that you can turn something on and see how it’s really affecting in real time what’s going on with your energy use. If we had that awareness, if people—

I think a lot of it just has to do with, number one, not being aware of what is your energy, where is it coming from. Where is it coming from? And I would just ask everybody who’s listening…

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, I think that’s a really good point that we need to be more aware of that because the power companies make money by selling electricity. So they don’t have a lot of incentives to reduce electric consumption. The whole business model is making money from selling electricity and we really need to move more towards conservation.

I really admire you for making the effort to reduce your electric consumption by changing some of your devices and monitoring its use.

DEBRA: Thank you. So we need to know, number one, where our energy is coming from. And anybody can just pick up the phone. When you stopped listening to the show today, just go straight to the phone and call them up and say, “What is the source of the power that you are selling me every month?”

And the number two is where are you using that energy? And there are all these things that we really need to be aware of like what’s our energy use, what’s our chemical exposure, how much money are we spending, how many fattening foods are we eating. We need to be looking at these flows that are going through our lives and control them, be aware of them and use them to our best advantage.

If you know that you are using a lot of energy and if you know that it’s causing pollution on the other end
this is something people think that electricity is so clean. It might be clean in your house, but it’s not clean on the other end.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s really not. I think on the west coast, they were fighting about a coal train. They want to ship a lot of coal to China. China produces electricity from coal-fired plants. A lot of them do not have pollution control device on them.

There’s mercury and coal. And the mercury in the atmosphere ends up in the fish meat.

So we are very directly connected to the energy we produce in the coal production and the use of coal as an energy source just with the mercury that’s produced. We know how to stop that.

And there’s been huge effort by the US EPA trying to curb the pollution that comes from coal-fired plant, which I really admire.

But that’s been a huge uphill battle because the power companies again do not want to attach pollution control device to power plants because they don’t make any money from doing that. They want to build more power plants.

DEBRA: I think that the motivating factor—we have talked about effects in another show. But I think that there needs to be this huge shift that goes from money and profit being the determining factor about taking actions to having sustaining life to be the sole determining factor.

And we need everybody at every level of life, the individuals, manufacturers, retailers, government, doctors. Everybody needs to be saying, “What can we do to sustain life? And then how do we make money doing that?”

STEVEN GILBERT: We are not doing that when we produce nuclear power, which generates some hazardous wastes. Those hazardous substances in the world are generated in nuclear waste. Plutonium is a nuclear waste as well as cesium and strontium and a whole bunch of other isotopes.

So it’s generating some of those and they don’t know what to do with it. It’s going to be hazardous to future generations. We really need to be focused all the time on what is best for the future generations, for our children and grandchildren.

DEBRA: Yes.

STEVEN GILBERT: And their children.

DEBRA: Yes. Otherwise, we’re not going to have a planet. They are not going to have a planet.

STEVEN GILBERT: They’re not.

DEBRA: I think that probably in our lifetime, you and I, Dr. Gilbert, probably life will be the way it is, the way it is now. I can project that. But I think for our children and grandchildren the world is not going to be the same.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s not. Florida is hugely vulnerable to sea level rises, which is happening. There has been enormous flooding along the coast of the United States and around the world. And this is going to create great destruction in people and really a lot of suffering worldwide.

DEBRA: And there are so many things that we can do about it right now today to have a different future.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah.

DEBRA: Anyway, I want to thank you because we are almost out of time. Another great show you always have great information.

And again, Dr. Gilbert’s website is Toxipedia.org and you can also go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and see all the other shows or listen to all the other shows that Dr. Gilbert has done as well as other shows that have been on, all the shows, all are in the archives. You can listen to every single show that we’ve already done and you are going to find out who’s going to be our next.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

Calcium—Is There Really a Deficiency in America?

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants. Today we’ll be talking about calcium, osteoporosis, boneloss….Should you be taking calcium at all, and if so, how much and in what form? And what happens to your health if you take too much. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Calcium – Is There Really a Deficiency in America?

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld

Date of Broadcast: October 08, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to survive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Wednesday, October 8, 2014. It’s a beautiful day in Clearwater, Florida. Oh, my God, we’re coming into our autumn and our winter where it’s not humid and the days are beautiful. I’m just out looking in my garden. I was clearing out my bed so that I can plant trees because they grow over the winter. It was just beautiful. It was just exactly the right temperature. The reason people live in Florida is the weather like today, which is great.

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist. She prefers to dispense medicinal plants, instead of drugs. And she really knows what she’s doing. Today, we’re going to be talking about calcium, and what types of calcium. We’re going to be talking about osteoporosis, bone loss, all those kinds of things. But before we do that, we’re going to talk about me for a minute.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey! It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. Actually, I wanted to say that I have Pamela on every other Wednesday because she has so much information and so many different things that we can talk about. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and see the list of links to her past shows every other Wednesday. So it’s going to be two weeks and four weeks, and six weeks and eight weeks and we’ll just continue to talk about how we can be healthy by using natural supplements instead of drugs.

I want to say actually so I don’t forget also that the difference between taking drugs and taking the supplement – from Pamela – is that drugs might control your symptoms, but they’re not healing your body. The kinds of things that she gives me and her other clients are things like homeopathic remedies. She’ll tell you about it.

They’re actually healing my body. I can tell that they’re healing my body because the last time we were together, I was talking about how I was sleeping better because I was taking passion flower. And what happened in the last couple of weeks – mid-last week – is that one night, I just fell asleep and before I even thought to take the Passion flower and I slept through the night. I thought, “Okay, the next night, let’s just see if I can just fall asleep.” And for the past week— I’m somebody who just had trouble sleeping, but for the past week, doing all the things that Pamela has been telling me – how long has it been? Like two months or something?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah.

DEBRA: This past week, I have fallen asleep on my own every night and slept for – for the last three nights, I’ve been sleeping eight and a half hours.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s great.

DEBRA: Yeah, all by myself without taking any other supplements or anything. So changes are going on in my body. What I’m most excited about aside from feeling so much better is that people are noticing that I look different. This week, I’ve been getting compliments that I look prettier and younger.

PAMELA SEEFELD:How wonderful is that?!

DEBRA: It’s true!

PAMELA SEEFELD: You deserve it.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. They’re saying, “What are you doing? You look so pretty.”

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah. You know what? It’s your body’s healing. We were looking back at your blood work for eight years that you’ve been going to the regular physician for and you weren’t getting better. And I told you, I pointed out, the numbers, it didn’t change in eight years. I’m like, “This is crazy! We need to get you better so that you don’t need to be on any medicine ever.”

DEBRA: Yeah. And the other thing is I’ve been off my insulin. So it’s been a month or something that I’ve been off my insulin. My blood sugar is the same and even better than it was when I was taking insulin. I’m not taking any other kind of Metaformin or Glucophage or any of these things. I’m only taking what Pamela is giving me, and it just is making a huge difference. I’m using all natural substances.

PAMELA SEEFELD: The homeopathy heals the beta cells of the pancreas. That’s happening for you. That’s why your sugars are coming down and you’re feeling better because the insulin doesn’t actually approach the beta cell.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. So I can tell that healing is going on in my body and my clothes just keep getting looser and I don’t have to be so strict about what I’m eating.

This is a really huge thing because it used to be that I would choose foods that I was eating – well, not that we shouldn’t do this, but I had to be very strict about what I was going to eat because if I ate one wrong thing, I would really pay for it by having a lot of symptoms. And now, if I want to eat a potato or something, I can eat a potato, and nothing happens.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. The homeopathy is balancing your body and your meridian. Yes, it’s really wonderful. I am so happy for you, I really am.

DEBRA: Yes, thank you. I’m happy for you too. It’s not that I want to eat potatoes every day, but I can eat a potato instead of saying, “Never again have potatoes.”

PAMELA SEEFELD: Great.

DEBRA: And what it’s done is it’s starting to open the list of foods that I can eat. And so, it’s giving me more nutrition and more options. I couldn’t eat broccoli. I haven’t tried to eat broccoli yet, but I couldn’t eat broccoli. I mean, something as a whole real food like broccoli, I couldn’t eat – or a potato. And now, I can eat a potato. I’m just so excited…

PAMELA SEEFELD: The cell signaling in your body is much more effective now. We’ve cleaned a lot of the stuff out. So what’s going to happen is it’s just going to be an upward process.

DEBRA: Yes, I’m looking forward to it. I’m enjoying it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m just so happy. I just love what I do, and the chemistry background that I possess and what I prescribe for people and what regiments I decide to write out for them. You know it’s a simple thing. You’re not on a million things.

DEBRA: No, I’m not on the million things. It’s affordable. It costs less than standard medical treatment, a lot less than standard medical treatment and I’m getting better. I’m actually getting better.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Efficacy is my 100% point.

DEBRA: It is! And she said this to me many times. I’ve heard her say that she really is result-oriented and she’s using supplements that are tried and true that she sees on many people. She sees this result over and over again.

And so, just right up front, I want to say that if you’re having some health concerns, if you’re on any kind of prescription or over-the-counter drug and you would like to not be on that drug, if your family or friends or co-workers are having problems in their own drugs that are just controlling your symptoms and maybe not even controlling your symptoms, and they want to get off of them, then all you need to do is just call Pamela because there’s a free consultation.

You can call her, she will talk to you on the phone and she will tell you what to take. You can just buy them from her. It’s affordable. So give your phone number because I just can’t recommend you highly enough.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, you can call me. And I’ll be glad to talk to you on the telephone and go over everything and mail some things out to you if you don’t live here in the Clearwater area. The number here at Botanical Resource Pharmacy is 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: And we’ll give that number throughout the show. You really just want to call her up. You could go to her website, but you really want to call her up.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, please. I would be honored and I would love to help you and your family.

DEBRA: She would, really. I talked with her all the time. She’s here to help. She’s here to help. So today, we’re going to talk about calcium, osteoporosis, bone loss, all those kinds of things. And we’re going to be coming up on a break in about a minute and a half. So let’s just get started. Where do you want to start?

PAMELA SEEFELD: We’ll just talk a little bit about calcium. Most people know what calcium is, where it’s found. It’s an element, a chemical element. It’s in a lot of food. It makes up our bones and teeth.

Most people think of calcium when they’re concerned about osteoporosis and osteopenia and preventing these problems. But really, it works also for muscle contractions and other things too. So there are calcium channels in the muscles that control contraction. So it’s actually really ubiquitous. It’s everywhere in the body.

So what I wanted to talk about today with the calcium is we’re going to talk about some of the myths of calcium deficiency and what really is going on in the United States as far as, “Are we really deficient in calcium?”

DEBRA: Just go ahead and start and I’m going to interrupt you when we need to go to break.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, very good. So we know that the calcium is necessary for bone mineralization, for the teeth and most people focus on that, but what we’re going to talk about is is there really a calcium deficiency in the United States.

So this is what we see. We see all these commercials, “Take your Calcium. Take your Calcium plus D.” What we’re finding is that – this is more of an opinion, but it’s also being substantiated by clinical documentation in the Library of Medicine. They really think, if you look around, that everybody’s deficient in calcium. Here in America, we all eat pretty well. And everything is fortified if you’re eating meat and processed foods. So the notion that everyone is calcium deficient maybe is wrong.

DEBRA: Now, we have to go. So we’ll take a break and we’ll come back and hear all about calcium. So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants instead of drugs. So we’ll be right back to talk more about calcium.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants instead of drugs, and we’re talking about calcium. Just go on from where you were, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, very good. So calcium is important to take. It’s important to have in your food and in your diet, and also as a supplement if need be. But I’m going to explain to you about what’s really happening as far as this whole notion about, “Everyone needs to take lots of calcium.”

You look around, how many women are following their doctor’s recommendation to take calcium and D every day? I see this a lot with my clients. They consistently do that. If they don’t do an adjustment in pH – and I’m going to explain what that is – what happens is it really doesn’t work.

So all these women running around, taking all this calcium and D. If we don’t make it go and facilitate it going to the bone, what happens is they’re taking the supplement, but they’re finding that a lot of these women that are taking so much calcium are actually ending up with osteoporosis because the excess calcium is not really going into the bone. It’s actually just clogging the arteries, which is not what we want.

So we have to direct things into the body. That’s what I do like when we were talking about certain supplements that I give people and homeopathics, sometimes I’ll use even a circulatory enhancer to enhance the circulation in a certain area of the body to bring a particular product there. So it’s all about understanding your body and where things go.

Calcium is a buffer in the bloodstream. So if you eat a lot of meat, a lot of animal products, things that are acidic (we talked about acidic and basic), if your diet is basically mostly acidic food and you’re not doing some kind of a PH adjuster –

It can be as simple as taking a pinch of baking soda and putting it in water every day. I usually don’t recommend it for people because a lot of people have hypertension and other things. It’s not a real accurate way of doing things. I use a product called AlkaLife quite a bit, but there a lot of different pH adjusters. I tried about four different ones myself until I settled on that one. That one has a lot of clinical data behind it.

But when you take a pH adjuster and you make your body more alkaline, it takes the calcium you take, either in the supplement or in food and move it into the bone. So I can always tell when someone comes to me and I’m looking at their CMP, which is their Complete Metabolic Profile with all the electrolytes of their body, and they come with the blood work, I look at it and I’m like, “Your calcium level is 10. It’s really high. Are you eating mostly only meat?”, and they’re like, “Yes, I’m on an Atkins diet.” You can always tell what people are eating by their blood work. I think that’s amazing.

DEBRA: That is amazing. Yes, that is amazing.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m spot on every time. So I tell them, “Look, I’m okay with that. I don’t tell people what to eat. I think you have to eat what you really want to eat and your body is going to tell you what it needs,” but if you don’t do a pH adjuster, these types of individuals that are eating lots of protein, lots of chicken breast – there’s nothing wrong with that. Protein is very, very important – but if they’re not doing a pH adjustment at the same time, they’re really going to end up with brittle bones and osteopenia and osteoporosis regardless if they take calcium or not.

DEBRA: That’s very interesting. One of the things that I want to say right here, because you’ve just been talking about directing things correctly in the body, one of the things that I find so valuable about working with Pamela (and I’m so fortunate to have her right here in Clearwater where I live) is that she really understands how things occur in the body and how the body works

And so it’s not just about, say, reading an article or hearing on the news that you need to take more calcium, she really knows what is needed to make the supplements actually get where they’re supposed to be and how much you need to take and what you need to take with something. And sometimes, there are even foods or whatever or the way you take it and she knows all these things. She has so much experience that when you follow her recommendations, you’re actually going to get a result.

So, it’s not about whether you take calcium or not take calcium. It’s “Do you need the calcium? What type are you taking? What are you taking with it? How are you taking it?” That’s where his expertise comes in. She sells supplements and so do a million other people, but she’s got a way of understanding from her medical background and experience. I’m not sure if medical is the right word – pharmacist background and experience.

It’s like a pharmacist is looking at dose and what’s the right drug and all those kinds of things and she’s been trained in that. But she brings that to the use of natural supplements. Did I get that right?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah! You’re very articulate and you understand because now we’ve been working together, you realized it. Really, the things that I tell people – it’s true, you’re not going to read that in an article.

And I can’t tell you enough times. I even have medical practitioners that are interested in doing natural health and they’re like, “Well, give me some articles to read, so I can learn this.” It’s not always about that. You have to really do a broad variety of reading.

I’m kind of like at the top of the food chain now. I’ve read so much. I spent like three hours a day reading and I go through the medical literature every day that I already know what’s going on. But understanding how cells signal and even understanding (even when we’re talking calcium), there’s a calcium-sensing receptor, they’re all through the body and these receptors affect weight, they affect muscle contractility, they affect whether the calcium is going into the bones or into the teeth or not.

It’s really amazing! You have to understand that things are on a cellular level and there’s really no big blanket statement like, “Okay, let me hand you an article and all of a sudden, you’re going to be an expert on a particular settlement or product.” It just doesn’t work that way. It’s a collaboration of lots of understanding and reading and knowing how the body works.

DEBRA: Yes. And I see that in your work. I absolutely see that in your work. I just want to tell our listeners that a couple of weeks ago, I went to my medical doctor who had given insulin. And I said, “I’m not taking my insulin anymore.”

He said, “What are you doing?”

I said, “I’m taking this homeopathic remedies.”

He said, “Where did you get those?”

I said, “From Pamela Seefeld.”

And he said, “Okay. Just do what she tells you to do.”

This is my MD doctor.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah. He knows, he knows I know what I’m doing. Actually, the product I gave you, that’s not at the health food store. I mean, there are homeopathic products, but they’re only sold from pharmacists and doctors.

The things that I give people, I really respect people’s time and money. I want them to have to pay a minimal amount of money to get a maximum amount of outcome. And it’s really about picking the right things that you know are going to work on the spot. Some of these OTC doses, they’re going to help somebody in your situation. So we need to give you something that actually is formulated by medical doctors.

DEBRA: Yeah. Most of people I think don’t know this because I’ve been in this field for years and years and I didn’t know this, but there’s like a whole other level of natural products that exists for professionals to give under supervision that are not in the natural food store or anywhere. You just can’t go buy them in a store. You have to buy them from somebody who’s trained to use them. And they’re so much more effective.

That’s why it’s so worth it to work with somebody like Pamela – specifically Pamela. I’ve never met anyone else like Pamela. She just has a unique set of abilities and a unique set of products that you can’t just go to the store and buy.

So we’re going to go to the break, and then we’ll come back and talk more about calcium. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. When we come back, we’ll talk more about calcium. Bye. Bye? This is not the end of the show. We’ll be back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld and we’re talking about things that you can do instead of taking drugs by using natural things, natural plants.

I’m always saying medicinal plants, but I now that – and we’ve talked about this on the show –you’re a big fan of fish oils. I don’t want to get off talking about fish oils. What’s the proper thing to say that’s the encompassing terminology for the like?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m a natural product pharmacist. How is that?

DEBRA: Natural product pharmacist. I’m going to write that down, I like that.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, natural product pharmacist. When I go to medical meetings and I speak, I go pharmacognosy consultant, which is plant medicine, but I usually say natural product pharmacist and then they understand, “Okay, we’re not using regular pharmaceuticals and legend drugs. We’re using drugs derived from plants.”

And the interesting part of that when we think about it, these things work like medicine. And they have similar activity and similar receptors except that they’re not prescription and they’re not having all the side effects too. So that’s all about it – its safety, efficacy and outcome.

DEBRA: And also, the word pharmacognosy. ‘Pharma’ is drug and ‘cog’ has to do with information and intelligence. And so, I like to think of these natural substances that Pamela is using as intelligent drugs because it has the intelligence of nature and they come from living things, so they’re mpt synthesized and all that.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Definitely. And they incorporate into the body in a better manner too.

DEBRA: Yeah. They absolutely do. Okay, good. Let’s go on with calcium.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right. Okay, good. So I was talking about my perception (and what is being substantiated now) that calcium, it’s not really a deficiency so much. Sure, there are going to be patients that are deficient, maybe their diet is very poor, but most people are taking calcium either in supplements or they’re getting it from their food.

We know that dark, leafy greens have a lot of calcium. Kale is very high in calcium. Spinach is very high in calcium. And of course, dairy. A lot of people eat a lot of dairy and that’s very high in calcium. That’s what we give to little kids, milk and so forth.

But we need to think about bone mineralization and let’s give them some different examples of some situations. Say, you’re really at risk for osteopenia. Say, you have osteopenia in your family. Your mother had really bad osteoporosis. She’s leaning over. She can’t walk very well. She’s had some vertebral compression, which can happen because the disc, the mineralization and the bones in the back are affected.

What are some things we can do to prevent bone loss? I’m not telling people not to take calcium. I’m saying that if you’re going to take calcium, whether it is in food or in supplements, you really need to shift it into the bones if you’re eating animal products. So that’s the first situation.

This is one example that I use. Sometimes, people get what’s called a bone exostosis. And what that is is an outpocketing of bone like a bone spur. We see this with people, runners get plantar fasciitis and sometimes, people get them in their shoulders (I see quite a lot of that). And there are some interesting things that you can do.

So if you’re taking tons of calcium, it can actually exacerbate or make that worse because you have to direct where you want the calcium deposited, not to a spur. You want it deposited into the big bone. So what I normally recommend if you’re taking calcium and D, there’s a few simple things you can do. You can incorporate something called ipriflavone. An ipriflavone is an isoflavone derivative that actually was shown to stop bone loss. What it does is it stops the cells that tend to chew up bone and throw the calcium back out into the bloodstream. It tends to stop that activity.

So that’s a good easy trick. Ipriflavone is available in a health food store. I use a product called RX Bone. It’s got calcium, it’s got D, and it’s got ipriflavone in it. So that’s one thing you can do.

Say, youhave a bone spur, and you’re concerned because your joint is torn in one particular area and they see a spur, and they’re telling you that they want to do surgery or, “Don’t run anymore.” It’s impeding your activities, correct?

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So what do we do? This is pretty interesting. There are homeopathic products that have an element in there called Hekla Lava. Hekla Lava is from a very specific volcano in Iceland. And what they found is the animals that grazed on this particular volcano have bony exostoses and spurs all over the body. We know that in homeopathy, [inaudible 00:31:05] kind of like vaccine.

So they put Hekla Lava in certain medical products that are homeopathic and you can actually dissolve out the spur or the bone exostosis maybe even in your hands if you have rheumatoid arthritis and the joints are starting to get swollen and big. You can dissolve out the spur, and at the same time build bone mass in other areas that are neglected.

DEBRA: Wow, that’s amazing.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, it works very, very well.

DEBRA: So those spurs are just misdirected calcium.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Both. Both. Both. The foot problem is pretty common because a lot of people like to run. You can see this and it’s very debilitating because people that run, they’re diehard about it, and they don’t want to stop running. They’ll run even with the pain, but it’s not good because it’s obviously causing damage.

Shoulders as well. I’ve seen even some people who had exostoses in the spine, and it was causing a lot of back pain. And this actually will dissolve it.

Andso, Hekla Lava is a great little component in products that can go and direct and help for bony spurs – also too, bony exostoses in feet. Sometimes, people that have trouble with their feet and they have bunions, but there’s actually bone underneath there, I use those to dissolve that out.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, it’s pretty cool.

DEBRA: You have so many really interesting things that I’ve never even heard of.

PAMELA SEEFELD: These are very, very important aspects to taking supplementation because you have to look at the whole body.

If I see someone’s hands and they’re having lots of exostoses of calcium, they come in and they’re taking calcium up the wazoo, I’m like, “Look, you’re making the bones worse there.” What’s happening is the body, due to inflammation, is misdirecting where the calcium is going.

And the new studies are showing – you probably have read this, about how calcium is related obesity. If your calcium level is too low, and it’s not being utilized in the body, it can actually affect your weight. And they’re thinking it’s associated with inflammation in the body. It’s misdirecting the calcium. It makes sense, because when people have really bad inflammation, look at their hands, they’re all deformed.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And that’s what’s happening with the calcium. Because of the inflammation, the calcium senses are not working correctly. And as a result, the calcium is being deposited in the joints in the hands and not in the big bone.

DEBRA: Wow! Just wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: So this is about understanding and saying, “Okay. What do we need to do if I see someone’s hands, they have problems and they’re taking calcium?”, we need to redirect out of the bones in your hand, in the joints, and we need to direct it to your back and your large bones.

Now, I’m going to talk a little bit too about the medicines that they give people for these problems. Let’s say you have osteopenia and you want to prevent it. I told you about the ipriflavone, I told you about the products that have Hekla Lava. There’s a product I use a lot of times called Osteobios, which actually builds bone density. And if you do pH adjustment, that can pretty much reverse where the osteopenia/osteoporosis is taking place.

But the medicines that they used, if you go to the doctor, they use a drug class called bisphosphonate. Some of the drugs are called Actinel and Fosamax. If you’re watching any of the TV ads, they’re talking about all these lawsuits and so forth that are associated with that because what happens is when you take those medicines, they only build the bone around the bone itself; the inside is still hollow.

DEBRA: On that note, we’re going to go to break. We’ll talk about this more when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a natural product pharmacist.

And Pamela, why don’t you give your phone number? Remember, you can call her for a free consultation and she will help choose the correct supplements for you at the right dose for what’s going on in your body. What’s your phone number?

PAMELA SEEFELD: 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Great! We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a natural product pharmacist.

I know we could talk for hours. I know you have so much information about this, but I want to ask a question. I want to make sure I get this thing because we’re on our last segment now. It goes by so fast. Why calcium and vitamin D?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a good question. So calcium, to be incorporated into the bone, there are D-receptors all over the body. These two things are needed at the same time to build the bone density.

So if you’re just having calcium and you don’t have any D in your body. If you’re in Florida, we’re out in the sun a lot. But most people in the rest of the country probably don’t see the sun as frequently as we do. So the D is important.

So here’s another good question. Why are they always saying you have to take magnesium? Okay. Really, magnesium is not needed to bring calcium into bones and for mineralization so much, but a lot of calcium supplements have magnesium because calcium tends to be very constipating. And magnesium really can prevent that side effect pretty effectively.

So a lot of it is tolerance for patients taking it more so than a physiological reason that the magnesium has to be there.

And I tell people too, the only time someone really is going to be low in magnesium – because I work in the hospital too, and we look at people’s bloodwork. People that come into the hospital a lot of times need to have magnesium infusions because it’s low. The only time you’re going to see someone with magnesium that’s low is if they’ve been vomiting a lot or they’ve had a lot of diarrhea. Those are the main reasons why. Or they have lots of fluid loss because of there’s a fistula in the gut or some leaky gut problem. That’s actually a real medical problem. They need a bowel resection or something.

So literally, most people are not going to be necessarily deficient in magnesium, and the magnesium is not necessary for the calcium to go into the bone. What needs the calcium to go into the bone is the pH has to allow the calcium to leave the bloodstream and enter into the bones at a more ready pace.

DEBRA: Wow! That’s just…

PAMELA SEEFELD: So that’s what’s really happening. So we want to change the pH of the body with some alkalizing agent to make the calcium go into the bones. Otherwise, people taking calcium supplements, they’re really not getting the full benefit of the bone density increasing.

DEBRA: That’s just so interesting. You say these things and what I think is, “Oh, that sounds absolutely perfectly right, but yet it’s just so different from what we’re hearing in so many other places.”

While you were talking, I was thinking about things I’ve read about the widespread magnesium deficiency, but you’re looking at blood tests every day and you’re seeing what people’s actual deficiencies are.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. And what we see is that if you’ve had these issues where you’ve been really, really sick with a flu, and like I said, you’ve been vomiting or having diarrhea, magnesium is expected to drop, and those people will have what’s called hypomagnesemia, which is low magnesium. Those are the people you have to be concerned about.

But magnesium is like a two-edged sword. You can take enough of it and it’s really good for the muscles and for the body, but if you take too much, you’re going to end up with diarrhea and you’re going to end up with more fluid loss. You have to be really careful.

Now, I was talking about these drugs that people use. So what’s happened is, the reason why there are lots of lawsuits (and if you watch any kind of TV and they’re always saying, ‘Call 1-800-Bad-Drug,’ or whatever, all these different law firms, when you’re building bone density with these medicines, what’s happening is the density is not going into the bone itself.

So that’s why you’re seeing all these lawsuits for people who are fracturing their femur. They’re fracturing these long bones in their leg. And the reason why is because they have this feeling that, “Okay, I’ve been taking this Actinel or this Fosamax and my bone density is great now,” and then actually, it isn’t because the bone in itself, the outside has more mineralization and is stronger, but the inside is still hollow. It’s really defeating the purpose, and these people are ending up with very painful fractures as a result.

So the things I was talking about are some simple inexpensive solutions. If you’re going to take calcium, you’re going to take vitamin D, you need to do something that directs the calcium into the bone – pH adjustment and maybe even some homeopathic products like I was talking about, the ones that have the Hekla Lava.

The Hekla Lava is going to take the calcium away where it’s been deposited inappropriately and move it to the bones of the body where it needs to go. And that’s what we need to, redirect the calcium from food and from supplements.

DEBRA: Good. Alright! So let’s see what else do we need to talk about. So, should people be taking calcium at all? Is it really necessary or are we getting – I think you might have covered this earlier, but I just want to make sure we get this point.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a good question. So who should be taking calcium? The person that should be taking calcium is a person that has some kind of osteopenia, osteoporosis or is really at risk. We know these things run in. If your mother had osteopenia and osteoporosis and she was a slight lady, then you’re probably going to be at risk for it too.

And bone loss is nothing to take lightly and especially even with men. I think men are really not looked at as being possible candidates for bone loss, they’re overlooked a lot of times because we focus so much on women. Men and women both can end up this way.

And men tend to be more meat consumers. That’s when I see these gentlemen coming with their wife, and I’m looking at them and I’m like, “Look, I’m okay if you want to eat meat for every meal, but you have to realize that you’re going to end up with very frail bones.”

And this is something that the regular doctors just never saw. They’re not really looking at the calcium level and seeing what’s happening with the patient. They’re just basically giving the calcium to the lady, and not to the men.

So calcium is very important. I would say though that if you’re taking calcium with every single meal, and you’re not doing a pH adjustment, you’re really missing the boat, and it’s not going to go into the bone. So the trick is to have calcium and D. And remember, D also works a lot for mental health.

The D levels, in the past, they’d say, “You’re at 20 and that’s a good level.” But now, a lot of the doctors are saying, “No, the data is showing you need to be closer to a hundred.” When you’re taking calcium and D, look at your levels from your blood draw from the doctor and see where the D is.

Most of the times when you’re taking 1000 to 5000 units a day of D, it takes very long time for it to budge. So I even use like 10,000 units a day for maybe a month or two to try to get it up there and then re-test it, and then we see where the person is at.

I think some of the biggest failures of this supplementation is that you’re taking it, but you’re not adjusting the pH, and you’re eating a lot of animal products, and then you’re expecting a certain outcome, and it doesn’t happen.

DEBRA: Or you’re not even taking enough. The other day, I have a drawer where I put supplements that I’m no longer taking because I’ve had at least six or seven years of people telling me different supplements to take. They say, “I’ll take these for right now” and then, you don’t need to take it anymore.” So then, it goes in the drawer.

And interestingly enough, you gave me 10,000 units of vitamin D, 10,000 units in one pill. I had an old bottle with vitamin D, but somebody said, “You don’t need to take vitamin D anymore.” I mean, people that I don’t see any more, I’m talking about here. And I had a bottle that was just 500 IUs…

PAMELA SEEFELD: They saw all these different low strings…

DEBRA: I had to take the whole bottle.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s not going to work. I mean, that’s not bad. I’m very much a realist. I’ve had these women and I really realized that a long time ago that you see, the D to be measured in the bloodstream has to be not sitting on a receptor. There are D-receptors in the brain, there are D-receptors over the body. In the past, we used to think, “Okay, vitamin D, you need it for bone density,” but it does a lot of other things, especially like for the whole immune system, for our hormones, all that stuff.

So what’s happening is the people are taking all these D and I was noticing that they get all excited. They were very, very loyal to it. They were taking about 3000 to 4000 units a day. They get their blood draw back, and they barely budge. The reason why is because you need to saturate all of these receptors with D and have those receptors pretty much be occupied before the blood test comes back to show that it’s elevated. And it takes a long time to do that because there are so many numerous D-receptors in the body.

The body is an amazing place. Let me tell you. When you start really looking at what’s happening, if you think about directing something to where you want it to go, that’s the only way you’re going to get an outcome. And if people are going to spend money and take supplements and want an outcome, you really deserve to have a positive outcome – sub-therapeutic outcomes.

I’ve been a pharmacist for 26 years. I see this through observation and from reading that these people are very disenchanted when taking the supplements when they don’t have a result. You really have to target what you want to do.

DEBRA: Well, it’s not just disenchantment. It’s that the supplements really aren’t doing anything, because they’re not strong enough or the person isn’t taking enough.

I’ve been going to people who have been advising me about supplements for – I think it’s about seven or eight years now. And before that, I would just take something from the health food store. I’m not saying that those are bad products. I mean, right now, I’m taking vitamin C that I buy at my natural food store. It is a whole food organic, vitamin C. I just get it there.

And my phone is ringing, so I’m going to turn it off. There! So, yeah.

Usually, I have my ringer off except that I have a house guest in the other room where the phone rings and you can’t hear it. It’s still ringing. I can hear it, but you can’t hear it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s life. These things happen.

DEBRA: And I was missing phone calls because I couldn’t hear. The door was closed and I couldn’t hear. Anyway, that’s what’s going on with the phone.

But what I wanted to say particularly since we only have one minute left is that make sure when you go to the doctor that you ask them to test for things like vitamin D because it’s not part of the standard blood test.

I had Pamela give me a list of all the blood tests that would be good, that are just standard baseline blood tests. I took them to my MD and I said, “I want this on my blood test,” and he wrote it in the request to the lab.

Anyway Pamela, once again, excellent, excellent information. I’m just so excited. Please give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. If anyone has any particular questions about the supplements or medications, please give me a call. I would be very happy to help you. It’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Great. And two weeks from now, on Wednesday, we’re going to have Pamela on again, and you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to her past shows. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Thank you.

DEBRA: Thank you.

Slow Flowers

A lovely online directory to help you find florists, studio designers, wedding and event planners, supermarket flower departments and flower farmers who are committed to using American grown flowers. Like “slow food,” slow flowers are locally grown and often organic (though not always). These florists guarantee the origin of the flowers they use.

Listen to my interviews with Debra Prinzing, Founder and Creative Director of Slowflowers.com

Visit Website

IKEA and flame retardants

Question from Lisa

I contacted IKEA about an article I read but I don’t fully know what to make of the response. I read an article about IKEA intending to phase out flame retardants by 2010. Did this happen? What were they replaced with? Do you have any furniture without polyurethane foam, if so what do they contain?

They Responded:

Hello Lisa,

Thank you for taking the time to write us.

All mattresses sold in the US have to meet regulatory fire retardant standards. IKEA uses organic phosphorous/nitrogen containing compounds in its flame retardants for most of our mattress product range and phased out all chlorinated tris flame retardants from our mattresses in 2010. IKEA also banned the use of the brominated flame retardant PBDE in 1998. None of our mattresses contain this chemical.

However, our MORGONGAVA and SULTAN HEGGEDAL natural material spring mattress does not contain any flame retardants. This mattress is manufactured using natural wool wadding, which allows it to exceed all regulatory flame retardant standards and be fully compliant with California TB117.

Also, all mattresses are tested for chemicals to ensure that they meet the strictest standards for the countries in which they are sold. This includes our TVOC (Total Volatile Organic Compounds) test on all finished products to insure that there are no harmful emissions or off-gassing.

Each state does have its own “fire rating” regarding flame retardants. There is a law label attached to each of our upholstery products for you to compare. In seating furniture and cushions the foam is treated with chemical flame retardant (phosphate ester basis) in order to comply with North American fire protection requirements and TB117.

California Technical Bulletin 117, a mandatory standard, is both an open flame test and a smoldering cigarette test for the component materials used to make residential upholstered furniture which is to be sold in the state of California. In this test, each upholstery component except the covering fabric is time exposed to either an open flame or a smoldering cigarette in a defined test chamber, and the propagation of the open flame or the cigarette char length is measured to a specific specification criteria contained in Technical Bulletin 117. All upholstered furniture components except frames must comply with this test procedure and criteria.

Today, all IKEA furniture complies with existing regulatory standards in the US, including California TB117. IKEA welcomes the new TB117-2013, which will allow us to manufacture upholstery products that meet the fire safety standard without the addition of chemical flame retardants.

As with any change in legislation or standards concerning our range, IKEA conducts evaluation, adjustments and testing of our products according to new requirements. Affected IKEA products will be in compliance with the requirements in the new California TB117-2013 Standard on January 1st 2015 at the latest.

Further details regarding IKEA’s commitment to product safety can be explored at the following online link:
www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/about_ikea/our_responsibility/
products_and_materials/ikea_and_reach.html

All IKEA upholstery materials pass these fire safety standards, but these are not the same as commercial standards. Commercial standards are set by BIFMA (Business Industry Furniture Manufacture Association).

We do hope this information has been helpful, and we thank you for your inquiry.

Kind Regards,

Kelly

IKEA Customer Care
IKEA US Contact Center
Email: UScustomercare259@ikea.com

Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message contains confidential information. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not copy, use, or distribute this information. If you have received this message in error, please advise IKEA Customer Care immediately.

Is it just me or did they not directly answer my question? Can you make sense of this. Are they saying that they understand they no longer have to use fire retardants but they will continue? Maybe I am just tired and distracted but it seems odd language and not a direction address of the question.

Thank you for your time.

Debra’s Answer

I can see how this can be confusing.

OK. Here are your questions and I will pull out their answers and paste them in.

* I read an article about IKEA intending to phase out flame retardants by 2010. Did this happen?

“IKEA…phased out all chlorinated tris flame retardants from our mattresses in 2010. IKEA also banned the use of the brominated flame retardant PBDE in 1998.”


* What were they replaced with?

“IKEA uses organic phosphorous/nitrogen containing compounds in its flame retardants for most of our mattress product range.”

* Do you have any furniture without polyurethane foam, if so what do they contain?

They didn’t answer this question.

Add Comment

Wonderbag Non-Electric Portable Slow Cooker

Question from Jenny

Hi Debra,

We have been looking for a slow cooker for a long time and have not found any solutions as there seems to be issues with the paint used in crock pots.

I learned about the wonderbag non electric portable slow cooker on amazon and love the idea that the purchase might help someone in need. And that we can use a pot we already have and not use electricity for the slow cooking. 

Before I put this on our Christmas wish list for a couple family members who asks what we are hoping for . . .. . I wanted to ensure there are no health issues with the foam used in the product.

Under the Q&A section on the web page of the product (middle of page) it says this:

Q: I want to know EXACTLY what the insulation is made of. “Foam” could be almost anything: foam rubber? what’s in this thing and is it recyclable?

A:Wonderbag obtains repurposed foam remnants from furniture factories near our manufacturing facilities. We take these larger foam pieces and break them into smaller pieces (chips) to fill the inside of the Wonderbag. We feel great about it because this material would otherwise end up in a landfill.

The Wonderbag consists of an inner layer of insulation containing recycled polystyrene balls, with an outer, draw-string covering of poly-cotton textiles. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonderbag

Debra’s Answer

I am concerned about toxics in both the foam and the cover.

Poly cotton is usually treated with a formaldehyde finish and I have not reason to believe this one isn’t.

Recycled foam is most certainly polyurethane foam and most likely contains fire retardants if it’s from furniture manufacture.

These are questions you might want to ask the company.

Let me know what their answers are, if you do ask.

This idea of cooking in an insulated pouch is an old one. There is nothing new here in the design.

I think it’s a GREAT idea!

Here are some links I found with DIY instructions for this technology.

DIY instructions for a Wonderbag www.iwillprepare.com/cooking_files/Wonder_Box.htm

www.instructables.com/id/hay-box-cooker

foodstorageandsurvival.com/building-a-wonderbox-style-insulated-cooking-box

nakazora.wordpress.com/tag/solar-box-cooker

This one has you wrap the pot in towels or blankets rimstar.org/efficiency_conservation/heat_retention_cooking.htm

See, the wonderbag is a great idea. It would be great if someone made them from less toxic materials.

Add Comment

Lead in Glass Dishes?

Question from Jen M

Looking for info on Anchor Hocking glassware, I wonder if you have any info in their safety level as far as lead, etc. I want to purchase their plain glass dishes and need to find out! Thanks

Debra’s Answer

From all the research I’ve done on the manufacture of glass, I’ve never seen lead used as a standard ingredient in clear glass.

EXCEPT to make lead crystal. Lead crystal is very expensive, labeled that it contains lead, and is not intended for eating or drinking. It would also have a Proposition 65 warning label from the State of California.

It is highly unlikely that any clear glass contains lead. I’ve never seen any tests that show lead in clear glass.

Call them and ask. You can always call manufacturers and ask about their products.

Add Comment

Are These Barrettes Safe?

Question from Jenny

Hi Debra,

We recently found some barrettes on line for my daughter. After they came in the mail I found out they were made in Malaysia. They are simple clip barrettes that have white paint on them. Is there any way I can ensure they are safe?

Thank you,

Jenny

Debra’s Answer

I would say they are probably fine. There may be heavy metals in the paint, but there’s no way for you to know.

If you are concerned, don’t use them.

If you want to use them, know that they are a very tiny exposure in comparison to other things you should be concerned about, like fluoride in tap water and pesticides in food, and formaldehyde in bedsheets.

Add Comment

IntelliBED mattress

Question from TA

Are you familiar with the IntelliBed mattresses? 

Here is their website:
www.intellibed.com

Sounds interesting. The video gives more detail about the nature of the intelliGEL than I have found (so far) on their website.

I am interested in finding a mattress for my toddler which will last throughout the childhood and teenage years. I’m aware of Naturepedic, Savvy Rest, etc. Now I’m wondering about this one.

Debra’s Answer

I took a look at their website and chatted with them. Interesting slight of hand marketing.

They talk about toxic foam and their “foam free sleep surfaces“, yet the core of the mattress contains “a small amount of high density foam” which is used “to support the gel in place.”

The “gel” is not a jellylike substance (that’s the definition of gel), but is dry, so it doesn’t need a bag to hold it in place.

The gel is made from food grade mineral oil, which is “completely safe and has been approved to use in baby bottle nipples.”

Mineral oil is highly refined straight petroleum.

Of course, all of this is wrapped in organic cotton, thus the “foam free sleep surface.”

I just don’t see the point. I’m very happy with my 100% wool mattress. If cotton is too hard, wrap it around wool, or springs.

All that said, I doubt that there would be much toxic exposure, if any, from these materials being in the core, but if you want a all-natural mattress, this isn’t it.

debra
what is the gel made from?
Chat started
Cameron joined the chat
Cameron
Hi Debra!
Thank you for visiting intelliBED, I’ll be happy to explain the gel
We use a food grade mineral oil to manufacture the gel. It is completely safe, and has actually been approved to use in baby bottle nipples because of it’s nature
May I ask how you heard about intelliBED?
debra
word of mouth
is the gel encased in plastic? If so, what type?
Cameron
The gel is held in place in the mattress by a small amount of high density foam.
Unlike other mattress companies, we do not rely on foam to support or comfort your body, but we do use foam to support the gel in place
debra
so the gel is infused into the foam?
Cameron
No the gel is not infused in to the foam, but we encase the gel in the center of the bed to avoid the gel moving around inside of the mattress
The gel itself is very pure. We do not infuse it in to the foam, or with any other materials
debra
OK but is the gel then in a container, like a bag, then wrapped with foam?
Cameron
No, it’s a dried gel so it does not have to be contained
debra
OK that’s what I wasn’t understanding. “Gel” is by definition a jellylike substane
OK that’s all I needed to know
Cameron
If you have any other questions, or would like more information; feel free to reach out to me

Add Comment

toxic carpeting

Question from Karen

What you have been saying for ages is finally being recognized by others –
articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/10/01/carpet-installation.aspx?e_cid=20141001Z1_DNL_art_2&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content
=art2&utm_campaign=20141001Z1&et_cid=DM56854&et_rid=677700060

Debra’s Answer

Thank you. I first wrote about toxic carpeting in 1984. I think I may have been the first to do so.

Add Comment

toothpaste alternatives

Question from Barb

I am curious, you said that you don’t use toothpaste, what do you use? I have been using baking soda mixed with coconut oil. Is that too harsh?

Thank you for your time.

Debra’s Answer

What you’re using sounds great to me.

I am always trying various tooth products, mostly tooth powders, different brands. I like tooth powder better because the ingredients are simpler and usually more natural.

Add Comment

Child’s Beka Deluxe Easel

Question from Melissa

Hi Debra,

I have been searching for a safe easel for my 3 and 5 year old daughters, a difficult task as most children’s easels seem to be “wooden.” I found the Beka easel, which was advertised as solid hardwood made in the USA. When the new easel arrived, I was surprised to see that the chalkboard surface (i.e., one side of the easel), the bottom of the wood paint trays and center portion of the easel appeared to be made of something other than solid wood.

I called Beka and was told that these parts are made of a fiberboard which is a tempered hardboard made in the USA (meaning only the frame of the easel is sold wood). The person I spoke with was very helpful but could not give me any more information about the composition of the non-wood parts. Should I be concerned about off-gassing/formalehyde with these parts or do you think they are safe? If necessary, I can pay $40 to replace one of the parts with a metal board and apply something to seal the other parts – but I certainly don’t want to do all of this if it’s not necessary.

Thank you very much,

Melissa

Debra’s Answer

Tempered hardboard is an engineered wood product, more commonly called Masonite. It’s been around since the 1920’s and is not toxic.

Unlike the more modern fiberboards that are held together with toxic resins, Masonite™ is made by coating wood fibers with linseed oil and pressing them together at high temperatures.

Some people who are individually sensitive to wood or linseed oil may react to it, but it contains no toxic ingredients.

No off-gassing of formaldehyde here.

Add Comment

Simmons Beautyrest Latex Pillows

Question from chris

I know that simmons products are not usually safe (as they have chemicals in them). But they advertise a latex pillow that I am wondering if it is safe. It is made with Talalay latex. This is the website I am looking at:
www.absolutecomfortonsale.com/Simmons-beautyrest-latex-pillow.htm

thanks.

Debra’s Answer

First, let me just suggest that you shop on Debra’s List to find products that are truly natural and toxic free. You can find many natural pillows on the Beds & Bedding page of Debra’s List.

Now, FYI about choosing latex pillows…

First, you want 100% natural latex and even better, GOLS certified organic latex.

This description clearly says it’s “blended latex” which means it’s part natural and part petrochemical, like the rubber tires are made from. I don’t know what “authentic Talalay latex foam” is. Authentic?

This description says to me the latex is not organic and is cut with toxic petroleum-based rubber.

I can’t recommend this pillow.

Add Comment

glue or adhesive for orthotic covers

Question from judy

I’m having orthotics made at a new place. I know that some of the coverings and adhesives used with cork orthotics are very toxic and others have been fine for me with some outgassing.

What types do you suggest to get fabric coverings to adhere?

Debra’s Answer

I don’t have any experience at all with making orthotics.

Readers, any suggestions for this?

Add Comment

Nourishing Broth: An Old-Fashioned Remedy for the Modern World

Nourishing Broth My guests today are  Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD, co-authors of the new book Nourishing Broth: An Old-Fashioned Remedy for the Modern World. You’ve probably heard a grandmother say that chicken soup will cure whatever ails you. Sally and Kaayla show just how true this is. This excellent book gives all the scientific background about how broth made from bones is necessary for good health, then gives recipes for bone broths of all kinds plus how to use them in cooking. Your kitchen will never be the same. www.nourishingbroth.com

nourishing-traditions-babySally Fallon Morell is author of the bestselling cookbook Nourishing Traditions and The Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby and Child Care. She is the founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation. Sally is a journalist, chef, nutrition researcher, homemaker, and community activist. Her lifelong interest in the subject of nutrition began in the early 1970s when she read Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Weston A. Price. Called the “Isaac Newton of Nutrition,” Price traveled the world over studying healthy primitive populations and their diets. The unforgettable photographs contained in his book document the Nourishing-Traditions-largebeautiful facial structure and superb physiques of isolated groups consuming only whole, natural foods. Price noted that all of these diets contained a source of good quality animal fat, which provided numerous factors necessary for the full expression of our genetic potential and optimum health. Ms. Morell applied the principles of the Price research to the feeding of her own children, and proved for herself that a diet rich in animal fats, and containing the protective factors in old fashioned foodstuffs like cod liver oil, liver and eggs, make for sturdy cheerful children with a high immunity to illness. And since she has been educating the world on how to enjoy this diet deliciously. www.westonaprice.org

Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD is the Vice President of the Weston A. Price Foundation, on the Board of Directors of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, and received the Weston A. Price Foundation’s Integrity in Science Award in 2005. Kaayla has been a guest on The Dr.Oz Show, PBS Healing Quest, NPR’s People’s Pharmacy, and many other shows. She is the author of The Whole Soy Story: The Dark Side of America’s Favorite Health Food – endorsed by leading health experts, including Drs Joseph Mercola, Larry Dossey, Kilmer S. McCully, Russell Blaylock and Doris J. Rapp.  Kaayla is known as The Naughty Nutritionist™ because of her ability to outrageously and humorously debunk nutritional myths.  www.drkaayladaniel.com.

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Nourishing Broth: An Old-Fashioned Remedy for the Modern World

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla T. Daniel, PhD

Date of Broadcast: November 25, 2014 (September 20, 2013)

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Tuesday, September 30th 2013. Here in Clearwater, Florida, we’re having a beautiful, early autumn day. I mean, here, I know some of you in the northern parts of the world are already having nice, crisp autumn days. But here, we’re just very happy that it’s not 90° and it can be 80 during the day. That’s an autumn day to me.

I’m already feeling like I want to eat soup. I don’t make soup all the time, but when it starts getting to be autumn, I go back into making my own chicken broth mode. I made chicken broth for the first time this year this past week. And that’s what we’re going to be talking about today, soup – but not just soup out of the can. We’re going to be talking about the old tradition of making broth from bones and the amazing health benefits that can come from that.

The occasion for discussing this is a new book called Nourishing Broth by Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel. Both of them have been on the show before. They have each written wonderful books themselves and have now joined to talk about broth.

Many of you I’m sure know Sally because she’s the author of Nourishing Traditions, which has changed the way we eat. I think it’s one of those books that just has had such a widespread influence whether people know it or not. There’s been such a change in getting back to real foods and that really started with Sally writing this book as far as I can tell.

She’s also the founder of the Weston A Price Foundation. She’s a journalist, chef, nutrition researcher, homemaker, community activist. And she has just done so much, I can’t even tell you.

Kaayla Daniel PhD, she’s the vice president of the Weston Price Foundation. She’s on the board of directors of Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund and received the Weston A Price Foundation ‘Integrity in Science’ award in 2005. She’s the author of The Whole Soy Story, which I have been recommending over and over and over again ever since it first came out because she really tells you why soy is not a health food.

And so if you’re eating all kinds of soy protein bars, soy burgers and soy this and soy that, I suggest you take a look at this book, The Whole Soy Story. I know for myself it made a big difference for me to stop eating soy. It was completely messing up the hormones in my body.

I was doing things like taking thyroid supplement and then my doctor would say, “I’m giving you this supplement. Why is it…? Are you not taking it?” It was because I was at the time taking my thyroid supplements followed by a soy protein bar for breakfast. So soy is a sneaky thing and it’s something that you need to know about.

But now, we’re going to talk about soup. Hi, Sally and Kaayla.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: How are you?

DEBRA: Good, how are you?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Fine, fine.

DEBRA: Okay! Kaayla, are you there?

KAAYLA DANIEL: I am here.

DEBRA: Okay, good. So good, we’ve got both of you. Well, I can’t say enough good things about Nourishing Broth because not only is it a cookbook, but it’s also a book about the subject of nutrition and how broth when it’s made in the proper way and eaten on a regular basis be the foundation of a whole new level of health.

So the first question I want to ask you – and I’ll ask you, Sally. I made brought because I know the way that I make broth, it’s just the way I make broth. And I know that you have recipes. You’ve talked about this in Nourishing Tradition. But I was wondering if there is a specific way to make broth, a specific technique that I should be rethinking what I do to make the broth that I make to be more nourishing?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Well, thank you, Debra. Well, of course, the more gelatinous, the thicker that broth gets when you chill it down, the better it is for you, the more of this wonderful cartilage components it will have in it. So yes, you want to know the techniques to make a gelatinous broth.

I think there’s two basic ones. One is making sure you have enough bones in that pot. I like to make sure the water comes up to the top of the bones. In other words, that’s the ratio. So for example, if you fill up a slow cooker to the top with bones, chicken bones usually, then you would add your water and it comes just up to the top of the bone. So that’s one thing, having a high bone to water ratio.

And I think the other thing is the right kind of bones. You want bones with cartilage in them. Chicken bones have a lot of cartilage. We like to recommend that you use the head and feet if you can. Another great source of cartilage to make your broth thick is the pig’s foot or split pig’s foot. Most people can buy these at the supermarket. So if you can’t get heads and feet of chicken, I recommend putting one of those in your chicken broth.

And then if you’re making broth with beef, beef bones, you want those knuckles or the tailbones or you see that white cartilage. So you don’t just want bones, you want the cartilage as well. That will melt into the water as you make your broth and give you that gelatin, which is what you’re aiming for.

DEBRA: Well, I can say that my chicken broth is quite gelatinous. What I do is that I use a lot of bones, chicken bones (organic chicken bones), I put in my carrots and onions and celery and garlic. And then I cook it for a very long time and I strain it out and put it in the refrigerator, so that I can skim the fat…

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Off the top, yes.

DEBRA: …off the top. And it’s like a bowl of jello. It’s really gelatinous.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right, yes. Congratulations.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. Well, I did read Nourishing Traditions. I did read every word of Nourishing Traditions.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: But if it doesn’t get as thick as a bowl of jello, as gelatin-like as a bowl of jello, I still tell people, “Don’t worry about it” because it still has got some good stuff in there and it’s still very good for you even if you don’t have the perfect gel when you finish.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. I will also say that I live in Florida and I have banana trees in my backyard. They came with the house. And so we just got into the habit of taking the bones and the leftover vegetables after we’ve strained off the broth and just dumping them at the roots of the banana trees and our banana trees are so well-fed. They love it! They love it! So I think chicken soup is…

SALLY FALLON MORELL: [inaudible 00:08:19]

DEBRA: Yeah. I think every living thing loves chicken broth. So this cookbook is being talked about the sequel to Nourishing Traditions. Why did you focus on broth?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: That’s me or Kaayla?

DEBRA: Either one of you.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Yeah, I think Kaayla would be a good one to answer this.

DEBRA: Okay.

KAAYLA DANIEL: Well, I think we see broth as the foundation of a good diet. If you’re going to be eating meat, which we certainly recommend, a lot of soups and stews are a very nourishing way to do that. It’s also an economical way because one of the biggest concerns a lot of people have is how do you afford high-quality pastured meats, et cetera. So eating more soup and stews with a low-cost cut can be very helpful.

And I think there was just a public cry for more information about broth and we had to just respond to that.

DEBRA: I think that soup is universally loved. I have a friend and if you ask him what does he want to eat, he would rather eat soup than chocolate cake or anything that you would think that somebody would want to eat as their favorite food.

And I think I know for myself that when I really eat a nourishing soup like making my own broth – and I’ll tell you that once I started doing it, I just will never go back to anything out of a can or a box because it tastes so much better and it also feels so much better in my body. It’s just having that comforting feeling, but also a nourishing feeling. I think it’s perfect that you’re focusing on broth because it has so, so, so many benefits.

So we need to go to break. But when we come back, Sally, let’s talk about what beginners need to know. I know I’m a seasoned broth maker, but I’m sure many in our audience are opening cans and boxes that might even say ‘organic’. Let’s talk about what they need to know and maybe why you want to make it yourself.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Today, my guests are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel. We’re talking about making your own chicken soup and other kinds of broth and how that is healthy for you. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel, PhD. We’re talking about their new book, Nourishing Broth.

So Sally, why should people make their own broth and not just buy it in a can or a box.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right! In the book, we talked about all the components of broth – the special amino acids, all the components of cartilage that your body uses to build cartilage in the body. All these are there in broth that you make yourself with bones.

When you buy soup or bouillon cubes or powdered soup or canned soup or whatever, there’s no broth in there. They are using flavorings to give you the taste of broth, but there’s none of the health benefits there. In fact, there could be some health detriments if you are sensitive to MSG and a lot of these flavorings.

I wanted to say that when you eat soup, you probably don’t want that chocolate cake. Broth is so satisfying. And one of the things broth can do is raise dopamine, make you feel good. That’s what chocolate does also, but broth is a much more nutritious way of doing that.

DEBRA: So what does a beginner need to know about making broth, somebody who just has never made it before?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Again, I would say to just start saving up bones or buy some backs or necks in the market and put them in a stock pot or a slow cooker. You put a little bit of vinegar in there to bring out the minerals into the broth and you fill it with some good water. You can add as many vegetables as you want. The fundamental one would be a chopped up onion. But a lot of people add carrots, celery, parsley, garlic and so forth. but just put in there what you have and what you want to put in.

And then you bring it to a slow simmer. You bring it slowly to a simmer, I should say. Let it slowly simmer anywhere from four to 24 hours.
DEBRA: Mm-hmmm… I usually simmer it about six or eight hours.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: And that’s just fine for chicken broth, yes.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah, yeah. So Kaayla, in the book, there’s a number of different kinds of broths. You have chicken broth and beef broth, fish broth and a number of different things. Which one has the most healing power?

KAAYLA DANIEL: I like to say whatever broth you actually make and eat because they’re all good. I recommend a variety because each of them has different percentages of all these healing components.

For example, if you’re making a chicken broth from a carcass of a chicken, you’re going to have the skin, you’re going to have the cartilage, you’re going to have the bones. But a chicken broth is not going to have as much marrow because chicken bone is like any bird bone, they’re light and not much marrow.

But you’re going to get a whole lot of marrow, for example, if you’re using lamb or beef [inaudible 00:16:55] bone – rich probes of marrow in there. So it’s really going to depend on which bones you’re using. You’re more likely to get, say, iodine and thyroid benefits from little dried fish. So they’re all good.

We get a lot of questions about what exact bones we should use for perfect broth and I tell people to relax, just use enough of them and do a variety and it’s all good.

DEBRA: Good! Well, I occasionally will make beef bones. I think it’s more difficult – I don’t know why – to make beef soft than it is for chicken bones. I eat a lot of chicken. I know a lot of people buy just chicken breast, just the meat of the chicken without buying the bones. But I always buy the whole chicken and I always makes roast chicken. It’s very unusual. I have to be really busy or some reason why I can’t make a whole chicken in order for me to quickly buy chicken breast and just make that, just be able to have some fast chicken.

And then I always have this steady stream of chicken bones. I always save them. Sometimes, if I don’t make the chicken broth soon enough, my freezer gets full of all these chicken bones.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: I know. It looks kind of scary in there, I have to admit.

DEBRA: They do, they do. But I never make one chicken. I always wait until I have the bones of two chickens. The other day, I made three chickens. It’s just so easy. I just want to make sure that people understand that this is not a big, drawn out process. You just save the bones, you throw them in a pot. You put the water in, you put whatever else you want to put in there (vegetables, whole grain). And then it just sits on the back of a stove while you’re doing other things. I fortunately work at home, so I can do that kind of thing or you can put it on a slow cooker and you go off to work.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Yes, slow cookers are great, yeah.

DEBRA: Yeah, it really is. The prep time is only the time it takes you to chop the vegetables and put the bones in a pot and then it just sits there and it does this thing. You open the pot and you have this super, super nourishing – it’s not a big deal to do it yourself. And once you do it, it just is amazing. It’s amazing.

KAAYLA DANIEL: I think people get too worried about making the perfect gourmet soup and a lot of people are intimidated (especially the younger generation growing up on everything processed and packaged and fast). But broth really is the original fast food. And once we have a huge [inaudible 00:19:48], it goes very, very quickly and you can always have nourishing food ready for yourself.

DEBRA: You can! And another thing that I do, I make it and often, I’ll make more than I can eat. At one point, I had a problem with making it and not being able to eat it as fast before it would then go bad. And so then, I started just putting serving size containers in the freezers. And so you can just take it out like a can of soup (except instead of having a can and all those additives and the BPA from the can and all of that stuff). You’ve got your own chicken stock and then you can make it into any kind of soup that you want.

So give us a tip. We’re coming up on break. So Sally, give us a tip of a quick soup that you can make if you just got your chicken broth on hand.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Well, the quickest thing you can do is pick off all the meat from the bones, chop it up and put it in your broth, a little bit of rice and cook that some more [inaudible 00:20:53]. And then maybe a can of tomatoes and salt and pepper. That’s a real easy recipe to do.

DEBRA: That sounds really good to me. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel, authors of Nourishing Broth, a brand new book. You can go to their website for the book. It’s NourishingBroth.com. You can order it there and read all the great comments from everybody telling what a wonderful book it is. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel, authors of the new book, Nourishing Broth.

So I want to give another tip about making soup. If you’ve got the chicken stock or the beef stock or whatever kind of stock you have broth on hand, I always try to make a little bit more of any dinner that I’m making so that I have leftovers. A really easy thing to do is just chop up those leftovers and throw them in the chicken broth and you instantly have soup. That’s my tip for this segment.

So you said earlier, Sally about picking the meat off the bones. I just wanted to ask you do you cook the whole chicken with the meat on it because what I do is I roast the chicken, I pull out the meat out of it and eat it and then I take the bones that have bits of meat on it. In my case, I only like to eat white meat, not dark meat. That’s just been my preference since I was a child. So the white meat, I just eat as roast chicken. And then the legs and the thighs go into the soup pot. So do you actually cook the whole bird or do you just use the bones?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Well, I’ve done it both ways. In fact, when I was cooking for a large family. Usually, on Thursday, I put two chickens in a pot and cook to those. And then all of that chicken meat went to make tacos or chicken salad or burritos or chicken a la king or something for the weekends. So we had plenty of food for the weekend.

And then as a bonus, I had all these broth. The leftover bones from picking the meat off the chickens could go back in and make more broth.

Today, I’m only cooking for myself and my husband. And so I usually do a roast chicken that we eat over several days. Then I save the bones. As I say, they look kind of scary in those ziplock bags in the freezer. But when I have enough to fill up the slow cooker, then I make my broth. You can do it both ways.

And one thing about cooking the whole chicken is you are cooking the skin. We’ve heard so much about skinless chicken breast, we should only skin the chicken breast, but the skin is very nutritious. The amino acids in the skin balance the amino acids in broth to give you a real nice balance of what you need.

DEBRA: Oh, yeah.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: And there’s a lot of gelatin in the skin. There’s a lot of cartilage in the skin. So when you do cook the whole chicken, you’re cooking the skin and getting all of the components of skin in your broth.

DEBRA: Well, I have to admit that when I roast my chicken, the first thing that happens when I take it out of the oven is I rip that crispy skin right off and put it straight in my mouth.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right, right. Yes, same with us. So when you are doing chicken that way, you have the bones left over, but there’s never any skin left over, I can tell you.

DEBRA: No skin whatsoever. Also, you commented about putting in the feet and the head. I remember the first time I had a whole chicken. This is many years ago. I opened the package.i was used to chicken breast, boneless/skinless. And then also, earlier, before they had boneless/skinless, I used to have chicken breast on the bones.

But I decided one day that I was going to get a whole chicken. And where I was living, that was something that was possible. I opened the packaged. I mean, just to see the feet and the head, it was very scary. It was very scary because you don’t think it’s an animal. And then, you put it in the pot and the feet are sticking out and it’s got little fingernails on it, on the toes.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right. I used to hang those over the edge of the pot, so my kids could see it, yeah.

DEBRA: Yeah. But I have to tell you that once I got over that, putting chicken feet in your soup is absolutely the thing to do. And where I was living at the time, there was a place where I could buy chickens with the feet on them. And then I could also buy just feet by themselves because the chickens were delivered with feet to the store. And so the butcher in the store would cut off the feet for those who didn’t want them. And so I could buy all the – they were just given to me.

But then they stopped delivering them. The delivery actually came with the chicken without the feet and I couldn’t get chicken feet anymore.

And so do you have some suggestions on how people can get chicken feet or anything you want to say about chicken feet, Kaayla?

KAAYLA DANIEL: I get my chicken feet from an ethnic market here in Albuquerque. They usually come frozen. They also have the gizzards and some of the other things that I like to include in my soup. Basically, a whole lot of the things that some of us want, but the average consumer is not going to buy. I usually buy a whole lot of chicken feet and they are frozen. I heat them in a freezer.

My method of cooking is usually on a Sunday, I will roast a chicken. There will be a lot of gelatin underneath the chicken that we’ll eat right then and there. And of course, we’ve eaten off most of the skin as well. So I will then, the second day or third day, I’ll probably take off say the breast milk because we usually go for the drumstick the first day. So I’ll take off the breast meat and I’ll make something like a chicken curry and that will be enough. It’s sauced with say coconut milk and some broth and some other ingredients.

So I’ll have my carcass. And then that does go into the slow cooker. But because I’ve already got my gelatin because it came off the roast chicken, I’m just going to get a good gelatinous broth unless I add a few other things. And what I’m going to add is chicken feet.

DEBRA: Oh, good. Yeah, yeah. The chicken feet really make a difference in the gelatinousness of it and also the flavor. It really makes a difference. I can tell if chicken stock has been made with chicken feet. It’s a huge difference.

KAAYLA DANIEL: It makes a huge difference. And then I give my dog the very soft chicken feet. Her skin, her hair fur is just amazingly healthy.

DEBRA: Well, so we’ve all heard all the grandmothers say that you should eat chicken soup and that’s the best thing for you and it’ll cure anything. Sally, is it true that broth can heal or is that an old wive’s tale.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: It’s not an old wive’s tale. It’s one of these traditions about food that’s totally validated by the science. And that’s what I love about this book. It’s really Kaayla who has put all the science together for us and it is absolutely fascinating.

One of the things I learned that I didn’t know was that we have cartilage all over the body, not just in our bones. We have cartilage in our eyes. We have cartilage in our organs, in our skin and lining the intestinal tract of the gut. We have cartilage in all that needs to be nourished and kept good and healthy and robust. And that’s what broth does.

So we can expect to see beautiful, healthy skin in people who eat broth, strong, flexible bones, good, strong digestion. Maybe we could even say good eyesight or healthy eyes. So there’s no part of the body that broth does not nourish.

DEBRA: Amazing! So we need to go to break again. But when we come back, Kaayla, I would like you to tell us about the science that supports broth for healing, how far that goes back, how long we’ve known this. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniels, authors of Nourishing Broth. You can learn more about their book at NourishingBroth.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Sally Fallon Morell and Kaayla Daniel, authors of the new book, Nourishing Broth. You can go to their website at NourishingBroth.com. You also probably want to go to the Weston A Price Foundation website, which is WestonAPrice.org, which has an amazing amount of information about all kinds of aspects of real food.

And if you become a member, you can become part of a local chapter and the people in that chapter will help you find the best quality food that exists in your local area. You can go straight to the farmer’s and get raw milk and pastured chickens and all kinds of wonderful things. So if you want the best information that exists about food, go to WestonAPrice.org and become a member.

So over the break, I was thinking about how economical it is to make broth because here, you have something that you’re going to – literally, we’re just throwing away the bones. They have no value. You put them in water and boil them and you’ve got all these nutrition. So people throw away the bones, throw away all that nutrition and then they go spend money on buying supplements.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Yeah.

DEBRA: And in times past before we had an industrial society, what people would do is get their nutrition, far superior nutrition than we have today from actual food.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Yes, with less meat because with broth, you don’t need as much protein. Broth is a protein sparer. I like to talk about how you can get four meals for a family of four from one chicken.

DEBRA: Oh, tell us.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Well, first, you bake the chicken, have roast chicken. Then you pick up all the extra meat, then you make broth. Some of the extra meat goes for maybe a chicken salad or chicken curry. I do a gourmet salad with sautéed chicken meat. And then finally, you’ve got your broth for a soup. So there’s four meals there.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. And I know that my chicken stock lasts all week. And not only can you have soup, but you can also use it as the base for making sauces and other things (like making a curry sauce with the chicken stock). So delicious!

SALLY FALLON MORELL: That’s how you make sauce, with broth.

DEBRA: With broth, that’s right. It’s the foundation for all those sauces. And if you go to cooking school, the first thing that they do is they teach you how to make stock. That’s it.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right.

DEBRA: So Kaayla, do tell us about the question I asked before about science supporting broth for healing.

KAAYLA DANIEL: Well, of course, we don’t have a lot of studies on soup itself because nobody is going to sponsor and pay for a lot of expensive studies for a product that nobody can pill or powder or patent. So we don’t have studies on soup itself. Well, we just have a few.

But there’s a whole lot of studies, hundreds of studies on the individual components of broth. They would include cartilage, which itself is a whole food and collagen and also some of the amino acid, glutamine and proline (the top three amino acid that we find in broth) and a lot of studies on the proteoglycans which stands for the protein sugar. People know them most popularly as the supplement Glucosamine and the supplement Chondroitin Sulfate.

So there’s hundreds, thousands of studies of these separate components. Some studies are on bone marrow. And of course, besides all of those that are unique to broth, we’re also going to get the nutrition from the vegetables that go into our broth and from other ingredients.

DEBRA: Like garlic.

KAAYLA DANIEL: Like garlic, exactly. Broth is a vehicle for all sorts of other ingredients. I think people worry too much about making the absolute perfect thing all the time. We can experiment. We can adapt our old, favorite recipes. Back from when I was a vegetarian, I used the Moosewood Cookbook and I adapt a lot of those recipes to include broth now.

DEBRA: I’m just smiling because so many people are trying to take their favorite meat-oriented recipes and make them vegetarian. You’re taking your vegetarian recipes and adapting, adding the nutrition that comes from animals.
Let’s see. Sally, how much broth do you recommend that people consume every day to obtain the health benefits?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: I think it’s good to aim sort of a maintenance dose of a cup of broth a day. Now, you can do that as a broth in a mug, but I typically use broth to make soup or to make a sauce or a gravy. That’s a really lovely way to get your broth, a very nutritious way to eat the meat that you’ve put that sauce on as well.

However, if you’ve been sick, if you are healing from something, I would have a cup of broth at every meal. You will be amazed at how quickly you heal. We do talk about broth for injuries in the book and how you need extra nourishment for your cartilage when you are healing.

One thing I want to add because you’re into toxins and how to avoid toxins, one of the things that Kaayla has found is that the types of amino acids in broth supports the liver’s ability to detoxify your body. So again, broth is very protective as well as nourishing.

DEBRA: And it really has been a staple of every cuisine forever.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Every cuisine in the world. I’m talking about African, Asian, American Indians. The American Indians made broth and considered it more nourishing, better for them than water.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. It’s just there in every culture except ours because we’ve moved away from making our own food out of real food ingredients. And instead, people are buying things in the supermarket. They think it’s more convenient, but it’s not nourishing. It’s not nourishing. It doesn’t have the same nourishment. It just doesn’t.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Right. You’re cheating yourself.

DEBRA: You are, you are, you are, you are. Absolutely. I think it’s important that everybody consider cooking and food preparation to be part of their normal, daily routine of being healthy and happy and having the joy of eating good food. It’s just part of our health. If we don’t do that ourselves and just substitute it with packaged, processed foods, we’re just not getting it. And to do this whole thing of processed foods and laboratory made supplements is not the same as getting your nutrition from food.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Well, one of the things, once you learn to make broth, you’re on the road to becoming a good cook. It’s the basis for becoming a good cook.

DEBRA: Yes, it absolutely is. Why are there no vegetarian recipes in the book? Why not vegetable broth, Sally?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Oh, I’ll leave that for Kaayla.

DEBRA: Okay!

KAAYLA DANIEL: Well, of course, the topic was bone broth and I don’t know any vegetarian bones. Although they do call tofu ‘the meat without the bone’. So much of the nutrition does come from the bones and the cartilage and the skin. And of course, we also get added nutrition from whatever vegetables we’re adding to the broth, typically the classic mirepoix, the onions, the celery, the carrots, et cetera.

But the bone broth made from bones is just so rich. It makes your reputation as a cook. The recipes just tastes so much better. For example, all the bean recipes, it’s absolutely fail-proof that you make them with ham hock. You’ll have a reputation throughout your community as cook.

DEBRA: Yeah. Well, we only have a couple of minutes of the show. So I’d like to give each of you the opportunity to give us whatever closing words you’d like to. Sally, do you want to go first?

SALLY FALLON MORELL: I just want to say what a joy it was to write this book. My big thing in my career has been to show the scientific validation of traditional food ways and it’s just been wonderful to see what Kaayla put together.

I also think the biggest compliment we’ve gotten so far in the book is that it’s a page turner. Can you imagine that a book on broth, people can’t stop turning the pages to read it? So very readable, yes.

DEBRA: It’s a very fascinating subject, yes. The book is just excellent! It’s excellent. Kaayla?

KAAYLA DANIEL: I’d like to invite everyone to join our broth making community because Sally and I have so much to share. And so we’ve put up a new website, NourishingBroth.com. That’s where we’re going to be answering all the questions (and we get lots and lots of questions) and people are sharing their stories and new recipes.

We also have a gift for people, two gifts in fact. One is Extra Helpings of Nourishing Broth. That’s the piece from Sally. And the other is my tip on ‘How to be Souper’, pun totally intended.

DEBRA: Souper, I love that. Good! Well, thank you so much again for being with me today. And again, I want to give all the websites for you to get more information from both of these lovely women. As Kaayla just said, you can go to NourishingBroth.com. That’s about the book. And then you want to go to WestonAPrice.org to find out more about the Weston A Price Foundation and all the wonderful work that both Kaayla and Sally are doing to make us all aware of the real foods, how they can be prepared, the traditional ways people have nourished themselves.

And also, they do so much work to make access to these foods – things like raw milk and pastured eggs and all of these foods that you don’t normally find in a supermarket, but are the things that we should eat. You don’t even find them in natural food stores although we do have pastured eggs now at my natural food store.
Oh, we’ve got to go! This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

SALLY FALLON MORELL: Thank you, Debra. Thank you so much.

DEBRA: You’re welcome.

KAAYLA DANIEL: Thank you.

DEBRA: Thank you, both of you. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Safe Headphones

Question from E. from Canada

Any tips for finding safe headphones?

I have decided to look for in-ear headphones since there is less material I might be sensitive to.

I thought I picked out a good pair: Reveal Bamboo Earbuds. They were anodized aluminum, phthalate-free and BPA-free but the cord still had a strong plastic odour.

What questions should I be asking manufacturers in order to figure out if their headphones are low VOC?

Thanks,

(E. from Canada)

Debra’s Answer

Good question!

You are on the right track with your Reveal Bambook Earbuds.

I’m not surprised there is a strong odor from the cord. It’s probably a standard PVC cord that may even have lead in it, which can be absorbed by your skin when you touch it.

The difficult thing is that I don’t think there yet are PVC-free cords for things like this.

The best thing I can recommend for you is to get these bamboo earbuds and then wrap the cords with something. Just any fabric would work to protect against lead, but not the VOCs. Foil will block the PVC fumes so you might use foil tape, or foil under fabric.

I would ask what types of plastics are used to make the headphones, because they are all plastic.

The ridiculous thing is that headphones probably could be made from some nontoxic, food-safe plastic, they just aren’t doing it…yet.

But…Here are a whole lot of choices for headphones made from bamboo and other natural materials, but probably still PVC cords.

Safe Gloves for Food Prep

Question from Alison

Hi Debra,

Thank you for your website and for all that you do!

My cook wants to wear gloves while working with raw meat. I was wondering if you know whether nitrile medical gloves are safe (ie don’t leach anything into the food), or do you know of a safe glove to use? Maybe natural latex?

The gloves won’t be used for anything heat related, just things like cutting meat, and making meatballs.

Thanks so much!

Alison

Debra’s Answer

The use of gloves for food prep is common—it’s done in every restaurant.

I just took a peek at disposable gloves regarding your leaching question, and I’ll just summarize by saying that all the materials leach, and this is addressed during a step in processing. But it appears that different brands of gloves may be leached for different periods of time. I have no way of creating a reccommendation to evaluate which might be the best gloves because of this.

The main materials used to make disposable gloves are

  • Vinyl / Poly (PVC)
  • Nitrile
  • Latex

But if you look at all the choices for gloves, it quickly becomes apparent that there may be other additives for various functions.

I would avoid the PVC gloves for toxicity.

Nitrile is a synthetic rubber made from acrylonitrile and butadiene. Acrylonitrile is a suspected human carcinogen, considered toxic, and know to release ions of cyanide. It also cannot be legally released into the environment because it is considered hazardous.

Latex would be OK if you are not latex sensitive.

It’s a tough decision. What is the reason your cook wants to wear gloves? Is it cross-contamination? I handle raw meat with my bare hands and then wash them with soap and hot water before I handle any other foods. And if I am making a salad, for example, I’ll handle the raw vegetables BEFORE handling the raw meat. I also use a separate cutting board and run my knife under the hottest water after using it to cut meat. I’ve never had any cross-contamination problems.

 

Stain remover for Laundry

Question from Cecilia

Dear Debra,

I would like your opinion about these two stain removers:

www.yoreganics.com/collections/all-products/products/stain-remover

us.ecover.com/products/stain-remover/

I tried the first one, and I think it works pretty well, but every time I use it I would cough and sneeze.

I haven’t tried the second one, but I would like your opinion because it has a bad rating on the EWG website.

In your website I found some old comments about Oxyclean and similar products. Would you still think they are safe to use?

Thank you very much!

Debra’s Answer

The Yoreganics stain remover is totally organic and nontoxic. If you are coughing and sneezing it is likely that you are individually sensitive to one or more of the natural ingredients. This is one of the dilemmas: organic products do not contain toxic chemicals but they can contain potential allergens, whereas petroleum products contain no allergens but may be toxic.

I can see why the Ecover product got a bad rating from EWG. It contains a number of synthetic ingredients, including synthetic fragrances and preservatives.

Another difference is the Yoreganics product is made from whole natural ingredients such as oils, aloe vera, and functional essential oils. The Ecover product contains ingredients that start with renewable resources, but are processed into industrial ingredients.

Oxyclean is made from oxygen bleach (sodium percarbonate) and hydrogen peroxide. Those are the active ingredients. Who knows what else may be in it. You can buy other stain removers with these active ingredients online. Or even just use them alone. Dilute the hydrogen peroxide so it doesn’t bleach your clothes on contact.

Add Comment

It’s Cold and Flu Season—How to Support Your Immune System and Why You Shouldn’t Get a Toxic Flu Shot

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants. Today we’ll be talking about your immune system: how it works and the best things to do to protect yourself from catching colds and flu this season—without a flu shot. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
It’s Cold and Flu Season—How to Support Your Immune System and Why You Shouldn’t Get a Toxic Flu Shot

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld

Date of Broadcast: September 24, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s September 24th 2014 and it’s a beautiful early – well, I was going to say ‘early autumn day’, but it’s not early autumn anymore because yesterday was the autumn equinox, so we’re officially in the middle of autumn. Here where I live in Clearwater, Florida, that means that instead of it being 90° higher day and night, it’s now 80°. And it was 70° overnight. So I’m very happy it’s getting cooler.

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who prefers to dispense medicinal plants rather than drugs and she’s telling us – I have her on every other Wednesday and we’re doing a whole series on how you can use plants to heal your body. And if you’re taking any prescription or over-the-counter drugs, how you can get off of those drugs and use plants instead.

Today, we’re going to be talking about why you shouldn’t get a flu shot and how you can support your immune system during cold and flu season so that you won’ t get sick or if you do, then it’s less of a problem.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey! Great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you! Great to have you here. So first, before we talk about colds and flus and shots and all of those things, I want to talk about me.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s good.

DEBRA: I want to talk about the work that you and I have been doing and particularly, a couple of weeks ago, I stopped taking insulin.

Now, the reason that I have been taking insulin is because obviously, for blood sugar, but I only started taking it as an emergency. I was doing well controlling my blood sugar with diet and exercise. And even though it wasn’t normal, it was good enough for me.

But then last summer (not this year, but the summer of 2013), my blood sugar went way up into a dangerous area and nothing I did could bring it down. And so I started taking insulin as an emergency life-saving kind of thing at the insistence of my medical doctor. But then I kept doing things to heal my body. Was it really necessary to continue to take insulin?

Some of you know that earlier this year, I went on a Paleo diet for 30 days and during that time, I reduced the amount of insulin I was taking by half. And then after I started working with Pamela a couple of months ago (it’s been a couple of months now), but I think it’s just been about a month where it was time to buy another bottle of insulin for $200. And I said, “Pamela, isn’t there something else I can do?” and she said, “Of course, there is!”

PAMELA SEEFELD: And I said yes!

DEBRA: So tell us what you told me to do.

PAMELA SEEFELD: This is what I told her to do, Debra and this is what we normally do with people that are transitioning off of insulin or especially oral hypoglycemic like metformin and glyburide and some of these popular drugs.

What you have is type II diabetes. Someone that has type I diabetes has been a diabetic since they were a little kid. That’s a different situation. The pancreas just never really worked correctly. In your case, what happened is you get insulin resistance and the insulin is just not working correctly in the body and the pancreas is not producing correctly after a while because it’s kind of overtaxed at one point.

So what we’re doing is we gave you homeopathic medicine, pericardium triple warmer. These particular brands of homeopathy that I use, that particular company only sells to pharmacists and doctors. It’s not at the health food store. It has to be prescribed.

What this does is it actually starts making your beta cells and your pancreas to start working again. I use this with countless patients. They’re off their medicines, they’re doing great. And what we do is we’re offering – the way I approach things, I want a cure. I don’t want to just give you something to replace what you already did.

And when we were discussing that, $200 is a lot of money to put towards the insulin. We are already trying to transition you off. It’s like, “Okay, look, we can just up the dose of this particular product and do a circulating enhancer to get them into the beta cells and it’s working great. “

DEBRA: It is working great. I mean, it isn’t costing me $200, but it is costing me over a hundred dollars to buy that amount in order to do that for the same period of time as I would have had to pay $200. But here’s the big thing. All insulin does is control your symptom. It’s just there to make your blood sugar not so high. It’s not doing a thing to help heal your body. And so now, what I’m spending my money on is something that is actually healing my pancreas.

And in all these years, nobody had ever given me anything to heal my pancreas. All they were trying to do was control my symptoms.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And the other thing I want to tell you too is that you won’t eventually be using two to three bottles a month. After a while, the pancreas is going to kick – it’s kicking in gradually and you’re going to see huge declining of blood sugar.

DEBRA: Well, I’m expecting that. But what I’m happy about right now today after two weeks (or maybe it’s been three weeks, something like that) is that without my insulin taking what Pamela gave me to take, my blood sugar is the same as it was on insulin.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yehey!

DEBRA: I was a little afraid. When I went to her, I said, “Well, I don’t want to buy my insulin. What could we do?” and she says, “Well, let’s just try this because you can always go buy your bottle of insulin if your blood sugar just goes crazy.” And what happened was that for the first couple of days, it just like went up and went down and went up and went down. And then, it evened out just right where it is. And every day, it’s just right at that level. And even though it’s not going down yet, I know that I’m just waiting for my pancreas to heal and then it’s going to down. And then I’m going to be taking less. And then I’ll be taking nothing. I’ll be able to have a normal pancreas.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. I mean, it’s going to come. The thing is with these cells – I mean, in most cases, most people, they never regenerate at all. But in your case, we’re giving homeopathic products that actually open up the meridians in those areas and actually target those cells completely instead of just doing just some general cleanse and that kind of thing.

This product is specifically for the little assignment I gave it. That works exactly like that. I’ve seen it very reproducibly work in a lot of patients.

DEBRA: I think this is just wonderful. And this is only just an example of what Pamela does. I just wanted to tell all of you that it’s possible to actually heal your body and it’s not about taking drugs or even natural remedies to control your symptoms. What we want to go for here is healing, regeneration of the damage that toxic chemicals and toxic foods and all those things are doing to your body that you want to detox, stop being exposed to and regenerate.

And now, I’m starting to regenerate. It makes me so happy. It just makes me so happy.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s wonderful. I’m very happy for you. You’re doing great.

DEBRA: Thank you.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m glad I could help… I am.

DEBRA: So I do want to say right off right now that you can call Pamela if you have health issues you want to talk to her about, if you’re on some drugs you want to get off of, if you have loved ones with health issues or drugs that they should be getting off of. You can call her on the phone and she will talk to you for free and advise you about what you can take instead. You want to give them the number?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, the number is here to my pharmacy, Botanical Resource. It’s 727-442-4955. That’s 727-442-4955. I highly recommend her especially if you have – like I know in my body, I’ve had a lot of difficult situations especially from all the toxic poisoning that I have had in my life and my body not functioning in all its wonders because of that. A lot of things that I’ve tried to do hasn’t worked over the years and everything that she’s given me is working. It’s just like night and day especially if you’re a difficult case.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, I’m very proud of what I do here. I’m very happy I can help you. I’ve been doing this over 20 years. I teach this.

I’m a really good chemist. I look at the products, I look at the ingredients and I decide what I’m going to use them for. So it’s much more than like me taking a class and someone old me that “Do this for that.” As a pharmacist, that’s how we learn, “These drugs go for certain things.” You have to sometimes think out of the box and look and see what’s really happening in a person’s body and target the exact ingredient to go to where you want it to go.

DEBRA: And she just does that very well. So when we come back from the break (because we’re already through the first segment), we’re going to talk about flu shots, why you shouldn’t take them and how your immune system works and what you can do to support your immune system as we go into the cold and flu season.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is Pamela Seefeld. She is a registered pharmacist who dispenses medical plants – and there’s a word for that. It’s a pharmacognosist. I love that one. So we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants. And today, we’re talking about what you can do so that you don’t have the flu.

So let’s start. I saw something, I get a lot of newsletter from different places, but one came last week that talked about how Dr. Oz had a show where he was talking about mercury in flu shot. Mercury is certainly something that we don’t want to be putting into our bodies. I think that there are some other reasons why not to take flu shots. Could you talk about that first because I know every place I go, they’re saying, “Have you had your flu shot?”

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s true, that’s true. They do ask that quite a bit. Well, this is the thing with the flu shot. We’ll just kind of backtrack for one second. We’ll talk about the immune system, okay?

DEBRA: Okay.

PAMELA SEEFELD: How do you keep your immune system working really well so you don’t even need the flu shot or even considering it? If your immune system is depressed, you’re going to be at risk for not only the flu, but a host of other colds and things that come around during the winter time. And we’re going to start going into cold and flu. That’s called cold and flu. It’s the two of them.

Your immune system acts on certain different things. There’s cellular and humoral and mediated immune system. The humoral is these things called chemotactic factors. They’re little signals that bring the immune system to the area. It’s kind of like a little signal like little beacons, “Come over here and take care of this.”

The immune system that goes after just in general any kind of cell (it can be a bacterial or a fungus or a virus) are called leukocytes. When people are sick and their immune system is trying to launch a response, you get these huge increases of leukocytes. And leukocytes are kind of cool because they don’t actually have an assignment. They just go everywhere. They look around for the tissue. These little factors bring it to the tissues. So how can we enhance these first line defenses so that no matter what you get in contact with, you’re not going to get sick?

A big thing is, believe it or not, diet. We have found – and I just downloaded some different studies here – that the t-cells, the t-lymphocytes, which is what’s affected in AIDS patients, when their immune system goes really low and they’re able to be infected with AIDS, we know that vegetables and fruits regulate and up-regulate t-cell activity to go to find viruses.

So when we want to prevent getting sick in the first place (because let’s face it, we know we don’t want to do the flu shot altogether), let’s get the immune system working better so you don’t need to have it.

The preservatives that are in – that’s pretty easy step. We always talk about diet, but there’s actually proof now that shows that these t-cells are up-regulated specifically by what you eat.

DEBRA: Oh!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Another thing too is stress control. Now, people that are stressed out, they have increases in cortisol in their blood stream and it suppresses the immune system, an increase of inflammation.

I’ll give you an example. If I go in a room and there’s like 20 people there and one person has the flu, will everybody get the flu, Debra?

DEBRA: No.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No. Right! That’s the trick. You’re saying, “No, I’m not going to get the flu.” What Dr. Oz is saying and commenting on those things is that when you have a flu shot, you’re launching an immune response. That’s what it does.

A flu shot and vaccines are kind of like homeopathy, but they’re not. I don’t want to confuse people. You’re getting a small amount of a causative agent to try and elicit an immune response. So what happens those little cells that were called in, they come to the area and they make antibodies. And so supposedly, supposedly, when you come in contact with the virus, you’re not going to get it.

You know what percentage of people still end up with the flu even with the flu shot?

DEBRA: I don’t know, but…

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s over 50%.

DEBRA: So over 50%? It doesn’t work.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s pretty high, yeah. They still end up with the flu. So when we look at it, we have to say, “Okay, the flu shot is bad.

We really shouldn’t get it.” But really, what we need to do is make our immune system work like it should work, so that if I’m sitting next to you and you’re sneezing and coughing, you have the flu, I don’t get it.

DEBRA: That’s right. So how do we do that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s the trick, to prevent it. If we want to prevent it, there’s some simple things you can do. What you’re eating is very important. If you’re going to eat fruits and vegetables, especially vegetables that have – you know, we’ve always talk about all these bioflavinoids and these immune system enhancement. You need to have oil, some kind of fat present on the vegetables to be absorbed.

Otherwise, you’re not going to be getting the benefit of bioflavinoid.

And taking a good multivitamin is also important. I would really like to comment that fish oil has an excellent immune response. It increase the immune system and lowers inflammations consistently and that’s an easy thing to take. If you don’t want to take fish oil capsules, you can even take sardines. If you have sardines a few times a week, that’s very preventative as well.

The immune system, the biggest depressant of the immune system is stress. It sounds crazy because people are talking about stress and anxiety. But if you’re really stressed out and you are not sleeping correctly, a lot of that is going to affect your immune system, right?

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And we know that glucocorticoids, which is cortisol that’s released from the adrenal gland – like people get adrenal fatigue where the cortisol is just released and released constantly. We know that excessive amounts of glucocorticoids in the blood stream can really depress the immune system. So stress control is really important.

If you take calming fish oil or passion flower or maybe do some yoga or some breathing techniques, you try and control your reactions to stress in everyday life, things like that. If you look at most people, when they end up getting the flu, it’s through at a point where they’re underslept and they’re anxious, so they have a lot of stress going on in their life.

DEBRA: Right! And you know, I’ve really noticed that most of the time, I can handle a normal amount of stress and even an extraordinary amount of stress. But when my adrenal glands go out, then I can’t handle any stress at all.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly!

DEBRA: And so I would say that if people are finding that they can’t handle stress and that they fly up the handle or that any little thing bothers them or if something goes wrong and they just got upset about it and they can’t do anything about it, that is a sure sign that the adrenals are being stressed and that you should do something to strengthen your adrenals.

So would it be a correct assumption to say if you have adrenal problems that your immune system is going to be less functional because of the stress?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. Yes, that’s exactly right. This sounds crazy because this sounds like elementary advice. But if you, like you’re saying, flying off the handle at little things, can’t keep your stress under control, that’s a big part of your immune system. It basically shuts everything down.

I’ll give you an example. When you have an immune response and the doctors are trying to control, say, an allergy or a rash, they give you prednisone. Prednisone is a steroid, it’s a glucocorticoid. You make cortisol in your body from your adrenals. It’s the same thing. That’s why they give you that, because your adrenals aren’t working correctly. You’re not preventing a severe immune response, so that’s why they’re giving it to you in a pill.

What I tell people is that you need to make sure that your adrenals are working correctly to make sure that you can launch a stress response.

DEBRA: Interesting. Well, we need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants that’s called a pharmacognosist. I’m still loving that word. I love it because it means drug cog- as intelligence. So you’re dispensing intelligent plants that have drug-like effects I guess. So we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants. We’re talking about what you can do for your immune system now that it’s getting to be cold and flu season so that your body will just fight off those bacteria and viruses and germs and you won’t get sick because that’s what your immune system is supposed to do.

I just want to interject that there are many toxic chemicals. The way that I got interested in this in the first place is because my immune system was damaged by toxic chemicals. There’s so many toxic chemicals that harm the immune system that there’s a whole class of chemicals called immunotoxicants, which destroy your immune system.

We’re all being exposed to them day in and day out unless we do something to not be exposed to those immunotoxicant. What I found was in order to heal my own immune system so that I wasn’t just reacting to everything all day long – it was like I couldn’t even wear a cotton share without reacting to it. Even things that people aren’t allergic to, my body would react to because my immune system was damaged by these toxic chemicals.

The thing that I really want to emphasize is that if your immune system is damaged, it leaves you wide open to catching anything that’s an infectious disease. So it’s not just cold and flu. Another thing in the headlines of newsletters I get is ebola virus. In Africa, there’s a big problem with it. Well, what if it came over here and we started having an epidemic of ebola? If your immune system is not in good shape, you’re going to be one of the first ones. This is just what happens.

And so our immune system is – everything in the body is important, but I can’t imagine life without a functioning immune system. You would just be open to everything.

Do you remember many years of ago, there was a movie I think with John Travolta called the ‘Boy in the Plastic Bubble?’

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: Remember that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yep.

DEBRA: Well, that’s somebody who doesn’t have an immune system.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: That’s what it would be like. So I can’t stress how important this is.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, your immune system is like a little army. Like I said, it’s a front, right, front and center looking to see. There’s all these different cells. Some of them are little beacons and say where the problem is and others actually go and just keep combing the area to find where they can go and activate so that they can engulf – kind of like amoeba, they engulf the different viruses and bacteria.

What I’ll say too is that I just looked at a new position statement on exercise. People that do intense exercise, they’re just like kind of the Weekend Warriors, they’ll go out and do too much, it actually suppresses your immune system.

But moderate exercise actually increases your immune system. When you do moderate exercise, it actually increases these neutrophils and lymphocytes and these different cells that go after it. It’s a transient increase and so it actually activates your immune system to go after infections. So I’m talking about walking, biking and things like that, not running a marathon, which can actually be counterproductive for some people. So exercise is important.

But I’m going to talk a little bit about supplements too.

DEBRA: Okay, good. Go ahead.

PAMELA SEEFELD: This is probably what most people are interested in. So we talked about we got to protect stress, we got to help the immune system.

If we looked at a product called andrographis (it’s an herb), an andrographis is very, very great as far as the immune response. I call this an herbal antibiotic. Now technically, it’s not an antibiotic, but it’s one of these things that you can use if somebody has an infection brewing or say that they’ve – a lot of times, when people have the cold or flu, they go to the doctor and they give them a Cipro or a Z-Pak and they really don’t have a bacterial infection. They give them antibiotics just to make them happy.

So now, when we do this, if someone comes to me and said, “I don’t want to take these prescription” or “I’ve been on all these different prescriptions and it’s not working,” andrographis is where they might go to. That increases the white blood cells, increases the lymphocytes, the neutrophils and all these different cells that have really specific assignments to go in the immune system and to take care of bacteria and viruses. It elevates that tremendously. It’s inexpensive and it works great.

You can get it at a health food store. I use a medical version of it, but I know that the health food stores sell it too. So, andrographis is great.

DEBRA: Could you spell that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, andrographis. So it’s A-N-D-R-O-G-R-A-P-H-I-S.

DEBRA: Good. Thank you. I’m sure some people will go get that.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Andrographis is great. Now, there’s a product from Heel. I’m not affiliated with the company, but Heel is a German company that does homeopathic products (a great, great company) and they have a product called Engestrol. Engestrol, you can get that even off of the Internet. It’ll say right there for flu. I’m sure it’s going to be prominently displayed on any website. Engestrol is what they’re using in Germany in place of flu shots.

DEBRA: Oh!

PAMELA SEEFELD: And this goes after viruses. It’s an increase in the lymphocyte activity, the lymphocytes that go after viruses by 95%.

You can give this to children and babies and adult. So I use this a lot. People, I tell them, “Just keep it in your purse. You put them underneath your tongue. You can do one or two a day as needed.”

Say you have a little child in childcare and you’re worried about cold and flu (you know, little kids pass these things back and forth to each other), you might want to use this. When you give them to infants and you use any kind of homeopathic pills, you want to crash it between two spoons and then put a little water and make a paste and put it on the gums of the baby. That works very good too.

DEBRA: Hmmm… so can you take that as a preventive like if you’re going out and you don’t want to get something, you just take that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yup, that’s exactly right. That’s exactly right. When people are traveling, I tell them to take it as a preventive. If you’re feeling you’re getting sick, you can take even more. I feel it’s perfectly safe even if you take up to eight tablets a day of that product.

So Engestrol is the real go-to because like I said, in Europe, they’re using that on the frontline instead of using the flu vaccines.

DEBRA: Okay, spell that one too. Spell that one too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, let’s see, Engestrol. E-N-G-E-S-T-R-O-L.

DEBRA: Okay, good.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Engestrol. That would be really an excellent product to have around, kind of a go-to product in your house for your children, for yourself. There’s a lot of excellent data on that. It’s very, very effective.

Now, I want to talk a little bit about coconut oil.

DEBRA: Good!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Coconut oil is probably one of the most underutilized supplement for viruses. Most people think about cognitive issues and of course, there’s data with dementia. A lot of people are using it for that, for prevention or for stopping some of the advancement of dementia in elderly patient. But coconut oil is a great product especially for children and for adults, but especially for little kids.

When I see someone come in and they have a little child getting colds and flu and viruses and things like that because the immune system is really low, the coconut oil, what it does is it’s medium chain triglycerides. So it’s not actually fat. You don’t actually store it. So it’s kind of like a free calorie. Coconut oil, with MCT oil, it contains lauric acid. And lauric acid has the effect of lowering viral activity probably up to 75%. So it can stop shedding and activity in the bloodstream.

I use this a lot where someone comes to me and says, “I’m using the Engestrol. I’m really concerned. All the kids at the preschool have this cold or flu” or whatever they’re trying to prevent, coconut oil in the kids’ food. It works great.

DEBRA: Wow! I didn’t know that at all and it’s so easy and so inexpensive. We need to go to break, but we’ll be right back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacist who uses, as you’ve been hearing, medicinal plants and foods in order to handle all kinds of body conditions. We’ll hear more about what you can do for your immune system in the cold and flu season when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist who uses medicinal plants and foods and other natural things in order to make people’s bodies heal, actually heal. She doesn’t just get rid of symptoms. She actually wants to make the body well.

That’s what I think is one of the big differences. A drug is just about symptoms, a lot of natural remedies are just about symptoms, but she actually does something that’s healing.

Pamela, can you tell us, just you mentioned coconut oil fighting viruses and flu. Can you tell us a couple of ways that people can use coconut oil if they’re unfamiliar with it and how they can use it for their food?

DEBRA: Yeah, great question. Okay! So coconut oil comes in capsules and it comes in solid. Sometimes, people, if I tell them, “I want you to put a tablespoon of coconut oil” and it looks like a clear fat. It has no coconut taste. Some of them do have a coconut taste. If it’s unrefined, it’s going to have a little bit of coconut taste. Most of the ones you’re going to get don’t have coconut taste. If you don’t like coconut, you don’t have to worry. It’s not going to taste strong coconut.

And what I normally recommend that I know for myself, what I do if I feel like my throat is getting sore, if I have my lymph glad swollen a little bit, if I’m feeling kind of run down, I like to put it on a cracker. I make my own organic crackers and just spread a little bit of almond. I eat a cracker before I go to bed. When I wake up in the morning, all the swelling in my neck have gone.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s quick and easy and it works great. I use it a lot too for mono. I see a lot of mono where kids in highschool have mono and the parents come to me and like, “She’s on the basketball team” or, “She’s on the tennis team. She needs to get back to where she was. She can’t be laying on the coach.” I see a lot of that where young people come to me, teenagers and we have to get them back in shape within a few weeks instead of them lingering on with this.

Coconut oil is quick. It’s within a few days and the person turns the corner. So if you’re looking for a quick result, but especially for children. What I recommend for the little kids is just mix it with their food. Pretty much, at room temperature, let’s say your house is – like if you’re in Florida, it can be like 80° depending on what time of the year it is, it’ll be like a semi-solid. If you put it in the refrigerator, it will be solid.

And if you have it in your cupboard, depending on the temperature of your house, if it’s in the low 70° or in the 60°, it probably will be solid.

If it’s in the 80°, you and I might leave the air conditioning off during the day and come back later on, it might be liquid. So it just depends.

You can literally mix it into food. You can melt it a little bit if you want to to to put it on things. I like it on popcorn really. I think it tastes great.

DEBRA: I was going to say that. I was going to say that because what I found is that if you make your own popcorn at home, which you should and not buy it in a bag (you can make your own organic popcorn at home), you have the issue of heating up bat enough to be able to make the popcorn pop. And I think the coconut oil is the perfect oil to pop corn in because you can heat it up and put in the popcorn and it just pops right up.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Absolutely!

DEBRA: It doesn’t taste like butter, but it has its own pleasant taste I think. I mean, I’m somebody who likes coconut, so what I like to eat is coconut manna or coconut butter, which is coconut oil with some coconut meat in it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s great.

DEBRA: I just think that that’s delicious. If it gets kind of melty so that you can pour it, what I do is that I put it in just on a baking sheet. I put little globs of it on a baking sheet and put it on the freezer. It actually turns into something like a candy. It has its own sweetness and you can put a little mint flavoring or whatever and it’s just like eating white chocolate. That’s what it tastes like, white chocolate. There’s no sugar in it or anything, but those coconut manna, frozen tastes like white chocolate.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, you’re exactly right. I’ll tell you, coconut is great for the family to just cook their food in it. You could throw vegetables in it. And what’s good about coconut oil instead of good butter and olive oil, the burning point where it starts to smoke and smolder is much lower in coconut oil. Coconut oil, you’d have to put it in the calorimeter. You cannot reach that temperature in normal cooking conditions in your home. So it will never burn, it will never smoke. You can walk away from it, come back to there if you’re throwing vegetables in it and chopping it up. So it’s very versatile. You can just mix it in with the food.

So the coconut oil is great. I’m going to talk a little about too about astragalus. Astragalus works on the t4 lymphocyte, the cell that’s affected in AIDS patients, but can affect for our immune system and for viruses. Astragalus is an inexpensive herb. You can take that to enhance the immune system as well.

So really obvious things, you can be cooking with coconut oil and the engestrol, maybe you have that sitting around for your kids and either the andrographis or the astragalus could be a back up product if you really wanted to do that.

Now, I wanted to talk about one thing really quickly about the stress effect. I found something. Do you know – and this is really interesting.

I did a full MedLine search, the National Library of Medicine last night to look at different things that affect the immune system.

This was just published and archived to toxicology this year, 2014, September 12th. It’s called the The Role of Oxidative Stress and Carbon Nanotube-generated Health Effects. I was not really aware of this and I thought this was very interesting that I’d like to tell your listeners.

Carbon nanotubules are a type of nanotechnology that is ubiquitous. It’s all over the place. It’s in semiconductors. It’s in radios. It’s in our phone. It’s in car parts and in electronics. What they found is that these nanotubules, because it’s nano technology, they could come on to our body and we can breathe them in.

And what they have found now, some of these toxicologists is that exposure to these carbon nanotubules is associated with depletion of antioxidants, increasing reactive oxygen species, cellular damage, inflammation signaling is impaired. So the immune system can be impaired from the electronics.

I’m not saying you’re going to throw away your phone. I’m just saying that we need to just be aware of this. The scientists are even questioning some of the safety of the nanotubules. It damages DNA. Now, I’ll let you ask some questions. What do you think of that?

DEBRA: I think we shouldn’t be using nanotechnology at all. More and more, I read these kinds of things or hear them from you. My first question is what do we do to counteract that?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well yeah, this is really important. I could be maybe far-guessing in this, but I will tell you that homeopathy would probably be your best bet because homeopathic medicine kind of goes where it needs to go and it has a very generalized assignment in the body other than specifically targeted herbs, vitamins or medicine.

But I didn’t realize that these nanotubules are coming onto people and they’re breathing them in. I thought that was pretty upsetting. I don’t really want to change the tone of the conversation, but I wanted to make sure that people were aware that there’s a lot of other things going on that are affecting our immune system – some, we can control and some, we can’t.

But in all realism, you really need to be taking some of these supplements to counteract some of the things that are going to be affecting your immune system. You have to do what you can about the things that you have control over.

DEBRA: Do what you can. That’s exactly what I was going to say. Do what you can about the things that you have control over because there’s so many things we don’t have control over that we need to give our bodies the best chance we can.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, most definitely. So the exercise, the healthy food. You’ve all heard these things before. I will tell you to have the coconut oil at the house and Engestrol is a really good product. I’m still really a bit fan of Body Anew, which is the homeopathic detox product that I use because that actually elevates humoral and cellular immunity. It works on both parts of the immune system.

I’ve been doing it consistently for 15 years. You don’t have to do it every single day, but it does basically scan the body and remove out things that aren’t supposed to be there (bacteria and viruses). Your immune system works in a much better level as far as the cellular level and effectivity level.

DEBRA: And I’ll tell you, I have seen Pamela. You can look at her picture, but she’s one of the healthiest people I’ve ever met. She really is. Her skin glows and she’s very happy and energetic and just all the things that you would want to be.

And so I see the results of what she talks about in her and I see the results of what she’s giving me. I see these same kind of results starting to happen. I can’t say enough.

So we only have two minutes left. Do you want to give your phone number again?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, most definitely. So if there’s any questions, they can call me at my pharmacy. It’s 727-442-4955. That’s 727-442-4955. I would be glad to help you with any condition you might have for yourself, for your pet. I treat pretty much everything. And also, I get people off of medications if they’re interested in that as well. I really appreciate everything.

DEBRA: And she really loves to get people off mental medications especially.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Specifically, correct. Mental health is a specialty that I’m very good at. I’ve done this for a long time. So anybody that’s on psychiatric medicines that wants to look for something other than that that actually works, I can talk you through it. It’s pretty easy and pretty inexpensive to do.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. I’m just always impressed when I hear some stories about what she’s doing. We only just have less than a minute left, so do you want to tell us a really quick story about somebody that you treated that had a big surprise this week?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, yeah. Actually, we’re talking about the immune system, I had a lady come to me last week and her little child was in daycare and had been constantly getting sick, constantly getting sick, constantly at the doctor – ear infections, throat infections, all these sort of stuff. She works full-time. She’s just a professional lady.

She’s very upset about the whole thing. She goes, “I don’t have time to keep taking my child at a daycare.” I said, “Look, the coconut oil.

Use the coconut oil.” She looked at me like I was crazy. I said, “Look, just put the coconut oil in the baby’s food in the little baby jar. Put it in there, warm it up, half a teaspoon twice a day.

She called me not even 48 hours later and said, “You know what? She’s better.” She’s not coughing anymore. All the drippiness stopped.

Anyway, it was a significant change within a short period of time.

You would be surprised. Natural products work very well, and I’ll tell you, especially about psychiatric products. I get people off of medicines every single day especially anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medicine and even narcotics.

DEBRA: And I would stop you because the music is going to come on. So thank you so much.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, thank you so much.

DEBRA: Pamela will be on again two weeks from today. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Living By Nature’s Ways

Today my guest is Lierre Keith. She is the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice, and Sustainability, which has been called “the most important ecological book of this generation.” We’re doing Part 2 of a discussion we began last week on The Vegetarian Myth: Why A Vegetarian Diet Might Not Be Best for Health or the Environment. The Vegetarian MythWhile The Vegetarian Myth does address the vegetarian diet, it does so by comparing the diet to the natural processes of life itself. And that’s what we’re going to talk about today: how life works and how different the natural world is from the industrial world. Lierre and I will each share our experiences of becoming aware of life beyond industrialism, and we’ll discuss some key points that relate to eating. Lierre a writer, small farmer, and radical feminist activist. She is the author of six books and coauthor, with Derrick Jensen and Aric McBay, of Deep Green Resistance: Strategy to Save the Planet. www.lierrekeith.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Living by Nature’s Way

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Lierre Keith

Date of Broadcast: April 23, 2015

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free.

Today’s show is going to be a little different. We’re going to be talking about not so much what we’re doing in our daily lives, although this show with that. But we’re going to be talking about a big shift in the way we think about ourselves as human beings in the larger scheme of life.

Today is Tuesday, September 23, 2014, and it’s the autumn equinox. Now, some of you may have seen in your calendars a few days ago on the 21st, the first day of autumn, well, actually, what the autumn equinox is, is the midpoint between the longest day of the year on summer solstice, and the shortest day of the year, on winter solstice. It happens on a very particular day when the sun is at a particular point in the sky and that is determined by the position of the sun, not by a date on the calendar.

And there’s this whole way that time operates in nature, which is determined by the sun and the moon. And then we have this calendar, which is all about standardizing everything, making what’s called a civil calendar. It has nothing to do with the time that’s going on in the natural world.

I bring this up today because it happens to be, well, I chose to do this show on this day. But it shows the difference between our industrial, civil life and the world of nature. And that’s what we’re going to be talking about today. We’re going to be talking about that difference and how we can get ourselves re-aligned in why that’s important.

My guest today is Lierre Keith. She was on last Tuesday. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability, which has been called the most important ecological book of this generation. And last week, we talked about The Vegetarian Diet. But this week, we’re going to be talking about some of those concepts that made her book the most important ecological book of this generation.

There’s so much to talk about. Hi, Lierre. Let’s say hello.

LIERRE KEITH: Hi, Deb. Thanks for having me back.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So what I want to start with is I know in my life that there was a certain set of things that happened, and I want to tell my story about how I became aware that I was part of the natural world, in addition to being part of the industrial world. I think it’s more basic and fundamental that we are all part of the natural world. I’m imagining from reading your book that you have some kind of similar story. So would you tell us about that moment that this shift occurred for you?

LIERRE KEITH: I think for me it started when I was a really young child. I grew up outside of Philadelphia and we would make journeys north to go see my grandmother in Connecticut and the other place that we went regularly down the shore with the New Jersey coastline. To get to either place, you had to drive along these absolutely horrible highways that are surrounded by these vast, ugly, toxifying machines. It just goes on from miles and miles and miles, this industrial wasteland.

And to my three, four, five-year-old mind, it was just the most horrifying thing. And I learned to just brace myself every time we were going in one of those trips because an hour or two of just driving through – eventually, I read The Lord of the Rings, and it was Mordor. To me, that’s just what it was. I knew that at the end of the journey, we’d be some place really beautiful. So we get to view the ocean or we’d be at my grandmother’s. She lived across the street from this beautiful little river. And we were allowed to just play down the river all day. And to me this was the most magical thing in the world, especially growing up in a more urban environment. They actually have running water and snakes and fish and water fowl and trees. It was just as magical as they could get. But you first had to go through hell to get there.

And I could not understand how it is that human beings had done this to the place that they live. And I think one of the most motivating things in my life was to try to understand that. Why would people do this, to take this place that has obviously been so beautiful once and turn it into this industrial hell?

So that was, I think, just absolutely formative in my early years. I was at this juncture between the beauty of the wild places that was a tiny bit wild that at least I had access to as a young kid and what was being done all around. And that was encroaching, encroaching, encroaching every year.

Now, there were less trees and there are less wilderness. At the beach, there were fewer sand dunes. You can watch the life to just shrink. And I felt the emergency in that.

So I think that was just very formative in my life. And I have now, as an adult, seen other small children have those kinds of reactions as well. So I know it’s not just me. I think there’s something in us as human beings, as actual animals who need a home, who love this place to see the destruction.

Now, of course, we’re really up against the wall in terms of that destruction. But I think we do respond to that. We just learn to shut it off.

DEBRA: I think so too. I just want to add, coming from California, it’s very different in California. So I think people listening in different places may not have a picture of what you’ve been describing because I know that I was shocked and horrified when I first came to the East Coast, driving along a highway and seeing that industrial, miles and miles and miles of factories and smoke stacks and just really ugly industrialism just right there on the highway. It is all in the northeast very much so.

I didn’t have that in California. That’s not the way the highways look. So I can imagine how you felt as a child.

My story is that I had a different thing that happened to me when I was an adult. And I woke up in the morning. I was living in San Francisco, in the city, in a studio apartment. I woke up one morning and I said, “I need to leave the city.” I just knew inside of myself I needed to leave the city.

And I went and I lived out in a forest about an hour north of San Francisco just on the other side of a hill from the Pacific Ocean. It had huge fir trees. It was a world community. So I lived on a little street. We’re all surrounded by trees but otherwise, there were a few other little cabins like mine and animals. The different wild flowers came out at different times of the year. I could go out my front door in the summertime and pick wild blackberries. It was very real close to nature kind of existence.

And because that was so different from the experience of growing up in suburbia and then living in the city (I lived in San Francisco for quite a while), I lived there for two years and there was just profound shift for me when I started seeing the ecosystem. When we live in a city, when we live in suburbia, there’s no ecosystem anymore. But when you go actually out and live in a forest, you start to understand that there are animals and a change of season. I had a skylight over my bed and so the moonlight would come in.

It was just so, so different that I started experiencing for myself that nature existed because I was living in it. Going camping for a weekend isn’t enough. Going away for two weeks to Girl Scout camp wasn’t enough. When I lived there in the forest for two years, it made a profound difference for me. And at the end of those two years, I looked at this beautiful ecosystem and I looked at suburbia and the city, and I said, “Wait a minute! There’s something very, very wrong here.” We are just living this industrial life of having everything come from a factory or in a store, and yet, if you’re actually in the ecosystem, you see that nature is sustaining life in a way that sustains life. And we humans have forgotten what that is.

And so the first shift, the first thing is just, we’re going to talk about some other things but the first thing is just to understand that you live in an industrial world, but there’s this other world of nature and we live within that too. All the resources for every product we use all come from that. It operates in a different way. And if we want to be sustainable, we need to find out what that is. And you and I have both done a lot in that regard.

And we’re going to talk about that one when we come back. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Lierre Keith. We’re talking about nature and how the natural world is different from the industrial world.

One of the things I wanted to say that I forgot to say when telling my story before is that the reason that I went out to live in the forest was because I was trying to escape toxic chemicals. I had been living in suburbia and especially in the city where there were a lot of toxic chemicals not only in my home, but in the environment. And I thought, “Where is the cleanest place I can go?” And I went to live in a forest.

But what I found, even though I was just looking for clean air, what I found was that there was this whole natural world there. It’s just like you stepped out of industrialism into this other world. And that’s what we’re talking about today, this other world of nature. The industrial world is within it, but as we put all our attention on the industrial world, we forget that nature is out there. And it has its own rules. And in order for all of our whole culture and everything to survive, all of life to survive, we as human beings need to start understanding what those are.

So the first thing I want to talk about, we mentioned it a little bit last week in talking with Lierre, is the fact that every lifeform survives by eating other lifeforms.

Lierre, why don’t you tell us something about that?

LIERRE KEITH: I am reminded of a quote by Charlotte Perkin Gilman, who was a feminist in the early 20th century and she had this great quote where she said something like, “The Buddha looked out at the world and he said in horror, ‘My god, they’re all eating each other.'” But I look out the world and I changed one word, and I say, “They’re all feeding each other and it’s good.”

And that to me is the exact problem with things like veganism or the separation that we have right now living in an industrial world. We don’t see those cycles. We don’t understand how life physically works on this planet. And that’s exactly it.

First, there’s growth and then there’s death and degeneration. And then at the end of that, there is regeneration. So everything that we are is recycled back into this process called life. So we are broken down into every last little molecule of carbon, whatever. It’s all going to get recycled, taken out by other lifeforms and life will continue.

That is what life is, it’s that cycle. There’s not really any way out of it unless you want to decide that you don’t want to live anymore. But your body will still be recycled even if you decide to knock it off. There’s no way out. That is just what happens on this planet. And you can decide it’s a terrible thing or you can decide that this is an incredible gift.

I decided that I would rather see it as a gift. Maybe that’s a discussion that’s got a more spiritual base to it. But your body is a piece of the universe that you’ve been given. And that’s an amazing thing to have.

DEBRA: It is an amazing thing to have. And also, our bodies – here’s another thing that we don’t see in the industrial world. When our bodies die, then what happens is that they get preserved with formaldehyde and get put in a box and sit in a cemetery. If we were living out in the wild or look at a native culture, it’s not industrial. What happen is that the bodies would get buried or the people would just – I know some Native American cultures or native cultures around the world, when people get to the end of their lives, they just leave their tribe and they go walk out into the woods or wherever, and they lay their bodies down, and their bodies just biodegrade like anything else. And it goes back into the ecosystem. Then the ecosystem feeds us and then our bodies feed the ecosystem.

But there is something else I want to mention about this too. There’s a wonderful little book called Furtive Fauna. And it’s all about our bodies being an ecosystem to other organisms. And when I read this book, there are so many things, little microorganisms that are living with us in our bodies. There is a little microorganism that cleans the little stuff that gets caught in our eyelashes. It actually helps us survive. And the whole microorganism that we talked about, the flora and fauna, in our guts, all those probiotics and everything, that’s a whole culture of being, little cells, that are not our bodies. They’re co-existing with us to help us digest our food.

There are all kinds of creatures in our bodies helping us exist. We’re an ecosystem. Our bodies are an ecosystem to other living things.

And so it’s all about this interconnection.

LIERRE KEITH: About 10 pounds of our body are organisms that are not us. That’s a lot. That’s by weight, but if you do find numbers, there may be as many as nine times more non-human creatures in the human body than there are cells of you. So you can lie there at night going, “Wow, what actually am I?”

And most of them are very friendly. Sometimes the bad ones take over and you end up in a bad way. But most of them are doing things for us and we provide them with a home. Like you said, we’re a habitat essentially. And they do all kinds of fun things for us. They help us digest our food, and they keep us healthy, and they’re part of our immune system, and they keep our skin clean on and on. We can’t see them and we wouldn’t even know they were there. But that is the case. We do provide a home for these other creatures. And now, we have this symbiotic relationship.

DEBRA: And that happens in layer after layer. It’s all kind of nested in nature, these symbiotic relationships as the systems get bigger and bigger and bigger. There’s one other thing I want to mention with regard to this too. And that is, I know that a lot of people don’t want to do harm and that motivates a lot of decisions. For me, the greatest thing if you don’t want to do harm and I don’t want to do harm, but I’m always looking to see what is the thing that can do the greatest good for life.

And that’s why I am so adamant about not using toxic chemicals because to me, the greatest thing that causes the greatest harm in across the greatest amount of life, is to use toxic chemicals. And I think that that’s a much bigger concern when you actually look at the harm being down than to be concerned about that we shouldn’t feed our own lives because we’re taking the life of something else.

Plants have feelings too. Plants know when they’re being eaten. Plants have been hooked up to machines that measure their emotional response.

We’re getting to break. So we’ll be right back and we’ll talk more about this. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and we’re talking about nature.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability, which has a lot about the vegetarian diet but it’s all based on the kinds of things that we’re talking about today. She really has this understanding of how life works and how what we eat from an industrial viewpoint is so out of whack with nature. And she explains all this in the book. It’s very interesting. You can go to Toxic Free Talk Radio and you’ll find her book there. You can click on it and order it. You can also go to her website.

So the next thing I want us to talk about is when I read Lierre’s book when it first came out. I think it was in 2009. And it’s full of scribbles, underlines, post-it notes, and turning down pages, but when I opened it, a couple of weeks ago, when I invited her to be on the show, I had written one thing on the inside of the front cover. And that is life produces food.

And it’s absolutely true. We don’t need supermarkets, we don’t need agriculture, we can just go outside and into the ecosystem and ecosystem will always produce food to support all the living things that are in that ecosystem. It produces food for plants, it produces food for animals, it produces food for humans. That’s what life does.

And here in Florida, I live in an area that has fairly old houses. My house was built in 1940. But every single person has old citrus trees. That’s what people did then. What they did was they planted citrus trees and we all have so much grapefruits, oranges, tangerines and everything, we can’t even eat them. We can’t even give them to each other because we all have trees.

And it’s just wonderful. And nowadays, people plant ornamental plants instead of planting food. But as recently as 1940, what they were doing was planting foods and fruit tree gardens and all these things.

So Lierre, talk to us about life-producing food.

LIERRE KEITH: So pretty much in nature, every action that every creature takes is going to provide food eventually for somebody else. And that’s why it’s really an interconnected web. It’s not a series of hierarchical relationships where we’re exploiting each other. It’s actually just a system of mutual feeding.

For instance, I live in Northern California now and we still have some salmon run. So the salmons come up the streams to spawn and that’s how they’re continuing their species. But in the meantime, the bears and the eagles and all these, what I call the apex predators, will feed on the fish. And by doing that they actually take the nutrients from deep in the ocean that are in the salmon’s bodies, and they keep themselves alive, they keep their babies alive, but they also distribute an incredible amount of resources, minerals and what-not back into the forest.

This is what this giant pump essentially of nutrients that go from ocean, up the rivers in the fish, and that out into the forest with the bears, and the foxes, and the eagles, and keeps the forest healthy. Without those nutrients, the forest will eventually die. And this is just inevitable because there’s nothing else to feed [inaudible 00:30:06]. They need nutrients from the salmon. And it’s the salmon that do that. But every step along the way, every creature involved is doing what it needs to survive, doing what it needs to feed its babies, and in the act of doing that, it’s feeding the entire community.

And that’s the beauty of this, is that we are all in this interlocking, mutual, symbiotic relationships. If you step outside of it, you don’t understand that. You think, “Oh, those terrible bears! They’re killing fish!” And that’s not what’s really going on. On a small level, yes, but by doing that they’re not just increasing their own species, feeding their babies, but they’re feeding forests.

And because there’s a forest, there are bears. And because there is a forest, there is actually a river that fish can live in, because without those trees, the rivers are dead.

So in fact, by the fish feeding the bears, feeding the forest that feeds the river, which makes the salmon possible. So the salmon are feeding themselves.

And you can look in any biological community and you will see exactly that cycle, that flow of life to life to life to life around back. So it actually helps you to be part of the cycle.

And a lot of us, we don’t see it, we don’t live in it, we don’t understand it. Our culture doesn’t teach us about it. And we’re left on our own as adults to try to figure out where has this all gone so wrong because we lack that basic understanding that life is always feeding life.

DEBRA: I think that’s exactly right. That our culture is not teaching us. I know that for myself. I had to go find this information. It’s out there but nobody told me to go find it. Nobody suggested that it was there. It was just me waking up one day and saying, “I have to get out of the city and go live out in nature.” I didn’t know why I was doing that. I just knew deep inside of me that that’s what I needed to do. And there I just looked around and I said, “Wait a minute. Here’s the model for life. It’s not in the city. This is where we’ve gone wrong, is not understanding the basic fundamentals of life.”

And so what we do is we go and we cut down the trees and we make paper towels. And then the trees aren’t there and there’s not a river and then there’s not a salmon.

I’ve seen the salmon jump. I used to live in Northern California. I could just go. I lived in the San Geronimo Valley and there’s a place there where they come up in January and you can just stand there on this little bridge and watch them jump up over the rocks. It’s a very cool thing to have right there where you live and have your community celebrate that.

And that’s not what I get in the city. That’s not what I get in suburbia. But that’s how we all should be living. That reconnects us as human beings to nature.

LIERRE KEITH: Yes, I couldn’t agree more. The other thing is the more disconnected we are as a culture, the more we lose sight of what’s being lost every day. The descriptions of what the salmon runs were like here, you can hear them coming for 24 hours. It sounded like a thunder rolling. That’s how much noise the fish made. That’s how many fish there were. And I’ve heard this description of rivers, the world over. And once upon a time, the rivers would be black and boiling with fish. It was so dense with fish, you could walk across the river on the back of the fish. There’s a description like that.

So from everywhere, that’s how dense life was. And in a very short period of time, we’re reducing it all to desert. And I don’t know what we think we’re going to eat in 50 years or 100 years. The soil is gone, the trees are gone, the animals are gone.

The planet is skinned alive by agriculture and people need to start feeling the emergency of it while we still have time to turn it around.

DEBRA: I think so too. I totally agree with that. if you read these accounts of what nature was like earlier on, even a hundred years ago, a hundred and fifty years ago, and you think about the immensity of how long this planet is in here, and the difference, how much we’ve lost. And there are so many things that we can do. We just need to decide to do those things.

And when we come back from the break, Lierre and I are both going to talk about some things that we do in our own lives in this direction to consider nature and how to restore it better than damaging it.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and order her book, and also go to her website, which is there as well.

So Lierre, knowing what you know about nature, what are some of the things that you do in your life to apply that?

LIERRE KEITH: There are two levels. One is that I really encourage people to get politically involved and whatever ways they’re comfortable doing because honestly, we are up against some really vast, global and very brutal systems of power that aren’t going to give up without a fight.

So not everybody has to be a frontline activist. A lot of people don’t have the personality for it or they’ve got too much going on in their own lives. We’ve got children, we’ve got elderly parents. It’s just not going to work. But there are plenty of ways to get involved, to help the people who can be on the frontlines doing those kinds of direct confrontations of powers.

And then behind the scenes, we really need to be creating an entirely new culture. And that’s going to take everybody getting involved. We have to believe that democracy is possible. We have to believe that we can take our place again on this planet as animals who need a home, rather than destroyers of the planet.

So it’s pretty much every institutions from the top one down, we have to redo and we have to redo them, putting the earth first, putting those cycles of life before everything because without them, we’re all dead. And that has to be the center of our spiritual practices, of our interactions with each other, of the way that we make political decisions, all of that has to come first.

We don’t have a world that does that. What we have is a world that puts profit before anything else. And we also have a world that believes in those kinds of social hierarchies that are creating a lot of these problems.

So we need to believe that a better world is possible and then get engaged. And then in a more personal level, there are things that we are all called to do that just express who we are as unique individuals. And for some people that’s teaching children, and for other people, perhaps that means making music or writing books or stories. We’re all going to have the things we do that just make us happy.

So whatever those things are for you, try to center this idea that the earth matters and that we are dependent upon all of those relationships that have a biophilic a world view that loves life and understands that, if the center of whatever it is you’re called to do.

And so one of the things that is really important to me is just food and local food system. And the reason that that’s so important is it addresses so many multipronged problems all at once. So I know that when I’m buying from one of my local farmers who is engaged in what’s called pasture-raised farming, so the cows are out on grass all the time, and the chickens follow the cows, and the ducks follow the cows. All the animals are in rotation and they’re moved very quickly off the grass. This is basically the way that you build topsoil. And by building topsoil, this is important because it’s the number one way to sequester carbon.

We all think of global warming as starting with the beginning of the industrial age, when people started burning fossil fuel. That’s not actually true. Global warming started when people started doing agriculture because all of that carbon was in the ground, and when you do, in the soil, in fact. And so when do you agriculture, in fact, you’re destroying all that soil. And that means it’s coming to pieces and turning back into carbon being released into the air.

And it’s true that industrialization has been an incredible accelerant for this destructive process. But the beginning of it is actually agriculture.

This is a lot of information to pack into two minutes here but to have farming that’s based on actually using grass, using pasture lands, is the reverse of that because you are, in fact, repairing that ecosystem by leaving the perennial cover in place, so the grasses are always in place. And they’re sucking carbon out of the air. That’s what they do when they do photosynthesis. And it’s all getting stored in the ground.

In fact, a lot of the figures show that if we were to do this appropriately around the world, we could actually sequester all the carbon that’s been released since the beginning of the industrial age in about 15 years.

And to me, that’s really the only the help that we’ve got. That’s it. We have to repair those grasslands. And what’s destroyed those grasslands is agriculture.

So that’s the primary wound. That’s where people went off the rails was when they took over entire biotic communities, destroyed the perennial cover, took down the trees, cloud up the prairie and then just used them for human use. So you’re sending all those other species into extinction because they’ve got nowhere to live. You’re destroying all the local waterways because all the soil just runs off into the water. Now, the fish have nowhere to go either. They’re all getting killed. You’re sucking up water from the water table underneath, and ultimately, turning what’s left of the soil into salt. That’s the salinization that you see everywhere around the planet. That’s inevitable with agriculture. And ultimately, all that carbon is being released.

So this is the destructive process from beginning to end. And when I was a vegan, I thought I was eating the right food, but I had no idea that agriculture was, in fact, this inherently destructive process. So by reversing that, by replanting those perennial species and repairing the grasslands and the prairies, and then you can eat food from inside in actual living community.

So rather than imposing ourselves across it and just growing corn or wheat or soy, you’re actually participating in the life on that land. So carbon is being sequestered, topsoil is growing every year instead of being destroyed, all those plants now have a place to live again and in a functioning prairie, one square meter should have about 25 different plants. So all that biodiversity comes back. You will instantly see birds, butterflies, insects, small mammals, amphibians. It creates little, tiny, mini wetlands everywhere if you do this right.

So all this life comes back instantly. I’ve seen places where it’s been a hundred years since they had birds. And all of a sudden, within a few years, there are birds nesting everywhere. Nobody has seen literally over a century because it was destroyed by agriculture. They had nowhere to live. And the moment you give them a place to come back to, they will because they want to live.

And you can be part of that repair by simply supporting the farmers who are doing this as well.

Most of my food comes from those kinds of farms. So I’m helping repair the planet, I’m helping a whole bunch of animals have really great life, the amphibians, all the way up to, if they do it well, they can live with the large predators as well. So everybody gets to come home again. You get to repair the water, you get to restore the water table, you get to sequester the carbon and you’re also helping one of your neighbors be able to earn a living.

This is important. So instead of giving all your money to these corporate robber-barons who are essentially gutting the planet for their profit, you’re actually giving money to a local person who needs to repair the roofs and send kids to college and do all that. Now, you’re circulating your money in a local economy. So you’re helping to rebuild a sort of relationship with humans that are way more based on justice rather than exploitation as well.

You can do all of that by simply buying local food from grass-based farms. And on top of it. It’s good for humans. This meets the amino acid profile that we need, the fatty acid profile that we need. It’s really perfect food. And if you think about it, that makes sense because we evolved from the Savannas from Africa eating exactly that. We’re large, grass-fed herbivores. So this is, in fact, the perfect food for humans as well.

So you can do all of that by something really simple, which is just buying food from local grass-based farmers.

The best website for this is run by Jill Robinson and it’s called EatWild.com.

DEBRA: Wonderful website.

LIERRE KEITH: He has a directory and you can find all the farms in your area that are doing this right. You may have to travel a little bit, but it’s worth it and you get a big freezer or you learn how to smoke and dry it, whatever you’re going to do. But you can find it actually quite pretty easily. Encourage your local co-op, your local food store to carry this stuff. That’s another political step you can take. And they get involved with other people in your area who also believe in this kind of local, sustainable, humane and appropriate human nutrition like the Weston A. Price Foundation. That’s a great group. There are other groups as well. This is just something I really care about because with one seemingly small act, you’re actually affecting all of this stuff.

And honestly, I think the most important thing is like what you’re doing by having a radio show, you’re getting the word out to other people.

DEBRA: Thank you.

LIERRE KEITH: Talking to everyone in your life, teaching your children a better set of values, talking to anybody else on your street, your neighbors, your friends, why this is so important and conveying the emergency of the situation because we don’t actually have a lot of time left before we reach those tipping points on the planet.

And if you love anything, it’s really time to step up to the plate and do what you can to save it.

DEBRA: I completely agree. And one of the things that I think is most fundamental that I like about your approach is that it’s very restorative. Everything you were talking about is not about saying, “I’m not going to do this.” You’re not saying, “I’m going to boycott factory farming so I’m not going to eat meat.” You’re saying, “How can I do the thing that is the best thing to restore life as a whole?”

And when that’s the question that is asked, then you come up with all these kinds of creative restorative things to do. You see what the solution is. And that’s always been at the basis of my work as well. Certainly, I’m telling people, don’t use toxic chemicals but that’s not the end of the story. The other part of it is to instead of using toxic chemicals, that you do the thing that’s restorative. And so always in my work, I have been talking about, here’s a less toxic product that you could use, an industrial product. But I’m certainly reaching out into the realm of artisans making things in their local ecosystems because that’s the sustainable model that is going to save everything.

Lierre is talking about it with food. I’m talking about it with products. Lots of people in the world are understanding this more and more. And that’s really the direction that we need to go.

That’s the end of the show. We’ve only got 15 seconds left. So thank you so much, Lierre.

LIERRE KEITH: Thank you for all your work.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. Thank you for all your work. We’ll just admire each other.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to all the past shows. You can listen to this one again. We’ve got to go. Be well. Bye.

False and Misleading Formaldehyde Label

From Debra Lynn Dadd

Yesterday I was in Micheal’s, a national chain craft store, and saw these giant clothespins sitting in a bin as I was waiting in line.

I looked on the label (lower clothespin in photo) to see what they were made of. Since it didn’t give the material, I slipped the packaging open to feel it, and it felt like wood, so I bought two. Purple is my favorite color.

When I got home and opened the package, there was another label inside that was not at all visible with the packaging. It was hidden under the other label!

This label very clearly states the product is made from MDF (medium density fiberboard) and is meets the Phase 2 California standards. I happen to know this is a “low emissions” standard, which is a clue that it is emitting formaldehyde, a carcinogen.

Even after all my years of examining products, I’ve never seen one like this, where the material is hidden and you can only see the material label after you buy the product. I wonder if this is illegal.

Add Comment

Non-toxic eye liner make-up

Question from Cypress

I am doing a big detox program and am more aware than ever of what I put on my skin.

I have not found an eye liner that does not sting or burn, either at the time of use, or later. I got one that was said to be made entirely of fruits and vegetables, though I did wonder how they made it black. It burned my eyes, both when I put it on and, particularly, later.

Does anyone know of an eye liner that really is friendly? I am not now looking for what SOUNDS good, but for actual experience as well.

Debra’s Answer

Well, this really is very individual, but readers, do you have a suggestion?

You might like this. Here’s a recipe to make your own eyeliner, from coconut oil, aloe vera, and charcoal.

This recipe is from a kindle book called All Natural Living: 75 Non-Toxic Recipes For Home & Beauty, which also has a recipe for making your own mascara as well as other beauty products and cleaning products. A deal at only $2.99

Add Comment

Problem with leather in newer car

Question from Jill

I have MCS . My old (and well tolerated) car was totaled in an accident. I finally got so desperate for a car (I live in mountains and have a child), that I bought a 2011 Subaru that had no detailing prior. I thought it might be old enough to be off gassed. I bought it from out of town and unfortunately didn’t have a long enough test time.

My former car (2003) had leather seats and I did fine with them – liked that they were so easy to clean if stuff got on them, especially scents.

Unfortunately, after spending enough time in the new car, I’m reacting terribly to the leather seats and leather steering wheel. After researching, I’m learning that it might actually be “fake” leather made from vinyl and some leather treated with chemicals, painted, and then impregnated with a “leather” scent. Either way – the leather – real or not – is causing terrible reactions. I saw online that even people without MCS have reactions to newer leather in cars, too.

I’m trying everything (super cleaned with baking soda, vinegar, safe cleaners, baked out in sun) and just bought seat covers in the hopes that will help. But the reactions are pretty severe. I’m wondering if anyone has ideas. I’m a but cautious to try ozone. Not sure if that has worked for others.

I did test out a lot of cars prior and didn’t do well in any. Mold issues are also a problem so older cars often have those. Not sure if I should try selling the car and search yet again for another, knowing none will be perfect, or keep working at this, and if so, how.

Thanks!

Debra’s Answer

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Nontoxic Antiseptic Cleaner for “Industrial” Setting

Question from ellen f

Can anyone suggest a non-toxic cleaner that would satisfy the antiseptic requirements for use in an “industrial” setting?

My husband goes to a health club where they use something so strong and nasty-smelling to clean the weight machines, it’s gotten to the point where when he comes home I can’t be around him even if he changes his clothes.

Emphasizing that the products pose a threat to everyone at the club, I finally got him to talk to someone there about it, and amazingly, the manager was concerned and told my husband that he would try to find something less toxic. He would like to know what I might recommend.

The replacement product has to be a germicide and must not degrade the vinyl on the machine seats.

Debra’s Answer

Hmmm…well here are some suggestions. I haven’t used these products so I can’t vouch for them. They probably want a commercial product and won’t go for something like an essential oil that has disinfectant properties.

One commercial product that says it is a nontoxic disinfectant is Shaklee’s Basic G, which you can get from a local Shaklee distributor. I’ve linked to this particular distributor not because I know her (I don’t) but because she wrote a very informative blog post about the product. It kills 99% of bacteria and lasts 3 days after application.

The other lead I have is from a children’s play center called Leaping Lizards. They say they use a non-toxic, 7 day germicide that keeps all of their inflatables and play areas clean and smelling fresh.

I couldn’t get them on the phone, so I don’t know what the product is, but since they are using it in a public space your manager might go for it.

Those were the best leads I could come up with for a public space.

Readers, any other suggestions?

Add Comment

Lubricating strips on razor blades

Question from SVE

Hi Debra,

How toxic are the lubricating strips on razor blades? This website describes them and lists polyurethane oxide – www.google.com/patents/US6993846. I do know I had a internal body reaction, not a skin reaction to the Gillette Sensor Excel razor blade.

I have ordered a steel razor holder and double edge razors (platinum) to use, at least temporarily. Do you have any suggestions here that would be best for avoiding reactions to toxins in razor blades? Thanks for all you do, Debra!

Debra’s Answer

I’ve never had this question before!

But good you asked it.

The plastic strip exudes a lubricant generally made from polyethylene oxide (not polyurethane oxide as you wrote).

Polyethylene oxide is another name for polyethylene glycol (PEG). A manufacturer says it is nontoxic and “approved by the FDA for use as excipients or as a carrier in different pharmaceutical formulations, foods, and cosmetics.” However, the MSDS says “After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of water” and “Not for use in Food, Drugs or Cosmetics” and “May cause skin irritation, May be harmful if absorbed through the skin.”

And here’s an article about PEG contaminated with 1,4-dioxane.

So I can see where your body might react to it.

How toxic is it? Personally I would use a razor without lubricating strips.

Add Comment

They Grow, Weave, Knit, and Sew Pure Clothes (and More)

rawganiqueMy guests today are Klaus Wallner and Thammarath “Touch” Jamikorn, cofounders of Rawganique. When I first wrote about Rawganique many years ago, I called it “organic fiber paradise,” and it still is. Since 1999, the co-founders, with the help of a team of artisans, manufacture unique sweatshop-free organic clothing, footwear, bed, bath, and home products from start to finish. All done in-house with 50 artisans with many lifetimes of experience and passion. State of the art modern equipment. Ancient traditional practices. Grow – weave – knit – sew, they do it all. Small scale but full scale comprehensive. If it can be made with organic fibers, they can make it. Designed for and by chemically-sensitive and -averse folks. www.rawganique.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
They Grow, Weave, Knit and Sew Pure Clothes (and More)

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Klaus Wallner and Thammarath “Touch” Jamikorn

Date of Broadcast: September 18, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s a beautiful day today here in Clearwater, Cali – I used to live in California until twelve years ago. We’re in Clearwater, Florida. It’s Thursday, September 18th 2014. And today, we’re going to have a very special show. Well, I like to say that, but then I always say, “But all the shows are special” because all the shows are special in their own way.

This is a unique show. It’s even more unique than most of our unique things because we’re going to be talking about clothing and other household goods, but it’s all made in a very special way. There is choices, they grow, weaving it and so the purest clothing and household goods that I’ve ever seen.

It’s all done by a group of artisans and it is just a whole different way of producing goods. We’re going to hear all about that today and I’m just so interested to hear all about how they do this.

My guests are Klauss Wallner and – I’m not quite sure how to pronounce Tham Jamikorn. Is that how you say your name?

THAM JAMIKORN: Tham Jamikorn is good.

DEBRA: Tham Jamikorn.

THAM JAMIKORN: You can just say Tham.

DEBRA: Okay, great. I’ll do that. So we have Klauss and Tham.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Yes, hi!

DEBRA: Hi! They have a business called Rawganique like ‘raw’ and ‘organic’ put together and –que on the end like a boutique.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Or unique, yeah.

DEBRA: Or unique. Raw, organic, unique, if you put all those together, you have Rawganique. And if you can’t figure out how to spell this so that you can go to their website, just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, you’ll see the description of today’s how and you can just click on the link and go straight to Rawganique.

So tell us just to start with what happened in your life that led you from being in the standard industrial mindset to even thinking of doing this and tell us what it is that you’re doing. How did you even get to think about it and actually make this happen over a period of years because you’ve been doing this since 1999? That’s amazing.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Yup!

DEBRA: So tell us your story.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, there were a few factors really. One of them was that my mother passed away from liver cancer and prior to that, since college, I’ve been very interested in organic clothing and there wasn’t a lot at that time, and organic foods. I longed to grow my own food because I was reading Scott Nearing’s book, Back to the Land and all that.

DEBRA: Yes, I do too.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, it was so inspirational. Klauss also happened to be going to some festivals, which was in its nascent stages, the Raw Food Festival and stuff like that. So all of that came together and we decided to leave the city and go back to the land, grow your own food year round and homestead off-the-grid on solar panels and all that. People really started writing about our lives and how we are trying to live without chemicals in our lives.

Lots of feedback came in. People stated asking, “Where can you get this? Where can you get that?” and I’ve been doing that for so many years, I knew all the things. So we started offering a few things here and there starting with organic towels, bed sheet, shoes, socks, t-shirts and all that. And then it just grew from there in response to people’s demand.

KLAUSS WALLNER: So basically, there was…

DEBRA: And then how did you – yeah, go ahead, Klauss. Tell us about how did you got interested in this.

KLAUSS WALLNER: I slowly grew into the lifestyle of using all-organic clothing. I read the books, became more aware of things that I wanted to exclude from my life. And then I started searching around. It turned out that a lot of the items just don’t really exist like clothing. In the eighties, you could find some t-shirts and socks if you’re lucky, organic cotton, but they weren’t of the greatest quality and things like for weddings or for office attire or proper shoes, proper wear or in casual, yoga, martial arts wear. That just didn’t exist.

So we made it our project to find out where the quality items were. And what didn’t exist, we just thought about how we can make them. And that’s how this whole project was started.
DEBRA: I’ve been recommending your website for I think at least ten years.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Thank you.

DEBRA: …when I first found out about it. And what I wrote on my website was that this was organic fiber paradise because you had so many things that I couldn’t find any place else. They’re just beautiful designed and they appear to be of excellent quality.
It’s just a place that I think people can go and breathe a sigh of relief, that all the things that they’ve been looking for that they can’t find any place are here like shoes made out of hemp with natural rubber soles. I mean, it’s just your whole viewpoint of how you put things together and your underlying assumptions about life are different from almost any place else you look.

THAM JAMIKORN: Well, thank you very much for saying that. We quite appreciate it. One of the reasons we started was us being chemically sensitive. And so we had to find alternatives for ourselves. A lot of the product was a response to customer feedback and request and needs because we’ve noticed a trend of chemically sensitive people. The number of chemically sensitive people are on the rise. And so all of that came together, which motivated us to even go more and more into production and chemical-free everything.

KLAUSS WALLNER: It’s important I think that our work, Rawganique isn’t a top-down project where we come up with ideas and then try to educate others to it. It’s really a groundswell where we’re constantly learning from the needs of others whose lives with chemical sensitivity or asthma and things like that are just so restricted and they talk to us what products they won’t be able to use and challenge us to make those. That’s a wonderful creative process that we’re involved in.

DEBRA: It is! It really is. I would like to say again – because I come from that same background, I became interested in toxic chemicals because I was chemically sensitive and I couldn’t tolerate anything and I had to find out where were the toxic chemicals and then what products could I use. When I started in 1980 – well, I actually started looking for things in 1978 (that’s how far backwhen I first understood that toxic chemicals were making me sick) – there were so few things especially with clothing. it was just like if I wanted to wear even cotton, I mean organic cotton didn’t even exist in 1978. If I wanted to wear cotton at all, all I can wear is a t-shirt and jeans. That’s all that existed.

And so what made such an impression on me is that coming from this background that you’ve described where you and others that you’re serving where the primary concern is, “How pure? Can I find something pure enough and without chemicals so that I can actually wear it?”, but you’re also going that next step and making it so beautiful.

And so I just look at things on your website and I go, “Yeah, I could fill my house with this. I could wear this clothes and that anybody else, even if you’re not chemically sensitive, any person on the planet would be happy to wear your things.”

THAM JAMIKORN: That’s so nice. Thank you again very much. It’s wonderful! It’s amazing that you started so long ago to think about these things. That wasn’t even the mainstream topic of the day.

DEBRA: No, it wasn’t.

THAM JAMIKORN: [Inaudible 00:09:57] was really inspired by Silent Spring. It reached me and made a huge impression on me. So we just started looking at ways of doing things like going back 200 years. Well, how did they make socks? How did they make shirts and skirts and pants without machines and chemicals and all that stuff? That’s what informs our whole perspective. We started collecting heritage things in Europe and all over the world and then examining, “Well, how did they do this? By hand.” So that’s a huge thing for us.

DEBRA: We need to go to break, but I’ll just say that was exactly the process I did is that I started looking into history. So this is very interesting that you did too. We’ll go to break and then we’ll come back and talk about this some more. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Klauss Wallner and Tham Jamikorn from Rawganique. You can go see their website at Rawganique.com or just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and you can click on the link because it’s easier than spelling it. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Klauss Wallner and Tham Jamikorn, co-founders of Rawganique. They’re at Rawganique.com. They grow, knit, weave and sew pure clothes all the way from the beginning to the end and household goods and things. They’ve been doing this since 1999.

So could you tell us before we go on in here more about how wonderful everything is that you do, could you tell us some about the toxic chemicals that would be found in clothing and household goods that you’re making that people will not find in your products?
KLAUSS WALLNER: We’ve done a lot of research on the toxicity that’s involved in growing the fibers, in processing, in softening, in the dyes of course and the wrinkle-proofing and all these things. They come packaged in materials and all that.

We really don’t want to stop at that point of feeling encaged in all these negativity that a lot of people are aware of in present times such as [inaudible 00:15:03] environment. But these times, they’re also very liberating because it’s amazing what we found out when we looked around for what you can do chemical-free. We connect it to artisans in Europe where the tradition of growing organic hemp and linen has never been broken. We’ve discovered amazing pure, handcraft artisan work that still continues.

DEBRA: But then let’s talk about that. Let’s just go ahead and talk about that and give us more details. Let’s start with the artisans that you’re working with and the traditions. Tell us more about that.

THAM JAMIKORN: Okay, like for example, you mentioned hemp shoes with natural rubber sole. Well, we have artisans [inaudible 00:15:49] who have been making shoes like cobblers for years and years going back generations. And so in the beginning, we approached them and said, “Well, is it possible to be able to do this with a fabric, you know a fiber in that leather with no chemicals?” and they were really open-minded in working with us. They said yeah, they know somebody in their village and stuff who hand-knitted hemp and hand-wove hemp and all that stuff.

So the dialog became about what we can do and what materials are available out there, so we started looking and found out that we can have access to 100% natural rubber that had been cut and mold to make soles and the [inaudible 00:16:31] is just all-organic hemp that we grow and weave because if you outsource a lot of these things, you’d come across situations where you’re not in control of what chemicals or processing go in because you ask us what’s not in our clothing and in shoes? Well, what’s not in anything that’s probably objectionable like formaldehyde, dioxins, wrinkle-proofing, chemical dyes. There’s none of that because we do everything from top to bottom. And so we’re able to not put anything of that in.

And I think our cause is more about what’s not in it than what’s in it, which is just organic cotton, organic linen and organic hemp.

DEBRA: I’m sitting here with a big smile in my face because I’ve been doing this so long and what I finally get down to after years and years and years is that it’s so difficult to find things for all the reasons that you just said that I’m always looking for, “Well, how can I make something myself? How can I start with the raw material and then make whatever it is I need with the most natural, least toxic materials?”

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, and that’s probably why we…

DEBRA: And you’re doing exactly the same approach.

THAM JAMIKORN: That’s probably why we sell tons of raw materials because people just got set up with like not knowing what’s in what. So it’s like, “Let me just get organic fabric or twine or rope or fiber and start weaving and start knitting.” I’m sure a lot of people out there will listen to you share your theme, do-it-yourself mentality, which is wonderful.

DEBRA: But what you’re doing is you’re taking that viewpoint that I have and you’re doing the work with the same care and concern that I would do it myself. And so it really is an artisan business and it’s not an industrial manufactured business, which has a whole different way of viewing things.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, exactly! Because out there there, it’s really small case. If we go to too big of a scale, then you can’t control a lot of the aspect, right? Every time I go and visit our tailor in Europe, there’s just warm and friendly and just so proud in what they do. They’ve been making products for us for so many years. They’re like friends and family.

And the reason we’ve got to be even more strict with ourselves and our standards is our customers are extremely vocal. They ask all the most detailed questions you can possibly think of, “Is this in there? Is that in there? How do you make this? How do you make that?” So it started our own dialog in ourselves to say, “Well, how can we make it even purer?”

So we’re always coming up with new things like 100% hemp sock, 100% organic cotton sock, 100% organic linen socks, things that people didn’t think of possible. You can go to 99%, but now it’s like, “Why not a hundred?” and things like that.

DEBRA: I love it! I love it, I love it because you’re just like going through the same process I go through. I have to say that probably some of those people who are asking you all these questions were asking them because they were reading my books.

THAM JAMIKORN: Ah, I agree. I can totally see that. They ask, “Why do you have to make elastic? Why do you have to put elastic in underwear? Well, how did people live 500 years ago, 200 years ago before elastic?”

DEBRA: Wait! Tell us. Answer that question. How do you make underwear without elastic?

THAM JAMIKORN: We just use 100% organic cotton, 100% organic hemp or 100% organic linen. You can do it. And actually, they’re comfortable. They’re actually functional.

KLAUSS WALLNER: And strings…

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, we draw strings.

DEBRA: Oh, strings. Yeah.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, exactly, we draw strings without the elastic in it. And so the whole thing is 100% organic. And of course, it’s possible, it can be done. People love it. We make the strings. We weave or we came up with this weave, this trim that’s really thin and light and so you don’t really feel when you tie the strings under your jeans or under your pants.

It’s comfortable because you can have it through any tightness you want without confining you or compressing against your waist or your skin.

DEBRA: Wow! Wow! This is so wonderful. This is so wonderful. We need to go to break again.

THAM JAMIKORN: The result of this years of endeavors and journey is actually a very simple product.

DEBRA: Yeah, that’s what it comes down to, yeah. Yeah, I need to go to break. But when we come back, then I want to hear more about all your products. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re having a wonderful conversation with Klauss Wallner and Tham Jamikorn about the clothing that they make at Rawganique. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Klauss Wallner and Tham Jamikorn, co-founders of Rawganique.

I just was looking at your site again. I keep looking at your site. During the break, I was just looking around. I just want to say, one of the most difficult things to find is organic wedding dresses and even more difficult is any kind of formal or business clothing for men. To find just a jacket that you could wear to work or wear to get married in is just almost impossible to the standards that you make them.

I was looking at how beautiful these pieces of clothing are. And the wedding dresses, these are made of organic hemp. They’re absolutely gorgeous, classic, couture kind of designs and they’re $299. You can’t buy the worst fabric, the most toxic wedding dress for $299.

THAM JAMIKORN: That’s wonderful. Thank you very much. Well, we started with – yeah, we don’t mark things up the same way that fashion houses do and that’s the main reason why. What the price reflect is the hand-made labor, the amount of time it takes our artisans to make this and the raw materials itself, the fiber and all that.

So we don’t think of fashion in terms of a business, but rather if people want to exchange their vows in organic clothing. That’s what we want to offer. For the bride and the groom, we have the whole thing.

It’s kind of funny because we have sort of been known as the hemp wedding central for many years because when the bride and groom get married, they want the whole party to be organic in a way.

DEBRA: Yes!

THAM JAMIKORN: From underwear to stock tissues to ties to vest to jackets to dresses. We kept coming up with new things that we can offer to make it a whole, complete experience. And that’s just what it is. We try to make it as pure as possible. It takes a long time to make each garment. I’m there all the time at the workshop where we make these things and it’s amazing, the amount of work that’s done when you do things the natural way. Everything is by done by hand.

DEBRA: Okay! So tell us how step-by-step all this handwork that’s being done.

THAM JAMIKORN: Okay. Well, first, the hemp is grown for this particular thing. It’s grown organically without any chemicals or pesticide or even water because the beautiful thing is in this part of Europe where we grow the hemp, it rains in the summer. So that’s where the hemp is actively growing. And by the time September comes, it’s harvested, October. And then the rain stops and so the hemp dries in the field naturally without chemicals or toxic [inaudible 00:29:41] that are often used.

DEBRA: Wow!

THAM JAMIKORN: So we ret it naturally. We dew-retting, river or stream retting to break down the fiber. And then we comb it mechanically without breaking it down with acids. So it’s mechanically combed to get these beautiful, long fibers, long staples.
And then we go into the weaving process. For wedding dresses, it has to be [inaudible 00:30:05]. And so we go with the finest hemp we can possibly do, which is about 18 meters per square yard. And then comes the cutting, the designing, the cutting and the sewing. And so it’s passed on from station to station.

We have a few sewers, maybe 14 or so. They specialize in different things. One person specializes in the color, one for the sleeves. And so the garment gets passed on from artisan to artisan and then it gets finished without chemical, detergents or anything. And then steamed iron, packaged and then there’s your wedding dress.

And so that’s what it means to us to be sweatshop-free because that’s one of our big concerns when we started. It’s about the whole sweatshop experience. So we want to make sure it’s all hand-made, handcrafted and no sweatshop involved.

DEBRA: So first of all, there’s no big machines that these are being made on. But when they’re doing the sewing, when you say by hand, do you mean it’s an individual person using a sewing machine or are they sewing/stitching by hand?

THAM JAMIKORN: Oh, no! Well, some parts of it, I hand-knit it. The lacy part of the wedding dress, for example, but yeah, what I meant by hand is that we still use sewing machines of course. But normally, I think in commercial production, you cut fabric, for example, 20 or 30 or 40 in a pile with a commercial cutter. Well, for us, we do the paper pattern and then we cut with scissors by hand just to make sure that it’s precise and all of that. So that’s what I mean by making things by hand. You feel and look at each garment, each process. But of course, we use the sewing machines too, yeah.

KLAUSS WALLNER: For me…

DEBRA: So individual human beings are making these. They’re making them in an artisan way like you would sew a dress at home as opposed to technicians?

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, we have really great working conditions, natural lights, not crowded and all of that. So individual artisans meaning yeah, exactly, they’re not a sweatshop part of a big factory or anything.

DEBRA: Right. And I think that that’s – I mean, even in the pictures, I’ve actually never seen any of your actual garments, but even looking at them in the picture, they have a quality of qualitiness, of excellence and artistry that you don’t often see.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, and we actually – because so many people are curious about our process, we make videos, mini-videos explaining and showing in audio-visual stuff how it’s made like how it’s grown, how it’s sown, how it’s knitted and all of that.
And we kept pushing the boundaries because a hundred percent hemp [inaudible 00:33:12] didn’t exist years ago when we started and now we’re making 100% hemp knit in tissue weight – really white, really soft almost like a heritage linen. We make a 100% organic linen knit, which is really are, 100% everything.

There’s just this challenge from customers, “Why can’t you? Why can’t you?” and we say, “Well, let’s see if we can” and it goes back and forth like that.

DEBRA: I just love this. I love this so much. I love the creative process. I love starting with a natural material and say, “What can it do?”, which is kind of the reverse of what I think in industrial products are designed more by there’s an industrial designer and they say, “Well, what are we going to do to fit this design?”

And so even though I don’t sell clothing, but with food, for example, it’s kind of the same process where I’ll look at some new ingredient that don’t understand like coconut flour, for example, which is so much better for you than wheat flour. I’ll say, “Okay, what will this coconut flour do? How can I create a really delicious [inaudible 00:34:19] or whatever out of this coconut flour?”

You’re doing the same thing. You’re taking these materials that are raw and pure and are as pure as possible and you’re saying, “Now, how are we going to turn this into clothing? What are the historical ways that people used these materials?”
I am just in heaven talking to you and looking at your website because that’s just so how I think.

We need to go to break. We’ll be right back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Klauss Wallner and Tham Jamikorn from Rawganique. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click on the Rawganique link so that you can be sure to get there. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Tham Jakiron and Klauss Wallner from Rawganique. And I forgot to come in and announce the show over the music because I was looking at the site at these beautiful dresses.

I have a hard time finding dresses. Well, first of all, there are no dresses in stores like this in terms of quality of fabric. But finding any dresses that are even – forget about organic cotton, even cotton that don’t have all the finishes on them and everything and now here are all these pretty dresses.

Here’s something that everybody needs to know about this clothing. It comes in size extra small to XXX large. So no matter what your size is, you can find something to wear on this website.

Talk to us for a minute about the dyes that you use because I see that you have all kinds of beautiful colors here.
KLAUSS WALLNER: Yeah, the sizing. We want to be as inclusive as possible. The dyes are actually fibro-reactive or natural. So we use natural dyes meaning vegetables, really vegetable-derived dyes where we can for things like socks and knit tops. There’s quite a choice.

The other items are fiber-reactive, which means it doesn’t use petrochemical [inaudible 00:40:16] and that’s the critical thing we believe in keeping it [inaudible 00:40:22]. And yet they are very stable. There’s no limit really to the dyes you can create there.

DEBRA: I think natural dyes just look so beautiful. They just have a softness to them that you don’t get with the chemical dyes.

And the other thing I want to say about the sizes is on the page where they’re showing the individual pieces of clothing, it has themeasurements – a whole list of like a dozen measurements for the different sizes. And so you can measure your body. It shows us a little diagram that shows us exactly where to measure and so that you can take your own measurements and order something that will actually fit! There’s no guess work about it. It’s just so thoughtful in every way.

KLAUSS WALLNER: What we do every day is when people ask us about sizing, when they’re not sure, we just ask them to send their body sizes and we, with our experience here at the warehouse measuring clothes, we find items that are most likely to work for them. It’s not all a blind guess in what you’ll get in the package, will it fit or not. We can measure it for them. We do that all the time.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, and the other thing about sizing that you started to mention is we really do want to be inclusive because over the years, people ask, “Well, what about my size? What about my size?” Well, we want everybody to be able to wear organic and that’s why we kept, again, pushing in both directions just to make sure that we have clothes for everybody.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. I so appreciate that because I often can’t find things in my size and to have all these beautiful clothes in my size is really, really something.

So just tell us about more of the different kinds of products because we haven’t talked about all the products and we’re getting to the end of our time here, so I want to make sure that you mention all the different kinds of things that people can buy from you.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, we have over a thousand products as you may know. And so we encompass the whole range. I mean, one of the big things, of course, is organic shoes, organic hemp shoes with natural rubber soles and with glue-free sole and then elastic-free underwear, all-organic, 100% hemp socks, organic hemp socks, organic linen socks, bed sheets, organic bed sheets, organic linen sheets, hemp sheets, organic cotton sheets and towels like hemp towels, organic linen towels, shower curtains, hemp shower curtains, organic shower curtains, the list goes on and on.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Yoga mats.

THAM JAMIKORN: We have yoga mats, hemp yoga mats…

DEBRA: I want to say as I’m sitting here – hold on sec. Wait, wait, wait. Wait just a second. Hold on. As I’m sitting here, you’ve got this little slide show of different things on the page. What just went by quickly was a picture of the hemp shower curtain. You weren’t hanging it with metal hangers, you’ve got – I’m assuming hemp little braided hemp holders with little wood knobs on them. This is so great! It’s so great.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, I know. We tried to do everything with a natural materials. All the buttons either with coconut buttons or tagua nut buttons that helps out the Brazilian rainforest.

Also, one of the big things is shampoo. We have 100% organic top-of-the-line and there’s no chemical in it, just one to three ingrediens. That’s our body care line. Facial wash is 100% organic mungbean powder, organic jasmine rice powder. These are really simple that have worked for hundreds of years in different parts of the world. That’s the specialty that we do.

DEBRA: I can really see that you’re taking this viewpoint of using renewable resources as opposed to industrial materials, so that you’ll use wood or a shell or something instead of using something like metal, which has to be industrialized. I mean, certainly there was a metal age where people were pounding on metal and stuff like that. But in today’s world, if you’re using zippers and hooks and all those things, that’s all industrially processed where you’re looking in saying, “How can we take these materials that exist in nature in their natural state and when you’re done with it, will go back into the ecosystem and just biodegrade?” I mean, you just can’t get a higher standard than that.

THAM JAMIKORN: Well, that’s exactly what we think. We’re definitely on the same page with your book and your life philosophy. Our thing is to re-imagine everything that everybody uses and how to make it as natural as possible. We keep looking for new ways to do that without chemicals and synthetics.

KLAUSS WALLNER: We always draw inspiration from looking at the past because a lot of needs has been beautifully solved hundred years ago before the age of a lot of chemicals and plastics and it worked just fine.

THAM JAMIKORN: It’s amazing what you can do with this organic hemp, organic linen or organic cotton, almost everything.

DEBRA: Yes, I think you can. One of the things that I like to do is I like to go to places where they’ve re-created how life was in earlier times. I just go and I look and I see – what comes to mind first is a dress that I saw in a place like that where I knew that that dress was created by a woman sitting in that house hand-stitching every little stitch. What kind of design comes out of that when that’s the way it’s produced as opposed to how is it going to be produced on a machine?

I’m sure that a lot of the design issues in today’s clothing comes out of, “How can it be made on a machine?” as opposed to, “How would it be made whatever is the natural design?” And in the same way, food is designed for how it can be processed and put on a shelf instead of how does it taste good. You’re getting back to those basic life processes, those basic life design that you’re integrating what you do into the flow of life rather than in this separate industrial way of thinking.

I just can’t admire you enough for that because it’s just that’s the way we should be living. That is just the way we should be living. And when you’re talking before about scale, I was thinking that you can only grow your business to a certain size because of you can’t go beyond certain scale. But what you can do is you could replicate your business and have another small scale business. Not only you, but anybody could look at your business model and say, “Let’s think like this and let’s make a whole different kind of product.”

I mean, there’s millions of people in the world who need these products like this. This is the business model, this is the manufacturing mode, this is the production model, to be in alignment with nature like this. You’re doing it and you have it. You’re such a role model.

THAM JAMIKORN: Yeah, thank you very much. And we can’t agree more with your philosophy. We love your historical re-enactment. It’s interesting you mentioned that because we supply a lot of hemp rope, hemp twine, hemp fabric, linen fabric because people who do historical re-enactments wants to be authentic and they actually want to work with the actual material that were available 200 years ago. It’s just amazing. You go into the room and you actually feel time drop and you’re like, “Wow! I’m in a different planet. It’s amazing!”

KLAUSS WALLNER: Our goal isn’t so much to grow to a particular size. We enjoy being a family scale operation. That’s wonderful. Our goal rather is not to let anyone’s needs go unmet. So over time, as awareness spreads and more people want to purge their lives of chemicals and be as natural as possible in their clothing and their daily product, then we may need to grow and then we’ll find ways of replicating that multiple small scales.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. Wow! Well, we only have about 30 seconds left. So is there anything that you just want to say in closing really quickly?

KLAUSS WALLNER: Yeah. We’re at this point involved in bringing a lot of what we’re doing into the modern age, which is with the technologies of social media, of online things that have been developed the recent years. So we’re making a new platform called PureClothes, PureClothes.com where we have all these bells and whistles like customer reviews and…

DEBRA: I’m sorry, I have to cut you off because the closing music is going to come on any second. Thank you so much for being here and explaining all of these.

KLAUSS WALLNER: Thank you, Debra.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. Go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and click on the Rawganique link and go see their website. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

More About “Organic”: Politics and the Regulation of Marketplace Distribution

Diana-and-JimToday my guests Diana Kaye and James Hahn will tell us more about what goes on behind the scenes in the world of organic agriculture and the making and sales of organic products. We’ll be talking about politics and how regulations affect the distribution of organic products in the marketplace. This husband-and-wife are co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. They own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/terressentials

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
More About “Organic”: Politics and the Regulation of Marketplace Distribution

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Diana Kaye and James Hahn

Date of Broadcast: September 17, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Well, it’s raining today. We’re having a wonderful rain storm today here in Clearwater, Florida. It’s only 72°, which means it’s getting cooler. It’s not 90° and it’s so nice. I’m so happy that we’re getting cooler weather now. It’s getting to be fall.

And today, we are going to be talking about organic again with my guest, Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. We’ve been doing a series about different aspects of what organic means, what about organic certification, about how the products, different things about organic products, how organic agricultural products are turned into products, et cetera, et cetera.

So today, we’re going to be talking more about organic, about the politics of organic and about the regulation of marketplace distribution.
Hi, Diana. Are you there and James too?

DIANA KAYE: Yes, ma’am.

JAMES HAHN: We are.

DEBRA: Both of you. Good, good.

JAMES HAHN: Good morning, afternoon.

DEBRA: I wasn’t sure James was there or we just have Diana today. I’m so happy both of you are here today with me.

And so why don’t you just give us a brief introduction about who you are and why you’re interested in organics, how you got interested in this just briefly because I know that we’ve talked about this before. For our listeners who haven’t heard you before, give us a brief introduction and then we’ll get into our discussion for today.
DIANA KAYE: Sure! Jim, do you want to handle it or…?

JAMES HAHN: No, go ahead, Diana.

DIANA KAYE: Okay.

JAMES HAHN: Keep it short though.

DEBRA: Keep it short, yeah.

DIANA KAYE: I know. I do tend to ramble. Our journey into the world or organic personal care products occurred because we had been dealing with me having a surprise visit from non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. It was very urgent and we didn’t have a lot of choices or time to make choices and I ended up doing chemotherapy.
The chemotherapy was very, very strong and it really kind of made a mess of my immune system. It made me extremely reactive. It was baffling to us why this would happen, why I was reacting to everything.

That led us down the path (with the help of Debra’s book) to find out that I was reacting. My immune system have gotten so out of whack from double dose chemotherapy. It was an experiment that I became very sensitized to things in my environment.

So we began (as Debra, I’m sure you’re familiar doing) the whole weeding out of your place, examining every single thing that you come into contact with. One thing led to another and we were able to get our house pretty much cleaned out (with your help, thanks), we worked on our diets. We’ve done vegetarianism for a number of years. The remaining problem was caring for our bodies.

When we were looking at products in health food stores, they said ‘all-natural’ and yet we were seeing all these chemicals and we began this really long journey into learning all about cosmetic formulation, looking at patents, the patents and trademarks at the Library of Congress on microfilm and all these articles to find out how these products were made, what these chemicals were and why they were in these products.

And that led us to decide that we didn’t want to use these products on our bodies and dump them down the drains into the water, which we all have to drink.
JAMES HAHN: We literally couldn’t find products that met the standard we set for ourselves.

DEBRA: And let’s also just mention what year this was.

JAMES HAHN: When was that?

DEBRA: Nineteen ninety something. A long time ago.

DIANA KAYE: It was from 1989 until 1991. And then we began trying to find products for us to use. And during the course of that period, in 1992 is when we started our business as a catalog. We used to sell your books in our catalogs because we were trying to help other people who were like us seeking answers. And we wanted to be able to offer them body care products and household products, but we had a limited amount of things to offer people, which we thought bizarre because we were living in a major city. We’re thinking, “My goodness, if we can’t find products here in the Washington D.C. metro area, what are other people doing?”
DEBRA: Well, yeah. When I first started my work and I wrote my first book in 1982…

DIANA KAYE: Yehey!

DEBRA: At that point, I was just learning about where these toxic chemicals were, but I had a good idea of what it was that I was looking for in a natural product. All the information that I could find on all the products in all categories that did not have toxic chemicals as far as I could identify, it all fit in a shoebox, in 3 x 5 cards in a shoebox. That was it. That was all I could find.

Clothing, for example, if you wanted to wear cotton in 1982, it was a t-shirt and jeans.

JAMES HAHN: Right.

DEBRA: That was that.

JAMES HAHN: Back then.

DEBRA: And so I want to applaud the two of you for being among the first to even be looking at this issue in the body care area.

DIANA KAYE: Also, Jim is a registered architect and I’m a designer. And so we also took a lot of courses in non-toxic building design. I mean, we really went to a lot of great depth just like you did to try to get our environment clean.

But the body care stuff, the more we learned about how your main sources of toxic exposure are skin absorption (number one), inhalation (number two), food by your mouth is number three…

DEBRA: It is number three. Yeah, because when you inhale something or you put it on your skin, it goes straight into the blood stream.

JAMES HAHN: Yeah.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, yeah.

DEBRA: If you put it in your mouth, it goes down through your digestion and mixes with the protein and the food and the fats and everything and it’s a much slower process to get into your body.

So really, if you’re thinking about toxic chemicals, you need to be most concerned about what you’re breathing and putting on your skin.
DIANA KAYE: And with personal care, you get a double whammy…

DEBRA: It’s both.

DIANA KAYE: …because if you’re buying a personal care – and for example, if it’s a shampoo, a foamy, bubbly substance, it’s a detergent-based product laced with preservatives and usually, even the health food stores, chemical fragrances – you’re absorbing all of these chemicals when you’re putting it on your head. But the worst part is all day long, you’re now surrounding yourself with these volatile compounds that are [inaudible 00:07:59] from your hair all day long.
DEBRA: Right, right.

DIANA KAYE: So yeah, it’s really a can of worm. And that, all of those reasons and that history is why we felt compelled to start making our products and sharing them with other people.

And like you, I think we wanted to share this information because the more people that knows, the fewer chemicals we have to deal with. I mean, it might be a little selfish, but…

DEBRA: Well, I don’t think it’s selfish. But it’s like I got to this point where we can think about ourselves as individuals. I think this is an important point. We can think about ourselves as individuals, but then we go out into an environment where everyone else is still doing the toxic thing.

And so it’s not about us staying in our non-toxic homes, it’s about the whole world being toxic-free because when everybody lives toxic-free, then everybody can have a happy life, all the different species can live. A tree doesn’t have a choice, a butterfly doesn’t have a choice…

DIANA KAYE: No.

DEBRA: …to not choose toxic products. And yet we’re putting all that toxic. All these toxic things end up being toxic waste, the things that we use end up out in the environment as toxic waste and all the other species have no protection against this.

JAMES HAHN: Yes.

DEBRA: And so we’re just killing species right and left. Pretty soon, we’re not going to have all these what we call ‘natural resources’ in order to make products that we need for our own life if we keep killing them.

DIANA KAYE: Absolutely. It’s so stirring that we’re disrupting the balance of the planet. We need, we depend on the tiniest insect, the butterfly.
DEBRA: Right!

DIANA KAYE: We need all of these animals. We need the creatures that are living in our tainted waters to maintain the balance of this planet.

That worries us so much every day. That’s another reason why we’re so passionate about – you know, I think we’ve come to expect after 22 years that we may not see a major change in our lifetime. But Debra, I have to tell you, since you wrote your book and since we started our company ten years later, I have seen some changes…

DEBRA: I have to.

DIANA KAYE: …and that gives me hope. It makes me feel better. but I think we still have a lot of work to do.

DEBRA: We do. We’ve come a long way and we still have a long ways to go. So we need to go to break. And when we come back, we’re going to start talking more about organic. You’ve been telling us a lot of great things and there is more to hear.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. That’s Terressentials.com. We’ll be right back!

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials and we’re talking about organic.

Okay! So where would you like to start? Would you like to start with politics or the regulations of marketplace distribution?

DIANA KAYE: Oh, boy! Politics, huh?

JAMES HAHN: Everything starts with politics.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, yeah, doesn’t it?

DEBRA: Alright! Then let’s start with politics. Go ahead.

DIANA KAYE: Well, I think the biggest surprise to us in the early years of our business was finding out that number one, there was no legal definition anywhere in the United States for the word ‘natural’.

DEBRA: And there still isn’t.

JAMES HAHN: That’s right.

DIANA KAYE: No. No, there still isn’t. And in fact, it’s just – oh, my gosh! We’re going to call this the ‘misrepresentation’ of that word in the marketplace in many different product categories is just frightening. It’s just become so widespread.

DEBRA: Could I just say something first about the word ‘natural’ as it pertains to body care products. That is that if you go into – like this was particularly true when I first started and Diana and James first started. There was a field called ‘natural beauty care’ or whatever it’s called.

If you look at the ingredients, the ingredients originally start as something that is not a man-made petroleum product. It originally starts with something like a coconut. But most of the ingredients in these so-called natural products are industrial chemicals because the…

JAMES HAHN: I have to say something about that.

DEBRA: Yeah.

JAMES HAHN: And that is if you think about it, everything that exists, the cellphone on my desk, the car parked outside, everything that exists, all the parts came from something in nature. Silicon came from sand and the metals were mined. Everything comes from the earth, but if it’s changed into something else, it’s not natural, what you’ve done.

DEBRA: That’s exactly right. That’s exactly the point I’m trying to make. And so I think the ‘natural’ industry – and we even do call it the “natural” industry, the natural industry tries to delineate that their source ingredients are renewable resources like plants and animals and minerals and that they’re not the bad petroleum, man-made chemicals.

But petroleum is from nature as well. I mean, I remember going to the La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles and you can see the tar oozing out of the ground. That’s just part of the same petroleum that we make plastics out of, it’s just a different form. But all these man-made petrochemical petroleum things, they’re all from nature, but that source material is modified by man, by industry.

Now, it doesn’t matter if you start with petroleum or you start with a coconut, it all goes into the industrial system and it comes out with something altered. And if you look up how a coconut become sodium lauryl sulfate, there’s lots of manmade chemicals involved in that and lots of man-made processing. And so sodium lauryl sulfate, I’m sorry, is not the same as a coconut.

DIANA KAYE: No.

JAMES HAHN: No, it’s [inaudible 00:17:26].

DEBRA: It’s not.

DIANA KAYE: No.

DEBRA: And so that’s what a lot of natural products are.

JAMES HAHN: Yes.

DIANA KAYE: We address that with an article that we call Bursting the Bubble. The article was writing to try to decipher the technical, scientific information about how to process these various chemicals, oleochemicals, surfactants and emollient, et cetera.

And so when people think about these natural and safe surfactants that are in the shampoos that they’re using on [inaudible 00:18:06], they’re not understanding that as you pointed out, they have been coconut oil, but then it’s put into a reactor, which is very similar to a nuclear reactor in terms of the pounds per square inch, the intensity of the pressure and also in terms of the core heat. These giant vessels, these industrial vessels will incorporate a liquid-heavy metal that’s used as a catalyst…

JAMES HAHN: …in many cases.

DIANA KAYE: …in most cases. And many of these heavy metal constituents they’re using are in nanoparticle forms (the smaller the particle, the greater the reaction). And then once the temperature and pressure reaches a certain point, there’s often a petrochemical agent or two added (ethyleenoxide is one) to the process to crack and split these molecules into new things that never before existed in nature. And voila! They’re sold as safe, baby products.

DEBRA: Well, yeah. And it says on the label. It’ll say the name of the chemical and in parenthesis afterwards, it says ‘coconut’.

JAMES HAHN: Yes.

DIANA KAYE: Yeah, that is…

DEBRA: And so you look at that and you say, “Oh! Well, this is coconut. It’s natural,” but it’s not. It’s not, it’s not, it’s not.
JAMES HAHN: It’s not.

DIANA KAYE: No, not at all. And this is an experiment. This is a giant experiment and people are subjecting themselves as guinea pigs.

JAMES HAHN: Not willingly.

DIANA KAYE: No!

DEBRA: No.

DIANA KAYE: But they’re trusting this word ‘natural’. And that is the huge problem. That is something that we feel in the world of politics really needs to be addressed. What we’ve seen is that the government has been reluctant to do anything in terms of defining this word although curiously, there is a definition for ‘non-synthetic’ in the National Organic Program Regulations in the section of ‘Definitions’. How about that?

DEBRA: Wow!

DIANA KAYE: Yeah. And non-synthetic equals natural. So technically, we have one that nobody pays attention to and I think that they’re sorry they ever put it in there because over the last 15 years, we keep pointing this out to people.

I think there has been some class action lawsuits in the food world, in the personal care world where the lawyers are basically seeing opportunities to try to set the records straight and it has worked to some extent.

JAMES HAHN: It’s making a part of a difference so far.

DIANA KAYE: But it’s the shame that we have to depend on lawyers and the legal system, class action rather than having enforcement of the law by the agents of the government that has this enforcement power within their reach. It’s at their hand and they’re able to do that. That’s the world that we live in right now.

JAMES HAHN: And see, there, you’re getting [inaudible 00:21:09].

DIANA KAYE: Right! So…

DEBRA: Alright! So now we have to go to break once again. When we come back, we’ll talk about politics.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, boy!

DEBRA: Let’s see at 12:57, we’ll talk about all these. Okay! You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn who has so much to say about organics and we’ll hear more when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. So now, we’re going to talk about politics and organic.

DIANA KAYE: It’s so weird that we have to mix politics in with fine organic skin care.

DEBRA: I know! I know, I know, I know.

DIANA KAYE: Oh!

DEBRA: I mean, we should be able to just make things out of the renewable resources at hand and use them to make our bodies clean and healthy.

DIANA KAYE: I know. And that’s what we really had intended just to be able to blend these beautiful, organic and edible butters and essential oils and the herbal extracts with beautiful things like clay from the earth and salt and just have things that would nurture us.

JAMES HAHN: When we started, we hoped to spend all of our time doing that.

DIANA KAYE: But we quickly learned that we had to actually get heavily involved in the politics. And the problems that we’re having is that there are so many giant corporations – and let’s not just limit to the U.S. because this is not just a U.S. problem. This is…

JAMES HAHN: World wide.

DIANA KAYE: …an international problem. We have giant corporations that are making body care products around the world and they love the word ‘natural’. They have loved it for decades now.

JAMES HAHN: Because consumers do.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

DIANA KAYE: They do not want to give that up. And then something strange happened 20 years ago. They found out about the Organic Foods Production Act and saw a huge opportunity to use the word ‘organic’… with abandon, I might add.

JAMES HAHN: Without meeting…

DIANA KAYE: …any organic standard. And so that’s what the companies did on a global basis. They jumped on to this organic bandwagon. Natural wasn’t good enough. Then it became ‘organic’ and they don’t want to give up that word. They’ve been giving it up slowly, but reluctantly, some companies, but other companies see it as an incredibly profitable buzz word if they can put on their website, on their product…

JAMES HAHN: …on their store, on their salon and spa.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, exactly! I mean, we’ve sen it driving it by on a sign outside a salon.

DEBRA: Well, let me ask you a question because I think this is the question that’s running through all the listeners’ mind right now and this relates to politics. Isn’t there a law about using these words?

DIANA KAYE: What do you think? There is a federal law called the National Organic Program, which was signed into law in October of 2012 and that was the result of the Organic Food Production Act of 1990.

The USDA, with consumer input, put together these regulations. They were published on the federal register for public comment. There were more than 200,000 public comments generated, more public comments generated regarding input into the Organic Program Regulation than any other law in history of law-making. And yet despite that, we have virtually no enforcement in the personal care world over the word ‘organic’.

JAMES HAHN: Well, what started in the beginning when the National Organic Foods Act came out, we thought that was really pretty terrific. And then the USDA said, “Oh, by the way, you cannot apply this to body care products” and we said, “What?”

DIANA KAYE: Because we had spent ten years formulating our product to the Organic Foods Production Act and we were ready to rock as soon as the rules went into law, it became a final law.

This was very disturbing to us and a couple of other companies…

JAMES HAHN: …not very many.

DIANA KAYE: No, not very many, but a few that we had been working with in the Organic Consumers Association, they filed a complaint. And then the USDA said, “Okay. Well, we changed our mind. We’ll let you all. If you want to seek certification, we’ll let you do it. You can get certified to this organic program.”
So that little waffling caused us a little bit of time because for basically a year, they said we couldn’t get certified to the new law. And then they changed their mind after a complaint was filed and we were able to get certification.

And so the industry though, the other giant – we’re a very tiny company, but many giant corporations were unhappy with this turn of events.

JAMES HAHN: You can’t believe.

DIANA KAYE: And again, they didn’t want to give up their use of the word ‘natural’ and ‘organic’ because they have been using those words to promote those products. And again, internationally, it started to split off and a lot of manufacturers working with their suppliers and their distributor, their retail store partner began to create their own so-called “organic” and “natural” standard independently of USDA National Organic Program Regulation to justify their use of the word ‘natural’ and ‘organic’.

JAMES HAHN: There’s something that’s really important I need to jump in here with and that is even though the USDA said, “Okay, you can get your body care products certified to our standard, we changed our mind,” even though they said that, they said, “We will continue to enforce the organic standards for foods and agricultural products. But in our opinion…” – these are not literally their word, but they said, “In our opinion, the body care products don’t count as agricultural products. Therefore, we’re not going to enforce that field at all… at all.”

DEBRA: But that’s so funny.

JAMES HAHN: I know.

DEBRA: I mean, it’s not a laughing matter that they’re not doing it, but what’s funny about it is that it just kind of goes to the mindset I think and the understanding of how people think about things because obviously, food is an agricultural product. Obviously, body care is not because it’s made from all these industrial chemicals.

DIANA KAYE: Right.

JAMES HAHN: Exactly! In other words, what it came down to…

DIANA KAYE: Jim…

JAMES HAHN: Go ahead, I’m sorry.

DEBRA: Let me just finish, okay? I want to hear everything you have to say. If people thought of body care the way you and I think of body care as being made from agricultural products, of course, it should be certified organic and of course. But I can see where the common way of thinking about body care product is that it’s an industrial product.

DIANA KAYE: Right! But that’s what we have to change because that’s what’s been causing us problem. The bizarre thing is that farmers, the majority of farmers today thinks that the application of pesticides and herbicides, that’s the traditional farming method.

DEBRA: No!

DIANA KAYE: And the organic method where you don’t use chemical input, “Well, that’s a strange alternative thing.” I mean, this is a crazy world that we live in.
DEBRA: No, using pesticides to grow food is a strange, alternative thing.

DIANA KAYE: Yes!

JAMES HAHN: Yes.

DEBRA: …if you look at the whole history of growing food.

DIANA KAYE: It’s totally bizarre. And there were people who said, “Oh, you can never make organic body care products.” This is what we were told repeatedly and we said, “Really?”

JAMES HAHN: [inaudible 00:34:18]

DIANA KAYE: “…because we’re doing it.” In fact, there was an archeological dig outside of London (this is now 10 years back) where they actually found a tin in this – they were excavating a road on the way to a temple and they found a tin of cream that was nearly 2000 years old and they analyzed this cream. All these scientists were fighting over it. And they finally got to analyze it. It’s very interesting. What they found out strangely, amazingly was that this cream 2000 years old was still viable.

JAMES HAHN: And when Diana says cream, she means skin cream.

DEBRA: Wow!

DIANA KAYE: It was a skin cream.

DEBRA: Wow!

DIANA KAYE: In fact, the cool thing was the woman – and we presume it was a woman, her fingerprints were dipped into the cream and you could still them after 2000 years.

DEBRA: I love this! And I have something to say about it when we come back from the break. We have to hurry up and go to break. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re going to continue with our discussion about organics.

Here’s what I wanted to say before the break. Now, I’m going to tell you something personal about me that I’ve never said on the radio before.
DIANA KAYE: Ooh…

DEBRA: First, I have to say before I can tell you this, I have to tell you that I’m half Armenian. My mother was 100% Armenian. And so I grew up in a family where my grandparents – I mean, I had this whole half of my family was Armenian with that whole kind of ancient, middle eastern viewpoint.
And so I grew up culturally with belly dancing in my family. I know that a lot of people think belly dancing is strange, exotic, sexy, et cetera. But you know what? Belly dancing, I read a book not too long ago about belly dancing, the history of belly dancing. What I found out from belly dancing was that it was not designed to seduce men. What belly dancing was designed for was as a health exercise for women.

JAMES HAHN: Really?

DEBRA: All those movements are to get women’s bodies – it’s like doing Tai Chi or something like that where it’s a series of movement that enhances the flows in your body to be healthy.

DIANA KAYE: Wow! Wow.

DEBRA: And as I was reading this book that contained that information, it also said that women in these cultures, ancient cultures, they made their own cosmetics. The reason they made their own cosmetics was because that was one of the few areas of life where they had control over their own life, it was to make their own cosmetics.

I’m almost in tears now even just saying that because these are the things that culturally and historically belonged to us to make for ourselves and as food for us to cook for ourselves. They’ve been so taken over by the industrial system.

JAMES HAHN: Argh!

DEBRA: They’ve taken away our creativity and our self-determinism and our connection with nature and all of these things. And even though you’re making products and selling them in a consumer way, it’s so much closer to what people used to do, that they were making their own cosmetic products, their own body care products. All these things that they used to nourish and take care of their bodies, women made them themselves. And that was what happened for millennia.

DIANA KAYE: Absolutely.

JAMES HAHN: For sure.

DIANA KAYE: Absolutely. In fact, women, they were the guardians. They took care of the sick, they nurture the children, they took care of the communities. They were in touch with the plants!

DEBRA: …with the plants! They know which plants did what.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, yes!

DEBRA: That is our heritage as women, to have that information and to make these things and to have a nourishing home. And instead of doing those things, what we do is go to doctors and we buy products.

DIANA KAYE: Yeah.

DEBRA: When I realized that, when I learned that by studying history, I started doing all those things myself because I wanted to have that birth right of doing it. And so I think that the highest good that we can do as individuals is to reconnect in that way and that you’re doing that in a way of showing people how wonderful these products are.

DIANA KAYE: It makes me cry.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. So when you do something yourself, when you go out, when you plant herbs in your own backyard and you make something yourself or even if you buy the ingredients and make it yourself, there is less of government regulation and government interference because it’s more directly you and nature. And that’s the way life is designed to be.

There! I’ll stop being philosophical.

DIANA KAYE: No, it’s absolutely true. The reason again that we started to make these products is that people today, people’s lives are so intense. They’re so busy. They’re so pressured. There’s so much stress. We wanted to have products that were just like all the products that we were talking about, things that have been made for thousands of years.

When they analyzed that cream that they found on the road to the Roman temple outside of London, when they finally were able to analyze it just three years ago or four years ago, they found out that the formulation was remarkably sophisticated and it was virtually identical to what we’re making today with our creams.
DEBRA: Yes. Yeah.

DIANA KAYE: So we’re saying to people that it can be done.

DEBRA: It can be done.

DIANA KAYE: Big companies say it can’t be done because you know what? It’s really expensive to preserve a product with organic herbal extracts and essential oils. It’s really expensive. If you look at a little bottle of an herbal extract in the store, a 1 oz. or a 2 oz. bottle and look at that cost for 1 oz. bottle and then if you compare it to phenoxyethanol, sodium hydroxymethylglycinate, the parabens and all these other synthetic, industrial, chemical preservatives…

JAMES HAHN: …dirt cheap.

DIANA KAYE: They’re dirt cheap. You’re talking pennies per pounds. They’re so toxic…

JAMES HAHN: And the same thing goes for the other thing, the emollients.

DIANA KAYE: Right! The synthetic fatty acid, the bubbly, foamy surfactant. They’re way more inexpensive to produce than real [inaudible 00:44:48] or buying virgin, extra virgin olive oil or virgin coconut oil, all certified organic.

But these things are precious, they work and frankly, we are also so disturbed talking about politics by the psychological manipulation through photoshopping and imagery where corporations are preying on a woman’s psyche to manipulate her into feeling that she won’t be loved, she won’t feel important and she has no value.

DEBRA: And she won’t be beautiful, she won’t be beautiful.

DIANA KAYE: Right, right! Unless she alters her body, colors her hair, uses make-up, uses all these toxic body care products.

JAMES HAHN: That’s a whole show of its own right there.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, my gosh!

DEBRA: That is a whole show. We should probably do that one day. But we only have a few minutes left of this show, so I want to make sure that for a couple of minutes, let’s just talk about the regulation and marketplace distribution because that was in the title of the show.

JAMES HAHN: Yes.

DIANA KAYE: My goodness, yes.

DEBRA: You know, I think for the next one, I think we’ll just say, “Diana and Jim are going to talk.”

DIANA KAYE: No, no. Debra, your questions are great.

JAMES HAHN: “…about whatever you want.”

DIANA KAYE: You really understand, which is why it just makes you such a great hostess for this show because you have studied for 30-something years. You get it like us.

DEBRA: Yes, I have. Thank you.

DIANA KAYE: So few people get it. And that’s what’s so important about your question. You’re really good at this. You’re good at translating the information so that people will understand what we’re talking about and getting the importance and how it relates directly to their personal health and whether or not they’re going to live a long, healthy life or have a short where they’re battling illness constantly.

That I think is why we’re on the same page and why we love your questions.

DEBRA: We are at the same page, we are.

DIANA KAYE: In terms of the marketplace situation, first of all, there is still the Organic Certification Program. Personal care product companies can choose to seek this. And honestly, I have reviewed personally every single body care standard that’s out there. Oh, my gosh, how boring.

JAMES HAHN: World wide.

DIANA KAYE: Yes, reading all these industry standards. There really aren’t very many government standards. The U.S.A. has the most potent one in terms of its restrictiveness and what you can and cannot use to make organic products and/or to grow organic raw materials.

So really, based on all of our research, the USDA Organic Certification is still the no.1 organic certification.

We’re sad because there are rules where youc an use clays. This is just one example of something that – it’s not ideal. You can use clays to filter food. You can use clays as ingredients in food products and in livestock beef, but they don’t grow. They’re not organic. They’re allowed, but they’re not organic.

Like for example, we have a product, our hair wash, which the bulk of it is clay, a natural clay that comes from the earth. It’s wonderful and amazing.

JAMES HAHN: It’s the dictionary definition of natural, not the marketer’s definition.

DIANA KAYE: Right!

DEBRA: Right, right!

DIANA KAYE: The only human alteration there is grinding it up into a powder that can be utilized to cleanse the body.

You mentioned Zeolites in a promotional piece. Again, Zeolites are allowed in animal feed and they’re so healing and wonderful. But they count against you – clays and Zeolite.

A salt is considered neutral, which we think all minerals, all clays should’ve been considered neutral. But the only thing that’s considered neutral under the rag is salt.
JAMES HAHN: I think they weren’t thinking far enough ahead.

DIANA KAYE: No, I don’t think so either.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

DIANA KAYE: So you can have a product that still can be totally natural, but it may not be certifiable to the organic [inaudible 00:48:52].

DEBRA: And I think that that is a problem because if somebody is looking for something that is I’ll say ‘of nature’ in the sense of it being a renewable non-industrial ingredient, close to its natural state as it appears in the world, then something like clay or salt or Zeolite or all of those things meet that standard.

DIANA KAYE: Oh, my God! Yes.

DEBRA: And I think, my opinion is that your hairwash, for example, that has so much clay in it, that’s about as natural of a natural product as exists in the world. But I understand you can’t get certified for it because it’s got ingredients in it that are not agricultural products.

DIANA KAYE: Isn’t that crazy? And yet there are all these companies with chemically, bubbly, detergent shampoos laced with chemical preservatives boldly calling these products organic still being sold on the shelves of health food stores across America.

DEBRA: Oh, I’m not even watching the clock. We have to go.

JAMES HAHN: We’ve got to go, Diana.

DEBRA: Thank you so much.

DIANA KAYE: Thank you.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well!

DIANA KAYE: You’re a lifesaver, kid.

DEBRA: Thanks!

The Vegetarian Myth: Why A Vegetarian Diet Might Not Be Best for Health or the Environment

Lierre-keithToday my guest is Lierre Keith. She is the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice, and Sustainability, which has been called “the most important ecological book of this generation.” Lierre and I will both share our experiences The Vegetarian Mythwith vegetarian eating (Lierre was a vegan) and why we needed to move away from these diets to regain our health. Lierre’s viewpoint goes way beyond the taste and nutrition aspects of food, to looking at the whole big picture of environment, politics and our own wellbeing. Lierre a writer, small farmer, and radical feminist activist. She is the author of six books and coauthor, with Derrick Jensen and Aric McBay, of Deep Green Resistance: Strategy to Save the Planet. She’s been arrested six times for acts of political resistance. www.lierrekeith.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Vegetarian Myth: Why a Vegetarian Diet Might Not Be Best for Health or the Environment

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Lierre Keith

Date of Broadcast: September 16, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and to live toxic free. It is Tuesday, September 16, 2014, and it’s a beautiful day here in Clearwater, Florida. It’s overcast, so it’s not too hot or starting to come in to autumn.

After a long summer, you just get to that point where it’s so nice that it’s even 10 degrees cooler. And that’s how I’m feeling today. I’m just very happy that we’re coming into autumn and winter, which is the most beautiful time of year here in Florida.

So today, we’re going to be talking about food and specifically, about the vegetarian diet. My guest has written a book. Her name is Lierre Keith. She’s written a book called <em>The Vegetarian Myth</em>, and we’re going to talk about her experience, and my experience of each of us being on a vegetarian diet, and why it didn’t work for us, and some of the scientific reasons why we both think that it’s not the right diet for human beings.

This book has been very controversial. And so I would just ask you to listen and just decide for yourself if this information that we’re talking about today is right for you. This is actually, as it turns out, part 1 of two parts, because I have read this book from cover to cover. I read it when it first came. It is one of the books that has the most yellow highlighting in it and scribbles all over the margins as I agreed with her over and over and over from my own experience and my own research.

And so we’re going to talk about the vegetarian diet today. Next Tuesday, the 23rd, we’re going to talk about the other half of the story which is talk to about how our connections with nature and food. Both of us have a lot to say on that subject, so we decided to just do a second show and talk about that next week.

But today, we’re going to talk about the vegetarian diet starting right now.

Hi, Lierre.

LIERRE KEITH: Hi. Thanks for having me on your show.

DEBRA: Thank you so much for being here. Go ahead.

LIERRE KEITH: That wasn’t me.

DEBRA: Let’s start with your story about your experience with the vegetarian diet, and what led you to write this book.

LIERRE KEITH: I became a vegan when I was 16. I was a very impassioned young person. I cared a lot about the state of the planet, and the state of human justice as well. And I met another teenage vegan. And that is the way that actually most people become vegetarian or vegan, is that they meet somebody, and they are convinced by the arguments and the information.

And I was convinced in about two weeks. This was information that I had never been exposed to, and when you hear about the horrors of factory farming, it is very compelling, and it should be. There’s really no reason for anything should be something like that.

So I was overwhelmed by what I had been participating in just by eating. And it’s a very compelling argument.

So this other young girl and her family, they were vegan, and they were able to answer all my questions about it, and I had no counter-information. It was the best that I had at that point.

So I went into it, just full course.

So I was a vegan for almost 20 years. My health declined and then collapsed. And I still did not realize that it was the diet that had destroyed me. It is really hard when you are in that world to engage with counter-information.

A part of the problem with being a vegan is that it becomes your identity. It becomes who you are. It’s not just the diet. It’s not even just the philosophy. It becomes your sense of self, and of course, you surround yourself by other people who agree with you on that and also makes this a part of their identity.

And when you get to that point where you’re willing to start questioning or you’re willing to start engaging without that information, it was like a friend. This is a story I’ve heard over and over [inaudible 00:04:29] community. You’re driven from the garden.

And so you know that as it starts to sail. People just go through such a terrible time. First of all, your own sense of yourself collapses, your own sense of morality and ethics and is this supposed to be the right thing, why isn’t working, I must be doing this wrong, this incredible turmoil, but in the back of all of that you know that half of your friends are no longer going to speak to you if you tell them that you’re considering changing your diet.

I’ve seen marriages break up over this. It can be really terrible.

So all of that is going on, and in the meantime, I’m a very curious young person, and I do start investigating more fully. What are these foods that I’m eating? Where do they come from? And what is the cost of […] all of this?

And of course, every time I step outside of that charm circle of vegan ideals, I’m coming up against completely counter-information about the level of destructiveness of the foods that I’m eating. None of this meshes.

So I lived with that kind of tremendous disjuncture between these different branches of knowledge and how they come together or not. And you do live in incredible turmoil.

So a lot of times, this is causing a dissonance. You set it aside. And I think for a lot of us, we really reach that final point when we’ve done permanent damage to our bodies. And I can’t pretend anymore. And that’s a terrible day. I’m sure you know yourself, nobody gives this up easily. It was one of the hardest things I ever had to do.

But on the positive side, it meant that I was finally free to engage with all that information that I had been collecting over 20 years about what true sustainability might look like, about the number of animals that were actually dying, depending on what food I was eating, and the fact there was no way out of that.

I really wanted my life to be possible without any stuff [inaudible 00:06:30] sense of being and as complete as possible.

So all of that I was finally able to absorb and start really engaging with.

So that’s ultimately why I wrote the book was I had to explain to myself what I had done, why it didn’t work. I got bored having the same conversation over and over with people. So if I just write it down, I can just hand them the book because it’s not an easy conversation.

And the other problem is that it can’t be done in slogan. It’s a huge, vast body of conflicting facts that people have to engage with on their own. And it can’t be done in five minutes. It’s a much longer set of conversation, and people have to be willing to engage, and not everybody is, or you have to do it in your own time.

I’ve heard from people who took them a year to read my book. And I understand that because it took me 20 years just to put it all together.

DEBRA: I understand it too. It’s a very wonderful book, and it has a lot of information in it. And there were so many times because I was on a similar journey two years. I was reading all the same books that you are reading. I was studying. I was asking all the same questions.

And so to get to your book, it was just like, here’s somebody who agrees with me. And it was so wonderful in that way, but it did take me a long time to read the book. And I can see that for someone who holds dear the basic principles of vegetarian and veganism that it would be very difficult to even consider some of the things that you say in the book.

And we’re going to talk about some of those things today.

I just like to, for a couple of minutes, just tell my story about being a vegetarian because I never was a vegan. But I didn’t eat meat, I think, for about seven or eight years. And I was convinced that it was the right thing to do nutritionally, but what ended up happening was that my health did deteriorate over that period of time. And there was just finally a day. I went to England and it was very hard to find vegetarian food or vegetarian restaurants or anything. I was traveling, so I couldn’t make my vegetarian food.

And so I just decided one day that I would just eat a piece of meat, and my body felt so much better. That I just continued to eat meat.

I want to make it clear. I’ll say this, speaking for myself. I’m not saying that people shouldn’t eat vegetables. And I eat a lot of vegetables, but the problem is that vegetables themselves nutritionally don’t provide all the nutrition that you need in order to be healthy. And we’re going to talk about that.

And also, some of the foods that vegetarians commonly eat are no so good to be eating either, and we’re going to talk about that.

We need to go to break. So I’ll tell you after the break.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and we’re talking today about The Vegetarian Myth with Lierre Keith. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food Justice and Sustainability. And there’s a lot of information on this book about the vegetarian diet, and how it actually isn’t and cannot be sustainable either for human health or for the environment.

And we’re going to talk about a lot more about the sustainability part of it next week, next Tuesday, in part 2 of this show.

And today, we’re talking about The Vegetarian Diet and some of the things that she has to say about the diet. And we’ll talk about sustainability next week.

I do want to say that my second experience with being a vegetarian was much later in my life when I had a friend living with me who was a raw food vegan. And he insisted that I just do his diet with him while he was there, so that I could see how great I would feel being a raw food vegan.

Well, not only did I not feel great being a raw food vegan, I was getting acupuncture treatments at the time. And after two weeks of this, my acupuncturist said, “What are you doing to your body?” And when I told him, he said, “Please immediately leave my office and go get a cheeseburger, a bacon cheeseburger.”

Because it was just from his Chinese perspective, I was being so out of balance by only eating vegetables. And I’ll just say again, we’re not saying don’t eat vegetables. But vegetables are not everything that we need for a diet.

So in your book, Lierre, you talk about three specific types of vegetarians. One is the moral vegetarian and the political vegetarian and the nutritional vegetarian. So I want to get through just talking about all these three of those briefly in the time we have together today.

Can you give us just a general idea of what is a moral vegetarian?

LIERRE KEITH: So the moral vegetarians believe that the human life can be sustained without death, without any harm to any essential beings. And some of them go even further and say that no creature depends on death.

There have even been people in the New York Times who have argued on the [inaudible 00:12:24] that we should essentially kill all the carnivores on the planet, because all they do is create death and suffering in their wake.

So there is something profoundly anti-life about not understanding that death is part of the cycle. All of us are alive, and we are only alive because millions of other creatures have died to keep us alive. And then we give our lives back.

We’re all part of this tribe called carbon. Every single molecule of my body will one day be recycled back into this amazing planet. The grass will eat me, and the bacteria will eat me, and all kinds of animals will eventually be part of that. And it will all just go back to where it came from, and more life will come from that.

And as a vegetarian, as a vegan, I thought that I could sustain my life, and there would be no harm to any other creature. What I didn’t understand was that agriculture, all my food came from agriculture. It was all grains and beans and vegetables that that’s the most destructive thing people have done to the planet.

I didn’t know what agriculture was. I grew up in an urban environment. I had not a clue of the place it came from, and I thought I was being conscious and ethical. I didn’t know that.

In really brute terms, you take a piece of land, you clear every living thing off it (and I mean down to the bacteria) and then you [inaudible 00:13:56]. And that’s what agriculture is.

We’ve had 10,000 years of this activity. We have trashed the planet. 98% of old-growth forests are gone, and 99% of the world’s prairies have been destroyed. And this is in the service of agriculture. And there’s no way you can take an activity that has destroyed 98% of the habitat for other creatures and say this is somehow animal-friendly.

But again, I was not aware of this. I just thought if I look at my plate, and I see a dead animal that’s a bad thing because something died. When I looked at my plate and I saw rice or corn or kidney beans, I didn’t realize that an entire ecosystem had been laid to waste, and then converted to human use at the expense of all those other creatures who had it seen as simply been driven into extinction because they had nowhere to live.

And that is the progress of agriculture across the planet. We are now losing 200 species a day. And ultimately, it goes back to that process of destruction and draw down.

So in a nutshell, that’s the problem, and I didn’t realize that. Most people who live in agricultural society really had no idea what the cost of this to the planet.

The moral argument is that you can have a life that is somehow free from suffering and death because the food you eat can somehow be pure and life-affirming and all this. And it simply isn’t true. On a more micro level, a smaller scale, plants want to eat dead animals, and I found this out as a vegan who was trying to garden that there was no way to have health soil without incorporating some kind of animal products into it whether it was manure, whether it was [inaudible 00:15:40] or blood meal. Those are basic things that the soil needs.

That was horrifying for me as a vegan. And I ran right up against that wall, and there was no way through. Just ideologically, I smacked right into reality, and I couldn’t find a way through it. And it was really hard because I wanted to grow my own food, and I couldn’t do it.

And then there’s a tremendous amount of death involved even in having a garden because, of course, you grow nice, juicy plants. Well, there are plenty of other creatures that want to eat those things, so you’re in a battle.

I just experienced tremendous ethical agony over what to do about that. And it became clear to me that the only way to do it was to kill them. That it was my life against theirs. Repelling only went so far, and when you’re fighting a battle with slugs, there’s really no repellant that works. They were going to help to die.

So I just went through that ethical collapse on a small scale because this didn’t match the version of reality that I wanted to be true with essentially a fairy tale.

The third time or the fourth time that I replanted that lettuce and the slugs devoured it in the night, I said, “Well, I guess I just won’t grow any lettuce.” And I went to the store. Just very clear, I remember this moment of holding this head of organic lettuce, and I thought to myself, “Who are you fooling? The people who grew this lettuce does the same thing that you’re refusing to do. You’re just paying somebody to do it for you.”

But they’re killing those slugs. There’s no way they’re not. It was a real moment of you have to grow up. You have to face the basic algebra of the system. These animals are going to die and the only thing you can do is do that well, do that wisely, and do that with as much humility as you can, and know that you’re [inaudible 00:17:33] eventually.

But it was a terrible moment for me as a vegan.

DEBRA: I understand. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. And we’re talking about her book The Vegetarian Myth. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability, and that’s what we’re talking about today is The Vegetarian Myth.

So I had mentioned that the second type of vegetarian is the political vegetarian. But I actually just want to skip that because we have so little time, and I want to go straight to the nutritional vegetarian because there is so much to talk about there.

Lierre, first, would you tell us about exorphins, and why they’ll make us eat certain foods?

LIERRE KEITH: They’re basically substances that exist in mostly grain, and they act in our bodies. They’re more [inaudible 00:18:36] substances essentially. So they’re very addictive, and they give us a great pleasurable feeling.

You might not know they’re addictive because if you’re eating wheat three times a day, you’re not going to notice that you have a low-level addiction going on. But there’s plenty of people, if you say, you might think about going gluten-free, you might think about going low carb, you might think about not eating bread all the time, and they look at you in complete horror, “I could not live without bread.”

And that’s why. That’s the big reason why.

And so for a lot of us, as proteins like gluten makes their way through our gut, they actually turns into what are called gluteum morphine, which is exactly what it sounds like. It’s morphine made out of gluten, and they’re very addictive.

I can speak to this myself. Pretty much everybody in my family is always addicted to wheat. I went gluten-free mostly because I have an autoimmune disease, and the results for me were very dramatic in a positive way. But one of the side benefits for me was that I never had to think about it again. Once I knew that this was going to work, I never looked back. And it was such a relief. I didn’t have to think about muffins or bagels or bread again. It’s not food to me anymore because that stuff just pulled my name from across town.

I know there are bagels. If I get in the car, I can have one.

I wouldn’t sell my children into slavery for it. I’m not going to pretend this is heroin or meth, but it has that pull on people to the extent where dramatically, I’ve seen friends have great results going gluten-free, especially with conditions like rheumatoid arthritis. They tend to respond very quickly.

So within 48 hours, I’ve seen people be able to bend their fingers again. It’s that fast. It’s amazing. They cannot keep off the gluten. They would rather have a piece of pizza or a bagel or a muffin than be able to use their hands.

And that really tells you the level of addiction that is provoked by eating gluten and some of these other substances that contain this morphine-like addictive substances. It’s very profound.

DEBRA: It is. And dairy also has these in it.

LIERRE KEITH: There’s some in dairy, yes, but to a certain extent.

DEBRA: And so for me, in my life, it’s like my favorite thing to eat was give me a good load of artisan bread, and put butter all over it, and I was absolutely happy. It was so much easier for me to give up sugar than wheat. Sugar was nothing in comparison to wheat. Oh, my god.

And yet, on a vegetarian diet, grains are the staple of a vegetarian diet. And vegetarians are eating these grains all the time, as well as everybody else.

And so again, I’ll just say we’re not suggesting that you don’t eat vegetables, but there are components, common components, of the vegetarian diet like grains which I personally have been identifying toxic substances being more work. I would say that wheat is as harmful, or grains in general, and particularly, wheat is as toxic to your body as any toxic manmade chemicals. It messes everything up. It just does.

And as someone who no longer eats grains, I used to do this thing. When I first trying to get off of grains, I would do this thing of cheating by when I would go to Costco. I shop at Costco because where I live, that’s the least expensive place to buy organic food. And they have a lot of organic food.

And so I go to Costco and they have all these little samples sitting out, and I’d go, “I could just have this one cookie and I could just have this sample of bread.”

But you can’t because just that little sample will do these things that set up the addiction. But as you said, when you get off it, and you stop, you just stop. It stops being food for you when you start seeing what else you can eat, and you don’t have that addictive pull anymore. You don’t have that addiction, and you don’t binge on it.

When was the last time you’ve binged on a carrot?

LIERRE KEITH: Exactly. People don’t binge on hard-boiled egg or on steak or salmon, smoked salmon. You don’t. You eat it and then you’re full. We actually have shut off mechanisms for both fat and protein.

Our brains can say, “You’ve had enough. You can stop now.”

And if you ask people, how many hard-boiled eggs could you eat? They can come up with a number. “I could eat four. I could eat five. I would be totally full after that. No more.”

When you say, “how much cake could you eat?”

We all know there’s no shut off valve. You eat until you’re ready to vomit.

DEBRA: Literally, yes.

LIERRE KEITH: We have no shut off valve for carbohydrates. It’s not in us. We don’t know when we’ve had enough.

DEBRA: I remember when I was a kid. My family used to like to go on a Sunday morning to a brunch at a fancy hotel. And I remember one day eating and eating and eating because there was all this food just right in front of me, and I just ate, and ate, and ate, and ate until my stomach hurt. And I learned that day why don’t I feel like I should stop eating. And I was just a kid, and I thought that. But that’s the way it is.

But when I noticed that when I eat the right foods that my body is biologically adapted for, things like proteins and vegetables and fruits, I feel satisfied at a point, and I stop eating. And I’m surprised that how little food it is in comparison to how much wheat I used to want to eat.

LIERRE KEITH: It’s biologically true because we have no mechanism to tell us when we’ve had enough carbohydrates.

DEBRA: Another thing I want to ask you, and I’m just picking and choosing things from your book here. There’s so much information. I’m just picking and choosing things because our time is so short. I want to talk about vegetarians and sugar, and we’re coming up on the break, so I don’t want you to get started.

But I’ll just ask a question, and then you can give the answer after we do the break. You talk about how vegetarians crave sugar, and you give three reasons for that. We’re going to give them after the break. But I wanted to say that I have noticed this not only in myself, but in my vegetarian friends that vegetarians, they really, really want sugar, and they are very interested in dessert, and you’re going to tell us why.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth. And when we come back, she’s going to tell us why vegetarians crave sugar.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lierre Keith. She’s the author of The Vegetarian Myth: Food, Justice and Sustainability. Today is part 1 of our interview where we’re talking about the vegetarian diet. Next Tuesday, September 23rd, we’re going to be talking about sustainability, the cycle of life, and our connection as humans to the world of nature and food.

So tell us why vegetarians love sugar.

LIERRE KEITH: There are three reasons. One is tryptophan, the next one is fat, and the third is your blood sugar.

So in reverse order, one of the big problems of eating a vegetarian diet is that it has essentially nothing but sugar. And you can make yourself feel better by calling it complex carbohydrate, but at the end of the day, those complex carbohydrates are broken down in your gut. That’s the job of your digestive system is to break everything down into tiny, little components that can be sent through into your bloodstream, and then the rest of your body picks up the nutrients and keeps you alive, keeps you healthy, keeps rebuilding you, and that’s how it works.

So it’s supposed to be broken down into small bits. And that’s what happens to complex carbohydrate. It’s broken down into simple sugar. And if we were all to eat the amount of carbohydrate recommended by the USDA food pyramid, which most of America did indeed try to do, that’s equivalent to eating two cups of sugar a day.

The human body was never intended to deal with that much sugar at any given day. It’s insane really.

This is the problem. This lends itself to all kinds of diseases.

And we call them the diseases of civilization. One of the main reasons that agricultural people get these kinds of diseases is ultimately because of that excess sugar for three times a day, every single day.

So what happens is all that sugar ends up in your bloodstream. We have one blunt instrument to deal with it, and that’s the hormone’s influence. And this is a biological emergency. Your brain can only function at a very narrow range of sugar. If it’s too high or too low, you will die. And this is life-threatening for diabetics because they’ve lost this ability to handle it.

Ultimately, everyone will wear out their insulin receptors by doing this day after day. But they’re already there. I can’t tell you how life-threatening this is.

So insulin, you eat all the sugar, terrible emergency, pancreas releases all the insulin that it can. Insulin runs around in your bloodstream, grabs everything and shoves it into your fat cells as fast as it can to clear that sugar from your blood before your brain goes into shock.

The problem with it being a blunt instrument, of course, is that it grabs way too much. So now, instead of having too much sugar in your blood, you’ve got too little, and it’s a hypoglycemia. And now, you’re cranky, and you’re shaking, and you’re sweating, and if you don’t put food in your mouth, you feel like you’re going to die.

And this is the state that many people who eat high carb, low fat diet, and [inaudible 00:29:00] (and this is especially true for vegetarians. There’s no way around it if you’re vegan. This is where you’re going to end up), you’re going to burn through those insulin receptors. And every time this happens, you’re wearing down the cell receptors, the surface of the cell that can lock onto the insulin and receive the nutrients.

And so each time you do this, it’s going to get harder for insulin to do its job for the next round. And that’s the problem.

So every time your blood sugar drops like that you’re desperate to put more food in your face especially sugar because now, your blood sugar is too low, and your brain isn’t able to function. So it turns out this terrible emergency call, “Feed me, feed me, feed me. I’m going to die.” And that is true. If your blood sugar is too low, you will fall into a coma.

So you’re responding to the emergency. You can’t figure out why you can’t keep control of your food intake. That’s why. You’re just responding to that emergency that you provoked.

DEBRA: I remember those things. I used to have to eat sugar or I was going to die. I remember that. You don’t think that you’re having that because, like you’re saying, I’m not eating cookies or whatever. You don’t realize that you’re having that reaction in your body because you just ate whole wheat bread. That’s supposed to be a health food.

But I don’t have those kinds of feelings at all anymore. Just not at all. So it is good food.

LIERRE KEITH: Nobody has to live like this. You can stop that entire vicious cycle pretty quickly. In a few days, you can have a really stable mood state, really stable food intake, and feel really happy and satisfied. It does not take long.

But blood sugar is number one. Number two, as I mentioned, insulin grabs pretty much everything and shoves it into your cells as fast as it can. One of the things that it can’t grab onto for unknown reasons is tryptophan. Tryptophan is an amino acid, and if you’ve ever been on Prozac or any of those SSRI’s, you probably know that tryptophan is the precursor to serotonin.

Without serotonin, we just aren’t happy. The amino acid that we would have to have is tryptophan that makes the serotonin. The thing about tryptophan is what’s called an essential amino acid. The human animal cannot produce this. We can only eat it. We can only eat tryptophan. We cannot make it on our own.

And when you’re eating these kinds of vegetarian or vegan diet, there’s really no good plant sources of tryptophan. You’re never going to get enough. The only moment when you’re going to feel like your brain has enough tryptophan, therefore, it has enough serotonin, is when you provoke these kinds of blood sugar responses if you eat sugar.

Now, the insulin runs around, grabs everything, shoves it into the cells, and the one thing it’s not grabbing onto it is tryptophan.

Now, tryptophan has no competition at the bloodstream barrier, and it manages to get through to your brain pretty quickly. Now, for 10 minutes, you finally have enough tryptophan. You’re not eating it because you’re a vegetarian or a vegan. It’s the only way you’re going to get it. It’s by provoking that kind of blood sugar crisis in yourself.

This is why depressed people crave sugar, and it’s why vegetarians and vegans crave sugar just because they want that tryptophan in it. It’s a very bad way to get tryptophan. You end up with blood sugar problems. You’re going to end up with diabetes. You’re going to end up with cardiovascular disease, [inaudible 00:32:30] and all that. But in a pinch, it’s all you’ve got.

So this is why over and over, and I’m sure anecdotally you’ve seen this in your vegetarian friends. They crave sugar like nothing else. And this is one of the big reasons why. It’s the tryptophan.

DEBRA: And you open a vegetarian magazine on sold desserts, it’s a big thing. I have had people tell me over and over that people who don’t eat meat crave sugar. Just period. You’re not the only person who said that. It’s common.

LIERRE KEITH: And the third reason that they crave sugar is that usually, they’re eating very low fat diet along with this. It’s hard to get enough fat when you’re just concentrating on eating all that carbohydrates, and also they vilified animal fats, of course. They’re not going to eat those at all. So you’re not getting any saturated fat. And honestly, you need it. The human body just needs a big chunk of saturated fat every day for lots of different reasons.

DEBRA: It does.

LIERRE KEITH: In particularly, your brain, I think we should start there. Your brain is somewhere around 80% fat. Your neurotransmitters can’t transmit without fat. Nerves can’t be healthy without it.

We are a set of electrical impulses inside a watery environment. That’s the one description of animals. The only thing that lets those nerves transmit the electrical signal is they’re insulated. And that insulation from the watery environment is made up of saturated fat.

So there’s no way your brain is going to function without saturated fat. Now, if you’re denying yourself saturated fat, it’s such an important nutrient that we have a fallback plan. And that fallback plan is if you eat sugar, the human body can actually create saturated fat out of sugar. And that’s again why people—yeah, low fat diet, vegan diet will crave sugar. It’s actually a craving for fat. But it’s the only avenue by which they will let their bodies get it.

If you take fat off the list, and if you take animal fat off the list, your body says, “All right, but you’re going to crave sugar instead because you’ve got to give this to me or we’re going to die.”

And I have had so many people in my life who they make the switch to a more appropriate diet. They start eating either bacon or eggs cooked in coconut butter, coconut oil for breakfast and [inaudible 00:34:52] because they say, “I wasn’t hungry again until 4 o’clock in the afternoon.”

That’s what life is supposed to feel like, and it’s because you’re giving your body appropriate fat. Now, you’re not starving, and you’re not getting that constant emergency signal, “I need fat. Give me sugar because I’ll make do,“ which is what your body is saying with those terrible cravings.

So those are the three reasons that you will find most vegetarians or vegans crave sugar to an often extraordinary length.

DEBRA: And sugar has even more problems that we’ve already discussed, so we won’t go into that. We only have less than two minutes before the show is done, and there are so many other questions I wanted to ask you. But we’re going to talk next week on September 23rd, next Tuesday. We’re not going to talk about the vegetarian diet, but we are going to talk about food. We’re going to talk about food and the environment and nature, just the whole cycle of life and how we, as human beings, fit into that cycle of life, and how we eat, how life eats us.

I’m going to share some information that my big realization about this, I’ll talk about that too. And Lierre will talk, and we’ll see how we can connect in the food that we’re eating with all of life in a positive, harmonious, sustainable way.

So Lierre, are there any final words you’d like to give us?

LIERRE KEITH: I try to always make plain that the values that underlie the vegetarian aspects are not the problem. So, compassion and sustainability and justice, these are really the only values that are going to get us to that world that we need. So that’s not the problem.

The problem really is just the vast amount of information. And I really hope that your listeners will at least reach out a little bit beyond their comfort level to try to engage a little bit more because you’ll still be the same person at the end of the day, but you’ll be able to make better decisions both for yourself and for the planet. You don’t have to change your basic moral framework. You don’t have all the information that you need to make perhaps a better decision.

DEBRA: Thank you so much. We’ll talk to you next Tuesday, September 23rd. We’ll be back with Lierre Keith, and I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

Mold prevention in bathroom

Question from Paula

Hi Debra,

I’m concerned about long-term health dangers in biocides. I’m having work done on my bathroom that will include sheetrock, joint tape, joint compound, primer and paint.

My contractor recommends using the mold-resistant or moisture-resistant version of all those products, and adding a mildewcide to the paint.

Debra, I realize that you prefer plaster walls, but if you were using the above materials,
would you choose mold-resistant products…or would you take the risk of future mold problems?

Thanks, Debra. Your help is very appreciated!

Debra’s Answer

DGreenBathroom

The problem with answering this question is that biocides are not one chemical, but a class of chemicals of varying degrees of toxicity. Where I wouldn’t want you to use triclosan, for example, there would be no harm in using a product that used silver as the antimicrobial because silver in a paint, for example, doesn’t outgas.

The first thing we need to know is what are the biocides used in each of the products and then I can answer your question. Feel free to write back with that information.

Click on the image Debra’s Guide to Creating a Green Bathroom to see how I remodeled my bathroom in 2007. No biocides. No mold problems.

Add Comment

Looking for a Place to Live with Clean Outdoor Air

Question from Jenny

Hi Debra,

We recently moved in with family to save money. We are contemplating what might be a safe area to live in -in the future:

What distance is ‘safe’ to live from a natural gas plant up to 550-600 megawatts. It’s hard to understand how much can travel in the air. We’ve been told the power plant will be like adding 60,000 more people in the area. Is 4.5 miles or even 11 miles far enough?

Debra’s Answer

This is a difficult question, because in an urban or suburban area, if you go out 4.5 or 11 miles you’re likely to run into another pollution source.

The question is where do you have to be in relation to the pollution source to not be affected by it. And the answer to that is more than distance.

When I was a little girl, there used to be a coffee roasting facility on the San Francisco waterfront, right at the San Francsico end of the Bay Bridge. As my family would drive across the Bridge into the city, there was a point where we would smell the coffee roasting.

I’ll tell you that we had to be practically on top of it before we could smell it. Less than a mile. And it also depended on which way the wind was blowing.

So when I look for a place to live, I check around for pollution sources, but I also find out the direction the wind is blowing. Where I live now, virtually 100% of the time it’s blowing in from the Gulf of Mexico. No agriculture, no factories, just blowing over a sleepy little downtown and residential streets. And beyond that, miles and miles of open sea.

There are usually government agencies in local areas that are tracking wind directions. In the San Francisco Bay Area it’s called the Bay Area Air Quality Management district. Look for a place like that in your area and they should have maps of wind directions and how many days per year the wind is blowing from that direction. This kind of information will help a lot to determine toxic exposures from environmental sources.

Add Comment

How Eating Fruits and Vegetables Help Your Cells Create Health

Pamela Seefeld,R.PhMy guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants. Today we’ll be talking about new discoveries about “cell signaling,” the secret communication between cells that makes health happen. And how eating fruits and vegetables and taking plant-based supplements helps that communication happen. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Eating Fruits & Vegetables Help Your Cells Create Health

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph.

Date of Broadcast: September 10, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It is – what’s the date? Wednesday, September 10th 2014. I’m here in beautiful Clearwater, Florida. The sun is shining today. It’s a beautiful, late summer day. We’re going to be talking today about fruits and vegetables, why you need to eat your fruits and vegetables. It’s really fascinating. It’s probably something that you don’t know anything about because I’m still learning about this subject.

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a pharmacognocist. And what that means is that she uses medicinal plants instead of drugs. She’s very, very, very effective at this. She’s right here in Clearwater, Florida with me and I met here because a friend of mine told me how she had gotten his mother off of all her prescription drugs by using medicinal plants and that right away, she started doing better.

I, of course, immediately went to her and she started helping me with problems that I’ve been having with my body that I’ve been trying to handle for years and years and years. All the things that I have done handled them some, but not as much as I would like. So she gave me some medicinal plants and we’re being quite successful at taking care of problems in my body that I have otherwise not been able to take care of.

So I’m very happy to have her on. She’s on now. I’m having her on every other Wednesday, so the next show will be two weeks from now. She has so much knowledge and so much information. We’re just going through all kinds of what’s coming up. We’ve got it all scheduled out through the end of the year about what we’re going to talk about in terms of how medicinal plants and foods can be used to heal instead of taking drugs.

And she knows all about drugs too because she is a registered pharmacist and is trained in that as well.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. I’m very happy that you’re back. So I know what we’re talking about today is cell signaling and how eating fruits and vegetables can help your cells create health. So why don’t you just start by telling us what is cell signaling.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, that’s very good. It is exactly what it sounds like. Your cell communicates with each other. They have little signals, hidden messages perhaps you would call them. The messages that they send each other determine if the cells are going to be robust and healthy and they’re not going to cause cancer or it’s going to be the other extreme where you’re going to be actually repelling cancer, stopping the blood vessels from going to a cancer state.

And so the cell signaling from fruits and vegetables and I’m going to talk about the flavinoids and the compounds in these fruits and vegetables, how the science is pretty concrete and it shows exactly what you can eat, what you can take for supplements to enhance the cell signaling so that cancer cannot form in the body.

DEBRA: That’s just so amazing. And for me, it also comes back to I keep seeing that nature knows best. And when we come back to just being align with nature and eating natural foods and taking natural supplements that that’s exactly what our bodies want. It just keeps being proven over and over again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it is. So we know in herbal medicine and if you look in the plant kingdom is really there are three bioflavinoids that we look at a lot. Can we use those actually in herbal medicine? There’s quercetin, hesperidin and rutin.
Quercetin was originally found in apples and in onions. Rutin was originally found in buckwheat. And hesperidin is found in the pithy part that’s around grapefruit. That’s where they originally located that. I use quercetin and rutin probably exclusively more so than the hesperidin.

But when I was looking, I went to the National Library of Medicine because I like to have everything be very scientific and to the point and very recent, so I did a recent search of some of the bioflavinoids and I found some interesting information that was just recently published. Actually, one of the studies that was just published was out of August 28th of this year, so it’s very recent. It talks about quercetin preventing prostate cancer through cell signaling, probably signaling to stop prostate cancer from dividing – very, very interesting.

Also, and this is actually something I wasn’t quite aware of. Quercetin looks like it’s preventing neurodegenerative diseases. This is of August 7th of this year in neuroscience. So these are major journals. They’re publishing things about bioflavinoids that show disease prevention and it’s all through cell signaling. It’s affecting the way the cells communicate with each other and preventing disease in the process.

DEBRA: Tell us just a little more about – could you paint a picture of what happens between the cells when they’re signaling each other and how the bioflavinoids and other phytochemicals affect that. Tell us what the cycle is.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay! So what happens is there’s good signals and bad signals. We’re going to try and make it easy because I don’t want to make it too difficult.

DEBRA: Yeah, let’s make it easy.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, exactly, easy for everybody to understand. So there’s good signals and bad signals. The cells have a potential to put up both. So we know that if for some reason bioflavinoids and flavinoids and sesquiterpenes and alkaloids and phenolics, these are all these different compounds that are in the foods, you see, the plants make these compounds to prevent herbivores from eating them. So the plants aren’t making this just for no reason at all.

Quercetin in particular is being made by a plant to maintain the structure of its leaf. So if they took quercetin away from plants, the leaves would fall to the ground. It maintains vascular stability in the vessels that are in the leaves.

So what happens is when you take these components, it interferes and it blocks the bad signals, but the good signals are actually enhanced. And it does this through several different mechanism. What we’re seeing is that it can reduce inflammation and cytokines definitely play a part in disease processes. They’re just recently realizing how these cytokines – and cytokines make you fat too. People don’t realize it too.

That’s why when people eat a plant-based diet, when they’re having a greater proportion of flavinoids in their diet, quercetin, rutin from buckwheat, all these different components, that’s why we know that when cytokines decrease (and those are inflammatory cytokines that are actually produce by the fat cells, the adipose cells), when they decrease, you lose weight. It’s not just because you have less calories coming in, you actually are affecting the signaling out of the fat.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: I think it’s amazing.

DEBRA: It is amazing. So again, that’s when people fruits and vegetables and that is what helps the cell signal your body to lose weight.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly right, yes. We found here that this is also another new study that was published in the Journal of Nutrition in June of this year and we found that overall, when you take quercetin – you can take this as a supplement. There’s different doses that I use for different indication. You can take it as a supplement. And quercetin, they’re seeing here that in cancer patients, it prevents severe weight loss. But in normal patient, it actually can help prevent the cytokines from circulating and prevent weight loss. So it’s actually going to help in both situations – someone that has cancer, but also someone that’s healthy.

DEBRA: Wow! It’s so interesting how this things work. It’s boggling my mind. Let’s just talk about weight loss for a second. Let’s talk about weight loss for a second because there’s so much emphasis on lowering the calories in and burning calories. It’s all about calories and balancing them. But really, there’s all these other things going on that affect things.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly right, that’s exactly right.

DEBRA: It isn’t just the calorie balance.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, it’s not. And I think it’s really important to realize that because this is what we’re really told in the media. You need to exercise a lot. I work out all the time. You need to exercise a lot and you just lower your calorie. And people are associating that the fruits and vegetables that you’re eating, this type of diet, when you have two-thirds of diet as fruits and vegetables, which is what I recommend, when you’re doing that, you’re thinking, “Okay, I’m consuming less calories, that’s why I’m losing weight.” It’s not the reason why.

Calories are a part of the component, but the big part is that we’re seeing is it’s affecting inflammation and these cytokines that are coming in and out of the fat that make you more fat. Cytokines, inflammation, this is why when people are kind of overweight, they tend to have a lot more arthritis, lupus, all these different diseases. Well, it’s not just because the weight is affecting it. It’s the fact that the cytokines being produced in the fat are making you gain more weight and making you have pain.

So when you take these components, it’s kind of blocking these cytokines. So the circulating amount, the net amount is decreasing. And so these negative signals that are coming from the cytokines and the fat are reduced.

DEBRA: And then you don’t have those problems anymore. This is so – wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s right. The pain goes away, you lose weight. I mean, that’s what’s really happening. I think this is very, very important for people to realize that it’s not all about this guilt trip about how many calories you’re eating a day. It’s not about that. It’s about what you’re eating supplement-wise and food-wise to change the signaling of the cells so that your body is more in harmony and the cytokines are decreased, the fat goes away and you feel better.

DEBRA: We’re going to talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a pharmacognocist, which is a pharmacist who uses medicinal plants to heal. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is pharmacognocist, Pamela Seefeld. What she does is she uses medicinal plants instead of drugs to heal the body.

Now, Pamela, before the break, you made the comment that we should be eating two-thirds fruits and vegetables. That’s a lot of fruits and vegetables especially for people who are not eating them. I mean, I eat a lot of fruits and vegetables, but I don’t even think I eat two-thirds fruits and vegetables. And all the vegetables people are eating is iceberg lettuce salad with a slice of tomato on it and lots of dressing. What does that look like to eat two-thirds fruit and vegetables?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, that’s a good point. I’m not saying that I’m always perfect at that. But maybe two weeks, we can try and focus on the vegetables and fruits that you eat. It’s got to have high impact. So maybe it’s not two-thirds of your diet, maybe it’s even half your diet, but the things you’re eating like you’re talking about the iceberg lettuce, it has low nutritional value, we know that the high nutritional value are these plants that have not been modified so much over the time period.

So we know scallion, onion, garlic, green apples. They have not been modified over the past hundred years. They pretty much look the same. Arugula, dandelion greens. And believe it or not, what’s really high in nutrition is watercress because that has not been modified at all.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s really basically a wild plant. So I’m a big fan of incorporating these plants.

DEBRA: I have heard that vegetables and fruits that have a lot of color in them have more nutrient. But this is the first time I’ve heard someone say plants that haven’t been modified. That kind of goes back to the Paleo idea of what people ate many, many years ago. I am very much in favor of people eating as close to nature as possible, but I’ve never divided my fruits and vegetables into like how – how can I even say this?

When I was gardening in California, I would grow heirloom varieties. I loved eating those heirloom varieties because those are the natural non-hybrids. I’m not shopping at the supermarket, so I’m not even going to say that. But if I go to the natural food store or even to a farmer’s market, at a farmer’s market, you can ask the farmers what they planted. But at the natural food store, you don’t know whether these are hybrids or heirlooms unless they’re labeled heirloom and they’re practically not. I mean, even organic, most of what they’re growing is hybrid.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, that’s true. What I would tell you though is that what I make a point of doing that’s pretty easy to do is my breakfast always has a green apple associated with it because the inulin is present in it, the bacteria in your gut really like it. In fact, they’re healthy food, they munch on it. So that’s a good start.

We look at the gala apples and the grannies, just the golden delicious, all those different apples. They have been modified a lot and they have a lot of sugar. Granny Smith apples are a great way to start the day with maybe some Greek yoghurt and some nuts. That’s typically what I have. That has the proteins. It has the carbohydrates and the fat. But the carbohydrates are going to be liberated out of the green apple because of the pectin. It keeps your blood sugar very stable. So it’s a really good fresh start to the day.

DEBRA: Oh, great!

PAMELA SEEFELD: I would say too that the garlic and the onions, I just put tons of that stuff with my lunch and dinner.

DEBRA: I do too.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So we’re really kind of getting it from that. And then, of course, the dark, leafy greens. The trickiest too when you’re looking at the vegetables you’re eating that the variety of the color is important, but what’s really important is there’s fat present on the salad because if there is not, you’re not going to absorb them. These are fat-soluble components. The flavinoids in these fruits and vegetables need to have a small amount of fat.

So olive oil with a little bit of lemon and I usually put garlic in there too, that’s my typical salad dressing because you’re going to really absorb them. If you don’t have something that has a small amount of fat even if it’s just nuts on the salad, you’re not going to absorb these flavinoids. And these are fat-soluble. You want to have them peak in the blood stream.

DEBRA: Then I’m doing the right thing because my salad dressing is olive oil and unrefined salt.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Perfect!

DEBRA: Yeah, and I think that it taste better. I used to be a big salad dressing person. I love ranch dressing and thousand island dressing, all those tasty things. But once I started using olive oil and just unrefined salt, organic olive oil and unrefined salt, you can actually taste the vegetables.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: It just taste so fresh that I don’t even want to eat those over the salad dressings anymore.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it enhances the flavor and that’s really proven to be true. And if you think about it, I was looking here, there’s another study that came out in Cancer Prevention, which was August 26th of this year and it talked about why do fruits and vegetables prevent cancer. The anti-cancer properties appear to be cell signaling the topic we’re talking about today, cell signaling). We know now that this particular cell signaling I was talking about, the cytokines, it down-regulates these cytokines, which can be pre-cancerous (initiators) and it starts something called – it stops angiogenesis.

Angiogenesis is when cancer forms in one area and blood vessels have to come out to feed it particularly. It’s kind of like outside of the normal pipeline so to speak. And angiogenesis is what we want to stop. We want the blood vessels to not go and seed a tumor cell.

So we know now that the plants, when you take them and you consume them, these flavinoids stop that process where the blood vessels are able to go on feed onto the cancer.

DEBRA: Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, it’s pretty great.

DEBRA: Wow! Wow! So in another show, we learned that sugar feeds cancer. So now we know no sugar and lots of fruits and vegetables, that would prevent cancer in the first place.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And this is in the Cancer Journal or this year like less than a month ago. So that’s really important.

There’s another study I was just looking at today because I did a full Medline search of anything most recently published. This was just published in Asian Pacific Journal Cancer Prevention. We see that lutein bioflavinoid (and lutein, people take it a lot of times for their eyes), lutein has cell signaling pathways and it stops the progression of colon cancer.

So these things are found, these bioflavinoids are found in fruits and vegetables to varying degrees. What you need to do is say, “I need to try and incorporate as many of these in every day for disease-preventing activity.”

Also, too, you can take these things as supplements. And depending if you had a cancer history, we can prescribe bioflavinoids and these antioxidants that go to certain areas depending on which cancer somebody has. I think someday you’re going to see cancer prevention and treatment tailored by their diet.

DEBRA: Wow! That would be so cool. That would be so cool, yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s where we’re headed. Luckily, the cancer journals are picking up on this and it’s not pharmacognosy journals and the people just meeting that are plant scientists. It’s becoming mainstream that people are embracing this. Cell signaling is all about – remember, we talked about dampening the anybody signals, enhancing the good signals.

DEBRA: Wow, that’s amazing. Okay! Well, we’re going to talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacognocist – and that word, pharma- is drug and then –cog is intelligence. And so it means plants, these medicinal plants have intelligence really. This is what we’re talking about, intelligence and the ability to communicate, which I think is all amazing – not amazing, but so wonderful because I think everything alive can communicate.

Anyway, I’m going to stop talking. We’re going to go to break and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is pharmacognocist, Pamela Seefeld. She uses medicinal plants and other things like fish oils to heal the body instead of drugs.
So Pamela, what else do you want to tell us about cell signaling?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay! So flavinoids, we were talking about these flavinoids. These bioflavinoids and flavinoids in general are found in plants. There’s also other things that can affect cell signals. I’m going to talk a little bit about some of these other things as well.

But this is interesting, the flavinoids themselves. We’re talking about these components in the plant that the cells produced to keep herbivores from eating then, animal grazing in the grass. They have enhanced activity for us.

It’s interesting. The cytotoxicity or the anti-cancer effects – this is just some chemistry for some people that are interested in that. This is a brand new study that just came out. They have found that the reason why this has anti-cancer effects, the flavinoids that are in your salad is there’s a 2-3 double bond in a C-ring, one of the structures. They look for that in the flavinoids. If it has that double bond, it causes what’s called mitochondrial poisoning.

So the mitochondria if you remember back in highschool, it’s the power house of the cell. It’s where some of the energy is produced for the cell. This actually stops. The cell signaling prevent cancer from having the mitochondria perform correctly and that’s why it kills the cancer cell. So they actually know the very mechanism why these components – you can take them in a supplement or you can take them as well in your salad – actually stop cancer from growing.

Interesting that we see know too is that flavinoids are very much arresting cell cycles with the cell signaling, the cell cycle signaling in breast cancer. And breast cancer we know affects one in eight women in America. So it’s one of the most common cancers. There’s a high propensity of people concerned about cancer – family heredity, BRCA gene testing, all these sorts of things that are going on right now. But really a big prevention of breast cancer is consuming flavinoids and consuming them along with the fat – we were talking about the olive oil – to make sure that you get a high peak in the blood stream.

Another interesting study that just came out too and I think your guests would find this interesting is that there are inhibitors of cell signaling for cancer and genistein, which is found in soy – and I’m not saying people go out and eat tons of soy. I’m saying genistein looks like it has some activity in preventing that.

Now, of course, someone who has a history of breast cancer, eating tons of soy is not a good idea, but a small amount of soy seem to be preventing this and it stops the signaling from the cancer cells themselves.

Now,I want to talk a little bit about Resveratrol because this is a supplement that people take quite a bit. Resveratrol, I really have high regards for, not so much – people say, “Well, I drink red wine.” Well, it’s not really quite the same time. But Resveratrol, if you take medical grade Resveratrol in a capsule, it’s very economical and it’s very effective.

And what we found now in this new study – this just came out this year August 21st, Molecular Medicine Reproductive Technology – in this particular journal, we’re talking about what’s going on as far as proliferation or the acceleration of cancer. We see that if you take Resveratrol, it induce what’s called apoptosis. Apoptosis means that the cancer cell actually burst open and die. So Resveratrol, its affinity for inducing apoptosis or the actual breaking up of the cancer cell is very high.

And also, new studies that just came out prevent cancer in the mouth epidermis. So this means that they look to induce skin cancer in this mice – and this was just published in Cell Molecular Biology in 2014, August 29th. This shows that Resveratrol stopped the mouse epidermis from proliferating for cancer. So it can have anti-cancer effects especially us being here in Clearwater and having lots of sunexposure. Skin cancer is a big problem here in the United States. So preventing skin cancer and the invasiveness of cancer is a brand new study as well. It stops the cancer from actually invading into the tissue.

So all this is through cell signaling. That’s how it works, just all through cell signaling.

DEBRA: And this is just amazing. I hear that – what is it? Like two out of three people have cancer, some big number like that? I think it’s different for men and women. I don’t remember off the top of my head. But these solutions are so simple.

PAMELA SEEFELD: They’re very simple and they’re very inexpensive. You’re going to eat anyway, right?

DEBRA: Right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And some of the supplements I’m talking about, the quercetin, Resveratrol, if you have a cancer history and so forth, I would be glad to talk to anybody. I don’t charge for my time at my pharmacy. If you had a question about dosages and how to incorporate them and what to eat them with as far as to get the highest peak in the bloodstream, as far as where you want it to target, whether you’re looking at colorectal cancer, breast cancer, any of your clients that are listening here today can call me some time at my pharmacy. I’m just going to give the phone number.

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s Botanical Resource and it’s 727-442-4955. You could check with me and see exactly what you’re doing as far as gearing towards the right dosage and the right product. I can help you with that.

So, we see also – another study that came out in a cancer journal this year, October. Actually, it’s October of last year. That was the most recent one that came out. In this study, it shows that also Resveratrol stops the cell signaling for prostate cancer. So we were talking before about how the different flavinoids affect prostate cancer. And prostate cancer really for most men that are going to be in their sixties and seventies, they’re going to end up with some kind of prostate issues as well.

Now we know that in the past, they used to treat these things very aggressively and they found that there was incontinence and sexual problems and a lot of things that were associated with it. Now, they’re trying not to be so aggressive because they realized that the outcomes were not as favorable as they thought.

So these are some simple things that you can take if you’re concerned about that. If you’re, males in particular, are having some issues with their prostate, these are simple supplements that you can take to prevent this. But at the same time, you can prevent cancer for the skin as well. So this is really something that can be all-encompassing.

Now, I’m going to talk a little bit about fish oil.

DEBRA: This is just – wait, we need to go to break. Actually, we have one more minute, go ahead, go ahead.

PAMELA SEEFELD: After the break, we’re going to talk about fish oil and I’m going to talk about how that’s cell signaling as well. This is important because a lot of people take omega 3’s and we want to make sure it’s signaling to prevent cancer.

DEBRA: Good! Well, I’ll just say that I’ve been taking fish oil for the last couple of weeks. I absolutely refused to take fish oil before because I don’t eat fish, my body reacts to it pretty badly. But Pamela explained on an earlier show about how fish oil is processed and that if you get a good quality one, then there’s no toxic pollutants in it and it also doesn’t have the protein in it that most people react to.

And so for the past couple of weeks, I’ve been taking fish oil with absolutely no problem. I actually feel very happy taking it. I go, “Oh, good! Fish oil, it must be doing something right in my body.” So after the break, she’s going to tell us more about this.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is pharmacognocist, Pamela Seefeld. She’s at Botanical Resource in Clearwater, Florida. She has a website, it’s BotanicalResource.com. But you can just call her on the phone. And when we come back, she’ll give her phone number again. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is pharmacognocist, Pamela Seefeld who dispenses medicinal plants to heal the body instead of drugs. Okay, tell us about your fish oil. I know that’s your favorite subject.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I love fish oil because it’s so effective and it turns on 300 different genes in the body. So we know it’s all-encompassing, it goes to the entire body. And of course, because it’s fat and fat-soluble, it has high penetration to the central nervous system. We know it works really good to prevent cognitive decline, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, all these types of things that people are really concerned about. It has high penetration for the brain.

The brain is mostly made of DHA. But EPA, giving it on the front-end tends to be more of a mood-elevating load. So actually, when they autopsy, they only find DHA in the brain. So these things are really interesting.

Fish oil, you can get DHA from algae, but a lot of times, I don’t like to use DHA by itself because it can tend to make people depress. So usually, you want to have ratios. There’s different ratios depending on what types of effects we’re trying to do towards mental health.

But the cool part about the fish oil, we’re talking about cell signaling, we know it signals cells all throughout the body and in a favorable manner. For cardiovascular reduction, it’s a 75% reduction of cardiovascular disease. So it’s really significant.

And we know that what it’s doing too as well – and this is a new study that I just downloaded talking about on the skin. Say someone has a cut or an injury and they’re taking fish oil, it looks like injury from blood vessel being damaged, say you get a bruise or a cut, what this seems to be doing is it’s protecting the endothelium, the skin and it allows new blood vessels to go and have more nutrients to the tissue where it’s needing repair.

So somebody that has maybe diabetic wounds or even gum disease, something is not healing correctly, fish oil can be an adjunct therapy to make sure that the blood vessels deliver the nutrients directly to the wound. To me, that is just absolutely amazing.

We’ve known about the effects on the heart and that’s what most people take it for, but really, we know too now that it can prevent the damages taking place. Say something is just not healing correctly, a wound that won’t heal properly or if you have a cut, if you already are on fish oil or taking omega 3’s, it’s going to make a huge difference as far as the blood vessels reaching the area and delivering medication, nutrients, things that will actually repair where the injury took place.

We also see that it helps augment brain repair. Go ahead.

DEBRA: Wow! Well, what I wanted to say is that I’m just thinking about in times past when people ate diets that were not industrial diets, they were eating things like fish and so getting the fish oils. They were eating plants that were just right out of the ground.

If you think about the hunter/gatherer – again, going back to the Paleo diet – and every time I say the Paleo diet, I feel like I want to add a disclaimer and say, “Meaning foods that people actually ate prior to industrialization” because a lot of what’s called the Paleo diet now, I look at those recipes and I go, “Oh, my God!” They’re not very natural even though they’re designed around eating things that are basic to nature. I mean, people didn’t eat a pound of bacon for breakfast, I’m sorry.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. That’s exactly right. You’re correct about it. They’ve really kind of gone to the deep and say, “Okay, we used to eat lots of meat. So that’s what we’re going to eat, just always meat.” That’s now what it’s about.

DEBRA: That’s not what it’s about and that there is a lot of meat in the Paleo diet, a lot of emphasis. But what I found after being on a Paleo diet for three or four months just trying it to see how it would work, what I found was that it was way too much meat for my body – way, way, way. And it’s not that I don’t eat meat or that I’m a vegetarian or whatever, but it’s just the whole emphasis on all this meat because that’s what people ate in Paleo times.

I actually think that they ate a lot more vegetables and fruits because you could go around and gather them, whereas to eat meat, you have to go kill a big animal.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And you’re right. If we look at these people that are talking about the hunters and gatherers, they weren’t sitting there eating steaks all day long. That really was not the situation.

DEBRA: No!

PAMELA SEEFELD: They’re eating lots of berries and lots of plant. This is what they decided to start calling the Paleo diet, just basically eating every kind of meat you want. It’s kind of like a modified Atkins, but you throw a few plants in it. That’s not really what we want to do.

We want to say that these plants that I talked about that haven’t been changed that much, colorful vegetables are very important and making sure there’s fat present. All these things are very important. And you can take Resveratrol as a supplement, you can take quercetin as a supplement.

And fish oil is a very, very important supplement. Especially if you want to have maybe mood elevating or calming effects. I do a lot of mental health. And especially if someone has anxiety or lots of stress, you can take fish oil that takes the edge off and makes you just a lot more relaxed about day to day activities.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah. I noticed that since I’ve been taking fish oil – I don’t remember what was the mental health benefit we were going for. I’ve only been taking it for two weeks, but I noticed that – not that I was so anxious before, but I noticed my ability to just sit and concentrate and do my work and feel calm and not be worried about things or just have my concentration distracted, I can just sit here and work very calmly hour after hour after hour. And that’s tremendous for me. It’s just tremendous.

I really see everything you’ve given me, I see the benefits. I just see the benefits. And I’ll also just mention just because I’m so happy about it – I’m happy about all of it. I really encourage you if you have anything wrong going on or anything that you want to prevent, please call Pamela because she will give you the right thing.

One of the things that I’ve had problems with is sleep. For years, I’ve had problems with sleep. She gave me Passion Flower. And now, I just sleep the eight hours. I just fall asleep and I sleep for eight hours. I am so happy.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I really appreciate that. That’s really great. And you know too, I have tried probably ten different Passion Flower products for different people. And the one I settled on was the prescription quality. So I’ve really kind of done the leg work. I’ve been doing this probably 20 years. I’ve been 25 years as a pharmacist, but I’ve been doing 20 years of naturopathic pharmacy.

Really, it’s important to understand that people take a lot of different things, they might read a magazine or something, but especially knowing and taking the right dose at the right time and how to make sure that what you’re taking, you respect people’s time and money is really important.

Like the sleep issue, the few products that I didn’t think were working, I don’t have them anymore. That’s what it felt especially even homeopathy. You know I’m a big fan of homeopathy. They’re finding now that homeopathy prevents – it actually affects cell signaling. That’s the brand new studies that came out.

So all the things that I’ve been telling people about homeopathy are really true. It affects cells signaling favorably.

DEBRA: Well, it’s interesting because homeopathy is one of those things where place say, “Well, there’s nothing in the bottle, but the energy of the material is so dilute, but it’s not like eating an apple or something.” That’s interesting that a study has come out to say that. It just goes to show that very small amounts and even just the energetic imprint of things can affect our bodies.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, very much so because they found that effected reactive oxygen species, it reduces that. It helped for mediating cell signaling in a favorable manner.

And homeopathy, what’s great about it is you can give this to animal. You can give it to little children. You can give it to adults. And really, a lot of times for homeopathy, I’ll give a homeopathic product that I think really can be all-encompassing for a family. They could all use it in different doses and everybody comes back feeling better.

So people need to embrace that homeopathy really is kind of like secret repair. That’s the way I look at it. It kind of goes to the area of where it needs to in each individual and repairs and stops disease processes on multiple levels.
Wendy: Yeah, yeah, yeah. There’s some amazing. We have so many amazing tools available to us and they all come back down to nature.

The thing that I wanted to say and I got kind of sidetracked before was about how in the past, pre-industrially, people were eating the food that was there in nature. And so it included things like fish oils and a lot of plants. And all these things that we’re talking about, people were getting on a daily basis in their diet because they were eating the foods direct from nature.

And the fact that we need to supplement them and be paying attention to them is because just our average food supply is processed foods and hybrid foods and all these things. It’s so far away from nature. And just as we get back to having the things that we would have if we were just living in a natural environment, then that handles all these diseases because we’re just getting what we need, what our bodies need.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. A lot of people are embracing fresh diets if you looked around. I mean, this is what people want. But it’s not just that it’s trending, it’s neat. It’s the fact that we know that there’s certain flavinoid you can take, certain doses of fish oil you can take, certain types of Resveratrol like the passion flower product that we’re talking about, there are certain things you can take to really target and say, “Okay, I want a therapeutic outcome. I’m not just taking this because I read about it and I want to take it. It sounds neat!”

That’s what’s really important, using your knowledge. I mean, God gave us, everybody, unique knowledge and applying those talents is what it’s really all about.

DEBRA: Yeah. So I just want to emphasize again what Pamela just said that it is about getting a therapeutic result. And so if you just are going to read an article or go to the natural food store and pick something off the shelf, call Pamela because she has the experience of knowing what to use for what condition and she also has the products that she’s honed down after 20 years of experience to see what works and what doesn’t work and she’s going to give you something that works. Give the number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. If they have any questions, they’d like to contact me, my number here in Clearwater is 727-442-4955 and I would be very honored to help any individual that has questions about medications they want to go off of or if they just want to enhance their health or if they actually want to treat a disease state, I would be very happy to share my knowledge.

DEBRA: Thank you very much.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Thank you.

DEBRA: We’re at the end of the show. We look forward to talking to you again in two weeks from today.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I love it! Thank you.

DEBRA: This is Pamela Seefeld, she’s a pharmacognocist and she’s great. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and you’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

Organic Mattress for Adjustable Bed

Question from Bonnie Johnson

I noticed Dr Weil has put his name on a new mattress. It is supposed to be natural and is made by Beautyrest. So far I have not been able to get any answer about if it has fire retardents. Although it is not organic I was looking at the fact that it can be put on a frame that will adjust. I could use that for my breathing problems. Any info that you have on it Debra?

Debra’s Answer

I went to the Comfortpedic IQ website to take a look. With all due respect to Dr. Weil, he endorses products for various different health reasons, and not necessarily toxics.

They don’t give much information about the materials of this mattress, except to say that it is made with memory foam. I have no reason to believe it’s anything other than standard memory foam, which is polyurethane foam. It needs to pass the flammability law requirements, so I imagine it has chemical fire retardants, since they don’t state anything else. Why do you think it’s supposed to be natural? I didn’t see anything about that on their company website.

If you are looking for a mattress that can be put on an adjustable frame, Naturepedic now makes organic adult mattresses and an adjustable frame. So that’s an option for you.

Add Comment

Making the Switch to Solar Energy

John GambillToday my guest is John Gambill, president of Hotwire Enterprises. For the past 16 years, this company has focused on wind- and solar-powered systems and energy efficient appliances, with customers worldwide. Today we’ll be talking about how switching to solar energy can reduce the air pollution generated by fossil fuel and nuclear power plants, and the practical steps of making that switch. John has a diverse background ranging from owning and operating a whole grains bakery and motorcycle/auto/airplane mechanic to wind generator manufacturer and solar integrator. For fun, John recently converted a Mitsubishi Expo from a mechanical car to an electric car which gets plugged into a solar array for recharging at his solar-powered home. John has installed solar electric systems on boats, RVs, ambulances, and residences. He has been a frequent guest on WMNF’s Sustainable Living program with Jon Butts. www.svhotwire.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Making the Switch to Solar Energy

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: John Gambill

Date of Broadcast: September 09, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free. Today is Tuesday, September 9, 2014. I want to say that it’s a sunny day because we’re going to be talking about solar energy, but the sun is just coming out from behind the clouds, which we get a lot of at this time of year because we’ve got a lot of rain here in Clearwater, Florida.

But over the weekend, I was at a potluck. I want to mention about this potluck because this is a very interest concept we have here in Clearwater, something called a time bank, which is not barter. It’s where you can do things and earn hours, and put them in a bank, the time bank. And then you can spend them on other things that you want.

For example, I would like to sew my own clothes, but I don’t sew very well. So, I can do things like help people with their websites or something that I do well, and exchange the hours that I earn for somebody to sew clothes for me or drive me to the store if I can’t drive or go shopping for me if I’m sick or whatever it happens to be.

And I’ve been doing this for a couple of years, and it’s a very good way to get to know people in your community. It’s a good way for people to be able to help each other without the exchange of money.

We have potlucks once a month, so we can get to meet each other. But also, there’s a database online where everybody registers the hours that they’ve earned and spent. But I like to go to the potlucks because I like to meet people that I might be able to do exchanges with.

So I was at the potluck, and one of our new members got up and spoke, and said how he works with solar energy. And I thought, last week, when Dr. Steven Gilbert was on, he’s a toxicologist, he was telling us about how he had just switched his home to solar. And we talked about how important that is to reduce toxic exposures to pollutants in the air that come from the creation of the energy that we use.

Before I introduce our guest, I just want to tell you where our energy comes from. And I’m reading this out of my book, Toxic Free, that I wrote a few years ago.

49.8% comes from burning coal, 19.9% comes from nuclear power, 17.9% comes from natural gas, 6.5% from hydroelectric, 3% from burning petroleum, and 2.3% comes from renewable energy sources such as wind power and solar energy that we’re talking about today.

So that’s 97.7% of our electricity is putting toxic emissions and greenhouse gases into the air every time you turn the switch on. And that’s air that we breathe.

And as we go through this show today, I’m going to be talking about some of those health effects and how doing something like using solar energy can reduce that air pollution, not only for ourselves, but for everybody in the world, all the animals and trees and the birds and everything, that all of life can be helped by switching to something like solar energy.

So my guest today is John Gambill. He’s the president of Hot Wire Enterprises. For the past 16 years, he’s been focused on wind and solar power systems and energy-efficient appliances. And he has customers worldwide.

Hi, John. Hello, John. Are you there?

JOHN GAMBILL: Yes, I’m here. Hello.

DEBRA: Hi. Can you hear me? I can hear you.

JOHN GAMBILL: Yes, I can hear you just fine.

DEBRA: Thanks. So John, tell us how you got interested in solar energy.

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, my wife and I were living aboard a sailboat in the Caribbean. And, of course, you don’t have extension cords long enough to supply power to your boat. So you have to make your own energy when you’re living aboard a sailboat and cruising around.

Most people in that situation use a combination of wind and/or solar to make their energy. And so, of course, we were doing the same. We came across this guy in Trinidad that’s on the southern end of the island, Eastern Caribbean Island chain near South America. He was building wind generators.

And so I went over and looked at them. I had a homemade wind generator on my boat at the time. And it looked like he was doing a pretty good job of it.

I went back and talked to my wife, Vivian, and said, “You know, these are pretty neat devices. We could probably sell these in the U.S. if we go back.”

And I finally talked to her into that. So we sailed back to the U.S. for several days and underneath the [inaudible 00:05:22] table in our boat, came back in time for the Annapolis Boat Show in 1998. We didn’t actually get to go, but we made it here just in time to get nailed by Hurricane—I forgot the name.

DEBRA: Katrina?

JOHN GAMBILL: No. It hit mostly the southern part of Florida in 1998. George.

DEBRA: Yes, I remember that.

JOHN GAMBILL: George. Anyhow, we started selling this wind generator. Then we had solar, and we started doing stuff on land-base as well. So now, we do mostly still cruising sailboats, but we’ve done a number of houses and a couple of water-pumping installations set up a cabin up on one of the rivers that’s really hard to pronounce up north, near [inaudible 00:06:23]. It’s got a chic and a wee and a bunch of other around.

DEBRA: All of our rivers here have long names like that that are hard to pronounce and hard to remember.

JOHN GAMBILL: Anyhow, we’ve been involved in that and we’ve also done some RV’s and things like that.

So that’s how we got started and pretty much where we are right now. We ended up flying out the wind generator manufacturers. We’ve been building them here in Tarpon Springs now for the last couple of years.

DEBRA: That’s Tarpon Springs, Florida. I think what we would like to talk about today is how can somebody start to do the thinking, the planning and the practical steps of moving from having pollution-generating electricity to having cleaner energy like solar?

That’s something that I’m really, really interested in. But I think the last time I tried to look into this, it was something like $40,000. And I just didn’t even know where to start or how it might cost less, or if there were any subsidies for me. I just couldn’t even begin to take that first step.

Why don’t we start with that?

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, you must have checked on that about six to eight years ago because prices have come down by more than 50% now, mainly because of the plummeting price of solar panels. And that was brought on by the Chinese building lots of solar panels. More than half of the solar panels in the world are being manufactured in China right now.

And while the Federal Trade Commission is imposing duties and tariffs because they’ve been dumping, selling at prices that are less than what it costs to build a panel here in the U.S., the definition of dumping. So the prices are likely to come up a little bit, but right now, you can buy solar panels for a little less than a dollar per watt. And six to eight years ago, in 2000, they were about five times that cost.

DEBRA: That’s a big difference.

JOHN GAMBILL: Now, that $40,000 system would probably cost more like $15,000 or $20,000. That’s certainly one way to get started. In fact, there are three ways that I would go about figuring out what you need for your house.

We’d either start with your electric bill, and then calculate what it would take to zero that out. And we do that on a yearly basis. Or we’d look at the space that’s available, and we’d figure out what would work there. Or you can tell me how much money you’ve got to spend, and I’ll spend it.

DEBRA: We’ll talk about more about this after the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is John Gambill. He’s the president of Hot Wire Enterprises, and his website is SVHotWire.com. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re having a thunderstorm, but then I can hear the thunder. So if you hear any grumbling in the background, that’s what’s going on.

My guest today is John Gambill, president of Hotwire Enterprises. His website is SVHotWire.com.

John, I wanted to ask you, the thing that I have been doing before I get my solar system is that the first step, I’ve read many, many times, is to simply reduce the amount of energy that you use, so you don’t have to have so many solar panels. So why don’t we start there?

JOHN GAMBILL: In fact, that would be the first step, is to reduce your energy usage, so that you don’t need as large of a solar system. And that’s usually very cost-effective to do things like CSO light bulbs or even LED light bulbs if there’s [no installation] in the home and those kinds of things.

And there’s a lot that you can do that is not too awfully even very expensive. The Department of Energy actually has some really good information online. If you go to the USDOE.gov, they’ve got a lot of information about reducing your energy usage.

I guess we can lead into water heating.

DEBRA: That was actually my next question because I would suggest that we can start going solar in small ways, even if we don’t do a whole $20,000 or $40,000 solar panel system. A way to start going solar could be with a solar water heater. And that’s something I’m looking at right now is that I need to replace my water heater. Am I going to go just buy a regular water heater, or I’m going to do tankless water heater that only heats up the water as it’s going through, instead of heating it up and keeping it hot in a big container? Or do I want to go solar? And those are the things that I’m considering at the moment.

So why don’t you tell us about solar water heaters as a first step?

JOHN GAMBILL: That’s a lot of territory to cover. First of all, let’s start with the instant water heaters. Those can be cost-effective, but it depends on how you use water. In a typical house, the water heater kicks on and off, maintaining a lot of temperature in the tank, 130 or 140-degrees. I know this is outrageous, but if you are gone for a couple of days a week from your house, the water heater is still kicking on and off, keeping that water hot. And if you only use the water once a day, then you’ve got basically a toaster running most of the day, keeping the water hot. And that’s quite a waste.

So if you use water, say, once a day, then an instant tankless water heater can be very cost-effective.

Now, there’s another option. There are systems that can hook up to your air conditioner.

DEBRA: Tell me about this.

JOHN GAMBILL: At the compressor. Thus, if you may have noticed this box outside your house that’s very warm, that’s wasted heat energy that could be used for heating water.

Now, as far as solar is concerned, there are two types of solar systems—solar thermal or solar electric. I deal mostly with solar electric. But solar water heating is even more cost-effective than a typical system for a water heater for a typical house. It’s going to cost something like $3500 to $5000 installed by a professional.

However, the components to put that together are relatively inexpensive. Now, I spent some morning looking on Craig’s List for water heaters. And there was one in Tampa for $75, used, of course. And there were a lot of these things built and installed years ago. And for whatever reason, they’re coming onto the market relatively cheap.

Now, I have this idea. If we get a bunch of people together, we could do a water heater [arm-raising]. If we were to build our own collectors—though initially, I said, if we could build our own collectors—we can do it pretty cheap, probably less than $300. Of course, it’s going to take a weekend or so. And if we get a group together, we can teach people how to [start] our pipes together, and rivet these things in glue and whatever to put water heaters together.

Solar water heater is a real simple device. It’s a black box. In fact, you could put a black box or black pipes outside your house, leading to the water heater in your house. And the sun would pre-heat the water going into your water heater.

DEBRA: There’s just all this sun all day long. It’s shining on my house. I feel like I should be putting it to use.

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, that’s the simplest way to do it. It’s just some black pipes. We had a system at Marina that I’ve lived up years ago. In fact, it was cheap PVC, the stuff that’s supposed to get hot, painted black, that was on the roof. And that’s heated the hot tub. And it was very hot.

So the basic technology involved here is really simple. After seeing what’s available to use, by the way, these old copper and aluminum water heaters are repairable pretty much forever, so chances of them going bad are pretty slim. Now, I should also mention, there are a lot of solar pool heaters available, which would not be very good to our [domestic] hot water because while they collect a lot of heat energy, they only raise the temperature a relatively small amount. So they’re not really designed for the higher temperatures that we have in our water heaters.

And you mentioned, you need to replace your water heater. Well, the professionals that install these systems will tell you that you need a bigger water tank. And it’s true that that makes it more efficient. So you could double the size of your water heater, and that would mean that you could go for a day or two without any sunlight and still have relatively hot water.

DEBRA: We need to go to break, but we’ll talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is John Gambill, president of Hot Wire Enterprises, and his website is SVHotWire.com. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is John Gambill. He’s the president of Hot Wire Enterprises. Before we go on, I just want to read a couple more things about the health effects of outdoor air pollution.

“When we use regular, fossil fuel-type energy to produce our electricity, then we produce outdoor air pollution. And I could read you a list of pollutants, but instead of that, I’m going to tell you that when you breathe air pollutants, your respiratory system is designed to protect your lungs from germs and large particles like dust and pollen. However, toxic chemicals in air pollution bypass those defenses causing harm to lungs and lung tissue. Air pollution can make your eyes water, irritate your nose, mouth and throat, and make you cough and wheeze. But the most common air pollutants can also cause more dangerous health effects, including premature death, shortness of breath and chest pain, increased risk of asthma attacks, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, that’s COPD, a group of diseases, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis that share the common symptoms of breathlessness.”

“In addition, once inhaled, these air pollutants can be absorbed into your bloodstream and reach all areas of your body.”
So this is not an inconsequential thing. This is something we need to start paying attention to. And solar power can help this tremendously.

Just seeing about what it would be like if, instead of solar power being less than 2% because it’s shared with wind power and all the other renewables, but if renewables were 89% of the method by which we produce our electricity, how different our air pollution situation would be very, very different.

So John, let’s go back to what you were saying at the beginning when I asked you about how to get started with the actual solar system. And you said, “Show me your electric bill, and we’ll zero it out,” or, “Tell me how much space you have, and I’ll fill it,” or, “Tell me how much money you have, and I’ll spend it.”

JOHN GAMBILL: We can do that. If you wanted to get started very small, then there’s a fairly new technology out called micro-inverters. When you hook up solar panels to your house, we usually use a grid tie inverter. The grid tie inverter takes the energy from the solar panels, and changes it, so that it can be pumped back into the grid, or used in the house.

With micro-inverters, each individual solar panel has an inverter on it. And so you could start with a single solar panel and a micro-inverter, and tie that into your distribution panels of the fuse box in your house.

So that would be one way to start small.

DEBRA: So how much would something like that cost?

JOHN GAMBILL: About $1000.

DEBRA: And that way, you would be displacing some of the pollution that is currently being generated by the electricity you use. And then you could add to that, and you could just add as you could afford it.

JOHN GAMBILL: It’s true. That would work.

DEBRA: Wow, that’s such a different picture than having to come up with $40,000, or even $20,000.

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, like I said earlier though, the low-hanging fruit, as you mentioned too, and some people said that the source of new energy is conservation to start with. Don’t use the energy in the first place. And then water heaters are more cost-effective than the solar electric system. The sun’s energy hitting a black box, 95% or so percent of it just turned into heat. But as the sun [inaudible 00:21:58] solar panel, about 15% or 17% of it gets turned into electricity. So it would be crazy to use solar electric to run an electric water heater, just that the big, black box sitting up on the roof or in the yard is going to be at last five times more efficient.

DEBRA: I think here in Florida, I was reading a book. Actually, the author of this book was on my show. I forgot what it’s called. I think it’s called Let it Shine, or something like that is the title of the book. I read every word of that book when it first came out. It’s not out in a revised edition. I’m not sure if I even lived in Florida at the time, but I remember him saying that solar water heaters were just standard equipment on houses in Florida in the 20’s or 30’s, or something like that. That there was just a time, he had just pictures of these solar water heaters on house after house after house on a street.

It just made such an impression on me that in a place like Florida or the Caribbean, or sunny places along the tropics at least, solar water heaters should just be standard equipment.

JOHN GAMBILL: Absolutely. In Florida, the home builders don’t offer it as an option as a rule. Just whacky!

DEBRA: Well, I’m really going to look into this because I have the opportunity now where I need to change my water heater. It was leaking and, now, it’s suddenly, just by itself, stopped leaking. So I think I’ve got a little more time. I don’t have to [inaudible 00:23:43] and buy something.

JOHN GAMBILL: Don’t let it start leaking dramatically. You don’t want to—that could do.

DEBRA: I know. It’s definitely on the top of my list of something that I need to handle as soon as possible. What I have here in Clearwater, Florida is that our water company, water and electricity, they have a program where I can buy a water heater for half the price from what it’s sold in the stores. They subsidize the rest of it. And so I actually can buy that one. I can buy a regular tank heater. I can buy a tankless heater.

I’m probably going to go with the tankless heater, but I need to see what the difference would be and how much it would cost to do the solar thing, and see if that’s practical for me, given that it’s an emergency.

JOHN GAMBILL: Even with the solar water heater, you still need a water tank. Although there are some solar water heaters that have a tank that’s built into them, again, depending on how you use water—let me just use our house as an example.

We have the standard 40-gallon water heater. It’s from Home Depot, least expensive, whatever.

DEBRA: Yes, that’s what I have.

JOHN GAMBILL: It does happen that on a cloudy day, by the end of the day, or after 24-hours, the water is not very warm anymore. And so if you wanted to take a shower, you just turn the hot water all the way on, rather than having it mixed with cold water. And occasionally, we even turn on the circuit breaker that powers up the electric water heater especially in the winter time when it’s cloudy.

But my system costs about $300, and we’re saving $25 to $30 a month.

DEBRA: I want to hear more about that but we need to go to break. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is John Gambill, president of Hot Wire Enterprises. His website is SVHotWire.com. And when we come back, we’ll talk more about simple things that we can do to get started on solar.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is John Gambill, president of Hot Wire Enterprises. His website is SVHotWire.com.

Before the break, we were talking about the $300 solar hot water heater. How do you get one of those for $300?

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, here’s my idea. Because the solar water heater is pretty much the low-hanging fruit, so to speak, it just makes sense that people would want to put these on. Of course, it prevents pollution from burning fossil fuels to make electricity. But mainly, it’s cheap. It’s an inexpensive way to get started with solar.

It’s going to require some elbow grease. My idea is to get a group together. I found a source for very inexpensive water heaters. It looks like it’s going to be less expensive to buy them than it is to build them myself. And we can put together a very simple system.

For example, the one that I have, which consists of solar collectors, the original water tank, the original water heater, a pump, and a small solar panel. Solar panels, when the sun is shining on it, produces electricity to run the pump, so the pump runs and moves the hot water from the collector to your original water tank. Turn off the circuit breaker for your water heater, and that’s it. That’s the whole system.

Of course, there are pipes involved. It can get much more complicated than that but the collectors are available used or even new at very low prices. And all it takes is elbow grease.

So we get a group of people together and, of course, the time bank that you were talking about earlier, you could perhaps build up time in the bank that could then be used to have other people come in, people with more expertise, as far as putting pipes together, to install the system.

DEBRA: John, you could train a solar water heater time bank installation team. And then people could use their time bank hours to have the team come up and do their installation.

JOHN GAMBILL: That’s a good idea. Yes, I like that.

DEBRA: I think that’s a fabulous idea.

JOHN GAMBILL: I’m so tired of people talking to me about solar. We attend these eco fests and sustainable living and talk to a lot of people. I’m so tired of people talking about it. Just get off your ass and do something.

DEBRA: I agree. You know, during the break, I was remembering from a long time ago when people used to make solar showers by just building a wood frame out in the backyard, and putting a garbage can on top, filling it with water, letting it sit out in the sun, and then gravity-feed it through a shower head, and then there’s your hot shower outside.

JOHN GAMBILL: That’s how basic this technology is and how simply it can be.

DEBRA: It really is that basic. I think that sometimes humans make things a little too complex, and that’s a lot of what goes on in our industrial society. But that is the simplicity of it.

So we’re almost to the end of the show. I just wanted to recap for people about the process that they could go through if they’re interested in starting the solar. So the first one would be, start with something simple like a solar water heater could be a good first step. And then the next one we talked about was just getting one solar panel with, what did you call it, an individual inverter?

JOHN GAMBILL: Micro-inverter.

DEBRA: Micro-inverter. And then you could add to those one by one. And then another thing that you can do is reduce the amount of energy you’re using now, so that when it comes time to switch the solar that you don’t have to have so many solar panels.

Another one would be to, if you looked that in the past, take a new look at it because the costs have come way down.

JOHN GAMBILL: There you go.

DEBRA: And see who’s doing what in your community in order to see what kind of help you can get.

JOHN GAMBILL: Absolutely, you got it.

DEBRA: Well, we still do have about five-minutes left. So is there anything else you’d like to say about solar that we haven’t talked about yet?

JOHN GAMBILL: I’m open to any questions that you might have. I mentioned that a typical system on a house is about 5000-watts or 5-kilowatts. And in doing just a little bit of research online, the savings in coal that would be burned to produce that amount of energy over a year’s time is about 3000-pounds of coal. I was pretty amazed with that too.

And there are some other things here too. 6.6 barrels of oil would be required to be burned to make that same amount of energy. And that reduces the CO2 that’s produced to make that electricity, by the same amount as about 22 acres of trees.

So even a little bit, even small systems can make a pretty big difference.

DEBRA: They can. I’m looking here. I had a page that I had found before the show that had some statistics on it. And then I was looking for other things and it got lost. So I can’t tell you those. I’m just going to click through here.

Here it is. This is from Environmental Defense. And they say the generation of electric power produces more pollution, in bold letters, produces more pollution than any other single industry in the United States. Isn’t that amazing?

I mean, it’s been ordered to produce the electricity that we use causes more pollution than anything else. And what’s commonly used are fossil fuels, coal, oil, natural gas, known as non-renewable resources, and burning of fossil fuels such as coal or oil creates byproducts that pollute when released to the environment. There’s sulfur, 62% of sulfur dioxide emissions that contribute to acid rain. These are all produced by us making energy or using energy that needs to be made.

Twenty-one percent of nitrous oxides contribute to smog. Forty percent of carbon emissions contribute to global climate change. And it just goes on like this.

So it really is making a big impact, and we can make a difference in what goes on in the environment by looking at what’s going on in our homes and the choices that we make.

JOHN GAMBILL: Here you go. So let’s stick together and do it.

DEBRA: I agree. And I really like your idea of having there be teams of people and groups of people working together to make this happen. Can we build our own solar panels and not to have them come from China?

JOHN GAMBILL: Yes. I haven’t done an exact materials list, but I believe it’s going to cost $300 to $500 to build your own solar collector, depending, of course, on a lot of factors.

DEBRA: And how much are the ones from China?

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, you can buy one from China right now. You can find from deals. And I found one this morning that was $100.

DEBRA: $100 for a solar panel?

JOHN GAMBILL: Yes.

DEBRA: And of course, there are some, maybe, toxic materials that are used to make solar panels. But the point about this is that once you make them, then they can be used for how many years.

JOHN GAMBILL: Well, the solar water collectors, solar water heater collectors panel, if they’re well-made, I don’t know, this stuff doesn’t exactly go away. It’s pretty much permanent. Solar electric, the panels typically have a warranty that they’ll be producing 80% of the rated capacity in 25 or, in some cases, 30 years. They’ll probably still be producing some power in a hundred years if possible, if somebody could be using one, although it would be reduced in efficiency, in a long time, in a very long time.

And if you go on and look at some of the right wing website, they’ll say, they’re using toxic chemical tools to make these, and it’s more polluting than burning coals. Realistically, if you had a solar plant, a plant-building solar panels that was run largely by solar panels, it’s pretty obvious. And it’s cumulative. Every time somebody adds to the amount of solar energy that’s being produced, they simply add to all the other ones that have come years before.

DEBRA: Well, I think it’s a great idea. Thank you so much for being here with us today. Again, my guest is John Gambill, president of Hot Wire Enterprises. And his website is SV, v as in victory, HotWire dot com.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. If you’d like to know more about this show, you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, where you can see all the guests for the week. Each one of these shows is recorded and archived, so you can listen to all the shows as many times as you want, 24-hours a day, anywhere in the world. That’s lots of valuable information, lots of really interesting guests, lots of ways to help you live toxic free.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

How Toxic Obesogens Can Make You Fat and Prevent Weight Loss

Lara AdlerMy guest today is Lara Adler, Environmental Toxins Expert and Certified Holistic Health Coach. We’ll be talking about how obesogens affect your weight, what happens to toxics stored in fat when you lose weight, specific chemicals that are obesogens, and and what you can doShe trains and educates practitioners within the health and wellness community to better understand the links between environmental toxins and their impact on disease states—from weight gain and diabetes, to thyroid disease and developmental disorders—so they can better support their clients. Lara is deeply committed to peeling back the curtain and opening up the conversation about environmental toxins to people in a way that’s informative, accessible, actionable and totally free from overwhelm. She takes a practical, real-world approach to minimizing toxic exposure to safeguard our health. www.laraadler.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Toxic Obesogens Can Make You Fat and Prevent Weight Loss

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Lara Adler

Date of Broadcast: September 04, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free. It’s September 4, 2014, and it’s a beautiful day in Clearwater. I know I say that a lot, but it is a beautiful day in Clearwater, Florida. The sun is shining. It’s just the end of summer. I’m looking forward to a cooler autumn. The fall and winter is the most beautiful time of the year here where it’s not cold, but it’s cooler than summer. And this is a beautiful place to be.

Today, we’re going to be talking about how toxic chemicals can make you fat and how they can prevent you from losing weight.

And so if fat is an issue for you, you’re going to want to listen to this because toxic chemicals do affect that. And if you’ve been trying to lose weight, it may be that what you need to do is detox and get some of these chemicals out of your body.

My guest today is Lara Adler. She’s an environmental toxins expert and a certified holistic health coach. And we’ll be talking about what are called obesogens.

Hi, Lara.

LARA ADLER: Hi. Thanks for having me. I’m really excited to be bring this topic to your audience.

DEBRA: Thank you. Thank you so much for being here. I know you know a lot about this. Now, I should say that Lara is a certified holistic health coach, but she doesn’t coach individuals. You can’t go to Lara as a client. What she does is she educates other health coaches. Tell us about exactly what you do.

LARA ADLER: Well, I realized that all of these health practitioners are on-the-ground working with clients on health issues already, whether it’s excess weight or thyroid disorders or cancer or whatever it is. And I realized that the health and wellness professionals that are out there—whether they’re health coaches or nurses or naturopaths or acupuncturists, whatever—they’re not well-versed in the subject of environmental health, environmental chemicals and how they impact us.

So my work is focused on educating health practitioners so that they can better support their clients in the work that they’re doing with them. It’s translating all of this research that’s really complicated around environmental chemicals and presenting it to practitioners in a way that really makes sense for them and for their clients.

DEBRA: That’s just so needed. I am so happy that you’re doing that. I think what the world needs today is a lot of people like you and me where we are picking our niche. I’m translating it all for consumers, but you, as a holistic health coach, you understand that whole field and how to speak to them, and what it is that they need.

I’m so glad that you’re bringing all of this information to that field because it’s really, really needed.

LARA ADLER: I’m delighted to do it.

DEBRA: Good. Well, you can bring it to us today. I just wanted everybody to know that you can’t call her up and have her work with you personally, but she’s out there educating people that you can work with, and that you can go to a holistic health coach and ask them about environmental toxins, and see if they’ve been educated because this information needs to get into everybody’s hands. Everybody needs to be thinking with this.

Lara, how did you get interested in this?

LARA ADLER: Well, like I said, like you introduced me, I started as a health coach. I had a whole other career before that, but I really started in this field of health coach about seven or so years ago.

Then I had a lot of clients, like most health coaches, who are coming to me for weight loss. Environmental toxin wasn’t something that was on my radar at the time. I actually didn’t really know anything about it. I’ve heard about mercury in seafood and stuff like that. But it wasn’t anything that I’ve learned in my education on the path to becoming a health coach.

And so I had these clients coming to me for weight loss, and I had all these protocols that I knew would work and help them. Some of them were seeing results, they were losing weight and feeling great. But others were doing what I would call “all the right things.” They were eating well and sleeping well, exercising and managing their stress, and they were happy.

Everything was right, but they just couldn’t lose the weight. Something was keeping them fat, and that really bothered me because I wanted them to get results.

And so I started researching what else might be going on here. I started picking apart what are the lesser known contributing factors. In that research, I stumbled into this world of environmental chemicals. And just immediately, it blew my hair back totally like, “Whoa! Where has this information been in all of my studies around health and wellness?” It just wasn’t part of that conversation.

Really overnight, the focus of my practice shifted. I really delved into this subject fully. I found in that initial research that so many of the chemicals that we’re exposed to are linked in different ways to metabolic disease, insulin resistance, resistant weight loss, diabetes, obesity and so on. And that just totally blew my mind.

And so I really wanted to be of service to my colleagues because like I said, in all of my training, this was new information for me. And I didn’t think that was right, so I really started to do the research that was necessary to be able to educate my peers and colleagues in the practitioner community.

So, that’s how I landed in this subject quite by accident. But I’ve been doing this work now for almost three years, exclusively focused on education around environmental toxins—around that way, that’s how I got here.

DEBRA: Well, it’s good. I love it when people apply the toxics information in their own fields.
So you say on your website that you’re an environmental toxins expert. What does that mean?

LARA ADLER: Well, I think—and I’m sure that the listeners of your show are familiar with that term—a lot of people when they hear that term, they still think of things that are what I call “out there,” external in the environmental, like some oil rig off the coast of somewhere, having a massive oil pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, what have you. So those are some of out there bigger thing that an individual, like me or you, we don’t have very much control over those things, and we can feel bad about them. And obviously, we can do what we can to prevent them from happening. But as an individual, there’s not a lot of clutch that we have there.

And so when I used this phrase, environmental toxins, I’m talking more about the things that are in our personal environment, our internal spaces—our home, the food that we eat, the water that we drink, the products that we’re buying and using every day. And so these are in our personal environmental.

And so my work focuses on helping people understand what are the things in their immediate space that they actually do have control over, and how can we understand what’s going on there, and what that communicates to change or behavior or our purchases or what have you to reduce overall exposure.

DEBRA: And of course, this is where we meet because that’s what I do too to a different audience.

LARA ADLER: Exactly! And so I tend to—and like I said, some of these information is going to be recapped or overviewed for your audience because they will have heard it from you or from other speakers as well. We thought this mountain of chemical that hit the marketplace for the last 50 or 60 years—and yes, sure, some of these chemicals have benefitted us.

We don’t want to tar them all with a negative brush. They’re not all bad. Many of those have made our lives easier and better and safer et cetera, and even longer. But most of them haven’t been tested for safety, yet they’re ending up in the products that we’re buying and using every day and bringing into our home.

DEBRA: Today, we’re going to be talking specifically about the chemicals that affect our body weight, the chemicals that make us fat, and the chemicals that prevent us from losing weight. I just want to tell you that Lara has put together a really nice, little, free e-book. It’s how many pages? I’m looking for the page number as well.

LARA ADLER: Eight or nine, I think, maybe.

DEBRA: Yes, 11 pages. It’s called Chemicals Not Calories. It’s free. You can go to her website, LaraAdler.com, and remember, it’s L-A-R-A, and then another A, Adler, A-D-L-E-R dot com. And you can get this free e-book, which we’ll give you more details on the subject that we’re going to be able to cover in the time period of our show.

But we’re going to go to break, and then we’ll come back and talk about this. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest is Lara Adler. And we’re going to be talking about toxic obesogens. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lara Adler. She’s a certified holistic health coach and environmental toxins expert. And she works in the field of holistic health care to educate her colleagues about toxic chemicals and how they can be affecting their clients.

So Lara, what exactly is an obesogen?

LARA ADLER: Well, it’s an important question. Obesogen is a relatively new term, really going back about 2006. But obesogens are chemicals that are directly or indirectly capable of increasing obesity, weight gain, diabetes or insulin resistance through the disruption of metabolic, hormonal or developmental processes. So they have the ability to alter the development of our fat cells, alter our metabolism and to promote fat retention. And so that’s essentially what an obesogen is.

Although the term is relatively new, we’ve actually been aware of this physiology of this happening in the body for quite a while. The most common example of that is everybody has known—some of you have heard stories, or somebody [inaudible 00:11:20] prescription medication that had a side effect of weight gain. But everybody [inaudible 00:11:25]. They were on some prescription drug, and then within three months, they put on 30 pounds.

Those are obesogens. Those are chemicals that that is having a side effect of weight gain. And a lot of the chemicals in our environment that we’re exposed to on a daily basis behave in the exact, same way.

So we’ve actually been aware of this process for a long time. They just didn’t have a name until about 2006.

DEBRA: So what role do you see these chemicals playing in increasing rates of overweight and obesity?

LARA ADLER: Well, I think it plays a significant role. The reality is that we have levels of overweight and obesity in this country like we’ve never seen before. A full 35% of the U.S. population medically qualifies as obese. And another 34% on top of that are diagnosed as overweight. That’s more like 70% of our population is struggling with it.

The conventional thinking for years around weight management has always been around diet and exercise. That it’s this “calories in, calories out” model that we are now starting to understand is not that accurate. That doesn’t work. If it works, then we wouldn’t be here where we are.

So, there’s a lot more going on. And when we have increases in statistics like 70% of our population struggling with weight issues (that didn’t exist on this scale 30 years), we have to look at the environment because that’s the only other possible explanation.

When we look at the environment and see that so many of these chemicals have the ability to affect the body in this way, it becomes very clear that this is an enormous contributing factor—and certainly, not the only one. But I liken it to a perfect storm. You’ve got all these chemicals. We’ve got sedentary or non-active lifestyles and really poor diet that generally speaking, people are still consuming.

DEBRA: For me, I’ve done a lot of research over the past 30 years about toxic chemicals, and I finally came to the conclusion that I think that toxic chemicals, and it’s not just something that I think. I could show you studies of how toxic chemicals are related to every single body condition that exists. Everything.

When I first started this, it was because I had an immune system problem, and there was a lot of focus on, well, how are toxic chemicals affecting the immune system, but they’re not affecting the liver or something like that.

But now, we know, if you’re sick with anything, anything, there’s a toxic chemical association. And so it doesn’t matter what the problem is, what the health problem is, the first thing to do is to handle the toxic chemical exposures, to get the toxic chemicals out of your body because as long as you’re continuing to do that having those toxic chemical exposures and having toxic chemicals in your body, anything else is pretty much not going to work because the toxic chemicals are still there doing their damage.

I can’t say that too many times.

LARA ADLER: That’s just the body burden conversation. Our bodies just were never designed to be able to process these chemicals out. And some of them—yeah, it can handle some of them, but not the volume that we’re exposed to now.

The symptoms can manifest in thousands and thousands of different ways for different people depending on different things. And so yes, that’s why I focus on working with health practitioners because every single health condition that anyone is ever going to seek a health professional for is attached to environmental toxins. And it’s not okay that health professionals are not fully versed and fluent in this area.

DEBRA: I think all health professionals should be experts in this and what they should be treating is exactly what you and I are doing, it’s getting the exposures and getting the toxic chemicals out of the body. That’s the first thing that needs to be done before anything else is done. And every health professional in the world needs to know this and know how to do it.

That’s just where we are.

So I’m glad you agree.

LARA ADLER: Yeah, absolutely! And the primary thing that I speak to is this concept of practical avoidance because that’s the first step. I think a lot of the conversations these days are around detoxing and that term is used very superficially in a lot of ways, “I’m on a juice cleanse, and I’m detoxing. Woo-hoo!”

But the reality is that you’re just constantly re-toxing all the time. And so we have to reduce our exposures first, and then we can work on getting what’s in us out to the best of our abilities while supporting our body’s ability to do its job on its own.

And I think these are the things that health professionals, and really, individual people need to be considering. It doesn’t help to do a detox if you’re still surrounding yourself with toxic chemicals the second you walk into your front door.

DEBRA: I totally agree with that. We need to go to break. But we’ll talk about more of these things when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lara Adler. She’s a certified holistic health coach and environmental toxins expert. And you can go to her website, LaraAdler.com, and get her book, Chemicals

Not Calories, for free. It’s an a 11-page e-book. It summarizes the things that we’re talking about.

So we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lara Adler. She’s a certified holistic health coach who works with other health coaches in the health care profession to educate other health care practitioners about toxic chemicals and how they affect their health and the importance of considering them in health care.

Lara, so tell us now about those you have in your e-book, Chemicals Not Calories, you have a list of 20 obesogens. Tell us about those.

LARA ADLER: Well, those are just the ones that we recognize now as biologically being obesogenic—meaning they’re able to interfere with these metabolic pathways. So, the reality is that there’s likely a lot more than that. We just haven’t confirmed them as of yet. And this is due in part because we just haven’t tested most of the chemicals that are on the marketplace.

So, that 20 is likely just a small list, but there are things like MSG and nicotine. These are things that we’re commonly exposed to in our foods, and through smoking or second-hand or third-hand smoke.

And then there are ones that are pervasive in our environment like phthalates or atrazine if you’re in the U.S.

Did you want me to go in to what some of those are? Would that be helpful?

DEBRA: Yes, tell us about some of the specific ones. But I want to ask you a question before you choose them. I wanted to ask you, I see on the list, MSG, and fructose, which are two ingredients. And I’m assuming that you’re talking about fructose, like high fructose corn syrup. Are we talking about fructose in fruit?

LARA ADLER: No, not so much in fruits, but isolated.

DEBRA: It’s an industrial chemical. High fructose corn syrup is an industrial chemical. And it’s listed as a food on the label but it’s a chemical. So these are two things. If people were to just stop eating MSG and stop eating fructose in any of its industrial forms, then right there, you’ve handled two of them.

So it’s not that difficult. It’s just about being aware of what they are and where they are that you’re being exposed to them.

So now, you go on and talk about the ones you want to talk about.

LARA ADLER: So one of the first one that I had in this handout, in this guide, is atrazine. Atrazine is one of the most, or is the most widely used herbicide in the United States. We dump something like 76-million pounds of it on crops and golf courses, et cetera, throughout the year. And it’s filtered through the ground water that ends up in our public drinking water where it’s not filtered out.

Studies have shown that 94% of drinking water in the U.S. has levels of atrazine in it.

Atrazine is on that list as an obesogen. It actually interferes with our mitochondria. I don’t know if anybody remembers—

DEBRA: Tell us what mitochondria is.

LARA ADLER: Right! The mitochondria basically is this old power plant inside every single in our body. So, they are our primary source of energy production. And when our mitochondria is damaged or hampered in any way, our overall energy will decrease. And if mitochondrial dysfunction (meaning, when these are altered in any way), it really influences the insulin resistance, the obesity and diabetes.

And these links have been made when looking at this low levels of atrazine exposure—not for people who are applying atrazine to fields like farm workers, but people who are drinking our tap water. Every time you turn on the tap, there’s atrazine in it. We’re getting these low-levels of exposure. And these low-levels have been linked in animal studies to obesity, belly fat, insulin resistance, et cetera.

And so it’s the significant one in that 94% of drinking water tested has this chemical present. And so we know, like you just said, if you take MSG, and if you take high fructose corn syrup, if you take processed foods and sugars out, because we want to regulate our blood sugar in some levels, so that we don’t end up in the pre-diabetic or diabetic state, but then we’re not also addressing other chemicals in our environment that do the same, exact thing, we’re kind of missing the boat.

DEBRA: What would somebody do to reduce atrazine in our life?

LARA ADLER: They would need to get the appropriate water filter that will do that. And I believe that most carbon filters will be able to do that. You don’t need to go out and buy bottled water. In fact, I don’t encourage people to buy bottled water because the bottled water essentially bottles tap water anyway. It’s not as heavily regulated as municipal water supplies are.

So bottled water is not the answer here. The answer is getting an in-home at-the-sink or a whole house water filtration system based on the contaminants that are present in your water.

Everybody’s water is different. There is no one size fits all product that I recommend. Everybody needs to do a little bit of research and understand what’s in their water. And they can do that by calling their water board or googling their water quality report for their town which is federally required and those are produced bi-annually.

DEBRA: So what’s another chemical?

LARA ADLER: Another one, it’s probably one of the most common one. It’s not actually a chemical, but [inaudible 00:23:44] chemical. Those are called phthalate. And it’s spelled with a P-H-T-H, which throws a lot of people because it’s just pronounced with a T-H.

Phthalates are found in a lot of different places in our homes. They’re found in certain types of plastics. But primarily, they’re found in our fragrance products, the scented candles, and the air fresheners, and the laundry detergents, and our personal care products, shampoos, body lotions, perfume, anything that’s got a heavy fragrance.

The phthalates are used in these products as a solvent and as [fixative], so that when you wash your hair, six hours later, they’ll smell like your shampoo. Phthalates are partly responsible for holding that fragrance into your hair or into your clothes after you’ve done your laundry.

And phthalates are what are called endocrine-disrupting chemical. They can interfere with your hormonal system, which, in part, regulates your metabolism. And so these chemicals are directly linked not only to weight gain, but a massive long list of other health conditions from early onset puberty, like cancers, et cetera.

So, it doesn’t really matter what your reasoning is for getting them out, just get them out because they’re not necessary.

So, the first step there is to get rid of unnecessary fragrances in your home. You don’t need to have your home smelling like eternal sunshine or whatever these silly names that they give these air fresheners—spring breeze, mountain spray, whatever.

Open your windows or get some flowers if you really want your house to smell nice. But don’t go for the plug-in or those air fresheners, scented candles, potpourri, et cetera.

DEBRA: And we need to go to break. And you can continue doing more tips about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lara Adler. She’s a certified holistic health coach, and she helps her industry learn about toxic chemicals, so they can help their clients. Her website is LaraAdler.com, L-A-R-A, and then another A-D-L-E-R dot come.

And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Lara Adler. She’s a certified holistic health coach who helps other health coaches and health care professionals learn about toxic chemicals, so that they can help their clients.

Lara, I just wanted to mention, because we just had a commercial on about water filters, that I’ve actually found one that I do think is, it’s not 100% one size fits all. I’ve heard a couple of people say, “Oh, I couldn’t use this because of x, y, z” about their water. But if removes such a broad spectrum of water pollutants that I used to say exactly what you said that you need to find out what’s in your water, maybe have your water tested, get the right water filter that matches your water. And that’s still exactly what people should do.

I’m just saying that this particular filter seems to be a match for most people. And it’s affordable. It’s affordable to buy. It only costs $100 a year to replace all the cartridges. And it really gets the water cleaned. It’s the one that I have in my house.

I am always recommending that every single person in the world needs to have a water filter because I don’t know of any tap water in the world that’s clean. And this is just something we all need to do.

LARA ADLER: Absolutely! I totally agree with that. In fact, it’s one of the number one things that I recommend people do. If you do anything, do that.

DEBRA: If you want to find out about this water filter, you can just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and in the right-hand column, you just look down until you see the picture of the water filter. And just click there, and you’ll find out all about this. It really is the best water filter I’ve found in 30 years of looking at water filters.

Now, let’s go back and continue to tell us about where people are encountering phthalates, and how they can eliminate those from their lives.

When you think about it, people are trying to lose weight and they’re wearing perfume. That’s sabotaging it right there.

LARA ADLER: Yeah, absolutely! A lot of these things, we’re attached to them because of habit or because of savvy marketing, they’ve sold us. Look at the Clairol Herbal Essences shampoo.

DEBRA: I used to use that.

LARA ADLER: Their entire ad campaign has nothing to do with the performance of their shampoo, but how wonderful it smells. And a lot of this is simply marketing. And you need to be mindful of that and not be sold to in that way and be a smarter consumer.

Five years ago, it was really challenging to find natural products, shampoos, lotions and deodorants, that didn’t have these types of synthetic chemicals. Now, the marketplace is absolutely overflowing with products that are made with really clean ingredients, natural ingredients, and that don’t use chemical synthetic fragrances. They used essential oil-based plant fragrances, et cetera.

And those are what I tell people to transition to if they’re still attached to having their hair smell good or their body lotion smells sweet or whatever. But get rid of the conventional stuff, the stuff that you find at Walgreens or Target or what have you, those type of stores, because they’re all going to be loaded with phthalates.

And you’re not even going to know this for sure because of labeling issues. But if you see the word fragrance or perfume on an ingredient list, you’re almost guaranteed that that contains phthalate. That’s the word that you’re going to want to look for on products [inaudible 00:29:52], fragrance or perfume.

And If it’s in there, that’s a source of exposure for you.
You don’t need to cross every single item in your house at once. It’s a whittling down process. Get rid of the non-essential ones, the scented candles first, then your shampoo ones out. And if you have buy a new one, go ahead and buy one that doesn’t include those products.

I actually have a Pinterest board where I pin a lot of products that I really like that people then check out if they’re interested.

Would that be okay for me to share that URL?

DEBRA: Sure.

LARA ADLER: So it’s Pinterest.com/LaraAdler, L-A-R-A-A-D-L-E-R. I have all kinds of products that I pin there that I like. So people are like, “Great! I want to buy this stuff, but what do I buy?” That’s a good place to start. And I know there are all kinds of resources online for people to find those things.

But that’s the first step.

DEBRA: Well, another thing is that you can also go to DebrasList.com, and find my huge list of those kinds of products. In fact, on DebrasList.com, it has different keywords for characteristics. And you can just click on fragrance-free, and it will take you to all the fragrance-free products that are listed.

LARA ADLER: Fantastic. There are so many resources out there nowadays which is wonderful because it means that more people are going to get turned on to these products easier, which is going to ultimately shift the marketplace. So it’s really exciting.

DEBRA: So now, tell us about PFOA.

LARA ADLER: PFOA is the short for perfluorooctanoic acid—not important, but you know that. PFOA is a chemical that’s found in a lot of different places in the home. It’s found in non-stick cookware. We know it as “Teflon” which is a brand name, but we usually like to use that term. [Inaudible 00:31:49] non-stick.

PFOA is a chemical that’s found in non-stick cookware. It’s also found in food packaging—[inaudible 00:32:00] grease-proof cardboards, the lining of a pizza box, or the inside of the microwaveable food meal, or the inside of an ice cream tub, or the inside of a microwave popcorn bag. These are all often coated with this PFOA chemical.

Now, PFOA chemical is another obesogen capable of disrupting our thyroid, which is partly responsible for managing our metabolism and weight. So that’s part of its role as an obesogen.

Most people think the biggest source of exposure is non-stick cookware, and it’s actually not. The biggest source of exposure comes from food packaging. I still don’t think people should have non-stick cookware in their homes. I still think those needs to be phased out, particularly if they’re scratched. But microwave popcorn is a really significant exposure source for people. The entire inside of the popcorn bag is lined with this chemical, so that the butter or oil that’s surrounding the kernels doesn’t seep through. It’s unsightly and all of that.;

And so this is a really simple switch for people to make. As people are aiming to be healthier in their lives anyway, moving away from packaged food is always a good idea. It’s kind of necessary. This gives us another reason to shift away from packaged foods—to avoid exposure to this chemical.

This chemical is found in—I think the statistic is something like 98% of the people tested by the CDC. It’s in our [inaudible 00:33:45] fabric protectors. It’s in all kinds of different places in the home.

The easiest place to address it is in the kitchen. So get rid of the non-stick cookware, move to enamel, cast iron, cast iron, stainless steel. Some people are icky about stainless steel. Whatever people are comfortable with, but move away from non-stick.

Skip out on microwave popcorn. If you want popcorn, [inaudible 00:34:13] or use an air popper. And move away from the kinds of pizzas that come in a box that’s lined with wax like you get at Domino’s, for example.

DEBRA: When you said it’s on the inside of ice cream product, I almost wanted to cry because I love ice cream. But I can’t remember the last time I bought a carton of ice cream. It’s been so long because I don’t buy ice cream because it’s got, like the famous, delicious flavors, all those brands, they’ve all got refined white sugar, and which I consider to be an industrial chemical.

And even if you buy a natural one, there are a lot of sweeteners in them. And now, to know that it’s not only the ingredients in the ice cream that might be making you fat, but the carton itself, I do make ice cream at home out of grass-fed cream and strawberries. I don’t even put the sweeter in my ice cream.

You really don’t need them. You can make great ice cream from grass-fed cream or almond milk or whatever it is, the creamy thing that you eat, and just put some fruit in it. And you can just freeze the fruit and put it in the blender with your liquid, and it makes ice cream. It’s very easy.

We’re getting to the end of our time. Thank you so much. This has been so informative. So if people want to find out more about what you do, how should they contact you?

LARA ADLER: Like I said, they can definitely check out my website. They can check that free guide on my website. If you’re a health professional, definitely check out the programs that I offer. You can find that on my website. If you’re not, and you just want to know about products or keep this conversation going, you can follow me on Twitter which is @LaraAdler or follow my Pinterest board at Pinterest.com/LaraAdler. That’s the best way to stay in touch that way.

DEBRA: Great. Well, thank you again so much.

LARA ADLER: You’re very welcome.

DEBRA: I think this has been really important to talk about, how chemicals make us fat or prevent us from losing weight because chemicals are the number one health problem there is. Obesity is one of the most important things that people need to handle. And the fact that those two are related, I think, is a really important thing that needs to be talked about more.

So thank you, Lara.

LARA ADLER: You’re welcome.

DEBRA: And again, her website is LaraAdler.com, and you can see her on Pinterest too.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can find out more about Toxic Free Talk Radio at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Find out who the guests are coming up, and also, you can listen to, all these shows are archived.

You can listen to this show again. You can listen to yesterday’s show.

So I’ll be back and be well.

How Mercury Affects Your Health

 steven-gilbert-2Toxicologist Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, a regular guest who is helping us understand the toxicity of common chemicals we may be frequently exposed to. Dr. Gilbert is Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and author of A Small Dose of Toxicology- The Health Effects of Common Chemicals.He received his Ph.D. in Toxicology in 1986 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, is a Diplomat of American Board of Toxicology, and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington. His research has focused on neurobehavioral effects of low-level exposure to lead and mercury on the developing nervous system. Dr. Gilbert has an extensive website about toxicology called Toxipedia, which includes a suite of sites that put scientific information in the context of history, society, and culture. www.toxipedia.org

read-transcript

 

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH STEVEN G. GILBERT, PhD, DABT

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Mercury Affects Your Health

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT

Date of Broadcast: September 03, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert, PhD, DABT and he’s a regular guest on the show. I have him on every month because he tells us about different toxic substances and how they are toxic, how we are exposed to them, what the dangers are because we need to know living in a toxic world. We need to know where these toxic chemicals are because the whole point is to be able to recognize them and not have them be in your life so that your body can be healthier. On this show, we talk about detox getting the chemicals out of your body. But it’s better to not put them in, in the first place.

And today, we’re going to talk about mercury and that’s a very common toxic metal. Most people know that there is mercury in your dental fillings, but where else is there mercury? So we are going to find out those things. We’re going to find out how it affects your body.

HI, Dr. Gilbert.

STEVEN GILBERT: Hi, Debra. It is good to speak to you again.

DEBRA: Thank you. How are you doing today?

STEVEN GILBERT: Oh, very good. I’m having a fine day here in Seattle.

DEBRA: Good. Is the sun shiny or is it raining in Seattle?

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, it’s mostly gray. There’s a little bit of sun peeking out, but it’s been gray and really rainy last night.

So it’s real back to the rains in Seattle.

DEBRA: Yeah. We had a really big storm here too yesterday. So let’s talk about mercury. I see that you have a lot of information about it in your book, A Small Dose of Toxicology. And let me just remind readers that you can go to Dr. Gilbert’s website, which is Toxipedia.org and you can get a copy of his book, A Small Dose of Toxicology for free.
It is an excellent book for everybody to read. It’s written in a way that is very easy to read and the information is organized really well and it is just a good book to start with to learn the basics about toxicology.

So tell us about mercury.

STEVEN GILBERT:The first thing I want to say is that you have or your listeners have mercury thermometers, they should immediately take them to the Hazardous Waste people and get rid of mercury thermometers. That’s the most common source of inorganic mercury in the home, mercury thermometers.

They really are hazardous when you break one. That’s one of the problems with inorganic mercury, the silver stuff. Many of us have probably played a little bit with it one time or another growing up, people in the older generations.

But it is hazardous because it evaporates in the air at room temperature and you inhale that mercury. You really don’t want to do that, so I urge your listeners to take their mercury based thermometers, any mercury items, so that can be toys with mercury in them, to Hazardous Waste and dispose of it properly.

DEBRA: So what about…

STEVEN GILBERT: So in general, quick rundown on mercury, it’s a really interesting complex metal. It’s a liquid in room temperature, so it’s also very dense. It’s about 13 times the weight of water.

So you can actually sit on mercury. If you look at the slides, I have a slide set that’s associated with a chapter of my book, you will see this slide of a gentleman sitting on a big bag of mercury. I can’t imagine what he’s inhaling, but it’s pretty remarkable stuff. He actually floored on mercury.

So mercury metal is used for many things. As you mentioned, it’s in our teeth. It’s also a favorite among alchemists because mercury adheres to gold or gold to mercury. So you get a little silver in a pan that you’ve mixed gold with, you can heat that pan and evaporate mercury. I wouldn’t do this at home, it’s really hazardous, but gold appears. So it could literally appear to be turning a base metal, so there’s mercury in the gold. But in reality, you are doing that, but that was something the alchemists do.

So mercury is used in gold-mining. It still is widely used in that [inaudible 00:04:08]. So they would wash the mine tailings over mercury, and then evaporates mercury to get the gold out of that. It’s a very hazardous business. It’s not good for the environment and it’s not good for the miners.

And the problem with mercury in general is once it gets in the atmosphere, it gets into the land and into the water. Bacteria turn into methylmercury to try to detoxify that mercury because methylmercury bio-accumulates and bio-magnifies and moves up the food chain. And we consume the mercury in many of the fishes we consume, particularly the fishes on the higher food chain. Sword fish for example has high mercury content. So that’s organic mercury. Inorganic mercury absorbs the majority of mercury absorbed in the gut. So it’s really absorbed in the gut and the brain.

If you eat a lot of tuna fishes for example, there are well-documented cases of adults as well as children, which we’re really concerned about, you absorb that mercury and it affects your nervous system. So that’s a very fast rundown on mercury and a lot more to talk about.

DEBRA: Okay, let me ask you some questions. First, could you explain again about the difference between inorganic mercury and organic mercury and tell us which one is the one that appears in nature? And then how does that one turn into the other one?

STEVEN GILBERT: So both mercury are naturally occurring. For example, inorganic mercury is the silver mercury. It’s the metal. It is concentrated. It is really fun stuff to play with.

There’s a movie about it, one of the Terminator movies—the mercury man, I guess you’d call him. He could change form and shape. So it’s been widely used. So mercury occurs when a volcano goes off and it could [inaudible 00:05:50] with it.

The mercury is produced from that because it’s a naturally occurring element. One of the biggest releases of the mercury occurs from some of the largest volcano eruptions that occur.

But also the majority of the mercury that’s put on the environment is done by human use because mercury is very good metal. It’s used for conducting electricity, thermometers, obviously, these blood pressure cuffs. You remember to get your blood pressure taken when you go to the doctor, you have a big slug of mercury. Those are then removed and recycled. But it is also widely used in different forms of treatments that are not good for you either. It’s used in, like I mentioned, gold mining.

So it is widely used. The problem is that the inorganic mercury, quicksilver it’s called, one of the names for it, gets into the environment. It is toxic.

Oh, just one of the use for them, inorganic mercury, was in [inaudible 00:06:47]. The Mad Hatter, you might remember in Alice in Wonderland.

DEBRA: Wow. Yeah.

STEVEN GILBERT: The Mad Hatter was actually poisoned by inhaling mercury. So if you inhale that mercury vapor and it goes to the brain, it’s not good for you.

So when it gets out of the environment though, bacteria, because it is toxic, tries to detoxify that mercury and add a methyl group, the CH3 group to the mercury. So we have organic mercury.

So, organic mercury moves by the bacteria, up to the snails, up the small organisms into the fish. So it moves up the food chain or it’s concentrated in the muscle of the fish and we consume the muscle. You can cook the fish and get rid of it. We consume that muscle like I mentioned in certain fishes like swordfish, shark. Some tuna fish, teal are hazardous because it’s a long lived fish and they concentrate the mercury in their muscle and we consume that muscle. We absorb about, like I said, 90% of the methylmercury, organic mercury in fish. And that moves to the brain.

So there are two forms of mercury, the silver mercury, which is many of us can see and the inorganic mercury, which we can’t see, but it’s most likely in the fish that we consume and that’s where the majority of exposure to mercury is from, fish consumption.

And mercury is, like I mentioned, in volcanoes. It’s also in coal and this is very important because when we burn coal, we release mercury in the atmosphere. We know how to control some of that, but many of the old coal fired utility plants do not have good pollution control devices on them, so they release mercury in the atmosphere. There are some good maps from the US Geological Survey showing east United States has more problems with mercury because of the prevailing winds blowing through the east.

DEBRA: So you mentioned…

STEVEN GILBERT: Anther very important source of mercury is a lot of coal burning in China. You probably heard about that in China.

DEBRA: Yeah.

STEVEN GILBERT: They are burning a lot of coal for electric power generation. They don’t have pollution control devices on there and the mercury ends up contaminating the oceans and blows towards the west coast of the United States.

So mercury is widely distributed. Mercury comes out of coal-fired plants and then it turns into organic mercury and it’s taken up by fish and other organisms. So that’s a little bit of history on mercury.

DEBRA: Yeah. I want to ask you quickly because we need to go to break in about 30 seconds. But you mentioned taking thermometers to the Hazardous Waste because if they break then you are breathing the mercury. I’m going to let you answer this after the break. I’ll ask the question. What happens when you break a compact fluorescence light bulb and there’s mercury inside those? We’ll get Dr. Gilbert to answer right after this.

You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is Toxipedia.org and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist and author of the wonderful book, A Small Dose of Toxicology, which you can get for free on his website at Toxipedia.org.

Now right before the break, I asked Dr. Gilbert what about if you dropped a compact fluorescent light bulb? People would ask me that question. It has been so heavily promoted that we all need to be using toxic fluorescent light bulbs, but people drop them.

I was even present once when somebody dropped one. And I said, “Oh, you need to clean this up properly.” Ad she said, “Oh no, I’ll just put it in the garbage.” And she picked it up with a paper towel and put it in the garbage. So what about that exposure to mercury?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, that’s been a controversy. Compact fluorescent light bulbs have a little bit of mercury in it. They have milligrams of mercury, so very small amounts. And then when we’re reducing that down, so more modern compact fluorescents have even less mercury in them. But you can also get lamps that are LED lights. I encourage people to look into LED lights, which I [inaudible 00:10:50]. LED lights use less electricity.

But the [concept] for us in light bulbs, we need to them up and we need to dispose of them. When they burn out, you really need to take them to Hazardous Waste site again and dispose them properly because even that small amount of mercury, you don’t just want to throw it in the trash and get it back into the environment. And I think that’s one thing that’s one thing that United States struggle with, how to dispose of this light.

So if you do break one at home, don’t use your vacuum cleaner. I would recommend just sweeping it up and even getting some tape, like some masking tape and adhering the debris to the tape and then [wrap] it up. And if you rea¬-lly good about it, you can take that to the Hazardous Waste site. If not, I recommend just throwing it away because you really want to get it out of your house and clean it up as best as possible.

But really the best option is again to prevent things, not to drop the fluorescent light bulbs, to take really good care of them, take them to Hazardous Waste when you want to dispose of them. And clean it up as best as possible in the home.

If you break the thermometer, it’s the same thing. You use duct tape to clean up those little drops of mercury. Do not use a vacuum cleaner because the vacuum cleaner picks it up and the hot air will vaporize mercury and will blow up the vacuum cleaner. So you do not vacuum up mercury. Take duct tape, stick the mercury to the tape and then take it to Hazardous Waste to dispose of it properly.

DEBRA: Good. I totally agree with all of that. So tell us what happens in your body when you are exposed to mercury?

STEVEN GILBERT: So we learned a lot about mercury. I’ll just do a little history from Minamata Bay in Japan. This is in the 1950s where a large chemical plant was releasing mercury into the bay, the Minamata Bay. At that time, the ’50s thought that the solution to pollution is dilution. So you just thrust the pile into the oceans and think the ocean will go away.

DEBRA: Oh my god.

STEVEN GILBERT: Again and again, we learn this countless times that it’s just not the case and we must be really careful with our environment whether it’s plastics we’re throwing away, the big plastic jars on the oceans or throwing mercury into the environment.

So the problem was the fish consumed the mercury. As I mentioned, it turns into methylmercury, the bio-accumulation of fish. So at first, the cats were getting sick in the fishing community. So the people started getting sick and the kids in particular were affected. This was well-documented and Minamata disease is what it’s called this time.

So it really drove home the point that the placenta is not a great de-toxicant. So the mercury moves across the placenta.

Actually further research years later determined that placenta is actually a sink for mercury. Sorry, the fetus is actually a sink for the mercury. And so the fetus will have higher mercury levels than the mom. This is very important because that exposure affects the developing nervous system.

So this is a great lesson learned in the ’50s that placenta is not a great barrier and we really, really have to be careful because even small amounts of mercury are hazardous. Large amounts are extremely hazardous.

So from then on, we really focused on is there a safe level of mercury consumed and how do you regulate mercury? I’ve done many studies on this. The low level of methylmercury exposure is particularly hazardous to children and their developing nervous system causing neurological disorders, reduced intelligence and more subtle things like depression, lack of sleep, headache and things like that. But the real hazard is for developing children, developing fetus and developing their nervous system and the reduction in intellectual ability.

That’s what organic mercury or methylmercury is. They have similar hazards. It’s slightly different with inorganic mercury. It can also affect adults. So it is shown that adults are not off the hook. People consume a lot of tuna fish, a lot of high mercury content fish can have a variety of sleep disturbances, headache, fatigue, lack of coordination, muscle and joint pains, hair thinning, heart rate disturbance, hypertension, tremor. All these things come along with consumption of mercury.

For example, this little case study here, a 64 year anthropologist who ate fish nine times a week who was often choosing tuna, swordfish, sea bass suffered chronic fatigue, headaches and hair loss. He had a mercury level of 21 micrograms per liter. And the EPA recommends about five or even less for women of child-bearing age because the fetus is a potential sink.

So women should be much more careful with their mercury consumption.

So it’s complicated. It’s a long story. There’s a lot of [inaudible 00:15:37] on mercury from many different states. And the FDA [weighs in] on this. We can get into regulatory stuff if you’d like.

DEBRA: Well, I am thinking about when I was a child the first time I ate fish. I spit it out and I have rarely eaten fish or seafood. I’ll occasionally eat shrimp, but I just don’t eat fish at all from any source. And I think it’s because my body just said,

“No, there’s something wrong with this.”

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, I don’t wanted scare you with fish consumption because fish is a really important source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids.

DEBRA: Yeah, I know.

STEVEN GILBERT: I mean it’s a really important food source for the many people of the world. There are good fishes to eat. For example, salmon is better because it’s not as long lived. It’s not high in the food chain. So fishes like salmon will have lower mercury levels in them. And you just have to look at the list of fish particularly recommended by your state and where you’re fishing and look at what fishes have lower mercury content in them.

But fish is really good source of protein, omega-3 fatty acids and it’s important. And the FDA recommends a small amount of fish per week.

DEBRA: I know. There’s also fish oil and for years, I didn’t take fish oil, but I did another show with somebody and all we talked about was fish oil. And I learned—wait, I’ll talk more about this when we come back from a break because we are actually running over.

You are listening to Toxic Free Talk radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert and his website is Toxipedia.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert and his website is Toxipedia.org. And he’s also the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology, which I think you all know by now, I highly recommend.

So before the break, I started talking about fish oil and what I wanted to say is that a couple of weeks ago, I did a show with Pamela Seefeld who is a pharmacologist and she explained to us about how women make high quality fish oil. And I am not talking about the cheap sets, but something that you would get a high quality medical grade fish oil.

But they are only taking that oil from the very smaller fish like sardines and anchovies. And when they process it, they are processing it so finely. There’s protein from the fish in it, but there’s also no pollutants in it.

So if you want to take fish oil and I actually started taking fish oil for the first time after listening to her interview. And it’s such a good source of all kinds of things. It does good things for your body and I can tell the difference already. I think I should have been taking fish oil all the time, but I was afraid to take it because of mercury and not liking to eat fish. But I think people, if you get a good quality fish oil, you should feel confident that it’s okay to take it. Do you agree?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes. I think that is a good supplement. I think you do have to be careful what fish oil you use because the older, the bigger the fish, the more mercury they tend to have in them. So anchovies and smaller fishes that have shorter life span will have less mercury in them.

Also with fish oils, be worried about organic pollutants such as PCBs and pesticides or chlorinated pesticides because they’re in the fat. So fish oil will accumulate some of those compounds depending on where the fish was sourced from.

And PCB is widely distributed in the environment, used in transformers with some of the rivers like Hudson at elevated levels. There’s an area around Seattle called the Duwamish Area where there’s also PCB in the water system and in the sediment. So you have to be cautious about that, but my view is everything in moderation including moderation.

DEBRA: I agree. So tell us more about mercury.

STEVEN GILBERT: So mercury, a little bit about mercury, I just want to get into a little bit of toxicology of mercury because it is widely regulated around the world. And there was just a treaty passed on mercury, the [inaudible 00:20:12] convention treaty in trying to limit the transportation and sale of inorganic mercury around the world because it’s a by-product of mining.

There’s a lot of mercury in the environment. And one of the problems is where to store the mercury that we have accumulated. It’s widely used in the nuclear industry. So many sites are contaminated with mercury. And old mines are contaminated with mercury. So it is something that we’ve managed to spread around the environment.

On the regulatory side, the US Food and Drug Administration sets a level that fish do not have more than one part per million of methylmercury in the fish. This may sound very small amount, but its’ really not typically if you look at what the US Environmental Protection Agency sets as a reference dose. So reference dose is how much you consume on a daily basis over lifetime and expect no hazardous consequences.

So the USPDA set the level of 0.1 micrograms per kilogram per day. So it’s 0.1 micrograms per kilogram per day. So it’s related to your body weight.

DEBRA: Could you just translate that into a measurement? Most people don’t know what a kilogram is and the microgram. How many teaspoons?

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, that’s a really great question. So how many fish you consume? That depends on how much mercury is in that fish. And that’s what the FDA tries to regulate with that one part per million or it’s actually one milligram per kilogram in the fish.

So a kilogram is about 2.2 lbs. So you can have one milligram, a very small amount, one part per million in the fish. But if you look at what the EPA recommends that you can consume, the 0.1 microgram per kilogram, it takes a little [flexing] around with the various nomenclature here and you convert your body weight into kilograms and figure out how much fish you consume, how much mercury you consume, how much fish you can consume. It is not very much.

So that’s a problem. You cannot consume a lot of fishes that have a lot of mercury in them. So swordfish, shark, some tuna fish like old tuna can have fairly high or above one part per million mercury in the flesh of the fish and you rapidly go over the amount you safely consume per day.

And this has been shown. We just published a paper on this a couple of years ago for adults consuming this. It’s even more hazardous for children and women in child-bearing age. So it’s a tough one and the US EPA is actually reviewing its RD and trying to come up with a new standard. And some people, myself included, are pushing for lower standards and we like to see the FDA be a little bit more aggressive about monitoring the mercury content of fish, but also lowering the one part per million to at least 0.5. [inaudible 00:23:20] has a level of 0.5 ppm of mercury for retail fish and seafood.

DEBRA: So do they test it? Do they test the fish for mercury levels?

STEVEN GILBERT: Not usually.

DEBRA: Okay. I think a good idea would be—and you can tell me what you think of this. I think they should be testing fish when they come off the ship and find out the parts per million and they should put that information on the package.

STEVEN GILBERT: I think that would be great. It would be tough to do it for a lot of the fish because there’s a huge amount of fish that come through. But at least doing more testing and labeling the fish in the stores as to what might be the mercury content like the tuna fish, which you will expect high levels of mercury in them and with fishes who have a lower concentration of mercury…

DEBRA: Yeah. Even if they didn’t tell you, “We tested this and this is the exact number,” if the fish package has had a little sticker on them that says, “This is a high mercury fish or a low mercury fish,” I think that that would help a lot because there are lists that you can get. I mean you could just—what would you look on? How would you search of that? Well, probably low mercury fish list or something like that that you would get because I know that there are a lot of lists.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah. There are a lot of lists around. Most [inaudible 00:24:41] got good one.

DEBRA: Yeah.

STEVEN GILBERT: There’s a number of websites out there that will list the mercury and the recommended fish consumption [inaudible 00:24:52] and all kinds of information.

DEBRA: Yeah. So if you are eating fish, you absolutely should learn the fishes that have the lowest in mercury. I don’t think that there’s anybody, any system that’s watching out to catch those fishes that have a whole lot of mercury in them and make sure that they get diverted and not be sold in the store.

STEVEN GILBERT: Right.

DEBRA: That’s just not going on in the world today.

STEVEN GILBERT: The fishes to avoid are sharks, swordfish, king mackerel, king fish. They are the big ones to avoid. And then there are some others, the tuna fish. Basically you want to limit your consumption of fish that may have higher levels of mercury in them.

DEBRA: Good. We need to go to break. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. His book is A Small Dose of Toxicology and his website is Toxipedia.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert and his website is Toxipedia.org.

Tell us some of the other places we might encounter mercury.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah. That’s a good question. I’ll give you another example of mercury because it is just a good antifungal, antibacterial agent put in paint. And it’s often used in bathrooms because they kill mold. The problem was there’s a little bit of mercury in the paint.

So in 1990,I think it was in 1990 or early 1990s, a family painted their baby’s room, baby boy’s room with mercury based paint without understanding the consequences of that. And the mercury actually evaporated to the walls and the child absorbed that mercury and got sick from mercury exposure. So that was one of the things to try to limit mercury.

And by large, there’s been a huge effort to limit distribution of mercury in the environment. And really…

DEBRA: Wait a minute. Wait. Do they still put mercury in paint?

STEVEN GILBERT: No, they stopped doing that. So 1991, I believe they stopped putting mercury in paint because it was—people thought it was good, mercury was good. It’s very toxic. It’s good for stopping growth of mold and other bacteria and fungus because it is toxic. But the consequences can be hazardous to human health too, so that’s why they stopped mercury in paint.

DEBRA: Yeah. Okay, good. I just want to make sure…

STEVEN GILBERT: But what I want to emphasize is that mercury is in coal. And so our answer to try to reduce the amount of electricity use is actually very important because reducing electricity use reduce the need for coal fired [inaudible 00:27:45] plants. And this has been an ongoing struggle across the United States.

For example, Washington State has a big battle about trying to ship coal to China. China burns coal and the mercury come to the Pacific Ocean. So our use of electricity is directly related to the mercury in fish, which is related to our health. So if you are using compact fluorescent light bulbs, switch to LEDs, try to reduce your mercury or your electricity use.

And this year, I put solar panels on the roof of my house trying to reduce the amount of electricity that we’re using. I think we all have a responsibility to try to look at the bigger picture, the consequence by action. And mercury is one of those things that do have a big consequence and there are ways that we can try to reduce the tendency of the technology, the industries that generate mercury in the atmosphere.

DEBRA: I think that’s a really good point and I’m glad that you brought it up because I just want to emphasize. We tend to think of environmental exposure as being out there somewhere and we don’t always see the direct actions of the environment being polluted with these toxic chemicals because of our actions.

It’s like if we were to open a can of gasoline or something in our house, we would see that that is a toxic exposure to us in our house. But when we use electric, other actions like driving cars and things, the pollutants are happening out there someplace else, but we are breathing that air. As Dr. Gilbert said, the mercury is going into the ocean and then it goes into the fish.

And so we need to consider our actions and how they affect the environment just as we consider our actions and how we create toxic chemicals, the exposures in our homes because those things come back to us then when we bring those other resources that are out there in the environment like a fish for example. We bring that in to our homes. We’ve brought that toxic chemical into our homes. So there is this direct connection between what we do and what goes on out there.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah. I that’s really well said Debra. I think that’s really important point to make.

DEBRA: Thank you.

STEVEN GILBERT: Our actions are small, but we have actions of millions of people and they add up to big consequences.

And mercury is a great example of that where we need to reduce the mercury in fish. And that means we need to reduce the mercury that’s being released in the environment. That means we need to reduce the coal fire burning of coal fire utility plants, which means individually we need to reuse the electricity we are using.

And then it also extends to nuclear power plants because nuclear is one of the options. To try to reduce the amount of electricity also reduces the need for nuclear power plants.

DEBRA: Yes, yes, exactly. And we shouldn’t have nuclear plants at all in my opinion. And I just commend you on putting solar panels. That’s been something on my list for a long time.

Can you just say something about that for a minute because they are pretty expensive? Are there programs to help? How did you make that happen?

STEVEN GILBERT: You’re right. Washington State is a really good state. It has pretty good incentives. Right now, at the Federal Incentives, you get 30% back on your taxes. So let’s say you put $30,000 solar power plant, which is pretty expensive, but you would get 30% of that back about almost $10,000 back. So the plant costs you 20,000.

And with the advancement of technology in the solar panels, the payback in a well-situated house is about five to six years with incentives. So for example in Washington State, we can sell the power back to Seattle City Light. We sell it back to our city light utility. And every August, I will get a check and the power is sold back.

DEBRA: Oh, great.

STEVEN GILBERT: I sold it July. So last two months, I generated over two megawatts of power and sold roughly 1.25. So 1.25 megawatts power back to Seattle City Light, which reduces my electric bill. And I’m going to get a check on August by doing that.

Unfortunately, Florida, in my understanding, does not have good incentive. And Florida, in where you are I believe, has a great amount of solar potential. It’s not being utilized because [inaudible 00:32:18].

DEBRA: Yes. It’s very under-utilized.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, it really is. You’d use it otherwise. It is possible that Florida could be generating a lot of power, but there are not good incentives for using solar panels in Florida because the power companies have really worked hard to reduce the incentive to use solar power.

DEBRA: It is what is going on here.

STEVEN GILBERT: So I think individually one way to go is you look at Europe. They are much more in solar power like Germany is trying to reduce dependency on nuclear power plants, switching more to solar.

And we can do a lot more in ¬states like Florida and several other states could do a lot more and create incentives for individuals to generate the solar power right from their homes.

DEBRA: Right here, where I lived, they are wanting to put in a nuclear power plant.

STEVEN GILBERT: Oh there you go. And that’s because…

DEBRA: And they should take that money and just put solar panels on all our houses.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yeah, You should invest. You can take all the money you invest in nuclear power and we can get alternatives to nuclear power. [inaudible 00:33:16] program in that someday. It was just not economically feasible for huge centralized power sources, but we should really be moving towards distributed power systems.

For example, my ability to feed power directly back to the [inaudible 00:33:31] through grid during the day when the sun is out. Even right now, I could look and I could tell you how much power I’m generating. I have a really neat gadget on the system. And we are generating about 3000 watts of power and I’m feeding almost two watts of power back to electric grid right as we are talking.

So this is very powerful technology. It’s really well-developed and it feeds directly back to reducing use of coal and reducing the mercury in the environment and improving health of our children.

DEBRA: Yay. Well, we’ve only got about three minutes left. So what else would you like to tell us in three minutes?

STEVEN GILBERT: I just want to say eat well. Being careful about nutrition is really important. And watch the fishes. And fishes are also contaminated like I mentioned with PCBs and other fat-soluble compounds. So you got to be careful with those contaminants in fish. It’s not just mercury you have to be worried about unfortunately. But watch out for that because these fat-soluble compounds are also potentially harmful particularly for the developing child.

And mercury, I encourage people to read up about mercury because it is widely used in the environment. It’s got many different uses. And because it converts to organic mercury and methylmercury, it gets into the environment and in our food supply. And we have mercury in our teeth, which are the amalgams, which is inorganic mercury. And that’s also source of contamination.

And as a side fact on that one, the problem with cremation is you create somebody and the mercury in their teeth in their teeth goes up smoke stack when they get out to the environment. So there are many good reasons for not using mercury amalgams in our teeth anymore. I generally recommend that. And some countries actually banned the use of mercury amalgams. And it’s less common in the United States, but it is still widely available.

DEBRA: Wow. We’ve learned so much about mercury today. It’s something that I know that I’ve had a lot of attention on as a toxic substance and it’s something that I think people widely know that there’s a problem with it. But we’ve learned so much more about it today. So thank you so much for joining with us.

STEVEN GILBERT: And I think mercury is fascinating. It’s a great, great example of toxicology, how we have learned more about that. And we really recognize that very small amounts of mercury are harmful to developing nervous system and harmful to our children’s health. And we really have an ethical responsibility to ensure that our children can reach and maintain their full potential. I know I work hard with that with my grandchildren, making sure they are not exposed or exposed mainly to all hazards out there.

We are responsible to them. We have to look not only to our own kids, but also globally. What can we do to affect the global distribution of toxicants and child health around the world?

DEBRA: I agree, totally agree. Well, thank you so much for being with us today. Again, this is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. His website is Toxipedia.org.

His book is A Small Dose of Toxicology and it contains a lot of what we were talking about today. So if you weren’t taking notes, you can go look in the book and a lot of it will be there and it is also the basis of mostly the shows that we are doing.

It’s like a book that goes along with what we are talking about. Anyway, A Small Dose of Toxicology at Toxipedia.org.

You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Dancing With Water

Dancing with waterAn inspiring reorientation to water in it’s natural state, this website has everything you need to make the transition to drinking water as nature intended. It helps you understand the New Science of Water and provides tools to create full-spectrum, living water right in your own home. Start by signing up for the newsletter and receive a week’s worth of daily emails introducing you to the concept. And if you’re interested, read the book and explore all the interesting things you can use to restructure your water to be vibrantly alive. NOTE: the information and tools on this site enlivens water, but does not remove pollutants. You need to start with clean water (I recommend using water from a PureEffect filter).

Listen to my interview with Dancing with Water: The New Science of Water co-author MJ Pangman.

Visit Website

Flaska Water Bottles

A reusable glass water bottle that is programmed with information that enhances the quality of the water inside. The end result is water that is restructured to be similar to spring water in it’s natural environment. The bottles are beautiful, with tight cork caps. The family-sized carafe is a gorgeous addition to any table (I had to have one). Protective sleeves come in many designs, materials include organic cotton and natural cork. NOTE: these bottles change the structure of the water, but do not remove pollutants. You need to start with clean water (I recommend using water from a PureEffect filter).

For 10 percent off your purchase, enter coupon code “Toxic Free” at checkout

Listen to my interview with Healthy Earth LLC President Bryan Mours. Healthy Earth LLC is the US distributor for Flaska water bottles

Visit Website

Find-A-Spring

A community and user created database of natural springs around the world, many of which are sources of drinking water. Spring water direct from the spring is “the cleanest, healthiest, most natural water available in our world today.” Just select a state to find a list of springs near you (not all areas have natural springs listed).

Visit Website

Eraser Toxicity

Question from Emily

I’m researching Iwako Japanese erasers and they claim they are lead, phthalate free and made with recyclable non-pvc materials. They say their erasers are made from four materials: base, softener, filler, and stabilizer. They don’t mention what is in these materials. What is your opinion on their toxicity.

Debra’s Answer

In the more than thirty years that I have been researching toxic chemicals in products, this is the first time anyone has asked about erasers.

Just a little history, because it’s interesting…before there were erasers, people would remove pencil marks from paper by rubbing them with bread. Then it was discovered accidentally that natural latex rubber (
produced by a tree called Hevea Brasilienesis) did a better job. The first commercial erasers were made from natural latex rubber.

The problem was that natural latex was perishable. Then in 1839, an industrial process called “vulcanization” was discovered. This adds sulfur or other equivalent additives to natural rubber to make it more durable. Rubber erasers then became more common.

Today most erasers are made from synthetic rubber, which is made of many different chemicals including styrene and butadiene.

artgum eraserBut natural rubber erasers are still made and sold in art supply stores. Look for an “artgum” eraser (anyone with a latex allergy should not use this eraser).

pink rubber eraser

Pink rubber erasers are made from synthetic rubber, iron oxide colorant, and probably some other ingredients.

vinyl eraser Soft white erasers are made from vinyl, which is why Iwako is saying “no PVC.” Since phthalates would be present in the PVC, that’s why they are saying “no phthalates.” Same with lead, lead is often an ingredient in PVC.

Iwako erasers are made from synthetic rubber, which I found at
www.iwako.com/IWAKO/toysafety/index.htm

iwako eraser label

While synthetic rubber erasers are not generally considered to be a health hazard, there is quite a bit of concern about synthetic rubber used in other applications, such as this report from New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Iwako is claiming its erasers are “nontoxic,” or at least some of their resellers are. I can’t agree that SBS synthetic rubber is nontoxic.

So that’s the story on most common erasers.

Read more about how erasers are made at www.madehow.com/Volume-5/Eraser.html

Primal Life Organics

Paleo, gluten-free, vegan skincare options for those looking to detoxify their skincare and get back to the basics. Products are all natural, organic and made fresh when ordered. Made from ingredients our primal ancestors could have used for their own skincare. Choose from makeup made from plants and clay, skin care, hair care, tooth powder, pregnancy products and baby care. Watch how they make their products on this video.

Listen to Debra’s 2014 interview with Primal Life Organics CEO Trina Felber, RN, BSN, MSN, CRNA.

Visit Website

Formaldehyde Emissions Standards

Question from shema

Hi Debra,

Is a high chair made of “E-1 multi layer poplar wood” acceptable/safe?

Thanks!

Question from kdragonrider

Hello Debra,

I am wondering if you would ever purchase any furniture that is Certified Formaldehyde Compliant Phase 2. Just curious what your thoughts are ? Thank You for your help and all you do :).

Blessings

Debra’s Answer

E1 is the European formaldehyde emissions standard. So I wouldn’t buy this because it has emissions. You want zero emissions. Look for a high chair in an unfinished furniture store.

E1 and E0 are the European formaldehyde emission standards. E1 emission standards have been used for years in the flooring industry. Wood flooring adhesives that meet E1 formaldehyde standards have less than 0.75 ppm formaldehyde. That’s not zero. The tricky thing is that a product could be labeled E1 and have zero formaldehyde because zero is less than 0.75 ppm, but products with 0.74 ppm could also qualify.

E0 is an updated version of E1. The standard is much more stringent, requiring formaldehyde emissions to be equal to or less than 0.07ppm. Therefore, composite wood products such as bamboo flooring, laminate flooring, or engineered hardwood flooring that meet E0 standards would be safer than those that only meet E1 standards.

To put this in perspective, both the California Air Resource Board Phase 2 CARB Formaldehyde Emission Standards and the Japanese Emission Standards JIS/JAS F**** are even more stringent, so any product that meets one of these standard would be preferable to products that meet the European standards.

Formaldehyde was designated as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) in California in 1992 with no safe level of exposure.

Here is a Comparison of International Composite Board Emission Standards

Add Comment

Toxic Psychiatry and How to Have Mental Health Without Drugs

Pamela SeefeldMy guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph, a pharmacist who specializes in pharmacognosy, which is healing with medicinal plants. Today we’ll be talking about her particular interest in the toxic effects of psychiatric drugs and how she helps people get off them. In addition, we’ll discuss how various natural supplements can affect your mood and feelings for better or for worse. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy. She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and is the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

transcript

DEBRA: Hi. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free. It is August 27th, 2014 and I am here in beautiful Clearwater, Florida where it’s a lovely late summer day. The sun is shining, there is no thunderstorm, so we should have no interruptions in our transmission here today – not that we ever do, but sometimes the electricity goes out when we have thunderstorms, so it’s always a possibility. But everything is perfect and smooth today, beautiful summer day.

Today, we’re going to be talking about toxic psychiatry. We’re going to be talking about toxic psychiatric threads, and how you can have mental health without them.

My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a pharmacist, who specializes in a specialty called pharmacognosy, which is healing with medicinal plants. So instead of giving people toxic drugs that are made in a laboratory, Pamela, with her pharmacist training, finds things to give people that have the same beneficial effects as drugs, but these plants actually heal you, instead of just alleviating symptoms.

So she works with a wide variety. She is right here in Clearwater, Florida with me. And I’ve been to her. She has helped me tremendously. Actually, I’ve only been to her once. She gave me one bag full of things to take. One of the things that has happened is I have lost 10 pounds in three weeks. That was one of the things I want to do, it’s to lose some weight; and Pamela helped me do that. Before, losing weight was really a struggle for me.

I have another friend whose mother was on a whole lot of drugs for a condition that she has. And Pamela gave her some natural remedies; and right away, his mother started doing better. That’s actually how I found out about her in the first place.

So today, she’s going to tell us about how psychiatric drugs are toxic, how they affect your body. We’re going to be talking about little things that you can do if you have mental health things that need to be improved, how plants can help you.

Hi, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Congratulations on your weight loss. I know you’re doing great.

DEBRA: I am doing great. I am doing great. I’m actually…

PAMELA SEEFELD: I’m very happy for you.

DEBRA: Thank you. Actually, I’m going to see Pamela again on Friday this week and I found a whole lot of old blood tests.

She has to look at your blood test because she can tell how your body is doing from looking at the blood test, even if something is coming up, some body condition that’s weakening, symptoms in the future that you’re going to have. She can help you handle that in the past before you can get sick. And so I just gather up all the blood tests I could find, and I’m taking them all to her on Friday. We’re going to go over them and see what we can do next.

I just think it’s fascinating, what you do, Pamela and so needed.

I knowin past shows – you can go ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and see the links to past shows we have already done with her. Actually, she’s going to be on every other Wednesday because there’s so much to talk about on this subject and so much to learn.

But how did you get interested in the psychiatric part of this?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a very good question. Just a little brief background, my background is Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacognosy, which is the study of plant medicine. It’s much different than Herbalism. People that are doing herbal medicine, there’s not really so much of the study of the medicinal qualities and where they go in the body. I also trained in Homeopathic Medicine here in the United States and in Europe.

So I do a broad range of things. I can do pretty much everything. We’ve talked about this, some cardiovascular disease to sleep disorders and so forth, but mental health has always been a particular interest of mine. I have definitely had plenty of time spent up in Washington DC grant reviewing for NIH, which is National Institute of Health. One of my best friends works at the National Institute of Mental Health and I tended to hang around with a lot of the psychiatrists and the people that work in mental health that are interested in other means of getting people well.

So my background is very varied in this. And mental health to me is like the final frontier because a lot of people, when they realize that their mental health is balanced and they overcome insomnia or depression or anxiety, all these things that are really harming people and making them not have their potential, most people’s illnesses really start out psychosomatically as a psychiatric issue where we can use some simple tools, some plants, some vitamins and some simple things that will work just like medicine and get people better so they are not needing medicines in the future.

DEBRA: That’s so great. That’s so great. So then, you were hanging out with people who were looking at these mental health things. And then now, what do you do with this?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Now, I tend to go to Biological Psychiatry. I try and go in there once a year, to their meeting, and see what they’re proposing. And what I have found by learning all these different things – and I actually lecture on this too to the psychiatrists. I do grand rounds.

Grand rounds are like when – like the VA Hospital, I do grand rounds at the VA Hospital. Grand rounds are when the doctors and psychiatrists get together at lunch and they meet in the room and they have a speaker. They do this every week, and it’s called grand rounds. Sometimes, they do it once a month, depending on which hospital institution.

So I do grand rounds, psychiatric grand rounds. We met several times a year. And the grand rounds talk about this is what you give this patient in the psychiatric realm, which are drugs and this is the data that shows that these vitamins or these plants can do exactly the same thing at a lower cost, better outcomes, and less side effects.

My background is very varied in this, but I have done this a long time. I lecture on this quite a bit. But I write new lectures for several psychiatrists that are very good friends of mine that really ask, “Can you please send me those lectures because I’d like to read it.” I really summarize all the data. And that’s what we’re going to do today.

DEBRA: Good. So go ahead and start.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay. I’ll just…

DEBRA: I don’t know what to ask you first.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, no, no. Don’t worry about it. I’ll just go there and you can interject as you wish.

All right, what we see is that a lot of people – and we were talking about the blood work. It’s nice sometimes that I see people blood work because if you go to a regular allopathic doctor and he’s going to do your blood work – and even pharmacists, when I worked as a pharmacist in their hospital – when you look at the blood work, they only look and see if it’s out of range.

If it’s out of range and it’s flagged, so to speak, then that’s the only time they address it. But a lot of times, people have things that are coming along that I tell people, “In five years, they’re going to give you this medicine. In 10 years, they’re going to give you this medicine.”

So it’s really about preventing all these medicines because people do not want to be medicated. They want natural solutions. And the thing with medicines is that a medication works on receptors. That’s how drugs work. That means this drug, drug X or whatever it is, goes to a protein on a cell and it’s an exact match. It looks just like the configuration of the protein.

And then, when it binds to the cell, it changes something inside the cell, and you get the effects. So you get the anti-depressant effect or you get the anti-anxiety effect or whatever you’re looking for. So when you do this, let’s face it, there’s no solving the problem. You’re just covering it up with medicine.

So what I do is say, “Look, you have some depression and anxiety. There’s nothing wrong with that. Life can be very stressful. Let’s solve what’s going on in the brain, the neurotransmission. Let’s get this solved so that this problem is gone.”

That’s the difference with what I do versus what we do in a pharmacy and medical realm.

DEBRA: That’s totally amazing. That’s just so amazing…

PAMELA SEEFELD: It is! It’s all about solving things, solving problems…

DEBRA: Yes! And that’s the difference in. In the first show that I did with you, during the first break, I looked up the root of the word pharmacognosy because I was curious about that little syllable cog- that has to do with the intelligence. And what pharmacognosy really means is it’s a drug, but it has information. It has intelligence. It does something. This is what’s missing.

This is what’s present in plants, it’s that information. That’s what’s missing in drugs that are synthesized in a lab and toxic chemicals and all these things. It doesn’t have the information part that exists in nature. Is that right?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And we tend to take things very simplistic. We don’t think of plants as being intelligent. But they have enzymes in the plant that are identical to what we have in our liver. They metabolize. They’re unique and they can make their own food.

What’s unique about plants is that the reason why they have activity and they have these compounds is they make them to prevent herbivores from eating them. And these compounds are toxic to some animals, but for us, they’re very, very therapeutic.

DEBRA: Good. We’ll hear more about it after the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacist. She specializes in pharmacognosy. She’s here in Clearwater, Florida, where I live, but she works with anybody by phone. Her website is BotanicalResource.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. We’re talking about toxic psychiatry and how we can help mental health without drugs. So go on.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. So this is what we have to look at. We’re talking about solving the problem. So I think most people would want a solution versus, “Okay, I’m going to give you a medication and this medicine is going to go bind the receptors. It’s going to change the chemistry in the cell,” but after the effect wears off, the problem is still there.

So this is what is different from what I do versus when we’re handing out medications to people. So let me just start with a few simple diagnoses and what we use versus what the doctor would give you.

DEBRA: Great.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So depression. Depression is a very common problem. And depression, we know that when people have excessive amounts of cortisol because of stress – and we all have heard these terms like adrenal fatigue and so forth. The adrenal glands rest on top of the kidneys. When you’re under chronic stress, anxious, stressed at work, stressed at family, things like that, traffic, cortisol is released.

When the cortisol keeps being released chronically all the time – the cortisol is really designed to be there if you have to flee a dangerous animal when we were hunters and gatherers, that kind of thing. But nowadays, people’s cortisol levels are elevated all the time because we’re constantly stressed out, worried, whatever.

So what happens is this cortisol components go in and out of soluble tissues. They can come in and out of the brain. So a lot of people’s depression is a result of excessive cortisol stimulation in the body.

So how does the doctor treat this? What they do is they give what is called the serotonin reuptake inhibitor like Paxil and Prozac and Zoloft. Those drugs are very common medicine.

In fact, do you realize they are so often prescribed that they are in the water supply everywhere in the country? When they actually measure the water, it has the serotonin reuptake inhibitors and estrogen from birth control pills. They’re in all the water. They can’t even get it out of the water anymore.

DEBRA: Which is another reason to filter your water.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly! That’s exactly right. And you know what too? Don’t think that these things are innocuous because there was a study that was recently done about a year and a half ago in Norwood that found that because there was such a high incidents of people using benzodiazepines, which is like Valium and Xanax and Ativan, those drugs, there was such a high incidence in that particular town that it was on the water supply and they were dumping the water into the river and the fishes were being killed. The reason why they’re being killed is because they weren’t fleeing their predators anymore because they were drugged out.

DEBRA: Oh, my God!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Do you want to talk about environmental problem? These kinds of things are happening every day. So these medicines are very dangerous and they have a lot of side effects and people need to realize that.

So if you’re depressed and you go to the doctor and he gives you one of these medications, when you take this, it just allows more of the serotonin or the happy neurotransmitter to be in the synapse in the brain, but it’s not solving anything.

And the problem with taking these medicines is that say, I put you on this medication. Two months later, you decide you don’t want to be on this anymore. You don’t feel good, you feel foggy, you feel out of it, your affect is very flat, you don’t have this experience of joy anymore. So what happens is you try and take it away, but then when you start taking it away, you have withdrawal, you have severe side effects.

We actually know now that the neuron, when you start taking away these medicines, they start to retreat into the brain. As a result of it, you start getting more depressed, more anxiety. It’s like a negative backlash.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And so this happens a lot. I did this a lot. I take people off medicines a lot. They come to me saying, “Please help me bridge off of this.”

The difference between going to a psychiatrist and saying, “I want to get off this medication” is that they just start breaking and splitting, but there’s no bridge to solve to get off of it. What happens is whatever was going on in your brain before you start taking the medicines, it’s still present and at the same effect, the medicine, you’re going into withdrawal. So actually you are at a worse stage than you were initially.

So what do we use for someone that’s depressed? There’s a product called OmegaBrite. It was developed by a psychiatrist, Dr. Andrew Stoll at Harvard University. There were double blind placebo-controlled trials against Zoloft. Actually, in the trial, it was better than Zoloft. What do you think of that?

DEBRA: I love it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah. So, when people come to me, sometimes, people are skeptical. They’ll say, “Well, really? There’s no data on that.” I’m like, “Oh, actually, there are.” I print the studies out of the National Library of Medicine and you can see that these particular products have clinical data that show it’s actually better than the drug as far as the outcome.

So OmegaBrite and something called Cardio B, which is a prescription dose folic acid, which binds to five serotonin receptors in the brain, phenomenal results to get people off of medicines, but also to treat the depression itself.

And the cool part is that both of these products make up the neurons in the brain, so you are solving the problem and you are not just covering it up.
DEBRA: Okay. I have a question for you.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Please.

DEBRA: And we have just a couple of minutes until we have to go to break. I know that people can go through – like something can happen in their lives. Like this morning, I was just feeling stressed about something and I just started feeling overwhelmed and like, “How am I going to get through this?” It was something that because it just seemed like an overwhelming thing to me, but I felt fine. Within minutes, I went, “Okay, so I can handle this.”

But I think that there’s a difference between — I’m asking a question here. There’s a difference between the ordinary up’s and down’s of life, but isn’t there also physical things going on in your brain that cause people to be depressed that has nothing to do with the ordinary up’s and down’s of life?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right, yes.

DEBRA: So you could, say, try to solve it by not wanting to be depressed or solve the problem or whatever, but if there is something biological going on, then you could go to a psychologist or psychiatrist or a psychic or whoever you want to go to all day long and it wouldn’t solve it because there’s wrong biologically.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. What you’re stating is that organically, there’s something going on in the brain that needs to be addressed. That’s why when you take medication, you actually are not resolving what’s going on in there

And really, when you’re taking omega 3’s and folic acid – and a lot of times too, I’ll even use some products that work on dopamine like SynaptaLean, which actually goes and targets dopamine and brings more dopamine into the brain. When you do this, you’re saying, “Okay, I’m acknowledging the fact that the neurons on the brain are not firing the way they should be and as a result of it, I am feeling very distressed and unhappy.”

Life events can bring upon these things especially because it seems overwhelming that you have to figure out some way to cope with what’s going on, maybe the death of a spouse or something really bad happening.

And this is what I typically see people being put on these medicines. But then after the event has passed, they want to come off of it and those options are not being brought to them. That’s where I see a lot of this.

So looking at that and saying, “Okay. Can I work on serotonin? Can I work on dopamine in the brain and improve my outcome and improve my brain function, and my cognition and memory?”, that’s where these supplements take place.

DEBRA: Okay, we’re going to go to a break and we’ll talk about this more when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacist. She specializes in pharmacognosy, which is the healing with medical plants. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld, a pharmacist who specializes in pharmacognosy, which is healing with medicinal plants.

So even if somebody doesn’t have a mental health condition, like say depression, then there can still be benefits for people from taking certain plants because it sharpens up their brain.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. So everyone has their very own level of comfort of where they are. They know that they’re functioning really high and they’re feeling really great, or they’re having some issues and they’re not feeling so well. We know that these things can fluctuate.

What I would tell people, there’s a few simple points. If you are going to take a supplement, you want to make sure you’re taking the right supplement and something that’s targeted directly towards you feeling better.

For example with the OmegaBrite, OmegaBrite is a type of fish oil. Everybody should be on fish oil regardless, because we know it works on 300 different genes in the body, it helps prevent cancer, it helps for cardiovascular disease, it helps lower triglycerides 30% every month. So that’s just the baseline.

And what I do a lot of times, look, you’re going to be taking Omega 3’ss anyways, why don’t you use one that’s going to be tailor-made for you? If you need more energy, if you have a little bit of mild depression, OmegaBrite is a great product for you.

And converse to that, if you have anxiety, if you worry a lot, Pro-DHA and Pro-DHA1000 works very, very good to keep the anxiety at bay and make you just not worry about things, feel less stressed about things.

And sometimes, I even use both of those. In the morning, I’ll give somebody OmegaBrite. This is what psychiatrists do. They give somebody an anti-depressant in the morning and they give somebody the mood stabilizer later in the day.

Looking to the same thing with fish oil, you can say, “I’m going to give you OmegaBrite in the morning. You’re going to have phenomenal energy. Go work out and just feel great.” And then, as the day goes on, if you have anxiety, you can take Pro-DHA or even some passion flower and they will cut the edge and not feel like you’re so stressed out.

DEBRA: Amazing! I think that there’s a lot of emphasis that we should be able to solve our problems or handle things in life and that there’s certainly benefit to doing a lot of different —whatever is the program that you choose in order to do that.

But I still come back to what I said earlier. If there’s something going on biologically so that you’re not at your optimum, you could be trying to handle a depression when there’s actually no emotional cause of depression. It might be biological.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: And it’s important to handle the biological card, and then see if there’s something that you need to take care of emotionally.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. We just have to think about ourselves. A lot of times, we’re not living in the present, let’s face it. Most people, we’re thinking about a lot of other things. But if you actually practice mindfulness and you’re living in the present and you look at your body, what is your body made up of? It’s made of carbon. It’s made of hydrogen. It’s made of electrolytes, sodium and potassium and magnesium and phosphorous. So all of these different things, when we look at someone’s blood work, what would we be looking at? We’re looking at all these chemical components that are in somebody’s body.

We forget that we are made of the earth. We are made of all these things around us, water and oxygen. We’re all made of these things, but especially, we’re made of all these metals. A good example is lithium. I use low dose lithium for people as a mood stabilizer. It’s excellent. It works phenomenal. We have lithium in our body. We have all these elements in our body: copper, zinc. It’s in our body.

And these all are called co-factors. A lot of these different things, these elements are co-factors to different reactions of the body. So if you took all the zinc out of your body, your body would fail. You took all the copper out of your body, your body would fail.

It’s really an amazing thing. We say to ourselves, “What is going with this individual? Why are they not feeling well?” And that’s where I like using homeopathic detoxification. When you start cleaning out this basement, so to speak, of all this different stuff that’s going on in your body, you really are able to revise yourself and be refreshed. And these products go into the central nervous system too, so they pull out mercury and lead and cadmium, things that can interfere with neurotransmission. A lot of people, they basically are harboring a lot of these things in their body. And that’s why they’re not thinking clearly.

DEBRA: A lot of those chemicals actually can be—those chemicals and heavy metals, some things can actually be in your brain, which would make it difficult for you to think and feel.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And that’s exactly what’s happening. That’s why part of my mental health protocol is always to involve using homeopathy to just clean out the body as well, because most people, inevitably, they’re going to feel better. They’re going to lose a little bit of weight, their energy levels are going to improve.

I’ve personally been doing this probably 15 years as far as taking these detoxifications. You just put a little bit of drops in your water. It’s very simple, but it removes nickel, cadmium, lead, mercury and pesticides. You would be surprised how many people have lead and mercury levels that are too high in the central nervous system. When you take these metals into food, they don’t leave your body naturally. That’s really the problem. We want this to be completely taken out.

So what do we want to do? We want to make sure that someone is solving the problem, taking the chemicals out of their bodies, so that whatever is interfering with the neurotransmission is gone. And then at the same time, saying, “Okay, you’re going to need to take some fish oil, some folic acid and maybe some other things for mood-stabilizing. Why don’t we take things that go specifically to your particular needs?”

DEBRA: Amazing! So tell us about some other mental health conditions and what you do for them.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. So if somebody has anxiety – and anxiety is a really common problem – most of the time, the doctors are going to give you something called the benzodiazepine. The benzodiazepines are a class of drugs that are highly addictive. They have what’s called tolerance and dependence.

So you need to give more medicine each time to get the same effect. And when you try and take it away after a period of time if you’ve been on it, you have withdrawal, panic attacks and anxiety. These are very commonly prescribed medications. I can tell you from working retail some time that it’s a fast moving drug, and they’re in huge, huge bins because they dispense hundreds and hundreds of these pills every day.

So people are addicted to this. When you look at benzodiazepines, they work on these particular receptors called the benzodiazepine-receptor. You can take medica-grade passion flower. I use that quite a bit here. It works exactly the same on the same receptor, but it’s not on the receptor all the time.

What’s great about it is I use it as a bridge off of benzos if someone wants to get off of them. But at the same time, you can go on it and you are not going to have tolerance and dependence. What does that mean? It means that if you want to use that once in a while for sleep or anxiety, when you take it, you’re not going to become addicted to it. And if you decide that you don’t need it anymore, you can put it aside, and you’re not going to end up with withdrawal.

DEBRA: That’s really a key difference between taking natural things and taking drugs whatever kind of drug you’re taking.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. It’s a key difference. I like the words you’re using, because it is. If you go for a medication for anxiety, you will become addicted. If you use a natural product that’s prescribed for you in an appropriate manner, you will never become addicted to it. You can use it as an excellent tool, and improve your life tremendously.

DEBRA: I just want to say that I had that experience actually with sugar where as long as I was eating refined white sugar and products that had high fructose corn syrup and things like that in it, all those industrial sweeteners, they’re very, very, addicting.

And it was really, really hard for me to stop eating them. It’s been years now since what I’m talking about here. It was very difficult for me to stop eating them because they are so addicting. But what I did was that I replaced them with things like honey and maple syrup and agave nectar and all these natural sweeteners that were not refined. And it was easy for me to then after a while. I just didn’t even want those sweeteners at all.

I can see the same pattern here, the difference between drugs and the plants you’re using.

We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacist. She specializes in using plants, medicinal plants. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, a pharmacist who specializes in pharmacognosy. I love that word every time I say it, pharmacognosy.

PAMELA SEEFELD: There are committees of us around. It’s a really great profession.

DEBRA: I had never heard of it until I met you. It is a great profession. I think that what you’re doing is wonderful. So go on with what you’d like to say. We are in our last segment now. I want to make sure that you get to say everything you want to say.

PAMELA SEEFELD: All right, absolutely. So I want to also put in a word if anyone is on any of these medications, prescription or otherwise or is having some issues as far as they’re not functioning at 100% of their peak and they really want a free consultation, please call my office here. I will definitely go over at what you’re taking and tell you how you can improve on that. It’s (727) 442-4955.

So another good diagnosis that’s very, very common is ADD and ADHD. Let’s face it, every kid is ADD and ADHD. They take a child. You give them sugar breakfast, you send them to school and they’re supposed to sit there and they pay attention all day. This is not how it works.

So what do they normally do? They normally give the kids psycho stimulants like Ritalin. But also, more dangerously, they’re using a lot of anti-psychotics.

Anti-psychotics originally (especially a typical anti-psychotics like Abilify and Risperidone), these drugs are dangerous in effect that they really are designed for somebody that’s hearing voices. They’re not designed for little kids. So we know that this is not the problem. They’re using it for sleeping for adults too.

So what do we do with children that are having some impulsivity issues? I don’t know about you, but when I was a little kid, I was running all over the place tearing up everything. That’s children.

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So what do we do? Instead of giving them psycho stimulants, we say, “Why don’t I give them some calming, focusing fish oil like pro-DHA, pro-DHA1000?”

Also, they have new studies that just came out that show that zinc is a very, very important co-factor for over 200 reactions in the brain. And kids that have hyperactivity disorder test very low for zinc. The reason why is that zinc gets utilized and used up when kids are eating lots of preservatives and pre-packaged food. And you look at these different kids, most of these kids are eating a lot of things out of boxes.

DEBRA: Yes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So I usually use low-dose zinc for children along with the fish oils and the detox, to clear all this out of their body. And then, I always recommend exercise. As kids have a way to take their internal energy and externalize it other than causing trouble in school, you see dramatic differences in the way they conduct themselves.

DEBRA: Many, many years ago when I first started doing this work, the thing that was very popular then was the Feingold Diet. It’s about taking out artificial colors and flavors and preservatives because it made children hyperactive. And I don’t hear much about that anymore. I’m supposing that it’s still there. The Feingold Association is probably still there.

You hear a lot about kids taking drugs for these things, but you don’t hear about just something as normal as feeding your children good, wholesome, organic, whole foods that you prepare yourself instead of all these packaged foods that will just completely change their behavior.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Most definitely! There is a program that I was participating in and that I did some talking for called I Love My ADD. And what they did is they take a school and they changed the desks. Instead of the kids sitting, they could have standing desks if they want. So they can stand if they don’t want to sit there all day.

They changed the food in the cafeteria. It was all whole grains and fruits and vegetables and lean meats. They actually baked their bread there. They saw that all the behavior problems went away. Grades improved…

DEBRA: I love it!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Everyone’s better. Yes!

DEBRA: Yeah!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Maybe, the kids doesn’t want to sit there all day. They have desks. Now they have treadmills on there that you can walk on them. This is like the big thing I got out of New York, some of these really trendy places. People don’t want to sit.

So changing the diet, remember I was talking about what your body is made of, the sodium and the potassium. Omega 3’s make up the central nervous system. We’re made of all these things. Remember, you always hear these little tales, “You are what you eat.” Well, actually, that’s true.

DEBRA: Yes!

PAMELA SEEFELD: You need it in your body. If it’s a supplement or food, it’s all the same. Food and supplements turn on genes in the body and you want it to turn on the ones that help you, not the ones that are causing disease.

DEBRA: Exactly.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s what’s really happening, food. This is really coming to be a very unique science. We know that cells signal each other and we know that when you take a supplement and you take food, these things all have healing, restorative properties because they affect the way the genes are turned on in the cell.

And what we want to do is we want to say, “I understand how this works. I am going to customize and tell you how to take these two or three things, so that the genes are going to be turned on in a favorable manner.”

As a result, mental health improved, cognition improves, all these things that people want. People just really need to realize that food is also medicine.

DEBRA: Exactly! I am sitting here with the biggest smile on my face. I’m starting to jump up and down when you said that. Would you just say that again, about the genes?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. Food is medicine. Food actually turns on genes. These genes are favorable and they prevent diseases. And we know now that what we’re really seeing is, “Why is there such a high incidents of breast cancer and cancer in general?”, you know why? Because people are not consuming enough of these disease-fighting property foods.

DEBRA: And what are those foods? What are those foods?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Fruits and vegetables.

DEBRA: Exactly.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Lean meats. But the big things are fruits and vegetables. I’m telling you that two-thirds of your diet should be made of plants.

DEBRA: I’m so happy to hear that because in the last few weeks, since I have been going through a lot of changes in my body the last few weeks and I’m dealing with things, I have gone through a phase where it was like I didn’t want to eat meat, I didn’t want to eat grains. I mean, I wasn’t eating grains anyway.

But what my body was craving were fruits and vegetables, particularly vegetables, particularly raw vegetables. And I’m not saying that we should just all be eating at 100% raw vegetable diet, but the thing is that I was just really getting down to really needing to have at least half of what I eat be vegetables.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Absolutely.

DEBRA: And we don’t think of it that way. And plants have so many wonderful healing properties to them. They need to be organic and they need to be fresh. I’m really getting to this point where I just want to – when I lived in California, I had a garden, and I would just go eat what was in my garden. I just went out in the backyard and pulled the raspberries off the raspberry canes and put them in my mouth. I need to get that here too. And that’s what we should be doing. That’s exactly it.

PAMELA SEEFELD: We know that. Let’s face it. Most of these people that are not feeling well, their diet needs to be improved. But I’m telling you that the cool part about this is if you take supplements along with it too that are specifically targeting certain areas of the brain, your outcomes are going to be even more phenomenal. I really can attest that. The plant-based diet is really the way to go.

But what we want to do is say, “Look at your blood work and see you are made of all these elements. Is there something there that’s making you not feel well?” I see this quite a bit actually where people maybe have pre-kidney problems or pre-liver problems or maybe metabolically they’re having some issues too and they don’t even know it.

DEBRA: Yeah. Well, I am so excited. I can’t wait to bring you my blood test, so that you can look at them over time and see what the trends are. I think this is just so fascinating. And I do see the difference, taking the things that you’ve recommended for me. I mean, just right away, I saw the difference. And I was already doing a lot of good things, eating my organic food, eating a lot of plants – although not enough, I could see.

But I think it’s a process. I wrote a thing for my blog a few weeks ago about how I was falling in love with kale. And when I first started, I didn’t want to eat kale at all. But as I started eating it, your body starts changing and then you want these good things.

And I can see the changes from taking the supplements that you’ve given me that are very, very specific to me and what’s going on in my body.

I just want to also emphasize – and I think that you’ll agree with this – about the necessity to be specific, because I think that a lot of people will just say, “Oh, I think I’ll go on this side or that diet,” or “I read an article that I should take this supplement.” That’s not the way to do it because our bodies are so specific.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right because what happens is most people watch a television show or read a news magazine and they’ll say, “Oh, I heard billberries are good for my eyes. I heard this is good for that.” And a lot of people come to me and they’ll be taking all these stuff. I would tell them, “The big things you have to protect against are cognitive decline, cancer and heart disease. You’re not taking anything to prevent those three things. And if you’re not taking anything to prevent those three things, one of those is going to come.”

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So that’s why it’s really important to look at what you’re taking. I always say, I really respect people’s time and money. You shouldn’t really take a bunch of things that you don’t need. You should take what you need. It should be customized. And your diet should be cleaned up, if you can possibly do it.

DEBRA: Well, I will say that you gave me things that were very specific to me. They were affordable. It wasn’t like you were getting me something that was $100. Things were $15, $25, things that most people could afford.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: They were all plant-based, kind of a whole nutritious thing to take, and they work. They work. So I really encourage anybody who’s listening who is on drugs, number one, to call Pamela. If you’re not feeling well, call Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I can get you feel better. I know what I’m doing.

DEBRA: She does now what she’s doing. I’ve seen this in myself and other people. Her approach is completely different than probably everybody that you’ve ever met and it all makes sense.

So we’ve got less than a minute. So give us your phone number again twice.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes. You can reach me at my natural pharmacy here in Clearwater. It’s (727) 442-4955. Okay. So the number again is (727) 442-4955. I would be delighted to help you with any issues you might have, if you want to come off medicine or if you’re trying to avoid medicines altogether. It can be any issues, diabetes, anything you have. I’ll be glad to help you and the consultation is free.

DEBRA: Great. Thank you so much, Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Thank you so much. Have a great time.

DEBRA: She’ll be on again two weeks from today.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes.

DEBRA: She’ll be on again, and we’ll learn more about this fascinating thing. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Mattress Wraps That Block Toxic Outgassing

Question from shema

Debra, these people sell food grade polyelthelene mattress wraps for $40.

www.yourguidetogreen.com/store/greg-39-s-picks/mattress-covers-no-chem-mattress-wraps/prod_1768.html

Debra’s Answer

Yes, this will block outgassing of toxic chemicals from mattresses, but it feels like you are sleeping on plastic and makes noise as you move around in bed.

It will do the job, but is not the optimum solution. Better to buy a naturally nontoxicmattress that doesn’t need a wrap. See Debra’s List | Textiles | Beds

Add Comment

Aluminum blinds

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I am looking for reasonably priced blinds for a bathroom and kitchen window. I see Home Depot has Aluminum blinds which are pretty cheap. Are these safe? If not, do you have any other suggestions? The windows are not standard so any other “natural” shades can be expensive…

Thank you!

Debra’s Answer

Aluminum blinds are fine.

Add Comment

Tolerable “painters tape”?

Question from Angelique

Has anyone found a tolerable version of painters’ tape? The blue and green tapes make me really sick. I wonder if there’s an alternative in case our remodeling job really needs something like that.

Debra’s Answer

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Health and Nutrition Coach on Diet and Detox

Wendy-Myers-1Today my guest is Wendy Myers, CHHC, NC, certified holistic health and nutrition coach and the founder, head writer and Chief Eating Officer of Liveto110.com. We’ll be talking about why the popular Paleo diet is not enough to achieve true health (I’ll be giving my comments about the Paleo diet too) and how heavy metals and chemicals are the underlying cause of disease. And we’ll talk a lot about detox. Wendy attended the Institute for Integrative Nutrition in New York. She is certified in Hair Mineral Analysis and is currently seeking her masters in clinical nutrition at Bridgeport University in Connecticut. Wendy’s interest in nutrition began with the death of her father from esophageal cancer. She vowed to find out what made him sick, what role his treatment and medications played in his demise, and how she could avoid the same fate. The more Wendy learned, the more she realized that all the answers to health do not lie in our medical system. Food, detoxication and natural healing modalities must be used to compliment the advances in modern medicine. Thus, Liveto110.com was born. Wendy’s site aims to inform readers about how to achieve optimum health, energy and vitality. Liveto110.com empowers readers to improve their health through the Modern Paleo diet, hair mineral analysis, detoxication and natural treatments for their health conditions. Wendy urges visitors to take responsibility for their health by learning about alternative treatments for their health conditions. Liveto110.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH WENDY MYERS

 

 


TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
“Health and Nutrition Coach on Diet and Detox”

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
GUEST: Wendy Myers, CHHC, NC

DATE OF BROADCAST: August 26, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Tuesday, August 26th 2014. I’m here in a sunny day in Colorado, Florida. I think it’s getting a little cooler now that it’s almost the end of summer and almost autumn.

Today, we’re going to be talking about diet and detox with a health and nutrition coach who is so in agreement with me I can’t believe it. Actually, she invited me to be on her podcast, which is how we met and we just found we had so much in common that I said, “Oh Wendy, come over here and be on my show too.”

So my guest is Wendy Myers, CHH NC. She’s a certified holistic health and nutrition coach and the founder, head writer and chief eating officer of Liveto110.com.
Hi, Wendy.

WENDY WYERS: Hello! Thank you so much for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. It’s my pleasure. We had such a great time on your podcast. And actually, that podcast was recorded. It’s going to be played in the future, so all of you can listen to my podcast on Wendy’s website when it happens. You could go to her website at Liveto110.com, sign up for her newsletter and then you’ll find out when I’m going to be on her podcast.

So Wendy, first of all, tell us about the letters behind your name, CHHC and NC. What do those mean?

WENDY WYERS: Yes, it means I’m a ‘certified holistic health coach’. You basically get that designation when you attend the Institute for Integrative Nutrition. It’s the largest nutrition school in the world. It’s really a wonderful program. It has some of the most amazing teachers there. It’s located in New York. And so it’s basically just a certification where you can help people eat healthier and live healthier lives.

DEBRA: And what’s the NC?

WENDY WYERS: Oh, the NC is ‘nutrition consultant’. I got that when I got certified in hair mineral analysis. So that is just a general name for someone who consult with others about nutrition, but I’m also getting my master’s in clinical nutrition right now as well.

DEBRA: Good! So you know a lot about nutrition.

WENDY WYERS: I sure do!

DEBRA: I know a lot about nutrition, but I don’t have letters after my name. So tell us how you got interested in this whole subject of nutrition, diet and detox.

WENDY WYERS: Well, it started when I got pregnant with my daughter. I’d always been kind of vaguely interested in nutrition meaning more in the lose weight. I was at this diet [inaudible 00:03:58]. But when I got pregnant, I really had to focus on nutrition because I was eating for two. I was sort of reading about it and I thought, “Why haven’t I read more about this before? It’s so fascinating.”

And then, unfortunately, my father was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. He passed away within six months of his diagnosis for his cancer treatment (not the cancer, mind you). It really was a wake-up call to me that I really needed to figure out how to not die like that. I just thought, “I’m not going to go out like that.”

So I started reading about what causes cancer and the true, underlying causes of it and natural treatments. I really have had so much faith in the western medical system. I loved reading about the latest drugs that were coming out. I had been reading about drugs and medicines since I was a teenager because I was just personally interested in it, but I saw how it failed my father.

I really felt that the 10 medications he was taking, that he had been on for about 10 years including statins and Metformin and many other medications all contributed to his demise. And then his cancer treatment, radiation and chemo finally failed him.
And so I just set out on a path to figure out how to live a healthier live and it led me to detox, the importance of detox and how it is critical in not becoming a statistic, one of the cancer statistics.

DEBRA: I went through a similar situation in my family where my mother died of cancer and both of my grandmothers. A doctor at the time when my mother died, it was the same period of time when I became very sensitive to chemicals and had immune system problems because of my chemical exposure, I talked to a doctor who said that because my mother and I both had the same exposures, he said that in me, it showed as an immune system problem and in her, it showed up as cancer. But it’s all the same thing. It all goes back the toxic chemicals and heavy metals and things that we’re exposed to in daily lives.

WENDY WYERS: Absolutely.

DEBRA: Yeah, I understand it. And I’m sure that a lot of our listeners too have had some kind of illness like that in their families, whether their parents or grandparents or aunts and uncles, brothers and sisters. I’ve had three of my friends have cancer. Fortunately, two of them survived; only one died. Two of them had breast cancer.

And so when I was growing up, you didn’t know anybody who had cancer. And now, so many people have cancer.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, it’s frightening. It’s 1 in 2 men get cancer and 1 in 3 women. That’s a lot. I mean, that’s a big number.

DEBRA: That is a big number.

WENDY WYERS: It’s insane! And there’s a reason. All cancers and diseases have the same underlying cause. It’s nutrient deficiencies and heavy metal and chemical toxicity.

DEBRA: Totally agree!

WENDY WYERS: They just have different disease labels…

DEBRA: I totally agree.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah! They just have different disease labels. That’s it.

DEBRA: That’s right, that’s right. Many, many years ago when I started looking at, “Well, how can I be healthy?”, I realized that the things that you do to restore your health like getting good nutrition and not being exposed to toxic chemicals and things like that, those are the things that you can do before you get sick in order to be healthy in the first place.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah.

DEBRA: And that’s why I decided all those years ago that I was going to educate people, particularly about toxic chemicals because after I went through being made ill by toxic chemicals and had to recover from that, I said, “Wait a minute! If I just was not exposed to the toxic chemicals in the first place, then I wouldn’t have had to go through all these illness because removing the toxic chemicals handled the illness.”

WENDY WYERS: Yeah.

DEBRA: So we might as well just start out with good nutrition and a nice, clean life. And then we’ll all be healthy and happy.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, and that’s my main message to people. Don’t wait until you get sick to start attending to your health because by the time you manifest symptoms, the disease process has been going on in your body for many years. So don’t wait.

That’s why I do hair mineral analysis because it can show imbalances in the body years before you manifest symptoms. The mistake that a lot of my own friends make – I use a lot of my friends as guinea pigs. Like my friend says, “I’ll get there – live a healthy life, eat a healthy diet” and they feel good generally even though – everyone has a little bit of fatigue, which is the beginning of the disease process, but I’ll explain that later.

They do a hair test and some of them were really imbalanced. It’s a signal that there are so many things they can do to correct those imbalances on the hair test before they get sick and before they get one of those disease labels or start manifesting symptoms.
But a lot of people has this mentality, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” That could not be further from the truth. We all have toxic chemicals in our body. The question is to what degree.

DEBRA: Yes, that’s absolutely true. We all have toxic chemicals in our bodies. We’re all going to get sick from them unless we do something to be less exposed to them in the first place and to remove them from our bodies and make sure that our bodies have proper nutrition and other things that we can do in order to support our good health.

WENDY WYERS: Yes.

DEBRA: So during this show, we’re going to be talking more about diet, more about detox. We’re coming up very shortly on the break, so I’m not going to ask Wendy another question. I’m just kind of adlibbing here until we get to the commercial.
You can go to Wendy’s website, Liveto110.com and find out more about her. She’s got a lot of the same type of information on her site as I do. We’re in complete agreement.

So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers, health and nutrition coach and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers. She’s a certified holistic health and nutrition coach. She has a great website called Liveto110.com. She has a lot of great information there that is totally in agreement with what I talk about. If you sign up for her newsletter, then you’ll find out when I’m going to be on her podcast.

So Wendy, let’s talk about diet. I know that you talk about the Paleo diet, but also say that it’s not enough. I’ve talked about the Paleo diet. I’ve had other people on the show that are proponents of the Paleo diet in different forms. But I’d the listeners to hear what you have to say about it. I also have some things I’d like to say about it, but you go first.

WENDY WYERS: Yes! Well, my version of Paleo is called Modern Paleo. And essentially, I believe it’s not about reenacting the caveman diet because the Paleo diet was the diet that Paleolithic men ate about – estimates are from 3.5 to 2.6 million years ago up until about a thousand years ago.

So it’s the diet that our bodies were evolutionary designed for. We evolved millions of years eating meats and vegetables and nuts and seeds and the fruits and vegetables. There’s a lot of evidence now that the Paleolithic men also ate a lot of [inaudible 00:15:17] depending on where he was from, so potatoes.

But it’s not about reenactment because you and I have survived as a species have we not adapted the new foods in our environment.

And so I believe that people can still eat legumes and grains and dairy and potatoes if they do a food elimination diet and find out which one of those new foods that appear on the horizon since agricultural times about 10,000 years ago and see if they work for them because dairy and legumes and potatoes are incredibly nutritious foods and there’s absolutely no reason to exclude them from the diet if you tolerate them because many people do.

So a lot of people, they eat a Paleo diet and it doesn’t work for them because they’re typically may not be getting enough carbohydrates in because they’re excluding grains and sugar and what-not and potatoes. So our main source of carbs will be fruits. So if we’re not eating fruits, they typically can suffer from low thyroid function and have other health issues related to not getting enough carbohydrates. This is, in fact, a nutrient that we need.

DEBRA: Yes. So I had an experience the last few weeks. Anyone who has read my food blog knows that earlier this year, I did a 30-day Paleo program that was pretty strict, just the basic meat, vegetables, fruits kind of thing. No dairy, no grains, cutting out everything. Just basically meat, vegetables and fruit and sweet potatoes. I eat sweet potatoes and butter. That was about it.

I lost I think it was 13 lbs. and my blood sugar went down. Over 30-day period, that’s what happened. I continued to stay on that diet, but I started doing things like eating other things that are typically allowed on the Paleo diet like chocolate.

WENDY WYERS: Mm-hmmm…

DEBRA: Good, organic chocolate with nice, organic sugar in it. I started eating more fat because I read about how your body can run on fat instead of running on carbs and I thought that was a great idea. And so I ate more fat, I ate chocolate and I started gaining weight. I gained back 6 lbs. I thought this is not going in the right direction, but look! This is a Paleo diet. I was basically eating what I was eating before plug more fat and chocolate.

WENDY WYERS: Yes.

DEBRA: And so then I kind of struggled with that. But what happened was that as much as I was struggling with it and wanting to lose weight again, I really was on this plateau after that where I was trying to do the right thing, but I wasn’t losing weight. And after I stopped eating so much fat, I wasn’t gaining weight either. I thought something was wrong here with this picture.

But then what happened was that I got a gout attack. I actually have a history of occasionally getting gout attacks, which is what happens when you have too much uric acid that builds up in your body. It happens when you eat a lot of meat.
And so for me to be on a diet where I’m basically eating three or four ounces of protein three times a day plus vegetables and that’s about it, that didn’t balance right with my body.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah.

DEBRA: I ended up having a gout attack for three weeks.

During that time, I didn’t eat any protein at all. It was just like I couldn’t even put an egg in my mouth. I couldn’t take a bite of egg. There was one day where I was making scrambled eggs. I was making two eggs a day in the morning for breakfast. I took a bite of the egg and I couldn’t eat it. I had to spit it out. It’s just like my body rejected it.

All I was eating was salad, lettuce and tomatoes and cucumbers and olive oil and salt. That’s what I ate because it was the only thing I could get down.

And I felt so good. I can’t tell you, my energy came up. I felt fabulous. I felt fabulous. I was sitting here with a gout attack, in pain, but the rest of my body was feeling great and I was eating practically nothing.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah. Well, I’ll tell you what happened. I’ll tell you what happened. You have to understand, you have to eat a diet that works for your health status at any given time.

DEBRA: Yes.

WENDY WYERS: When I have clients that are having liver issues or other kinds of health issues, I advise them to not eat meat and eggs because their livers can’t handle it for whatever reason.

And whenever people feel like they can’t eat meat or for you where you couldn’t get that egg down, you have to go with that because your body does not want that and it won’t taste good to you. Foods that your body need nutritionally will taste amazing to you.

DEBRA: Yes, I’ve learned that.

WENDY WYERS: …because your body needs it, craving it. So for you, when you lost that initial weight (which is very common), when you don’t eat a lot of carbohydrate, you shed a lot of water weight. It may not be actual fat, but people shed a lot of water weight because carbohydrates need a lot of water.

DEBRA: I’m going to interrupt you right there because we need to go to break.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah.

DEBRA: I know you have lots more to say on this and so do I. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers, health and nutrition coach. We’re talking about the Paleo diet and the right diet for you. We’re going to talk about detox when we come back too. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

WENDY WYERS: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers, health and nutrition coach. Before the break, we were talking about the Paleo diet and how it didn’t work for me.

I want to say that the conclusion that I came to was that we can look at these list of foods and ideas behind how we should choose these diets, but I think what I and others have gotten is that we just kind of say, “Well, here’s this recommend diet” and then we follow the diet when what we really need to be doing is figuring out what is the right diet for our own bodies and our own needs. It might not be the same diet from time to time in our lives.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah. And that’s the thing. Your diet does need to change from time to time. People develop food sensitivities and then other food sensitivities resolve and go away. People with cancer, they need to go to a vegetarian or vegan diet to treat that. So you really have to look at where you’re at and not blindly follow any kind of diet recommendation.

But I think that the Paleo template is the basis. It’s the basic template that people should begin with to design their own personalized diet because it is in line with our body’s physiological nutrient environment.

DEBRA: Well, what I really like about the Paleo diet is that I learned many, many years ago to look to nature for inspiration and information about how to be healthy and how to live because we have all these industrial ideas from living in an industrial consumer society and yet nature does things differently.

And so what I like about the Paleo diet is that it takes you out of eating all these processed foods and says just eat food as it is in nature. But I think that in some ways, it in some ways, it’s too restrictive and this is why I like your approach of saying, “Well, if your body tolerates them and it’s healthy and you’re okay with it, why not eat other whole foods, whole, nutritious foods that are not processed even if they’re not in the strict Paleo list?”

For example, I do really, really well with legumes – really, really well. They give me a lot of fiber. They help my blood sugar. I enjoy eating them. They taste great and I think that they’re a good source of protein. And so to completely eliminate legumes for me and then replace it with meat, which my body doesn’t handle as well, I don’t think that that was the right thing for me to do.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah! It doesn’t make sense.

DEBRA: It was fine for 30 days, but not in the long run.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah.

DEBRA: Once I’ve got past those 30 days, it just didn’t make sense to my body.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, and I have people do a 30-day Paleo reset as well. I talk about that, outline that in my upcoming book, The Modern Paleo Survival Guide because I think people can do kind of a reset. It’s almost like doing a food elimination diet. You just take out all these stuff that people are potentially sensitive to. And then you can start reintroducing them one by one and it will work for you.

DEBRA: Yeah. Well, that’s pretty much what I’ve been doing. For at least a week, all I ate was vegetables. I was not worse for not eating protein for that week. But then, the next thing that I wanted was I started kind of nibbling on chicken, but I didn’t eat three or four ounces of it, maybe an ounce. I just nibbled on these little pieces of roasted chicken. And then I was willing to eat a little chicken broth. It was kind of like coming off of fast or something.

There was one food that I ate, something that I was eating quite frequently, these wonderful pork sausages from my natural food store, naturally grown pork. You just think, “Well, here’s a healthy natural food store product,” but my body didn’t like it at all. It made me really tired and irritable and upset. It took me three or four days to recover from that.

And so some of these things, people are eating foods and just thinking, “Well, this is just kind of my baseline, how I feel,” but if you stop eating them, you might be really surprised to see how wonderful you feel.

Anyway, so let’s go to detox. Tell us why heavy metals and chemicals are the underlying cause of disease.

Hello? Wendy, are you there? Ah! Well, I need to let my producer know that we’ve lost Wendy. Yeah, okay. So we’re going to get her back on the line. But let’s see, what else can I tell you about the Paleo diet?

I do think the Paleo diet is a good place to start, but as I’ve said, don’t limit yourself to any one diet. You need to figure out what makes your body feel good.

So one way you can do that is just you can go on a fast. I’ve once went on a fast. And then I did an elimination diet and I found out what foods were making me not feel well and which foods did make me feel good.

Just recently, as I’ve said, I just ate salad for a week and I noticed that I felt really, really good. And so then I started saying, “Let me just try one food at a time.”

And try things like chicken or something that isn’t one of the big allergens like soy. Don’t try soy, corn or wheat. Just kind of stay off the grains and just see what kind of proteins you can add to – I’m sorry, I’m reading and talking at the same time. Okay, they’re continuing to try to get Wendy back on the line.

So you can just keep trying and seeing what kind of foods your body likes to eat.

And then what I do is that I just make a list of the foods. And it changes through my life. Whatever it is that is the foods that currently are right for me to eat, I make a list of them and then I say, “How can I make these foods delicious?” because taste is a big thing for me.

Yeah, there’s something called instinctive nutrition. Wendy was saying earlier that foods that are good for you taste good to you. You can look this up online, ‘instinctive nutrition’ where the whole premise is that your body, whatever is good for your body will taste good to you. And that only works if you’re eating whole foods. You can’t say, “Chocolate cake tastes good, so that’s good for me.” If you’re trying out whole foods (meats, vegetables, fruits), if they taste really good, your body probably needs them.

So what I do is that I make a list of the foods that I have eaten and tried and I know that they are doing well for me. And then I see how I can put them together or what kind of seasonings I can put on them, how I can cut them up in different ways, what I can do to prepare them to make an interesting and varied diet because I want things to taste good. If it doesn’t taste good to me, then I want to go and eat chocolate cake or whatever, ice cream.

If you make your healthy diet taste good, something that you look forward to eating, then you’ll enjoy eating it and every part of you will be happy.

We’re going to go to break. Hopefully, we’ll have Wendy when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers. Her website is Liveto110.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: Your’e listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Wendy Myers, health and nutrition coach. She has a website, Liveto110.com. That’s Liveto110.com. If you go there and sign up for her newsletter, you’ll get to find out when I’m going to be on her podcast.

But also, you’ll get some free gifts and one of them is a PDF about how to put together your own modern Paleo diet that we’ve just been talking about. All the information is right there and she has an upcoming on that subject. So you want to find out about that.

Wendy, let’s talk about detox. I know that you have some things to say about how heavy metals and chemicals are the underlying cause of disease.

WENDY WYERS: Yes, yes. Yeah, the more I learn about this, the more I’m completely convinced that nutrient deficiencies and heavy metal and chemical toxicities are the main cause of disease.

DEBRA: I agree.

WENDY WYERS: Of course, there’s genetics involved at some point. But really, the metals and chemicals will interplay with our genetics and express different diseases based on our genetic make-up. I think that comes more into play.

It’s something that when you get sick and you go to your doctor, they’re not looking at either of those things. There’s a myopia in modern medical care where they’re not looking at nutrition and they’re not looking at heavy metal and chemical toxicities unless they’re acute. They’re trained to look at acute metal toxicities, but not the chronic, low level heavy metal toxicities that most people are suffering from.

And also, it starts with nutrient deficiency. When you don’t have enough zinc for instance in your body (that’s what your body uses to repair your arteries and your skin and what-not), then your body is forced to retain cadmium, which is a very toxic heavy metal that causes kidney disease and cancer and it’s a pollutant in the environment from industrial dumping.

And when you don’t have enough zinc, your body is forced to retain that and to use that in enzymatic processes. The body uses it to repair the arteries and the skin and other areas of the body even though zinc is the preferred mineral. It’s the preferred patching of material for your arteries.

Over time, this is one of the biggest causes of heart disease and high blood pressure and hardening of the arteries. Cadmium is really brittle and it prevents the blood vessels from being able to expand and contract readily or as well as they would normally contract or what-not and that causes these diseases.

So that’s just one example of how a nutrient deficiency will cause us to accumulate heavy metals and over time, over many, many decades of nutrient deficient diets and accumulating heavy metals and the hundred thousand chemicals that are in our environment today, we eventually develop illness and symptoms and diseases.

And it starts with fatigue. When the adrenals become toxic and the thyroid becomes toxic and nutrient deprived, these are the glands that make our bodies energy. So when you start to become fatigued, it’s because those glands are toxic and your metabolism slows down. And then you haven’t even [inaudible 00:42:28] to detox heavy metals because detoxing takes energy.

DEBRA: Yeah.

WENDY WYERS: So if you don’t have enough energy, if you’re tired all the time and you’re craving sugar and coffee, that’s just because your body doesn’t have adequate energy supplies. And when it doesn’t have enough energy, you are accumulating metals and chemicals because your body doesn’t have that energy to detox them.

DEBRA: Yes! I actually just wrote a whole article about that.

WENDY WYERS: That’s actually the disease process over time. People get worse and worse and worse. Oh, yeah? I love it.

DEBRA: I recently wrote a whole article about toxic chemicals and adrenals.

WENDY WYERS: Mm-hmmm…

DEBRA: Yeah.

WENDY WYERS: It’s a huge problem. I think most people are in some stage of adrenal fatigue.

DEBRA: I think so too. And one thing that I’ll just say – go ahead.

WENDY WYERS: The only thing – yeah. Oh, I was just going to say that when you go to your doctor, the only remedy they give you is hormone replacement therapy, which does nothing to address the underlying cause of why you have adrenal fatigue in the first place.

DEBRA: I actually went through adrenal fatigue. I know what it feels like and I know how to recover from it. And one of the things that my nutritionist that I had at the time told me was that when your body is upright (when you’re standing up or sitting up), then it stresses your adrenals. And when you’re lying down, your adrenals can recover.

WENDY WYERS: Ah!

DEBRA: And so she told me to just simply lie down. She gave me a good excuse to just lie in bed all day.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, I say to the client, “Sit your butt down.”

DEBRA: Yeah, but if you’re tired – and most people don’t know that they have adrenal fatigue. But if you’re tired in the afternoon, say, instead of drinking coffee or eating chocolate or something, go lie down just for 15 or 20 minutes. Even that will help your adrenals.

WENDY WYERS: Absolutely! Yeah. I mean, take a nap. Don’t drink coffee and eat sugar.

DEBRA: Yeah.

WENDY WYERS: When people are craving these things, they’re craving them (which many of us do), our bodies are naturally trying to get the energy that it needs. So it’s not that people have low will power or what-not when they have voracious sugar and carbohydrate cravings, it’s just that they typically have adrenal fatigue and their body is just crying out for quick, easy energy sources.

DEBRA: But the thing about that particularly for adrenals is if you eat that sugar or you eat carbs, it actually makes your adrenal fatigue worse.

WENDY WYERS: Yes.

DEBRA: So it’s like this vicious cycle. This is one of the reasons why you want to do all these things that I’m talking about and that Wendy is talking about in order to improve your nutrition, get better food, supplements, if you need to take them, detox your body in whatever way you choose to do so because that’s the thing that’s really going to break the cycle and is going to get you back on track.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, and that’s what I do exactly with my Mineral Power Program that I designed. It uses a hair mineral analysis and I’m able to get a peek into your nutritional status and any heavy metal toxicities you have and design a program for you that gives you the supplements that you need for your body at that time and do diet and lifestyle changes.

You do that long enough, your body heals itself. It takes two to three years to detox the bulk of heavy metals from your body and to increase your mineral and nutrient status. But it does work.

The focus of the problem is healing your adrenals and thyroid and increasing your energy and your mental clarity and your ability to detox. People are realy blown away by what comes out of their body on the program.

DEBRA: Well, there’s a lot of junk we’re carrying around, yeah.

WENDY WYERS: Yes.

DEBRA: There’s so many different kinds of detoxes. It’s interesting to me how they kind of fit together. I know you and I were talking about taking Pure Body Zeolite, which is what I recommend to people. That will remove directly things immediately from your body. And there’s also a place to be doing a long-term program like yours as well.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah! I think Zeolite’s amazing. I think it’s a wonderful thing people can do to get really quick results. But that’s one thing that for a long-term detox, you really have to increase your nutrient status especially minerals. I like chelated minerals.
And once you start doing that, your body just naturally detoxes and starts pushing out these metals it doesn’t need any longer. It’s actually using these metals for certain processes in the body.

And so once people start increasing their minerals, they’ll naturally detox as well. But I think Zeolite is a wonderful addition to a detox program.

DEBRA: That’s so fascinating, what you said about the body is using cadmium when it doesn’t have zinc. There’s I’m sure other things like that going on in the body. It’s kind of like in the thyroid, something we’ve talked about before where if the body doesn’t have iodine, then it uses fluoride.

The thing that I think of when I hear these things is that nature has created our bodies in a way that it works, that we’re supposed to have iodine and we’re supposed to have zinc and we’re supposed to have all these nutrients. And then, when we don’t, then now we’re living in this world where our body, instead of being made out of zinc and iodine is made out of cadmium and fluoride. It just is like a mutation.

To think about that, like if I had a picture of my body where, “Here’s a little cadmium molecule and a fluoride molecule and this molecule and that molecule,” it’s a different body. It’s not the body that nature designed.
Are you there?

WENDY WYERS: Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And these metals, they’re in the soil. They’ve been around – oh! Hi, can you hear me?

DEBRA: Yeah, I can hear you.

WENDY WYERS: Debra, can you hear me? Okay, fine. I’m sorry.

DEBRA: I can hear you. Can you hear me?

WENDY WYERS: Yes, I can hear you.

DEBRA: Okay.

WENDY WYERS: Yeah, so these metal have been in the environment since cavemen times. They’re in the soil. But the problem is with modern industry, we have drudged them up. All these metals in the environment, we drudge them up. We put them in computers. They’re in hydrogenated oils. Nickel is used as a catalyst to infuse hydrogenated oils. So many people that eat these hydrogenated oils have a lot of nickel toxicity.

There’s many, many examples that I can talk about, but it just goes to show you how we have so much…

DEBRA: But we’re at the end of the show.

WENDY WYERS: Oh, okay.

DEBRA: We’ve only got 20 seconds.

WENDY WYERS: Well, thank you so much for having me.

DEBRA: Thank you for being on the show. I’ll have you on again. Hopefully, we’ll have better transmission next time.

WENDY WYERS: Yes.

DEBRA: And we’ll be able to hear you better. But again, Wendy’s website is Liveto110.com. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Formaldehyde “Authoritatively Judged” To Be a Carcinogen

from Debra Lynn Dadd

Last week an article in the New York Times reported, “A panel of experts convened by the National Academy of Sciences found sufficient evidence from human studies to declare formaldehyde ‘a known human carcinogen’ that causes nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer and myeloid leukemia. It also cited evidence from studies of animals and of carcinogenesis suggesting that formaldehyde may cause a much wider array of cancers than just those three.”

In 1981, the National Toxicology Program listed formaldehyde as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.” In 2011, they upgraded the listing to “known to be a human carcinogen.” After opposition from industry, Congress had the National Academy of Science review the evidence. Their review determined that, indeed, formaldehyde does cause cancer in humans.

Source: New York Times: The Verdict on a Troublesome Carcingen

Add Comment

Formaldehyde in Paper Towels and Other Paper Products

 from Debra Lynn Dadd

After making a comment in a recent post about not using paper towels because they contain formaldehyde, I received this shocked email from a long-time reader

Debra,

I can’t believe that I have been trying to be as toxic free as possible for many, many years and I am still using paper towels daily! Your website as had lots of information through the years about paper towels, including your comments regarding Cathy’s question on August 11 about non-toxic lining for drawers.

I contacted Bounty (Procter&Gamble) and this is the list of ingredients sent me. What do you think?

You can post that information if you think it would be beneficial to others in you Q&A section.

Thank you very much.

Thanks for contacting Bounty, Stephanie.

Below is the ingredients for the Bounty Towels & Napkins

INGREDIENT LIST MATERIAL FUNCTION
Processed Wood Pulp Used to make paper from softwood trees
(Pine & Spruce) and hardwood trees (Oak/maple.)
In NA we use virgin wood pulp. Our products don’t contain recycled fibers
Wet Strength Polymer Added to increase strength during wet use.
Adhesive Hold pliestogether Present in trace amounts
(special type of glue)
Ceteareth-10 Surfactant emulsifier

We do not intentionally add formaldehyde to our products, and we check that our raw materials do not contain any formaldehyde either.

Since we don’t add or use formaldehyde in the processing of the product, we don’t test for it in the finished product.

It may be helpful to know that formaldehyde is a naturally occurring substance, and can be detected in wood pulp at very low concentrations

Hope this helps.

Wendy
Bounty Team

Need to get back in touch? Please do not change the subject line, just hit reply. This makes sure we receive your message

At first glance this paper towel seems to not contain formaldehyde, however, it does contain “Wet Strength Polymer.”

What is that?

According to Paper Functional Chemicals- Wet Strength Resinspapers such as filter papers, hygienic papers, papers for bags, label papers, wallpapers, laminate base papers, and packaging papers for moist goods can only fulfill their function if they have adequate “wet strength” (the ability to hold together when exposed to water.

The way wet strength is achieved is by using wet-strenth resins (WSR).

“the most common WSR are urea formaldehyde resins (UF-resins) and melamine formaldehyde resins (MF-resins), These chemicals need acid pH conditions and the presence of alum in the papermaking process. For neutral pH conditions polyamide-epichlorohydrin resins (PAE-resins) are mainly used (e. g. for hygiene and laminate papers); polyethylenimine products are used for specialty papers such as industrial filter papers and shoe board.”

This article notes that urea-formaldehyde resins are the least expensive (so likely to be most common). They can be added to the wet mix, “but they can be also used via surface application in the paper machine.” That means the resin is lying right on the surface of the paper.

I don’t know enough about the chemistry of how this works to make an evaluation of how these chemicals interact with the cellulose. I do know that chemicals can react and turn into something else entirely, such as fat and lye make soap.

I also don’t know how much, if any, formaldehyde emissions come from paper, but they are well-known from urea-formaldehyde foam insulation and composite wood products. I first heard about formaldehyde in paper towels years ago from people with MCS who reacted to paper towels.

Click through to the article if you want to learn more about what is used to make paper. This is an industry website with lots of information.

Read more here about Toxins in Toilet Paper.

Add Comment

Using Wood Cutting Boards to Cut Meat

Question from shema

Hi debra

I have heard that wood cutting boards can be dangerous if used to cut raw meats because of bacteria growth so instead what should I use? I have seen polypropylene but not sure.

Thanks

Debra’s Answer

cutting-boardThe problem with cutting raw meat on any cutting board is that if you then cut vegetables on the same cutting board, the bacteria from the meat can transfer to the vegetables. If you then eat the vegetables raw, you will eat the bacteria from the raw meat.

In professional restaurant kitchens, they have different colored cutting boards for different uses, to prevent cross-contamination.

You can buy these in a set, They are made from polyethylene, which is a nontoxic plastic. The label says they are antibacterial.

I don’t think I need six different cutting boards. But I took a clue from this and have two separate wooden cutting boards: one for meat and poultry, and another for everything else. When I use the cutting board for meat and poultry, I immediately put it in the sink and wash it with the hottest water. Then I put it to air dry and hang it on a wall so it continues to be exposed to air.

Add Comment

Waterproof mattress cover with Polyurethane backing

Question from TA

I am looking for a waterproof mattress protector to take along while traveling, to protect the bed from any leaks my toddler might have. It seems like the best options I’ve found so far are the “waterproof breathable” mattress covers, which are cotton terry with a polyurethane membrane:

MALOUF SLEEP TITE Hypoallergenic 100% Waterproof Mattress Protector – 15-Year U.S. Warranty – Vinyl Free – Queen

Queen Size Luna Premium Hypoallergenic 100% Waterproof Mattress Protector – Made in the USA – Vinyl Free

SafeRest Queen Size Premium Hypoallergenic Waterproof Mattress Protector – Vinyl Free

The prices seem reasonable, and the SafeRest and Luna ones have over 3,000 reviews each, most of which are positive. I see a number of good things: made in the USA, free of PVC, not thick or crinkly, protects against dust mites and allergens, etc. But what I’d like to know is whether you think this polyurethane membrane is non-toxic and free of chemical smells. It appears to fold up like a sheet and would be easy to take when traveling (well, easier than a bulkier mattress pad, anyway!). I need to get something right away, but I’m holding back until I get more assurance about this PU membrane. It definitely seems better than PVC. What do you make of it?

The disposable options don’t seem like a great idea, and other smaller options tend to have plastics and PVC. Wool is pricey and thicker/heavier to haul along with all our other travel gear. Vinyl is a definite “no.” A folded-up towel isn’t super effective and smaller things like that also shift around while sleeping on them. So I keep coming back to a mattress cover like these I linked to above, but I’d just like to feel sure that they are free of toxicity.

Ughhh… Now that I looked more closely at the Q&A on the product pages for the Luna and the SafeRest covers, I see that customers asked what materials are used in the covers, and the answer is 80% cotton and 20% polyester. I had assumed that the cotton terry was 100% cotton. It appears that this one might be 100% cotton surface:
www.amazon.com/LinenSpa-Waterproof-Mattress-Protector-Eliminates-Warranty/dp/B00A2WEJY4

In all cases, I see reviews that say “my toddler (or dog) had an accident or diaper leak or spill on the bed and nothing got through to the mattress” and those that say “my toddler (or dog) had an accident/leak/spill on the bed and the mattress got soaked.” I don’t know why there would be such variability in user experiences. The reviews overall seem positive. There are also differing report about whether the covers make the users feel hot and sweaty. Along the same lines, I came across the Gotcha Covered mattress cover that uses organic cotton and a recycled PU backing; but the price is considerably higher (more than 3 times higher than some of the others), and out of 4 reviews, 2 of them are negative, saying “hot and sweaty” and “not waterproof.” Since it’s something I need just for travel, I’m not inclined to pay that much more for something that might not work very well.

I also see this Natural Mat product, which is not as large of a cover; it is designed for a crib mattress, but I believe it would lie flat on the bed. They also use PU, but it is apparently contained between the 2 layers of organic cotton.

I am aware that Naturepedic makes a safe cover, and I’ve actually had one. However, it is more expensive, fairly heavy, and it did not protect the new mattress it was used on from body oil. It wasn’t tested against urine, so I can’t speak to its effectiveness for that purpose.

Debra’s Answer

All of the mattress protectors you are describing are using the latest technology of a very thin layer of polyurethane fused to a fabric, so it can be waterproof without the sweatiness or noise of a vinyl mattress cover.

The difference between the different brands is the type of fabric used.

Because I’m familiar with the one sold by Naturepedic, I can tell you that the polyurethane film is completely nontoxic. I’ve seen and smelled samples of this film and there is no odor whatsoever.

And I’ve researched polyurethane. Polyurethane itself, as I’ve said many times before, is completely nontoxic. What makes polyurethane foam and polyurethane wood finish toxic is the additives. But this film is simply polyurethane. Though made from petroleum, it is nonetheless not toxic.

Naturepedic is so scrupulous about not using toxic materials that if Naturepedic uses a material, it can be trusted to be safe. In addition, they have their products tested by independent third parties that verify they meet nontoxic standards.

About their polyurethane film, Naturepedic says, “Drysleep uses a specially formulated polyurethane waterproof barrier that is proven to not leach harmful chemicals. It is made from the same grade material as is required for food contact applications. It also meets the highest standards for medical device biocompatibility (USP Class VI). It does not contain any fire retardants or antimicrobial treatments and is free of vinyl/PVC, phthalates and latex. It also easily passes the GREENGUARD “Gold” certification standards for chemical emissions. With a Naturepedic organic mattress pad, you never have to worry about harmful chemicals or allergenic materials.”

So this gives you something to compare to with the other brands.

As to whether or not this polyurethane film protects from urine or other liquids, I don’t know why it appeared to not work for some, but as you said, the majority of the reviews are positive. I see no reason not to use one of these mattress protectors.

Organic Mattress Encasement for Bed Bugs

Question from Patricia

Hi Debra,

I currently find myself living across a wall from a guy who found a bedbug.

His girlfriend who is there most of the time has a roommate who recently brought bedbugs back with her from NY. Their apartment has a full blown bedbug infestation.

I have a pretty pricey mattress that was a gift from my sister this last Christmas.

I have been unable to find a a safe mattress encasement anywhere. Where can I find one? Help!!!!!

Debra’s Answer

Patricia wrote back to me and said she found one at The Clean Bedroom and it’s on sale now for 20% off.

I just wanted to mention that I did some research on this before she called back, and I was erroneously told by one seller that a bed bug is smaller than a dust mite and so encasings made to keep dust mites out don’t work for bedbugs. That’s totally wrong. Dustmites are so small they are invisible, and you can see bed bugs, so any mattress encasing that completely encloses the mattress and is made to keep out dust mites would work for bed bugs.

Here’s a bit of info about dust mites and bed bugs.

Add Comment

The Challenges of Achieving Organic Certification

Diana Kaye and James HahnToday we’ll be learning about what it takes to get the USDA organic certification with my guests Diana Kaye and James Hahn. We’ll be talking about locating a certifier, preparing the organic system plan, compiling documentation, maintaining records, inspections, and everything else that must be done to get organic certification. This husband-and-wife are co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. They own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/terressentials

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Challenges of Achieving Organic Certification

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Diana Kaye and James Hahn

Date of Broadcast: August 20, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today, we’re going to be talking about one of the broadest toxic-free areas of products that you can choose from and one of the most regulated and that’s organic. Whether it’s organic food or fibers or personal care products, there are a lot of regulations for organic.

My guests today are from Terressentials, Diana Kaye and James Hahn and we’ll be talking about what they have to go through in order to be a USDA certified organic farm and make you USDA certified organic products.
Hi, Diana and James.

James Hahn: Hi, Debra.

Diana Kaye: Hi, Debra.

DEBRA: Nice to have you on again. And listeners, they’ve already been on twice talking about their experiences with what organic means and why they decided to get their organic farm and all kinds of things about organic we’ve already talked about.

So today, what we’re going to be talking about is the challenges of achieving their organic certification, what that’s like.

And so where would you like to start with that?

Diana Kaye: Well, first of all, perhaps I could clarify the types of certification that folks could get.

DEBRA: Yes, please do.

Diana Kaye: How about that?

DEBRA: Great, great.

Diana Kaye: So in our particular instance, although we do live on a farm and we’re situated here with our crafting studio operating in lovely Maryland, we actually have three separate operations going on here.

We do grow organic flowers. We’re not certified for the flowers however. The flowers are something that we sell in our retail store and we do also use our land here for doing experiments with herbs and flowers for research purposes, for things that we might consider using in our personal care products or other types of products down the road.

And so the types of certification that are available – oh, we also make our personal care products. That’s the second thing that we do. And the third thing that we do is that we own and operate two retail stores that feature our products and other fair trade handcrafts and some other organic certified and fair trade good.

DEBRA: Okay.

Diana Kaye: So the types of certification that are available to a business are the one that I think that most people are familiar with, which is a ‘certified organic processor or grower’. A grower would be someone who is a farmer who would grow either plants or raise livestock or even grow raw materials such as cotton or hemp that could be certified organic and then further processed into a textile.

There’s a third type of certification – I’m sorry, a second one, which would be called a ‘certified organic processor and/or handler’. What a processor is someone who takes those tomatoes that come from the farm or the cocoa butter that comes from the farm and processes the raw material into a usable, organic finished – let’s say they take the crops and then process that and make that into an organic raw material.

So for example, with cocoa butter, you can grow the cocoa beans, the pod and then those pods have to be dried (and sometimes they’re roasted) and then you have to separate the cocoa butter from the actual chocolate or cocoa nib. So that’s a whole other step.

The growers don’t process necessarily. Some growers do, but most farmers (which would be the first level or the first category), they simply grow the raw material and then cut the material/harvest it. And then they ship it off to the processor.

James Hahn: And the processor if you’re taking about cocoa butter, that whole process has to be according to organic principles, not just the growing of the planet. It’s like every step of the lifecycle of that cocoa to be certified in the end product has to be part of the certification loop.

DEBRA: I have a question. Diana, tell us what the third one is and then I’ll ask my question.

Diana Kaye: Okay, the third one isn’t very well known and it’s not something that’s required, which we think is a real big problem in the marketplace. The third category would be –
Let me back up. I said that first of all, the second category was a processor/handler. A processor is someone who would take that cocoa butter and make it into a body cream, mixing it and blending it with other oils and butters and then packaging that and reselling that. So that’s processing.

A handler is someone who, for example, might purchase cocoa beans – no, let’s say coffee beans and they get them in large 50 lb. bags. These are green coffee beans and perhaps they roast them. Maybe they already buy the roasted beans from somebody else.

If a person buys a finished raw material and all they do is just repackage it, they don’t do anything to it (so they’re buying roasted coffee beans in a 50 lb. or 100 lb. bag and they’re simply measuring it out and putting it into 1 lb. bag and then stapling those bags or sealing those bag some way and putting a label on them), that’s a handler, someone who doesn’t really process, something who doesn’t use a mixer or a blender.

So when we think of processor, we should think of processing tools, things that most of us are familiar with that we probably have in our own kitchen.

DEBRA: Like a food processor.

James Hahn: There’s one thing I want to quickly insert here and that is when Diana says you can have a handler who is certified, you could for example have a retailer where the store itself is certified.

Diana Kaye: Well, that’s the third category, Jim.

James Hahn: Okay.

Diana Kaye: So the third category – and this is the one that I mentioned gives us the bit of unsettling. The Federal National Organic Program law does not require the require the retailer to be certified to handle or present for sale certified organic products.

This is what bothers us. For example, we know of many different retail stores (some in, say, the health food category, some mass market groceries) where the stores might have – some might have an in-store deli where they actually produce and process food and then they put it out in their deli cases for sale.

And then there are other stories that don’t have a deli, but they may have a backroom where they’ll take that watermelon and slice it up into quarters and make it more convenient and wrap it for people or they may buy bulk. They may have a bulk area. A lot of health food stores have bulk bins where they’ll dump those 50 lb. or 25 lb. bags of nuts into the bin, so those people are in essentially, retail stores are essentially handling organic food.

But this is the part that bothers me. They’re not required to be certified.

James Hahn: The other thing, if you don’t mind my saying, which is related to this is you can have a store that announces to the world that they are certified as a handler. That can give the impression that all of the products they sell are organic. But that is not at all necessarily the case.

DEBRA: Yeah, I see the difference. So what is actually being certified is the farmer grower and a processor or handler can be certified. But are you saying that not only are the retailers not certified, but there’s no even any certification for the retail?

Diana Kaye: Well, good question. Actually, they can get certified, but the law does not require it. We think that that’s a big loophole that isn’t good in the National Organic Program Federal Regulations because for example, if you are a certified organic processor – which, by the way, that’s what we are. We’ll get into this a little more about why we have one certification, not the grower, but why we’re processors and not growers.

When you are a processor, there are very strict regulations about how you need to maintain your facility, logs that you have to keep for maintenance, pest control in addition to maintaining all the records for all of your raw materials.

In other words, for your raw materials, you have to maintain your purchase order, you have to maintain all of the certification paper work that comes with every single raw material every single time you purchase it and you’re required to keep all of these documents for five years.

DEBRA: I don’t want to interrupt you, but we have to go to break.

Diana Kaye: Sure, no problem.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. We’re talking about the organic certification process. We’ll be right back after this to find out more.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And today, we’re talking about the challenges of achieving organic certification with my guests, Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. You can go to their website where they have USDA certified personal care products, wonderful personal care products at Terressentials.com.

Okay, go on, Diana.

Diana Kaye: Ah, okay. So backing up to the retailer situation, for example, if you are a certified processor for which we are and also, another type of processor might be the person that makes the pasta sauce that you love that comes in a jar or the bread that you like, those people who make those kinds of products including personal care would be ‘certified organic processors’.

And then, for example, there is a really lovely coffee company over in New Jersey and many around the country who package coffee beans. Those people are certified organic handlers. There are some that might roast the beans and package them and then those people would be the certified organic processors/handler.

DEBRA: …because they’re doing something to it.

Diana Kaye: The issue with their – pardon me?

DEBRA: …because they’re doing something to it.

Diana Kaye: Yes, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

Diana Kaye: Well, the thing with retailers is a lot of them are doing something. Even if that means they are opening that bulk of bulk food and they’re putting it in the bin, here’s the question, what are they cleaning that bin with? If they are cutting that watermelon up into quarters and then wrapping it up with plastic wraps, what are they cleaning their countertop and their knives with?

James Hahn: And the reason Diana is asking that is if they’re doing it according to organic regulations, those dictate the types of cleaners that you can use.

Diana Kaye: Absolutely! There’s a list of approved products that you can and cannot use. So that’s a very important of the processing/handling. In our case, I’ve also seen many stores that in their deli cases, they label food that they’ve prepared whether it be macaroni salad or even a salad, but it’s ready to go and I’ve seen stores that label these products as organic because they use the materials, the raw materials from their produce section.

However, this is what bothers me. When they take the raw materials, be it cucumbers, tomatoes, whatever from their produce section and the macaroni off the shelf and boil it, but they take it back into the kitchen, are they processing that food according to the standard that is required for the tomato sauce in the jar or the body care product? If they are not certified, they’re not. No!

DEBRA: We don’t know. We don’t know if they’re cooking that macaroni in tap water with fluoride in it and chloramines and all kinds of things.

Diana Kaye: Yeah!

DEBRA: And when you were talking about the bins, when you’re talking about the bins, the first thing I thought of was, “Well, what if they had bugs around? What kind of pesticides are they spraying to get rid of the bugs?”

Diana Kaye: Bingo! Exactly, exactly.

DEBRA: So now, it’s not organic anymore.

Diana Kaye: Well, that’s our point. By the way, just to back up, we see this as another problem with the National Organic Program Regulation. The NOP (that’s the National Organic Program) allows people to use tap water in food whether it be…

James Hahn: …or for any purpose.

Diana Kaye: …for any purpose, rinsing vegetables. If you see a juice that says ‘from concentrate’ and they’re required to list the juice concentrate in the water, that doesn’t mean the water was even purified or distilled.

In our case, we’re uncomfortable with that. We don’t drink tap water. We use distilled water to make our products, but that is not a requirement under the NOP [inaudible 00:17:41]. We’re sad about that, but the NOP allows EPA standards for drinking water to be an acceptable quality of water to be used in food.

James Hahn: So that’s an area where we go beyond the requirements.

Diana Kaye: Right! So those are the basic levels of certification, but we thought it was really important to point out the retailer aspect because that’s it, that’s the last step where the food or the personal care products are before you take them home.

We really feel that if a retailer is handling, that they should be required to go through a retailer certification especially if they have a prepared food section so that people can feel assured that, like you said, they’re not using pesticides and a lot of grocery stores do, any kind of store. They might even have a regular contract with a pest control applicator.

But also, even going so far as what you clean your countertops with. That’s the level of detail that we have to go through.

DEBRA: Well, I would assume (and I think that a lot of people make this assumption) that if you’re buying something at a natural food store that they have prepared, that they’re using the cleaners that they’re selling on the shelf. That’s not necessarily the case.

Diana Kaye: No, ma’am.

DEBRA: We should not make that assumption.

James Hahn: Absolutely not.

DEBRA: I do see that a lot of times in stores, there are some people who are being employed at not very high wages that may not know how to do things…

Diana Kaye: Sure, sure.

James Hahn: Mm-hmmm…

DEBRA: …and that there may be a store policy that is not trickles down to somebody who’s working on the floor.

Diana Kaye: Absolutely!

DEBRA: Yeah, I totally understand what you’re saying and I hadn’t even thought of that.

Diana Kaye: For us, it makes shopping very difficult for food because Debra, we’re like you, we’re trying to maintain our health. It’s very difficult and challenging in this world if you’re someone like you or us or some of your other listeners who are purists and who are recovering from an illness or trying not to get illness. We want to minimize the chemical residues. And so it becomes a challenge.

And that’s one of the reasons that we are certified organic as processors. I mentioned earlier that I wanted to make the distinction. We grow here and we have a few acres that we planted. But the certification process is so intense and there’s so much work that’s involved. We are a tiny company and two things.

Number one, we could not manage a certification for our farm and a certification for our processing. The important thing is we’re an experimental research. That’s the kind of growing we do. We couldn’t possibly grow all of the crops that we need for the raw materials to be able to make our line of products. So we have to depend on partnerships with other organic farms around the world to be able to supply us with the raw materials that we need to use to make our products.

So because the level of detail is so tremendous and the paper work that’s required, that’s all we can manage.
James Hahn: And the climate of course is not right.

DEBRA: I understand. We need to go to break.

James Hahn: Okay.

DEBRA: We need to go to break, so I’m going to stop you. But I’m going to ask my question first before we let you talk some more.

James Hahn: Surely.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re talking about organic certification and everything that goes into that with Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. Their website is Terressentials.com where they have lovely gourmet certified organic personal care products and we’re going to find out what that means. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials and we’re talking about organic certification.

Now, I just want to clarify one thing. When a consumer sees that USDA organic seal, I always think that that means that the ingredients themselves are organically certified, certified organic. So where does the processor certification come in. How will a consumer know that it’s processed organic or can that seal not be used unless it’s been processed by an organic processor?

Diana Kaye: That’s the second part. The company may not use the organic seal on their finished products unless the growing and the processing, both steps, are certified.

James Hahn: It’s like with food. Not only could they not use the seal, they would not be able to use the word ‘organic’ to describe the product legally.

DEBRA: Okay! So as long as everybody is being legal, then if we see organic on a label and we see the USDA organic seal, that means that it’s been grown and processed.

James Hahn: That’s correct. Every step of the process has been examined.

Diana Kaye: That’s the way it’s supposed to be and hopefully it is out there in the real world. I think we covered this another show where we have different certifications coming to the United States from other countries. Those certifications aren’t equal to the level of scrutiny and the detailed organizations that American companies – or let’s not say American, but just any company because a company in a foreign country could get certified to the USDA National Organic Program Regulations and they would also be allowed to use the USDA seal.

Truthfully, they would find it to their marketing advantage to use the USDA organic seal on the front label of the product because it means much. People recognize that globally because it was the first organic detailed standard that was composed and created with consumer input.

James Hahn: It’s still the best standard in the world.

DEBRA: Okay. So now, given that it is – I mean, I’ve had other on people talking about this and I’m pretty impressed with the standard. Why don’t you tell us about what it takes to actually get certified so that people can understand that it’s not just somebody walking in and saying, “Okay, you’re fine.”

Diana Kaye: Oh, my God, no.

James Hahn: Definitely not.

DEBRA: So tell us what it takes. What’s behind that seal?

Diana Kaye: Okay. The very first step is your application process, which is a many month-long process where you have to basically write a dissertation of what your whole process is, what your goals are describing the product that you’re going to produce. So this is truly an essay form.

And then you have to have supporting documentation for all of that. The supporting documentation, I kind of just washed over this a little earlier, which means that any time you order a raw material – and by the way, if you’re a small company, it’s sad, but you have much more work to do than a larger company because small companies tend to buy their raw materials on smaller quantities on a more frequent basis because small companies are not making products in 30,000 or 50,000 gallon tanks.

And that’s common, by the way, for personal care products. They’re made in these huge batch when large companies do it. Many small companies (and we are one), we make things in very small batches and we buy raw materials more frequently, which actually, I prefer because I know that in many cases, that means we’re getting fresher materials.
However, when it comes to documenting all of that, all of those many purchases, it’s extremely time-consuming because for every single purchase, you have to maintain the whole paperwork trail for every single purchase.

And in addition, we make ourselves – all of the extracts that are listed in our products, we actually make all of those here in-house as well. Many companies, they buy their extracts, their herbal extracts off the shelf from herbal extract companies. So they’re recording a purchase. In our case, now we get into production log. So we actually have to track all the raw materials for every single herbal extract that we make and I’m talking we have to track them down to fractions of an ounce and we have to be able to document that.

In fact, one of the aspects of the process – and I’m skipping ahead a little bit here – is the inspection. At that time, a certifier will select randomly a product and you have to be able to track back through all of your invoices and production logs and all of your records to be able to track every drop of every material, every ounce, very gram.

James Hahn: …and identify exactly which batch that drop came from.

Diana Kaye: So it’s extremely complicated to do that especially if you have multi-ingredient products and if you’re also the producer of some of those multi-ingredient products. So for example, an herbal extract is a multi-ingredient product because it requires two ingredients or more.

We’ll make a chamomile extract. That would be certified organic grape, alcohol or sugar alcohol. In our case, we tend to use sugar. Some people use the grain alcohols, but we prefer the sugar. It’s cleaner. And then you would have your certified organic herb material. So we have to track.

And again, we buy in small quantities. We’re not buying a hundred pounds and making a hundred gallons or fifty gallons at a time. We’re making smaller batches. We might make a gallon or two. So we have to track every bottle, every drop of each herbal extract that we make. And if we’ve got 25, those are almost – in fact they are. Those are individual product. So it’s not just our finished product, which a customer would see as the body lotion or body cream, but every single ingredient that’s an extract, that’s a compound, multi-ingredient, we have to track that as well.

So in addition to that, when we’re first composing our application called the Organic System Plan (and that’s part of the regulation), we have to document how we’re going to – and this is what we alluded to earlier when we’re talking about retailers. We have a chart and we have to break out every single method that we use to clean our facility. We have to list a mop, a broom, a vacuum. Whatever tool that we use, we’re required to list that.

And in addition that, we have to list every cleaning product that we use. In our case, we use our own organically made soap. We make our own organic sanitizer. We use baking soda, we use vinegar, we use our own organic essential oil. But again, we have to log every single thing. We have to actually have logs where we note when we clean, who cleaned. We have a separate log for maintenance when we clean our filters in our HVAC units. We have another log, which is strictly for mouse trap, fly paper. We have plug-in UV lights with sticky traps.

DEBRA: I need to interrupt you…

Diana Kaye: Oh!

James Hahn: Okay.

DEBRA: …because the commercial is going to come on any second. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’re talking about how to organic certification, what it takes to get that with Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. Okay, so you were giving us a list of all the things you have to keep lists of.

Diana Kaye: I know. That’s essentially a huge component of what we have to do, paperwork documentation.

James Hahn: Our stack of documentation, how tall would you say it is, Diana?

Diana Kaye: Oh, Debra, it’s the saddest white binder that we could find and it’s 4 ½ inch. That’s our organic application. We have to have for every raw material, we have to break out every single – so basically, every recipe for every product is included in there. We have to create what’s called a flowchart for every single product that’s in there where you actually have to use a bubble diagram. So you outline each step of your process for every single product. You do that graphically with a bubble diagram.

The paperwork, I have to say is tedious. Sometimes, it feels like it’s overwhelming. And again, I say for a small company, it feels like it can be more challenging because larger companies – and I’ve used this comparison, they may make products once or three times a year and they buy raw materials in metric tons where we may be buying –
Like when we buy certified organic lavender organic, we may buy 5 kilos or 10 kilos at a time. They’re buying it in 55-gallon drums and they made that by a palette of drums, which is 455-gallon barrels to make their products. So their paper workload is significantly less than it would be. And it’s a shame, but it’s the same that the documentation process works.

James Hahn: But it is the same standard that applies to all food producers so that if you see a food and it has the USDA seal on it or uses the word ‘organic’, they are required to have gone through that entire process.
Now, one thing I want to point out to your listeners is that if you’re talking about personal care products, only the 1% of the “organic personal care products” on the market have gone through that process. Most do not.

Diana Kaye: And that’s kind of sad.

DEBRA: Okay, so just give us a little summary about what people would be reading on a label if they see organic. Actually, after your last show, one of my listeners wrote an email to me and he asked me about a particular organic personal care product – I’m going to sneeze in about a second. Anyway, so he said it contains organic ingredients. [Sneezing] Excuse me. Wow! That’s the first time I’ve sneezed on the air.

Diana Kaye: Blessings! Blessings!

DEBRA: Thank you. So anyway, I said to him, “Well, is the product itself certified organic or is the ingredients certified organic” and he said it didn’t say on the website. He said, “Well, I’m going to write to them and find out.” And so they sent him back a very nice email saying, “We’re working on getting that certification.”

So what exactly should people be looking for to indicate that it is a certified organic product?

Diana Kaye: Well, this is pretty important. And this is sad. In the personal care world, the enforcement is not just there. The first thing that we can tell people to say to look for is the USDA seal on organic.

The ‘made with organic’ category kind of gets tricky. I’m going to just dive into that real quick. For instance, we have our hair wash. A large component of that product is clay. And that clay is permitted. It’s on the national list of approved materials. Clay benzonites are used in many different kinds of products. We use them in our deodorants as well. They are allowed, but you cannot certify salt minerals.

So any mineral (calcium, salt or clay), they would be allowed if they’re not irradiated or chemically treated, but they’re not alive. They don’t grow. You can use them in products.

So in our case, all of our other ingredients in our hair wash are certified organic products – herbal extracts and essential oils. And that’s it. We don’t use anything else. However, because of the percentage, the product can’t use the USDA seal, but it’s been processed by us in our certified organic facility according to that organic system plan (that’s 4 ½ inches high of paper work and documentation), but we can’t use the USDA seal on the back of the label.

DEBRA: Yeah. Go on, go on. I’m going to say something.

Diana Kaye: The tricky part is if you are a certified company, you’re required to list that who you are certified organic by. Now, what we’ve seen many companies do (and this is where it makes it so difficult for consumers), companies that are not certified that are personal care products, they will list – like maybe they’re buying three ingredients that are certified organic. And they’ll actually list those certifier’s name on the back of the label. And so a consumer thinks that that means that product is a certified product when that is not the case.

The consumer should ask to see the company’s organic certificate that shows that the company that makes the personal care product is a certified organic processor.

DEBRA: Well, I think that the companies should be posting that kind of information on their website.

Diana Kaye: Well, I agree. They should also be posting their list of ingredients for their products. But unfortunately, most don’t.

DEBRA: Exactly! It’s like all that information should be there. That’s something that I’m working on, wanting people to do that and encouraging people to do that and asking more questions of companies.
I think one of the biggest problems that we have in the whole industry, all of consumerism, the whole marketplace is simply not knowing what’s in the product.

Diana Kaye: Yes.

DEBRA: And then another thing I wanted to say about the organic certification is that it gets confusing to the consumer when the product itself – like you were talking about, the clay portion of your hairwash is not an agricultural product, so it can’t be certified organic, that ingredient.

James Hahn: Right.

DEBRA: But there’s nothing toxic about your clay.

James Hahn: Nothing at all.

Diana Kaye: That’s a great little…

DEBRA: Yeah, but I didn’t finish my sentence. And then I want to hear what you have to say.

Diana Kaye: No, I love it.

DEBRA: And so I actually had somebody say to me recently that their product was 100% organic because it was certified organic.

Diana Kaye: Argh!

James Hahn: No, it doesn’t mean…

DEBRA: And I said, “No, your product isn’t 100% organic because it’s got other things in it and you can’t say that.” I actually called up somebody and said, “You can’t run your ad.”

Diana Kaye: But they do, Debra and that’s the sad part.

DEBRA: I know. I know they do. I know. So the point is as good as the organic certification is, it’s misleading in ways here. And the way I think that it’s misleading is that your product is totally non-toxic, but you can’t say that it’s 100% organic because it isn’t.

Diana Kaye: And the shame of all that is – and this is just from our perspective, but it’s really important. For consumers who are like us, again, we’re competing with literally hundreds of other companies who have synthetic, chemical detergents like in their shampoo, for example and maybe they have a drop of three organic ingredients and they call the product organic and they’ll list a couple of certifiers names on the back of their label, the consumer sees all of that and thinks that that is an organic product and yet it’s got a man-made, synthetic chemical detergent, it likely has chemical preservatives like ethanol.

People panic about parabens, but all of the replacement preservatives have very little documentation for long-term safety. So it’s like you’re just throwing the baby out with the bathwater and you’re trading one thing for something that’s unknown.

We deal with that and it’s so hard to communicate to consumers all these because it is confusing. And that’s why oh, Debra, your show is so helpful because you’re helping to get people to understand the complexities of the labeling situations. And honestly, it would be so wonderful if we could have more enforcement in the personal care marketplace.

James Hahn: …instead of none.

Diana Kaye: But honestly, it’s like personal care products are orphans. We’re an afterthought, almost as if they didn’t even anticipate that people would want to have a truly 100% certified organic body cream, you know?
DEBRA: Well, yeah. I agree with you. But also (I think we’ve talked about this before), we’ve both been working in this field for 30 years and we both see that there’s progress.

Diana Kaye: Yeah, there is.

James Hahn: For sure.

DEBRA: And there still needs to be even more progress. We’re not there yet 100%, but it’s so much better than it used to be. And the more talk about this, the more people listen to the show, the more people write articles, the more people are educated and then they can go and ask these questions and know what to look for and things like that, the more it’s all going to kind of settle out I think. I think we have a ways to go.

We only have less than a minute now. So I want to make sure…

Diana Kaye: It always flies by so fast.

DEBRA: I know. It does, it does. You’ve given us so much great information. I’m going to have Diana and James on on a regular basis, about once a month. We’ll be doing more shows talking about organic, so that everybody can learn and listen.

Thank you so much for sharing with us today. Thank you for your wonderful products. I’ll give you 15 seconds to say goodbye.

Diana Kaye: Well, Debra, I would just want to say once again that Jim and I are so delighted that you have taken up the cause here to educate consumers about what organic means and to help peel back the layers of this onion so that people can see and learn how to read the labels and to know what questions to ask of the personal care product.

DEBRA: I’m going to stop you right there because that’s the end of the show. Thank you, Diana and James from Terressentials.

James Hahn: Okay, thank you.

Diana Kaye: Thank you.

DEBRA: They’re at Terressentials.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

The Healthy Home Project: Affordable Toxic Free Remodeling

Erin S. IhdeToday my guest is Erin S. Ihde, MA, CCRP, founder of The Healthy Home Project. We’ll be talking about how she transformed a house project- by-project, using healthier, “green” materials, “all on a peanut-butter-and-jelly budget.” The Healthy Home Project blog follows the remodeling a 107-year old historic home in need of much TLC. Each posts features resources based upon a single theme, from healthier paints to safer disposal of household hazards. Resource links within the post are provided for more comprehensive information on each topic. Erin believes creating healthy spaces is one of the most important things we can do for the kids in our lives. She is a hospital-based project manager in environmental health, specializing in pediatric research and education. Erin has an MA in Environmental Education from New York University, where she received a fellowship from the Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, and a BA in English from the Honors Program at The College of New Jersey. She is a Certified Clinical Research Professional through SoCRA. Most importantly, she is mom to two amazing kids. thehealthyhomeproject.org

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The Healthy Home Project: Affordable Toxic-Free Remodeling

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Erin S. Ihde

Date of Broadcast: August 19, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free. It’s a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida, on Tuesday, August 19, 2014.

Today, we’re going to be talking about one of my favorite subjects, which is remodeling, remodeling in a way that’s not toxic.

My guest today has remodeled a house. I guess, she’s in the process of remodeling a house. And she’s doing it in a non-toxic way. She’s blogging about. And she’s especially doing it for her kids because she’s a single mom and she wants to make sure that her kids have the least toxic, most healthy environment available. And we’re going to be talking about why that’s important, as well as what she’s doing.

My guest is Erin Ihde. She is a, in addition to all those things, I’m just looking at my notes here. She’s going to tell us about herself.

Hi, Erin. Hello. Erin? I can’t hear her. My technician is coming on. We just lost her. They’re calling her back.

So, I’m going to tell you more about her. She’s a hospital-based project manager in environmental health, specializing in pediatric research and education. She has an MA in environmental education from New York University where she received a fellowship from the Metropolitan Center for Urban Education.

She’s back now. Hi, Erin!

ERIN IHDE: Hi.

DEBRA: Hi! I have a little technical problem here, so just hold on a second. Actually, start telling us about how you came to do your healthy home project, and I’m going to just type to the technician here for a second.

ERIN IHDE: Well, I moved into this house just over a year ago. My children and I were living in an apartment at the time that

I found this house. We basically needed something very affordable, and needed a more long-term housing solution than where we were. And when I found this place, it was actually abandoned. There was nobody living here.

DEBRA: Oh, my God!
ERIN IHDE: So, it was in pretty bad shape. It needed pretty much everything done to it, so we weren’t able to live in it right away. I just figured why not make this a project where I can really use some sustainable materials and healthy paints, and basically, everything from start to finish. So it’s really been quite a journey.

DEBRA: What was it that made you be interested in doing it in a non-toxic way?

ERIN IHDE: Well, I’ve always been interested in environmental topics and non-toxic living pretty much since I was in high school. I was part of the environmental club. So, I proceeded from that time onward. I got my masters in environmental education, like you said. And I’m a hospital-based environmental health researcher, so I have that background to begin with.

It was really kind of a natural fit.

DEBRA: So, tell us why it’s so important for children—I totally agree with you, by the way, about this. I can see in my own body, as an adult, what an effect toxic chemicals had on me, and what a beneficial effect it had for me to remove toxic chemicals in our homes. But there are specific reasons why we have to be even more concerned about children. So tell us about those.

ERIN IHDE: Well, children have greater exposures to environmental toxins than adults do in three main ways. The first is pound-per-pound of body weight. Children drink more water, eat more food, and breathe more air than adults. They respirate at a quicker rate, and they take in more water and more food than we do. So their exposure is different in that sense.

They also have frequent hand-to-mouth behavior, which gives them more opportunity to ingest toxins.

And then the third way, especially true with small children, is they tend to stay close to the ground where toxins often settle.

DEBRA: And also, another thing about them playing close to the ground, especially like kids sitting on the floor in homes, that when we are walking around with our shoes on outside, and then we come in the house, we start tracking all those toxic chemicals on the floor. And so this is one of the reasons to take off your shoes before you come in the house because otherwise, anything that you’ve stepped in outside is now on your floor. Kids are playing on the floor. They get it on their hands, they put it in their mouth.

ERIN IHDE: I’m so glad you said that because that’s one of the rules we have in our house as well. We have a spot by the front door and one by the back door where everybody leaves their shoes. It’s just an automatic thing now. But it is so important to take off their shoes when you come in the house.

DEBRA: It really is.

ERIN IHDE: Especially now it being the summer with pesticides on people’s lawns.

DEBRA: Yes. So what about rapid cell division, children having rapid cell division?

ERIN IHDE: During two different time periods that children go through, that being the infant developmental period and the adolescent years, those are times of very rapid cell division in kids. So these are critical windows of development. And compared to an adult, there’s also a greater timeframe from an environmental exposure to when a disease or health condition might manifest.

So those are just some other ways and some other reasons why environmental exposures in children are very different than those in adults.

Kids aren’t little adults. They’re unique and they’re uniquely vulnerable. So as adults, we need to do all we can to protect them.

DEBRA: I completely agree. I think you’re doing a fabulous job as a mom to be concerned about this and taking care of your kids. And I think that all mothers need to do this—and fathers too, and grandparents, and aunts and uncles. We all need to be watching out for kids.

There’s just so much evidence about children having illnesses now at earlier and earlier ages, things that we didn’t see before like when you and I were kids. We were much healthier than kids are now. And we really see it. And it’s something that we really need to pay attention to.

So, can you tell us more about indoor air pollution that motivated you to do this project?

ERIN IHDE: Well, I think of a house or a home, it’s like a bubble. Everything that’s inside the home, including all the toxins, becomes part of the environment for everybody who is in that home. According to the EPA, the indoor air is two to a hundred times more polluted than outdoor air. And most of us spend up to 90% of our time indoors. So, there’s a really large timeframe there for exposures to anything that’s inside the home.

Another thing to keep in mind is that older homes tend to breathe more than newer construction homes which are usually built to be energy-efficient and, therefore, more air tight.

DEBRA: And so, it’s important for the newer homes particularly. I always live in older homes for that reason. But the point is that if you have a lot of toxic things in a newer home, they won’t evaporate it out in the same way as they will in an older home.

In times past, we didn’t have so many toxic things, and we had what’s called a leaky house. Nowadays, new houses are tighter and we have more toxic things in them. So when you’re doing a construction project, it’s really important to be thinking about how toxic the paints in the walls and the floors, and everything that you put in the house. It’s really, really, really important to be considering these things.

Well, we need to go to break, but when we come back, we’re going to learn more about what Erin has done in her home, and you can go to her website which is TheHealthyHomeProject.org. She’s documented everything that she’s done in her blog.

We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Erin Ihde. She’s the founder of The Healthy Home Project, and what she’s doing is, as a single mom, she’s remodeling a house that needed everything to be done, as she says, on a peanut butter and jelly budget.

So Erin, let’s just back up a minute and tell us, I want to hear more about your process of deciding that you need to have a home and finding your home, and how you decided to make it non-toxic because I think that what you’ve just gone through in doing this is a journey that everybody needs to do. And many people are saying, “I wish I had a healthy home, but I can’t afford it.”

But you made it happen, and I want to hear more about how that happened for you.

ERIN IHDE: Well, as I mentioned before, the home that I found was not being lived in. It has been vacated some time before. When there was somebody living here, it had gone through a decline over several decades. It is an older home built in 1907. So it’s on the National Historic Registry.

DEBRA: How did you find this home?

ERIN IHDE: I found it online. I decided to go on the real estate listing, the main real estate listing website from my area, and it was late one night, and I thought, “I need to get out where I am. This isn’t a permanent solution, where we are.”

And I just don’t think I can afford anything. And I went online, and there was this house. And I decided to look at it a couple of days later. And the moment I saw it, I knew this was going to be something. It took my heart right away, I guess you could say, because the [bones] of it were beautiful. I could see that just looking past the crumbling walls and the holes and the ceiling and things like that.

DEBRA: Now, you had no experience doing any kind of remodeling before. Is that correct?

ERIN IHDE: Well, I have lived in two houses years ago, and I had done some remodeling in those houses, but not to the extent that this needed. So this was a whole different ball game, and I was also doing it by myself, so I was coming from a different perspective at this time.

It was beyond the scope of my imagination, really, what needed to be done.

DEBRA: So you went ahead and took this leap of faith, and bought the house, and you said before that you couldn’t live in it right away. So what was the first thing that you did in order to start doing the remodeling project?

ERIN IHDE: The day I closed on the house, I came in and I tore down a couple of ceilings. There were drop ceilings throughout most of the house, and in some places, there were even two drop ceilings, so I took down one, and I found another above that. And then I took that down, and I found a huge hole in the original ceilings. So that was the first phase, it’s really seeing what was behind some of what had been done over the years.

DEBRA: I’ve done quite a bit of remodeling and buying houses progressively that I’ve lived in, where I would buy a house, and then remodel it while I was living in it in a non-toxic way. And my ex-husband was very good at building. And so it was a good project for us to do as a couple.

And I remember one house that we bought as an investment house, everything had been covered up. It was an old house from the 20’s or something. But in the 60’s or some time like that, somebody decided to remodel. And so they covered up all the beautiful architecture.

When we went in there, it had this drop ceiling in the kitchen. And we just started ripping things out. There was this one point where I said, “You know, it would be really nice to have arch over this opening. Couldn’t we put in an arch?”

And we just started ripping it up. And there was an arch there already.

I love old houses, and I love taking down all that stuff.

So then, have you done all this work yourself, or did you hire people? How did you make it on a budget?

ERIN IHDE: Well, the first phase was just to get it in the shape that it needed to be for us to move in. So I wanted to make sure, especially having kids, that there is no peeling paint, that everything was clean. There was old carpeting here probably from the 60’s or 70’s. So all of that carpeting was taken out, the floors were refinished.

And something I mentioned on the blog is the carpeting I was able to recycle through a local carpet recycling company. And then the floors, I refinished using a whey, non-toxic, it’s made from whey, and actually the company that makes it, I think, is Vermont Naturals. And I think that gentleman was on your show.

DEBRA: He was on my show, and I use that product. It’s one of my favorite ones.

ERIN IHDE: So all the floors were refinished with that, the downstairs. So basically, that first phase was just getting it ready to move in, so not everything was done. But I did hire a contractor to help with some of the really heavy stuff, and an electrician, and a plumber.

For the technical stuff, I definitely hired people.

DEBRA: But you did a lot of the work yourself.

ERIN IHDE: I did. I came first in the morning to check on everything, and to get everyone organized for the day, and go over what needed to be done. And then when I could, I would come during my lunch break and check on things. Inevitably, there would be surprises that were found during the morning as things were uncovered and progress was made.

So that was a troubleshooting time.

And then I would come after work, and check on things again, and then do some work myself.

DEBRA: Yes, when we come back from the break, we’ll talk a little more about how you put it together because you did it, I think, on a project-by-project basis, which is how I do my remodeling too, instead of looking at it and saying, “Well, it’s going to be $100,000 to remodel this house.” We just go, “Well, how can we do this one little piece of it?” And that makes it a lot more affordable.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Erin Ihde. We’re talking about her healthy home project, where she’s remodeled a house herself to be non-toxic, and her website is TheHealthyHomeProject.org.

We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Erin Ihde. She’s the founder of The Healthy Home Project. They’re at TheHealthyHomeProject.org.

Erin, once you made this decision that you needed to do things in a non-toxic way, how did you find out about what was toxic and what wasn’t? I love to watch those home-decoratig shows on TV, but they’re always talking about paint and you do these different things, but they never look at what the health effects are. There’s just so much of what happens on TV is toxic.

So how did you find out what to do?

ERIN IHDE: Exactly. I watch all the different home shows, and I love it. I love seeing what other people do, but I did have that issue that what I see on TV isn’t necessarily something I want to replicate in my own home, just because I don’t know what products they’re using, and they’re not non-toxic.

So I have been getting your newsletter for a while. So I got a lot of great ideas from that. And also, I like to buy things locally, so I’ve tried to support as many things as possible from the area. And just from doing research, really, it’s how I found a lot of the things that I’ve used here.

DEBRA: That’s very good. I’m glad that you did a lot of your own research. I just want to make a comment about TV and about toxic things. I sometimes think, “Oh, I would love to have a home-decorating show where I could just tell people how to remodel their homes non-toxically, and to have an organic cooking show,” and all these things. I notice that they don’t have those on TV. And I think that the reason that they don’t have that on TV is because if they were to have a show, one show, like at the Food Channel for example, we’re to have a show about cooking organically, then that makes all their other shows wrong. It makes all their advertisers wrong.

And so it will be interesting to see what happens without getting this kind of information on TV because it’s one thing to have it, for me to be on a segment on the Today Show or something like that, or for Dr. Oz to say something about it, but to have a whole show where this is the lifestyle, where this is what we’re talking about, it just makes everything else wrong. And it is wrong. I have to say it. It is wrong.

And yet, we’re watching these shows. There’s so much in the media that is promoting the toxic lifestyle, the unhealthy lifestyle. It’s difficult sometimes to get a foot in the door. And that’s what I like so much about the internet is that I can say whatever I want to say on my website.

I’ll just have to start my own television channel on my website.

So Erin, what are some of the toxic chemicals you were concerned about?

ERIN IHDE: Well, there are about five main ones that are very common during the remodeling process, and also just in homes in general. One of those things is VOCs. That stands for volatile organic compounds, and they’re in hundreds of building products from paint to adhesives. They’re linked to cancer and respiratory issues, in addition to some other adverse health outcomes.

So it’s really important to choose a paint with no VOCs. And paint is something that we all use so often. A lot of paints claim to be no VOCs, but the claim actually refers to the base, and then in the coloring, it’s put in. It’s not no VOC.

DEBRA: That’s right. So when you’re choosing a paint, you need to make sure that there are no VOCs in the paint and no VOCs in the coloring. And that’s something you need to ask. It doesn’t say that on the label.

So which paint did you choose?

ERIN IHDE: I chose a product called Ivy Coating, and it’s made pretty local to me in Brooklyn.

DEBRA: I’ve never heard of them.

ERIN IHDE: I had never heard of it either actually, until a few years ago. I know the man who actually was involved with creating it, and it’s sold at a store called Green Depot, and there are a couple of those home improvement stores around the country, and it’s also on the internet. So that’s actually where I got it from.

DEBRA: Is that IV like the ivy vine? I-V-Y?

ERIN IHDE: Exactly.

DEBRA: I’m going to look that up. So what’s another chemical besides VOCs that you watch out for?

ERIN IHDE: Another one is lead just because this is an older house. So proper testing is the way to really know whether there’s a hazard present or not. So on my blog, I covered a little bit about lead testing I had. For example, one of the floors upstairs was painted, and before it could be sanded, we needed to test the paint to see if it contained led. And thankfully, it didn’t, so we could go ahead and sand the floor.

DEBRA: What other chemicals?

ERIN IHDE: Flame retardants are a big one right now. It’s a really hot topic in the media. The Chicago Tribune came out with a whole series in 2012. That really put the issue on the map. So many home furnishings from mattresses to sofas are manufactured to meet the California Flammability Standard, which is called TB117. And even though it’s just a law in California, it’s been used as a standard across the country.

Thankfully, that standard has just recently changed as of January 2014, but there’s still a phase-in period.

DEBRA: I need to do a whole show just on that because there are some things about that new standard that aren’t quite exactly right. And I don’t want to be mysterious about this, so I’ll just simply say that the way the new standard is worded, it actually makes it illegal to just use a natural fiber because of the way it’s now a smolder test. And there are all kinds of technicalities.

And so, whereas before, you could just have a natural fiber covering, or make something out of a natural fiber, and it would pass the test—now, it doesn’t. Not because it’s flammable, it’s just the way they test it.

And so now, it’s opened the door for the way they test to have things that are very flammable materials, not require fire retardants.

I don’t want to get into that whole thing, but it’s just to know. It’s a step forward in California to not require fire retardants, but there are still problems with it.

We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Erin Ihde.

And she’s the founder of The Healthy Home Project at TheHealthyHomeProject.org. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Erin Ihde. She’s the founder of The Healthy Home Project at TheHealthyHomeProject.org.

Erin, right now, your summertime project is to remodel the bathroom. Tell us how that’s going.

ERIN IHDE: Well, it’s still a work in progress. I can tell you what I’ve done so far. One of the first things was to remove the old, vinyl floor tiles because vinyl is such an issue, especially in older homes. I first had them tested to see if they contain asbestos because older vinyl tiles sometimes do. And thankfully they tested negative, as well as the mastic, which is the adhesive underneath the tile.

So once that was done, I [fold] those up, and we put down a recycled content porcelain tile, which has 40% pre-consumer-recycled material in it. And it’s also made in the USA, so I was very glad to find that resource.

DEBRA: Good choice.

ERIN IHDE: One of the other steps was to tear down the 1970 paneling which is made from MDF, or medium-density fiberboards. The reason I wanted to take that down is because MDF, especially the older kind, contains formaldehyde, which is in the glue that bind the shredded wood together to make the paneling.

So, even though I knew the paneling had the majority of the off-gassing completed many years ago, I just wanted to remove it because it doesn’t really work in a high moisture environment as well.

DEBRA: No, it really doesn’t. And this is one of the problems with MDF and those similar kind of compressed boards, is that even if the off-gassing is done, if any water gets in there, and I know they’re using it on the outside sheathing of houses now, again, by new subdivisions, and you can see that board just right there. And it’s just sitting there out in the rain, and there’s nothing to protect it. And it just falls apart. The resin doesn’t hold it together.

And so that’s not a good thing to have in your bathroom. You’re absolutely, totally correct about that.

ERIN IHDE: I’ve seen that in new construction, and my neighborhood as well. It’s very surprising to see that used in the exterior. It does fall apart. It doesn’t hold up.

So after the paneling came down, the walls were severely damaged. So they were patched and skin-coated, and sanded, and then I used Ivy Coating primer, and Ivy Coating paint to fill everything up and make them look like new.

I also found two light fixtures at a store called Green Demolition, which is a store that sells fixtures and other home remodeling, everything from cabinets, everything you possibly need for remodeling. And it’s taken some other construction projects.

So it’s basically used things that are for resale, and all the proceeds go to charity which makes it really great, win/win situation.

DEBRA: I’ve gotten a lot of things. Another term for this, if somebody run into find one locally, listeners, you just look under architectural salvages is what it’s called in the yellow pages, architectural salvage. And when I was in California, I lived in the San Francisco Bay Area, and there were so many old houses they were taking apart all the time. And I got so many beautiful doors and windows and marble, marble for $5 a foot, square-foot, and things like that.

And here, we don’t have so many where I live now in Florida, we don’t have so many old houses that are being demolished.

But Habitat for Humanity has a chain of stores called Renew, I think it is. And so they’re always looking for materials that are left over on construction projects. This is one of the ways that you can do things that are inexpensive. You have to use your discretion about looking at the materials of these used items to make sure that they’re non-toxic.

But people are just pulling out whole kitchens full of cabinets, and all these things that just cost hundreds and thousands of dollars. And you can go to architectural salvage and get it for nothing. It’s pretty amazing.

ERIN IHDE: Exactly. So many of these things I got for this house, I bought that way, and I paid just a fraction of what it would have been in a home retail.

DEBRA: And it goes with the style of your 1907 house.

ERIN IHDE: Exactly.

DEBRA: That’s so great. So what part of the bathroom are you working on now?

ERIN IHDE: Well, the part that I’m doing now is, I have an old cast iron enamel bathtub, and I had read one or two articles about these old tubs possibly containing led in the glaze. And so I thought, “Well, let me just test mine and see.” And lo and behold, it came up positive. And I was really surprised.

So what I’m going to do now is re-glaze it. The other option would be to replace it entirely, but I don’t want to create more waste in the landfill, so I’d rather just re-glaze it, and then I’ll use some recycled tile around the tub around. So that’s the last step.

DEBRA: Good. So then when you finish the tub, it’s just there. You don’t have a shower in the bathroom. It’s just the tub?

ERIN IHDE: it is. There’s a shower there too.

DEBRA: Okay, so it’s a separate shower?

ERIN IHDE: It’s the same. It’s actually all the same. So It’s a tub with the shower right there.

DEBRA: Oh, I see. Good. So what else do you have left then to do for the bathroom? So then that would be it?

ERIN IHDE: Yes, that’s pretty much it. Just the one light fixture needs to go up. I took out all the molding, the old molding, so I need to put up some new molding. And that’s pretty much it, once the tub area is done.

DEBRA: Can I ask you how much did it cost you to remodel your bathroom because if you were to go to a contractor or watch a TV show, it’s like $35,000 or $50,000 or something like that?

ERIN IHDE: I would say, one bill is still pending, but I can probably just a rough ballpark would be no more than $3000.

DEBRA: Yes, so I want everybody to hear this. You can remodel your bathroom in a non-toxic way for $3000.

ERIN IHDE: I don’t even think it was that much.

DEBRA: Yeah. I know, I know. I understand. When my husband I were remodeling, we remodeled a whole bathroom. We ended up having a mold problem, and we had to remodel the whole bathroom. We tore it all out down to the studs. But you know, we had a little insurance check that didn’t cover it, but we spent the insurance check on the plumber, and the technical kind of people, because they had to put in new pipes and things like that.

But in terms of the work, the walls, the tiling and all those things, we were just buying a can of paint and saying, “Okay, this weekend, we’re going to paint this.” And then we would just paint it. And then we would figure out, “Well, how much money can we spend on tile now?” We did it as a series of weekend projects.

ERIN IHDE: That’s exactly how I’ve done this. It’s been about three months, so it definitely wasn’t done in a week or anything like that. It’s been step-by-step, figuring out what I need to do next, then what I need to purchase next. And then, just going out and doing that piece.

DEBRA: So this is something that anybody can do. I just really want to get this point across that you can do a lot of the labor yourself, even if you’ve never done it before, or you go to some place like Lowes or Home Depot. Those are do-it-yourself places. Everything is arranged so that you can take those materials home and do it. They have instructions. They have workshops. They have instructions online. A lot of stuff can be done, if you need to hire somebody, you can hire a handyman, instead of a contractor. I just want everybody to think that they can do this. If you need a new home, if you need to remodel something, you can do it in a toxic-free way. You can do it in an affordable way, that it’s absolutely possible to do that.

So we’ve got about one minute left. Any last words you’d like to give?

ERIN IHDE: I would just like to echo exactly what you just said that that’s really why I made the blog and the website, is to empower other people to be able to make these same changes in their homes whether they’re just painting a wall or redoing an entire house. It’s absolutely doable and I hope that the resources that I have on the site and some of the stories I tell help other people to do the same thing.

DEBRA: Well, you’ve done an excellent job. I can see that you’ve done your homework, and I think this is a great resource and an inspiration for people. Again, her website is TheHealthyHomeProject.org. And you can see everything that she’s done and see how you can apply that to your own home. I know that sometimes it seems a little scary to look at doing home improvements, but they can be done. They can even be done by single moms. They can be done by couples. It’s easier than you think, that’s what I’ll say.

Thank you so much for being with us, Erin. Again, her website is TheHealthyHomeProject.org. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

ERIN IHDE: Thank you for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome.

What’s Really in This Faux Wood?

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I purchased an outdoor table made of a “PE faux wood resin.” I have tried researching what exactly could be in this material, and I have come across some sites where the resin could be composed of PE/PP/PVC. Of course the PVC concerns me…I contacted the company a couple times, and one rep responded that the table was simply made of polyethylene, while another rep thought it might contain PVC, but was looking into it and hasn’t gotten back to me yet. Do you think I can trust that this table is only PE, or would you not trust it…Do they have to disclose that the table contains PVC, even if it is a smaller amount than the PE? Just wondering what you would do! I love the table and think it’s great for seaside, but would rather my family be safe!

Thanks so much!

Debra’s Answer

There are many labeling laws, but the overarching one is the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) “Truth in Advertising” law.

This says that “ads must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence.”

This applies to labels too.

So per this law, if the label says PE it should contain PE and if it says PVC it should contain PVC.

I would assume that it is 100% PE and the first rep was right. But now that there has been a question about it from the other rep, I would follow through and get a confirmation.

Add Comment

Water-Resistant Coating on Shoes

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I purchased a pair of moccasins thinking they would be safer since they are made of suede, sheepskin, EVA/Poron cushioning, but I see they are also “water-resistant.” I contacted UGG Australia and a rep informed me that the shoes are treated with a protectant or coating to make them water-resistant. Would you return these, or is the coating harmless in a shoe?

Thank you!

Debra’s Answer

Actually water-resistant coatings can be pretty toxic. It’s better to get shoes that don’t have them.

I personally would return these shoes and look for others without the coating.

Add Comment

Wellness Within Your Walls—Outgassing and Indoor Air Quality

Jillian Pritchard CookeMy guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke, founder of Wellness Within Your Walls. We’ll be talking about how to connect the global family with healthy, eco-sensitive products, that result in beautiful, sustainable, non-toxic environments. WWYW® addresses the “Tight Box Syndrome”- which has become an issue with poorly ventilated buildings that have placed energy efficiency above health. These buildings can’t breathe and harmful toxins are trapped in the interior environment with no way of escaping the living environment. WWYW® strives to educate the builder, manufacturer, architect, designer and consumer on how to take control of reducing toxins in the interior environment and how to off-gas toxic chemicals from products responsibly (we’re going to talk about off-gassing in particular). Jillian is also the founder of DES-SYN, an interior design firm that was established in 1991. She is known as a premier eco-interior designer and creates interiors that are beautiful and healthy for the client and kind to the earth. With more than 30 years of experience in cities including New York, Los Angeles and Atlanta, she has become well known to many in in the residential, commercial and hospitality design industry. Jillian has authored numerous articles that specifically deal with reducing harmful toxins in the interior environment. She has been featured on CNN, Martha Stewart Radio and her design have been published by Veranda magazine, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Professional Builder and Builder Magazines and numerous other publications nationally and globally. www.wellnesswithinyourwalls.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Wellness Within Your Walls—Outgassing & Indoor Air Quality

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Jillian Pritchard Cooke

Date of Broadcast: August 14, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free and talk about how we can make things right.

I love this song. This is why I chose it as my theme song about being points of light and about knowing what the right thing is to do and doing it in our own lives and doing it in the world and making the world a better place.

And that’s really why I do this radio show. It’s because I want to give you the information so that you can tell what is the right thing to do with regards to toxics, how we can identify toxic chemicals that are making everybody sick and what we can do so that we can all be healthier, happier, think more clearly, just have more productive lives because we are not being harmed by toxic chemicals.

Today we’re going to be talking about indoor air quality. My guest is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s a founder of Wellness within Your Walls. She specializes in addressing the tight box syndrome.

Now, I haven’t talked about this in a long time, this idea. I remember when I first started doing this work that there was a time when our walls, the walls of our houses were built to be leaky (I guess is a good word). They weren’t built tight, and so there was air-exchange between the outside and the inside.

And then, back in the 70s we had the energy crisis. And so suddenly, it became an issue to save energy on home heating.

Everybody started coughing and closing up those little spaces.

And so, what happened was, suddenly, all those toxic things that were in our homes which had been leaking out suddenly became an issue. We came up with the phrase “indoor air pollution” at that point.

So, Jillian is an interior designer. I want to make sure I get that right. She’ll correct me if I was wrong because there is an interior decorator and an interior designer. They’re two different things. She is specializing in looking at what is outgassing from home interior products. So now that we’re in this tight box of the way our buildings are now, they’re building up, and how can we reduce the amount of out gassing, how can we be aware about gassing, how can we choose products don’t outgas.

She does some other things too, but that’s the one that’s of most interest to me on this show today. But we’ll talk about lots of other things that have to do with them, with decorating as well.

Hi Jillian!

JILLIAN COOKE: Good morning, Debra! How are you?

DEBRA: I’m very good. How are you?

JILLIAN COOKE: Very good, thank you.

DEBRA: First, I want to say I love Wellness within Your Walls. I love that as a name. I just immediately gravitated to that when I saw it.

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, we took some time to really think through when we were naming our standard. And it really says it all. So…

DEBRA: It does, it really does.

JILLIAN COOKE: I’m thrilled that you liked it.

DEBRA: Thank you! So, tell us, how did you get interested in this subject?

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, for me it was very organic. I was involved in sustainability. I really didn’t have a firm understanding of “wellness within your walls” as it relates to everybody’s homes.

But the organic nature of this, I was very involved with sustainability in the last 20 years. And about 10 years ago—a little less than 10 years ago—I was invited to participate in the first LEED-certified home in the United States.

We have been around for a while as a commercial program, a commercial certification. And a real dear friend of mine, Laura Turner Seydel, and her husband Rutherford Seydel, decided that they wanted to participate not only in this program, but have their home be somewhat of a show house to the public in different organizations to help educate on sustainability.

And the three of us approached it from three different directions. But my direction initially was to find a sustainability with Laura, and her husband Rutherford approached it from the standpoint of energy efficiency.

And while I was involved in the project, unfortunately, I was diagnosed with a very rare form of cancer. And I realized that as I shared that with Laura, she would do what friends do. She would’ve said, “Oh, you need not to be involved in this. Step back and take care of yourself.” So, I chose not to tell her and I stayed involved. My entire focus on the entire project shifted from sustainability and energy efficiency to health.

My first question when I was diagnosed with the cancer was, “Where did it come from?” And as an interior designer, I have been involved in projects for, at that time, over 25 years. I was required by my contract to be on a site during times when they were most toxic. I really did not pay much attention to that.

So, knowing the toxins I was exposed to and the type of rare cancer that I had, it became very much a mission to figure out how we could reduce the toxins in that first LEED-certified house.

And LEED does a great job especially on the gold and platinum levels. But most programs about there at that time didn’t really pay much attention to the wellness side of it. There was education placed about what lead was doing as it related to paint in old homes, and we have really addressed the asbestos problem. But there were so many other problems that have not yet been revealed.

But with the right kind of research and working with the many different groups in the United States that have become part of this wellness movement, Wellness Within Your Walls was established more as a partner to other entities in the industry with the main focus being on wellness.

So, the genesis, if you will, for the Wellness within Your Walls standard really came from that one particular project. So, my cancer was—as crazy as it sounds—a blessing in disguise.

DEBRA: Well, I always say that too. I didn’t have cancer, but I started doing my work because I became extremely chemically sensitive. People didn’t even know what that was back in 1978. It’s a difficult thing.

A lot of people have a very difficult time with it. And it certainly defined my life since then, but in a very good way that it led me to, as with you, to be able to see that there are things that are dangerous and toxic in the world and that we can do something about it once we become aware that they are there and that they are affecting us and that we have alternatives.

So we have a similar path.

Could you, just for a second, explain for our listeners how sustainability—I’m very familiar with sustainability too. It’s a bigger picture, but it doesn’t always contain being concerned about health because other issues are—go ahead and tell us your experience with that.

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, the word sustainability is a fantastic word. And it is overused. But most of the words that are attached to the green building movement or the wellness movement are overused. And in many cases, there is the conversation of greenwash (which I know you’ve featured from time to time on your radio show).

But sustainability as it relates to health, unfortunately, you can be very sustainable in regards to how you harvest wood for manufacturing of homes and furniture. But if you don’t finish the process with paints and stains that are no VOC or low VOC using a positive gassing-off method, then really the conversation of sustainability is just a one-sided conversation.

It’s just that. You’ve done right by the trees, and you’ve done right by Mother Nature to a certain degree. If you don’t carry all the way through—as a cradle to cradle refers to it—like a life cycle, then really, you’re mitigating the good work you started by finishing the product with something that is actually, in the end of the day, maybe not as harmful to the atmosphere because of the gassing-off and the time it takes. It is harmful in many respective or in many, many months or years. But to the human body, it’s instant exposure to those chemicals on a sustainable piece can start the change of your cells going from a healthy cell to a pre-cancer cell, for example, to finally a cancer cell.

So, this conversation of sustainability, it needs to be had at the same time as the conversation of wellness and health and off-gassing and vapors and fumes and chemicals, harmful chemicals.

DEBRA: I totally agree. We need to go to break. And I just want to say that, for me, having studied sustainability and applied a lot of it, I came back to focus on toxics because I think that’s the first step to sustainability. And we can talk about that more too.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s the founder of Wellness within Your Walls. She’s at WellnesswithinYourWalls.com.

Jillian, before we go on, I just want to say again what I said before the break about toxicity being non-toxic. Addressing toxic issues is the first step to sustainability because I think that everything else that sustainability encompasses—energy efficiency, sustainable resource management, all those things—they’re all just as important.

But to me, I actually was including sustainability in my own standards for many years. And then, I decided I really needed to focus on toxics because so many people working on the field of sustainability don’t include that. They’re looking at the environmental effects, but not the human within the environment. I think that we’re all part of life, and that we need to be looking at all of that.

And every time we use toxic chemical, it goes into the environment as well. So, that’s where I start. And then, once things are not toxic, then it’s great for them to be sustainable in other ways as well.

JILLIAN COOKE: I thoroughly agree, I thoroughly agree. And I think that so much of this is a dialogue, and being able to make available to the consumer at large the concept that they do have choices.

They may not be seeing those choices everyday as it relates to labeling (which is a huge issue in the country), but if they could identify what the harmful chemicals are through different organizations throughout the United States, then they can be part of the dialogue and they can be part of the choice.

And at the end of the day, it’s tried and true that we really do vote with our pocket book, don’t we? If we start making these choices to stay away from products that are toxic and that can cause harm to every age group, and specifically the young—which is one of the age groups that just concerns me the most because they cannot speak for themselves. Their parents are being sold through marketing campaigns, all kinds of things that are not healthy for children that are, in many cases, under the age of even eight years of age, 15 years of age depending on what things brought into the home.

So, I think that the dialogue that goes along with what you’re saying about is more than sustainability. It is health. We have to be able to channel the information to the public at large so that they can not only make the right choices, but be part of the dialogue.

I used the farm to table example more often in our credit courses that we offer to ASIDNAIA. It’s pretty simple at the end of the day. When you look back 10 years ago on the farm to table concept, people were sort of getting it, sort of talking about it. And now, all of a sudden, it’s in mainstream America. They’re paying their hat on the fact that they are farm to table.

And I do think that that’s what the wellness movement is really starting to stir not just in this country but internationally.

Everybody’s got that concern of why is cancer on their lives, why is autism on their lives, and a number of other known diseases. And more often than not, it does go back to the toxins.

And of course genetics comes into play. But the toxins more and more are becoming identified as being responsible for so much of what medical industry is dealing with.

DEBRA: Yes, that is absolutely true. That’s been my experience as well.

So, you’ve mentioned that you have a standard for Wellness within Your Walls. Tell us about that.

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, actually, it’s pretty simple. There are seven folks that are part of the Wellness within Your Walls team. And we really kept coming back to the concept that certification can be complicated. And often, certification can be not real. Folks can come up with just about any kind of certification based on any set of criteria.

So, we wanted to make it simple and useable. The three categories we identified was natural, sustainable and responsible.

Not all natural is good. Formaldehyde is a natural product and chemical. It’s good in certain cases—our bodies produce formaldehyde—but it’s bad in certain cases when it’s used in adhesives and in many building products when it gets to a certain level.

So, our program defines the word natural and the good that’s from natural. Water is a chemical, and it’s natural. It’s a good thing especially if it’s purified. Air is natural, and it’s a good thing. But radon is natural, and it’s not a good thing. Same thing can be said for lead and asbestos and a number of other products that are out there.

We wanted to make sure that when we created that part of the category, that dialogue was going to exist, so that we can identify that many years ago, people did not know lead was bad for you. Now, lead is not in paint. So, let’s take that concept and look at all the things that are out there that might be natural that are not good for you. And let’s have the conversation.

Let’s have the dialogue. Let’s lead our way through the information and make the column to the left what is not good for you versus what is good for you that’s natural instead of just looking at the word natural on packaging and assuming that “it’s natural, it’s good for you.”

Sustainability is not all—recycling and reusing is a fantastic concept, but not all that you recycle is good. If it was bad the first time, why on earth would we recycle it the second time? So, that’s the sustainable category. It speaks to responsibly taking plant life as in trees or bamboo, not clear-cutting and having an understanding of what the outcome is when you clear cut as far as just bamboo.

Bamboo is the latest, greatest product that’s being pushed in the furniture industry, and also in the textile industry. And if it’s done responsibly through plantation growth, then I’m all for bamboo. But if you’re going to clear cut a forest and take the animals away from their habitat, then that’s not exactly sustainable. It’s not a sustainable product. It becomes a non-sustainable product if that happens.

And then the category that I like the most, that I had the hardest time wrapping my hands around is the responsible category.

DEBRA: Okay, we need to take a break. We need to go to break, so when we come back, we’ll talk about that. I know you want to talk about that, and I want to talk about that too.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s the founder of Wellness within Your Walls. Her website is WellnessWithinYourWalls.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s the founder of Wellness within Your Walls. She’s at WellnessWithinYourWalls.com.

Jillian, before the break, we were talking about your three categories. The third one is responsibility, controlling toxins responsibly through accountability. So, tell us about that.

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, that’s the one I had the most trouble with when we were creating it because, originally, we just didn’t wanted to discuss toxins. We were like ostriches with our head in the sand.

And then, I realized with the help of our fabulous group that that’s a huge mistake. Because we live in a toxic world, we no longer can say that there’s a place on this planet that’s not affected by toxins in some way. And then, the weather is a perfect conversation (though obvious, it’s a separate conversation).

So, we created this level of the standard, this category to say, “Okay, yes! There are toxins. You are going to encounter toxins all day every day. You could potentially be encountering toxins during the eight hours of sleep at night depending on what your mattress is made of.”

So, let’s have a really strong dialogue about what those toxins are and how you can mitigate them if they are in your life. A simple example of that is you might be ordering something off the internet, you open up the box when it arrives at your home, and you’re just overcome by some level of vapor that might have to do with the textile finishing process, it might have to do with the paint that was used, the steel that was used, the fire retardant that might be on them.

And so, what do you do at that point? Do you send it back? Do you seal it? Do you take it and put it in the garage for a certain number of days with windows open and off-gas it?

That became the real focus for our team as it relates to everyday living and the accountability all the way with the beginning of the food chain with the manufacturers to the end of the food chain with the consumer and the purchasing.

DEBRA: This is a really the interesting part of it for me that you’re doing because it’s a little different from my approach, and yet, I think is a complimentary one because as I’m always saying, “How can we find things that have no off0gassing, no toxic chemicals?” and yet, we are faced with—I get these questions all the time, “I bought this” or “I bought that” and “How do I get rid of the odor?”

And so, let’s just start our discussion of off-gassing by having you explain what it is.

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, off-gassing even can take place with natural products that do not involve man-made chemicals.

For example, I ordered for a client recently a mattress from a reputable mattress company that claims everything to be organic. I had that mattress show up into our warehouse, we unwrapped it and it smelled like a barnyard.

DEBRA: I get people write to me and they say, “Oh, I bought this organic thing and it has an odor to it.” And it’s not necessarily a toxic odor, but it’s something—like, example, for myself, I can’t use anything that’s made out of latex. It could be a 100% natural organic latex and I can’t tolerate the odor. Even though it’s not toxic, I just can’t tolerate the odor of latex.

So I can understand that. I have no problem buying organic cotton which has a little stronger smell than non-organic cotton that has been processed more. But some people don’t like that, so they don’t want it. And so go ahead.

JILLIAN COOKE: So, we’re just so much a part of the dialogue. That’s why when you identify the category of natural within the standard, it feeds in the category of sustainable, which feeds into the category responsible.

So, even responsibility isn’t necessarily always related to harmful toxins, the conversation responsibility is related to the big picture as we see it—not just natural, but also those products that are man-made.

We’d be really kidding ourselves if we thought that we could live without man-made materials that involve toxins. At this moment, I do not know of an adhesive that is in certain sealants that have to withstand certain levels of traffic and maintenance specifically in institutions like hospitals and schools unless you use these toxins.

And the reason is because there hasn’t been something produced to date—not that the scientist aren’t working on it.

Recently, we’ve been involved in a summit put on by UL Industries. I was fascinated by the direction that the green sciences they’re going in. And not until recently, they didn’t even offer green science in colleges. Now, it’s become a new department—and thankfully so. That, in itself, is going to help us deal with the accountability as it relates to being responsible through the manufacturing process.

So, it would be great to say that we could all just suck the rubber out of the tree and that would glue everything together, the natural gassing off or the natural rubber is a lot less than a lot of the adhesives that are coming out of the chemical industry.

But there lies in the middle probably something that hasn’t been created yet.

The paint industry, they just really took the bull by the horn. Seven years ago, eight years ago we worked on Echo Manor.

We used no VOCs and low VOCs mainly because of the maintenance. And three years later, Benjamin Moore jumped on board with “We’ve got to get these VOCs out.” And then, right next to them, big names like Sherwin Williams. You can now go to some of the biggest building shows in America and you can find no VOC products. There’s another company, Imperial Paint, that’s found a way to have it be the best it can be for hospitals and for institutions like schools that are no VOC.

So, the good news in this—and why I now find the responsible category to be probably my most favorite category—is the onus is being put back on the manufacturer. It’s being put back on the retailers, those that are bringing it into their homes, the consumer, the end-user. They’re all having a dialogue. And that happened because the green sciences got together with the manufacturers and said, “Hey, we got to figure this out!” And they are.

DEBRA: And they are. I see that. I do see that that’s going on in the world today, that we have many more possibilities than we’ve ever had before and that’s the direction we’re going.

We need to go to a break, but we’ll be right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s founder of Wellness within Your Walls at WellnessWithinYourWalls.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jillian Pritchard Cooke. She’s founder of Wellness within Your Walls. You can visit her website at WellnessWithinYourWalls.com.

So Jillian, now given that we have these products—and in in particular, you’re addressing interior home products—given that we have these products that are out gassing, what can we do about it, about the out-gassing?

JILLIAN COOKE: Well, really, that is what we need to do, understand the time that each of these chemicals need to off-gas.

And it’s extremely complicated because you can have more than one chemical off-gassing at a time. One harmful chemical might take 10 days, and another harmful chemical might take two years. So, when we talk about off-gassing, it’s not that simple.

So the best thing to do—we’re working on putting together a guide to help maneuver through the minefield of harmful chemicals and exactly what the timing is. But the best thing to do is anything that you bring into your environment, you just make sure that you can trust your nose often. You just need to get it into a space that is very well ventilated and that children aren’t around, and animals aren’t around, and let it off-gas.

Mattresses are a perfect example. There are number of mattress companies out there that promotes the best night’s sleep ever, but there’s a reason for that. When your body hits this mattress with these foams, they mold themselves to your body.

And as you move, they remold themselves to your body. Well, it takes a lot of technology and a lot of man-made chemicals to make that process happen during your eight hours of sleep.

So, I would say you start with make the choices not to bring those products into your home. But if you have, then—a return mattress policy is non-existent unless it’s defective in some way. The laws are such that you own that mattress. So, really, you’re not bringing it into the home.

But that really relates back to pesticides on your lawn, right? You don’t really want your children playing on pesticides and bringing them into your carpets or your animals bringing them in and then spider-jumping into your two-year old’s bed. Your 2 year old’s petting the dog, and the pesticides are getting everywhere. The whole idea of off-gassing directly links back to the dialogue, and it directly links back to the choices.

So, my preference is that you would not have to off-gas. But if there are chemicals written in, you can ask for a safety data sheet. Most folks don’t realize you can go anywhere in the United States to a retailer and you can ask the question, “What is this made of?” And you can request the safety data sheet. But no one totes that or promotes that.

DEBRA: I do, I do.

JILLIAN COOKE: The average individual, Debra. You’re not average.

DEBRA: I know, but I’ve been telling people in my books for years to look for the material safety data sheet. And on my website, when people ask me questions, I often are quoting the material safety data sheet.

So they are available. Yes, I agree with you. And people should look at them. But they don’t always tell 100% of what’s there.

The reason I use material safety data sheets if you see a toxic chemical on it, then you know it’s there. What it doesn’t do is guarantee that there are no toxic chemicals in it because not all the toxic chemicals are on the lists of what needs to be recorded.

JILLIAN COOKE: No, they’re not. They’re not. And they can rewrite the names of them just on a whim. You take a little of this chemical, a little of that chemical and put it together. You might think that you’ve gotten to the end of finding out what this harmful chemical is going to do. And then all of a sudden, it pops up in a new name and a new entity.

It’s very, very difficult to stay ahead of the curve. It’s not unlike the pharmaceutical industry in that way. But that’s how they make their money. We are very much in a capitalist society, so really, they’re not breaking any laws as they are at this time.

You have to be ahead of the game and making the decision to first go with the non-toxic approach. Wherever possible, make that non-toxic decision.

If you cross that line, that’s when the off-gassing comes in, that’s when you reduce the living in a tight box. Find ways to really ventilate your home. Stay on top of what is coming out of industries like the HVAC, the air and heating industry. They are making tremendous steps to the right direction. They see it as being a big issue with closing these houses up.

DEBRA: So, I would just add in there that if you have some kind of product that is giving off some vapors, one thing that you could do is, as Jillian said, you could put it in the garage or someplace where it has time for those vapors to emit and dissipate before you bring it in the house.

The other thing you can do is seal it in some way. There are some sealants that do—you could put a sealant for formaldehyde on particle board and it will seal in the formaldehyde and it won’t out gas.

I also want to give a suggestion. If you just look up—type into your favorite search engine “NASA out-gassing”, N.A.S.A., National Aeronautics Space Administration, N.A.S.A. If you type in N.A.S.A. out gassing, you’ll get a lot of links to various sites that talk about—it’s the N.A.S.A. data for how materials out-gas.

And the reason that N.A.S.A has done this is because they are concerned about toxic chemicals in space ships. And so, whatever they put inside the spaceship, they need to know what the out-gassing data is.

And so you can look up on these sites and see what N.A.S.A. has to say about how long it takes for a material to out gas.

It’s very fascinating reading if this is something—

I mean, I often am not concerned about this because I’m buying things that don’t out gas and I know that they don’t out gas because I’ve done a research. But if there’s any question about whether or not some chemical that you know of out-gasses, you can look it up on the N.A.S.A. site and you’ll find out all about the out gassing.

JILLIAN COOKE: That’s a wonderful resource.

DEBRA: Yeah, it is. It is. They’ve been researching it as long as I’ve been writing for many years. I think they started doing it when they first started making rockets—when I was seven years old or something like that.

JILLIAN COOKE: Another option is if you’re moving into a new home, take a warehouse and have all your furniture go to a warehouse first—with carpeting as well. I think that some of the big carpet industry folks up in Dalton, Georgia are jumping on the bandwagon where they are making available for large project spaces where they can have the carpet rolled out.

That’s a big culprit. I’m all for where you are, hardwood everywhere. But unfortunately, especially in a commercial world with tenant finish, that’s not a first choice.

So, I think we’re going to see more of those types of businesses pop up where you can have off-gassing take place in a controlled environment.

DEBRA: I think that sounds like a great idea. I would prefer—and I know, I think that we’re moving in a direction, particularly with green chemistry, where we’re going to be reducing the amount of toxic chemicals at the source more and more and more. That’s going to become the standard. I can really see that happening. And particularly, the amount of products that are available now versus when I started 30 years ago is amazing. We’re really going in a direction.

And I think that we will get to a point where we won’t have to be concerned about this.

But something like a paint or finish, it has these chemicals in it so that you can spread the finish on and then it evaporates off. And then you have a finish that you just have the particle part, not the vapor part. And so that can be not very toxic at all.

After paint has dried, after paint has cured, it’s not a toxic exposure. It’s the stuff that makes paint liquid that is the VOC.

The key thing here is if that’s the way the product works, you need to have that out-gassing time. And often, what happens is that you’ll buy a piece of furniture or something where the off-gassing time has not occurred. And that’s why it’s toxic to the user.

So, not only do we need to be looking at how can we use less toxic materials, but also, if there is out-gassing involved, to make sure the manufacturer puts in that time or there’s some interim place to put the item, so that by the time it ends up to the consumer, it isn’t toxic.

JILLIAN COOKE: Yeah, it could be as simple as a labeling that has the word “cured” with the date on it. Just like labeling on our products that are in our refrigerator, things that we eat, we know when our milk should be no longer good to drink, it should be the reverse concept when it was cured on this date, manufactured on this date, cured on this date. And that alone will start a dialogue, “Oh, if you wait a few extra months, you get better curing.”

DEBRA: I love that, I love that. I hope that people will start doing that and that consumers will start asking about that.

Particularly with furniture, you don’t know how old the piece of furniture is, so you don’t know how long it’s been curing.

JILLIAN COOKE: And I think it’s folks like the Sustainable Furnishing Council (which is a great group) and NAHD who represents all of the building entities in the United States, I think if they could adopt something as simple as that along with their data sheet, I think we’d be in a much better place as it relates to toxins and in the environment.

DEBRA: I think so too. I think so too. Well, we only have 10 seconds left, so thank you Jillian so much. This has been very interesting. My guest is—oh, we got to go! She’s in Wellness within Your Walls. Be well.

JILLIAN COOKE: Thank you so much. Take care, Debra. Bye.

DEBRA: Bye.

Seeking huge pot for boiling water

Question from Beverly

I’m looking to buy a huge pot for cooking large batches of food, 21 quarts or even bigger. Ideally, I’d also like to be able to use it as a replacement for my water bath canner so that I don’t have to keep two giant pots around. I see lots of large cooking pots in the size I am looking for but they all seem to be either stainless steel or aluminum. I don’t see anything the size I need in cast iron or glass (which would be impossible to use anyway because of the weight). What would my best option be? I will be boiling water for huge amounts of pasta and cooking tomato-based products, among other things.

Debra’s Answer

chicken soup cooking

My best recommendation for a HUGE pot is the 10 quart Dutch Oven from Xtrema. I have one and it is enormous. Bigger than any pot I’ve ever had. Completely ceramic through and through. I love it.

The only other option you have really would be an enamel pot such as this one from Granite Waregranite-ware 21 qt

I have this exact pot too, in a smaller size. I don’t use it because when I make soup it burns. The metal is not very thick. So it would be fine to boil jars for canning, for example, but I don’t cook in it.

Add Comment

Why You Should Take Fish Oil and How To Choose the Right One for You

Pamela Seefeld,R.PhMy guest today is Pamela Seefeld,R.Ph, a pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances to heal the body, instead of drugs. We’ll be talking about different kinds of fish oils, their health benefits, and how to choose the right one for you. Pamela was my guest on 30 July (see Medicinal Plants Can Replace Toxic Drugs) and was so informative that I invited her to be a regular guest (she’s going to be on every other Wednesday). Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Why You Should Take Fish Oil and How to Choose the Right One For You

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph

Date of Broadcast: August 13, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free and in fact, how to do things that are helpful and regenerative for those of us (which includes everybody) whose bodies have been damaged by toxic chemical exposure.

Whether you know it or not, if you live in this world today, that’s what’s happening. And your body, if you have any kind of health problems, any kind of illness, it’s probably being contributed to by your toxic chemical exposure for everyday products that you’re using in your own home and just being exposed to toxic chemicals when we go out in the world. There are things that we can do about those things. That’s what we’ll talk about on this show.

Today is Wednesday, August 13th. I’m here in Clearwater, Florida and it looks like we’re going to have some rain. It’s a foggy August here and that’s great because it cools it down.

Today, we’re going to be talking about fish oil. Not my favorite subject because I don’t eat anything from the sea. I never have since I was a child. But I know that fish oils are extremely important in keeping your body healthy. And we’re going to talk about different kinds of fish oil. How you can choose the ones that are right for you (and maybe we’ll see if we can find a fish oil for me). But they are very important, so we’ll find out about that.

My guest is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacist who specializes in medicinal plants and other natural substances in order to heal the body instead of giving people drugs. I met her because she has a shop here in Clearwater, Florida where I live and she helps people get off of their prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs and even psychiatric drugs. She knows how all these natural substances that can work to heal your body.

I am so impressed with the amount of information she has and the clarity with which she understands all of those that we’ve actually scheduled her every other Wednesday for the rest of the year and probably beyond. So you’re going to hear a lot from Pamela and I think you’re going to learn a lot.

Hi Pamela.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey, great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. For those people who weren’t here the last show and don’t know your background, just tell us a little bit about how you got interested in and what your viewpoint is about what you do.

PAMELA SEEFELD: I studied pharmacognosy at the University of Florida and pharmacognosy is the study of plant medicine. It’s a little bit more than herbalism, which is the study of the pharmacological properties of plants.

I’m also a pharmacist as well. My background is also in homeopathic medicine. I studied that in England and in Germany. And here in the United States, I’ve done extensive speaking, talking, and attending conferences that were in relation to pretty much every subject I’m interested in, which is basically all human health – a lot of cardio-vascular disease, a lot of mental health. I specialize in mental health more than anything probably.

What I really do is look at the pharmacological background of all the different plants and of the natural and homeopathic products that we’re using and to determine what’s best for most people from a pharmacological standpoint. In regular pharmacy, we learn that “this drug is for this disease and that drug is for that disease” and everything is pigeonholed. Natural products don’t necessarily work that way. It’s very important to realize that these have multiple effects on the body and the chemistry behind it is what I’m very good at.

DEBRA: And I will say that she is very good. After the last show, I went right down and said, “Okay, what should I take?” and she gave me a bag full of them. And I liked all of them.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s great. I know what I’m doing. I’ve been doing this a long time. That’s wonderful.

DEBRA: She really does. She really knows what she’s doing. The way I found out about Pamela was from a friend of mine whose mother had Alzheimer’s I think and was taking a whole lot of prescription drugs. My friend went down and Pamela replaced those drugs with natural drugs and his mom is doing a lot better. So I looked at that and I said, “I need to talk to this woman.”

So let’s start by telling us why are fish oils important?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, so omega 3 fish oil are made up principally of EPA and DHA. That’s eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. You can see why they are shortened into acronyms. These particular products are in concentrations depending on how they process the fish.

The majority of the products that you see are going to be a 2:1 ratio of EPA to DHA. That’s how it normally comes from the fish. But the smaller a fish is, like a sardine for example, they have a shorter lifespan and they’re smaller. And so they have less time to concentrate toxins in the environment like mercury.

And that’s why tuna fish is really problematic because tuna is a very large fish and it has a longer time period to expose itself to things in the environment. And as a result, it can accumulate mercury and that’s why they’re always giving warnings that you don’t want to be eating too much tuna fish.

DEBRA: Oh.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, did you know that? It’s cool, huh? And it’s very interesting.

DEBRA: Yeah, I didn’t know about the sizes of fish since I don’t eat fish.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, the size and the lifespan of the fish matters. You have to think that it has a larger surface area and a greater chance to be able to concentrate. For us, it would be subcutaneous fat, the fat underneath the skin. That’s where things are stored.

When people look at tuna fish and giving it to small kids or to pregnant women, there are restrictions to how much they can eat. When you take in mercury, it doesn’t leave the body. And the bad part about mercury is that it has high acidity for the central nervous system, the brain. And we know that it’s directly related to cognitive impairment.

DEBRA: And so it’s not a good thing to be feeding children every day when they go to school.

PAMELA SEEFELD: They should not have that, no. Or I use homeopathic detox that can pull that out. You would want to use something to remove it if you’re going to be doing that. But really, in all honesty, young children should not be eating tuna fish. It doesn’t say that they shouldn’t be eating fatty fish. There are plenty of other fishes that are safer, but that would be the worst.

The safest thing to eat is probably sardines. And what they do when they go out and catch a school of sardines, they test them on the boat immediately. So the very high-quality oil, for the products that I use like OmegaBrite from Dr. Stoll (he’s a Harvard psychiatrist and I can talk a little more about that later with the mental health), these particular products that are very, very good, they buy these sardines that, they test that. They’re very pure and they buy them off the ship literally. That goes for the better, higher quality products. The lower grade oil, the less expensive brands, the mail order stuff, Costco, that kind of stuff, you know what I’m saying, not that they’re bad, but those lesser quality oils, those go for the cheaper products. So that makes sense.

So the more expensive products, the medical-grade products, they take the better quality oil because they don’t want the contaminants. And actually, when they go and purify them, they use what is called fractional distillation, which is how they process petroleum. They use these column filtrations and different products are put off at different areas depending on how they go through these microbeads. It’s really very interesting.

DEBRA: That is interesting to me. I just want to emphasize what you just said because I understand what fractional distillation is from studying petrochemicals.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly!

DEBRA: So what it does is that – and correct me if I’m wrong – they heat it up, but then different things will evaporate at different temperatures.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct, and doing this separates out the components that we have –the fish protein, the components that have contaminants, things like that.

But what’s important to know is that the concentration of the EPA and the DHA has unique effects on the body and that’s leading up to mental health. It can turn on 300 different genes in the body and those are the ones they know about. It can be for cardiovascular disease, it can be for mental health, it works for children.

It’s a bunch of different topics we’re going to hit on today, but what I would say is that it’s important to realize that it’s all encompassing for all individuals. It can address a lot of different things in the body which are very important.

Luckily, fish oil doesn’t have one specific assignment. And it’s important to know that when you first start taking fish oil, the organs have very high affinity for fish oil – the heart, the lungs, the liver. They can actually radio-label these fish oils. And when they’re first given to somebody who hasn’t really taken supplementation in the past, we see that those areas light up the first.

So when you’re treating somebody for mental health, you really have to load the body with omega 3’s in the beginning because you have to realize that the first few weeks, these body organs are going to take the majority of it and the central nervous system will see very little of it.

DEBRA: Oh, I see. So, when you give people fish oil, or anything else, then certain parts of the body are going to take it first then other areas will…

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. That is important to know.

DEBRA: That is very important to know. We need to go to break. We’re going to find out more when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and I’m here with Pamela Seefeld, pharmacist and pharmacognocist – I don’t even know how to say that word.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Pamela dispenses good, natural substances. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a – okay, I’m going to get it now, “pharmacognosist.”

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes!

DEBRA: I was practicing during the break. The thing I really want to remember about this word (because I looked it up at the last show), the key part of it is, well, “pharma” means “drug,” but then “cog” is like the word, “cognitive” or “cognition” and it means “knowledge.” And so these are “drugs with knowledge.” They work differently from drugs that don’t have knowledge. They’re natural and they have all that good information that comes from nature that is in there because it’s a natural substance and it works with our bodies in a knowledgeable way, pharmacognosist.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct.

DEBRA: Now, I want to ask about something that you said. You talked about medical-grade supplements. So I just want you to tell us the difference between medical-grade and what people just buy from the drugstore.

PAMELA SEEFELD: All right. That’s a really good question. So, medical-grade oils, like I said, are going to be prepared from the sardines that are very small fishes, shorter lifespans, caught in very clean waters and they’re tested in the boat. Those particular products will go for the medical-grade oils. What I normally would recommend is, especially if you’re using it for mental health or for wellness, when you’re using products that are not medical-grade, there is a risk of having contaminants in there and also, the way the oils have been handled.

The higher grade oils are going to go for the better products. A lot of times, what we use, especially from a mental health standpoint because these people, technically, a lot of times already have issues with mercury, arsenic, lead, and pesticides, these things go freely in and out of the central nervous system and it affects people’s cognition, mood, and depression. And a lot of times, when you remove those things out with a homeopathic detox, you can normally correct some of that.

Especially if you’re doing this for mental health, but you’re also doing it for cardiovascular disease, you want to have a medical-grade oil. And some of the products that I use are from Nordic Naturals and they have a medical health line that’s different from the health food store line. That’s actually a higher grade product.

DEBRA: So can people buy medical-grade? I know my doctor gives me professional-grade vitamins and I have to get them from him. I can’t order from another professional. I can’t just go to the natural food store and pick these up.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, that’s a good question. The products that you’re going to have at the natural food store are not bad. I’m not saying that they’re bad. It’s just that they will not be specifically geared for your indication, what you’re trying to treat. And the quality of the oil might have some contaminants in it. That’s possible.

When people call me or they come here in person, I usually ask them, “Are you depressed? Do you have a lot of energy? Do you have a lot of stress? Do you have a lot of anxiety? Are you having trouble sleeping? Are you having trouble with work?” because most people inherently have something else going on in their lives.

A lot of times, people will read or watch a television show and it says, “take fish oil,” and they know they should take it. They’re going to grab a product and take it from the shelf. They’re going to ask the lady at the health food store and she’s going to say, “Oh, this is good,” but it’s inherent to look and important to see that the concentration that you use will affect the way your brain works. And that’s the beauty of it. You need to decide on the product.

For example, there’s a product I use quite a bit called OmegaBrite. OmegaBrite is from Dr. Andrew Stoll. He’s a Harvard psychiatrist. He did a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with Zoloft, which is a drug used for depression.

And in the trial, the fish oil product that he came up with had actually more anti-depressant effects than Zoloft. There are clinical trials with this. So I use that product a lot even for people who aren’t depressed, but also for people who need more energy, for people transitioning from a serotonin reuptake inhibitor like Paxil and Prozac and some of these drugs because the clinical data showed that you can actually come off the medicine with that product.

I’m not saying randomly take a fish oil. You want to take one that is specific to your particular need.

DEBRA: I know you have five different kinds of fish oils. You have multiple fish oils. And so I think that if someone probably wanted to take a fish oil, the smartest thing to do would be to have you help them choose which one it is.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is important, yes, because what they are going to choose from the store (it doesn’t mean that the product’s bad), you want to have something that is going to inherently enhance your life, right? So if you have a lot of stress, you want it to take the stress away. And normally for that, I use a DHA to EPA ratio of 4.5:1 and that was shown to be very effective for ADD, ADHD, scattered thinking, anxiety, and a lot of stress. It takes that off the brain.

And it’s really interesting too to note that EPA, when it goes into the brain, it has its own transport protein that moves it into the brain and that’s what causes this mood-elevating effect. But when they autopsy, they only find DHA in the brain. So these things actually interconvert. They’re thinking that it’s actually converting. That conversion process in the brain is why it’s causing that mood-elevating process.

There’s a lot of chemistry and science that backs up which product you need to use and I will be very grateful to talk to anybody that has a question about what oil they want to use to treat their mental health issue, whether they’re on medicines or not. They can call me at 727-442-4955 and I’ll be glad to tell them which concentration they use for which product.

DEBRA: Yeah, it really is one of the things that I think is so fascinating about what Pamela does. She really is approaching it as a pharmacist where it’s not just about taking something at random and not knowing how it affects the body. She knows how it affects the body, but also what goes with what condition.

It’s a very exact, precise thing. And that’s so different from just hearing advertisement that you should take fish oil or whatever that supplement might be and taking it on a random basis. When I had her choose my supplements, it was just right on.

We need to go to break. Actually, we have 15 seconds. Pamela, why don’t you give your phone number again.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yes, it’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: Okay, so now we’re going to go to break. It’s so tough to not ask a question before we have to come on to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld and she has so much to say. So when we come back, she’ll tell us more about fish oils. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacognosist who dispenses medicinal plants and other natural substances to heal the body instead of drugs. In fact, she helps them off drugs if they’re on drugs, and she’s really, really good at what she does. Okay Pamela, what else do you have to tell us about fish oils?

PAMELA SEEFELD: This is pretty good. In preparation for the show today, I went on the Library of Medicine, the National Library of Medicine, which is nih.gov. And the National Library of Medicine has all the articles all over the world about health. And these are studies that people conduct, clinical trials, and you can read about these different trials and what their results are.

I went and did a search, which is called a MedLine search. I went to see some of the newer articles, some of the newer studies that show some of the benefits of fish oils so we could have some timely and really interesting information to talk about today (besides all the other things we can discuss).

So a brand new study just came out last month and it’s talking about cardiovascular disease, omega 3 fatty acids, fish oils and what it does for the cardiovascular risk factors. And this is very interesting. We find that when people are taking fish oil, we know that their lipids go down. Fish oil will raise HDL, the good cholesterol, and lowers the triglycerides. In fact, fish oil, if you look historically at all the studies combined, fish oil will lower triglycerides 30% per month, which is a huge number.

In fact, I found one study that talked about patients that are on hemodialysis. These people are really highly at risk for cardiovascular disease and for heart attack. Taking the omega 3’s in a higher EPA to DHA ratio raised up their good cholesterol and lowered their triglycerides more significantly than medication. It’s very important to these people especially if they have any type of illness to be taking it.

But this is really interesting. We find that it lowers blood pressure, and also at the same time, it helps for people to lose weight. We’ve known for a long time that it’s anti-inflammatory and it has antioxidant effects as well. So these things work collectively all through the body to prevent heart disease. It’s very interesting that it’s so significant on multiple things.

Most people that have had heart attack risk factors, they’re going to have high blood pressure and high lipids. You think all go in together. Really, fish oil is all encompassing to take that down.

DEBRA: I want to ask you a question first. You’re telling me all these great things. I’m listening to this and I’m thinking, “I should be taking fish oils.” But I know for myself that I’ve tried to take them in past and also, I don’t eat any kind of seafood at all because my body just doesn’t like it.

I know some people who have difficulty swallowing the pill, and you have a trick for that. But also for people who are allergic to fish, are there other things that they can take that are comfortable? And why do things like walnuts have a lot of omega 3’s? Why would that not be as good as fish oil?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a very good question. Okay, so omega 3’s, when we take them in in fish oil, a medical-grade product does not have anaphylactic, which is the throat closing up, we need to go to the hospital, call EMF and that type of thing. They probably could take a fish oil product that’s medical-grade and I could assist them in that because the fish protein that people react to would have been removed, but the lesser-quality products, it would still be present. That’s right there. When you take omega 3…

DEBRA: That’s a huge, important thing to know. That’s a huge, important thing to know because I really thought that all fish oil would be the same.

PAMELA SEEFELD: No, and that’s probably the general consensus because we would think that the FDA’s regulating it, the products are all the same. But really, in reality, the medical-grade products will have gone through a much higher degree of scrutinization than the other products that you’re going to get, “buy two, get one free” that kind of stuff if you use mail order, things that come to your house.

Those products, like I said, are going to be the poor-quality fish and they’re not going to go through the extra processing because that’s going to cost money. I really respect people’s time and money. You know that being in here. This isn’t like a big markup kind of thing. I look up to see what is someone’s value and what works within their budget to get the best product. People that have real allergies to fish oil, they really need to check and talk to a pharmacist like myself that can tell them what to use.

But going back to what’s in food. When you take walnuts or flax seeds or these types of things that have omega 3, you’re still absorbing a lot of the omega 3, but you have fiber with it too. Deending on what you’re eating at the same time will depend on how much of a peak you get in the bloodstream.

So I’ll give you an example. If you take a fish oil capsule in the morning but you have it with an apple, and you don’t have any fat in the meal, your absorption peak in the bloodstream, which is what you want, is going to be pretty low.

So I tell people the trick, when you’re taking omega 3’s or any kind of medical-grade oil, you want to have a small amount of fat present at the time you consume the food. So it doesn’t have to be tons of oil or anything. It can be almonds along with the fish oil or something that has some fat.

I like to drizzle olive oil on a lot of things. That’s what I use. If you have the taste of fat in your mouth prior to taking the supplement, you get a much higher peak in the bloodstream and that’s really where the trick is. Otherwise, you’re not absorbing most of it.

DEBRA: That is so useful. If you didn’t say anything else on the show today, just knowing that one thing – because people are taking so many supplements and spending so much money on supplements, and to know that there are so many ways to take them that would make them more effective on the body, that is very, very important to know.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it is. And I think that from my background, being from pharmacology, what I do is really unique. There are million vitamin stores around the country, but not many people know about the chemistry behind food and behind supplements and how it can work in the body.

And that’s very important to know because when I prescribe a regimen for somebody and I say that you need certain doses put in your diet and certain products, it’s very important that they know that you should take this with this type of food or that type of food.

If you’re going to spend the money and take the time, you’re going to want a high peak in the bloodstream. You don’t want to have a low peak because you’re taking the supplements and they’re not going to be used for what you want them to be for.

Another interesting study I found (and I think you’ll find this pretty neat) is that when we combine fish oil – this I another study that was just published this year talking about intestinal inflammation. When we look at inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, we know that a lot of people have irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn’s Disease, all these different inflammatory diseases in the bowel.

What the studies found is that if you consume bioflavonoids like quercetin – you can get those in vegetables and fruits. Quercetin is very highly-concentrated in apple and in onion just to name a few. But quercetin is in three-quarters of our plants), if you combine the two together, they react to protein which is a measurement of inflammation that’s very dangerous, it comes down 75%, just combining the fish oil with the bioflavonoid.

So what does this mean for us and our diet?

DEBRA: But before you answer that, we need to go to break. We’re going to have a cliff hanger. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is pharmacognosist Pamela Seefeld and we’re talking about fish oils. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is pharmacognosist Pamela Seefeld. She helps people find healing plants and other natural substances to help heal their bodies instead of drugs. So, go on with what you were saying before the break.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, so we were talking about ways to improve absorption of different food with fish oil and about bioflavonoids along with fish oil. There are three bioflavonoids in herbal medicine: quercetin (which was originally found in onion); hesperidin (which was found around the pitty part around grapefruit); and we use rutin (which was originally found in buckwheat). So that’s where they were originally isolated from the plant.

It’s so important that when you’re taking fish oil as a product, we need to have real food in our diet as well as taking supplements. People that are just taking supplements and not looking at their nutrition at the same time are really missing a key concept and a part in fixing their illnesses in their body.

So the beauty of it is that we find that when combining the two – you can take quercetin in a pill too. I use homeopathic bioflavonoids as well. When you take those, they incorporate together in the body and they create a decrease in inflammation that is much more significant than fish oil by itself.

DEBRA: Wow, this is so fascinating to me that 1) nature does this and 2) that you understand all this because it all just makes sense to me.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Nature is really unique and it’s very special. People really underestimate the intelligence of plants and I say that very figuratively. The enzymes that are in the plants are the same enzymes that are in our liver that metabolize medicine and pesticides. The plants have the same P50 enzymes, which to me is just very amazing.

And what’s nice is that the bioflavonoids in plants are there to keep the vascular structure intact, so that the leaves are taunt and sitting up straight and they can have photosynthesis. But when we take those into our body, they do the same exact thing to our blood vessels…

DEBRA: Oh, I love this.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Isn’t it unbelievable?

DEBRA: No, it’s believable. It’s so right. I love how right it is that of course, there are these functions that happen throughout nature, that they need to happen in the plant, they need to happen in our bodies and you can put them together and they’ll perform the same function.

PAMELA SEEFELD: The same exact function and the same little assignment. They go to the same places in the body as they do in the plant and they come, repair, and heal us. Taking and picking the right supplements and the right concentration based on your level of stress, are you sleeping, especially for children. We really didn’t touch too much on kids. We can probably do a whole show just on children.

Children are so important not to be on medication. All these kids on all these medicines for attention deficit and hyperactivity, you can take omega 3’s and the DHA to EPA 4.5:1 and see a miraculous difference in the child’s behavior with no drug. And there are studies that can show this with a few simple supplements that’s very inexpensive.

We need to look at mental health as being the forefront of treatment, because if you’re not feeling well and things are not convalescing in society, you’re not doing well with all your things that you have going on, it’s really going to be hard to occupy yourself with creating something to get over other health issues.

DEBRA: Right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: So this is interesting. I wanted to say one more thing. There’s a study that just came out this month, August 1st and this was talking about osteoporosis and obesity. These are major problems that affect a lot of people going into middle age and going into their golden years, right?

We see all these women walking around and they’re all taking calcium and D and they’re having lots of trouble with their spine. My grandmother used to call it “settling”, when the spinal cord starts to settle and they lose height.

Well, the new studies show that taking fish oil – this was just published – affects the skeletal response. What they’re saying here is that when you take fish oil, it’s associated with increase in bone density and a weight loss as well. It also seems to be particularly helpful in the spine.

This is where you see a lot of people hunched over and their posture’s not good anymore, they’re having trouble with compression, which is called “stenosis” where you have narrowing of the spine. The fish oil, believe it or not, actually helps build bone density. This is pretty new information. This was just published.

There are other reasons. Everyone’s taking all this calcium. Calcium’s not the problem. The problem is that the calcium is not staying in the bone. That’s what the real problem is. And it looks like fish oil works on the receptor called the peroxisome proliferator and it looks like it works on PPAR, which is really interesting. People are looking for other ways to build bone density other than just taking calcium and D.

DEBRA: Wow. Wow.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Isn’t that neat? This was literally just published.

DEBRA: Yeah, it is so neat. I think that you have such a different way of looking at things than the standard medical way of looking at things. I understand what you’re talking about because many years ago, I discovered for myself that if I want to heal something, look to nature. In nature, there is a regenerative factor that isn’t in things that are man-made in a factory or in a laboratory. And I think we’re just going to keep finding that the answers to everything that we see as a problem is all going to be found in nature.

And so I’m not surprised to hear about all these studies and it just delights me because we should be healthy. Our natural state should be health. And so the fact that plants and fish oils and all these things can help us restore ourselves, I just think is wonderful.

I wanted to just ask you one more thing. Let’s come back to the medical-grade. I asked my doctor once about professional-grade supplements and he said to me that one of the differences between medical-grade and the stuff that you buy from the natural food store or the drugstore, is that they’re really designed to be more dose-specific, so that somebody like you or somebody else who is a health professional could look at it as giving something as therapeutic, rather than simply giving somebody vitamin C or giving vitamin C for a purpose. Did I get that right?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right. That was very well-spoken. What we’re seeing is that a lot of people will read an article or see something on TV or know that they’re supposed to be taking supplements of fish oil perhaps and they go take something off the shelf and they ask somebody at the health food store, “Is this good or bad?”

But most people, especially when you’re looking at what’s encompassing the whole family, you are going to need to take something that is going to be specific for your needs. And mental health is the first and foremost like if you have mild depression and you just think it’s an astoundingly hard day, “I can’t believe I have to go through this again,” or if you have a lot of stress, stress at work or stress at family.

It’s important that if you’re going to take omega 3, then you need to take one that will be absorbed, that you will know exactly what food you need to consume with it to get the highest peak in the bloodstream, and something that has a high affinity with the brain.

Actually, I even use homeopathy, believe or not, I use it. There are circulation enhancers to bring it to a higher concentration in the brain. It’s for when I have people that really want to get a fast result.

DEBRA: Wow, I love this.

PAMELA SEEFELD: It works really good. “We don’t have all day, we’re going to get this done this week. We’re going to front-low. We’re going to try to push it into the brain at a higher rate.” That’s the beauty of using the natural products along with homeopathy. It works fantastically.

DEBRA: Okay, so we have two minutes left. And this is my last question. There are all these different kinds of fish that are used in fish oil, like anchovies, sardines, krill, and all these things. Can you just tell us what they are and something about them?

PAMELA SEEFELD: The anchovies are en even smaller fish than the sardine, so their quality of oil is very good as well. What we find is that when we’re talking about the different qualities of oil, when they catch a school of fish and there are these anchovies, sardines, salmon, they test it and the higher quality oils are going to the companies that sell medical-grade. They buy that immediately. They pay top-dollar for that.

The others go to more junkie stuff, things that are more mass market and not sold to professionals. They’re just at regular health food stores or places like that, chains. And it’s interesting that the sardines, the bottom level go to the grocery store. So it doesn’t mean that it’s bad, but you’re getting the ones that the other companies didn’t want.

The krill oil is better because it has more free form fatty acids than fish oil does. But in my opinion, and I looked at this quite a bit because I revisit it all the time, I don’t think necessarily that the krill is better over the fish oil. And the reason that I say this is that it’s not necessarily the amount of free fatty acids that are in there. What determines how something is going to work in your body is what you’re consuming with it at the same time to get the right peak.

Remember how I was talking about how your body releases biomasses and as a result, you get a peak in the bloodstream? I think a lot of people are taking these different types of oils and they’re getting what is called a sub-therapeutic response, “Fish oil didn’t work for me.” Well, were you taking the right product that fits what you’re eating, and are you looking to trying to get the highest peak in the bloodstream? There are little tricks to do that and I think a lot of people, the reason why…

DEBRA: I need to interrupt you because the end of the show music is about to come in in 10 seconds. I want to tell you that her website is Botanical Resource. Give your phone number again and then we’re going to be saying good bye.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh my gosh! Yes, it’s 727-442-4955.

DEBRA: And you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and find out more about the show. Be well!

Preventing and Healing Cancer with Natural Care and Detox

Dr-Douglas-Levine.gifMy guest today is Douglas R. Levine, DC, founding Executive Director of “Life After Cancer Network” a non-profit cancer survivor’s organization dedicated to the natural restoration of health to people who have had cancer, their families and caregivers. I invited him to be a guest after receiving an email promo from him for a new free mobile app to help people get and stay healthy and cancer free for people who are interested in cancer prevention, hair testing, detox, and overall health. He wrote, ” I was shocked to see what my own hair results yielded last year…TOXIC! I reached out to a Life After Cancer Network provider and he showed me how to detox naturally.” So we’ll be talking about how to survive cancer, and prevent having it in the first place. Dr. Levine is a licensed Chiropractic Physician in New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts. He has been in private practice in Bergenfield, New Jersey since 1983. He holds a Bachelors of Arts Degree in Natural Science/Mathematics from Answer to Cancer – A guide to living cancer-freeThomas Edison State College in Trenton, NJ. He also received his Master’s Degree in Human Nutrition from the University Of Bridgeport, Connecticut. He received his Doctor of Chiropractic from New York College, Old Brookville, New York. Dr. Levine has written the best selling book ‘Answer to Cancer – A guide to living cancer-free’, sold worldwide to educate and create public awareness about the importance of natural strategies for lowering a person’s risk of getting cancer as well as preventing it all together. www.lifeaftercancernetwork.org

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Preventing and Healing Cancer with Natural Care and Detox

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Douglas R. Levine, DC

Date of Broadcast: August 12, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to survive in a toxic world and live toxic free. It’s Tuesday August 12th, 2014 here in Clearwater, Florida. We might have a little rain here in. Here in Clearwater, August is known as foggy August because this is our big rain month. But what it does, it’s a cool spring process. Nature’s air-conditioning and it’s great.

So today, we’re going to talk about cancer, some toxic chemicals and detox, and how we can prevent cancer by paying attention to the toxic chemicals that cause cancer.

My guest is Dr. Douglas R. Levine, D.C. and he is the Founding Executive Director of Life After Cancer Network. It’s a nonprofit cancer survivor’s organization dedicated to the natural restoration of health—so people who have had cancer, their families and caregivers. So they also address people not getting cancer in the first place.

I invited him to be a guest after I received an email promo from him about a new free mobile app that they have to help people get and stay healthy and cancer-free. And in that promo, he said that he was shocked—he did the hair testing. And then he said that he was “shocked to see what my own hair results yielded—toxic. I reached out to a Life After Cancer Network provider, and he showed me how to detox naturally.”

So I thought, “Here’s a man after my own heart.” He’s looking at the causes of cancer being related to toxic chemical exposure, so of course I had to have him on the show.

Welcome, Dr. Levine.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Hey.

DEBRA: Hi. Are you there? Can you hear me?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yeah, I’m here. Yup.

DEBRA: Oh, I thought—now, I’ve got you. How are you today?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: I’m well, thank you.

DEBRA: Good. So, tell us how you got interested—obviously, you’re a doctor of chiropractic.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yes.

DEBRA: So how did you get interested specifically in helping people with cancer and how did you find that—I mean, usually the track is not, “Let’s look at carcinogens and natural health.” Usually, the track is something like using toxic chemicals in order to try to kill the cancer.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yes.

DEBRA: So, how did you get into doing what you’re doing?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Okay. That’s a good question. It started from my own personal experience of having cancer. I’m a cancer survivor. At the age of 19, I was in college and I noticed that my body was going through some changes. I started to suffer from night sweats, severe headaches, rapid weight loss. I couldn’t sleep at night. It got to the point where I lost about 30 pounds in two weeks. I knew something was wrong.

And then I realized one day, I woke up and I had a baseball-sized growth over my clavicle which is right near the shoulder.

So, I went to Columbia Presbyterian. They did some biopsies and they diagnosed me with having Hodgkin’s disease. So here I am, a 19-year-old with Hodgkin’s disease, feeling very confused, shocked. I decided to go through the standard treatment which was surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

What I realized from my experience is that I lost a tremendous amount of weight, my treatment ended, and I didn’t know what to do after that like many survivors back then and even now. What I did was I started to do some research on my own. I start to research things like toxic exposure, eating healthy, things that I really wasn’t aware of.

I eventually got some very good health advice from a local chiropractic physician down the block from me to the point where I became a chiropractic physician.

That translated into wanting to help people naturally. I then wrote a best-selling book called After the Cancer on cancer survivorship, prevention. And as expected, I knew that book would sell a lot of copies because there are people eager out there trying to figure out what they can do to prevent recurrence and prevent cancer altogether.

So, I basically belonged to a club that I never really had any intention of joining. And as a result, I had become a member with the 13.7 million cancer survivors that are alive today in the United States.

DEBRA: Well, I think that probably everybody knows somebody with cancer who had either not survived or survived.

And I can say that in my own life, my first experience with cancer was with my mother—no, actually my grandmother. Both my grandmothers died of cancer. My mother died of cancer at age 51. DEBRA: My best friend is a cancer survivor. I have another good friend who is just recovering from breast cancer. I knew another woman who was in an organization that I belonged to and she died of breast cancer. It’s just like it’s all around.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It’s an epidemic and the numbers—I do talks all over the country to physicians and to the general public.

And when they are brought to the statistics that you do not see in magazines, newspapers, or radio, they were amazed to see that 1.6 million people this year got cancer. That’s just this year. And by 2020, those numbers are going to jump to 2.2 million people a year.

There’s not going to be enough cancer centers or oncologists to treat all the people. This epidemic is continuing to increase.

So, it’s becoming a huge problem. No one’s really talking about it. No one’s actually trying to deal with issues or preventions, reducing risk factors, all these things that are affecting people’s health.

So, [pledge] practicing is actually my cause to help people because the federal government is not getting involved. No one is getting involved. Someone’s got to get involved, and that’s me.

DEBRA: Well, I’m glad that you’re here and I’m glad you’re doing what you’re doing because it’s been very clear to me for more than 30 years that there are chemicals, very specific chemicals called carcinogens (those are the chemicals that are known to cause cancer. We all know that cigarette smoking causes cancer, that’s pretty widely known), but there are all kinds of carcinogens that are in all kinds of products that we’re using every day that we’re not even aware of.

And so, for me, it’s really important to know where those toxic chemicals are and to reduce our exposures to them and I think that by doing—not that that’s the 100% solution. But by doing that, it greatly reduces our risk of getting cancer.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yeah, I absolutely agree with you. For your listeners, there are different ways you can get cancer. I’m going to break it down as simply as possible.

Cancer is basically a disease where cells lose their intelligence. They go out of control, and they start to embed themselves in normal tissue and literally take over the body.

A risk factor is anything that increases a person’s chance of getting a disease. Now, risk factors can be what’s called modifiable or non-modifiable. A non-modifiable risk factor is something that we cannot change. For example, as we age and more cells keep dividing, just the mere fact of getting cancer as we get older, that risk factor goes up because we’re just getting older.

The median age of getting cancer is 66, if you’re born a man or a woman. If you’re born a woman, you have a hundred times greater chance of getting breast cancer than if you are a man. So yes, men do get breast cancer.

Another non-modifiable risk factor is if you’re born Caucasian or if you’re African American. If you’re an African American male, you have a greater risk factor of getting prostate cancer than if you are a Caucasian male. The other side of it is that Caucasian women have a greater chance of getting breast cancer than Asian, African American, or Hispanic women.

DEBRA: So that has a lot to do with it. I need to interrupt you about for a second because we need to go to the break. But when we come back…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Sure.

DEBRA: …we’ll talk more about this.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: You bet.

DEBRA: And I also want you to tell us specifically about the carcinogenic chemicals that people are people exposed to everyday.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Douglas R. Levine, Doctor of Chiropractic and Executive Director of Life After Cancer Network. His website is LifeAfterCancerNetwork.org. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Douglas R. Levine, D.C. Founding Executive Director of Life After Cancer Network and author of Answer to Cancer. And you can find that book on Amazon. If you to go ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and read the description of this show, you can link right through and get his—what is it, 459 pages?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It’s four hundred—and actually, I had to shave it a little bit. I’ll have to say it with a volume two I think.

DEBRA: So you were telling us about the risk factors…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Modifiable and non-modifiable, right. Modifiable.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: So those non-modifiable risk factors are things that we can’t change. What we do have control over are things that are modifiable.

A modifiable risk factor is, basically, if you’re a smoker, you need to stop smoking because it causes cancer. If you are above your normal BMI or body mass index, that is a risk factor for getting cancer or for recurrence. And then we have things like environmental pollutants, alcohol, prescription drugs, food additives, contaminants. All those things are risk factors.

So those are things that people need to take a closer look at, understand that being exposed to these things daily, weekly, monthly, yearly puts you at risk of getting things like breast cancer, colon cancer, leukemia, all these different things. So people need to be aware of this.

DEBRA: I think one of the things that has changed the most in the way I view things having—I got interested in this subject because I became very sick from toxic chemical exposure. It was an immune system problem, not cancer. But the thing that I realized is that we tend to think that this is the way life is, that what you see on TV and how we all live. That’s the normal life and then it’s normal to get cancer. People get cancer and people get heart disease, and this is the way it is. But it isn’t that way.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It isn’t that way. It isn’t that way.

DEBRA: It isn’t that way. It’s not normal.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It is not normal.

DEBRA: It’s not normal that you should go through life, and then when you’re 55 or 65 or whatever, then you’re going to get sick and you’re going to go in a rest home, and you’re going to have a big hospital bill, and that’s what your life is going to be like because your body just wears out or something.

It really is the way we live and there are so many things that we can do. And that’s what this show is about, really. It’s to identify those things that cause harm to us and to have more information about the things that are good things that we can do.

But the first thing I think is just changing your mind about being able to see that there’s another way to live and it’s not “normal” that we’re going to all end up getting cancer just because—it’s like I think that there are all these statistics that say, “This is the way it is.” And then people go, “Well, yeah. That’s the way it is,” instead of thinking outside the box and saying, “We could create something different.”

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right! It’s not sticking with conformity. It’s being a non-conformist. To me, a non-conformist [inaudible 00:13:30] can be conformity in a way because it’s getting people back to basics, it’s getting people to eat health, think health, and do healthy things.

As we instruct people through our network and I instruct people even in my own office, the body has rules and the body has laws that govern it, and the body is self-healing, the body is self-regulating. However, if you start to break those laws and if you start to expose the body to things that are not good for it, it’s going to revolt and you’re going to get sick.

So it’s making a conscious choice about what you think every day, what you read every day, what you eat every day, and what you want to expose your body to is going to ensure that you stay healthy for the long term.

I always tell people I don’t mind getting older, I just want to have a good quality life. People don’t realize that men have a one in two risk of getting cancer in their lifetime, and women, one in three. And that number is getting close to one in two.

One in six men gets prostate cancer. One in eight women gets breast cancer. I mean, these numbers are staggering. And these numbers are going to continue to rise unless people start to become educated about the healthy things that they can do in their life.

DEBRA: Tell us about some of the things—we only have a couple of minutes before we need to go to break, but tell us about some of the things that you changed in your life to not be exposed to carcinogenic chemicals.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Eating. Number one is food. Basically, if people have a chance to eat produce from local farmers, I encourage it because they haven’t been adulterated with pesticides.

I encourage people to eat organic. That’s one of the things that I’ve done immediately. People need to be aware of the benefits of eating organic. And, yes, it’s a little bit more money. That’s true. But we’re talking about putting food in our body and that’s the gasoline that runs our machine.

So, eating is the number one thing that people can start with. There are other things. Basically, one of the best detoxifiers in the world is exercise. Sweating is by far—and moving your body is something that benefits the body. So these things, again, help ensure to keep the body healthy.

After the break, I’m sure we’ll talk about things like home products, helpful products that people just take for granted, and they contain substances that are cancer-causing, so people need to be aware of that as well.

DEBRA: They do.

We’ll talk about that when we come back. But I want to tell you, there’s a book you may be familiar with, called Toxin Toxout.

It’s a new book that’s by the authors of Slow Duck by Rubber Duck and he was on—one of the authors was on the show.

The whole premise of the book Toxin Toxout was to test out all the different detox methods, and he said the number one thing to do to detox is exercise and sweat.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Number one.

DEBRA: That’s the number one thing that they found was most effective.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yup.

DEBRA: So they’re in agreement with you. And I’m in agreement with you about not eating pesticides, about organic because I’ve seen a number of studies that show that if you just stop eating food that has pesticides on it within several days, a lot of those pesticides will just clear out of your body. You don’t even need to do anything to detox. Your body will just clear those pesticides.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: The body is self-healing. The body is self-regulating.

DEBRA: Yes. Yes, it is.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: And that’s it.

DEBRA: It is. It is. We just need to not defy it.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right.

DEBRA: So we’re going to—yes. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Douglas R. Levine, Doctor of Chiropractic, Founding Executive Director of Life After Cancer Network and author of Answer to Cancer. His website is LifeAfterCancerNetwork.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Douglas R. Levine, Doctor of Chiropractic. He’s also the Founding Executive Director of Life After Cancer Network and author of Answer to Cancer. So Dr. Levine, you were going to tell us about carcinogens and household products.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Carcinogens and household products, there are many and probably too numerous to mention this show.

DEBRA: Give us some specific examples though.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Specific examples?

DEBRA: Like if you were to…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Let’s see, things like ethylene-based glycol which is used as a cleaning agent. There are other things like compounds called terpenes, which are found in lemon, pine, orange oil. Those are carcinogenic compounds. People know that if they go swimming in a pool and they get water in their mouth, they spit it out because there’s chlorine in it. So these are things that are just not good for the body.

DEBRA: Yes. Well, let’s talk more specifically about heavy metals because that was what you mentioned in your promo piece.

And so let’s talk a little bit about how your network helps people identify these things. So one of the things that you offer is hair testing. That is specific for heavy metals to find out—and heavy metals, most of them cause cancer, right?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: There are many that have been associated with cancer and/or other health-related problems that people would not put two and two together.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: How hair analysis work is that hair is basically considered an excretory organ. That means that you have hair on your body. That hair follicle is in touch with your blood stream. So you have blood circulating through our body and hair will accumulate things like the normal minerals in our body. But it will attach itself or heavy metals will attach itself to hair, so hair can be used as a diagnostic tool for metals that have no physiological benefits to the body. These things are things like lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, nickel, and the list goes on.

So, what people do is they take a sample of their hair, usually from the head, about maybe a teaspoon worth and they send it to a lab. The lab actually breaks down your hair to see if you’ve had any heavy metal exposure.

We try to encourage people different ways to get the lead out, so to speak, so they can restore the normal physiology in the body. It uses a testing tool—I do it in my office, but there are other practioners throughout the country that do it. This doesn’t have to be through the network, but we have people all over the country that do it to try to educate people about toxic element exposure and it could affect their health.

DEBRA: When you were talking about this—obviously, I’ve known about hair testing for many, many years. In fact, I think I’ve had my hair tested more than once. But for the first time, when I was listening to you talk about this, I was thinking about,

“Well, if hair is a…”—what was it you called it? It was a…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: An excretory organ.

DEBRA: Excretory organ?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yeah. Yeah, right. So basically, it’s like a suitcase for things that are going through the blood stream.

DEBRA: I’m going to write that down, “hair as an excretory organ.” I’ve done a lot of research on how the body detoxes, and so you think of the skin as an organ that detoxes, and the intestines, and all these things. But I’ve never thought of the hair as an excretory organ before.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yup.

DEBRA: And so I was just imagining, you have these heavy metals in your body and so then it goes out in your hair, but we don’t—what we think about hair is we think about hair as being beautiful, “Are you having a good hair day?”

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right.

DEBRA: I was just thinking about all the things that people do to try to control their toxic hair and how much more beautiful hair would be if it wasn’t full of heavy metals.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: That’s correct. That’s correct.

DEBRA: Wow! I’ve had people on the show, and I’ve talked to people that talk about detoxing your hair, but they talked about detoxing your hair from the modern toxic hair products and getting those out of your hair, but I’ve never heard one single person…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It’s got to be done from the inside out.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: So the reason why there are these toxic metals in your hair is because it’s in your blood stream. And if it’s in your blood stream, it’s in the tissue of the body; it’s not just in your hair.

So, people never equate that if they have a high level of cadmium in their body and they get it from whatever exposure—from the air, from touching things, from food, wherever it comes from—it will increase a woman’s risk of getting breast cancer.

I’m trying to connect the dots for people that, sometimes, it’s not the blood test that they see. And these things are high or low, that something has to be causing these things to be high or low. So people will go to their regular medical physician. And if this number is low, then we’re going to give you something to make it high.

But it’s important to understand the whys of why people have these things going on in their body and a lot of this has to do with toxicity and they’re not even realizing that they’ve had toxic element exposure. They’ll just go on and treat the symptoms, but not really deal with the cause.

DEBRA: What you just said is probably just, in a nutshell, exactly what most of medicine is about—it’s to treat symptoms.

Actually, this week, I had a realization about that just on my own—like I’m much healthier than I’ve ever been in my life right now, but that doesn’t mean I’m perfectly healthy because I had many years of toxic exposure and damage to my body and things.

And particularly about diet, I just want to say—and I’m about to write this, but I’m going to say it today—people, they wonder what they should eat and they want to go on specific diets and they read about a diet and say, “Oh, I should go on that diet,” and especially if it’s a diet that’s supposed to help something, like you could go on the Thyroid Diet for example and that’s just to help the thyroid, but the thing is that a lot of times, people will go on a diet because they have a specific set of symptoms and they’re trying to alleviate their symptoms. I say, “If I don’t gluten or I don’t eat tomatoes, or whatever, I won’t have these symptoms,” but that’s only just alleviating the symptoms, whether it’s from a food or drug, or whatever. It’s only alleviating symptoms. It’s not addressing the underlying problem.

I finally reached this point in my life where I’m really getting down to healing the things that have been damaged by toxic chemicals.

We’ll talk more about that when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Dr. Douglas Levine. He’s the Executive Director of LifeAfterCancerNetwork.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd. And if you were just listening to that commercial about water filters, today, actually is the last day of a special offer where they’re $20 off. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, look for the faucet, click through, and find out more about that. That’s the water filter that I use in my home.

I’m sure that Dr. Levine can tell you that there are many carcinogenic pollutants in water.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Absolutely! Everybody should have a filtration system just like the one you’re describing because safety first and prevention first. There’s nothing wrong with taking that extra step to protect yourself from what’s going on in the environment today.

DEBRA: Right, right. So tell us more about—oh, I wanted to finish what I’m saying about getting down to this level of really—I call it my “body restoration” project because it’s not about just trying to feel good, it’s about identifying what parts of my body have been damaged by toxic chemical exposure or poor nutrition or whatever that it is. It’s actually to recognize that damage has been done and what do I need to do in order to restore. And that’s a totally different questions.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: That’s a totally different question, yeah.

DEBRA: Like the other day, we filmed several shows about—there’s a new book out called Missing Microbes. I had the author of that book on. We were talking about how antimicrobials and antibiotics are destroying the flora and fauna in our guts. He was saying we’ve lost like 30%. And there are information now about things that you can do to restore those natural microbes that we need to have for our bodies to function.

When I started learning that I thought, “Well now, when I’m eating, am I feeding my microorganisms?”

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It depends on what you’re eating.

DEBRA: Yeah. Every time you take a glass of water with chlorine in it, or chloramines, you’re killing your microorganisms. It’s that simple. That’s what those things are in there for—in the water. Those toxic chemicals are there to kill them.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: They kill them. That’s right, that’s right.

DEBRA: You drink that and it’s going to kill what’s in your gut. And then, we wonder why we have to take Tums and things like that.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right! And you’re treating the symptom, not the cause.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah. So I’m really looking at restoration as being the—but if you’re looking at restoration, I’ve figured out there’s actually three steps. This is just a new thing for me this week.

The first thing you need to do is to you need to stop bombarding your body with toxic chemicals. Then, the second step is, once you’ve reduced that exposure, then you need to remove the toxic chemicals that your body has already accumulated.

And then you need to start the restoration project because if you don’t do those first two steps, it’s like trying to fill a bathtub full of water with the drain open. You’re just not getting anywhere.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Well, it’s the same way with cancer treatment. And if you have any survivors listening out there or any friends or family members, or anybody, this is the problem today with cancer.

Somebody goes through traditional treatment, they have radiation, chemotherapy, they’ve had surgery, they’ve been battered, they’re exhausted from their treatment. Their treatments finally end and now what do these people do?

DEBRA: Yeah. So what do they do? How do you help them?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: They contact our network because that’s why the network was created, to help renew and rebuild their bodies because nobody in traditional medical care is doing that right now.

Oncologists don’t do that. I appreciate what they do, but but they’re not helping people restore. It’s the practitioners in our network that help people. I help people, we have massage therapists that help people, we have acupuncturists that help people. And that’s why we’re here. We have nutritionists that help people. They need a place to go, so I created that place.

And it’s the same thing with what you’re saying, “Hey, I’ve been exposed to this. I understand that the damage has been done, what can I do to help myself?” That’s what you’re trying to do. I appreciate that. More people have to know more about what you do and about your book and support health rather than disease.

DEBRA: So, this is why I wanted to have you on the show because I know that you started making this network for cancer survivors, but I think that, in a sense, there are a lot of us who are survivors of toxic chemical exposure regardless of what the damage has been done.

I learned a long time ago that the thing that I needed to do to heal my body was the same thing that I needed to do to keep my body healthy in the first place. It’s the same set of things. It’s don’t be exposed to toxic chemicals, it’s get good nutrition, it’s get enough rest, the whole list of things.

It’s a well-known list of things. And if people would just start doing that list, then they wouldn’t get cancer, they wouldn’t get heart disease, they wouldn’t get whatever illness they’re concerned about. Whatever illness is in their family, they wouldn’t get it because the environmental factors have been removed. You just do the things that create health, and you’ll create health.

So I think that your network is applicable to everyone, whether they’re a cancer survivor or not.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: And that’s why we have the app, which is called Cancer Network. It’s a free app for any survivor, caregivers, friends, family members, where they can have direct contact right with all our network providers and it’s free for them.

DEBRA: So, tell us more about your app and your network. Tell us, what will people find when they go there?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Well, if you are a survivor, a friend or family member, you can register right on our website and you can print out a survivorship plan.

Basically, it’s a series of questions that you answer basically yes or no. You’re going to get a print out of where you are and where you need to go to begin your journey back to finding your new normal again.

We are the only organization that offers this survivorship plan. There’s no organization in the country that does what we do.

So, we are really the first to offer some type of basics to restore people’s health and get them back to basics.

If people want more in-depth information, they can contact any of our network providers. They are here to help and they will guide people in every area of help, whether it’s nutrition, chiropractic, osteopathy, acupuncture.

The problem I have with natural healthcare providers and people that help cancer survivors is that it’s very fragmented in the United States. There’s somebody who does it in Missouri, there’s somebody who does it in New York or Florida. People are scanning through Yellow Pages or they’re going online, they’re trying to find somebody.

The network was designed to bring all these puzzled pieces together in one place, so that people can go to one entity, find somebody they feel comfortable with and move forward from there.

DEBRA: So, basically. these are the folks that even if somebody didn’t have cancer and wanted to prevent cancer and improve whatever their health issue is right now, these are the kinds of people who, when you go to them, and you say “detox” or “toxic chemicals” or “carcinogen”, they’ll know what you’re talking about?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Absolutely. And there’s somebody here to help you.

DEBRA: Yeah. Yeah. Because I know that it’s sometimes difficult to find those people. You go to a lot of doctors or even alternative practitioners, and they don’t understand these specific issues.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Agreed.

DEBRA: So, I think it’s great, what you’ve done, because it’s so difficult to find these people and…

DOUGLAS LEVINE: I didn’t have it 30 years ago.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: I was looking for somebody. I went to somebody down the block. And I didn’t have it. I said, “You know, something…” one of my goals when I was writing the book was to create an organization like this for people because I didn’t want people to go through exactly what I went through—not finding somebody, not dealing with anybody credible, and not having research-based information that will help move them in the right direction.

DEBRA: Yes. That’s why I do what I do because when I became very sick from toxic chemicals more than 30 years ago, there were no resources at all. There were no books like mine. There were no websites to go to. There were no organizations like yours.

It was like a fluke that I even got the idea that toxic chemicals were making me sick. I just had to drag myself out of bed and go to medical libraries and start researching, “What’s these chemicals? And what kind of symptoms? Oh, I’m having that symptom,” and then I stopped using that product. I stopped using chlorine in the water and perfume and these things. My symptoms went away, but there were no resources at the time, none whatsoever.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right.

DEBRA: But we have so many resources now. We have so many resources today. We have so many nontoxic products. We have so many practitioners who understand those that it’s really—this is a time that everybody should be learning to take care of their bodies in a toxic-free way and support our health, and we don’t. I think what we could greatly, greatly, greatly reduce the amount of cancer in the world and still have our grandmothers, and our mothers, and our loved ones who found us, instead of having them not be here because of cancer.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: It is a disease of lifestyle and the environment…

DEBRA: Yes, definitely.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: People need to recognize that, that it’s a preventable disease and it’s just understanding what needs to be done and actually doing it.

DEBRA: Well, thank you so much. Excuse me. Thank you so much for being here. I’m going to take a look at your network.

Again, you can go to LifeAfterCancerNetwork.org. And can they get your app on the website? They would do this.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Yes, if they go to the app site, they’ll see two icons, one for Android and one for the iPhone. And if you just press it, it brings you right to the store to get it.

Again, it’s free for all the survivor, caregivers, friends, family members. That’s why it’s there.

DEBRA: The Survivorship Plan, you just go to LifeAfterCancerNetwork.org and you’ll see that too.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Correct. Yup.

DEBRA: Yeah.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Thanks.

DEBRA: I’m going to take a look at that because I think that that’s a great idea about how are you going to survive the rest of your life?

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Right. That’s why we’re here. That’s the question I had 30 years ago and there was nobody to help me.

DEBRA: Like, “What’s the plan? How am I going to be healthy for the rest of my life?”

DOUGLAS LEVINE: That’s right.

DEBRA: Yup. Yup.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: People [inaudible 0:36:49]

DEBRA: I’m going to go take a look and see what you’ve got there.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Absolutely.

DEBRA: Okay, thank you.

DOUGLAS LEVINE: Debra, thanks.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

non-toxic lining for dresser drawers

Question from Cathy

Hello Debra,

I’ve been looking everywhere on-line for help with this question, and I just remembered your website. I should have asked you first!

I have a new dresser, and I’d like to put some kind of liner in the drawers, to protect the wood from the clothes, and the clothes from the wood. 

Contact paper, fabric, wrapping paper with wallpaper paste (Mod Podge), cork, acid-free paper, parchment paper — I’ve looked into all of these and I’m not feeling good about any of them.

I’m thinking that the local frame shop’s acid-free mat paper might be my best bet, but I don’t know about what the material is made of, only that it’s acid-free.

Any ideas?

Many thanks,

Cathy

Debra’s Answer

Well, in the past I have just used a paper that I like.

All paper is basically made in the same way, from some kind of cellulose pulp. Most paper is made from wood pulp, very fine writing paper like Crane’s is made from cotton linters that are too small to be woven into yarn to make fabric. Nowadays many papers are made from recycled paper or fibers.

The thing that would make a difference regarding toxicity is if the paper is treated with something for performance (such as paper towels are treated with formaldehyde for strength) or when inks are added. Brightly colored wrapping paper is more toxic, for example, that a plain sheet of art paper intended to receive paint.

At my local art store like Michael’s, they have big sheets of colored papers that you can cut to size. You might see what they are treated with, if anything.

There are also handmade papers, which tend to not be treated, but may be sprayed with a finish. So always ask.

I can tell you in general about toxics that might be in paper, but always ask the manufacturer because there can be a lot of variation.

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Diesel Fuel and Leather Seats

Question from audrey

I am writing for a friend who is looking for a new car and who has mcs. She found a car that she likes but it requires diesel fuel. Do you see any reason that this would be worse if one has mcs instead of using regular gas?

She also has seen some cars that have leather seats. She said the leather in cars about ten years ago seemed to be more toxic/smelly than the ones today. Do you know if this is true? Also she said she has read that some leather in cars are now having fragrance added to the leather. Was wondering if you knew anything about that and how can we stop such a foolish thing. Thank you for your help.

Debra’s Answer

Well, actually diesel exhaust contributes 15 times more secondary organic aerosol chemicals than gasoline emissions per liter of fuel burned. So gasoline would be a better choice for MCS.

Now leather seats. It depends on the seats. I have leather seats, but I bought my car used and they had not been treated with any kind of cleaner. I love my leather seats.

I once reupholstered my car seats with cotton canvas. I brought my fabric to a car upholstery place and they did it for me. So that is always an option.

Add Comment

Window pane repair

Question from Angelique

A pane in our metal multi-pane window broke. During repair, what kinds of materials do I have to look out for, and what would be best to use?

Debra’s Answer

Here are complete instructions:

Replacing a Pane of Glass on an Aluminum Window Frame

It mentions using clear silicone and vinyl strips (on the outside) to hold the pane in place.

Since this is standard for metal windows, I would just use these materials. The silicone should be for this purpose and is called “Glass-Metal Sealant.” It probably will have some fumes but they will outgas. Keep windows open, use fans.

For wood windows, you can install a pane with wood strips on either side. That’s one of the reasons I love wood windows.

Add Comment

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and the Brain

Question from JD

Hi Debra,

Let me start off by saying, I think you have done an amazing job in spreading the word and educating people on the dangers of toxicity. You have a wealth of information that can help others to understand and begin to live a toxic-free life. Thank you for that. 🙂

In all your research, have you ever come across Annie Hopper, founder of Dynamic Neural Retraining System and former MCS Sufferer? Annie’s program involves retraining your brain from being stuck in a trauma loop within one’s limbic system.

When Annie was suffering from MCS, she was on a mission to cure herself. The missing link, she found, was the study of the brain. She began to study about brains and references a book called, “The Brain That Changes Itself,” by Dr. Norman Doidge, in her program. She also includes a video clip of this doctor where he explains neuroplasticity.

Neuroplasticity: From Med.net – It is the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. Neuroplasticity allows the neurons (nerve cells) in the brain to compensate for injury and disease and to adjust their activities in response to new situations or to changes in their environment.

Two weeks ago, I began her program. As I began to educate myself on the limbic system and take part in the cognitive therapy portion of her program, the chronic “fight or flight” piece (the feeling of panic when breathing in toxic products or when foretelling and getting stuck in the “what ifs” before entering a public place), my anxieties decreased significantly.

I’ve struggled with MCS since the mid-90’s, and for the first time in almost 20 years, I am hopeful that I can fully recover. Don’t get me wrong, I’m 100% in agreement with organic food, toxic-free products, zeolite, and exercise, and know they have prevented me from getting really bad.

While I learned a lot about neuroplasticity, what fascinates me the most is the brain’s ability to get stuck in a rut and releasing send false messages to my body, such as heart palpitations, fatigue, swollen glands, going hoarse, headaches, digestive problems, puffy eyes, coughing, the list goes on. Moreover, the brain’s ability to retrain itself, thus leading to a healthier life, mentally, emotionally, and physically.

I admit, I thought Annie’s program might be hype, so I researched it thoroughly. What I found is that her vision is to facilitate global healing while also promoting environmental awareness that precipitates big changes in how we live on this planet.

Annie was a keynote speaker at a national Brain Injury Conference in June 2009, and delivered ground breaking research on “Acquired Toxic Brain Injuries and Neuroplasticity.” She was also a guest speaker at the American Academy of Environmental Medicine in 2013, held in Phoenix, Arizona.

There is also a doctor (I believe in her hometown) who refers all patients with MCS symptoms to Annie, because he got, and is getting, great results from patients that have tried or are trying her program.

Anyway, I’m sold on her program, and I thought you might be interested as another possible resource, should you agree with her program.

Thanks for all you do,

Julie Possee

Debra’s Answer

I don’t have any experience with this method so can’t comment on it, but I would like to take this opportunity to say that simply avoiding toxic chemicals is not enough to build health. There are many other factors, including other things that may be wrong with the body or mind, lack of nutrition, etc.

What elimination of toxic chemicals does is remove a continuous source of harm to your body, allowing your body to do other things that can contribute to healing. It’s like trying to empty a bathtub with the water running. If you continue to be exposed to toxic chemicals and try to do something else to heal your body, it’s likely not to work because toxic chemicals are continuing to pull your body down while you’re trying to make it heal.

But once you eliminate incoming toxic exposures and removing toxic chemicals stored in your body, there are any number of other things that can be done, and may need to be done to restore health.

This may be one of them for some people.

Add Comment

Scotch Guard

Question from Patrick

Hello Debra Lynn,

I moved a year ago and bought a new couch for my new space. Because I have a youth group that meets at my house, I was advised to spray the couch with Scotch Guard. Normally I am adverse to using any kind of chemical spray, but I took the advice.

Soon after I noticed my eyes burned every time I spent time on the couch. It’s beneath three tall windows overlooking a street lined with trees. I have terrible tree pollen allergies, so I thought it was the trees causing the problem. It was until recently that I remembered the spray.

To test the theory that it was causing the reaction, I rubbed my face in a cushion at a time my eyes were not itchy. They immediately burned.

So my questions are: If it’s the Scotch Guard (and not something toxic in the couch itself), is there a safe way to remove it? Steam-cleaning? If it’s the couch, how do I find a new one that isn’t toxic?

Thanks,

Patrick Jennings

Debra’s Answer

I’m not surprised that you are reacting to Scotch Guard, because it is a fluoropolymer, like Teflon.

Here’s one opinion about removing it, “Scotchguard is a fluoropolymer that creates a film like level on the fabric. You will find it almost impossible to remove without a chemistry lab and it will not dye. If you could remove it, it would probably make the fabric unusable. Even in a textile facility, once on the fabric, it is considered permanent on the fabric.”

That’s what I have always thought. You can’t remove it.

But then I found there are a lot of instruction for “how to remove Scotchguard” on Google.

I don’t know if any of these will work or not.

How to find a couch that isn’t toxic. Try the Furniture page of Debra’s List.

Add Comment

Going Beyond Filtered Water

MJ PangmanMy guest today is MJ Pangman, co-author of Dancing with Water: The New Science of Water—a book that has revolutionized our relationship with water while unveiling its most mysterious properties. Ever since the year 2000, when she observed its powerful effects on her own body, Dancing with WaterMJ has focused her research on a special phase of water known as liquid crystalline water. This phase of water interacts more rapidly and efficiently with biological organisms. It can provide superior hydration, enhanced nutrient absorption, more effective detoxification, increased metabolic efficiency and improved cellular communication. With a Master’s degree in plant science and a love of the natural sciences, MJ will take to take you to a new level of your understanding about water and tell us how to turn water into a vital, life-supporting nutrient. dancingwithwater.com

NOTE: The techniques that MJ will be talking about require that you start with the purest water you can obtain. I recommend the filters from Pure Effect Water Filters.

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Going Beyond Filtered Water

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: MJ Pangman

Date of Broadcast: August 05, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Tuesday, August 5th 2014. I’m here in Clearwater, Florida and I think we’re going to have a thunderstorm today. We have lots of thunderstorms here. It’s very interesting tropical weather. They’re wonderful! I love thunderstorms.
Anyway, we’re going to have a very interesting and very different show today. I talk about very different aspects of living toxic-free on this show and invite people on with many different kinds of viewpoints. I just want to give you a little orientation towards what we’re going to talk about today and that is the whole field of living toxic-free.

To me, it’s like a spectrum. At one end is everything that’s toxic that is just clearly harmful to life and even those things that are toxic have different degrees of toxicity like something that is very, very, very toxic, the worst toxic thing would be instant death on exposure.

And then you would have other things that make you sick when you’re exposed to them, make you see in various degrees right away. And then there are things that have to build up in your body and you have to be exposed to them day in and day out. And then when they build up, then you get sick from them.

And then you kind of get to the zero point where something is not harmful, but it’s not beneficial either, it’s just not harmful. And then when you cross that line, when you cross that line, you start getting into things that enhance your life, that actually make your health be better.

Technically speaking, something could be toxic-free if it gets to zero, that zero point because it’s no longer harming you. And pretty much, when we’re talking in the realm of consumer products, what we’re trying to aim for is just get to that point where you can have a consumer product that’s not going to harm you.

But what we’re talking about today, we’re going to take a giant leap over that line and go into an area of talking about something that can greatly enhance your life and your body condition, your health and your happiness, everything because it’s taking you closer to one’s natural state as if you were out in nature, as if you were a tree.

Humans out in nature, if we all lived out in the natural world and not in the industrial world, then we would have other elements affecting our bodies, other natural elements as opposed to the toxic things in our industrial world. What we’re going to talking about today is how to be restoring that natural life force and the medium that we’re going to be talking about restoring it through is water.

Now, before I have my guest start to speak, I also just want to add one thing here and that is that I talk a lot about water filters. And in fact, I have a water filter. If you have been listening to me for any length of time, you know there’s a lot of filter that I recommend that I knew because I think that not only does it remove the toxic chemicals the best, but it also kind of starts inching in the direction of making the water more like it is in nature.

The things that we’re going to be talking about today, in order to apply any of them, you need to start with water that’s not polluted. That’s the first step. And so everything that you’re doing to remove toxic chemicals from your water is all the right thing to do. And then there’s more and it’s fascinating how much more there is that we can do to get these life-enhancing properties into our water and into our bodies.

So I’d like to introduce to you my guest. She’s my MJ Pangman. She’s the author of Dancing with Water: The New Science of Water. It’s an amazing book. I’ve studied this subject. I’ve been studying this subject for a long time about water and about the natural state of water.

When I first – I have so much to say about this, but I want my guest to talk. Anyway, so when I read her material, it’s so simply described and so just everything that you need to do arranged in a way that’s extremely useful. I highly recommend that you read her book.

Now, you can go to her website, DancingwithWater.com and you can get a free, little course. Just sign up. It’s right on the home page. You can get a course and every day, you will get emailed another lesson for about seven days I think it is where she goes over all the basics, all the things that we’re going to be talking about today. You can just go to her website and sign up. [Inaudible 00:06:29] because you’re going to want to read this over and over again to understand this.
Hi, MJ.

MJ PANGMAN: Good morning. How are you, Debra?

DEBRA: I’m good. How are you?

MJ PANGMAN: Excellent!

DEBRA: It’s kind of a long introduction, but I wanted to get all those things in. Tell us how you got interested in this subject?

MJ PANGMAN: Oh, you know, how does anyone fall into what they are meant to do here? Life is such a beautiful journey. It was probably about 15 or 17 years ago that as a writer in complementary medicine, I just run across this whole concept of water’s molecular structure and the fact that water could be a living, liquid crystal.

That was so fascinating to me that I just began to research and write. I got an opportunity to work with a Korean professor who had spent 40 years of his life researching this subject. I got the chance to help him translate some of his material into English because virtually unknown at that point in time in this country that there were things that we could do to water to restore its living quality and to restore its energetic qualities that then when you consume this kind of water, could make a powerful difference in the efficiency of your body at the cellular level.

Anyway, it was just so fascinating that I began to devote more and more of my time to it. And here we are today, the co-author of the book and I working on a second edition of Dancing with Water because it has just been so very wildly received within a niche, people who are ready for this kind of information.

Anyway, that’s sort of the background. It just drew me in and now, I’m swimming in it.

DEBRA: I love that. I do want to say, you have this really good – I’m looking at your course. I have studied your whole free course here now and it has a lot of information in it that I am in agreement with and were familiar to me from reading other things. But the way you’ve expressed it is so very, very clear.

I particularly wanted to bring up this whole idea of living water. It’s right in the beginning, you started talking about living water as opposed to dead water. So let’s just talk about the difference between those to start off.

MJ PANGMAN: Well, it’s an interesting thing right from the start because the term ‘living water’ is ancient and pervades many cultures. And so you have to ask yourself, “Why does this term ‘living water’ continue to show up?” Well, obviously, there is a difference between something that is living and life-supportive and something that may not be so life-supportive. I hate to think that water is ever really dead because it can always be restored.

So once again, it’s never really dead, but it certainly has like many people on the planet, lower life force level when it’s not treated appropriately. So water can be sick, let’s say that based on how we treated water. And water can have its life force taken from it.

DEBRA: I think that it’s a wonderful thing. I think it’s actually a sign of life, that something can be restored. For example, I think about the difference between say a tree that is made of wood and then you cut a limb off a tree and you turn it into a piece of lumber. You can’t restore the piece of lumber into being a living thing, but you can repair a tree. To me, that’s the difference between something that’s living and something that’s not living. And so obviously water is a living substance, but it can be damaged like our bodies can be damaged in terms of its vitality and it can also be restored.

We need to go to break, but we’ll come right back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is MJ Pangman. She’s the author of Dancing with Water and her website is DancingwithWater.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is MJ Pangman. We’re talking about how to make sick water into living water. It’s so fascinating to me. I just love the way nature works and I love talking about this.
So if we want to create full spectrum living water, what’s the first thing that we should be looking at?

MJ PANGMAN: We need to look at the forces in nature just like you said. In nature, water is always moving. So that’s number one. In nature, water moves and when she moves, she never moves in a straight line. One of the worse things that we do for water is completely out of ignorance on our part. We think that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line, but water never moves in a straight line.

So when we force – and there’s a keyword too – force water under pressure through straight pipes, we actually strip the energy and the energetic quality from water. When water freely moves in the earth, she’s always meandering and she always takes longer to get there, but she’s full of live when she does. So movement is the key, turbulence is one of the key thing to look for when we want to revitalize water, movement.

DEBRA: I think about when I – like I live right here near the Gulf of Mexico. I don’t go in the gulf as much as I would like to and especially I didn’t want to go in after the big gulf oil spilt. But prior to that, my ex-husband used to go – especially in the evening, we go walk on the beach and we go swimming in the gulf. The difference between tap water like sitting in a bath tub versus swimming in a gulf –

Once I went on a trip to the Caribbean and I went up into the jungle and there was a pool of water. It was a pool like a cascading pool, a series of cascading pools. And so there was all these movement, these little waterfalls coming down into this pool over and over again where I was sitting. The vitality of that, you can feel that. You can feel that in the water. The water that comes out of our tap doesn’t feel anything like that.

MJ PANGMAN: No, it wouldn’t.

DEBRA: Yeah, it’s pretty amazing. It’s pretty amazing.

MJ PANGMAN: So one of the things that happen with movement is that whenever water moves, she’s always spiraling. She’ll come in contact with a rock or some kind of an obstruction. And always the action off of the rock is to spiral backward. You see all these eddies in rivers and what-not?

DEBRA: Yeah!

MJ PANGMAN: If you watch a river very long, you can just notice the spirals everywhere – the little ones, the large vortices. In fact, our hydrologists now recognize that as a river moves down its course, there are huge spirals that go down the center of it that interact with smaller spirals off of the side. I mean, it’s just a beautiful interaction. This is water in movement. The spiral action is one of the things that we find is capable of reviving water.

Whenever you stir water in a pitcher, you’re doing that same kind of thing. I mean, it’s a very beautiful meditative way to connect with the water as well. So there are some simple things that we show people in the book that absolutely makes perfect sense, just stirring the water and then when you begin to add some other dynamic to the water, it doesn’t have to be hard to bring back water’s life force.

DEBRA: Before that step one, I just want to, again, emphasize that what you need to do be doing is starting with water that doesn’t have toxic pollutants in it.

MJ PANGMAN: Correct.

DEBRA: You can’t revitalize, you can’t just take tap water and put it in a pitcher and stir it and start to revitalize it because the toxic chemicals, not only the straight line of it coming to the pipe, but also the toxic chemicals are working against this life force as well. So first, remove toxic chemicals and then start doing these things. Okay, so what comes next after movement?

MJ PANGMAN: In nature, the earth is a beautiful combination of electromagnetic field that are produced by the rocks, by pressures, by the fact that we have an electron-rich environment. The earth itself is covered with electrons that are delivered by lightning strikes everywhere around the planet all the time. So the earth itself has a negative charge and the ionosphere has a positive charge. So there are electromagnetic forces in the earth that are present all the time that water interacts with and water needs in order to organize.

It has been shown through many different methods that when water is placed within a very gentle electromagnetic field, it forces the molecules to align and to organize. So what we’re talking about creating for water is – we mentioned the term ‘liquid crystal’. The difference between quartz and the quartz crystal, not only is there a visible difference in the clarity of the material, but the reason for that clarity is that it’s the way those molecules are organized. Quartz is in what they call an amorphous conglomeration of silicon dioxide, but quartz crystal is an organized grouping of those molecules and it is quartz of entirely different property.

I like to remind people that in the forties, the world changed as we began to understand how to use the properties of crystals in our technology. Crystals are used in solid-state technology today. They began to be used in the 1940s when we incorporated crystal in crystal radios and allowed us to perfect the bending of signal further and wider with greater clarity because of this organization in the crystal matrix.

Water has the same molecular capacity to organize in the same way as a quartz crystal. It has the same molecular organization if it’s allowed and provided this gentle, electromagnetic forces that are present in the earth. And when that happens, water is assembled in a matrix that allows the transmission of signals to be clearer and cleaner.

And that’s water’s purpose. Water’s purpose in your body is to be this medium that carries signals and carry information. Not only does it carry nutrients, but information. So that’s what we’re after here, to provide water with the gentle electromagnetic frequencies that are natural. Now, you’ve got movement and electromagnetic field and you’re on your way.

It sounds like we’re ready for another break.

DEBRA: Excellent! We’re ready for another break. My guest today is MJ Pangman. She’s the author of Dancing with Water. Her website is DancingwithWater.com. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and we will be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is MJ Pangman. She’s the author of Dancing with Water. We’re talking about how to revitalized your already filtered water that doesn’t have toxic chemicals in it into being living, vibrant water that can help your body be more alive and healthy and be water the way it is in nature.

So MJ, what’s the next thing to do to revitalize your water?

MJ PANGMAN: Okay! Remember that water that doesn’t have any minerals in it does not conduct electricity. Most people don’t know that. They think water conducts electricity, but it’s the minerals in water that are the connective forces. So water that’s empty, water that’s had the minerals removed does not conduct electricity. Water was intended to carry minerals. Not that water is our primary source of minerals, food ought to be, but water doesn’t have minerals in it is not complete.

So the next step is to balance the minerals in water. Now you mentioned earlier that we’re starting here with clean water and there are lots of ways that we have devised in the last number of years to start with a clean slate and some of those ways are to distill the water or to put it through a reverse osmosis filter that leaves the water empty (which is not ideal at all) and there are other methods that filter the water to leave the minerals in the water, but no matter what you do, most water on the planet is still not minerally balanced.

And so the question is where in the world can we find a nice mineral balance? And the answer is in the ocean. That’s where we have all the minerals available to us in their perfect balance.

So a person, if they felt comfortable about working with that medium in our day, the ocean is a wonderful source of the balance of minerals. However, nature has provided us with those same minerals in the form of salt. There are some wonderful salt that can be harvested in many places around the world that are unprocessed, feel natural and they provide us the balance of minerals.

So the next step is to balance the minerals in the water or as the case may be, to completely re-mineralize the water based on whatever your starting place is. So the idea is to put the minerals back in the water, give the water something to work with, give it some energetic quotients if you will and not only does that then provides us with a balance of minerals that are more biologically available when we go through this process that we’re kind of outlining here, but it’s the way to recharge the water, to re-energize the water.

So we recommend that people take an unprocessed, natural salt and make a saturated salt solution and then that they use a small amount of that depending on the water that they’re starting with. If it’s completely empty, a half of teaspoon in a half a gallon of water. If it’s already got minerals in it, less than that.

But put the minerals back in the water. Give the water some energetic quotient to work with. And then as we move the water, as we expose it to organizing energy field, the water just sort of gathers energy from the universe if you will with all of those pieces put back together. It’s ready to go.

DEBRA: The first time I heard this concept was actually in 1987. I remember the year because that was the year I met my husband. It was actually at the very same time within the same hour I met my husband and I was already introduced to Viktor Schauberger, not in person, but via his book. His book had not yet been published in America.

Somebody had a copy, somebody in the audience. I was giving a speech and somebody in the audience had a copy. He had brought it particularly for me, somebody I didn’t know. He just walked up to me afterwards and he said, “You need to read this book.” He was right because I read it and the thing that impressed me the most was his explanation of the complete hydrologic cycle, which is not what you learn in science class.

The complete hydrologic cycle is that water evaporates. It goes up and becomes a cloud and it comes down in rain. And then it trickles into the earth. And as it does that, it gathers minerals and salts and all these things that we’ve just been talking about. And then it comes up in a spring. And so what you get in spring water is this cold, living, mineralized water, which is not what you get out of the tap.

And the point that he made very strongly in the book was that in order to have the water trickle down through the earth, you have to have vegetation. Without vegetation, the water just runs off. So when we do things like clear cut forest and things, we’re not allowing water to trickle down through the earth and then come back up to us.

How many of us ever get to drink spring water? I’ve drank spring water. It’s wonderful. But it used to be that that’s all people drink, that there were springs that were revered. They were considered to be sacred. They were protected. And the people, there would be like a village, there would be a spring and that’s the water that people drink. And that’s not like anything like what we’re drinking now.

MJ PANGMAN: It’s true. Sad, but it’s true.
DEBRA: Sad, but true, yes.
MJ PANGMAN: Right! Viktor Schauberger was a forester in Austria. He loved nature. He loved the forest. So for him to watch what happened with the whole deforestation, it would make him cry today to see what we’ve done with this planet even since he left in 1967 (I think he passed away). He was a lover of nature. He watched nature. And that’s where he got all of his ideas and his inspiration.

DEBRA: Okay! So then the next thing is sound and light.

MJ PANGMAN: You know, these are organizing forces that we don’t often recognize. One of the chapters in Dancing with Water is completely devoted to the organizational ability of sound. There’s wonderful videos if you start to look up how vibration affect the organization of matter.

There was a fellow in Europe. His name was Hans Jenny. He did some amazing research in the thirties, forties – I may have the dates wrong with that – where he puts sands on a plate and he vibrated the plate. He noticed that as he increased the frequency, the sand would organize into geometric forms.

DEBRA: I’ve seen those pictures.

MJ PANGMAN: They’re awesome.

DEBRA: They are.

MJ PANGMAN: The same thing happens with water when you expose water to – I’m going to group these into a larger category and say ‘organizing forces’, which include light and sound and life force itself, which is difficult to classify. Those forces, add the energetic quotients to water at the molecular level, these geometries create the liquid crystal that we’re talking about here as living water.

DEBRA: And we need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest is MJ Pangman, author of Dancing with Water. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is MJ Pangman. She’s the author of Dancing with Water and her website is DancingwithWater.com.

So the last element to put all these together to re-energize water is darkness. But instead of talking about that, I have two more really important questions and we only have about ten minutes left, so I’m going to ask you something else.
First, would you tell us what kind of benefits people could expect to experience when they drink this kind of water?

MJ PANGMAN: Of course, that depends on the individual. Everyone is in a different place. I’m going to back up and I’m going to just remind people that water is a living entity especially when we take care of it. We talk about water as our dance partner in Dancing with Water and we talk about the ‘dance with water’. So the metaphor is on many levels here with this title, Dancing with Water.

So everyone is in a different place, but water is conscious and will work with the consciousness of an individual. That’s kind of a step out there for some people, but I put that out there for people to ponder. Water has the capacity to work with you as an individual and that’s why people’s responses can be quite individual.

But as a whole, one of the first things that people notice when they begin to drink water that they have worked with, that they have worked with to bring back its life force, to re-energize, to restructure, to return water’s liquid crystalline state is more energy. The afternoon fatigue that a lot of people experience these days, that slump in the afternoon, I’ve had many people tell me that as soon as they started to drink this water, they were good to go, they didn’t fall asleep after lunch and that was a miraculous thing for them. So that’s probably the most often recognized difference.

Another thing that women pay more attention to is softer skin. For you, Debra, that is an indication because the skin is the largest detoxification organ of the body, anything that affects the condition of the skin is an indication that your body is now able to move the toxins through this largest detox organ through the skin. Any improvements in the condition of the skin are about how water is moving and doing what it needs to do as far as hydration and detox. So many women notice softer skin right away.

Athletes will tell you that they have the capacity to work harder and recover faster. The lactic acid build up that athletes often experience as a result of hard workouts at the level of the muscles seems to be able to move and clear faster when you are working with what I refer to now as more efficient water. The water is more efficient. It’s able to do its overall job in a more efficient manner.

So at the cellular level, we’re talking about water moving into the cells to hydrate and at an extracellular level, we’re talking about water drawing toxins out in a more efficient manner.
So some of the other things that people who have some symptoms often notice – I’m going to back up again and give some background here. Diabetes is known as the thirsty disease in Chinese medicine.

DEBRA: That’s right!

MJ PANGMAN: Many people who have diabetic symptoms will tell you that all of a sudden, they’re not as thirsty anymore and that they don’t require the level of medication that they did. Now, we cannot make any claims as far as that goes, but I hear that again and again. That blood sugar begins to balance. That’s an amazing thing, but that’s about water’s role in the body. And once again, diabetes is called the thirsty disease in traditional Chinese medicine.

I mean, these are some of the things. People who do live blood cell analysis and take before and after samples of the blood show dramatically how the red blood cells, they move apart. When a person is sick or dehydrated, the red blood cell stick together because they’re not able to move.

DEBRA: Uh-huh, I’ve seen those.

MJ PANGMAN: That’s called [inaudible 00:43:45], correct. But drinking one glass of this water, I remember the fellow in South Africa sending me these first pictures. He used live blood analysis to help diagnose and work with his patients and he said, “Oh, I could not believe this. Typically, if I would give a patient a glass of water, it would not make a difference in the blood. But this water, within 10 or 15 minutes moves those red blood vessels apart, gives them a charge, if you will and offers me the clarity to see what’s going on in their blood, so that I can tell them what difficulties they have that we can work with.” He was just flabbergasted.

DEBRA: I am sitting here laughing with delight because of course, if you put – I mean, you’re probably familiar with the book called – I’m trying to remember, Your Body’s Many Cries for Water. He just talks about water, just being dehydrated. But here, we’re going to a different level now and saying instead of putting this degraded water in your body, you’re now putting living water in your body. Of course, it’s going to perk up. It’s just going to perk up. Everything is going to start going right.
MJ PANGMAN: You bet it is, yeah. That’s right.

DEBRA: We think of things like aggressive factors like toxic chemicals, something that is being actively done to our bodies as being something that is harmful, but we don’t often think about what’s missing. And not only do we miss nutrition, but we also miss this aliveness. We so often don’t even think at that level. I’m just thrilled to hear that story because it really does show that our body is waiting to have these aliveness factors.

Now, I want you to just talk a little bit about some of the products that you have available on your website because you have a number of different things that people can use to apply all these things that you’re talking about. My favorite thing is the water cradle. I want to get a water cradle.
MJ PANGMAN: Ah, you picked the top of the line in our opinion. That’s an interesting choice you made and that speaks to you, Debra.

DEBRA: This one really speaks to me.

MJ PANGMAN: You’re connecting with nature, yeah. You know, one of the reasons Melanie and I wrote this book –we just were, “Will people listen to this? Will they care?” and we just said, “We’re going to show people that there are a hundred ways to bring these forces that we’ve just spoken about in this program together to bring back life forth. There are a hundred ways to allow water to move. There are a hundred ways, there are a hundred different ways to add salts back in mineral formulations in liquid forms these days. There are a hundred ways to add the life force organizing forces, to bring in chi, prana, sound, light.

There are just a hundred ways to do this, everything from some very simple natural ways like I spoke in the beginning, stirring the water, you can put magnets in your water, even placing quartz crystal in water.”
We talk about that in the book why that worked. People have done for centuries and it’s been pooh-poohed as an old wives’ tale, but there’s a science behind placing rocks and stones in water. They have an effect. We claim that in the book.

So there are so many different ways and we have tried to gather for the website a plethora of different ways from the very simple to a collar that you can place between two bottles and spin the water through a magnetic field, something as simple and inexpensive as that to some very expensive devices that automate the process.

But you’ve chosen something that we’ve developed and as an exclusive for Dancing with Water and we called it The Water Cradle. It’s based on Viktor Schauberger’s work where he showed that this shape (shapes are very important in the universe) that Viktor Schauberger worked with, the shape of the egg, it’s nature’s gestation vessel. It allows nature to continue to move quietly in the dark like what happens in the below ground part of nature’s water hydrological cycle that you mentioned earlier.

So then if you’ve got the appropriate salts in the water, you put water in a place where it can breathe within a ceramic container, you are providing in the base (which we don’t have time to go into) organizing forces (paramagnetic materials, life force attracting material in that base) surrounded with something that causes them to ring (we talk about that in the book), a way to gather life force, to protect the water.

Water is very open to receive information once you create this liquid crystal and now you want to protect it. You don’t want it exposed to the deleterious electromagnetic fields like microwaves and fluorescent lighting and some of those other things that are in our home, the fields that emanate off of computers, it’s the water cradle.

It structures the water, it protects the water and it enobles the water. And that’s Viktor Schauberger’s term as well.

DEBRA: Well, we only have ten seconds left, so I have to say thank you so much for coming today and telling us all of this. I want everybody to go to MJ’s website, DancingwithWater.com and find out more about this. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

MJ PANGMAN: Thank you, Debra.

Silicone Keyboard Cover

Question from E.

Hi Debra,

I am looking at using a silicone keyboard cover to seal in VOCs on my (4-year-old) Apple keyboard. None of the covers I have found are described as food-grade. One company could not say for certain if their product was food-grade. Does this matter since I am not using this silicone for food? I will be typing on it daily.

Thanks

Debra’s Answer

I’m doing more research on silicone and apparently there are various types with various additives. I’m still sorting that out.

Just know that skin can easily absorb toxic chemicals if they are present.

Why do you think your Apple keyboard is emitting VOCs? I just called Apple and was told the keys are made of hard ABS plastic. My iMac is four years old too, and I’ve never experienced any outgassing that I’ve noticed. Hard plastics rarely outgass.

And why do you think silicone will block VOCs? I don’t think it will. It’s waterproof, but gas is a much smaller molecule. Silicone may be a vapor barrier, but that might be a speciality silicone for that purpose.

Add Comment

Bee Killers in Your Backyard

from Debra Lynn Dadd

gardeners bewareWe’ve all heard that bees are dying off at an alarming rate, and this has been attributed in part to pesticides used in agriculture.

But a new study from Friends of the Earth and Pesticide Action Network found that bees are being killed by pesticides on plants in our own backyards…on plants that are being sold as “bee-friendly.”

The study shows that 36 out of 71 (51 percent) of garden plant samples purchased at top garden retailers in 18 cities in the United States and Canada contain neonicotinoid (neonic) pesticides — a key contributor to recent bee declines. Some of the flowers contained neonic levels high enough to kill bees outright assuming comparable concentrations are present in the flowers’ pollen and nectar. Further, 40 percent of the positive samples contained two or more neonics.

These toxic, long-lived insecticides not only harm bees, but can also harm butterflies, earthworms, birds and other beneficial animals in our gardens for months to years.

Of course, you could simply not buy these plants, but they aren’t generally labeled as to the type of pesticide used. And it’s not just bee-friendly plants. All plants in garden centers could have harmful pesticides on them.

You can also shop at an organic nursery if you have one in your area (I have two).

The real solution is to get them off the shelves.

Friends of the Earth: New tests find bee-killing pesticides in 51% of “bee-friendly” plants from garden centers across U.S. and Canada A short summary of the report

Friends of the Earth: Gardener’s Beware The full report

HealthyStuff.org Lend your voice to a campaign asking retailers to remove plants with bee-kiling pesticides from their shelves.

Add Comment

Nutrition for Beauty: Look and Feel Your Best from the Inside Out

Jolene HartMy guest today is Jolene Hart, CHC, AADP, who teaches women Eat Prettyto use nutrition and lifestyle choices to look and feel their best from the inside out. She’s the author of Eat Pretty, and a health coach certified by the Institute for Integrative Nutrition and the American Association of Drugless Practitioners. Jolene is also the founder of Beauty Is Wellness, as well as a former beauty editor and contributor to publications from InStyle and Allure to The Huffington Post, Organic Spa and Prevention. jolenehart.com

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Nutrition for Beauty: Look and Feel Your Best from the Inside Out

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Jolene Hart, CHC, AADP

Date of Broadcast: August 04, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Monday, August 4, 2014. We’ve got a little overcast here, so there might be a thunderstorm, but I’m crossing my fingers that everything is going to be fine, that we’re going to have power and we’re going to have a wonderful show.

Today our show is a little bit different, but it’s also right in line with things that we’ve been talking about. My guest today is Jolene Hart. She’s written a book called Eat Pretty. It’s about nutrition for beauty inside and out. I think that I was captivated and decided to have her on the show.

When I went to her website, she had a recipe for a cherry chocolate smoothie. Now, the idea behind all of this is using nutrition and lifestyle changes to make your body more beautiful instead of toxic things. The thing about this cherry chocolate smoothie is it has no sugar, no sweetener of any kind and it is absolutely delicious.

I had been looking for a way to eat chocolate without having any kind of sugar or sweetener. The combination of the cherries and the cocoa in this smoothie with the other ingredients has a lot of nutrition. You get your chocolate fix, you get all the benefits of all these great things and you’ll look more beautiful too. That’s what we’re going to talk about today.

Hi, Jolene.

JOLENE HART: Hi Debra. Thank you for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So tell us. I see from your bio that you’re a former beauty editor and a contributor to publications like InStyle and Allure and Organic Spa and Prevention. Did you start out in the regular beauty world and then decide that you were going to take a little different direction?

JOLENE HART: I did. I started out working in magazines, and I worked in fashion and then in beauty. During that time, when I was working as a beauty editor, I was also dealing with a lot of skin issues of my own.

So, I had been consulting dermatologists and aestheticians and just trying to figure out what the root was of my cystic acne and the eczema that was on my body. Really, I tried every product that crossed my desk. And as beauty editor, hundreds of products would cross my desk in a month and I was always looking for something that was going to solve these issues for me.

It wasn’t until I took a step back from products and really overhauled my diet and my lifestyle that the changes happened so quickly.

This book, Eat Pretty, was really the book I really needed at that time in my life. So just being able to share this message was really important for me. I did, like I said, take a step back from my position as a beauty editor to really look at beauty from the inside.

DEBRA: I think that that’s very smart. And I’ve noticed in my own life that – I have had a lot of acne as a teenager and things. I noticed as I cleaned out my act in my life, suddenly my skin just cleared up. And I didn’t do it because I was looking for a solution. I spent all of my teens on tetracycline.

JOLENE HART: Me too. I spent many years on tetracycline. Now we know that being on an antibiotic for that long can be really detrimental to your digestive system. But still to this day, teens and women in their 20s and 30s and older are being put on those kinds of medications. So I wanted to share that there are other things that you can do because I really wish someone had told me this back then.

DEBRA: I wish that someone had told me that too. And that’s actually how I started writing my first book. I needed a book to tell me how to live without toxic chemicals and there were no…

JOLENE HART: That’s really interesting.

DEBRA: Yeah. It was the same kind of thing of having a personal problem, figuring out the solution, and then not having there be anything to guide me.

I do want to just say that it’s interesting that you showed up to be a guest this week because your message of healing essentially from the inside out and having that show up as beauty in your body is something that I’ve been looking at in other areas with other products. And there’s a big difference that I’m seeing. I’m starting to look at this through a different lens, so to speak.

There are so many products now that I’m aware of where what they’re talking about – and beauty products especially fall into this category, but I was looking at nutritional products or products that say that they’re going to handle your blood sugar issues or whatever it is. So many of them are just saying what we’re going to do –

Oh, I was watching one on TV about a new weight loss pill. What it does is it changes the receptors in your brain to tell your brain that you’re full. Now, that’s just like trying to handle something on the outside. It’s like if there’s something wrong on the inside, put a cream on it or a lotion or take a pill. Even a lot of natural remedies are looking at things from this direction.

But the point being – one of the reasons why I wanted to have you on – is that what I’ve come to, after all these years is if you do handle the things that build health in your body, if you remove the toxic chemicals, if you don’t put garbage in your body, you’re going to be healthy, you’re going to be beautiful, you’re going to be energetic. All the things, all these products, all these toxic products, all these drugs are trying to – you know, people are trying to be sold all this stuff, but the true answer is exactly what you have in your book.

JOLENE HART: I agree. And I feel like a lot of these other products you’re talking about, they may work, but also bringing in these extra ingredients and extra toxins or products can throw your natural balance off in your body.

So I like it bring it back to zero and look at even a pattern of seasonal eating, which even goes beyond what we look at today in the grocery store. It ends up being so intuitive for your body and you end up getting the freshest and the best foods for your beauty just by eating simply with the seasons. That’s probably the most basic you can get and yet it really does work.

DEBRA: It really does. That’s something I’ve come to a long time ago too. But let’s just like look through your book. Her book is Eat Pretty. It’s a beautiful book. The design is beautiful. I’m really enjoying looking at it.

The first part, you want the reader to rethink beauty. How do you want us to rethink beauty?

JOLENE HART: You really think about beauty from the outside in. And I, of anyone, was so guilty of this as a beauty editor. It was my job to recommend products that would make you look more beautiful and make you look your best and I wasn’t looking at my inside the way I should have been.

So rethinking beauty and turning everything around and realizing that – I like to mention the name of my company, Beauty is Wellness. It really is that glow that you have, the energy and the vitality, and your body running at its best. It really does come from the inside out. So take a minute and rethink the way you think about product and you think about your beauty regimen because you might be looking at things the wrong way.

DEBRA: Yeah. I was just thinking about you being on this morning and about how we’re so oriented to wear make-up and that that’s what beauty looks like. But I think that somebody who is very healthy is so gorgeous.

JOLENE HART: We all just want that glow. I’m sure you would feel the same way, but as an acne sufferer, I have lived by my make-up. I wouldn’t go out of the house without a concealer layered under a foundation. All I wanted to do was to be able to leave the house in my bare skin and feel like I had a glow and like I was beautiful. It really took a long time to get there because I was looking at things the wrong way. I was looking at make-up first.

DEBRA: I am happy to say that I don’t wear make-up. I don’t wear foundation at all anymore. I only wear it when I go on TV or I’m giving a speech or something where I need to wear it professionally. But I don’t wear it anymore because I don’t have anything that I need to improve about my skin. Not that my skin is absolutely picture-perfect beautiful, but the thing is it has its own healthiness to it. And if I put the make-up over it, it doesn’t have that healthy look anymore.

JOLENE HART: I agree. And of course, here we are in the depth of summer. Nobody wants to be layering on make-up either. You want to be able to go in the ocean and go on the pool and not having make-up dripping off your face. You only want to feel like you’re naturally beautiful.

DEBRA: And we are naturally beautifully. And with that, we’re going to go to the break. When we come back, we’ll talk more with Jolene Hart about her book Eat Pretty.

. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Jolene Hart. She is the author of the book Eat Pretty: Nutrition & Beauty, Inside Out.

She is also a health coach certified by the Institute for Integrative Nutrition and American Association of Drugless Practitioners. And she’s the founder of Beauty Is Wellness.

I love that name, Jolene, because beauty is wellness. If you’re well, you look beautiful. That’s just the way it is. You can go to her website, JoleneHart.com and right on the front page is the recipe for that luscious cherry chocolate smoothie…

JOLENE HART: You’re making me want to make it.

DEBRA: I’m just in love with that

JOLENE HART: It’s so amazing because like you said, the cacao powder has so many benefits for your skin, so you don’t have to feel guilty. There’s no added sugar, and you have the great benefits of the fresh sweet cherries which are in season right now. It’s a healthy indulgence.

DEBRA: It is. It’s thick and smooth and it’s just delicious. I feel like I’m eating a treat that is actually making my body more healthy.

So speaking of foods making your body more healthy or not, tell us about some of the foods that most people eat that don’t make your body healthy. These are the ones that we should be eliminating or reducing in our diet. And tell us what the food is and something about how it’s harming our beauty.

JOLENE HART: I call this list beauty betrayers because many of these foods taste wonderful. They’re often staples of our diet, but they’re not serving us well.

So I’d never say eliminate 100% of these foods 100% of the time because of course, when you deprive yourself, you always want them more. But just being aware of certain foods that don’t serve your beauty well that may speed up the aging process or increase inflammation is very empowering for you so you can help balance your diet.

One of the big ones is sugar. Sugar does speed up aging. It does cause inflammation. I have a huge sweet tooth, so creating dishes like this cherry chocolate smoothie that are healthy and that help balance that was really important for me in finding a diet that would support beauty.

Another one is refined and processed foods. These foods are not living fuel for your beauty. They are meant to sit on the shelf for weeks and months at a time, and often they’re really devoid of nutrients.

So you want to go for those nutrient-dense colorful fresh foods to give yourself those anti-aging biochemicals, to give yourself the building blocks of great beauty. Really, the food you’re eating becomes your body on a molecular level. So you want to choose the best fuel.

When you sit and you think about that for a minute, that everything you put in your mouth is what your body is using to defend, to repair, to detox, and to create new skin cells, you want the best for yourself. You think, “Okay. Maybe, I can skip that vending machine snack this afternoon because it’s not doing me any good. It’s actually hurting me in my quest to look my best.” So just knowing this information is really helpful in aligning the way you eat.

DEBRA: I’m sitting here thinking about times in the past when I would get those things out of the vending machine. I would always take the opportunity when I go out, I would always take that as an opportunity to give myself a treat and go to the ice cream store or I would stop at a bakery or…

JOLENE HART: Right!

DEBRA: …or get a candy bar from a vending machine or whatever it was. I know it was just like I didn’t know any better and I wasn’t making the connection between what I put in my mouth is what my body turns out being. And that’s so important.

JOLENE HART: I have the same story…

DEBRA: It’s one of those things that something is so obvious, once you see it, you wonder why you didn’t see that before.

JOLENE HART: I know. I mean, I have the same story, but it’s not just you and I. So many women and men…

DEBRA: It’s everyone.

JOLENE HART: We all do this. And food is also a stressor for so many of us. There’s guilt involved. We’re obsessing about calories.

And so eating in this style, eating pretty is the way to make each meal during the day a pampering experience. The same amount of pampering you can get from a facial or buying a new lipstick, you creating these meals that nourish your body and make you look your best is really a pampering experience. So that’s what the book’s message is at the core.

DEBRA: I love that. Last week, I was talking with someone, as you were mentioning earlier, about the antibiotics outside your digestive system. You were talking about how could we eat in a way that would feed the microbes in our digestive system.

When I started thinking about that after I found out that antimicrobials and antibiotics were destroying our microbes, I started asking myself, “How can I feed my microbes?”

Now, it’s the same thing where it’s like, “How can I sit down in a meal that feeds my microbes, that feeds my body, that feeds my cells.” It’s not about depriving ourselves of the foods that we’re accustomed to. It’s about completely turning it around and saying, “How can I find the foods and love eating them and love preparing them and knowing that it’s an act of love for my body that I’m doing this?”

JOLENE HART: Absolutely, I couldn’t say it any better. And those fermented foods or foods that do support your gut health are so at the core of this book as well. The state of your skin is a direct reflection of your digestive system, of how well you’re breaking down and assimilating those nutrients, of how well your body is cleansing and eliminating. So what you’re doing is so important for your skin and your beauty as well.

DEBRA: I’m looking at a page here, it’s page 21 in your book where you have this list of things that foods can do. They can create free radicals or neutralize them. I’ll just let you give us the list instead of reading it myself. It’s interesting.

JOLENE HART: I don’t know if you want me to read more from the list, but just thinking about – you know, you sit down in a meal and you have a choice. Is your plate going to create those aging molecules in your body or are the foods you’re eating going to turn off the aging? Are they going to turn on genes for disease or are your foods going to switch off those genes and protect you from disease?

Every time you sit down, you have those questions in front of you and you can make a plate that makes you neutralize these free radicals, that protects you from sun damage, reduces inflammation, balances the pH of your body. There are so many incredible benefits you can get versus actually causing more damage in your body.

So I think for me that was another bottom line, when I sat down to think about what I was eating.

DEBRA: Yeah. Me too, me too. This is what we’re conditioned in our society to think, that you can just put anything in your mouth, food is fun and all of these things. But for me, I got down to deciding how can food help me be healthier? How can food help me have the energy to do what I want in life? And we can make those choices every day.

We need to go to break. And my guest today is Jolene Hart. She’s the author of Eat Pretty. And you can go to her website JoleneHart.com and try that cherry chocolate smoothie. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =


DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Jolene Hart. She’s the author of
Eat Pretty. You can get more information at her website, JoleneHart.com.

Jolene, you have a section here called Nutritional Genomics and Epigenetics. Tell us about that.

JOLENE HART: I think this is such a fascinating area of study that I think in the future and in maybe my next book, we’ll be able to explore a little bit more. As I was saying before about the foods that you eat turning on and turning off your gene action, a lot of us don’t think about having the ability to control our genes.

We think you’re born with genes for a certain eye color or a certain hair color, but there are genes for disease and for certain actions that rebuild your beauty that are turned on and off with your diet. So nutritional genomics and epigenetics are two areas of study that help us to relay our diet to the way our genes perform.

So eating in this manner – eating pretty, and eating with the seasons, and eating these fresh whole foods – is at this point we know is a wonderful way to turn on those genes for longevity and for disease prevention. So that’s something I think is really important.

And I hope we’ll study this more in relation to beauty specifically in the future because it would be really interesting to know what foods can encourage maybe [inaudible 00:28:06] to increase or encourage skin healing or hair growth.

DEBRA: I think that we’re moving in that direction. There’s a book that you might be familiar with. It’s called Deep Nutrition. Do you know that book?

JOLENE HART: Yes.

DEBRA: That was the first book that I read that showed – she actually has pictures in the book of what our face structure should be looking like and what it looks like when people actually eat whole foods and how it looked in the past.

And then if you compare that to how people’s bodies look now and how their faces look, people who have been raised on processed foods and things like that, it’s almost like our faces are deformed from the natural state. I think that was fascinating.

And that book too goes along with the same diet program that you recommend – I should say eating program. I don’t want to use the word “diet” because it has such negative connotations. But it talks about you and I and deep nutrition. We’re all in agreement about how to eat.

So tell us how to put together an eat pretty plate.

JOLENE HART: So there are a couple of qualities that I think you should look for when you’re putting together a plate. We talked a little bit before about the freshness of your food, the wholeness of your food, making sure you are getting living beauty fuel for yourself.

And to do that, look for seasonal foods and look for colorful foods. I have a chart in the book about a lot of the different phytochemicals and what they can do for your beauty. And so just eating that way is a wonderful foundation.

But beyond that, make sure you have the wonderful eat pretty plant-based – and I also recommend some animal-based proteins, which can be the building blocks of your beauty and are essential for repair.

And make sure you have plenty of healthy fats because I think a lot of us skimp on foods that we think maybe will cause us to gain weight. Actually, those fats like avocados and coconut oil and walnuts are so essential for producing hormones, for absorbing all the fat-soluble nutrients in your fruits and vegetables, and for making sure that your skin is well-moisturized and supple. So you don’t want to skip on those things.

So have a great balance of proteins and fats and then just load your plate up with those wonderful fresh seasonal foods that are anti-inflammatory. Inflammation can be a precursor to not only blemishes, but wrinkles and redness and sensitivity. So making sure that you have those anti-inflammatory foods is also a key for eating pretty.

DEBRA: You’ve got a great chart here. Obviously, this chart exists in other places, but you’ve done a good job of putting together in your own way from your beauty benefits viewpoint about the different nutrients and the food sources for each nutrient.

And I was actually, just the other day, wanted to put these together for a different reason, not with the beauty benefits, but I’m really interested in how I can get all the nutrients that I need to have from foods that I eat as the number one source rather than taking a multivitamin.

I take whole food vitamins right now or whole food supplements, but the first choice is to just be getting enough nutrients from my foods and know that if I want to make sure that I have vitamin A that I eat butternut squash or to have vitamin E in my diet to eat almonds. I think that I have a pretty good variety of things that I’m eating because I’m eating a lot of whole foods and fresh foods. But what I didn’t have down was knowing, “Okay, if I’m eating kale, it’s a good source of this vitamin and this vitamin” and being able to go through and make sure that I have all the vitamins.

So you’ve got a great chart here that makes it easy to do that.

JOLENE HART: It helps me as well. I have a similar eating style where I do take a whole food based supplement, but I aim to get all of my nutrition from whole foods.

So I don’t think we know at this point how compounds work synergistically in the foods that we eat. So I think it’s short-sided to think that I can just take a biotin supplement to get my B’s, my B7. I think we need to get all these vitamins from the foods because they do come with other compounds that help us to break them down and assimilate them. So it’s always best to get them from the food source.

DEBRA: I think so too, because there are co-factors. Even all those are included in the whole foods. I’m just becoming so much more aware of food and plants and just the things we put in our mouths, having them be natural and whole and getting all those nutrients.

This show is about toxic chemicals and not being toxic, but there’s this whole other layer beyond something not being toxic, but being life-giving.

JOLENE HART: I agree.

DEBRA: And that’s what we’re talking about today, moving into that realm of having there be life-giving foods that are building life in your body.

JOLENE HART: Absolutely, living fuel. And for so long, I didn’t cook with fresh foods. I ate for convenience. And for many, many days, that just meant eating packaged foods and processed foods and nothing that [inaudible 00:33:50] is probably the biggest step that I took toward healing myself.

DEBRA: Good. It’s about time for us to go to break. I’m scrolling through your book as we’re talking, and you have a wonderful chapter here. You call it the Eat Pretty Pantry.

You go through a list of different foods and describe what it does to help make your body more beautiful. We’ll talk about that when we come back.

JOLENE HART: Great.

DEBRA: You know what? We still have another minute…

JOLENE HART: Okay. Just as a preview…

DEBRA: Wait. No, never mind.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jolene Hart. She’s the author of Eat Pretty. Her website is JoleneHart.com. When we come back, she’s going to tell us about different healthy foods and how they make us more beautiful.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =


DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Jolene Hart. She’s the author of
Eat Pretty: Nutrition and Beauty, Inside and Out .

Jolene, tell us about some of the foods in your Eat Pretty Pantry.

JOLENE HART: Absolutely! Well, the Eat Pretty Pantry Pantry are really the foods that you need as a foundation for all these healthy meals. So personally for me, it’s so much easier to eat in a healthy way if I have those components of a meal ready when I get home.

So you go to the farmers’ market and you buy whatever is in season. And then, you come home with these fresh foods, but fresh vegetables are not on their own a meal. So, having these healthy gluten-free grains, these wonderful fats and proteins to cook with in your pantry makes it easy to put together a meal in 30 minutes or less. And this is something that I rely on every single week for my family.

Some of my favorites are gluten-free grains like buckwheat, quinoa, and millet. They’re so rich in beauty minerals. Some cheese seeds and hemp seeds are wonderful for creating smoothies. You’ll see those in the cherry chocolate smoothie.

Other things like walnuts and lentils and gluten-free oats and gluten-free oats, wonderful stuff like coconut oil and olive oil –I go through all the reasons why these are wonderful ingredients for your beauty and how they can help contribute to your daily meals – and even some unknown ones like sea vegetables and how important those are for your body.

DEBRA: This is just a wonderful resource because you’re taking something that—as we said before, the diet that you’re talking about is not unique to you, but what is unique to you is to show people how to use it to improve how their bodies look.

And that’s something that everybody wants. It’s it’s something that a lot of toxic chemicals are being used. You’re showing how this applies in a very organized way, in a very delicious way. You’ve done an incredible job with this book. I’m just so pleased with it.

So tell us now about your seasonal approach.

JOLENE HART: It really is amazing. It wasn’t something that I picked up on right away. But as I was eating fresh foods and realizing that the most nutrient-dense and the freshest foods are what is in season at certain times of the year, I also started to compare their benefits to what my needs were season to season.

For example, here we are in height of summer and we need a little bit of extra UV protection because we’re getting more sun exposure, we need extra hydration and we all want to stay slim at this time of the year, because we’re wearing less clothing and we’re wearing our bathing suits, if you look at what’s in the Eat Pretty Beauty Basket at this time of the year, the foods target those exact benefits.

So you have foods like watermelon and tomatoes that are naturally UV-protective for your body. They’re not something that you can use to replace sun screen, but they’re a wonderful underlying layer of protection for your skin that will amplify the benefits that you have from your natural products.

You have foods like celeries and cucumber and coconut water that are great for hydrating you. And as you’re digesting those foods that are naturally high in water, you’re actually hydrating better than if you are just chugging water. If you’re chugging water, you’re going to be just getting rid of it as quickly as you’re drinking it. So having those slow digesting foods is going to keep you well-hydrated and keep your electrolytes in balance, which is so important if you’re working out or you’re sweating a lot.

And then also, you have naturally diuretic foods. You have pineapple which is great for a flat belly. Again, cucumber is wonderful as a diuretic just to keep the water retention out this time of the year and help you to feel slim as well. No one wants to feel like they had extra water they’re carrying around when it’s near 92° outside.

So it’s just amazing that the foods – and this continues each season. Everything that you really do need in a season is coming from the foods that are ripe at that time of the year.

DEBRA: Isn’t that a beautiful symbiotic relationship with nature?

JOLENE HART: It’s incredible.

DEBRA: I used to have no awareness of nature at all. I was a hardcore consumer living in the industrial consumer world and it was just like, “Oh, nature is some place I went in summer camp.” And then I went through this big transformation where I really started seeing that we really are creatures of nature and everything that we need to be healthy and happy is all in the natural world.

As the seasons change, different plants come up and those are the things that we need to support our health at that time of the year. But also from place to place, eating locally, that as we eat the foods of our place, it helps our bodies live in that environment better.

JOLENE HART: I absolutely agree. Perhaps we were overcomplicating it earlier. We didn’t realize.

DEBRA: So we just have a few minutes left. Anything you’d like to talk about that we haven’t covered?

JOLENE HART: Well, after we go through all of the seasons in the book, I have a section called The Essential Beauty Players, which didn’t want to lose the section. It doesn’t have to do with eating per se, but I do talk about digestion and hormone balance, getting better sleep and your emotions and how they relate to your beauty because all of these areas are part of the beauty conversation. And food does relate to each one of them, but it’s not strictly food.

So learning how to balance your hormones through self-care and through meditation and learning how your moods can affect the way your skin looks, I think this is all so fascinating. I wanted to make sure that it was part of Eat Pretty because I didn’t feel like this information had been represented fully in the media or in other books that have been published.

And the first chapter is, again, digestion. You and I could probably talk an hour about digestion.

DEBRA: We could probably talk an hour about digestion. Digestion is so important. We did talk about digestion on this show because not only is it just important for health, but because of the toxic connection that if your digestion isn’t working and having things moved through your body, what happens is that the toxic chemicals that come in your body get processed by your liver and then get dumped into your intestines in order to be removed from the body.

And if they’re just sitting there because your intestines aren’t moving, they get reabsorbed by your body. So good digestion, in addition to really getting the nutrients out of the food is just essential to getting the toxic chemicals out of your body too.

JOLENE HART: And your skin will shoulder some of that toxic waste burden as well, the waste-removal burden. Maybe you’ll see skin issues of rashes popping up and hives or swatches. You don’t know what’s going on. And your skin is taking on some of that burden because you’re not digesting well.

DEBRA: Fascinating subject. Wow! So if you were to tell people one thing that they could do at the end of the show to get started on this, what would that be?

JOLENE HART: Make it fun! Go to your farmers’ market today and see what you can find, what’s the freshest, what’s ripe right now and bring it home and start cooking with it. Make it a really fun, beautiful, like I said, pampering experience for yourself and start rethinking the way you see your daily meal.

DEBRA: Spa meals, but not spa meals in the sense of having them…

JOLENE HART: Bird food.

DEBRA: Bird food, yeah. No, these are really nutritious. This is not about just eating lettuces. It’s not a diet like that. It’s a spa meal in the sense that you’re feeding yourself for beauty and healthiness.

JOLENE HART: …and start feeling incredible.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

JOLENE HART: But it is really important to listen to your body and find out how your body reacts to these foods because my optimal plate is not going to look the same as yours and it’s not going to look the same as my neighbor’s. So really do hear that connection to your body and hear how you respond and look how you respond in the mirror.

DEBRA: So what do you eat? That’s probably a different list of foods than what I eat, but what do you eat?

JOLENE HART: I’m happiest on a Pescetarian diet. I think there are a lot of benefits to eating fish and pastured eggs even though they are animal products.

But personally, I’ve had an allergy to wheat my whole life. So when I finally went gluten-free, that was one of the last things I needed to do to really feel great, to get my energy back. And for a long time, I had been struggling with absorbing certain nutrients. And once I took the gluten out, for me, that was the epiphany moment of everything finally feels good.

But eating seasonally and eating fresh makes me feel my best. I obviously splurge now. And then like I said, my sweet tooth is probably the biggest downfall, but I never feel my best if I don’t go back to this style of eating.

DEBRA: Yeah, I totally agree with you. Gluten was a really big thing for me as well. I love bread.

It was interesting because I gave up sugar a long time ago. And it was much easier for me to give up sugar and then go to the natural sweeteners like honey and maple syrup and things like that. And then finally, what I’m doing right now is no sweeteners. The only sweet things I’m eating is fruit. So that’s why I love your smoothie so much. But it was much more difficult to not eat bread and butter. I could just eat bread and butter everyday for every meal and nothing else. I love bread and butter.

JOLENE HART: You don’t think about it, but those carbs in your body also turn to sugar. So that was maybe a hidden source that you are getting your sugar-craving satisfied by, but it wasn’t serving your body either.

DEBRA: But now, I make biscuits and pancakes and all those things from almond flower. And so it gives me the same satisfaction without giving me the reaction to the gluten. For me, eliminating gluten actually made my thyroid not be crazy anymore. Within 30 days, my thyroid went to normal.

So anyway, we’re at the end of the show. Thank you so much, Jolene.

JOLENE HART: Thank you. This is wonderful.

DEBRA: Thank you. Her website is JoleneHart.com. The book is Eat Pretty, a wonderful subject.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com to find out who’s going to be on tomorrow and to listen to past shows. This show will be archived immediately. Be well.

Fragrance-free Cleaning Products That Benefit The Environment Too

Mary AllenMy guest today is Mary Allen, co-owner of Savvy Green LLC with Rita Knorr. Based in St. Petersburg, Florida, their new brand of fragrance-free household cleaning products are also designed with the environment in mind. We’ll be talking about toxic chemicals in cleaning products and how simple cleaning products can work just as well. Mary and Rita started their company at home, using a simple recipe to create a dry laundry detergent to give to friends and family. The thought was that if all of their friends used the powder detergent “gifts,” that alone could account for a significant reduction of detergents in large plastic containers and their associated carbon footprint. Of course, their friends loved the powder and a new cleaning products brand was born. Mary grew up in a family of grocers. From a young age working in the store, she loved to understand what brought people into the store. After college started working retail specialty and department stores as a buyer and manager in many areas of the store. She has worked in product development, merchandising, testing, packaging, marketing and sales. She has traveled the world to bring the best products to her customers. most recently for 21 years with Bealls Department Stores and Bealls Outlet Stores. www.savvygreen.net

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Fragrance-Free Cleaning Products that Benefit the Environment too

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Mary Allen

Date of Broadcast: July 01, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. You know I always love—I’ve been doing the show for how long now? About a year and a half. I always love listening to that opening music because it really is about making a decision to do something right.

And that’s what we’ll talk about in the show. It’s about making decisions to do things that are less toxic, so that you have better health and you take care of the environment and that we’re supporting life. Everything we talk about on the show is life supporting as opposed to life destructing.

I just read something this morning about how we don’t need to be afraid of things that appear to be dangerous if we know what to do to overcome them.

We can hear about toxic chemicals in the news all the time. Or it just sounds like we live in such a dangerous world. But if we know what to do, if we know that we can make a different choice and choose something that is less toxic, if we know that we can remove those toxic chemicals from our body and how to do these things, it’s not such a dangerous world.

It may still be toxic. It may still be harmful to other people that don’t know how to take care of themselves. It’s certainly harmful to the environment, so we absolutely need to clean up the world. We absolutely need to handle and remove all the toxic chemicals that we possibly can.

But each of us don’t need to be afraid that we are going to be sick and die or have less quality of life even though that’s happening all around us because there is enough information. If you do the things that we talk about on the show and on my website, you can have a healthy, happy life. And it’s totally, totally possible.

So that’s why I do the show everyday – every week day. And that’s why we have shows in the archives so that you can get all this information and hear all these all inspiring people who are making the world a less toxic place to live.

And now I’ll get off my soapbox, and we’ll talk about—well, soap actually. We are going to be talking about cleaning products, non-toxic cleaning products.

My guest today is Mary Allen. She is the co-owner of “Savvy Green” with her partner, Rita Knorr. They’re based right here in St. Petersburg, Florida which is right next to me in Clearwater, Florida. They have a new brand of fragrance-free household cleaning products that are also designed with the environment in mind.

Thanks for being on the show, Mary.

MARY ALLEN: Thank you so much, Debra. Thank you for your show and sharing all the information that you do with […]

DEBRA: Thank you. Are you hearing me okay? I’m hearing some static on the line.

MARY ALLEN: Great. Yes, I hear you okay.

DEBRA: Okay, good. So Mary, tell us how you—well, I know first of all you had an environmental interest. So why don’t you tell us about how you’re interested in living in a less toxic way. And then tell us about you and Rita started your company.

MARY ALLEN: Well, for me personally, living as simply and environmentally conscientious as possible mainly because I did use to travel a lot. I still do travel some. But you know when you travel around the world and see what’s happening to our environment globally, it really makes you think about where we live.

So many rules and regulations revolve around what we eat and drink anymore. But yet you don’t hear so much about what goes on inside our homes. It’s starting to be more important […] But I really think that what goes on around our home is not as dominant in what you hear out there…

DEBRA: Well, I would say in comparison to hearing about environmental issues in the news, hearing about the toxic dangers right inside our homes and consumer products is not given as much attention.

MARY ALLEN: Right. And that’s what’s so interesting to me because I’m really interested in being safe in what I eat and what I use. So I want to know what’s in the products. It’s interesting to me that so many of the products out there aren’t regulated, that so many companies can put whatever ingredients they want into products which is really interesting to me.

So I don’t know all the rules and regulations. I’m not claiming that I do. But it is interesting to me that there isn’t as much focus with what we do use inside the home in […]

DEBRA: Well, I think that needs to change. I think actually that every product should list every ingredient. And Walmart is actually coming up to be demanding that in the next two years from all their vendors, which I think is a great step in the right direction. It just should be every product that the consumer should be able to know what’s in it.

MARY ALLEN: Exactly! And I totally agree with you. That’s right. I think a lot of companies are getting onboard with it. And Whole Foods has really been a very important leader in calling out ingredients that they don’t want to sell in their products.

So, I think that’s really a good thing for all of us.

DEBRA: Good! So then tell us a little bit about your life before you decided to do this company, this new company.

MARY ALLEN: Well, I started at a young age. My family was actually in the grocery business. And so I’m very entrepreneurial. That really got me started on my path basically. As a kid, I worked with my dad in his store. And it really got me interested in products and things that people wanted to buy and what’s sold.

And then from there, after I got off school, it’s sort of interesting that I ended up working with someone in a specialty store and got really hooked into retailing and merchandising.

And so my career started in buying for a specialty store in Jacksonville, and so I’ve always lived in Florida. But from there I worked for a department store and then got more involved in product development, packaging. And then most recently through the past 20 years, I worked for […]

DEBRA: I know Bealles Department Store.

MARY ALLEN: Right.

DEBRA: It’s actually a great place to get really cheap clothes. And a lot of times, I find natural fiber things there. So that’s good.

MARY ALLEN:Well, it’s a great locally private held company.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN:And their department stores are only in Florida, but their outlet stores are all over the country.

DEBRA: Wow!

MARY ALLEN: So it’s just great that a local family-owned company is still in business because it’s tough to compete against the bigger boys.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: But anyway, it was a great foundation for my background. I ended up getting into the hardline area which are things like home goods and gourmet food, things that people buy for gifts for their homes. And so, a lot of that involved product development, packaging, traveling globally, looking for products for our stores, especially for our Florida lifestyle.

Basically, it’s mostly hardline. But it really got me involved in testing because so many of our home goods now before they come in to the country and go out, they’re all tested, believe it or not. They’re tested for lead. Candles are tested for lead, ceramics and things like that. So I got very involved in the whole testing process as a merchandise manager eventually over a group of buyers and travelling around.

We did so much importing and bringing our own products, developing our own products, so I was very conscientious about bringing in the very best that we could, making sure everything’s tested well, that we are being safe and responsible in what we were bringing in. That sort of got me on this whole testing thing.

DEBRA: Let me ask you a question. As somebody who shops at those outlets, I have no idea that you were doing all of that. I had no idea of the safety that you are going through. So how come they don’t say we test all our products and things like that? We’ve only got about 15 seconds for you to answer that.

MARY ALLEN: Well, it’s hard to say, but I guess mainly because a lot of it is actually customs regulation. So customs want to be sure that you’re bringing in all of these products tested for across […] in California especially for lead.

DEBRA: Oh…

MARY ALLEN: Because especially for kids’ items, you have to be so cautious.

DEBRA: I didn’t know there were customs rules about that. I want to hear more about that when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Mary Allen. We’re actually going to be talking about her new line of cleaning products that are fragrance-free and benefit the environment. She’s got some other interesting things to tell us. We will hear more about it when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Mary Allen. She’s the co-owner of Savvy Green. And they have a new brand of fragrance-free household cleaning products that are also designed with the environment in mind.

Mary, so could you just tell us a little more about the customs regulations? You were just talking about they’re required to be tested, products […] get through customs?

MARY ALLEN: Well, a lot of things that come in—I’m sorry, a lot of things that do come into the country do need to be tested and make it through based on our customs broker’s rules […] that customs does require. But the rules have changed so much. It has been a few years since I’ve been involved in the importing, so I don’t want to speak to what the custom’s regulations are right now.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: But I can tell you that we are, as a country, very conscientious about lead and products. And that’s why you see any more things being recalled from companies because there may have been too much lead in a product. But we did test for that.

And so all of these details really made for my background and the beginning that really helped me with Savvy Green—because of the merchandising, because of the packaging, the product development.

The marketing background that I have between Bealles Department stores and Bealles Outlet stores. And then, before that, the department stores. So that attention to detail really helped me with this process of building a new brand and focusing on things that are important to me with the brand and my partner, Rita Knorr, because she has always been an early adaptor of living this lifestyle and healthy choices. So it’s really been a big part of Savvy Green.

DEBRA: So tell us how the two of you met and what made you decide to start this company.

MARY ALLEN: Well, actually, we met in yoga class. But we’ve become very good friends. We live in St. Petersburg Florida. Rita and her husband, Rick, are neighbors. We’re friends and neighbors. We practice yoga. Rita is a yoga teacher. She has many years of engineering. She has 25 years in engineering. She’s really interested in how things work and how to improve and live in an environmentally sustainable lifestyle.

So, we met through all of that. And then, the way Savvy Green sort of got started was she was making her own—Rita was making her own laundry detergent in her kitchen. And she would make this laundry detergent that she would put in glass jars and give to friends as gifts.

DEBRA: Now, what motivated her to do that? I know that a lot of people—like I make my own cleaning products, but I don’t make my own laundry detergent. So do you know why decided that she felt like she needed to make her own instead of use laundry detergents that were on the market?

MARY ALLEN: Well, first of all, she’s always interested in how things work and how to be more sustainable. So, of course she wanted to figure out. And from her background as an engineer, it made her want to figure out how to be greener and cleaner as well as try and help change other people’s lifestyles in that regard.

She actually had seen—and there’s a picture, I wish I could show the picture on the radio show. But she actually had seen a laundromat in our area and it had piles of these plastic jugs on the roof—I mean, hundreds, maybe a thousand, of these plastic jugs on the roof of the laundromat. And these are, of course, liquid laundry detergent.

DEBRA: Right.

MARY ALLEN: Well, liquid laundry detergents are predominantly water. And so the carbon footprint of liquid laundry detergent is much higher because it’s mostly water. And so shipping predominantly water is not the best use for resources.

DEBRA: No, I’m afraid not.

MARY ALLEN: So that got Rita involved in the powder and doing some research to find good recipes for the powder.

Well, I would go over to her house. She would be in her kitchen counter. And the next thing you know, I’m helping her grate soap. And before her husband could even walk in the kitchen, there’s like piles of powder all over the kitchen.

So me, with my backgroun din merchandising and retailing and product development, I’m thinking, “Wow Rita! You could really do something with your laundry detergent.”

And so that sort of how it got started. We talked about selling it maybe at one of the Saturday morning markets, green markets that we have. And then she told me this name that she had thought of ‘Savvy Green.’ And of course with my product development and brand management background, I have a sense that I just loved the name “Savvy Green.”

I loved everything about it because ‘savvy’ is smart. And green is how we want to live. And we wanted to be clean. So that sort of how smart green and clean came along because of Savvy Green.

So from there, then we both got excited about Savvy Green and expanding on how to expand her powdered laundry detergent.

DEBRA: Well, I’ve been using your laundry detergent. And it works really well. And it has absolutely no fragrance. What made you decide to not put a fragrance on it?

MARY ALLEN: Well, so many, including myself, I’m not a big—even though I’ve been in the home goods, for some reason, scents in candles and in potpourri have a tendency make me not feel so great. And so many people I know are allergic to certain fragrances. And plus, so many fragrances are artificial.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: There are very, very few natural fragrances out there. There are essential oils. They’re out there. But so many are artificial, so we didn’t want to…

DEBRA: They are. Good!

MARY ALLEN: Yes.

DEBRA: One thing that just amazes me about laundry detergent being scented is that I can smell laundry detergent on people’s clothing. And why would a manufacturer want to clash with somebody’s personal choice to wear perfume or not just from an aesthetic viewpoint.

So, anyway, we need to go to break. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Mary Allen from Savvy Green. Their website is SavvyGreen.net. You can go there and find out all about their cleaning products. But we’re going to talk about them right about after the break. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Mary Allen. She’s the co-owner of Savvy Green LLC with Rita Knorr. They’re in St. Petersburg Florida. And their website is SavvyGreen.net where you can go and find out more about all the products we’re about to talk about. And you can also order them online because I think that they’re only in our stores locally here in Florida. Is that correct?

MARY ALLEN: Actually, believe it or not, we do have a great co-op in Chicago that we’re selling Savvy Green.

DEBRA: Great!

MARY ALLEN: We have two or three stores in New York city that we’re selling Savvy Green. We’re in North Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee. So we’re in a few stores around the southeast and northeast. And we’re working on expanding.

DEBRA: Well, listeners, if you don’t find it in your local stores, you can ask them for it. And maybe they’ll put them on their shelves because they really are very good products.

So tell us about it. Tell us first about the packaging because I know that’s really important to your company.

MARY ALLEN: Yes. It is very important because when Rita first started giving the gift in the glass jars, we thought, “Wow! Glass jars are very expensive.” And as you expand and want to ship, they could be a problem with the shipping. They’re heavy, and it could be cost-prohibitive for us to put the laundry detergent in. So we started…

DEBRA: Well, I saw a thing about glass. You were talking about not shipping water because of the extra cost of energy usage and pollution generated by that. Because glasses are heavy, it also adds to that same shipping problem of additional pollution produced by glass. So where it’s very non-toxic for people to use, if something else could be used for a container, it’s better for it. It reduces the amount of pollution that goes out into the environment.

MARY ALLEN: Right. And so for us to come up with a packaging of our own—living in Florida most powdered laundry detergents we were seeing always came in a cardboard box. And you couldn’t really reseal the cardboard box. And in Florida with our humidity—well, guess what? A lot of powdered laundry detergents in a cardboard box would end up clumping because moisture would get into the box. So we’re thinking, “Well, to come with just another cardboard box just didn’t make sense.”

So we started looking around for what could be an alternative to a cardboard box, and we started of thinking of using a flexible pouch. But we didn’t want to use any flexible pouch because, clearly, that’s plastic. I started doing more research and found a brand new innovative product that companies were beginning to use called ‘HTPE#2’ high density poly-ethylene. And it’s something that could actually be recycled with other plastic bags and products in the mainstream of recycling. And so that really interested us—and especially since our film comes from recycled material.

DEBRA: Oh, good!

MARY ALLEN: Yes. So and then any of the scraps from our packaging are then recycled.

So we did some research and found some companies that did this HTPE#2 pouch and took it from there. Of course, we had to have a great zipper because we wanted it to reseal every time. Since we’re both really into details, so many packages that you get after a few tries just don’t close anymore.

DEBRA: Yes. I’ve had that experience.

MARY ALLEN: So, we wanted to have a great zip-closure. So all of these things increased our price just a little bit, but we think that this attention to detail really gives us a high value product. So that’s how the package was born.

And the other thing that’s important about our package, I can tell you, is these water-based inks. And it’s a matte finish. So it’s really important to us. We wanted it to look very natural and clean-looking. And so the water-based inks that are used, they can be reused again if they they’re doing the printing process.

DEBRA: That’s wonderful. Yes.

MARY ALLEN: So there’s very little, if any, waste in our printing process.

DEBRA: And the ink doesn’t smell on the package either.

MARY ALLEN: Correct! And it’s just really one layer. Our package is a little thicker than most. It gives us a little better moisture barrier, so to speak, to keep the product from clumping. So that improves shelf-life and then it also improves it from any damage to the product.

We do get a little bit of wrinkling because the product is a little thicker than most. But it’s a tough package and it is recyclable which we’re very proud of. And because of that, we’ve actually won a few awards for our packaging. So we’re pretty excited about that because she’s a new company.

DEBRA: Yes. That’s very good. It’s very good. It’s very easy to just sit it on—it also stands up really well. Even though it’s a pouch, it stands up with the folds on the bottom of it. It stands up really well. I can just easily unzip it and easily re-zip it after I use it. The product itself has no fragrance. The plastic package has no outgassing from the inside, from the plastic. And you just did a really good job with that part of it.

MARY ALLEN: Thank you so much. It is a stand-up pouch. And what’s so great about it is takes up so much less space than so many other packages. It also is easy for people to pick up and hold. A lot of heavy car—first of all, we really wanted an ultra-concentrated powder because Rita’s product, you don’t really need to use very much, a tablespoon or less and you’re good to go.

We didn’t want to overdose. We didn’t want to include any directions that would cause you to overdose on using your detergent. And it’s really easy to hold and pick up. It feels good in your hands. And we’ve gotten a lot of compliments from a lot of people because of that because it is easy to hold and pick up and takes up less space.

DEBRA: Yes, it does. It does all those things. We need to go to break in just a few seconds. So when we come back I want you to tell us all about—you have three products. I want you to describe each one of them, so our listeners get an idea of what you have.

MARY ALLEN: Okay, great! Thank you.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Mary Allen, co-owner of Savvy Green with her partner, Rita Knorr. And their website is SavvyGreen.net. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Mary Allen, co- owner of Savvy Green with Rita Knorr. And their website is SavvyGreen.net.

So, tell us about your products.

MARY ALLEN: Currently, Debra. We have three products—our powdered laundry detergent, our powdered dishwasher detergent and an oxygen brightening powder. They’re in our same package—refillable pouch. All are super concentrated.

Clearly, we wanted to be able to use one small scoop. And so the scoop is included in every package.

But the laundry detergent is—actually, all of our products are phosphate-free, chlorine-free, fragrance-free. The laundry detergent has 108 standard washes. It’s just slightly under a tablespoon that you use. And it really works. I’ve been using that product for quite a while. It’s biodegradable. It’s great for people with sensitive skin. It’s safe for babies and baby’s diapers. It’s safe for delicate fabrics.

We don’t recommend using softeners. In some cases, you might have to. If you have large clothes, you might have to use one and a half or two scoops. But in general, from everything I’ve heard, the number of washes really works because of its super concentration. You really don’t need that much in it.

And we don’t leave any residue. The product leaves no residue which is so terrific. In the dishwasher detergent, the same, no residue. Ultra-concentrated, you get 80 loads out of our dishwashing detergent.

And then, in the oxygen brightening powder, that’s basically a non-chlorine bleach. And you can use anywhere from half a scoop to three scoops depending on what you’re using. It’s a great destainer and deodorizer. You can use it in your laundry as a laundry booster. You can use alone to soak things in a bucket or in a sink to help remove stains.

So, currently, those are our three items. We will be coming out with the single dose packs in the fall in laundry and dishwasher detergent. So we’re really excited about that as well.

And those are the three products.

And of course, just FYI on the laundry detergent, it is good for front and top loading machines which is great. So it works great in both cold and warm water. So I can say that they really do work. My family uses them. And we get great reviews from the family, you know that you have a good product.

DEBRA: Right. So can you tell us what the ingredients are in each of those products?

MARY ALLEN: Oh, sure. So in the laundry detergent, we have sodium carbonate which is basically washing soda. We also have sodium methyl silicate which is a drying agent. It’s more or less a—I mean, it’s a detergent. It’s mineral-based detergent. And then we also have […] detergent which is a detergent. And so those are the three ingredients in the laundry detergent. It’s very clean, very organic mineral-based items in our detergent. And it’s mostly washing soda.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: It’s a very simple ingredient. And really, that’s all you need. It doesn’t leave chemicals in your clothes like some other products. It actually cleans your clothes, so you don’t need a fragrance to mask not very clean clothes.

DEBRA: My clothes seem very clean when I wash them. And it doesn’t seem like they have anything in them. They just are very clean. So, what’s in the dishwasher detergent?

MARY ALLEN: Oh boy. Well, let’s see. In the dishwashing detergent is much more complicated because of the food that you have to get out of your dishes. Let me just make sure that I’m reading this right now. Let’s remember that I’m not a chemist, Debra.

DEBRA: It’s okay.

MARY ALLEN: So if I don’t pronounce something right, you chemists that are watching this, please forgive.

But our ingredients in the dishwashing detergent are soda ash or sodium carbonate—just like our laundry detergent, it’s the base—sodium citrate, sodium sulphate, sodium methyl silicate, sodium bicarbonate, alcoholic oxalate, silica, sodium polyacrylate, protease and amylase enzymes, fatty alcohol polyglycol ether and then the sodium methyl glycol dye succinate.

All of these ingredients are naturally derived from plants and minerals. They’re either a water softener or a detergent. The enzymes actually are produced from living organisms and they’re like catalysts in the detergent that help remove stains.

They break down the starches and the proteins in the food that may be left on your dishes.

The sodium carbonate, its main use is for water softener. Sodium citrate does the softening as well. So, many of these ingredients are basically to soften the water, so that they can get clean. Things like sodium sulphate and silica, they’re actually used for anti-clumping. They keep the powder from clumping.

Let’s see, what did I forget here? The fatty alcohol polyglycol ether, that’s a rinse aid to keep your glasses and dishes from spotting.

So, all of these things are sourced from US companies in our dishwashing detergent.

DEBRA: Oh good.

MARY ALLEN: It’s very complicated I found to get a dishwashing detergent that’s super concentrated that cleans your dishes, that doesn’t leave the residue. And our dishwashing detergent, I believe, is really terrific.

DEBRA: Well, you know I don’t have a dishwasher which is why I haven’t tried yours, your dishwashing detergent. But I know that early on, when I was trying to find the home made recipes for all these things because products like yours definitely exist 30 years ago, it was really hard to find something that I could wash my dishes with just using my dishwasher that I did have at that time.

I just went to washing my dishes by hand because you can just use regular plain old soap to wash your dishes by hand. And I have been doing that now for more than 30 years. I’m just accustomed to doing it that way.

I’m not saying that people shouldn’t buy your product if they have a dishwasher, but I don’t think we need to have a machine to do everything.

MARY ALLEN: Right.

DEBRA: Yes. Well, I have a washing machine because it’s really hard to wash clothes.

MARY ALLEN: Right.

DEBRA: It’s really hard to wash clothes by hand, and then hang them up on your drier and on the clothesline and stuff. So I do have a washer and a drier. But for dishes, I just wash them by hand with soap.

MARY ALLEN: I was going to say, I used to do most of my dishes by hand as well. But I found over time, I think, that you may use actually use less water by using your dishwasher more. And if you can find something that’s an efficient cleaner, it really makes a difference.

And so I started using my dishwasher once I found the product that I liked. And with our dishwashing detergent, you can still use a rich rinse agent as you normally would.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: And then our oxygen brightening powder is basically two ingredients. I mean it is two ingredients. It’s sodium bicarbonate—and again sodium carbonate. So both are cleaning, softening agents. Sodium bicarbonate is—I guess the best way to say is it’s a non-chlorine bleach. It whitens, it brightens, it cleans.

DEBRA: Right.

MARY ALLEN: It’s a great product. And this oxygen brightening powder is terrific and has so many uses.

It’s not a proprietary formula. A lot of different companies have an oxygen brightening powder, but we felt like it was important for us to get one out there because…

DEBRA: To go with your detergent.

MARY ALLEN: …because it goes with our detergent, right.

DEBRA: Yes.

MARY ALLEN: And it really helps clean. You don’t need a liquid stain remover. It does the job.

DEBRA: Yes. Well, we’ve only got about just over a minute left. So are there any final things you would like to say that we haven’t covered?

MARY ALLEN: I can just say that we are looking to expand into more stores. We’re obviously a new company. So hopefully, people will check our website out and follow us as we grow. And please do tell your local stores about Savvy Green.

Debra, we just appreciate you being so interested in our company and hearing more about our products.

DEBRA: Thank you so much. So that was Mary Allen and her website is SavvyGreen.net. Remember the ‘.net.’ It’s not “SavvyGreen.com.” It’s SavvyGreen.net. Go check out their website, and find out all about their products.

And if they don’t carry them at your local store, then you can ask your store, tell them about it, and see if they’ll stock it for you.

I really like this laundry product. It just really gets my clothes clean. I have used some other natural ones that have their own natural fragrances. But this one absolutely has no fragrance, smell, odor, anything about it. So if you’re looking for something fragrance-free that works and is all natural, this is it.

So you’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can find out more about other shows and listen to the archives by going to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Medicinal Plants Can Replace Toxic Drugs

Pamela SeefeldMy guest today is Pamela Seefeld,R.Ph, a pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants. I heard about Pamela from a friend of mine, whose mother was on a lot of drugs for a specific condition. Pamela replaced the prescription drugs with medicinal botanicals and his mom started doing better. We’ll be talking about how synthetic drugs are toxic to the body and how medicinal plants can be a viable alternative. Pamela is a 1990 graduate of the University of Florida College of Pharmacy, where she studied Pharmacognosy (the study of medicines derived from plants and other natural sources). She has worked as an integrative pharmacist teaching physicians, pharmacists and the general public about the proper use of botanicals. She is also a grant reviewer for NIH in Washington D.C. and the owner of Botanical Resource and Botanical Resource Med Spa in Clearwater, Florida. www.botanicalresource.com

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH PAMELA SEEFELD

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Medicinal Plants Can Replace Toxic Drugs

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph.

Date of Broadcast: July 30, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida on July 30th 2014. And today, we’re going to talk about drugs and some alternatives to taking drugs.

You’ve probably all seen those commercials on television where they come on with some product, a drug product they want to sell and there’s a beautiful scene of grandparents playing with children or running through a meadow, just something really beautiful and this is the life that you want to have and that you’ll have if you take this drug.

“And oh, by the way,” they say in a very pleasant voice, “it also causes liver damage and kidney failure and death.”

And if you go through volumes of places you can go online, books at the library and if you take any of these drugs, it will come with a warning label that has a very huge, long list of side effects. And all of these drugs are made in laboratories and factories. They’re industrial products that are made from some of the same chemicals that toxic chemicals in consumer products were made from.

So they may alleviate your symptoms, but they don’t have any properties in them that actually heal your body like natural materials do.

So today, we’re going to be talking with my guest. Her name is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants instead of drugs. I had never heard of a pharmacist who dispenses plants and so I thought I’d have her on the show.

I actually heard about her because a friend of mine, she practices here in Clearwater, a friend of mine, her mother has been taking a lot of drugs for a very common illness. He wanted to get her off the drugs. He went to see my guest and she gave him some medicine plant kind of remedies instead of drugs and she’s doing a lot of better – right away, she started doing a lot better. So I thought I’d better call her. She’s Pamela Seefeld and her business is Botanical Resource in Clearwater, Florida.

Hi, Pamela!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Hey! Great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. I’m so happy to have you because this is a new field for me to learn about. So tell me, how did you get interested in being a pharmacist. And within the field of pharmacy, why did you chose – there’s a word for this. I’ve got it here somewhere, but you’re going to tell us about the word for pharma-something rather that is the study using medicinal plants.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. If you look at medications, two-thirds of all medications originally were derived from plants. They started changing it quite a bit and it doesn’t really resemble the original product.

I’ve been a pharmacist for about 25 years and in pharmacy school, I studied something called pharmacognosy. Pharmacognosy is the study of medicinal plants. It’s a little bit even than herbalism. It’s knowing the medicinal qualities and the constitute properties, how they act in the body, what plants possess them and what different parts of plant different part of these properties, different chemicals. They’re actually natural product pharmacy that go to different receptors in the body and repair the body.

And what’s interesting about natural products – and I do a lot of homeopathy, which is natural products – is that when you use these products, it goes to the area and it actually starts solving what the problem is, whereas medications are really just treating symptoms. There’s really not a solution to the problem. You get a medication, you have it and maybe some of your symptoms go away, but you have a lot of side effects and it’s not really solved. If you take the medicine away, you’re still sick. But with natural products, if you use them correctly, you see tremendous results.

DEBRA: And I think that that’s – I mean, what I use as a healing modality is I get body work and I get nutrition and I take professional grade supplements. So it’s a lot of plant materials. I had never heard of someone who does what you do looking at what the plants do and being able to dispense them specifically to help different body areas. I think that’s very fascinating.

Do a lot of people do what you do? I mean, there must be pharma – how do you pronounce that again?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Pharmacognosy?

DEBRA: So you’re a pharmacognocist?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Pharmacognocist, correct. I’ve met a few pharmacist that do this. There are maybe a handful of people in the whole country. I’ve really taken this to a new level. I’m kind of hiding out here in the weeds, so to speak, in Clearwater. I’m sure I could be up in New York and I’ve had offers to go a lot of different places. But I like my practice here. It’s contained. I love Florida and I really love what I’m doing. And a lot of times too, I do things internationally and even on the telephone.

I’ve done lots of TV and radio nationwide from different shows. I don’t necessarily even have to see the person. I can talk to them on the phone. It’s a brief 15-minute conversation if they want to fax me or email me their blood work. I look at what they’re doing and I say, “Metabolically, I’m telling you what’s not necessarily…”

Like if you go to the doctor’s, he’ll look at your blood work and say, “Oh, this is out of range.” They only look at something that’s out of range. I don’t look at that. I take a few seconds. It’s a free consultation. I say, “Okay, this is what I see coming. This is what’s happening because of the medications you’re taking. This is the medicine they’re going to prescribe for you within the next two to five years” and I just tell them flat out, “Do you want to not take medicines? Would you like to get rid of the problem now?” and we can triage the problem.

I have thousands of clients. I’m very, very blessed at what I do, I have eight years of college chemistry, I’ve been doing this a long time and I know looking at labels naturally what the products are and how they will work in the body.

DEBRA: That’s amazing. That’s amazing. I don’t even know what to ask you next.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, that’s okay. I can talk just in general about some of the things I see.

DEBRA: Talk!

PAMELA SEEFELD: My specialty is – I do really everything. I even do veterinary, dogs and cats. I do liver failure, kidney failure, things like that. I use homeopathy for that. I have been very good at that. I can tell you, Crohn’s disease, GI issues are easily treated with homeopathy because when you take stuff orally, it goes directly to the lining of the stomach and into the intestines. So anything GI-related is very easy to treat.

But my interest is really things that regular medicine can’t treat technically. If they give you medicines for a particular problem, it gets worse and it doesn’t get better. I can give you an example.

When I see people that have borderline kidney issue, it’s not out of range yet, but I can see where it’s trending. I look at them and I just calculate what’s called their creatinine clearance, which is a measurement of how the kidneys are handling protein and urine and I’ll tell them flat out, “Look, you’re going to be needing to see a kidney doctor within the next few years. And then he’s going to…” –

This is what I’ve had my clients tell me. They go to the kidney doctor, the nephrologist and he’ll say, “Okay, you’re starting to have kidney failure. I’ll see you every six months until you end up on dialysis. And then I’ll see you every month.” I look at them and I’m like, “Are those good odds? Is this what you really want to hear?”

So I use professional homeopathy. I actually got a lady off of dialysis. She was a new start, but she’s kidney issue free.

DEBRA: Wow! I do believe in my experience I’ve seen that we live as human beings in this bigger system of nature and I think that everything that we need in order to be healthy is all in nature.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a very profound statement and very true.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. And so we just need to look to nature and see where the solution is, that we live in this culture. I think of our industrial culture as being like an artificial culture. The whole way that we think is artificial as opposed to natural world that if you were to take away our industrial culture, we all have come from nature. Our bodies developed in nature. There’s a grand design or however you want to say it. The solutions are in nature and it’s just a matter of learning them and finding them. This is why I’m so fascinated by what you do.

So we’re about to come up on the break. I don’t want to ask you a question that you’re going to start answering, but we also have a few seconds too. I’ll just say when we come back, what I’d like to do is talk about – let’s take a situation like something that a lot of people have like diabetes. Let’s talk about the drugs and let’s talk about how we could handle that in a safer way. How does that sound?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That is a great topic.

DEBRA: Okay! Well, we’re still not to the break.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, diabetes is pretty prevalent and it can be prevented, so yeah, definitely, I have lots of great ideas for that. And that’s pretty easy to do.

DEBRA: Great! So we’re going to do that. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld, R.Ph. Does that sound for registered pharmacist?

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct.

DEBRA: Okay. Her website is BotanicalResource.com and she has, as she said, a practice here in Clearwater, Florida and we’re going to find out more after the break about the different ways that we can handle diabetes and really handle it in a natural way. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist, but what she really is is a pharmacognocist. I’m always fascinated by word roots and I looked it up during the break because I looked at that and I go, “Okay, pharma, that’s pharmacy, about drugs. And then cognosy–, that must have something to do with knowing or knowledge.” I looked it up and that is the origin. Pharma- is about drugs and gnosis is knowledge. So it’s like drugs with knowledge instead of drugs without knowledge.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly what it is. And it’s so timely and so important, absolutely.

DEBRA: Wow! Wow! I love words. And I love how they just absolutely describe what it is. Okay, so before we talk about diabetes, could you just give us a little rundown of the kinds of things you mentioned, homeopathy, but what are the other kinds of plant-based remedies that you might use?

PAMELA SEEFELD: I do a little bit of everything. I do use herbal medicines. I use standardized products that I think are very, very complete and very effective. A lot of times, we’ll use products in place of medications. For example, some people are using Celebrex for arthritis. I have other things that I can use homeopathically and herbal wise that work very well to stop inflammation in the body. And inflammation is a big problem for a lot of people.

I would tell you too that we use vitamins as well here in my natural pharmacy. And the things that we’re using, I use high dose folic acid. Folic acid, if you use 5 mg. of folic acid a day, there’s five serotonin receptors in the brain and it binds to four of them. So I do a lot of mental health.

A lot of what I do is transitioning people off of medication. It could be heart medicine. It could be diabetes medicine, but I particularly help people when they really want to come off of anti-depressants, anti-anxiety agents, things like that. Those typically, what happens is you go to the physician, he’ll put you on that and you’re on it indefinitely.

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: And a lot of these people, maybe there was a circumstance in their life like their father died or something happened and they were put on an anti-depressant and ten years later, they’re still on all these medicine. This is just not appropriate for many individuals.

So mental health is the last frontier really because when people aren’t feeling happy and feeling great and full of energy, then typically, we’ll start getting medicines for everything else. And that’s the hallmark of it.

Also, I am a really big advocate of using homeopathic products to detox the body because sometimes, when you go to a health food store and you ask for a detoxification product, it might have a lot of laxatives. A lot of these contain like rhubarb and cascara. These things make you use the restroom, but that’s not really detoxing. This is more of a bowel cleanse.

The things I use actually pull out nickel, cadmium, lead, mercury, pesticides and chemicals. I’ve been doing the homeopathic detoxification probably 15 years and I feel great. My clients that actually stick with it, they come in, they look younger, they feel great, they don’t gain weight. It makes a huge difference.

So taking chemicals out of the body especially in the brain too – we know that mercury, haven’t you read about these studies where kids are eating too much tuna fish and they have memory problems and things? You can pull mercury out. The problem with heavy metals is that they’re very difficult to leave the body.

Saunas are a great way to remove nickel, cadmium and lead off of the sweat. They can measure that coming out of the sweat. And I guess here in Florida, we can go out and do yard work. I do have a big sauna in my house, so I use that quite a bit.
DEBRA: All we have to do is lock outside…

PAMELA SEEFELD: Exactly! Exactly! I don’t know, people come to my house and they’re like, “Is that a playhouse?” I mean, they take a path to the room, I go, “No, that’s the sauna.” They’re like, “What?!” But I use it quite a bit. But if people can’t afford a sauna, just go outside and do some yard work and you’ll get the same kind of results.

The metals are really important to take out because once you take those into your body, they don’t leave. And especially mercury in the brain, it’s particularly problematic, so is lead. It can lead to cognitive deficits that most doctors really won’t pick up. Especially if it’s an older person, they might think, “Okay, we’ll just chuck it up to age.” It’s not that. They need to get the chemicals out of their central nervous system.

DEBRA: I’m glad that you’re talking about this. Actually, we can just move diabetes a little further into the show and continue to talk about this because it’s such an important thing.

One of the things I do write a lot about is detox because of my work. I’m interested in people getting toxic chemicals in. And for many years, I only told people to avoid toxic chemicals and it’s only been in the last few years that I’ve been so interested in getting them out of bodies because I started doing various detoxes that were specific for things and I found that I felt a lot better if I did that.

And then I suppose that if we stopped being exposed to toxic chemicals, our bodies will go through the detox process. And maybe over a period of years, some of those toxic chemicals will come out. But the amount that we’re exposed to today, would you say that everybody just needs to do a detox?

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s a very good question. Yes, absolutely. That’s the first thing I’m recommending for mental health, any debility, anything someone is coming to me for, “My cholesterol is high. I don’t feel good. I don’t have energy,” all these things, which is just typical. I see a little bit of everything every day.

I tell people, “Look, first and foremost, we need to remove the chemicals out of your body because the cell signaling, we know that the signaling takes place on a cellular level. And cell signaling…” – and some of my friends are actually physicians. They work in physics too. They can start measuring these cell signals are affected by chemicals.

And interestingly enough (and I know we’re going to defer to the diabetes), what they’re finding – I mean, I read the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal every day, these articles that aren’t even necessarily concentrated in medical journals, they’re showing up periodically in mainstream media that are discussing that people in the past – for example, diabetes – used to think, “I eat really bad. I gained a lot of weight. I have insulin-resistance. Now, I have diabetes.”

Now, the researchers are finding – this isn’t some obscure journal, these are front-rate journals – that okay, these people are testing very high for urinary pesticides much more so than the general population, so now they’re thinking, “I got exposed to a bunch of chemicals, preservatives or whatever they may be. It started to damage the pancreas. As a result of it, I started putting on weight. Now, I have diabetes.”

That chronology of events is a big change because in the past, we’re saying, “Okay, you ate sodas, you ate fried food.” It might not necessarily be that. We are finding that these people for some reason are not processing the chemicals the same as other people.
And I think you’re going to find in the future – I’m really telling you this, this is the truth. You watch and mark my words. A lot of diseases that we have today will be linked to chemicals in the environment.

DEBRA: Well, that’s already true. When I was researching my last book, Toxic-Free a few years ago, I actually could find studies which associated toxic chemical exposure to every body system, problems in every single body system.
PAMELA SEEFELD: Absolutely!

DEBRA: And so I can say without a doubt that any illness that anybody is having, any body malfunction is associated with toxic chemical exposure in our world today. It just is.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Oh, we know that probably since the industrialized revolution, there’s probably 20,000 chemicals. The Environmental Working Group with their body burden a few years ago, they found 300 chemicals in cord blood for these babies that were born. It’s pretty significant.

DEBRA: It is. We need to go to break. And when we come back, we’ll talk more about toxic chemicals, toxic drugs and how we can use medicinal plants to heal our bodies with my guest, Pamela Seefeld, registered pharmacognocist. There, I got it! I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She is a pharmacognocist. We’re talking about using medicinal plants in order to heal bodies. Okay, let’s talk about diabetes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Correct. Diabetes is very common and very preventable. I’m talking mostly about type II diabetes, people that are in their middle age, even 30’s, 40’s, 50’s. All of a sudden, they go to the doctor and the doctor is like, “We need to give you Metformin. We need to give you Glipizide.” Those are the medicines they typically use. Those are the first oral drugs they use.

Now, diabetes doesn’t show up overnight. It’s not one of those things that, “Okay, today I’m a diabetic. Yesterday, I wasn’t.” It doesn’t necessarily work that way. And this is what I find a lot of times. I can tell you some situations I see quite frequently.

What happens is the big thing is that someone may be treated with high cholesterol, statin medications. I look at their blood work and I’m like, “Well, the reason why your cholesterol and your triglycerides are going up and the reason why they had to put you on Lipitor or something like that is because your blood sugar is unstable and it’s too high.

Fasting blood sugar for a normal person should be between 75 and 85 on a blood draw. The little range that they have goes up to 110 and 120 depending on which lab you used. And so if somebody is already in the nineties or close to a hundred, they’re already pre-diabetic. They’re already on the road to it.

And typically, what I see is that the physicians won’t intervene at that point. They’ll say, “Look your blood sugar is what’s causing me to put you on cholesterol medicine and triglyceride medicine and all these other stuff. We need to get your sugar down. Let’s look and see what you’re eating. Let’s see how you’re eating your meals. We need to balance your blood sugar.”

That’s not the way things are approached in regular medicine. It’s that, “Okay. Your cholesterol is up. Let me give you a statin medication.” And a few years later, like, “Oh, now we’ve got to give you something for the diabetes.”
Meanwhile, all this time has passed and no one has done anything about it. It’s just very, very sad. This is a preventable thing.

So what I tell people, if you’re fasting blood sugar is a little bit high, even in the nineties, I don’t like that. You need to look at a few things.

Fruit has a lot of sugar. So if you’re eating fruit, you want to have some kind of protein or fat at the same time. Now, I’m not talking about you need to put oil on something. If you want to have a banana, you need to have some natural peanut butter a piece of cheese or something that has a little bit of fat or protein along with it or even, a lot of times, I eat a lot of almonds. If you have fat or protein along with the carbohydrate, it delays the emptying out of the stomach and so the blood sugar rise won’t be so precipitous.

This can also apply to candy, anything else, soda. Obviously, we don’t eat that kind of stuff. I would tell you that carbohydrates are your friend, but you need to have some kind of fat or protein present at the same time.

So a lot of people just don’t realize these are just easy ways to balance their sugar. It could also just be from poor eating as well. We know that nutrition is the hallmark. A lot of people do not see that. If somebody already has a fasting blood sugar close to a hundred (and I see this pretty much every day), I have a homeopathic product that actually repairs the pancreas, reverses the damage that’s already been done. And then when I also use the Body Anew, which is the homeopathic detoxification, it cleans everything up. I’d say that within a month, you can reverse all of these.

DEBRA: Wow! Wow!

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, it’s great.

DEBRA: Wow! Okay, so…

PAMELA SEEFELD: I know! I mean, that’s probably a lot of information. I mean, I can tell you that pharmacologically, there are things vitamins-wise and homeopathic wise that are significant and very effective and it takes a short time to really have them work.
Another thing too is that people, when they’re starting to have elevated blood sugar end up with something called neuropathy. Neuropathy is numbness and tingling in the hands and feet. It’s nerve damage. In regular medicine, the medicines don’t work for it – Lyrica and Neurontin and all these stuff. They can’t handle it, all these medicines.

A lot of those medicines make you really loopy and tired, they don’t solve the problem and the nerve damage is very bad because when you start damaging the nerves from sugar, what happen is some of that is not reversing in the regular pharmacy realm.
But in homeopathy, you can actually target it with homeopathic products that actually resurface the outside of the nerve. So that can work for any kind of nerve conduction issue that might be taking place – even carpal tunnel. Anything that’s going on with the nerves, these are obscured diagnoses and things that happen that regular medicine just has nothing in the goody bag for you.

DEBRA: How did you even find out about this field? I’m astonished that they’re teaching it in pharmacology school.

PAMELA SEEFELD: This is what really led me on that path. I was already studying pharmacognosy. And then I got out of school and I was working – I mean, I still work as a pharmacist. I was working as a pharmacist, a clinical pharmacist (I was a clinical, not the drugstore type), I really decided that I wanted to put my education to good work.

So then I decided that I was going to go and spend a great deal of time in Europe and here all over the United States (and I even went to Cuba) and I studied homeopathic medicine under different people and herbal medicine. So I went to King’s College in London. I was really traveling quite a bit and decided that I was going to read every pharmacognosy book written in English. I’ve memorized everything. And now, it’s kind of like I just kind of build on my own background of chemistry and knowledge.

A lot of times, I’ll even use a homeopathic product that really have an inherent and deep understanding of what the chemistry is behind natural products that I can look at a homeopathic product and I will decide to use it for something else in a particular area in the body and I will tell my client, “Look, it says another indication on the front” or whatever (they put these labels on the front of these products), “Do not look at that. I’m using it for something else.” And sure enough, a few days later, they’ll call me back and like, “I’m already better.”

So it’s important to think out of the box. Life in the world, in the United States, we always are kind of pigeon-holed and we have to think, “That this is for that… this is for this…”and in pharmacy, “Drug A goes for this diagnosis… drug B goes for that diagnosis” and that’s not really how the world works. The world works that you need to build on your mastermind in the back of your head, all the things that you’ve accumulated and understand.

When I look at somebody, I look at someone’s blood work or they call me with an individual issue, I say, “Okay, what’s really happening here?” and I explain to them, even sometimes diagram. “This is what’s happening with these cells, with these blood vessels in this area and we are going to change that.” That’s why what we’re doing here is solving the problem instead of saying, “Okay, let me give you something. You’re going to be symptom-free,” but meanwhile in the back of my head, I know she’s not really going to get better. That’s not how it works.

DEBRA: Wow! No, I understand. I totally understand what you’re saying. I’m sitting here being so excited because I understand it’s a different way of thinking.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Well, it is. I mean, I can’t think of myself as a mad scientist, but I’ve been doing this for a long time and I’m very successful at it and I have a lot of clients. I just feel very, very grateful that God has given me the intelligence and the understanding and the inherent knowledge of how to use pharmacy to my advantage to heal people instead of saying, “Okay, this is the drug you need.”

And I have in the past. There have been rare opportunities where someone came to me with all these symptoms, they’re misdiagnosed and I write down their diagnosis, “This is what you have. This is the prescription medicine that they should’ve given you and you need to go see this doctor” and I was right. I mean, I’ve done that before too.

That’s a rarity. Most of the time, I can pretty much take care of it with homeopathy, but when it really comes down to it, it’s people saying, “I really want a solution.”

Or if you know certain things reside in your family, there’s a family heredity of certain diseases, you can prevent that also too. We didn’t even touch on cancer. I see a lot of people with cancer.
DEBRA: We have to go to the break. Wait, wait. We’ll have to go to the break. We’ll talk about this when we come back.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s okay, thank you.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. Pamela Seefeld and I are very excited about what she’s talking about. We’ll come back and tell you more of that. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Pamela Seefeld. She’s a registered pharmacist, but she’s also a pharmacognocist – I love that word. I just love that word – which is a pharmacist who…
PAMELA SEEFELD: It packs a lot of meaning.

DEBRA: It does! A pharmacist who dispenses medicinal plants. And I’ll just say again, we talked earlier about this, I looked up the root of it, it’s ‘drugs with knowledge’. And that’s what plants are. They have knowledge and information and they’re part of this big system of life and they can do things to heal our bodies.

So tell us about cancer.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay! So cancer is prevalent. You have what? One in eight women in America with breast cancer? It’s such a big problem. It’s highly diagnosed.

What we’re seeing with cancer is that cancer is caused by chemicals, pesticides, any sort of chemicals in our environment that turn on genes. We have the beginning of cancer in our bodies every single day. But our immune system seize it. It takes care of it. There are these genes called ankA gene and they get turned on by chemicals.

So when people come to me with cancer, I’m telling them that, “Okay, do the chemo, the radiation, whatever you decided to do with the oncologist, but let’s face it, the chemicals that caused the initial cancer are still there.”
DEBRA: Right.

PAMELA SEEFELD: The trick is to get them out. You might be in remission, but the chemicals that were capable of turning on those particular ankA genes in your body and your immune system was unable to identify will not leave with traditional method.

In fact, the things that we use now in chemotherapy are really quite barbaric because it has a lot of collateral damage. It doesn’t only kill the bad cells that have the high turnover by cell cycle – that’s how these drug works, like how many times this thing replicates – they have collateral damage of these other cells that have high replication. That’s why you lose your hair. That’s why you get the mouth sores. All those things are high turnover cells and the drug cannot see the difference between the bad cells and the good cells. And that’s what happens.

So really, when it comes down to it, if you want to protect against having cancer, you really want to do like the Body Anew or a homeopathic detox product. I personally do it every day when I work out.

My big thing is cardiovascular exercise because when you sweat, you mobilize toxins and get things out of the body. When you drink the detoxification, my homeopathic detox, when you drink that while you’re exercising, you’re removing a lot more of these toxic products.

It’s important to realize that people, when they’re treating cancer, they don’t look to say, “Okay, what caused the cancer?” People will say, “Well, it’s genetics” or “I was on a hormone.” That really is not what’s happening. What’s happening is chemicals you’re exposed to every day, whether passively or intentionally that you don’t realize (your cleaning products, you’re out and about) –

And also, too, I may say even if your diet is really clean, you don’t live in a bubble. You might take the dog for a walk by the gold course, there are pesticides there. I see a lot of people that are tennis pros and spend a lot of time on golf courses, they end up with neurological problems because of the pesticides, lots of MS. Let me tell you, it’s very much related to the chemicals. People that play tennis and teach tennis, I have seen a lot of people with neurological disorders.

DEBRA: Wow! I’ve been studying for 30 years, more than 30 years like where are the toxic chemicals in the world that we are being exposed to. I started out with toxic chemicals in my home because those are the ones that I could see were harming my body.

But really, out in the world, we don’t think about this. I got an email this morning from an organization talking about how we go to places like Home Depot and Lowe’s and stuff and we buy plants that are marketed as bee-friendly, but they have pesticides on them that kill the bees. And we don’t think about that thing.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. We can’t see it, but it’s everywhere.

DEBRA: Yeah. And so you don’t think. You think, “Oh, tennis, that’s good that we’re going out and exercising,” but there’s these invisible chemicals everywhere. I don’t want to scare people to think that we need to be afraid of all these toxic chemical exposures. Other people have identified a lot of them, but even if you knew every single one of them, until the world gets cleaned up, we do need to do these detox things. It’s the detox activities in my opinion that save us from those exposure.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right.

DEBRA: We do need to do the clean-up, but we don’t have to be victim of the exposures. Everybody go around being sick from them because there are things that we can do to protect our bodies and to clean out our bodies so those toxic exposures are not making us sick.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s exactly right. And what I would recommend – and people can get a hold of me if they have a question particularly just on occasion that they don’t have Internet access at 747-442-4955, Botanical Resource Pharmacy. I just want to mention that.

If you use homeopathic detox and you do it every day – what I typically do is layer these things in the water. So basically, say someone has a little bit of pre-diabetes or someone has a little bit of hypertension or they have some anxiety, the best way to do it is put homeophatic detox in water, you kind of drink it through the day or you drink it while you’re exercising. This way, you’re really taking things out on a daily basis because if you think that you’re able to circumvent chemicals in the environment, it’s really hard.

Now, really interestingly, during your commercial break, you were talking about water filters and things in the water, I don’t know if you’re aware of it, but here in Clearwater, there’s radium in the water because a cardiology practice in Sarasota dumped radium down the drain because the people that were handling the radioactive properties of these products weren’t paying attention and they had to be cited for it. This happened in two places – here and in northern Minnesota. And so we have radioactive water right here in Clearwater.

DEBRA: Well, this particular water filter removes radioactive particles. That’s one of the things that it removes.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Right, that’s right. That’s interesting.

DEBRA: And so I have one in my house. Actually, this filter protects me from exposure to all the pollutants that I know of. It’s just a little over $300. It’s something that everybody could have everywhere and it would protect them from all those water pollutants. It’s such an easy thing that people can do.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Absolutely!

DEBRA: You never know. You never know when there’s going to get something dumped in the water. You really don’t.

PAMELA SEEFELD: What I’m telling you, this is just really ridiculous. And really, there were articles about this. It’s kind of buried with the news. Really, there was one article even (I think it was in the Wall Street Journal) a long time ago, they were talking about how in the past, radioactive materials were really handled by the hospitals. The staff is trained in that.

But you have a lot of cardiology practices that are doing these procedures because they’re monetarily very good and they’re handling radioactive materials and their staff might not be properly trained. They’re just dumping it wherever.
And this is really, really dangerous. And that’s just the stuff we know about. There’s a lot more going on.

Also, too, we have the EPA, we have rules and regulations in place, I always tells people heavy metals never leave within two inches of the surface soil. They’re there forever. So if somebody dumped a lead battery in the back of yard a hundred years ago, you don’t know. Those things are still there. They do not go down into the water supply.

And also too, all these pressurized decks, these treated decks that people have in their backyard, there’s a lot of arsenic in that, which has high affinity for the soil.

So I think if you’re going to do a few things –because I see a lot of people come to me thinking, “I heard Dr. Oz say I should take bilberry and take that…” – they come in with bags and bags of all these vitamins that they heard about. I say, “Look, your chances of disease are two things. You’re either going to have a heart disease or you’re going to have cancer. Those are the things that get most people. Everything else are non-consequential.”

I mean, those are things you should look at, but I tell people that you really want to do detox every day. That’s very, very important because it protects against cancer, it protects against neurological problems and memory problems, all these things that are very, very important to people.

And you need to take prescription dose, high dose folic acid (which I use here a lot) and fish oil. If you take the fish oil and the folic acid, the reduction of heart attack incidents is 75% just doing that. I don’t care what you’re eating, what you’re doing.

Obviously, all that good, healthy things make a huge difference, but if you don’t do those three things, you’re really missing the boat on preventing against a lot of very bad things.

DEBRA: Okay, let’s talk about fish oil. I can’t take fish oil.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Okay, good.

DEBRA: Maybe you have a fish oil I can take, but I have never been able to take fish oil.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Alright, okay. So there are different categories. Some people, they have an allergy to fish oil. Those people are opted out. What I would tell you is that if people don’t do well with fish oil because they’re gastrointestinal tract doesn’t handle it very well, maybe they burp it out, the trick with any vitamin or any supplement is if you have issues with a sensitive stomach, you want to put it in the freezer.

When you put something in the freezer and you take it frozen, what it does is it bypasses the stomach and goes to the small intestine. That’s where it starts to thaw. It will release the medication in the small intestine instead of the stomach.

So I use that little trick all the time for someone that comes to me. I say, “I want you to take this supplement,” “Oh, I can’t take supplements. They make my stomach upset,” I’m like, “Don’t worry about it. I’ve got you covered.”

You just have to use basic pharmacology to understand that you need to bypass the stomach for the absorption. A lot of things can be absorbed, but there’s a partial absorption in the stomach, but the small intestine is where the majority of our nutrients are absorbed from food and it’s a perfect locality to put the vitamin.

DEBRA: Oh, wow! You know so much, I’m so impressed.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Yeah, I know. This is fun. I’m having a great time. No, there is a solution for everything. Remember I was talking about thinking outside of the box?

DEBRA: Yeah.

PAMELA SEEFELD: That’s why God gave us this wonderful thing called a brain and the ability to learn, retain knowledge and to assimilate and to try and comprehend what’s best to help people because let’s face it, when we learn things, my feelings is that we learn to give it away. That’s why we’re here. We’re here to learn and organize data in our head and organize our thoughts to help in the betterment of mankind. If we are not on that mission to try and make people well in some capacity, what is really the point?

DEBRA: I totally agree with you. I totally agree. Well, we have less than a minute left. And so I just want to ask you, first, why don’t you give your phone number again? And the website is BotanicalResource.com. Give your phone number again so that people can call you if they want to meet you. and

PAMELA SEEFELD: So my phone number here at my natural pharmacy is 727-442-4955. We’re here Monday through Friday, 10 to 5 and Saturday 10 to 2. And any questions you may have about yourself, your family or your pets, I would be very, very honored and happy to help you with that.

DEBRA: Well, I’m going to come down and see you in the next couple of days. I can’t come this afternoon, but I’m going to come down and see you because I think you can help me.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Please do. I think you’ll be very impressive.

DEBRA: I think I will. Okay, that’s the end of the show! Thank you so much for being with me.

PAMELA SEEFELD: Thank you so much.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

People Towels

Reusable personal hand towels, made of a patent-pending fabric that’s 100% certified organic Fair Trade cotton. The light-weight fabric is absorbent, yet dries quickly, making it possible to carry and use in public places instead of paper towels. One of the co-founders discovered the concept of using a personal hand towel on her first visit to Japan where everyone – men, women, children – young and old carry a hand towel because they do not have paper towels in public places in Japan, and hand dryers are only occasionally found in large cities. PeopleTowels are printed with eco-friendly dyes, and come in a variety of designs to appeal to different tastes and styles. Convenient hangtags even allow you to clip or loop your PeopleTowels to your backpack, belt buckle or purse.

Listen to my interview with People Towels co-founder Mary Wallace.

Visit Website

Nanoparticles

 steven-gilbert-2Toxicologist Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, a regular guest who is helping us understand the toxicity of common chemicals we may be frequently exposed to. Dr. Gilbert is Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and author of A Small Dose of Toxicology- The Health Effects of Common Chemicals.He received his Ph.D. in Toxicology in 1986 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, is a Diplomat of American Board of Toxicology, and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington. His research has focused on neurobehavioral effects of low-level exposure to lead and mercury on the developing nervous system. Dr. Gilbert has an extensive website about toxicology called Toxipedia, which includes a suite of sites that put scientific information in the context of history, society, and culture. www.toxipedia.org

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH STEVEN G. GILBERT, PhD, DABT

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Nanoparticles

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT

Date of Broadcast: July 28, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free. It is July 28, 2014, a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida.

Today, we’re going to talk about nanoparticles. I know everybody has heard of nanoparticles, but I bet a lot of people don’t know what they are. Today, I’m having our toxicologist, I want to say my resident toxicologist because he’s been on so many times, Dr. Steven Gilbert, Ph.D. from Toxipedia. And he has his own website, Toxipedia.org, and he’s the author of a book called A Small Dose of Toxicology.

Hello, Dr. Gilbert.

STEVEN GILBERT: Hi, Debra. It’s good to speak to you today.

DEBRA: Nice to speak with you too. So as long as we’re talking about A Small Dose of Toxicology, why don’t we start out with you telling us about your translation project? Tell us more about A Small Dose of Toxicology as a book. It’s been translated into many languages. Tell us about your new translation.

STEVEN GILBERT: So we’re working A Small Dose of Toxicology as an introductory toxicology text. It’s free on the web. It’s SmallDoseOf.org. That’s SmallDoseOf.org. So you can download that or any chapter of the book as you like.

It was recently translated in the Chinese. So it’s now published in China. And we have hopes that it will be an introductory text for people to learn more about toxicology and the issues in China.

Our latest effort is to translate the book into Arabic. There are over 400-million Arabic speakers in the world. And we have a great toxicologist that’s in the West Bank (and a novelist) that’s willing to translate the book.

Then we started an Indiegogo website to try to raise funds to complete this project. So we’re looking to raise not a lot of money, but quite a bit of money at the same time. It’s $14,000 to get the book translated. And it will be available for free on our website published by Healthy World Press as a free e-book in Arabic.

So, we’re very hopeful we’ll get that project done in the next 6 to 12 months and have it out there on the web where we’re going to put it up.

The first chapter is almost done. We completed the translation. It’s under review right now. So we’ll be posting it chapter by chapter in Arabic as the chapters become done.

So, I’m very excited about this project.

We also have our […] on the history poster. I’ve looked at the history of toxicology, and it’s translated in Arabic and Chinese as well as 10 other languages.

So, we’re working very hard to make toxicology (which really is an international issue) and help people understand a little about the health effects of chemicals around the world.

DEBRA: I will say that this is an excellent book. Anybody who hasn’t already downloaded it for free—and I’ve been talking about it on show after show—if you haven’t already downloaded it, please do because its’ an excellent book. It talks about the basics of toxicology in language that anyone can understand.

This is not a dry, uninteresting chemistry book. This is living toxicology. It’s about what’s happening right now. It’s about understanding how toxic chemicals interact in your body. It’s about gaining the ability to tell what’s toxic and what’s not.

And so this is just the basics well-explained, and you can have it for free. So go download this book, everybody who’s listening.

STEVEN GILBERT: Thank you very much. You can learn more about it right on the front page of Toxipedia, and learn how you can support our efforts to translate it into Arabic.

DEBRA: That’s Toxipedia.org.

STEVEN GILBERT: I’ve actually been to Gaza twice on humanitarian issues, and it’s really painful to see what’s happening over there right now in Gaza. It’s a really, very unique place. The people are wonderful. I’m hoping that this book will also help them in their issues there.

DEBRA: So let’s talk about nanoparticles.

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, nanoparticles, that’s a big subject—or a small subject depending on how you look at it.

DEBRA: Well, why don’t you start by telling us exactly what a nanoparticle is?

STEVEN GILBERT: The definition of nanotechnology is the understanding and control—I want to emphasize the understanding and control—of matter. So it’s really talking about controlling matter to atomic level. And so, nanotechnology is the understanding control of matter with dimensions of approximately between 1 and 100-nanometers, where unique phenomena enable [noble] applications.

One thing about the size, let’s get a little more perspective on the size, a sheet of paper is about 100,000 nanometers. So you can imagine that sheet of paper and dividing it up to 100,000 times. A strand of human DNA is about 2.5-nanometers in diameter.

So, this is one of the concerning things, nanoparticles of the size and dimensions of DNA, so that some of the particles can travel in and out of cells, it tends to interact with DNA. And this is what has toxicologists worried about potential health effects.

A human hair is about 80,000 to 100,000 nanometers. So you can then just take a piece of hair and dividing it up 100,000 times. There are over 25 million nanometers in an inch. And this is another important factor. A single gold atom is about a third of a nanometer. So, you really can manipulate matter at the atomic level.

And of course, the definition of nanometer is a millionth of a millimeter to a billionth of a meter. So you’re talking about a very small material. And the unique thing about nanoparticles is their physical and chemical properties change. For example, a tee which is usually white, at a nano scale, it becomes clear. This has very important implications for things like sunscreen.

DEBRA: Let’s just relate this to a real consumer product right now. So sunscreen, let’s talk about it. A lot of people are putting sunscreen on their body. And titanium dioxide itself is one thing, but then when it’s at a smaller size, so that it’s not white, but it’s just clear (you don’t turn white when you put on your sunscreen) how does that change?

STEVEN GILBERT: That is why people like it.

DEBRA: That is why people like it. So tell us how that is different. When you put it on your skin, what happens that’s different?

STEVEN GILBERT: The concern is the titanium and zinc oxide […] So most sunscreens, the idea of sunscreens is protect against ultraviolet radiation. And there are UVA and UVA, ultraviolet radiation. And the nanoparticles are used to reflect the light. There are also chemicals that can be added that absorb some of the energy from the light.

So nanoparticles are great in that sense in that the small size reflect the light well. It becomes transparent so it doesn’t show up white on your nose which is good. They have a large surface area ratio, so if you apply chemicals […] in sunscreen, you have more surface area for these chemicals.

So they’re effective products. They’re very efficacious. They work well. The concern is that these nanomaterials, are they absorbed through, for example, a scratch in the skin. A baby’s skin is a little bit different, so you have to be concerned about absorbing these nanoparticles into the skin. And this is something that’s still being studied.

A lot of implications are they’re not. But then you have to ask, are these things washed off into the environment?

Ecologically, what happens to these nanoparticles as they end up in the environment?

So there are many different aspects to this—in skin breaks, if there’s a rash, something like that, is there more absorption of the nanomaterials and nanoparticles into the body that way? Do they bioaccumulate? What are the effects in wildlife? So there are many different aspects.

And by and large, we’ve just charged ahead and started using these products, in my view, without adequate study.

As a cosmetic, the FDA could declare these chemicals as new chemical entities. So a nano-sized titanium would be declared a new chemical entity, so it would require more testing. Food and Drug Administration elected not to do that.

Particles of a nano-size titanium, it’s not a different physiochemical properties. It’s still considered titanium.

So this was a great deal for the manufacturers that use these materials, but I think they deserve really closed [screening] and making sure we know what we’re doing with these nanomaterails.

DEBRA: If you make a chemical or mineral like titanium dioxide, if you make something into a smaller size, does that make it more toxic?

STEVEN GILBERT: There’s potential for that because it crosses the cellular barriers more quickly. For example, something like silver nanomaterial is a bacterial size that’s designed to kill bacteria. So it’s very effective at that, at killing bacteria.

So, they do interact with biological properties. But the question is, “Are they potentially hazardous?”

This is particularly true for developing organism. Toxicology is built on those responses. And once […] exposure, then what might be the response? How does your immune system respond to this? Does it potentially cause cancer later in life? What are the issues that might be relevant to nanomaterials and nanoparticles?

DEBRA: And we don’t know those yet. So we’ll talk more about nanoparticles when we come back. My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert. And his website is Toxipedia.org, many wonderful things there, including your free copy of A Small Dose of Toxicology.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio, and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert.

He’s at Toxipedia.org where you can download a free copy of his book, A Small Dose of Toxicology.

So Dr. Gilbert, let’s see. What shall we talk about next with nanoparticles?

STEVEN GILBERT: I think a little bit of history is…

DEBRA: Yes, tell us some history because this is not a new thing.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s not! You’re really right. If you look back historically, one of the first examples of nanomaterial was […] Rome about 300 A.D. And this has […] glass.

So if you look at a glass straight on, it looks opaque and green. But if you shine light in it, it turns red and glows. And this is due to the nanomaterials of gold and silver that are being incorporated into the glass.

In the 1600’s or 1500’s, stained glass windows in European cathedrals contained nanoparticles—gold, chloride and other metals that made the glass really a unique color.

Damascus saber swords, those high-quality swords, […] they’re known for their sharp edges, they’re really related to carbon nanotubes and the nanowires. They discovered this by looking at it with SCAN electron microscope.

So the whole field really didn’t get started up until 1936 right before World War II with field emission microscopes that were developed. These developments were essential to really understand and manipulate matter at the atomic level.

Another […] was Richard Feynman. Your listeners might have heard of him. He’s a […] physicist. He wrote a paper called There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom and gave one of the first lectures, I think it was in 1959, in technology at atomic scales that have predicted a lot of these scanning electron microscopes built in ’81.

In 1985, […] the buckyballs were discovered at Rice University. This is really a big deal because nanoparticles and nanomaterial, you can store different types of chemicals inside these buckyballs.

And then in 1986, atomic force microscopes—you can see the things really start picking up from the 80’s with the discovery of different materials, and really, the technology to manipulate these.

In 1991 was carbon nanotubes. Carbon nanotubes had a huge impact on materials, the way the materials are used now has carbon fiber in them. Just for example, I just read over the weekend that the Tour de France, the […] bicycle race in France, just ended. But one of the issues has been the bicycles are carbon fiber. And these carbon fibers, they’re a lot of nanotubes, instead of bending in a crash, the spikes shatter.

So they’re very strong and they’re very lightweight. That’s what carbon nanotubes are all about. But they also have some undesirable properties. They don’t then absorb some of the collision. Bicycle race injuries seem to be more severe.

So that’s just one of the implications or the side implications of nanomaterials.

In carbon nanotubes, we fly in them in airplanes, the new Boeing 787. Tennis rackets, all kinds of materials are starting to use carbon nanotube materials.

DEBRA: What exactly is a carbon nanotube?

STEVEN GILBERT: Carbon nanotube is you roll a carbon very thin—like one atom. You can make it a little bit thicker if you likem, but then you roll them up using atomic force instruments. The roll makes them very strong, very lightweight, and you can transfer electricity through them. They have a lot of really interesting properties.

A concern though, from a health perspective, is related to asbestos. Nanotubes have very sharp edges and look a lot like asbestos fibers. So we know from experience that asbestos inhaled can cause mesothelioma, a fatal lung cancer.

So, the concern was if carbon nanotubes would be a potential hazard with […] workers that are responsible for sanding, for grinding, for making nanomaterial up. So this is a worker-related injury. And that’s by and large an issue across the board with nanomaterials. There are worker issues that we need to be concerned about.

DEBRA: Do nanoparticles exist in nature, or are we making particle sizes that are just only manmade?

STEVEN GILBERT: There’s a lot more of them, but they do exist in nature. They’re naturally-occurring. And our […], some of them.

For example, diesel exhaust out of trucks will have a lot of nanomaterial in them. And this is particularly a concern from around ports, from a lot of train and truck traffic going in and out of it. And this becomes an environmental […] People living near the port are exposed to these nanomaterial.

My concern about the nanomaterial, as I’ve mentioned before, they have a large surface volume ratio to their size, so they have very large surface volume, and other materials can be stuck on the surface of these nanomaterial like polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Can they coat that nanomaterial? You inhale those things in your lungs, and then it can be distributed throughout the body.

Nanomaterials are also natural. They can be sea spray, for example, along the ocean waters. Volcanoes will produce nanomaterials and nanoparticles, I should say.

So they’re both naturally occurring. But as usual, with humans, we tend to exaggerate some phenomenon, so now, we’re making all kinds of new and unique […] There’s no natural process that created carbon nanotubes. This is an entirely manufactured material.

Although we have silver, it’s not […] We’re making them and putting them in a whole host of products now.

DEBRA: It seems like this is something that is more difficult to identify than some other toxic things. You can smell formaldehyde, for example, if you know what formaldehyde smells like. You could identify it. But how would one identify that they’re being exposed to a nanoparticle?

STEVEN GILBERT: You raised a really interesting point, Debra. There are no going rules and regulations that says that a manufacturer has to show the product has been demonstrated or acknowledged there’s nanomaterial in a product. So that’s not required.

The FDA just […] start thinking about this our talk today. On June 24th, the FDA came up with some new guidelines around nanomaterials in cosmetics. I should just […] your time if I can find the quote from the…

DEBRA: Actually, we need to go to break in about 20 seconds. How many nanoseconds is that? So you can find it during the break, and we’ll come back and talk about that.

STEVEN GILBERT: That would be great.

DEBRA: Today, we’re talking about nanoparticles with Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is Toxipedia.org. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and we’ll go to break and come back, and find out what Dr. Gilbert would like to tell us. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert. His website is Toxipedia.org. That’s T-O-X-I-P-E-D-I-A dot-org, and you can go download a free copy of his very excellent book, A Small Dose of Toxicology.

So Dr. Gilbert, did you find what you were looking for?

STEVEN GILBERT: I did. Before I go there, I just want to mention one other thing. There’s a great [book] called Prey by Michael Crichton that has nanotechnology, nanoparticles as the theme of the book. So if your listeners are looking for a good summer read, it’s Prey by Michael Crichton.

DEBRA: is that P-R-A-Y or P-R-E-Y?

STEVEN GILBERT: P-R-E-Y.

DEBRA: Aha! Okay, good. Thank you.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s a fun book. It’s a fun read. I recommend that.

So I think we’re talking a little about consumer products. And I just want to mention, when we talk more about that, particularly, related to silver, for example, one of the products is a bear, a little cuddly bear for your infant. And the product has nanosilver particles in it. It’s […] said that it’s clinically proven to be safer because it has killed bacteria, so you don’t have […] growing on your fuzzy bear.

Now, the problem with that is what do kids do? They stuck on their ears of the bear, they mouth the bear. So there’s a possibility that a kid is absorbing silver nanoparticles, and one of the potential consequences of oral exposure to nanoparticles.

So you might think that these products are all tested before they’re put on the market. That’s not the case.

Let me just read this quote from the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The first part of it sounds good. “The potential safety and health risks of nanomaterials that has another compound that are incorporated into consumer products can be assessed under existing CPSC Statutes Regulations and Guidelines.”

There’s a catch.

“Neither Consumer Product Safety Act nor the Federal Hazardous Substances Act requires the pre-marked registration or approval of products.”

So none actually require the pre-marked registration approval, thus it is usually not until a product has been distributed in commerce that the CPSC would evaluate the product for potential risks to the public.

So my view, we have some of the stuffs backwards where these products are not tested before they’re on the market. And then we decide if there’s any potential harm with that.

Another example of silver materials, silver particles is they’re used in socks to kill the bacteria on the feet. But the problem with this is what happens when your feet have cracks in them, things like that, and all these materials are being absorbed into you, they’re being exposed to your feet.

And when you wash the material, the silver nanoparticles, some of them will leave the socks of the fabric and get into the waste stream, get down into the sewage treatment plants, and then out into the water system. So it’s one of the consequences of silver nanoparticles from an ecological perspective.

So, I think it’s one of the huge struggles from a regulatory perspective, how to manage the explosion of nanomaterials and nanoproducts, products that use nanomaterials in our day-to-day lives.

DEBRA: But there are no regulations for them to apply.

STEVEN GILBERT: Right! It’s been a really tough struggle for that. The EPA would use the TSCA, Toxic Substance Control Act. It was passed in ’76. But we all know that that law is pretty broken, so all these materials are not well-tested. It’s very difficult for the EPA to regulate this.

Nano silver particles, they’ve tried to move it, to regulate them as pesticides, as bactericides which is really what they are.

But the advertisement for the products was that they are naturally-occurring and natural silver-based nanotechnology that’s used to reduce bacteria in these products.

Kitchen silverware, all kinds of new products that are coming out there with silver nanoparticles, and it’s reduced bacteria.

And I want to emphasize bacteria is everywhere. Our tabletops, our everything is […] bacteria. And the important thing is just use soap and water to keep it clean. Don’t use antibiotic-based products, or silver-based products for trying to reduce bacteria in the world unless there’s a real need for it. Just soap and water does a great job.

DEBRA: I agree. I had a guest on, a doctor who wrote a book called Missing Microbes. He was talking about how, because of antibiotics and antimicrobials, we’ve lost 30% of the amount of different types of microorganisms that we should have in our bodies that are helping us.

And so I could see that silver would do the same thing. It’s one of those antimicrobials.

STEVEN GILBERT: Our bodies are very finely-tuned. We’re used to a lot of different kinds of bacteria. We have a little ecosystem of bacteria inside of us. Nanomaterials and antibodies really disrupt those systems. And I think we have to be really cautious about that or minimize our exposure to antibiotics.

Particularly things like […] and triclosans, they just show not to be efficacious. And what you really need to do is keep things as clean as possible with soap and water.

DEBRA: Yes, that will do it.

STEVEN GILBERT: […] clean the house, the first thing you have to do is wash the hands.

DEBRA: Yes, you mentioned that before. I remember that. And I would also point out, I always like to say that doctors in hospitals just scrub. They scrub with hot water and soap.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, that’s right.

DEBRA: So, there are no antimicrobials. That does the job, and it has for many, many years, many decades, centuries.

So, should we be concerned about all nanoparticles? Don’t you think that nanoparticles are automatically bad because it’s a nanoparticle?

STEVEN GILBERT: I don’t think so. I think there are a lot of good uses for nanomaterials. There are certainly going to be—like I just had solar panels put on my house. And I’m sure those solar panels, they use nanotechnology. So, there are really some excellent uses.

I think the concern is that we overuse them. Do we really need nano silver particles in our socks, in our bears for our kids, or the blanket for the kid? I think we just have to be a little bit judicious about where we want to use nanoparticles.

They’re widely used in our phones. There’s great advantage to them. Small size is important. They use less energy. For cell phones, this is great. They have the potential to revolutionize batteries.

There are a lot of great uses for nanomaterials. I think planes is another one, light in cars. You need more carbon fiber material.

So there are a lot of important uses, but we just need to be aware and take more of a precautionary approach to when we use them and ask what our exposure is. Do we really want to be exposed to nanomaterials every time we […] like our cosmetics? How much nanomaterials do we want to use in our cosmetics?

There are some that are really useful. Maybe titanium and zinc oxide are safe and efficacious for sure. But how much do we need to use or how careful? My view is always precautionary. We should try to reduce exposure, so we can […] the materials that there are not necessary […]

DEBRA: Also, there’s a big difference between using nanoparticles in cosmetics that you’re putting on your skin, and using nanoparticles in a solar panel that’s on top of your house, in terms of one’s exposure.

And so it’s not necessarily the technology is really bad, it’s mostly overuse, as you said, or having too much use I places where it really doesn’t need to be. And that overloads our bodies. But if we can use these technologies judiciously and appropriately, then they can be beneficial.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert and he’s the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology, which you can download for free at his website, Toxipedia.org. And we’ll be right back

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist, and the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology. You can download your free copy at Toxipedia.org. And also, if you go to Toxipedia.org, you can find out about his most recent translation of this book into Arabic, and make a contribution there if you want.

How many languages has it been translated into?

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s in English, Chinese, we’re working on Arabic, and our Spanish is going to be our next one.

DEBRA: It’s a great book. It should totally be international. It’s great.

STEVEN GILBERT: Actually, it’s interesting. A German colleague has just started translating it in German on his own. I’m not sure when it will be done, but that’s also in the works.

DEBRA: Good! I think that my book, Toxic Free, is now in five languages or something like that.

STEVEN GILBERT: Wow, that’s great.

DEBRA: Yes, I’m very happy that that has happened. I’m looking at your nanoparticles page on Toxipedia, and I just want to say a few of the known health risks. In sunscreen, it’s been known to damage human colon cells, damage brain stem cells in mice, and penetrate the human skin, entering the bloodstream, posing a threat to the heart, liver and red blood cells. It can travel from mothers to unborn fetuses.

And these are things that are known health risks. There were those studies.

So it’s being used in so many products, and as we said earlier, that it’s not necessarily on the label. It’s not necessarily advertised, and not very well understood.

So in this last segment, let’s talk about how consumers can minimize their risk for nanoparticles.

STEVEN GILBERT: I think the important thing is just be aware of what products might have nanomaterials in them, and […] exposure.

And I think you mentioned too, the really important ones are sunscreens and general class of cosmetics because we’re applying them right to our skin.And [manipulation] materials that might get into the atmosphere is important if you inhale them—and in the water supply.

But I think cosmetics are probably the most important one now. They’re also used in some medicines, things like that.

So I think to try to look into some of the websites where the products might be listed. There’s a really good website called Nano.gov. So it’s Nano.gov. It’s tried to produce some […] So there are websites that list some of the manufacturers, some of the products with nanomaterials.

But I think the FDA is trying to get their handle on this issue. I think looking at cosmetics, and really demanding of your legislative folks to pass rules and regulations that require labeling—like how many people know that there are nanomaterials in their sunscreens? There’s titanium and zinc oxide, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide in nano scale in sunscreens. They’re not required to label them as such.

And also, as the size of the particles can be very widely—so how much control the manufacturers use over the particle size, and what chemicals might be attached to the particles, is the other really important question because of the surface area issue. There’s a greater surface area to volume ratio, so you get more exposure to any chemicals that are attached to these products. And these products, because they’re small size, they’re great carriers. They move the chemical into the cell, and you get exposure and potential hazard effects from that.

From a toxicological point of view, nanomaterials are complicated because it varies in size, the […] of the materials. They change their physiochemical properties. In my recommendation to be always on the precautionary side is try to limit exposure unless you really need it.

DEBRA: I completely agree with that on every type of toxic chemical there is, or anything that’s unknown. I think one of the biggest problems here with nanoparticles is that the health effects, we’re just starting to look at them. And so we don’t know what the health effects are. We don’t know they’re in the product.

When you were just taking about the different sizes of the nanoparticles, it suddenly occurred to me that nanoparticles are a whole range of different sizes in a range, but they’re all within this very small, infinitisemal size, but they’re not all exactly the same size.

STEVEN GILBERT: And that’s how the manufacturing process works […]. There are some people […] are calling ultra-fine particles which do not quite meet the definition of nano-size.

Remember, […] nanoparticles serve an arbitrary definition. It just said it was 1 to 100-nanometers. So if it’s 101 nanometers, a nanomaterial, there’s a wide range of concern about how the manufacturer […] size, whether they’re clumped together or not.

And really, I want to emphasize too, the occupational health issues. The World Health Organization put out a statement that people that “research, develop, manufacture, package, handle, transport, use and dispose nanomaterials will be the most exposed, and therefore, most likely to suffer any potential human health harms. As such, worker protection should be paramount with any nanomaterial oversight regime.”

And I’d like to add to that, we should be doing a better job of studying the workers because […] their exposure is going to be great, and we can learn a great deal about potential health consequences of nanomaterial by studying the workers.

DEBRA: I would totally agree with that too. That’s exactly where they would be.

STEVEN GILBERT: I think that’s where the exposure would be greatest. You’ve got the greatest volume of material there, and the greatest manipulation of the product both into the atmosphere as well as in the water supply. There’s surface area around that manufacturing process.

DEBRA: I was also thinking about what you said about the nanoparticle silver washing off, and then it would go down into the water system. Would you think that some of those nanoparticles are getting into our drinking water supplies?

STEVEN GILBERT: I don’t think we looked at that. One of the challenges when you do these studies is trying to quantitate the amount of nanomaterial that’s in the medium. So trying to look for it in the water, look for it in the food, look for it in soil is challenging.

But I think that’s something we need to be spending more time on. I think one of the challenges that we should take on is quantitation of the nanomaterial in different media, so we know what our exposure is.

And silver has been used for a long time. It’s used in medicine for a long time as an antibiotic, for example. It was used […] after World War II when antibiotics got more widely used. But now, it’s coming back particularly in wound dressing. So, actually, you use silver nanomaterial in wound dressing.

And generally, people would say—or they’re convinced that silver nano exposure is not harmful for them. The application in medicine […] But still, it’s not clear exactly where all the silver nano parts that are going in the biological system.

So, there needs to be a lot more study—either animal studies or human health studies—that try to quantitate where the nanomaterial is going in our bodies.

DEBRA: So much to learn. In some ways, you and I have both been working in this field for many years in our own respective ways, in decades. And yet, I keep learning more and more, but I keep finding that there’s more and more to know. And I would say that probably, there’s a word just at the tip of the iceberg about what we know about toxics.

STEVEN GILBERT: Really, what’s discouraging to me is that we know better than this. We put asbestos and lead onto the environment to great detrimental effects to many people. Thousands of people have died from mesothelioma from asbestos exposure. Many kids have been harmed by lead exposure as well as […] chemicals.

And what we don’t need to do is add nanomaterial into that. So my view, we should have a much more robust program to study the potential ecological health effects of nanomaterials before we put them in our socks, in our shoes, in our teddy bears, and all kinds of other products.

We should have a pretty good understanding of the life cycle of these products, how they’re manufactured, where they go, […] products, how do we dispose of them, and what happens to them in the waste stream, and what happens, of course, from an ecological and human health standpoint.

DEBRA: I totally agree. There’s so much that you were talking earlier about the Consumer Product Safety Commission making a statement, and this was something that I read many, many years ago.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission is one of the first places I went when I was looking for information about toxics.

And it really is most people don’t understand that there isn’t preliminary testing, that what happens is that the Consumer Product Safety Commission can’t do anything until the product is in use, and consumers start writing to the Consumer Product Safety Commission to tell them that there’s something wrong.

And that’s just backwards. It’s just backwards.

STEVEN GILBERT: It is backwards, and we need a more precautionary approach. So we put human health, ecological health first before using some of these products. So we really go to ask, “Do we really need it?”

Do we really need antibiotics in our soap? That’s one of the great examples of that. Do we really need antibiotics in our teddy bears or nano silver particles in our teddy bears, in our socks? There are some things that you just don’t need.
[…] some nanomaterial in the washing machine. It would add a little bit of silver nanoparticle in the wash water. So do we really need to go there with some of these products?

DEBRA: No, we don’t. We don’t. Well, Dr. Gilbert, it’s been a pleasure talking to you yet again, and I’m sure that we’ll talk to you a lot more.

STEVEN GILBERT: Thanks, Debra. Have a good day.

DEBRA: You too. So you’ve been listening to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. You can go to Dr. Gilbert’s website, which is Toxipedia.org. Get his book, A Small Dose of Toxicology. It’s absolutely free. You can also go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and find out who’s going to be on tomorrow, and this week. I always have the list of all the guests for the week.

You can also listen to this show again. You can listen to any other shows again because they are all archived.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Toxic Free Gym Gloves

Question from Gustavo Alves

Hi Debra!

I work out at the gym 5x a week and lift weights. I have to wear gym gloves. However, I’ve been researching and some gloves have the Proposition 65 warning (“This product contains one or more chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm”).

Since these will be in direct contact with my hands, I’d like to avoid them. Most of them (if not all) have some PVC, as the description proudly list it. Some gloves don’t have this warning but I wonder if that’s because they’re not sold on California. They could be equally dangerous, but without the mandatory warning, right?

So, any recommendation on gym gloves that are safe/made of natural materials?

Thanks!

Gustavo

Debra’s Answer

Readers, any suggestions?

Gustavo, if you could post a comment with various materials used to make gym gloves I could tell you which is the least toxic. This is just not a product I am familiar with.

But wait. Here’s a comment I just found on a fitness discussion board, in answer to your very question.

don’t use gloves. Get some chalk I got my chalk for about $2 at a hiking shop and it’s lasted me over a year now. I only use it for chin ups and deadlifts.

Learn to grip properly to prevent calluses
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTqNSgCmM2s

I think I read somewhere on this forum gloves actually hinder your grip strength. I take pride in my calluses even though I’m female- really they aren’t noticeable unless I really pay attention to them

Add Comment

Nuwave Stainless Steel Pans

Question from Helen Gray

I am curious if you know anything about Nuwave stainless steel pans that are induction ready that have a “Ceramic Non-stick Duralon Coating”? Are they safe? Thank you

Debra’s Answer

This description just doesn’t make sense.

Ceramic is clay-based and Duralon is nylon.

I’ve been looking at all these new “ceramic” nonstick pans that have been coming out and I just can’t recommend them. Even Green Gourmet that I used to recommend.

Two reasons.

One is that nobody is saying what is really in these finishes.

And, the finishes don’t last. Where do they go if they are no longer on the pan?

I was also told by a cookware rep that olive oil breaks down these ceramic finishes.

I’m sticking with my Xtrema cookware that is 100% safe ceramic through and through.

Add Comment

Oil-based Polyurethane on Wood Floor

Question from amie

Hi Debra

I am moving into a house that was refinsihed with polyurethane on the wood throughout the house. They did this last April so it has been 3 months. I was diagnosed with MCS six years ago. I tolerate more these days but am afraid that this will affect me. Besides heating the house do you recommend I use safecoat product to seal in offgasing or do you think this is enough time for it to cure. I did have a light reaction when I first got into house. They have since aired out and it felt better. Would love your advise

thank you

Debra’s Answer

Oil-based wood finishes and paints take a very long time to cure, many months.

Once I advised a client with oil-based paint to “bake” his house to remove the odor. This actually speeds up the outgassing process. He baked his house for two weeks and that totally handled it. Odor gone.

I can’t tell you how much heating it will take. But once it is completely outgassed it won’t be toxic. Polyurethane actually isn’t toxic. It’s all the solvents and additives that are in the finish. If you had a “light reaction” and felt better after it was aired out, it may be well on it’s way to being fine and you might only need a week or two of baking.

I don’t recommend that you put another finish on top. It’s better to cure this one to complete outgassing.

Add Comment

Chemicals in wool yarn

Question from Mandy

I’m wondering about chemicals in wool yarn. I read in one of your previous posts that there have been tests that show that the chemicals in conventional cotton are removed during the milling and production process. I wondered if this might be the case with wool yarn? Or, if after an item has been knitted that the residual chemicals could be removed by regular washing? I was wondering if you might know if there is any information about this anywhere?

Thank you for your help!

Sincerely,

Mandy

Debra’s Answer

I would say that if there were chemicals on the wool yarn, they probably wouldn’t be removed in the processing. The process to make wool into yarn is much less than the process to make cotton into cloth.

Your best bet would be to buy certified organic yarns where the processing must be organic as well as the growing.

Take a look at the yarn page on Debra’s List.

Add Comment

Custom Ear Plugs

Question from Alonna

Hi,

How to block airplane noise? Has anyone tried custom-molded ear plugs for sleeping that would be ordered from an audiologist? The material options are silicone or vinyl. Do they have an odor or cause skin reactions? Thanks!

Debra’s Answer

Of these two options for materials, silicone would be safer by far over vinyl.

Add Comment

What Organic Means — From the Experience of Being Organic Farmers

Diana and Jim.gifMy guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn, husband and wife, and co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. They own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. We’ll be talking about what “organic” means, their experience as organic farmers and problems with the organic system. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/terressentials

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
What Organic Means – From the Experience of Being Organic Farmers

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Diana Kaye and James Hahn

Date of Broadcast: July 23, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It is July 23rd 2014. I’m here in Clearwater, Florida where we’re having a sunny day. I’m going to get right to my guest because we have a lot to talk about today.

We’re going to talk about organic, what it means, what it’s like to be inside the organic process. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn, husband and wife and co-founders of the USDA certified organic business, Terressentials. They make some wonderful personal care products out of organic ingredients, many of which they grow themselves on their farm. Others are very carefully selected according to their very high standards, their personal standards.

I’ve been using some of their products lately. They’re absolutely wonderful especially they have some that are fragrance-free and some that are scented with essential oils. And the fragrances are amazing!

I’ve tried a lot of products over the years, but these, they’re fresh and clean and not overwhelming and simple. I have lemon soap that I have in my kitchen sink. I’m washing my hair with their cool mint hair wash. They’re just refreshing and lovely to use. They are exceptional – not that all other products are not. There’s many, many wonderful products, but these fragrances and just the way these products are put together are unusual and outstanding.

Anyway, so I have both Diana and Jim on the line. Last time, Diana has been on the show before. They were going to be on before and James had to go and work, do something on the farm. Today, we’re going to talk to Jim too.

So hi, Diana and Jim.

James Hahn: Hi, Debra.

Diana Kaye: Hi, Debra. That was such an opening. I’m not sure we can live up to that.

James Hahn: No.

Diana Kaye: But thank you. That was awfully kind of you.

James Hahn: Very nice.

DEBRA: You’re welcome.

Diana Kaye: We’re happy to hear that you are enjoying real organic products.

DEBRA: Yes, and that’s what we’re going to be talking about today, what is a real organic product. I do want to say that you’ve been doing your business since 1992. So you’ve been doing this for a long time. So why don’t you start out and just tell us a little bit about how you came to do your business and become organic farmers?

James Hahn: Go ahead, Diana.

Diana Kaye: Sure, sure. Well, really, our journey into the world or organic started with my personal experience with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and an urgent situation that didn’t really leave me with a lot of time to evaluate treatment options. It was very aggressive. It happened very quickly and I ended up doing experimental chemotherapy, which is – phew! Talk about an experiment.

So Jim knew me before the pre-cancer, pre-chemo and saw what I went through and then at first hand was right there with me and dealing with the aftermath. The chemo that I dealt with was an experimental protocol in that because my cancer was so aggressive, they doubled the dose in half the time and it really took a huge toll on my body. My body reacted by becoming extremely sensitive to synthetic chemicals.

I became a very reactive person after the chemo. I would have problems breathing, migraine/headaches, bizarre rashes. We didn’t know what was going on. And the doctors, conventional western medicine, the answer often is, “Well, here’s one drug. And if you have a side effect, let us give you another drug to treat that.”

And so it ended up that they said that they were able to arrest the growth of this aggressive tumor that I had, but I had a whole host of drugs they wanted me to continue to take to treat all of these problems that had developed. And again, many of the drugs were to treat side effects.

I was having a hard time with all of these drugs and dealing with it at age 29. The doctors really said, “Well, your option is you’re going to have to learn to live with it” and that was unacceptable to me and Jim.

So we began researching what happened to me, how I got the cancer, what was causing me to have these strange reactions. I essentially was chemically sensitive. At the time, there was no Internet, so this was a lot of research done through the Library of Congress. We lived in Washington D.C. at the time, university libraries, looking up lots of things on microfilms.

DEBRA: I remember those days. I was there doing it too.

Diana Kaye: Yeah! So it was very tedious and it took us several years. But what we essentially learned was that in order for me to regained my health and give my body a chance to rebuild itself, we were going to have to find the purest, possible fuel for our bodies. So Jim was joining me with this. So that meant pure, organic foods. We began using distilled water.

We learned also about skin absorption and inhalation. Our previous backgrounds before going into this business – well, Jim is a registered architect and my background was designed. In fact, we met working for an architectural firm in D.C. So we actually took courses in non-toxic building design, designing for handicap individuals. And in this particular case, it was also individual who were handicapped or disabled due to exposures to chemicals in building supplies.

So the more we learned, the more we realized that we had to make a lot of changes and we did. We couldn’t find personal care products anywhere. We searched health food stores that we could find that met our standards, which would be free from synthetic detergents, synthetic emulsifiers, synthetic fragrances, synthetic preservatives and on and on and on.

So we began making some products for ourselves. And at the time, I was involved with some chemical sensitivity support group and a lymphoma support group and people there in different parts of the country were saying the same thing, “We can’t find clean products” and we realized that there was a need.

And that is how our business was started as a mail order catalog. We offered a lot of books in our catalog at that time, again, because there wasn’t an Internet to help educate people about what they can do to reduce their toxic exposures and offering them alternative products.

We found that we wanted to get out of the city, escape Arlington, Virginia in D.C. because of all the pollution there. And we realized that to do our business, we didn’t need to be in the city and we wanted to be able to grow organically some herbs.

So for several years, we looked for and found an old sheep farm in Maryland and we’ve been here for 18 years. Our business progressed from selling plants to dealing with the increased demand for our personal care products, which today is really what we do.

We actually grow herbs for our experimenting and to create new products, but our demand is such that we actually buy today our herbs from certified organic farms from all over the world, our herbs and oils and butters. That’s kind of where we are right now.

DEBRA: Well, that’s a wonderful story. It’s very similar to my own in terms of starting out because of the damage that my body had from chemical exposures as yours did. It’s interesting that you ended up having cancer and chemical sensitivities because I think that most people don’t realize how much of cancer is associated actually with exposure to toxic chemicals and that there’s all you know, there’s all these attention on the cure, but not so much on the prevention.

And so I just want to really emphasize that part of your story that if you’re concerned about cancer or you want to recover from cancer, the first thing to do is remove toxic chemicals that cause cancer from your life.

Diana Kaye: Debra, that is the most important point.

James Hahn: Sure.

Diana Kaye: One of the things I didn’t mention (and I’m so glad you touched on) is exactly that in our course of figuring out what happened to me, we discovered that I had many toxic exposures in my life and that most likely, I was sensitive to different chemicals, but didn’t know it and didn’t understand what was happening to me. So the ultimate end result was that I had chemical overload, which ended up in the aggressive non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, which now has been linked to chemical exposures.

DEBRA: We need to take a break. When we come back, we’re going to talk with Jim and Diana about their experience with organic farming and being certified to be USDA organic certified. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. Their website is Terressentials.com. You can also just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and see the listing for their show, the show today and it’s got a link to their website.

And so, tell us now, you got an organic farm and then you started with the organic certification process. Well, wait! First, let me ask you, you said at the beginning that now, having tried your products that I have an experience with what real organic is, so what would be not real organic? Tell us about that difference.

Diana Kaye: Go ahead, Jim.

James Hahn: Well, basically what it comes down to – well, if we’re talking about food, the word ‘organic’ is regulated by the USDA and the Organic Foods Production Act spells out a whole set of rules and regulations to be followed.

In our particular field, body care products, USDA says, “We don’t feel that that…” — how would you say it, Diana? “We don’t feel that we need to enforce the regulations.”

Diana Kaye: Right. The USDA has pronounced years ago that personal care product companies are free to get certified through the Federal Organic Regulations, which is known to everyone as the National Organic Program. However, they have said that they don’t feel that they need to enforce the National Organic Program regulation in the personal care marketplace.

DEBRA: What does that mean? In practice, what does that mean?

Diana Kaye: Well, it means that if a company is not certified to the USDA Organic National Program by a legally accredited organic certifier and doesn’t have an organic certificate, then they are not organic. And the sad thing is the majority of companies that we have seen in the personal care marketplace that claim to be organic are not certified by a third-party accredited certification agency and they are making claims, but these are unsubstantiated and unverified claims.

Jim and I find this really disheartening because consumers, many of them don’t understand the National Organic Program regulations. Many consumers are completely unaware that the rules are not being enforced in the personal care marketplace.

And what happens is that people trust that the word ‘organic’ means something in personal care and they will often pay significantly more money for products that make an organic claim, often very boldly on the front label of the product or on the home page of the website and yet, the product formulation is actually conventional synthetic, industrial cosmetic ingredient, not meeting the qualifications for organic certification in any way.

DEBRA: So let me get this right. So people are putting the word ‘organic’ on the label, but it’s not just that they are not organic and they’re not certified. It’s that they’re not even organic.

James Hahn: That’s correct.

Diana Kaye: Many, yes, many products.

James Hahn: That’s correct. And one thing we’ve noticed is that a lot of journalists and writers who are talking about organic issues appear to be completely unaware of this. We see articles that say, “When you see the word ‘organic’, that means it follows the USDA regulations and 95% of the content is organic.” As Diana says, it doesn’t apply to everything. That applies only to food and that is so seldom brought out.

DEBRA: So the USDA Organic Program is only monitoring in the world of food and not in the world of personal care. That is what we have seen. They said that if someone files a complaint, they’ll look into it, but they are not actively monitoring the personal care marketplace.

This is what we find so sad. There are many companies selling products over the Internet, but there are still (and over the years, there had been) a number of companies that were selling via the health food channels and even mainstream grocery story channels. These companies for years were using the word ‘organic’ with abandon.

However, the Organic Consumers Association really called out this misrepresentation and got a lot of media attention to expose this practice. And as a result of that, there had been several class action lawsuit in the personal care marketplace. But the number of companies that have been named in these lawsuits has been – very few companies out of the many, many companies that are out there.

So basically, what’s happening is the enforcement is now being left up to attorney rather than the regulatory body of the USDA. We find that really sad and extremely frustrating because we constantly hear from people who are so proud that they are taking steps to help improve their health and reduce their chemical load and to leave lighter footprint on the planet. We’ve actually had people come into our store and bring a little shopping bag from the Organic Salon saying, “Oh, I just got this organic shampoo.”

So it puts us in an awkward position because we want to help educate and inform the public. And many times, when we do that, it’s the whole ‘don’t shoot the messenger’ thing. Please don’t shoot us!

DEBRA: I understand.

Diana Kaye: Right! If we take that bottle and we turned it around and we look up on the computer the ingredient – we have often had people get really angry with us. We understand what’s happening. They get angry because we pointed out unfortunately that they got duped. And later, perhaps they resolve that situation, but we would rather talk about beautiful organic ingredients and the impact of organic agriculture. But too many times, we have to deal with re-educating people and informing about this labeling issue.

DEBRA: Well, we’ll talk more about this when we come back from the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. You can go to their website at Terressentials.com. We’ll be back to talk more about what’s really organic and organic certification and how you can choose the best organic personal care products.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn, husband and wife, co-founders of their USDA certified organic business, Terressentials.

Now, I do want to hear about organic certification, but I want to ask you another question first. So are the ingredients in your products – I know that every ingredient in your product is USDA certified organic. But is there in the personal care world the equivalent of being a certified organic product?

I know with food, there’s different amounts of percentages of organic that need to be in the food product in order to get the USDA seal. Is there a comparable program like that for USDA in the personal care products?

James Hahn: It’s exactly the same program. In fact, there is no separate program under the USDA for personal care products. What that means is the ingredients that we use in our products basically are food. They’re things like organic coco butter, organic essential oils, organic extracts. They’re made from plants.

I mean, you wouldn’t want to eat paste, for example. There are no industrial chemical input of any kind that go into our product. So it is the exact same standard that applies to the food products in the store, a pie or a drink or anything like that. It’s exactly the same set of standards.

DEBRA: Okay! Alright, so tell us about getting certified. What’s that process like?

Diana Kaye: Well, could I back up just to clarify one thing?

DEBRA: Sure.

Diana Kaye: Because we would like to make everything really crystal clear.

James Hahn: That’s right.

Diana Kaye: Not every single ingredient in our product is a certified organic ingredient [gasp]. For example, the way that the regulations are written, you are required to use organic materials. However, it’s not just the ingredients that are regulated. The regulation covers how ingredients are grown on the farm, how they’re harvested. And here’s the key – key, key, important point – how they are processed or handled to make the finish product.

Whether it be pasta sauce or body lotion, whether it be bread or body cream, the processing rules and the amount of ingredients in your product determine your degree of certification.

There is a list called the National List of Prohibited and Allowed Substances. Everyone who is certified is required to adhere to that list. They have rules for how you can process different raw materials, organic botanicals, for example.

There are ingredients that are used in food. And here’s an interesting point. For instance, baking soda is not an organic material, it is allowed because it’s essential for the use in baked goods. Clays are used in food because they are used as filtering medium. There are certain clays that are approved for use that are on this national list.

It’s very specific. In order to make use of the organic seal, the USDA seal on a product label or front label, your product has to be 95% organic botanicals processed in an accordance with the regulation. And the remaining 5% might be ingredients like baking soda or other ingredients that may not be organic or agricultural in origin, but are on the National List of Approved Substances.

DEBRA: I think this is a really, really important point. I’m glad that you brought it up because this is true for other kinds of products as well. I think that people in a sense – how can I say this. I was just having this conversation with somebody this week about how organic applies to only the agricultural botanical part of a product, but a lot of products (like you mentioned, baked goods), they need to use something like baking soda. That’s strictly speaking not organic because it’s not a botanical item.

Diana Kaye: Correct.

DEBRA: And that would be true. I was trying to think of something that was 100% organic. Well, something that’s 100% organic could be something like the mattress that I sleep on is 100% organic.

Diana Kaye: Probably not.

DEBRA: Well…

Diana Kaye: According to the rules…

DEBRA: I would say…

Diana Kaye: I was just going to jump in and tell you just a little tidbit.

DEBRA: Okay.

Diana Kaye: People don’t even understand even in the food world, for example, we have a lip protector where every single ingredient in that product is organic. However, if an apple was rinsed with a wash that contained hydrogen peroxide in water, that apple would no longer be 100% organic. That’s how strict the rules are.

DEBRA: Okay, I get it.

Diana Kaye: And that apple…

DEBRA: Yeah, okay.

Diana Kaye: Yeah! So you couldn’t even call your product 100% organic if one ingredient was washed with a rinse water that has hydrogen peroxide.

James Hahn: Although that particular apple could be called “organic” and that’s fine.

Diana Kaye: Absolutely, yeah.

DEBRA: Well, the apple could be called organic because it was grown organically, right? But then in the processing, it was washed with hydrogen peroxide. So now, the processing is not organic.

Diana Kaye: Correct! So it’s kicked down from 100% organic to organic.

DEBRA: This is really…

Diana Kaye: The USDA is complicated.

DEBRA: No, but I’m glad that we’re talking about this because there is this whole thing where I know the consumers say, “Well, I want it to be 100%” and in fact, somebody this week told me that they get more results when they run ads if it has the word ‘100%’ in it, it has those numbers, 100%. That’s the thing that people respond to in ads. And yet I think that the USDA organic is correct for a product for using the seal because there’s all these ways that it’s not going to be 100% and yet consumers have this idea it needs to be 100%. But what else is in there if it’s not 100%?

Diana Kaye: Exactly. And the truth of the matter is in all product categories whether personal care and/or food, it is extremely rare to find a product that can be labeled 100% organic because that is how strict our USDA rules are.

And by the way, they are the most strict set of regulations of any country in the world.

James Hahn: By far… by far…

DEBRA: I know that because I actually had someone on the show who is part of the committee that sets those standards. It’s the highest – I forgot what it’s called, but it’s the one that makes the list, the organization that makes the list. We were talking about what goes on that list and how they make those decisions. I could see how strict it was and I thought at the time that if every single product had that kind of program behind it where the standards were that strict, it would completely change the marketplace.

Diana Kaye: It would!

James Hahn: I totally agree.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. Wouldn’t that be fabulous if all products were made according to something akin to the USDA organic standards? Amazing! That would be amazing.

When we come back, we’re going to hear more about the USDA organic standards and see how wonderful they are. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials and they’re at Terressentials.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn, husband and wife and co-founders and owners of the USDA certified organic business, Terressentials where they make real organic personal care products.

Diana and James, I’m looking at the clock and we’re finally getting to talk about you.

Diana Kaye: We know we get on these rolls and soap boxes, don’t we?

DEBRA: No, but everything that we’ve been talking about is so important.

Diana Kaye: It is.

DEBRA: I don’t want to – let’s just get started because we only have about 10 minutes before the show is over.

James Hahn: Okay.

DEBRA: And that’s certainly not enough to talk about the USDA certified organic program in full. Let’s get started and then we’ll have another show and we’ll talk more about it. We’ll just do a show just on the certification program now that we’ve set it all up.

Diana Kaye: Oh, boy!

DEBRA: What else would you like to say at this point?

Diana Kaye: Well, I think there’s another thing that – Jim and I were discussing this. This happens every day with us. There’s something else that’s happening in the personal care world. It’s happening in the food world, but I’m going to point out what it is and then we can kind of delve in to the two different aspects, food versus personal care.

In the personal care world, what we have seen that has been happening over the past 10 years is that the industry itself in the United States and Europe, there are different manufacturers and their suppliers and also, their distribution partners had been getting together and they had been creating their own set of “organic” standards. These are not government standards. They are not standards that have been created with public input. They are not a law in any of these countries – and this is happening in the United States.

We’re very frustrated with this because the National Organic Program federal law in the United States says that you may not have a standard that competes with the National Organic Program of the United States of America.

And so we find it very depressing and disheartening that these different industry groups are coming up with their own standards and some of the products are now even saying ‘certified to this standard’ and the consumer have no idea. They’re thoroughly confused. We’ve talked to hundreds of people and some of them are saying that these standards mean that that’s the certifier and it’s not. It’s such a confusion situation for people.

That’s the personal care. In the food world, the United States has made what’s called a reciprocity agreement with the European Union. The European Union standard – and we also have one now with Canada. The Canadian standard and the European Union organic standards are different in some ways from the U.S. standard. Ours is still the most strict.

But due to international trade, they created this agreement, this reciprocity agreement that has been in effect since 2011 (actually, since June of 2011) where the United States said, “Okay, we’re going to accept any product that’s been certified in the European Union as equal to a U.S. certified organic product in the spirit of international cooperation and trade.” We did the same thing for Canada.

In the food world, there are some differences in the food processing and handling, but most consumers aren’t aware of this. But still, even in the food world, you’re not going to have artificial flavor showing up in a product that comes from Europe or artificial fragrant (in other words, a petrochemical fragrant) because no country allows artificial fragrant to be allowed in an organic product.

Natural flavors is a whole other topic for conversation at another time. But in the personal care world, unfortunately, the processing standards allow many chemicals to be used in the processing that are prohibited under USDA regulation, preservatives to be used which are prohibited under the USDA regulation.

So essentially, what we have in the personal care marketplace is a giant mess.

DEBRA: That’s so unfortunate.

Diana Kaye: I just wanted to add that because…

DEBRA: I’m glad that you did. It’s so unfortunate that it’s a mess, but as life evolves, I think we go from chaos to order. And so I’m hoping at some point it will become more orderly and more understandable. But I think that change is happening.

I remember back, I’ve been doing this since 1978, that’s when I first started. I lived in Northern California in the San Francisco Bay area. I remember when we first started having organic food and California certified organic farmers (I don’t know when they started), but I remember that, “Here’s a certification? What do we do with this? What does it mean?” And now, there’s a lot of certifications for a lot of different things.

There was a time when there were a lot of local certifications. And then the USDA came along and said, “We’re going to have a national certification.” And so there is one certification instead of all these local one.

And so I think it’s all progressing. And as much of a mess as it is right now, I think it’s all moving in a direction. And having conversations like this move it all forward. I’m listening to everything you’re saying today and I’m thinking this is much more complex than I even knew. And this is something I’m studying every day. And so I can imagine how much more confusing it would be for consumers.

I was talking to somebody yesterday who actually owns a business selling non-toxic products and she was saying, “It’s all so complex, I can’t even… you know, I just want to go down to the store and buy a carton of eggs.” There’s so many things that you need to think about and we need to think about these things for every single product and for every single product, it’s different. Waaaa…

Diana Kaye: It’s true! We feel the same way when I go to the grocery store. But I know I want free range, pasture raised organic chicken eggs.

DEBRA: Yeah, yeah.

Diana Kaye: I know I want the Omega-3 fats, the good fat (not the Omega-6’s). I’ve been looking to actually having chickens here in our farm although Jim keeps saying, “No, you don’t have time to do that.”

James Hahn: It’s true.

DEBRA: I had chickens in my backyard and it was fabulous. I loved the eggs…

Diana Kaye: See…?

DEBRA: It didn’t take that much time, but…

Diana Kaye: Thank you. Thank you, Debra.

DEBRA: It really is worth it. It really is worth it… until the police came and took them away because they’re illegal where I live.

Diana Kaye: What?! Oh…

DEBRA: Yes, my chickens were confiscated.

Diana Kaye: That’s ridiculous! You know, that’s happening all across America and I think that’s going to be changing too.

DEBRA: I think so too.

James Hahn: Chicken police.

Diana Kaye: That’s great, a chicken police?

DEBRA: It is chicken police.

Diana Kaye: Don’t they have anything better to do?

DEBRA: No, but see, I’m going to tell you my big – this is my vision. Everybody in the world will come to have the same kind of values that you and I have and all the products on the shelves on the stores, everything that gets made and sold will all be as organic and non-toxic as possible. I think that day will come.

If you and I, both of you and I have been watching this and helping this whole movement towards less toxic things grow and expand over the last 25-30 years, don’t you see that it’s happening that we have more and more all the time?

Diana Kaye: Debra, you could be me talking. I mean, that’s why we do this, why we persist.

DEBRA: Me too.

Diana Kaye: Despite the frustrations that we have to deal with in the marketplace because we have a vision. We’ve been through that whole chemical sensitivity and cancer thing and we know there’s a better life. So that’s why we persist.

James Hahn: I might add that there’s a lot more interest and growing interest all the time in organic products. One thing that has come along with that is that now, there’s a whole lot more corporate influence in the entire world.

DEBRA: Oh, you know, that’s a whole other subject.

James Hahn: It sure is, it sure is.

DEBRA: I don’t know if there’s time because we’ve only got about 1 ½ minutes left.

James Hahn: Great!

DEBRA: So in that 1 ½ minutes, I’m going to just let you say just something very brief just to wrap up whatever you’d like to say that you haven’t said today without starting a new subject.

Diana Kaye: Okay. Well, I want to quickly throw this in. Debra, Jim and I, your books were really very valuable in helping me seriously to survive. I’m not sure that I really would’ve survived the after effects of the chemotherapy and recovered if I haven’t had information like yours to help me.

DEBRA: Thank you so much.

Diana Kaye: And the work that you have done, the educational work, your persistence over the years has been tremendous. It’s so valuable. We wanted to thank you for all the work that you’ve done because it is such a necessary thing in today’s world.

James Hahn: True.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you. I just want to reach through the microphone and give you a hug.

Diana Kaye: I know! I’d like to do the same.a

James Hahn: Oh, I can feel it.

DEBRA: I know, I know. I totally understand. I totally understand your dedication and I appreciate it so much that if I didn’t have businesses like yours to promote, I wouldn’t have anything to do. I mean, it really is.

Diana Kaye: I think you’d find something, Debra.

DEBRA: So I know the music is going to start.

Diana Kaye: You’re a woman with many missions like me too.

DEBRA: Thank you. Well, you know, I’m going to come up to Washington and see you someday.

James Hahn: Okay!

Diana Kaye: Oh, you should.

DEBRA: Yeah. But I have to go now. We have to get off the air because the music is going to start playing. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

James Hahn: Thank you.

DEBRA: I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Diana Kaye: Take care.

How to Remove Toxic Chemical Odors Around the House

Kyle KnappenbergerMy guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. He is the Director of Applications at Timilon Technology Acquisitions LLC, in Naples, Florida. Kyle joined Timilon in 2013 when they acquired the technology behind OdorKlenz®, a consumer brand of household odor removal products. We will be talking about harmful chemical classes around the home and ways to eliminate them—particularly how to remove perfume odors from laundry and washing machines. For over a decade, Kyle has been working on using safe metal oxide technology for odor control and toxic chemical neutralization applications. He has a Bachelors of Sciences degree in microbiology from Kansas State University, and co-holds six patents related to the mitigation of chemical and biological contamination. www.debralynndadd.com/debras-list/odorklenz

Here’s a video Odorklenz made to promote Karl’s interview on their social media. It made me smile 🙂

 

The MP3 of this interview has been lost, but will be placed here if we can find a copy.

read-transcript

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How to Remove Toxic Chemical Odors Around the House

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Kyle Knappenberger

Date of Broadcast: July 22, 2014
DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. I’m here in Clearwater, Florida. Today is July 22nd, 2014.

We’re going to have an interesting show today. Well, they’re always interesting shows and guests. I learn something every time someone comes on the show. And the guests that I choose, they really know what they’re talking about. They’re really in the midst of their industries. A lot of them have been doing this for a long time, and they’re providing really good solutions to the toxic chemicals we’re exposed to on a daily basis.

My guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. He’s the director of applications for Timilon Technology Acquisitions and you may have already heard of the brand name of the product we’re going to talk about, which is OdorKlenz. It’s a consumer-brand of household odor-remover products. They work really well.

I’ll just give a little background and say that a lot of people, when there’s an odor in your home, you might reach for an air freshener. But what an air freshener does is one of two things. It covers up the odor with a toxic fragrance. And all perfume and fragrances that are in some products, they’re all made from a whole lot of toxic chemicals.

The other thing that air fresheners can do is that they can deaden your nerves in your nose so that you don’t smell the odor. Those are the two things that air fresheners do. What odor removers do is actually remove the odor.

What we’re going to talk about today is the technology about removing different kinds of odors around the home. And we’ll find out exactly how to do this. One of the things I’m most interested in is removing perfume from laundry like buy something from a thrift store and it’s got perfume on it or like I had a situation where I bought a washing machine and it was scented with a detergent scent, and I had to get the detergent scent out. There might be all kinds of reasons for why you want to get perfume out of something and that’s going to be one of the things we’ll talk about. So stay tuned to the whole show.

I’d like to welcome my guest today, Kyle Knappenberger.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Hi Debra. It’s a pleasure to be on your show today.

DEBRA: Thank you. Thanks for being with me. How did you get interested in reducing odors?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: It was actually a bit of a luck. I had gotten introduced to a company many years ago when I was in school and had the opportunity to join that company right out of school. The company primarily focused on destructive absorption technologies and furthering the use of metal oxides for the destruction of really harmful and toxic types of chemicals.

Through the evolution of working for that company for many years, we were really focused on neutralizing some of the really deadly chemicals out there, things like chemical warfare agents or warfighters and military-type of applications.

And about nine or ten years ago, as about everyone should remember, Hurricane Katrina hit down in New Orleans, Louisiana. We had our toxic chemical neutralizer stuff, our military-grade product, and we had a team down there to help with some of the clean-up and mitigation and work with some of the responders.

What we found out was that people should have been more concerned with toxic chemicals from that type of event, but what stuck in people’s minds more than anything was the impact of the odors from this particular event. They were asking us, “Can your chemical neutralizer, your warfare grade neutralizer be effective against a whole host of odor our folks were encountering in their homes?” And of course, this was from a very specific disaster so the odors, as you can imagine, were quite significant and impactful.

Our products worked beautifully for that, which really led that company to start expanding beyond just military-grade chemicals to more common occurrence chemicals because as we all know, we’re exposed to a variety of toxic chemicals on a daily basis. These things can be in our homes.

During your introduction, you mentioned quite a few of them, things like the air fresheners. Frankly, they release quite a few volatile elements to our environment and we’re doing this to ourselves. We’re releasing potentially dangerous chemicals into our environment on a daily basis.

The technology that has been developed over a number of years includes natural earth mineral technology that Timilon has acquired. That’s extremely effective and efficient at neutralizing and wanting to break down a lot of chemicals.

So that’s the progression. I got to join a company after researching water purification techniques in school, went into deadly and toxic chemicals in chemical worker agents and then by extension, more common, toxic chemicals that we’re being exposed to on a daily basis.

DEBRA: We’re going to talk about the technology later, but I just want to ask right now, does this technology, if it was just sitting in a room, would it absorb toxic chemicals like an air filter does? Would someone use it instead of an air filter?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: The technology does absorb if you just have these metal oxide granules and powders sitting on a dish. Yes, they’re going to be absorbing those chemicals right out of the air. If you place them into a system (which is what our company does, the commercialization of this technology) and put them into things like air cartridges, air filters, or other mechanisms, or different types of approaches or delivery system, you can much more actively bring the toxic chemicals or the noxious chemicals to the material, which will then increase the removal and the elimination efficiency of those chemicals.

DEBRA: And was there a specific reason for why Timilon acquired this technology?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Timilon is a technology-acquisition company that likes to commercialize a broader array of technology. They have seen and are aware of this technology and when it became available for purchase and acquisition, they moved on doing that.

And Timilon has taken that commercialization of what I would call again, our destruction absorption technologies and they really want to push it into much broader markets for the mitigation of toxic and noxious chemicals, which include odors.

And we really are, here at Timilon, focused on the markets that we would call the personal air quality and surface decontamination with key emphasis on what we would call critical environments where people, children, elderly, the chemically-sensitive people are living their lives. We really want to take those environments and make them much more suited for living by reducing the chemicals and pollutants that are in those environments, so that people aren’t being exposed to them.

DEBRA: I definitely see the change. I first became aware of OdorKlenz a few years ago and used the product at that time. But when I go to your website now, I see many more products than existed then. We’ll talk about those later in the show.

We actually need to go to break, but I think that it’s interesting to me that you started with using this in chemical warfare, which are some pretty toxic chemicals. And now you’re bringing that in the home to handle the toxic chemicals that are in the home. We’ll talk about that when we get back from the break.

My guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. He’s from Timilon Technology Acquisitions and they make OdorKlenz, household odor removal products. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. He’s from Timilon Technology Acquisitions and they make OdorKlenz. That’s a consumer brand of household odor removal products. This is something you can use instead of an air freshener, which has toxic chemicals in it. You use this product to remove the toxic chemicals from your home.

So Kyle, tell us about some of the toxic chemicals that people might have in their homes that your product would be good to remove?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: It really encompasses quite a few different classes of chemicals, liquid and vapor chemicals. Just think about all the things around your home. You’ve got batteries, which contain sulfuric acid. You’ve got household cleaning chemicals like bleach, which is a sodium hypochlorite solution. You have a variety of pesticide and insecticide which are organophosphates.

This is a bit of a sidenote, but the pesticides and insecticides that you use are extremely comparable in chemical structure to chemical worker agents and nerve agents. And in fact, when we do a lot of our testing against some of our military-grade products or warfare-grade products for warfighter products, we use pesticides and insecticides because they are very similar.

And when you think about what the job a pesticide or insecticide does, it kills things. And folks have these things in their garages, basements, and they’re applying these things in their homes! They’re very dangerous things to have around and they contribute to poor air quality.

And then you have your glass cleaners, which have ammonia and alcohol. Toilet bowl cleaners have a lot of harsh chemicals in them, including acids and phenyls. And the air fresheners that you mentioned, they contribute to a lot of VOCs in the home such as formaldehyde and one particular chemical and all the different repellants that are used in those again (some alcohol and organic compound). And then all the things you find in your garage, you’ve got oils, fuels. And where you live, you might have pool chemicals.

Then there are things that some people don’t even think about. The actual building materials in your home contribute to poor air quality. The laminate flooring or carpet contains a lot of adhesive that can release VOCs to your air. Pressed wood and particle board cabinets, even furniture that you buy and assemble, or even furniture that’s been finished and lacquered and maybe it hasn’t fully dried or cured. It can be a big emitter of a whole host of VOCs and essentially carcinogenic chemicals. They’re everywhere!

And then the first thing that most people do when they try to cover up these types of chemicals is they go and grab an air freshener, which is a masking agent in many cases. That’s just adding additional chemicals to the environment. And we at Timilon have always felt that if you’re wanting to remove odors and chemical pollutants from your daily environment, let’s not add in additional chemical pollutants and odors into your environment.

DEBRA: That would be the smart thing.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Exactly. You would be surprised how many folks and industries are using chemical processes to eliminate odors. They’re eliminating odors by adding odors. And it just seems very counterproductive.

DEBRA: You told me some things over the phone before our interview about the chemicals that are used to clean up disasters. I know that some people do have disasters like flooding and fire in their home. How can your products be used for that? And what are the toxic chemicals that they use to clean up disasters?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: I’m going to simplify it down to just a couple of categories of types of disasters. You’ve got your fire and water disasters. That’s a bit of an oversimplification. But when you think about what happens to a home after a fire or a surge backup, you had an event and things have burned or things have been released. All the different compounds in your home are releasing toxic chemicals.

There are disaster restoration crews that can come out sometimes, depending upon the severity of the job, maybe it’s the home owner who’s a do-it-yourself type, but a lot of the chemicals that are utilized after an event like that, they’ll bring in crews and they’ll start removing items from the home, which is good. You want to get the source out. But then they’ll bring in chemicals or generators like ozone machines or free radical hydroxyl machines or even thermal fog, which is basically a chemical that’s heated up or micronized and released out into the environment.

Those processes puts chemical out into the environment to react with the other chemicals that are present in that environment and they may or may not do that. If they do it, that might be a step in the right direction. But those chemical byproducts are still present in that home.

You may have changed what it smells like and you may or may not have reduced any environmental hazards or indoor air quality problems with that. And that’s how this technology (I mentioned Hurricane Katrina in the last segment), that’s really where we started to see that our technology is really good at, mitigating airborne and source chemicals.

And that’s where our process, for example, [inaudible 00:20:24] we’ve taken our materials and we’ve been able to put them into air cartridges that go into portable air units or they can go into a home’s HVAC system so that you can cycle the air, exchange that air, pass it through our materials and let our materials react with it in a safe way to break down those chemicals to actually remove them from the environment.

As opposed to releasing ozone into the environment and hoping that it reacts with the chemical and has that reaction go cleanly, we want to be able to do that same thing, but do it in a confined environment and remove those chemicals in your home, but not have those chemical reactions occur out in the environment. And when they do have source treatment, we can apply our products directly to the sources, treat and neutralize the sources in conjunction with the air process and take care of the whole problem.

DEBRA: Good. We’re going to hear more about how this technology works when we come back from the break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. He’s from Timilon Technology Acquisitions who makes OdorKlenz, which is the product that we’re talking about right now. I just found a way I can use this in my house and I’m going to tell you when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. The company he works for makes a product called OdorKlenz that we’ve been talking about thax`t is a household odor removal product, not an air freshener. It removes the odor and doesn’t just put more toxic chemicals in the air. We’re going to learn more about how the technology works now.

But before the break, I said that I thought of a way to use this product in my home because I don’t have toxic chemicals to remove in my home. I’ve removed them all from the source. But I’m thinking of many ways — not many people live in a toxic-free home as I do, but even in my own home, I was really delighted to see that you have these in HVAC filters.

I know that I don’t have any control over what’s going on with the outside air and sometimes, somebody will, even though I tell people no perfumes, sometimes I’ll have a party and somebody will come in with cigarette smoke residue in their clothing or perfume or detergent. Most likely, it’s detergent scent from washing our clothes. I was saying, “no perfume,” but people don’t understand that there is scent in their detergent.

Sometimes these odors, these chemicals will inadvertently get into my house. It would be so nice to just turn on the HVAC and clean out the air in my whole house. Sometimes they’ll come do lawn work next door or something. I can see that this will be something that if everybody just had one of these filters at their homes, they can just turn on their HVAC and what would happen?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Well, that’s exactly right. Having this technology into a configuration such as an HVAC filter or a cartridge as a standalone device really does help minimize the pollutants that are in your indoor air.

Some of the things that are kind of interesting as homes get built better supposedly more efficiently, we’re essentially tightening up our home, which are trapping and not letting those chemicals out that are being brought in by people into your home. They’re coming in, but not getting out like they used to.

More efficient air filtration is important. Most people’s air filters primarily do only one thing, which is to remove particulates. They get micron or submicron particles, the things that are toxic chemicals or the noxious odors that we can smell or in some cases we can’t smell. Those things go through your traditional air filters. Having a technology like our natural earth mineral technology is much more efficient and brings capabilities to those types of processes that can’t do that.

DEBRA: How does that work? Is it adsorbing? First, why don’t you tell us what the word ‘adsorbing’ meaning because it’s not ‘absorbing’. Tell us what that means first. I want to ask you ‘adsorbing’ or is the material actually changing, breaking down the chemicals?

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Well, we do like to use the phrase to describe our technology as destructive adsorption. When our technology comes into contact with it, if you were to say something just ‘absorbs it’, you would essentially be implying that a chemical is just being stored on that material maybe within its pores. That’s what happens with a lot of carbon products or just general absorbents. They can hold onto a material or they’re storing it, but they can release it just as easily.

Now, the process that we call destructive adsorption is a surface phenomenon that our materials have that is taking advantage of the high surface area of our material.

There is a chemical reaction or a chemical process going on because. This is going to be a little bit simplified here, but the different atoms and molecules, they want to have neighbors. They want to be paired up with other chemicals.

But the atoms that are on the surface of things or on the corners or edges, they don’t have as many neighbors. The atoms at the middle of the molecule have friends all around them – left, right, back, up, down. Well, if you can increase the surface area to have more corners and edges, then that molecule (like in the case of our metal oxide), it’s going to have more active sites that can reach out and pair up and grab onto a toxic chemical or a noxious odor, or really whatever type of chemical is out there, whether good or bad.

And that’s what makes our technology really different. We’re combining absorption technology with high surface area materials, really giving it the best of both worlds, so that we can seek out, grab things, react with it, break them down or neutralize it and retain them on the surface of our material. In effect, you can truly then eliminate it.

DEBRA: Wow! So you’re not just collecting the chemicals. You’re actually breaking them down so that they’re not— we’re kind of getting into the function of chemistry. I’ll admit, I never actually took chemistry in school. I think there are probably other people who are listening who don’t quite understand how chemical reactions happen. But I’ve read lots of chemistry books after I started trying to learn about toxic chemicals.

So just to explain again, really briefly how that chemical reaction is taking place, that chemicals are these — well, you tell them because you’ll say it better.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Well, there are earth minerals and metal oxides that we use that are very safe materials, but they are wanting to come into contact with other chemicals. They are wanting to chemically bind with them, react with them, and tear them apart on the surface. This is a very safe process.

Now, the analogy that I like to utilize is imagine if we had spilled a toxic chemical on the floor. It was a liquid and we wanted to soak it up. We’d want to use a material that is ideally safe, but then we’d want to use something that’s efficient in doing so.

I’ll take the example of popcorn and popcorn kernel. Well, if we had a popcorn kernel…

DEBRA: I’m going to interrupt you. We need to go on break. Let’s finish the story when we get back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Kyle Knappenberger and we’re talking about OdorKlenz, a consumer brand of household odor removal products. When we come back, we’re going to talk about how all this technology that we’ve just been talking about gets applied in consumer products that you can use in your home to remove toxic chemicals. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Kyle Knappenberger. We’re talking about OdorKlenz, a brand of household odor removal products. This is such an unusual product that I’m unaccustomed to saying “household odor removal product.” So, go on with what you were saying before the break, Kyle.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Oh, thank you. I was giving the analogy of if you are wanting to soak up or eliminate a toxic chemical – it’s a bit of a simplification here, but our technology is really in using safe materials.

In the analogy, you have two different, but fundamentally the same things. In one bucket, we have unpopped popcorn and in the other, popped popcorn. If you’re going to soak up a toxic spill, you’re going to want to use something that has more surface area, more internal pores and more active sites. In that case, the popped piece of popcorn. Again, fundamentally, they’re the same thing, chemically they’re the same thing, but one is much more efficient. That’s what we’ve done with our metal oxide technology.

We’ve been able to adapt this technology. Whether it’s metal oxides or things that are commonly found in the ground, but we’ve been able to make them much more efficient at neutralizing a variety of chemicals and odors. And we’ve been able to take this technology (again, which is green and non-toxic) and apply it into a variety of different forms, whether that’s powders, granules, air cartridges or liquid because as you know, when we’re trying to address toxic chemicals around the home or in our laundry or in our daily lives, you have to optimize the way that you come into contact with those things.

If you have a spot on the carpet that’s may be from a pet or a loved one who spilled something and you want to neutralize it, well, you need to make sure that you treat that spot so that you can fully react with, neutralize, and then remove it from that spot. So we’ve been able to adapt our powders into those varieties of different forms to address a wide variety of different applications.

One of the things that when we’re talking at Timilon about when addressing indoor air quality, we have a lot of products that are very good at solving specific problems, whether that’s a pet that got skunked or your clothes has been in an environment where they’ve been contaminated with a variety of odors or things. But we also like to think of this as a system process.

If you really want to address indoor air quality, utilizing these things in conjunction with each other means we’re maintaining a much more comfortable and improved environment in which we’re living in. That’s the approach we like to take, address different varieties of toxic and odor problems.

DEBRA: Tell us what the different types of product that you have, the different ways that you have applied this technology.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Oh, absolutely! Some of the key ones that were originally developed as I’ve mentioned out of the Hurricane Katrina were surface products and air products. We have products like our OdorKlenz S, which can be applied directly to sources whether that’s on a carpet, maybe it’s on a cushion or a chair or something like that where you directly apply our material in a liquid form to that surface, work it into the surface and then you can remove it through either extraction from household cleaning tools or you can let the product dry and then vacuum up any residue that you may have.

We then also have [something] for more of your spill types of applications. We’ve got our OdorKlenz Absorbent product, which is a granular material. If you were out in the garage and you maybe spill over your weed killer or lawn chemical products, you can absorb that up, neutralize that odor and make the situation a lot safer.

We have a new line of products, which is a sport line of product, which as we know, there are a lot of folks that are pretty active in a variety of different events and sports, whether that’s athletic runners and a wide variety of things. You’re creating a lot of odors with those things.

Sometimes you just can’t treat them right away. They often go right into your gear or garment bags. We have a variety of products that can be directly applied to those garments or gears to neutralize odors right after you’ve used them or in the case of our OdorKlenze Laundry Additive, which is by far, one of our most popular products. As we’re just walking around in our day to day lives, whether that’s in our homes or at our jobs, we’re being exposed to a wide variety of chemicals and odors. You want to get those odors or chemicals out of your clothes so that you can start the day clean and fresh.

And kind of an interesting side note, when we initially launched the OdorKlenz Laundry Additive, we have a subgroup of customers that really found us. These are from the chemically-sensitive customers that were not even a market that we were particularly looking at. They were calling us and saying that, “Your product works really good at neutralizing the chemicals and odors in detergent.”

I have a very specific customer who gave me the example that they never travel away from their home for more than a few days because they were afraid of using other people’s washing machines or dryers or even laundromat dryers. They themselves may have tried to minimize what they’re exposed to on a day to day basis, but they don’t know who used that dryer or washer right before them and what their detergents consisted of. I had a customer that said, “This is fantastic! I can now go on a cruise and not be afraid of what the person that used the washer before me may have been exposed to.” That day to day thing, to be able to help someone like that, is actually very rewarding.

DEBRA: I can understand that. But while this is really important to people who are sensitive to some perfumes and scents (these perfumes and scents are toxic to anybody), whether or not you’re reacting to them, they’re toxic. And everybody who’s using laundry in any kind of public place should be using this product because you really don’t know what was in the washer before you put your clothes in there.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Exactly! And again, it’s not just the things, like you said, that people are exposed to, but the chemicals in a lot of laundry detergents themselves – the bleaching agent, whether it’s aldehyde or amine compounds, quat compounds, chlorine, or ethylacetate (which is a fabric softener). A lot of people are very irritated by these things. In higher dosages, they can be toxic. Everybody is being exposed to those sorts of things and having a way to minimize your exposure to it is a wise decision.

DEBRA: I am so pleased that your company is making all these new applications in this because this product is really needed. I’m always talking about removing toxic chemicals at the sources, but I’m really in communication with my readers and my listeners and I know that there are a lot of people who are being exposed to toxic chemicals, but they can’t do anything about it. They can’t remove their carpet because they’re in an apartment and they don’t own it.

There are a lot of people living in apartments, so they can’t do anything about the toxic chemicals that are being emitted from the formaldehyde coming out of the particle board cabinets and things like that. And as much as they would like to, they can’t change their environment. This just opens the door to a whole lot of people being able to reduce their exposure in ways that wasn’t available before.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Absolutely! Simple things like standalone air scrubbers with OdorKlenz cartridge or an HVAC filter that has our materials impregnated into it and combining that with things like treating your carpet with granular products before you vacuum it up or washing your laundry in a good detergent with the OdorKlenz Laundry Additive, these are all things that can contribute to a system-approach to minimizing odors and indoor pollutants and making your environment that you live in on a daily basis much more comfortable for yourself.

DEBRA: Thank you so much for being on the show. I told you it’ll come by really fast.

KYLE KNAPPENBERGER: Time flies when you’re having fun.

DEBRA: It does. So I want to give your website, it’s OdorKlenz.com, so people can go to your website and order online. I see on your website saying it’s free shipping for $50 or more. And if you order before Labor Day, which is some weeks from now, it’s 15% off your entire purchase. If you use the coupon code “summersale”. So this is a good time to try this out.

You’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. Thank you so much. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Filtered water while traveling

Question from TA

I’m wondering if you have any suggestions for how to have access to pure water while away from home. On a road trip, I’d probably try to just bring as much water from home as possible, since we have the Pure Effect under-sink filter.

But even on a road trip, there is only so much space in the car and we’d need a good bit of water if we’ll be away for a week or so. And when traveling by plane, it doesn’t seem possible to bring any of our water from home, other than what can be consumed on the way to the airport, since we can’t take it on the plane. If traveling by airplane and staying at our destination (or several destinations) for several days to a week or more, what are the best options for getting pure water?

In the past I have used the Berkey sport bottles, but they require a fair amount of effort to get the water out of the bottle and don’t allow me to drink very much at a time. And they’re plastic and don’t get rid of fluoride. They’ve served their purpose on more than one occasion for me, but I’m looking for other options.

I’ve considered getting a small countertop filter (I think I saw one specifically for travel once), but when carrying that or a travel-size Berkey water filter, they do take up a fair amount of space in luggage.

I’ve seen pieces of charcoal/carbon that can be placed in water to absorb the toxins out of the water, but I don’t know if this is a great option or not. (Does it do a great job? Would it take longer than is feasible when we need water available throughout the day, etc?)

I saw this product, but it looks like it only filters chlorine and taste/odor issues, but there’s a whole lot more I’d like to remove from tap water besides chlorine.
www.everydropwater.com/product-details.html

So I’m wondering if you have any recommendations for accessing clean water away from home in a way that doesn’t take up half of a suitcase, and that filters as much as possible. I realize there probably aren’t any options that do the same quality job that our Pure Effect filter does, but what is the next best thing when away from home? And is there any travel-friendly option that removes fluoride? I’d rather not give my toddler fluoride at all.

On my last trip, I got some reverse osmosis water from one of those dispensing machines at a health food store. I believe we got a 2.5 gallon plastic jug and filled it up from the machine, and I added mineral drops to each glass. But the water didn’t taste great – I think because of the plastic jug. And I’m not sure that adding mineral drops is really enough to correct what is done to the water through the RO process.

We also bought some glass bottles of spring water on that trip, but that gets very expensive very quickly!

Debra’s Answer

Great, great, great question! And I wish I had a good answer.

The small filters you mention, such as the charcoal and everydropwater.com remove chlorine and maybe chloramines, but they are very limited. They are better than nothing, but no match for your Pure Effect filter.

Readers, what do you do for safe water when you travel?

I asked Igor Milevskiy at www.PureEffectFilters.com your question and here is his reply:

The travel size filters that I’m aware of on the market cannot be as effective as the Pure Effect system she has, this is due to the generally small size of the travel filters not allowing room for much of the necessary filtration medias required for thorough and wide range filtration.  Another problem with smaller / bottle style filters is that they tend to be more prone to bacteria and fouling issues, due to standing water and constant exposure to human contact and air.  Also, after the water is filtered, it sits in the plastic reservoir, where it can absorb plastic chemicals.

That being said, I can recommend she take our CLASSIC system with her into hotels or places where she can hook it up to a faucet.  This is our 2 chamber mid-size system that’s not as large for packing and taking with you as the ULTRA system.  Also, because it’s only a 2 chamber system, she would need to swap in whatever cartridge is most needed (e.g. Fluorsorb Cartridge if she’s going to a place that fluoridates water, or AntiRad-Plus cartridge where radiation is more of a concern, these are the two cartridges she can choose for that second chamber… the SuperBlock carbon block should always be in the first chamber).

Here is a link to the Classic system, it weights apx. 11 lbs, and may be easier to pack than other systems she mentioned, since it’s only 6″ thick/deep: 10″ (Width) x 12.5″ (Height) x 6″ (Depth):

www.pureeffectfilters.com/filter-units/the-pure-effect-classic.html

The “drop in” charcoal sticks or tablets (coconut shell derived carbon is best) can be good for short term situations like in an airplane, however, they can become fouled and grow bacteria sooner, and should be disposed of within a few days of usage.  Also, it’s important to know the source of the carbon, and it’s best if it’s NSF or WQA Certified.  I’ve seen some carbon sticks from Japan, and I’m not sure if they may have already absorbed any radiation from Fukushima (e.g. Iodine-131, which is absorbed well by activated carbon), or other impurities.

Add Comment

Safest Interior Paints

Question from Carol

What do you think is the safest interior latex paint, oil-based primer, and oil-based paint to use for bedroom walls, baseboard, cabinetry, etc.? Thank you very much.

Debra’s Answer

There are many ways you can get the answer to this question on this website.

One would be to go to the Paint page of Debra’s List.

Another would be to search for “paint” using the search box at the top of the right hand column on every page.

Here are the search results for “paint.” This has a lot of Q&A about paint.

Without going into a full explanation of all the different kinds of paint, I just want to answer your specific question.

Commercial paint like you buy in a store might be latex paint or acrylic paint. Both are plastics. The key determining factor is VOCs. You want to choose a no VOC brand and even safer would be a brand where the colorants have no VOCs (those are volatile organic chemicals).

But even without the VOCs, you’re still putting plastic on your walls. If that’s OK with you, once it dries you’ll have a nice plastic wall. It will outgas for a while, but eventually will become inert.

I would say that the safest paint would be something like Old Fashioned Milk Paint , which is made from all natural ingredients. The last room I painted I used this paint and I will always now use it to paint walls. It is easy to use and gorgeous and all natural. Perfect.

Now, you also asked about oil-based primer and oil-based paint for baseboard, cabinetry etc. No. No oil-based paint period. It’s very toxic and takes a very long time to outgas. Here’s where you would use a no-VOC satin or semi-gloss paint.

There are natural paints from Germany that are made from plant resins, but I have used them and, though natural, the odors are very strong and take a long time to cure.

So my best answer to your question is milk paint with no-VOC satin or semi-gloss for the trim.

Add Comment

The World of Sustainable Furnishings

Susan InglisMy guest today is Susan Inglis, Executive Director of Sustainable Furnishings Council. She has over twenty-five years experience working with artisans and in sustainable manufacture in the home furnishings, fashion, and gift industries. We’ll be talking about the Sustainable Furnishings Council and how they support reducing toxics in furniture. Susan has worked in twenty-seven countries on five continents providing services ranging from identifying procedures for insuring the sustainability of a natural resource base to market-led product development and how to access new markets effectively. Susan’s direction of the SFC has gained national attention and brought the organization widespread recognition as the primary source for verified sustainable home furnishings. Susan has spoken on behalf of SFC throughout the U.S. and abroad and has inspired many companies to adopt a sustainable platform for the future. She is the proud recipient of the 2009 WithIt WOW Award for Education. www.sustainablefurnishings.org

read-transcript

 


 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
The World of Sustainable Furnishings

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Susan Inglis

Date of Broadcast: July 16, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic free.

You know I listened to this song that at the beginning of the show everyday, “You take what’s wrong, and try to make it right.”

And that’s what we do here on this show. We’re looking at the wrongness of toxic chemicals and consumer products in the world today, and we’re showing you how to make things right in your life so that you’re not exposed to toxic chemicals that could be making you sick.

And I put that word “could” in there, but for the most part, so many people who are having so many illnesses—and even things that you might be suffering from in your own life, in your own health—all these things have relationships to exposures to toxic chemicals.

And this is what we’re working on sorting out in this show, figure out what’s toxic, where it is, and what you can do instead to protect your health and the health of those that you love.

Today is Wednesday, July 16, 2014. And I’m here in Clearwater, Florida. And we have been having thunderstorms all morning—big thunderstorms, lots of rain. So, if this show gets cut off it’s because the power went out. I am crossing my fingers and thinking good thoughts that we’re going to have power for the next hour, and we’re going to have a wonderful show.

Our subject today is Sustainable Furnishings. My guest is Susan Inglis. She’s the Executive Director of the Sustainable Furnishings Council which is an organization of various companies that make various furnishings of different types—the whole furnishings industry, people who are making different things within the furnishing industry. They’ve come together because there are all working in some sustainable way.

And we’re going to talk about what is sustainable furnishing. But also how toxics fit into that, and what different people are doing. We’ve already had some people, some members of the Sustainable Furnishing—I’m not really sure how to get this right, Sustainable Furnishings Council. I wanted to say Association. It’s the Sustainable Furnishings Council.

We had a guest on the owner and founder of Prairie Rugs. We’ve had on Berry Chic from Naturepedic. And I’m sure we’ll have on some other guest from more organizations, more companies from the Sustainable Furnishings Council.

But today we’re going to talk to the Executive Director, Susan Inglis. Hi, Susan.

SUSAN INGLIS: Hello, Debra. Thank you so much for having me on your show.

DEBRA: You’re welcome! It’s my pleasure.

So, Susan has more than 25 years of experience working with artisans and sustainable manufacturer in the home furnishings, fashion, and gift industry.

So Susan, would you tell us how you got interested in these issues of sustainability and how the Sustainable Furnishings Council came to be?

SUSAN INGLIS: Yes, I will tell you the story of how we got to where we are.

I got interested in issues of sustainability just as a matter of my heritage. I was just born and evolved into it. And so, all my life, my family here in North Carolina, we have been interested in making things with our hands. We’ve also been interested in stewardship of our natural environment. So that’s what I was born into.

And when it came time for me to make a living, I started a business working with artisans. And it evolved over the years from a sweater business to a home textiles business to a brokering business.

And that’s what it was, the small business from the mountain was business brokering hand-made when I got word of a plan to have a meeting to talk about the possibility of starting an organization called Sustainable Furnishings Council.

We were brokering a lot into the home furnishings industries at that time, so I was interested to hear about this. I knew that it would be good for my business and right up my alley. So, I went to that meeting at the showroom of Jerry Cooklin, who is the founder of Sustainable Furnishings Council. He is Peruvian. He was manufacturing furniture in Peru and showing it and selling it out of his showroom in Half Point, North Carolina where there is a major furniture market twice a year.

Jerry called a meeting at his showroom to talk about forming this organization. I’ve heard about it and showed up.

And he told us how he had had an epiphany himself and spent the last several years greening up his operations which involved making very careful choices about the wood he was using, and the processes he was using to make his furniture.

He knew that even greening up his own operation was just having a small impact compared to what the whole industry could do, so he made an effort to bring the conversation to the industry.

I got involved then. And we incorporated some six months later and have been growing ever since.

I hasten to mention that my little business from the mountain working with artisans does still exist, but it’s quite limited because since September of 2006, I’ve spent more and more time working with Sustainable Furnishings Council.

DEBRA: Yes. Well, it was in 2006 that Sustainable Furnishings Council started?

SUSAN INGLIS: Yeah.

DEBRA: So, you’ve been around for eight years?

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right. We were fully incorporated very early in 2007. And as you said, our members are companies that are involved in the home furnishings industry in various ways. That includes companies that supply materials used in making furnishings (that would be things like wood, fabric, and foam, et cetera) companies that make furnishings products (furniture, accessories, lighting, rug, et cetera), companies that sell these things in stores and interior design firms that specificy these things in projects or homes and offices.

So, that’s an overview of the kinds of companies that are involved in the home furnishings industry in our organization.

DEBRA: So, you really help people representing each different phase of the life cycle, so to speak, of furniture.

SUSAN INGLIS: Exactly.

DEBRA: …from the materials itself all the way to the people that the consumer would have contact with in order to purchase these.

SUSAN INGLIS: Exactly.

DEBRA: I think that this is so great. Because so many times—I say this over and over but, it bears repeating over and over—so many times the problem for consumers is that they go to a retailer, and the retailer doesn’t know anything about the materials or where this product has come from. All they’re doing is selling it.

And so, this is a really good opportunity for your members to meet each other, and get involved with the whole cycle of it, and to be able to then say to a consumer, “I know about this product.”

SUSAN INGLIS: Exactly, you’re exactly right. And we do find that the sales staff in stores are some of the most eager ones for the kind of information we, as an organization, can share with them. We do a lot of educating of industry players. And those retail sales staff, and those interior designers really want the information they need for talking to consumers.

DEBRA: How many members do you have?

SUSAN INGLIS: Right now, we’ve got between—let’s see, I should’ve listed that up Debra. We’ve got over 350 member companies right now. Our membership has hovered between 300 and 400 for the last several years. When we incorporated, there were 40 odd companies that threw their names into the hat to get started with us. And by the end of that first year, we had 100 companies involved. And now it’s hovering between 300 and 400.

DEBRA: What a great accomplishment! We’re going to take a break.

SUSAN INGLIS: Thank you.

DEBRA: We’re going to take a break. And when we come back, we’re going to find out more about the Sustainable Furnishings Council and its members. And how furnishings are sustainable or not.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. And my guest today is Susan Inglis from the Sustainable Furnishings Council. And their website is SustainableFrusnishings.org. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Susan Inglis from the Sustainable Furnishings Council. And that’s SustainableFurnishings.org.

Susan, how do companies qualify for being part of the council?

SUSAN INGLIS: We have a simple and important requirement for membership. A company must make their own public and verifiable commitment to sustainability. And they must make a commitment to transparency. And they must make a commitment to continuous improvement.

Now, the first thing you and your listeners will notice is that word “sustainability”. It’s an umbrella term. It’s a big word, and it’s covers a lot. There are many topics that fall under that sustainability umbrella. And our members’ commitment vary.

So, some members are more focused on matters of reducing toxic input. Some are focused more on matters of preserving natural resources, on energy use production, et cetera.

So, all of these things falls under the sustainability umbrella, and they are all important to us as an organization, and they’re all interrelated. But the point of focus of different member companies varies. And that’s fine with us as an organization.

Our premise is that the planet is in enough trouble. And our health is suffering sufficiently that every company has to start wherever they are and go forward.

Grab an oar and go. We want to support progress and implementing more and more best practices.

DEBRA: I totally agree with that. Because I think that as somebody who has been looking for and cataloging products for more than 30 years, I know that if I were to just take only the one—wait, let me just start over with that sentence.

There was a point I started out looking at toxics. And about 20 years ago, 1990-1987—I started in 1982 with toxics. In 1987 I decided, “Oh, my God! There’s an environment out there. And there’s a lot more that’s wrong with products than just toxics.”

SUSAN INGLIS: Exaclty.

DEBRA: And this was before Earth Day 1990. I had a little newsletter called the Earthwise Consumer that started to try to look at green issues before it was even called green.

And what I found was that—what ended happening was after many years, several years ago, I went back to just focusing on toxics because the issue of evaluating a product for sustainability is so multifaceted that if you were to try to find a product that is completely 100% sustainable in every facet, you would have a very short list.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right, that’s right.

DEBRA: And so, I decided for myself that what I was going to do was just focus on toxics because that’s where I started.

And if I could just find products that were not toxic, that that was a very important thing to do.

And in fact, nobody else is really doing that. There are a lot of organizations that are doing some pieces of that. But I’m the only one that I know of where I’m taking that idea of having something be not toxic and spreading it to all the consumer products.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s really exciting, Debra.

DEBRA: Thank you. I’m very excited. Thank you. But I want to say that what you’re doing—I want to first of all, commend you for doing it and tell the listeners that I know how hard it is because I tried to do it for so many years. And that in the realm of sustainability, you really need to acknowledge that there are many facets, and everything from conserving resources, to being non-toxic, to the renewability, or non-renewability—

It’s so many things. What’s the energy is. What’s the water used? How much energy is used in the transportation of the material from where it’s going to (where it’s manufactured) to where it’s sold. It’s just a huge, huge thing.

And so, I know from looking at—I haven’t looked at every single business in your list yet because it’s hundreds. But I know from looking through this that some of your businesses qualify because they’ve reduced their energy use or some because of using organic or renewable materials and some because they’re less toxic.

And so, when people are looking through for furniture and all kinds of furnishings on your site, they need to figure out what is most important to them.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right.

DEBRA: And I know my listeners are going to be looking for the ones that are least toxic, but they’re going to find some that are energy efficient and might be toxic.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right.

DEBRA: And that’s just the nature of what this is.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right, that’s right. Now, all of our member companies fill what’s called our best practices agreement.

One of the first things we did as an organization was to sit down and suss out what our best practices for sustainability in our industry.

And this covers a whole range of things—things about energy use production, things about reducing toxic input, things about making careful choices in materials and processes, etc. So we have this list of best practices. And each of our member companies go through the list, and indicate which practices they are implementing now, which practices they are not implementing, and which practices are not pertinent to their businesses and which practices they’re in the process of implementing this year. And then, they update that every year.

So, when you or your listeners go to our website looking for furniture, you can use the finder to find manufacturers. And say you’re looking for dining room furniture, you’ll click on “dining room,” and up will come these little thumbnail pictures showing you the dining room furniture made by various members of our organization. And you’ll see the one that you like best, and you’ll click on that company, and you’ll see their best practices.

DEBRA: Okay, great.

SUSAN INGLIS: You’re going to see one little image of their furniture. But that’s enough to show you whether it’s your style.

And then, you go to their website and learn more.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. But during the break, I’m going to go to your website and do just that. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Susan Inglis from the Sustainable Furnishings Council. And we’ll talk more about sustainable furnishings when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Susan Inglis. She’s the Executive Director of the Sustainable Furnishings Council. It’s a group of businesses that are moving in the direction of becoming more sustainable. They have over 300 members. And you can go there and find some furnishing type products that are less toxic and have other environmental benefits.

Susan, I was just playing around with your website during the break. I can’t seem to get back to the homepage—oh, wait, here we go. It’s not the fault of your website, it’s my browser. But anyway—

SUSAN INGLIS: It may be the storms you’re suffering.

DEBRA: It may be. It’s just I switched to a new browser. And there are things that I like about it, and things that I don’t like about it. But anyway…

So, I did see on your homepage—which I can’t seem to get back to—over on the right—I just want to tell everybody so that everybody knows where to go—over on the right there’s a box—I can’t look at it right now—but it’s says “Materials.”

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right.

DEBRA: Yeah! And that’s where you need to click. There are four categories of materials. Tell us what they are.

SUSAN INGLIS: They are find materials, find manufactures, find stores, and find designers. It is on the right hand side of the homepage at SustainableFurnishings.org.

When you click on “Find Manufacturers,” for instance, you have a little box where you can find the kind of product that you want. And so you might click on “dining room.” And then you would see all the companies that make dining room furniture.

DEBRA: Right. Wow! I’m really having technical problems here because I’m not able to open any websites.

SUSAN INGLIS: Oh, dear.

DEBRA: It’s not just yours. Jeez!

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s frustrating. And we’re so dependent on those things.

DEBRA: I know!

SUSAN INGLIS: I’ll tell your listeners something else about what they’ll see there. They will see images of the Sustainable Furnishings Council members seal. All our members are qualified to use the members seal in their marketing and advertising. And if they are good enough, we recognize them as exemplary.

So, when you were looking at the list of companies—for instance the list of manufacturers that make dining room furniture—you’ll see that some of them have a silver members seal.

DEBRA: I noticed that.

SUSAN INGLIS: Yeah! So, that means the company has qualified by proving certain things to us. And those requirements that we have include requirement for showing that they are not overly polluting the indoor air. There are requirement for limit on VOC’s or volatile organic compounds.

And in furnishings, there are volatile organic compounds in finishes and in glues. I mean, we’re all familiar with that new product smell, right?

DEBRA: Right, right.

SUSAN INGLIS: And if you walk into a furniture store, you will smell that smell. And it will be the volatilizing of the chemicals used in finishes on fabrics and on wood surfaces or other surfaces.

So we require that these VOCs are limited. And of course, we ideally want there to be no VOCs. But as we were saying earlier in the hour, there are some cases where it’s nigh impossible to get rid of toxins in the world we’re in these days.

DEBRA: Sometimes, yes.

Now, I want to ask you, do you have a minimum requirement for—everyone has to meet a minimum requirement? Or is that one of the options for an aspect that they can choose?

SUSAN INGLIS: The minimum requirement is transparency. All companies must be willing to tell consumers exactly the chemicals that they are using, exactly what the chemical input are. They have to be willing to be transparent about it. But it is the transparency that is the minimum requirement.

Now, for being recognized as exemplary, there are more specific requirements that are specifically for limiting VOCs. And those are akin to what Green Guard Certification certifies.

So if you’re familiar—two things for your listeners. Look for Green Guard Certification. And if you’re familiar with that certification, you know it is a surface certification. So it’s only certifying what volatile organic compounds are coming off the surface of the item. And there’s various certification at various levels.

DEBRA: Right, right.

I think that’s an important point to know about the disclosure because that is also one of the problems that consumers run into. They contact a manufacturer or a retailer, they want to know what’s in the product. Either people don’t know or they refuse to tell them.

So, at the very least we know that if we contact one of your manufacturers, or source, or designers, that we’re going to be able to get the information so that we can make an informed choice.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right. And you’re right, that’s a very big deal.

DEBRA: It is. A very big deal.

SUSAN INGLIS: Most often, I think, retail sales staff, for instance, they have no idea. So that you ask the sales person in your local store and they say, “I don’t know.” It is true, they don’t know. And it’s going to be hard for them to push the question up the chain to find out the answers. There’s just way too many industry players, individuals who do not know.

DEBRA: But that’s part of the transformation that’s going on in all industries right now—just for people to be finding out and for people at the beginning of the chain to be disclosing and sending that information up the line, so that everybody knows all along what’s going on, how it’s being manufactured, what are the problems.

And some people don’t like to talk about what their problems are. (I’m going to say this quickly because we’re coming up on break.) But some people don’t like to say what are the problems. But it’s by saying, “This is the truth about what’s going on about our products” that then maybe they can get information. Maybe one of their customers would know how to fix the problem how to do it less toxically.

SUSAN INGLIS: That’s right.

DEBRA: If they would just be open, then all kinds of discussion can happen. And it’s keeping everything secret that keeps it from moving forward. So, bravo to you for doing that with this organization.

We need to go to break. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Susan Inglis, Executive Director of the Sustainable Furnishings Council. And they are at SustainableFurnishings.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my guest today is Susan Inglis, Executive Director of Sustainable Furnishings Council. And their website is SustainableFursnishing.org.

Susan, we’re in the last segment now. These hours go—it sounds such a long period of time, but it goes by so fast. Id’ like to make sure that you have an opportunity to say anything that you’d like to say even if I haven’t asked a question. So, is there anything we haven’t covered that you’d like to talk about?

SUSAN INGLIS: Yes. Well, I would like to be sure your listeners know that when their shopping for furnishings, just like when they’re shopping for other products, they can ask questions that insure that the products they buy, the way they spend their money, lines up with their values.

People are always going to be buying furniture based on whatever their taste is and whatever their budget is. So all of us are going to buy the kinds of products we like the look and feel off, at the price we can afford. But know that we can also get these things with an alignment with the values that we hold.

So, when we are very concerned about removing toxins in the entire supply chain, whether a toxic input makes it all the way to your living room or not, if you want to be sure that there are no toxins in the supply chain, just start asking questions.

That’s the main thing I want your listeners to know, just start asking questions.

DEBRA: Well, I totally agree with that since I’ve been asking questions for more than 30 years.

SUSAN INGLIS: Yes, yes.

DEBRA: But the problem—I’ll just say this again—the biggest problem is that when people ask questions—me and other consumers because I hear this over and over again—is that it’s pretty frustrating trying to get answers. And so, the more your organization can do to get more answers for the customers then that’s—I mean starting with disclosure is really important. And I do think that that’s important.

And for some of us—go ahead.

SUSAN INGLIS: I’ll just interrupt you, Debra, to say that we do have a very good resource section on our website. It is one of the sections that we are continuously improving so it’s going to be easier and easier to use. But it’s there now with lots of good resources. So I encourage consumers, your listeners, to make use of that resource section.

I also want to encourage your listeners to be in touch with their congressmen and let them know that they are concerned about toxins in their consumer products and things that come in to their homes because we do not have, at this time, good legislation for insuring a reduction of toxic chemical input.

DEBRA: That’s exactly right. And many of my guests bring this up. And I am totally in support of getting better legislation.

It’s something that we definitely need.

I started doing the work that I’m doing so many years ago because, at the time, there was no information about toxics in consumer products. In fact, I realized the other day that I actually wrote the very first book on toxic chemicals in consumer products.

SUSAN INGLIS: Good for you!

DEBRA: It was published back in 1984. I actually self-published the book in 1982. But the first published book on the subject was in 1984, and I wrote it.

SUSAN INGLIS: Good for you, Debra.

DEBRA: Thank you, thank you.

SUSAN INGLIS: That is so important. Good for you.

DEBRA: And so, there was just no information at all.

And so the point here is that we live in a world where it’s all up to the consumer right now to be evaluating all these products, and all these toxic chemicals. And it’s because we live in a world where consumer products are not safe, for the most part, and there are no laws that say they have to be safe for health or they shouldn’t be on the market.

And people think that the government is protecting us. They are not.

SUSAN INGLIS: Not in that way, you are right.

DEBRA: And I would love to be out of a job. I would love for every manufacturer to only make safe products, to understand how to do that, to decide that they’re going to, so that we could walk into any store, go to any website, and any product would be safe for health. That’s my goal. That’s my goal.

SUSAN INGLIS: It would be great. May we get there quickly!

I too would like be out of a job because that would mean that all the companies in the home furnishings industry are including best practices for sustainability in their regular quality checks. It would just be a matter of quality that they are being responsible about the materials they choose, about energy use reduction, about toxic input reduction, et cetera.

DEBRA: Right, right. So, tell us about—I don’t want you to pick and choose and say, “This is my favorite member,” but give us some examples—

SUSAN INGLIS: Hard to do!

DEBRA: I know! I mean I can’t do that with my list either. Just give us some examples of—because we have just a few minutes left. So give us some examples.

SUSAN INGLIS: Well, I will talk about our exemplary members because companies that have qualified to be recognized at the exemplary level are really achieving remarkable things. And we do have, among our exemplary members, stores as well as manufacturers.

So, one of those stores is Room & Board. And Room & Board does have stores across the country (probably in your entire listening area). And Room & Board emphasizes US manufactures. In doing that, they are reducing the amount of transport required for getting your new furniture to your house.

And a couple of other things about emphasizing US manufacturers. In this country, like actually in most countries, we have pretty good environmental protection laws. Most countries do have good environmental protection laws. But here in the US, we also have good enforcement of those laws, good compliance with the regulation.

So when a product is made here in the US, you can be pretty sure that it is made without exploiting people, without polluting the environment where it’s made, and without exploiting the scarce resources.

Room & Board is a good example of a company that earned that exemplary recognition by addressing the triple bottomline effectively.

And I do want to mention that our requirements for recognizing companies as exemplary do cover the triple bottomline—that is what’s good for the environment, what’s good for the communities of people and other living forms that are part of the ecosystems on our planet, and what’s good for the economy, what makes these communities thrive.

So, that is the triple bottom line. And we are concerned about sustainability in that holistic way. The companies that are recognized as exemplary have demonstrated a concern for this triple bottom line in their operations, in their product choices, and in their outreach. So, when you see the Sustainable Furnishings Council members seal being used, then you can know that there is real substance behind the use of that seal.

DEBRA: Good, good. What’s another exemplary company?

SUSAN INGLIS: Another one is Naturepedic. I know that Berry Chic of Naturepedic has been on your show before.

DEBRA: Yes.

SUSAN INGLIS: Naturepedic is a mattress company. We have several mattress companies that are members. And all of them have very healthy toxin-free mattresses. But I’m going to mention Naturepedic now because they are an exemplary member, and they are a company that was started basically in order to produce the better mattress, to produce a mattress that is free of toxins and serves the customers need for comfort and economy as well.

And those mattresses are made here in the US and are made of responsible materials through and through.

DEBRA: Yes, they are.

SUSAN INGLIS: The companies I’ve mentioned, like others, are also very involved in their communities. They are involved in various ways in their communities, not just selling their products. And that’s an important part too.

DEBRA: It is! So, we’ve come to the end of our time. Thank you so much for being with me, Susan.

Again, Susan Inglis is the Executive Director of Sustainable Furnishings Council. Their website is SustainableFurnishings.org. And you can go there and find different members. And see if they meet your needs. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

SUSAN INGLIS: Thank you, Debra.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Labs That Test for Toxics

Question from Joel

Can you please recommend a reliable and affordable lab that tests for lead, asbestos, radon and heavy metals (in food)? I live in New York City.

Thanks.

Joel

Debra’s Answer

This is a great question and one I would like to have an answer to.

I did some searching and didn’t come up with a lab that was really oriented to consumers. Though there are labs oriented to helping manufacturers, they are not affordable.

Are you considering testing every sample of food before you eat it? I think that would be impractical and expensive.

The best advice I can give you is to do your best to source the most organic raw food available to you and then prepare it yourself in your own kitchen. That is the best way to get the least contaminated food. You have a lot of organic food available in New York City.

Add Comment

Tick protection

Question from Karen B

Hi Debra. I have a dilemma because my work has me outdoors much of the summer where I am exposed to ticks . We have a heavy tick infestation here in Massachusetts.

I do use care where I walk but still I have gotten tick bites. I just took an antibiotic for the latest tick bite. This is one case where I would rather take preventative drugs rather than risk Lyme Disease.

So I was wondering what you think about this product, keeping in mind that I do have MCS. It is an ankle gaiter that could stop any entry to the body because most ticks come from the ground up. Do you think this is safe? Do you have any other suggestions? Thank you!

www.lymeez.com

Debra’s Answer

This is one of those situations where it can be better for your health to use something like an insecticide, rather than have the consequences of something worse like lyme disease.

This product appears to be able to protect you from tick bites without you taking anything internally. It’s a cuff treated with microcapsules filled with permethrin, which burst when disturbed to release very small amounts of the insecticide. The amount is so small you probably wouldn’t even notice it, but it can kill a tick before it bites you.

Permethrin, is a made-made version of pyrethrum. Pyrethrum is a naturally occurring insecticide of the chrysanthemum flower. Permethrin has been a registered ixodicide with the EPA since 1977. While ingested permethrin can be harmful, the World Health Organization considers it to be “the insecticide of choice for clothing treatment.”

I would say give it a try and see if you tolerated. The toxic risk is very low, especially when used outdoors, on clothing, not in contact with your body.

Add Comment

FoxFibre Colorganic | Vresis Limited

Fabric, yarn, and sliver made from organic naturally-colored cottons and wools. I remember back in 1985 when these cottons first became available. They are natural colors that are inherent in the cotton, revealed by breeding. I have a sweater made from this cotton yarn that was hand-knit and is still one of my favorites.

Visit Website

Fed by Threads

Clothing for the whole family, made from organic cotton and organic hemp/organic cotton blend (a few items contain spandex, so read the labels). Various safer dyes are used, all are vegan and sweatshop free. They also offer custom-print organic t-shirts. “This all began with the simple idea to have a community shirt made for our dance/yoga/photography studio The Movement Shala in downtown Tucson. At that time, we learned some startling statistics about the depth of the hunger challenge in the United States and while Jade was bulging pregnant with our son, Sequoia, we decided we had to do something, even if it was a small act. So the simple idea was born to feed 12 emergency meal boxes every time one of our community shirts sold. What started as one rack of shirts has blossomed into what is now Fed By Threads! “

Visit Website

Where can I buy nontoxic checks?

Question from Mary

I would like to order checks that are odorless, or at least, nontoxic. Suggestions please.

Debra’s Answer

I’ve listed the major suppliers of checks made from recycled paper using soy-based inks on the Checks page of Debra’s List.

Soy-based ink is much less toxic that standard ink made from petroleum.

Readers, what are your favorite places to buy checks?

Add Comment

Outdoor Dining Set

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I just bought an outdoor dining set, but am now having second thoughts if I want my children eating/sitting on it. The table is “resin wood with white paint finish,” and the chairs are “steel/iron tube with white powdercoat finish” and made in China.

When I asked a customer service rep at Crate and Barrel what the table was made of, one person said it was polypropylene. I do know the canopy is made of polypropylene with brass grommets. Would you recommend this set or cancel because it is too toxic?

There are other sets made of cheaper materials. One dining set (table and chairs) is made of “rustproof aluminum with a powdercoat finish.” Another set is made of “extruded polysterene with UV antioxidant protection,” and other set is made of “resin wicker.” Would you recommend/use any of these sets?

Of course my favorite is the teak dining set which is much more expensive, but at least it is safe for my children ( I do wonder about the Teak protective oil they recommend to preserve the color)…

If you would only recommend the natural wood to dine on, then I would find a way to get the teak. I trust your recommendations and am grateful for all your great research!

Thanks so much!

Debra’s Answer

If it were my backyard, I’d get the natural wood and be careful about the “teak oil.” Looking for a recommendation about this, I found one article that said it doesn’t have the strength to hold up to the harsh outdoor environment. It is also known to attract fungus and mold. This article actually had no recommendations for teak protection.

I had an unfinished solid wood table in my backyard for about twenty-five years before it fell apart, but that’s what wood does. It biodegrades.

Now, if you are not going to do solid wood, your “resin wood with white paint finish” is probably fine. And the steel/iron tube with white powdercoat finish is definitely fine. Polypropylene is made from petroleum, but not particularly toxic.

“Rustproof aluminum with a powdercoat finish” would also be fine.

I’d stay away from the “extruded polystyrene with UV antioxidant protection,” and “resin wicker…” well, we don’t know really what that is.

Cast iron and glass is a good choice for outdoors. It’s long-lasting and not toxic.

Add Comment

Living With Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)

Richard H. Conrad PhDToday my guest is biochemist Richard H. Conrad PhD. From his home in Hawaii, Richard does consulting by phone for individuals, architects, builders, and corporations on the subject of reducing chemical and EMF exposures in homes and workplaces. He aim is to both keep healthy people healthy and help people with multiple chemical sensitivities and electromagnetic hypersensitivities. Today we’ll be talking about the nature of electromagnetic hypersensitivities, how to prevent them, and how to live with them if you have them. Richard was raised in New Jersey, and won a couple of national science awards while in high school.After graduating from Brandeis University, he obtained a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Johns Hopkins University in 1968. Richard spent some time in the Biochemistry Department at Cornell University and was an Assistant Professor at the University of Washington in Seattle. One of his many interests led him to spend a number of years experimenting with different ways of disinfecting his swimming pool and hot tub. During this time he developed and patented ozone generation equipment for purifying water (where he met my father, who was also working in this field). In addition to his consulting, Richard’s website has many papers and links related to MCS and EHS. www.conradbiologic.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Living with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Richard H. Conrad, PhD

Date of Broadcast: July 14, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It is Monday, July 14th, 2014. I am here in Clearwater, Florida. The sun is shining, no thunderstorms. And we are going to be talking today about electromagnetic hypersensitivity. That’s EHS for short.

My guest today is biochemist, Richard H. Conrad, PhD. He is someone who has multiple chemical sensitivities and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. But he is also a scientist and he has a lot of information. He thinks about things about how to figure out what the solution is and he has a lot of background experience in science.

I’m looking for all of his credentials here. He graduated from Brandeis University. Then he obtained a PhD in Biochemistry from Johns Hopkins University. Then he spent some time in the Biochemistry Department at Cornell University and was an Assistant Professor at the University of Washington in Seattle.

One of his many interests led him to spend a number of years, experimenting with different ways of disinfecting his swimming pool and hot tub using ozone. And there, he met my father or he met me. So we have known each other for quite some years and have had many, many conversations on these subjects.

So welcome to the show, Richard.

RICHARD CONRAD: Thanks, Debra. Good morning.

DEBRA: Good morning.

RICHARD CONRAD: It’s morning here.

DEBRA: It’s just past morning here. You are off in Hawaii. Richard is in Hawaii. So what time is it there?

RICHARD CONRAD: A little after 6 a.m.

DEBRA: Yeah. So we met. How long have we known each other?

RICHARD CONRAD: Twenty-five or twenty years?

DEBRA: Twenty, something like that, yeah.

RICHARD CONRAD: And the fact that you mentioned the ozone generation, I had gotten into electronic design rather heavily and did a lot of electronics. I am a real techie that enjoy electronics.

I was designing high voltage, high frequency, switching power supplies for generating ozone. These are tremendous emitters of EMF (which I didn’t think about at the time). And they didn’t bother me at all. I was standing next to them, operating them, experimenting with them.

It was until years later that I got EMF sensitivities from the devices.

DEBRA: Well, tell us your story of how you became chemically sensitive and electrically sensitive.

RICHARD CONRAD: Well, in chemical sensitivities, people can be either disposed genetically or things happen as they grow up that affect their immune and endocrine system that makes them more susceptible.

But in particular, I had some mold problems in my home that I didn’t know about. The carpet under the bed I was sleeping on was soaking wet for months with water that have leaked in from the shower. And then, the other factor probably was formaldehyde from a particle board camper, a brand new one that I was living enclosed up in the winter.

It happened rather quickly all at once at one point. Suddenly, colognes and perfumes began to bother me.

But I was doing my electronic experiments for maybe five years after that with no problem and working with switching power supplies. And a friend of mind told me about her electrical sensitivities. It was the first time I had heard of it. I thought it sounded crazy to me. I didn’t believe it because I worked with the stuff, and it didn’t bother me. And she wasn’t a scientist.

And she was maybe, I thought, a little bit susceptible to believing these things and making it up. And then I forgot about it.

A few years later, I bought some new equipment, a projector to use as a computer monitor, a video projector. And I was amazed at the gorgeous image. I was using it for DVDs and large screen computer monitor for doing CAD design work.

After about two hours on it, my skin began to burn. It was strange. It felt like a sunburn. And I was wondering what that was.

I didn’t know what it was related to.

And then the next day, I was using it and my skin started to burn after about an hour. And the next day, my skin started to burn about 20 minutes. And then the next time I used it, my skin burned in five minutes. Eventually, my skin was burning within one minute when I turned it on. There’s no doubt about the correlation.

They say that correlation isn’t always causation. But repeated correlation, when there’s no other thing that’s changing in your life, it’s common sense to realize what is causing the problem. This is the projector for me.

And then after that, I began to have reaction to various other things like my mini keyboard. Playing music, my wrists would hurt. In fact, I think some of carpal tunnel syndrome is not just the overuse of the muscles and the joints in the hands and wrists. Using them in an electromagnetic field really potentiates the carpal tunnel even more.

DEBRA: That makes sense.

RICHARD CONRAD: And then there are a number of other exposures I got inadvertently and I didn’t know it was happening until later. And then I realized it correlated with the electrical device.

The normal symptoms—well, there are no normal symptoms, but typical symptoms of electrical sensitivity (because I have talked to hundreds of people and did a survey on smart meter effect) are ringing in the ears, an unusual ringing of the ears, different kinds of tinnitus (it’s usually called tinnitus, I think) which can have different kinds of characteristic sounds like buzzing of bees or a cadence or rushing water.

It’s a sound that’s generated inside your head. But in the nervous system, it doesn’t go away. Or it goes away slowly, but can happen very quickly after an exposure and that takes days or weeks to go away if at all, if it goes away at all.

And heart arrhythmia, which people have never had before, can be due to exposure to equipment. One type of equipment that people are exposed to that they don’t realize has a lot of EMF is when they get an ultrasound that also produces a lot of EMF.

Unusual headaches, unusual insomnia, burning skin, agitation, fatigue, numbness, these are effects on the immune and the nervous system, which pervade the whole body.

So you could get any kind of system, which reflects problems in the nervous system that varies from person to person. But there are these typical range of symptoms that are usually the tinnitus, heart arrhythmias, burning skin, agitation, insomnia, headaches, severe headaches.

DEBRA: So it basically affects the nervous system and the immune system?

RICHARD CONRAD: It appears to. Yes. Unfortunately, the research in humans is very, very sparse. The only research in humans has been showing—there are few experiments that do show that people’s heart rate and heart rate variability changes with exposures in double blind experiments.

Also there are changes to the EEG and changes in sleep patterns in humans that have been proven and in fact were accepted by the people who don’t want to accept these things such as the telecommunications companies and the WHO.

They have to admit that these effects exist and the FCC.

But they claim, “Oh, they are not significant.” Well, if the EEG, changes in the EEG are not significant and changes in sleep patterns are not significant, that means thinking and your mood and your ability to figure out problems where your emotional happiness are not significant. So they are looking slam bang side effects.

But if the FDA was in charge of regulating EMFs and they did it in such a way that they regulate, even though sometimes poorly, drugs, if there’s a host of side effects in people, they start looking at them and keeping track of them and will draw drug if there’s a problem. And in fact, before drug is allowed to be on the market, they will go at the side effects and testing.

In the EMF world and the telecommunications, cellphone, the computers, all the different Wi-Fi devices and the smart meters, there has been no testing on humans. None, no matter what they say, there is not any testing on humans.

And when they get report after report after report of the side effects, they say that’s the first time they have heard of it. Each time, that’s what they say.

DEBRA: I’m sure it isn’t.

RICHARD CONRAD: And then they reject it.

DEBRA: We need to go to break.

RICHARD CONRAD: Okay.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. And we will talk more about this when we come back. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is biochemist Richard H. Conrad. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd. Today, we are talking about living with electromagnetic hypersensitivity and my guest is biochemist Richard H. Conrad, PhD.

He’s got a lot of papers and links related to MCS and electro-hypersensitivity on his website, which is ConradBiologic.com.

And he also does consulting. So if you have a question for him about how you can reduce toxic chemical exposures and EHS, electromagnetic exposures in your home, then he is a good person to call. Again his website is ConradBiologic.com.

So Richard, you talked to a lot of people. I know you have talked to just probably hundreds of people over the years who have electrical sensitivity. What are some stories you have heard from them?

RICHARD CONRAD: In a way, similar to mine. They didn’t believe in it beforehand. They haven’t had heard of it beforehand in many cases. And when it first happened to them, they didn’t know what was happening and didn’t relate it to electronic equipment until correlations began to become obvious.

And most of them were people that were addicted to their electronic equipment and wanted or had for their occupation to continue using it and can no longer use the equipment or at least only sparingly. And most people were using Wi-Fi, cellphones, computers and then they get electrical sensitivity and they stop using Wi-Fi completely. They can’t use cellphones anymore. And they use computers, but maybe only for 10 or 20 minutes before they get symptoms.

I got one story of a fellow that just called me a week ago from Jamaica, a young 21 year old guy, very bright, who has won a number of awards in software design for mobile applications. And he is just starting his career. He has about 15 or 20 programming software programming languages under his belt. And he was invited to be a part of a startup company and he really had high hopes of his work. He has a girlfriend. I am sure he wants to get married.

Then what happened was one day, he was working many hours on his computer and fell asleep in front of it and in front of the 4G wireless modem, about 4 ft away from him. When he woke up, his life changed forever.

He had numbness in his body, a great deal of fatigue. He’s a guy that normally has great energy and he ended up in the bed and didn’t know what to do and didn’t know it was affecting him until he began to make correlations.

And he bought an EMF meter and realized how much EMF radiation was in his environment. And he figured out what the sources were and cleaned it up and practiced avoiding it, which is basically one of the few things we can do to lessen electrical sensitivity and lessen the probability of getting it.

Now, he built a little shack at the beach so he could escape all technology for a few days at a time. And he still can’t use anything and he still has the numbness in his arms and legs, fingers, feet. But at least he is not as ill. But he can’t pursue his occupation. He’s all trained and ready to go as a programmer and he is in limbo right now.

DEBRA: I want to ask you a question about something you just said. You said that he goes to the beach so that he can escape all technology. What I am about to ask you is something that I wondered about for a long time because you are much more of an EMF expert than I am.

I know that they are just sending all these frequencies all around the world. You can hardly walk down the street without running into one of them. And so, I have this idea that there really isn’t a place that you can go in the world where you would receive no exposure to EMFs anymore. It’s like toxic chemicals, there is no place you can go where there are zero toxic chemicals.

Is that true? Or maybe when he goes away from the center of the city, it would probably be the worst place where there is so much electromagnetics going on that maybe if you went to the beach or out in the mountains, you wouldn’t have so much immediate exposure, but there would still be that background exposure?

RICHARD CONRAD: Yes. People can generally tolerate, although possibly it was subliminal symptoms like agitation and attention deficit in everyone, short term effects that they don’t realize and possibly long term cancer effects from low levels, but no overt symptoms.

But once it gets over a certain level, it’s like a straw that broke the camel’s back and for certain people, it throws them into extreme sensitivity. And if they get out of the strong exposures, at least they have a chance to recover somewhat.

There are huge differences in the levels in different areas. You’re right, the radar is the low frequency transmissions to penetrate the earth and go through the ionosphere and penetrate the oceans to communicate with submarines, all the satellites beaming down microwaves.

You can escape it all, but the very, very strongest, by thousands of times stronger is what people have in their very own homes and what they are using against their heads, putting microwave transmitter next to their heads, the cellphone and smart meters on the sides of houses, which are causing symptoms way above what you’d expect from the levels of the intensity that’s actually there. It is probably due to the of pulses of the microwave.

If people get away from the major sources, then after a while, they can tolerate the lower sources at least without overt short term effects. In fact, being under salt water, salt water absorbs most of the microwaves. But being at the beach, by that, I meant just being away from civilization and cellphone towers and other people’s cellphones.

It is a great help to do that, just like if you eat organic food, you still might be getting some plasticizers from some processing in the factory or packaging and trace amounts of things. But it’s still a great help in spite of breathing chemicals in the air. At least, most of what you are taking in is better.

DEBRA: By doing that, you are reducing the overall load. Even if it isn’t down to zero, it is less than a million. We need to go to break again.

RICHARD CONRAD: And one thing people should always be doing…

DEBRA: Wait. We do need to go to break or the commercial will just come cut you off midsentence. So just hold that thought and we will be right back. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and I am talking with biochemist, Richard Conrad. His website is ConradBiologic.com. We’ll be right back to hear what he’s got to say.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is biochemist, Richard H. Conrad, PhD.

He’s talking to us from his home in Hawaii where he does consulting by phone with individuals, architects, builders and corporations about reducing EMF exposures in homes and workplaces. And his website is ConradBiologic.com.

And Richard, what did you want to say before I so rudely cut you off? Do you remember?

RICHARD CONRAD: I wanted to mention…

DEBRA: It was something about reducing. We were talking about reducing.

RICHARD CONRAD: Yeah, there’s so much to say in such a short time. For everyone, it is important to reduce their exposures. And we are getting a lot of unnecessary exposure from Wi-Fi that’s on all the time, computers that are left on all night. Everything should be shut off when not used, especially while sleeping so the body can recover.

And people should not use Wi-Fi. It would be much better use internet cable so they don’t have these transmitters, intentional EMF radiators.

DEBRA: I have a question about that. I don’t use Wi-Fi in my home. Usually, I use my desktop, but when I turn my laptop on, it asks me if I want to connect to this Wi-Fi because it is picking up my neighbor’s Wi-Fi.

RICHARD CONRAD: Yes. In some cases, in apartment buildings, there might be hundreds of Wi-Fi at very high levels that someone is exposed to. It won’t help too much to turn off their own. But in most cases, in individual homes, it does.

When you are in an internet café and using your laptop, the Wi-Fi signal from the modem in the internet café is strong enough to be worrisome. But much worse is the Wi-Fi next to the source that’s so close to you, your computer, which is communicating with it.

So using Wi-Fi with a laptop, you are getting a huge dose compared to what’s coming from the node 10 or 20 or 30 ft away.

So just doing it for someone that’s not sensitive and hopefully not predisposed to getting more sensitive, it is okay to do it for a few minutes at a time. But it is not something I would recommend.

DEBRA: I totally agree. I wanted to say that in terms of just being exposed to less, I had an EMF inspection some years ago and they came in with all their gas meters and stuff. And they found that the highest levels of EMF in my home were right where I was working every day. I was just sitting right in the hottest spot in my house.

And one of them was I had a generator under my desk because we have a lot of thunderstorms here in Florida, so sometimes the electricity goes off. So I got this backup generator that will keep my computer on even if the power went off.

And that was the number one source. And it was sitting right under my desk. I would put my feet on it.

RICHARD CONRAD: To keep your feet warm, huh? Is it a backup, a batter backup, an APS system?

DEBRA: It is a battery backup, yeah.

RICHARD CONRAD: Yeah. That has a switching power supply that’s running all the time. That’s why it is so strong.

DEBRA: Yeah. So I just got rid of that just completely. I took it out of the house entirely and I no longer have a battery backup. But I haven’t needed it. I mean I haven’t had any problem not having it.

And the second hottest place was right next to my desk where my phone was. It was my cordless phone, not my cellphone, but my cordless phone.

RICHARD CONRAD: They are really bad.

DEBRA: Yeah, they’re really, really bad.

RICHARD CONRAD: They […] whether or not you are using them.

DEBRA: Right. So I immediately took out those two things. I got a corded phone. I’ve been using a corded phone since.

And it’s just these things where there’s so much new technology. And I think that people just think that it’s more convenient or it is the coolest thing or whatever when in fact, if we would just do something like getting the wireless phones out of our house. I mean I know that there’s a whole list of other things that can be done even if somebody just removes the wireless phone.

On other shows, we’ve already talked about cellphones. And I have a cellphone, but it is way on the other side of the room in my purse. And I tell my people, “Here’s my cell number, but don’t call me on it because I don’t ever answer it.”

And the only time I have it is so that I make sure that if I need to be reached in an emergency when I am travelling. I use it when I go out of the house. I have it if I need to make a phone call and things like that.

But I am not walking around with my cellphone in my pocket all day long like some people or having it next to their ear all day long like some people.

RICHARD CONRAD: They, in fact, transmit less, but they transmit even in receive mode when you are not talking on them as long as they are on.

And even worse are the smart phones because they are more like a computer, which is communicating with the internet.

And there is much more data going back and forth all the time on those. There’s a lot more emissions from those.

DEBRA: So there are…

RICHARD CONRAD: I wanted to mention…

DEBRA: Yeah, go ahead.

RICHARD CONRAD: There are two things I want to mention, a lot of things.

DEBRA: I know. There’s a lot to talk about. How about if you talk about why the FCC and the EPA don’t protect us from harmful EMFs?

RICHARD CONRAD: Because the FDA standards are designed to protect us from heating as if we were meat in a microwave oven.

And they are not recognizing the effects of very low levels of EMF, which there are tens of thousands of research papers showing these effects in cells and in animals. And most animal experiments are relevant to humans. Not all, but this is what’s used in the drug industry. So why not in the telecommunications industry to be worried about thousands of animal experiments that show problems with breakage of chromosomes, leakage of the blood brain barrier, which allows synergy between chemicals and EMF because the blood brain barrier protects the brain from chemicals that happen to get in your body? If that breaks down, you got even worse effects of these chemicals.

The very low currents can double the rate of cancer growth. Whether or not they induce it, we’re not sure, but it certainly greatly increases cancer growth. Low electrical currents are normally used in the body for healing and changing cells from one kind of cell to another differentiation and de-differentiation to induce healing. By the same token, if they are applied wrongly or artificially, they can induce cancer cell growth. This is known.

But the FCC wants to set the standards so that everything is heavily influenced by the Department of Defense, in the military. They want to be able to use the radars and all their equipment, their electronic equipment without restriction.

And the FDA looks to the EPA. They say, “We don’t know anything about health. The EPA controls the health.” And the EPA drops the ball because they are told to by the government. And the EPA has stopped all research on EMF and doesn’t talk about it anymore.

So it’s all without any controls at all, no feedback at all. And systems without feedback eventually self-destruct and that’s what is starting to happen. It’s denial.

DEBRA: Yeah, I understand. We need to go to break again. There are so many breaks. But you are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is biochemist, Richard Conrad. He’s talking to us from his home in Hawaii. His website is ConradBiologic.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is biochemist, Richard Conrad.

He’s at ConradBiologic.com and not only does he do consulting, he has many papers and links related to what we are talking about today. There‘s lots of information. If you have a particular problem with your own health in this regard or want some help reducing EMF exposures in your home or workplace, give him a call.

Richard, this is the last segment of the show. I know it goes by so quickly. Let’s talk about what your general recommendations are as a consultant and what kind of precautions people can take. Let’s talk about the positives of what we can do.

RICHARD CONRAD: One of the first things to look at is something that’s easy to correct aside from getting rid of all the wireless and microwaves and all the sources in your home and the technology that people are using, minimizing the exposure. The actual EMFs, the magnetic field, the low frequency from the house wiring, most houses have mistakes in the wiring that creates unnecessary high EMF exposures that have all kinds of proven effects on people.

This can be corrected by discovering these by having a Gauss meter and going around the house in the areas that people normally spend time and an electrician that knows what he’s doing or a consultant. Using an electrician or directing the electrician can often solve most of these problems in just an hour or two by correcting improperly connected neutrals where you have neutrals improperly connected to each other where they joined two circuits together that shouldn’t be connected.

Shortcuts that the electricians normally take in inappropriate grounds, by lowering the background EMF in the home, people are not as predisposed to getting reactions from the other higher frequency devices. So that’s the first step.

I don’t believe that any of [dependence] or protective devices work most of that. It’s nonsense, those little labels that people say you can stick on the cellphone. It’s absolute hype.

There are a few active devices that generate human resonance that people plug in to work. Some of them might work for some people and they might hurt others.

The one thing to know about the microwave systems out there, Wi-Fi, smart meters is that all of these us pulse microwaves.

And the pulsing is done at frequencies that the human brain uses in the typical EEG frequencies. And this is what makes them so much worse.

The microwave, for instance the cellphone is a very efficient delivery system of inappropriate but biological frequencies into the brain because they pick the frequency of the cellphones and the Wi-Fi are right at the same frequencies as a microwave oven where tissue absorbs and heats if you have enough.

But even if you don’t have enough energy, the absorption causes low level effects and can carry this pulsing because the microwave is pulsing to the low frequency. It delivers the pulses at lower frequencies into the brain that wouldn’t ordinarily get into the brain as easily.

And the wavelengths are not just easily absorbed by tissue as we know when we heat a steak in a microwave oven. But they are the same wavelength as the size of the brain, which makes the head a good antenna for them for receiving them.

So this is all inadvertent, but it’s dumb, it’s blind. And people, once they are told—when I say people, the telecommunications companies, when it’s pointed out to them, they don’t want to hear it. They don’t want to make or accept that they have been doing things that hurt people.

And then rather than protect people and design, redesign their systems in such a way to cause less damage, which they can very easily do by different kinds of frequencies and different kinds of modulation schemes. They just stick their head in the sand and refuse to budge.

DEBRA: Maybe they are just looking at it and saying, “I don’t want to shut down my company entirely.” Maybe they don’t understand…

RICHARD CONRAD: Oh, they understand what they are doing. They understand what they are doing and they don’t care.

It’s just like the people who are making […], once it was discovered what it was doing, they still try to cover it up—the cigarettes, the same; silicone implants, the same. They know what they are doing. They are no longer humans. They are corporate robots. And their function is to generate money for their company.

But if they had any foresight, they’d realize that here’s an opportunity to get a leg up over the other companies and develop new products that are safer, which they are going to have to do eventually and be ahead of the game. But they stay behind and they are hurting a lot of people. It’s real.

DEBRA: I agree with you that a lot of people are being hurt by this. I mean I am on a lot of mailing list and I get a lot of information about this, about how people are being hurt by electromagnetic hypersensitivity. And I do think that companies should do the right thing and that somebody should be the first to have safer products and then everybody will follow after that.

You and I have been in this field for a long time. And remember 25 years ago, there were a lot of toxic products and not very many safer alternatives. But when people like me—I’ll give myself credit—when people like me started saying, “Okay, buy these. Here’s the little handful of safe products. Buy these because they are safer.” Now there are just so many more products than there used to be.

RICHARD CONRAD: It happened, but much more slowly because in the case of chemicals, it was the chemical companies and the insurance companies that were stopping it. Now, it is the military and the government. So it’s even harder.

DEBRA: Yeah.

RICHARD CONRAD: It will just come out eventually and I think it will be public pressure that eventually will make a change although as we can see with smart meters affecting so many people without them realizing what’s affecting them first and they don’t even know they have the smart meter and they get any strange symptoms.

Then they correlate it finally and have the smart meter removed and they do a lot better or they leave home and they are doing better and they come back and they make their own correlations and they see that it’s real.

DEBRA: Yeah.

RICHARD CONRAD: The electric companies are resistant to even thinking about it or dealing with it.

One other thing I wanted to mention quickly if we can go back to it, if we have time is just the plug-in filters that are being sold to plug into your wall just supposedly reducing EMF and dirty power. It rarely worked and that’s because most of the dirty power from certain power supplies and other sources is what’s called common mode noise.

And these filters and the devices, the meters they sell to measure dirty power only measure differential noise, which is a small part of it. And they only correct differential noise at a certain frequency. So they shouldn’t be relying on these plug-in filters.
They call them filters. They are not really. They are just capacitors. They should not be relied on to protect people in their homes at all.

DEBRA: Okay, good. That’s good to know. So what are some specific solutions besides avoiding obviously that people can do to use their computers more safely?

RICHARD CONRAD: First, the general thing is that what makes people more susceptible and more sensitive is stress and inflammation. And unfortunately, electrical sensitivities, electrical exposures make people more stressed and more inflammation in their system.

But if you can reduce stress from other sources and inflammation from other sources, people who are electrically sensitive are much more sensitive on days that they eat food that they are allergic to for example.

Sometimes problems, especially the insomnia due to the electrical fields interfering with melatonin and melatonin levels and its beneficial effects, some people are benefited by taking extra melatonin before they go to sleep at night.

I have an article on my website on partial solutions for EMF sensitivities and one of them is Inositol taken at night. It can help some people lower their inflammation and responsiveness to electrical fields.

But for computers and to be able to be online, it’s a very difficult problem. The best thing I can suggest is it is just a matter of picking devices. Some devices that work cause a lot more problems for people than others. And one just has to try different devices and see.

In general, everything has a switching power supply. All of the wall warts that we use, all the power adapters and chargers are switching power supplies. Stay as far away from them as possible.

It’s best to use a laptop on batteries and not plugged into the wall at all when you are using it. And the charges should be used only when you are not at home and at some distance from you if you have to use it while you are on the laptop.

Using an extra keyboard and mouse can be a help. The old roller ball mouse has less EMF than the modern optical mice.

Certain keyboards are a lot worse for people than others. It’s a mess.

DEBRA: I’m going to interrupt you there because we only have 30 seconds left.

RICHARD CONRAD: And I have a lot of solutions, partial solutions for that. And the real solutions are very expensive, for instance, building a shield box for a projector, which can be used at a distance, projecting onto real projections…

DEBRA: Richard, Richard, Richard, I have to interrupt you because we only got 10 seconds before the music comes on and it’s the end of the show. So thank you very much.

You can find more about Richard at ConradBiologic.com. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd.

Be well.

Earth Creations Clothing

Clothing for everyone in the family, made from a “hemp/organic cotton blend has wonderful durability and gets softer every time you wash it,” with eco-friendly dyes.”We strive to create high-quality, eco-friendly clothing in a sustainable manner, and make something beautiful that you’ll love to wear day after day.” Most garments are made in the USA in a sweatshop-free environment.” Large selection, lots of colors and styles to choose from. This company started out making t-shirts dyed with natural clay. One day after a storm, one of the founders went for a bike ride and ended up covered with red clay mud. When, after years of washing, it was found that the color could not be removed, clay-dyeing was born. And it still continues today.

Visit Website

Recommended Caulks?

Question from di

Has anyone tried any of the other Eco-Bond caulks besides the multi-purpose version? I have MCS and need a non-toxic version.

I’m needing to do caulking again and prefer to not need to paint it in some areas.

If not, what brand do you use? The elmer’s glue brand caulk? or Aquarium caulk?

Thanks.

di

Debra’s Answer

Readers? What is your experience?

Add Comment

Bed Sheets

Question from Nancy Carew

Hi – I am in despair trying to find bed sheets I can tolerate. I have one set we are using that is just about threadbare and patched in several places (it is an old cotton set I have had for years).

I have ordered Garnet Hill percale sheets, Janice’s organic sateen sheets, 2 other types of organic sheets, and flannel sheets from Portugal and have reacted to all of them. I have soaked in both vinegar and baking soda and washed endlessly.

Do you have any suggestions of what other types of sheets might work for me? (I also took a very old set of white sheets from my father’s linen closet but I can’t seem to get a perfume odor out of those.)

I would appreciate any suggestions you may have. Thanks so much.

Debra’s Answer

Readers, any suggestions? I can only evaluate products by their ingredients, not by individual intolerances. Any brands you like?

Add Comment

How Safe is a “Poron Footbed”?

Question from Stacey

Hi Debra,

I found some UGG Australia leather shoes that I like, however, they are also made with a “PORON/EVA footbed.” Do you think this PORON is safe in shoes, or would you not recommend shoes with this cushioning?

Thank you!

Debra’s Answer

Poron is a brand name for a urethane material made from petroleum. No MSDS is required because “this material does not release and will not result in exposure to a hazardous chemical under normal conditions of use.”

EVA is ethylene vinyl acetate, which is made from ethylene and vinyl acetate. But it is not very toxic. The MSDS says that it may cause irritation if it comes in contact with the skin, but inhalation is not a probable route of exposure and it is “not considered hazardous.” It’s basically a polyethylene. Like a sandwich bag.

Even though both these materials are made from petroleum, their toxicity is relatively low.

Add Comment

How To Dress Without Toxics and Still Have Style

Greta EaganToday my guest is Greta Eagan, eco ambassador, writer, stylist, conscious living expert, and author of Wear No Evil: How to Change the World with Your Wardrobe. We’re going to be talking about toxics in textiles and how to have “style + sustainability without sacrifice.”Wear No Evil Shortly after graduating from the London College of Fashion, Greta founded fashionmegreen.com, a sustainable fashion awareness project- now a popular blog. Both the author and her blog have become leading sources for information on sustainable style, green beauty, and eco-chic decor. Greta has contributed to publications in print and online, including Glamour, Lucky and the Huffington Post, and has collaborated with brands such as Kate Spade, Eileen Fisher, The Outnet, Refinery29, and many more. She has made TV appearances for eco-fashion and beauty segments, hosted Aspen Fashion Week for Outdoor Television, and been both a panel and keynote speaker at conferences around the world including SXSW Eco. www.fashionmegreen.com | www.gretaeagan.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How To Dress Without Toxics and Still Have Style

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: GRETA EAGAN

Date of Broadcast: February 13, 2015

DEBRA: Hi. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. Today is Thursday, July 10th, 2014. We’re going to be talking about – I just heard a noise, goodness.

Anyway, we’re going to be talking about clothing today. We’re going to be talking about how to choose toxic-free clothing but also how to still look stylish when you’re wearing toxic-free and otherwise green clothing because there’s more to green clothing than just being toxic. Then we’re going to talk a little bit about that too. But mostly of course, on this show, we’re interested in our toxic exposures and how to remove them.

We’re going to talk a lot about fashion today too. I’m smiling to myself because I know earlier in my life, I used to be quite a fashionable aware person and always had to wear the latest thing, et cetera. Until I started thinking about what those clothes are made of and wanting to only wear natural fibers.

Now, I live in Florida. I used to live in the San Francisco Bay area, but now I live in Florida. And fashion goes out the window here because it’s so hot. And you’re just sweating all day long if you’re out and if you’re not in an air-conditioned building.

And so when I moved here, I totally changed everything I wore to things that were – everything had to be made out of cotton or linen because that’s the most comfortable thing to wear in the heat. And it also needed to just get thrown in the washing machine because I would literally have to change my clothes two or three times a day if was not in an air-conditioned environment. You just perspire and perspire and perspire.

Now, I spend a lot of time indoors in the air conditioning, but still my basic wardrobe is cotton tank tops and cotton Capri pants. I just have those two items in every color I can get them in. I just mix and match them in any possible way. And that’s about how other people dress here too. But we’re going to talk about all kinds of fashion style and toxic-free, how we can wear clothing that’s toxic-free.

My guest is Greta Eagan. She is the author of Wear No Evil: How to Change the World with Your Wardrobe. Shortly after graduating from the London College of Fashion, she founded FashionMeGreen.com. It’s a sustainable fashion awareness project that’s now a popular blog.

She and her blog have become leading sources for information on sustainable style, green beauty and eco-sheet décor. She’s contributed to publications in print and online including Glamour Magazine, Lucky and Huffington Post. She has collaborated with brands such as Kate Spade, Aileen Fisher, the Outnet, Refinery29 and many more.

Welcome to the show, Greta.

GRETA EAGAN: Hi. Thanks for having me.

DEBRA: Thanks for being on the show. So tell us – I just gave a little introduction, but tell us your story of how you went from being just a regular fashion-oriented person to being concerned about these issues.

GRETA EAGAN: Yeah. I always like to say that I was a fashionista before an environmentalist. That’s the truth.

Originally when I went to the London College of Fashion, I went to study Fashion Promotion and Marketing. I already had this innate passion and love of fashion, which I think a lot of people who are in the fashion industry have and what drives them to be in the industry itself.

And as I learned more – I mean it was literally through one of my first courses, which was the History of Fashion, I learned more about the democratization of fashion and the industrialization and how the Industrial Revolution really had an impact on fashion production and mass fashion production.

What we had originally was more limited resources and in the sense of what we had available. And you found that families would repair pieces of clothing and pass them down. They’d make them last as long as they could.

Then with the spinning jenny and different technologies that came out of the Industrial Revolution, obviously now we’ve just proliferated that more and more we really can produce fashion so much more quickly. It’s bred this thing that we’re all aware of now called fast fashion or even what people are calling throw-away fashion.

That was at the height when I was studying in London. Fast fashion model was really coming into full steam. People were buying top and wearing it for a night out and not even bothering to wash it. They were done with it because it was such a cheap piece of fashion that it didn’t really warrant a wash and another wear. They were satisfied with the one-wear.

That was just really, really disturbing to me. And I had a real moral conflict. I had to sit myself down and have an honest thought. If I wanted to participate in the fashion industry, could I do it and still have my conscience and my morals upheld.

That’s what really led me down to the path of finding this alternative way of participating in fashion and what was pretty much termed corporate social responsibility for fashion. And then it led me down the rabbit hole of what we now call Eco Fashion, which is a more conscious production, new space and discarding of the clothing that we use and put next to our bodies.

DEBRA: So do you consider Eco Fashion to still be fashion in the sense that – if you were to ask me what is the definition of fashion, I would say that it – as you say the industry, the fashion industry, I think of it as being an industry.

But like any other industry, the idea is to get people to continue to buy the product whether they need it or not. So there’s always new fashion that comes in, something being in fashion or out of fashion. If you are – like I used to be, you had to be wearing the right thing at the right time that the fashion industry was telling you to wear.

I went through a period of time when I started being aware of toxics where I said, “Okay. So clothes don’t have to be about fashion. They should be about keeping my body warm and looking nice.”

So for me, part of the question about what I wear is “Is it appropriate?” Like I was saying in the introduction, I dress suitably for Florida. And here, we need to have clothes that we can throw in the washing machine as many times a day as we need to. I’m not concerned about what fashion is anymore because I’m dressing for my place.

And so how does eco fashion – does eco fashion as a movement include things like buying fewer clothing and considering things like timeless designs and those things, as well as what the materials are?

GRETA EAGAN: You brought up a couple of really good points. One is the definition of fashion.

Miuccia Prada, who’s the founder of Prada and a very visionary designer, tends to lead the way in the fashion industry a lot of what she puts out other designers follow. And she does perpetuate these new styles that you were saying that you changed.

She said that in a society that we’re in today, a global society where everything is moving so quickly, fashion and clothing are actually communication. It’s a visual language that we communicate to other people. What we wear is a reflection of how we feel, maybe how we feel comfortable in what we’re wearing or like you were saying, for dressing for the environment.

I think that the goal is to get to a place where you’re not really dressing for everyone else. Like you were saying, if you weren’t really wearing the right thing at the right time, maybe you felt differently.

If you’re living in New York and you’re working in the fashion industry, there certainly is the certain amount of pressure to wear certain fashionable pieces. But I think the goal as I’ve gotten older – and I’ve been working in the fashion industry for a number of years now – is to find the pieces that actually communicate to you just really intrinsically how you feel as your self-expression. I think that’s something that we get overtime.

And then from there, there might be an experimental phase where you’re trying different things out. When people move through that phase, I actually really suggest to my clients a lot of the time.

If you want to try a new trend – and fashion is cyclical. If you want to try a new trend, go to a consignment store. You can usually find some things that if that trend has been out for a little while, there’s something that you can buy or it’s likely something that’s come back around that’s already been out in the world at some point or another.

And you can then try that trend out. If you like it, you know what to invest and you know it works for your body. You know that the color way works for your skin tone, whatever it is. And then you can start to make investments into pieces that last longer that are higher quality and make up a wardrobe that really reflects who you are and the environment that you’re in.

DEBRA: Great. We need to go to break, but we’ll talk more about all these things when we come back. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Greta Eagan, author of Wear No Evil. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Greta Eagan, author of Wear No Evil. We’re talking about everything having to do with clothing and fashion and how it affects our health and the environment.

Greta, you have so much information in your book. I think that this is a good workbook for somebody who is making a transition from having what is the common wardrobe that we have in the world today and wanting to take a look at the things that have health and environmental effects that you have processed, that you’ve outlined of how to go about doing that, which I think is a good one. It’s pretty much the process that I went through when I was making these changes myself.

You have something called the Integrity Index that you put together. And I’d like us to talk about some of those points that you have there.

First, I’d like to say, one of the – I want to talk about viewpoint for a minute because I think that everybody needs to have their own viewpoint about what is most important to them. I think that you said that in your book too. And I know that your book is written from an environment and ethical viewpoint.

I noticed one thing that I just wanted to mention. When I’m looking at your integrity index, the first thing that I would say for people to look is different than the first thing that you say. Neither one is wrong or right. It’s just a different viewpoint.

The first thing that I would say to people is to look for fabric finishes permanent press or no iron because that is made with the formaldehyde dressing. You’re just going to be breathing formaldehyde all day long if you wear a permanent press shirt.

The first thing that you talked about is to look at the dyes. So would you tell us about the impact of dyes? Even though, from my viewpoint because I’m looking at health effects first – from my viewpoint, I’m not so concerned about dyes.

But tell us about the environmental effects of dyes and why you put that first.

GRETA EAGAN: Yeah. Just to give an overview, like you said, a lot of people – it’s music to my ears to hear that this comes off as a work for people making a transition because there are a lot of people who are making changes and being very conscious in their purchases for food or even the transportation they take or even the cleaning products they bring into their home. But when you look at the fashion industry, a lot of people don’t know that it’s actually the second most polluting industry worldwide behind petroleum.

So the effects of the fashion industry are huge. And actually, the dye process, that cumulative effect of being such a polluting industry, about 20% to 25% of that comes from the dyeing process. That does actually tie in to what you are talking about with these different systems and treatments that they apply to fabrics and fibers to get them to be wrinkle-free or that sort of thing.

The same applies to retaining a color and the vibrant feel of that color. If you have a piece of clothing that’s hot orange, that’s not necessarily a natural color that exists and that would be sped fast wash after wash, unless there were some chemicals involved.

The EPA has actually identified some of those chemicals that are being used for fluorinated compounds or what they call PCS. And those PCS have actually been identified by the EPA as carcinogenic.

So it’s a really hard and murky place where there isn’t a lot of clean and clear information about what are these chemicals that we’re using and that we’re being exposed to. But the reality is that there are a lot of chemicals from the dyes that are used to the fixed things that we were talking about for certain properties of your fabrics, but also even the synthetic fabrics that are being produced.

So if it’s a polyester or a rayon or a viscose, all of those are synthetic materials that are made either from something like a petroleum or from a plant-based fiber that’s been chemically treated to become a fiber. And those are quite toxic, and they have been shown to off gas carbon and nitrogen and sulfur dioxide.

Like you said, you’re exposed to that, not only if it’s next to your skin and maybe some people are sensitive enough to have a rash where they can see that they’re sensitive to those chemicals. But we’re inhaling them. There are ones close to us, and we’re breathing them in.

DEBRA: Now to me, not having as much inside information as you have, as a consumer, all I can do is I can look at a dye and say, “I’m pretty sure that that’s a synthetic dye because it’s color fest,” or “I’m pretty sure it’s a natural dye because this was made in India. If I put it in the washer, everything is going to – and it’s red – everything is going to turn pink because the solvent will come out in the wash.”

So how can a consumer make a decision to have a more eco-friendly dye? How would they even know?

GRETA EAGAN: So there are three levels. There are the normal dyes that are quite toxic. They are what we first developed and started using when we started mass-producing fashion.

And then we started to look at it and say, “This feels really wasteful. Wow, we’re turning rivers of different colors, like you’re already alluded to something made in China that they’ve talked about.” You can always tell what season it is, the fashion season. The water coming out of the factories and running into the different streams and rivers actually changes that color of what they’re using.

So we started to pay more attention to the impact of that. So people, different companies and brands have actually gone towards using what they call low impact dyes. So you have normal dyes and then you have low impact dyes. And then you have natural dyes.

Natural dyes come from natural sources. They’re not synthetic, so they might come from minerals or vegetables. They’re the more – or even mud – the traditional ways that we would have dyed clothing back in the days when we didn’t have these chemicals cocktails.

But the good news about the low impact dyes – and they’re actually one of the more eco-friendly options that we have. They’re just the smarter dye. They use less water. They aren’t using those fixings and mordants that make the color stay.

So they’re smarter and more evolved to dye. They’re not as pure as natural dyes, but the unfortunate thing is that a natural dye actually still uses some of those mordants and quite a lot of water. So it’s a bit of a trade of and you have to decide what’s important to you.

DEBRA: Good. We need to take another break. We’ll be right back to talk more about fashion and clothing with Greta Eagan, author of Wear No Evil. Her websites are FashionMeGreen.com and gretaeagan.com. So you can go there and find out more. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Greta Eagan. She is the author of Wear No Evil. She also has a blog called Fashion Me Green at FashionMeGreen.com.

She knows a lot about styles and clothing and has this wonderful book as a transition, a guide to how you can transition from the clothes you’re wearing now into things that are better for your health and the environment.

So another major thing that I want to talk about, Greta is the transition in looking at fabrics. I think that fabrics is a place where anybody can start – they can look on the label and see what fabric the garment is made from and then choose better fabrics.

So let’s talk about that for a bit. And then there’s so much more out of your book that I want to get to.

GRETA EAGAN: I know it can be overwhelming at times, but that’s why I wrote a book.

DEBRA: Right. Obviously, we can’t get to everything. But I want to get to the major points here.

So the way I look at it is that the worst fabrics are synthetics. And so we should be able to recognize what the synthetic fabrics are and avoid them. Then the next step is to just go to a natural fiber like cotton, linen, silk or wool. And then the next step is to go organic.

I think you would agree with those three steps.

GRETA EAGAN: Yes, I do. Absolutely.

DEBRA: Let me just jump to organic. Let’s talk about that because I think that for me, the biggest problem is just not being able to find organic clothes in the stores and that you can order things online. There are a lot of resources actually to order things online.

But I can’t try them on. And there’s also sometimes that – I think that things are changing, but for a long time, there wasn’t must style in those clothes that you could order online or that were colored or things like that.

So I remember wanting organic clothes. So I ordered unbleached and un-dyed sweat clothes. That was what I wanted to wear everyday.

Where are we now about organic and having organic becoming more mainstream?

GRETA EAGAN: We are in a good place, I’m happy to say. And eco fashion as a category, where maybe it’s this more conscious clothing, has a bad rep to live down. It used to be very beige and frumpy and like you said, not necessarily the style that you wanted to be wearing.

I was really true for a while. Part of the reason why that happened is that we had people, who were environmentalists or maybe more environmentally conscious, making the clothing rather than designers making the clothing.

The good news is that there’s been a huge shift. Even all the way down to the level of where these designers are coming out of their design schools. Sustainability and broader education about the impact of the fashion industry is part of the curriculum. So that’s where we’re headed, which is great.

And the immediate effect of where we are right now, we have bigger brands who are taking on the responsibility of offering different lines, maybe their little capsule collections that are made specifically from organic fibers.

A good example of this is H&M actually, which is a more affordable fashion brand, retailer. And they actually, for the past two years, have been the number one buyer of organic cotton. And they have made a pledge that by 2020, they will be producing all of their garments that will be using organic cotton. That’s huge.

When you see big retailers like that – I know Walmart also has their organic cotton for more work-out clothes that they’ve been doing. When you see big retailers like these getting on the game, they really move the needle because the supply and demand is so big that it really does incentivize these different farms and farmers who are producing cotton conventionally to switch to organic cotton because the need is there and the supply and demand is there.

So that’s the good news. I would also say that there are lots of brands. As I mentioned, designers who are now getting started in producing their lines – that’s part of their DNA. They don’t want to produce a fashion label or a collection without using more sustainable fabric.

We have some different brands. There’s a new one called Be Good Clothing. I think their website is just BeGoodClothing.com. And they’re essentially taking the Everlane model, which is to make this timeless basic T-shirts and button-downs and staples for your wardrobe. And they’re making them with organic cotton and more sustainable fibers.

They’re able to offer that in a more affordable price because there is no middle man. They’re selling direct to consumer.

And you mentioned that the problem with ordering online is that you don’t get to try it on. The good news is a lot of these brands now have amazing shipping policies where you can order a couple of sizes and send things back. And they don’t charge you shipping. So you can try and figure it out…

DEBRA: That’s very good. Yeah. That is very good. I look and I go, “This is going to fit meme. How is it going to look?” And I don’t want to be paid double shipping for something that I don’t want.

So I’m trying to figure out just quickly how I can – I’m 100% behind organic fabrics for clothing. Yet, I think in all the different areas of my life, the clothing is the area where I’m most behind.

For me, if I’m wearing my little tank tops and my little Capri pants, I’m not having a big toxic exposure myself. But I know that there’s a big environmental effect for these little clothings. But I’m not being affected by it directly.

So it makes it more difficult I think for people who are more health-oriented and environmentally oriented, even though I know that there’s a big environmental effect of me wearing these cotton clothes. It’s harder to spend that extra money or go through the extra effort when I can just go buy a T-shirt, a tank top for $8 as I’m walking down the mall that’s on sale.

So I think that it’s – let’s go ahead and talk about your book because you do have a very good process here. So you have something – after the integrity index, you talked about the Diamond Diagram and your Wear No Evil System.

You talked about going through your closet. That’s exactly what I did. I went to my closet and I put everything that was a natural fiber – this was 35 years ago. I put everything that was a natural fiber in one pile and everything that was a synthetic fiber in another pile, and I had no clothes left to wear.

And at that time, in 1978, we were in the midst of leisure seats and polyester. It was very difficult to find anything, like a T-shirt and jeans to wear, that was not synthetic. But that’s not the case now. That’s not the case now.

So tell us about your process that you described on the book after the break. Oh my god. Here we are…

GRETA EAGAN: Okay, sure.

DEBRA: Okay. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And my we’re talking today with Greta Eagan, author of Wear No Evil. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Great Eagan, author of Wear No Evil. Her website is FashionMeGreen.com and GretaEagan.com.

Okay, Greta. So tell us about making these decisions about your diamond – how you make decisions about choosing products.

GRETA EAGAN: Sure. And just to follow up from what we were saying right before we went to break, I just want to say that I know that it can be challenging to make the commitment to buy a certain way, in your case, maybe organic.

But I just want to remind everyone that every time we buy something, we bought with our dollars. And we tell those manufacturers and retailers and brands that that’s what we want. So it adds up, and it does have an impact.

DEBRA: I totally agree.

GRETA EAGAN: So it’s worth the effort.

DEBRA: Yes, it is. It really is. My point was in the past when I’ve attempted to do that, I couldn’t find anything that I wanted to wear that I could wear. Part of it had to do with size and part of it had to do just with – sometimes I need to wear things other than T-shirts.

GRETA EAGAN: Right. That’s part of what I actually outlined in my book. You’ve mentioned already that there are these kinds of pieces to this Wear No Evil System.

The first being the integrity index, which I outlined 16 different ways that you can look at a piece of fashion and decide on its eco credentials, as I call them. And it might be ethical or it might be that it’s non-toxic or sustainable or socially linked. There are all these different ways of participating.

And what we do is you get an overview of all those different ways than what you’ve already alluded to. Some of them are more important to you that might be different, that are important to me. That’s where we are. There’s no right or wrong way of doing it, but it’s about the individual. So in that exposure to these different eco credentials, you, as a consumer and an individual, get to decide what’s important to you.

What I do is I take those four or five top eco factors that we’ve looked at. And you then put them into play in the diamond diagram, which is a flexible model, a way for you to navigate through life and navigate through shopping, to still uphold your values while you are getting these pieces of clothing that you need for your wardrobe.

And one of those would be style. We really cannot sacrifice on the style because it doesn’t make for a sustainable piece of fashion. If it’s not stylish, if you don’t want to wear it, if it doesn’t uphold your sense of identity, then it’s probably not going to get worn. It will just sit in the back of your closet.

DEBRA: That is so, so, so true. I was actually a co-founder of a corporation that was making sustainable products. We were trying to figure out what actually is green. We looked around. It does fit in various ways.

What we discovered was that you can’t sell a green product unless number one, it appeals to the consumer. And so it has to be something that they want to use or they’re not going to buy it. It applies right here just as you said. The first thing that someone’s going to look for is “Do I feel beautiful when I wear this?” or “Do I feel handsome?” or “Does it express my self-expression?” So it’s not just about whether it’s non-toxic or not, although that’s my number one thing.

They can be the perfect pieces of clothing for me. I will not buy it if it’s toxic. But at the same time, I won’t buy something non-toxic if it’s not right for me to wear. So you’re absolutely right.

GRETA EAGAN: What you were saying, that’s part of the Wear No Evil System. If you’re going to subscribe to the Wear No Evil movement and be part of this more conscious consumption, it’s not enough to buy something just because it’s pretty.

You have to have the style factor and then at least one other factor. That’s where the Diamond Diagram comes into play and helps people navigate the spaces. At the very least, it has to have style and then one other factor. And in your case, it might be that it’s organic or that it uses a low-impact dye.

If it uses two of those or it uses both of those and it’s stylish, then you’re operating on a whole different level of conscious consumption. And you keep operating on that level as we were talking about before. It really sends a message about what the consumer wants.

I do think that as the population is becoming more educated. These things are becoming more important and also becoming more transparent on the side of the brand.

DEBRA: I just want to throw this and there’s so much we can talk about on this subject. I want to say that in my life for the past 35 years, I really have been committed to natural fibers. I will not wear a synthetic fiber and I will not wear something that has a permanent pressed finish. That’s my line.

I will wear natural fibers that are not organic, but my preference would be – anytime I have the option to do this. I take it. My preference would be to have everything organic, everything low-impact dye. The only reason that doesn’t happen for me is accessibility and affordability.

But I want to just make an example of how far I will go in another option for people. Once I needed to wear an evening gown to an event and I could not find anything down that wasn’t synthetic. I just couldn’t find one at all.

So I made my own. I made just cotton – I took cotton material. It’s just plain color. I just made it a strapless sheet dress. And then I took 100% cotton’s cream material for curtains.

And I made just a thing that went on top, a flowing – what’s it called when you just…

GRETA EAGAN: Like a shawl or a wrap?

DEBRA: Yeah, but all the way down the whole length of the dress. So it was just very beautiful. It was 100% cotton. It cost less than $100 for me to buy this fabric. And I had the most beautiful evening gown. I bought a beautiful necklace to go with it. It was very fashionable. I thought I was the most fashionable person there.

So just because you don’t – I just want to tell people that just because you don’t find something off the rack, it doesn’t mean that you can’t make something that reflects your integrity and your style.

GRETA EAGAN: And there are – I would also say where we are right now in the industry and in this kind of movement towards more conscious living. There are a lot of resources that are coming up. So I’ll just name a few and there are more listed in my book.

I’m always on my website where I’m talking about brands continuously because they keep coming. If you want to shop, you can shop and you can filter by these different eco credentials that are important to you. You can shop at Modavanti.com. You can shop at Zadie.com or ShopEthica.com. There are number of these online eco boutiques that are popping up.

Also take a look in your local area because I know, especially in New York and San Francisco and Los Angeles, there are different eco boutiques and more stores that are popping up that are really subscribing to this conscious consumption.

DEBRA: Yes, excellent. We have about three minutes left. So what would you like to say that you haven’t said yet?

GRETA EAGAN: Oh gosh. It’s a journey, but I really commend anyone who takes this on. I did it based out of my research. Once, I dedicated my dissertation to sustainability in fashion. When I came out, I just knew too much and I couldn’t go back.

For a little while there, I really struggled. You said when you sorted your clothing and then all of a sudden, you had nothing to wear but your birthday suit. And I can really relate to that.

I really struggled for a little while and I felt like I lost my sense of style and my sense of self because I was really trying to fit within these confines of 100% sustainable, 100% environmentally friendly or ethical.

I think the truth is just we have to meet the industry where it’s at. It’s great to support brands that are doing these things, producing the products in the ways that we want them to. But I also think it’s important for us to know that nothing is 100% right now. That’s okay. Some is better than none.

DEBRA: It’s a very important thing to recognize that the whole industry is in transition, the whole world is in transition, each of us are in transition. Everything that we can do that’s a step in the right direction is worth doing.

GRETA EAGAN: Exactly.

DEBRA: We can get very idealistic about things needing to be 100%. I know that there are some people who need to have clothing that is just the purest of the pure. That clothing needs to be available in order for people who need that to have that.

I also know that any step that we take is worth taking. Taking each step than – I’ve been watching this for 35 years now. So I can see as we take steps as consumers.

When I started, there was no organic cotton and anything. There was hardly any cotton or anything. As people started buying cotton, then there are organic cottons started to be grown.

And then as people started making things out of organic cotton, then now we have things that are more stylish out of organic cotton. And we just need to keep moving things forward. Just keep moving forward.

GRETA EAGAN: It’s true. Just one other thing, we’ve talked a lot about organic cotton which is a great fiber and fabric. It’s a little thirsty. So there are some other fibers that I’ve just loved to mention.

DEBRA: Please.

GRETA EAGAN: There’s peace silk, which doesn’t actually harm the insects. So it’s peace as in world peace, peace silk that you can look for. Like you mentioned, there’s linen. There’s chute.

There’s hemp now, but we weren’t able to produce right in this country. We’re seeing some movement there. It’s a really great fiber that doesn’t take a lot of water.

DEBRA: I have to interrupt you only because if I don’t, the end of the show is going to come on and interrupt you anyways. So thank you so much, Greta.

GRETA EAGAN: Yeah. Thank you so much. Good luck.

DEBRA: Thank you. You too. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Toxics and Trees

Shannon SmithMy guest today is Shannon Smith, Communications and User Voice at Ecosia.org, a search engine that helps the environment by planting trees as you search the web. We’ll be talking about how trees create clean air and our our the air pollution we create harms trees. Ecosia is a search engine that plants trees when users search the web. The social business has already raised over $1.5 million for rainforest protection since its founding in December 2009. By donating 80% of its ad income to a tree planting program in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest, Ecosia aims to have the highest positive impact on the environment per dollar. The Berlin-based start-up neutralises all CO2 emissions related to its search as well as publishing donation receipts online – its promise to the two million monthly Ecosia users, who are proving that small changes can have a big impact. Former journalist and writer Shannon Smith has liaised between users, partners and team members since 2010 to build Ecosia into a movement for sustainable change. She is a Texas native. www.ecosia.org

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Toxics and Trees

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Shannon Smith

Date of Broadcast: July 09, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s Wednesday, July 9th 2014 and we are having a thunderstorm here in usually sunny Clearwater, Florida. But that’s just typically our summer weather pattern, and so it is very nice to have our thunderstorms cool down the weather here. It’s great. It’s just the way nature works, and it’s wonderful.

Today, we are actually going to be talking about nature. We’re going to be talking about the environment and toxic chemicals. Usually, we talk about health and home and toxic exposures. But today, we are going to talk about trees and toxics.

My guest is Shannon Smith. She’s a Communications and User Voice at Ecosia.org. And what Ecosia does is it’s a search engine that helps the environment by planting trees as you search the web.

So, all of the CO2 that they produce relating to all the searches that we do is offset by planting trees.

And so today, we are going to be talking about trees and how our actions such as searching on the web and other things affect air pollution, what trees do to help us with air pollution and how air pollution damages trees. So we are going to be looking at the bigger picture today, outside the four walls of our homes to see how our actions produce toxic chemicals that affect the environment.

Hi Shannon.

SHANNON SMITH: Hi Debra. Thanks for having me on.

DEBRA: Thank you. Shannon is speaking to us all the way from Berlin where Ecosia is based. And Shannon, why don’t we start by telling us a little bit about Ecosia?

SHANNON SMITH: Sure. I think […] Ecosia, just like you described, is a search engine that basically plants trees. It’s just like Google or Yahoo or any of those guys, except that we take 80% of our advertising revenue that we earned from the search engine and we donate that to a program we’re partnering with. It’s the Nature Conservancy Plant a Billion Trees Project.

And they have several different programs—one is concentrated in a tropical rainforest, one of them is in Brazil called the Atlantic Forest. And that is the portion of forest on the eastern coast of Brazil. It also runs into some of the most heavily populated areas in Brazil. So it’s one of the parts of the rainforest that’s most […] deforestation.

DEBRA: Good. And how did you get interested in working in this field?

SHANNON SMITH: I have always been interested in sustainability issues and simplifying things and going back to nature. We talk about toxicity and things like that—and sickness and also consumption.

It’s just different things that all lead back to what feels like the same issue—and that is that there’s an overtaxing of the resources we have in the world. This desire to produce things cheaply causes us to produce goods using methods that are destructive whether that’s by producing a product that is toxic based on what it has been made of or what it has been made with or how it has been made, the resources that we use to make it.

So I feel like all of these things connect very closely and sustainability is a concept in terms of using the resources we have from the earth basically and a way that future generations can also still have those resources and benefits from them. That seems to be the only real way forward.

And in a way, when you look at the growing population of the world and the way we are all using resources, I think it just makes sense to take a look at what we are doing, what we are producing, how we are producing it and to do it in a way where we can all survive or the next few generations can survive hopefully. And I think it would solve a lot of the problems we’re experiencing […] which are many.

That was where my interest originated. And then I found Ecosia to be a perfect fit in terms of a movement and an effort that proves that small changes can make a big difference.

DEBRA: One of the things about this is that it’s something that each one of us can do without much effort at all—and I’m speaking to my listeners now. The only way that I see anything different on my screen, I sign up. And it’s free and it’s easy. It takes about a minute to switch over.

And the thing is it has a very nice little banner at the top that’s teal blue and a nice little logo. And so, the only thing that I see different than using any other search engine is that it’s got a little counter at the top that tells me how many trees have been planted to offset my use.

So I don’t have to do anything, except to go about searching the internet just the way I usually would.

The search results come from Yahoo and Bing and also there’s a little tab at the top that you can search the Google if you want. There is a tab for images and apps and videos. So it’s just as easy as any other search engine, except that as you use it, it plants trees. Is that about it?

SHANNON SMITH: Exactly. It’s perfectly described. Yes.

DEBRA: Thank you. I don’t see any reason why anybody shouldn’t just sign up with you and get tree planted as they search the web. And as we go through the show today, you will give a lot more information about why it is important to plant trees and how that benefits us with toxics in our world.

SHANNON SMITH: Definitely. Yeah, that’s one of the things that I am most excited about. We realized that people were really interested in the search engine when it was first founded back at the end of 2009. And that is that it is something easier. It’s a place for people to meet and come together to contribute to something to make it better.

And it is also something important if you think of the numbers when you can realize that my collective contribution with the community of likeminded people have the potential to truly make a positive difference in reducing toxicity in the world and reducing carbon emissions and different things like that, these things that are all threatening the wellbeing of the people and the planet itself throughout the world.

DEBRA: You covered this briefly when you were talking earlier. But I wanted to just say so that our listeners understand where you get the money to plant these trees if you […] And so, you explained this the other day, but explain how your advertising works.

SHANNON SMITH: Sure. This is interesting because I think a lot of people aren’t quite clear on how search engines in general earn their money. There actually are only, I guess, two or maybe three major search engines with their search indexes in the world. I mean there’s a few definitely, the Yandex in Russia and different things like that.

But definitely in the US, we’ve got Google and Yahoo, which has actually come together with Bing in the last couple of years. I think they should have seen search engine index. Search engines, everybody is seeing that they display ads on the side of search results or above them, the sponsored links. And every time a person searches in the search engine and click on an ad, that’s where the certain number of cents.

Sometimes you even have affiliate links wrapped up in the search results and if a purchase is made through one of those affiliate links, often times you will have 3% to 5% of the purchase price going to the search engine displaying the links or to the company that’s distributing the affiliate links throughout the web.

So, there are a lot of people profiting from these ads that we are bombarded with every day on the web and sometimes subtly and sometimes not so subtly. So it is a huge industry. The life blood of the web is this model, this advertising model.

So what we have done is it’s what makes the world go around. Everybody is a part of this. But what we have decided to do is pick up money that we’d normally get from the Yahoo ads that are displayed on the site.

And we have promised users to donate 80% of all of that ad revenue to a tree planting program. We have chosen Nature Conservancy’s Plan a Billion Trees Program in the Atlantic Forest in Brazil like we said. But exactly all that money comes from the revenue we earned from the ads that are displayed on the site.

DEBRA: Right. So that revenue comes by user clicking through probably pay per click or something like that. And so when you are using this, the more click, the more money they get, the more trees they can plant.

We need to go to break. But we will be right back. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

My guest today is Shannon Smith from—how do you say it? Ecosia?

SHANNON SMITH: Ecosia.

DEBRA: Ecosia. And we’ll be talking more about toxics and trees. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Shannon Smith. She’s the Communications and User Voice—what does that mean, Communications and User Voice?

SHANNON SMITH: Sure.

DEBRA: What do you do?

SHANNON SMITH: I’ve worked, for the time when I’m at the Ecosia, on the connection between the users we have, which is something like two million monthly unique users now, the connection between those users and what we do to create a symbiosis so that we are always going in the right direction and making sure that everybody is in the same page and that everything that is happening is being communicated clearly back and forth.

And it is a huge part of what we do because we are completely just like any business. We consider ourselves a social business. But like any business, we would be relying on our customers. And we rely on the people who believe in Ecosia to support us.

And based on that principle, we owe this group a sense of transparency and making sure that our impact is actually having an impact and that we see that information back to users.

So the idea is that users keep us in check and we keep users informed. And that’s how this entire project grows and how we actually have an impact and change something altogether in the end.

DEBRA: Yes. Does the word Ecosia have a meaning? How did it come together as a word?

SHANNON SMITH: That’s funny. A lot of people have asked the Founder, Christian, about that. It was just a play on words. Christian actually had a couple other charitable search engines, so to speak, before Ecosia.

One of them is called Forestle. Some people still remember it. It’s since been redirected into Ecosia, but that actually worked with Google for some time with Google search results. But it was cut off after about a week or so when users grew quite rapidly from the beginning.

And so Christian was quickly scrambling to find another partner to work with. So Yahoo and Bing were the only options in Germany. And then a partnership started from there.

But he was basically just looking for a name for another search engine for his next search engine that would become a little bit more international, this idea of eco or something that sticks in people’s minds so that it is at least recognizable for the values it embodies. I think Eco-Utopia is where the idea generated. But there’s no other real significance to the name.

DEBRA: Because sometimes people have a story behind how their coined term came to be.

SHANNON SMITH: Sure.

DEBRA: But I think it does communicate. I understand the eco aspect of it immediately. Yes. So let’s talk about trees.

The thing that is most amazing to me about trees is that trees help us breathe. Without trees, we would not be able to breathe because what happens is that as we, humans and other mammals, breathe in, we need to have oxygen. And when we breathe out, we breathe out carbon dioxide.

And trees are exactly the opposite. Trees love carbon dioxide. In fact, they eat carbon dioxide for dinner. It’s their favorite thing. And they take this carbon dioxide and they release oxygen. So their function of what they take in and what they give out is exactly the opposite to ours.

And I love that picture, seeing this picture in my mind of I am breathing out something that a tree loves and a tree is breathing out something that I need in order to survive.

SHANNON SMITH: Exactly.

DEBRA: Go ahead.

SHANNON SMITH: Trees are these incredible things that are incredibly complementary to the natural way that we live. And it is so neat to have a partner in the natural world like that that cleans up your mess and you clean its mess up, this perfect exchange, something like a vital exchange.

DEBRA: It is a perfect exchange. Yeah. It is like this in and out. I can just see in front of me a tree. In my mind, I can see a tree and me standing in front of a tree. And as I breathe out, I am just going,

“Here tree, have all this carbon dioxide.” And the tree is just delighting in giving me oxygen.

And I think that most people don’t understand where our oxygen comes from, that it comes from trees, it comes from forest. And when we don’t have forest anymore, we don’t have oxygen and that’s just the way it is.

And so we talk about toxic chemicals being destructive, but there are also things that we need on the positive side that if we don’t have them, we are not going to do well either. And so trees are just so important, so important. And I just wanted to say that I love trees and that we need to make sure that we take care of them.

SHANNON SMITH: Absolutely

DEBRA: So I have some facts here that I have gathered about trees and pollution. Do you want me to give those or do you have some things that you would like to say about trees and pollution?

SHANNON SMITH: Yeah, sure. You’ve said a lot. I mean trees are just outside. We see them, but we might not really realize what they do. Just some interesting things that have come up lately that have come to our attention, especially throughout working on this program is the fact that air pollution is killing more people than AIDS and malaria, combined in the world, as well as causing cancer and different things like that.

I think air pollution is also in the same category as tobacco smoke, UV radiation, plutonium and things like that. And it is really quite neat that trees, once you plant, have the ability to clean things up a little bit. And there are things and lifestyle changes that we could definitely make.

The change will come slowly and things we can do to protect ourselves to the world in different ways in different parts of the world. It is simple as planting trees. And there are a couple of examples of really neat experiments that have been done to see where a row of 30 birch trees have protected houses. It cut the pollutants in the air by 50% in just two weeks or something like that.

DEBRA: Wow.

SHANNON SMITH: So there’s a whole array of possibilities in terms of trees you plant in your backyard.

And then it’s a whole other slew of benefits when you talk about reforesting the rainforest, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah. We need to go to break again but we will be right back. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Shannon Smith from Ecosia. We’re going to talk more about trees when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Shannon Smith from Ecosia. That’s a search engine that plants trees to offset the energy use when you are searching.

When you sign up with them, they have a little counter that’s on the banner at the top of the page. And that tells you how many trees have been planted on your behalf. And they have already planted 36 trees for me and I just have only been using it for a week or so.

So it really shows how much energy gets used. It is already 36 trees worth of offset. Shannon, are you there?

SHANNON SMITH: Yeah. It’s great. Yeah.

DEBRA: It’s a fun thing to do, but it also really raises awareness. It’s not like you are just out there saying we are going to plant some trees. You see exactly the number of trees that are being planted for you. So I am happy to plant those 36 trees.

SHANNON SMITH: You know what is so great? We are so happy that you have. Thanks. Yes. And it is great, the number up there. It’s neat too. Like you said, it raises awareness, but it’s also a collaborative thing as well. The number of trees we helped plant with people searching at this very moment. So it’s what happens when you come together and then trees get planted.

And it’s a neat thing as well to program. That’s been going on for quite some time and there’s a lot of information on the Plant a Billion Trees website about exactly how that’s going and the successes they’ve had with the trees that have been planted in this particular region of Brazil. Yeah, that’s positive impact on the entire world’s climate and that sort of thing.

DEBRA: Yeah. So if you are interested in signing up, go to Ecosia.org. So that’s Ecosia.org.

I just wanted to say a few things about the relationship between trees and toxic pollution and what happens. And so trees will absorb. They help trap and hold particle pollutant, things like dusts and ash and pollen and smoke that can damage the human lungs.

But they also absorb CO2 as we all know and other dangerous gasses. And as we said earlier, in exchange, trees then provide the atmosphere with the oxygen for us to breathe.

Now, actually one acre of trees will produce enough oxygen for 18 people every day. An acre of trees isn’t actually that much. It would be interesting. Do you happen to know how many trees are needed to supply the oxygen for one person?

SHANNON SMITH: That’s a good question. If it’s 18 per acre, do you know the offset for car is quite interesting? It’s like an acre of trees.

It also depends on the kind of trees—that’s an interesting thing—a young tree or an old tree or a tropical tree or a temperate climate tree. But I think an acre of trees can offset the emission of 2.7cars for a year. It’s like the trees and the cars on the road for the duration of that year or something like that.

DEBRA: Wow, that’s interesting.

SHANNON SMITH: It’s a good idea of what would be needed to counteract, for instance, our driving habits, so yeah.

DEBRA: Right. So trees remove gasses by absorbing them through their pores in their leaf surface. But here’s the thing. Trees are performing this big job of removing particles and gasses from the air that we are producing. I find this so interesting.

Just think about if you were a tree and you were absorbing all those particles and gasses into your body, it the same thing for a tree as it is for us. When we are exposed to toxic chemicals, it damages our cells, it damages our body in various ways.

In the same way, trees being exposed to our pollution are being damaged and the air pollutants that enter trees damage their leaves, which collect the sunlight. And so it damages the process of photosynthesis, which makes food for them and it just weakens the trees, making them susceptible to other health problems, such as insects and diseases.

So we really need to be looking at the fact that trees are being affected by these toxic exposures as much as we are, as living bodies. They are being exposed and they are being harmed.

SHANNON SMITH: I think it is ally interesting too because it points back to that symbiosis thing we are talking about and how all these things are connected. It’s like one part of this environment whether people in the other side of the world or trees, which we just think are there sometimes and don’t pay much attention.

They are suffering and essentially. In the end, we are suffering too. So there’s always a cost to that. It’s not just the direct effects in our body, but it’s the effects on the things around us that we are also dependent on. This is very much true of trees absolutely.

DEBRA: Very much so. Also living here in Florida, it’s hot for six months. It’s hot. I am very happy to have the thunderstorm clouds today. But I am always looking for trees because underneath the tree is a lower temperature where we can feel a lot more comfortable and it is a lot easier for us to live in that way.

Yeah, I am just thinking. Oh, I know what I want to say. Oh no, I forgot it again. That’s the way it is.

Okay, here it is.

Okay, so we were talking earlier how when we breathe out, we create the carbon dioxide. But we also need to be thinking about how when we use things like search engines or computers or anything that requires energy, every single second, we are producing pollution that is harming trees.

SHANNON SMITH: Absolutely.

DEBRA: And so it is like our exhale, it’s our toxic exhale. I had never thought of it like that before.

SHANNON SMITH: Absolutely. And people talk about carbon footprints and no matter whether you are onboard with climate change or not in terms of it being an issue, it is still the absolute truth that the things we do have an effect on other things.

And just like you say, in the same way that we breathe out, we breathe in, we take up resources. Every time we purchase something or use something, it has an effect, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah. We have to take another break, but we will come back. You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Shannon Smith from Ecosia and they are a search engine that plants trees to offset your energies when you search the web. It is a good thing to do. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You are listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I am Debra Lynn Dadd and my guest today is Shannon Smith from Ecosia. That’s Ecosia.org. You can go there and sign up for their search engine services and they will plant trees for you as you search the web to offset your use and production of pollutants from the burning of fossil fuels for energy.

I have a list of some of the major air pollutants and their primary sources. And these are things that trees absorb and collect and take out of the air, but also cause damage to trees. So again, on the one hand, they are doing this tremendous service for us by leaning up air pollution. But the story doesn’t stop there because we need to recognize that they are doing that at the expense of their own health.

So here are some things. And some of these I hadn’t thought about before. So burning of oil, coal and natural gas for energy. Here’s another one, hydrogen fluoride and silicon tetrafluoride. Well, the first one was carbon dioxide. This one is hydrogen fluoride and silicon tetrafluoride. That comes from steel manufacturing. So when we are using stainless steel pans and things like that, that’s creating air pollution.

Ozone, which probably everyone asserts of, is a chemical reaction of sunlight on automobile exhaust gasses. Driving your car is producing pollutants that are harmful to trees.

Let’s see, burning fossil fuels. Okay, here’s another one, chlorofluorocarbons. They come from air conditioners, refrigerators and industrial foam.

So all these things, it is not just driving our cars, not just burning fossil fuels for energy, but every single product that we use and is made. All of them require the burning of energy and some of them have chemicals in them like chlorofluorocarbons that are also pollutants in their own right. So we need to be thinking about the energy use of everything because every time a product is made, every time we drive our car—I know these are sobering facts, but they are facts—it’s like having a toxic exhale out into the environment.

SHANNON SMITH: Yeah. That is exactly right, Debra. Even just the awareness is important. Lifestyle changes can be difficult to make. So the first step is the understanding how all of that works, just like you described basically. Everything we do and use has some connection to these things.

And when we recognize that, then we can either start to make changes and start to do things to try and offset what we are doing. But that awareness is so important.

We’ve been talking about how trees are incredible weapons against the harmful effects of all of these pollutants. Of course, they can only take so much too. So it’s […] expect.

DEBRA: It can only take so much. And I think that it all comes down to—we hear things like terms like carbon offsets in the news. And carbon offsets, I mean it is really important. But the thing is you can only trade around carbon offsets so much that we always need to be looking at it. If there’s something harmful, we need to be looking at reducing at the source.

I’m going to relate this back to the human body because I think that it all works in the same way. In a human body, if we are exposed to too much toxic chemicals, what happens is that our organ systems start breaking down, that our bodies get overloaded and then we start getting sick and eventually we die. I know we are going to die anyway, but die sooner and die less comfortably from being disabled by these toxic chemicals.

But the thing is it is happening out in the environment too. It is happening to trees. It is happening to birds. It’s happening to all parts of the environment. And so we really, really, really need to be reducing our pollution at the source, not only for ourselves, but for the entire system of life on the planet.

SHANNON SMITH: Exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah. So in the meantime, one of the things what we can do is plant trees. But if we still produce so much toxic chemicals that the trees get overwhelmed and we don’t have forests because we have killed the trees, then we are really going to have a problem. And so I think it is best to do whatever we can right now before we destroy the entire planet to reduce our toxic chemical use.

SHANNON SMITH: Exactly. Someone had the brilliant visual of the frog and hot water or the cold water that’s heated up. The fog doesn’t know anything is wrong as it heated, but slowly of course. It jumps out quickly. The water is boiling and that’s a problem immediately.

But do we want to be sitting in that cold water that’s heating up, heating up, heating up, waiting for disaster to strike with our health or with the environment around us that we are so dependent on?

And I think you make such a great point about toxicity in general and these products that are produced in a way that we don’t want to have anything to deal with. Why don’t we take the catalyst out? You encourage people stop buying them and they stop getting produced.

And that’s one way with the power of consumption or consumers’ choice that you can really also make a difference. And just that awareness of how that works, how it affects us and how it affects environment is great.

DEBRA: It does. I do want to say that I am not suggesting that people stop buying things altogether or not have the things that we need in order for us to survive individually.

SHANNON SMITH: Sure.

DEBRA: I think what needs to happen is there needs to be a big shift from doing things in the toxic way to doing things in a more sustainable way. And certainly what you are doing with Ecosia is a step in that direction.

And it certainly happens step by step. I’ve been doing this for 35 years and there are still things that I am learning every day. There’s still always more information, more awareness to have and another step that one can take. But we just keep taking them step by step and step and then pretty soon there’s a big change in the world. I think there are already is. Don’t you see that we are moving in that direction?

SHANNON SMITH: Absolutely, absolutely. I think there are all kinds of sustainable products I think you mentioned being produced and people are demanding them, especially here in Germany where we are based.

And I know it’s happening in the States as well and it is incredible and people are doing really incredible things. And you see that in our users too all over the world. These people know what’s going on and they are willing to make small steps.

That’s the point. It’s not about guilt. It’s not about telling ourselves how terrible we are. It’s really about looking at what we can do trying to understand what we can understand and taking these small steps as a group, which I think will really add up pretty quickly.

DEBRA: It does. Shannon, it has been a pleasure talking with you. We only have about two minutes, three minutes left. So are there any final things that you’d like to say that we haven’t covered?

SHANNON SMITH: Yeah. Thank you for having us on first of all. I think a lot of people don’t know about Ecosia and that’s one of the things we hope. It’s that people like the concept and like the service.

We will start talking about it because I think it comes from people, from everybody who is choosing to use a search engine and the awareness it creates about our relationship to each other and to the environment and things like that.

Yeah, it’s just wonderful what users have been able to do so far. We are grateful and excited and grateful that people like you showed interest about it. So that’s fantastic. And it’s great what you are bringing to light on the show.

DEBRA: Thank you.

SHANNON SMITH: The things that you do with toxicity and sustainability, I think that’s the only true way forward. So it’s exciting.

DEBRA: I think so too. I mean we have to recognize that what we do affects the world that we live in and that everything that we put out comes back to us and that that’s just part of the way of life and that we have the control and the ability to make choices right in our hands.

Every time we buy a product, we have a choice. As I have said, I’ve been doing this for 35 years. I think this year is year number 35.

SHANNON SMITH: Congratulations.

DEBRA: Thank you.

SHANNON SMITH: […]

DEBRA: It’s actually been a pleasure for me to do this work. It continues to be a pleasure because I am not focused on the toxic chemicals even though I need to know what they are and what the problems are. I don’t focus on the toxic chemicals. I focus on what are the solutions and just being able to see the world.

I just look at the world, looking for the nontoxic products, the sustainable products, the better ideas. And I am always looking for them. And then I am always just weeding out to see what I can find.

That’s what we do on the show. I invite people to be guests who are supplying the solutions like you.

Thank you so much again, Shannon.

Again, that’s Ecosia. It is at Ecosia.org. So you can go there. You can also go to Toxic Free Talk Radio.com to find out more about the show and about our upcoming guests and the past guests because all of these shows are recorded and archived. And we have wonderful shows, wonderful guests. So go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.ocm. Take a look and take a listen. Be well.

Helping Children Make Good Food Choices

Katherine PryorMy guest today is Katherine Pryor, a good food advocate based in Seattle. While advocating for Farm to School funding in the state capitol one year, Katherine was impressed by the array of stories told by parents, teachers, and school administrators about how having farm to school programs and school gardens had changed kids’ eating practices. She wanted to write these stories from the kids’ perspectives, hoping to inspire schools and government agencies to support good food education. Her first children’s book, Sylvia’s Spinach, is being used to complement school garden curriculum and encourage young readers to try new foods. Her next book, Zora’s Zucchini, will be published in 2015. We’ll be talking about how you can help your kids make better food choices at home and when they are out in the world at school and with friends. Among other projects, Katherine has worked Sylvias Spinachon a successful campaign to get Starbucks to commit to dBGH-free milk nationwide and worked with Health Care Without Harm’s Healthy Food in Health Care initiative, helping hospitals use their purchasing power to support local and sustainable food producers. In addition to writing, Katherine manages a statewide program to bring local and sustainable foods to Washington hospitals. www.katherinepryor.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Helping Children Make Good Food Choices

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Katherine Pryor

Date of Broadcast: July 08, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. It’s Tuesday, July 8, 2014, on a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

I can’t talk today. It’s the day after the long 4th of July weekend, and I took yesterday off also. So let me just start again.

Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and how to live toxic-free. It’s Tuesday, July 8, 2014.

After a vacation, it just takes a minute to get back into this. Today, we’re going to be talking about helping children make good food choices, and my guest is Katherine Pryor. She’s a good food advocate based in Seattle.

She’s written a book called Sylvia’s Spinach, which is a delightful book for children. I’ll tell you more about it, how I felt about it when she comes on.

While advocating for a Farm to School funding in the state capital of Washington, Katherine was impressed by the array of stories told by parents, teachers and school administrators about how having farm to school programs and school gardens had changed kids’ eating practices.

She wanted to write these stories from the kids’ perspectives, helping to inspire schools and government agencies to support good food education.

Sylvia’s Spinach is her first children’s book. It’s been used to complement school garden curriculum and encourage young readers to try new food. Her next book, Zora’s Zucchini will be published in 2015.

Welcome to the show, Kathy.

KATHERINE PRYOR: Thank you so much. It’s nice to be here.

DEBRA: Good. So I loved your book. I just loved your book. And one of the reasons that I loved it is because it takes the child from not liking a vegetable, and not even be willing to try it, to going through school programs, where they plant seeds, and she happens to plant spinach, this vegetable she didn’t like. And because of the school program and watching the seeds sprout and the vegetables grow that she then liked spinach, and she was willing to eat it.

And I know, myself even as an adult, I’ve been through that same process of growing something in my backyard and just loving the way that it tastes, and just so wanting to eat it because of how delicious it is.

Recently, I’ve been trying to make myself eat kale. I’ve been trying to make myself eat kale for a long time, and trying it in different ways, and just really knowing how delicious it is, how nutritious it is, but just really not liking the way it tastes.

KATHERINE PRYOR: I think you’re on the same boat with a lot of people on that one.

DEBRA: I think so too. And this is why I want to tell you this because I’ve also been making a lot of changes in my diet over a long period of time, but recently this year, I really cut out wheat and all grains, and dairy, and all sugar, even natural sweeteners. The only thing sweet I eat is fruit.

This has been a very difficult transition for me, but the more I do these things, and just basically eat the freshest vegetables that I can, and basic proteins as the basic thing that I eat in my diet, and I eat nuts and seeds and stuff. But the vegetables are the most important to me. My body really needs to have vegetables, and the more fresh they are, and the more right out of the ground they are, the better my body likes them.

And an amazing thing happened to me was that after trying kale, and after trying it in different ways and not liking it, and then making all these changes in my diet, a friend of mine brought over a kale salad the other day that he had purchased. And it had a wonderful Asian dressing on it. And I sat there and I ate it, and I said, “Can I have some more?”

I realized that I wanted kale. Immediately, as soon as I left, I went down to the store, and I bought a whole bunch of kale, and I chopped it all up, and I put coconut aminos, and toasted sesame oil, ginger, and anything Asian I could think of. I’ve been [sorted] on. And I had enough, and I just ate that. And cashews.

And I ate that for three days. Every day for lunch, I ate this kale salad, and then I went and bought more kale. I’m totally in love with kale. And I just bought more and more, and I’m so happy, it’s so good for me, and my body feels good.

I guess what I’m trying to say is that everybody should be as adventurous as your character […] to try something new.

KATHERINE PRYOR: I think your story is really perfect. It’s illustrating why it is so important that we get kids eating these new foods, green foods, at the youngest possible age.

We know that a child’s palate is developing literally every day. They’re growing new taste buds. And we know that their palate and their food preferences are very much being shaped at a young age.

And so here, you had to literally re-train your palate to like kale. And it sounds like you’ve kept at it until you did which is fantastic. But think about how many people wouldn’t go through the effort that you just went through to re-train your brain and your tongue to like something that maybe you hadn’t been raised eating.

DEBRA: I was not raised eating kale. I was in a situation where my mother never learned how to cook. My grandmother was basically a housewife and she did all the cooking. My mother never learned how to cook.

So when I was born, when she got married, my father cooked. And he just cooked whatever it was that he felt like eating like bacon, mashed potatoes and cake, anything he knew how to eat, but it was not a very good idea.

And I had this strange situation where my mother decided when she didn’t want to learn how to cook, she wanted to learn how to be healthy. So she was making green smoothies back in 1957, except that she was making them in a little blender like they had in those days. And so they were horrible, stringy and gritty.

I decided I was never going to eat. She called it a green drink. I said, “I’m never going to eat this again.

When I grow up, I am not drinking this green stuff.”

KATHERINE PRYOR: And if you’re like most kids, I had those healthy parents too, we had green drinks also.

And I remember saying, “Why do we have to get the brown bread? Why can’t we get wonder bread? It was so much more delicious.”

And I would never have guessed that here I am, all of these years later, telling people to drink green drink, and if they’re going to eat wheat, to eat whole wheat.

DEBRA: I never would have guessed […]

KATHERINE PRYOR: They were really onto something, but I think that at the time, we maybe didn’t have the culinary knowledge of what to do with these things to make them taste good.

And I feel so lucky to live in an age where if there’s something you’re curious about, how to make a delicious green smoothie, there are a million recipes out there. And they’re really […] figuring out how to make that good for kids.

DEBRA: Tell us how you got interested. We only have a minute until we need to go to break, but start telling us how you got interested in your subject.

KATHERINE PRYOR: Well, you’re absolutely right that I was lobbying—I found a good food advocate in my day job. I was lobbying in my state capital for farm to school funding. And a dad told a story of how his daughter wouldn’t eat spinach until she grew it in her school garden. And then she ended up falling in love with spinach. She wanted to put it in everything that summer.

And everybody was […] professional advocates, they’re saying, “We need to write a white paper about that.

We need to do a press release about that.”

And all I kept thinking was, “Well, what about this little girl who went through this incredible, personal transformation to do a complete 180 and changed her mind about food? I want to tell it from her perspective.

And I think other little kids might respond to that.”

So I started learning more about how you write kids’ books. I took a class on it. And then I just started having fun with the format. Maybe after the break, we can talk a little bit more, but I’ve done a lot of really […] with kids.

DEBRA: And I want to hear all about it, but we do need to go to break right now. [inaudible 00:09:53] is going to come in and start talking on top of you.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. My guest today is Katherine Pryor. She’s a good food advocate and author of Sylvia Spinach, and we’ll hear more from her right after this.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Katherine Pryor, author of Sylvia’s Spinach.

So Katherine, tell us more about writing the book.

KATHERINE PRYOR: Basically, as I was working on Sylvia’s Spinach, around the same time, my husband and I had started a program with a food bank in South Seattle. This food bank literally had a greenhouse attached to it, and the greenhouse had been abandoned by the community gardening program that was using it.

And we had the idea to start growing organic vegetables […] for food bank clients. What a lot of people don’t realize is that with emergency foods, produce and protein are generally the hardest things for food banks to store because they don’t have the freezer space. They don’t have the refrigerator space.

A lot of times, if produce is donated, it’s coming in near the end of its shelf life. So it’s going to be something that people are going to have to […] right away.

And he’s got a background in plant biology. And here, I’m a food advocate. I said, “This is what happens when those two specialists do get married […]” We started growing food together.

So we started this program with a food bank in South Seattle. We were giving out these organic vegetables […] that the clients could take home and grow themselves. They could either grow them at home, they could grow them on apartment balconies, or they could grow them in community gardens.

And the thing that we were shocked by was the way that the kids just lit up on the days that we were there.

So we would be near the end of the line, people would come in, and they would get their dried goods, those beans and pastas and things like that, and canned goods. And then they would get some fresh produce, then maybe some bread. Then they would come to our table.

We noticed that the kids were not even bothering to go through the rest of the line. They were just b-lining to our table and taking out the plants that they wanted to grow. They had a million questions. What will this plant be? What will this plant be?

And the kids were very much the ones who were deciding the plants that their parents would take home and grow.

And at the end of our first season, we wanted to do a survey to see how it had gone, to see if the program had actually worked for people. Were they, in fact, able to harvest fresh food at home? And we found that—I think it must have been like two-thirds of the participants had been able to eat from their garden two or more times a week. And almost single one of those participants said they had kids who could help in the garden and would then eat the produce.

And to us, that was the biggest success that we possibly could have asked for. And it really got me thinking about the relationship that a child has with food as they see it growing. They nurture it, they get to see every stage of its development, and then the big pay-off, you get to taste it.

DEBRA: I think for children, they still have that wonder about nature that I think that we tend to lose as adults, as we go through life and start putting our attention on other things like earning money and all the problems of the world, all those kinds of things. But children, my viewpoint personally is that we’re all born of nature, that you could take the whole industrial world away, and we would still be human beings living in nature as we did prior to the industrial age.

And the children still retain somehow. And so they can look at something living, like a plant, and get very excited about it, and want to take care of it, and participate in the growth of it. And for them to see that connection between the food growing and then it nourishing their bodies is a really wonderful experience that I think every child should have, and every adult should have.

That should restored in everyone.

I had a garden when I was a child, and we grew tomatoes. My grandparents had a garden, a very large garden, and trees. I’ve said this many times on the show, but I’ll say it again, because I love it so much. My first food memory was at age two or three, my grandfather lifting me up into the peach tree, so that I could pick my own peach. And the way that it smelled in the sun, I can remember everything about that. And bringing it in the house, and having my grandmother take the skin off, and slice it up, and put it in a bowl with cream and sugar.

Yes, she puts sugar on it.

But I had that experience of being up in the tree where the peaches are. That’s my earliest memory of food, and I think everyone should have that.

More recently, I had the experience of having chickens in my backyard until the police took them away because they’re illegal where I live. But I had them long enough that I could feed them my kitchen scraps and have an egg come out the other end. And then eat those eggs and see how amazing that very, very fresh chicken egg tastes when you know exactly what went into that egg, that there is no question about what happened at the farm. It was right there in my backyard, and I made that egg happen. And it was fabulous.

KATHERINE PRYOR: It’s miraculous.

DEBRA: It is! No, it is. It’s the right word.

KATHERINE PRYOR: I know that’s a funny word to use about something that literally happens every day, but there is something miraculous about food especially for kids who are growing up in an increasingly urban and suburban areas where they probably don’t see food growing. Really, their biggest interaction with food is maybe in a grocery store and a food […] or something like that.

They often times have never actually seen a tomato growing on the vine. They’ve never seen pea plants.

They might not know that a peach comes from a tree. They really are disconnected from this.

I think the first time that a child sees a tomato growing, a pea growing, and they’re able to reach out, take it, pop it in their mouths, they have this understanding of where food comes from that, unfortunately, we’re pretty disconnected from in the modern world.

DEBRA: We are. We need to take another break, but we’ll talk more when we come back. My guest today is Katherine Pryor, good food advocate based in Seattle, and author of Sylvia’s Spinach. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Katherine Pryor, author of Sylvia’s Spinach.

Katherine, I know that I’ve made a lot of changes in my life, in my diet, as I’ve said earlier today on the show, but one of the reasons why I really wanted to have you on the show is because if I had made the kind of changes that you’re talking about as a child, and other advocates were talking about, who are helping children with school vegetable-growing programs, if I had had that, I think my health would have been very different.

And as an adult, as a consumer advocate, as a researcher about health, it’s so clear to me that great nutrition is necessary to good health. Just really eating those fresh fruits and vegetables, having enough nutrition that comes from real whole food, that is such the foundation of health. And because we don’t have that, we end up having skyrocketing healthcare costs, people wonder what drug they should be taking, but what we really need is nutrition, nutrition, nutrition.

Do you want to say anything about that?

KATHERINE PRYOR: It’s so, so important. There is absolutely no doubt that healthy kids stand a much better chance of becoming healthy adults.

And that’s one of the things that makes things—like this skyrocketing childhood obesity rate is so terrifying.

We know that, unfortunately, unhealthy kids stand at a much a higher risk of becoming unhealthy adults.

We see rates of obesity and diabetes going through the roof just in the last […] from the early 1990’s. And they were nowhere near what they are today.

So we know that unfortunately, the way we have been eating is really putting our health at risk, and future generation’s health at risk. We know we need to do something to stop it.

And that’s why my goal is really to get young kids thinking about eating good food, but not necessarily telling them that it’s because it’s healthy. I want them to love it because it tastes good and it’s fun.

DEBRA: Exactly. I totally agree with you on that. I started doing what I’m doing when I was only 24, I’ve been doing this for so many years. I was only 24 when I started, and I thought, I can’t just tell people that toxic chemicals are toxic and expect them to not use them. I need to tell them that there’s this other more wonderful life that they could have. That it really is more wonderful to wear cotton than polyester, and organic food is so much more delicious than toxic food.

That’s what I did. I somehow knew when I was 24 years old that I needed to take that approach. And I think it was because I needed to take that approach with myself. I was so sick from toxic chemical exposure, and I needed to essentially give up everything I already knew about the world and find everything that wasn’t toxic.

And it’s pretty much like the same process now with nutrition is that I need to come up with for myself a diet that is just so delicious and so wonderful, and so much what I want to eat because I love it, that I don’t even want to eat any of those other things.

Yesterday, a friend of mine and I went down to Sarasota, and we went to Whole Foods. We went to have organic lunch. You walk in, and there are whole racks of all the gluten breads, and the huge pastry department, organic sugar, of course.

But you can’t just walk into a place like that and eat anything, and expect that it’s all going to be healthy because there are all these businesses who say, “Well, we have to produce all these unhealthy foods because that’s what people buy. That’s what they want. And if we don’t give it to them in an organic form, they’re going to go someplace else and buy it from somebody else.”

KATHERINE PRYOR: Honestly, I think one of the big problems is that we’ve taken food like that that were historically a treat food. That’s just something you ate on special occasions. That’s just something you ate at special times of the year, on your birthday, other people’s birthday.

We’ve taken this treat food, and we’ve made it everyday food. And it is available everywhere.

Honestly, I certainly enjoy a cake. My family knows I sucker for the occasional ice cream cone.

DEBRA: But there’s a difference about eating that occasionally.

KATHERINE PRYOR: I love it. You just have to treat it like it’s a special occasion food, and not an everyday food.

I think once you start looking at food that way, it really gives you an awareness of how surrounded we are by things we probably shouldn’t be eating as much as we do.

DEBRA: Well, it’s so easy to buy all these foods or be around them. The point I wanted to make about yesterday was that I am so committed to staying on the diet that makes me feel healthier, and have more strength and energy, and be able to function better that when I walked into Whole Foods and saw all those pastries and desserts full of wheat and sugar, I just said, “I’m not going to do this. As tempting as that may be, I’m not going to do this.”

And I think that that’s part of educating children. It’s educating children by what they love to eat at home. But also, what happens when they go out into the world? Talk about school lunches. Talk about going out with their friends. What would you like children to know about that?

KATHERINE PRYOR: That’s where it gets tricky because there are a lot of parents that I know who absolutely have the best of intentions, and then you send your child out into a world of nugget-shaped chicken and French fries with every meal.

I hate to say it, but I routinely ride my bike through a big kitchen that does a lot of the prep work for the Seattle School. It’s a big industrial kitchen. And my bike path happens to go right by that. And oh, my goodness, when you ride your bike pass that building, it smells like grilled cheese and tater tots because a lot of times, that’s what they’re making for the kids in school.

There is a huge amount of work to be done on the school food front. And I have to say, I absolutely applaud the changes that USDA has been making in changing the requirements for fruits and vegetables and whole grains. This is a massive, massive system that they are trying to turn around, and it is going to take a while.

But I think we’ve got some really good people working on this.

DEBRA: Before you tell us that, we do need to go to break. It goes by so fast, doesn’t it?

But we’ll be right back. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio, and my guest today is Katherine Pryor. She’s the author of Sylvia’s Spinach, and you can go to her website, KatherinePryor.com, and find out more about her and her book and everything she’s doing. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Katherine Pryor, author of Sylvia’s Spinach. You can go to her website, KatherinePryor.com, to learn more about her.

So we were talking about the school lunch program.

KATHERINE PRYOR: Yes, absolutely. And one of the things that I have been loving seeing here in Washington is there’s been a real push to […] getting those Washington farm fresh food into schools. And so we’re starting to see kids who are having more of a relationship with the farms where those foods are grown, which makes them way more excited to see it when it shows up in their cafeteria.

And one of the things that I have also loved seeing is they started doing fresh snacks programs for kids. A lot of schools, particularly, elementary schools, will qualify for funding that allows the school to provide the kids with a fresh snack either in the morning or afternoon. That could be anything from a carrot to a […] to an apple, pretty much whatever happens to be in season right then.

One of the things that I’ve been hearing these schools reporting that I think is really exciting is the school front has been able to implement this program where you’re literally giving the kids a fresh snack either in the morning or in the afternoon, they’ve seen reduced rates of visits to the principal’s office for kids acting out in class.

And it’s just something that I’ve been hearing anecdotally from teachers, from school nutritionists. But my goodness, is that what it would take to reduce rates of kids getting antsy in class, taking up all the teacher’s time when they have to get everyone else on track, and then taking up the principal’s time when they have to figure out what’s going on with this kid.

If we could just give every kid an apple at 10, at 1, at whatever time it would work for the school, we know that kids are much better able to focus.

And if you think about it, whole foods tend to stay with us way longer and sustain our energy way longer than something highly-processed like a white bread, or something like that.

And so what I think we’re going to start seeing more and more of is this effort to get young kids the healthiest food that we can in an effort to help them be better learners. I think we’re starting to see evidence that this is going to work.

DEBRA: Are the kids actually eating those fresh foods? Are they turning up their noses like Sylvia in your book and saying, “No, I don’t want to eat a carrot. I want chocolate chips.”

KATHERINE PRYOR: There will often times be some suspicion of them, and so the teachers who seem to have the most success with it—well, we do a couple of things. One is you try to make it fun. If it’s a carrot, let the kid play with the carrot before they actually eat them. A carrot can be a lot of things in the kid’s imagination.

The other thing—and this is more of what I do when I do school visits for Sylvia’s Spinach. I hate to spoil the ending, but she does end up eating spinach in the book. And so as I’m reading that part of the story to the kids, I will literally eat a piece of spinach as I’m reading it—and the kids gasp.

But then, at the end, I do something called the test of bravery where I ask the kids. We’re talking five and six-year-olds here. We’re not talking big kids […] I will do something called a test of bravery where I will invite all of the kids to try a piece of spinach.

We hand around the biggest plate of washed organic spinach that the kids can try. And we do something called the Sylvia Taste Test where they sniff it, they lick it, and then they crunch it.

And the thing that I tell them is they don’t have to like it, they just have to try it. Remarkably, that seems to do the trick.

DEBRA: That’s what we used to say in girl scouts. Just try it. And so what’s the result when they do that? Do a lot of kids like spinach?

KATHERINE PRYOR: A lot of them do. It’s usually a good percentage.

But here’s the other thing about kids. They’re so susceptible to peer pressure. What I’ll then do is I’ll call on some kids, and ask for their feedback. I’ll have them use some describing words to tell me what they thought the spinach tasted like.

And if that first kid that I call on says it was yummy or it was good, then the vast majority of kids in the classroom are going to say the same thing. Peer pressure is a huge driving force to them.

Think about it. When you were a little kid, you like what your friends like, and you want to like what your friends like. You don’t necessarily want to be different. And I actually think that little kids who are adventurous either is going to inspire a whole classroom to be willing to try new foods.

DEBRA: I think so too.

KATHERINE PRYOR: I think sometimes kids can be our best ambassadors to things like that.

DEBRA: I was just getting this picture in my mind of kids going home and saying, “Mom, can we have spinach for dinner?”

KATHERINE PRYOR: That’s so funny because I had kids ask for more. “Can I have some more?” And I’ll have these teachers and librarians just giving me this strangest look. “What have you done to these kids?”

And I swear, I don’t know if there is a spinach lobby. I do not work for them. I really just take it because it’s a food that kids have a hard time with, and I had heard a story about it. And it seemed like the right vegetable for the book.

It is remarkable how open kids are to it once you presented the food in a really fun way.

And I think that’s one of the things that the […] food movement, we’re not quite there yet in terms of the fun levels that we’re having. I think that one of the things we need to keep in mind—and I think there is no question. We need to change the way that we’re eating. It is literally making us sicker, both the types of food that we’re eating and the way it’s […] There’s no question we need to turn this around.

But the thing that we need to realize is that in any good social movement, we need to win hearts and minds.

There is no shortage in studies out there showing this type of fat is better than this type of fat. You need this many calories per day, and they should come from these foods.

If you’re into food, there are a lot of really incredible logical things you can study to get into it.

But most people are not going to be that. And so I think what we really need to start doing is making good food fun. And that’s for kids and adults. We really need to start getting them emotionally connected with good food.

DEBRA: Here’s one thing that I did. When I first started eating organic food many years ago, I was astonished the first time I ate an organic orange because supermarket oranges have this funny taste to them, which I found out was a fungicide. And it’s on the skins of every orange. And I grew up thinking that that fungicide taste was the taste of an orange.

And the first time I ate an orange without fungicide, it was a revelation. I totally loved it so much so that what I gave everybody for Christmas that year was organic oranges. And nobody else that I knew had ever eaten an organic orange at that time. And it was amazing to them to too.

And so I think there’s no number of studies, or doctors saying things, or scientists saying things, can compare to the actual experience of eating a food that you love. It speaks to you as being healthy and delicious when you put it in your mouth.

KATHERINE PRYOR: Food is a memory.

DEBRA: It is!

KATHERINE PRYOR: You have those foods that you bite into, and it can transport you to all the other times in your life that you’ve eaten that food. And if you have really positive emotional experience with good food at a young age, you’re going to carry that with you.

Unfortunately, I will say, the marketers of said food have also discovered this, which is why marketing to kids of unhealthy products is so prevalent and so frightening.

But I think that once we create positive associations with good food—and in fact, we can probably use the same marketing techniques […] We could probably learn from them.

I think that we have a much better chance of training kids’ palate from a really young age to like foods that are going to make them be stronger, healthier adults.

DEBRA: I totally agree. We only have, literally, a minute left before the end of the show. I wanted to say that one of my favorite places in the world is the San Francisco Farmers Market at the Ferry Building. Whenever

I go to San Francisco, I always go there first.

One day, I was at that farmers market, and there were parents strolling around a little a baby in a stroller.

Not a little baby, maybe one or two. And she had a box of blueberries, these pure, just fresh, organic blueberries, and she was just putting it in her mouth as fast as she could. And she had blueberry juice all over her face.

But the expression on her face, of this little child eating these organic blueberries was, I will never forget it, just the joy of that.

That’s about all we have time to say. Thank you so much, Katherine, for being here. Her book is Sylvia’s Spinach. Her website is KatherinePryor.com. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And you can find out more about this show at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Be well.

Binders in Cork Floors

Question from CZ

Do you have any information about the kind of binder used in manufacturing cork floor tiles? ?

I just learned that cork floor tiles are not solid cork but they’re made from cork granules and a binder pressed together. I’ve been reading about cork flooring for months and never heard this. It’s disconcerting that makers and retailers never mention the binder (much less identify it by name). Today I came upon one manufacturer’s website where they did mention a binder. I’d buy from them except they’re above my budget.

Every cork product description says “hypoallergenic” but I never see testing information mentioned. Even if cork is traditionally low tox, it’s important to know exactly that ingredients any company is using to make their tiles, the binder and the surface finish. And I’d like to know the maker has a clear commitment to safe ingredients.

I was hoping to use cork to cover a very bad floor in my family room because I must sell my house soon. (Low tox plywood was going to be the subfloor). Cork seemed something I could afford and safely live with until my house sells. Lumber Liquidators has had good prices on plain cork floor tile. I’ve just left them a message asking what binders and surface finishes are used in manufacturing the tiles they sell. Thanks for this opportunity to vent but also I’d appreciate any further info and feedback.

This leads me to ask you and your readers if you have any recommendations about flooring that is clearly low tox and that is low cost. Thanks much.

Debra’s Answer

Experience anyone?

Let me know what Lumber Liquidators says and I can tell you if it’s toxic or not.

Add Comment

Mobile Homes and MCS

Question from LL Goeckel

I am looking at options for senior living without assisted care…what about mobile homes? What is the best overview and then what specifics would be important to evaluate ?

Debra’s Answer

I’m going to leave this question to others to answer, who have more experience.

In general, motor homes are filled with particleboard and other toxic materials.

I haven’t ever compiled guidelines for choosing mobile homes.

Readers, any experience with this? Let’s create some guidelines right here.

I can say one thing. If you live in Florida, don’t live in a mobile home. It will be gone if there is a hurricane.

Add Comment

Are There Flame Retardants in Dehumidifier Filters?

Question from Erin

Hi Debra,

I have a question about washable filters for portable dehumidifiers. What are the chances that the filters are treated with flame retardants or other chemicals? The companies I’ve contacted could not find a MSDS for the washable filters I inquired about. Does that mean there are no chemicals present?

Also, do you know where I could buy replacement filter mesh that is chemical-free/natural so I have the option of replacing the filter with something else?

Thanks

Debra’s Answer

I would say that the chances are slim a dehumidifier filter would be treated with flame retardants, since flame retardants are only used where a fabric might come in contact with a source of fire.

Can you find out from them what materials are used to make these filters?

An MSDS sheet is required by law for all products that contain toxic chemicals that appear on certain lists. Generally, if there is no MSDS, then the product does not contain those chemicals.

Add Comment

Plastic in Toothpaste

From Debra Lynn Dadd

PeasizedTPasteI always love it when readers send me articles about toxic exposures I might not have seen.

This one is about plastic in toothpaste. She thought it was leaching from the tube, but no…Crest and other brands of toothpaste actually put bits of plastic in the toothpaste, which then embed themselves in the gums of those who use it. I kid you not.

Take a look at this article written by a dental hygenist and see her explanation and pictures.

The plastic is polyethylene, which is not toxic, but it isn’t biodegradable and will just stay stuck in your gums, I’m thinking, unless you remove it.

For some reason, maybe a long-ago tv commercial, I thought those flecks were crystals of mouthwash or something useful. But there is NO FUNCTION for these bits of plastic. Incredible!

If you are already using a natural toothpaste, you probably won’t find bits of plastic in it. But if you are using any brand with speckles in it, you might want to reconsider.

Source: Healthy Holistic Living: Crest Toothpaste Embeds Plasitic in Our Gums

Add Comment

Growing Organic in the City—Yes It’s Possible!

Dan SusmanToday my guest is Dan Susman, director of Director Growing Cities. Growing Cities is the first documentary about urban farming across America.From rooftop farmers to backyard beekeepers, Americans are growing food like never before. Growing Cities tells the inspiring stories of these intrepid urban farmers, innovators, and everyday city-dwellers who are challenging the way this country grows and distributes its food. And that’s what we’re going to talk about today. Growing Cities been accepted by American Public Television to reach a guaranteed 80% of PBS markets, but the filmmakers are responsible to secure all funding for the broadcast, including all the editing and conforming the film to PBS standards. So they are reaching out through a Kickstarter program to raise $30,000 by July 9th.

Dan has lived, breathed, and eaten urban agriculture over the past three years making Growing Cities. He has visited countless urban farms and food projects across the country and worked with many leaders in the sustainable agriculture movement. He is also the co-founder of Truck Farm Omaha, an edible education project which teaches local youth about sustainable farming and healthy foods. www.growingcitiesmovie.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Growing Organic in the City—Yes! It’s Possible!

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Dan Susman

Date of Broadcast: July 01, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free.

It’s a gorgeous summer day here in Clearwater, Florida. It’s the first of July, 2014. And this morning, I just posted, actually announced. I was going to tell you to just go to my website at ToxicFreeQA.com, and read my Declaration of Independence from Toxic Chemicals.

But I just realized that it isn’t at the top of the list. I posted it a couple of years ago. But if you just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and go to the search box, and type in “independence” and it will come up, I think, as the first item.

It’s Independence from Toxic Chemicals. And in there, I talked about the whole idea of independence and freedom, and why we have the right to be toxic-free. There are some interesting things about the Declaration of Independence, which is one of my favorite documents of all time. And you’ll just learn a little bit more about me by reading that.

So I invite you to do that this Week of Independence in America.

I’m very excited today. Actually, I should say I’m very inspired because I just spent the last hour watching a film about growing food in cities. It’s a documentary film, and I invited my guest to be on the show today because he’s the director of the film, and they have been accepted to be on the American Public Broadcasting, PBS stations all over America.

Except here’s the catch, they have to come up with all the production costs themselves, and it’s $30,000. And they have to come up with it by July 9th.

So we’re going to be talking about the issue of growing food in cities, or the opportunity of growing, the wonderfulness of growing food in cities, and in your own backyard. And as people, all of us, taking responsibility for feeding ourselves in our community.

We’re going to talk about that during the show today, but I also invite you to go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and scroll down until you see, there’s a video. The Kickstarter video is right there on my website. There’s also a link to their Kickstarter page.

And if you’d like to make a contribution towards the $30,000, that would help them get this out there.

It’s a fabulous, fabulous film. I was inspired by every second of it. And we’re going to talk about that on the show today.

So hello, Dan. Thanks for being with me.

DAN SUSMAN: Hey, no problem. Thanks for having me and all of the really nice and kind words you said about the film already.

DEBRA: Well, I’m going to say more because it really is. What an accomplishment, and what an inspiration.

I saw it in the film, so I know the story, but tell our listeners how you became interested. What inspired you to make a film about urban farming?

DAN SUSMAN: I was really interested in sustainable agriculture just all throughout growing up. I grew pumpkins in the backyard with my mom and my dad. So from at a young age, I was very interested. And in college, I worked on farms.

Basically, I just decided, “Hey, this is what my passion is. This is what I want to learn more about.”

My partner, Andrew Monbouquette, he was really interested in filmmaking. He has dedicated his life really trying to do that.

We grew up together in Omaha, Nebraska. After college, we just came back together, and he really wanted to make films. I really wanted to learn more about urban farming in whatever cultures. So, we just combined our passion.

Four years later, this is where we’re at.

DEBRA: What a great accomplishment, just a great accomplishment. I have some experience myself with growing food. I used to live in California, so I was very interested that the first city that you want to as having a lot of urban agriculture was San Francisco.

I was born in the San Francisco Bay Area, and lived there until 13 years. That’s when I moved to Florida.

And you’re right when you say it in the film that there are a lot of people doing a lot of creative things about how they garden, and how they farm even. I don’t know if it’s still there, but I remember on 4th Street in Berkeley, there used to be—I don’t remember the name of it. But one of the lots, instead of having a store there—maybe this was just when they were still building it up. One of the lots that was empty had a farm right there where they had plots on the lot.

They were growing lettuce, herbs and things like that. And you could just go there and buy just right out of the plot.

And it wasn’t seedlings. You could actually buy a full head of lettuce out of these boxes.

And I thought that that was one of the coolest things that you could actually buy, a fully grown live plant instead of going to a supermarket or even a natural food store and buying a harvested head of lettuce. You could just buy it right out of the ground or right out of the box.

And one of the things that I thought was so wonderful about that is that you can grow things in a box anywhere. You can grow things in a bag. I have a lot of permaculture friends, and one of the permaculture things is you just buy a bag of compost and split it open, and plant things in it.

Anybody could do that anywhere. And that’s one of the messages, I think, that I was so impressed with in your film, was that you go all around the country, and you show all these great examples of people in different walks of life, and economic situations.

I was taking notes while I was watching the film because I wanted to bring up different things. I think the thing that most impressed me was the scene when you were talking about, people had just put compost over the cement.

You don’t even have to have a park or something. You just put down compost on the cement and start growing things.

DAN SUSMAN: There are so many different ways to do it. It’s incredible how creative people get. When you’re presented with challenges, like you are typically in the urban environment whether you have space or they’re not great soil/medium to grow in, whatever it might be, people are figuring out really creative ways whether that’s putting soil down on old basketball courts, like you’re saying, or rooftop farms. There are vertical gardens on walls.

There are so many different solutions for growing in small amounts of space. And whether you’re in an urban environment or not, I think people even grow in window sills inside. They don’t have a yard at all.

I think there are a lot of opportunities. It’s pretty easy to focus on the challenges. There are so many opportunities that we have.

And that’s the […] the film takes. It’s really solutions-oriented, and it really shows what people can do in their own community, to grow, and to really make those communities better by growing food.

I think you saw that in the film, but it’s something where we—kind of getting back to your first question—have seen so many problems. And so many films and media that really show the problems in the food system, and what was wrong with what we were doing. We really just felt like it was time to put a spotlight on the people who are doing things right, the farmers, the activists.

There are so many people, community gardeners, every day people really, who are really making their communities better by the simple act of growing food.

DEBRA: Well, we need to go to our break, but we’ll come back and we’ll talk more about this.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dan Susman. He’s the director of the documentary film, Growing Cities. And he’s trying to get funds together to be on PBS across the country. They need $30,000 by July 9th. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and see their Kickstarter video, and get the link, and make a contribution if you’d like.

We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dan Susman. He’s the directory of a documentary film called Growing Cities. It’s all about urban farming, and they have a Kickstarter campaign. They need to raise $30,000 by July 9th in order to get their film on PBS across the country.

But if you go to my website, ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, scroll down, and you’ll see a link to their Kickstarter. It’s hard to remember, or I would give it out over the air. But just go and click, and see what their offers are, see their trailer. They’ve got a list of all the things that those $30,000 need to go to.

You’ll see their big block of awards for the film. There’s more information about Growing Cities, urban agriculture, all of it. It’s a good supplement to this show to go and take a look at that page.

And you can make a donation, as small as $1. Every little bit helps.

So Dan, I wanted to ask you, could you just tell us, I was trying to figure out the difference, the definition. When you talk about urban farming, the first thing that comes to my mind is people having farms in a city, where they’re feeding other people in the community.

But in watching the film, I saw that you had some examples of backyard gardening, where I didn’t think he was feeding other people. It looked like you were referring to people growing food in their own backyards, or digging up their front lawns, just all opportunities, I guess, for growing food in the community.

What is your definition of urban farming?

DAN SUSMAN: That’s a good question. That’s one I get quite a lot. People define it in different ways. For us, we’re really inclusive about it. I think you could tell by the film probably. There are so many different examples of people growing food at a shed in their backyard, they’re on vacant lots, community gardens. There are so many different ways.

So we try to be as inclusive as possible with that definition. But basically, we say anybody who’s growing food in the urban environment. Even suburban areas, they’re […]

That’s not to discredit farmers. That’s their job, and that’s what they do every day. I think that’s something we really value what they’re doing.

Almost by that definition, I guess, we just try to be as inclusive as possible because this is a movement. People are growing food for so many different reasons and so many different ways that, to us, whether they’re growing it for themselves, their families, their neighbors, the broader community or for sale, everybody’s growing food, and I think that’s the important part.

And they’re making their communities better.

I would say, yes, we tend to be most inclusive about it, and not worry too much about definitions, I guess […]

DEBRA: I guess I’m just thinking about, it sounds like this is a new thing, but as one person said in the film, it’s just what people have been doing all along. It has a new name. And so I think about my grandmother, I’ve said this before on the show, but it bears repeating a lot.

My grandmother had a huge garden which she and my grandfather tended for many, many years. Just their own backyard, and they had trees, fruit trees. One of my earliest memories was my grandfather picking me up, so that I could pick my own peach off the tree, and how delicious that one peach was, just heated by the sun, really the ripest one that he found for me, and then picking me up to pick it.

And that’s part of my food memories. And I think that a lot of people don’t have those kinds of memories.

But it used to be commonplace for people to be growing food in their backyards.

I live in Florida, in a neighborhood that is—my house was built in 1940. But all the backyards have old fruit trees on them.

Everybody has citrus trees around here.

If a house was built in a certain time period, it’s got citrus trees in the backyard. The brand new houses don’t.

There was a time when everybody grew food and victory gardens. It was just part of what you did. And then we lost all that and we stopped growing food. I’m not saying everybody stopped, but it stopped being part of what everybody did.

I remember when I lived in California, I lived in a small rural community. And one of the things that I loved was a neighbor gave me raspberry canes for my garden. I grew a lot of food in that garden. And my neighbor gave me raspberry canes.

And they multiplied and multiplied and multiplied.

But everywhere you went, all my neighbors had my neighbor’s raspberry canes. And it was just wonderful to know that I was eating one neighbor’s tomatoes, and another neighbor’s raspberries. And it was just a lovely thing that really tied our community together, to be sharing these plants.

And that’s not so common as it used to be. And that’s the kind of things that I thought when I was watching your film.

It’s been difficult for me to make the transition in Florida because I’m accustomed to growing in California. And so I have some herbs, but I haven’t been as successful with some things as I was in California. But the other day, I had bought a box of mint tea bags from the store. And as I was walking up, my back stops where I have my little herb garden, and I went, “Wait a minute. Why did I buy mint tea bags when I could grow it?”

And I immediately went down and bought mint plants, and put them in pots.

I think a lot of it is just changing the way we think as individuals, and realizing that we can grow food.

DAN SUSMAN: Yeah! No, totally. Everything you said is really spot on. I think that especially when you were talking about […], that’s really been happening for a long time. Just like you said, this has been happening since World War I, World War II.

As you see in the film, we go over it pretty quickly, but it isn’t new.

DEBRA: It isn’t. We need to go to break. I’m sorry to interrupt you, but we need to go to break, and we’ll come right back.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dan Susman. We’re talking about his documentary film, Growing Cities.

You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and find out more. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dan Susman. He’s the director of Growing Cities, a documentary film. And they are doing a Kickstarter campaign because they’ve been invited to be on PBS, but they have to pay $30,000 in production fees in order to do that.

So you can help them out by going to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and clicking on their Kickstarter page, and finding out all about how you can make a donation, if you’d like to do that.

Dan, I have a question for you. So I have a fairly large backyard, and I can rip out all my lawn. After seeing your film, I wanted to do exactly that. But I had chickens. I had, past tense, chickens, which is one of the most wonderful experiences that I’ve ever had. And it was so great to be able to go out in the backyard and feed my chickens, and they would lay eggs, and then I would eat the eggs.

And I just knew the whole life cycle of that egg. I knew exactly what that chicken had eaten. And there were no pesticides.

There was no whatever else they put on eggs. They were delicious. They were wonderful.

And then the police came and took them away.

I was wondering if you have any comments about different cities having different regulations, how people get around that.

Any thoughts on what the regulations should be? Anything on that subject?

DAN SUSMAN: I’m sorry to hear that. Unfortunately, it’s the story that’s too common, I think. I think, in general, the laws in cities and towns and everything are, generally, moving in the right direction, I think. There’s a lot of places that are legalizing backyard chickens, goats, rabbits, and all of these things that you wouldn’t think you can have in a backyard.

But actually, when you think about it, if you’re describing that—a chicken is a lot less dangerous than a Rottweiler or a Pitbull. It’s a lot nicer too because instead of just picking up the poop, you can just […] in the morning.

In terms of why it makes sense that these laws are there, I don’t think it really makes any sense except that there’s a lot of places that are—in my hometown, I think, is one of them, here in Nebraska, where really a farm state. And I think there’s this fear in a lot of cities and towns that are in the Midwest that are also just more generally, in suburbs and areas like that where they’re really afraid that people are going to think, “Oh, they’re still back in the dark ages. They’re still farming.”

The city leaders, “Well, I think we need to make laws to make sure that nobody has chickens or does that.” These big metropolises, places like San Francisco and […], these types of places, the biggest cities and most urban places we have are actually saying, “Oh, yes. Sure, you can have chickens. Sure, you can have those if you get the right permit.”

So I think it’s really this sort of reaction, this sort of backlash to, “Oh, we don’t want people […] backwards or something,” when, in fact, it’s so much more. It’s more about how do we take control of our food, and what’s inside of that.

So I think, in general, we’ve seen a lot of cities, a lot of people coming together, neighbors going to their city council and saying, “Hey, this law doesn’t make sense. We should be able to have chickens in our backyard.”

In particular, there’s one place, this woman up in Seattle, Jennie Grant, she formed something called The Goat Justice League. They advocated to make goats legal in backyards in Seattle. She had a […] protest. They’d walk goats around.

They worked with city leaders in the end and got a bill passed. So they could actually have goats in the city.

So I think there are numerous examples of that. But I think a lot of people with the same story as you, it’s unfortunately because so many people feel like they’re alone and are like, “Well, what do I do? How can I fight this? It doesn’t make sense.”

But there’s a lot of inspiration that could be drawn from other places I think.

DEBRA: I think so too, and I think that one of the things that’s inspiring about your film is that you really show—Independence Day is coming up on Friday—you really show our right to grow our own food, that we should all have the freedom to grow our own food and why.

It’s something that we’re designed to do as human beings, that we’ve been growing our own food for millennia. And yet, today, most people have other people growing their food, and are dependent upon the availability of food for the few distribution system.

One of the reasons why I started learning how to grow food when I was living in California was that I had this idea that if, and I’m not saying this is going to happen, but if our food system were to collapse—that has happened in places in the world, if our food system were to collapse, I wanted to know how to grow food. I just wanted to know.

And when you look at the quality of food that we get in the world today, I just had an epiphany—I’ve had lots of epiphanies in my life, but recently, I had an epiphany. I asked what would be my ideal food to eat. And what I got was fresh, whole, organic vegetables right out of the ground. That would be the ideal thing.

And I’ve eaten that kind of food, and I always love it. And I always go, “Yes, this is great.”

And yet, I’m not even growing those. I’m not even growing it in my own backyard, in part, because I don’t know how to grow here. And yet, I could learn how to do that. Everybody could learn how to do that. There are people who know how to grow here. Just because I spent most of my life in California doesn’t mean that I can’t learn this.

And then my other excuse is I don’t have time. But what am I doing with my time. Not that I’m flittering my time away doing useless things, but I’m one person living by myself, and to do all the things that one needs to do to maintain a home, or money to pay the bills and all those things, to also maintain a garden, oh, my God.

But you know, I do know that there are people who don’t have land that want to come and work on a garden. And I think that if I were to really think this out, I could grow so much more food than I could possibly eat, and share it with the people who come and help me to grow it.

Here we are at another break.

DAN SUSMAN: That’s so quick.

DEBRA: I know. It is so quick. And I’m doing all the talking. I need to let you talk more.

DAN SUSMAN: It’s okay. I’ll try to jump in more.

DEBRA: But I love this subject, and I love your film. We are going to go to break. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dan Susman. And I promise I’ll let him talk more in the next segment. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dan Susman, director of Growing Cities, the movie.

I just discovered that you actually have a website, GrowingCitiesMovie.com, and you can go there. I was looking for that. But you know, it wasn’t on the press release that I could find.

You can go to GrowingCitiesMovie.com. You can find out more about the film. There’s also a list of screenings, and it also gives you information on how you can host the screening, how to find the screening, how to host the screening. You can just find out all about this. There’s also a link there to their Kickstarter campaign.

That’s GrowingCitiesMovie.com.

Dan, would you tell us about food justice and food security?

DAN SUSMAN: I was going to mention it eventually. But food justice, food security, I think are some of the biggest issues here, especially in urban agriculture and farming cities, this idea that everyone should have the opportunity to access fresh and healthy food regardless of their income level or background or where they live.

So food security, people have often heard of food desert, these places where there’s very little access to fresh, healthy food.

That often happens in the inner city, although there are plenty of food deserts that are in the rural environment as well.

So many of the projects we visited occurred in these places where it’s miles and miles to reach a grocery store, and then maybe even that store doesn’t even have really high quality produce or any of the types of things you’d want to really live a healthy lifestyle.

In a lot of those places, you have people who get their groceries from a gas station. When you think about what’s in gas stations, candy, chips, soda, and that’s about it. Literally, people are living off of that.

So I think that’s where urban agriculture and community gardening can really—especially in people’s lives who don’t have access or don’t have the monetary funds in order to access that food, then this can bring them straight to that. It’s in the community. It’s something that were there often growing. People can grow the food themselves. It’s affordable.

It certainly takes some time. But in terms of the benefits, even in terms of just improving the community itself, things like housing values go up next to a garden and all sorts of auxillary benefits besides health. I think that’s pretty cool.

But I think in a lot of the cities we visited, there are people who are working with folks who were just out from prison for instance. In Chicago, you saw on the film folks, convicts who don’t necessarily have violent crimes or anything. They just made a mistake when they were young. Maybe they had problems with substance abuse or something like that. It’s really hard for those types of people to get a job when they out of prison.

There’s an organization in Chicago called […] that works with those people, gives them jobs, teaches them skills through gardening as their tool to teach them.

So, that’s part of food justice. Things like working with kids, there’s a place called […] in the film. They work with kids and teaches them about growing food, both how to market it, and sell it, and all of these skills—math, public speaking, so on and so forth—that go along with running a business.

You’ll find in the film, food is the tool to really achieve a goal […] they’re working with people who can’t afford fresh, healthy food, or whatever it might be. I think what we show in the film is there’s just this wonderful possibility to use food as a tool to make your community a better place to live.

DEBRA: I really see that and that has been my experience too here. Several years ago, someone started a gardening group where what we wanted to do was help people learn how to grow food in our community, and what were the skills, and my best friends I made in that group, being somebody who had just moved here.

And we don’t have that group anymore for a variety of reasons, but I learned a lot, and I met people, and I still feel like a community with them. There’s something about growing the food, and eating it, and having pot lucks, and having people say, “Here’s my salad with my flowers that I grew.”

And we all go, “Hmm.”

And it gives you something, wholesome is the word, that comes to mind. It gives you all something wholesome to do together, and something that helps everybody, and something that improves your health and the community.

And I wanted to say earlier when you were talking about people not being able to afford food, a packet of seeds costs practically nothing, a dollar or two. And anyone can take a packet of seeds and a pot of soil and grow something.

It’s so much more economical. You can eat the best organic food for pennies because it doesn’t cost a lot of money to grow your food. You just buy the seeds, you plant it, you water it, you take care of it, and then you have food.

And so this whole idea that you have to have lots of money in order to buy food at the supermarket is not really true. And I think people don’t see the economic benefits of that. They have victory gardens. In our economic times, everybody should be growing food just for the economic reasons.

DAN SUSMAN: You’re so right. The economics of it is you need to have time which I think that’s the […] thing. You need to have that time. You can’t be working three jobs, and you have to get your kids at school, and do all those other things.

But you’re still right in terms of just all the people who are unemployed and who can’t find work, and they’re tough on their luck, and all these things, why don’t we look at farming as a viable career option? Why don’t we look at that because, one, we’d be employing people, two, we’d be providing fresh food in places that need it the most.

There is an incredible, incredible opportunity there especially in the urban environment where you have waste coming straight from the city. You could go and build a farm, using people who are usually thought of as useless to society.

You have this wonderful cycle that could take place and is starting to take hold in some places, but needs so much more support. I think you hit it right on the head.

DEBRA: I was just thinking. You were talking about back in the depression, there was something called the CCC, the Citizens Conversation Corp I think it was. And the government hired people to do conservation projects, environmental conservation projects.

There could be all kinds of programs hiring people to grow food in any kind of urban, suburban, even rural environment.

And just put people to work growing food, I think, would be a great idea.

So we only have a couple of minutes left. But what was the most inspirational to you, what was the thing that really tugged your heart, the one thing that you visited that was most memorable to you?

DAN SUSMAN: I think I mentioned them earlier just really briefly, but the group down in New Orleans […]—I think you saw it at the end of the film—what they do is they work with […] It’s just the place that was hit the hardest by Katrina.

And you say, “Katrina, when was that?” Well, it was a long time ago. But even when we were filming in 2011, for seven years after it hit, it looks like it had been hit last week. So it’s just a place which has almost been left behind. But there are still families there. There are still kids there.

So those kids, I […] in this place where it’s very dangerous for them to grow up. They’re carrying guns around as young as 8, or 9, or 10 years old.

We heard some of those stories. And I think that really touched me because I can’t even begin to relate to where these kids are at. But at the same time, to see, using food as this way to give them something to do, and give them a safe space, and give them the attention they need as kids, to really flourish and grow, I think was really special and powerful to me.

So I think that was probably one of the most touching. It really hit it home for me in terms of wow, farming and growing could really make an impact on people’s lives—and not only change these kids’ lives, but really change and empower the entire neighborhood.

DEBRA: Tears are coming to my eyes as you’re talking about that. Food can just be transformational in a lot of ways especially empowering people to do that basically for themselves.

Well, we’ve only got just a few seconds left now. So I’ll just say thank you so much for being on the show. And again, you should go to his website, GrowingCitiesMovie.com, and not only will you find out about the movie and the Kickstarter campaign, but there’s also a lot of information to learn lots of resources.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

 

A Truly All-Natural Carpet

James StinnettMy guest today is James Stinnett, founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills. They are the premier North American manufacturer of all natural, non-toxic carpet, area rugs and padding—made using undyed, untreated wool on the face, along with hemp, cotton, jute and natural rubber for the backing materials. We’ll be talking about toxic chemicals in carpets as well as how Earth Weave makes their carpets and padding. James grew up in Dalton GA, the carpet capital of the world, then moved out west to Montana after receiving an Operations Management degree from Auburn University. There he started and ran a successful flooring company, Rocky Mountain Flooring. Inspired by his love of nature to make non-toxic carpet and rugs James returned to Dalton, GA with a passion for providing high quality, healthy, non-toxic products. His company, Earth Weave Carpet Mills, founded in 1996, is the first and only North American producer of truly healthy broadloom carpets. James oversees every aspect of the business ensuring the products he manufactures speak for themselves in quality and purity. After being in business for over 18 years Earth Weave has maintained a notable reputation for being North America’s premier manufacturer of non-toxic, natural carpeting products. www.earthweave.com

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
A Truly All-Natural Carpet

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: James Stinette

Date of Broadcast: June 30, 2014

DEBRA: Hi. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s so important to do this because there are so many toxic chemicals in the world in consumer products we use every day, in the environment once we walk out our door. Even our bodies are carrying around toxic chemicals from past exposures that we didn’t even know about. But there are things that we can do to make our lives better, to be healthier, to be free from the harmful effects of these toxic chemicals. And that’s what we talk about on this show.

Today is Monday, June 30th, 2014. It’s a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida. Actually, when I’m sitting here during the show, I’m looking out into my garden. There’s 17 ft. of windows. I just am seeing this butterfly flying past my window. It’s just so beautiful. It’s so beautiful. It’s a beautiful day.

Anyway, today we’re talking about carpeting. We’re talking about what’s bad about carpet and we’re talking about the best possible carpet that I know of that you can buy. If you want to have carpet in your home, you don’t have to give up carpet, but you do need to watch out for the toxic chemicals. And that’s what we’re talking about today.

My guest is James Stinette. He’s the founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills. They’re the premiere North American manufacturer of all-natural, non-toxic carpet, area rugs and padding made using un-dyed and untreated wool on the face along with hemp cotton, jute and natural rubber for the backing materials. We’re going to learn all about this today.

Hi, James. Thanks for being on the show.

JAMES STINETTE: Thank you, Debra. Thanks for having me on. I’m glad you have sunny weather there. We have a little bit of rain here, but you have some nice view to look out there.

DEBRA: Well, we’re going to have rain this afternoon, I’m sure. We have rains every afternoon, thunderstorms. We’re in the south. We’re both in the south.

Anyway, tell me how you got interested in making an all-natural carpet.

JAMES STINETTE: I grew up in Dalton, Georgia, which is the carpet capital of the world and was exposed, I guess, just at every turn because that’s the industry here. It’s kind of like Detroit was to the auto industry. Wherever you go, everyone here is involved in the carpet industry whether it’s manufacturing of yarn, manufacturing of backing systems, manufacturing of the full carpet system or the distribution of it. So I grew up in Dalton and worked in various stages of that.

I guess I’ve more so always been environmentally conscious and outdoors. I just wanted to be outside and enjoy the mountains and things like that. So after I graduated from Auburn University– like I said, growing up here in Dalton, I worked in those various things, but I graduated from Auburn University, I moved out to Montana and I started a business out there selling carpet. I was just selling the mainstream Hoover Covering, Shaw, Mohawk and what-have-you because I was young and had connections from back here. So I had a business doing that. I thought there’s got to be a better way.

I’ve seen landfills here when I grew up in Dalton, we’d take things to the landfill and you’d see all the carpet waste that was there, and just always…

DEBRA: Yeah.

JAMES STINETTE: And at the back of my mind—sorry, go ahead.

DEBRA: No, I was just agreeing with you about the carpet waste. I think that that’s something that most people don’t realize. They put down this synthetic wall-to-wall carpet and it doesn’t biodegrade. Isn’t carpet like a big waste problem?

JAMES STINETTE: It’s huge. And I saw a number the other day, I don’t even want to quote it because I thought it was so enormously high. I need to clarify that. But the amount of volume in pounds that they were saying that carpet attributes to the actual overall pounds of landfill waste was just enormous. You’re right.

So that was where I was coming from. I have that desire to be outdoors and to protect the environment. And selling these things — not huge business, just a small business, but it was growing, I just had this idea, “I need to figure out a better way to do this. There has to be a better way.”

I just started doing some research. Back to the way carpet was made years and years ago before the synthetics took off, before it became cost-effective to do things in a synthetic manner, they were all natural materials. So I went out and just redeveloped a backing system. I say “redeveloped,” I tweaked the old style and developed the primary backing because that was the key thing, getting the primary backing as adhesive because we used wool and wool for yarn was currently being used. So that wasn’t the revolution. It was more just bringing it all together.

The carpet that we make is no different as far as the way it’s made, the process of being put on a tufting machine, yarns and they’re placed in their primary backing and then adhesive is applied to that. So it’s no different than what everyone else does, but it’s just the fact that the constituent materials we use are natural. So that’s where I got into this and just said, “Hey, there’s got to be a better way” and just thought it through and spent – it was probably 18 months of research and development to try to come up with the products we currently have or at least the ones we had then. We expanded the line since then. But the product is essentially the same as it was 18 years ago now.

DEBRA: I just want to congratulate you for having an idea and following through with it in order to make such an outstanding product because a lot of people have ideas and they don’t do anything with it. So this is great that you did something and you made a product and you have marketed it and you have – I’m going to assume a successful business or you wouldn’t still be in business.

JAMES STINETTE: Yes, we’re not the biggest, but it’s going good. Yes.

DEBRA: Good, good. At least you’re covering your costs and all those things and you can stay in business, and feed your family, and all those kinds of things. So…

JAMES STINETTE: In regards to that – I mean, I’ve considered myself more of an eco-entrepreneur. I don’t feel like being an entrepreneur. It’s not necessarily a bad thing. Well, maybe there’s this thought process that, “Hey, you can’t be healthy and environmental and actually be an entrepreneur and good for the economy as well.” I don’t agree with that. I’m an eco-¬entrepreneur and I think that’s where the future is.

DEBRA: I totally agree with you because I think that sometimes people get confused between the idea of being entrepreneurial and having a business or even having a factory and misusing that by some toxic corporations.

Everything in nature, everything in life is producing things. I mean, even an animal will build a nest. A bird will build a nest and we need to build our homes and put things in it. I think that you’re absolutely right that the future is people like you figuring out how to do it in an ecological way, so that the materials that we’re using for these items that we need in our homes, it comes from the earth in a sustainable way. We use it and then it can go back into the ecosystem in a sustainable way.

So I am assuming from the description that I’m reading of your carpet, that you could just put it out in your garden, and it would just biodegrade.

JAMES STINETTE: Yes, over a number of years. That’s one thing that people think, “Well, this carpet is going to fall apart because it biodegrades.” It’s probably a better term to call it is “compostable” because “biodegrade” simply means it’s going to do it on its own, “compostable” means it requires other organisms to do that. But that’s what’s out there in the environment. Once it’s exposed to dirt and the soil and the other organisms, yes, it will be composted actually.

DEBRA: Yeah. And so, your carpet is never going to sit in a landfill. Those landfill carpets, do you think that they’ll ever break down and go back into the environment?

JAMES STINETTE: Well, they say 10,000 years, but how would you know? I mean, you can’t…

DEBRA: Ten thousand years? Yes…

JAMES STINETTE: You can’t really accelerate that in a lab.

DEBRA: I don’t consider 10,000 years to be biodegradable. It’s there and it’s part of the environment and it piles up because it doesn’t have a time period in which it goes back, a reasonable time period in which it goes back into the environment.

That is what happens. Nutrients from the environment go into making these raw materials and then we use them and then they need to go back. Like leaves on a tree, a tree produces leaves, the leaves fall, they do their job for the tree, they fall, they go back in the ground and the ground breaks them down and then the tree utilizes the nutrients again. And that’s the cycle we all should be having.

We need to go to break, but when we come back, we’ll talk more about carpets with my guest, James Stinette, founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills. We’ll be right back. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is James Stinette, founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills. You can go to his website at EarthWeave.com and see his carpets and buy one if you need a carpet for your home.

James, I want to tell you and our listeners some stories that I have about—I would just call them “carpet horror stories.”

Many, many years ago when I first started writing, nobody was talking about toxic chemicals in carpets. And yet I knew that there were toxic chemicals there because I had a number of clients where I would go to their homes and help them identify what was toxic. I knew that for me, I had to remove the carpet from my home because I knew that it was making me sick.

And then I had clients and I would tell them to get your carpet and their symptoms would go away, but there were no studies about this.

I don’t remember the exact year, but I think it was in the ‘90s sometime, the EPA had a big problem, because – I’m trying to remember all the details of this story because they have installed a new carpet and the workers on the EPA building started having symptoms. They documented all these symptoms. They tested the carpet and they found that there was a toxic chemical.

Since there have been a lot of tests on carpets and they are finding just long lists of – I’m not even going to go into what the toxic chemicals are because they’re just a bunch of names that we probably wouldn’t recognize. But it’s not just one or two toxic chemicals, it’s lists, hundreds of toxic chemicals that are found in just standard synthetic carpets.

And I haven’t had a carpet in my home in more than 30 years since I ripped the carpet out of my bedroom one day. I just got on the floor and ripped it out because I couldn’t sleep and I was trying to figure out what I needed to do to make my bedroom a place where I could sleep and carpet was one of those things. I haven’t had carpet in my house since.

So I am very happy that you’re doing what you’re doing because I know some people who really do want to have carpet and there’s no reason not to have carpet if it’s made out of safe materials.

JAMES STINETTE: That is true. And you’re right, a lot of colder environments really need it – the bedrooms (it’s a popular item for the bedrooms) and stairwells and our stairways and basements where there are kids.

And that’s our biggest clients, I guess, new families, young mothers that have kids that want something soft for the kids to play on.

The industry, as a whole, the flooring industry really promotes hard surface for health. There are Scandinavian studies actually that have looked at indoor health and indoor air quality associated with hard surface versus carpeting. And they’ve actually found out that if you have a healthy carpet, that it actually can act as a temporary sink and collect any airborne dust particles until they’re clean. I guess the issue is that if people don’t do the cleaning, then that’s where they run into another risk in addition to the chemicals that could be in a standard carpet.

DEBRA: Well, there’s another whole source of chemicals, the rug shampoo that people then need to clean those synthetic carpets and the contaminants. That makes sense to me, that it would be a sink for dust particles and things because I know that carpets often can collect things.

And I’m thinking, this just occurred to me, I’ve never seen this written that I can recall. You know how when you wear synthetic clothing, that there’s static electricity. And so you have to use antistatic in the laundry. But I’m wondering if synthetic carpets have static electricity kind of thing that would cause more particles to be attracted to it. Your carpet doesn’t have that kind of static attraction being a natural fiber. I just thought of that. I don’t know if you know anything about that.

JAMES STINETTE: I’m not really sure on that as far as whether there would be a difference between a synthetic nylon and a wool.

DEBRA: Yeah. So I do know that the toxicity of carpets has been recognized by the carpet industry. Toxicity in synthetic carpets has been recognized by the carpet industry because now there is a program. I don’t have the name of it at the top of my head, but there’s a program where…

JAMES STINETTE: The Carpet Rug Institute.

DEBRA: That’s right. There’s a program that rates carpets for different levels of emissions. And so if there wasn’t a problem, they wouldn’t have that. And yet I would say that my evaluation would be that your carpet would be just like off-the-charts better in comparison.

JAMES STINETTE:Well, here’s the thing. There is actually just one level. It’s the Green -Label Plus. And I think that a lot of the misinformation that’s out there – we make a wool face fiber. There are other wool manufacturers out there, and they tell their carpets as being green, eco-healthy, sustainable, natural.

Actually, go to their website and you will see the words of wool. It’s green, healthy, eco, natural, sustainable, non-toxic, biodegradable and all these things. And if you look closely, they’re right. Wool is, but their backing system is identical to a nylon carpet because they still have the styrene-butadiene rubber adhesive in there.

And you were saying, they test for these and rate them on levels. They actually do not have different rating levels. There is just one level and it’s really the Green Label Plus. Ay nylon carpet, their nylon carpets can get the exact same rating as a wool carpet, because it’s really the adhesive that has the 300 different chemicals in it – the toluene, the benzene, the styrene, the 4-PC.

A lot of the consumers out there are duped by the industry because they see maybe a designer or someone that’s supposedly in the know that says, “You want a wool carpet because wool is healthy. Wool is green. Wool is eco. Wool is all these things.” They don’t tell you, “Well, it still has the same styrene-butadiene adhesive on the back and moth proofing,” which is a pesticide on there as well.

DEBRA: I want to talk about moth proofing when we come back. We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is James Stinette, founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills, and his website is EarthWeave.com. You can go there and see his carpets. You can see the little lambs running along the hillside that give the wool for his carpets. I’m not saying those are the sheep, but that’s the idea.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is James Stinette. He’s the founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills and his website is EarthWeave.com.

James, before the break, we were almost starting to talk about moth proofing and pesticides. I know there are also stain repellants and things. Can you just talk a little bit about those things before we get into talking about your carpets?

JAMES STINETTE: In what regard? I’m sorry.

DEBRA: Tell us about – I think when I was researching this many years ago, there were different types of pesticides that were used on carpets for moth proofing, but there was also a moth proofing process. I’m trying to remember where they change the wool in some way that wasn’t the pesticide. I was wondering if you could just tell us, if something says “moth proofing,” what does that mean?

JAMES STINETTE: They put a synthetic chemical permethrin on there, which is somewhat a derivative of the chrysanthemum plant. I guess they take something from that plant and change it around to get this chemical make-up. And it’s a known neurotoxin. So it’s something that my clients and our customers do not want on their product in their home. We don’t feel that it’s needed on the carpet and that it’s just something that’s not healthy.

DEBRA: Yeah. What about stain-resistant products? Are there things like Scotchgard and things like that? Do you know anything about this…?

JAMES STINETTE: I’m not sure if the industry – they’ve kind of gotten away a little bit from Scotchgard. Well, actually, Scotchgard changed one of their chemicals that was in there because it was actually known to be a carcinogen. They found out to be that. So they’ve reformulated a little bit, but it’s still out there in the whole synthetic industry.

The big thing now with carpet is they’re soft as wool or soft as silk, soft, soft, soft and they’re doing that through chemical processing. They’re taking synthetic yarns and treating them in a different manner to get the softness. I don’t think they’re going to perform as well as they had in the past, but they’re trying to give this hand and this luster and this appearance of wool. Everything is trying to approach the perfect fiber, which is wool.

Really, the scale structure on the fiber, everything about it, you cannot mimic through a synthetic because if you’ve ever looked at a wool in the microscope or there are pictures of it, it has a scale structure and that scale structure lends itself to its durability and its longevity and its resilience and also its clean ability.

So the synthetics, they’re trying to get there, but they can’t do it. They try to mimic it the best they can, and they do it through chemical processing.

DEBRA: Yes, yes. Tell us about your carpets now. Tell us about the materials and how you put them together and everything.

JAMES STINETTE: Sure. As I said at the beginning, we don’t really do anything different as far as the construction technique. It’s still made on the tufting machine, which is essentially a very large sewing machine. It’s 12 ft. wide. It has a lot of needles through it and yarn is fed through it. So it’s the same process as what everyone else does. We just choose to replace the synthetic materials that everyone else uses with a wool faced fiber. So if you look at the top of the card, it has wools. It’s British wool. It’s the longest lasting, most resilient fiber available.

It’s naturally colored. So just like your hair color, maybe your family, they all have same hair color, let’s say. We choose sheep that has similar hair color from similar family range and breeds. We combine those to get our coloration. So there are no dyes or chemicals put on there, no moth proofing. The sheep are just free ranging out on the hills as they have been for thousands of years literally in the UK.

DEBRA: Literally, they have. Sheep are a big thing in the UK.

JAMES STINETTE: Definitely, and this is…

DEBRA: Yeah, here in America, we don’t see sheep on the hillsides like you see it in the UK.

JAMES STINETTE: Exactly! And like I say, they’ve been doing it for years and years and years. This is not a new thing.

So we take those yarns and then we put them into custom-manufactured hemp and cotton primary backing. Whereas everyone else in the industry uses polypropylene, we use a hemp and cotton primary backing. This is something I custom developed. There is nothing else like it out there. And it took a long time to develop it.

It’s not perfect. There are inconsistencies in natural materials, but that’s what gives us the texture and everything that we need, whereas you’ve got a synthetic polypropylene primary and it’s repeatable and everything is identical each and every time.

And the other thing about it is it’s not as inexpensive as a synthetic. Our backing system, just that primary, it’s four times the cost of a polypropylene primary, but it’s what we need to do to get the¬¬ natural biodegradable system that we have.

All these that I am talking about can be seen on our website under ‘Carpet Construction Diagram’. Once we placed the yarn…

DEBRA: I’m looking at that page and it’s a very good diagram.

JAMES STINETTE: Thank you, yes. As you go through that, you can see we’re going from the top down. So we’ve got the wool on the face, we’ve got the hemp and cotton primary backing and then, we’ve got the natural rubber adhesive that we use (that’s from a rubber tree and that’s what we use to replace the styrene-butadiene rubber adhesive that all other manufacturers use). And then, you have a jute secondary backing.

And here’s one thing in the industry that rubbed me in the industry. For years and years, we were the only one even pushing this, being healthy and natural and green and all these things. We don’t even use the word ‘green’ anymore. I’ve stopped using that word because it was…

DEBRA: Me too.

JAMES STINETTE: I just use ‘healthy’ because as I told you earlier, there are all these wool manufacturers, they’re telling their products as being green and eco and everything, but they don’t tell you about that styrene backing. So that’s where the crux of the matter is. That’s what makes ours different.

You can actually find wool carpets out there that don’t have dyes on them. And some don’t even have moth proofing. You flip them over, they may have a jute secondary. It’s the sandwich. It’s what in the middle of the sandwich that they don’t tell you about, that spread that’s in there that has the chemicals.

So the materials that we use, the properties of them are completely natural. They’re truly renewable, truly sustainable.

The buzz words that just drive me crazy now are ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’, those two things. And then they will have them attached to synthetic products. And I cannot, for the life of me, understand that, how they can use those words.

DEBRA: I’ve heard that a lot too. Here’s what I see. I see that there are people like you who are doing the right thing and they are doing it completely and thoroughly. They’re understanding, “This is a sustainable product and so everything about it needs to be sustainable. It needs to fit in the ecosystem of the earth.” That’s your guiding star.

But other people are coming from having done something really synthetic and then they say, “Well, let’s move in the right direction.” And they’re moving in the right direction, but they are not producing a sustainable product. They shouldn’t say that if they aren’t.

We need to go break again. We need to go to break. We will talk more when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is James Stinette. He’s the founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills and we’re talking about this truly natural carpeting. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is James Stinette, founder of Earth Weave Carpet Mills. And his website is EarthWeave.com.

James, so tell us about your padding. First tell us why we need to have carpet padding. And then, tell us about – I know you have two different carpet pads.

I always thought I don’t really need padding. And actually, I’ve never put down a carpet. I’m usually taking them up, but I do have one area rug in my house which happens to be covering an old – well, I live in Florida and the way my house was constructed, if you were to cut a hole on the floor, you would just look down on the dirt. There’s no basement or anything.

And so, central air conditioning/heating system had been installed and then they took it out, so there was a grate. You just look down in the grate (because there was a hole on the floor), you look down on the grate and you see the dirt underneath and the lizards and everything.

So I had to put something over that or replace the floor right there. And just temporarily, I just went and got a little wool area rug that I put over there. It’s still there 13 years later. But I’m thinking about getting an area rug for my living room and I thought, “Well, I don’t need a carpet pad under that.”

Tell us why we need a carpet pad.

JAMES STINETTE: We have two different paddings. One would be for installation, wall to wall and that is the wool padding that we have. In that application, it promotes resilience and longevity of the carpet.

The commercial applications, a lot of times, they do not use padding underneath. That’s more just because in commercial, there are a lot of rolling items, perhaps chairs and carts and things like that they need to pull. The padding would maybe make it a little bit softer, a little bit too cushiony.

For residential applications, a padding is actually an integral part. It’s a system. You put that under there, it gives it a great base. Ours is 40 ounces of wool. It’s firm, it’s dense, it’s not hard, but it’s resilient enough that it gives it that springiness that you need and kind of cushions the steps that you take.

DEBRA: As I’m looking at this piece of padding on your website, and I’ve been looking – oh! When you mouse over it, it gives you enlargement. That’s very nice.

As I’m looking at this and I’m looking at your carpeting, I can just imagine how good that would feel under my feet, to have that double-padding, the padding and the carpet, and walking on that and how soft that would be. I could see why people would want that.

I think I had this idea from so long ago even before you existed as a company that I don’t want to have carpet because carpet is toxic, toxic, toxic. And I’m looking at your carpet, and I am thinking, “What a wonderful, natural thing to have under my feet.”

Okay. So then, the other one is the rubber rug gripper.

JAMES STINETTE: The gripper, yes. And that’s more to be used under an area rug if someone has an area rug that may not have furniture like a coffee table or something that’s sitting on it. And it just keeps it to non-slip. It keeps it from sliding. It will not harm a wood floor. And there are some out, synthetic versions that actually do some damage to hardwood floors, but this is fine for that.

It offers a little bit of additional cushioning as well, but predominantly, it’s more of a gripper. That’s why we call it a rug gripper. It just keeps it from sliding around.

DEBRA: So here’s the next question. So then, how do people clean these carpets?

JAMES STINETTE: How do they clean it? We suggest hosed carpet cleaning. We have a link to that on our website. They have a completely natural non-toxic cleaning process. And just like our system of the padding in the carpet, we want to suggest natural things with Total Care. So that is a system that they use.

And the great thing about them is they have a home system that someone like yourself could buy for your occasional spills or stains, and then they also have professional cleaners that will come in, people with their own machineries that will come in and use the same materials.

I don’t want to use the word ‘chemical’, but there are natural materials that they have for the cleaning. They will come into your home and do a thorough cleaning if you have a wall-to-wall carpeting. Those guys are nationwide. So that’s why we like to recommend them. Not only are they completely natural and non-toxic, but they have a nationwide system to do this.

DEBRA: Excellent! I didn’t know about them and I am very happy to hear about them because I know that some people still do have carpet and at least, they could clean their carpet in a more natural way and eliminate that toxic exposure from the normal carpet cleaning.

So it looks like you’ve got everything figured out here. That’s so great.

JAMES STINETTE: Not everything. We’re trying, but not everything.

DEBRA: So what about people who are chemically sensitive?

JAMES STINETTE: Well, that’s a huge part of our market. People buy our rugs and we have tons and tons of repeat customers. It’s odd.

In the last week, we had three or four inquiries. Actually, someone said they bought our carpet four years ago in remodel. They’re putting it in again. They love it. And someone else is like eight years ago and they bought another house.

Those people that don’t want to be exposed to these chemicals are those who buy our products. And there are people that either knows they’re chemically sensitive and can’t be around. There are other people that don’t want to expose their kids to the chemicals that are out there.

So that’s our main clientele; those who seek this out. They do the research and they find out that there is a difference in our products and everything else that’s out there.

DEBRA: Your product really is different than everything out there. I can really see that. There was another question I wanted to ask you and now I’ve forgotten.

Oh, I know what I want to talk about. So I know that your products are qualified for the LEAD certification. You have a comment here on your website about LEAD certification. I’m trying to find it again, so I can ask you about it. I’ll just paraphrase what I remembered.

JAMES STINETTE: That’s a sore issue with me because like I say, it’s kind of back to we don’t use the term ‘green’ and LEAD is kind of just pushing this word, this ‘green’.

When USGBC, the United States Green Building Council first started, there were companies such as myself and other truly healthy companies in there and now, it’s just overrun by the big chemical companies, the MonSantos and the insulation companies. They’re no different in the company’s products now than they were before. That’s where the money is at. So that’s the biggest thing I have, I see in the industries the term called “green-washing.”

Fortunately, you don’t really see a lot of this because I think you’re focused on the health side, but a lot of people in my industry, in the building industry, they focus on green. And that doesn’t mean anything like I say, because everything is green out there. I mean, Clorox is green. I see advertisements on TV for Clorox, and it’s green. In Exxon, your gasoline is green.

DEBRA: Yeah, I know, it doesn’t mean anything.

JAMES STINETTE: It doesn’t mean anything.

DEBRA: I think that what you had said, I’m trying to find it as I’m listening to you, is that you said something about that there’s not a difference between the ones that are – like you were talking about the Carpet Institute, that there’s not a difference between something that is unique…

JAMES STINETTE: They don’t reward people or companies like our product. They don’t actually reward someone for putting in a truly natural, truly sustainable healthy product…

DEBRA: That was the point.

JAMES STINETTE: You get the same number of points as if you were to put in a synthetic that just meets the Carpet and Rug Institute (CRI) Green Label Plus Program. It doesn’t mean they don’t have chemicals on it. It doesn’t mean it’s healthy. It’s just means that it meets their criteria.

DEBRA: And I’m wanting to particularly make the point about this because this isn’t the only certification program that does this. I’ve been saying this about other certification programs like GREENGUARD and other ones we were talking about the other day where you can’t just look at the certification and say, “Oh, this certification means this,” because there are no gradations that then can point out what’s at the top and what really is green. It just all falls into one category and so, you can’t tell the difference. And that’s the problem for me with all those certifications. You can’t just really find out what is the best one. So I sympathize with you.

JAMES STINETTE: Unfortunately, it’s big business. It’s big business and that’s where the money is going. We know that.

DEBRA: Yeah. And so, it kind of becomes meaningless. That’s too bad because I think that people really need it.

JAMES STINETTE: And the big thing we fight against is green-washing, the levels of green and shades of green. Maybe we’re too far to the purist side, but I don’t feel like there are any levels…

DEBRA: Never.

JAMES STINETTE: There is either green and healthy, which is natural, or there’s not. How can you have something that’s synthetic in all these chemicals? Take the BPA. They’re now finding out in the plastic drinking bottles and all these things. For a long time it was there, it was safe – I shouldn’t say ‘safe’, it was allowed. And now, they’re finding out that it shouldn’t have been allowed. So why would you trust these people?

DEBRA: I understand what you’re saying, that either it should be allowed or it shouldn’t be allowed. We are always finding out some things, more things about toxic chemicals. And so if something shouldn’t be allowed, it still shouldn’t be allowed. I get what you’re saying.

Anyway, we’re coming to the end of our hour. Thank you so much for being with me. It’s been a pleasure to talk to you again. My guest has been James Stinette from Earth Weave Carpet Mills. His website is EarthWeave.com.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. Be well.

JAMES STINETTE: Thank you.

Cleaning Mitsubishi Splits air units

Question from CZ

The Mitsubishi Split air conditioner unit in my bedroom has a terrible odor that the heating-cooling company has diagnosed as sweaty gym socks syndrome and says it needs spraying with a fungicide/mildew remover to coat the coils–and this solution will not work for me.

Vinegar and water, my first thought, would cause too much oxidation I’ve been told.

What alternative cleaning and clearing would work for the chemically sensitive?

I would appreciate suggestions!

Debra’s Answer

Readers, any suggestions?

Add Comment

Persistant Bioaccumulative Toxicants

 steven-gilbert-2Toxicologist Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT, a regular guest who is helping us understand the toxicity of common chemicals we may be frequently exposed to. Dr. Gilbert is Director and Founder of the Institute of Neurotoxicology and author of A Small Dose of Toxicology- The Health Effects of Common Chemicals.He received his Ph.D. in Toxicology in 1986 from the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, is a Diplomat of American Board of Toxicology, and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington. His research has focused on neurobehavioral effects of low-level exposure to lead and mercury on the developing nervous system. Dr. Gilbert has an extensive website about toxicology called Toxipedia, which includes a suite of sites that put scientific information in the context of history, society, and culture. www.toxipedia.org

read-transcript

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH STEVEN G. GILBERT, PhD, DABT

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxicants

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Steven G. Gilbert, PhD, DABT

Date of Broadcast: June 26, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free.

Today, we’re going to be talking with toxicologist, Dr. Steven Gilbert, who’s been on the show so many times. I appreciate it every time he comes because he’s a real, live toxicologist, and this is what he does all day long, is study what chemicals are toxic, how they’re toxic, where they are, what to do about them, and he’s written a wonderful called A Small Dose of Toxicology.

I had mentioned this book before, and I always say everybody listening should just go to his website and get a free copy of this book because it not only talks about some of the major chemicals that you should be concerned about, but it also talks about some basic things about toxicology, and it’s all written in a way that’s very easy to understand.

And so you will want to go to his website, which is Toxipedia.org, T-O-X-I-P-E-D-I-A, and get that sometime during a commercial or something, or after the show. But it’s certainly a book that should be, I don’t want to say on your shelf because it’s an e-book. It’s probably not going to sit on your shelf, but it should be in your home, and you should have that information as part of just general background for living in the toxic world that we live in.

Hi, Dr. Gilbert.

STEVEN GILBERT: Hi, Debra. It’s good to hear from you again.

DEBRA: Thank you. It’s nice to have you. Today, we’re going to be talking about persistent bioaccumulative toxicants. And this isn’t something really different than what we usually talk about because it’s not something that we generally find in consumer products on the label, although they definitely are in consumer products, but it’s something that governments are concerned about accumulating in the environment.

So tell us exactly what is persistent bioaccumulative toxicants. And I know it also goes by other names too. So tell us about those.

STEVEN GILBERT: It goes by other names. For example, PBT is persistent bioaccumulative toxicants […] from the USEPA.

And most of the states have chosen categories like that. The United Nations call them persistent organic pollutants or POPs.

And both agencies, they have developed a list of these chemicals.

And the primary reason is because they’re persistent in the environment, they do not break down. So they’re persistent in the environment. And they’re bioaccumulative in the sense that they move up the food chain, they accumulate in the animals or plants, or in human bodies. That’s where it becomes more serious.

And we’ve really learned to know from studying toxicology that very small amounts of some of these chemicals can produce the adverse effects.

So we’re concerned about chemicals that persist in the environment and do not break down. And a classic example of this is DDT.

It’s a well-known insecticide, widely-used after World War II. And it was really the foundation for Rachel Carson writing Silent Spring where she really laid out the key study, DDT, although it might not seem toxic to humans (at least when we were thinking about it then), it was very toxic to birds and to the wildlife.

So high predatory birds like eagles and hawks, it damages their ability to—their chicks could survive because of the eggs.

[They’ve got crusts]. And this was very serious. It caused a lot of damage to the bird population in the United States.

It really showed the importance of understanding ecological effects of the persistent chemicals, and how they survive in the environment, what the consequences to wildlife is.

DEBRA: I know most people have a lot of attention. I know I started out this way. I wasn’t thinking about the environment at all. I was thinking about these consumer products that are making me sick when I use them. And I know that a lot of people come into having interest in toxics by what the health effects are on themselves, or concern about their children, or women who are pregnant, who are concerned about their growing child in their womb.

But the environment is extremely important. It’s absolutely vital. We couldn’t be alive without the environment. Everything that keeps our own bodies alive all comes from the environment, all the natural resources that are used to make the products that we use every day, our food, the air we breathe, the water we drink, all of those things come from the environment.

And if we don’t have an environment, then we don’t have our own lives.

And I think that that’s one of the most important things for people to know, and yet, it’s so widely not known in our culture today. People just don’t have that awareness.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, it’s really true because we have contaminated the environment, which ultimately leads to the contamination of humans.

A really good example is lead and mercury. I’ll just focus on mercury for a moment.
Mercury moves up the food chain when it gets out into the environment. And mercury is in coals when you burn in these coal-fired utility plants. And the ETA has passed a recent regulation trying to control the mercury […] But the mercury comes out of the coal, off the smoke stacks, gets in the environment, and then it’s converted to methylmercury.

So the inorganic mercury that’s in coal is converted to organic mercury. That organic mercury gradually moves up the food chain and accumulates in fish. So the big fish eats the small fish, the small fish have eaten the bacteria, and the snails have accumulated the mercury, and it moves up the food chain.

So fish that are on the top of the food chain, there’s tuna, swordfish, shark, accumulate this mercury. And we now know that mercury has very serious consequences for neurological development in children or infants.

So we have contaminated a very important source of protein around the world. But we continue to do that with burning of coal.

So, it’s really a global issue. It comes down to thinking globally on these issues. And the coal that we ship to India and China come back to haunt us in some interesting ways because of the bioaccumulative nature of methylmercury.

So, we’re on one big closed-loop system here. We’ve got [continuity directly back to us].

DEBRA: You just talked about how inorganic mercury in the environment, they get changed to, what was it? Mercury or lead?

STEVEN GILBERT: Mercury, it changes from inorganic to organic mercury.

DEBRA: Could you just explain that in a little more detail? It’s the changing of the form by us using it that makes it more toxic.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, that’s true. And many people have probably placed little […] of mercury because it’s widely used in thermometers and thermostats. My old house used to have a thermostat with mercury in it. When you go and pull the cover off that, you can see little mercury sloshing around in there.

And they use that because it conducts electricity. So mercury is a really interesting metal. It has a wide number of uses. It’s a catalyst and it’s used all over the place in many industries. And only in the last 20 years, we really tried to control the mercury effluence and the mercury use.

It’s used, for example, in gold mining because mercury attracts the gold. If you take your ring and put a little bit of mercury around it, it will turn silver because the mercury adheres to the gold. But when you evaporate the mercury—and that’s another important property. It evaporates in room temperate. If you heat it, the mercury is boiled away and you’re left with gold and the gold mining.

But just like with burning coal, when you heat that coal or burn the coal, the inorganic mercury goes up the smoke stack, and then into the environment.

And in the environment, in fact, it’s been used as a [fungicide]. For example, mercury was used in […] A form of mercury was used in vaccines. So it’s very bacteria- and fungicidal. It killed those unwanted organisms.

But these organisms also fought back, and they tried to convert it. To detoxify the mercury, they convert it into methylmercury. So they attach a methyl group to this mercury. And that’s where it starts bioaccumulating up the food chain.

Mercury interacts with protein, so it accumulates in the muscle of the fish. In a high predatory fish, it gradually accumulates more and more mercury. So the long, big, old tuna would likely have quite a bit of mercury in it.

Because we contaminate, we spread mercury throughout the environment from burning of coal and other uses. And also mercury is somewhat naturally occurring in the environment although at much lower levels.

So as mercury moves up the food chain, it contaminates the fish we want to eat. And that’s a serious problem for kids, fetuses, and women of child-bearing age. So you really want to limit the amount of mercury intake.

So the FDA just came out with an advisory on mercury where they advise women of child-bearing age and pregnant women to consume fish of low concentration of mercury. So fish that have little mercury, they’re recommending increased consumption of. They’re trying to avoid fish with high levels of mercury.

So, this is why I mentioned it’s really a global problem in a sense that we burn mercury and lead off into the environment.

The burning of coals, for example, will contaminate our waterways. We’ve got fish advisories all over the United States, and really, around the world, about trying to control the mercury in fish. And we continue to burn coal.

And we know how to sequester the mercury from these coal-fired plants, but we don’t do it because they’re expensive to do. Owners would rather generate electricity and make money than use pollutant control devices. So we’re all culpable in this mess.

DEBRA: We need to go to break now, but we’ll talk more about this when we come back because I have a question for you about tuna. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. And I’m talking with Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. And he’s also the author of A Small Dose of Toxicology, which you can get for free at Toxipedia.org. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. And we’ve been talking about persistent environmental bioaccumulative toxicants. It’s got so many names, just a couple of names, but it’s all the same thing.

So my question that I had about tuna is, of course, every child is fed tuna sandwiches. I didn’t eat a lot of tune because I didn’t like it. But so many people eat tuna. It’s a standard lunchtime thing. And a lot of people eat tuna as sushi.

Is there any tuna that is not contaminated?

STEVEN GILBERT: Well, there are some fish that have lower mercury levels in them—like salmon, for example, or shorter-lived fish. So they live for a couple of years. They’re not as high on the food chain as, for example, tuna. So salmon generally has less mercury in it.

Mercury is important because we eat the meat, the muscle of the fish where the mercury is. But for example, in salmon, they might accumulate some DDT, or PCBs, but they’re in the fat of the salmon, not in the muscle. So you have to know where the chemical is accumulating to be wise about what to eat.

So we try to choose fish that are low in mercury.

DEBRA: And the EPA has a list. I think there are several lists, but the EPA, as you said, just came out with one.

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, there are several lists. The FDA just published a recent one. Most of the states have fish advisories. The Washington state does. It stirs you to the fish to consume that are lower in mercury.

DEBRA: So should somebody be looking for their local state list because it would have local fish on it?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes. Most of us have local fish. There will be local fish advisories, and then you have to consult them and know what fish are for sports-fishing.

And I think the other thing, remember, is that this is also an environmental justice issue because people that are high fish consumers can be lower on the socioeconomic scale, and they’re using fish for subsistence living, in a sense.

And they eat more fish […] that they are exposed to other PCBs, DDTs, as well as mercury.

DEBRA: Every time you turn around, there’s another aspect of this. But I know for myself, I as a child, I just didn’t like fish from the first bite. There was something about it I didn’t like. I always refused to eat fish and seafood. And it’s still that way for me. I just put it in my mouth and I don’t want it at all.

Every once in a while, I try and bite a fish, but I think it might be just from the toxic chemicals that are in fish.

So I’m looking in your book, A Small Dose of Toxicology, and there’s a whole chapter on this. If you’re listening to this, and it seems like this is a lot of new information, you can just go to Toxipedia.org, and download A Small Dose of Toxicology. If you go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, there’s a picture of the book there with the description of this show. And if you click on it, it will take you right to the page where you can get this book for free.

STEVEN GILBERT: In the chapter (and also in the PowerPoint presentation that goes with that chapter), I list out a table that has different chemicals that had been declared persistent bioaccumulative or POPs. I think I listed the Washington state list too.

So there’s a range of chemicals and metals. Lead for example, is persistent in the environment. It bioaccumulates in the bones, for example.

But you can get a list of these chemicals. A lot of them are pesticides, you’ll notice in that. And that came out of post-World War II when we thought we had a handle all things chemical and knew how to manage the environment.

I just want to say, Rachel Carson had a great quote from Silent Springs. “As crude a weapon as a caveman’s club, the chemical barrage has been hurled against the fabric of life.”

And I really think that’s what we’ve done in a lot of ways. And these lists really demonstrate that, how we’ve taken the chemicals and really hurled them at the fabric of life to create a lot of hazard in our own lives now.

DEBRA: I was just going to mention these lists. And that’s why I […] But yes, these are good lists. And I think that the thing that strikes me when I look at them is that it contains not only the things bioaccumulate in the environment, but they also bioaccumulate the same chemicals and metals would bioaccumulate in our own bodies in the same way.

STEVEN GILBERT: I was going to say lead is a great example of that. If you’re exposed to lead while you’re growing up, the lead accumulates in the bone.

And then for example, there are certain periods of life—it might even be during pregnancy where the child […] zinc or calcium. Their bones are de-mineralized in the mom. And that led, along with the calcium that’s de-mineralized, goes into the child, the developing fetus.

So, persistent bioaccumulative toxicants are very serious. And you’ve got to remember that the child, the fetus, is very small, so a small amount of exposure represents a big dose to that developing fetus or developing child.

So there are many ways. And we have to be really careful with these compounds.

DEBRA: We’re about to go to break again. But I just want to finish saying what I was going to say, and then we’ll go to break, and then we’ll have a new question here. The things that really jump out of me that I didn’t understand before that were persistent are lead, as you said, mercury, and here’s another one, it’s tin.

I know that I did some research some years ago about tin because I bought a set of cookware that was lined with tin. So I was trying to find out if that was safe. And of course, there are tin cans, but they aren’t lined with tin anymore.

But at the time when I was doing that research, it didn’t come up that it was a persistent metal. And so I’m no longer using that cookware for other reasons, but that’s something that you do see in consumer products.

Let’s see what else is on the list. There are a lot of pesticides, PCBs, PBDEs. Tell us a little bit, really quick, about PBDEs.

STEVEN GILBERT: PDBE is a part of a category of flame retardants. They’re very persistent in the environment as it turns out. They are in the cushions and mattresses.

They’ve started becoming banned—California has moved to do that—because these chemicals would get out into the environment, they would be distributed all over the world, and show up […]

And it’s because they tend to accumulate in fat. So when a woman lactates, the fat is mobilized and the flame retardants come out into the milk.

And they’re actually shown not to be effective in mattresses and cushions. And the reason why these chemicals are used as a money-making product for the chemical industry because they are used to quench fires that might start from cigarettes.

And the cigarettes were manufactured to burn down, so they didn’t go out. Cigarettes will naturally go out if you’ve not puffed on them, if you just roll your own.

But initially, the tobacco industry made them, so it did not go out. And they added flame retardants in these mattresses and cushions because they thought that was the way to keep the cigarettes from burning.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. And we’ll be right back with more about these persistent chemicals.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. And we’re talking about persistent chemicals in the environment. Of course, if a chemical is persistent, then it’s also going to be persistent in our bodies.

Dr. Gilbert, I understand that some of these chemicals, governments are tracking these chemicals because they’re considering phasing them out, some of them. Tell us where we are in the world, in different countries, about eliminating these chemicals because it’s not really a consumer question. This is more a regulatory question, isn’t it?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, that’s true. A lot of these chemicals have been phased out, particularly the pesticides. And we’ve also tried to control, for example, mercury used in gold mining, and mercury products like thermometers and other things in schools and homes. They try to collect these back up. But pesticides are still widely out there, some of the old, banned pesticides. I’ll give you an example of that.

My wife’s father died in November. He was in his 90’s, mid-90’s. And in cleaning out the house, we found old containers of DDT and Aldrin, two banned pesticides.

So we took these to the hazardous waste disposal. This is an example of how these pesticides are still findable in home environments.

And agriculture communities use a lot of these too. And they still show up in hazardous waste collection sites and agricultural communities.

So despite the efforts to try to ban these things—in a sense, ban the sale of them—because they’re so much manufactured, they’re still accessible in everybody’s environment.

I think, in a sense, we’ve done a good job of trying to understand the consequences of these, and move towards pesticides, for example, that break down in the environment. So ultraviolet lights break down the modern pesticides, but you have to be careful with tracking these pesticides indoors because indoors, you don’t have the ultraviolet lights, so they’re more persistent inside.

So you really have to be taught about chemicals that you use, and where you’re using them, and how do they break down.

DEBRA: That’s a really good point. This comes back to one of the things that I mentioned in my book, Toxic Free, was about leaving your shoes at the door, and not wearing your shoes into the house. This is exactly a reason why you should do that because if your neighbor has DDT, and they’re spraying it on their lawn, and you walk by the sidewalk, or you’re walking your dog, and the dog runs on the law, or whatever, what would you do about that?

What if you were walking a dog, the dog goes running on the lawn, and the lawn service has just come. You could take off your shoes at the door, but what about pets? They can’t take off their shoes.

STEVEN GILBERT: That’s a good thing to raise. I think taking off your shoes is absolutely essential. The three most important things to do are eat well, have good nutrition, take off your shoes, and wash your hands.

The first thing I do with my granddaughters, as they come in the house, is wash their hands. It’s a chronic joke. Wash hands, wash hands, wash hands.

But trying to reduce exposure is really important.

So with pets coming indoors, it’s really important to keep the house well-vacuumed, and to mop the floors, if it’s a hardwood floor. And also, encourage your neighbors about […] pest management.

Some provinces, specifically in Canada, have moved toward banning the cosmetic use of pesticides and herbicides.

So, we really are getting a little bit smarter in trying to control and reduce the use of these products because […] doing a little weeding is good exercise. And we need to do a little bit more of that and a lot less application of pesticides.

DEBRA: I totally agree.

STEVEN GILBERT: […] more about integrated pest management.

DEBRA: What else can I ask you about these chemicals?

STEVEN GILBERT: One thing is PCBs, polychlorinated byphenyl ethers, they’re usually compounds that were used in transformers. It’s still widely-distributed in the environment. For example, the orca whales in Washington state that travel in our waters out here, they’re the most contaminated creatures in the world.

So these PCBs would spread all over when they’re used. And they show up in women’s breast milk. That’s a serious product.

Washington State is just doing a chemical action plan for PCBs to know where they are. They show up in […] and also in some paint still.

So I think we still have a lot of work to do to try to corral these compounds. And PCBs are examples of compounds that go to fat.

So the big reservoirs for persistent bioaccumulative toxicants, are they in the muscle? So if they’re consumed, are they in the fat? So, you have to concern about lactation if they’re excreting the phthalate PCBs, DDTs, chlorinated compounds, and brominated compounds like TBDEs. And you also have to worry about bone compounds (those that are stored to the bone).

And the other thing I want to mention is persistent compounds, the radionucleotides and radioactive particles, they are very persistent in the environment. They have half-life hundreds, thousands, even tens of thousands of years.

Fukushima, the nuclear plants that just had all the problems in Japan, is still putting nuclear isotopes out into the environment. And these are taken up by plants, as well as fish.

So there are lots of persistent compounds out there that we need to be concerned about. And we, in general, need to control the use of these persistent compounds.

DEBRA: So I’m looking at this list, and I don’t see the radionuclides on here. Am I just missing it?

Here’s the question. I know that this list is you’re summarizing these different lists, and you have columns that show which chemicals are in which list that have been produced by governments. And so are there other ones that the governments haven’t identified?

STEVEN GILBERT: Yes, I think so. It’s probably true. I think these are lists of some of the classic, older ones. And I think as we understand how these compounds work in the environment, we have a better appreciation for them.

But a lot of compounds do break down. A good example is caffeine, which many of us widely consume caffeine. But it’s widely metabolized in the body and excreted in the urine. So that’s a compound that is not persistent or bioaccumulative, thank goodness. But it does excrete into the environment, and it shows up in the waterways.

But the compounds I’ve listed in these lists are really the bad actors of the bad actors that we know have toxic, adverse effects, we know they’re persistent, and we know they bioaccumulate.

So there other compounds out there, they’re persistent, but don’t bioaccumulate as well, or they are not quite as toxic, so they don’t make this list.

And I think you make a really good point about not having radiological compounds in these lists. And when I revise this chapter, which is coming up soon, I’m definitely going to add that into this list.

DEBRA: Yes, because I’m looking at things here that I know we’re being exposed to, the radioactive ones, the tin, the mercury and the lead, and they’re in consumer products. This is what we’re going to talk about after the break, which is coming up. Actually, let’s go to the break, and then I’ll ask you the question.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, see the description of the show today, and click on the book cover of A Small Dose of Toxicology.

It will take you right to the page where you can get this book for free.

We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Steven Gilbert, a toxicologist. His website is Toxipedia.org, but you can go to my website, ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and click on the cover of his book, A Small Dose of Toxicology, and you can get that book for free. And it also has a link to Toxipedia.org. Is it dot com or dot org? I don’t have it right in front of me, dot org, I think.

STEVEN GILBERT: It’s supposed to be .org, but .com works too.

DEBRA: Good. If you can’t figure out how to spell Toxipedia, then just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and there’s a link right there.

So the question that I wanted to ask you is we talk a lot about reading labels, but these chemicals are in the environment, and they’re showing up in consumer products through the raw materials that are used to make the consumer products, and waters, and things that it just says water. It doesn’t say what is contaminating the water.

And so because these chemicals are so widespread, then they show up in many, if not all of our products, as contaminants.

And this isn’t on the label.

STEVEN GILBERT: That’s really true because these things are technically contaminants, they’re not part of the product. For example, calcium supplements have lead in them because the animals that were used to get the calcium from were contaminated with lead.

So this is a problem. It’s on toys, for example. Lead is used in paint, so it shows on toys. And lead is a little bit sweet, so kids, they consume the lead chips off that product or it gets on to their hands. You see the lead.

So that’s the real issue. We don’t know sometimes which fish have the mercury in them, so we can’t really buy smart in that sense. And the Food and Drug Administration […] need to be more consistent about enforcing the mercury contamination in fish levels.

I also want to mention tin. You really have to know what form are in these products. Tin as a metal is not that toxic. But when tin becomes organic tin (these methyl groups attach to these tins), that’s when they become toxic. And these toxic materials are used as pate balance on boats.

So it’s used on boat holes to keep off barnacles and things like that because organotins are very toxic compounds. They tend to accumulate in ports and harbors.

And again, we’re just cavalier with very toxic compounds because we try to do things on the cheap. It’s cheaper to put these organotins on the holes of boats, so you don’t have to scrape the barnacles off. But we don’t account for the consequences of putting this material out into the environment.

So we need to be much wiser about, and really account for the costs of these materials. We’re not externalizing the costs onto the wildlife, and onto humans, which ultimately happens in many of these situations.

DEBRA: That’s such a good point. Another thing that I talk about a lot, but I think I need to keep saying it until it actually makes the change in the world, is that I know that for myself, as part of my own personal process, I started out just having the same ideas and viewpoint about things as most people in our current society.

But I went through a change where I realized that if I didn’t have some concern for, first, my own life and my own health, and then concern for all of life, if I didn’t make the first question that I asked, “Is this toxic,” or, “How does this support or harm life? How does this support or harm my body? How does it support or harm the ecosystems,” if I didn’t ask that as my first question, then I wouldn’t end up with the right answer.

And that to me is the missing question, is that people don’t ask themselves that question. For myself, I refuse to use toxics. I just refuse. If the only way to do something is a toxic way, I just don’t do it. I don’t wear fingernail polish.

STEVEN GILBERT: That’s a really important choice to be made with consumer products, in using personal care products and what toxins are in those things. It doesn’t have to be persistent bioaccumulative toxicant to be a hazard.

For example, Bisphenol A, BPA, is fairly, quickly metabolized, but we’re constantly exposed to it. So we have this background level of these materials. And in that sense, it is a toxic compound that we need to be paying attention to. Just because it’s not “persistent in the environment,” it doesn’t mean we’re not chronically exposed to it.

So, I think those are really important questions to ask. My neighbor, I refuse to use pesticides on our lawn and our driveway.

It gets weeds in it. So I got out there and weed the thing. Our neighbor tends to use pesticides, herbicides, to kill these materials. And I just think that’s the wrong way to go. We should not be doing that.

DEBRA: Well, do you have any suggestions? I get this question a lot what I’m about to ask you. How can I control what my neighbors do?

STEVEN GILBERT: That’s a tough one. I think they just need more education about integrated pest management, and talk to them about if they really need to be using these fairly noxious chemicals that are potent […] herbicides.

My attitude is I just need to keep talking to people and try to educate people barring more regulatory approaches.

And the real approach, in my view, is regulation, where we just have to say to people, “These chemicals are no longer going to be for sale. You can’t use chemicals to beautify your lawn. You need to get out there and use other means to do that that are not as toxic, and not putting these materials on the environment because they get into the soil, and it eventually gets washed into the waterways.”

In our situation, it’s […] which is really unfortunate.

DEBRA: When I was in San Francisco, I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, and then moved to Florida.

But I went back to visit about seven or eight years ago. They have a very good Office of Environmental Affairs in the City of San Francisco. They do a lot of education of the people there.

And I have to say this. I have to say that they do allow backyard chickens in the City of San Francisco. And I have to say that because they’re not allowed in my little suburban town of Clearwater, Florida. And I keep saying this, but it’s just outrageous to me that the police came and took my chickens.

That is an example of bad regulation.

But what I wanted to say is that when I was there, they were doing big campaigns to educate people about mercury, and the disposal of mercury in thermometers and in fluorescent lights because there was so much mercury in San Francisco Bay.

STEVEN GILBERT: Mercury is a very serious pollutant. Some of the old gold mines are contaminated with mercury because mercury was widely used in gold mining operations.

In Washington State (and I think San Francisco too), we’ve had mercury take-back programs for schools, high schools and businesses. They’ve really tried to get mercury out of pressure measurement equipment, and out of thermometers used in almost all situations that have mercury in them.

So if anybody has a mercury thermometer, they should really take it to hazardous waste, and dispose of it properly because we do not want that mercury get out into the environment. It ends up in our fish that we consume.

So we really have to look at the loop that this is where the mercury goes. So I’m really glad to hear that San Francisco is trying to control its mercury. That’s great news.

DEBRA: Yes, me too, because San Francisco is known for its seafood. People go there and go to Fisherman’s Wharf, and the fresh catch comes in. And it’s really important not only to the health and the environment of San Francisco, but to the economical-being because you don’t want people to go to San Francisco and be poisoned by the mercury in the seafood they had, the tourists.

I don’t think that that’s ever happened, that somebody ate a crab or something, and then had to be rushed to the hospital. I don’t know. It may have, but I’ve never heard of it. And I haven’t heard of everything.

But it’s part of the overall load of chemicals, the body burden, that eventually makes people sick.

STEVEN GILBERT: That’s a really good point you bring out. We’re not exposed to just one of these chemicals. We’re exposed to all kinds of chemicals from PCBs, a little bit of DDTs, a little bit of mercury, a little bit of lead. So it’s an accumulative effect of all these chemicals we’re exposed to.

And mercury can be consumed. High consumers of mercury-laden fish, as adults, can have […] health consequences.

There have been several incidents of adult exposure. I just co-authored a paper about a year and a half ago documenting some of these cases. I’m trying to come up with better messaging for adults that are consuming mercury-laden fish.

So, we really got to be thinking about this. And the point that you raised about multiple chemical exposures, that’s a really good one. Small amounts of a whole bunch of chemicals equal a large dose of toxic properties.

DEBRA: That’s why I’m not so concerned anymore about how much am I being exposed to one chemical. People are often asking me, “Well, what’s the safe level for this? What’s the safe level for that chemical?” To me, my conclusion is we just need to be aware of as many chemical exposures as we can be, learn as much as we can, and we just lessen exposure as much as we can.

The reality is that we really don’t know what’s in the products. Even if we read labels, I think the best we can do is use that label reading to eliminate as many chemicals that are known. But we’re still not going to end up with having zero toxic exposure because of the environmental contamination.

We’ve only got about 30 seconds, so any final words?

STEVEN GILBERT: My final word would be on this chemical exposure. People need to work towards better chemical policy.

We need to reform TSCA and have a better chemical policy in the environmental chemicals and better knowledge about what the health effect potential of these chemicals are.

So, chemical policy reform is absolutely critical for our environment, for human health.

DEBRA: Thank you so much, Dr. Gilbert, for being with us. And I’m sure we’ll talk to you again.

STEVEN GILBERT: You’re very welcome, Debra.

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com to find out more about the show, and what’s coming up, and listen to past shows, and even listen to this show again. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Kangen Water

Question from Genie Dillard

I plan to get the water filter you recommend.

But I wanted to ask you…

There is a great deal of promotion on the Kangen water, in terms of preventing oxidation, lowering PH and creating “microclusters” that allow water and other nutrients to enter the cells.

I’m hoping someone has knowledge of this water system, its pluses and possibly minuses. Does it really do something beyond what an excellent filter system does? Many have reported medical benefits. I’d like any information you or your reader can offer.

Debra’s Answer

I’m familiar with Kangen water and the whole concept of alkaline water.

I’ll just say first that I used to drink alkaline water, in fact, I drank it for about ten years, until I got my PureEffect filter, which I like better. The difference is that the alkaline water I was drinking before was made by a machine that “split” the water into alkaline water and acid water using an electrical charge from a metal rod immersed in the water. The machine I had did nothing to remove anything from the water, it only performed the function of splitting the water into acid and alkaline, and placing each into it’s own container.

The premise behind drinking alkaline water was—and still is—that it is healthier for your body to be more alkaline, and modern life makes your body more acid. Toxic chemicals, refined foods, and even tap water and water from some water filters make the body more acid. To make the body more alkaline, people go on diets and eat alkaline foods. A number of years ago there was a book called Reverse Aging by Sang Whang. He said that alkaline diets don’t work, but drinking alkaline water does make the body more alkaline. I read the book and it made sense to me, so I bought an alkalizer and started drinking alkaline water.

Then Kangen water came along. This machine basically splits water into acid and alkaline like my little alkalizer, by the same method, but has more settings so you can specify how acid or alkaline to a specific degree. I know people who have these machines and I have heard stories of people getting sick from heavy metals leaching into the water. One woman I know removed it from her natural food store because so many of her customers were getting sick after drinking the water.

Alkaline water also has a detox effect, so you have to start with very little and work up.

The PureEffect filter is different. In nature, water is naturally balanced between 6.5- 9.0 pH (pH stands for the Power of Hydrogen, which is a measure of how acidic or alkaline something is). Using nature as his guide, the founder of PureEffect saw that rain water makes it’s way down to the ground, then is filtered through the earth and over riverbeds, where it picks up it’s mineral/electrolyte ions and becomes naturally balanced. Taking this process into consideration, he developed their filter systems to pattern this effect naturally. As tap water flows through a PureEffect filter, the pH is raised naturally by the release of trace amounts of natural minerals, rather than using metals and electricity to make water artificially alkaline beyond what is found in nature.

Since drinking the first glass of water from the PureEffect filter, I never again drank water from my alkalizer machine. It’s sitting on a top shelf. I’ll sell it cheap to anyone who wants it.

I’m interested in clean water without pollutants. That’s not what Kangen Water is about. Read this statement from the manufacturer’s website at www.enagic.com/blog/what-is-kangen-water-from-enagic

Kangen Water machines work by applying an electrical charge to your tap water, and then sending that charged water through an ion exchange membrane. This will mix positive and negative ions within the water, which can help break molecular bonds on dirt, which is why it is ideal for cleaning and personal hygiene.

The Kangen Water will break the molecular bonds on dirt and oil on your face, keeping it clean, smooth, and moist. Rather than using harsh astringents that dry out your skin, or leaving a soapy film on your skin because your water can’t clean it all off, Kangen Water can help clean your face better than regular tap water.

It can also help you clean your home by loosening the molecular bonds between dirt and the surfaces you’re washing, attracting it like a magnet. This way, Kangen Water can actually lift grime and dirt off surfaces, which makes it easy to wipe away. No need for dangerous, toxic cleaners, no need for abrasive sponges and frantic scrubbing.

That’s fine that it has all these benefits, but what does it remove from the water?

The above statement goes on to say:

“A Kangen Water system, with appropriate filters [italics mine], can clean up contaminated and polluted water, removing the chemicals, bacteria, and other unpleasant little nasties that can cause ill health.”

With appropriate filters. The Kangen unit that splits the water into acid and alkaline does NOT remove pollutants. You need to have the appropriate filters to filter the water first before it goes through electrolysis.

I can’t comment on the health claims of Kangen water.

My rule of thumb is to stay as close to Nature as possible. Until I can get water straight from a spring, I’ll stick with water from my PureEffect filter.

Add Comment

Update on “easy care” clothing?

Question from julien

Years & years ago, my family and i began following your advice to avoid all permanent press clothing because of the outgassing of formaldehyde from the finish.

Recently my wife received as a gift two beautiful shirts from Land’s End catalog. Sure enuf, we noticed the easy-care labels. Is it possible the no-iron finishes have evolved in a positive direction?

For approximately two years i’ve noticed most manufacturers of men’s shirts and chinos are taking the no-iron route YET AGAIN.

Even Jcrew, Ralph Lauren, and other companies that had pretty much stayed away from these finishes.

I need new chinos and will have to research again! My wife would love to keep the two unique pretty shirts, and we’ve considered the possibility of always handwashing and airdrying so as not to contaminate washer&dryer.

But if today’s no-iron easy-care finish yet has formaldehyde, is it worth having in our home? (we’ve been nontoxic and natural since 1988!!)

Please consider doing an update on this frustrating topic.

Thank you for your life devotion to helping us live healthy lives!!

Debra’s Answer

Yes, there have been some changes in how permanent press fabrics are made to be permanent press, but the active agent is still formaldehyde.

This article explains it all very well: OrganicClothing.blogs.com; Permanent Press: Facts Behind the Fabrics

Add Comment

Caring for Your Dog Naturally

My guest today is holistic veterinarian Dr. Deva Khalsa, author of the bestselling book Dr. Khalsa’s Natural Dog. We’ll be talking about the things that dog owners often do out of love for their pet, which might not be so good for them. Dr. Deva earned her degree from the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Veterinary Medicine in 1981. Since beginning her holistically oriented veterinary practice over 25 years ago, Dr. Deva has been incorporating homeopathy, acupuncture, Chinese Herbs, nutritional advice, and allergy-elimination techniques. Today her work is a blend of sophisticated holistic techniques and traditional veterinary medicine designed to best enhance the natural strengths and attributes of her patient. Dr Deva has a reputation as a life-saver for ailing animals who would not have survived had they not been brought to her for treatment. She is often featured as a veterinary expert on radio and television, from National Public Radio, to Martha Stewart’s Veterinary Satellite Radio show, to her many appearances on major television networks. Dr. Deva also developed her own line of nutritional supplements through Deserving Pets as a gift to the animals she loves so dearly. Dr. Deva firmly believes that by enabling our furry friends to maintain optimum health through daily nutrition and diet, we will be able to allow them to live their lives to the fullest, by staving off many of the most devastating illnesses and ailments. www.doctordeva.com| www.deservingpets.com

 

read-transcript

 

 


transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Caring for Your Dog Naturally

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Dr. Deva Khalsa

Date of Broadcast: June 25, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free.

I just heard, as I was waiting, and you’ve probably been listening to the news too. I just heard a commercial from Lumber Liquidators, and I just wanted to mention that they’re having a sale announced in that commercial, very low prices on wood line.

I have a Lumber Liquidators here. I’ve looked [at it this morning]. If you want to go check out the sale, that’s a really good price. They have flooring that is solid wood. Some of them have things on them, but go and take a look, and see if they have solid wood flooring.

I’m sure they have solid wood flooring. I meant to say solid wood flooring on sale because that’s a very good price. And if you’re looking to redo your floors, a pre-finished solid wood floor is a very good non-toxic option. I have them in my house, and it’s very, very good.

So my guest today is holistic veterinarian, Dr. Deva Khalsa. She’s the author of the bestselling book, Dr. Khalsa’s Natural Dog. She earned her degree in 1981, so she’s been doing this for about 25 years. She has been incorporating homeopathy, acupuncture, Chinese herbs, nutritional advice and allergy elimination techniques.

Today, her work is a blend of sophisticated holistic techniques and traditional veterinary medicine designed to best enhance the natural strength and attributes of her patients.

She really has been a lifesaver for ailing animals who would not have otherwise survived have they had not been brought to her for treatment.
So she’s got a lot of experience and information today. We’re going to be talking about how to care for your dogs.

Hi, Dr. Khalsa. You know what? I’m going to go call her Deva because I know her personally. Hi, Deva.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: That’s much better. Hey! Nice to be here. Very nice to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you. And she lives in Australia part-time.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: No, New Zealand.

DEBRA: New Zealand, that’s right. But she’s here now in America, in Florida, probably right down the street from me. And so we’re talking to her in this time zone, and not another one.

So tell us how you got interested in being a veterinarian, and why a holistic veterinarian.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I always wanted to be a veterinarian ever since I was a little girl. I think when I was about two years old, the story is told about how I collected all the ants before my birthday, and put them in a box, so my mother won’t kill them.

And I collected every animal on the street, whether they were sick or not, and brought them home to treat. So I always wanted to be a veterinarian.

In those days, not that many girls were veterinarians. I actually think I’ve been a veterinarian for almost 35 years or 30, more than 25, as I add it up.

But I don’t want to add it.

But the thing is that those days, mostly men became veterinarians. And by the time I started in veterinary school, a lot more women were becoming veterinarians. It’s the only thing I’ve ever wanted to do. I totally, totally love it. I couldn’t imagine doing anything else.

But what happened was, the veterinary school at that time, still is pretty much, was the hardest professional school to get into. And it was harder than medical school. Dental school used to be doctor’s backups, and medical school was my backup.

So I got into medical school, but I didn’t get into veterinary school. And I lived in New Jersey, and only [inaudible 00:03:48] New Jersey. And New Jersey is packed full of people [inaudible 00:03:53] to veterinary school. They had deals with different veterinary schools.

So I moved to Pennsylvania, became a Pennsylvania resident in a year. The next year, I applied to University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine. I got into veterinary school, and I turned down the medical school. I didn’t go to medical school.

Bur during that year, I thought that if I had to be a medical doctor, which I didn’t want to do, at least I’d become a holistic [inaudible 00:04:15] medical doctor because I felt that, especially in those days—now, times have changed quite a bit in the last 30 years. But in those days, people really didn’t take responsibility for their health as much as they do now.

They expected to go to a doctor and get a pill, and he would fix it. Nowadays, we’re still into supplements, at least, I’m sure the people who listen to this show, and eating rice, and keeping toxins out of our environment. And it’s a big thing.

But in those days, it wasn’t.

And I thought it’s just ridiculous. People don’t care for themselves, then they expect the doctor to fix it. So I wanted to do holistic.

So I took holistic human. Just courses. Lots of course. I got into veterinary school. I knew a lot of stuff. And as I went to veterinary school, I kept looking at what they were doing, thinking that if I did it like they do it with people, then what could happen is they could get better this way instead of this more toxic and more invasive manner.

So by the time I got out, I got a job, and I tried all the stuff I learned on animals, I learned on people but I tried it on animals, and it was beginner’s poker luck. Everything worked miraculously.

So I got so excited. I went to India. I went to Brazil. I went to England. I studied with the best of the best. And before I knew it, I was one of the top holistic practitioners in the world. At the first International Homeopathic Conference at Oxford, in England, I was the keynote speaker. And I just took all the people stuff that I learned, and I kept transferring it to animals.

And so I learned lots of different technologies for holistic health. And I had a huge practice in Pennsylvania before I moved to New Zealand, and loved it.

And that’s a long answer to a short question.

DEBRA: We’re going to go to break early because we’re actually going to reconnect and see if we can get better quality sound because we’re not as good as it usually is.

So you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is holistic veterinarian, Dr. Deva Khalsa. And as you’ve already heard, she’s quite experienced and knowledgeable, and we’re going to hear all about taking care of your dog naturally when we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is holistic veterinarian, Dr. Deva Khalsa. And her website is DoctorDeva.com, if you’d like to go there after you’ve listened to her speak.

So Deva, you said that you’d like to talk about things that dog owners often do out of love for their pets, which might not be so good for them.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Yes. I think that’s an important concept because remember, veterinary medicine is basically mainstream medicine. And so they live by conventional products and pharmaceutical products. So veterinarians recommend these things all the time [inaudible 00:07:05].

And we like our veterinarians because they like animals, and we like animals, and we trust them.

But they’ve been trained conventionally, and they haven’t been trained to look at what these products do, and how often are they needed. And they also sell these products. And so it makes money to sell products to animals that help prevent certain problems.

But what’s happening is, we love our animals, and we want to do our best for them. So people are spending a great deal of money on products their pets don’t need. And we can go over a few of these different products.

DEBRA: Yes, tell us about some of these products.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: What are your listeners’ area? Are they all over the United States?

DEBRA: All over the world.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Oh, perfect. That’s simple. Well, the first thing is that dogs don’t need the numbers of vaccines that they get. Research has shown, and this research has been thorough and carefully done over a period of almost 10 years by Dr. Ronald Schultz, who is Ph.D. in immunology, and he’s brilliant and well-known and very well-respected in his field, and Dr. Jean Dodds, who is a veterinarian, and that’s very well-respected in her field.

So you know how we get a polio shot when we were kids, and then we don’t worry about it? You’re not worried that your grandmother is 80 years old, and she’s going to get polio, but she hasn’t had her shot in 78 years?

That’s because it lasts for a lifetime. And the vaccines for parvo and distemper, that booster shot that you’re told to go in for every year, that shot lasts for a lifetime [inaudible 00:08:40] and especially after six months of age.

The research is pretty irrefutable. Let’s say, you get two puppy shots. Let’s say, when you have a puppy, you give him a shot at 14 weeks and 17 weeks, which is late, but that’s what I’d like to do with a booster. Then they get [inaudible 00:08:55] a year later. They’re fixed for the rest of their lives. They don’t need that booster every year. They actually don’t need it. It’s unnecessary.

The same thing with the cat distemper shot, the booster shot that you’re told to get every year. Many people with indoor [inaudible 00:09:11] outside. [inaudible 00:09:12] and they get this vaccine.

What [inaudible 00:09:18] is the puppy booster and the kitten booster, and not the rabies shot, just the boosters, they have a whole bunch of diseases in them. And we could spend an hour talking about the diseases, and how rare some of them are, and how they don’t work. But booster shots simply are not needed.

These vaccines are incubated in a broth of chicken. In one of serum, there are embryos, chicken embryos, which are eggs, basically, and bovine serum, which is a serum of cows, and some brewer’s yeast, and a lot of [inaudible 00:09:42] contaminated the broth for years and years and years—and then some adjuvants and some mercury.

It’s really a pretty toxic mix. And when you give it to your dog every year, you’re going to promote autoimmune disease, allergies, and lots of other diseases. In fact, cats commonly get kidney failure and have kidney problems after 10 or 12 years of age. Many cats start to get elevated kidney enzymes.

And that’s because the cat vaccines also have feline kidney tissue in the broth, and you’re sensitizing the cats to their very own feline kidney tissue.

So what we’re doing is basically the same thing as if we ran in every single year of lives, and got our polio vaccine, and got our tetanus vaccine, and got our diphtheria vaccine, and got our measles and mumps vaccine. And we ran in every year, and we did it.

There’s enough autoimmune disease in people, there are enough allergies in people, there’s enough irritable bowel disease in people that if we did that, it would be a plague rather than an epidemic.

So the thing is that we’re giving them these vaccines every year, these multivalent combination vaccines that are terrible for their immune system, and absolutely unhealthy, and they don’t need them.

My site is DoctorDeva, which is doctor spelled out, D-O-C-T-O-R, and then my first name, which is D-E-V-A. So it’s Doctor D-E-V-A, and E as in egg.

And on it, I have under free pet care health help, I have articles, research that was done, what was found, who did the research. It’s irrefutable.

Anyone who is listening can go on there and just look at the free pet health help. It’s a woman holding out to her dog, and then you look at the article about vaccines, and you can read it, and see all the absolute data.

I have 32 YouTube videos on different things. Some of them are vaccines for dogs and cats. I have magazine articles, many, many of them that I have written for magazines. There are hundreds of them. Probably, there is 50 on the site.

And you can get all the information you want about that to prove to yourself that you don’t need them.

And you have to actually educate yourself because your veterinarian is going to say, “Let’s get your dog a booster shot.”

In addition to the bordatella, which is the kennel cough shot, which is unnecessary, unless you board your dog, and it only lasts for three months. So unless you board your dog all the time, there is no reason to give that vaccine.

The last one that is very common is the rabies vaccine, which is legally necessary, even if the duration of the immunity is extensive. It’s lifelong, but it doesn’t matter. Your township wants you to give your animal the rabies vaccine.

But the rabies vaccine is known to be contaminated with the fibrosarcoma virus, a cancer vaccine. So it’s a fibrosarcoma cancer that is caused by a virus.

Cats get it commonly from the vaccination. So the students are taught to give the rabies vaccine to cats in their tails or their legs, so they can amputate one or the other if they get fibrosarcoma cancer in the areas of vaccine.

So in short, vaccines are [inaudible 00:12:48] and consumers should educate themselves as to what their pets really need, and do a good job educating themselves, so when they go to their veterinarian, they can stand up and say, “This is what I read. I printed it out. I’d like to stay your patient, but I want you to understand that I don’t want my animal to get vaccinated.”

So the first is vaccine.

DEBRA: I used to have cats. I don’t have a cat right now, but I’ve had several cats, and we never vaccinated them, and never had a problem with all those things. And I think that we do need to be looking, like I heard you mention mercury. Is mercury in all the vaccines, in all those booster shots?

DR. DEVA KHALSA: As I know, unless something has changed in the past years, yes.

DEBRA: So every time you give your pet those booster shots or those vaccines, you’re giving them a good dose of mercury. And that’s a toxic heavy metal.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Yes, and the thing is, the only real disease that cats get that can be prevented from vaccine is feline distemper, which is also called panleukopenia, and only kittens get it.

So if your cat is a year-old, it’s not going to get feline distemper, and it doesn’t need the vaccine. The rest of the stuff is totally superfluous. And it’s not a joke. They’re just not going to get it. It’s superfluous.

And the other thing is that the vaccines for FIV or FeLV are terrible vaccines. The FeLV vaccine, feline leukemia virus, it doesn’t prevent feline leukemia virus, in my experience, and there are many other veterinarians who would agree with me. It’s very toxic, and according to Marty Goldstein and many other veterinarians, we believe that it can cause cancer in pets, just the vaccine alone.

And we’re seeing one in two dogs get cancer. This is why it’s so important to eliminate toxins because we’re seeing one in two pets get cancer.

So the trick is, and we’ll go over flea prevention and flea products next, but the trick is to minimize toxins that your pets get exposed to, and to maximize goodness that they get into their systems to help them dump the toxins out.

DEBRA: Well, that’s just about the same formula as what is good for humans.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: You got it.

DEBRA: And so when people do things to remove toxic chemicals from their homes, they’re also removing the exposures for their pets. And I would think that one of the things that we talk about in terms of children’s health is that a child, if you think about the amount of toxic chemicals in a home, that we have big bodies, but children have small bodies, and babies have even smaller bodies.

And so the amount relative to their body size is much more than it is for an adult. And then you start looking at a pet or a cat or a kitten, it’s just amazing how the concentration just gets greater and greater and greater.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Look at vaccinations. When they vaccinate your pet, there’s a little vial with all the bugs in it, and then water. And then you’ll take the sterile water and put it in, and you mix it up, and then you stick it in the dog.

So you can stick it into a two pound [inaudible 00:16:01] puppy the exact same amount that you would stick into a Great Dane adult. And look at the amount of toxins that little dog is getting.

In fact, little dogs and young dogs get terrible vaccine reactions because they’re so small, and they’re giving them such a burden.

But interestingly enough, our dogs—are you there?

DEBRA: I’m here.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I heard a click and I got a little nervous. Interestingly enough, when lawns are sprayed, your dogs don’t usually stay on your lawn all the time, and you may spray your lawns, or your neighbor may, or the park may. We assume that when the rain comes and washes it down, it goes into the ground.

And actually, what happens when it rains is that it mixes up the stuff, and it forms a mist that goes up about two-feet from the ground, of all the herbicides and the insecticides that have been sprayed on the lawn.

So then when your dog goes out and runs through that mist, it’s running through a mist of insecticide.

It’s the same thing with fall leaves. If your dog is allergic to mold or has allergy, you walk through the leaves, you’re wearing shoes and pants, and you stir them up, the mold, because that’s what makes leaves to grade. But the dogs are in there and there’s dust, mold dust.

So they actually get a much higher exposure than we do. And besides that, we give them their heartworm prevention all the time, and we give them their spot-on products all the time.

I developed a vitamin under the name of the company, Deserving Pets, which has things in it to detoxify our pets because we’re giving them so many toxins. That was the purpose of it because one in two dogs is getting cancer because kale dumps toxins from cells about eight times faster.

The longer a toxin sits in a cell, the more the chance it has to change it into a cancerous cell and alter the DNA.

So all these vegetables and fruits that you’re talking about, these essentials that people should take, it’s the same cell in a dog as it is in a person, except dogs don’t like raspberries and blueberries that much. There are lots of recipes in my book, Doctor Deva’s Natural Dog, and its second edition in January coming out next year.

The first edition is still out, but it’s $400 on Amazon.com. I don’t think anyone is paying that. You can still buy it on—

DEBRA: I need to interrupt you because we need to go to break. The commercial is going to play even if you’re still talking. So you’re listening to

Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and we’ll be right back with Dr. Deva Khalsa.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is holistic veterinarian, Dr. Deva Khalsa. And her website is DoctorDeva.com, and it’s doctor spelled out, and then Deva is D-E-V-A, DoctorDeva.com.

So let’s talk about fleas.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Okay, let’s talk about fleas. Depending on where you live, it depends on, really, how many fleas you get. And there are these Top Spot products which people dab on which seem really nice compared to the dips, sprays and powders since the collars we used to use before.

Now, note that dips, sprays, collars, and flea powders, and even collars, the poison gets into your pet’s bloodstream and circulates all through the capillaries, through all the organs, the kidney and the liver, so that if the collar is sitting on your dog or cat’s neck, and the flea comes and bites them on the tail, it’s going to drop dead because of the poison in the blood.

The collars and the dips don’t powder on. They go systemically.

But then what seemed to happen was these Top Spot products came online, and they were thought to be really handy, little things. You put them on, and they keep the fleas and ticks away. And everybody’s worried about Lyme disease, and no one wants fleas on their dogs.

And so what happens is they start to use these commonly. It was thought that they were relatively safe for years. And we, as veterinarians, were told that they were safe. But actually, it’s not true because in 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency began reviewing the safety of these spot-on flea and tick products. What they found wasn’t pretty.

And additionally, the Washington-based Center for Public Integrity, which is a non-profit investigative news organization, and the National Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group, they began to look at these over-the-counter flea and tick prescriptions.

What they discovered was that they are totally not safe. The active ingredient, which is Fipronil, in many products like Parastar, Frontline, EasySpot, [inaudible 00:20:41]. We’re told as veterinarians that it’s absorbed into the sebaceous gland, which is the oil gland of the dog. And it provides a natural reservoir, which kills the ticks.

But then this woman—or I don’t know if it’s a man or woman—Dr. [DeBoise] of the EPA’s Pesticide Division, took a look at it, and discovered that it enters the body, and was excreted into the urine and feces of dogs, and then enters the fat and all the organs. And it showed that low doses of Fipronil long-term, which is what animals have when they’re dotted with this one particular product every single month, has the potential for nervous system toxicity, thyroid toxicity, thyroid cancer, ultrathyroid hormones, liver toxicity, kidney damage, convulsion, whining, barking, crying, reduced fertility.

It can go on and on.

Loss of hair at the spot.

It doesn’t even work against fleas and ticks that much, so what they do is they add more ingredients. They add other toxic ingredients.

So basically, Pesticide.org says that Fipronil, which is the ingredient in these spot-ons, disrupts nerves in animals other than insects. It doesn’t bind as tightly to these nerve cells, but it does, when it’s exposed to the sun, it becomes 10 times more toxic.

So you put it on your dog and he lies in the sun, it’s going to get much much more toxic because the sun is hitting the product.

DEBRA: I just want to say, I’ve never come across that before. That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist, that idea. But it’s fascinating to me that a chemical would become more toxic in the sun. And suddenly, I’m thinking, well, what about the chemicals that humans are exposed to? Which of those chemicals become more toxic in the sun?

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I don’t know. A lot of the stuff isn’t easy to find as data.8

DEBRA: I know.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: It’s not like you can just look it up. And anyone who has that chemical doesn’t want it to be known that that might happen. But it’s a good point. It’s a very good point.

DEBRA: Especially now, in the summer time when people are out in the sun, and it could be activating toxic chemicals that we don’t know even know about.

I mention this not to be scary, but it’s another reason why we should be watching and eliminating as many toxins—

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Yes, you should research that. And I’ll to find you my support, and you can actually maybe go from that and see what you can figure out.

DEBRA: That would be great because I would like to know what.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I want to be fair to all the products too. There’s another insecticide called, Imidacloprid. It can be called [Iminoclopromid] and Imidacloprid. But we’ll call it Imidacloprid. And it is the compound that’s in many of the insect-dusting things they put on crops that’s killing the bees worldwide.

In fact, Europe and Russia have put bans on Imidacloprid use in their crops, I think Europe for two years, and Russia refuses to use it. I think they’re saying, by some trade agreement, Monsanto says they should use it, and Russia is saying they won’t use it until it’s proven it’s safe, and they’re going to do the research that it’s proven it’s safe.

And meanwhile, Putin is very much against using this in Russia at all.

But this is what you use in Advantage and other products. It’s a hard word. It’s neonicotinoid. And they act on the nervous system too. And they can damage their kidneys, livers, thyroid, heart, lungs, spleen, adrenal, brain and gonads. It’s a neurotoxin. It can cause incoordination, labored breathing and muscle weakness.

And researchers found an increase in birth defects in mice, rats and dogs when this drug was tested after its debut in 1994.

So that’s another thing that we put every month, thinking that we’re protecting our animals.

Now, the pyrethrin and synthetic pyrethrins, which are called the pyrethroids—pyrethrins are made from marigolds. Everything thinks it has to be safe because they’re natural.

They are the highest cause of reported death.

Now, all these adverse reactions are reported. But honestly, if your dog or cat, and any of you listeners listening now, if your dog and cat has an adverse reaction, you went to the vet or the emergency service from one of these spot-on products, would you be savvy enough to call the appropriate department and report the adverse reaction?

DEBRA: Probably not.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I won’t because I’m a veterinarian. I don’t have the time.

So these are reported reactions. But the most common reported death cause—in fact, there are lawsuits. There are class action lawsuits against some of these firms. The most common cause of death is the pyrethrin, the synthetic pyrethrin.

And what happens is because they are not as effective per milligram as the other products, they really [whoop] it up. The new product has 36.8% in it, and that’s a very high amount to put on.

So what we’re doing is we’re putting all this stuff on our dog every single month because we don’t want to expose them to disease. So let’s just go two simple things. Let’s say, you don’t want your dog to get Lyme disease or any other diseases that are passed by ticks, which are quite a number of diseases. And you’re worried that, “Oh, my god. A tick might get on my dog.”

Well, first of all, the spot-on products don’t necessarily guarantee that a tick will not bite your dog and inject a disease before it dies from the product. That’s number one.

And number two, the best way to prevent your dog from diseases is to keep them healthy. The commercial about garlic, and if you chop up garlics very finely, and let it sit for 10 minutes, the chemical reaction occurs, which releases a lot more lysine, and then you mix it in with your dog’s food, it’s like giving him an antibiotic every single day.

And an article on my site called Garlic: Friend or Foe? gives explanation, doses and everything in garlic. It’s totally safe for dogs.

I hear music, so I bet there’s a break.

DEBRA: Yes. It’s time for a break. Thank you. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Deva Khalsa. You can go to her website, DoctorDeva.com. It’s doctor spelled out, and then Deva is D-E-V-A. And we’ll be right back, and talk with Dr. Deva more about what we can do to take care of our dogs.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is holistic veterinarian, Dr. Deva Khalsa. She’s the author of the bestselling book, Dr. Khalsa’s Natural Dog, and has more than 30 years of experience treating pets in a holistic way.

So one of the things that I often say about humans is that we should be creating health instead of treating disease, and I think you would agree with that.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Absolutely.

DEBRA: Could you give us some tips about things that our listeners can do to create health in their dogs?

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Well, the people buy for their dogs a processed, very heated, and very highly compressed dog food that’s made with byproducts, and when you look at what the bag costs, even if it’s expensive, you’re buying the more expensive brand, the ingredients can only be so perfect to sit into that bag, especially big companies that pay enormous advertising costs, television commercials, whatever.

They’re paying for that somehow, and it’s coming out of the cost of that bag of dog food.

So you’re buying basic dog food which is telling you it has everything you need for your dog. And in fact, all of the studies on vitamins and minerals for dogs are incomplete, everything. But no one really knows exactly what they need.

And if they’re being in practice for over 30 years, I would use human vitamins, different combinations of human vitamins, all kinds of things for my patients because of the fact that I didn’t have anything that I felt was good enough in the veterinary line. And that’s why I made Deserving Pets [inaudible 00:28:47] because I put in kale, broccoli, pumpkin, and so many things, alfalfa and cranberries, carrots, and all of these different fresh fruits and vegetables, in addition to high quality, human grade vitamins.

And then I micro-encapsulated them, so that they’re palatable. Your dog doesn’t know, he’s eating kale, and that he’s eating broccoli, and that he’s eating lots of healthy grains. He just thinks he’s getting a treat because it’s micro-encapsulated, which means it is coated, and it is flavored, so the vitamins never oxidize because they don’t reach the air, and the whole fruits and vegetables that are organic also never oxidize.

And so I created this, so that cells would have the building blocks to stay healthy.

For our homes, we use vacuum cleaners, and we use natural products, like vinegar or whatever, to clean our home, and we use scrub brushes and water and window cleaner. And we have paint and tape, and all kinds of things to keep our house in shape.

And we have to because if we didn’t create and create and create it, it would just get destroyed.

And cells have to do the same thing. And their tools are vitamins and minerals and the phytonutrients in super foods. And that’s what helps keep their cells clean, dump toxins, and also repairs themselves.

And they don’t get that every day. They get a processed, highly heated dog food, in which the vitamins and minerals are basically destroyed due to the process. And they’re told that their dog is getting everything, or their cats, that they need, especially cats.

Cats don’t eat vegetables. That’s why my cat vitamin is so good because the cats like it and they get everything.

So when you give the cells everything they need, what happens is they’re able to fight off and clean out all the junk that both we and our pets are getting exposed to every single day.

People go out and go, “I want my dog to have good joints. I’ll go out and get glucosamine. I want my dog to do this. I’ll go out and get this.”

You actually need a product that gives you everything you need to keep everything healthy every day that’s put together in a smart way, so the cells have what they need and everything stays health.

I have animals that are on glucosamine, they go on this product, the alfalfa and the vitamin C, it works to keep the dog’s arthritis and joints healthy, they can go off all their other products.

So you have to have a balanced, complete product that your dog gets every single day that’s really, really well-made. A lot of pet vitamins do not have the milligrams, the international units. They have a general jumbo on the bottom that tells what it’s in, but it doesn’t tell you how balanced it is, and exactly what’s in it. So giving your pet what they need to stay healthy every day is really, really important.

And on the other side of the coin, just like people, it’s minimizing toxins.

DEBRA: Those are the two things. After all of these years of studying this, what it finally came down to for me is eliminate toxins and put in lots of nutrition. And that people need to be eating whole foods. They need to be taking whole food supplements. And pets do too, but it’s the same formula for pets.

But when we look at, as you said, what the pets are actually eating, what the pet foods are about, it’s all cooked. I think there are a couple of raw pet foods out there. And I haven’t researched it a lot because I don’t have a pet right now.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: Well, they have, but the people who feed raw are not feeding lots of vegetables either. You know [inaudible 00:32:14] for people (that my family from New Jersey is doing now because there’s just so much cancer in my family). I’m adopted, so I don’t really have to genetically worry about it. But the new diet is 80% vegetables.

DEBRA: That’s great.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: That is the new thing out there the doctors are telling people. 80% vegetables, and then other 20% is carbs and protein.

DEBRA: I think I eat at least 50% vegetables, but that’s not how it’s been. I didn’t grow up on that. I grew up on TV dinners actually.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: I didn’t grow up on that either, but I’m a vegetarian. And when they told me—and I was for years now, I would eat fish occasionally, for the past 10 years, but it’s very rarely. But the thing is that when my family told me that they were eating 80% vegetables, I’m like,

“I’m a vegetarian. I’d have a hard time eating 80% vegetables myself.”

And do you count them from when they’re fresh, or when you cook them and they melt down?8 I don’t know, but it seems like a lot of vegetables.

There are two salient things that I say that reflects how we think nowadays, and we’ve been conditioned to think this way, through commercials and through advertising, and some sort of self-conscious routine that we have to have great lawns, and we have to have this and that.

So dandelion is one of the healthiest herbs on the planet. It does so much. It cleans the liver, unbelievably [inaudible 00:33:31]. It is healthier than milk thistle for the liver. It’s great for the urinary tract. It moves toxins out of the lymph system, circulates and gets things going in your body.

The Italians pick it in the spring, and they eat it. It grows on our lawns. And what’s the first thing we do when we see dandelions growing on our lawns? We spray it.

DEBRA: With RoundUp.

DR. DEVA KHALSA: We spray it. Everybody goes, “Duh,” because it’s one of the healthiest things around, and we’re busy spraying it because someone on TV or someone on the radio or somewhere in the magazine, we got convinced we had to do that so our neighbors would like us.

And then there are all these bad press on the web about garlic. So I got completely disgusted with it because people have been giving dogs garlic for years, that dogs can’t have garlic, that it’s toxic. Well, it turns out the FDA did a study, in which dogs did get sick from garlic, and you know why, because what they’ve said were dogs that were size of a Golden Retriever, 75 entire cloves of garlic every meal, two meals a day.

What dog would eat the equivalent of 75 cloves of garlic, two meals a day for weeks on end? You and I could not possibly do that.

Only some of the dogs would get sick from it. So they said that garlic was toxic for dogs.

Do you know that you could actually kill someone by having them drink too much water? You can die from too much water.

So I called the National Animal Supplement Council, which gets every report, every adverse report on products that are out there. And for 5000 years, garlic has been used for medicinal purposes. The price of a slave in Rome used to be a couple of garlic.

So the thing is that I called on the adverse reports on garlic, and millions and millions of doses have been for—and these were products that had other things in the mix, so who knows if it was garlic or the rest of the stuff?

And they weren’t bad adverse effects. They were diarrhea, vomiting, something like that.

So the thing is that garlic is excellent for dogs. I wrote an article for Dogs Naturally magazine, an excellent magazine. And it’s on my site, Garlic: Friend or Foe? And it gives all the statistics, all the information about garlic.

And meanwhile, everyone is afraid to feed their dog garlic. We’re spraying our dandelions, and we’re scared to feed our dog garlic. But we’re putting on Top Spot stuff every month, so they don’t get fleas and tick. See what I mean?

DEBRA: I do know what you mean, but I think that a lot of people who are alive today, I think you and I are similar age, and we grew up at a time where what we were told was better living through chemistry, and we were given all the TV commercials about the chemicals we should use and everything. And that’s what everybody thought was normal. And now, we’re finding that it isn’t what we should be doing.

We need to be learning all these things that you’re talking about, and we need to be changing our viewpoint about how we approach life because it’s a very different thing to decide that you’re going to be creating health by doing the things that create health, rather than just doing anything, and getting sick, and then trying to repair the body whether it’s a human body or a pet body.

And it’s a different way of looking at things that we’re not oriented to in this culture, but it’s [inaudible 00:36:40].

DR. DEVA KHALSA: No, and we have difficulty enough deciding it for ourselves. And then what people have to do for their dogs, people are convinced they can’t cook for their dogs. They could have raised seven strapping kids, but they’ll kill their dog if they cook for them. But it’s better to feed this highly-processed food with lots of byproducts in it.

And the fact is we can cook for our dogs. We can make them healthy meals. We can make them healthy snacks. And we don’t have to be [inaudible 00:37:05] about it. We could give them a kibble if we need to. We can cook for them when we need to. We can make nice snacks when we need to.

In fact, my book has a chapter called The Hassle Factor. And basically, you fill out a form. Where do you live? What do you do if you live in New York, and you have a tiny apartment and three Great Danes? You better be dating a butcher, if you want to cook for your dogs.

So the thing is that you look at what your lifestyle is, and how you can easily make your dog healthier. And then you figure out what process you can do. And it all works, but it’s just common sense.

The good news is that there are so many people, and the people who listen to your show are learning that common sense, and so we can look forward to a healthier world because people like you and your radio show, and thank you for having it.

DEBRA: Thank you. Thank you so much. Well, we’ve only got about 30 seconds left, so I’m going to say thank you so much for being on the show.

And we’ve learned so much. I’m sure that there is much more you could tell us, so I hope you’ll be on again.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can go to my website at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com to find out more about this show. You can see what shows are coming up, and you can go listen to the archives of all the shows we have done to learn more great information like this, about how you can live toxic-free. Be well.

Where to Start Eliminating Household Toxics

Amy ZiffMy guest today is Amy Ziff, Founder and Chief Capidealist™ (someone who believes that world change will come about through harnessing our collective purchasing power on the free market) of Veritey, a website that makes it exceedingly simple to find products and services that are healthy. Amy puts an amazing amount of work into evaluating the products she sells and rates each one for being nontoxic, sustainable, cruelty-free and socially responsible. We’ll be talking about where to start once you decided to eliminate toxics from your life as well as her own process of choosing toxic-free products. Amy is a trained journalist, proven entrepreneur, start-up veteran, and healthy living advocate. She never wanted to work at a women’s magazine writing about make-up. Amy always was looking for ways to make a difference, and to find better ways to live a healthy life. When she became a mom, everything came together. Amy was frustrated by how hard it was to make what should be simple decisions – healthy decisions – for herself and her family. For years as a hobby, Amy has been seeking out the truth about products and their real ingredients. (What companies put in their products can be shocking, including known carcinogens and other toxic chemicals that can cause an array of conditions from asthma to infertility, and which are often not disclosed.) Amy believes you shouldn’t need a PhD to decipher what products are safe to use and which to avoid. Yet the reality is that getting to the truth of what’s in a product can take hours of research and a lot of legwork. Most busy moms and parents just don’t have that kind of time. Veritey makes it simple for people who are time pressed to make healthier decisions. Veritey is about where truth meets healthy living. www.veritey.com

 

read-transcript

 

 


transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Where to Start Eliminating Household Toxics

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Amy Ziff

Date of Broadcast: June 24, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio, where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic-free.

It’s a beautiful summer day here in Clearwater, Florida. And we’re going to be talking about something simple today. We’re going to talk about where to start if you want to be eliminating toxic chemicals from your life, from your home. Where do you start?

I remember a long time ago when I first started, more than 30 years it’s been now. I had no idea where to start. And there were no books. There were no radio shows like this one. There was no place for me to even ask that question.

And now, of course, we have a tremendous amount of information. Sometimes so much information makes it difficult to decide what do you do first.

I first asked myself this question back in 1986 after I had written my first book, and people were saying, “What a great book.” It was called Non-Toxic and Natural and I listed all these different non-toxic products I had found.

And then people were saying to me, “But where do I start? Where do I start?”

So I wrote my second book called The Non-Toxic Home which put everything in order of what I thought was most important.

But what I found from doing that was that it was hard. There isn’t a hierarchical list that you can’t say this one thing is most important, and this other thing is least important because everything has a different level of toxicity.

But there are some easier things that we can do, things that are easier to do that make a bigger impact in terms of reducing your toxic exposure.

That’s what we’re going to talk about today. It’s where to start. And even if you’ve already started, you might pick up a few tips of things that maybe you haven’t done yet that are things that are important to do.

My guest today is Amy Ziff. She’s the founder of a website called Veritey. Her purpose is to make it exceedingly simple to find products and services that are healthy.

And so she does a tremendous amount of research into her products. I know that one of the things that’s happening now is that to live toxic-free is getting so much more important that there are a number of products and websites that are just popping up, where people who really don’t do their research, just say, “Oh, I just want to cash in on this.”

But Amy is not one of those kinds of people. She really is dedicated to finding out what is the truth about the products, and giving you only a very small selection of products that she has personally researched.

Welcome to the show, Amy.

AMY ZIFF: Thank you, Debra. Thanks for having me.

DEBRA: Thanks for being here. So tell us, how did you get interested in this.

AMY ZIFF: Well, it was a long and a quick and efficient journey all at the same time. When I was nine, I personally had a health crisis, and my mom refused to listen to what the traditional doctors were saying. What ultimately ended up making me well was changing my diet, avoiding certain allergens.

They’re common today, but in the 70’s, this was radical. It was going off of corn, sugar, and gluten.

And then it turned out that I was allergic to a lot of stuff in my home, molds and dander, dust and different mites and trees.

And so I became very aware at an early age that what we surround ourselves with is so impactful to our own health and wellbeing. And it can really make the difference between surviving and thriving.

And so I was surviving.

Then we cleaned up our home environment, my diet, and I was able to thrive.

Then fast forward into my own journey into parenthood. I have three children, and I had my first child, five-and-a-half years ago, and then I had twins after two years later. And one of my twins was incredibly allergic to things that I thought were natural, things that certainly were labeled as such.

I was an eco-shopper, and I went to Whole Foods, when I could, for products. And I thought I was buying really good products for my children. And so I thought, “What could possibly be in these products that could be bothering my daughter? What’s going on here?”

And I have a background in journalism, and also, I’ve been an internet entrepreneur.

So what happened was, the journalist in my started digging and digging and digging, and going, holy moly. There is so much stuff in our everyday products, and especially, products that we’re using on children and babies that is not very natural at all, and is not safe or necessarily what I want to be using for my kids.

And there is no uniformity in labeling, and there’s no way to really know this unless you become your own detective [blues], and really do your homework.

And so that’s what I started to do. And then before you know it, I was keeping those massive lists, and that grew into a database that became the real basis for Veritey, my site, that helps people find, what I’d like to say, the truth in healthy living.

We’re really looking at the truth in one these products are. The bottom line is, I want to use safe, non-toxic products for myself and my family in order to give my children their best chance in life. And as a parent, I feel it’s my responsibility to keep my little ones safe.

And so I don’t want to invite in toxins that are related to anything, any kind of issue. It could be asthma. It could be ADD. It could be cancer later in life, or infertility. It just really spans the gamut.

And now, knowing what we know about genetics and epigenetics, and the ability for these chemicals to be modulators on our genetics and our DNA, we realize, wow, it really does not matter what we surround ourselves, and particularly, in those early years.

So that’s how I got started. I did this deep dive into products and toxins a couple of years ago, and I’ve been non-stop ever since.

DEBRA: Well, it is important to do the deep dive. I’d just like to jump in and say that for many years, especially those of us who are older like me, and have been around for a while, back in the 70’s and 80’s, 1970’s and 80’s, that was in the last century.

There started to be products that were called natural products. And this was at the time when everybody was wearing polyester leisure suits, and plastic was thought to be a really good thing.

And so as opposed to that, then there were these natural products that were not made from better living through chemistry. They were products that were made from natural materials from nature like cotton, for example, or a natural food was any food that didn’t have artificial color and flavorings and preservatives.

That was as far as it went.

And so the only thing about a natural product that’s natural is that it starts as a renewable resource. For most natural products, they then are processed through the industrial process, and various toxic chemicals are added, and various good things are taken out.

And so what comes out at the end isn’t anything like what it started at the beginning.

How many years has that been? 30 years, 40 years, since we started having natural products? As time has progressed, then the natural products have become purer and purer, and they’re now being made out of organic ingredients.

But there’s still a wide range of what’s called a natural product. And as consumers, we can’t just say, “If it says it is natural that means that it’s safe.”

We can’t say that because there’s so much industrial process behind it.

Certainly, if you have an organic apple on your hand, that’s pretty safe. But if you have something called natural apple pie, it could have anything in it.

AMY ZIFF: That’s right. Natural will have all kinds of additions in food. You can have MSG in natural flavors, for example. So it’s a great way of pointing out that the word, natural, has such a wide berth at this point in time given that there is absolutely zero legislation around what that term means that we can’t really trust it.

And in fact, I remember looking at this Johnson and Johnson cream that I was using on my kids, and it said it was hypoallergenic. So here I am thinking, okay, this one’s safe. Well, it turns out it contains something called DMD hydantoin, and that forms formaldehyde in the bottle.

So I certainly don’t want to be slathering my kids with formaldehyde-based cream.

DEBRA: I have to interrupt you because we have to go to break, but we’ll talk more about this when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Amy Ziff, founder of Veritey, and we will come back and talk more about natural products, and how you can get started removing toxic chemicals from your home. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Amy Ziff. She’s the founder of Veritey. How do you pronounce that word actually?

AMY ZIFF: It is Veritey. It’s a fictional word that we based on the actual word, verity, which in Latin means truth. So we are truth in healthy living, but we tailored for your life.

So we blended that together, and came out with Veritey.

DEBRA: Oh, I see. I get it. Good. Very clever. I like having that truth in the word. I knew the Latin word for truth, but I was trying to figure out exactly what this word was.

So tell us, let’s go on to talk about where people can start. What’s the first thing you would say?

AMY ZIFF: I’d like to say, start wherever you’re at. And here are my three principles in that. One, keep it real. And when I talk about keeping it real,

I’m really talking about the [inaudible 00:11:20] in your life, from real ingredients into what you are eating and buying. So that applies to your couch, or the foods you’re going to eat.

It should be untreated within keeping it real. Think about you want to get whatever it is you’re buying as true to its original source as possible.

So there are lots of things that go in here, and of course, tons of nuances. But you can really keep this very basic, and just think about this. Keep it real. Ask yourself what [inaudible 00:11:53] in this product. If you don’t know, ask the person you’re buying it from.

If they don’t know, or they give you this exhaustive speech, it’s probably not going to fit into this rule, keeping it real.

Try and keep it unprocessed. And if you can’t get totally unprocessed, minimally-processed.

And the reason why I mention this, it applies to your couch, is that couches are one of the most toxic elements that most of us have in our homes because, of course, there’s a lot of processing that actually goes into furniture. This is something that often shocks people.

So happy to talk about the flame retardants, and how to get those out, but again, it is something to really think about in my rule.

So one, keep it real.

Two, keep it simple. This is where you just think about less is more. Less handling of your products, less manipulating of your products is better. And fewer ingredients does best for it as well.

And again, that’s whether you’re buying a snack bar, or furniture. These complicated compressed woods that have been highly treated are usually also highly toxic in your home. So going back to the basics can really help you on this.

Again, so keep it real, keep it simple, and then this is the key, start with whatever it is you need next. That might be a toothbrush, that might be a desk, it might be a couch, it might be baby food. I really, really mean it.

Start with the very next thing on your grocery list, and let’s start attacking it there because I believe we can create change through shopping.

Women control 85% of the wallet share in this country. And if we don’t start applying what we know to how we shop, we won’t create a new change.

But if we do, wow, are we a force to be reckoned with.

So women, let’s get together. Let’s take that 85% of our wallet share, ad let’s change what kind of products are being made in this country by demanding to know what’s in them, keeping it real, keeping it simple, and starting what we need next.

DEBRA: I completely agree with everything that you said.

AMY ZIFF: Like minds.

DEBRA: Yes, like minds, exactly. Well, what I found in this field is that there really is a truth. There is a truth. And that if we get down to that truth, and we just keep applying that truth, then we’re going to end up in the right place.

And that truth is that for the most part, and I say for the most part because, just because something comes from nature doesn’t mean it’s not toxic.

There are plenty of natural toxic things in the natural world.

But for the most part, people aren’t making products out of things like botulinum toxin. They just aren’t.

AMY ZIFF: Well, you are not getting botox, but it is truth. And the other thing is that nature has so cleverly designed the natural world that most of the toxins are not, and intentionally so, bio-available. It is only the manipulation of them through human interaction that we’ve made a lot of these toxins bio-available. Lead is a great example of that.

So we’ve taken something natural in the world, but it wasn’t bio-available, and we’ve made it extremely bio-available. And now, we have a real problem on our hands with lead that needs to get cleaned up.

And most people are unaware of it, and unaware of how to deal with it. There are a lot of people that I talk to that think that’s going to be a really pressing human health issue in the coming decades, even though we took it out of gasoline, and we got it out of paint. Shouldn’t it be gone?

But all of those houses that were painted in the 70’s with lead paint are now sweltering. So it’s around. You have to be careful.

And that can be scary. Once people get scared about going non-toxic, I think it, very quickly, can get overwhelming, and people want to put their heads in the sand, and just say, “Well, I can’t do it. I’m going to do it like I’ve done before, like my mother did it, like my neighbor does it, and we’ll just keep going forward that way.”

But I’d like to say, please, please, please don’t do that. It can be scary, but you’re not there alone. As you’ve said Debra, there are so many resources nowadays. Reach out. Veritey hopes to be a lifeline in that crazy sea of “what do I dos,” and try and help point you in the direction that could be safer, better, healthier for you. It does matter.

When we look at diseases in this country, and what’s happening with childhood cancers having grown 25% since 1975, one in three kids having autism, one in six U.S. couples struggling with infertility. These are all related to toxins in our environment, and products that we may or may not be using, but are surrounding ourselves with.

Chemicals are, as I’d like to say, they’re uninvited guests to the party of the life that we’re living here. And we’ve got to take control back, and get these toxins out.

I really encourage people, don’t get overwhelmed, know that knowledge is power, and take some control back. You can do it, and you can start it with your very next product that you have to buy.

DEBRA: That’s great advice. I totally agree with that too. Again, great minds thinking alike.

We need to go to break in just about 10 seconds. So I’m not going to ask you another question right now. But when we come back, what I want to do is ask you about you were talking, and I agree, that whatever is the next product that you buy, then buy it non-toxic.

So we’re going to talk about that when we come back.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Amy Ziff, from Veritey. We’re talking about how to take that first step to start removing toxic chemicals from your life. And we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Amy Ziff, from Veritey. We’re talking about how you can get started removing toxic chemicals from your home.

So Amy, let’s just role-play for a minute, and do a little example of somebody’s made a decision that they are going to start with the next product that they buy, and buy something that’s less toxic than what they were buying before.

So they go to the supermarket, or wherever they’re shopping, and they decided that they’re going to buy pickles. So what’s the process to go through to take that step?

AMY ZIFF: So you want to buy pickles, but you’re not really sure how to determine whether your pickles are non-toxic.

So you’re in the store, and the first thing you’re going to do is go to the pickle section, and start looking at different containers.

Now, I can tell you just from bringing up this image of pickles in my mind that one of the things you’re going to notice is color variation on these pickles. So if you flip over the labels, then you want to look for, are there artificial food dyes, or what is free of those.

A lot of the pickles that we get are not actually normal color. The color that seeped into them is from added dyes because manufacturers think that’s what a person expects the pickle to “look like.”

So you look for words, in general, pickles and otherwise—this serves as the catchall, but for things you can’t recognize or pronounce.

So when you see a string of alphanumeric numbers, and it’s like a jumble of letters, [inaudible 00:20:05], they probably don’t have something real in there. That’s a chemical. That didn’t happen in nature.

With pickles, again, you’re going to look for something contains no natural flavors because natural flavors are anything but. They’re a catchall much like fragrance can be a catchall for all kinds of chemicals and additives in your personal care items.

With foods, natural flavor is one of those ones that I’m always wary of, and won’t buy unless I’m really clear on what that is.

And then simple, simple, simple. So the pickles that I like most and my kids just go crazy for have about five ingredients, none of which are sugar, by the way. So it is possible to find. It’s salt, it’s vinegar, it’s some very specific spices, depending on how hot or how not hot, I guess, that I like the new pickles. My husband likes [inaudible 00:21:10].

Some of those spices go up and down. Garlic, usually typical, salt, and water. That can make a really fine tasty pickle.

And that’s what you’ll be looking for.

One of the things you’ll compromise in this is you may not be able to keep those pickles outside of the fridge, and you may not be able to keep those pickles for a year. Things that have no preservatives in them don’t last a long time.

It makes sense. Now, vinegar and salt do act as natural preservatives, so in this case, the pickles were lucky. They’re not going bad anytime soon.

But that said, they may have an expiration date.

So it’s something to be aware of. But I think we’ve all gotten into this mindset of buying in such bulk things that we don’t necessarily even need. It just seems like a good deal at the time. And so we have to reverse that thinking a little bit.

And when you’re trying to buy less toxic, often times you’re not buying in bulk, you’re creating this whole ethos around you of using what you need, and trying to use it all, and using less.

And for anyone out there whose next question is, “But how can I afford it? These things are more expensive.”

I always like to say, when you do this, when you go non-toxic in your life, you start evaluating everything, just like what we did with the pickles.

You’re flipping over, you’re looking at that ingredients list, and you’re realizing, “There’s all this stuff in here.” And then you say, “Maybe I can do without.”

So for people who I go in to their home, and I’m looking at their stuff, and we’re talking through it, they stopped using, I would say, more than 50% of what they had been using. It turns out we don’t need dryer sheet.

DEBRA: No, we don’t.

AMY ZIFF: You can stop spending your monthly allowance that you were spending on your dryer sheets, and put that into a higher quality, essential oil-based, scented laundry detergent, for example. And right there, you’ve cleaned something up.

And baking soda, vinegar, lemon, those things go a long way in cleaning your home. The lemons are pricey, but not really when you stop buying all of these premade things.

And I’m not advocating for everybody making your own DIY. It’s a little bit too far along the path, but there are really good, simple products that you can get that aren’t made of too much more than that that will help you go a long way and detoxing your life because the cleaning stuff that we use in our home is really a significant source of what’s called indoor air pollution.

And our indoor air is 5 to 10 times more polluted than our outdoor air.

So another [inaudible 00:23:48] open your windows every day, people, because that will really help you literally breathe easier. And if you live right next to a road, try and open the windows on the other side of the house or the apartment.

DEBRA: Good. So I want to go back to pickles for a minute because I just discovered something. You can go online and search on pickles label, and all these different labels will come up from all these different brands of pickles. And you could just sit here and look at the pickle labels and their ingredients for as long as you like until you find a pickle that you like.

Now, here’s one. I won’t tell the brand name because I’m going to criticize it. So it has cucumbers, vinegar, salt, garlic, turmeric, natural dill, oil, salt—fine so far. But then there’s sodium benzoate, and that’s a preservative that you don’t want to eat.

We’ve already mentioned artificial colors. I’m looking at another label here with ingredients that are so small, I can’t read it.

AMY ZIFF: Sodium benzoate is one that really bothers me because once you set it, and it jumps out, you will start to notice sodium benzoate is in a lot of your food, and it’s in almost all of your personal care products. There isn’t really enough research on sodium benzoate.

There’s the research that does exist definitely points towards the fact that we need more research because it’s doing some funky things in lab rats.

So I think we have to be very careful with the fact that it’s coming into our bodies, not just through what we ingest, but also through what we put on our skin. We absorb as much as 80% of what we put on our skin.

And suddenly, you have this synergistic effect of a chemical that we don’t really know what it does.

DEBRA: So here now, I’m just picking these labels at random. This one I’m going to mention, this is Bubby’s Cultured Dill Pickles. It’s made from cucumbers, artesian well water, salt, calcium chloride, garlic, dill and spices.

Now, that’s a pretty good one. The thing that I would be red flags for me still is that it’s not organic, so there are pesticide residues in it. There’s also a note on here that it’s non-GMO-verified. So this is not a GMO pickle.

We need to go to break. We’ll talk more about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and I’m talking with Amy Ziff of Veritey. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Amy Ziff from Veritey. That is at Veritey.com. Amy, you want to spell it?

AMY ZIFF: Sure. It’s V-E-R-I-T-E-Y dot com. Veritey.com.

DEBRA: So we’re going to talk about in a minute what you can find when you go to Veritey.com, but I want to say that if all this talk about ingredients, strange-sounding ingredients that we’ve been talking about with pickles sounds like, “What are you talking about?” I just want to say that when I first started learning all of this, and remember, I was trying to learn it in an environment where there was no help at all. Nobody was talking about this subject at all.

I just started with one chemical. I think it was formaldehyde, in fact. And my father bought me a chemistry dictionary. And I looked up the word formaldehyde, and it told what the health effects were, and it told how formaldehyde was made.

The difficult part was finding out where it was in products, which I had managed to do. But that was a different book entirely.

But what I want to say here is you’re going to look at the pickle jar, and it’s going to say polysorbate 80. It’s going to say sodium benzoate. And you’re not going to have a clue what that is. But it’s a good idea if you see those words to just not eat them, is the first thing.

But the second thing is that you just start with just one product or one chemical, and you just start. And then as you start looking at more labels—I know what sodium benzoate is because I’ve seen it so many times. And just start seeing it.

AMY ZIFF: Yes, you get better and better.

DEBRA: And you get better and better the more you read the labels, and you start recognizing it. If you just say, “I’m going to learn sodium benzoate. I’m not buying any products with sodium benzoate,” and then what you’ll find is, I think you’ll find you just won’t go to the supermarket.

You’ll just go over to a natural food store instead, which doesn’t mean that 100% of the products there are okay. You still have to read the labels.

But you’re not going to find sodium benzoate in most products in a natural food store. There’s going to be a whole list of things. You’re not going to find in a natural food store that you will find in the supermarket.

So you can do things like read a lot of labels, but you can also do things like you can come to my website and look at Debra’s List. And just go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and look for shop in the menu. You can go to Amy’s site.

We both already have products that we’ve done the label-reading for you, that we’ve chosen these from our expertise. And so you don’t have to start over again.

And so if you’re looking for food product ideas or what kind of shampoo to use or any of those things, you can just go to my site or go to her site, and see what we have to say because people are already reading the labels for you.

AMY ZIFF: That was one thing that I really learned, Debra, was that. It was hard to find—when I started, I didn’t know about you at the time, unfortunately, so I was really having trouble finding someone who had done this before. But as I’ve gotten deeper and deeper into this, I do find that there are other resources.

You get better at it, and you start, as you say, recognizing things, then you get a little bit more sophisticated. And the reason why our symbol is an onion is because this whole thing is constant. And even today, I’m still learning. And I’m sure you still are.

DEBRA: I’m still learning.

AMY ZIFF: I moved cross-country and my goal was to create a non-toxic home, and sadly, I was made aware that doesn’t exist, and that’s an impossibility. But I have probably pretty close to have created as non-toxic as it can be in this day and age. And then I know what to fight back with against the toxins, what kind of plants to surround myself with, and all that.

But that has been a real process. And so you start where you are, you start to make it [inaudible 00:30:52]. And then you get better at it, and you realize the connection, and that we are living in an ecosphere that is totally connected, and that your whole world is you can’t just reduce the toxins in your home without starting to think about what you’re ingesting.

So you mentioned GMO’s when we left off with the pickle. That’s really an important, I think, if you’re trying to avoid toxins, to try and start getting out of your diet. And they are everywhere.

For sure, nothing with high fructose corn syrup is going to pass the test anymore because that is pretty much guaranteed to be GMO. Canola oil goes on that list because it’s a genetically-engineered product.

It can be shocking. Things you think or thought were healthy turn out—this is rewriting that book, so it is really important to lean on people who’ve done this before, so you don’t have to shoulder all that burden. And know that every single thing you do to make a difference in your life, to be a less toxic, to reduce your chemical footprint, I often say, when you’re doing that, everything makes a difference.

That is good news for your body because our bodies are made to detox.

DEBRA: Every single thing that you do, don’t think that a jar of pickles is too small. Start with a jar of pickles.

AMY ZIFF: No, it makes a difference.

DEBRA: And tomorrow, you get organic ketchup.

So what I’d like to do, we only have about five minutes left of the show, could you just give us a couple of suggestions of things that somebody could just walk into a store and buy, and have it be less toxic. I would say, go to a natural food store, and buy anything that has the organic label on it. If you can see the USDA organic symbol, and just look for that, and buy something that has that on it.

So what’s one thing that you would say that for somebody to go find a non-toxic product?

AMY ZIFF: I would say some of the biggest things—I tend to look at this in terms of in your home, what are the biggest things that you could get out and replace. With [inaudible 00:33:07] things, it’s a little bit different, Debra, from starting in store, but I’ll tell you why I’m getting there.

So I think about the most important thing you can do to support your body is create a healthy boudoir. Get a bedroom that isn’t off-gassing.

And so if I were going to the store, I’d be thinking about, “What’s in my bedroom? Maybe I’m not ready to throw out all my furniture and start over.”

And that’s probably a good thing. But you want to think about what’s touching you every single night. You spend a third of your life in bed, generally.

The statistics say. Eight hours of your day is going to be in bed and asleep.

Well, make sure you’re using a laundry detergent that you’re breathing in and out that’s going to be non-toxic.

DEBRA: Good suggestion.

AMY ZIFF: Now, I’m going to the store to get my non-toxic laundry detergent, but there’s still many claiming all kinds of things. What do I do and where do I look?

Again, this is where you keep it real, keep it simple, and this is what you need, but look for a brand. And often times, this is a generalization, but if you’ve made it to a health food store, they’re going to have stripped out a lot of things from this.

So you’re not going to see the Tides and the Whiffs of the world. You’re going to be seeing some alternate brands. And they do span the gamut. I personally really like the Ecos, the earth friendly products brand. You can get it free of scent, or you can get it scented with essential oils.

I think they’re pretty good and clean.

Seventh Generation is not perfect, but you know what? They’re so much better than others that I think. They’re good.

If this is sounding really complicated and overwhelming, you could go to a service like Honest.com, and order direct. Their products, again, not perfect, but the truth of the matter is, if you’re using someone like Honest.com, you’re still so much better than 95% of what’s out there.

DEBRA: That’s exactly right.

AMY ZIFF: I want people to feel that they can do this, that they can start, that they can make differences in their lives.
Perfection is something we can all strive for, but it’s really hard to achieve in any aspect of our lives, including going completely non-toxic. So make it easy. Go easy on yourself, so that you feel good because you know what, there is proof that when you buy something that’s good for you, and good for the environment, maybe they’re 1% for the planet, and giving back, that makes you feel good, and you get an endorphin rush.
“Now, that product actually works.”

And you continue to use it, there’s a whole cycle of goodness that’s happening for you, for the world, for everything. And that’s what I love.

DEBRA: And you should take whatever step you can take in the right direction. I didn’t start off with the most non-toxic products. I started off saying, “This is what’s available. This is what I can afford. This is what I understand.”

And now, I’m pretty sophisticated in my choices, but it took me many years to learn this. It took many years for the market to start catching up. It took many years—

AMY ZIFF: You were the pioneer.

DEBRA: Yes. Thank you. I was.

AMY ZIFF: You were. And now, it must seem really easy when you look out at the world. You’re like, “This is nothing.” You are so lucky.

DEBRA: It is. People who are starting now are very fortunate because other people came before. Yes, there are possibilities.

At this point in time, there does exist a non-toxic solution for everything. It’s just about knowing about it, and some of those things you need to make yourself. But you can eliminate so many toxic chemicals. And I’m going to have to stop talking because the show is going to be over in two seconds.

Thank you so much, Amy. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. Go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com to find out more, to listen to past shows, to find out what’s coming up, and even listen to this show again. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

I was a minute off.

This show is over at 12:56 and 30 seconds. It’s now 12:56. I ended at 12:55 and 30 seconds. So we do have a few more seconds. But what I want to say is that people should do what they can. Every step helps, and you can go to Amy’s website, Veritey, I don’t have it right in front of me, V-E-R-I-T-E-Y dot com. And you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and find out more about products that you can choose that are toxic-free.

AMY ZIFF: Go non-toxic. You won’t regret it.

DEBRA: And this is the end of the show now. Thanks, Amy. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Tile and grout cleaner

Question from Claire

Hi Debra,

I’m thinking of using Tile Lab tile and grout cleaner/resealer. Here’s the MSDS:

www.custombuildingproducts.com/media/2386841/
msds_tl_grouttilecleanerresealer_en.pdf

Do you think there’d be any lasting health dangers to it once the job is finished?

Thanks so much.

Debra’s Answer

This MSDS lists NO hazardous chemicals but it does list some health effects. It recommends skin and eye protection. It’s hard to tell without any ingredients.

On their Technical Data sheet, just published a few days ago, it says that it “Complies with all Federal and SCAQMD Standards for VOCs.” That doesn’t mean no VOCs.

Sorry I can’t tell you more, there’s just not enough data. You might call them and see what you can find out.

Add Comment

How Antibiotics and Antibacterials are Compromising our Health

Martin J. BlaserMy guest today is Martin J. Blaser, MD, author of Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics Is Fueling Our Modern Plagues. We’ll be talking about how the massive increases in the developed world of “modern plagues”—such as obesity, type 1 diabetes, asthma, allergies, esophageal cancer, celiac disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and autism—are related to loss of diversity of the complex—and crucially important—ecosystem of microorganisms within our bodies on which we all depend. As diversity diminishes, our immune systems are compromised, and we become much more susceptible to new infections. And this loss of micro-organism diversity is due to the use of wide use of antibiotics and products that contain antibacterials such as triclosan. Missing MicrobesDr. Blaser has studied the role of bacteria in human disease for more than thirty years. He is the director of the Human Microbiome Program at New York University, the former president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and has held major advisory roles at the National Institutes of Health. He cofounded the Bellevue Literary Review, and his work has been written about in many newspapers and journals, including The New Yorker, Nature, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal. He lives in New York City. www.martinblaser.com.

read-transcript

 

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
How Antiobiotics and Antibacterials Are Compromising Our Health

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Dr. Martin Blaser, MD

Date of Broadcast: June 12, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, this is Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It’s Thursday, June 12th, 2014 and I’m here in Clearwater, Florida.

We are having a very interesting show. I don’t like to say that, because I think all the shows are interesting. But this one is unique and different and it’s something we’ve never talked about before.

My guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser. He’s written a book called Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics is Fueling our Modern Plagues. We’re going to be talking about all these different illnesses that look like they’re separate and distinct like obesity, type 1 diabetes, asthma, allergies, esophageal cancer, celiac disease, Crohn’s disease, autism.

All of these, he says, are related to the loss of the diversity of the complex and crucially important ecosystem of microorganisms in our bodies. Every function in our bodies depends on these microorganisms, and these are being killed off by things like antibiotics and anti-bacterials.

So that’s what we’re going to talk about today. I think this is going to be very interesting. Welcome to Toxic Free Talk Radio, Dr. Blaser.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: It’s great to be here.

DEBRA: Thank you so much. I think your book is so interesting. And when I saw it, I thought we’ve never talk about this before. This is not something I have ever seen, and yet it seems so remarkably simple and obvious. How did you get interested in researching this?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: First, before I answer your question, which is a wonderful question, I wanted to just say that listening to you – you know, here’s a guy who’s saying all of these diseases are due to a change in our microbes. To me, it sounds quite grandiose.

But actually, I think it’s true. I’m going to try to explain why I think it’s true and tell you from the beginning that at this point, it is a hypothesis, but there is more and more support for the hypothesis.

So the story began in two different places. The first place is that many years ago, I was working for the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta in their Enteric Disease Branch. That’s the branch that deals with infections to the intestinal track. And I was the Salmonella Surveillance Officer of the United States. I was involved in studying salmonella.

At that point, we were very concerned about antibiotic resistance in salmonella because more and more salmonellas were not being easily treated with antibiotics.

And at that point, more than 30 years ago, I learned that most of the antibiotics used in the United States are used on the farm. They’re not used for people. They’re used on a farm. In particular, they’re used to fatten up farm animals. It’s what’s called the ‘growth promotion’.

In the 1940s, farmers found that if they fed their livestock low doses of antibiotics, their livestock would gain weight and they reduced their feed more efficiently. This is much more profitable for farmers. And that’s why the use of antibiotics is still extensive on the farm and why it’s continued, because of the strong economic motivation.

DEBRA: Okay. As we’re talking about that, let me just say something about that first. As you’re talking about that, I’m thinking back to my teenage years when I was given low doses of antibiotics for acne. I think that that’s the standard treatment. Of course, I gained weight. I just think of all these people who are on antibiotics for different reasons and obesity.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yes, exactly. So you’ve skipped a little ahead of me, but we’re going to the same place.

And so about 10 years ago, a light bulb went off. I thought to myself, if farmers are feeding antibiotics to their livestock to make them fatter, what are we doing to our kids? Could there be an unintended consequence of all the antibiotic use that our kids are getting?

And another thing that the farmers found is that the earlier in life they started the antibiotics, the more profound the effect, suggesting that early childhood was particularly important.
And now, I will skip forward and tell you that over these last 10 years, we’ve been doing experiments in mice and other laboratory animals to ask the question, “Do antibiotics change the development of the mice? Do they change how obese they’re going to be?” And the answer is yes.

We have done a whole series of studies. We had a big paper that was published a year and a half ago in Nature that shows that giving antibiotics to mice changed their body composition. They had more fat. They changed their metabolic pathways in their liver. So we have more and more experimental support that this hypothesis is actually correct.

DEBRA: Wow! I’m just stunned to hear this. When I think about the billions of dollars being spent on people trying to lose weight, not to mention the personal way that people feel being overweight and the health effects of being overweight, this is something – this is the first time I’m hearing this, and I read a lot.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: It’s interesting, because I’m a physician. In fact, my specialty is infectious diseases. And as infectious disease doctors, one of our main occupations is to oversee the use of antibiotics in ill people to consult with other doctors with people who are really sick.

And of course, we love antibiotics. I want to say that I love antibiotics. I wouldn’t want to live in a world where there were not antibiotics because from the very introduction in the 1940s, these drugs were miraculous. There were people on the brink of death who were saved because of antibiotics and disease that were untreatable were cured with antibiotics.

And as a result of that, we all considered that antibiotics were miraculous. Because we couldn’t see there were some minor and infrequent side effects that basically, they were safe. So everyone, myself included, gave antibiotics a clean bill of health.

Little by little, the medical profession and the public began using antibiotics more and more and more for milder and milder conditions – not just the conditions that were life-threatening, but for mild conditions like acne or to prevent acne. Now I’m not saying that acne can’t be terrible, but it’s certainly milder than a case of spinal meningitis for example.

So in 2010, the Center for Disease Control did a study of antibiotic use in the United States. What they found was astounding to me. They found in the United States for outpatients, not even including people in the hospital, for outpatients, there were 258 million courses of antibiotics prescribed in that year. And that’s in a population of 300 million people. So what that meant is that in 2010, there were five courses of antibiotics prescribed for every six people. This has been going on year after year after year.

And the CDC looked at the data by age. And you can extrapolate that and say that the average child in the United States by the time they’re two has had three courses of antibiotics. By the time they’re 10, they’ve had 10 courses. And by the time they’re 20, they’ve had 17 courses of antibiotics. That’s the average child. That’s across every child in the United States.

These numbers may seem high, but they’re entirely consistent with many other studies that have been done. None had been done on this big a scale. So this enormous antibiotic use and nobody has been paying attention to what the consequences could be.

DEBRA: We’re going to need to go to a break in about 30 seconds, so I’m not going to ask you another question because I don’t want to have to interrupt you.

But I think that this is incredible. It’s just another taste of having there be an industrial product that people look at as being a miracle. And then time goes by – not even just a miracle, but something that’s not harmful. Time goes by, we start seeing that it has profound effects.

We’re going to talk about this when we come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser, M.D., author of Missing Microbes: How the Overuse of Antibiotics is Fueling our Modern Plagues. You can go to his website and find out more at MartinBlaser.com. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser, author of Missing Microbes .

Dr. Blaser, I want to just back up for a minute now that we know where the story began. You talk about the microbiome. Explain to us what that is.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yes, certainly. So the microbiome is all the microbes that live in and on the human body. That’s a very big number of microbes. In fact, if you take a census of all the cells in the human body, 70% to 90% of them are microbes. Only 10% to 30% are human cells. So we are mostly microbial cells.

And that’s the way it’s been since time in memorial. We got lots of our microbes from our moms, and she got it from her mom, and so on and so forth, all the way back. In fact, ever since there had been animals on this planet, which is about 500 million years, they have had residential microbes living in them.

We now know that most of these microbes are beneficial to us – beneficial or neutral. But in depth, they’re beneficial. They do important things for us. They help protect us against invaders. They help train our immune system. They help us digest food. They make vitamins for us. So the microbes that had been living with us are there for a purpose. They help us live.

DEBRA: I think that most people, if you say microbes, they think that they’re in the intestines, but where are some places in your body that they might be?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Well, the biggest group are in our intestines, but they’re in our mouth, they’re in our skin and our ears, eyes. In women, they’re in the vagina. So we have been living with these microbes since time immemorial.

And one of the things that have happened is that because infectious diseases have been so terrible like cholera and tuberculosis and typhoid fever, the public has always been fearful of these tremendous plagues. I’ll call those ‘our ancient plagues.’ The advent of sanitation and antibiotics had been a godsend. So we have now controlled these ancient plagues.

We, as a society, have become germaphobic. We think that all microbes are bad like cholera and plague and tuberculosis. Of course, some of them are, and we are at war with those guys. But most of the microbes in the human body, most of the microbes in the world are neutral or beneficial for us.

And that’s a greater level of sophistication that I try to bring out in Missing Microbes . The the whole title of Missing Microbes is that we have lost some of our defenders. We have lost some of our friendly organisms that help our babies grow up and develop normally – develop normal metabolism, normal immunity and maybe even normal cognition.

DEBRA: So it seems like that there needs to be a balance between protecting ourselves from the harmful microbes and not destroying the good microbes.

An example that I frequently give is that when we drink tap water that has chlorine or chloramine in it, it’s put there for a reason because it was found that it was needed to do that so that the harmful microbes that might be in the system or even in the pipes.

Often, people will ask me, “Why did they put it chlorine and the chloramine at the water treatment plant? Why don’t they just leave it out and then the water can come to our house clean?” Well, they have to put it in because the pipes that the water goes through are contaminated with all kinds of microorganisms that could get in the water and then cause us harm if we drink that tap water.

But then, we drink that tap water (I filter my water and I’m always telling people to filter their water), but if people don’t filter the chlorine or the chloramines out of their tap water, they drink the antibacterial, chlorine or chloramines, it goes into their intestines at least and starts killing off the beneficial bacteria.

So how can we protect ourselves without destroying ourselves?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: That is really the question because the chlorination of water was a tremendous advance in public health. We have clean water. We can turn on the tap, and we know that that water is safe to drink. But in many parts of the world (in India; in Africa, and parts of Asia), we can’t. And people are becoming ill, they’re dying for many kinds of diseases because of dirty water.

So as you say, we have to find the right balance between things that protect us against pathogens but, don’t do in our beneficial organisms. Again, this is one of the themes of Missing Microbes .

I want to point out (because there’s so much to talk about and so little time) that I gave you the figures for the United States in antibiotic use. And a few months after that paper was published by the CDC investigators, a group in Sweden published their use of antibiotics. I first want to point out that, as I think all your listeners know, Sweden is a small country with a high standard of living. The Swedes are at least as healthy as we are and they are using 40% of the antibiotics that we’re using at every age.

When our children at three had four courses of antibiotic, they have had 1.4. When our kids have had 10, they’ve had 4. So there’s no epidemic of childhood deafness in Sweden or early childhood mortality. They’re doing just fine. What that implies is that at least 60% of the antibiotics we’re using are unneeded.

So one of the things I’m calling for is the much more judicious use of antibiotics. Use them when we really need them and don’t use them the other times. That requires education of doctors and it also requires education of the public that antibiotics are not free. They come with cost, biological cost.

And when people bring their kids to the doctor and the doctor says, “Your child doesn’t need an antibiotic, those parents should feel relieved, not deprived.

DEBRA: Yes. I remember many years ago (I don’t even know how many years ago it has been now), I remember being told that if I take an antibiotic, that I should eat yogurt to restore some of the bacteria, the beneficial bacteria that’s being destroyed by the antibiotic.

I don’t know that that’s even commonly known even now, but it was something that I was told a long time ago. Nowadays, I would probably say, “Take a probiotic or drink Kombucha tea or something like that to restore the flora in the gut after taking an antibiotic.” But always, it would be preferable to do something else instead of taking the antibiotic.

But as you said—we need to go to break. So let’s just go to break and come back. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I know there’s so much to talk about. I just want to go on and on.

You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser, M.D. He’s the author of Missing Microbes and we have lots to talk about. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser, author of Missing Microbes .

Dr. Blaser, right before the break, I said something you wanted to jump in, so go ahead and give me your answer.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: You talked about what you should do after you take an antibiotic. Should you take yogurt? Should you take a probiotic? Should you take some special teas?

Most of that is folk wisdom. Very little of it has been studied. It’s not clear to me whether that’s any better than a placebo. I think we are going to learn through science, we’re going to learn what organisms we have to give back after somebody takes an antibiotic.

One of my theories is that every time somebody takes an antibiotic, of the thousands of species that we have in our body, a few go extinct. And the next time, a few more go extinct.

Now, what’s the chance that that’s true? There is some support for this idea because we know if we compare people in the United States with people in developing countries, we’ve lost diversity. We have just a smaller census of different kinds of bacteria than they do.

So what’s the chance that taking one or two organisms in yogurt are going to restore our diversity? Once it’s gone, it’s gone.

DEBRA: It’s not. It’s not. think that people don’t really realize that yogurt has very few strains of…

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yes, very few strains. But let me just say…

DEBRA: And if you’re taking a probiotic, it’s very few strains as well.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: The same, exactly. Let me just say that I eat yogurt everyday. I love yogurt. But I eat it because it’s delicious. And I think it gives me a lot of nutrients. But I don’t think it’s helping my microbiome. It’s neither helping nor hurting my microbiome. I think we need to discover the organisms that we’ve lost and replace them. Maybe, we’ll be giving them to our kids in the future.

DEBRA: Wow! As you’re saying this, I’m thinking about what you said in your book that mothers pass on microbes with their children in various ways when they’re born. And if the mothers don’t have those microbes, then the children don’t have them from the beginning of life.

And if they were taking antibiotics and continuing to lose and lose them and lose them, that if the things that we’re doing thinking that we’re replacing some of those are not necessarily lining up with what we’ve lost, then I can see how the pool of diversity of microbes is just getting smaller and smaller.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yes. A number of years ago, we speculated that this loss of microbes, this loss of diversity is actually cumulative across generations, that each generation of moms has fewer microbes to pass onto the next.

And again, we’re finding evidence that this is true. That was the theory, but we’re beginning to find evidence that this is true.

And that’s very alarming because the recent suggestion is that we’ve lost perhaps a third of our diversity. It’s silent. You can’t tell when somebody has lost their diversity. The only way we can tell is that we have all these diseases that are rising.

We come back to my original grandiose idea. Let’s just say we have 10 diseases that have risen dramatically since World War II. You’ve mentioned them, obesity, juvenile diabetes, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, asthma, food allergies, peanut allergy, and the list goes on.
So either each of those is rising independently and each has its own cause or there’s one commonality, something that is underlying all of them. The one thing that could fit that is big enough to encompass all of them is changes in the early life microbiome, the microbiome that our babies are developing with, that are choreographed to help our normal development, and that we have been inadvertently changing.

One of the things you mentioned was about birth. My wife, Maria Gloria Dominguez, has been studying this for the last few years. She’s been studying the difference between babies born vaginally and by C section.

So we humans are mammals. For the last hundred million years, all mammals are born by passes through the birth canal. They go out through their mom’s vagina and in the process, they’re picking up their mom’s bacteria. They’re covered with bacteria, they’re swallowing the bacteria. Those become the founding bacteria to help them start their life.

So this is what mammals have been doing for 100 million years including us. Then we started doing C sections, which again are an incredible operation. They are life-saving sometimes for babies and for moms, but we’re doing more and more and more.

So most recently in the United States, we were up to about 32% of babies now born by C section. That’s one baby out of three. In Brazil, it’s about 50%. And all over the world, C sections are rising.

What Gloria has shown and others is that the microbiota, when the baby is born vaginally and by C section, is quite different. So all these kids born by C section are not being born with the normal compliment of microbes passed from mom the way they were back in the old days. This is what I point out in Missing Microbes . Just because something is common, it doesn’t mean it’s right.

DEBRA: I totally agree with you. As you’re talking, I’m getting this picture of like a science fiction movie and the future of people fighting over the microbes that they’re supposed to have when they’re born. Because we don’t pass them on anymore, there’s like this secret stash of the microbes that you’re supposed to have and that everybody is supposed to get one of these capsules at birth.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Actually, we’re hoping to develop that stash. We’re hoping to understand what are the microbes we’ve lost, what are those missing microbes, develop them and give them to kids.

There’s an organism I’ve been studying for about 30 years called Helicobacter pylori, which was first discovered as a pathogen causing ulcers and stomach cancer. We were involved in those studies on stomach cancer as well. The more we studied it, the more it became clear to me that this is one of those ancient organisms that are disappearing. That was my first missing microbe. And I thought, “If one microbe that is an ancient microbe is disappearing, probably there are others.” That’s the where the whole idea came from.

But in 1998, in the British Medical Journal, I predicted that doctors of the future would be giving H. pylori back to children. So far, nothing has happened. And I think it’s actually still too early because we still have to do a lot of science to understand this, but it is my belief that that will be coming. We’re going to be giving H. pylori and other organisms back to kids so that we can get the early-life benefits of those organisms and maybe then eradicate the organisms later so we don’t have the late-in-life cost.

DEBRA: Well, people are already taking probiotics and prebiotics. So this is just more biotics. We need to go to break again. But what I want to ask you is (and we’ll look at the answer when we come back) do you have any idea how many microbes we lost to this?
We’ll come back and get the answer from Dr. Blaser who is the author of Missing Microbes . You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and we’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Dr. Martin Blaser. He’s the author of Missing Microbes . Before the break, I asked him if he knows how many microbes we’ve lost.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yeah. Thank you. We can only estimate, but there was a very nice study that was published about two years ago now in Nature comparing the microbiomes of healthy people in the United States, Africans and Malawi and Amerindians in Venezuela. This is led out of Jeff Gordon’s lab at Washington University. Gloria Dominguez and Rob Knight participated in this study.

And what they found is they took a census of how many species were present in the gut, really a fecal specimen from healthy people. In Africa, it was on average about 1400 species. In the Amerindians, it was about 1600 species. And the people in the US, it was about 1200 species. So from that estimate, we’ve lost between 15% and 25% of our diversity. A more recent study by Maria Gloria and colleagues suggests that maybe about 35%.

So that’s a lot. That’s something that’s quite measureable. In a sense, this is like the global warming inside of our body. It’s the same kind of thing. Global warming has been happening for some time, but we didn’t wake up to it until it was well on its way. And that seems to me, that that’s what’s happening with our missing microbes.

DEBRA: So I want to make sure that we talk about antibacterials, because things like triclosan is just in everything. I went to buy a pair of scissors at an office supply store, and there was only one out of six or seven options for buying scissors that didn’t have anti-bacterial on the handle of the scissors. Tell us about that.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Antibacterials are everywhere. They have two purposes. One purpose is to protect the scissors so that the scissors will last longer because bacteria and fungi, they cause decay of many things. So it makes some sense.

But part of it is that they’re also in materials that we use to so-called “protect” us. For example, they’re in toothpaste. The problem is that we Americans were exposed to millions or tens of millions of times everyday to these anti-bacterials, which we would predict would have an effect on our microbiome. But nobody has really measured this. We have no idea what the consequence is. But we need to know.

I will note that about two weeks ago, the State of Minnesota banned triclosan. They said you can’t use it in things that go into products for people anymore. That won’t take effect until 2017, but it is a first step. I think we really have to understand what are they doing to us, because they have just crept up.

Another thing we do is we put on all these antibacterial lotions on our hands. We think that we’re protecting ourselves from germs. There are times to use those lotions. When you’re in the hospital, you don’t want the transmission of dangerous antibiotic-resistant germs. During flu season, we don’t want the flu spreading from person to person. Hands are important.

But those two things together represent probably less than 5% of all the times when one could use the hand thing. And the other 95%, we’re just slathering it on by the millions.

My question is, “Are we doing more benefit or are we doing more harm?” By trying to get rid of bad organisms, we may be actually hurting our good organisms, depleting our good organisms that one day we’re going to need.

DEBRA: I totally agree with you. We just talked about this before earlier in the show, but I just want to say it again, because I think it’s a really important point. And that is when we’re talking about these microorganisms, they’re not like a system of our own body. They’re like something that is symbiotic with us, yes? Am I understanding this correctly?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: Yes, they are symbiotic with us, but you can also think of them in essence like in other organ of our body like a kidney or a liver because they are doing many different kinds of functions for us like our kidneys or our liver. Increasingly, we think of it as an organ, which just gives you a sense of how important we think they are to our health.

DEBRA: My mind is just twisting around trying to comprehend this because I have studied – now this is going to sound strange maybe, but when I was writing my last book Toxic-Free, I realized that I really didn’t know what were the organ systems in my body.

As I started researching, I was finding that they aren’t very well explained and there aren’t books – I mean, I think if you would ask people on the street what are your body systems, they wouldn’t be able to tell you. And yet, we need to be aware of what they are, because toxic chemicals are damaging each one of them.

And I really am seeing how the microbiome of our bodies – I love that word – the microbiome of our bodies, whether it’s an organ or a symbiotic ecosystem of its own that is working hand in hand with our bodies, they are performing functions. And without this microbiome, we wouldn’t be able to live, our bodies wouldn’t live.

And so we do need to consider what are the toxic chemicals, what are the factors that are destroying it since we need it.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: This is why I wrote Missing Microbes . I wanted to explain these ideas to the public, because explaining it to the medical profession – and I speak quite frequently to doctors and scientists trying to get these viewpoints out. I have to say that in general, they’ve been very well-received. But that’s not enough. We really have to change the comprehension of normal people about all these things that we’re doing.

Everybody thinks that antibiotics are free, that antibacterials are good for us. It’s much more complex. And if we can change the dialogue in the doctor’s office so that parents say, “Can we avoid giving antibiotics?” rather than, “My child must get an antibiotic?” we’ll be getting some place. Again, we know that we’re doing so much, much too much in many areas.

DEBRA: If somebody’s listening to this and they’re saying, “What can I do to maybe restore some of my microbes?”, what would you tell them?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: I say the first thing is to prevent further damage, prevent more decline of your microbes. The restoration is going to be more complicated. I don’t know that we have the state of science today to do that.

I’m hopeful. That’s what we work on in the lab, come up with the real probiotics that we’re going to be using in the future to restore those missing organisms. We have several candidates that we’re working on in the lab that we think that we’re going to be giving especially to kids.

For adults, it’s more complicated. We’re mostly concerned about how kids develop because so many of the important diseases, their roots are in childhood. If we can catch the root, then we can prevent a lot of diseases.

We know obesity begins in the early years of life. So somebody may become obese when they’re 25 or 35 or 45, but there’s a lot of evidence that the first five years of life are the critical time for when that’s developing.

DEBRA: This is so interesting to me, because for me weight has been an issue in my body my entire life. And it’s not about what I eat or what I don’t eat or how much exercise I get. I can do all those things and my body still doesn’t lose weight.

DR. MARTIN BLASER: We’ve known for 50 years that how your body forms in the first few years of life will determine a great deal about a person’s ways.

DEBRA: This is actually such a relief to me. So we’ve only got about two minutes left. So is there anything you’d like to say in closing?

DR. MARTIN BLASER: There’s so much I’d like to say…

DEBRA: Another five hours…

DR. MARTIN BLASER: I want to come back to the tremendous use of antibiotics on the farm because as a result of that, antibiotics are getting into our food, the meat, milk. In some communities, antibiotics are in the drinking water because the water intake is downstream of the ethylene from industrial farms.

Millions of people are getting exposed to trace levels of antibiotics. What are the consequences? We don’t know. We need to know. And probably we need to stop it because all these antibiotics we use on the farm ultimately are affecting our human ecology. That could be another thing that is causing the depletion of our diversity.

And we need that diversity, because the good guys help protect us against invaders. They’re our coastguards. If we deplete them, we become susceptible. And I discussed that in a chapter of Missing Microbes , that I call Antibiotic Winter. It’s a very bleak thing, but we need to prepare. Otherwise, we’re going to be in trouble.

DEBRA: Wow! I need to say something, because I can’t have dead air time.

Listening to everything that you’re saying, I understand the magnitude of what you’re talking about because I could say everything that you’re saying about all the toxic chemicals that I’ve researched over the past 30 years where there are these fundamental things that underlie everything. One of them is what you’re talking about, about losing our microbiome.

Another thing is all these toxic chemicals that are destroying every one of our body systems. It all underlies everything.

Anyway, I’ve only got about 10 seconds. So I’m just going to say thank you so much, Dr. Blaser. His book is Missing Microbes . You can go to his website at MartinBlaser.com. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. You can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com and listen to this show again, listen to the other shows, find out what’s coming up. Be well.

Why One Couple Decided to Get an Organic Farm and Make USDA Certified Organic Gourmet Personal Care Products

Diana and Jim.gifMy guests today are Diana Kaye and James Hahn, husband and wife, and co-founders of their USDA certified organic business Terressentials. They own a small organic farm in lovely Middletown Valley, Maryland and have operated their organic herbal personal care products business there since 1996. Terressentials was originally started in Virginia in 1992. It grew out of their search for chemical-free products after Diana’s personal experience with cancer and chemotherapy in 1988. Prior to Diana’s cancer, they were involved in commercial architecture in Washington DC. Diana and James are proud to be an authentic USDA certified organic and Fair Made USA business. They are obsessive organic researchers and artisan handcrafters of more than one hundred USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products that they offer through their two organic stores in Frederick County, Maryland, through a network of select retail partners across the US, and to customers around the world via their informative web site. Their products also caught the eye of the producers of the Discovery Channel’s Dirty Jobs show. The show’s host, Mike Rowe, “helped” them make a batch of their very popular Pure Earth Hair Wash, which was enormously funny and has been aired repeatedly on the Discovery Channel around the globe. Their Pure Earth Hair Wash was just named the “Best of Washington DC” by the Washington Post. www.terressentials.com

read-transcript

 

 

LISTEN TO OTHER SHOWS WITH DIANA KAYE & JAMES HAHN

 

 

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Why One Couple Decided to Get An Organic Farm and Make USDA Certified Organic Gourmet Personal Care Products

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Diana Kaye and James Hahn

Date of Broadcast: June 11, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world and live toxic-free. It is – what’s the date today? The 10th or 11th. I haven’t looked at the calendar of June 2014. I’m here in Clearwater, Florida where we’re having a lovely summer day.

I have a new mic today, a new microphone and I love it. But I’m still getting used to it. The old microphone sometimes – yesterday, we had a technical difficulty and couldn’t do the show at all because my old mic was having a problem. It’s been having problems off and on. So I think this one is going to be better. I’m still getting used to like how far I need to speak away from it or close to it and all those things, but we’ll get used to it. We’ll get used to it.

Okay! So today, we’re going to be talking about USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products. These personal care products had been around for quite a while. One of the first organic personal care products that there were. I’ve known about this company, I’ve been recommending it for many years. They’ve been doing this almost as long as I’ve been writing about it.

They have their own organic farm. They produce more than a hundred of these gourmet products. They’ve been on television, the Discovery Channel’s DEBRA: show. The host, Mike Rowe, helped them make a batch of their very popular Pure Earth Hairwash, which we’re going to be talking about later. It’s actually a dirty thing. It’s made out of mud, but it gets your hair really clean.

So welcome to my guests, Diana Kaye and James Hahn from Terressentials. Hi, Diana and James.

Diana Kaye: Hi, Debra. I’ve had a little bit of a technical glitch here and I deeply apologize. I haven’t been able to get – we had a little, minor crisis that James has had to attend to. He’s going to try to join us, but he’s not on the line right now. I’m really, really sorry about that.

DEBRA: It’s totally fine. Things happen. This is live radio. Sometimes, we don’t have guests at all. Sometimes, I can’t show up like yesterday. I didn’t have a microphone. So it’s totally fine. We’ll start with you.

Diana Kaye: Sure, no problem.

DEBRA: Okay. So Diana, tell us you are one of the pioneers in organic personal care products. So tell us, how did you get interested in this?

Diana Kaye: It really goes back to 1989. A year before that, I completed a radical course of chemotherapy that really, really played havoc with my immune system and caused me to become so reactive to so many things that has been around me all of my life that my partner and I, James were trying to figure out why I had become so reactive. This was not an expected side effect when thinking about therapy.

Our research showed us that first of all, the cancer I had, non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma has been linked in numerous studies to chemical exposures. So that was quite an eye-opening experience to learn about that. And then to find out that a lot of the chemicals in products that we had been using were considered by our County Municipal Waste Authority as hazardous waste!

DEBRA: Hazardous waste, yeah.

Diana Kaye: It was quite disturbing. We were trying to clean up our lives. In fact, your books were of great help to us back then and some several others.

DEBRA: thank you.

Diana Kaye: We went to our kitchen, the garage, got a big box of products, put it out for the trash people one evening and then the next morning, I went out to get the paper and the box was on my doormat, on my welcome mat. It was a note from the trash people saying that this was hazardous waste and had to go to a special hazardous waste facility. So yeah, that was really a scream.

And so, we learned. We began to question what these ingredients were. When we didn’t know how to pronounce something – and this was all pre-Internet, so…

DEBRA: I remember those days.

Diana Kaye: Yeah, yeah! So it was books. We live really close to DC in Arlington, Virginia so we spent a lot of time at the Library of Congress and the university libraries reading textbooks trying to understand what these ingredients were that we could not pronounce.

And so we learned a lot about chemical processing, chemical manufacturing. We read patents. We read industry textbooks. It’s safe to say that what we found out shocked us. Ingredients that were in (and still are) in products that are labeled ‘natural’ are manufactured in industrial chemical facilities using petrochemical reactive agents, in factories that are regulated by the EPA because of their air, their water and ground pollution. And these are ingredients that people call ‘natural’?

DEBRA: Yes.

Diana Kaye: We have kind of a different definition of that. If I can buy feeds for something and plant it in the garden or it actually is part of the soil, to me, that’s natural.

DEBRA: I completely agree, I completely agree. I know that when I first started writing about this, so much has changed in the last 30+ years since I started. But when I first started writing about it, I was looking at, “Well, here’s all these toxic things. And then here’s the natural products” and the natural products seem to be more natural. A lot of them had ingredients like – they would say sodium-something, lauryl-something and in parenthesis, it would say ‘coconut oil’.

It took me actually a lot of research and a lot of time to learn that these natural ingredients aren’t. I’m sure that you and I will talk about this more in the course of this show, that these natural ingredients are actually not natural. They are natural to the degree that instead of being made from petrochemicals, that the original material is a renewable resource like a coconut, for example.

But then it goes through the same industrial process. That’s not the same thing as just taking a coconut and rubbing it on your skin or whatever.

Diana Kaye: Yes, exactly.

DEBRA: Yeah! And so we have this word ‘natural’, which kind of makes us think it’s okay, but what is allowed to be within the realm of natural is so different from one end of the spectrum to the other. We’ll talk about that more, but I want to hear more about your story.

So you did all these research like I did (we were both doing it in the same period of time in those libraries, looking those things up). And then what decisions did you make out of that?

Diana Kaye: Well, it’s pretty safe to say that after doing considerable amount of research for two years, three years, we found that we had fewer and fewer off-the-shelf option for conventional products to use to clean out, to clean our bodies, to take care of our pets, to take care of our yard and garden.

And we searched the world, by the way. At one point, we were talking to a holistic doctor in Australia to have him actually produce soap for us because we were so disillusioned with what was available here in the States. We talked to some folks in Germany. We were bringing some of their products over.

It was very expensive, I have to tell you, to bring products from Australia and from Europe. And at the time, I was also involved with numerous support group, chemical sensitivity groups, a cancer support group and people that we were talking to who were the people that were like us who were very persistent researchers or were not willing to accept what was being told to them because they could read labels and they’re looking at these ingredients the same as we were.

And so we were sharing information. We were doing research. We were successful in finding some things and people said, “Well, share it with us!” Here we are in a major metropolitan city or area, the Washington D.C. metro area and there are all these people who couldn’t find products that they felt comfortable using. We realized that there was a large gap back then. There was an area in the marketplace that just didn’t have the solution.

So one thing led to another. We first started producing just a mail order catalog – again, pre-Internet. There weren’t websites back then. And so, we put a lot of books in there, one very excellent book and of course, we had some of your books, we had several others, we added another book called The Truth About Where You Live, which was published quite a while ago and it’s still highly relevant. It took every county in the United States and listed all the toxic sources of pollution from underground storage tanks of petroleum…

DEBRA: I think I remember that. We actually need to go to break. I’m so busy listening to you. This is all so interesting that I forgot to look at the clock.

Diana Kaye: Uh-oh.

DEBRA: So we need to go to break, but we’ll be right back.

Diana Kaye: Sure.

DEBRA: This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd and I’m talking with Diana Kaye and later, we’ll have her husband, James Hahn on as well from Terressentials. That’s Terressentials.com. We’re talking about personal care products, al the toxic stuff in them and what Diana and James are doing to give us safer products. We’ll be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye and her husband, James Hahn who will be on shortly after he handles his emergency. They have a business of USDA certified organic gourmet personal care product called Terressentials. That’s at Terressentials.com.

So Diana, I would just like to say something before we go on with what you have to say. I want to say something that came out this morning in an email that somebody sent to me. It was an article about people with MCS, multiple chemical sensitivities. It had a lot of photos of people living in dire straits who had this condition.

It was describing the illness in a way that I had never really noticed this before, what I’m about to say. It describes the illness in a way like even the name, when I first heard about those and went through this myself, it was called ‘environmental illness’. It’s an illness about the environment. Now, it’s called ‘multiple chemical sensitivities’ or MCS.

That states that the person who is being affected, that they are somehow sensitive to these chemicals. They’re just sensitive to chemicals, “there must be something wrong with them.”

But in fact, what’s happening is that people who are suffering from this are being poisoned and it’s not being acknowledged as a poisoning because even the name is – well, here’s this group of people who are extraordinarily sensitive to otherwise not dangerous things. That’s the way it’s presented. That’s even the way it’s presented by people with MCS who write these articles.

I would like people to understand that multiple chemical sensitivity, it’s difficult to get this accepted as an illness because people keep looking at the people who are being affected and saying, “Well, this doesn’t make sense as an illness.” Well, it makes sense as a poisoning.

And it’s not just MCS. MCS is just a little, tiny corner of this great, big picture of all these illnesses that are now associated with toxic chemicals – cancer, diabetes, infertility, heart problems.

I say this a lot, but I’m going to say it again because it needs to be said over and over and over. When I was researching my most recent book, Toxic-Free, I went and looked at the literature again and I had as my hypotheses that toxic chemicals were affecting every single part of your body. They could be at the root of every single illness, any symptom and I found the science to back that up, that now, you can go online, you could look up any illness that you may be having, even down to things that we can’t even perceive like changes in our DNA. Toxic chemicals in consumer products we are using every day are affecting every single one of those things. And yet people don’t look at it as a poisoning.

There! [inaudible 00:17:23]

Diana Kaye: We’ve been doing the exact same research for the past 27 years. I reached the same conclusion and I too have the data to back it up.

My concern – and I’ll add another illness in there or category of illnesses, neurological disorders.

DEBRA: Absolutely!

Diana Kaye: It’s really troubling to me because neurological disorders aren’t just the really obvious things like Parkinson’s Disease (which has been attributed to pesticides use), also things like migraine, developmental disorders including autism, progressiveness, violent behavior, apathy, lethargy.

And then you did mention metabolic disorders like diabetes, but let’s take it a step further, neurological disorders that involve the hypothalamus, which regulates the body’s ability to feel hunger or to feel satisfied. The list goes on and on and on.

We’ve always had these concerns because in toxicology, the previous models for exposure used to be – and this is, again, when I started 25 years ago or so, ingestion was your number source of toxic exposure. But in the past 10 years, that’s been rearranged. It used to be ingestion, inhalation, skin absorption. And now, it’s inhalation, skin absorption in second and ingestion third.

DEBRA: Exactly!

Diana Kaye: So I’m concerned because in our business over the years with having the catalog, the website and two retail shops, we meet a lot of people. I’ve spoken first hand face-to-face to people who think, “Oh, I buy organic food sometimes, so I’m okay.” And then I ask them, “Well, do you drink the water?”

I’m concerned about our water ways. I think that probably that’s our mission here at Terressentials, to raise awareness about the chemicals that people buy that are manufactured in industrial, chemical factories that pollute our water.

And then (this is something people have a hard time getting their heads around) is the fact that we’re part of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed here in Maryland. There are about 14 million people based on the previous census that live in the watershed area. The bay has been so unclean, so unhealthy for so many years that Congress actually mandated a federal clean-up policy, which Maryland, Virginia and all the watershed states failed.

It worries me now that it seems like the public’s exposure here to what the root causes are of the problems in the bay are always being tacked back to a couple of farmers. Now, granted, there is run-off, but that’s really not the biggest problem.

I’m going to go back years back to a very excellent researcher at the EPA, a scientist called Christian Daughton who, again, more than 25 years ago began researching what is in our waterways. He published several reports, written articles, scientific articles about his concerns.

One of the most outstanding quotes (and I’m going to do this to the best of my recollection here) that he stated in one of his articles was his concern that neurological change were occurring in the population, but they were going to occur so slowly over time that these neurological changes would be accepted as “normal”.

DEBRA: We need to go to break. When we come back, we’re going to talk about that some more. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye. And coming up, hopefully, her husband, James Hahn will be joining us. They have a business called Terressentials, which has USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products, Terressentials.com. We will be right back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye and maybe her husband might be joining us. She’s from Terressentials and they make USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products.

Diana, say now again what you said right before the break.

Diana Kaye: In terms of our concern about the pharmaceuticals and the personal care product ingredients in the water and the EPA scientist?

DEBRA: Yeah, what he said. Quote him again.

Diana Kaye: Yeah, I actually pulled up his article, which is highly readable. There’s an abstract. People can find it online. The title of this special report – okay, it was published December 1999. This is how long this issue has been known and this was the report. The research had been going on for years prior to this. The title is ‘Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment: Agents of Subtle Change’. The first author listed is Christian Daughton who I’ve spoken to in the past and he had a co-author, Thomas A. Ternes.

Again, this is a long article and I don’t have the quote in front of me, but generally, what he’s saying here is that there’s so many chemicals in our waterways and many of them cause neurological problems and that we are already seeing these changes in humans. His concern was that – and again, I’m going to paraphrase what he said as a quote in the report. His concern was that these neurological changes had been happening in humans slowly over time. They’ve been happening so slowly (which is why he calls them ‘agents of subtle change’) that the population, society is considering these or beginning to accept neurological changes as normal.

That worries me. We’ve been seeing a rise in – and I don’t believe it’s just in better detection of autism, spectral disorders. It’s frightening to me that I keep reading about these aggressive incidents. I’m sure that some of that has to do with the Internet and more widespread reporting, but it just seems like more and more of this is happening in children.

And again, a neurological change is apathy, lethargy.

DEBRA: Yes, it does.

Diana Kaye: And you mentioned earlier your concern about people labeling MCS, ‘multiple chemical sensitivities’, thereby trying to say that, “Oh, it’s a victim. This is just a person that’s extremely sensitive,” but I agree with you, this is a concern that we have about chemicals poisoning people.

This is why because, again, going back to toxicology issues and forces of chemical exposure, we think that it’s going to be merely impossible to regulate – and what I mean by ‘regulate’ is to filter the air that you breathe every single day unless you live in a bubble.

But the EPA has said in years passed that you can control what you bring into your home, which is a source of chemical emissions, whether it be furniture, a personal care product, a household product, these – and I think, Debra, you and I are both aware of this and maybe the public isn’t so much – volatile organic compounds. We don’t mean ‘organic’ in the good sense of the word.

DEBRA: No, no.

Diana Kaye: We’re talking about organic chemistry here. This is a worry that I have with people who do, again – and you mentioned writers who say they’re chemical sensitive, it seems like their whole focus is on fragrance rather than all the other many chemicals, some of which can cause bigger problems, long-term problems because of their build up in the body. With fragrance, a lot of times, it does cause problems and I totally agree and those are often immediate reaction.

We’re concerned about the long-terms effects. I’m not talking maybe even 20 years, maybe just a year or so of absorbing these chemicals into your body every day.

DEBRA: And having them build up.

Diana Kaye: …right, right! And causing all these interference with all of the systems in your body and a breakdown, so disease occurs or shall we say poisoning. I think one of the big issues – I like to paint a picture for the public to try to understand this.

For example, you buy a bottle of body lotion. Ooh, a nice, big bottle. You got it from your friendly health food store or wherever. It’s labeled ‘natural’ or it might even be labeled ‘organic’ (and that’s a whole other topic), but this product has a host of ingredients that the normal person could not pronounce.

And yet a lot of people accept that and I wonder if that’s part of the neurological agent of subtle change, apathy or lethargy, not investigating what you’re actually putting into your body.

But here’s the picture. You have this bottle of body lotion, a big bottle. You got the 12 oz. size or 16 oz. because it was at a really great reduced price. You put that body lotion on and wow! It absorbs quickly. You like that.

And yet when the bottle of body lotion is empty, where did all of the lotion go?

DEBRA: In your body!

Diana Kaye: Hello? Yeah! People just never make this connection. And then we try to draw the next picture, which is you’re buying a bottle that says it’s all natural and it’s foamy or bubbly and it’s got three or four different detergents and foam boosters in it. But it’s all natural.

You take it home and you use it in your shower and you bubble and scrub and foam up and rinse… and rinse and rinse. Where does it all go? It ends up in our waterway.

DEBRA: Yes.

Diana Kaye: People don’t understand water treatment facilities. They’ve never researched them, so they don’t understand that water treatment really is a series of screens – seriously, fill screens, metal screens that filter sediments (i.e. sewage sludge, a.k.a. sewage sludge). And then what passes through is the water with all the chemicals that you used in your house and your garage. Anything that goes down the drain in your house ends up in the water.

And then what water treatment do in the vast majority of communities in this country is adding chemicals to the water. You precipitate out or cause flocculation of some chemicals and then also adding in chloramines as a disinfectant to kill the bacteria from the messy, poopy stuff that’s in the water. And that’s the recycled water that everyone gets.

It’s also sometimes drawn from community rivers. I know in our community, some of our water is drawn from the Potomac River (not mine, we’re on a well up here). But we’re concerned about that and that is why we’re trying to explain to people that there is a big difference between natural and organic.

And in addition, just one more thing to add, many of these chemicals, petrochemicals, that is, that have toxic issues are what’s called lipophilic; lipo- meaning ‘fat’, -philic is attractive. So in other words, these are chemicals that are actually attracted to fat molecules. So once they penetrate your skin, many of the migrate to the fat because of their affinity for fat and they’re stored there.

DEBRA: And we need to go to break again.

Diana Kaye: Uh-oh.

DEBRA: It goes by really fast, huh?

Diana Kaye: It does.

DEBRA: My guest today is Diana Kaye. She’s from Terressentials and they make USDA certified organic gourmet personal care products. You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. We’ll be right back and talk about this subject more.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. My guest today is Diana Kaye from Terressentials. And Diana, before we go on, I just want to point out, we just had a commercial about a water filter that will remove pharmaceuticals and all those toxic chemicals that we’ve been talking about in your waterways. The reason that I really make a big deal about this water filters is because of all the things that you are saying that get into our water and those toxic chemicals that are not removed.

I just want to say this again about this whole cycle of consumers using the toxic chemicals in their homes, they go down the drain, they go down in their waterways, they do not get removed by the water treatment company. And all those toxic chemicals that we’re using and polluting the indoor air come back to us in our tap water.

So everybody, I just think a water filter is needed in every home, absolutely every home.

And earlier, you were talking about how the EPA says that we do have control over what we bring into our homes. Well, we do. But as soon as we walk out our doors, we’re still being exposed to all those toxic chemicals.

So we’re living in a world that’s dangerous right now. It’s dangerous to our health. We can see that in the statistics of increased – even in my lifetime, the incidence of disease has increased and the ages of children are getting lower and lower. They’re getting diseases now and conditions that only adults used to get and the numbers are higher. And that’s just happened in my lifetime.

So yes, we need to do everything that we can do to reduce the amount of toxic chemicals we use in our home and that make a significant difference. We can great improve our health by doing that and also, by removing toxic residues from our bodies. But when we go out the door, we still are being exposed to toxic chemicals from car exhaust and other people’s buildings and public buildings, in restaurants.

In all these places out in the world, they’re still there. We need to be keeping that in mind and looking at how are we going to create together a world where you don’t have to be concerned about toxic chemicals because they’re just not there.

Diana Kaye: That’s a lovely dream to hold onto.

DEBRA: It’s my goal. It’s my goal.

Diana Kaye: I know! Mine too.

DEBRA: Yeah, recognizing that that’s not where we are now, but recognizing that if we all work together, it’s something that could be achieved.

Diana Kaye: Absolutely! That’s why we spend – and I’m sure, Debra, you do the same thing with so much education. We’ve invested so much researching, writing articles, doing community talks, talking to people even one-on-one, doing whatever we can to raise awareness about – this is my feeling about this. I think we need to get people to understand where things come from, that they don’t just magically appear on a shelf, that there’s a process that’s involved. And unfortunately, with food and body care products (especially body care products), the processing itself can result in so many harmful chemicals that hurt our air and our water.

I have great concern. I’m an animal lover. Forget the animal testing in the labs. That’s being covered, but I have always been concerned about the wildlife that has to swim in the water, live in the water, drink the water that we have so polluted. So we’ve been trying to just get people to hello? First of all, read your label. Read your label.

‘Natural’ isn’t good enough. If you’re talking about a product, for instance, a little baby butt balm and it says all natural, but it’s not organic, it consist oils, fat and maybe beeswax, none of which are organic, this is the product where the toxic chemicals that were sprayed on those plants, which are lipophilic (they’re attracted to the fat), they’re going to concentrate in those oil.

If the beeswax is not organic and it comes from conventional agriculture area where chemicals are sprayed, again, because it’s a fatty substance, these chemicals are going to concentrate in that natural beeswax.

So the next step is organic and legitimate organic. Unfortunately, we don’t have a lot of enforcement in that area. There are a lot of products that are labeled ‘natural’, which really is meaningless unfortunately. Even ‘organic’ now that are not certified, that contains a host of different chemicals and non-organic ingredients.

That’s the first step that people can do to protect themselves because again, referring back to the toxicological models of chemical exposure, we have to be concerned about inhalation, number one, breathing and number two, skin absorption.

If you think about it, people bathe. They take a shower. Some people, twice a day, those people who work out. You wash your hands hopefully eight to ten times a day. And the curious thing is when our skin is wet, it becomes five times more absorptive than when it’s dry.

DEBRA: I didn’t know that. Oh, I’m so glad that you said that because most people, this makes a huge difference because even all the things that get put in beauty kind of soaps, all the colorants and the fragrances and all those additives and everything and then you wash your hands or you put it on the shower, you’re just putting all those chemicals in your body and your skin is all opened and absorbing those more than even if you were not taking a shower. Wow! Wow, wow, wow.

So Diana, I hope you’ll come back again because there’s so much that we can talk about, but we only have about five minutes left of this show and I want to make sure that we talk about your products. So tell us about Terressentals and what you’re doing that is so different from what we’ve been talking about.

Diana Kaye: Sure! I’d be happy to. First, I’d like to say that with my experience and researching, I don’t feel comfortable with processed ingredients. I’ve been through the ringer. Having had cancer at a very young age, having developed [inaudible 00:45:36] ‘sensitivities’ or shall we say awareness of my reactions to the chemical poisoning. I feel comfortable about saying…

DEBRA: I like that, ‘my awareness of my reaction to the chemical poisoning’. Thank you.

Diana Kaye: Well, it’s what it is, right?

DEBRA: It is what it is, it is.

Diana Kaye: I try to get through to people about that. Just understand that once you inhale that chemical and you realize that your olfactory nerve endings are being burned, that’s what’s causing you the pain in your head through the top of your nasal cavity, this is a physical pain that we’re being exposed to.

And so I’m trying to get people like you are to understand that this is a poisoning. So for me, when I bathe, when I moisturize my skin, which is rapidly changing as I age, I want to make sure that what I’m rubbing into my body, I would feel comfortable eating.

And I’ve actually done that. I have proven my point on several occasions. I’ve actually eaten our products. I’ve had a little [inaudible 00:46:49] of lotion, which I have drunk. I ate some of our body creams in Washington D.C. at the National Organic Standards Board’s meeting, on television for ABC because the point is if you’re rubbing it onto your skin, you are ingesting it.

DEBRA: You are.

Diana Kaye: Not everything is through your mouth. So we’ve created over the years – I love to call them ‘gourmet’ because they smell delicious. We have body oils and creams where every single ingredient is organic. Many of them are the same ingredients that are used in food products, organic orange oil, lemon oil, peppermint oil, organic vanilla oil, coconut oil, coconut butter, sunflower oil, things that are really wholesome and healthy and were grown organically with certification.

We go through a certification process. We have to document everything that goes into your product, we have to document what we buy against what we say that we sell. So we have to account for every drop of organic material. We do have an inspection. It is a lot of work, a tremendous amount of effort and time and expense to document this year around.

And I’m happy to do it. It is a big headache, but this is what separates us. This is how I can tell people, “This is what we’re doing versus what everybody else says that they’re doing.” We’re authentic. It’s my life. I live, I breathe organically. I try to teach people about edible landscaping to bring it all home, to get people to understand where things come from.

And in our case, we’re a small artisan producer. I often like to give people the idea that we’re almost like a gourmet bakery. We make things in small batches fresh and we ship things directly to our customers and to a handful of stores so that they know when they’re getting a product.

And when you open one of our products, you can smell the difference. It’s in your face. I mean, these are fresh, real ingredients. There’s nothing weird or synthetic about them. They smell delightful, delicious and lovely. They feel good.

And do they work? Yes! Our clay hair washes are so amazing. It’s this gift from Mother Earth that absorbs dirt and oil from your hair. It doesn’t strip it and it binds this excess oil and dirt into itself and then carries it down the drain. And when it goes into the water, it’s dirt. It’s amazing that this is something that just comes right out of our planet that doesn’t require processing other than just grinding the rocks of the clay into a powder to make it easy to use.

DEBRA: Okay, I need to stop you right there because in about ten seconds, the music is going to come on and we’re going to be at the end of the show. So, I need to just thank you so much and say where people can go to your website, Terressentials.com. We’ll continue this conversation on another show. This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. You can find out more at ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com. Be well!

Lead and Chromium in Crock Pots

Question from Claire

Hi Debra! I love your site and find the information to be extremely helpful!

I had a question about chromium in crock pots.

I recently tested five crock pots with an XRF device to check for lead.

Though the lead levels were okay (they all ranged from 14 ppm to 257 ppm) they all had varying amounts of chromium (2637 ppm, 6813 ppm, 3567 ppm, 2554 ppm, and 4223 ppm).

The XRF device does not tell you what type of chromium it is, so I don’t know if it is trivalent or hexavalent. The levels were pretty high. Do you think this would be okay?

I know you have posted about chromium electroplated into another metal before, but was curious what your thoughts were since this would be chromium on stoneware. Thanks so much!

Debra’s Answer

First, there is no safe level for lead, so I don’t consider these levels to be “OK.” Since cookware is available that doesn’t leach lead, I prefer to use the lead-free cookware.

Now about the chromium. Chrome is used by potters in the forms of green chromium oxide, iron chromite, and potassium dichromate. These are used in slips and glazes as colorants.

EWGs Skin Deep Cosmetics Database has this to say about Chromium Oxide

“Chromium oxide is a mineral pigment, Cr2O3, used as a colorant in a variety of products. This ingredient contains trivalent chromium, a form of chromium that functions as an essential trace element in human metabolism.”

Iron chromite and potassium dicromate are also naturally occuring.

So I would say that any chromium found in pottery would likely be trivalent.

There is some data that would tell us how much trivalent chromium would be safe or harmful. There is no “safe upper limit” established for chromium as a dietary supplement. Apparently chromium ingested is very poorly absorbed. So while those numbers may sound huge, it’s not very toxic and little may be absorbed European Food Safety Authority.

How many milligrams of chromium are in those crockpots? Well, 6813 ppm is 6.813 mg/g. 1 gram is 1000 milligrams. Even at 6813 ppm, for each gram of material only 6/1000ths would be chromium. And 250 mg of chromium is considered OK.

I think the chromium is fine, but somebody correct me if this math doesn’t look right.

My conclusion is: I’m not concerned about the chromium, but am concerned about the lead.

Add Comment

Outgassing Camping Foam

Question from Sandy

Hi Debra, I know the camping foam you buy in sports stores is probably petro and not the healthiest. I am wondering if it is baked out in the sun for a month or so if it would eventually become safe. Thks

Debra’s Answer

Well, it would improve, however, it is made from some pretty toxic chemicals PLUS fire retardants, so I can’t guarantee it would outgas. You could wrap the whole thing in Reflectix and seal the seams with foil tape. That would make it nontoxic.

Add Comment

Your Baby’s Toxic Womb

Penelope Jagessar ChafferMy guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer, a multi award winning documentary filmmaker, writer and children’s environmental health advocate. She’s working on a film called Toxic Baby. Today we’ll be talking about what Penelope has learn about how toxic chemicals can affect your baby even before it’s born. Penelope is the first black, female director to be nominated for a British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) award. Born in London, of Trinidadian parentage, she started her career at the BBC, before moving to Channel 4. She has won many awards for films created for the BBC and Channel 4. In addition to being the director, producer and writer of Toxic Baby, Penelope has been named one of the top 100 Green Online Influencers and has been awarded the “Mom On A Mission” award by Healthy Child, Healthy World, the non profit named by Vanity Fair magazine as one of Mrs. Michelle Obama’s two favorite charity organizations. Penelope’s TED talk with Professor Tyrone Hayes on the effects of toxic chemicals on babies and children has been viewed over 300,000 times. She is also an author for Toxipedia, writes her own blog and for publications around the world. A mother of two, Penelope lives in Brooklyn, New York City. www.toxicbaby.com | www.ted.com/talks/tyrone_hayes_penelope_jagessar_chaffer_the_toxic_baby

read-transcript

 

 

You may also be interested in listening to Why Women (and Men!) of Childbearing Age Need to Detox their Bodies Before having Babies

 

transcript

TOXIC FREE TALK RADIO
Your Baby’s Toxic Womb

Host: Debra Lynn Dadd
Guest: Penelope Jagessar Chaffer

Date of Broadcast: June 09, 2014

DEBRA: Hi, I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and this is Toxic Free Talk Radio where we talk about how to thrive in a toxic world, and live toxic free. Today is Monday, June 9, 2014.

We’re having a different kind of show today because usually, what I like to do is talk about all the positive things that we can do to live toxic free, but we also need to balance that with finding out what’s going on in our toxic world, and to find out really how serious the problem is. That’s what we’re going to be talking about today.

My guest is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer, and she’s a multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, writer and children’s environmental health advocate. She’s working on a film called Toxic Baby. It’s not done yet, but she’s given a really excellent TED Talk. She has a website. She has trailers for the film. She knows a lot. She’s been named Mom on a Mission by Healthy Child, Healthy World, for her work on the Toxic Baby film.

She writes all over the world. Her TED Talk has been viewed more than 300,000 times. She writes for Toxipedia. We’ve had Dr. Steven Gilbert, who runs Toxipedia. He’s on monthly to tell us about toxic chemicals. She writes for Toxipedia. She knows a lot about what’s going on in terms of how children, babies and even babies in the womb are being affected by toxic chemicals. And that’s what we’re going to talk about today.

Hi, Penelope. Thanks so much for being here.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Hi, Debra. It’s great to be here. Thank you for having me.

DEBRA: You’re welcome. So tell us, how did you become interested in this subject?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Well, like a lot of women, it really hit home when I thought of considering whether I wanted to have children. And as the time started ticking, I started thinking about it more and more. And once I got pregnant, I felt really compelled to have a sense of what was happening in my body, but also what was happening in the world that would affect my child.

I think that’s an instinct that we all really, really feel when we’re at that stage of our lives.

I was a really committed environmentalist up until that point, so finding out how toxic chemicals, they’re so prevalent, they’re so many of them, and how they really do affect children and their health, I was just stunned by the fact that I didn’t know about it at all.

DEBRA: And most women don’t. You have on your trailer a very dramatic trailer for your film, Toxic Baby. People can go to your website, ToxicBaby.com, and see this. You have a picture of the fetus in the womb, talking about the toxic chemicals that it’s being exposed to, listing Bisphenol A.

And when I watched that it was so dramatic for me because even though I’ve known, I study this, I write about this, I’ve been writing about this for 30 years, and even though I knew those facts that all fetuses are being exposed to these chemicals unless their mothers have, prior to conception, done something to detox these chemicals out of their bodies.

So if you haven’t done that and you’re pregnant or you’re about to become pregnant, your baby is going to be exposed in the womb to these chemicals and many more than what is listed there.

But it was just so dramatic to see the baby speaking, the fetus speaking, and saying, “This is what I’m being exposed to” because it’s absolutely true. And yet, most people don’t know this.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: You’ve really hit home something there by picking up on that piece of footage. I personally think the situation is as bad as it is because so much of the toxicity of chemicals is unseen. We can’t really see the effects of Bisphenol A that mimic an estrogen in the body.

Every time your baby was exposed to this or you were, you had a boil on your face, your hair fell out or something like that, that’s a lot more fish oil, that’s a lot more […] And I think that we would have a lot more movements on this.

But it is really an unseen epidemic, and the consequences are not necessarily known. We don’t even know for sure exactly what’s going on, but they won’t be seen for potentially long time afterward.

And so part of the challenge in being a filmmaker with an issue like this is trying to reproduce in a way that people can see and understand. I just kept thinking if my unborn baby could speak to me, what would it say to me? And that was the image that I had in mind.

We were really fortunate in that those images, most of them, were very famous fetal images that made the cover of Life Magazine way back in the 1960’s, the original iconic fetal images. And what we’ve done through the magic of Hollywood and computer generation at 21st Century, we manipulated those images to make them speak. They’re actually real fetuses saying those words. And that’s my son’s voice that you’re hearing.

And he’s not allowed anyone to ever do that. This is the first time that that has been done. But for me, it was really important to not show lots of scientists talking, and it’s all black, and it’s very gloomy. I really tried to be cinematic in my approach because I think that if people can see the issue, if they can really visualize the problem, then they can connect with it in a much more profound way.

What you just said really backed that up. So I’m thankful that you felt that too.

DEBRA: I did. I did feel it because it was very real. I actually don’t have children myself. In my particular case, I don’t talk about this often, but I think I’ve had a lot of endocrine damage. And so I wasn’t able to conceive children. Instead of taking dire measures and doing all kinds of fertility things, I just decided that if this was the way it is, this is the way it is.

And I put my time into doing my writing and other things. And I think that my work, in fact, has helped a lot of children, and helped them to have healthier lives.

Another thing that touched me in your TED Talk, you were talking about, I don’t remember the exact words that you used but it was something about the fetus being in a captive environment. Do you remember exactly what you said?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Yes, I said the fetus is trapped in a contaminated environment.

DEBRA: That’s exactly what you said. I remember those words now. Yes, and that was so dramatic. It’s like I can read and write things that are facts and data about toxicity, but what you’re really doing is using your artistic skills to make these things real. And to think about the fact that I might be carrying a child or somebody is carrying a child, they’re soon-to-be-born baby, and that baby is trapped in a toxic environment, in a contaminated environment where there are all these toxic chemicals.

And it’s like, “What if I was trapped in a room that was contaminated and I couldn’t get out?” And that I had to breathe these toxic chemicals. In every glass of water would have toxic chemicals in it, and I couldn’t do anything about it.

I can’t even imagine what that would be like, but yet, that actually is what’s going on in pregnancy today.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Absolutely. There are two points there, and I would like to address them both if I can.

And those points, I think it’s amazing to hear you share that. But I have to say that your experience is not uncommon. It’s incredibly common.

I had two miscarriages myself. I have two children, but I’ve had four pregnancies and two miscarriages. It is an epidemic that no one talks about, the struggles that women have to conceive. I’m really grateful that you had the strength and the conviction of your character. I guess you’re at peace in where you are in the world to be able to say, “Okay, well, this is it. I’m not going to go down this route,” because the root for insecurity is a lot of hormonal intervention.

It’s about pumping your body full of hormones to make you more fertile. Once you do happen to conceive, to keep the fertilized egg and prevent it from miscarrying […]

DEBRA: And I just couldn’t do that. I just couldn’t put all of that in my body. We need to take a break, but we’re going to talk more about this when we come back.

This is Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer. She’s working on doing a film called Toxic Baby. She’s also an environmental health advocate for children. She knows a lot about what’s going on with toxic exposures to children, to babies, and to fetuses.

We’re going to continue to talk about that after we come back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer. She’s an award-winning documentary filmmaker. She’s working on a film called Toxic Baby. You can go to her website called ToxicBaby.com, and see the trailers for the film. And you can also see her TED Talk about toxic chemicals that babies are exposed to in the womb.

So go ahead with what we were talking about before the break.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Well, I was just saying that the whole process of conception and carrying the baby is it’s all regulated by hormone. And in fact, every aspect of our life as human beings is regulated by hormones. We understand estrogen and testosterone, but even the way that our heartbeats, how many beats that it produces a minute, that’s driven by hormonal activity.

And it’s really crucial when you’re talking about babies. So if you had gone down that route, you’d have been ingesting the hormones that are mimicking hormones that we already have, and putting in doses that we don’t really understand what the repercussions of that.

We’re now seeing women who have gone through fertility treatments with later cancers, cancers associated with the sexual organ, particularly uterine and ovarian cancers.So many of these cancers have […]

So I think that by not going down that route, potentially, you have steered yourself away from something that could have been in your future.

And going back to the idea of the fetus being locked into this environment, we used to think traditionally that pregnancy was the time of absolutely protection. You have a baby literally in your body, and nothing can get to that. And there’s an organ called the placenta that traditionally, the medical community thought was an absolute filter, and that anything that was bad, the placenta’s job was there to stop anything coming through.

Now, the thing is, the placenta is an ancient organ. And we’re inventing things that the placenta has never heard of it, it’s never had to deal with.

In my film, again, I try and put a […] placenta. What does the placenta do when faced with a certain pesticide that was invented during the 1940’s, during the Second World War, something like Bisphenol S, which is the replacement for Bisphenol A.

These are compounds that the placenta has never had to deal with. And everything that goes into the mother’s body will be present within the umbilical fluid and in her blood, and therefore, in the baby’s blood.

There’s a researcher who is in my film who I’ve talked to at great length, […] He’s Dutch. He’s been studying this for several decades now. They were measuring chemical contaminants in umbilical cord, the blood in the fluid, and in the babies when they were born. And they were finding almost the exact same level in the mother and in the baby.

So these babies are being polluted in the womb, and they are being polluted at the level that the mother is carrying. There’s no sense that the percent is going to diminish the amount of pollutants that the unborn baby faces.

And so if you just imagine that the fetus, the embryos and the fetuses can’t go anywhere, everything that they need has to be available within that environment. There’s no replenishing of the amniotic fluid, there’s no new air coming in. Everything is coming from the mother. And they are trapped because there’s nowhere else for them to go.

A significant number of these chemicals have the ability to disrupt our hormonal signaling. This is a problem for fetuses, embryos and babies in particular because, as I’ve said the act of conception, when a woman releases her eggs, the sperm and egg coming together whether that fusion happens, whether that conception happens, how the embryo develops, how it does not develop, how it becomes the fetus, the timing of the pregnancy, the timing of the delivery, when that baby comes, if it’s going to come early, if it’s going to come late, all of these things are determined by hormones.

They do have something that’s coming in that is telling the developing fetus that actually, this is going on. When it’s not going on, it’s actually not a real hormone that the baby is accessing. It’s actually a mimic. It’s actually something that’s coming in and pretending to be that thing. Then you’re going to have a problem because the hormones say, “Well, you should be developing your heart right now.”

And something comes in and says, “Well, maybe you wouldn’t necessarily do that. You would have another hormone doing that.”

Then that could have repercussions for that particular organ development. That’s something that is really new science, Debra. It’s the kind of science that has really turned so many things on its head, classical toxicology, obstetricians, and the way that they view pregnancy, or just biology in general.

It’s a huge cause for concern. And unfortunately, it’s not taught in medical schools. So a lot of the doctors have no idea about this.

DEBRA: Well, it’s not taught in medical school. It’s not just not taught to obstetricians. It’s not taught to any doctors. And so what we have now is a system where I would say from my study and from talking to leading edge doctors. I just had a doctor on last week, on Monday, where we were talking about how the number one health problem in the world today is exposure to toxic chemicals, and that you could have any treatment with any drug or a chiropractic adjustment or take herbs or whatever.

You can do all of those things. But if the problem is that you’re being poisoned, and you do nothing to remove the poisoning, then you’re still going to be sick. And yet, people are going to all kinds of practitioners of all kinds, traditional and alternative, and toxic chemical poisoning, everybody is experiencing every day is not being recognized as a contributor to health.

Even after I’ve been talking about this for 30 years, even after everybody that’s on this show has been talking about it that we still have the majority of health care not recognizing this problem.

And yet, you and I, and other researchers can come up with all this evidence that toxic chemicals are causing health problems, that they’re there in our consumer products, and yet, it’s still not widely enough known.

We need to go to break again. And when we come back, we’ll talk more.

My guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer. She’s the filmmaker for a film called Toxic Baby. And you’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and Penelope and I will be back.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer. She’s an multi-award-winning documentary filmmaker, making a film called Toxic Baby. You can go find out more about that at ToxicBaby.com, and also hear her TED Talk there.

Penelope, in the trailer, you showed that you were getting blood taken to be tested for the presence of toxic chemicals in your body, what did you find out from that?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Well Debra, I thought that I was really toxic. Like many people who live with vaguely healthy lives […] you can’t be as toxic as they all make you out to be. And actually, it’s true. The things that they were finding in my blood were astonishing, flame retardants, chemicals, plasticizers, dioxins, PCB’s that were banned in the United States. That was very restricted to use in the United States. And that’s one of the chemical groups that’s heralded the Toxic Substances Control Act way back in 1976. It was still present in my bloodstream more than 30 years later.

So that was really astonishing, and it really signaled how long these chemicals can stay in the environment, and they can get into our body and stay there. That was really horrific.

But I had actually had some great news, which was also surprising. And that was that I didn’t have some chemicals which would be widely expected that we found within the average person in the United States. I didn’t have any BPA. I think 93% of the earth’s population will have detectible levels of BPA. I didn’t have detectible levels of BPA. I didn’t have detectible levels of organophosphate pesticide. I didn’t have detectible levels of triclosan.

And these are chemicals that one can avoid through the choices that you make in your day-to-day life.

And so I’ve become such a big advocate, increasingly more so. I had move advocacy work in getting people to clean up their lives and inspiring people to make those choices because I see that you can actually make those changes and not have those chemicals present.

I didn’t do that deliberately or specifically, but it was interesting to know that that was the case.

DEBRA: There have been some other studies which have shown things like BPA actually leaves your body fairly quickly, and that if people have it in their blood, it’s because they have had a recent exposure actually within 24 to 48 hours. If you don’t be exposed to BPA, you won’t have it in your body.

And so what you’re telling me is it seems like a confirmation to me that if you’re not exposed to triclosan and you’re not exposed to BPA, then you’re not going to have it in your body. It’s not going to be causing health effects.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: That’s absolutely true. The thing is, some of these chemicals are processed by the body really quickly. So something like BPA will go through the body within roughly about 24 hours. It’s the same thing for phthalates.

And so, once you remove that source, you can actually remove those chemicals from circulating in your body.

DEBRA: But there are other chemicals that stay in the environment and in your body for a very long time. And they’re not so easy to remove.

I’m just saying it over and over, I’m so glad that you told us about what the results were because it really does make a difference for people to not be exposed to these things in the first place. And I think that a lot of times, people say, “Well, there are chemicals all over the place. What difference does it make for me to not use this shampoo or whateve?”

And it does make a difference because all these toxic chemicals that we’re exposed to, whatever we can do to reduce them, reduces our risk of becoming sick from those toxic chemicals. And so it’s a really good thing.

What was the most surprising thing that you found in your research, the thing that surprised you the most?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Finding out how toxic I was, it was really surprising. That was a real shock because I also think that we think that if we’re living next to Chernobyl or nuclear power plant or something like that the expectation would be that we would be really toxic. And that if you’re living an average life, you probably won’t be that toxic.

So that was really surprising. And the amount of things that one can do, the study of science, the scientific study of epigenetics, which is a new science, was probably one of most surprising things for me.

DEBRA: Tell us about that because I think most people don’t know what that is.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: For a long time, the question was, “Is it genetics or is the environment?” And the nature versus nurture, sort of, argument. People thought that they weren’t really, really separate things.

What the science of epigenetics tells us is that there are factors within the environment that have the ability to switch on and off, but in […] switch on genes that continue to be switched on as those genes continue to be passed on.

And so in laboratory animal studies, you expose a mother to a certain chemical, and you follow the pup. And what you find is that the genes have been switched on because of exposure to that chemical. The pup then has that gene that is switched on, you see the manifestation of whatever that might be. And then you see it in their pups, three generations later, four generations later.

So what that is saying to us is that when these genes get switched on, unless they get switched off, they’re going to keep carrying that potential for that disease.

On the one hand, it’s a really horrific thing to think about because the decisions that we make are affecting generations to come, the generations that are not even a blink in the eyes. But the other side of that is actually great news, and that is that we now think so many diseases are mitigated by this expression, these gene expressions.

And so if we can find a way to take the chemical markers that are switching on the genes out of the environment, and therefore, switch the genes off, we have the ability to treat and remove diseases that we thought were unremovable in our day-to-day lives. And we’re thinking really specifically about cancers here.

So you can look at it as something that’s really negative and really horrific, but I choose to look at it as something really amazing, and really powerful. It really makes me want to do the work that I do, and raise awareness about it because the more awareness there is, the more money that there is, the study, these kinds of things because potentially, it’s really good news if we’re looking at the ways of preventing these diseases.

Then it means that we’re going to have healthier people, and we’re not subjecting our generations to come to things that we would not ourselves want to have to live with.

= COMMERCIAL BREAK =

DEBRA: You’re listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio. I’m Debra Lynn Dadd, and my guest today is Penelope Jagessar Chaffer.

We’re talking about the film she’s working on called Toxic Baby.

So wow, this is just so mind-boggling, all of this information, because again, as I said at the beginning, I know all of this as data, but when we actually talk about it in the context of real life of women actually having babies, which I have no experience with, I believe you. I believe it when I hear women say, “I got pregnant, and then suddenly, I started thinking about what was going to happen to my baby and how to create a safe world.”

I think that that’s something that is common for mothers to feel that sense of protection. And then to be faced with, and then finding out about all of these toxic chemicals.

Finding out all of these things, how did that change your life as a mom? What did you do differently?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Well, first of all, I made a commitment to do everything that I could do. There are some things that we can’t do, and that’s why it’s really important to get a federal legislation that really protects people in a way that it’s not doing right now.

But there are many things, I found out, that I could be doing to give my children the best possible start. And a lot of that is now being backed up by scientific study, which is great. There’s a study that came out of California which showed that if you try to feed your children a 75% organic diet, then we could reduce their levels of organophosphate pesticide. It’s probably one of the more common pesticide, certainly one of the most toxic ones. You could remove that pretty much, undetectable in children’s urine and blood.

And so my children eat an organic diet as possible. Their diet is mostly whole foods, prepared at home, very little packaging, certainly no tin cans.

DEBRA: I agree with all of that.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: The thing is, Debra, that I appreciate that there is not that many people doing what I’m doing. I live in New York City, I live in Brooklyn, and from my family, people are really surprised. For a long time they really didn’t get it.

I’ve had people say, “That’s crazy. It’s a bit out there.”

But I have to say that my children are robust. They really are. Considering they’re navigating the New York City metro, subway, network. They’re sharing the same germs as millions and millions of other people. And I think a lot of people who know, after a while, they were like, “Wow, the kids don’t really get sick.”

I don’t want to hold my children up as some kind of example. But what I see that’s really important is to people understand that you do actually see the benefits of trying to clean up. And not just trying to clean it up, but keeping it clean.

I don’t bring scented products into my home unless they’re naturally scented like perhaps a soy-based aromatherapy, natural oil-based product. That might find its way home. I read labels avidly. Everything that’s coming in, I’m going to read, I’m going to question it before I bring it into the home. I don’t want to bring it in and then wonder about it.

It made me really vigilant. And to a certain extent, it probably feels like hard work, but the amazing thing is, like anything that can become habitual, once you do it for certain amount of time, you stop thinking about it. I pick up something, I read it.

Well, I know what most things now, but I’m like, “I don’t like the look of that. I’m going to bring that in.”

DEBRA: I find that too. The way I live now may seem odd to people, but it’s second nature to me now. And it was odd to me when I started so many years ago, when I started being aware of toxic chemicals in consumer products.

I had to figure out which products to use, and which products not to use, because there was no website like mine to go to. There were no books like mine to read. I had to figure it all out. But once I figured it out, it’s not that difficult to keep buying the same non-toxic product over and over again.

I’ve learned how to clean my house with baking soda and vinegar. I don’t have to learn that again. I’m always looking at new things, and I’m always learning new things. Right now, I’m learning more about different whole foods that I can prepare in different ways to prepare them because I’m totally committed to preparing all my food, and not buying anything from take-out, or not going to restaurants because you just don’t know what’s in them.

One of my favorite shows to watch, I hate to say this, but I love watching Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives with Guy Fieri on the Food Channel because it shows me what I’m going to eat if I go to a restaurant. And it’s horrible if there’s sugar in everything. There’s wheat in places that you think that you’re not going to find it. None of it is organic unless you go to an organic restaurant.

It’s really an eye-opener to watch that show.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: Yes, I completely hear you. When you think about food, our health, the foundation of our health is really based on what we put into our bodies. And really, food is primary to that because, of course, that’s how our bodies run.

For me, I know that leafy, green vegetables, particularly spinach, but I think the science is showing perhaps that it’s the same compound also do the trick. What matters is that they protect against BPA exposure.

There was a great study that came up in Duke University that showed that in rats, if you expose rats to dark, green, leafy vegetables like spinach, the effects of BPA were mitigated.

And so from my perspective, I’m like, “Okay, great. How can I get those leafy, dark green vegetables into my diet?”

DEBRA: That’s exactly it. That there are so many things that we can avoid, but there’s a lot of things we can’t avoid. BPA is one of those things you could say, “I’m not going to eat anymore canned food.” But it’s really hard to go shopping and not get BPA exposure from the cash register receipt.

Then you have to look at the other side and say, “Well, what can I do to support my body if some BPA comes in that I can’t avoid that it will process it, it will protect me?”

And I think that it’s really, really important that women who are thinking about conceiving be doing things to start removing toxic chemicals from their body. And I have a lot of information on my website about detox as well as information about products that don’t have toxic chemicals in it.

So it’s all available. It’s just a matter of people making those decisions. And if women start out by lessening their toxic exposure and removing toxic chemicals that are already in their bodies, and getting really good nutrition, we’re going to have such healthy babies. It will be amazing.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: I couldn’t agree with you more. Before I had my first child, I did a detox. I didn’t even really understand the full ramifications of that until later on. But I was already starting on that journey, and I thought, “Well, it sounds like a good thing.” And I’m so glad that I did it.

And I think when we see the rising levels of disease for children, it’s really heartbreaking, and it’s really astonishing. If you have a child with asthma, you suddenly take out those cleaning products or those scented products or whatever, and you see those symptoms really lessen, then you can see that that linked really clearly.

I want to say something really quickly also about preparing for pregnancy. I was speaking actually on a Skype call this morning to someone in Europe about this. The Dutch have the best toxicity measures that I have seen, at least having spoken to many researchers in North America and in Europe because they had a couple of really bad accidents and incidences.

And now, in Holland, over 75% of pregnancies are planned in Holland. Officially, the obstetricians and the gynecologists are saying, “You should consider not wearing make-up. You should consider taking out perfumes.”

They’re actually advising patients to do that. And I think that is so wonderful.

DEBRA: It is.

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: They are really encouraging people to not only get the information, but use it in their own lives. And I think we all need to do that. I’ve been preparing my daughter for any pregnancies that she might have. And people are always really freaked out by that. She was really uncomfortable. But I said, “No.”

I’m preparing her for any pregnancies that she might have in 20 years’ time, 30 years’ time from now. And I think that’s what we need too.

DEBRA: Well, we do because in order for our species to continue, that’s what we’re designed to do, it’s to have healthy children and move our species forward, and continue life on earth. And I just think that toxic chemicals are the enemy of so many things. They’re the enemy of that. But they’re the enemy of our health and happiness, not being able to have strong bodies to do the things that we want, or not being able to think clearly, or being spiritually aware.

It cuts across everything that we just need to do the things that we’re doing, you and I, and so many others who are aware of this, and moving this all forward. We just need to continue to do it because it’s so important. It’s just an underlying thing.

Well, we have only less than a minute left. I just want to thank you so much for being on the show. Is there anything else that you’d like to say just for a couple of seconds?

PENELOPE JAGESSAR CHAFFER: I just want people to really understand that there is so much that they can do. It’s easy to feel overwhelmed and frightened and scared, but there’s a lot that you can do. Be empowered, get the knowledge, and make the changes, and you’ll see that difference in your life.

DEBRA: I agree. Thank you so much. My guest has been Penelope Jagessar Chaffer. Her website is ToxicBaby.com. You’ve been listening to Toxic Free Talk Radio, and you can go to ToxicFreeTalkRadio.com, and find out more about the upcoming guests. You can listen to this show again. You can tell your friends to listen.

I’m Debra Lynn Dadd. Be well.

Contaminated Clothes

Question from Bonnie Johnson

Two years ago I had a contracter seal some areas in my spare room closet for ants.

Although I gave him some caulk to use he managed to run out and replaced it with another.

I am really sensitive to glu and caulk, I could not go in the closet for a year and even now it bothers me.

During the first year I had a lot of clothes I love stored in the closet. Last year I took them out and washed them all twice but due to cancer treatments never wore them. This year I decided to try them and have been very reactive to them. I have washed these clothes about 4 times now. I can not imagine that the seal is still in the fabric but maybe that is the case.

Does anyone have any ideas on how to get the caulk toxin out of my clothes? Or at this point are they a total loss?

Debra’s Answer

I agree with you. I cannot imagine that there is still any contaminant left in the clothing.

Readers, any ideas on this?

Add Comment

Translator

Visitor site map

 

“EnviroKlenz"

“Happsy"

ARE TOXIC PRODUCTS HIDDEN IN YOUR HOME?

Toxic Products Don’t Always Have Warning Labels. Find Out About 3 Hidden Toxic Products That You Can Remove From Your Home Right Now.